Harry Dunn (defender) : There doesn't seem to be much of any WP:SIGCOV outside of this local newspaper coverage.  I'd like to see what consensus is here, as it feels like a "delete" for me, but I'm curious what others think.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 17:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Football figures whose playing and manager career is mostly confined to small clubs do not have exact material to support WP:GNG .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 09:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Scarborough F.C. players where he should be added. Giant Snowman 14:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I don't know, I don't think redirecting to the players article helps, seems to be an important figure for the club in the 1970s and 1980s, first as a player then as a manager. I'd prefer to keep , however if not, suggest a redirect to the club page Scarborough F.C. His name is mentioned four times on the page, twice as player of the year and twice as manager. As the content on the article is sourced, it maybe a good idea to merge some of the content. Deletion doesn't help anyone. Govvy ( talk ) 10:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think a keep is a bit much for this player, but I'd be totally amenable to a merge or redirect, for sure. Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Looks like delete, but out of respect to the previous relister who sought a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus, this should have one final relisting to allow for some additional discussion, any at all. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 19:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems to have been pretty prominent; though searching isn't helped by the fact that the same team had another prominent Harry Dunn at the same time... There's an interview here , and while an interview, it does note that "Harry became a legendary player for Scarborough Football Club. ... Harry Dunn, in what was a 22 year period from 1965 to 1986 you played over 900 games for Scarborough FC, you scored many goals and created many more. You had well over twice the number of appearances of any player in the Club’s history and well over three times the number of appearances by any local player. You have been described as: -the ever present Harry Dunn -competent, reliable and dependable -a calm presence on the field -a gentleman on and off the field – everything that was needed for a team captain to lead Scarborough Football Club to the success it enjoyed and particularly to those Wembley victories."  Also some briefish pieces on him: [15] [16] [17] [18] . Kind of expected more... BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 22:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist to assess newly found sources. Otherwise a Redirect to a players' list might be appropriate.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The three sources in the article and the interview linked by BeanieFan are enough, in my opinion, to meet the GNG.  Add to this an excellent claim to notability, far beyond what I'd expect for a run-of-the-mill football player stub that gets taken to AfD.  I don't have access to British Newspaper Archive, but those links at least show there's some "offline" coverage, as would be expected.  Toadspike [Talk] 09:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus