Toyota TX-Series Transmission: A before finds no independent coverage of the product and the article relies on primary Toyota sources.  Possible re-direct?  Theroadislong ( talk ) 21:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 21:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#TX-series .  I tried to find GNG sources earlier when I was looking this over and didn't see any.  That page has it's own issues but I think they are resolvable.  Even absent the sourcing issues, from a WP:NOPAGE perspective I'm not sure this was a good idea in the first place.  184.152.68.190 ( talk ) 22:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions , I don't see this passing WP:GNG or WP:PRODUCT .  Encoded Talk to me!  22:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the TX transmission section seems the best idea.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#TX-series : Fails WP:NPRODUCT , insufficient coverage by reliable secondary sources.  User3749 ( talk ) 16:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All additional sources would just be repeating what the primary sources state.  It's a build spec, not something that is subjective.  It's an objective fact.  12DionneJ ( talk ) 16:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So we can have articles about cars, articles about the engines in those cars, but can't have articles about the transmissions in those cars?  Make it make sense.  This article expands upon existing articles, specifically, “List of Toyota Transmissions.”  It follows the same structure as existing articles that are closely related.  These “sister” articles have been in use for almost 2 decades with zero issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12DionneJ ( talk • contribs ) Sure we can have articles about transmissions BUT they need to be supported by independent secondary sources, that's how Wikipedia works.  If there are other poorly sourced articles about transmissions then they probably need to be deleted too.  Theroadislong ( talk ) 16:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All additional sources would just be repeating what the primary sources state.  It's a build spec, not something that is subjective.  It's an objective fact.  12DionneJ ( talk ) 16:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's literally how everything is the automotive world works.  All aftermarket Electronic Service Information websites/sources, (like AllDATA, Motologic, Mitchell's ProDemand, etc) get their info from the manufacturers.  We're not talking about horsepower and torque ratings of an engine or advertised fuel economy.  12DionneJ ( talk ) 16:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#tx-series : As an WP:ATD .  Fails WP:NPRODUCT .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#tx-series : WP:ATD and per nom.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 06:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#tx-series per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#tx-series as topic fails notability guidelines.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect