hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ajit Menon: The subject fails to meet WP:GNG .  — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Journalism ,  and India .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Paid media per WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  Aronitz ( talk ) 13:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Looks like a recent campaign of NEWSORGINDIA.  Including this , this , and this .  Unable to find anything better online.  Fails WP:GNG and also likely falls under WP:PAID . -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 06:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia is free content, and contributors must reveal their intentions to be paid creating or editing articles.  Also, it appears to be promotional and sourcing is not adequate.  Therefore, delete this article.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 15:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022 Madrid explosion: Gas explosions occur everyday all over the world, nothing particularly notable about this one.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Spain .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , agree that this seems to be a tragic but with little notability and a non-lasting event.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 02:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Re'john Ene: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bahamas .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - comprehensively fails GNG, can only find stats coverage and SoundCloud Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gorsi clan: Originally prodded for failing WP:GNG and because the creator allegedly used a large language model , it was deprodded by a user who suspiciously deprodded three other articles created by Hanshingling, and who didnot make any actual improvements.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 12:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History ,  and Punjab .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 12:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay, sir thanks You so much for replying and giving your precious time for the discussions.  I will follow the Decision and Guidelines of Wikipedia and will not make any changes to these articles until the Discussion of Deletions of these articles not finish.  Bensebgli ( talk ) 12:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)}} Sock .  Abecedare ( talk ) 18:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - as per nom.   Also, there is an open SPI investigation as well.  Onel 5969 TT me 14:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  // Timothy :: talk 21:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bill Fitzgerald: BD2412 T 03:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Alabama ,  and Virginia .  BD2412 T 03:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not much there, aside from self-generated publicity regarding a departure from a news network and the hosting of a political debate [40] , [41] , [42] , as well as subtle passing mentions in books [43] .  No significant coverage by reliable, independent sources.  Multi7001 ( talk ) 03:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Romell Gumbs: No indication of notability.  Despite playing in England, I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 21:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muhammad Saleem: likely autobiographical.  ltb d l ( talk ) 06:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan .  ltb d l ( talk ) 06:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG.  The BLP  currently relies on unreliable sources.  Created by a SPA so likely COI.   — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 08:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Good find.  86.130.244.141 ( talk ) 00:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muaid Moaafa: Twitter is not reliable or independent and database sources do not confer notability, so that rules out all of the references bar Shorouk News and Akhbaar24 , both of which contain minimal information on the player and are referenced to Twitter, which is not reliable or independent.  The only news story that I could find that wasn't referenced to Twitter was Ar Riyadiyah , which is just a photo of him training from home, with two sentences confirming what the image shows.  No significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SIGCOV found, fails BASIC and ANYBIO.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 08:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rinat Baibekov: Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.  A search found nothing better.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 03:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless an editor can rewrite the article based on newly discovered references to reliable, independent sources that devote enough significant coverage to this artist showing that they meet WP:ARTIST .  The "Artist's statement" section is of no value, because an acceptable Wikipedia article about an artist summarizes what sources independent of the artist say, not what the artist says about themself.  The "Overview" section is unreferenced, banal and uninformative.  The "Exhibitions" section is entirely unreferenced, and is therefore of no value in establishing notability.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 04:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Russia , England ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per both above.  Johnbod ( talk ) 12:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards: Draftify 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:06, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Please read the list of AfDs and the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South before offering an opinion here 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Awards ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Copycat awards per WP:DADASAHEB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sid95Q ( talk • contribs ) 17:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This seems to be exactly the same issue discussed in the previous AfD, and the sources in this version aren't particularly convincing either.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 02:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and ECP SALT - As explained at WP:DADASAHEB , an imitation award.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 14:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nominated this as draftify.  I have had more time to consider.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alan Roberts (sailor): Sources in article and found in BEFORE do not meet WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth.  The event they are primary known for does not have an article.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 02:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Damian London: Article asserts their most famous role was as a recurring character on Babylon 5 , but that seems to be about it.  Does not pass WP:NACTOR either.  Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Illinois .  Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - seems to have insufficient referencing to support notability and quality.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 21:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New Frontier Design: "Best luxury tiny home builder" in The Spruce 2020 awards is the key claim to notability presented.  Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP - "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources..."  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , United States of America ,  and Tennessee .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , see table below, only a single source that meets WP:SIRS and WP:CORPDEPTH -- but I'm honestly happy to see at least a single source.   Note that the article needs a lot of NPOV improvement, too.  — siro χ o 09:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: prepared by User:siroxo Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  architectural digest largely an interview with founder ?  ✘ No digital trends [18] this covers a specific product, with only a few words about the company ✘ No BBC company covered by interview with founder ✘ No insider heavily relies on interview ~ mostly about product not company ✘ No the spruce [19] in-depth entry in a list, meets WP:CORPDEPTH ✔ Yes business insider relies heavily on interview with founder ~ ~ ✘ No treehugger [20] ?  couple sentences about company, mostly product review ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  I can't find much more about this builder.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Portuguese in Montenegro: The article is padded out with information on trade between the two countries, NATO, etc., presumably to make up for the lack of in-depth coverage of the topic in reliable sources.  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Montenegro ,  and Portugal .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Agree with the nominator that the very-recent, almost non-existent community is not notable.  Further, the sourcing is almost all primary and the one secondary source I found does not seem to support the article topic in any way.  The creator of this article is @ Miguel01Cruzado who appears to be devoted to promoting claims of Portuguese heritage.   I've called their edits out in the past for lacking reliable sourcing but it felt like a losing battle.  Oblivy ( talk ) 07:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Template style article creation along with others (Portuguese in xxx) with very little substantive content to justify the article.  Possibly redirects to Portuguese xxx relations but quite probably ultimately not worth the effort.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 10:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there is no evidence that this community meets WP:GNG as a stand-alone topic.  As others have said, the article is mostly based on tangential information and contains almost no information about the Portuguese community living in Montenegro, presumably because little to no info actually exists.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per arguments made at all the other "Portuguese in wherever articles".  AryKun ( talk ) 15:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Geraint James (rugby union): A couple mentions here , another trivial mention there , but nothing substantial.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Wales .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Played one match for Cardiff due to extraordinary circumstances.  Unlikely to feature further or have any future significant coverage.  RodneyParadeWanderer ( talk ) 16:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A number of passing mentions, but looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:SPORTBASIC and no evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brandchannel: does not meet the significance criteria.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhyWeAll ( talk • contribs ) 18:29, July 1, 2023 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 3 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I found SIGCOV in the New York Times but not much else.  There is a lot of incidental coverage of lists, product placement tracking in films, but not much substantive.  Interbrand would seem to merit an article but we lack the obvious ATD here, so delete unless Interbrand is created.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 00:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Internet , Websites ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  The article appears to be written by a small number of users contributing content without any citations and then retrofitting some unrelated sources to match existing text.  Overall, pretty much no supported material.  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 11:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Life expectancy (concept): However this does seem to expand upon the concept so what should be done here?  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (Speedy) Delete A10 would seem entirely sensible here, the two are about the same concept, and this is a far shorter and less substantial text.  If you think there's anything worth merging, go right ahead, but we should not have a CFORK.  Delete without a redirect.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 18:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Possibly as a merge to Life expectancy Industrial Insect (talk) 18:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Mathematics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Danielaanaiza , the creator, maybe you could explain why you created this article?  You put Not to be confused with Life expectancy.  on this article so you were aware of Life expectancy .  Is there something we're missing?  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 01:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely redundant to Life expectancy and very OR-ish at points, to boot.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , We shouldn't hold articles which are redundant .  Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per WP:REDUNDANTFORK .  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 18:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete