List of mosques: Their rationale implies that the content is not worthy of being merged, so it is within the scope of AfD.  List of mosques serves no useful purpose.  It's clearly too vague to ever be a viable list article per WP:SALAT (e.g. there's no List of church buildings either, as far as I can see).  This is a function accomplished by Category:Mosques .  The list has no proper inclusion criteria: the lead states "some of the more famous mosques", but that's obviously unhelpful, there's little about the current list that suggests the additions are being limited to "famous" mosques, and even if we tried to enforce such a criteria it would inevitably be an unclear POV mess; anything can be "famous" from a certain POV, and " notable " would by definition include every Wikipedia mosque article (which, again, is what categories are for).  There are of course almost no sources in that article either, despite the many additional claims inserted into the list.  All of this makes it incompatible with the guidelines outlined at WP:STANDALONE .
 The only useful version of this would be an article that links to more precise lists of mosques.  This already exists here at Lists of mosques (notwithstanding some needed improvements).  Two articles with such similar titles are also likely to cause confusion and they already look like WP:CONTENTFORKs of each other.  Therefore, List of mosques should simply redirect here.  — User:R Prazeres 17:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC) – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 00:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Islam ,  and Lists .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 00:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect per the above.  Indeed I only proposed as merge because I thought a blank-and-redirect would fall under that type of proposal, but deleting (with or without redirect) addresses the problem too.  R Prazeres ( talk ) 00:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This can survive, and quite possibly should, as a list-of-lists, assuming someone wants to make sub-lists, say for per-nation mosque lists, which can in turn be lists of per-province mosque lists.  Absent that, a comprehensive list in one file doesn't seem to be terribly useful or maintainable.  Jclemens ( talk ) 00:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If I understand you correctly, is that not what Lists of mosques is?  (That was the context of the original merge proposal copied above.)  R Prazeres ( talk ) 01:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Indeed.  I appear to have missed the hatnote.  Carry on.  Jclemens ( talk ) 01:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No worries, easy to miss!  R Prazeres ( talk ) 01:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I got confused by the similar titles but while lists of mosques is a navigational list this one isn't.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 02:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep One of the most spurious nominations I've ever seen, to be honest.  Category:Lists of religious building lists even has a container category for these sorts of pages, and the See Also section functions similarly to other pages in that category.  This is really a speedy keep in my book - deleting this is completely non-sensical.  SportingFlyer T · C 05:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lists of mosques .  Upon further review, this article and that article are functional duplicates.  I did not read the entirety of the nomination statement, which I thought was making an incorrect argument that mosques should be categorised instead, and that we were deleting the master article.  SportingFlyer T · C 05:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  It seems pretty uncontroversial that the two articles should simply be merged using Lists of mosques as the title, which appears has been largely done already.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or redirect to Lists of mosques per the above.  I would have supported a straight redirect if the Lists article didn't list some individual mosques as well, but there indeed are individual mosques listed on the Lists article.  – Epicgenius ( talk ) 17:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Epicgenius I thoroughly disagree with a merge.  The way a page happened to be is frankly not a strong reason why we should go along, because anyone can edit, and a page may simply not have attracted any potential opposing valid views.  Listing individual mosques contradicts with the nature of a page that, per its title, should have been a "list of lists".  I checked the edit history of that page.  And apparently, this edit a few years ago added a whole lotta individual mosques to what once was truly a list of lists.  The account behind the edit has only 7 edits and has not been active since.  Likely due to little traffic then, no one reverted that edit and went along with the flow.  After this AfD, the removal of the individual mosques from that page is warranted in my opinion.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aintabli , as I mentioned, I am fine with either a redirect or a merge.  I only mentioned a merge in case there was a desire to maintain tables of individual mosques on the Lists page.  If these tables of individual mosques are removed, then I prefer a redirect instead.  – Epicgenius ( talk ) 22:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect is the most suitable option.  ScriptKKiddie ( talk ) 16:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lists of mosques : I fail to see why this should be merged.  A list of mosques, even if it is only the "famous" ones, which is too vague, is impossible.  Transferring content to the Lists of mosques would contradict the purpose of that page.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect