Shivaharkaray: As per criteria 6 and 7 of WP:DEL-REASON —it appears this place does not even exist.  Completely imaginary!  Jovian Eclipse 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  Jovian Eclipse 04:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Not a HOAX, at the least .  Saqib ( talk ) 19:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Saqib : This edit from the Hinglaj Mata Temple page by a sockpuppet account predates the Tribune article by years and simply by looking at the lead, I think it is pretty obvious that the author has plagiarized from Wikipedia.  I have particularly highlighted that edit because it was the precisely the one establishing for the first time that there are three Shakti Peethas in Pakistan.  Older revisions have two.  I would also like to make another point that this supposedly revered pilgrimage site not only has absolutely zero visitor accounts in the internet era, but no picture of it is available anywhere.  It does not even receive the slightest mention in the books of scholars on Shaktism, who have otherwise produced detailed works on both Hinglaj and Sharada.  Jovian Eclipse 21:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Jovian Eclipse , But there are Indian RS confirming the existence of three Shakti Peethas in Pakistan, which includes Shivaharkaray such as The New Indian Express , The Economic Times .  Plus, there are books that mention it too.  You can just do a quick search on Google Books to check it out.  — Saqib ( talk ) 07:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Saqib : This is supposed to be a very well-regarded shrine for Pakistani Hindus, for at least a century just as the other Shakti Peethas are.  Every source you listed has come into existence after the aforementioned edit on 18 June 2021, which makes it blatantly clear that their reference was nothing other than Wikipedia (the ET article even explicitly says so).  The books are all self-published ebooks, not academic works from well-reputed presses.  The NIE article refers to a place called Karavipur where the temple is located, and it is again supposed to be near a railway station named Parkai.  A quick 5-minute online research will reveal that none of those two exist anywhere in Pakistan.  Also note that every "source" is either about the Shakti Peethas in general or about Hinglaj, but none about this temple itself.  That also makes it fail WP:N .  Jovian Eclipse 09:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No votes yet.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: An evaluation of sources would be useful here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While the place may indeed exists, it does not meet WP:GNG and does not have WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources for a standalone article.  The article itself does not contain comprehensive detail about the shrine, but about the goddess and the legend connected to that goddess.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 06:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete