hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Tim Anderson (programmer): If anyone wants to add enough details to justify a stand-alone biographical article that option would remain available.  CapnZapp ( talk ) 12:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Video games .  CapnZapp ( talk ) 12:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep doing a WP:BEFORE finds some passable sources [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] Working on WP:HEY 'ing article IceBergYYC ( talk ) 06:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment as nominator: The reason I nominated this article wasn't because it wasn't sourced, but because it basically said nothing about the individual past "creating Zork".  Thus, my suggestion to redirect to Zork .  I still don't see why this person merits an article if we can't find any sources actually discussing the subject.  As for co-founding Infocom, well, not all of the co-founders have their own Wiki page.  What I'm trying to say is: while I commend your work to save articles from deletion, so far I don't see any addition that convinces me the article merits keeping.  However, I realize that being notable for two things (both creating Zork and co-founding Infocom) likely will make some editors not want to have to decide where to redirect.  CapnZapp ( talk ) 07:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Expanded again.  I feel that now in its current state it's likely enough to stand alone.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 15:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - article has been significantly improved, looks to have sufficient referencing to support article quality and notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 21:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Sufficient, sourced information on a clearly notable person.  Kind regards, Grueslayer 05:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
The Hope Division: Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , United States of America ,  and California .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The Sputnikmusic review had to go because it wasn't from staff, but the other three reviews (which were already there, just not in ref tags) should be plenty.  Both AbsolutePunk and Alternative Press are listed at WP:RSMUSIC .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per norm.  Non-charting album, no certificates nor awards.  ihateneo ( talk ) 13:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are plenty of notable albums which have none of those things.  Does the GNG pass mean nothing to you?  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] QuietHere , that's why i said "per norm", the reason why this is a discussion is because the outcome or fate of this article isn't solely decided by one person.  I covered what wasn't mentioned, you want me to repeat what's already been said?  ihateneo ( talk ) 01:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ihateneo this response makes no sense to me.  What norm?  Again, plenty of notable albums don't have charting or certs, but they get a pass based on the amount of coverage they received from reliable sources anyway.  The "norm" would be to look at all tenets at play, including GNG/NALBUM#1, and determine whether they are met, not ignore them for no reason and delete anyway.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 06:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think they meant "per nom".  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: And it is true that albums do not have to chart or have awards to be considered notable.  But it helps.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This from Australia [100] helps, I think we have enough to keep.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , meets WP:NALBUM .1/GNG given sources presented by QuietHere and Oaktree.  — siro χ o 05:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tom Zubrycki: Blow it away and let someone independent start over.  Note that the author has repeatedly removed the autobiography tag from the page but has self identified as the subject.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 09:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Am in the process of editing entry to make it less 'promotional'.  Have added links to film referred to in "writing/directing career".  Over the next 7 days will check and add references and citations.   I would like to take on board any suggestions to improve this entry.  Thanks Tzub ( talk ) 11:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Your use of promotional in quotes suggest you disagree or don't understand.  You need to immediately stop editing this article about yourself, if things have gotten so bad you end up at AfD, the game is up.  Read WP:COI right now.  You risk not only complete deletion of your Wikipedia profile, but public embarrassment - oh look the guy who got into a pissing match at Wikipedia because he was editing his own article.  Duffbeerforme is right, let other people edit the article, this is how Wikipedia works.  Wikipedia is not your CV or place in history, it's whatever people besides yourself want to say - that's why it's valuable.  You have your own website to write about yourself.  There are so many problems with your article clearly you don't understand the norms and rules of Wikipedia, or flaunt them, either way it will not go well for you if you continue this way.  -- Green C 15:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Give the initial state of the article, I can totally see the nom's position. I went ahead and removed everything that doesn't have a reliable secondary source , cutting the article size in half (not quite TNT). I removed all the inline external links to film databases and TZ's website. With all that done, there is still enough evidence of notability per GNG, the topic itself is notable, as was even suggested by the nom ("let someone independent start over"). The article is salvageable, so long as Tom can leave his Wikipedia article alone, even if he doesn't like it, or finds it's incomplete.  If Tom has sources he should post them on the talk page with suggested edits. If he continues to edit the article I will report it to the COI Noticeboard.  -- Green C 15:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The quote from the film encyclopedia seems solid, this also helps [25] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of cities in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania: Shellwood ( talk ) 23:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the two lists.  I think the AFDed article, List of cities in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania is probably the better target to be updated with data and information from List of cities in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern by population .  As always, I am willing to undertake such a merge.  — siro χ o 00:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the two.  It may be worth looking at the German Wiki article here for comparison and any references.  Bermicourt ( talk ) 08:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the two.  I agree with both opinions here.  Horst-schlaemma ( talk ) 09:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
S. Horowitz & Co.: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  Article is highly promotional in tone and needs a rewrite.  However the firm has significant and ongoing national-level coverage in Israeli press, with the firm existing since 1921.  For example [21] [22] Marokwitz ( talk ) 14:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per

Discussion outcome: keep
Dean Webb: Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 21:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note to the closing admin.  I would like ask please that if by chance the consensus leans towards deletion, we look at redirecting the page to Ivor Kirchin , Basil Kirchin as he was a member of The Kirchin Band for a year, having replaced the featured singer Rory Blackwell in 1957.  Webb stayed with the band for a year and I believe sang on at least two recordings.  He was involved with both Ivor and Basil.  This would also preserve the history.  Thanks Karl Twist ( talk ) 06:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , there's a couple of good articles in the The British Newspaper archive.  Unfortunately its pay so you can read thing.  There's also this article with his picture below, Disc , No. 67 Week ending May 16, 1959 - Page 7 THE BLACKSMITH WHO PREFERRED BEAT TO THE ANVIL CHORUS, Big break I haven't got time to comb through the other UK music trade magazines and a lot of the earlier ones can't be word searched.  So it's a case of having to go through all the content of this often faded but thankfully preserved historical music info.  I'm satisfied to call this a keep .  Karl Twist ( talk ) 10:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as has reliable newspaper coverage as referenced in the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
MEDICA Trade Fair: Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Medicine ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - this thing is huge.  It's spread over 15 exhibit halls.  The best way to comprehend the magnitude is to look at the satellite image .  It's held at the Messe Düsseldorf , one of the few places in the world big enough to hold it.  The Las Vegas Convention Center is the only venue in North America bigger than Messe Düsseldorf.  MEDICA's the biggest healthcare show/gathering in the world.  5,000+ companies have exhibits there.  When COVID's not around, almost 100,000 people from around the world attend.  That's not nothin' -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Warning: independent refs are challenging to find.  My experience so far: German newspaper articles cited in the German article are mostly behind paywalls.  Sorry, I don't care enough to pay.  5,000 companies all issue press releases touting what they're bringing to the show.  These clutter a Google News search.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Size and longevity (and inclusion in Trade_show#List_of_major_trade_shows ) are good indications of notability.  No strong delete argument given by nom.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 13:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep this should meet WP:NEVENT , although the fluff about the most recent event should be toned down.  Graywalls ( talk ) 21:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Under the Radar Volume 1: Shellwood ( talk ) 21:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for pinging me. I don't have a huge amount of emotional investment or interest here (I was more interested in the topic five-ten years ago, when I worked on these pages), but I think there are a range of sources which can help establish notability.  These look useful, for instance: https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/robbie-williams-announces-surprise-new-4714614 https://www.officialcharts.com/chart-news/robbie-williams-announces-surprise-album-under-the-radar__7543/ https://www.nme.com/news/music/robbie-williams-9-1214301 https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/11/28/robbie-willams-named-album-cover_n_6235976.html -- Jonie148 ( talk ) 08:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Many thanks for finding these - I did like with any article do a WP:BEFORE search and only found the NME source so many thanks for finding these, I'll add them to the article, Thanks, Warm Regards, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Voting keep per Jonie148.  I think there are enough sources for a short but helpful album entry here.  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per Jonie148's findings.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 10:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alien Kulture: Shellwood ( talk ) 00:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   There are a number of secondary sources on this band - including print/web media, books, and academic.     See for example Guardian article [5] and a chapter in the The Oxford Handbook of Punk Rock [6] .   A number of books have coverage which is more than a passing mention - including those referenced in the article.   The Evening Standard also states that Alien Kulture were the biggest "musical thrill" of Rock Against Racism here .    It is worth noting the WP:sustained level of coverage this band has attracted, even though they were active circa 1980-1981 there are a number of recent sources discussing them.  Resonant Dis tor tion 14:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets GNG with the added citations.  Sam Sailor 06:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as clearly meeting GNG, as demonstrated by recently added citations.  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 08:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved since nomination with the edition of a number of reliable sources references such as The Guardian, Evening Standard, and reliable books Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Black & White (G.NA album): I guess I can't definitely call this non-notable, but it's at least gonna need some work to meet that burden of proof, and if it can't do that then it should be redirected to G.NA .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 02:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and South Korea .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 02:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I think; but could use some help from a Korean-language speaker.  It charted at #22 (debuted there and never went higher); and it got coverage in Korean-language news (e.g., [40] ; [41] ; [42] ) (She's sometimes identified in Korea as "지나" rather than "G.NA", which helps a little on googling.) I think those satisfy a couple of the factors in WP:NALBUM (1. "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works..."; and 2. "has appeared on any country's national music chart").  I'll add the charting; I'm reluctant to add the news coverage, since I don't read Korean and would need to rely on machine translation.  TJRC ( talk ) 02:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I just noticed that the article as it exists says it peaked at #1; but the reference has rotted away, even via the wayback machine, and I cannot independently verify that.  If it indeed was a #1-charting album, it would certainly meet notability; but I'm a little skeptical of that.  TJRC ( talk ) 03:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Gaon Music Chart was rebranded as Circle Chart last year, so anything that wasn't archived on the Wayback Machine died, but the charts are all available on the Circle Chart website.  The album peaked at number 11 [43] .  It was the song that topped the chart [44] , which ranked at number 22 on the year-end chart [45] .  ✗ plicit 03:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes the title song for the album seems to have been number one for two weeks. .but on the show M countdown, which is like a south korean music chart show.  Waltzingmogumogupeach ( talk ) 17:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per TJRC's analysis with respect to NALBUM — siro χ o 09:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Siroxo and others.  Meegvun ( talk ) 08:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Himanshu Sharma: Nothing special found any search engine!  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 05:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 05:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Fairly meets WP:CREATIVE with at least 8 credits as writer of notable films.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC) +significant awards that have him meet WP:ANYBIO + coverage that seems to have him meet GNG ....  [ reply ] The current sourcing is not very good, though.  All that's there are two or three short articles with maybe two paragraphs describing him between them, a social media announcement, and an IMDB profile.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 20:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe if you count the IMDB profile as one source, and one/multiple of the news articles as another?  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 20:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This writer has received at least 2 nationally significant awards, which is sourced + meets WP:CREATIVE for his multiple credits as writer (also sourced), so I am leaving it at that, as I consider the requirement for notability is met.  two or three short articles with maybe two paragraphs describing him between them may be considered a description of significant coverage.  Thanks.  Just added 2 sources.   Feel free to remove ImDb.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please review newly added sources to the article, especially the nominator Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep : A triple fulfillment of notability guidelines (GNG, ANYBIO, and FILMMAKER).  The subject person is the sole writer of six notable films, namely Tanu Weds Manu , Tanu Weds Manu Returns , Mr. Pellikoduku , Raanjhanaa , Zero , and Atrangi Re , fulfilling WP:FILMMAKER #3.  He also won two National Film Awards , a Filmfare Award , and a Times of India Film Awards , fulfilling WP:ANYBIO #1.  I have also found personal interviews with the subject person (see Times of India [41] , The Telegraph [42] , and India Today [43] ), and media coverage on his personal life (see The Indian Express [44] [45] , Times of India [46] , and NDTV [47] ), fulfilling WP:GNG as well.  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 14:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Snow Keep per Prince of Erebor's sources.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 00:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep