G. B. Singh: Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 16:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Military , Politics , Sikhism , Colorado ,  and Oklahoma .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable.  No sources provide him any biographical coverage.  CharlesWain ( talk ) 04:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG .   Only mentioned in passing over 2 non-notable books.  Orientls ( talk ) 16:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources .  The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria , which says: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable , intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject .  If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.  Sources Fuller, Amy Elisabeth, ed.  (2009).  "Sing, G.B. 1954–" .  Contemporary Authors: A Bio-Bibliographical Guide to Current Writers in Fiction, General Nonfiction, Poetry, Journalism, Drama, Motion Pictures, Television, and Other Fields .  Vol.  270.  Detroit: Gale .  pp. 396–398.  ISBN 978-0-7876-9528-6 .  ISSN 0275-7176 .  Retrieved 2024-06-20 – via Internet Archive .  The book notes: "Born September 5, 1954, in India, G.B. Singh eventually moved to the United States where he attended the University of Oklahoma. Educated as a periodontist, Singh joined the United States Army Medical Department, launching his career in the military. He gradually rose through the ranks, attaining the position of colonel, unusual in that he is one of few Sikh-American's to ever achieve such a high rank within a branch of the United States armed forces. Sikh-Americans who wear turbans must receive special dispensation if they are to be allowed to hold higher military ranks, and none of them are allowed to be part of units that go into combat. Singh wears his turban proudly along with his military uniform, a trait that has caused considerable talk in this post-9/11 world. While performing his duties, Singh has been stationed all across the country, and has also been stationed in Korea twice. Beyond his work for the Army, Singh is also a student of Indian politics, study- ing that nation's political history and religion, particularly Hinduism, and the life and works of Gandhi."  Reed, Bill (2004-08-24).  "Deconstructing Gandhi - Author claims 'Mahatma' guilty of racism, divisiveness" .  The Gazette .  Archived from the original on 2024-06-20 .  Retrieved 2024-06-20 .  The article notes: "Yet, Col. G.B. Singh isn't obeying the rules. His first book, "Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity," portrays Gandhi as one of the most dangerous leaders of the 20th century. ... The book is the culmination of 20 years of research, as Singh evolved from one of Gandhi's admirers to one of his harshest critics. ... Singh has a kindly face framed by a dense beard and turban. He appears gentle and soft-spoken until he delves into the subject of Gandhi. Then his passion flares. Singh was born in India to a family of Hindus and Sikhs. He was educated in the scriptures, and he was trained in the godlike worship of Mahatma Gandhi. ... Singh became a periodontist and emigrated to the United States in 1976. He joined the Army and rose to the rank of colonel, making him one of the highest-ranking officers in the U.S. military to wear a turban."  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow G.B. Singh to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline , which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  Cunard ( talk ) 07:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Pinging the only AfD participant from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.  B. Singh who has edited in the last three years: David Eppstein ( talk · contribs ).  Cunard ( talk ) 07:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhi Under Cross Examination .  Cunard ( talk ) 07:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Cunard.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 09:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Further comments: he not only passes WP:NAUTHOR as the creator of multiple notable works, per Cunard's later sources he appears to independently pass the GNG.  Everyone voting delete is simply going WP:IDONTLIKEIT PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources by Cunard only prove that this is a case of WP:BLP1E ; person known only for writing misleading attack pieces on Gandhi.  ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 13:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The books were published and received coverage over a several year period so that isn't "one event".  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 14:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see any "reviews" that would make him notable and in any case, it does not change the fact that per WP:BLP1E , we need to assess that "how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources", and this subject fails that.  ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 08:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ...that isn't what BLP1E is for?  He has multiple, full length author profiles.  His books have plenty of reviews.  There isn't even an "event" here.  He writes books.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This person wrote books, that have been talked about in media, as has this person.  As shown above, these are RS.  Scandalous or not, notability is established.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E .  Cursory search does not show anything different.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  We shouldn't push to delete material merely because we disagree with it; the question is whether it is notable.  The two related AfDs on two of his books Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhi Under Cross Examination have turned up possibly as many as six in-depth reliable reviews for the first book and three for the second, well over my threshold for WP:AUTHOR .  These are mainstream sources (and point out the fringe and partisan nature of the books) so the requirement of WP:FRINGE for mainstream coverage is met.  He may be a partisan conspiracy theorist and he may be incorrect on all points; per FRINGE, that raises a higher bar, that we use mainstream and not fringe sources to cover him, but I think that bar is met.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There does seem to be an effort from this editor to remove things that are not complimentary of Gandhi, but that does not make a strong case for deletion.  True or not, these "things" have enough coverage to be kept here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Only 2 sources provided above includes a database of many non-notable authors and a 20 years old random coverage from Colorado's The Gazette , a local daily .  None of this establishes WP:GNG , let alone gaining significant coverage from the expert sources of this field.  Orientls ( talk ) 12:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Striking duplicate "delete" comment.  Cunard ( talk ) 10:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable fringe writer.  Agletarang ( talk ) 11:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: G. B. Singh received 820 words of coverage in Gale 's reference work Contemporary Authors . The Wikipedia article for Contemporary Authors cites a Texas State Library book for the statement "The work is a standard in libraries and has been honored by the American Library Association as a distinguished reference title."  G. B. Singh received a 1,760-word profile in The Gazette (Colorado Springs) . The Gazette is a respected regional newspaper that won Pulitzer Prizes in 1990 and 2014 . Colorado Springs is the second-most populous city in the state of Colorado, and the 39th-most-populous city in the United States. The two sources were published five years apart. WP:BLP1E does not apply to an author who has received this level of coverage. WP:BLP1E does not apply because neither "Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" nor "The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual" apply. G. B. Singh clearly passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria . Cunard ( talk ) 10:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : More than enough coverage in the sources listed above; regardless of the validity of the theories, this person has been talked about in RS, enough for notability here. Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The prior AfD was also a keep, for passing AUTHOR. Notability is not temporary, there was a valid discussion 13 yrs ago and it was notable then and still is today. Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It makes no sense to cite past AfD in order to evade the existing concerns, otherwise there would be no option to renominate the article for deletion. ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 14:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ ArvindPalaskar It makes complete sense to mention the past AfD *unless there are new circumstances*, such as standards changing over time. In some topics we have increased our notability standards (i.e., sportspeople). The rationale used to keep the article back then, he is the writer of several notable books, is still valid now. The nomination is literally just incorrect, he passes both WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG . PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 14:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per analysis of the sources done above. No evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG . Capitals00 ( talk ) 12:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Capitals00 How do two independent biographical summaries which approach or exceed 1,000 words each not contribute to the GNG? PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 02:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus