Jane Willis : The article was created by a WP:SPA back in 2008 and seems to have slipped through the cracks of review.  GuardianH ( talk ) 08:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This page should not be deleted.  To be the subject in a well-known book, Bringing Down the House, and movie, 21, as Jane was, seems to be cause enough to keep this page active.  The movie and book are both significant.  In particular, the IMDB profile for Kate Bosworth, mentions her role in 21 (Kate plays Jane in the movie), and the movie is still talked about in gambling circles, making Jane a subject of continues public interest.  In New York, there’s general interest in Jane’s marriage to Richard Davey, who is leading Metropolitan Transit Authority (buses and subways).  There are many spouses of government officials who have Wikipedia pages, so Jane’s relationship with Rich should factor in keeping the page.  Coolbeans221 ( talk ) 11:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It isn't based on her, it's based on a team collective.  She has no widespread coverage of secondary sources even then.  GuardianH ( talk ) 17:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are many sources featuring Jane: https://hls.harvard.edu/today/how-one-lawyer-went-from-being-a-shark-at-the-blackjack-table-to-a-shark-in-the-courtroom/ https://nypost.com/2022/05/07/jane-willis-was-member-of-mit-blackjack-card-counting-team/ https://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/04/21-qa.html https://gothamist.com/news/like-byford-before-him-mtas-new-city-transit-chief-starts-in-a-time-of-tumult https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2010/10/11/focus15.html https://www.law360.com/articles/1076426/innovation-economy-drives-massachusetts-powerhouses https://www.law360.com/articles/1078119/massachusetts-powerhouse-ropes-gray Coolbeans221 ( talk ) 23:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Prob Keep - the sources are not great, but feels like there is enough to meet the usual notability standards.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing for a lawyer, there is an actress with a similar name.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus