hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Badal Sesher Pakhi : Sources in article and found in BEFORE do not meet WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 02:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage found other than the announcement of the series.  ABP Bengali provides some coverage, as does Etvbharat , but I'm not sure about Etv’s reliability.  Both of them are just announcements of the series; no other coverage found.  Grabup ( talk ) 05:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - plenty of coverage available.  See for example Hindustan Times .  ABP and ETV are pretty major outlets as well, for what it's worth.  -- Soman ( talk ) 22:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Hindustan Times article only talks about marriage and doesn't provide any information regarding the series at all.  Additionally, when you said "ABP and ETV are pretty major outlets as well," you should know that Republic World is also a major outlet, but it is considered unreliable.  Similarly, there is no consensus that ETV and ABP are reliable sources at WP:ICTFSOURCES , but I personally think that ABP should be considered reliable but I question ETV's reliability.  Grab Up - Talk 11:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Sun_Bangla#Currently_broadcast .  Per nom fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG .  The series is an individual television program and is far less notable as it likely airs in only one local media market and not to a broader regional or national audience.  Sources are poor with not enough coverage.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 02:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carson Garrett : Reason was: "This is not a notable person. He has appeared on one season of a reality TV show that has hundreds of contestants."  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 02:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Engineering ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:GNG A majority of the references are referencing him as a Survivor contestant, which are done for every contestant recently, none of which have their own page, and much of the rest are quite banal.  WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Some more notable contestants of the same reality show do not have pages, and unfortunately he has not yet had enough notability.  Purpley24 ( talk ) 06:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gabardıç : Aintabli ( talk ) 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance , Music ,  and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No proper content in article.  Not notable.  killer bee 09:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lincoln Sport : There doesn't seem to be a "Lincoln Sport" vehicle but rather a possible confusion with the Lincoln L series through any of the following: "Sport Phaeton", a body style which seems to be from both the Lincoln L series and Lincoln K series : 1 , 2 , 3 This article does mention a "two-passenger roadster " model though is not given a name; the model, along with a "four-passenger phaeton " are both referred to as "sport cars" presumably part of the Lincoln L series but are not shown to have an actual model name.  This advertisement for a used "1922 LINCOLN SPORT MODEL" is interesting, though the most likely scenario is that the particular vehicle is just being referred to as a "sport model" rather than actually being named the "Lincoln Sport".  This also seemed to have happened with the Lincoln phaeton model , same with this " Lincoln Sport Sedan ".  I've looked at newspaper sources from around the time and what seems to be the probable case from what I have gathered is that the "Lincoln Sport" is not an actual car model, but rather the case is that certain Lincoln models at the time were just referred to as "sport models", such as their phaetons, sedans, or even roadsters.  Here are some additional newspaper clippings: " Lincoln Sport Sedan ", " Lincoln Sport Touring ", " Lincoln four-passenger sport model ", " Lincoln sport roadster ", " Lincoln sport model ", " Lincoln sport model sedan ", " Lincoln sport model cars " B3251 ( talk ) 01:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  B3251 ( talk ) 01:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all the references use "sport" as an adjective, as indicated by the fact that it is not capitalized in the body of text.  The only one I see that even hints at this being a model name is this advert ; it may be that one of the Judkins bodystyles was indeed called a Sport Sedan, but that also doesn't make it a model name.  None of the links discovered by B3251 could be considered to meet WP:N or WP:RS .  Furthermore, no one has contributed any actual content to this article since it was created in 2006, because there was no such car.  The only change aside from formatting changes was when an IP changed 1930s to 1920s back in 2009.  Mr.choppers | ✎ 12:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - by all appearances a non-existent model based on a misinterpretation of something.  -- Sable232 ( talk ) 01:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeffrey Steinberg : Furthermore, this article appears to be WP:COATRACK for LaRouche movement in that it seems to exist only to showcase the subject's "Selected publications" on a variety of fringe topics in Executive Intelligence Review .  (Related to this, see the LaRouche-related topics in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests .)  Location ( talk ) 19:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors ,  and Businesspeople .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.   Just took a quick look.   Looks like zero GNG type sources and as a result near zero content about him .   Bulk of the content is list of essays.  North8000 ( talk ) 19:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looking for independent reliable sources about Steinberg is frustrating.  There are a lot of other Jeffrey Steinbergs who show up, and those hits that I can be reasonably sure are about this Steinberg are not independent, or merely mention him in passing.  I cleaned up the bad sourcing in the article, which left almost nothing sourced to an independent, reliable source.  - Donald Albury 20:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Like DA above, I am unable to find significant coverage of this person in independent, reliable secondary sources, so they seem to fail notability guidelines.  Their "essays" in Executive Intelligence Review are also not notable; listing them serves only as a weird, promotional effort for the LaRouche movement .  JoJo Anthrax ( talk ) 21:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deogracias Biribé : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless significant coverage of this athlete can be found in independent, reliable sources.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 02:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn't sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 06:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PVS (project) : It is sourced only to what appears to be a press release  The link is dead but an archive is available.   The article itself is very poorly written as it appears to have been edited by editors with insufficient English language capability.   My own searches for sourcing is hampered by having to rely on machine translation of Portuguese, but what I can find are just enrolment announcements.   This project does not meet notability .  Whpq ( talk ) 13:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Brazil .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Material in article largely unsourced.  Source in article and BEFORE are promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 06:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fresco Pictures : The generic name could be hiding some legitimate sources on the internet, which hopefully will be discovered during this discussion if they exist.  ~ T P W 18:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 18:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Channel Magazine : (Note there is also a magazine called CRN (magazine) by The Channel Company.  IgelRM ( talk ) 13:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Entertainment ,  and Pennsylvania .  IgelRM ( talk ) 13:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional in addition to having zero independent references to support notability.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hypnos (record label) : Graywalls ( talk ) 04:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Entertainment , Companies ,  and Oregon .  Graywalls ( talk ) 04:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : this article doesn't have enough reliable sources, and fails both WP:N and possibly WP:NPOV .  64andtim (chat) 06:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Could not find any significant coverage.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omar Enrique Mallea : Although this footballer played competitively in Chile and very briefly in Argentina and Switzerland, there is no WP:SIGCOV available in English-, German- or Spanish-language sources that indicates the GNG could be met.  The only coverage available consists of database entries and routine match coverage like this .  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Argentina .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found a few bits of coverage but most of it is just basic blog stuff which we can't use.  I found an AS article that has some stuff about him (he's player #13) but it's barely more than a sentence.  En Una Baldosa has a post about him but I'm not sure that this meets WP:RS standards.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Dhangadhi Premier League records and statistics : Records are about a minor cricket league, not even having T20 status.  None of the stats are included in ESPNcricinfo or any other stats page as a group (of all seasons).  Fails WP:NLIST and falls under WP:NOTSTATS .  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Cricket , Lists ,  and Nepal .  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  AA ( talk ) 18:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:NLIST , and does violate WP:NOTSTATS .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NLIST and WP:NOTSTATS as Joseph2302 states.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leslie Stephens : Htanaungg ( talk ) 03:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Tennessee .  Htanaungg ( talk ) 03:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Long Valley, Lassen County, California : I was able to "verify" the post office against Jim Forte's site, which is technically self-published but which we have never run into cause for doubting; he gives its dates as 1869-1912, for what that's worth.  There's no GNIS entry for it and I haven't seen any sign of it on topos, and I cannot work out where the coordinates came from.  The part about the " Beckwourth Trail " refers to the valley, not a town, so it's irrelevant.  Someone who has a copy of Durham may be able to shed more light on this but the most reasonable guess is that there was a post office set up at the saw mill.  That's not the same as a notable settlement.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There was never a settlement called "Long Valley" it was a valley, and there were settlements in it.  They were not called "Long Valley".  The post office was and it served settlements there.  In the newspaper there are mentions of people from Long Valley, but there is no reason why people cannot say they are from the Valley they live in.  People used an address of Long Valley, because that was there post office.  Here is and example: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-lassen-advocate-just-a-valley/143501762/ There are also numerous examples in these newspapers of post offices not being named for the town or valley the serve.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Noting previous AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton, California .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] comment re previous nomination In spite of the barrage of procedural keeps, all of the articles were eventually deleted except for this one and two others, neither of which has been subjected to an individual AfD.  Mangoe ( talk ) 23:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lahore Front : These include the Battle of Burki , Battle of Asal Uttar , Battle of Phillora and Battle of Chawinda .  If at all there is a need for consolidation of this data, it has been carried out on the more relevant Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 .  None of the sources call it the Battle of Lahore.  >>> Extorc .  talk 18:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  >>> Extorc .  talk 18:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Pakistan , India ,  and Punjab .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  This page is WP:CFORK , separate pieces of content from pages on different battles and treating them as same subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Inquisiq R3 : I'm not sure if it was just renamed (the software was also renamed Inquisiq R4 years ago), or if this is a different program.  This LMS has had a notability tag since 2021, and neither Inquisiq nor Hireroad having pages, I find it strange that a specific piece of software from them has a page.  Searching for Inquisiq returns mostly SEO spam, or this article, which fulfills none of WP:GNG SekoiaTree ( talk ) 00:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Internet ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete