List of Mexican supercentenarians: Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 01:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 01:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - @ Jorge Duran Coral : If you (or anyone) had access to sources for this, it would fit in well with the others on Category:Supercentenarians by nationality .  @ Significa liberdade : not everybody on the other lists has their own article, but it would be helpful if at least few on this one did.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : @ Maile66 : Perhaps not everyone will justify the creation of an article, but everyone on the list requires a citation of a reliable source to support their inclusion.  At this time, this list has none .  General Ization Talk 00:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete This topic is not terribly notable and as stated above, nobody on the list is important enough to have their own article.  The article is not supported by any reliable sources.  76.117.162.190 ( talk ) 23:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All the people do not have BLP articles, fails WP:GNG and can be merged to List of supercentenarians .  I don't see said list being beneficial in the future.  -- Wesoree ( talk · contribs ) 17:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The claim none have articles is false: María Capovilla , Emiliano Mercado del Toro , and Juan Vicente Pérez are in English whilst Francisca Celsa dos Santos and Inah Canabarro Lucas have sourced articles in Spanish.  As such, sources are readily available; others can be found to include those without articles [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] .  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 21:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as this deletion is also contested here.  How does this list meet, or doesn't meet, WP:NLIST guidelines?  Also, please do not move articles to a different page title in the midst of an AFD discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails as a navigational list because the only blue-linked entries are people notable only for their age, and there are only a very few of them.  It is likely that readers looking for these people are interested in supercentenarians in general; such readers would be better served by an article listing supercentenarians in general.  In fact we have a list at List of supercentenarians but we've chosen to stick to people notable for other reasons besides age.  And navigational lists have to navigate to articles, which isn't likely to be possible for people who haven't done wiki-notable things beyond living long lives.  Fails as a stand-alone list because although the press from time to time likes to write articles about people surviving to great age, implying that supercentenarians might be a an independently-notable set, (1) these articles aren't focussed on Mexico (except in Mexico), so again a global list would make more sense than a Mexican list; (2) they are often borderline, rather trivial interest articles analogous to those on particularly tall actresses, or worst seaside towns.  (3) the press tends to write about old people rather than specifically supercentenarians.  Elemimele ( talk ) 07:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : After reversion to the proper content, Mexican supercentenarians alone are not notable.  The creator is also blatantly attempting to circumvent procedure.  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 00:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete