2022 SGP3: microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 16:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 16:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Poland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Catalogue entry, no evidence of significance, reception, etc.  No pl wiki interwiki, references are just catalogue/database reports.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is a new competition in the Speedway world and it is extremely likely that the riders listed in this event will go on to become World or European champions in the future.  Therefore the article page will become increasingly relevant over the coming years and references will increase significantly as the riders move up to the U19 and U21 age groups.  Pyeongchang ( talk ) 14:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia does not exist to predict the future.  See WP:CRYSTAL .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 06:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Google search brings up some Reddit threads and a couple of WP:ROUTINE news reports; nothing that has any significance.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 06:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I'm confused as to why Wikipedia would not want an article on a sporting event that is covered live on TV in multiple countries throughout the world via Eurosport and Discovery+.  It's a feeder competition for SGP and SGP2, in a similar vein as MotoGP3 and MotoGP2 is to MotoGP.  It's an annual event for which there is already a main hub page.  Johnny2hats2 ( talk ) 22:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It still needs references to demonstrate its notability.  I don't believe being on TV is considered notable by Wiki standards?  KeepItGoingForward ( talk ) 21:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources don't demonstrate significance and searches by wiki users have not been able to find sources demonstrating significance that are not listed in the article.  KeepItGoingForward ( talk ) 21:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some of the information on the URLs has changed since the page's creation.  I have now added the relevant news stories for each meeting to try and establish notability.  Johnny2hats2 ( talk ) 14:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia articles require independent secondary sources with in depth coverage of the subjects.  None appear to be here.  Kathlene Smoot ( talk ) 00:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some of the information on the URLs has changed since the page's creation.  I have now added the relevant news stories for each meeting to try and establish notability.  Johnny2hats2 ( talk ) 14:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete both.  Fails GNG, sources in article and BEFORE showed routine brief news and database style pages, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth Above provides no sources to evaluate.  // Timothy :: talk 19:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete