hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Johannes Bernole: The subject made three appearances for his respective national team as a teenager.  I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - clearly fails WP:GNG Angelo ( talk ) 23:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 17:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 14:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above, unless substantial information and notability is included.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 11:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per all.  Owen× ☎ 17:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WZDS-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Weigel Broadcasting#Television stations : a newer (2010s/2020s-started) LPTV carrying only national services is highly unlikely to attain the requisite significant coverage , so this redirect as an alternative to deletion is the best we can do.  (Note that had Weigel not bought this station, it would have been an equally non-notable DTV America/HC2/Innovate station…)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree BMarGlines ( talk ) 12:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
SCHLINGEL International Film Festival: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chemnitz#Culture .  I would not be shocked if this is kept, there's indirect coverage and sources allowing verification but it needs cleanup.... - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mujhe Beta Chahiye: All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sadia_Jabbar#Former_productions - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Henk Walk: This manager is covered in passing mentions only, failing the WP:SIGCOV guideline.  No lasting impact on Bhutan whatsoever, so fails WP:SUSTAINED (as well as informal essays such as WP:IMPACT / WP:10YT ).  I can't find anything else about him; not his age, where he is from, if he was a player himself, other managerial jobs etc.  Simply put, Henk Walk is not biography material and being a name in a list at Bhutan national football team#Coaching history should suffice.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Asia ,  and Netherlands .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree coverage is extremely scarce.  Also being manager of a very small football country (Bhutans highest ever Fifa ranking was 159/211 not even during Walk's tenure which lasted for a single year, without any spectacular scores.  I agree what is shown now does not suffice for notability.  Arnoutf ( talk ) 21:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 15:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bhutan national football team#Coaching history .  Dutch amateur coach (I did find passing mentions), who was the manager of the Bhutan national team.  This appointment was definately the high point of Walk's career.  Sufficient for a redirect.  To keep we would need more than passing mentions.  gidonb ( talk ) 22:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Success of the team should not have bearing here.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Success does of course have bearing on match attendance, fan following and by extension media following, i.e. significant coverage.  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
One More Time (HammerFall song): Source eval: Promo from primary >>  1.  "HAMMERFALL – limited picture 7inch for ... - Nuclear Blast USA".  Archived from the original on 2014-04-13.  Retrieved 2014-05-16.  Database record >>  2. ^ "Hammerfall – One More Time (2011, Vinyl)".  Discogs.com.  Retrieved 30 December 2021.  BEFORE showed database and promo, but nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepthy.  No objection to a redirect to the album.  // Timothy :: talk 09:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Infected (HammerFall album) per nomination.  Found nothing of value myself.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pia Maria of Orléans-Braganza: Details are purely genealogical.  The interwikis seem to have been built on cross-wiki spam.  I bring it for community evaluation.  Sturm ( talk ) 09:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Royalty and nobility , France ,  and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to/possible merge into Brazilian imperial family .  For precedents dating as far back as 2020, see Special:Search/Orléans-Braganza prefix:"Wikipedia:Articles for deletion" .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 10:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect (without a merge since the present article is a biography with no indication of notability) to Prince Luís of Orléans-Braganza (1878–1920) following the precedent of her brother .  Pinging @ Slgrandson : since I'm proposing a redirect to a different article.  Rkieferbaum ( talk ) 12:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Rkieferbaum : Alternative endorsed.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 21:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Prince Luís of Orléans-Braganza (1878–1920) as an WP:ATD , as per her brother.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Albright Township, Chatham County, North Carolina: All sources I can find are either old copies of legislation/legal documents with single mentions or websites that scrape from the US census.  The provided source for the "Geography" section doesn't even label the township or show its borders, it's just a map of North Carolina that one can zoom in and out of.  Indy beetle ( talk ) 05:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and North Carolina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chatham_County,_North_Carolina#Townships .  North Carolina townships serve no administrative function and are generally not notable enough for stand-alone articles.  Reywas92 Talk 13:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete These are non-notable and having them just causes searching problems.  Mangoe ( talk ) 13:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not sure I see the utility of having a redirect even after deletion.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 05:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chatham County, North Carolina#Townships per Reywas92, and as a reasonable search term.  Frank Anchor 16:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Operational Readiness Platform: Search only shows results for operational readiness for companies.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 19:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Transportation .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 19:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The term does exist, the abbreviation 'ORP' being more used.  They are nothing more than widened areas of the runway at each end or just one end (for take off in to the prevailing wind).  It's really a historic term that fell out of use in the RAF with the end of the V bomber force.  It should be redirected to Quick Reaction Alert after some kind of mention there.  The 'Q-sheds' mentioned there were literally tin sheds by the end of the runway to protect interceptor aircraft from the weather which were replaced by use of hardened aircraft shelters (the nearest ones to the runway on a typical squadron HAS site).  Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I was struggling to identify a redirect target.  I agree with your suggestion, thank you.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  NN.  A one sentence article.  Desertarun ( talk ) 21:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Giolla Finna mac Uallacháin/Coulahan: We seem to have one source [16] which mentions him in one sentence as the son of a "king" (one of the many, many kings at that time).  No reliable sources that he had any descendants, never mind the ones mentioned.  If kept, it should be moved to a much better title than this hybrid thing, but I believe it should either be deleted or at best redirected to e.g. List of kings of Síol Anmchadha (strange, how among all the Madudhan/Madadhan there, there suddenly is this one Mac Uallachain who seems to be unmentioned in more recent books).  Fram ( talk ) 15:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Royalty and nobility ,  and Ireland .  Fram ( talk ) 15:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of kings of Síol Anmchadha .  As noted by the nom, the content is largely unverifiable and there is little/no indication that the subject had much if any notability (independent of the role/title held).  Which seems to be " King of Síol Anmchadha ".  As an AtD, just redirect to the article on that title/role.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural Objection I am far from sure whether Síol Anmchadha was an important enough polity for each king to require an article.   My impression is that there were dozens of petty kings in Ireland at this period and one list for each is probably enough, as we probably have little more than genealogical information on any of them.   However, if the article on one of them is to be removed, we ought probably to remove them all, by redirecting to the list, not merely one of them.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 18:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect fails GNG, to List of kings of Síol Anmchadha per above.  // Timothy :: talk 10:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of kings of Síol Anmchadha as an ATD.  Redirecting there is certainly a better solution than deleting.  CycloneYoris talk!  23:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Insufficient sources to establish that WP:NBIO is met.  Happy to reconsider if other papyrus scrolls are found :) MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
National Law School of India Review: There's no real claim of notability here.  That the "journal has been cited in various publications" and "the only student-run journal to be cited by the Supreme Court of India" are misleading; it is not the journal that is being cited, but the article published in the journal.  This might suggest notability of the authors whose work is cited, but not the publication where the articles were published.  Further, in that respect, "student-run" is irrelevant, since it is the author that is being cited, the fact that he or she published in a student-run journal has no bearing on its notability.  It's worth a paragraph in the law school's article, but lacks notability for a free-standing article.  TJRC ( talk ) 20:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' per TJRC .  BD2412 T 01:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Leyla González: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found were passing mentions ( 2011 , 2021 , 2022 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and El Salvador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 21:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of El Salvador women's international footballers : Per above, subject does not meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Najd FC: Unsourced article, nothing found in BEFORE meets WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth from independent sources.  Found name mentions, routine sports mill news, listings, nothing that meets WP:SIRS.  // Timothy :: talk 01:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To List of football clubs in Saudi Arabia .  Svartner ( talk ) 11:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of football clubs in Saudi Arabia : The article currently don’t meet notability as no sources are available.  Currently it is best to redirect as Svartner suggested.  Grab Up - Talk 12:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 15:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hachette Distribution Services: Even this article (available through WikiLibrary), which is an analysis of Hachette's business strategies, just has a trivial mention in the data at the bottom that HDS exists, and no discussion of it as an entity.  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 07:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and France .  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 07:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete while there's a single source that it exists [16] I couldn't find any secondary sources for it to verify any information for a potential merge.  Shaws username .  talk .  12:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hachette (publisher) Shaws username .  talk .  23:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect into Paradies Lagardère , which is its ultimate controlling company via the Lagardère Group .  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect into Paradies Lagardère , hardly anything here and no citations.  Maxcreator ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023 CAF Confederation Cup Finals: Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON , but currently fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 00:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify Will be happening in a month and participants will be known before that.  -- SuperJew ( talk ) 08:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022–23 CAF Confederation Cup .  Since there is no sourced content a merge is not possible; unsourced material should be removed not transfered to other articles.  If proper sources are added to the article for a merge, let me know.  No objection to Merging sourced content.  // Timothy :: talk 14:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022–23 CAF Confederation Cup (fixed target).  There is nothing worth merging, and this is the correct redirect location.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 14:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022–23 CAF Confederation Cup : It's WP:TOOSOON and the article contains no sources whatsoever.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 22:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect