hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rashid Hanif: fails GNG.  X ( talk ) 00:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  X ( talk ) 00:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable cricket player with very few reliable sources on him.  Fails WP:GNG FatCat96 ( talk ) 00:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete Non-notable cricket player.  Citadeol (talk) 10:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sylhet Division cricketers Fails WP:GNG and the updated WP:NCRIC however there is clearly a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Christine Dawood: Refs are profiles, WP:SPS sources and PR.  UPE.  scope_creep Talk 08:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Germany ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shahzada Dawood § Personal life .  Not finding SIGCOV, but a redirect is appropriate.  House Blaster talk 23:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The articles falls on Wikipedia's guidelines of Notability ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)) , which doesn't state that you can't have a wikipedia page if you are not a published author.  Her page has over hundreds and thousands of views, shouldn't that be a reason to keep this?  The idea for Wikipedia is to give public access of knowledge to all.  If people are looking for Christine and finding it helpful, it serves the purpose.  I find it baseless to delete.  Inthejungle32 ( talk ) 18:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Editor is a WP:SPA likely a WP:UPE sent in by the agency to save this dreadful article.  scope_creep Talk 18:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Information about what?  There is more information on her husband's death than about her.  I"m not sure why people would be looking for her on wikipedia. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] agree. this article is not noteable other than her husband's death and whom has his own article. there are many sources online about her and there is reallt no need for a wikipedia article. 86.17.54.133 ( talk ) 10:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 08:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Outside of her husband's death, there is nothing about her. I can't find any mentions of her that aren't in relation to her husband; her career seems rather routine/non-notable. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shahzada Dawood#Personal life as an alternative to deletion , I did not find sources that would satisfy GNG or NBASIC. No SIGCOV found, if there are at least WP:THREE sources that satisfy notability guidelines stated above, please ping. The reasoning for "keep" stated above is not convincing.  ~ Tails Wx 16:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
W35DQ-D: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 00:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 00:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : this article is rather skimpy even compared to other DTV America/HC2/Innovate station articles.  That is of little relevance to whether this should go or not, but the station itself being the typical 2010s-started DTV America/HC2/Innovate with no reason for, much less any extant, significant coverage makes this another obvious call.  It's another nominal survivor of last year's bulk nomination , of course.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 02:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Miloš Veselý: His Czech Wikipedia article is likewise unsourced stub without major changes since its last revision in 2022; otherwise, it would copy over English Wikipedia.  Google searches also come up with silly, random namesakes.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 12:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Czech Republic .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Czech Republic at the 2010 Winter Olympics#Bobsleigh .  I couldn't find enough to keep the page either.  FromCzech ( talk ) 19:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
01 Distribution: Was previously nominated for deletion, and in the end was redirected to the parent broadcaster RAI , which I think should be the preferred action again.  Ortizesp ( talk ) 01:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies ,  and Italy .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , again.   I don't see anything since the last discussion which makes this any more notable.  Lithopsian ( talk ) 19:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , in agreement with Lithopsian .  It's a tiny page— so I believe it's best suited as a section in 01 Distribution's parent company RAI (specifically on this section of aforementioned article .) green@grenier ~$ sign --now; sudo systemctl enable wptalk 01:04, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to RAI#Related companies per basically everyone else.  There probably should be semi-protection applied as well; various IPs have been trying to restore an article every now and then since the previous AfD, but until now these attempts were always eventually reverted before coming back here.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong agree on the semi-protection and... pretty much everything else you said.  green@grenier ~$ sign --now; sudo systemctl enable wptalk 11:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jason Crane: Top results from searching show a separate Jason Crane.  Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 02:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rocket from the Crypt , as most of this bio is about the band rather than this band member, and sources can't be found verifying the rest, suggesting that there is a fair amount of WP:OR (original research) here.  Plus this is a WP:BLP (biography of a living person) and unverified information should be deleted.  Search of Wikipedia Library, ProQuest, and Google mainly turns up the "other" Jason Crane who is a jazz musician and poet with his own radio show/podcast (although this 2001 article in Seattle Post-Intelligencer appears to mention "this" Jason Crane as part of Black Heart Procession).  (Most likely a passing mention at best.)  If/when someone decides to write an article about the "other" Jason Crane (if he does indeed turn out to be notable), they can create the article from the redirect.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 14:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per above.  Could not locate enough SIGCOV of the subject to justify keeping the article.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WQDE-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Another HC2/Innovate station with a razor-thin operational history, no significant coverage , and no reason there could be any.  Another nominal survivor of last year's bulk nomination .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sasha Feldman: This is not enough to satisfy NACTOR.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Azerbaijan ,  and United States of America .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless an editor can provide references to significant coverage of this actor in independent, reliable sources.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Confessions of a Teenage Jesus Jerk : BLP1E .  Redirection is an ATD.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 05:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
383 Commando Petroleum Troop RLC: Similiar units almost certainly would not have an article.  Only one reference is listed and it is not independent of the topic of the article.  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 23:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom .  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 23:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Commando Logistic Regiment .  Non-notable (and tiny!) military unit.  Various sources note that the unit exists, but nothing to demonstrate independent notability from the parent formation.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 10:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There's actually quite a bit of coverage of this unit in works discussing the role of the Commando Logistic Regiment during the Falklands War - please see this Google Books review: [8] .  This book in particular discusses the troop and its role, as the decision to not mobilise it for the war was a significant mistake in the author's opinion.  @ Hawkeye7 : do you have a view here based on the article you developed on logistics in the Falklands War?  Nick-D ( talk ) 01:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Commando Logistic Regiment , since the article contains nothing that is not in that parent article, without prejudice to its re-creation at a later date if more material becomes available.  I did mention the unit in British logistics in the Falklands War , but as Nick-D notes, it did not deploy.  Badsey and Privratsky discuss the problems that arose as a result of this, so secondary sources are available.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Commando Logistic Regiment .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Probiotic Probio DR10: In line with the guidelines at WP:PRODUCTS an article about a product should have significant coverage in secondary sources to indicate notability.  A search for specifically "Probiotic Probio DR10" or for the shorter phrase "Probio DR10" returns no results from either google books or google scholar.  DR10 is covered, as cited, in research papers, but this coverage is not significant.  Therefore I propose that the article be turned into a redirect either to the company that created the product Fonterra or to the more general article probiotic .  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 04:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 04:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Health and fitness ,  and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support redirect to manufacturer article.  Article feels fishy, reads like a promotional leaflet.  AfD tak removed this morning without comment.  Take a look at the edit history.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 06:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I noticed that as well. It is also interesting that the IP address that attempted the deletion locates to Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia and the main editor of the page has "Malaysian" in their user name. In no way proof, but it is an interesting coincidence. 🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 19:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeess, interesting... -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 20:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And I've also had to warn the editor about removing the AfD tag as well.  Not showing a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and procedures.  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 22:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to company page.  I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of this has been lifted from a promotional press-release somewhere.  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That was my instinct as well but I have done several searches looking for copyvios and came up empty.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 14:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kendriya Vidyalaya Malkapuram: KylieTastic ( talk ) 13:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  KylieTastic ( talk ) 13:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Andhra Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The top results are socail media pages.  Also, this article is so short probably because you can barely find any information on this school anywhere.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 13:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 13:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Karvanista: Only sources cited in Reception are routine coverage for Doctor Who (Sources that are basically plot summary explaining who a character is for readers, which is done whenever a new character is introduced/re-introduced into the series) and the only sources findable in a search; beyond Flux, there really isn't anything talking about him in a significant capacity.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect per nom.   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 00:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect per nom.  There aren't enough sources discussing this with WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 18:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator, an AtD redirect exists either at List of Doctor Who supporting characters or Doctor Who series 13 .  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article can be deleted, and a redirect can be created by any editor who feels strongly enough.  Doctor Who series 13 works.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 11:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Saritha Komatireddy: Unsuccessful federal judicial nominees are not inherently notable.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Alternative proposal : Merge all otherwise non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees into a single article along the lines of Unsuccessful Donald Trump judicial nominations .  We can preserve a truncated form of the data in one place, without reaching individual notability concerns.  BD2412 T 21:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think a redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies makes more sense, seeing as there is already a description of the WP:BLP1E for this nominee and the other non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees, along with details about specific dates regarding the nomination process and why the nomination ultimately failed.  As it is, the list of otherwise non-notable judicial nominees for Trump is fairly small and I don't think there is the needed SIGCOV.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the target suggested by Let'srun.  Hatman31 ( talk ) 20:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep , otherwise redirect per above.  While the nom is quite right to state that Unsuccessful federal judicial nominees are not inherently notable , they are also not inherently un -notable.  There's a lot of duplication among Indian wire service articles, but at least one of them should reasonably count, and we also have these bylined reports from Bloomberg and the Boston Globe .  And then there's this page or so of coverage related to her AUSA work.  (One gets the impression from news searches that she has a much higher than average profile as an AUSA, which doesn't bear directly on the question of notability but does explain why it's not surprising to run across such coverage occasionally.)  Some coverage in Telugu press as well, although the articles I've been able to locate don't have a lot of independent content.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 02:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Racquetball at the 2023 Pan American Games – Qualification: Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON , but searches did not turn up any, fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 09:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Guatemala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Racquetball at the 2023 Pan American Games as an WP:ATD Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 13:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Racquetball at the 2023 Pan American Games : Nothing shows notability for quals apart from main subject.  Fails GNG.  // Timothy :: talk 06:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect