hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Road signs in Lesotho: There's basically zero prose and it only exists to include related images.  The only sources provided appear to be primary.  The scope of the article does not appear to be providing information outside a collection of images.  These belong on Commons, which actually does host galleries with little to no prose.  G M G talk 16:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Also delete the articles on the "See also" section which has the same problems (created by others), as well as the Road signs in Cyprus article created by the same editor.  The editor has been here for over a decade and they should know better by now.  These are just some of the articles I've checked.  There maybe others with the same issue.  The editor should look at Road signs in the United Kingdom for inspiration if those are the types of articles they are interested in.  Tamsier ( talk ) 12:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into a single article about road signs in countries that use the SADC system (South Africa, Botswana, Tanzania, Namibia; possibly others?) with a few examples of common signs of each type and highlighting any that differ from the standard.  There is the start of useful encyclopaedia article here.  The present format is not great, but deletion is not the solution to a poorly structured encyclopaedia article.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Eh...There are like 100 of these, and they're not really attempts at writing an encyclopedia article in the first place.  What you're suggesting doesn't sound very much like a merge, but more like writing a new article.  Having two broken primary web links, a primary gov manual, and two lines of prose doesn't really give you a whole lot to work with.  G M G talk 22:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's definitely an encyclopedia article to be written about road signage practices in Lesotho.  But unfortunately we have a giant gallery with no encyclopedic information.  I'm not opposed to Thryduulf's suggestion, but for this article I would advocate WP:TNT without prejudice against someone recreating an actual article at this title.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:TNT as per the above.  Mr.choppers | ✎ 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert L. Ord: Fails WP:GNG .  FinnPanda ( talk ) 12:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Maryland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found one substantial article about him in the Washington Post .  I see the court case, but that doesn't say much about him, and the short ACLU article about that isn't independent as they were representing him.  Many of the sources listed here do not mention him.  I found one brief quote, also in the WaPo.  Lamona ( talk ) 20:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gregory Doc Rossi: I could not find significant coverage in independent sources.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 02:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Ohio .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 02:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France , Italy , Portugal ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines with no relevant entries on Google.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 16:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Subject does not meet MUSICBIO .  Drowssap SMM 19:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No notability or significant coverage InDimensional ( talk ) 14:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New Horizon Scholars School: Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muhammad Ahmed Bello: A distinguished career in journalism might do, but I’m not seeing the sources that would support that.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Nigeria .  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOTRESUME .  What a huge mess.  We are not LinkedeIn .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per G11 and WP:BLP.  // Timothy :: talk 22:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GEC Medical: Can't see anything that could be added.  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 15:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Medicine .  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 15:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aintabli ( talk ) 16:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fabiana de Barros: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Studied at notable places, related to notable people, but notability is not inherited.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources in the article are primary or don't even mention the subject.  I couldn't find any significant coverage.  Of the sources I found, virtually all were mentions of Fabiana de Barros in the context of her father Geraldo de Barros .  WP:NOTINHERITED .  Jfire ( talk ) 19:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any reliable sources for this article.  It is a promotional article.  I agree that the existing sources are weak or fail verification. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Interior Design Masters series 4: Fails WP:GNG , lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.  Mostly original research .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 07:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 07:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 02:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Artisan Furniture: Sources are a combination of primary sources, WP:FORBESCON pieces and advertorials.  KH-1 ( talk ) 01:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen#Artisan Furniture - I'm not even sure if this would qualify for being the primary topic for the name.  I did a google search, and its website was buried in the results, even when I tried to specify the location and all.  Most of the refs are are either self-published or from Furniture News, with the Forbes references consisting of a collage of articles and a WP:FORBESCON violation.  Additionally, the article creator @ Bas009 has repeatedly been accused of WP:COI editing in the past (see User talk:Bas009 ), and given that he didn't bold the company's name in the lead but instead hyperlinked it to it's website, I highly suspect this to be a paid article creation.  - Knightsoftheswords281 ( Talk - Contribs ) 01:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, Thank you for your response, whilst I can confirm I’m not financially remunerated by this and, as said before, have an interest in the British-Indian space, I understand this fails to be notable enough and I have a better understanding of sourcing now.  Thanks for providing your reasons!  Bas009 ( talk ) 04:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Rajasthan ,  and United Kingdom .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I would say redirect but the only references I find are reprinted or rewritten press releases.  Nothing reliable about him launching this collection.  His page has this referenced to the Artisan Furniture website so would recommend removing it from that page altogether. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a firm verifiably going about its business, but supported by announcement-based advertorial coverage (e.g. the several Furniture News / Furniture Today items).  Searches find listings of the firm's goods, as well as broader discussion of "artisan furniture" as a term of art.  For the latter reason, I think redirecting to the LL-B article would be inappropriate, and I don't think there is enough for WP:NCORP here.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Utterly generic dropshipper with an utterly generic name shipping utterly generic furniture.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fábio Marques: There is no in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources; the best I could find is this signing announcement which touches on his youth training with Atletico Madrid, but doesn't go into detail.  There is a fair amount of routine coverage like injury announcements, squad call-ups as well as coverage that isn't independent like club press releases.  Overall, WP:GNG is not met.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sign of notability.  -- Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 16:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with nomination, doesn't appear to be any special GNG noteworthy.  Govvy ( talk ) 18:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - best I can find is Mais Futebol , a brief announcement Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bash-n-the-Code: Boleyn ( talk ) 17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Christianity ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question is the Keith Lancaster mentioned Keith Lancaster ?  It seems likely to me they're different people based on the genre and timing.  Jclemens ( talk ) 20:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment they had quite a few charted songs, see [22] , including biographical bit that could be used as source.  Broc ( talk ) 20:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless sources can be found that prove the article meets WP:N and is not WP:OR .  I find it hard to believe a "musical derivative" of a band not deemed notable enough to have its own article (Found Free), is itself notable.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 03:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  Online I found this review , but this seems more like a blog .  There are some coverage regarding shows , and on Newspapers.com all the coverage are of that nature.  Mark Lee Townsend was a member by the way.  Geschichte ( talk ) 04:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I found this but not much else.  Contradicts information found here, but is worth checking out.  ❤History Theorist❤ 01:26, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fáilte: While I see why we have Alba and éire , (Scottish Gaelic and Irish for Scotland and Ireland respectively) because it refers to a country, do we really need a dictionary for a specific world in another language?  For anyone wondering, fáilte is the Irish word for welcome.  JuniperChill ( talk ) 13:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Ireland ,  and Scotland .  JuniperChill ( talk ) 13:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep ; make it more explicitly a disambig page.  —Tamfang ( talk ) 19:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would turn it into a DAB, as Tamfang suggests.  I concur with JuniperChill that it is not appropriate to keep as a dictionary-like entry, but since there are three Wikipedia pages containing the word, a DAB may be appropriate.  Cnilep ( talk ) 00:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not sure how turning it into a disambig would work since the only other pages containing the word are Fáilte Ireland and Fáilte Towers .  This may be an example of partial title match, but I am not sure if people simply refer it to 'Fáilte'.  JuniperChill ( talk ) 10:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's a fair cop .  I won't be too sad if the page is deleted.  Cnilep ( talk ) 04:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - On balance, I think it is difficult to justify this as an article as Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  Dunarc ( talk ) 22:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Fáilte Ireland : that article gets more page views than Fáilte Towers .  After redirecting, add a {{ redirect }} hatnote targeting the TV series.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 04:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and do not redirect.   The existence of a redirect would inhibit searching, and a DAB is no good since there's nothing but PTMs here.  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 13:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Wikipedia is not a dictionary ( WP:NOTDICT ), and this is English Wikipedia, not Irish – this is especially not a translating dictionary, nor a dictionary of all the world's languages.  The greeting makes no sense as a redirect, either.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 13:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in New Zealand: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are basically news announcement and does not assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and New Zealand .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as this is WP:LISTCRUFT and not encyclopedic.  David Palmer aka cloventt ( talk ) 02:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Englart: The majority of sources are primary or don't provide significant coverage.  There is only one source that contributes to notability.  — GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Websites ,  and Australia .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Politics ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] '''Delete''' - agree that the Herald Sun / Moreland Leader source is the only one contributing to notability - this is insufficient for establishing wider notability.  Combined with the primary sources, it is overall insufficient at this time to merit inclusion.  WmLawson ( talk ) 23:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] •	* Delete .  A lot of primary sources; many are self-published - fails WP:BIO .  Includes partisan commentary – fails WP:NPOV .  Consider adding mention to 1998 Australian waterfront dispute depending on sources.  Spinifex&Sand ( talk ) 23:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet WP:GNG standards and sources are minor, partisan or questionable.  Delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KJWY-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 16:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oregon .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 16:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Meade: PhotographyEdits ( talk ) 11:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not finding any independent sources.  I also note that the WP article history is full of SPAs, many editing as IPs.  Some of his companies seem to have disappeared as their home pages are blank.  (Why blank and not 404 or a DNS-available page? No idea.)  Lamona ( talk ) 04:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete