hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Wonder If U Care: The Billboard TikTok Top 50 chart placing and streams/views alone don't help with notability as per WP:NSONG .  pinktoebeans (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United States of America .  pinktoebeans (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Artist redlinks, no other songs; it's yet another Tiktok background song nobody would think is a standout song of 2023, much less look up.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not appear to have any coverage outside of the Stereogum article.  No apparent valid merge/redirect targets available.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 08:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article is also an orphan .  It was linked from list of shoegaze musicians , but I've removed that since the artist appears to be non-notable as well.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 08:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Yes it got some buzz from social media watchers but professional coverage is very limited, and the journalists involved should have done their research to give us some sort of story about the musician himself.  It would make more sense here for the musician to have his own article first, but that would be unlikely to survive our notability rules either.  For song or musician, an encyclopedia needs more than some minor commentary on how something that nobody ever bothered to investigate got noticed by streamers.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kelsey Griswold: Let'srun ( talk ) 23:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Oklahoma .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Thailand: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Thailand .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: No opinion on the page in its current format, which does seem to be WP:LISTCRUFT , but it's a notable topic with potential for a valid article, especially given the long-standing legal and political issues surrounding broadcasting rights for major sporting events (mostly football) since 2012, which have been widely covered.  [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] If the page does get deleted it should be without prejudice to the creation of a proper article.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 11:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on sources found.  Deletion is not cleanup.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 15:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Despite sources, will never pass WP:NLIST .  A list wihtout body text for context will never pass GNG too.  This is 2024, not 2004.  Wikipedia standards has gone a long way since.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia is not a tv guide, this fails to meet the WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andreas Paraskevas: On review of search results, I can't find any English-language sourcing, and a comprehensive Greek-language search reveals the following sources: [7] 2019 article about his speculated transfer from APOEL to Doxa.  [8] [9] 2022 and 2023 articles about two separate ACL injuries (very unfortunate I must say).  Overall I just don't see a level of coverage in these sources that would meet the threshold of significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSCRIT .  GGT ( talk ) 20:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cyprus .  GGT ( talk ) 20:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balgzand Gas Plant: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Environment , Geography ,  and Netherlands .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:COATRACK , Extremely little of the content is actually about the gas plant.  As this article is a huge failure even before examining notability, the delete is without prejudice on the topic.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm surprised there were not more sources for this, even the gas fields have more sources than this.  I will cite lack of Reliable sources, Lack of Secondary sources.  And add, that it's just an industrial facility.  We probably don't want to have articles on every factory that exists.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Questionable notability with no secondary sources with SIGCOV.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Afonso Caetano: The best sources that I can find are Maisfutebol , which is a basic transfer announcement with only the bare minimum of details, and Record , which confirms his age, length of contract and briefly summarises his previous teams.  It provides no more info than a database source would and, on its own, is not enough to pass GNG or SPORTBASIC.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Yebba: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Massachusetts .  Owen× ☎ 19:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails notability guidelines for actors.  There are some minor mentions in a couple of news articles but they do not convince me of sufficient notability.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes the GNG even with what is in the article.  And, importantly, per the golden WP:NEXIST rule: Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article .  AFDISNOTCLEANUP applies.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Ping me if WP:THREE sources are posted.  // Timothy :: talk 20:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karad district: Not notable.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India .  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nomination - FitIndia Talk (Admin on Commons) 12:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No sources found, terrible article.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 23:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gong Mun-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of South China AA footballers: Let'srun ( talk ) 14:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Sports , Football ,  and Hong Kong .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – With South China AA .  The information about the players is relevant to be in the main article, but the fork isn't necessary.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - indiscriminate list.   Definitely do not merge, the club's article should not be bloated with a massive list of (apparently randomly selected) past players Delete - no evidence of notability.  These kind of articles can be notable, this one is a mess.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom. -- Wish for Good ( talk ) 04:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Extraterritorial crossroad: Concern, by Chidgk1 ( talk · contribs ) was: Most of the sources I found were likely copied from this article – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 02:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Geography .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 02:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but possibly rename.  I'm not sure about the words in the title but the concept seems sound.  For example there are lots of sources talking about the concept in this part of the world: Zangezur corridor also historical examples such as Berlinka .  I might be missing some nuance from the nom so am open to changing my ! vote.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No such term as far as I can find.  Half the definition ("a strip of land that formally belongs to neither country") seems is absurd and does not apply to any of the examples listed.  The other half ("or with other special arrangements") is so vague as to be useless.  Part of this is already covered in Enclave and exclave#Unusual cross-border transport channels .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Couldn't find anything regarding the term, barring sources that more than likely copied from this article, as mentioned by Chidgk1 ( talk · contribs ).  Mooonswimmer 16:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ri Jo-guk: All sources are match reports.  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – Do sources of footballer club/national team debut and them scoring goals count as significant coverage, or are they more like routine?  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It should ultimately depend on how in-depth the coverage of the subject is.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paranga (football): Angryapathy ( talk ) 18:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Football ,  and Greece .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The concept is probably a part of Greek discourse.  The article is a WP:TNT candidate, written in bad English, even translating team names (Iraklis to Hercules).  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this abomination of a text as soon as decently possible.  Nothing of note and even less coherence.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 12:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  It's not even clear what this article is about/trying to do.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Horrifyingly poor writing.  Obviously a quick, unthinking translation.  Candidate for WP:TNT if there ever was one.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 21:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aneel Murarka: Someone more familiar with Indian news and corporations might be able to find something.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 23:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 23:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per quick sources check: 1,2,12,14,18 — error 404 7,15,16,18 — other access errors (maybe for me) 3,4,5,6,11,13 — laudatory articles with no byline 8 — the same text from 6 9 — this domain is for sale 10 — he didn't mentioned 17 — the first article with a byline, but it's a trivial mention I haven't made an attempt to find reliable sources myself, but I suppose if he even suddenly has notability, the article should be rewritten using better materials.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 18:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Budhiya (film): Sources in article are release promo and database.  BEFORE showed more promo and database, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.  // Timothy :: talk 08:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Message I left to evident no avail, on nom's TP a few minutes before he took the page to AFD (after I had removed the Prod tag from the page, that the same user had put 1 1/2 h after the page was created...):An expert should, in my view, establish if it's really the 1st FL in Bagheli before further action is taken on the page. — MY, OH, MY !  09:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a fair question but it doesn't seem to be the case; this article mentions a Bagheli-language film from 2019.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 21:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not an easy one to find sources for, since searching in Hindi returns a lot of results for Budhia Singh who is also the subject of a film.  I didn't find any sources that aren't already in the article, which as the OP says are promotional in nature.  ! Voting delete for now, unless better sources can be found.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 21:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: ineligible for soft deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 10:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete