hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Emily Wilson (gymnast): Although she is in the early stages of her career and has received some team medals, she does not meet the WP:NGYMNAST criteria which require individual medals.  Also, there isn't enough significant coverage to meet the WP:GNG criteria.  Mercenf ( talk ) 10:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG .  Only sources I could find lacked WP:SIGCOV .  User:Let'srun 14:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - This nom is vandalism.  5 medals at international events for team usa... team USA website is as credible of a reference as they come.  She is inherently notable.The published medal results from these events make her inherently notable. .  Just like playing in the NFL or another major league.  69.238.162.225 ( talk ) 00:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] vandalism comment .  Has tagged team the entire set of pages in editing war. .  Both are from upwork. .  He nominated 2 pages and didnt even leave the required notifications on the talk pages.  This is vandalism.  This user has over 5m views on his pages. .  All articles are well referenced before they were attacked.  135.148.232.242 ( talk ) 14:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify to afford time to gain some notability.  It is very seldom I suggest draftification, however I do think an article on this athlete may be just a little WP:TOOSOON , yet can't think of an appropriate redirect target in the meantime (though i'd support either as an WP:ATD ).  The next Olympics is a good shout, but is still a year away.  Strictly speaking, as per nomination, she doesn't quite meet the criteria set out at WP:NGYMNAST yet.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 19:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:NGYMNAST or WP:GNG .  I also note that the article is a product of paid editing and the article (and this AFD) are being edited by ipsocks of the blocked paid editor.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 19:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've temporarily semi-protected this AFD due to persistent IP-hopping ! votes from a blocked editor.  I recognize protection on an XFD page is somewhat unusual, but given the circumstances I believe it is the least disruptive option.  If any legitimate editor has an issue, please reach out on my talkpage and I'm happy to discuss.  The Wordsmith Talk to me 20:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NGYMNAST or WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boukari Laouali: It’s all coming to me till the end of time 10:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Africa .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even the French articles are just about him writing a book, all appear PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eternity's Crossing: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 00:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and West Virginia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 02:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support if nobody can come up with other sources or evidence of notability.   It doesn't sound particularly notable, and as long as the nominator took the time to look for sources that might demonstrate it, deletion is probably appropriate.   It's a relief to see WP:BEFORE observed in the nomination—far too many articles get nominated for deletion without any effort to establish whether the topic is notable, leaving it up to everyone else to do the work for the nominator, and more often than not spending the day demonstrating that the subject was in fact at least marginally notable.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 13:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pavel Micheev: WP:NHOOPS might apply to "played most minutes" but, unless there is already consensus on this, I'd argue playing most minutes isn't that statistically important.  --- 𝓙𝓪𝓭𝓮 ( Talk ) • 𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓎/𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓂 20:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails GNG.  If sources from another language could be found and verified, then maybe.  But as is, he's not notable.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 05:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Venus International school: No indication of the roll of the school although there appear to be only 16 staff suggesting it is small.    No third party references.   Need to find third party information - or question notability.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 16:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Upon my checking, I found only passing mentions in The Hindu and DNA , which do not provide in-depth coverage.  Consequently, the article fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  Grabup ( talk ) 17:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per User:Grabup's findings -- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Signe Førre: Article creator is blocked indefinitely.  Wikipedia is not the chronicler of every live gig in the jazz world.  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Norway .  Shaws username .  talk .  15:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Víctor Morales (Belizean footballer): Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CollegeDekho: Shellwood ( talk ) 11:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There are significant coverage from many reliable sources.   Most importantly from [3] , [4] , [5] .  These all are not routine coverage.  Pentashantha ( talk ) 04:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 04:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete An unremarkable startup that fails WP:NCORP .  Unable to locate any WP:CORPDEPTH coverage in the sources linked above by the article creator.  The WP:ADMASQ tone used in the article raises COI/UPE suspicion.  Maduant ( talk ) 22:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  20:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/NCORP guidelines apply.  I am unable to locate a single source (including the sources listed above which are regurgitated company PR) that meets the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 10:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gas pipe clarinet: Mach61 ( talk ) 17:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Mach61 ( talk ) 17:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'd have thought there was coverage and detail of this term, but I'm not seeing it.  JMWt ( talk ) 17:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find much beyond what are name drops [33] [34] , simply using the term.  DICDEF applies.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom GrayStorm ( Talk | Contributions ) 04:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ritchie Zanga: The only non-database coverage available online is the very brief transfer notice included as the article's only source.  This is not even remotely close to significant coverage.  PROD was contested after adding that source - even though it is not plausible SIGCOV.  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Italy .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and a WP:TROUT for misuse of the deprodding process.  The deprodder did a disservice by necessitating an entire AFD for such an utterly clear-cut case.  Geschichte ( talk ) 01:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage.  KeepItGoingForward ( talk ) 01:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Semi-amateur athlete and based on a single source.  Fails WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 02:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ridhi Arora: Furthermore, the amount of unreferenced BLP statements and need for complete rewriting to make it encyclopedic mean that a WP:TNT is needed in any case.  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 12:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Television , Theatre , Finance , Maharashtra ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  Zero coverage I can find about this person; only hits that come up are for a fashion show or designer.  Could be a hoax for all we know.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Full of promotional language but no reliable sources .  Mike Turnbull ( talk ) 17:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Absolutely nothing I can find to show notability.  This could also be deleted as a webhost violation or moved to a draft.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm very much guessing these are likely the same person.  Userpage appears to have already been speedy deleted twice but quickly recreated, I'll tag it again.  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 20:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References of press articles, press interviews, imdb profile, and YT links have been added for notability Ridhi Arora ( talk ) 22:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Interviews, IMDB and YouTube do not establish notability.  Press articles only do if they're from independent reliable sources.  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 22:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1980 Buffalo State Bengals football team: Let'srun ( talk ) 19:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems they were just a club team in this season ?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Yes, according to this and this they were a club football team in 1980 and moved to NCAA D-III varsity status for 1981.  Ejgreen77 ( talk ) 15:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As noted above by User:Ejgreen77 , this was  a "club" level team, i.e., not a varsity level school team.  To my knowledge, we have no other artices on "club" level teams.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 15:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Volunthai: Their website - volungthai.com - widely quoted in older online pages and previously in their wiki page (until I removed the reference) - points to a 'free hookup' site.   The organisation appears to have always been very small.  Can't find any associated organisations that I can link it with.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 17:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Internet ,  and Thailand .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It does not appear the organization exists anymore so if suitable sources exists, they will be hard to find.   I searched ProQuest for the Washington Post and other sources mentioned in the article but those and others were all first hand accounts so WP:primary or brief mentions.   The only source that seemed it might be secondary SIGCOV is ProQuest 308904716 , an 26 August 2003 piece by The Bangkok Post titled "Building bridges" but only the abstract is available.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ann-Blair Thornton: Let'srun ( talk ) 03:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Kentucky .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only two hits, one talking about prize-winning hams [12] , then confirmation of pageant participation [13] , both of which don't really help notability Delete, lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO .  Mooonswimmer 00:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in France: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and France .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary list.  Shankargb ( talk ) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Shankargb : Note that "unnecessary" is not a valid deletion rational.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kimo Sampson: JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Grenada .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rotimi Williams: My before came up with little.  Fails WP:GNG Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 21:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 21:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joaquin Avila: Most of the sources used in this article are primary, with a direct connection to the subject.  It was created by a WP:SPA back in 2006, and seems to have slipped through the cracks of review.  It reads like a promotional article to an obscure financier, which is easily confused with the notable lawyer of the same name — Joaquin Avila (lawyer) .  GuardianH ( talk ) 12:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Finance ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Plenty found for the lawyer, nothing for this fellow.  It appears he's no longer with Carlyle either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete existing sources are primary or just mentions and do not contribute to notability.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Probably need to review the articles of this author since it seems the purpose is to just advertise Yale alumni and staff.  - Imcdc Contact 05:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete