Shay Kanot : I can't find any indication that this passes WP:DIRECTOR .  The citations used in the article only reference them in passing so it would appear that this fails WP:NBASIC also.  Tar nis hed Path talk 12:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Film ,  and Israel .  Tar nis hed Path talk 12:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Most mentions are about his films, nothing about him, and are trivial one-liners (XYZ Film by Shay Kanot).  I can't see notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Easy pass of DIRECTOR #3.  Maybe also DIRECTOR 4c.  AFDISNOTCLEANUP.  gidonb ( talk ) 02:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Notable in some Israeli sources, especially after seeing search results for the Hebrew name .  Also as stated above, could reasonably pass DIRECTOR#3.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 07:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I originally came across this page ( Special:PermanentLink/1189701926 ) during NPP and was ready to PROD it or draftify it but then my analysis looked like it still might've been notable in Hebrew sources but I can't read Hebrew so I thought I would give it a go and at least WP:FIXIT and clean it up to article standards—I was feeling generous and was in need of a Wiki-project for the day.  The analysis above is correct: the sources I was able to find in English only have passing mention and alone probably don't satisfy GNG .  Once I had the article acceptable, I went to de-orphan it and link to other mentions and then found his most notable project Kicking Out Shoshana also had NPOV concerns that I felt needed to be addressed .  So to learn know that the creator was blocked doesn't surprise me.  What I will say is that—as probably the most significant editor of the page since the other editor's article creation and then subsequent block—I don't want my edits of the page to be construed as any endorsement of ! keep,  nor should they prevent a ! proceduraldelete as a result of the block.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 15:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I took a look at the sources, and I'm feeling okay.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 21:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above, although the page needs styling editing.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 13:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep though page definitely needs some work, person is notable enough from looks of it (has done several films and is a director).  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 19:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep