hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2022 Deir ez-Zor attack : Ecrusized ( talk ) 13:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kitulu Day Secondary School : Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Kenya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lakeview Christian High School : There have been two years for people to find sources and so far, none have been found.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 23:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 23:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Christianity ,  and Indiana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment, leaning D .  There are a couple hundred articles on newspapers.com, available to you at the wikipedia library.  Most of it is passing mentions in obituaries, wedding announcements and such, that do not establish notability .  I suggest searching on alternative names, including but not limited to Lakeview Christian Academy, as the school was known when it opened.  There are some stories about a woman who was on the run from the FBI in the 90s who enrolled her child at Lakeview for 3 1/2 years before getting caught.  Interesting, but does it establish notability?  Probably not.  Jacona ( talk ) 14:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per SCHOOLOUTCOME.  Fails SIGCOV.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 18:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — was unable to find SIGCOV or SECONDARY sources enough to satisfy GNG scrutiny.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 20:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Delete fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  4meter4 ( talk ) 22:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shifting nth root algorithm : Appears to be original research.  Better (but still not great) coverage of computation of roots is at our main article nth root .  My prod saying all this was removed as the only edit by a new editor without improvement, and with the only rationale being WP:ITSUSEFUL .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 19:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 19:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yep, looks like OR .  And explained rather opaquely, at that.  (Opaqueness isn't itself a reason for deletion, of course, but in this case, I think it does point to a lack of interest in improving the page.)  Wikipedia is not a repository of stuff somebody noticed about basic arithmetic one day.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It's a bit unclear, but it looks like it may be a different derivation of the algorithm described in Methods_of_computing_square_roots#Digit-by-digit_calculation .  That's a well-known algorithm - e.g. it's described in Hacker's Delight and First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC , and I've seen it suggested that it originated as an abacus technique.  Adam Sampson ( talk ) 23:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Nth root computation algorithms are certainly an area of study ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ).  My question is more or less whether this shifting algorithm is part of that area of study that's been covered, and frankly my insufficient mathematical competence is hampering me in completing a source search.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Listings in a Stack Exchange post and Wikiversity are what I'm able to pull up for sourcing...  I'm not sure this is properly sourced, but it's too long to be made up.  I don't see how we can keep this without some specialist mathematical sourcing, which I can't find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Yes, original research and not well explained.  Athel cb ( talk ) 10:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tommy Graham (singer) : Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT .  There are charting claims here (which a cursory check of the RPM database did verify), so he would be eligible to keep a properly written and properly sourced article, but just having a couple of modest chart hits on genre charts (but never the main national Top 40 chart) is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any sources at all, and the article as written has a significant advertorial skew that can't stand under WP:NPOV requirements.  No prejudice against recreation if somebody can write and source something significantly better than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and recreate if sourcing could be found.  Agree with above, this is written in such a promotional tone that it needs WP:TNTing .  Surprised I could not find copyvio in there, searched for a few choice lines.  Hits a 0% on Earwig.  With proper sourcing and improvement, subject may pass GNG, but as of now is just a completely unsourced promotional BLP. -- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏ (ring-ring) 16:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdullah Baiat : Potentially fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC due to lack of significant coverage.  Kooora , a stats site, and 2lkhbr , a trivial mention, were the best that I could find when searching in Arabic (عبد الله بيات).  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG, BIO. Nothing in article or BEFORE shows any notabilty. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 08:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ,Not notable.  Alex-h ( talk ) 10:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, no notability.  Callmemirela 🍁 talk 19:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Yeong-uk : The articles didn't meet WP:GNG , WP:SPORTSBIO and WP:SPORTSCRIT for the time.  May be notable in the future!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  20:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Korea ,  and South Korea .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  20:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rachid Ghanimi : This might be a WP:TOOSOON situation.  In any case, it clearly fails WP:GNG .  It was also draftified previously due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV , but the original creator moved the article to mainspace without changing anything.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Morocco .  Kpg jhp jm 04:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Looking for sources only brings up stat pages like Transfermarkt and fbref .  Kpg jhp jm 04:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – WP:TOOSOON .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barrow & District League : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable local amateur league.  Fails WP:GNG .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 12:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Can't find any sources nor establish how it fits into the British rugby league system - Delete .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Optimus Clix : No sources found on Google, or WP-refs.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 22:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Companies ,  and Portugal .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 22:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the very reasonable nomination, although I would not oppose  a redirect to Optimus_Comunicações as a search term.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JavaScript InfoVis Toolkit : ojdo ( talk ) 09:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe I am the major contributor to this page.  I agree this is abandonware and the page should be deleted.  2620:10D:C091:500:0:0:4:4ABF ( talk ) 13:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 18:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cinebulle : toweli ( talk ) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Aviation .  toweli ( talk ) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete me neither.  no sigcov.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 14:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mosaad Megahed : 2) There are concerns about paid edits.  3) I've gone through WP:PROF and I don't think the subject is notable.  Dr. Vogel ( talk ) 11:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Medicine , Egypt ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment appears to be a working dermatologist, I can't comment on the citation or impact factors.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete under G5 .  CastJared ( talk ) 15:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources insufficient, mostly papers written by the person.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 07:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 14:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2006 Zushi mayoral election : The winner of the election isn't even notable enough for a page, why then is the election?  The city itself is a suburb of Yokohama and has a population of about 58,087, this would be fine, but the article gives me no reason to believe the elections of Zushi are actually notable.  The article does not appear to be included on the Japanese Language Wikipedia either.  Delete.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 19:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 15 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there is nothing in the sources that suggests this particular mayoral election is notable.  As nominator points out, there is no standalone article about this election in Japanese Wikipedia.  There is, however, a biographical article on the winning candidate, Ryuichi Hirai , which strongly suggests there wasn't anything particularly notable about the 2006 mayoral election (when he was re-elected for his third term), either.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 01:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rich Julius : Subject doesn't appear to be notable.  WP:NOTCV Pepper Beast (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California .  Pepper Beast (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ireland , Michigan , New Jersey ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The sources in the article are all associated with the subject.  Many do not even mention the subject - and appear to be added to support other loosely related text and bolster "notability by association" claims.  A search in other sources (like Irish Independent and Irish Times ) returns nothing at all.  The WP:COI and WP:PROMO overtones are also difficult to ignore.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Guliolopez.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  12:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Guliolopez - Spleodrach ( talk ) 17:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suburban Hostage : - Rich T | C | E-Mail 01:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Vanity page created and maintained by multiple SPA editors and IP addresses.  A small time group, self-record and release own work.  Gained no significant third party coverage.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 10:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raphaël Bohren : Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Switzerland .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NSKATE #2 requires gold in national championship.  My deprod was in error.  Apologies.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Futurama crew : We're not IMDB; we don't simply retain contextless credits lists of everyone who's ever worked on a longrunning TV series.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 22:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television ,  and Lists .  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 22:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The names of the writers and directors can be where the episodes are listed.  D r e a m Focus 01:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sweet media of Wikipedia, the names of the writers and directors are in the List of Futurama episodes , producers and creators in the main article, so this list is pointless and redundant ... and redundant.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 06:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Definitely fails NLIST as nom has said.  Spinixster (chat!) 08:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and others.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 22:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Both is redundant with all of infromation being listed on either the main article or episode list and with only one source fail WP:NLIST .  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom – zmbro ( talk ) ( cont ) 21:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This information is presented in Futurama , but better.  While this article could be useful as a navigational aid, at this point it appears it's better suited to keep it in the article about the show.  Jacona ( talk ) 20:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete