hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Juniper Foundation: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 02:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Buddhism ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Sourcing wise I can't find much more than is already in the article and nothing that would contribute to its notability.  The only thing even approaching a third-party source would be the Snow Lion Newsletter (here's an archived copy ) which wouldn't necessarily be a reliable source, but since that reference isn't even about (and indeed predates the formation of) the Juniper Foundation, it's a moot point if it's reliable or not because it wouldn't contribute to the notability of the subject in any case.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 10:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  jengod ( talk ) 19:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charlie Barrett (rock climber): Artem.G ( talk ) 15:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not meeting criminal notability, and the pro rock climbing career is rather non-notable.  I don't see the required level of notability to have an article here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I had tagged this page as a WP:BLP1E while patrolling and planned to circle back to it.  This subject has zero notability as a climber (i.e. nothing in mainstream climbing media per WP:NCLIMBER ), and outside of this case, has no notability.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 17:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Is a case of WP:BLP1E , subject lacks previous coverage before the 1E.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jéan Rossouw: Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Couple of bits here , here and here which I think make it worth a weak keep.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on account of the serious dearth of sources denoting notability .  The ones provided above by RugbyFan22 are two routine listings of players, plus one nostalgia-cum-trivia article titled "Where Are They Now".  We cannot construct notability on such thin ground.  Otherwise, Wikipedia would be a collection of random information .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep the sources mentioned by Rugbyfan22 look like non-trivial coverage (there is a prose section of each, it's not just a routine listing).  I am assuming Rugby365 is an acceptable source.  -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 17:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Keep or delete?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  07:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per The Gnome.  This subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV from IRS to meet the GNG.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:SPORTSPERSON was recently revised for this exact situation.  A sports biography must contain at least one independent reliable source which significantly covers the subject.  Nothing approaching that here, applied, presented or found.  BusterD ( talk ) 16:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
When There's No More Room in Hell: Volume I: Found no significant coverage of the subject, nor any useful reviews on music sites.  Does not seem to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and United States of America .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I couldn't find the sources needed to meet the GNG.  Will reconsider if some are found, but the fact that most artists on this compilation album are red links, and not even Allmusic has a review, are pretty bad signs...  Sergecross73 msg me 16:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It doesn't have any sources at all.  Agreed with Sergecross73.  CastJared ( talk ) 17:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  QuietHere ( talk &#124 contributions ) 23:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  When most of the people who are on the album are not notable, I seriously doubt that the album is.  No sources too, which backs this up.  ULPS ( talk ) 12:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Time Apart: A History of Hope: I searched the websites of the other alleged sources for information about the movie that the introduction lists; nothing relevant appeared.  None of the film festivals listed in the article appear to be major, and only one, the Atlantic Film Festival , is apparently notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  Setting aside this award's inability to establish notability, when I checked previous New Brunswick Joy Award recipients, neither this film nor the filmmakers showed up in any year from 2008 onward.  Based on this, I believe that this film clearly fails WP:NFILM .  AnAbandonedMall ( talk ) 14:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Entertainment ,  and Canada .  AnAbandonedMall ( talk ) 14:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  To be fair, the New Brunswick Joy Award is actually a pitch contest for as yet unmade films, so you actually will find this film in that link if you back up to 2004.  But it isn't a notability-conferring award for the purposes of WP:NFILM at all: that requires the awards to get reliable source media coverage to establish that the award is actually seen as a notable one, and is not a status held by awards that require you to source the claim to the awarding organization's own self-published content about itself because media coverage about the awards is nonexistent.  The claim that it "received press coverage" in various media outlets has also proven mostly unverifiable, as absolutely none of that has turned up in any WP:BEFORE searches besides the one piece noted by the nominator above (which is, going by date and publisher, the same piece that's already incompletely cited in the article as its sole footnote, so we haven't bumped up to two) — but one piece isn't enough all by itself, and "notability because media coverage" is not passed by saying that the topic was covered in media, it's passed by using said media coverage as footnoting for content .  There's just nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have more than just one locatable source.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Electrolux Laundry Systems: TooManyFingers ( talk ) 16:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 21:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 4 gnews hits one of which is primary.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quizimaze: Was unable to find anything via a basic before search and newspapers.com has very little outside of advertisements.  Just i yaya 04:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Canada .  Just i yaya 04:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Based on the BGG page I find it unlikely this is notable.  Hobit ( talk ) 17:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , appears to fail GNG.  ― novov (t c) 03:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails WP:GNG – Pharyngeal Implosive7 (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rural Youth Europe: Wikipedia is not a means of promotion, a free web host, a mirror of an orgs own website or a link farm.  Lacks independent reliable sources.  Content is loosely paraphrased from the orgs own PR, added by a SPA.  Even if there is some notability here this is not the page to have, blow it away and let someone independent start over.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 03:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Environment , Europe , Finland ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find any coverage to satisfy GNG/NORG about this ceiling organization in specific, even if (at least some of) the national member organizations themselves have been covered in press.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 09:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Looks like a promotional article.  -- Kammerer55 ( talk ) 16:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
T. Tapunuu: Simione001 ( talk ) 22:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Sources in article and BEFORE (Tapunuu and T Tapunu'u) showed nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Sources in article is database records (1 ref + el). WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 04:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leida Chirino: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Soliai Letutusa: The sources cited don't seem to mention him.  In my searches, I can find the usual database sites which confirm that he exists but do not confer notability.  Oceania Football mentions him as an unused sub in a game and Samoa Observer has an image caption mentioning him, both far from WP:SIGCOV .  Other than that, I found Oceania Football Center which also mentions him just once.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tural Yusifov: Not enough for an encyclopedia. -- Correspondentman ( talk ) 09:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that doesn't meet WP:SNG for journalism related professionals, and WP:ANYBIO —the awards are not notable nor neither are they major awards per the criteria.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  15:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quirel Masse: Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and South America .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not seeing any evidence of GNG in my searches Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rokšped: No SIGCOV whatsoever.  〜 Festucalex • talk 21:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I could find no coverage other than this brief press release .  No obvious redirect targets.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 00:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests: Cited sources in the page do not appear to use this framing.  Searching on Google Scholar for the page title, and also "Rajput resistance" "Muslim conquests" did not turn up anything useful.  Searching Google Books turned up only a handful of results that weren't false positives, and none of them bode well for this topic: Serving Empire, Serving nation pg 185-190 discuss revisionist nationalist histories that attempt to construct a narrative of resistance to Muslim conquests through reinterpretation of folklore and historical events, but does not adopt or endorse this historiographic framing.  Royal Umbrellas of Stone talks about Rajput resistance, but predominantly uses the term to discuss social movements and rebellions against established Mughal rule, not against the initial conquests.  The only source that I can find that uncritically adopts the framing of "Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests" is.. .  The Abortion Explosion: Woman Weapon of Mass Destruction #1 , which appears to be a polemic against abortion and not a reliable source of any kind, let alone Indian history in particular.  This could potentially be a redirect to Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent , but given that Rajput kingdoms also sometimes formed alliances with Muslim polities (see Rajput Mughal marriage alliances ; n.b. this aspect is totally absent from the Rajput resistance article), deletion may also be appropriate.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and India .  signed, Rosguill talk 19:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @Rosguill what is it you think this is a fork of?  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Per Special:Diff/1219105445 , it's a fork of Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent .  Also note that this article was created evading a salt on Rajput resistance , and this has also been deleted several times as Rajput resistance to Muslim invasions .  I suspect that

Discussion outcome: delete
Qais Khedri: No sources found by searching in Persian (قیس خدری) or English.  No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC , the latter clearly stating that Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  〜 Festucalex • talk 21:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 19:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete cannot find any sources as per above.  Karnataka ( talk ) 22:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ye Yint Aung (footballer, born 2000): My ability to search in Burmese is limited, and further impacted by the existence of Yair Yint Aung , whose name in Burmese is spelled the same as this topic.  Still, I attempted to search in Burmese by including search terms for teams that this subject has played on, and didn't find any coverage more significant than brief mentions in lineups or match summaries.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  signed, Rosguill talk 18:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found Myanmar Digital News in addition to the transfer report already in the article but I don't think that it's enough for GNG.  Scratch that, sorry, that article is about Ye Yint Aung .  The 2000 born one doesn't seem to be notable at all.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Lightburst ( talk ) 22:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete