hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
La Salle High School (Union Gap, Washington) : Has been tagged with citations needed template since 2012; all the sources are either not independent or not significant (e.g. database entries).   I can find some news coverage of the school but all of it is routine daily reporting in the local paper, nothing that establishes this school as anything more than WP:MILL .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Schools , Christianity ,  and Washington .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   But I'm just "weirdly annoyed" with the nomination.  ;) Not going to work on the article at this point.  EagleFan ( talk ) 21:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the nominator notes, it's actually got quite a bit of coverage in the Yakima Press-Herald, more than I expected actually.  It's the only Roman Catholic high school in the diocese, which is somewhat unusual, and it's mentioned in a biography of Cardinal Francis George [23] , because of the role he played in founding it. -- Jahaza ( talk ) 04:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I see issues with the article (I tagged and ran away), but there's nothing wrong with the article that can't be fixed with regular editing.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Epos Now : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Please explain the acronym SME, as a reader is completely lost to what that could be.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In this context, it refers to Small and medium-sized enterprises , which make up the overwhelming majority of UK companies Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  The article is subpar, but I think their POS system has enough coverage.  US News [2] , TechRadar [3] , Startups.co.uk [4] .  ~ A412 talk!  06:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 19:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Here I found some of the sources 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 although they are not an in-depth coverage, yet these reviews, awards can't be neglected.  Atighot ( talk ) 22:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep as there are much more reliable sources than those cited in the current version of the page.  The organization is pretty notable, per TechRadar and other media coverage.  扱.  し.  侍.  ( talk ) 15:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ursula Münzner-Linder : Tkaras1 ( talk ) 02:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Only reliable and accessible sourcing I could find by Google search was this link , which alone does not seem sufficient.  Her name is apparently not even spelled correctly!  Tkaras1 ( talk ) 02:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 14:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article needs a significant update, Ursula it seems that he died in 2011, but even an update I don't think will be able to keep the article. -- Mooon FR ( talk ) 20:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Friedrich Weber (veterinarian) : not much found in a quick preliminary search , except for mentions of his name .  ltb d l ( talk ) 10:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History ,  and Germany .  ltb d l ( talk ) 10:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Being a participant in the Munich putsch might be enough to make him notable.   This is not a BLP case, so that the lack of references is not fatal.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 16:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The German article on Weber is much more in-depth and has additional sources.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sufficient sourcing to meet WP:GNG on German Wikipedia.  Leading conspirator in the Munich Putsch, SS-Gruppenführer, Reich veterinary chief and leader of a major Freikorps.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A few paragraphs in Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust by Boria Sax seem to indicate that Weber, as the "president of the newly formed Chamber of Veterinarians, which combined all German veterinarians into a monolithic bureaucracy", personally led the removal of Jews and dissenters from the veterinary practice and eliminated kosher slaughter ( exsanguination ).  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Weak keep, there are some discussions in books [11] and [12] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The Fr wiki article is translated from the German wiki article and they have two extensive sources from period books.  I think it's good.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Unsourced here, but extensively sourced in the French and German Wikipedias relating to such page.  Their page talks about how he played a key role in the Nazi leadership.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 03:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Halifax Community College : Additionally, an education institute does not inherently meet the Notability unless it meets WP:GNG, which it does not.  It was created by User: Faizanalivarya , known for COI editing.  The editing history by User: Faizanalivarya ( see this ) to add unsourced promotional content about a relatively unknown small college in the US, and then these comments on the talk page suggesting the possibility of paid editing.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 10:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and United States of America .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 10:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It is a legitimate, accredited college.  It's a small community college in a rural location, however, so it doesn't seem to have gotten much press but there is a little bit if you really dig e.g., [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] .  And of course there are the standard information sources for accredited institutions in the U.S. such as IPEDS , USN&WR , and its Carnegie classifications .  ElKevbo ( talk ) 13:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep In addition to some GNG-passing sources above, others may include [18] [19] [20] [21] Hameltion ( talk | contribs ) 20:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above discussion.  Community colleges in North America are almost alway notable, and WP:BEFORE should be used.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources cited by ElKevbo and Hameltion.  Passes WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 22:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Babel II (short story) : All the coverage is simply about its publication history.   Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG .   The Michael Ashley source is nice brief piece on it, but even that is not that in-depth.  Onel 5969 TT me 09:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  The story appears to have been reprinted quite a bit .  And in addition to the Michael Ashley source the story has its own detailed entry in The Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages .  But beyond that I'm not seeing many more citations about the story, so I won't get too worked up if it's deleted. -- SouthernNights ( talk ) 18:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Archived in at Syracuse university library, thus meets BKCRIT #5, The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable.  This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study.  Jclemens ( talk ) 18:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi.   I thought about that, the issue is, this isn't a book.   But a short story.   Not sure that applies.   As I said, I'm a fan.   Not only do I have his novels, I looked this morning, and I actually have my paperback copy of The Worlds of Science Fiction , in which this story appears.   I also thought I had Far Out , but I can't find it.   I think one of my children absconded with it.  Onel 5969 TT me 21:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, no one writes notability criteria specifically for short stories, but my reasoning is that if any book criteria congruently and sensibly apply to a sub-book unit, like a short story, we should use them.  And it does say "written works" which is more expansive than books, so there's that, too.  Jclemens ( talk ) 04:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I added a couple of references.  If this short-story by a prolific author is one of a handful mentioned in a relatively short foreign non-English obituary, I'd think it's significant.  Nfitz ( talk ) 23:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : SOURCESMUSTEXIST, ILIKEIT.  @ Onel5969 : how could you?  ;) (but thanks for the memory).  // Timothy :: talk 15:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Position of Lebanon in the 2006 Lebanon War : Noting there is no other article for the other party, so this is an WP:NPOV violation.  Statements representing the positions of all parties involved, which would ensure WP:NPOV , are already on the main page for the war.  If any extraneous statements on this page are additive, they can be merged.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 01:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military ,  and Lebanon .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  I think this article should remain.  The 2006 Lebanon War was not between Lebanon and Israel, but between Hezbollah and Israel, so Lebanon was an injured bystander.  Please note that the conflict is more correctly known as the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah War .  The article doesn't blame either of the two warring parties, but describes, in a neutral and factual way, Lebanon's attempts to achieve a ceasefire.  Consequently, the argument that it violates Wikipedia's rules about NPOV doesn't hold.  The article is an expansion of a chapter in the main article and contains valuable information for future researchers.  I see no reason to remove it.  Thomas Blomberg ( talk ) Thomas Blomberg ( talk ) 00:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:10, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge any relevant material to 2006 Lebanon War if it isn't already included.  Mooonswimmer 13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per @ Thomas Blomberg .  I think the article can be cleaned up, better researched, and formatted better, but I think it's certainly useful for research into the unique position of Lebanon's government apparatus as a third party in a way happening on the land they have jurisdiction over.  (edit: formatting)  OJDrucker ( talk ) 15:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Eissporthalle Iserlohn : Nothing to add from the article on de.wiki.  not seeing much else which could be considered against the inclusion criteria JMWt ( talk ) 14:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey and Germany .  JMWt ( talk ) 14:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Iserlohn Roosters , whose home stadium this is - WP:ATD .  Ingratis ( talk ) 18:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 19:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Eastmain.  The Kip ( contribs ) 17:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Improvements during AfD clear up any doubts about notability. -- Milowent • has spoken 18:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Amrita School of Medicine : Should be a redirect.  Onel 5969 TT me 11:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Medicine , Haryana ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I feel that this page can be made at least as a stub.  Because Hospital and the school are different topics and It can't be merged.  It is one of the notable Hedgeunkil ( talk ) 16:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . i think it is suitable to school article so keep it on MICHAEL 942006 ( talk ) 18:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , sources seem fine to me.  Cheers!  // 🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  14:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Quite a lot of sources [20] on the school, seems to meet WP:GNG.  33ABGirl ( talk ) 06:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - School of medicine is attached to hospital and WP:N is good.  So, better to keep instead of redirect.  There are many sources available in web aswell.  Hedgeunkil ( talk ) 12:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC) Striking dupe vote.  Onel 5969 TT me 21:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  Meets WP:GNG .  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 20:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - at the time of nomination, there was not a single independent, reliable source which went in-depth about the school of medicine.   Since the nomination, a total of 2 references have been added, the first , is a brief mention of the school, amidst a much wider discussion of the need for more doctors and opening more schools, while the second is a simple database entry.  Onel 5969 TT me 21:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: policy based input would be helpful Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Currently multiple independent, reliable sources have been added.  Please look into it Hedgeunkil ( talk ) 16:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - the coverage of national rankings in the New Indian Express ( [21] [22] ), despite themselves essentially being press releases, seems highly indicative of there being additional coverage available.  This is an WP:NEXIST argument, as I don't think that the current sourcing adds up to WP:GNG .  signed, Rosguill talk 05:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
SuperTux : QuietCicada - Talk 15:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software .  QuietCicada - Talk 15:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article needs heavy cleanup, but this is a case of WP:SURMOUNTABLE .  The game is clearly notable, having got reviews in Linux Voice , Free Software for Dummies , and PC Games World .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The game is notable and a quick search on Google and DDG brings up some decent sources.  Yes, it does need improvement, but remember WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP .  -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 02:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are plenty of RS to establish notability, there is another: Amiga Future 69, November/December 2007, p. 20 (review of the Amiga version).  Pavlor ( talk ) 06:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP Blitzfan51 speak to the manager — Preceding undated comment added 22:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Nkechi Blessing Sunday : Nswix ( talk ) 04:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Nigeria .  Nswix ( talk ) 04:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Not sure the City People award gives notability, very flowery text in the article, seems PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  The subject meets criterion one of WP:NACTOR .  She has had major roles in multiple notable films.  She has also been nominated for a couple of notable awards, speficially City People Entertainment Awards and the Best of Nollywood Awards.  I think this is enough for a weak keep.  She appears to be somewhat of a well-established actress in the Yoruba movie industry.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  03:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep the City People award, I'm not sure.  But the Nollywood Awards seem notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the subject is a well known actresses and brand influencers in Nigeria, with coverage and a strong career.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 11:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , major celebrity in Nigeria, frequent subject of press coverage.  See https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/nollywood/569156-real-reason-nkechi-blessing-twerked-before-ooni.html? tztc=1 , https://dailypost.ng/2022/06/04/2023-dont-let-god-punish-you-nkechi-blessing-blasts-omokri-over-tinubu-comparison/ , https://leadership.ng/nollywood-actress-nkechi-blessing-visits-ooni-of-ife-sets-tongues-wagging/whatsapp-image-2022-11-22-at-12-49-20/ , https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/tori-61023470 , https://punchng.com/i-wont-keep-my-relationship-off-social-media-nkechi-blessing/ , etc, etc. 668,000 followers on Instagram, -- Soman ( talk ) 21:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep