hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jalen Schlachter: Sources are all standard run-of-the-mill sources so failed GNG, never played in the NFL, pedestrian college football carer.  Wizardman 13:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions .  Wizardman 13:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Michigan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage found for this person; playing college football alone isn't notable.  Not meeting notability requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for the subject to meet the WP:GNG , only some routine mentions in articles about other players.  This [ [10] ] may be WP:SIGCOV but it is paywalled.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Some coverage is available here , here , here , here , and here .  Ejgreen77 ( talk ) 02:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I saw that coverage but it all fails WP:YOUNGATH in my opinion.  Other minds may differ.  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nerm: It is currently referenced to radio programmes listing, event listings and an interview, not all of which mention Nerm.  I have not been able to find better sources to add - I have added another BBC programme listing and two articles written by Nerm.  I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC .  The article has been heavily tagged for years.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 21:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 21:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Radio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Palannoruwa Central College: I can't find evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NORG in English or Sinhala (පලන්නොරුව මධ්‍ය මහා විද්‍යාලය).  The best that I can find is Kelimandala (translated) , which only mentions the school in passing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Sri Lanka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeevan Nagar: ROTM coverage like this or namechecks coverage like is not enough to meet GNG.  Not every TV drama aired on TV channels inherently get a WP page.  In Pakistan, we only have TV dramas, nothing else, so we don't need an article on each one of them based solely on some ROTM or paid/PR coverage — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 21:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Concrete Technology: There are already pages which go into details, this stub serves no real purpose.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 06:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 06:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – unnecessary article worthy to be merged to other existing topics.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 18:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashleigh Udalovas: Let'srun ( talk ) 01:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and New Jersey .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep as a titleholder, Miss New Jersey might be notable, but I'm not good in pageant competition notability checks.  Nevertheless, the Miss New Jersey page suggests that the competition is significant and prominent.  I'd lean towards keeping the page.  -- Mozzcircuit ( talk ) 14:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I might be swayed by a state-level beauty pageant if the article were actually sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG , but that's in no way "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG.  This is referenced to a mixture of primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, and local human-interest coverage that's acceptable but not enough all by itself, and we require more than that to deem somebody permanenntly notable for winning a regional beauty pageant.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Would a Redirect be a possibility here?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL as described above.  I don't know if there's anywhere to redirect this to.  SportingFlyer T · C 22:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bintan Agro Beach Resort: Insufficient independent significant coverage.  Uhooep ( talk ) 08:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment For some reason, the nominator considers that all the hotels and resorts in Bintan Regency fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Aymatth2 ( talk ) 13:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] v t e Hotels and resorts in Bintan Nikoi Island Banyan Tree Bintan Club Med Ria Bintan Angsana Resort & Spa Loola Adventure Resort Mayang Sari Beach Resort Comfort Hotel & Resort Tanjung Pinang Hotel Sadaap Hotel Laguna Hotels portal Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Software industry in Madurai: This failed a PROD for being potentially notable, but absent any evidence to support that potential, I think this article should be deleted.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 01:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of in depth, significant coverage.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources.  5 sources on the page and 3 of them have absolutely nothing on the subject and the other 2 about "Oracle planning to open a new center" and the other is about "building an IT park".  No sources on the page have any coverage on the subject and does not warrant a page due to failure to pass WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KayvonTV: (It's also shooting for "has been featured on major television networks" in the lede, but I've been completely unable to verify that claim at all.)  As always, web content is not "inherently" notable just because it exists, and has to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source media coverage about it -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary and unreliable sources that are not support for notability, such as his own self-published website and Blogspot blogs and dead TV listings and content self-published by his own past employers.  Out of 21 footnotes, just two are to nominally reliable sources at all: a deadlinked (but waybackable) Sports Illustrated piece that briefly glances off Kayvon's existence without being about him in any non-trivial sense, and a deadlinked (but proquestable) Toronto Sun article that's just about him hanging out at TIFF to collect celebrity autographs rather than doing anything noteworthy, which isn't enough to get him over GNG all by itself.  But that Toronto Sun hit is also the only remotely useful source that turns up at ProQuest at all : otherwise, I'm only finding glancing namechecks of Kayvon Zahedi attending Toronto Argonauts Grey Cup victory parades as a spectator and a press release self-published by Aux , not anything remotely notability-building.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced properly.  Bearcat ( talk ) 04:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 04:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This explains most of the claims [21] , he's a "reporter" that gets in people's faces at events and collects a sound bite or tow (they use the term guerilla reporter).  He may have been "on CBC and Global" (briefly mentioned) in news events, but I can't find confirmation of those (heck, I'VE been on CTV News once, but that doesn't make me notable).  This is refbombed and very PROMO for an individual that isn't otherwise notable.  Limiting the search to . ca websites, only a few pop up that aren't PR items, msotly in non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  There is too little coverage available to source nearly 99% of the claims in this article.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 14:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Appearing on TV news programmes does not make one notable.  I was on my local CTV/CTV2 station once, when i was a lil kid before I started my mtf transition (a segemnt about elementary school kids getting an early summer break due to a teacher strike), but that doesn't make me notable.  Kinopiko talk 22:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DUnit: -- Wiki Linuz ( talk ) 04:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I checked for sources, but sadly, I can’t find any that deem this subject notable.  The cited sources are not reliable, and the subject fails to meet WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 19:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christo Joubert: I am having a hard time finding anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BEMET: The subject also lacks significant coverage.  Also seems like the editor of the page has close connection with the subject.  Can't find any RS about anything written.  Rydex64 ( talk ) 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Rydex64 ( talk ) 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Insufficient coverage in reliable sources.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 07:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with the others.  Considered a redirect to the famous Teapacks but the connection is probably not sufficiently substential.  gidonb ( talk ) 05:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I agree that redirecting to Teapacks would be unwarranted.  Better Nuncio ( talk ) 10:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manu (Theosophy): Only unreliable Theosophical writers like Elizabeth Clare Prophet are cited.  No academic historians have specifically covered this topic, it is not possible to have a neutral article.  The only sources that cover the topic are fringe related Theosophical sources that fail WP:RS .  The topic is non-notable and no independent coverage exists.  Psychologist Guy ( talk ) 15:11, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per the nominator, only primary sources exist.  There is no reliable independent sources that cover this concept.  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 00:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 16:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] PhD theses are neither automatically unreliable nor automatically reliable.  WP:SCHOLARSHIP .  Jfire ( talk ) 22:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Servoy: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Cannot find any reliable sources providing significant coverage on this.  popo dameron ⁠ talk 03:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as far as I can tell, the product fails NSOFT, and the company of the same name fails NCORP.  Owen× ☎ 15:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Dean (singer): CNMall41 ( talk ) 00:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 00:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is all I could find [57] and it's barely a mention, unsure if it's even the same person.  Sources used in the article are not RS.  Delete for lack of notability, no sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SINGER .  APK whisper in my ear 03:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indrit Sejko: Furthermore, I can't find any information about him after his debut; he seems to have disappeared.  Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC as things stand.  No objection to this being restored should WP:SIGCOV occur later in his career as he is still only 18.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete – Article obviously fails GNG with only database source listed.  Corresponding article on Albanian Wikipedia is also an unsourced stub, no major edits since its last revision in 2022.  I also don't see any evidence he'll become notable or gain recognization in a few years.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing notable.  Athel cb ( talk ) 15:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MATA bus fleet: The vast majority of information here is uncited, and several of the citations are self-published sources.  A substantially condensed and properly cited list of current fleet would be appropriate at Memphis Area Transit Authority , but Wikipedia is not a database of unsourced trivia about all-time fleets.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation , Lists ,  and Tennessee .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with merging the condensed current fleet with the main page.  But how do you recommend properly citing fleet information when it is not published by the transit agency?  ElToAn123 ( talk ) 22:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fleet lists are generally in the realm of WP:FANCRUFT and very few would ever have enough reliable independent (non self-published) coverage to be considered notable.  This one is no exception.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 08:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NLIST, doesn't serve a purpose under WP:CLN.  No objection to a consensus redirect, but do not think it helpful.  // Timothy :: talk 14:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete by NLIST or NOTDB.  Less detailed tables would have worked with a detailed article on the MATA bus operations.  gidonb ( talk ) 05:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete