hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Anshul Avijit : Fails WP:NPOL , coverage appears otherwise routine.  He can't inherit notability from his grandparents or mother.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 20:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 20:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Simply being nominated for the general election in 2024 doesn't automatically confer notability as per WP:NPOL .  However, if the individual wins and is elected as a Member of Parliament, they would then meet the notability criteria.  Currently, there's a lack of in-depth coverage on the subject, with the cited sources being primarily press releases.  Grabup ( talk ) 02:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : he is national spokesperson of Indian National Congress and we have article like Nupur Sharma .  Also, sources have done in-depth coverage of the subject starting from his grandmother Sumitra Devi (politician) to his mother Meira Kumar . - Admantine123 ( talk ) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they have not yet won already — but this makes no claim that the subject has preexisting notability for any other reason.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if he wins, but just standing as a candidate is not in and of itself grounds for an article now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mini Europa : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Poland .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or drafify .  No references, no pl wiki interwiki.  Sadly, the author is inactive since 2019 so I doubt anyone would try to save it after drafticiation.  Merge is hard due to no sourcing.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, TLA (talk) 11:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – Per Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus .  Svartner ( talk ) 17:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Since the author is AWOL, a ! vote to draftify is going to have the same result as WP:SOFTDELETE .  Adequate justification is needed for deletion direct or indirect via draft space.  I don't see any indication that anyone (self included) has done any WP:BEFORE work.  I don't see any strong arguments for deletion.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 01:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Again, this is a non-notable figure skating competition, no longer held, that was exclusive to junior and novice-level skaters only (ie. no seniors).  The sea of red links shows that the skaters who did medal here were themselves not notable.  The men's competition also frequently featured only one competitor.  This was a Who cares?  competition, and the article should be taken out back and given the Tonya Harding treatment.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abu Raihan : This is not "inherently" notable enough to clinch inclusion in Wikipedia if it's all that can actually be said about him, and just makes him a WP:BLP1E rather than a person who has earned a permanent place in an international encyclopedia -- and furthermore, Wikipedia has a rule that due to the potential of a Wikipedia article to cause harm (e.g. becoming a magnet for vandalism or attack editing), we have to be especially vigilant and strict about the notability of minors.  So winning a student-level contest just isn't grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Due to WP:BIO1E and concerns about the notability of minors.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree that WP:BIO1E applies.  Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 07:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Less Unless ( talk ) 07:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Meets WP:BIO1E .  // Timothy :: talk 09:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dean Timmins : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , England ,  and Australia .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSKATE and WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable independent sources.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of songs about Bangalore : Because there are none.  The deletion reason is the same as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about Ahmedabad , Madras , Oslo etc.: The list fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE , WP:LISTN and WP:OR .  There is little to nothing worthwhile in this list, be it content or context.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Lists ,  and Karnataka .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral None of these songs have their own articles, but some of the people singing them do, and the films they are in do as well.  D r e a m Focus 03:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  01:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a notable subject.  The list shall never end.  Shankargb ( talk ) 15:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No articles for any of the songs, no article for this topic.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the same reasons prior discussion closed as delete.  Sergecross73 msg me 19:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aiden Burn : Spinixster (chat!) 03:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 03:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Helene Kvint : I am not finding reliable sources to add to this article WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 18:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 18:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Theatre , Czech Republic , Denmark ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources or reference section in the article, every external link is a self-published primary source, and I am not finding any reliable sources.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 19:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  aaronneallucas ( talk ) 19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   No reliable sources.   Even if this person is notable in Denmark or the Czech Republic, little would be lost by deleting this and starting again with some actual refs.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 21:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources or justification of notability.  Easy delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
EFOSMO : If I understand correctly, EFOSMO is a proposed model that was presented in two academic papers that were published in several journals across the globe.  Nothing further happened with the proposed model so I conclude that the subject does not meet WP:GNG and the article should be deleted.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support deletion: The article has multiple issues, but chiefly does not seem notable.  Constant314 ( talk ) 18:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Rusty4321 talk contribs 19:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Cannot find any sources outside of the two papers that invent the term.  I also note that the article was created by User:EFOSMO so was probably intended as promotion of the concept or term.  Lamona ( talk ) 04:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eglė Raznauskaitė : All I found were passing mentions like 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Lithuania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I couldn't find news coverage of her, even in Lithuanian.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 18:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Insufficient sources to meet GNG.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete we do not have enough for WP:SPORTCRIT Lightburst ( talk ) 00:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  Powerviki ( talk ) 15:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Averell Spicer : LibStar ( talk ) 01:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football ,  and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment He does have a couple of significant articles in the Los Angeles Times in 2004 and 2008 (part I) (part II) .  There is also this from rivals.com that is behind a paywall.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ProQuest brings up an article that's likely sigcov from The Record , but there's only an abstract: "NO DOUBT ABOUT HIM // USC recruit Spicer an easy choice for Inland Empire Football All-Star Classic" .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  For two reasons.  First, I couldn't find sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG .  The ProQuest article noted above (which I can't read either) appears to be from his time in high school before even enrolling at USC.  Second, he never played any regular-season NFL games, and moreover, it appears that he didn't win any signifcant honors or have a particularly notable college career either.  See here (22 total tackles and two sacks in four years at USC) and here (USC bio indicating he was primarily a backup on the defensive line).  Combining the lack of on-field notability with a weak showing of coverage, I find no basis for notability.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first Los Angeles Times piece from 2004 ( here ) has depth of coverage, but it's an article written when he was in high school, part of a series on "the Southland's top high school football players".  It appears he showed great promise in high school and was a top recruit, but he sustained injuries in college and never quite made the grade at USC.  Per WP:YOUNGATH , an in-depth profile from his high school playing career doesn't support a stand-alone article -- particularly where he didn't fulfill the promise when he got to the next level.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The second Los Angeles Times piece is an article seeking to answer the question of who would replace Sedrick Ellis , USC's star nose tackle (headline: "Trojans look for stopgap measures" to fill the hole at nose tackle).  Spicer was one of the "stopgap" measures to replace Ellis and thus received some coverage.  USC during the Pete Carroll years was one of the super-programs where even a backup (or "stopgap") nose tackle received some coverage, but the fact remains that Averell never made the cut (whether due to injury or whatever) and doesn't IMO warrant a stand-alone article.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramil Hashimli : This is a promotional page create by Atakhanli (the user was blocked-the reason for the blocking was noted that the editor was engaged in paid activities.).  There is no nearly enough RS about the subject to establish notability. -- Correspondentman ( talk ) 09:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : The {{ subst:afd2 }} formatting was not fully implemented here; I have fixed this.  No opinion at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Science , Medicine ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't see anything here that would satisfy WP:NPROF , WP:NAUTHOR , or WP:GNG .  Qflib ( talk ) 18:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kivika A Achumi : I could not find substantial, non-promo coverage for this individual.  Notability seems to hang on the large number of Youtube views.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nagaland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Five hits in Gnews, simply confirming appearances at various events.  Nothing we can use for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ui-guk Kim : I couldn't find any reliable, independent sources that have significant coverage of the subject from a BEFORE search, and the only source that is in the article currently is unreliable.  Tails Wx 01:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Tails Wx 01:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your concern, I added another citation for this information, I hope this is enough to allow for it to stay up.  Yuri Iluliaq ( talk ) 02:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That source, FamilySearch , isn't a reliable source either.  Tails Wx 02:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 02:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , WP:A7 , besides no indication of notability anyway 35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 02:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roger Cossack : Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete PROMO, other than being a lawyer that was interviewed on CNN, I don't see anything we can use for notability.  Visiting prof at the university isn't notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons above, and article is all primary sources.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 04:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Individual does not appear to pas WP:ANYBIO given the lack of sources available.  Quick citation check does not hint at possibility of this person meeting WP:ACADEMIC either MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 04:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Law .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  2001:4455:61D:DB00:4184:9335:4EB4:685F ( talk ) 12:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: IP has only three edits all in AFD MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 13:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete