hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Lawrence G. Costanzo: Article survived a 2007 AfD but notability thresholds can change.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Religion ,  and Arizona .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage for this person, neither position is notable without an extensive sourcing to back it up.  There has been no coverage added since 2007, so I don't expect notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Why is this person notable?  TechBear | Talk | Contributions 15:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  SportingFlyer T · C 20:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of 8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown panellists: Even if completed, the page would contain no information not already covered at List of 8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown episodes .  The programme is notable but, I would say, not so notable that we need a separate article listing all panellists.  — Bilorv ( talk ) 18:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  — Bilorv ( talk ) 18:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge it into the episodes article if it's not WP:OR and can be sourced, Delete it otherwise.  SportingFlyer T · C 19:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SportingFlyer : it's not original research because it's easily verifiable from the primary source of the episodes themselves.  I would recommend against merging as this would either mean an incomplete list (which this list is at present) or take up an enormous amount of article space.  — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It may be original in the sense that this chart has never been compiled everywhere else.  Just because it can be easily verified back to the primary source of each episode doesn't mean it's not still WP:OR .  SportingFlyer T · C 19:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't see the need for the list without any sort of sourcing or discussion about the panelists themselves.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Already covered in List of 8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown episodes and this unsourced and badly formatted spin-off article adds no additional value to the topic.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 20:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sue Robbie: Redtree21 ( talk ) 06:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and England .  Redtree21 ( talk ) 06:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lots of images of her, not much sigcov in RS Traumnovelle ( talk ) 08:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough coverage for WP:GNG .  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ronald Rieder: This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Psychology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : all I can is an obituary [2] , could even be a different person.  There isn't much in the article now for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  The obit is a paid memorial notice so not independent.  here is the NYT source ( ProQuest 110065074 ).  The article is about Freshman orientation programs; he has a brief quote.  Not SIGCOV.  The Psychiatric News article has longer quotes from him, but again, he's not the subject.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ke Hobe Biggest Fan: Tagged for notability since 2016 Donald D23 talk to me 23:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Donald D23 talk to me 23:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No longer meets WP:GNG .  I could not find any WP:SIGCOV for the talk show.  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 15:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But did meet them in the past?  Pelmeen10 ( talk ) 20:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MartianCraft: Created by SPA .  Maybe their app Briefs has some marginal notability (and that's a big maybe), but companies don't inherit notability from their products.  Best source I could find – Tera tix ₵ 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and Virginia .  – Tera tix ₵ 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards, either in the cited sources or anywhere else that I found by searching.  The short version of the cited sources: not even a single one of them provides substantial coverage of MartianCraft (many provide none at all) and some are not independent sources either.  The longer version: the cited sources are: A link to a dead web site, domain up for sale.  No mention of MartianCraft at all, though it does describe "Briefs", which is one of MartianCraft's products.  Another link to a dead web site.  A page on the company's own web site, announcing a business deal.  A web site selling one of MartianCraft's products.  Another page on the company's own web site, announcing another business deal.  No mention of MartianCraft on the cited page, and using the website's search facility failed to find any mention of MartianCraft anywhere on the site.  No mention of MartianCraft on the cited page, none found by searching other pages on the same web site, and the site describes itself as a "digital marketing agency".  A company listing site, merely giving facts such as the number of employees, the city in which the company is based, year of foundation of the business, etc.  ... another link to the same web page as the last one... ... and yet another link to the same page again.  No mention of MartianCraft.  The website calls itself a "business media brand", whatever that means.  A page with a significant mentions of Rob Rhyne, cofounder of the company, and some quotes from him.  Twice it mentions in passing that he runs a business called MartianCraft; there is no other mention of it.  A dead link.  A review of the software "Briefs", which in the first sentence describes Briefs as "from MartianCraft", and makes no further mention of MartianCraft.  JBW ( talk ) 18:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Melissa (rock band): Notability seems doubtful so bringing here for consensus.  Mccapra ( talk ) 14:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Malaysia .  Mccapra ( talk ) 14:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Note the amateurishly Photoshopped pic in the infobox, which makes me suspect that someone affiliated with the band tried to create an image of various recent members for illustrative purposes.  But on the other hand, how hard should it be to just get everybody into some chairs and take a real group photo?  This is not relevant for notability but it may indicate a self-promotional effort for a band that is not in a stable state.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - They've apparently been around for a long time, and there may be a challenge with translation from the band's native tongue.  Since this article includes no information on how their name may appear in other languages, there is no way to conduct a wider search and we will have to assume that the band is being promoted internationally under this name anyway.  So a search for "Melissa" in conjunction with "Malaysia" plus various member names and other strategies will have to do.  And even with some creative searches I can find nothing reliable and significant .  The current footnote #2 is to an article explaining how the band decided to continue after one member's death, and footnote #4 is to an article about member Keff Melissa's solo career.  Otherwise all I can find is social media posts and self-uploads.  Perhaps they are disadvantaged by a shortage of rock media in their country, but maybe someone with sharper searching skills will find something.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Palestinian civilian casualties in the Second Intifada: Nominating this for AfD alongside List of Israeli civilian casualties in the Second Intifada and Civilian casualties in the Second Intifada .  Any individual events can be added to the respective Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict year-by-year event list.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 19:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Terrorism ,  and Palestine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (all three): These pages are indeed all examples of what is discourage by WP:NOTMEMORIAL writ large, stringing together events without sufficient notability to have had pages created about them.  The appropriate place for notable or significantly covered events is indeed at one of the appropriate year-by-year timelines at Template:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict .  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 17:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTMEMORIAL.  AryKun ( talk ) 14:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Usefully compiled data for an intensely studied conflict.  Can clean up any WP:NOTAMEMORIAL concerns.  Mistamystery ( talk ) 20:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTMEMORIAL.  -- Shrike ( talk ) 14:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Shrike : What about the other one ?  It's a bit of an all or nothing issue.  They are parallel lists, so surely either both or neither should go unless we want an NPOV crisis on out hands?  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 16:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
On-Demand Trading: The sources are all paid PRs.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 06:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 06:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : These are press releases.  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 06:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency , Companies , Alabama , Florida ,  and Wyoming .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:NORG as none of the cited sources cover the subject in depth.  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  2 primary sources + 5 copies of the same press release ≠ notability.  — python coder ( talk | contribs ) 02:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Honestly feel like this should be speedy delete on A7/G11 grounds, but I guess since it's already here may as run it for the full 7 days so it's G4 as well next time.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 12:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mascherato: Orange Mike | Talk 20:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  Orange Mike | Talk 20:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Largely PROMO, no reviews of the production found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not a notable musical -- it has never been produced, except in a workshop, and not a notable concept album -- it neither charted nor won any major awards.   If it ever goes to the West End, we can write an article about it then.   This is clearly WP:PROMO . -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 21:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yep (software): Appears to be written like a press release.  After searching, unable to find comprehensive, in-depth coverage of the software itself.  Article was PROD on 19 January 2023, then self-reverted 23 January 2023.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 19:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question: - Created with cat=W	Web or Internet ; should I have used cat=T Science and technology instead?  I am clueless how to move this discussion, if necessary.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 20:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  - Master of Hedgehogs ( converse ) ( hate that hedgehog! ) 20:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ConcurrentState ( talk ) 19:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not look notable to me.  Article does not to show adequate sourcing and notability.  Mevoelo ( talk ) 17:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Encoded Talk to me!  22:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : indeed, written like a press release.  the sourcing used is reviews and that doesn't qualify as reliable sourcing.  it's quite hard to find sourcing apart from those, anyway.  She was a fairy 09:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Femi Babatunde: Other than the one source already cited, I can't find anything about this footballer at all.  Unless significant coverage is found, Babatunde fails WP:GNG and probably even WP:SPORTBASIC #5, which requires at least one decent source.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree with all of the above MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to fail WP:SPORTBASIC .  Agree with nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a football player that needs more source to establish notability.  The current state lacks SIGCOV and researches revolves other people's ID that may be 'Femi Babatunde', a notable Nigerian typical name.  It's on other nire to day the article fails almost all the criteria for WP:SPORTSBIO , WP:GNG .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  20:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Joyce (musician): Could not find any RS about this person.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 23:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and United Kingdom .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 23:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 06:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn’t find anything beyond that he was a standard musician and a professor at Tulane university.  If sources are found im willing to reconsider.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Azeus Convene: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP , WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND .  Routine coverage for a brochure article, adveritising the company on Wikipedia.  Fails WP:DEL14 , WP:DEL4 .  scope_creep Talk 21:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leo Das: 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ ) 16:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ ) 16:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Tamil Nadu .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - will set a terrible precedent for one-film character articles.  Not notable.  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 23:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] His backstory is not revealed yet that's why he seems like a one film character.  2600:1700:78E2:9010:7131:909A:C27:2A39 ( talk ) 03:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not a great prospect when only one of the cited sources seemed to have any coverage of the character, as "Leo" was mostly used to refer to the film as a whole instead of the specific character.  While the character is mentioned in sources that discussed the plot of the film, that does not seem to make the subject notable considering how many articles about characters that have received the same type of coverage were not kept in the end.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 14:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not need as a character .  Monhiroe ( talk ) 20:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All this is available at Leo .  Kailash29792 (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no separate notability from the fiction, where it is already covered in a more proportional way.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 15:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough to create a separate character article.  Pinakpani ( talk ) 07:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete