hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Eric T. Olson (philosopher): He does have a few books, though data on them is (to my cursory look) limited.  Happy to be corrected by someone with more expertise in the field, but seemingly apt for deletion.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 15:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Philosophy , England ,  and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , both of his single-authored books have multiple reviews (in good journals), so he meets WP:Author .  -- Jahaza ( talk ) 19:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:Prof#C1 on exceptionally high GS citations for philosophy.  Nominator is advised to carry out WP:Before before making further nominations in this area.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep .  Exceptionally high is right - google scholar lists 1330 for The Human Animal .  fyi for the nom: "full professors" like this one in book-writing fields tend to get kept at AfD, on WP:NPROF grounds or WP:NAUTHOR ones.  Their careers may be "standard" in the normative sense, but that's not the same as "standard" as in typical .  We don't tend to have articles on the latter group, but remember that that group includes teaching profs (rather than research ones), lecturers, adjuncts, etc etc.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes NPROF-C1 / NAUTHOR.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 12:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the above.  I've added a few of the reviews as references in the article (there's more out there for anyone who wants to look).  WJ94 ( talk ) 13:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the above.  Clearly passes WP:NPROF and WP:AUTHOR .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep both per WP:PROF#C1 and WP:AUTHOR .  I added more reviews and another book (too new to have been reviewed).  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 13:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn Thanks for the clarification A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 03:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
AC Express (Indian Railways): Actually the services are part of superfast express and that content has also been removed by editors from express trains of india page, instead these info has to be updated there and this page is made just a waste.  Jagganath01 ( talk ) 05:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC) ( WP:SOCKSTRIKE — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 09:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Jagganath01 ( talk ) 05:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Nomination is by a blocked sockpuppet.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , article is notable, or else we would also need to delete the train tracks.  CactiStaccingCrane ( talk ) 06:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Jay Wesley Neill: I am not sure what the criteria is for murderers, but I don't think this is generally notable.  Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 11:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime ,  and Oklahoma .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - WP:1E is not a stand-alone reason for deleting an article.  The primary purpose of 1E is to ensure that articles about events are centred on the event rather than a single individual involved in the event.  Failing 1E is primarily addressed by renaming and editing the article to be about the event so long as it passes WP:NEVENT , and only deleting where an article about the event already exists and there is nothing to merge/redirect.  In this case, there is no corresponding article about the massacre.  The massacre clearly passes WP:NEVENT due to decades-long in state media and beyond including coverage of the event in 1984 , coverage of the trial in 1985 ,  coverage of the 2002 execution (see the source in the article) and  retrospective coverage in a 2008 academic article and a newspaper story from 2021 .  I'm open to renaming and editing the article to be about the event, or a merge/redirect if a suitable one can be identified.  The article about the town has a section about the massacre, but the detail here would be undue if merged into it so I do not support that.  Basically, the nom seems to have misunderstood what the purpose of 1E is - it isn't, by itself, a reason to delete.  FOARP ( talk ) 15:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Someone who murdered four people would seem to be notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per above comments.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Even beyond 1E there were two people involved in this (even though only one was executed).  Should be retitled "Geronimo Bank murders" or something of the like.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 20:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Destrii: Some exist, but not enough to meet SIGCOV.  Doesn't seem to meet GNG or SIGCOV as of right now.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
The Lazarus Child: I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found a link from the Calgary Herald via Newspapers.com .   Needs more coverage in order to be eligible.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 01:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 01:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I did find a link from Screen International .   I’d be willing to withdraw if anyone can please find a review on this film from a reliable source.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 01:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Review at CineMagazine [50] Donald D23 talk to me 02:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Excellent work, User:Donaldd23 .   I knew you’d rescue this article.   I speedy withdraw this nomination.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 02:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Vasil Terziev: Fails GNG and NBIO.  Two sources in article are promo.  BEFORE showed no WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  No objection to a redirect to Telerik , sources found in BEFORE with mentions arece about this subject.  // Timothy :: talk 22:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : As mentioned, WP:ATDs could be redirects to Telerik or 2023 Sofia mayoral election .  The results of the run-off election will be known in less than a week (i.e. sooner than the end of the AfD runtime) so I'm not sure there's a whole lot to assess until then.  n.b. Sources likely to be in Bulgarian, which is in Cyrillic-script so searching just in Latin-script may not reveal the full results.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 23:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There is a Bulgarian Wikipedia page for the article subject that may have additional relevant sources.  It would be good if someone can conduct a BEFORE search in Bulgarian to see if notability can be established.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Happy to withdraw if someone can find BLP quality sources, but this definitely needs proper sourcing.  Right now all the content in an article for an active candidate is unsourced except for two general refs and fails V and BLP.  I don't see any better sourcing (but there is some) on bg.wikipedia I searched again for Васил Терзиев and Васил Александров Терзиев and again found interviews, but nothing otherwise.  Google Bard has found things for me in the past, it only found interviews.  // Timothy :: talk 01:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I would recommend googling for "Vassil Terziev" (double S), more sources show up this way.  The person is nationally prominent in Bulgaria as one of the leaders of the country's tech sector.  The outcome of the runoff on Sunday could also have a great effect on his notability, so I would not take any action until then.  — Toдor Boжinov — 07:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn : The spelling "Vassil Terziev" found SIGCOV from IS RS, I have withdrawn the nom, but will leave closing to a uninvolved.  // Timothy :: talk 21:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Propose to move to this spelling leaving a redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 21:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Rob McAlpine: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] An archived version of The Scotsman ref in the article looks pretty good actually.  A couple of bits here as well.  I'll be happy to withdraw.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There's this as well, with the other two sources provided enough for a GNG pass.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ikkjutt Jammu: Both organisation have officially different different social accounts and websites.pls delete it.  Nishalover — Preceding undated comment added 10:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Jammu and Kashmir .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy procedural close , sockpuppetry and no valid rationale for deletion, same as last AFD by another sock of this master: see SPI for details.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it Mr. Wikishovel, You+don't know anything about this organization.  You are a stubborn person who doesn't know anything about this organization.  You are prejudiced I am from Jammu Kashmir and know more about this organization than you.  There is much more incorrect information in this article.  It has been given.  Nishalover ( talk ) 09:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- The sources already in the article suffice to meet the GNG.  If nom's claims about the article's inaccuracies are correct then fixing them is a matter of ordinary editing.  Take it to the talk page, not to AfD.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 15:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Problem is, this article is with wrong redirection like Ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal , Ankur Sharma (politician) .  Nishalover ( talk ) 16:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:FIXIT .  Central and Adams ( talk ) 16:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are many organizations in the local language of Jammu that have the same name.  The problem with this article is that this article is about political Party whose name is IkkJutt Jammu . Apart from this is an Ekjut Jammu Party whose name has been changed to Ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal .  These two are different . But this article has redirected Ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal to which is wrong.The article has a website   Added (Ekam4Sanatan) Accordingly this also the name of Ekjut Jammu Party has changed.  Not of IkkJutt Jammu . Delete the article if not So the wrong Redirection should be removed from the article so that the confusion will end.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HinduJat ( talk • contribs ) 06:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Matthias Finger: Boleyn ( talk ) 17:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , France ,  and Switzerland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question to nominator .  There appear to be fairly large citations to books and papers.  Does the nom think these do not contribute to notability?  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 21:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The Google Scholar profile that was linked seems to be worse than useless: it includes some irrelevant publications and none of the significant ones.  I removed it.  Instead, to find the high-citation works, one should search author:matthias-finger — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks: when this new search is done [23] does the nominator think that it has any bearing on notability?  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 00:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep - he is a prominent and prolific researcher whose publications are impactful enough to meet WP:PROF , as I read it.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In case it is not obvious I support Keep on the basis of a pass of WP:Prof#C1 at least.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per excellent points above.  Thanks everyone.  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Boleyn , you need to close this as explained here.  Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal) .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Cut Bolyn some slack!  They are working their butt off processing these articles.  Llajwa ( talk ) 17:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Marit Sandvik: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The nomination should be procedurally closed unless you elaborate on why.  Among others, the subject has won two awards.  We can't have deletion nominations that are this sparse.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK edited.  @ Ultra 348 : Hi, do you want to withdraw your AfD nomination as you removed the AfD notice on the article with the edit summary 'Ok keep' and added a sentence to the article saying that she is notable for winning those awards?  Atlantic306 ( talk ) 00:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] yes Ultra 348 ( talk ) 01:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Lina Ghotmeh: Kudos to @ Hygroscopique : for their stellar efforts.  Geoff | Who, me?  18:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment by Hygroscopique:  Thanks so much ;) Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Relies on primary and self-published sources rather than independent, third party publications .  Reads like a resume and/or listing of projects and prizes.  Primarily promotional in tone .  Geoff | Who, me?  22:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Architecture ,  and France .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks so much ;) [ reply ] Keep this page, I think there is a lot of material to add and the Architect is of good notability Whiteacrobat ( talk ) 21:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Türkiye Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti: The page created under the name " Telsiz ve Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti " should be named "Türkiye Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti."  Therefore, I would like to move it, but since there is a redirect page with this name, I am unable to do so.  Hence, it is necessary to delete this page first.  Arceonix ( talk ) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Probably RfD (redirects for discussion) is more suitable for this rather than AfD.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural close : this is the wrong venue for this particular request (redirects are discussed at RfD , while requests to change article titles are handled at requested moves ), and Telsiz ve Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti is itself still up for deletion (if it is deleted, that would render the entire matter moot — but so far the only !vote is a "disagree" by the nominator here).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Organizations ,  and Turkey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural Close per WCQuidditch .  Wait until the other AFD closes before moving this to RFD if it passes.  CoconutOctopus talk 11:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Karin Ireland: KH-1 ( talk ) 03:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I stand corrected - those book reviews did not show up in my original Google search.  I withdraw this nomination . - KH-1 ( talk ) 01:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I found a few reviews of her book Don't Take Your Snake for a Stroll here , including by Kirkus Reviews and School Library Journal .  Mooonswimmer 14:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:AUTHOR #3 and multiple reviews for multiple works; I have added reviews and additional works to the article, and according to her biography at Encyclopedia.com , additional works and reviews WP:NEXIST , so this article can be further developed.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 19:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Per Beccynr & Moonswimmer's research, seems to meet WP:AUTHOR.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 14:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep