hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Daniel Otter: Jon Kolbert ( talk ) 19:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Coverage is all press release items or articles about other people where he's mentioned.  I don't find any extensive sourcing in Canadian sources either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom/above.  BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources found are all routine mill news, name mentions, listings, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 02:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see significant independent coverage of him in reliable sources.   I found a number of passing mentions, mainly in articles on events describing him as the promoter, but merely doing your job does not prove WP notability.  Papaursa ( talk ) 04:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
M3 Communications Group, Inc: Stevie Awards are described as "fee-based" with 30-40% of nominees receiving an award, so carries no weight.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 00:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Bulgaria .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 00:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Management ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Davina Reichman: Refspam is also evident TLA (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Fashion ,  and Australia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I’m leaning towards deleting based on reading the two previous nominations.  I find the lack of linking in the reflist telling.  Notability not demonstrated, CoI issues…if the topic is notable it can be recreated RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 10:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Notability is not inherited and can someone explain why two of the sentences have 11 citations?  Tar nis hed Path talk 00:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources are not indepth of her.  and nothing in gnews, fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darshan_Singh_Sur: Yamantakks ( talk ) 08:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; completely non-notable and borderline WP:G11 .  I went ahead and removed the blatant advert from the article ("here's what events I do and my contact details") so I don't think the rest meets G11, but fails GNG anyway.  CoconutOctopus talk 10:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No violin players found in any sort of sourcing using this name.  Very likely PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While it looks like this person exists, no sources that I could find help in meeting WP:GNG .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per all above, WP:TNT Seawolf35 T -- C 19:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Interdisciplinary Contest in Modeling: The hits on both google search and google news are either passing mentions or not-independent-enough sources.  Duckmather ( talk ) 04:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Mathematics .  Duckmather ( talk ) 04:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in South Korea: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  The only source are simply announcment, just not worthy of an encyclopaedic value.  Those arguing for a keep must be advised of WP:USEFUL .  I also advise those to create a Fandom page for your favorite sport if you want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and South Korea .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A jumble of sports contracts, not encylopedic or maintainable.  Desertarun ( talk ) 11:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Pocket Monsters RéBURST chapters: The article is sourced only to the manga's publisher and has no notability as a stand-alone list .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 07:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 07:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 07:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clearly, if the anime isn't notable enough for an article, as decided by an AfD, neither is a list of its episodes.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  But maybe one day this will be a notable series, so SOFTDELETE is ok.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 13:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, I just want to check, is List of Pokémon manga#Manga not released in English being proposed as a redirect target article? Or is there another article that is more appropriate? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 05:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Personally, I don't feel that this one needs to be redirected, being that it is a list article which seems an unlikely search term. Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The target article doesn't contain any information about the manga chapters. Redirecting in this case is inappropriate. -- Mika1h ( talk ) 15:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdurahman Nasser: My Arabic searches have yielded no decent results about this particular Abdurahman Nasser and so there is no evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
URL Snooper: Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Israel Association for Automatic Control: I'm not seeing the refs which could be considered to show notability to the inclusion guidelines.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Israel .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Business .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment are there any RS in Hebrew?  FortunateSons ( talk ) 09:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no idea.  But there's been plenty of time to add Hebrew sources if they exist.  If Hebrew speakers/readers find RS, all to the good - but we don't ! keep on the off chance that there WP:MUSTBESOURCES JMWt ( talk ) 14:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – In its current state, shouldn't be here.  If someone wants to add a lot more to the page, could be a different story.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 20:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Herbert Obele: Can only find some tangential coverage like [64] , [65] , nothing of much substance.  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 08:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Germany .  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 08:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Doesn't even have an article at de.wiki.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 13:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ennepetal hostage taking: Article has sat largely untouched for the past two decades.  There are sources exclusively from the day this happened.  The only thing I found that wasn't from the actual day this occurred was a 1 paragraph mention in a list of German hostage crises from 2010, which does not have enough detail to build an article from.  Fails WP:NEVENT .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Germany .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't speak German but I'm not seeing a reason to think this has lasting coverage.  WP:NOTNEWS JMWt ( talk ) 09:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article doesn't seem to cover a topic that has significance importance.  Deletion might be the best course of action here.  Waqar 💬 17:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mullaly's Siding: Not a notable topic.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't see significant coverage in independent sources required to meet WP:GNG .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm confused why in the world a few yards of track to a flour mill would need an article.  There's probably a few dozen sidings like this within ten miles of my house, dozens more that were removed since the area deindustrialized.  Reywas92 Talk 01:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Efthalia Siakalli: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was the most I found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cyprus .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Danough: I didn't find sufficient sources through with a WP:BEFORE search to pass NMUSIC or WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 12:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , United States of America ,  and California .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 12:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet GNG criteria and is not notable, so should be deleted.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 20:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Hungary: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are nonexistent.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Hungary .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary list.  Shankargb ( talk ) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Shankargb : Note that "unnecessary" is not a valid deletion rational.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No merit under WP:NLIST BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia isn't a TV guide, this fails to meet the WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - doesn't pass LISTN as no significant coverage of these items in the list as a group Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AutoTheme: ... disco spinster talk 18:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  ... disco spinster talk 18:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Zero citations or sources have been added after ten days anda couple-dozen edits.  Last1in ( talk ) 19:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is clearly a marketing page .  The only significant contributor to the page was Spidean , and the software's homepage was "www.spidean.net" (which is now parked).  On top of that, the only references to the plugin I can find are a CVE report, a forum post by the author, and a couple pages of this book that appear to be copied directly out of its documentation.  There's clearly not enough here to claim notability even if the style and COI issues were addressed.  Box of wolves ( feed ) 01:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 15:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 15:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above , fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antul Teotia: Times Now Hindi article is an Interview.  — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 09:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Women , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 09:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are 7 links i have added.  How much media links does an editor needs to create a article?  Shivamco19 ( talk ) 09:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Shivamco19 Just media links does not make an individual Notable, the subject should pass the Notability guidelines.  For a politician pls read WP:NPOL .  — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 11:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Owen× ☎ 14:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  She has not held any role that would constitute a pass of WP:NPOL , and simply having a smattering of run of the mill campaign coverage is not sufficient to make a person in local politics more notable than everybody else in local politics, since everybody in local politics can always show a handful of campaign coverage.  At this level of significance, the key to notability is not "she exists", but "she's a special case of significantly greater importance than most other people in local politics", and that hasn't been shown at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and politicians of district council doesn't passes NPOL.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  11:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete