hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Anna Green (Hollyoaks) : One of the sources is WP:PRIMARY , so the article essentially has one source for proving notability.  Nothing found via WP:BEFORE .  (Oinkers42) ( talk ) 06:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Television .  (Oinkers42) ( talk ) 06:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Hollyoaks characters ; otherwise, this may clearly be Fandom territory.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 06:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Unless the reception is expanded and/or analysis section added, this is a clear WP:GNG failure.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Noted Slgrandson and Piotrus' concerns - I will address them and work on the article.  Rain the 1 10:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have made steady progress with the expansion so far.  I have found a bunch of other sources from the archives that I will use to continue improving the article further over the coming days.  Rain the 1 21:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep per WP:HEY .  RT1 has worked hard in massively improving and sourcing the article.  There is now in depth development and reception and multiple sources showing notability and in depth coverage.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I agree that Raintheone has made significant improvements to the article.  Keep per WP:HEY .  Toughpigs ( talk ) 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : As User:Toughpigs said above, significant improvements have been made and I think the article passes WP:GNG.  – JuneGloom07 Talk 21:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I have been working on the article since the nomination to address the concerns mentioned above.  Given what I have added, the time of nomination vs now - I think there is enough sourced content for an article.  There is real world content concerning casting, character creation, characterisation, plots with real world coverage, her role within the show is explained and reception has been added.  Per WP:HEY it does not match the nominators reasons for deletion, it passes WP:GNG and I have used various sources meeting WP:SIGCOV.  I feel keeping is the better decision here.  Rain the 1 17:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 02:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Qee : Nothing I could find online that meets WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North America-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per non, lack of independant references.  Teraplane ( talk ) 04:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : [13] and this [14] help notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per the sources found by Oaktree b and Cunard in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toy2R .  pinktoebeans (talk) 12:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of GMA Network stations : MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Philippines .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm guessing that it will turn out to meet NLIST, but if it doesn't, merge into GMA Network .  It's short enough that it wouldn't be awkward.  small jars t c 09:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Spin-out lists such as this one are generally exempt from WP:NLIST where merging it back to the parent article would become too large.  Secondly, it serves a designated, internal navigational purpose, where most of the entries have links to Wikipedia pages.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 11:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, Why?  I Ask .  That is a good point about the parent article becoming too large.  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per Why?  I Ask.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 23:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There's a reason you're on ANI, Snoozy, and this nom set is not helping your case at all.  This isn't getting deleted and a list of network affiliates can easily be sourced.  If you're not asking for deletion, there are talk pages you should be using regarding article content, and AfD is not meant for this purpose at all.  Nate • ( chatter ) 02:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Not seeing enough justification for keeping.  Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 05:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a reasonable WP:SIZESPLIT .  Meets WP:NLIST per above arguments.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 00:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Al-Nabarawi : Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Science ,  and Iraq .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 02:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Actually quite notable.  There is an English translation of his book.  He's got an Iranica article and an EI2 article .  The only source in the article actually gives his death date as 1193.  I can't fault the nominator for failing to connect the dots, however.  They are very hard to connect.  But they illustrate the difficulty of approaching topics where there is no definitive English spelling.  First, Google distinguishes "al-Nabarawi" from the form with the macrons, "al-Nabarāwī".  The latter will be more common in academic writing.  Also, the Arabic may be spelled "al-Nibrawi" (again, with our without macrons).  In addition, it is only one part ( nisba ) of a full Arabic name and in this case the primary sources are not consistent.  Both of the two reference works I cited prefer the nisba al-Shayzarī.  Note that Iranica drops the Arabic al- (as Persian does).  They would do the same with Nabarawi.  Sources that use "al-Nabarawi" may ultimately rely on Brockelmann , who strings together all the nisbas, putting al-Nabarawi last.  Srnec ( talk ) 20:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the sources uncovered by Srnec.  𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk ) 03:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to be notable from the sources found by Srnec.  Mgp28 ( talk ) 09:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Red Rock, Yavapai County, Arizona : I couldn't find any coverage of a place called Red Rock aside from Red Rock State Park .  "Red Rock Crossing" seems to be a simple road crossing of the river which is sourced only to a now-defunct special interest group which opposed a proposed bridge.  – dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona .  – dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - This appears to be a populated place: The community association gives a bit of history.  The historic cemetery lists the names of some of the early settlers.  History of Red Rock , although it does not indicate it was more than a ranch.  Another history of Red Rock , and of early settlers, the Schuermans.   Also discusses the first school and cemetery.  The GIS for Yavapai County shows the community on its map.  Most important, go to Google Maps, or any map, and you'll see a community of many houses there, and one of the roads in the community is Schuermans Drive.  Magnolia677 ( talk ) 18:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Magnolia677.  Does appear to have been a recognised community.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per Magnolia677's analysis.   Passes GNG and GEOLAND.  Onel 5969 TT me 16:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above, meets GNG.  ~ EDDY ( talk / contribs ) ~ 23:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per the sources found by Magnolia677 this meets GNG.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 03:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keeep , sources provided by Magnolia677 are sufficient to pass the general notability guideline.  Jacona ( talk ) 23:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Last March , the Schuerman Homestead House, at 120 Loy Lane in Red Rock, was added to the National Register of Historic Places listings in Yavapai County, Arizona .  In 1954, the movie Drum Beat staring Alan Ladd was filmed there, see [9] .  Magnolia677 ( talk ) 11:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Joanna Pacitti : Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Television ,  and Pennsylvania .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is some significant coverage found on Wikipedia Library, including [7] [8] [9] Alvaldi ( talk ) 20:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I'm not sure what the issue is, I echo everyone else who's found SIGCOV.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This about her "disqualification" [10] among others was the first I pulled up.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Sources 1 and 3 given by Alvaldi provide significant, independent coverage from reliable sources, therefore GNG is met.  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 01:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per Alvaldi.  Please WP:BEFORE Jack4576 ( talk ) 01:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You're on the [11] cusp of being banned from AFD, so I'd save the lecturing, champ.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:17, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Lecturing" or not, he has a point: this is something like your fifteenth AfD nomination in the past two weeks, all on American Idol contestants, for which WP:SIGCOV exists and is easily findable.  This nomination is particularly confusing, as the whole reason she left American Idol was because of her past in the music industry and the "ton of press" she received for it before Idol .  I'm not sure how you can do research and not encounter this fact, as it was heavily reported.  Furthermore, all of these nominations seem to hinge on successive misinterpretations (that you have admitted) of WP:NSINGER .  It really looks like you've just gone down the list of contestants and carpet-bombed AfDs -- and later redirects, when those AfDs stopped going your way. Gnomingstuff ( talk ) 03:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep She's had songs on numerous high profile film soundtracks. -- Jpcase ( talk ) 01:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- In addition to the sources Alvadi mentioned, ProQuest turns up profiles in the Chicago Tribune ("Joanna's summer fuels her 'Crazy Life'"), McClatchy ("Don't miss 21-year-old Joanna's talent"), the Philadelphia Inquirer ("'Crazy' journey to dream"), and others.  These all predate her appearance on American Idol , so WP:NINHERITED does not apply.  Gnomingstuff ( talk ) 21:35, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per Gnomingstuff Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 13:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Vectra AI : Citation #3, #5, #6, and #8 (4 out of 9) are sources that are primary and not independent of the subject.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 10:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and United States of America .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 10:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This talks about the company [15] and a company discussion paper by PwC [16] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Various articles that are not PRs mentioning that the company found a vulnerability in Microsoft Teams [17] [18] [19] and an article on Nasdaq [20] GetMeTheMoon ( talk ) 08:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still feel this debate could do with a little bit more input to firm up consensus either way.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - my initial reaction was to argue for "keep" as the nomination is malformed.   If four of the nine sources in the article aren't in-depth and independent, then that means 5 are.  But looking at those remaining sources, 1 is not independent (company's former website), 2 looks in-depth and independent, 4 is not independent (paper produced by topic), 7 is a list, and 9 looks independent.   So I think there's two good sources in the article.   I don't think the sources brought up in the above discussion are all that great, a lot of quoting the company, but added together I think a somewhat-useful NPOV and V article can be created for our readers, per WP:WHYN .  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 00:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Doehling–Heselton Memorial Trophy : Joeykai ( talk ) 00:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep plenty of significant coverage of the rivalry and trophy: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-reporter-ripon-lawrence-rivalry-2000/136670698/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-oshkosh-northwestern-ripon-college-r/136670649/ PK-WIKI ( talk ) 00:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets GNG.  Books turn up coverage.  1 Lightburst ( talk ) 00:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I added some more newspaper coverage cites, hopefully this helps.  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 18:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2020 Lithuanian Baseball League : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball and Lithuania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Keep - Only one source and that appears to be a primary.  Article had languished for nearly three years.  Important safety tip: It can take an AfD to get the sources.  Thank you, Bearas !  Last1in ( talk ) 23:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] New sources added, therefore reasoning to delete the article due lack of sources is no longer valid Bearas ( talk ) 17:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably keep - Found these sources in various local media within 10 minutes [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] .  Seems to meet WP:GNG .  Respublik ( talk ) 22:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you Respublik, all references added to the article.  Keep article improved with additional references added, and it does indeed meet WP:GNG .  Simple google search comes back with 21k of findings in Lithuanian media alone and countless in English.  Bearas ( talk ) 17:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Bearas and Respublik; meets GNG.  — Prodraxis { talk • contribs } (she/her) 17:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Anant Patel : Sourcing (or lack of) is purely routine local media coverage.  𝔓 420° 𝔓 Holla 14:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is a state level representative, not local politician.  MrMkG ( talk ) 14:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you MrMkG for your contribution.  Could we please centre this discussion around how the available sources establish WP:BLP and WP:NPOL .  Thank you, and may God bless you.  𝔓 420° 𝔓 Holla 14:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I believe nom has misunderstood, he's not a local politician but a state politician.  Per WP:NPOL members of state legislatures are notable.  Here's a profile from the Indian Express AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per AusLondonder.  The source they link confirms that he's a district-level politician for Navsari district . — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Moriwen : Thanks for that, just to clarify though he represents that district in the Gujarat Legislative Assembly , the state parliament of Gujarat, so he's at an even higher level of government than district level.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You're quite right!  I stand corrected, thanks. — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Gujarat .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- the subject meets WP:NPOL as a member of a province-wide legislative body.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:NPOL .  Simple search brings up many reliable media news sources that can be used to expand the page on this politician.  RangersRus ( talk ) 20:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject passes WP:NPOL as an Indian state legislator.  There appears to be sufficient coverage to surpass WP:NOPAGE .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 00:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NPOL .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 10:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as legislators no doubt pass WP:NPOL .  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 17:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article probably should be improved, but the state legislature is not a "local" office, state legislators automatically pass WP:NPOL in a way that municipal politicians do not , and better sourcing is available to expand this with.  Nomination appears to be mere tit-for-tat retaliation for an article the nominator created about a smalltown mayor being listed for AFD, but smalltown mayors and state legislators are not equivalent topics.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Stagestruck: Theater, AIDS, and the Marketing of Gay America : Lacks reviews, none of the awards are major.  UPE and notability tags removed without explanation or improvement so brought it here for discussion.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and New York .  Owen× ☎ 12:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Found entries at CNN and LibraryThing .  Will add something later.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 13:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ouro : LibraryThing doesn't provide any coverage that meet WP:NBOOK .  The content seems to be user generated .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  14:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ ARandomName123 : Right, I figured that out by now.  But even if it doesn't count as a WP-worthy source, it's still some kind of information that the book reverberated somehow in the wild.  I was encouraged by the fact that LT has its WP article.  I won't include it.  Thanks for the heads-up.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 17:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment. Is it a bit better now? -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 13:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Review in CNN above, and reviews in the Library Journal and The Booklist is enough to meet WP:NBOOK (both via TWL).  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  14:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above sources.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 15:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep