hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Abraham Cruz : Fails WP:NACTOR .  I was unable to find any references that shows that the actor or his films are notable.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 05:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Its hard to understand why this article still is live since it was tagged for deletion in 2016.  The is nothing to indicate WP:Notability meeting WP:GLG .  Easy delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 16:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W63AU : Let'srun ( talk ) 17:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pennsylvania .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marlyn Williams : All I found was a few sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Few bits, but not enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with Rugbyfan22that this article does not have enough legitimate coverage to merit an article.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacques Kotzé : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southampton City Primary Care Trust : Shellwood ( talk ) 17:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Information fuzzy networks : Unsourced, but has two external links that may have been intended as references.  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 14:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notifications left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Artificial Intelligence , Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics . -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 14:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The title is wrong.  It should be "info-fuzzy networks"; the longer name is something people say because they read about it on Wikipedia [37] .  Either way, there doesn't seem to be much secondary literature, i.e., things not at least co-authored by the originators, Oded Maimon and Mark Last.  Most of the existing text is opaque not-prose.  The second external link, "A Comparative Study Of Artificial Neural Networks And Info Fuzzy Networks On Their Use In Software Testing", is a dead link that turns out to be a master's thesis [38] (generally not a great kind of source) supervised at least in part by Last (so, not independent).  XOR'easter ( talk ) 20:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  The page title can be changed if it's decided to Keep this article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Research goes back at least to 2001 - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-4911-3_9 .  Seems like a borderline case.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 17:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this basically seems to fail meeting the essay WP:NSOFT after further consideration.  All of the sources appear to be WP:PRIMARY with no further referencing to support notability, so the article may be promotional to highlight the authors' work.  If anyone finds additional sources, please send a ping.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 17:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baanty : Another article written in a way that, if not carefully looked at, will look like it clearly passes any notability guideline, whereas it critically doesn't pass any.  Just like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor Geezy , looking at the sources, they are either PRs/advertorials for music releases or lacking in WP:SIGCOV , they are also mostly unreliable pieces (without a proper byline).  The source cited for the claim that they won an award Nigerian Books of Record in 2021, here utterly fails verification because there was no mention of Baanty, Ikpon Kelvin or even "Creative Director" which they won.  It is also pretty dubious since the article says they've been active since 2022, so how come winning an award from the prestigious NBR?  The other award and nominations isn't/aren't significant enough to make the subject presumptively notable under any criteria.  Overall, fails WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 00:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article fails WP:NCREATIVE and WP:NMUSICIAN .  The sources cited in the article are PR pieces.  It lacks independent coverage and fails to establish notability.  Further, the timeline and awards are inconsistent, further undermining the article's credibility and notability. -- AstridMitch ( talk ) 01:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Businesspeople ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 00:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not enough WP:SIGCOV , most of it promotional.  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The subject fails to meet WP:GNG , WP:NCREATIVE or even WP:NMUSICIAN .  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cary Woodworth : Amigao ( talk ) 03:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only sporadic minor acting credits, does not meet WP:NACTOR criteria.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 20:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There's nothing in the article or found in a Google search a claim of notability.  Alansohn ( talk ) 01:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  SPA-created.  SPA made a grand total of around a dozen edits over the course of a single day in 2007 creating this article and linking it to a number of other articles, then never heard from again.  Very likely a vanity autobio.  2600:1700:8650:2C60:75C5:BDFD:1D63:1505 ( talk ) 19:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asian Science Camp 2015 : Likely Confirmed COI editing, shouldn't have been moved into main space past AfC, but has been previously draftified twice already so won't send it back again.  Declined multiple times at AfC, but author insists on publishing, so here we are.  Fails WP:GNG and whatever other notability standards one cares to measure it against.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Science , Asia ,  and Thailand . DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete aside from the fact that this article would probably have to be completely rewritten to comply with all of the other wikipolicies, I am able to find marginally passable indications of notability for the Asian Science Camp as a whole, but not for 2015 in particular. I don't think all years pass GNG.  Good day— RetroCosmos talk 10:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Block COI author and speedy delete under G5/G11 . This is disruptive editing. Author is a COI SPA intent on publishing their pet page by hook or by crook. If getting rejected at AfC only emboldened them to go around the process, we have no use for their contributions. SALT the page if they come back with a sock. Owen× ☎ 16:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete along with Asian Science Camp 2022 , Asian Science Camp 2016 , Sixth Asian Science Camp . The individual annual events are obviously not notable. Reywas92 Talk 16:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 21:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Tom : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barbara Majeski : Fails WP:GNG .  US-Verified ( talk ) 00:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - so many low-quality references -- do 10 ten-percent refs add up to one good 100% ref??  I spent a lot of time looking at them and looking for more.  I am familiar with the local Princeton, NJ publications.  They are reliable but so very locally-focused that I hesitate to consider them.  This person is working hard to become famous for being famous and has almost made it.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Television , Internet ,  and New Jersey .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 05:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No independent & reliable sources in article (all coverage is paid or interviews or both), no luck on google.  Beyond notes in nom, note that SFGate link is also labeled sponsored and attributed to "Ascend Media".   — siro χ o 07:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
North West Counties : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Can't find any sources nor establish how it fits into the British rugby league system - Delete .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saimir Kasemi : The subject made two appearances in the German fifth tier in 2007 but it appears they have made no professional appearances at all.  A web search finds a few articles about an ice cream parlour they have been running after their retirement.  But there's no WP:SIGCOV relating to their football career.  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albania and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's no evidence of any further professional career, lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Waqar 💬 16:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Function Health : While the search is hard given health functions, a search combined with Hyman's name just brings more publicity and churnalism.  I don't see the WP:SIRS depth of sourcing required for WP:CORP .  A merger to Mark Hyman (doctor) might be possible as the only co-founder with an article, but not sure that would be DUE.  Star Mississippi 00:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations ,  and Companies .  Star Mississippi 00:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SPAM .  Although the article has independent references, it's a stub that reads like a promotional pamphlet, with minimal effort made to establish notability beyond one of its co-founders having a Wikipedia article of his own.  CoolieCoolster ( talk ) 02:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine , Technology ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] vote delete.  feels like a company trying to promote — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:45F0:31E0:A5BA:C143:EE9E:F7BA ( talk ) 06:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per above.  Avoids A7, but is a long way from N, and I do not see how it could possibly get there.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 12:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karadak front : On top of that, none of the sources refer to a "Karadak front", so this article has no purpose being on Wikipedia.  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 10:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and North Macedonia .  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 10:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] it's a front to take control of the Lipkovo-Kumanovo region and in a front there are series of battles I don't know why you think it shouldn't be on Wikipedia Jesssiemen ( talk ) 11:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete excessive information, most of which is already included in multiple different articles, but mainly in 2001 insurgency in Macedonia .  Jingiby ( talk ) 11:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Like every war the 2001 insurgency in Macedonia had fronts (Karadak and Pollog), and this particular one was to take control of the Kumanovo-Lipkovo region.  If this page should get deleted because most of the battles in the front already have pages, why don't we delete fronts like the Western and Eastern fronts from both World Wars?  Because most to all the battles already have pages of their own.  Based.shqiptar.frompirok ( talk ) 15:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nothing wrong with having a front article, but the difference between those fronts and this so-called front is that the former are widely covered by reliable sources.  I have not seen any reliable sources that use the very term "Karadak front".  If it was notable, it'd have something unique, rather than simply repeat information from other articles.  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 19:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is a translation of my Albanian article "Fronti i Karadakut."  It is a compilation of a series of battles that happened in the region, which I created due to the lack of information on the Albanian Wikipedia.  I don't see a reason to have an English version of it, since the majority of the battles already have their own Wikipages.  GermanManFromFrankfurt ( talk ) 01:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As nom pointed out, I haven't seen this term used in RS.  -- Local hero talk 02:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Google does not show any hits for this term outside of Wikipedia.  The total lack of sources means this term should not be an article title.  PhilKnight ( talk ) 18:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NHL Entry Draft broadcasters : Conyo14 ( talk ) 20:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Ice hockey and list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 20:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - AFAIK, we don't even have a list page for NHL broadcasters.  GoodDay ( talk ) 21:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete , I found this [7] which may help but not much else.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 22:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Aside from the cogent arguments cited above, with which I agree, this is absurdly trivial.  Ravenswing 08:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: An article for just this seems a bit much.  If someone wants to move the individual season information to the relevant yearly draft articles I won't stop them.  Deadman137 ( talk ) 15:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This article is to be moved to List of NHL entry draft broadcasters , if not deleted, per outcome of RM discussion at Talk:NHL_entry_draft#Requested_move_14_April_2024 .  – robertsky ( talk ) 11:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Trivial information which fails WP:LISTN .  Flibirigit ( talk ) 12:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete