hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Athulya Chandra: Monhiroe ( talk ) 06:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only one notable/lead role ( Gulu Gulu ).  The sources suck.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mac (It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia): Discussed at a previous AFD .  No notability outside of the show itself.  I'm including the following articles in this nomination: Dennis Reynolds ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Deandra Reynolds ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Charlie Kelly (It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia character) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Mbdfar ( talk ) 19:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete all nn outside the fictional universe.  - Altenmann >talk 21:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The vast majority of the article is WP:FANCRUFT .  The language is also unencyclopedic.  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only hesitation is that these articles are rich with information about the show, albeit questionably edited at times.  For deleting nonetheless because indexing by character does not feel encyclopedic.  Rather, imo the per-season articles seem more fit for any notable information about each character, as their tables describe each episode.  - HeDisconnected 23:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Dennis Reynolds and Deandra Reynolds as reasonable search targets.  The other two are less likely to be search targets due to the disambiguators so I would consider redirect or delete for those.  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 01:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mario Villanueva (footballer): No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
B'laster Holdings: The three articles are: B'laster Holdings ( edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs ) , the subject of this AFD; Draft:B'laster Holdings ( edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs ) User:BB38532/sandbox ( edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs ) The first and third are the work of User:BB38532 , who is a single-purpose account , and the second is partly the work of BB38532, and also of another SPA who has declined to answer whether they have a conflict of interest .   The existence of the two articles in draft and user space is only evidence of an apparent campaign to publish an article.   The draft was declined five times and has been rejected twice.  So does B'laster Holdings satisfy corporate notability ?   An article should speak for itself and explain why the company is notable, but the article consists of what the company says about itself, not what third parties have written.   The references are not independent secondary coverage, but include press releases, an interview, and trade publications.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 news5cleveland.com One in a series boosting Ohio businesses No - See organizational independence Yes Yes Yes 2 prnewswire.com A press release about an acquisition No Yes Yes No 3 counterman.com Another press release about an acquisition No Yes Yes No 4 americanmotorcyclist.com A story about being the official rust remover of motorcycle races No - See organizational independence Yes Yes Yes 5 aftermarketnews.com An interview with the COO No Yes Yes No We can conclude that the AFC reviewers who declined and rejected the draft were right, and the article should be deleted, and the draft and the sandbox can be ignored (unless they are resubmitted).  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 22:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ohio .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 22:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete It's not clear how AmericanMotoryclist.com is not independent of this company, trade publications being marked "use with care," but yes, the sourcing is overall weak.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 00:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on account of notability - supporting sources being inadequate in both number and quality.  And that's not an assessment proffered before the necessary work was done .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 12:57, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
United Rail Passenger Alliance: I do get some brief mentions in newspapers [49] [50] [51] [52] but none contribute to notability as far as I can tell.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  They seem to have the experience to do a complete BEFORE, so I believe this fails GNG> // Timothy :: talk 04:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryo Nakano: The only Japanese source that I could find that might be about him was Gekisaka , but this is an interview of a school student so clearly falls foul of WP:YOUNGATH .  In Singaporean media, ignoring all the coverage from Albirex, which is not independent of Nakano, we only have SPL1 , SPL2 and Borneo Bulletin , all of which are just trivial mentions.  Based on this evidence, doesn't look to pass WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Japan ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC , as nom explains.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siaka Haidara: His highest accomplishment seems to be playing at the 2nd tier of Greek football in 2021-22, totaling 3 appearances in a season (0 goals).  The single source is a soccerway.com link, of unknown reliability.  Place Clichy ( talk ) 15:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Place Clichy ( talk ) 15:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  Place Clichy ( talk ) 15:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  Place Clichy ( talk ) 15:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Place Clichy ( talk ) 15:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yattee: This article seems to be for promotion and only has primary sources; the only non-primary reference does not mention the subject.  Indefensible ( talk ) 00:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 07:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find any in-depth coverage in independent sources, even unreliable ones.  No evidence of genuine notability.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 15:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wollo Kombolcha: Source in article is a database record, BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 05:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Ethiopia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already brought to AFD so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG due to lack of detailed football coverage found in English or Amharic.  All I can find is their Facebook page and the GSA source already used.  I do note that there is one Amharic source listed in the previous discussion but it's not enough on its own and the source itself doesn't really give any opportunity to expand the article into anything meaningful.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shreyash Shandiliya: Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , India ,  and Bihar .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is a LOT of coverage from what are normally RS.  They can't all have sponcon or syndiacted press release warnings I've missed.  Mach61 ( talk ) 12:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is clearly labelled "Brand Stories" [11] , this is advertising/sponsored [12] .  Rest is about as colourful, PR type stuff.  Delete for no coverage outside of PR content.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sourced to PR/advertorials. - KH-1 ( talk ) 01:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Georgian campaign against the Eldiguzids: [10] The original creation of the article dates back to 2018 by a blocked user named Georgiano, but it was deleted in 2020 due to various violations of core policies, including instances of copyright infringement, among other issues [11] - [12] Following a hiatus of 3 years, the article now reappears on Wikipedia, under the watchful eye of another batch of WP:NOTHERE accounts and IPs.  Subsequent edits to the article of significance are obvious IP socks linked to the original sockmaster, as well as new sockpuppets (such as user:Caucasian127).  Strangely, the prevalence of sock and meatpuppetry did not suffice as a reason to accept the CSD 5 request.  [13] Similar to its previous iteration, the article is marred by violations of Wikipedia's policies on original research ( WP:OR ), as well as those on verifiability ( WP:VER ) and reliable sourcing ( WP:RS ).  There is also a likelihood of copyright violations.  - LouisAragon ( talk ) 16:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Iran ,  and Georgia (country) .  LouisAragon ( talk ) 16:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment can't this be speedied if it was created by a banned user?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: G5 was declined by Robertsky due to there being "substantial edits by other editors".  Relisting to establish consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 20:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zamindars of Kanihati: Very little sources to support notability claims and some citations in the article make no mention of the family.  As per WP:BIOFAMILY , notability of one person is not sufficient for the entire family.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 18:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and India .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 18:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mosab Al Khateeb: It is lacking in citations for his biography.  An article that appears to be intended as a promotion.  Dl.thinker ( talk ) 07:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music .  Dl.thinker ( talk ) 07:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft delete?  Okoslavia ( talk ) 22:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A WP:SPA biographical article on a musician, much of which is poorly translated into English; for example "After that I release my current status and Jordan and cut off." is an incomprehensible sentence.  In its short history, the article has been draftified twice, rejected at AfC, moved to mainspace, and had a CSD removed by an IP.  If this was to remain, it would need significant copy-editing to bring it to an acceptable standard.  If there is notability, it would seem to rest on the subject's participation in a season of Star Academy (Arabia) talent shows, but short items such as the JordanZad agency pieces do not establish attained notability .  (A WP:REALITYBIO redirect could be an option, with protection to avoid it immediately reverting to an article.)  Note also that the WP:SPA article creator has also created a Draft:مصعب_الخطيب here about the same person.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tong Tong, South Sudan: We should not be creating WP articles based on a single tag/term from Google Maps (which is contrary to WP:INDISCRIMINATE as well IMO).  If this is a real populated place, we might keep a redirect to the legal jurisdiction it is part of.  P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Not a good enough citation, and searching indicates that this is a person/organization name; I get nothing decent indicating a place.  Mangoe ( talk ) 21:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a spot on a Google map is insufficient to satisfy verifiability and I could not find anything else to even verify.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 22:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Failed to find sources.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 01:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is short and vague, saying, "It is an old village filled with greenery and huts and is situated nearby similar villages called Langogu/Gbutugu and Kopalli."  This reads like something out of a guidebook, not an encyclopedia, and nothing is offered to readers about why Tong Tong is a notable place.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete