hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Emerging and growth-leading economies: It's time revisit the status of this article and my view it's time to delete the article.  The reason for the deletion is this: This is a flashy term coined by a company which has occasionally been regurgitated by low-quality sources.  The article was literally created by a COI account working for the company.  There is no sustained significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  The purpose of the encyclopedia is not to advertise slogans and labels that companies bandy about to advertise their services.  The term overlaps with terms such as Emerging market , Newly industrialized country , developing country , Less developed country and half a dozen similar concepts.  The existence of countless non-notable versions of the same concept leads to articles of worse quality and wastes the time of editors.  Since the 2018 AfD discussion, no changes have been made to this article to make the article of any interest to readers or in compliance with content policies (the article is solely sourced to the company's own documents).  If there is anything worth keeping in this article (there isn't), then the content should be merged with any of the aforementioned articles.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 02:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 08:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Business , Economics ,  and Lists .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Haven't checked earlier discussion but it makes sense to delete now.  NavjotSR ( talk ) 15:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Theresa Bubbear: Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 10:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Estonia , Finland ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - Finnish sourcing appears very limited.  There are a some interviews relating to NATO from the likes of Helsingin Sanomat [13] and Iltalehti [14] , but as interviews I'd heavily discount their contribution towards notability.  Especially when the interviews are not really about them as a person, but rather about their (or the UK goverment's?) views about a then-future Finnish NATO membership.  The rest of the coverage looks like the standard "the UK ambassador warned Brits that it gets slippery in Lapland" (no, that's a real headline [15] ) nothingburgers.  That said, I'd probably be pushed to a (weak) keep by even one very good article about them as a person/individual.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 09:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete google news search yielded a few routine news mentions and the interviews that Ljleppan mentions above.  But not enough to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Egypt, Baku : There's just no coverage.  There are some mentions of the embassy in Azerbaijani state media (like Azertag, Azernews), which are not independent from the subject, given that they are publicly-owned and tightly controlled by the regime (RSF and Freedom House give some of the lowest marks for media freedom to Azerbaijan).  Pilaz ( talk ) 19:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Egypt ,  and Azerbaijan .  Pilaz ( talk ) 19:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  The last paragraph isn't even about the embassy.  LibStar ( talk ) 19:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sara Caldiero : The article literally just says that she exists without even trying to show any evidence that she has any meaningful notability claims (e.g. noteworthy literary awards, etc.), and its sole "source" is an online bookstore, which is not support for notability at all.  I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with much better access to deep American resources (literary journals, etc.) than I've got can find stronger WP:GNG -worthy coverage about than I've been able to locate on the google, but "the availability of her books in an online bookstore proves that she exists" is not enough for a Wikipedia article in and of itself.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry ,  and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  No coverage at all for this person.  No critical reviews of any kind in Jstor, or Gscholar.  No mentions in newspapers, this is about all there is [8] , confirming she read a poem at an event.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - it appears she is also known as Sara Caldiero-Oertli, but on the Wikipedia Library and particularly ProQuest, I have found various announcements in mostly Utah press about poetry readings, a brief mention of a scheduled reading in Poets & Writers ( ProQuest 203609212 ), and a brief quote in an quote-based piece about a small workshop ( ProQuest 1513784208 ), so it appears there is insufficient support for notability according to the WP:BASIC or WP:CREATIVE guidelines at this time.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 17:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Measuring programming language popularity : AtlasDuane ( talk ) 19:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  AtlasDuane ( talk ) 19:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete - reeks of original research .  -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:NOTESSAY .  This is the very definition of WP:OR .  The thesis is here: ... that sum up to say Python is the top programming language of 2021.  The rest is original research.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article is a WP:OR disaster.  Take 'em down chief.  IncompA 19:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Sirfurboy casualdejekyll 23:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:OR .  0x Deadbeef →∞ ( talk to me ) 00:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment As evidenced by all the primary sources in the article, measuring programming language popularity is an active field of endeavor and possibly a notable topic.  What we would need would be secondary reliable sources comparing and contrasting the kinds of metrics developed and how they are measured.  There are secondary sources like [13] and [14] that take this approach, but I don't believe they are reliable.  Hence I agree with deletion for now, but am happy to reconsider should secondary RS be found.  -- {{u| Mark viking }} { Talk } 17:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:OR, but in principle, it could be promising once the research catches up.  Mason ( talk ) 13:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mojo Pizza : Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and India .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 01:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I couldn't find anything other than PR sites.  Pilaz ( talk ) 23:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:49, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete , no SIRS sources available in English, barely any non-trivial independent/secondary coverage at all, no CORPDEPTH.  Best I found was a short mention in a hospitality trade journal [2] .  Unsure if there are non-English sources.  — siro χ o 01:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gotham, Inc. : Found only one independent source with in-depth coverage: https://archives.lib.duke.edu/catalog/gothaminc .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 03:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies ,  and United States of America .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 03:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of notability.  There's literally no content in the article, just a list.  Sources are all press releases.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 07:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete really, no reliable secondary sources available.  -- Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 10:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mangrove Institute of Science and Technology : Most of the references are from the institute’s website.  The other link https://theorg.com/org/mangrove-institute-of-science-and-technology is from an internet directory.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 05:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Science , Technology ,  and Bangladesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Pretty underwhelming in terms of WP:NSCHOOL to the point I don't think there's much else to even say here.  KoA ( talk ) 14:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jack Rankin (British politician) : Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Coverage is routine for any election candidate.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Conservatism ,  and England .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL or WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 15:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — they must either win the election and thereby hold the seat, or already have some other claim of preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten them a Wikipedia article anyway.  But the former hasn't happened, and the latter hasn't been shown here at all.  No prejudice against recreation after election day if he wins, but nothing here is already grounds for a Wikipedia article now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .   Draftification  might be an ATD to consider here since this is a pretty safe seat for Rankin's party and this would be a good start to an article if and when he is elected to this seat.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think draftspace should be a repository for campaign literature nor a repository for articles on individuals potentially notable one day.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tamás Giák : There is a BOON article about him, but it's mostly just a long quote from him and the writer does not address Giák in depth.  Nemzeti Sport has some coverage but it's just very brief transfer announcements like Egri transfer and leaving for Austria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Hungary .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dejan Denkovski : Only one of the included references is still accessible, and it is not actual coverage, his name is merely listed on a list of casualties.  Given that the other references are given the same description here, I would imagine those sources would have been similar.  Searches for both "Dejan Denkovski" and "Дејан Денковски" did not appear to bring up any significant coverage on this particular individual, but I am bringing it to AFD rather than WP:PRODing it, in case others are able to find non-English language sources.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and North Macedonia .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 04:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  The article Oliver Petrushevski should likely also be deleted under the same rationale.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 21:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Timber City Academy : A search for sources only turned up primary sources or unreliable sources such as databases etc. or partial matches.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no in-depth sources in GNews Archives and GBooks for Timber City Academy and its former name Butuan Chinese School.  Alternatively , redirect to Butuan#Education as it is briefly mentioned there -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  HueMan1 ( talk ) 00:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zarulizwan Mazlan : He is mentioned in passing on his FA's website about a youth fixture, NST , which mentions him in passing in a match report, and Bharian , another passing mention in a report about youth football.  His entire career lasted only 170 mins and consisted only of games for Terengganu's reserve team .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Malaysia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:SIGCOV , as nom explains.  A career wholly lacking notability.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joelyn Aimi : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lineage of Ether : Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 21:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I could not find any reliable sources about this subject matter.  I don't know why this article even exists.  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 18:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As the nominee indicates, this subject has no secondary sources outside of apologists.  Unlike the Genealogy of Jesus , there is little information outside of the Book of Mormon in regards to these individuals.  Any possibly noteworthy information can be merged to other articles.  Rollidan ( talk ) 19:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  TechBear | Talk | Contributions 20:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOR .  Killarnee ( talk ) 00:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't find anything suggesting notability   -- Devoke water 12:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and other comments.  (Let's do Lineage of Alma the Younger next, please.)  Trevdna ( talk ) 18:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete