hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Shudhu Tomari: Donald D23 talk to me 17:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Bengali films of 2013#October-December ?  (see TOI article in the page, mentioning its release).  (NB- I deproDed the page, see TP). - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Bengali films of 2013#October-December per Mushy Yank .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Michal Vacek: I'm not a native speaker of Czech language, but all I could find were brief/passing mentions and no activities of his own.  Corresponding article on Czech Wikipedia is also a stub, which might help otherwise.  No news has been released about him since his last appearance in 2015 , either.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 12:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Czech Republic .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Czech Republic at the 2014 Winter Olympics#Bobsleigh .  I also couldn't find a source that would be enough to sustain a separate article.  FromCzech ( talk ) 07:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Order in which countries enter the new year: ― Howard • 🌽 33 15:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  ― Howard • 🌽 33 15:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: to List of time zones by country .  The rationale makes sense, but redirects are cheap and this meets the criteria for WP: ATD-R .  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 19:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of time zones by country per above.  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 00:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of time zones by country per above.  Rocfan275 ( talk ) 01:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I think deletion in some sense seems inevitable here, but I have to ask, what possible purpose does a redirect serve here?   It's not a plausible search term; it's not a plausible phrase to link from.  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 17:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirects are WP: CHEAP , so why not?  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 16:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One redirect is cheap; millions are WP:COSTLY , so why?   Even still, that's no argument against deletion.   There's no page history worth keeping here, and this would be a useless redirect, so why create it?   Nothing would stop anyone from creating this name as a redirect after deletion, except of course for the fact that it's such an awkward, implausible phrase.  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 14:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We both agree that making one redirect is cheap, which is what we're actually doing here.  I don't see what's left to discuss.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 15:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We most definitely do not agree.   You've provided no rationale why this should be converted to a redirect instead of a WP:VAGUEWAVE to WP:ATD-R .   I would advocate for deletion of this redirect.  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect WP:RPURPOSE says that redirects to [s]ubtopics or other topics that are described or listed within a wider article are legitimate redirect.  Consider also WP:R#KEEP #2 and 5.  The very existence of this AfD proves that the redirect would aid accidental linking and make the creation of duplicate articles less likely .  Nickps ( talk ) 18:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lloyd's Lunchbox: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 15:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the "Spike and Mike Festival of Animation" article, seems to be the context in which this is notable [17] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
JQuranTree: No independent and reliable sources covering this software.  The only source with WP:SIGCOV is this paper by Kais Dukes, which is also a developer of this software, so it can't be considered independent.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , lacks significant coverage.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 15:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So I was able to find some more places that mention this library.  978-1-928480-56-3 : "For citations to the Quran in this chapter, I have used the translations by Yusuf Ali from the online Corpus Quran, which forms part of JQuranTree, a set of Java APIs for accessing and analysing the Quran." (p. 113).  9781575865430 may be another book that mentions the library, but I don't have online access to it.  10.5120/ijca2015905709 : "The modification was guided by Extended Buckwalter encoder and decoder in JQuranTree API which is a set of Java APIs for accessing and analyzing the Quran released as an open source project." (pp. 38–39).  10.1007/s13369-017-2737-2 : "JQuranTree Buckwalter encoder uses a superset of Buckwalter transliteration system to enable reversible transliteration of Tanzil XML...These characters are not implemented by the JQuranTree Buckwalter encoder." (p. 762).  [30] mentions it 8 times, and may be useful.  10.1109/ICCIT-144147971.2020.9213772 may be useful, but I don't have online access to IEEE.  Leaning delete .  SWinxy ( talk ) 18:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : possible redirect target at Digital Quran ?  -- asilvering ( talk ) 06:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Digital Quran : where this API can be mentioned.  Owen× ☎ 22:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arkansas Department of Aeronautics: I argue that this page is not notable enough.  Therefore, I think it should be merged into the "Government and Military" section of "Aviation in Arkansas".  A.FLOCK ( talk ) 18:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions .  18:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  18:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Arkansas state agencies#Department of Commerce for an ATD.  Nate • ( chatter ) Redirect as per suggestion above.  It's barren article anyway.  Cortador ( talk ) 07:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WESV-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Illinois .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Estrella TV affiliates#Owned-and-operated stations : there doesn't seem to be any evidence of any local content or anything else that would generate any significant coverage (and its pre-Estrella history was as a TBN repeater that, under today's standards, would be even less likely to be notable).  A remnant of the looser inclusion standards of 2010; an {{ R to list entry }} is all that's needed in 2024.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Power of Pure Intellect: The album is by a non-notable band and doesn't have WP:SIGCOV from what I can find.  It does not seem to meet any of the WP:NALBUMS criteria either.  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  20:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  20:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to X Marks the Pedwalk , which notes it in discography, as WP:ATD — siro χ o 02:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dayana Calero: The subject has earned at least three caps for the Nicaragua women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Nicaragua .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Shan't contest this.  Danish Ranger ( talk ) 01:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as I cannot find anything pointing towards GNG either.  Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 20:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 14:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Agile Communication Environment: Can't find much online.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 13:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Computing ,  and Software .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 13:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Avaya Unable to find any significant coverage, even in possibly unreliable sources 94rain Talk 01:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Avaya as per 94rain.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2009 Peshawar judicial complex bombing: LibStar ( talk ) 10:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009#November , where it is mentioned.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 15:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it is an event of historical significant given that about 10 people were reported killed and 50 others seriously injured.  The bombing received significant coverage of international media such as BBC , CBS , France 24 , Al Jazeera and other media outlets covered the bombing incident.  Ludamane ( talk ) 10:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is the coverage WP:LASTING and well after the event?  The number of people killed is itself not a criterion for notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009 : where it is already covered in as much detail as in this article.  There is no evidence of WP:LASTING notability, and no valid reason to split this into a separate article.  Owen× ☎ 15:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009 .  27.4.1.83 ( talk ) 09:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lynn Weis: I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Luxembourg .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Outside (Alaska): I believe the article fails WP:NOTDICT , as it has no substance beyond a dictionary definition and I was unable to find sources that could be used as the basis for an encyclopedia article.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 19:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Alaska .  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 19:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : No comment on the article itself, but I strongly disagree with the notion that WP:BOLDly redirecting is somehow not allowed.  Both WP:BLAR and WP:ATD-R make it clear this is allowed, though it can of course be contested.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This seems like clear dictionary (not encyclopedia) material to me.  As such, deletion or soft redirect as an alternative are appropriate.  Cnilep ( talk ) 08:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll do some additional research in historical records and other material to see if I can find additional references, but right now, I support a redirect .  JKBrooks85 ( talk ) 20:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to wikt:Outside .  Wikipedia is not a dictionary .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 05:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
In-motion scale: The checkweigher article says that automatic checkweighers are also known as in-motion scales.  The checkweigher article is the older of the two, and it has sources.  What do you think?  HenryMP02 ( talk ) 15:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Checkweigher and redirect to Weigh in motion .  From some cursory searches, I can't actually find much use of people calling checkweighers in-motion scales online.  More often, this seems to refer to a completely different device used to weigh trucks.  Since that's the more common name, either a redirect with a hatnote 'or' potentially a disambiguation page would be sufficient.  Definitely not worth the duplicate page though, since I can't find any distinction and duplicate pages are discouraged.  Aamri2 ( talk ) 14:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  Aamri2 ( talk ) 03:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Merge with Check weigher .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  15:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Check weigher .  There's no point in having two articles on the same subject, and of the two, check-weigher is in much better shape.  There is really no material here that needs to be merged.  I don't favour redirecting to Weigh in motion as this is a completely different application and scenario.  Better to treat that as a "see also".  Elemimele ( talk ) 16:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We have contradictor guidance here on Merge and Redirection.  Just seeking an opinion or two to settle this difference of opinion on target articles.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: As above.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to checkweigher , that seems like the more reasonable option to me. I don't really see much that would be worth merging.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 10:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to checkweigher makes perfect sense to me.  Jacona ( talk ) 18:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chris Batstone: Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Suburban Legends , but could overpower that article, and no referenced info to merge.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Television ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ska#Third Wave Ska (3rd Wave Ska) : Since "He" was the lead singer of a notable band.  The article gave no reliable/verifiable source (I will try and find one) but since there is WP:BANDMEMBER , which states; Members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability.  Bearing also WP: ATD , Redirecting is the best option.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 21:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Suburban Legends per WP:BANDMEMBER .  No notability outside the band.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 02:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different proposed Redirect target articles.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Suburban Legends : Thought as much, the band has more to offer.  No need to delay this AFD.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 16:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect