List of railway stations in Muzaffargarh: The Anonymous Earthling ( talk ) 08:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation , Lists , Pakistan ,  and Muzaffargarh .  The Anonymous Earthling ( talk ) 08:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 March 21 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Prob delete - I can't really see a good reason to ! keep, there is already List of railway stations in Pakistan , is the subdivision really justified?  I don't feel particularly strongly about this and could be swayed by a good argument otherwise.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:44, 21 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of railway stations in Pakistan#Punjab .  Some of the stations are present, others missing in that list.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 05:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge [ was "Speedy Keep" ].  There is no cause for having AFD discussion here.  NLIST requirements are met by "railway stations" being a thing, and it being fine for Wikipedia to have a worldwide list of notable ones, and the world-wide list can be split.  Merger to List of railway stations in Pakistan or maintaining split is merely an editing matter for discussion at, probably best, Talk:List of railway stations in Pakistan , with a regular wp:MERGE discussion.  Also this is a list of existing Wikipedia articles, so it simply is fine for them to be listed.  Maybe they should not be separate articles, and I think it would rather be better for this one to include a table with photos and some or all of the info in the currently separate articles.  But merging all of these back to "List of railway stations in Muzaffargarh" is also merely a simple matter of editing / merger proposal.  Stop this nonsense and end this AFD before others have to consider the preferred level of merges vs. splits of content.  --Doncram ( talk , contribs ) 05:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 02:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge this should be a section on List of railway stations in Pakistan .   (or a new page focused on Punjab, Pakistan ).  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 18:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: 3rd and final relist.  Clarification on whether nom's rationale has support would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I changed my ! vote above, as Speedy Keep no longer timely.   Why was this not closed, long ago?    "Speedy Keep" with trout or other chastisement to the deletion nominator would have been best.   Deletion nominations about sections of worldwide lists (accepted by NLIST or whatever criteria) should be immediately stopped, by admin intervention.   Questions of merging or splitting lists are for editors to consider at Talk pages.   There is no way in hell that it makes sense for AFD processes to decide to delete just one geographical area section out of a list-system.   If you hate the list-system as a whole, you can take that on, but probably better as an RFC than a multiple page deletion nomination.   However, per Clarityfiend 's comment, I gather this list overlaps with List of railway stations in Pakistan#Punjab (i.e. there's partial duplication both ways, the two lists seem not to be informed about each other) so it does make sense to merge/recombine the lists.   But it also is fine for any editor to split out that list into smaller geographic areas, especially if they will have developed the list to provide more information, photos, coordinates, etc.   None of this is for AFD to be deciding.  --Doncram ( talk , contribs ) 19:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge