hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Pawar/Bhoyar: Not Notable.  There already exists a parent article at Paramara dynasty , drafts created on the AfD subject were already declined at 1 & 2 -- iMahesh ( talk ) 06:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India .  iMahesh ( talk ) 06:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mirrors the Paramara dynasty article.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 00:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a povfork.  Source used twice can't be checked as no p9age numbers.  Editor also created an article now moved to draftspace which is very similar.  Draft:Bhoyar Doug Weller talk 16:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I recently moved a copy Draft:Bhoyar to draftspace.  Also the editor has been blocked as a result of distruptive editing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibjaja055 ( talk • contribs ) "Comment'' - we seem to have a meatpuppet (not a sock so far as my CU check shows).  [24] Doug Weller talk 13:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - looks like a meat farm at work in pushing a sanskritisation agenda, the topic is covered elsewhere, the term in the article title isn't used in sources etc.  - Sitush ( talk ) 19:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete mercifully per nomination.  Subject fails WP:GNG .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Hawaii Bowl broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; as with the ESPN sources, one redirects to the main page whilst the other is a 403.  The other two are news report of the game itself, so not doing much to assert notability, which is used to argue about the notability of lists like this.  One is a YouTube video, the one of a local paper leads to an error message.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and Hawaii .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per above nom.  I see no encyclopedic value or reason for this list.  Editor who created it is now a blocked sock.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Association for Cave Diving: Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Environment , United States of America ,  and Florida .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a pet peeve of mine, could you maybe try and follow WP:AFDLIST , specifically " To avoid confusing newcomers, the reasons given for deletion should avoid Wikipedia-specific acronyms. " AFD is one of the first "behind the scenes" places many new users ancounter, and a nomination like this is not goinjg to be coherent to them.  Beeblebrox ( talk ) 16:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The above point aside, it does appear that the article is sourced almost entirely to the organization itself, and the problem was noted shortly after it was created thirteen years ago.  That seems like more than enough time, and what appears to have been done instead is to simply expand the coverage of the organizations programs based on their own materials.  Beeblebrox ( talk ) 17:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IKON Award for Best Actress: Fails GNG, sources exist for the award, but not to support an individual category within the award.  No objection to a redirect to iKON Awards .
 I am also nominating the following related pages: IKON Award for Best Actor ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) IKON Award for Best Director ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) IKON Award for Best Film ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) // Timothy :: talk 05:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Uganda .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all , and support a deletion for iKON Awards too; these need sustaining WP:N over a number of years to earn an article here, and aren't notable just for existing and need details about how the nominations and winners are chosen and balloted.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blue Hill KF: Modest history peaking on the 6th tier.  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Free Republic of Nias: Already covered somewhere else and only exist for a very brief amount of time and not notable as its immediatly transfered to Japanese control.  Nyanardsan ( talk ) 06:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  Nyanardsan ( talk ) 06:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hard Delete - my mistake!  Initially i've would have thought that this page could be revived with better sourcing via translation from the corresponding indonesian wiki.  but i've come to a realization that there was the deletion discussion before (and that there was little to cite), thanks for the info! i'd allow the deletion of this page.  Kaliper1 ( talk ) 06:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps creating a redirect to Gunungsitoli#Mid-to-late 20th century or Nias#World War II would encourage later contributions to be added to those sections.  CMD ( talk ) 11:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Since it was so short lived, its notability should be judged as an episode in history involving several significant events, rather as a republic.  However, too much of the article relies on an Indonesian-language source that seems WP:FRINGE based on what Davidelit said in the previous AfD.  I have asked Wikiproject Indonesia to take a look.  small jars t c 18:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If not a hoax or fringe theory, seems an encyclopedia-worthy topic with adequate sourcing to pass GNG.  Sourcing is in Indonesian, however.  I do not find the previous close as Delete to be compelling.  Carrite ( talk ) 15:07, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Green Park Boutique Hotel: LibStar ( talk ) 06:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Business ,  and Laos .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Post-harvest Technology Application Centre: JMWt ( talk ) 11:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or dratify - found a few potential sources- most results are on facebook or blog sites.  There's some other government sources with one or two paragraphs here and there (e.g DOCA webpage ) and a non-government website that mentions in passing only.  I think it fails WP:SIGCOV , but with two sources that discuss it slightly, a more detailed search could find more information.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 15:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  I was unable to find significant coverage in secondary sources.  The government website is a primary source and there is no point in draftifying an article created in 2008.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Federation of Anarchist Communists: I checked through my own sources at hand and couldn't find anything other than a single passing reference in The Continuum Companion to Anarchism .  As this article appears not to meet our general notability guidelines , I'm proposing it for deletion.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 13:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Italy .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 13:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  The only mentions of this are on Anarkismo, which seems un-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I got a hit for it here , if anyone has access.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 08:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 👀 Requested here czar 12:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I can't access the above source, sorry. I did find some extra information in Black Flame , but it's very sparse. Summary style would say: FdCA was formed during the 1980s while many new platformist organisations were being established (van der Walt & Schmidt 2009, p. 259); it joined the International Libertarian Solidarity (van der Walt & Schmidt 2009, p. 224); it supports "historical materialism" (van der Walt & Schmidt 2009, p. 107); and it advocates "organisational dualism" (van der Walt & Schmidt 2009, p. 126). This doesn't seem like enough for an article, even a stub. -- Grnrchst ( talk ) 11:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] imo even basic stubs like that are useful, especially if the information isn't available in continuous paragraphs and is scattered through a book like the one you used to write that summary.  But that's still only one source, so... -- asilvering ( talk ) 17:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft delete .  Lacking significant coverage per nom's reasoning and source analysis.  czar 12:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Laurence Fox GB News scandal: Relatively minor controversy that did not have much of a lasting impact.  Furthermore, it is already covered in the GB News article.  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 11:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to GB News#Other investigations per nom Nate • ( chatter ) 16:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , Events ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete An unnecessary fork from GB News and Laurence Fox.  A redirect is unnecessary as this is an unlikely search term.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agreed with above comments.   There is nothing here that can't be covered in the GB News and Laurence Fox articles.  Resonant Dis tor tion 22:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Delta Gemunupura College: All of my searches in English and Sinhala (ඩෙල්ටා ගැමුණුපුර විද්‍යාලය) don't seem to yield any decent coverage for this to pass WP:GNG and WP:NORG or at least one of those guidelines.  All that seems to come up is the school's own Facebook account and basic database entries like Lanka Information , none of which confer any notability.  Furthermore, the article was created by a problematic WP:SPA and spam account that has repeatedly tried to promote this school here.  See User talk:Chathura prabhashwara 0 .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Sri Lanka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing in gnews.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Malaysian football transfers 2010: Avilich ( talk ) 23:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , there's a whole category of these articles: Category:Lists of Malaysian football transfers .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 08:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this topic of football transfers can be notable, but this one doesn't look to be.  Giant Snowman 10:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unreliable sources, one being a blog, the other Facebook.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - if WP:RS aren't covering this specific topic, neither should we Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WLLP-CA: Let'srun ( talk ) 16:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Religion ,  and Tennessee .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 17:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gresham Police Department (Oregon): It certainly exists, there is coverage, but what I've found is run of the mill , no deep coverage.  The content is poor enough that it's been turned into a redirect in the past, which . .  the city of Gresham article can't even be bothered to find a passing mention to the police department, making it a confusing redirect.  See also Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_17#Gresham_Police_Department_(Oregon) .  tedder ( talk ) 16:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Oregon .  tedder ( talk ) 16:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of significance.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 16:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim or references for notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 14:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Cotton Bowl Classic broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Also, mostly unsourced per WP:RS .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , it's an important college football bowl game, with sourcing from [50] , [51] , [52] .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 16:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ROUTINE and WP:ITSIMPORTANT applies.  This is not about the notability of the games itself.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 16:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 18:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet notability.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 22:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:LISTN is not met due to a lack of RS.  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dunihi: DefaultFree ( talk ) 01:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This appears to be a run-of-the-mill virus that fails WP:GNG , couldn't find any coverage suggesting that the article's subject is at all significant or notable.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 01:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Social networking pedagogy: It looks possible that the topic is notable but the current page reads like an unverified essay and needs WP:TNT JMWt ( talk ) 14:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Education .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I've yet to complete a search on this, and I have to head offline now, but I will note this paper that describes a "social networking pedagogy", but attributes its creation to David Trend and Henry Giroux rather than Thomas Patrick Huston and Hallie DeCatherine Jones.  This article also mentions the term, and gives a bit of an overview about applications in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Article text at present will need to be wholly rewritten if kept, so I'm half-inclined to go towards WP:TNT , but I want to complete a more comprehensive search first.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Publicly accessible link to the second article: [7] .  Regards, HaeB ( talk ) 21:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 23:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Eleven years should have been enough time for adding citations, and as pointed out above, the content would likely need to be thoroughly rewritten and corrected anyway even if suitable references are added.  Regards, HaeB ( talk ) 21:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete