hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Colos (rapper): Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Albania ,  and Germany .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ FOARP : who ! voted "Weak Keep" in the previous AfD, might have something to say.  4 years have passed and if no new, in-depth coverage has been published, this AfD should be carefully considered.  Ktrimi991 ( talk ) 16:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If more RS are found, I am happy to change my stance.  Ktrimi991 ( talk ) 21:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unless we can find sources in German.  There is nothing in English we can use.  "Colos" appears in everything from various African websites to Vietnamese ones, none of which are about this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I think at least one source FOARP found last time, [6] does indeed have SIGCOV of the subject.  It's not enough on its own though, we'll need another source.  — siro χ o 05:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tracefs: Only significant coverage (ie. not press release republication or forum post etc.) is a paper by the authors of the software.  https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast-04/tracefs-file-system-trace-them-all Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 05:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 07:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination, clearly fails WP:NSOFTWARE , as well as WP:GNG .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammad Bahiraei: searching his name in English gives almost nothing, even in Persian there are only very few things about him.  the article says he won a gold medal at the Asian Championship in 2007 which is wrong (probably just a junior medal) he also never played in a pro league or even a major national tournament.  Sports2021 ( talk ) 23:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I removed some of the called out unverifiable information about a medal at the Asian Championships after attempting to verify (AFAICT the national team has never medaled in such a competition).  That's not promising for this article, but I don't have a ! vote as of now.  — siro χ o 01:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unremarkable athlete who does not seem to pass GNG, the only sources available are passing mentions.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 13:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zhou Yusen: (I'm not convinced the one remaining source is reliable either, the author is a lab leak conspiracy theorist).  He doesn't seem to warrant a standalone article per WP:1E , any reliably sourced information could go into an article related to COVID-19 if due.  JaggedHamster ( talk ) 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conspiracy theories and COVID-19 .  JaggedHamster ( talk ) 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Military .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG .  The article is a WP:COATRACK for COVID-19 lab leak theorizing .  At best it could be redirected, but Zhou is not currently mentioned there.  Jfire ( talk ) 19:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : please note that the subject is also known as "Yusen Zhou" (Zhou is a surname).  Per Scopus , Zhou has an h-index of 49 with over 140 publications.  I am not advocating for retaining of the article, yet, but it is possible that the subject may be notable under Wikipedia:Notability (academics) .  Remember, do not base notability judgements on the current or former state of any article .  --Animalparty! ( talk ) 23:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, that's a good reminder. If anyone makes a strong case for academic notability, I'm more than happy to revise my opinion. In any case, I've removed the coatracked content from the article. Jfire ( talk ) 23:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is WP:NACADEMIC satisfied? Bon courage ( talk ) 03:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and China . --Animalparty!  ( talk ) 00:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see how to write an article on this subject without succumbing to problematic WP:FRINGE sourcing since there are lots of unvetted conspiracy theories swirling around about this character that are so obscure as to not warrant inclusion and the academic inclusion criteria, as good faith as it is, does not seem able to deal with situations like this.  If a full professor dies in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it still make a sound?  jps ( talk ) 23:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A WP:BLP1E , not worthy of a separate article.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 19:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Avinash Chate: All sources on the page are regurgitated paid PR articles.  A Google search brings up more such paid PR publications.  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 06:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 06:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete - These sources appear to be paid, yet there is no conclusive evidence confirming them as such, as they lack disclaimers and are not featured in the "brandspot" section.  The suspicion arises due to the absence of credited authors and the promotional nature of the articles, which deviate from typical news formats.  Grabup ( talk ) 09:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very PROMO with flowery language in multiple sources.  Non-notable corporate communicator person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Every news story cited here reads like paid placement.  Per WP:NEWSORGINDIA , Indian news sources require careful consideration due to weak controls on advertising and sponsored content, and almost all of the stories would trigger caution (for example, their lack of a bylined author).  We should not use the available sources to validate notability under GNG or BIO.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 16:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Yingling: Article only has one citation, which only relates to the aforementioned exhibit winning an award and has nothing to do with the article's subject.  Furthermore, the article has a COI issue as it appears to have been created the subject himself years ago.  – WPA ( talk ) 02:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence of notability, seems to fail both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR due to lack of reliable sources.  I cannot seem to find any reliable sources that mention Yingling, and even if sources do exist the minor nature of the roles played would still probably warrant deletion.  ReedyTurnip ( talk ) 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  – WPA ( talk ) 02:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation , Amusement parks ,  and Oregon .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not seeing any coverage on this person.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 07:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gilbert Taument: A web search finds passing mentions but no WP:SIGCOV .  His brother Gaston is a notable footballer.  There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me.  The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 00:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 00:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Netherlands .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hakim Arif: Promotional writing and insignificant coverage.  — T. 10:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  — T. 10:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Other than some press release, I am unable to see any significant coverage in RS, fails WP:GNG .  Also notability is not inherited.  -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 17:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  — Yahya ( talk • contribs. ) 18:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Graeme Blevins: While there are a number of sources, I couldn't find anything that is both reliable and provides WP:SIGCOV .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 04:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 04:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Thanks for flagging.  Have improved the article with additional authoritative news sources.  We are talking here about one of the very best saxophone players of his generation.  In the Brit Awards 2024 (the leading awards in UK for music), RAYE won more awards than any other artist, so for Blevins to have a track named after him on her album is notable.  He has been regularly in the bands of several household name stars and played in a Grammy award winning album.  Wikiwikiwwwest ( talk ) 00:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Still try to include more sources that contribute to the WP:GNG criteria.  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 13:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per adequate refs by now JarrahTree 01:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which sources?  I wasn't able to locate any.  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 04:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Coverage in the article is now about the Raye group, which isn't helping this person's individual notability...  Listed here [8] , but it's always in a long list of other people.  Playing on an album with a group of others doesn't meet notability here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the subject of this article lacks in-depth coverage in secondary, reliable sources, so it fails WP:NBIO .  I couldn't find any indication it meets WP:MUSICBIO either.  The additional references do not solve the problems highlighted by the nomination.  Lots of WP:REFSPAM overall.  Pilaz ( talk ) 09:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pumping Station: One: 16 of this article's 27 citations are from the website of the company itself, and the rest have little to no notability.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 19:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Computing .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 19:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this looked promising, but it's in Winnipeg [20] .  No sourcing found for this makerspace in Chicago.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think the coverage from the American Bar Association Journal , Columbia Chronicle , Time Out Chicago, Gapers Block , Northwestern University .  This might help as well: "Avondale's TARDIS Calls Pumping Station: One Hacker Space Its Home" .  DNAinfo Chicago .  Retrieved 2023-05-30 .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can see where you're coming from here, but the sources still generally aren't any good.  The ABA Journal source is just a brief mention about one of the article's main subjects having spent time with the company.  Same thing goes for the Northwestern article.  The other sources you mention seem to lack credibility or just noteworthiness in general.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 20:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom, reads like ads.  Artem.G ( talk ) 09:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: to discuss the sourcing identified Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company/organization therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria apply.  Sourcing fails to meet the criteria for establishing notability.  The Avondale article is a blog so fails WP:RS and has no " Independent Content " since it relies entirely on information provided by the company and/or people closely associated with it.  Similar issues arise with most of the other references, relying on information provided by the company or people closely associated with the company, failing WP:ORGIND .  The remaining are brief mentions with insufficient in-depth information about the company to meet WP:CORPDEPTH .  HighKing ++ 13:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ACW American Joshi Championship: The promotion doesn't even have an article HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 15:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 20:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the promotion had an article until it was deleted for notability concerns in December 2022.   This isn't notable either.  LM2000 ( talk ) 19:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per LM2000.  -- Mann Mann ( talk ) 02:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
American National Business Hall of Fame: Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 22:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Business ,  and United States of America .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 22:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WIU Libraries are managing these 2 sites starting July 2023..... .we have been busy making it accurate....  71.194.113.131 ( talk ) 21:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 07:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable.  Found no refs.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 07:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  I failed to find proper sources or references.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Thoroughly fails WP:GNG .  Like others above, I failed to locate any reliable secondary sources on the subject whatsoever.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
R. Michael Givens: Givens is a former Sons of Confederate Veterans commander who was frequently quoted and who commissioned articles for SCV's magazine.  The role does not confer notability, and commissioning the articles renders them not independent.  He's in the news for his role, but I'm not sure that's enough for biographical notability nor does he necessarily merit a mention in SCV or the magazine, so not sure a redirect is helpful to the reader.  The subject (self disclosed) would prefer it says less, but then there's no notability as the film work doesn't rise to the level.  Thoughts?  Suggestions?  Star Mississippi 18:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History ,  and United States of America .  Star Mississippi 18:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing here merits inclusion.  He was affiliated with an organization that is notable but he doesn't seem to be a particularly notable member of it.  He's quoted in articles speaking for the group and that's basically it.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 22:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I think it is possible that Givens's film work rises to the level of WP:NCREATIVE or WP:GNG .  See for instance [8] , [9] .  However the article is currently in violation of WP:BLPBALANCE , so unless someone steps up to address that, I think that policy compels us to delete.  Jfire ( talk ) 00:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete