hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Tolufazepam: Studied in a single paper from 1988; WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of further study or commercialization.  A redirect to Benzodiazepine in 2014 was contested.  With respect to the late User:DGG , I think a redirect or outright deletion is the correct outcome.  Jfire ( talk ) 23:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Jfire ( talk ) 23:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to benzodiazepine : Reference 2 seems to be secondary and reliable.   Otherwise, only primary sources and database listings found.   Poorly-studied compound that in the cited sources is mostly discussed along with other compounds, making it a good candidate for a redirect.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Per WeirdNAnnoyed .  A stub can be short but not a dictionary entry.   -- Otr500 ( talk ) 08:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pickering Lumber Co. 12: Appears to fail GNG.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sadly as a railfan, I must vote for deletion.  There is no coverage other than the Nyles Canyon Railway's blog for sourcing, and some photos of the locomotive.  Not meeting GNG.  Some coverage in this book, but it's a directory listing [5] Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If sources cannot be found then this should be redirect ed to Niles Canyon Railway#Notable steam locomotives (although that section might be better named just "Steam locomotives") where it is mentioned.  I don't see any benefit in deleting the sourced information present in the article.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, apologies for the late reply.  As expected and mentioned in your message, no additional sources about her have been found, therefore, i completely agree to redirect her page to Niles_Canyon_Railway#Notable_steam_locomotives , and delete her page.  I'm glad we could come up with a solution ^^ Christian40213 ( talk ) 18:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You do realize the one and only source in the article is a photo with no additional information from some dude's blog, right?  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How is that relevant to what I wrote?  I'm not arguing to keep the article in its present state or merge unverified information.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 22:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The only sourced information within the article is that the locomotive showed up at an event in 1986.  You said I don't see any benefit in deleting the sourced information present in the article but I don't see any valid sourced information.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 00:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Saint Leibowitz: Di (they-them) ( talk ) 22:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 22:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Canticle for Leibowitz, not notable outside of the novel.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Canticle for Leibowitz.  Agree with above.  -- Bduke ( talk ) 08:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per others as WP:ATD .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 12:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Josue Danny Ortiz Trophy: Extremely limited sources that even mention the award; the two in the story include WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in discussion of Danny Ortiz .  Additional sources not included are also trivial mentions that do not provide significant coverage.  Propose to redirect to Danny Ortiz .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 15:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Guatemala .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Danny Ortiz as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WKUT-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kentucky .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Yet another DTV America/HC2/Innovate station that has only ever carried national services without much if any significant coverage , even before their ownership.  Like many of the others, this artilcle is another nominal survivor of a bulk nomination from 2023 .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Merveille Mbemba: The subject has earned at least one cap for the DR Congo women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 16:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kyrgyz Wikipedia: That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.  Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing?  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Internet , Websites , Asia ,  and Kyrgyzstan .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per WP:ATD-R — siro χ o 06:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect.  No need for a separate article.  Athel cb ( talk ) 12:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Previous AFD was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on individual Wikipedia language editions .  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fortress walls and gates of Bukhara: Sources in article are blogs/travel websites, not archeological sources.  BEFORE found nothing that makes this notable apart from the main article.  Sourcing in the article shows there is nothing to merge, no objection if there is a consensus to redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 10:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , History ,  and Uzbekistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Spiderone , again you beat me to sorting by seconds!  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please accept my apologies!  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom, CFORK is sufficient for an immediate WP:BOLD redirect, AfD is not even necessary in this case.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 11:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Possible Weak keep Ark of Bukhara seems to be about the fortress  or citadel, while this one is more about the outer walls of the city, which would be appropriate to have an article on, perhaps City walls of Bukhara .   At present this seems to be a poor article, but the solution is to improve, not delete.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 12:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I have studied the city in detail (I took Siege of Bukhara to featured article quality last year), and believe that the best solution is redirecting to Bukhara .  As Peterkingiron points out, Ark of Bukhara refers to the inner citadel TimothyBlue —not the walls of the city itself.  I do not believe that there is sufficient detail for this article to stand independent—e.g. Pugachenkova in Bosworth and Asimov's UNESCO history summarizes (p.508) the walls and gates of the whole Transoxiana region in around a page, and I have not seen enough scholarship elsewhere.  Per WP:NOPAGE , I thus think that redirecting to Bukhara is the best solution.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 12:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bukhara per ~~ AirshipJungleman29 above.   Any appropriately sourced content can be merged from the history.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yadira Pacheco: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2014 , 2015 , 2018 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Panama .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per the nom.  Not enough WP:SIGCOV present.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Metropolitan Police Traffic Criminal Justice Unit: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing independent found, other than mirrored Wikipedia content.   Violates WP:NORG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge to Central Operations .  No reason to delete the info.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: This is looking like No consensus right now.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Central Operations : Redirects are WP:CHEAP and this obviously fails GNG.  This has no info that needs to be merged as this is a non notable unit.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
A Time for George Stavros: It's also an unpublished failed attempt at a book that didn't survive beyond a short synopsis, making it highly unlikely to ever achieve notability.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 11:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 11:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: could the information be merged into the main article on Philip K. Dick which has sections on his early writing and the various phases of his career?  Elemimele ( talk ) 16:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, the text could be transposed.  A lack of notability for an article on a subject doesn't prevent information within it being used on a page for a notable subject, and the requirements for an in-line citation or consensus on adding the line is significantly lower than requirements for a subject to have an article.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 13:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:BOOKCRIT #5, and per my comment at WP:Articles for deletion/Nicholas and the Higs .  Could possibly be merged into Humpty Dumpty in Oakland , since according to this Humpty Dumpty is a very close rewrite of George Stavros ; or could be merged into a new article " Lost works of Philip K. Dick ", as I suggested at the other AfD.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 21:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "The five preceding criteria do not necessarily apply to books excluded by the threshold standards, and do not apply to not-yet-published books".  A Time for George Stavros was unpublished (and never will be), and has no ISBN or catalogue in a national library, therefore Bookcrit #5 is irrelevant.  I think merging into the Humpty book would be a good idea and would improve that article.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 13:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair point, struck my keep ! vote.  I'm hesitant to formally propose a merge to Humpty Dumpty , since I think it would be less a merge and more a total rewrite of that article; so instead I suggest redirecting to Philip K. Dick bibliography for the time being, with no prejudice to the content being incorporated into another article in the future.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 16:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 12:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 12:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
XM Deportivo: Thus, it fails WP:GNG .  In addition, the article creator was banned for vandalism.  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and/or redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels : there is insufficient significant coverage to merit any actual notability, but this seems to be the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable SiriusXM channels (if not associated with another notable parent entity).  (It doesn't appear to currently be mentioned there — though a similar channel called "Radio Deportivo" that was shuttered in 2004 is — but what little potential sources exist for this channel might at least be enough for adding it there.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels – There's no indication of standalone notability under WP:GNG here.  I'm not sure we should merge content that has no sources whatsoever, so a redirect seems appropriate.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 10:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Leaving Certificate Mathematics: Furthermore there are no other articles on other Leaving Certificate subjects, for example "Leaving Certificate economics, business, Irish, English, etc."  This article could possibly be moved to the Leaving Certificate (Ireland) article or deleted altogether.  Edl-irishboy ( talk ) 13:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Mathematics , Europe ,  and Ireland .  Edl-irishboy ( talk ) 13:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To be honest, I think it can probably go.  The information is mostly either already in the Leaving Certificate (Ireland) or is out of date.  David Malone ( talk ) 14:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect the the Leaving Certificate article Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I'm usually in favor of redirect rather than deleting when we have a reasonable target like we do here.  But in this case, it violates one of the main rules for titling on Wikipedia - WP:PRECISE .  A reader looking here to find information about the mathematics leaving certificate in Britain wouldn't find any help.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 04:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The term "Leaving Certificate" is most commonly used to refer to the Irish secondary qualification (a quick Google will show this), so I would not think many readers would expect to see any other nation's educational qualitifcations referred to with this term.  Nepal's school leaving examination is called the School Leaving Certificate, abbreviated as SLC, but as the word "School" is used in the name as well, this prevents any mix ups.  pinktoebeans (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Leaving Certificate (Ireland) merging any relevant information.  And while we're at it, could we rename Leaving Certificate (Ireland) to Leaving Certificate (which is currently a redirect), per my reasoning above?  pinktoebeans (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Leaving Certificate (Ireland) per above.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 17:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect to Leaving Certificate (Ireland) Spleodrach ( talk ) 08:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 North Carolina Libertarian presidential primary: Only sourcing is an overview of all North Carolina elections, a FOX News local station, a Facebook post, and two X (Twitter) posts.  A search doesn't yield anything significant for the Libertarian primary for North Carolina.  reppop talk 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  reppop talk 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary redundant content fork lacking sources to demonstrate notability per WP:EVENTCRIT .  No content not covered at existing main article.  The idea we need 50 seperate pages for a primary election of a minor party is just absolutely ludicrous.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] *:You are wrong when saying “ No content not covered at existing main article.”.  There is a full list of candidates on the ballots, in depth writing about write-in campaigns, and a map of the counties and their winners.  And this party is the 3rd most popular party in the USA, and has many Members from each state, and has qualified for primaries in many states.  All political parties are equal, mate.  Don’t discriminate.  GeorgeNotFound23 ( talk ) 21:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC) — GeorgeNotFound23 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  ( Blocked sockpuppet of

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wang Qingyun: Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.  Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Skating ,  and China .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  I was not able to find any English or Chinese sources about the subject person, and she has only won bronze medals in the Chinese Championships, failing both GNG and NSKATE.  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 14:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chinese Figure Skating Championships#Ladies .  Doesn't pass WP:SIGCOV .  Tau Corvi ( talk ) 11:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chinese Figure Skating Championships#Ladies : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable secondary sources.  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect