hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Cooperative web: It might be possible to create an article about Blue Spruce, but this article's title and content are not appropriate for such an article.  There's also the older, wiki-inspired collaborative service CoWeb , which stands for "Collaborative website", but this service is unrelated to IBM's project.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Capital punishment in the State of Palestine: This page seems like an invalid DAB, but perhaps someone here can salvage it.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Palestine .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] AFD is unnecessary; I've tagged it with WP:G5 .  BilledMammal ( talk ) 01:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Potters For Peace: Source 3, 10 and 13 are dead.  In any case, sources 10 to 15 are about Ceramic Water Purifiers and not this organization, so it's a content fork.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Environment ,  and Colorado .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I don't have time to fix the article myself right now, but a Google Scholar search shows up lots of articles about the group.  Some discuss the group itself while many are about the technical quality of their water filters.  Rarick, Charles A. and Duchatelet, Martine, Potters for Peace: Building Social Entrepreneurs One Piece at a Time (2006).  Journal of the International Academy of Case Studies, 4(1)2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2491964 Carpenter, B. S. (2010).  Embodied Social Justice: Water Filter Workshops as Public Pedagogy.  In Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning beyond Schooling (pp. 337-340).  Taylor and Francis.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863688-52 Kowalski, K. (2008).  Removal of virus-sized particles and escherichia coli by the potters for peace ceramic water filter (Order No. 1460862).  Available from ProQuest One Academic.  (288219160).  Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/removal-virus-sized-particles-escherichia-coli/docview/288219160/se-2 Lijil ( talk ) 08:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, asilvering ( talk ) 01:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sources don't have to be available online to be valid.  In this case, the references that appear to be dead may be available through The Wikipedia Library or a university library.  I think that the references establish notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Lakshmi Shruti Settipalli: Sources are not secdondary or independent dont meet WPINDP or WP:SIRS Comintell ( talk ) 07:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All I find are PR items [27] , [28] which at least confirms it's written by ANI PR, [29] and [30] , none of which are RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The article needs inline citations and may have originated for promotional purposes, but still meets notability.  I dug through the listed sources and converted the bare URLs into citations.  It turns out that two of the sources do provide significant coverage that is independent and reliable.  "Lakshmi Shruti Setttipalli Was Intrigued by Squash When She First Saw It Played" is published in Prosquash , the leading source for squash in India (where the sport is big).  The other solid source is the extensive article, "I Want To Be The Best" in the Deccan Chronicle .  Rublamb ( talk ) 21:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Sources highlighted by Rublamb ( [31] , [32] ) appear to demonstrate WP:GNG .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 22:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As has been pointed out, there is some coverage.  That said, it falls short a bit of the WP:GNG .  gidonb ( talk ) 02:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see what's wrong with the Deccan Chronicle article; that's an extensive full-page feature story.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Zirkeyk: Hongsy ( talk ) 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't find this place even searching on geonames.nga.mil Hongsy ( talk ) 14:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Reference #2 is the official Census of Iran .  If a town is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#11), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable.  @ Hongsy , is Zirkeyk listed?  Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE .  Thanks, -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - This is an abadi , which is a class of rural locality explicitly excluded from GEOLAND as so many of them are not actual communities but instead pumps/farms/factories/etc.  However, locations with populations above 100 are supposed to be slowly being converted into actual villages, so it's possible this is a real place.  FOARP ( talk ) 11:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 17:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There's at least a school there, per IRNA ( معاون سياسي اجتماعي استاندار سيستان و بلوچستان در سفر يك روزه به شهرستان خاش از مدارس زيركيك و ده قلعه ايرندگان ديدن كرد و مشكلات حوزه آموزشي اين بخش را مورد بررسي قرار داد appears to refer to a زيركيك in Irandegan, which would correspond with the entity in this article).  That being said, the IRNA link isn't significant coverage, and my Persian language abilities are quite limited, so I'm having a hard time finding anything about this place other than it exists, has a school, and has some small population.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Hayden Moss: Looking at the first nomination, the close may have been based on numerical superiority, i.e. majority vote, more than merits of arguments.  No offense to a longtime editor who participated in the prior discussion, but I analyzed the following sources: Primary sources (e.g. interviews and questionnaires), which may not apply per WP:GNG : Ent.  Weekly , Calgary Herald , Toronto Sun , CBS biography Covers Big Brother 12 win: NY Daily News (subscription required) , HuffPost Even Moss's rivals onscreen in Survivor made references about Moss's Big Brother appearance.  Despite a news report of Hayden's then-upcoming Survivor appearance with his then-girlfriend, I doubt Survivor appearance is sufficient to prevent the article from being either redirected to Big Brother 12 , his winning season, or deleted.  If the editor's arguments were to be disputed and then discounted, then other "keep" votes basing on that argument would also no longer hold more weight.  Other rules would also apply: WP:BIO1E (just in case), WP:PAGEDECIDE , and WP:BLP (not just BLP1E alone), which can apply to (material about) this person's personal life.  George Ho ( talk ) 04:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Television ,  and Arizona .  George Ho ( talk ) 04:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nom's comment – Should be either redirected to Big Brother 12 (American season) or deleted by default per WP:BIODELETE if no one here opposes.  George Ho ( talk ) 01:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Romy Tiongco: TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity , Philippines ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think the two programmes on the BBC all about him and the first of these and its report his on him were what led me to start this page and think him notable enough - perhaps via general notability rather than as a politician per se.  A political activist, NGO worker and then politician  ( Msrasnw ( talk ) 17:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Comment - maybe you should find more sources, only 2 out of the 7 sources work.  TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 00:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If there are 2 "working" sources, that should be enough for WP:GNG .  Howard the Duck ( talk ) 05:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One of the sources is a video source which does not work anymore, is one source okay?  TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 05:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Our "policy" on this is WP:LINKROT , and it being dead should not be taken against the article, more so if the reference is more than a decade old.  So no, your premise of this article having just one source doesn't hold.  Howard the Duck ( talk ) 07:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I did a WP:BEFORE search outside of the sources in the article and can't find anything which suggests to me that the article passes WP:GNG .  The non-working links do not necessarily suggest there was secondary coverage of him, either - the magazine just has a wordpress site and the BBC radio bit is an interview, which are not secondary.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Pandavar Illam: Tirishan ( talk ) 22:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Longest running Tamil serial, WP:GNG have added references from The Times of India [19] .  and Sun TV Website [20] and more Episode coverage in Tamil language.  [21] , [22] . -- P.Karthik.95 ( talk ) 10:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source 1 aka the Times of India source on this reply is routine promotional coverage on the serial hitting a certain milestone and quotes from the actors Source 2 is routine coverage on the promotional video and repeatedly states that something detail about the serial is unknown Source 3 is a self published source, and its expertise is currently unknown.  The entire body of this source is "Serial story coming soon..." with a list of actors Source 4 is also a self published source, and its expertise is currently unknown.  It just lists the serial cast (taking from this archive because the source isn't loading for me) Source 5 is routine coverage about the cast receiving their COVID-19 vaccination This reply links to the show's page on Sun TV (the channel airing the serial which is not independent), which is not a source and none of this proves how this serial is notable for Wikipedia.  Karnataka ( talk ) 15:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Longest running Tamil serial.  most of people know about this series.   you nominated this is actually a well known one.   It does cite it's notability.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:4000:12CA:3C7B:C5A3:1C9A:2FB9:C004 ( talk ) 05:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Bobherry Talk My Edits 14:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Trojena: It has been selected as the host location for the 2029 Asian Winter Games .   The references are all press releases or marketing, except for one news report of the award of the games.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 www.neom.com Announcement of establishment No Yes Yes No 2 www.neom.com Information-advertising brochure No Yes Yes No 3 english.alarabiya.net Press release announcing establishment No Yes Yes No 4 saudigazette.com.sa/ A press release about the announcement of the plans for the site No Yes Yes No 5 www.spa.gov.sa, Saudi Press Agency Press release about bid to host 2029 Asian Winter Games No Yes Yes No 6 www.arabnews.com News report that it will host 2029 Asian Winter Games Yes Yes Yes Yes That one news story is not enough to satisfy general notability .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 07:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Saudi Arabia .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 07:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Its nomination as a site for the Asian Winter Games makes it notable.  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 08:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Right now it looks like No consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
United World College of the Adriatic: UtherSRG (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe this school is notable, both for Friuli-Venezia Giulia (the region it is based in), and for it's role in developing international education and pedagogy.  I will take a stab at adding some details and a handful of independent sources to the article to make that more apparent.  Keep .  Dotx3 ( talk ) 13:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - United World Colleges tend to be notable.  However this article has been flagged for over a decade and is in real need of proper sourcing.  - Imcdc Contact 02:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sevvanthi (TV series): Tirishan ( talk ) 20:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : WP:GNG have added references from The Times of India [31] , [32] . The serial has been remade in more than two other languages: Telugu : The Times of India [33] , News18 India [34] , Malayalam : Kerala TV [35] .   There may be important updates in the future. -- P.Karthik.95 ( talk ) 10:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It does pass GNG.  CastJared ( talk ) 15:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 08:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus