hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Veronika Raquel: I've conducted a quick Google search and haven't found any reliable sources.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 02:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 02:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Sexuality and gender ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NENTERTAINER .  I did not find significant coverage or any reliable secondary sources on the subject.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Autoflower Cup: It appears that a sock of User:Expertwikiguy created this.  Chisisi Handal ( talk ) 15:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Spain ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP I am the creator of the page.  The subject has enough coverage to meet the WP:GNG policies of Wikipedia.  Googleboywonder ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 08:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This deletion should be struck because this nominator is a sock.  Obviously a new user would not know how to immediately nominate a page for deletion and have so much knowledge of Wikipedia policies, so he must be a sock.  And yet he is accusing me of being a sock of a random other user without providing any details on how he came to this conclusion.  He even posted a message on my talk page, as if he is a super experienced editor, maybe impersonating admins.  He only opened his account to get this page deleted.  Googleboywonder ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 08:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Comment struck as user has been blocked for block evasion.  - Bilby ( talk ) 04:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to confirm User:Googleboywonder , do you have a COI related to Autoflower Cup ?  - Indefensible ( talk ) 01:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO.  All links to this thing are PR items, including Yahoo Finance [8] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete possibly TOOSOON.  The international contest is only 3 years old and the US one was first held this year.  I find no independent sources that are substantially about the event.  This is a bit hard to judge because nearly all of the sources are from the cannabis industry and even those are pretty immature.  I did not see any that I could say fit our vision of a "reliable source."  Lamona ( talk ) 04:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article refers to dubious websites or press releases.  At times, the text looks like an advertisement.  -- Wyndhan Han ( talk ) 11:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 158: C messier ( talk ) 13:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, as it is not notable.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 16:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : yet another galaxy that is not notable.  - Parejkoj ( talk ) 17:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sabrina Salvati: Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 16:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Massachusetts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero sourcing in RS that i find, what's used for sourcing now in the article are all red per source rater bot.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Honestly that's fair.  I created this page because she's been working in proximity with and directly with a lot of prominent political figures, but I agree that there isn't enough surrounding information around her to make this page relevant by Wikipedia standards unless someone else can find other sources.  It's additionally difficult for someone like her because everything anyone has said about her exists on Youtube and not in written articles...  Paco Markon ( talk ) 19:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Current sources are unreliable and quick search shows insufficient depth of coverage to meet WP:NBIO .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
95 Bulls: All coverage in the article are trivial interviews or advertisements of small local shows.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 20:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:TOOSOON .  They do have some local coverage in Brooklyn, but it is largely in the form of brief mentions when opening for someone else, and the interviews are informative but softball/promotional efforts.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and as follows.  They have essentially no social media presence: three (3) followers on X, and fewer than 4,000 on Instagram.  They opened for another NN band , King Congo , last New Years Eve.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vietnamese teams in the League of Legends World Championship: This article is full of unsourced cruft and tables of statistics with no accompanied commentary.  There are no sources that indicate that the subject of "Vienamese teams at the World Championship" is a notable topic.  There is no reason to merge this article to any of the World Championship articles, as its simply statistics.  – Pbrks ( t · c ) 16:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Vietnam .  – Pbrks ( t · c ) 16:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: While eligible for soft-deletion, this has been recently edited and so a soft-deletion is unlikely to 'stick'.  Relisting for further consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Merely statistics, no notable results in the championship.  Using Ctrl+F on the main article, 'Vietnam' is only used four times in the prose, indicating there isn't enough content to be merged.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 00:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is simply not for just parking tables.  REDISCOVERBHARAT ( talk ) 13:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JDVM Inter College: Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NSCHOOL, lack of independent, secondary, reliable sourcing.  -- Prodraxis talk contribs (she/her) 23:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uttar Pradesh .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete couldn't find any GNG-level source.  The single source in the article is a bare-mention.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 07:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NCHOOL.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 09:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG.  5.42.92.163 ( talk ) 16:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Maliner ( talk ) 17:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Fails WP:GNG .  Alex-h ( talk ) 08:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J. Paul Lanza: The creator of the article, User:Klanza16 , has a username that suggests a possible relationship to the subject (see WP:COI ), and previously created J Paul Lanza , which was speedily deleted under WP:A7 .  — Bkell ( talk ) 17:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Connecticut ,  and Massachusetts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Vanity spam, nothing found for this person; a contractor who builds homes isn't terribly notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kajal Arefin Ome: The individual was not considered an important figure in his field and his work was not widely cited by teammates or legacy.  The individual is not considered to be the originator of any significant new ideas, theories or methods.  The person's work -  (a) has not been placed as an important monument,  (b) has not been part of an important exhibition,  (c) has not attracted significant critical attention, or  (d) has not placed his work in the permanent collection of a significant gallery or museum.  He is only known for a TV series, about which there is a separate article .  Can be redirected to that article if desired.  → Tanbiruzzaman 💬 17:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  → Tanbiruzzaman 💬 17:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and Bangladesh .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG.  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 13:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Foundation for MetroWest: Coverage is mainly local and not wider as per WP:AUD .  Only one article links to this.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Massachusetts .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If coverage is "mainly" local, then it is "at least one non-local", which is all that AUD requires.   This appears to be a community foundation , and my inclination is to merge it into MetroWest (=the geographical area it serves).   We probably could find sources to demonstrate separate notability, especially since one of the already-cited sources is about "National Recognition For Rigorous Philanthropic Standards", but I think that merging it up will help people understand its purpose.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 04:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This Boston Globe article was the best thing I could find.   It's less about the organization and more based on the subject of the organization's report.   I think if there was more of this type of coverage, you could make an argument for the article, but all the other news coverage is routine press releases about board members and local newspapers.   I am not in favor of merging as it is not clear how much information there is to enhance the target article.   Would it just be one sentence about the existence of one particular charitable organization?  Malinaccier ( talk ) 02:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Erjon Beu: All I found in my searches were transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , etc.) and trivial coverage in match reports ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Malta .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It fails GNG .  Though there are a few sources on the web from a selected number of reliable media but most of the sources are just trivial mentions.  Cruzdoze ( talk ) 19:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: @ GiantSnowman : Note that a user has added this source to the article, which does include four or five sentences of independent coverage on the subject.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One source of that nature is insufficient.  Giant Snowman 22:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep – The article itself tends to be deleted, but the athlete in question is the record holder for games in the Malta league.  Is there really nothing else about him?  An athlete with so many matches in a league (even if it is a minor league) tends to have an inherent notability at least.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  @ Svartner , it's the goalscoring record in Malta's second highest league.  Now this is a tiny league.  In 2015–16 the total attendance was given as 25,200 spread across 183 matches , yielding a crowd of 137 per match.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vicky Goswami: HarshalDhotre06 ( talk ) 15:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Kenya , South Africa , Gujarat ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete on BLP grounds.  Wholly inadequate sourcing for an article that exists solely to discuss someone as a criminal.  Star Mississippi 15:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GoldenDict: Onel 5969 TT me 09:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not seeing anything which would show meeting GNG nor NSOFTWARE .  Ping Shenlebantongying who requested this be undeleted.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 20:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are so ___MANY___ softwares on wikipedia pages mainly citing the main website marked as something something something.  What's wrong with that?  Unless there are a lot of dramas involved with the software, then all of them won't have a lot of citations from else where.  There are a lot of mentions on web and some papaers on google scholar, but they are mostly unrelated to be part of wiki.  Why you are so hurry?  Not everyone have time to edit wiki like you.  Just wait.  slbtty ( talk ) 01:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well it's been 5 days and still no updates.  I'm not seeing notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aoidh ( talk ) 18:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Pure PROMO.  Best source I could find was the MacRuorsForum, which isn't acceptable sourcing, then it falls off a cliff.  Delete for lack of any kind of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2019 Liberal National Party of Brisbane leadership election: I propose its deletion.  An article like this should exist instead with the results of a list of LNP mayoral leadership elections, if there are sources for it.  (Also, the "Liberal National Party of Brisbane," not a thing.)  J2m5 ( talk ) 14:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Politics ,  and Australia .  J2m5 ( talk ) 14:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nominator.  There really is not much to write about for this topic, and this article is part of a broader pattern of Totallynotarandomalt69 treating local government as if it were a state government or federal government. .  Steelkamp ( talk ) 04:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] pretty unfair comment there - BCC is pretty widely treated as a large government which is why there are very in-depth articles for its elections, even by-elections and wards get pages But I think the initial @ J2m5 comment is fair so I'm happy to support delete and maybe re-direct to a more expanded section on Schrinner's page?  Totallynotarandomalt69 ( talk ) 06:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The current wording "Liberal National Party of Brisbane" wouldn't be good because that's not an official name in use.  So I would prefer a straight delete rather than a redirect under the current article's name J2m5 ( talk ) 08:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Makes sense, support that Totallynotarandomalt69 ( talk ) 11:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Totallynotarandomalt69 , please read WP:POLITICIAN .  Mayors and councillors are not notable most of the time.  Tar nis hed Path talk 04:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Without any secondary sources (all are WP:PRIMARYNEWS ), merging is not a good AtD, and there is no clear target for a merge in any case. Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 18:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Following on from WP:POLITICIAN that mayors/councillors are rarely notable, I fail to see how an article about the preselection of them is notable. Tar nis hed Path talk 04:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  can't find anything that suggests notability  -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 19:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Syed Mohammed Saeed Raza: Just a father of notable person does not make him notable.  -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 09:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , India ,  and Bihar .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 09:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Poetry ,  and Islam .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -This article's subject are not currently notable or they dont meet's WP:POET & WP:AUTHOR . ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 14:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Partial merge to Abdul Qavi Desnavi as WP:ATD , where subject is mentioned.  — siro χ o 04:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Kindly Refer to page 14 of the 1954 edition Magazine St. Xavier's College, Bombay [37] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ng8nTWw2b_QH3524KdjWklaHuFN9RzB6/view Kindly Refer to page 14,43 of the 1953 edition Magazine St. Xavier's College, Bombay [38] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HV75Oa18EosMmsQkNknn7a-oMMXoCtgt/view Bpldxb 10:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Subject does not have too much coverage.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 02:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 15:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above-- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 09:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete