hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ashtami (disambiguation) : Should be replaced with a hatnote added to the main article.  CycloneYoris talk!  20:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hatnote Disambiguation page not required at this time.  Sohom ( talk ) 20:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not needed.  I have added the necessary hatnote at Ashtami - where there wasn't previously a hatnote pointing to this dab page, apparently created by an inexperienced editor who doesn't understand how dab pages and navigation work.  Pam D 08:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – unnecessary dab; hatnotes should be set up instead.  Toadette ( Let's talk together! ) 15:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Also note this SPI that was filed and waiting CU.  At this point it is becoming disruptive.  I moved the page back to draft and reasoning can be found in the SPI.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eric Chen : Fermiboson ( talk ) 13:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Cryptocurrency ,  and United States of America .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 13:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails general and academic-related notability guidelines.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 20:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete didn't meet notability last time, still doesn't meet notability now.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The subject of the previous AfD is unrelated, an associate professor of psychology at Fordham University.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 03:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found this through the academic deletion sorting list but Chen appears to have no academic notability whatsoever.  The article (and the related Injective Labs ) appeared to be making the claim that Chen and Injective were somehow affiliated with Stanford University, but that appears to be false.  Instead, we need to go through WP:GNG and WP:NCRYPTO , but I agree that most sources in the article fail the reliability determination in NCRYPTO, and therefore do not contribute to GNG-based notability.  I checked three book sources that superficially looked better (Dolev, Slayton, and Jarvis) and found no mention of Chen at all in any of them.  My own searches found nothing else.  The article on Injective Labs could also use some scrutiny.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 03:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete he is not notable as academic.  -- Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 12:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Philip Kutsu : Kutsu needs to pass WP:GNG to have an article.  The best that I can find is Modern Ghana , a trivial mention, Xinhua News Agency (via ProQuest) , a trivial mention of being a standby player for a youth tournament, and Miami Herald (via Newspapers.com) , which is a mention in a match report about getting a red card.  Through multiple searches, I couldn't find any actual detailed coverage of Kutsu.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage found for this person.  Agree that the sources above are trivial.  The family name appears to be a Japanese word, so a few hits come up for that.  Not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:46, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:57, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bheja Fry (film series) : Was going to redirect to Bheja Fry (film) .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 19:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Sources in article are 4 promo refs about individual films, not the series, BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found promo and database style listings, interviews that mention the subject but nothing with SIGCOV.  Bheja Fry (film) looks to also fail GNG and NFILM, I don't think the redirect will last long, but that is another discussion.  // Timothy :: talk 08:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In addition to echoing TimothyBlue's concerns above, the article's current subject is WP:SYNTH ; sourcing does not appear to treat these films as some sort of extended series.  For this reason, it should be deleted for WP:DEL-REASONs #6 and #8.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Miomir Đuričković : Contested draftification.   This article was originally created in article space, but (correctly) draftified by User:Paul Vaurie for more sources.   What was also needed was better sources.   More sources were added, but none of them are significant coverage , and another copy was created in article space.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 fksarajevo.ba Pictures of players on the team No No, only a picture Yes No 2 www.sofascore.com A database entry page Yes No Yes No 3 sportsport.ba A page about his contract with the team No Yes Yes No 4 cg-fudbal.com Mention that he played for the team Yes No Yes No 5 int.soccerway.com/ A database entry page Yes No (although plenty of information) Yes No Since there is also a draft, the article should be deleted, and the draft can be kept for improvement.   The article was created by a copy-paste from draft space, so a history merge would be in order if the article were kept, but it does not need keeping.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Bosnia and Herzegovina ,  and Montenegro .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the page and improve the draft in draftspace.  Current sources not demonstrating WP:GNG being passed.  Thank you for the analysis, Robert McClenon .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] sports notability as formulated by wiki rules rests on whether the footballer in question is a member of a football club that competes in a top-tier professional football league and whether he has made official appearances for said club.  The player in question, hence, fulfils the sports notability rules.  Period.  PeppermintSA ( talk ) 02:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is incorrect.  WP:NSPORTS2022 deprecated WP:NFOOTBALL so that now redirects us to WP:SPORTBASIC .  Unless WP:GNG or SPORTBASIC are met, the article must be deleted.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kasi Kelly : Let'srun ( talk ) 19:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sourcing found for this person, who must pass GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks the in-depth coverage needed to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ogayslabe : Moved to article space by me subsequently.  Minor Somali sub-clan.  Basically unsourced except for the agreement with the British and for the notable member.  I removed two links the Wikiwand version of Warsangeli as they are copies of our article.  Perhaps merge to one of the major clans.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 21:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Somalia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have improved the article and I believe it is worth publishing on the main space.  Oali24331 ( talk ) 08:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Harti , though this topic isn't currently mentioned there.  Strictly speaking ( WP:V ; WP:LC etc.), I'm not sure there's any content to merge.  -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] P.S. & FWIW/FYI, I've not actively watched Category:Somali clans articles for a while now, but the lengthy subclan/lineage listing is a longstanding issue. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somalia/Archive 1#Clan lineage (and that was 2009!). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - most of the article is unsourced so there isn't anything worth merging and there is no evidence whatsoever that this topic meets WP:GNG .  It violates WP:NOR , a Wikipedia policy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the article is worth publishing, since it is new information that is not existed, and readers are interested in it.  Oali24331 ( talk ) 14:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Smith-Pettit Foundation : It seems like a fairly minor religious foundation that funds a small number of academic topics JMWt ( talk ) 15:05, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Latter Day Saints ,  and United States of America .  JMWt ( talk ) 15:05, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I didn't find sources to back up the article in Google News and the sources to the current article are insatisfactory.  Adler3 ( talk ) 15:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It doesn't have sources.  Agreed with Spiderone.  CastJared ( talk ) 17:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alex Punay : Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 11:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Guatemala .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 11:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - notability is not established.  C 679 04:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1958 East Pakistan-India border clash : It is yet another skirmish with no lasting impact.  This new creation is itself 80% copy of the earlier article which was deleted after the last AfD.  There is no change in the sourcing.  Georgethedragonslayer ( talk ) 10:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What should be done to the article to prevent deletion?  And, there was another article similar to this, that was deleted?  Clarify.  User:BangladeshiEditorInSylhet ( User talk:BangladeshiEditorInSylhet ) ( Talk of Georgethedragonslayer ) 6:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Bangladesh , Pakistan ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BangladeshiEditorInSylhet : By "earlier article" I believe Georgethedragonslayer is referring to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1958 East Pakistan–India border skirmish , which was deleted in March 2023.  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 08:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Worldbruce : Alright, I read the discussion, I get it, I will try to do something.  Delete Non-notable skirmish.  Raymond3023 ( talk ) 04:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The subject lacks sufficient notability and detailed coverage in reliable sources outside of local military records and local commemorations.  Nxcrypto Message 09:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No change since the last AfD.  Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 07:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dominique Fred : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leslie Joe : There's no indication this businessman is notable.  A redirect to Sunrise Soya Foods isn't ideal as it's not clear they meet N:CORP.  Star Mississippi 23:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Canada .  Star Mississippi 23:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Draft:Leslie Joe .  Duplicate article.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 01:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom to Draft:Leslie Joe .  Duplicate article, and the subject seemingly fails to meet the WP:GNG anyway due to a lack of secondary coverage.  User:Let'srun 02:20, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : it is not permissible to redirect mainspace titles to draftspace pages.  BD2412 T 01:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BD2412 : what do you suggest?  Some way to combine the two?  Lightburst ( talk ) 15:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There appears to be nothing in the mainspace article that is not already in the draft, so there is nothing to combine.  The duplicate content must be deleted.  BD2412 T 17:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Like BD2412 , I could not understand how it is acceptable for this to be converted to a redirect to draftspace despite that is covered by speedy deletion criteria under R2 .  And I don't think the nom even suggested redirection of a mainspace article to a draft ( Star Mississippi , correct me if I am misintrepreting you.) Thanks.  VickKiang (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicaise Kelebona : No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  There is a general problem of football and American football players being added spuriously.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 19:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In fairness, at the time this article was created, the subject met the since depreceated NFOOTY guidelines.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Johnson (entrepreneur) : BangJan1999 16:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , United Kingdom ,  and California .  BangJan1999 16:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The new references either don't mention him, or only mention him in one sentence.  APK whisper in my ear 16:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No references to pass the notable decisions.  CastJared ( talk ) 16:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cornelyn : It is neither a village nor a hamlet.  The house itself is recorded by Coflein but is not a listed building.  It appears to have zero notability and fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 00:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions .  Velella Velella Talk 00:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unlike in the case of Castellior , I find no indication that this location has any archeological significance.  It's possible the Massey family, who I assume built the estate, is notable (see e.g. [63] , [64] ), but I don't see enough sources to indicate that the estate or manor is independently notable.  Jfire ( talk ) 02:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, it's definitely Cornelyn Manor, not an "area".   I found the Massey sisters, too.   And some advertising blurb about management training courses in the 1980s.   But there's really scant information about this place or the Masseys (Edith, Gwenddolen, or William) beyond that they were born, lived here, and died.  Uncle G ( talk ) 08:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2011 West Virginia High School Boys' Soccer (AAA) : Only press coverage is simply reciting scores from the tournament.  fuzzy510 ( talk ) 02:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and West Virginia .  fuzzy510 ( talk ) 02:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete High school sports seasons are rarely notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Govvy ( talk ) 19:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per SportingFlyer.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete