hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
United States of Europe: I propose to delete this page, redirect the title to European Federation , which covers this concept, and add a hatnote there.  BD2412 T 23:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 23:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The political entity on this dab is not much more than political aedvertising.  No elections, no seats.  For the rest: as by the nominator.  The Banner talk 00:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural note User:BD2412 , since earlier history was merged to what is presently titled European Federation , much of the history is ineligible for deletion per WP:MAD .  The page may still be redirected, and WP:AFD remains a correct venue for such a discussion per WP:ATD-R .  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:10EB:6979:4B48:D793 ( talk ) 12:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The history itself can always be moved under a different title.  BD2412 T 16:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:BD2412 sure, but that seems to be needless extra work since the result is that instead of simply targeting A from B you first move B to some other title C before targeting A with both, what's the point?  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E493:D84:28E3:D006 ( talk ) 17:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see what you're saying.  I have no problem with this being maintained as a redirect to European Federation with the current history intact; it should not exist as a disambiguation page.  BD2412 T 17:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes I agree, and that's fine WP:AFD is explicitly a correct venue to establish consensus for a WP:BLAR , just wanted to make sure we stayed within policy.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E493:D84:28E3:D006 ( talk ) 17:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to make the above clear following the relist since I never explicitly bolded anything, I support redirecting to European Federation as the primary topic at present with any necessary disambiguation being accomplished with hatnoting.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B ( talk ) 15:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose deletion, unless "European Federation" (rather an awkward name, especially the capitalised "F") is moved to "United State of Europe".  -- Checco ( talk ) 14:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That is not the standard required by WP:PRIMARY TOPIC .  BD2412 T 20:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to European Federation as per nom.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 20:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Montgomery Bowl: Can be sufficiently covered in that article and doesn't need its own page Esolo5002 ( talk ) 23:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Good-faith proposal, but the Montgomery Bowl was not a name change of the Fenway Bowl, and does not belong in that article.  It was created by organizers as a one-off bowl to fill a gap in the schedule of 2020–21 NCAA football bowl games —the description, as appears in the article, was a " substitute of the Fenway Bowl for this season only" (emphasis added by me).  This article is not an outlier, as there are other examples of articles about bowl games that were only played once (e.g. Charity Bowl ), and articles about bowl games that never got past the proposal phase (e.g. Haka Bowl ).  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 23:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2020 Montgomery Bowl One season aberration game and unlikely to have future editions (not that Montgomery will never host a bowl again but it won't just be named after the city).  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , American football ,  and Alabama .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A single article seems reasonable, although my initial thought would be to merge the other way (place game detail currently found in 2020 Montgomery Bowl into Montgomery Bowl ).  Montgomery does have an active bowl, Camellia Bowl (2014–present) , which is no small part of how the city ended up with the one-off bowl in question.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 00:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2020 Montgomery Bowl : we don't need two articles on a one-off bowl game, but the article on that one specific installment is a much better and less surprising redirect target than the game it was a "substitute" for.  (And for the record, Montgomery is a current bowl game host: the Camellia Bowl has, since 2014, been played in the same stadium that also hosted the 2020 Montgomery Bowl, so there were two bowl games there in the 2020 season.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For the record, I have no particular objection to any "consolidated" article being titled at simply Montgomery Bowl , though that might be more suited to a subsequent RM discussion than something that directly results from this AfD discussion.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the suggested target, as a WP:ATD .  No independent notability for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gregory Cousins: Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 13:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Exxon Valdez oil spill#Spill -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 16:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed. Redirect as per WP:1E . lizthegrey ( talk ) 21:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Transportation ,  and Alaska . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above. His name is a reasonable search term given the discussion of his role in the event at the target article, but there is certainly not enough to justify a standalone BLP. -- Kinu t / c 22:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Indira Road Krira Chakra: This club carries no major historical significance, as reflected by the sources, failing WP:GNG .  From a status perspective, it has not played major matches ( List A matches ) and so fails WP:NCRIC .  AA ( talk ) 11:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages because they fall under the same deletion rationale: Kalindi Krira Chakra ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Lalmatia Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Udayachal Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Kakrail Boys Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Gulshan Cricket Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Azad Sporting Club cricket team ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Orient Sporting Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Dhaka Spartans Cricket Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Dhaka Assets ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Surjo Torun Club ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports .  Shaws username .  talk .  11:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all .  There is nothing to show that any of these clubs is anything more than a local cricket team, competing in the sub-List A Dhaka First Division Cricket League .  Some of them may be promoted to the List A Dhaka Premier Division Cricket League in future, but until then there is nothing to indicate notability.  I don't think merely competing in the Dhaka First Division Cricket League can confer notability on a team.  Sammyrice ( talk ) 22:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all to Dhaka First Division Cricket League where the teams can be listed.  Pichpich ( talk ) 20:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all to Dhaka First Division Cricket League per Pichpich, there's nowhere near enough on the teams in the tournament for separate articles yet, however all can be listed in the parent article with any information listed there.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 11:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all per Pichpich and Rugbyfan22.  A much more constructive and useful solution.  Sammyrice ( talk ) 21:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024–25 AFC Third level Club Championship: Name of competition, teams, ... are all not known yet.  Should again be redirected to Asian Football Confederation#Clubs with one or two lines there about this.  Fram ( talk ) 12:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and Asia .  Fram ( talk ) 12:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 10:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as way WP:TOOSOON , no information known yet.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's worth pointing out that the country allocations for this seem to be assumptions, and not actual confirmed information.  The article doesn't have any WP:RS indicating that this will actually be the case, seems like WP:OR to me.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect It does not meet the minimum standards for a sound article.  Dl.thinker ( talk ) 10:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anjaane Nagar: Fails WP:GNG ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 15:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television ,  and Pakistan .  ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 15:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series , where it is listed as Anjanay Nagar. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WXNY-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New York .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations : Its long (for an LPTV) pre-Daystar history seems to nonetheless have been mostly other national services or relaying other stations, all likely with no significant coverage to speak of.  (Even in New York City, there is no guarantee of attaining the sourcing and coverage we now require.)  A remnant of the lower inclusion standards of 2007.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bells Break Their Towers: Fails WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage.  The sources cited don't appear particularly indicative of general notability, but in any case per WP:NALBUM : Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography Polyamorph ( talk ) 10:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Polyamorph ( talk ) 10:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - There are currently AfDs for five albums by this band, all with recommendations to redirect.  All the album articles were created in stub form early in Wikipedia history and have had very few edits or readers in the many years since, indicting low interest in improving them.  You could just boldly redirect all the albums to the band regardless of the AfD process, and in the (unlikely) event that someone objects we can take it from there.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Otra Tocada Mas: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Per WP:NEXIST the absence of sources in an article is not an indicator of notability, and per WP:BEFORE a nominator should attempt to find some before nomination for deletion.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It's part of the discography of a very notable band, isn't that enough?  And if in fact isn't, couldn't be merge with other minor albums?  Zidane tribal ( talk ) 17:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability of the performer(s) has nothing to do with that of their recordings.  This is not a vote.  dxneo ( talk ) 08:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for failing WP:NALBUM and WP:SIGCOV .  Alternatively redirect to El Tri (band) per WP:ATD .  A WP:BEFORE search yielded no significant coverage.  Rather than trouncing the nominator, commenters should do a good faith search for sources before chastising someone for not doing due diligence.  I could locate no reviews in RS and there weren't even passing mentions of the album.  Nothing in google books, newspapers.com, entertainment magazines like Billboard or Variety , or even in standard e-zines or music websites where one would usually find a review.  It appears to be an entirely non-notable work by a notable band.  4meter4 ( talk ) 15:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 09:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fuck It, I Love You (Malcolm Middleton song): BilledMammal ( talk ) 03:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  BilledMammal ( talk ) 03:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A Brighter Beat per WP:NSONG .  162 etc. ( talk ) 04:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A Brighter Beat : Other than the paragraph in this article, I could only find passing mentions of the song.  Shows no signs of notability; Big Yawn is a blog and gives me no immediate reason to believe it would pass a reliability check.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 05:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Batino: The only source, [7] , only discusses the eponymous plant and does not mention anything about this barangay (also, no mention of the city and the province).  See also Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive 47#Are barangays notable?  (can we please have a consensus now?) .  At the most closest alternative, redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 04:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 04:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays as an WP:ATD .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 01:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There seems to be another barangay named Batino in Calapan .  Perhaps move it first to Batino, Calamba , and then redirect it to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 01:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Juraj Vankulič: There doesn't appear to be anything to add, rendering Shooting of... not a viable solution.  A redirect to 2022 Bratislava shooting would be a fine ATD but expect that this is contentious so wanted broader eyes, especially with folks who have access to non English sourcing.  Star Mississippi 03:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , Sexuality and gender ,  and Slovakia .  Star Mississippi 03:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Juraj was a very notable and important person in Slovak queer scene.  This article is important to their friends and family for keeping their legacy alive.  Creating this article was the sole reason why I began an editing account.  I beg you, please, do not delete it.  Animaeon ( talk ) 03:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's a noble goal, but please read WP:NOTAMEMORIAL and WP:COI if you knew Vankulic or are otherwise connected with their friends and family.  Star Mississippi 04:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe if any reviews of his performances could be found?  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 10:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment. I really tried to find something going in favour of the article being kept but there's just not enough on this young man to warrant an article. Suggest merging worthy content to main article and redirecting . -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 14:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Bratislava shooting per WP:NOTAMEMORIAL and WP:BLP1E .  I couldn't find significant coverage which means Vankulič fails GNG.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 14:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Bratislava shooting per WP:NOTAMEMORIAL and WP:BLP1E .  No significant coverage of Vankulič's career as a drag queen or anything not related to their death in the terror attack.  Mooonswimmer 20:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Searchlight (workshops): Fails WP:GNG and we can cover anything that does on Chailey Heritage School in the Searchlight Workshops section.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 21:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chailey Heritage School#Searchlight Workshops : As creating editor I had hopes that others would enhance this article.  I feel it merits targeted WP:BLAR rather than deletion.  This then leaves a good entry point for readers.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You haven't addressed my main claim here, a redirect may be overly broad.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 21:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Allan Nonymous Perhaps you have a misunderstanding of the ability to redirect to a section im another article.  Doing this addresses that concern absolutely.  There is nothing broad about a rifle targeted redirection.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to clarify here, I wasn't saying the redirect target was too broad.  I was saying the redirect term (i.e. "Searchlight (Workshops)") might be a bit too broad per the many things called searchlight.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 12:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Allan Nonymous That is the name of the thing.  Thus, broad or not, that is what it is called.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : To aid this decision, I have migrated small but important additional material to the proposed target article and section, including references which were omitted, sourced and referenced the charity number (etc) for Searchlight Workshops, and noted the charity's cessation in 2011.  One reference remains primary, but I believe it to be permitted under WP:PRIMARY .   🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chailey Heritage School#Searchlight Workshops per above.  // Timothy :: talk 12:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect