hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jhermy Fuentes: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2012 , 2014 , 2016 , 2017 , 2022 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - clear WP:BEFORE has been done; nothing but trivial coverage has been located Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per all above.  Svartner ( talk ) 09:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Evelaynne Alcequiez: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Permission slip: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY .  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 16:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Field trip .  This should be a pretty straightforward solution, since that is the thing to which the document relates.  BD2412 T 03:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] When I was at school, I used permission slips to leave classes early for medical appointments, or to consent to my photograph being taken.   I remember we had a yellow slip with about ten different checkboxes and the staff would just tick the applicable box for what permission was needed.   So it wasn't just for field trips.  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 09:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Another big one – permission to skip the lunch queue/enter the canteen at a specified time without queueing, for those taking part in lunch clubs.  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 10:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well the current content is about field trips, and it would probably be better to merge there than go nowhere.  BD2412 T 02:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, field trip could mention that permission slips are needed for students to attend.   But that mention should occupy no more than a sentence of the article, and permission slip is entirely unreferenced.  It is likely easier for an editor to find one source that supports whatever should be briefly said about permission slips at field trip than for an editor to merge the article.  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 12:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and do not merge .  In universities in the US permission slips are used to register for classes with limited enrollments and for other cases.  Merging would be inappropriate because the term has far more general usage.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 00:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 16:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:NOTDICTIONARY .  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karen Akopyan: Does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC .  Sabih omar 04:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  — Karnataka talk 06:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article about footballer who played nine matches in the Russian second division (and some in the Armenian league), but which comprehensively fails WP:GNG .  I could only find routine coverage (e.g., match reports [20] and database entries) in Russian-language sources.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hasan Al Moustafa: No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC from the references provided.  Best I can find in Indian football coverage is Indian Sports News , a trivial mention, and Sportskeeda , which only mentions him twice.  Best source I can find in Arabic is Kooora , a database source, which doesn't confer notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
UFO convention: Of the 11 listed as notable, only National UFO Conference (now defunk) is an actual notable UFO conference.  Conspiracy Con is for conspiracies, MUFON has only a brief mention of symposium in the MUFON article.  Giant Rock was a place where some UFO people gathered, not a convention.  Roswell has a festival but even that is not a notable article.  All the others currently mentioned are not notable.  In popular culture section, is weak and some are only loosely associated with conventions.  Two citations, one to Giant Rock and the other to MUFON.  I think this article is only here to collect non-notable gatherings.  Let each convention exist on it's own, and if we have enough that are notable, then have a UFO convention category.  This is just unnecessary.  Sgerbic ( talk ) 07:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Paranormal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete or listify .  As an article this is a WP:OR mess, but maybe it could be renamed to a list of UFO conventions (keeping the list and removing the OR trivia about in popular culture)?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] listify or if not delete .  Preferably listify following above suggestion.  Editing84 ( talk ) 09:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Listify to List of UFO conventions per WP:NLIST .  The conventions red-linked currently without Wikipedia articles could just be due to no one yet having compiled the necessary quality news media sources, which are likely to increase in the present era.  5Q5 | ✉ 13:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Knox United SC: Couldn't find any online either.  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Australia .  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Semi professional football club playing in Victoria .  Plenty of sources must exist including in print media.  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Simione001.  Definetlyu has offline sources.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 17:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] any evidence of such?  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 23:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of notability, fails GNG and NORG.  None of the sources in the article or found in BEFORE are WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  05:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV .  WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is listed in Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions § There must be sources .  Keep voters must locate sources that demonstrate the topic passes GNG.  Speculative statements are not convincing arguments.  We need to see the evidence.  4meter4 ( talk ) 15:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chloé Dépouilly: Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , South Africa ,  and France .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NSKATE #2 requires gold in national championship.  My deprod was in error.  Apologies.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There are a whole bunch of similarly deficient nominations.  Really, such blanket nominations without evidence of WP:BEFORE and consideration of WP:ATD should be all procedurally kept as WP:SKCRIT#3 given lack of a valid deletion rationale as WP:NSKATE is indicative that sigcov is likely, and is not presumptive/determinative, so someone could meet none of the NSKATE criteria but still meet WP:SPORTCRIT for some reason.   And ! votes relying only on NSKATE are likewise invalid.  That said, it's quite possible that most of these should be delete or redirect results.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 01:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cynthia Laury Dahl: Doesn't meet WP:NPROF , not convinced meets WP:NAUTHOR (unless someone is better at finding reviews than me), or WP:GNG .  Article has been PRODded before.  Perhaps WP:MILL .  Kj cheetham ( talk ) 13:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women .  Kj cheetham ( talk ) 13:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  This article only shows up in search in some educational faculty sites and a LinkedIn account is the second result.  Nothing really says anything about her except for that she works there, so I agree that it fails WP:GNG .  User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 14:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamad Jaamour: is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any footballer to have their own article.  I've revived the Syrian Soccer article but it's only a trivial squad list mention.  Kooora merely lists his goals in the Syria Youth League and is only a database source.  I found some Arabic coverage on Facebook but that's not a WP:RS .  The only other source that I found was ZAMANALWSL , which is another trivial mention.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Joseph (politician): If he wins, automatically notable, but at this point he is subject to general notability policy, and has no indication of passing Brislian ( talk ) 04:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draft per WP:TOOSOON .  All the coverage is specifically related to one event WP:BLP1E , if he does get elected he will be notable as you mention, thus drafting is best for now.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 08:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Military ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Beyond running as a candidate, the individual is not notable.  TOOSOON applies.  Can be re-created after the election win, if it goes that way.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify Delete per WP:TOOSOON , and nom.  and others above .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Changing above ! vote from "draftify" to "delete" per the rationale of Antonine below.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a blatant example of not notable.  WP:TOOSOON shouldn't apply here as otherwise you could apply to all the other candidates standing in the general election, but the editorial guidelines are quite clear that only notable people get articles.  Simply standing for election in a national contest does not automatically make someone notable, so this should be an automatic deletion as a simple case of not being noteworthy.  Antonine ( talk ) 21:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails multiple categories related to BLP articles.  Textbook example of not notable and not meriting an individual Wiki article.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 23:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per previous votes.  Unelected candidates are not inherently notable.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anton Wormann: Shellwood ( talk ) 00:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Five total hits in Gnews, they all appear to be rehashing of the same story about buying a house in Japan.  Gsearch goes straight to socials.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion , Internet ,  and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per others.  Drowssap SMM ( talk ) ( contributions ) 02:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sarala Birla Academy: RPSkokie ( talk ) 09:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 09:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL , and is unsourced.  I couldn't find any reliable sources for the article.  Most of the article is likely WP:OR , as well.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 09:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Karnataka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While some sources are available, they do not meet WP:SIGCOV .  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 17:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced, although the sources in the Bengali version of this appear to be primary.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nilo Aguillar Effori: Purely promo vanity page.  Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 02:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Law ,  and Brazil .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Also looked for sources: could find none talking about him.  References on article were links to articles that he wrote.  He does appear as an interviewee about some formula 1 things here , but it doesn't cover him significantly.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 03:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like a self-promo.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : classic vanity page.  Please ping if you find sources to contrary.  Jtrrs0 ( talk ) 15:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
King Biscuit Flower Hour Presents - Humble Pie In Concert: Based on a before search it does not appear to have charted, won an award, or received enough significant coverage for a stand alone article.  Nominating to be redirected to Humble Pie , the band who recorded the album.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NALBUM per nom.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 05:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nadine Cohen: Not much on the page to indicate this is a notable person JMWt ( talk ) 16:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia .  JMWt ( talk ) 16:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete created by a single purpose editor so possible promo.  None of the roles confer inherent notability.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete