hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Lesaka Technologies: Fails GNG, NCORP BoraVoro ( talk ) 07:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Africa .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep - The Mail & Guardian article seems prominent enough to establish notability.  WmLawson ( talk ) 05:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] : Delete per WP:NCORP 104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: An IP that added "Delete per WP:NCORP" to 3 AFDs in 2 minutes.  I think the chance that the closing admin places weight on these posts is approximately zero.  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Block evasion, at any rate -- struck.  jp × g 🗯️ 01:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on present citations and also have found these additional citations Insider Monkey , Seeking Alpha , itweb ,  and The Street .  It should be noted that this is a publicly listed company on NASDAQ and there are more news articles in Google under its current name and old name "Net 1 UEPS."  Hkkingg ( talk ) 08:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hkkingg , Seeking Alpha and TheStreet are, as I understand it, generally considered group blogs, not RS, and as far as I can tell Insider Monkey seems to be the same.  Is there any specific reason not immediately obvious you believe those sources meet the criteria?  ( itweb seems to be a WP:CORPROUTINE announcement as well)  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 08:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't know about this one.  Simply Wall Street has a detailed analysis of the company's stock performance, [6] and this article (the second half) has important facts about the company (e.g., "3,300 employees in five African countries"), but there are so many press releases in the search results that it's hard to tell what's useful.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 02:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Cassius Willis: Very few mentions aside from the usual set of websites (IMDB, Rotten Tomatoes, etc), no significant coverage .  Was in 42 episodes of The Young and the Restless , but seems to h ave otherwise played fairly minor roles.  Was an NAACP image award nominee, but I couldn't find any SIGCOV relating to that.  PROD was removed by Kvng with the rationale 11 incoming links indicate potential importance .  All of the links are from cast lists, with the exception of one from NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Actor in a Daytime Drama Series .  — SamX [ talk · contribs · he/him] 04:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep being in 42 episodes of The Young and the Restless I think is more than enough to establish notability given the prominence of that show.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 09:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep , the Young and the Restless part seems to have been a major story arc (for what it is, a soap opera) and 42 episodes is major.  Rest are bit parts, but he's just above notability I think.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No one responded in terms of GNG and BIO.  More policy-based opinions are welcome.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Timothytyy ( talk ) 07:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The responses are in terms of WP:NACTOR .  These are policy-based opinions.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: One last try.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 08:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Christopher Erskin: As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of passing one or more criteria for notability -- significant awards, evidence of third-party reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work in media and/or books , etc.  -- but this literally just says he exists, lists a bunch of jobs he did, and sources all of it exclusively to directory entries (IMDb) and other primary sources (Vevo) that aren't support for notability at all, which is not enough.  He needs either a significant volume of WP:GNG -worthy coverage, or a stronger notability claim than just his work's existence.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:FILMMAKER for the combination of Directing the feature film Johnson Family Vacation – critically panned but a major film nonetheless – reviewed many many major critics including but not limited to Roger Ebert [10] , Richard Roeper (quoted in [11] ), Stephanie Zacharek for Salon.com [12] , as well as critics for Chicago Reader [13] , Globe and Mail [14] , and many other major outlets.  Note that as director, subject was discussed directly in many of these reviews.  Verifiably directing a large number of major music videos including but not limited to: " I Wish (R. Kelly song) " [15] T-Boz's " My Getaway " [16] Uncle Sam's " I Don't Ever Want to See You Again ", with Boyz II Men [17] Rome (R&B singer) 's I Belong to You (Every Time I See Your Face) [18] Allure (group) 's version of  " All Cried Out (Lisa Lisa and Cult Jam song) " [19] It seems very likely, given all this coverage, that WP:BASIC is met as well, though WP:FILMMAKER suffices.  :— siro χ o 06:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  02:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Vladimir Jankovski: Sources in article are a bios on a nomination pages, nothing that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth from independent sources.  BEFORE found nothing meeting SIGCOV with indepth coverage.  // Timothy :: talk 17:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Macedonia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The Macedonian article has two news items about him and confirms he won an award; the news appears to be in RS, I think this passes notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's also a review of his book here [3] .  The News link in the nomination header here brings up a few other articles about him in Macedonian media, and he's mentioned as a translator here [4] in a Maltese newspaper, showing some international reach.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Winning/being nominated for a major award here meets WP:ANYBIO .  I am more certain of SIGCOV especially when translators usually aren't given more details like a normal full-time writer.  However, if the article was nomiated for such an award, then, there should be reviews of works  somewhere.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  06:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Daniël van Goens: Nothing in the article is a discernible claim to notability.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 00:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Unclear .  There are some newspaper articles , but he lived before social media and TV.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, – Joe ( talk ) 17:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The newspapers linked in the comment above the relist are simply name drops.  I can't find anything else for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Best I can find are various musical works (sheet music) in the BNF Gallica and a few mentions in Gscholar, mostly confirmation of his works.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the Dutch wikipedia article lists a number of sources such as JH Letzer: Musical Netherlands 1850-1910 .  Bio-bibliographic dictionary of Dutch musical artists - as well as writers in the music-literary field, 2.  edition with additions and improvements.  Utrecht: JL Beijers, 1913, page 239  Illustrated music lexicon, edited by Mr. G. Keller and Philip Kruseman, collaboration with Sem Dresden , Wouter Hutschenruijter (1859-1943) , Willem Landré , Alexander Voormolen and Henri Zagwijn ; published in 1932/1949 by J. Philips Kruseman, The Hague; page 178 Jozef Robijns , Miep Zijlstra : General music encyclopedia , Haarlem: De Haan, 1979-1984, ISBN 978-90-228-4930-9 , volume 4, page 29 Necrology Caecilia 1904 by Simon van Milligen.  Several of those books have dutch wikipedia articles about the books themselves.  Also coverage here and here .  Together there is enough coverage to pass WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: 3rd and final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on the coverage provided by Atlantic306 , I think we can say this passes WP:GNG .  I really suspect there is a lot more, but I have trouble assessing it with my limited language skills.  There is certainly a lot of his work available, especially since he died 114 years ago.  Jacona ( talk ) 01:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership: Article cites three outlets, which I've machine translated.  All article are fluff pieces on the subject, which is fine and can help constitute notability, but Emek seems wholly unreliable.  Ynet is probably reliable.  I would lean unreliable with Mida.  Remsense 诉 15:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I'm wondering what sort of notability one looks for in a school.   Wikipedia guidelines seem to indicate the bar is set at notability within one's field and how high is that bar for "the field of schools"?   Are only Harvard and Juilliard notable because they are in the news whenever some famous alumnus is appointed to SCOTUS or wins an Oscar ?   Initially, it appears that one can make a good argument that since other similarly notable schools have no article, then this should also have no article, but then maybe the WP:Be bold rule applies?   So there's a bad article or two.   I found another good article demonstrating that  a) this school exists and that  b) it's written about online and in newspapers and serves a role in society and in IDF military preparedness.  15:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) @ DRosenbach : it sounds like you were reading WP:NPROF which covers people in academia.   Schools are covered under WP:GNG or if the institution is for-profit then the GNG WP:NCORP sourcing guidelines might come into play.  See WP:NSCHOOL .  S0091 ( talk ) 17:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Judaism ,  and Israel .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Reliance Industrial Infrastructure: There is no need for a one paragraph article when the Summary page already has the information.  Gails GNG and NORG.  Single source in article and BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.  No objection to a consensus redirect (a bold redirect would be rv) to Reliance Industries#Reliance Industrial Infrastructure .  // Timothy :: talk 17:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom We really don't need an article on this at all separately.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This is a separate company, traded separately on two different stock exchanges.  Reliance Industries only has a minority of the shares of Reliance Industrial Infrastructure .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Eastmain 's comments above are compelling.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Disagreement rests on whether or not these are two separate companies.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -per

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Arepera Socialista: Most of the current coverage in the article is due to a WikiLeak cable description: "Socialism's Tangible -- and Tasty -- Benefits" and the chain has been closed for years, with no long lasting impact.  NoonIcarus ( talk ) 18:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Politics , Business ,  and Venezuela .  NoonIcarus ( talk ) 18:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - seems to have received some decent coverage such as https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/12/10/chavezs-socialist-sandwich-emporium/ , https://www.elciudadano.com/economia/la-arepera-socialista-venezolana/04/13/ , https://www.proquest.com/docview/1082428344/2183CA7C85174C77PQ/17 , etc. which meets WP:GNG .  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just a quick note: once again, Foreign Policy's article is about the WikiLeaks cable, and the ProQuest reference seems to be a case of WP:NOTNEWS and a passing mention: " Employees who arrived late will be sanctioned ".  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 10:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Panta n' antamonoume: Donald D23 talk to me 11:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Greek name is Πάντα ν' ανταμώνουμε .  I find it very hard searching in Greek.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe Keep ?  (or redirect to the channel or to Rika Vagiani , where I've just added it).  https://program.ert.gr/details.asp? pid=3844901&chid=11 ; NewsBomb articles https://www.newsbomb.gr/tag/panta-na-antamwnoyme including https://www.newsbomb.gr/media-agb/story/429147/erhetai-to-panta-nantamonoyme ) or this kind of things: https://typologies.gr/πάντα-ν΄ανταμώνουμε-στη-δτ-με-την-α/ (and yes, it's in Greek),- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Might be another No consensus closure.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect The show has been on for 10 years and should have some media coverage, but apparently it has remained a local Greek TV show.  This article would be more appropriately placed in the article about the show's host. -- Saul McGill ( talk ) 15:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What do you mean by "local Greek"?  The show was broadcast on NERIT#NERIT1 , the main national Greek television network channel.  (Not that I mean to have you change your !vote).  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Allegiance: War of Factions: In the WM library, appears only in games catalogues e.g. “Greater Games Industry Catalog • #6 Fall 2008: L.”  Greater Games Industry Catalog , no. 6, Oct. 2008, pp. 136–42.  EBSCOhost, link .  We don't have an article for the publisher, so no obvious WP:ATD .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 20:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Games .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 20:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy pings for article contributors: @ Ealdgyth , Mathman1550 , QamarPl , Leitmotiv ,  and Mindmatrix : Suriname0 ( talk ) 20:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Preview in Scrye : [50] and will see if anything else comes up.  BOZ ( talk ) 13:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nice find!  Suriname0 ( talk ) 20:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (remark) 17:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There is also a review in Paizo's Undefeated magazine #9.  I don't think I have that issue, but am checking.  Guinness323 ( talk ) 19:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep I can't imagine the Undefeated review won't count toward WP:N, so it sounds like we are over the GNG bar of multiple reliable independent sources.  Hobit ( talk ) 13:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, asilvering ( talk ) 01:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus