hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ariel King: Little other independent information can be found.  The recent removal of the "Controversies" section per a discussion at WP:BLPN , removed what little independent sourcing existed.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  21:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Health and fitness .  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  21:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  #prodraxis connect 21:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was unable to find significant coverage of her in any reliable sources that are independent of her.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 21:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find any significant coverage in independent sourcing either.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 23:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' per others.  Daniel Case ( talk ) 01:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There does not seem to be any significant coverage about this person.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 02:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per others.  When researching the discussion about the "Scrutiny" section of the page, it became clear there just isn't that much out there.  -- AntiDionysius ( talk ) 11:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, can't find any independent coverage about King, articles just link to work that King publishes herself The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Melissa Delgadillo: Despite the wrath of sources, there is a lack of WP:SIGCOV here.  Article was originally created by an SPI who only ever edited the article for this subject.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets notability requirements for beauty pageant contestants.  McFilet O' Fish Fan ( talk ) 01:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What are these "notability requirements for beauty pageant contenstants", and where are they recorded?  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 09:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Let'srun As far as I can tell, User:Wikifamous has not been subject to an SPI investigation; what do you mean by this?  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 10:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Apologies.  Thought I saw they had.  Will strike that.  Let'srun ( talk ) 10:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Won multiple pageants pre-internet era and more coverage exists.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 14:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 2007-2011 is pre-internet era?  And where is this coverage?  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 01:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage other than the Miss International win, nothing notable career-wise found.  No hits in Gnews, Gsearch goes straight to social media for various individuals, likely not all for this person.  Not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: If there is more coverage that is not apparent in the article, please provide it in this discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree Elttaruuu ( talk ) 01:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parisam vaippu: These issues have been present since its creation in 2014.  As such, I think that the page Parisam vaippu should be deleted.  TypistMonkey ( talk ) 02:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism , Kerala ,  and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless anyone is able to show sources in other languages suggesting notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 13:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thamizh Thiyagarajan: Sources reveal nothing about the individual.  The creation seems to be a part of a series of additions by the User: Sajantext to promote a single, low-key movie.  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 15:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Already he did world short film donna.  and he did upcoming Tamil films.  or want to add more categories or links??  Little known Tamil film producer who has worked on one low-key film: Ans : yes.  everything is film right.  already he did world short film and worked in tamil film industry.  reference: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7133853/ Sources reveal nothing about the individual: Ans: read the Tamil Hindu thisai article about this person.  Reference: ( https://www.hindutamil.in/news/supplements/hindu-talkies/1144723-the-woman-who-set-out-to-rescue-murugan.html ) @ Neutral Fan : The creation seems to be a part of a series of additions by the User: Sajantext to promote a single, low-key movie.  Ans: this is not a promotional movie.  movie already completed and waiting for the release.  Then you should mentioned every upcoming movies like promoting right.  this is not enough reason Sajantext ( talk ) 16:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] donna short film reference link: https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/cannes-2015-nomination-boost-for-indie-filmmakers-says-donna-director-762153 every reference is here.  then why we need to delete this person.  other wise you should help me out to improve this page. @ Monhiroe .  Sajantext ( talk ) 16:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's really quite hard to understand what you mean at any point.  It's not clear at all.  This unknown person has made three low-key, unknown short films and has a token 'special thanks' credit in a low-budget film.  There's really little defence about his supposed notability - clear, quick delete .  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 16:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] bro we need reliable source right.  everything was there bro.  low key or big short everyone in public figure.  enough sources already there then why we need to delete.  Sajantext ( talk ) 16:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : not a notable person and Too ealy to have page Monhiroe ( talk ) 16:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wife appears more notable than he does, based on her article in the newspaper.  This person just isn't recognized in any RS to warrant an article here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Futurism (Judaism): The article consists of two unsourced statements which partially define the topic , and two lists which aren't related to the topic .  Dan Bloch ( talk ) 04:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - found some references from both Sefaria and My Jewish Learning to establish notability as reliable references.  Futurism (Judaism) is a bust but Jewish Futurism has some hits.  Might want to change the title of article.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 12:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you provide any of these references, or the search that found them?   The vashtimedia.com citation you added is specifically about futuristic Jewish literature, which is not what the bulk of the article is about.  Dan Bloch ( talk ) 13:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't find anything other than passing mentions for Jewish Futurism.  Shapeyness ( talk ) 14:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV -- Shrike ( talk ) 14:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Since I cannot find references to support this article I have to assume it is a neologism, It should be deleted.  Lightburst ( talk ) 23:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alicia Victoria: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Dominican Republic ,  and Florida .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  BEFORE showed stats, promo, game news, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 23:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deidre Enos: Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Massachusetts .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yoon Joon-soo: Few games on record.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 01:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and South Korea .  toobigtokale ( talk ) 01:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Just few matches in 2007–2009, poorly sourced, and no related article on ko.wiki.  Svartner ( talk ) 21:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
News Bites: No notable hits in GBooks, GNews Archives, and GNews.  Be prepared for a lot of false positives in your search due to how common "News Bites" is as a phrase.  Weak Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Studio 23 as plausible target per WP:ATD .  Weak as there are a lot of similarly named programs/media entities found during my Google Search.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 00:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unreferenced and also not notable enough to be on wikipedia 48JCL Talk 00:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clearfly Communications: The sources are not infact WP:RS , ref 3 links to its testimonial page.  The sources I actually found are from search of "Greenfly Networks Inc" but again are just regular seed funding news.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it does not demonstrate sufficient coverage in reliable, independent sources.  The company's page is largely based on self-published sources, such as the company's own page.  Additionally, the page does not show how the company has significantly impacted its industry.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 09:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kishon Philip: I found Soccer Kakis and Sports 247 but both of these are just trivial mentions of him.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Snap table: I failed to find any mention of a generic use of the term in roofing.  The particular tool does not seem to be notable, I have failed to locate any independent sources.  Викидим ( talk ) 01:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  Викидим ( talk ) 01:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing significant there for the article to stay at main space and article is entirely unsourced .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by O chawal ( talk • contribs ) 21:26, November 11, 2023 (UTC) Weak Keep Less Resources — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAJaganaddamRJY ( talk • contribs ) 06:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only non-commercial reference to the term I was able to find is a Merriam-Webster dictionary definition , which has nothing to do with the roofing tool.  Owen× ☎ 14:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pandolfini Italian Culinary Academy: SL93 ( talk ) 22:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Schools ,  and Italy .  SL93 ( talk ) 23:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:NCORP .   It's actually a WP:A7 candidate - any importance of the palace is a case of WP:NOTINHERITED , and there's no claim to notability as a (private culinary) school, noting the application of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES to schools of significant size but not sizable significance.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 06:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above comment, this should have been a case of CSD A7.  The article does not make any claims of significance about the school.  I could not find any (passing or in-depth) coverage in reliable sources to fulfill WP:GNG .  Broc ( talk ) 09:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability under any standard.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Mason (wrestler): The article is entirely cited to a wrestling stats website.  I can't find any coverage online, apart from an occasional mention in relation to an event.  Wikipedia isn't the place for fan pages, time for this article to go IMO.  Sionk ( talk ) 12:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  Sionk ( talk ) 12:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I will do a research, maybe I can find something.  The issue is that British wrestling has been very popular in the last years, so many wrestlers get articles.  Sad part, reliable sources doesn't cover them, so probably, many of them will have their articles deleted.  -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 08:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's certainly an unhelpful and misplaced level of enthusiasm to write articles on Wikipedia, but that's not matched by any strong evidence of being popular, outside of niche websites.  Sionk ( talk ) 11:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 01:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The references in the article are, as per the sources section of WP:PW, not reliable .   A Google search turns up various social media hits and non-independant sources.   If the references were removed, then there would be none left.   Thereby the article doesn't even pass even GNG .  ArcAngel (talk) 06:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only hits on people with similar names, nothing found for this wrestler.  Sourcing used in the article is mostly red, orange or not identified per sourcebot, so not helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ranveer Singh Saini: Created by a user currently indeffed for sockpuppetry.  Callmemirela 🍁 talk 19:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Callmemirela 🍁 talk 19:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Golf ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable individual.  No sourcing in RS, sock creation as well, red flags.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The author wasn't just socking, they were in fact the sock of a long-since blocked account.  This is UPE spam.  Girth Summit (blether) 16:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sri Chakram: Entire articles relies on one production source quoted from the lead actress.  One unreliable review (broken link).  No reliable reviews/other sources.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 05:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete