hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sekthaus Carl Graeger: However, as was the case then, I do not see CORP level sourcing here, the German article or via a before.  While they no longer make their own wine, it's still produced and sourcing should be accessible if it existed Star Mississippi 01:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Wine , Organizations , Companies ,  and Germany .  Star Mississippi 01:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article, for me lacks significant coverage in current reliable sources.  The majority of the references cited are from archival sources or are dated, which raises concerns about the contemporary relevance and notability of the subject.  Additionally, there's a limited amount of recent information or ongoing significance to the brand beyond its historical achievements.  Also, the quality of old sources is questioned, and seems not to follow the Wikipedia guidelines for reliable sources and verifiability.  -- Mozzcircuit ( talk ) 08:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for now.  I found a lot of old ads, a brief discussion that is in the references, a patent, but no WP:SIGCOV .  This is an old and small company.  A combination that can go either way.  I'm definitely open to the idea that there is WP:SIGCOV out there.  Just couldn't find it.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Worldef: No sourcing found, the Forum appears non-notable as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aintabli ( talk ) 20:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Algerian Cup semi-finals: 'Algerian Cup semi-finals' is not independently notable outside of the Algerian Cup and an unlikely search term.  Merging may not be an option since the whole article is unreferenced.  Details of the semi-finals themselves seem to be already covered in individual season articles, although for example 1964–65 Algerian Cup is completely unreferenced as well.  C 679 04:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  C 679 04:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions .  C 679 04:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This really is not about notability, season pages are okay for the cup and that covers each semi, this is really not in the WP:SCOPE of how to construct the football content on wikipedia.  Govvy ( talk ) 09:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete don't need a separate articles for semi-finals, they can be covered in other existing articles like the parent article Algerian Cup or the season articles.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Separate articles for finals are understandable, but not for semi-finals. Svartner ( talk ) 18:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Algerian Cup as preferred WP:ATD and WP:CHEAP . ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Inexplicable why this was made. I believe deletion should be used to set the right precedent. Geschichte ( talk ) 14:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Wow Air destinations: Many airline destination lists have already been deleted, and this list is no different.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Iceland .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Lists .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and past precedent.  AryKun ( talk ) 17:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmed Al-Oufi: I'm not sure if 2 caps for the Saudi Arabia national team are enough because I literally can't find anything else beyond the usual stats websites.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Isabelle Wiebach: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Europe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , lacks significant coverage.  Liechtenstein has a population of under 40,000 so it's not like you'd expect significant coverage.  Her club career is also not significant, she's in the 4th-5th tier league Swiss clubs.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 11:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andy Byrd: I can strip away that blatently unrelated information, but I'm not able to find much on this guy to warrant even a stub afterwards.  He's got an OK social media following, but doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG .  Lindsey40186 ( talk ) 18:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, he doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG.  I think it is best to delete this article.  Johnmarkdyer ( talk ) 18:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nn.  And I removed massive sections, seconding Lindsey40186's concern.  - Altenmann >talk 19:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find podcasts or various videos about this individual, nothing we can use for notability.  Seems that after the non-RS are taken out, we're left with a stub, simply confirming he exists...  Nothing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the above editors.  This appears to be an easy call to delete, even after the initial edit and cleanup.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 21:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The main category for this one would be nauthor, but the books do not seem to have had a wide audience (e.g. listed as #30K in the religious and spiritual category on Amazon, #300K in Christianity).  One book seems to have an independent publisher ("Destiny Image") but the other (2 volume) seems to be published by the organization Fire and Fragrance which he is associated with.  Lamona ( talk ) 19:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brandi Bae: Previously, WP:PORNBIO was the guide but it was depreciated in March 2019.  Lightburst ( talk ) 17:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Lightburst ( talk ) 17:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 20:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No change in notability since the article was deleted at AfD two years ago.  Same junk sources and still fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT .  Independent search finds nothing substantial or reliable.  • Gene93k ( talk ) 20:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to be significantly different from the previous version, which would make this eligible for speedy deletion.  Same garbage sources.  Note , please do not honor any requests to draftify this article.  It appears this was done before, and the person just shoved it back into mainspace with no effort to improve.  Zaathras ( talk ) 21:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ulvi Mammadov: The accuracy of the remaining information has also not been substantiated.  Overall, the topic does not meet the GNG.  The article has been deleted on Azerbaijani Wikipedia as well.  Surə 🗯 13:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Someone removed the AFD, reverted their edit.  This might be like the rusty pole article.  Toketaa talk 17:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No supporting evidence of world championships.   Dates and locations don't match up with major karate organizations and article was deleted on Azerbaijani WP.   He is not ranked in the top 350 or so karateka in his division by the World Karate Federation, which seems unusual for someone who claims to have won a bronze medal in the last world championships.  Papaursa ( talk ) 04:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per Papaursa .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 00:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Adah: These sources are lacking in WP:SIGCOV , and some are unreliable and clearly not independent of the subject.  Full of promotional fluff and stuff like that.  Fails WP:BASIC too.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk ) 22:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Promotional non notable article.  The sources does look WP:ROUTINE , and this is usually problems we have with businessmen and philanthropist.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Africa .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per my checking, I found that these sources are promotional and don’t provide in-depth coverage of the subject.  These sources fail to meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG .  To establish notability, in-depth coverage from multiple independent, secondary, and reliable sources is required.  Grab Up - Talk 05:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gransito Movie Awards 2008: Οἶδα ( talk ) 22:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related page because it lacks the same coverage: Gransito Movie Awards 2007 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions .  Οἶδα ( talk ) 22:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Internet ,  and Italy .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If the award itself is not notable, neither would a listing of awardees per year.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 04:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per Why?  I Ask it's the award which is obscure and not notable (eg. no idea if it still exists, and if not when it was cancelled).  C avarrone 06:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The website was last up in 2009 [1] , after which it was seemingly usurped.  It appears to have been the only source (as an external link) [2] , likely indicating self-promotion.  No reliable, independent sources can be found on the topic, and thus it should not have a separate article (which was deleted 2017).  These sub-articles should have gone with it.  Οἶδα ( talk ) 17:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khalil Ziade: Source #1 and #3 not working.  Source #2 his website conflict of interests.  Sources from #4 to #12 are unreliable and looks like paid sources.  Page creator appears to have a conflict of interest with the article.  فيصل ( talk ) 01:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Lebanon .  فيصل ( talk ) 01:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Source #1 and #3 not working, but have archive links in the citations so we can still check them.  I found an English-language source by clicking on the Google News link above: an American magazine called Nevada Business published an article called Family Owned Businesses 2018 on 1 March 2018.  It has a paragraph on Growth Holdings (along with paragraphs on other similar size businesses such as a piercing salon, and a restaurant and bar).   The magazine article seems to suggest that his brother Philippe is more likely to be notable than Khalil.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 08:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG and I could not find any notable sources.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Id Tech 2 (disambiguation): "Id Tech 2" should just redirect to the topic at Id_Tech#id_Tech_2 , and so this dab is not needed anymore.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 23:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 23:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 23:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 23:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete : Id Tech 2 already redirects to Id Tech#id Tech 2 , which is all we need.  Pam D 07:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Id Tech#id Tech 2 already handles this topic, as stated by PamD.  The article doesn't disambiguate much, it just lists the game engines using said software, plus there's only 3, and one of them is a game.  I'd say this belongs in a list article, but there's not much to list.  MK at your service.  09:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) serves minimal purpose as it lists only three game engines developed by id Software , which are already covered.  To avoid redundancy and improve efficiency, the page should delete, This follows Wikipedia's guidelines, helping users find complete and relevant information without duplication.  Yakov-kobi ( talk ) 10:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the above discussion Master rollo ( talk ) 17:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerry Cristoforo: Fails WP:NPROF .  US-Verified ( talk ) 20:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to have established notability.  "Adjunct professor" has two possible meanings in North America: a status-only appointment, where someone does research and teaching at a university which should be recognized, but is not paid for that work; or someone who is paid by the course to teach (often badly).  Even though "adjunct professor" does not give automatic notability, this person's accomplishments (including as a founder of a university program) point to notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 11:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject has 150 citations and an h index of 6, so does not meet NPROF C1.  His appointments and awards do not approach any of the other NPROF criteria, and there is no evidence of a GNG pass.  None of the keep reasons above are valid arguments for notability.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 17:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing in the article nor in his citation record suggests a pass of WP:PROF , and we also don't have any of the in-depth independent reliable sourcing that would be required for WP:GNG .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 20:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Low citation count.  Doesn't meet WP:PROF .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete