hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Bahria Town Nawabshah: I don't see it passing WP:ORG either.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep - the nominator nominated 7 articles for deletion within the scope of 2 minutes, with identical deletion rationales.  I strongly doubt any serious WP:BEFORE was performed here.  -- Soman ( talk ) 12:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Soman , So, basically, just because I nominated a bunch of pages around the same time doesn't mean I didn't do my homework beforehand.  And if my reasons for nominating are similar across different AfDs, it's because the issues with those articles are pretty much the same too.  Why don't you come with some coverage that meets the GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 12:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : According to my check, I looked for in-depth coverage from multiple independent secondary sources to establish notability, but I found this and not much more detailed coverage.  These articles lack in-depth coverage of the subject and can’t establish notability.  The subject fail to meet WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 08:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect is this a city, a neighborhood, or an apartment building?   Is it under construction or complete?   None of the references answer these questions, or give any substantial independent coverage.  Bahria Town#Bahria Town Nawabshah is an acceptable redirect target in lieu of deletion.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 A-League Women finals series: The level of detail is equivalent to that shown in articles of previous seasons of the A-League Women Matilda Maniac ( talk ) 23:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Events , Football ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To 2023–24 A-League Women . Svartner ( talk ) 04:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above. Giant Snowman 13:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sandy N. Leal: I suppose this could be redirected to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 04:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies per recent precedent.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 06:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ismelda Cruz: The subject has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  All I found were passing mentions like 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and El Salvador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as mentioned above.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 14:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Solar eclipse of October 17, 2153: Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unless there're any time travelers among us, this is WP:TOOSOON -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 14:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Way WP:TOOSOON . Also already listed at List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century . ULPS ( talk ) 14:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century . Per an RfC from last year consensus is that eclipses need to meet WP:GNG or be redirected to the appropriate page. For this eclipse that means redirecting it to its corresponding list. Qwaiiplayer ( talk ) 15:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per the above. Primefac ( talk ) 06:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as Qwaiiplayer and primefac said redirect to list of solar eclipses. MICHAEL 942006 ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 10:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century per the precedent RfC and above comments: general consensus is that future eclipses that do not meet WP:GNG / WP:NASTRO should be redirected. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 18:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per previous participants and WP:TOOSOON . -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 00:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WKOB-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New York .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : It clearly has a longer history than many other HC2/Innovate stations, but a good chunk of it has been relaying other stations (this was originally WCBS-TV's UHF translator back when the New York City stations all had those) or full-time national services.  Maybe there's something out there at least about the station's Korean days of the 1990s and early 2000s (of note, this was not part of last year's bulk nomination of many HC2/Innovate station articles ), but it's hard to imagine anything warranting anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} .  Probably another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006 in the end.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Agdapdap Islet: No reliable non-wiki mirror hits in Google, GNews and GNews Archives.  Alternatively , retarget to List_of_islands_of_the_Philippines#Romblon -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philippines and Islands .  Lenticel ( talk ) 07:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to proposed target.  Does seem to exist, but no coverage at all beyond confirmation of it existing, so can be discussed only at the list per GEOLAND.  AryKun ( talk ) 13:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as mentioned above.  Island probably too small and relatively unremarkable to have its own article.  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 06:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of islands of the Philippines#Romblon : there is not enough reliable sourcing to establish notability per WP:GEONATURAL , with the only coverage verifying its existence.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 16:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Microjazz: Random line of sheet music, not inherently notable.  Zim Zala Bim talk 15:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Education ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Well, this [10] helps, I'll see what else comes up...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Christopher Norton : Most hits are in relation to Christopher Norton [11] , [12] are brief reviews...  Unless someone can find better sourcing to ! keep the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Christopher Norton : if independent sourcing for the term can be found, otherwise redirect .  Owen× ☎ 19:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
O Mang Reloaded: .  If I'm not mistaken, a deluxe or extended version is not eligible for a standalone article therefore this should be merge d into O Mang?  .  dxneo ( talk ) 17:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and South Africa .  dxneo ( talk ) 17:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no reason why a deluxe album wouldn't be allowed its own article.  It's less likely to happen because deluxe albums don't usually get the same level of coverage, but articles such as Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection are completely valid.  However, notability is required for any album, deluxe or otherwise to receive an article, and I don't see evidence of that for either version of O Mang , so I say delete redirect both articles to Hip Hop Pantsula .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 20:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] QuietHere , my point exactly.  I don't know a way of nominating two or more articles at once so I thought it would be great to merge or redirect then delete them altogether as I don't think we can discuss notability of another article here.  I stand to be corrected.  dxneo ( talk ) 20:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Dxneo follow the instructions at WP:MULTIAFD and you'll have it.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 21:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] QuietHere , the related article ( O Mang? ) is marked as redirect, i guess this should also follow in that direction since the nomination looks stupid already.  dxneo ( talk ) 04:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I meant to write "redirect" rather than delete above and forgot.  Adjusted my vote.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 15:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  There is only one article included in this AFD deletion discussion.  To do a bundled nomination, please see guidelines at WP:AFD .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisting seems a bit inadequate as there are no sources and redirect is probably the way to go.  dxneo ( talk ) 18:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can see why you would disagree with a relisting but I don't understand how it is "inadequate".  I think you probably meant another word.  As for me, I just wanted to hear assessments from more than two editors.  That's my preference and it's only the first relisting.  I don't think that is asking for too much.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hip Hop Pantsula per above discussion.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 16:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Star Jones (TV series): Tagged for notability since 2019 Donald D23 talk to me 13:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Law ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 13:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Star Jones#truTV : this seems like a logical alternative to deletion here.  This seems like another remnant of the looser inclusion and notability standards of 2007.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator I would be ok with a redirect.  Donald D23 talk to me 13:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aldersgate College: No notable references from GNews, GSearch and Google News Archives.  Alternatively, redirect to Solano,_Nueva_Vizcaya#Education -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 01:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Groosalugg: No analysis, no reception.  My BEFORE shows few mentions in passing and some discussion of plotlines involving him, but nothing stricte about him.  Suggest redirecting to the List of Angel characters .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Angel characters .  I don't think that character needs his own page.  He was only in 9 episodes and doesn't have much media coverage.  Other characters where deleted, that were much more relavant to the series, like Lorne (76 episodes), Lilah Morgan (35 episodes) or Lindsey McDonald (19 episodes).  He is surely the least relevant of the Angel characters with their own page.  -- Dynara23 ( talk ) 16:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to a lack of coverage. Not enough for WP:SIGCOV . Would consider a redirect per WP:ATD . Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Angel characters per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Prime ministerial confirmation of Ferdinand Marcos: — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 04:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 7 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sheesh, just redirect this junk to Ferdinand Marcos#Prime Minister and do the same with the rest of the mass-produced inauguration substubs.  They do not need separate pages just because they happened, this can be covered perfectly well in the respective articles of the presidents.  Reywas92 Talk 14:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand Marcos#Prime Minister We don't need to give this its own separate article as the election was a clear sham and it was a pre-ordained result.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand Marcos#Prime Minister , nothing separately notable here.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 06:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand Marcos#Prime Minister per Reywas92 and others.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 22:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hobbs, New Mexico party shooting: Elli ( talk | contribs ) 21:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and New Mexico .  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 21:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , depressingly.  A routine crime of no lasting impact other than to the victims, their friends, and their families.  Mangoe ( talk ) 21:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Another mass shooting in America?  That's a daily occurrence.  The only notable thing is that the arrested man was framed by the detective, who is related to other, more likely suspects.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 23:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per below.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2019 as WP:ATD .  — siro χ o 02:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Siroxo - Another sadly non-notable event.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hurting (song): Jax 0677 ( talk ) 22:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Karl Wolf ; no sources establishing notability.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 21:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect