hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Golam Rabby: Also, it doesn't have WP:SIGCOV that could pass WP:GNG .  — MdsShakil ( talk ) 12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Journalism ,  and Bangladesh .  — MdsShakil ( talk ) 12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  Doesn't pass GNG as it lacks significant coverage.  PhilKnight ( talk ) 16:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There seems to be No Reliable Sources.  Untamed1910 ( talk ) 14:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Doesn't pass WP:GNG .  -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 20:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Devokewater | (tαlk) 20:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natural Insight: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing that could help to save the page, poor media highlights, etc.  Johnpaul2030 ( talk ) 08:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asmex Digital: Fails WP:CORP .  A search in google news yielded little.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No coverage besides some brief coverage of their acquisition of a part of Invigor Group, the sources of which contribute more to the notability of that company than this one anyways.  ~ A412 talk!  18:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  very weak news coverage.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – per A412, the acquisition is WP:ROUTINE as well.  TLA tlak 04:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katie Brusseau: The attempted notability claim here is that she released her first five-song EP a few months ago, which is not a notability pass per se in the absence of significant WP:GNG -worthy coverage about her music -- but there's no sourcing about her music shown here at all , and instead the footnotes exist entirely in the context of her also having been a lighting designer in local community theatre.  But that doesn't satisfy any Wikipedia inclusion criteria either, and two of those four footnotes are primary sources that aren't support for notability at all , while both of the other two are reviews of the theatre show by high school students in minor community hyperlocals, which both briefly mention Brusseau's name without being about her in any non-trivial sense, meaning that isn't enough coverage to magically vault her over WP:GNG either.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have a much stronger notability claim, and much better referencing for it, than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Virginia .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Likely PROMO.  all I can find is this [7] , she was in a high school play?  I'm not even sure it's the same person.  There is nothing found for this musician.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The sources listed are not independent and also do not support notability, and certainly not notability as a musician.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Taiwo Ogunwumi: Sources are either passing mentions, dependent, or primary.  BEFORE makes no difference.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Environment , Social science ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hidenori Yoshimizu: Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Japan .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Wakelin: It could merge/redirect to his wife, Tia Carrere , but I am not convinced it would be appropriate.  Claims to notability seem to be be married to and working with and on notable people and projects, but notability is not inherited.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Photography , United Kingdom ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gary Nader: While some sources discuss the subject, only one appears to be independent and most are actually about the art gallery he runs (which I believe may actually satisfy notability for an article of its own) and only mention him in passing.  (A possible solution might be to merge to an article about the art gallery if such an article were created.)  Lenny Marks ( talk ) 01:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Lenny Marks ( talk ) 01:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note There is also a strong suspicion of COI as the article was created and edited by a user with the same name as the article subject.  -- Lenny Marks ( talk ) 01:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or Merge to an article about the gallery, which has a decent amount of coverage. This person's article is rather puffy as it stands, and I'm not seeing enough discussion of him outside of the context of the gallery. Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some coverage in ArtNews about him and the gallery, but trivial, only about half a page. First one that comes up is a Forbes contributor piece, so not valid. Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b ; As it stands, there is no article about the gallery as far as I'm aware. At least under the name cited in some of the sources. -- Lenny Marks ( talk ) 20:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm ok with a ! delete if it ends up going there.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Visual arts ,  and Florida .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:47, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , seems to have good GNG coverage as an art collector, plus is an author and publisher.  His fields of collection are highlighted on the page and in his bibliography.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 02:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article does not have sources that show notability.  He seems to be a very rich guy who has his own gallery and then the LAAM Latin American Art Museum.  The first three sources are puff pieces https://www.larryslist.com/artmarket/the-talks/gary-naders-vision-for-the-miami-art-world-latin-american-art/ https://issuu.com/acc38/docs/planet_v_s_-_hs5_-_nader https://www.azureazure.com/personalities/gary-nader-and-the-power-of-art/ Various mentions in the Miami Herald about his auctions or coverage of a break-in at this gallery.  WP:PROMO .  The publications listed are mostly catalogues he published for his gallery.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 20:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wolfgang Baer: Mostly expounds his crackpot theories and lists his fringe publications.  Reference 5 looked at first sight to give him a sliver of notability, but it turns out its a newspaper column written by himself.  Tercer ( talk ) 12:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Tercer ( talk ) 12:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:FRINGE researchers need in-depth mainstream sourcing on their fringe work to satisfy our requirement for a WP:NPOV .  We have none in this case, and no evidence of notability for non-fringe work (which in any case would require refocusing the article on that work).  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 13:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The existing text is unsuitable in just about every way, and there's no reason why this article should exist in the first place.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Oof.  I was skeptical about "unsuitable in just about every way", but no, that's about the right of it.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment His "Conscious Action Theory" book can be found using Gscholar above, it appears to be published be Routledge, a reliable publisher.  That said, there is nothing in Jstor or the NYT about him, Gscholar doesn't pull up much.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep The book was reviewed here [37] and here [38] , which seem to be a serious review of the work and the concepts it proposes and some discussion of the person behind them.  This is not in my field of expertise, but it doesn't read like hokum to my untrained eyes.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Neither of those links counts for anything.  The first is in a fringe and unreliable journal and the second is not a review but rather a researchgate page on the book itself.  In any case, even with better reviews, one book would be unlikely to be enough.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research is hokum, pure and simple.  And even if it weren't, one review of one book isn't going to pass WP:NAUTHOR .  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Execution-style murder: PatGallacher ( talk ) 13:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 13:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or userfy.  See WP:TNT .  This is right now a WP:DICDEF , but could be written as a book.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - It's a common term and it has been referenced many times by various sources - https://www.google.com/search? client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Execution-style+murder#ip=1 .  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 00:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] unsure - think it is possible/likely that this topic is notable (in the sense that paramilitary, gangs and mafia etc might kill people) but I'm not sure I'm seeing a way to write the page which would meet the quality standards of an encyclopedia.  As it is written it seems almost anything could be included.  JMWt ( talk ) 19:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as Bearian points out this is basically a dictionary definition, plus some examples that could be WP:OR .  The most obvious way to expand this would be to create an even longer list of famous execution-style murders, which IMHO would not be a worthy project.  Delete : per Bearian, per WP:DICDEF .  // Timothy :: talk 08:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Obij Aget: Only sources are promo pieces for subject opening an ice cream shop.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets GNG or BIO.  BLP requires high quality sources.  // Timothy :: talk 17:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Basketball ,  and Africa .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't seem to meet WP:NBASKETBALL either.  zoglophie •talk• 18:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peter Berlin (lawyer): Sources are either unreliable, not independent, or provide significant coverage.  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 13:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , United States of America ,  and California .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 13:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication of notability, notwithstanding the "Top 100 Trial Lawyers" and "Super Lawyer" pseudo - awards .  TJRC ( talk ) 18:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete .  The creating editor makes nothing edits here and there, then lo and behold, they create the page in one foul swoop.  Make a few more edits that day and that's that.  Smells of WP:PAID .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaskedSinger ( talk • contribs ) 05:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alvino Kusumabrata: Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL.  Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf ( talk ) 06:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Indonesia .  Owen× ☎ 07:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Authors .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Did my own BEFORE, and came up with nothing proving that this person has significant coverage sufficient to prove notability.  Justarandomamerican ( talk ) Have a good day!  17:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:TOOSOON .  Lacks significant, non-local coverage.  The main source of biographical information is an interview.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 17:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blaine Golden: The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Coverage exists, but I'm not sure there's enough to pass WP:GNG .  Created under the now defunct WP:NRU guidelines.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tom Bowl: Was nominated for deletion back in 2005 and was kept as it had "at least a modicum of mainstream media coverage", however our notability requirements have become much more well-refined since then.  funplussmart ( talk ) 00:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of significant coverage and there’s lots of cruft.  Also, the article needs to be blown up and rewritten to fulfil the holy manual Brachy 08 (Talk) 00:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Michigan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Looks like some kind of advertisement, and lacking reliable sources as well.  Plus, the article is written in third person view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geko72290 ( talk • contribs ) 20:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 00:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No live sources come up in multiple search attempts using different search engines. -- Eastview2018 ( talk ) 16:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete