hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Power of a method : The hits for "power of a method" I found are invariably about power of a test , or something else unrelated to this.  Only source is an WP:SPS published by retired businessman Norman W. Edmund , and does not support the article at all.  Paradoctor ( talk ) 17:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Paradoctor ( talk ) 17:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced and completely OR.   I can find several hits for the phrase in scholarly literature but all are talking about radically different things.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If this was notable then it should also be in the base page methodology .  I found nothing there, so it fails that test.  In a search the phrase is so common that it is used extensively in other contexts, which also does not support this article.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 09:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Would a redirect to power of a test be useful instead if there are some uses like that in RSes or are uses too varied?  Shapeyness ( talk ) 21:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We need sources that define the meaning of the term.  Us declaring this or that use to mean x or y would be WP:OR .  If you think you can find such, great!  Paradoctor ( talk ) 21:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajura : Then, we get reports about upcoming award events, in which the artist is mentioned once, as a candidate, e.g. here , here , etc; or announcements about upcoming tours, such as this .  Practically all sources offer promotional copy instead of reviews, e.g. "The video is a reflection of the singer’s talent, as it is colourful and creative [and] will definitely garner the single more reviews"; some go as far, or as low, as reporting that the artist "has released new publicity photos" ( see here ).  He's a young artist who has released one unremarkable single, marketing wise.  There are millions, literally, like Ajura.  At our most generous, we can wish for something better in the future .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: The page was created by a currently blocked sock .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Are these City People awards notable?  This person won an award; the article for the City People Awards doesn't seem to use notable sources.  It's not the first award from that City People we've seen here either...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll ask at the Project Africa page, see if they can help.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] [28] comparable to the People's Choice awards for example.  This should make the individual being discussed here notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The People's Choice Awards , since their inception, are decided through polling and, since the early 2000s, through online voting or polling research.  There is no participation by fans in the City People Entertainment Awards , as far as we can tell.  Putting the latter on equal footing with PCA would be a stretch.  But even so, Ajura has not won a City People award; he was only nominated - in the New Act category.  One weak appearance in the field of awards "should make Ajura notable"?  We need more, much more than this.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 18:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Related discussions : 2023-08 Restlezz (musician) (closed as ✗ delete) Logs : 2023-05 move to → Ajura (singer) -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Underland Press : Before nominating, I removed all WP:PRIMARY sources and didn't find anything very WP:RS looking upon a preliminary search.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 06:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , United States of America ,  and Oregon .  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 06:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No significant coverage per WP:SIGCOV , fails WP:GNG .  GAGIWOR ( talk ) 11:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mykyta Hrebenshchykov : No evidence of WP:GNG .  I found Suspilne , which mentions him once, and a bunch of interviews with a musician from Kyiv who shares the same name but goes by 'The Curly'.  The footballer is from Chernihiv and looks nothing like the musician .  If the musician is notable, then a separate article should be started at The Curly but I see no evidence that he is notable either.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Transit authority (surveillance term) : Longhornsg ( talk ) 00:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Military , Terrorism ,  and United States of America .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 00:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICT .   Just a definition, no discussion or context.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aimee Moran : No coverage found online.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 11:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Wales .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 11:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sigcov 1 .  Stvbastian ( talk ) 11:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An interview is a primary source.  Routine Google search does not bring up a source meeting WP:GNG, therefore delete.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thats not a primary source.  The article provide an author own thinking based on primary sources, and written through editor edits.  Stvbastian ( talk ) 23:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It does contain a lot of non-quote material, but it also fails independence because it is published by the Badminton Wales and material from governing sports orgs is explicitly rejected from counting toward notability.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 00:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks sufficient coverage to pass notability guidelines.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV .  The above mentioned source is from the National Governing Body for Badminton in Wales and thus is not independent of the subject Alvaldi ( talk ) 20:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find anything better than the Badminton Wales source already discussed above Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have added a few news references to the page.   I am not prepared to argue that this coverage is sufficiently notable, but I wanted to point out that there is at least some independent coverage outside the governing sports organization.  IdRatherBeAtTheBeach ( talk ) 18:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For evaluation of the last-minute addition of references.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The Cardiffian is a few paragraphs about a tournament, with one line mentioning her.  The Cuban site is the same.  Other source is trivial coverage.  Nothing found for notability either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sources providing SIGCOV.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 23:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 14:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Badessy : LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 22:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Haiti .  LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 22:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Capital City Connection : As always, television shows are not automatically notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability, so nothing here is "inherently" notable without sourcing for it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama .  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing to suggest notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vhairi Munro : Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no decent independent coverage yet.  The Daily Record piece has a few quotes but it's not enough coverage of Munro herself to justify her having her own article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Koimoi : First AfD resulted in no consensus with the second resulting in keep.  Low participation in both.  Cannot find sources to support notability.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Websites ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This website states that "Koimoi.com is India’s #2 Digital Bollywood Portal with over 5 million users a month visiting its Web and Mobile sites." (which is not a claim they took from Koimoi's About , apparently).  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 00:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 22:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article lacks substantial evidence of notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines WP:GNG , with no independent secondary reliable sources cited.  Additionally, the website itself is deemed unreliable under WP:ICTFSOURCES .  The first cited link is blog website not a reliable source at all.  Grabup ( talk ) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The relevant guideline here would be WP:NCORP , right?  I don't think we've got any hope of that if no one's been able to make a solid keep vote through all of these AfDs.  I went looking through google scholar/books and found a lot of glancing hits (eg, "Koimoi lists both Bollywood and Hollywood movies"), but nothing substantial.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 05:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aamjhar River : The references consist of two youtube videos of people standing in water bodies that seem like rivers somewhere close to Aamjhar and a google search of a bridge on the river Ahu (which flows close to Aamjher I guess).  None of this actually proves that that the freakin river exists pointing to the fact that this article is probably a WP:HOAX .  Sohom ( talk ) 18:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG as the only sources are YouTube videos and a Google search.  Doesn’t even meet the low standards of WP:GEONATURAL .  - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 18:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Rajasthan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails GEONATURAL and GNG.  The river does exist as an incident occurred there , but regardless, this source won't satisfy notability guidelines.  Tails Wx 02:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The name is the Amajarv river on both the ISRO and MapmyIndia maps, and it is a tributary of the Ahu River not of the Kali Sindh.   So the article is wrong in its basics.   This is a start-again situation.   Without sourcing to YouTube next time, clearly.  Uncle G ( talk ) 11:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not that the river is short, I get it, but there is nothing important about it and large parts of the article are unsourced.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 , 03:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Proximus TV channels : Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 10:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Belgium .  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 10:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : At most, this was only ever a list of Proximus TV's official channel lists, links to which were eventually removed for being dead links.  (Someone tried to have this speedied in 2017 because of that, but it was declined as that is not a CSD criterion; it does seem to indicate that an AfD was long overdue here.)  Hard to imagine that any version of this complied with Wikipedia not being a directory .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Petr Dezort : No sources providing coverage can be found online.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 12:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Tennis ,  and Czech Republic .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 12:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete his only two titles in tennis were not even in the minor leagues... they were in the minor-minor league men's Futures events.  That's not enough to cut it per Tennis Guidelines.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 07:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Fyunck(click) - He has two Challenger titles in doubles though.  Jevansen ( talk ) 07:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I missed those on the ITF page.  Thanks.  I know Tennis Project Guidelines are supposed to treat doubles the same as singles, but these days that's pretty iffy.  It seems like the amount of minor league and minor-minor league finals he played were pretty minimal, and you do need some notable sourcing or accomplishments regardless.  Guideline edges are inherently grey and blurry and we need to be flexible.  I would say this one falls short, but I won't be distraught if others feel it should remain.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 19:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If there are no secondary sources providing SIGCOV it is not notable regardless of whether it passes NTENNIS or not.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 11:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can only find coverage written by him or by people closely associated, relating to the tennis academy that he runs.  This Czech search yielded nothing decent.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unable to find anything that's counted as a significant coverage either about Dezort, which is unsurprising given his career results.  Fails WP:GNG .  Jovanmilic97 ( talk ) 23:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dominic Mulvany : No independent sources.  Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Ireland .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is about all the coverage I can find [19] , appears to be a long-working musician, but not rising to what we consider notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, found traces online but likely not enough to support notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, notes from Oaktree b and Indefensible above, WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC .  No indication that ever charted anything in the Irish charts (singles or albums).  Or elsewhere for that matter.  A search in the Irish music press ( like in Hot Press magazine ) returns nothing.  A search of the Irish Times returns this piece on a school concert .  Which may or may not be the subject.  A search in the Independent News & Media stable of regional papers returns pretty much just this from the regional Wicklow People .  Not seeing evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  The SPA/COI overtones, in the initial article creation, are also less than ideal...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to meet WP:SINGER or GNG — siro χ o 20:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is a classic example of the use of Wikipedia as an extension of a client/their own hosting space for publicity purpose.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graywalls ( talk • contribs ) 04:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NMUSIC .  Spleodrach ( talk ) 23:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anna Bühler : JMWt ( talk ) 07:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Germany .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AkelPad : It's just a random non-notable text editor, fails WP:NSOFT .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 07:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 07:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Best I can find are reviews on download sites.  I don't imagine a text editor gets much critical notice; I couldn't find any reviews in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete