King & Maxwell: Agusmagni ( talk | contributions ) 22:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television ,  and United States of America .  Agusmagni Agusmagni Agusmagni 22:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 01:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , this is the fourth time in a row the nominator has sent clearly notable TV series with plenty of significant coverage to AfD.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 06:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , completely frivolous nomination.  The fact that the nominator tried to prod it twice shows unfamiliarity with how things are done here, so grab the opportunity to learn more!  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I have no opinion on this TV series and trust the regular commentators to evaluate it more knowledgeably than I would.  But I wanted to note that, when I reverted the second prod on procedural grounds, my edit summary explicitly told the nominator that, if they were to take it to an AfD, they should provide "a proper justification of what you tried to do to determine its notability" rather than a WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE rationale.  They have obviously not done what I suggested.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think we should delete Agusmagni ( talk ) 02:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You're missing the point.  You need to provide a rationale that explains why you think this article might not meet the specific Wikipedia notability guidelines that would be relevant for it.  We're not here to count how many people are for and how many are against, which is the only information I get from your comment.  We're here to build an understanding of how this topic does or does not fit into the Wikipedia notability guidelines.  Comments that do not do that are likely to be discounted when the discussion is closed.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 20:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep as no valid deletion rationale has been advanced.  We don't base the judgment call about whether to keep an article about a TV show on whether that show sounds forgettable, but instead, on whether reliable sources exist for it.  Here, they do.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TNT (American TV network) because most of TNT's shows are not notable.  Agusmagni ( talk ) 00:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You can't just assert that.  Again, you need to provide a rationale for why it might be true, a rationale grounded in what the word notable means on Wikipedia .  XOR'easter ( talk ) 01:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The show has non-notable people behind it and only has news released before the show.  Agusmagni ( talk ) 19:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability is never inherited , so you are still not providing a valid rationale.  Honestly, someone should just close all of the AfDs as speedy keep.  Rusty4321 talk contribs 20:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Disney Channel logos logos Agusmagni ( talk ) 21:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep article for notable show.  The nominator has posted " Let's start an edit war " on this page (and then replaced it with nonsense).  They are clearly WP:NOTHERE .  Toughpigs ( talk ) 23:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per above.  The user is basically just here to start edit wars and tag articles for deletion.  kpgamingz ( rant me ) 23:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per others, and to the nom, please don't nominate another article for deletion until you have read the guidelines and policies Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Nomination lacks proper justification and seems based on personal opinion.  Waqar 💬 20:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep