hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of sovereign states in 221: I think it's fairly obvious that this fails all notability criteria, and would be of no use as a redirect even to List of political entities in the 3rd century .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 20:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Lists .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 20:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Might give it a pass if it had some sort of sourcing.  I really don't see the need.  These lists seem to be chronological by year since...  I'm not sure really.  The years 221 and 223 anyway, based on the box at the bottom.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's redundant as per comment above, and the article doesn't make it clear what its inclusion criteria are.  E.g. it lists "Saxons" as a sovereign state.  What's that supposed to mean?  Was there a single sovereign ruling over all Saxon people?  Cortador ( talk ) 21:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A clear NLIST fail.  No sourcing, lots of OR, significant omissions and what exactly is special about 221?  How are states defined?  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 12:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Better to have category about the subject.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 15:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   per nom -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 11:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LIST .  This is random.  Why no 311?  Why not West Saxons and Northeastern Saxons?  Bearian ( talk ) 17:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
O-Sensei (comics): Plot summary, a short list of appearances in other media, no reception/analysis.  The best ATD I can suggest is the usual redirect to the List of DC comics characters .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 13:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 13:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find anything that approached significant coverage .  Meanwhile, the character is not mentioned in the list, so a redirect would not make sense to anyone who does not know about this obscure character.  ― Susmuffin Talk 23:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Minor character that does not pass the WP:GNG .  I am not finding anything in searches that are not either non-reliable sources, such as fanpages, or the most trivial of mentions.  As stated by Susmuffin, the character does not even appear in the overstuffed DC Character lists, so Redirecting is out of the question, and as the character is just so incredibly non-notable and there is not a single piece of genuinely sourced information here, merging would not be appropriate.  And of course, since O-Sensei redirects to the notable individual Morihei Ueshiba , this specific search term would not be a particularly useful redirect anyway, given that it is a very specific, very unlikely search term.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 17:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree that this character fails GNG and is so minor a redirect is not appropriate.  Rhino131 ( talk ) 13:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of DC Comics characters: O in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  To the closer of this AFD discussion if the outcome is delete, can you see to it that some of his history goes to the page that I just mentioned?  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 23:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A.J. Applegate: AVN and XBIZ coverage is not sufficient.  Morbidthoughts ( talk ) 20:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women .  Morbidthoughts ( talk ) 20:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 09:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Maxim is about the most RS I could find [2] , not really useful.  She's mentioned here [3] and here [4] .  Last isn't a RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I found a piece on her in the The Jerusalem Post (a good RS), and the International Business Times , (not a great RS).    Very hard to search for adult film stars given the wall of x-rated links they throw up.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2032 European Women's Handball Championship: Event is 8 years away.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 16:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:TOOSOON GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 17:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete way WP:TOOSOON .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  There was an indiscriminate creation of articles about upcoming sports events.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Боки ☎ ✎ 17:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Iran Aseman Airlines destinations: Per the subsequent AN discussion these should be nominated for deletion in orderly fashion.  Briefly, this is a failure of WP:NOT , particularly WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  The WP:NOT issue by itself is sufficient to warrant deletion, but if further reasons are needed it is a clear failure of WP:CORP since the only sources provided are the company's own website and a 404 link to a blog.  I am not WP:BUNDLING these nominations as I think it highly likely that unbundling would be requested.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Iran .  FOARP ( talk ) 13:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator and per WP:IINFO .  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 02:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Hopefully someone will vote here, but if they don't, I guess I should say that I don't agree that this article should be ineligible for soft-deletion.  This is because: The article was only nominated for deletion once, in 2015, as part of a mass-nomination of 400 articles.  The merits of this particular article were not discussed in that AFD.  The 2015 AFD was eight years ago.  There is a policy consensus at VPP in 2018 against this article.  This should at least count as an additional vote against it if one is missing.  There have been a series of AFDs closed recently (see here for a list) in which articles basically the same as this one have been deleted, and the consensus of the 2018 VPP discussion has been re-affirmed in those discussions.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per clearly violating the 2018 consensus and existing precedent and policy.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 16:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Freedom and Justice Party (Bolivia): No evidence of notability per WP:NORG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Bolivia .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support and we shouldn't stop here.  There are several articles about political parties that should be deleted for the same reason.  Charles Essie ( talk ) 20:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We really have no need of more research-free nominations and deletion rationales.   Instead, we need people to do the research before coming to AFD.   That's what the unsourced article drive is about : looking for sources.   You show no evidence of looking for sources in this rationale.   That hasn't helped the encyclopaedia one iota.  Uncle G ( talk ) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Uncle G : Disappointing you characterise my nomination in this way when as you say below no sources exist.  Having crappy one paragraph articles about micro-parties that haven't been updated in 22 years is not my definition of helping the encyclopedia.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 11:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Charles Essie : Agreed, I'm working on weeding out some of these awful articles about clearly non-notable political parties (most of which haven't been updated in at least twenty years).  Unfortunately many were created with zero sources by editors who believe all political parties are inherently notable.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 11:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I looked in the same handbook where I found Social Liberal and Democratic Party ( AfD discussion ) documented in depth.   It doesn't have this party, by either English or Spanish names.   Looking for anything else, after eliminating the Egyptian party of the same name (in Spanish as well), turns up pretty much nothing.  ISBN 9781107145948 gives this a total of two words : "unsuccessful (flop)".  Uncle G ( talk ) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 3% of the vote and zero candidates two decades ago, isn't notable.  The sources used are trivial coverage.  I don't find anything further we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Farid Ahmadi: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 23:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dimitris Pappas: signed, Rosguill talk 23:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Greece .  signed, Rosguill talk 23:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NBIO - the references are not nearly significant enough to justify notability.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 01:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable footballer and per arguments above.  -- VertyBerty ( talk ) 08:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manicaland Development Association: RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 21:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Africa ,  and Zimbabwe .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 21:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: while Manicaland is notable, this is not and has no information about it.  There would need to be some sort of important secondary coverage of impact or consequences.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 04:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vilma Abrahamsson: Joeykai ( talk ) 11:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 16:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet GNG or SPORTCRIT.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 01:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Any coverage I find looking in the local paper is just match reports or very short statements on her injuries.  Fails WP:NBIO and WP:SPORTCRIT .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 08:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing GNG, SPORTCRIT, NBIO, etc.  Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samantha Nassolo: A search for sources yielded just 1 hit in google news.  Being the founder of "Miss Lira Beauty Pageant" is not really a claim for notability.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and Uganda .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , random run of the mill nightclub owner who happened to do some work for some small scale beauty pageant.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Willy Suarez Maceo: Also, he has only been charged, not convicted of a crime, so there's a chance that he's innocent.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 19:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , Cuba ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If there's more in depth coverage after/if he's found guilty, then that's another story, but as of now this is in violation of BLPCRIME.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kristian Freed: All I found was this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league , Australia ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Undecided : A player who has played in two world cups is plenty notable so there should be more out their, but if nothing is found then there isn't enough references here to pass.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 12:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The media mentions Kristian Freed 99% of the time in listing the team's roster, I've only encountered him being praised for his play a couple times, which isn't enough for notability either.  Also, the USA Rugby National Team is considered a weak team and has never won anything of significance-- Saul McGill ( talk ) 15:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lack of Notability: The subject does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and lacks significant coverage from independent reliable sources.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 22:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andh Bhakt: Article was then re-created, but still isn't notable.  Pepper Beast (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Politics ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Was deleted literally last month.  Still doesn't show any notability for inclusion.  Would be better suited for a Wiktionary entry.  Procyon117 ( talk ) 09:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It was deleted before yet I don't see any change in the article.  Xoocit ( talk ) 09:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete