hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Milad (entrepreneur): Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 23:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology ,  and Bangladesh .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 23:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete G5, see SPI and history of Al Hasan Milad .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G4, G5, and G11.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Daily Jalalabad: The article shows zero evidence of notability.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Websites ,  and Bangladesh .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Daily Jalalabad is a notable regional Newspaper in Sylhet, i have imported this article from Bengali Wikipedia .  Mainul Saiman ( talk ) 05:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per nom.  Also it was created by a sock (user:Rnwiki-global).  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 08:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have created it now... i was not create before by anyone.  Mainul Saiman ( talk ) 12:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page creator is not a blocked, confirmed sockpuppet.  Please do not make these accusations based on suspicions alone.  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see wikidata .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 12:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I still recommend going through the WP:SPI process first, because he is currently not blocked for this reason on enwiki.  ALSTROEMERIA 🌸 Čijukas Kuvajamas 03:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] SPI is ongoing, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Parvej096388 .  Although there is a 90% possibility that the user is related to this case, the implementation of CSD G5 still has to wait for the final announcement of the conclusion.  ALSTROEMERIA 🌸 Čijukas Kuvajamas 03:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note I have blocked

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Ada Khan: Shellwood ( talk ) 15:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The current sources seem to be WP:ROUTINE coverage for an actor.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Chef Dammy Pas: Last AfD is here [49] Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - G4, G11.- KH-1 ( talk ) 02:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There are references, but the entire page needs to be nuked and possibly rewritten in a non-promotional tone.  APK whisper in my ear 05:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] (Speedy) Delete , speediable per A7/G4/G11, but happy to let the AfD run if needed.  No evidence of notability.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 06:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Kpg jhp jm 07:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I CSD'd the article as a G5.  Seems the afd closer script I installed isn't playing nice with Vector22, and I'm short on time so I'd appreciate if someone would be so kind as to wrap this up.  Thanks a ton.  ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk ) 10:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Jesús Calderón: Sources do not even come close to WP:GNG .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage found for this individual, is a resume, perhaps PROMO.  What's used for sourcing are primary or non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article seems to just be a list of accomplishments without footnotes.  a fairly large amount of the sources the article gives are self-published.  Shadow311 ( talk ) 14:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television ,  and Spain .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G11 : Article was obviously created for self-promotion, not for actual encyclopaedic purposes.  I've already tagged the page.  🔥 Jala peño 🔥 Stupid stuff I did 10:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Olybet: Nothing found in RS that we can use for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Estonia .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Shehr Main Dihat: The "detailsbiography" source clearly does not meet RS criteria.  Prod was disputed by page creator.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Internet ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Neutralyze: All references are purely advertisement 'articles'.  Q T C 19:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  Q T C 19:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  It is quite immediately apparent this subject fails the criteria for organisations and companies.  Also searched under "Kantian Skincare" since the title appears by most accounts to be the name of the product, not the company.  Results hardly differed.  In fact , might go with an A7 for this one.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 04:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Ammarsjah: Ckfasdf ( talk ) 23:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Indonesia .  Owen× ☎ 23:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Per WP:NSUBPOL : Members of local/municipal bodies or members of bodies without law-making powers have generally been denied presumed notability (see WP:POLOUTCOMES ); that is, members of bodies only capable of enacting subordinate (secondary) legislation are not presumed notable under the criteria established in WP:POLITICIAN.  YordleSquire ( talk ) 01:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Denim (given name): WP:NNAME : If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject of a name article do not exist, then the surname or given name list article would not be notable and should not be created.  I verified this is the case with "Denim".  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 20:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 20:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It also says "a properly sourced article about a name may still be notable without a list" which this article has sources.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 22:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The sources are only database entries and do not provide significant coverage of the name.  See WP:SIGCOV .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 22:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable name.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NNAME .  Jfire ( talk ) 00:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Go ahead and delete it.  I am the article creator.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 16:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Ortner Airport: In cases such as this I generally look for a plausible merge or redirect target, but I do not think that 1967 Lake Erie skydiving disaster , the reason for it's cla9imed 'fame', would be of any use.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 15:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It is indeed somewhat well-known for that incident, and is a fairly popular airstrip.  I was working on the page last night and fell asleep before I could expand it and add more citations.  Windowcleaner4 ( talk ) 17:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The topic is notable enough just because of the Ortner Air Service- which may deserve an article of its own.  Windowcleaner4 ( talk ) 17:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Checkuser note The article creator has been blocked as a Confirmed sock and the article has been deleted per WP:CSD#G5 . -- Ponyo bons mots 21:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
ATRenew: 虹易 ( talk ) 15:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Environment , Technology ,  and China .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep publicly traded company on NYSE, has plenty citations in the article and more in Google.  I have found these additional citations Seeking Alpha and Business Insider .  Hkkingg ( talk ) 08:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hkkingg , Benzinga (the actual source of the BI article) is not an RS, and it says right there at the bottom that This article is from an unpaid external contributor.  It does not represent Benzinga's reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.  You've been here over a year, please do some basic due diligence on your ! votes, this is almost a better argument for delete than keep.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 10:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article has been moved to draft space per G5 .  @ 虹易 : The nominator may consider withdrawing and speedy keeping this discussion per WP:CSK #1, as the subject article no longer exists.  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 18:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Bahrain Second Division: A quick BEFORE has not turned up any sources outside of general databases (e.g., soccerway), which do not establish notability.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 07:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Bahrain .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 07:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Football in Bahrain as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 11:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Yogendra Kumar: --- Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi ( talk ) 14:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi ( talk ) 14:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG .  Darron4 ( talk ) 16:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with nom.  Very little in terms of sources or any relevant coverage to support notability.  GuardianH ( talk ) 16:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete not notable SpaceExplorer12 ( talk ) 20:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Dennis Mangano: I think the subject might potentially have some notability, but the article is not written to show it, nor referenced to show it.  Flagged as failing WP:GNG after arriving in mainspace by the editor who moved it to mainspace.  Being charitable, this feels as if the move were in some manner accidental.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics , Medicine ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify per nom.   Not ready for mainspace.   Other than one lawsuit in 2007 (which isn't mentioned in the article prose), the references seem to just be his published research papers.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  New enough for this to be a reasonable choice, sources inadequate for current content, but with some possible case for notability (possibly through WP:PROF#C1 ).  That criterion does not require depth of sourcing for notability itself, but it does not eliminate the need for all claims in our article to be properly sourced.  In particular all claims of having invented or discovering something important should be backed up by reliable independent sources that verify those claims; his own publications are not adequate for that kind of claim.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 04:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify (the AFC reviewer who originally declined the submission).  I do think the subject could meet the GNG, as there is some coverage (I have 1E concerns as it relates to the fact that a lot of the coverage will be primary in regards to the various lawsuits) but that is not demonstrated here and I have doubts that its demonstrated presently and the I have non-encyclopedic concerns about the article in mainspace presently.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete G5 : Sock of blocked user Harrysigma 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
South Kash Coaching Centre (SKCC): I don't see any reliable sources mentioning this organization.  APK whisper in my ear 03:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment The article's creator has now nominated it for speedy deletion and I can't say I disagree.  Kleuske ( talk ) 08:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
CH (artist): BEFORE does not bring up reliable sources.  The artist appears to have invented a style "Postmodern-Narrationism" and an association (World Association of Artists) and named themselves "chairman".  The article is not written in NPOV and it was created by a SPA.  I think this article is purely WP:PROMO with ref bombing to non-relevant sources.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding anything to substantiate the notability of this artist.  Eight of the "sources" are either EN Wikipedia or Chinese Wikipedia.  Other sources include 5 citations to prove they are in "Who's Who".  The article is written promotionally , and seems written in a way that seems like an autobiography.  I wasn't able to verify the collection, maybe another editor has better luck.  Other citations are primary sources, or don't mention him at all.  This newspaper has either a review or a press release that mentions him and his invented genre Narrationism (I don't read nor speak Chinese) [49] it may be the only good source.  Other citations seem like sponsored content or native advertising [50] or are user submitted content.  [51] .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST .  Netherzone ( talk ) 01:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your detailed research.  Regarding this source Internet Archive from China Yishubao (中国艺术报).  The source's title is "Me and the Postmodern Narrative School" (translated from "我与后现代叙事派") and the author is listed as Chen Hao (陈豪), the subject of the article.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , China ,  and California .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article was tagged as a copyright violation of https://narrationism.com/ , and I agree with the tagging as the article is a word-for-word copying of the website.  I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject in my searches for sources.  Chen Hao ( simplified Chinese : 陈豪 ; traditional Chinese : 陳豪 ) does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline .  Cunard ( talk ) 08:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete