hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WTHC-LD: PROD was declined without a rationale.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This station is notable only at the local level.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Topic is a part of a subset of obscure (but encyclopedic) information about an obscure subject.  If we are to delete this page, it will create a hole in that subset of information.  So either merge this (and all of the other pages in that subset that are effectively no different from this) into some larger page, or keep MNewnham ( talk ) 20:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chabuk (film): AShiv1212 ( talk ) 07:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NFILM .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:35, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and there is no reliable Critics review.  Monhiroe ( talk ) 04:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rita Puspa Zakaria: The majority of references in her article pertain to her work within her region, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC .  Additionally, her designation as a lecturer potentially qualifies her as an academic, yet fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:NACADEMIC .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 20:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability.  BLP seems to have been edited exclusively by banned editors.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already part of a bundled nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah binti Ahmad so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This reads as an extended family biography, I don't see notability with the sources presented.  I can't find any in Gsearch, but there might be more in the native language.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Proforce Limited: Press is mostly press-releases BoraVoro ( talk ) 14:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Companies , Transportation ,  and Nigeria .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Subhash Dhankar: Theroadislong ( talk ) 07:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Played minor roles in several films and a recent web series, but WP:NACTOR requires significant roles.  Sources provided don't meet GNG threshold, cursory search does not help.  — siro χ o 08:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete according to the nomination.  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 12:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:N .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article asserts that the actor has portrayed notable villainous roles but provides no credible sources to verify their roles.  Based on the criteria outlined in NACTOR, the actor does not meet the required standards.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 09:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Maliner ( talk ) 10:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The roles are not major roles, so that acting notability is not satisfied, and general notability is also not satisfied.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 13:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  And per user Unitedmotionpictures sent me an email to approve their article which I denied.  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 10:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rahul Jaiswal: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  Not to be confused with the bodybuilder of the same name, who may very well be more notable.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the editor who brought the name up in another discussion.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO: One source in article is a database, the other is a dead link in all likelyhood to a name mention is a game recap (see ref text).  Nothing found that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Sources found in BEFORE are name mentions and listings.  BLP requires strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 18:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel W. Wright (poet): microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 14:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Poetry .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails NPOET , only sources found are bibliographies and self published sources.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 07:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOET .  I was unable to find significant, independent coverage of this poet or their works.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulsamed Akin: Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 21:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Germany ,  and Turkey .  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 21:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find match reports about games he played in, nothing in-depth about the person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  A stub a decade ago and still a stub.  Aintabli ( talk ) 02:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To be exact, a single-sentence stub, and nothing changed after a decade.  Aintabli ( talk ) 19:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article lacks any depth and fails to comply with WP:SPORTBASIC (prong 4) as it does not include any SIGCOV (just databases).  Also, my searches turned up nothing that would constitute SIGCOV that might satisfy WP:GNG .  Not finding a suitable redirect target, so deletion unfortunately appears to be the right result.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 19:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A check for this player that is football base is next to nil.  HawkAussie ( talk ) 08:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability.  Fails to meet criteria of WP:GNG .  Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.  Villon411 ( talk ) 11:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tree of Peace (World War I): Others are from the site of the already-deleted Servare et Manere , Sobola’s outfit.  Either way, the self-promotion is clear.  — Biruitorul Talk 16:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I completely agree.  I see no redeeming features in this article.  Wikipedia is not the place for it.  Its WP:PROMO for the founder, self-aggrandisement and nothing else.  scope_creep Talk 20:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:REFBOMBed promotional article of a non-notable organization.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Villa Holidays: lizthegrey ( talk ) 18:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No independent notability.  Flurrious ( talk ) 21:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Feli Ferraro: The listed song credits are misleading, as she is not the primary recording artist of any of them; professional songwriters do not typically receive the same level of coverage for their work, and should not be presumed notable on the basis of having collaborated on notable works in the absence of actual RS coverage about their influence on the work.  Searching online did not turn up any coverage better than what is already cited.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Women .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have to go with delete .  I don't find any reasonable sources beyond what is here, and since the editor who created this works on and creates many articles for modern music I have to assume that what is here is the best that can be found.  What I see in the sources here are mainly name checks.  The only significant piece about her is on a site that I presume is that of her agents (Arthouse Entertainment).  The "Genius" site that includes her in "best" lists is crowd-sourced and therefore not a reliable source.  Lamona ( talk ) 02:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Views on the Arab–Israeli conflict: Onceinawhile ( talk ) 23:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Basically a POV-ish WP:COATRACK for material not properly integrated elsewhere.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 07:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Middle East , Israel ,  and Palestine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Unneeded CFORK with substantial POV issues.  // Timothy :: talk 13:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balls Island: "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist . [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river".  The small island seems to be of little significance, with no hope of expanding it to an encyclopedic article.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , New York ,  and Islands .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This claims it was featured in national geographic [12] , any thoughts on how to confirm and evaluate the claim.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I don't know what to do.  The link above is just a real estate ad, and they could be lying about national geographic.  But if it's true then it might be notable.  I can't find any mention in the newspapers for this.  so I could accept that maybe there is a single secondary source on this place and still vote delete.  But, I don't think others are going to go along with that.  As far as I can tell, only national geographic subscribers can search their back issues, so....  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Walter F. Burmeister's book The Susquehanna River and Its Tributaries gives this a sentence, and even then discusses this only as part of a group of islets.   If even that doesn't document this island in depth, there is indeed little hope for expansion.  Uncle G ( talk ) 01:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even if the National Geo article exists, it's probably just a list of river islands or some such.  If that article had said anything quotable about this place, the real estate ad would certainly have quoted it.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Md. Sayedur Rahman: Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no pass of WP:PROF evident, nor any other notability criterion.  In particular the Google Scholar citation counts are too low for WP:PROF#C1 .  This one caught me by surprise, because at first I thought it was about Md.  Saidur Rahman , who is notable.  But it's a different person, with I guess a common name.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no significant coverage fail WP:CNG.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EngrShakamal ( talk • contribs ) 15:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 04:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SNG, No GNG, why to Keep?  Okoslavia ( talk ) 06:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sergey Lapin (boxer): Regional accomplishments aren't enough and his silver medal at worlds was as a member of a team (WSB).  Nswix ( talk ) 00:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Boxing , Martial arts ,  and Ukraine .  Nswix ( talk ) 00:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE As per nom, fails NBOX, SIGCOV or GNG.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found no evidence of boxing success that would show WP notability.   Zero appearances at a world championship at the amateur level and only one professional fight.   Coverage seems insufficient to meet WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 16:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete