hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
MC El Bayadh Bus Crash : Article about a bus crash.   No wp:notability per the events SNG or GNG.   Also per wp:not news.  North8000 ( talk ) 13:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENT .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 15:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Football , Transportation ,  and Algeria .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Selective merge a mention that a player and staff died in a bus crash before a match in the main MC El Bayadh article seems fine, but this event has no WP:SUSTAINED coverage and violates WP:NOTNEWS .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (however) I believe this can be covered in the two team club pages, and should be added to the 2023–24 Algerian Ligue Professionnelle 1 season page along with 2023–24 in Algerian football if it ever gets created.  As that kind of information can effect the team big time involve in this competition.  I don't see the need for an independent article.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to MC El Bayadh#History .  Giant Snowman 14:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Weevil (Torchwood) : Fails WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens .  I found no evidence that the subject is independently notable.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 10:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per WP:ATD .  Not independently notable.  Archrogue ( talk ) 17:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - In Universe cruft.  Carrite ( talk ) 10:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect not very important or iconic Whoniverse monster Dronebogus ( talk ) 11:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Regions of the Boy Scouts of America : Per deletion policies 13 & 14:
 "Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace".  That policy would be WP:NOTAGUIDE "Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia" This article is basically internal documentation and not unlike an article like Safeway region, or Best Buy Districts sourcing to their own documents of internal interest only.  At best it's a re-direct, but I'm wondering the necessity of having so many of them that maybe on the verge of becoming keyword stuffing.  Graywalls ( talk ) 03:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Scouting ,  and United States of America .  Graywalls ( talk ) 03:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - Could this be merged into Boy Scouts of America ?  Eopsid ( talk ) 15:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article is 100% primary sourced, so not suitable.  Graywalls ( talk ) 15:10, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  However, the redirects for the old regions (i.e.

Discussion outcome: merge
March-BMW M1/C : Scant resources on the Internet, too.  No expectation of increased coverage in the near future on my end.  X750 .  Spin a yarn?  Articles I've screwed over?  09:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to BMW M1 could be an alternative to deletion.  — siro χ o 11:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But the thing is, even if we do merge it, the three best sources in the article are nowhere near RS.. .  X750 .  Spin a yarn?  Articles I've screwed over?  20:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] While we definitely don't have enough for WP:N right now, I think we have enough reliability for WP:V of this prototype for some sort of merge.  I just don't really know the best destination.  Do you know if this is the same car as " March-BMW M1 " or is the /C a designation of a different car?  — siro χ o 22:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The /C denomination refers to the car being adapted to Group C regulations, March Engineering is a company that specializes in racing cars.  I think we should wait and see what other users have to say too.  X750 .  Spin a yarn?  Articles I've screwed over?  22:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into BMW M1 seems appropriate in my opinion as well.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
The Path of Duty : BEFORE searches give where to watch and a few passing mentions with brief plot summary when describing the TV series this stems from.  Karnataka ( talk ) 20:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Karnataka ( talk ) 20:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of Upstairs, Downstairs episodes per

Discussion outcome: merge
Dulhan paratha : I don't see notability here, as this is about a paratha sold by a local restaurant and prepared by mixing some extra items in it.  Additionally, the sources used promote this cafe as they list locations, rates, products, time etc.  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 15:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect to Paratha - with the newspaper sources it should be possible to write a reliably-cited one-sentence summary of this material in that article.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 15:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Paratha : I agree with Chiswick Chap 's rationale above.  Maliner ( talk ) 15:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are separate articles for Aloo paratha , Gobi paratha , Mughlai paratha etc so this variation of paratha can also have a separate article.  Referencing is also fine for a local food item from reliable Urdu news sources in Pakistan like Daily Jang , Daily Express , Daily Pakistan .  2402:E000:653:1693:0:0:0:1 ( talk ) 05:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Yinfeng line : The name is seldom used officially and during train operations.  Chinese Wikipedia has no article about it.  Using Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit) is just fine.  阿南之人 ( talk ) 10:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge The rationale makes sense though the content here needs to be merged to Yinfeng line rather than deleted/redirected.  In the future, I would propose a WP:Merge or boldy merge it rather than taking it to Afd.  Garuda3 ( talk ) 11:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, it has been merged by me.  阿南之人 ( talk ) 11:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You haven't edited Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit) yet.  The information and references at Yinfeng line need to be transferred into the Line 3 page.  Garuda3 ( talk ) 13:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Garuda3 : See Special:Diff/1181017547 .  阿南之人 ( talk ) 11:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The corresponding article in Chinese at zh:宁波轨道交通3号线 has many more references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 12:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Indeed - though the Chinese article is for Line 3 as a whole so includes both Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit) and Yinfeng line .  Garuda3 ( talk ) 13:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge while keep as redirection page.  The name Yinfeng Line was used only when the initial section (from Jiangshan to Minghui Road) is open.  After the rest section is open the whole line was then renamed as Line 3 (Yinfeng section) and now you can find barely nothing about the name Yinfeng Line on the official website.  Though it is possible that some section of the line might be separated from Line 3 in the future, there is no official schedule for it and as a Wikipedia article, we do not make predictions.  Siyuwj ( talk ) 02:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit) .  This is what zhwiki does.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 14:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Just say call it a former line and add a bit to what happened to it and what it became part of.  there is no no need to delete this.  and add a link to the line it was merged into it.  Deleting this would be a waste of the person (who originally wrote this)'s time.There is no need for deletion.  Huaxiazidi ( talk ) 10:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2022 Raqqa attack : Ecrusized ( talk ) 08:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Timeline of the Syrian civil war (2022) , where this event is already mentioned.  - Cameron Dewe ( talk ) 07:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Merge or delete?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested seems fine.  Not a very notable battle outside of that context.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of Cohen crime family members : These people certainly existed, but their membership in a supposed "crime family" is at best dubious.  Note that the main article Cohen crime family has been nominated for deletion on the same grounds at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cohen crime family Coretheapple ( talk ) 16:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Crime , California ,  and Nevada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Cohen crime family , both created by User:HomG .  Same crime family, except the list has no sources at all.  — Maile ( talk ) 00:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Los Angeles crime family under the section about Jack Dragna .  This so-called family appears to have arisen as a result of a falling out between Dragna and Mickey Cohen when Bugsy Siegel was killed.  Also, both Siegel and Cohen were working for the New York mafia, so their West Coast operations is more like a branch office.  - Cameron Dewe ( talk ) 22:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Two different Merge targets suggested, one of which, Cohen crime family , is also at AFD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment While I don't think this should be kept per WP:REDUNDANTFORK , the nomination should have waited till the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cohen crime family , since a 3rd merge/redirect target has been identified there at Mickey Cohen .  Greater clarity about what to do here will be obtained once that discussion closes.  Stony Brook babble 15:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] True, but my feeling was that this article warranted deletion on its own lack of merits.  Coretheapple ( talk ) 12:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Point well taken.  However, in the interest of preserving the flow of information here, a delete would prevent this from being housed in Category:Lists of criminals , Category:Organized crime members by organization and Category:Organized crime-related lists .  Stony Brook babble 01:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nor should it be, as this was an arbitrary list concocted by Wikipedia editors without any basis in sourcing.  Coretheapple ( talk ) 13:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Caveira (Rainbow Six Siege) : The bikini/lingerie discussion also relates more to the person doing the cosplay than the character itself, and one of the cosplay examples is from an official contest by Ubisoft.  Lastly the Controversy section is more development for the game itself, and also offers no discussion on the character itself.  Trying to do research with WP:BEFORE also turned up nothing either actually discussing Caveira as a character.  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 01:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 01:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 01:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can see a list of characters being a thing for sure.  That said, it's hard to fathom individual operators being standalone notable.  This is literally a page ripped straight from FANDOM.  People put an intense amount of effort into this, but you can't make notable what isn't actually notable - it is a bit flummoxing that someone would have looked at this minor character and assumed they were standalone article material.  I have no prejudice towards the material being preserved in user-space if someone wishes to work on a list article in the future.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - definitely a REFBOMB and prose bloat situation to make it look like there's a lot more here than there really is.  Better represented in an article of another aspect of the franchise.  Sergecross73 msg me 18:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge as compromise.  The reception of the character in the first subsection is a list of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs , and does not meet the standard for WP:SIGCOV .  The rest of the reception section is off topic.  It should be removed, or at best, adds trivial mentions about other topics that don't really demonstrate notability for this character.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge per nom.  Also, controversy section isn't talking about the character directly.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 23:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , was unable to find adequate coverage to demonstrate GNG.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 02:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Legacy of Wolves : The article was originally a redirect to List of Eberron modules and sourcebooks , which may say something about the book itself's notability.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 06:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  Samoht27 ( talk ) 06:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to, I guess, List of Eberron novels#The Inquisitives as WP:AtD .  There is only one review, so this seems to fail WP:NBOOK .  Still, what has already been collected should not simply be lost in deletion.  If anyone knows of any more secondary sources, please let me know.  Daranios ( talk ) 11:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 06:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to List of Eberron novels#The Inquisitives per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  The author's web page for Legacy of Wolves does not list any reliable reviews of the book.  I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 22:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Broken Arrow (Korea) : I think it can be safely merged into it without loss of content.  — Brigade Piron ( talk ) 10:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  — Brigade Piron ( talk ) 10:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge No need to delete.  Let's merge into Battle of Haktang-ni .  Footwiks ( talk ) Footwiks ( talk ) 11:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Battle of Haktang-ni considering that this is a WP:CF and that article has relevant information.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 09:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Battle of Haktang-ni.  Agree, after review, that should be no problem and a reasonable solution.  Kierzek ( talk ) 13:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Siuuu : Also, WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for the input and thoughts, would you care to add the section?  Isaac Tam Tsz Hang ( talk ) 23:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Cristiano Ronaldo seems fine, I don't find much coverage about this salute, could easily be merged into the main Ronaldo article.  Fine piece of trivia, but I don't think it's notable alone.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – It's definitely not encyclopedic content.  Svartner ( talk ) 05:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Cristiano Ronaldo#Goal celebrations – mentioned there, but let's start the topic in its section.  I would also prefer keeping the article since it is the subject of multiple reliable sources and given that the player's article is unusually long.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 15:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 22:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 22:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Cristiano Ronaldo#Goal celebrations – Aww this would be a funny article.  But for now it's essentially a dictionary entry.  TLA tlak 03:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Cristiano Ronaldo#Goal celebrations .  Can be expanded a bit.  No need to SPINOFF.  gidonb ( talk ) 23:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Seems obvious to me.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Cristiano Ronaldo#Goal celebrations .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - widely known as the most popular and iconic football celebration ever.  I dont think merging is a good idea as the article is already tagged for being too long -- FMSky ( talk ) 18:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
JL Toreliza : No standalone notability outside band.  Refs constitute the band and clickbait and interviews.  scope_creep Talk 07:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Television ,  and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge relevant info back to BGYO for now per nom.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to BGYO , where he's a member of.  Not enough independent coverage about him outside the band.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 03:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge