hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Peace to Luhanshchyna: No reliable sources cited.   — Michael Z .  03:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .   — Michael Z .  03:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The corresponding Russian-language article at ru:Мир Луганщине has several references that could be added here.  Please remember WP:BEFORE .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don’t see a single reliable independent secondary source giving significant coverage to this subject there.   — Michael Z .  04:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Russia .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A potential WP:ATD could be a merge to Luhansk People's Republic#Government and politics ; as a ruling political party (even of a fake state), it is noteworthy enough to at least warrant an in-depth mention there.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably would consider the same for Luhansk Economic Union , the other major "political party" in the LNR.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fails to satisfy WP:GNG .  No reliable sources cited. -- Panam2014 ( talk ) 13:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to consider a possible Redirect or Merge to suggested target article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 04:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Luhansk People's Republic#Government and politics per Curbon7's ATD. There are only a couple of lines of substantive information here and those would appropriately be incorportated on that page. There does not appear to be significant coverage such that an encyclopaedic article in its own right can be sustained. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 07:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I agree with the previous comment-- Noel baran ( talk ) 17:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Intelligent Finance: A BEFORE is somewhat difficult given the organization's common name but, insofar as I can tell, it has only a smattering of WP:ROUTINE coverage, plus press releases.  Chetsford ( talk ) 22:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Bank of Scotland : doesn't seem notable by itself, but verifiable information can be included as a short paragraph on the target.  Owen× ☎ 23:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Plays for New Audiences: Content should be merged into Children's Theatre Company and Theatre for Young Audiences The Savage Norwegian 21:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  The Savage Norwegian 21:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Illinois , Minnesota ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I realize now that I could merge this content over to Children's Theatre Company myself and make this page a redirect.  Apologies for my haste in nominating for deletion.  The Savage Norwegian 21:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that this content should be a section within the CTC article.  References elsewhere can be linked to that section.  Kablammo ( talk ) 11:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (the cited material) to Children's Theatre Company .  Despite a reasonable number of search results, I found no evidence that the subject is independently notable.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 11:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
W67DP: Merge with WKTC .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Carolina .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Basically unreferenced.  - Altenmann >talk 02:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with WKTC : its broadcast history can apparently be divided into two eras: repeating WKTC, and a Telemundo affiliation that wound up shifting to a WKTC subchannel after this facility faded away.  Neither exactly suggests independent notability, even if the Telemundo affiliation at least appeared to get some coverage at launch.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Digimon Next: The article just relies on primary sources.  Xexerss ( talk ) 23:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan .  Xexerss ( talk ) 23:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Digimon#Manga per nom; fails WP:NBOOK / WP:GNG .  Link20XX ( talk ) 00:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Digimon#Manga per nom.  A before with the Japanese and English names failed to produce SIGCOV (note that the latter produces results for Digimon World: Next Order ).  ミラP @ Miraclepine 14:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge to Digimon#Manga .  If the section there is restructured, have some of the plot imported to it's section in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 00:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Cornell Big Red Pep Band: No clear indication of notability here/or of coverage to establish that.  [Note that I attend Cornell, have no connection with this org.] Eddie891 Talk Work 13:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York .  Eddie891 Talk Work 13:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Cornell Big Red Marching Band , since the Pep Band is affiliated with that organization.  - Kzirkel ( talk ) 15:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Timeline of Bharat Jodo Yatra: Bharat Jodo Yatra exists, and there's no reason for timeline to exist other than as "dumping content".  Last merge discussion was opposed and ended in No consensus with the only reasoning being it was "written with effort" Soni ( talk ) 04:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  Soni ( talk ) 04:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy link to previous merge discussion .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 05:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Merge to Bharat Jodo Yatra .  I do not see why timeline needs to have a separate page when timeline segment is included in Bharat_Jodo_Yatra#Timeline .  This page is WP:CFORK .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For what it's worth, I think even that timeline section probably breaks WP:NOTNEWS and needs to be removed, refactored or otherwise severely reduced.  But that's another discussion for Talk:Bharat Jodo Yatra Soni ( talk ) 07:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge Not a political student but there's already a Schedule section in Bharat Jodo Yatra .  I don't think it needs its own page for a timeline, as it could be effectively merged into the Bharat Jodo Yatra page.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 06:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Governor of Zaporozhye Oblast: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Russia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:NPOLITICIAN .  Could be expanded with Russian or Ukrainian sources.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That guideline about people does not apply to this article about a wartime appointment , not about a politician or judge (that would be Yevgeny Balitsky , although he is neither).   — Michael Z .  19:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : to Russian occupation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast#Occupation administration per my comments in the previous AfD, which I think reflect even more on this article considering the novelty of this disputed subnational entity.  Next time, consider using WP:PROPMERGE instead.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  The article is a one-item list with no references.  There’s nothing to say about this specific post that can’t be said in articles about the appointed military–civilian occupation head himself, about the occupation, and about its events, which are all notable topics.   — Michael Z .  19:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
132 Aviation Support Squadron RLC: This article is regarding a company-sized sub-unit.  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom .  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Retitle as 7 Aviation Support Battalion RLC , a battalion sized unit, which will be more notable.  This includes 132 Squadron and a couple of other companies.  Buckshot06 (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME the unit you are referring to?  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 00:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME .  Retain squadron article as redirect - better references may appear in time.  Buckshot06 (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME .  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 21:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect to 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME .  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect to 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
PTV (TV station): I only have added 3 references to the article, so far, with most of the references from the Prime7 article, and the article was unreferenced for the longest time, except for the HAAT, which I converted into a note today.  I hope someone finally expands the article with additional information on the station's history.  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 00:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Australia .  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 00:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ MrSchimpf , can you please find additional references for PTV Mildura, and leave your opinion on this article deletion discussion, whatever you choose, keep , redirect or delete .  I know there was a reference on 1 July 1997 (the station's launch day) by the local Sunraysia Daily newspaper in the city about Prime Television (PTV)'s launch in the city, but I can't find it online, except in a TelevisionAU article.  Can you please find the original reference?  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 00:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: User:TechGeek105 , I'm not sure why you nominated this article for a deletion discussion when it sounds like you are seeking sources for it and don't want it deleted.  If that's the case, you shouldn't have brought it to AFD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz , sorry for the late reply, I'm mostly no longer active on Wikipedia, hence the {{Retired}} tag on my user page, but the reason why I nominated this article and other articles for AFD and PROD, is because they fail the notability guidelines ( WP:GNG ), and I failed to find more than 3 references for PTV Mildura.  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 22:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm confused about why I'm being pinged about this; I never contributed to this article and though I do contribute occasionally to AU television articles, it's mostly for maintenance edits.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Prime7 which does cover this topic.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 09:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I'd like a second opinion on the Redirect suggestion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Prime Television : Doesn't have sufficient references for a standalone.  Salvage useable and verifiable content to Prime Television considering there is already some overlap.  ––– GMH Melbourne 11:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2024 American Samoa Republican presidential caucuses: There it can be sufficiently covered in one sentence.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 00:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge In uncontested race, results are easily and best covered in main article.  Reywas92 Talk 03:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with 2024 American Samoa presidential caucuses#Republican caucuses : Subject doesn't contain the necessary WP:SIGCOV for a standalone article.  Merge as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge There's very little information other than the election results and the majority of sources have nothing to do with this specific race.  -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 17:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Should understand that even if there are territories that do not participate in the 2024 US presidential election race, but for this article, there are full secondary sources, redirecting will not make it better, so if this Republican caucus would be deleted, the article about the Democratic caucus should have been deleted as well. Memevietnam98 ( talk ) 11:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article for the Dem caucus is more notable than this one. An incumbent President lost the race from someone within his party. And that one has more coverage than this one. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 11:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2017 Hayatabad suicide bombing: No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge /basically redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017 , Pakistan has a lot of terrorism and is hard to search for sources for so if there are actually later sources in Urdu I would not oppose it being an article again someday (but I highly doubt that is the case).  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 02:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support merge , searching for the events bring up other similar events before it.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 02:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Zajączkowo-Dworzec: a bot operated by retired editor Kotniski .  Name means literally "Zajączkowo-Station".  As is visible from satellite images , this is actually a railway station/marshalling-yard, and is described as a part of Zajączkowo on the Polish regulation on place-names (see p. 2518 here ).  Whilst the article includes a population, I could not find a listing for this place on the Polish government statistical database , though this holds data for Zajączkowo going back to 1988.  This is another example of Polish communist-era infrastructure (e.g., state farms, forestry offices, mills etc.) being included as a territorial unit, and then turned into a Wikipedia article by bots and bot-like editing.  I'm agnostic about deletion or just redirecting to Zajączkowo - either is good.  TL;DR - fails WP:NTRAINSTATION , WP:GNG , WP:GEOLAND .  FOARP ( talk ) 12:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 12:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect .  Per TERYT , this is part of Zajączkowo, Tczew County .  I don't see what makes this have stand-alone notability separate from the village it is a part of (this is most likely just a "cluster of few buildings next to the train station in the village").  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Zajączkowo, Tczew County . Another bogus bot creation. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Zajączkowo, Tczew County per Piotrus.  // Timothy :: talk 18:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
August 2013 Karachi bombing: No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013 .  As per the 20 other discussions.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 19:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013 .  This was how similar issues were handled recently: [9] , [10] , [11] .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Rutan (Doctor Who): A search for sources yields only listicles.  Rutans can probably be merged into either the Sontarans' article or the general list of alien races article.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens .  BD2412 T 01:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect Not suitable for Wikipedia without reliable third-party sources.  Does not meet WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect per above.  Probably at least a semi-likely search term or link target Dronebogus ( talk ) 01:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge