hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
See Ya (mixtape): The current single source in the article, Hypebeast gives just four sentences to this mixtape (the other three sentences is on Khalifa in general, whereas the final sentence is about another unrelated tour) and is not SIGCOV.  My BEFORE search found non-SIGOV sources: a 6-sentence coverage here, of which only 5 sentences are about the mixtape (the other sentence is about an unrelated tour), this , which is also just 6 sentences, with the final two sentences about Wiz's High School Reunion Tour, this , with 9 non-quote sentences (even fewer about this mixtape as a few sentences are also about Wiz got his fans ready with a visual for “Close Frame" ), this , with only 5-sentences about this mixtape and the rest being simple listings on unrelated tour dates, and other non-reliable user-generated reviews .  Overall, I don't see how GNG is met, and would BLAR this to Wiz Khalifa .  However, another bold action (draftifcation) was contested , so I am bringing this to AfD instead.  Thanks.  VickKiang (talk) 04:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  VickKiang (talk) 04:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wiz Khalifa discography .  If there's hardly any references talking about the tape and several tour dates unrelated to it, as well as no charts or critic reviews, I feel like redirecting it.  You could draftify it, but what's the point in doing that when it probably'll never meet WP:NALBUM .  DaCrashy aka AJB ( TALK 2 ME ) ( Everything I Did ) 02:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Namsan Traditional Theater: Possibly merge into Namsangol Hanok Village , but this artilce is not so substantial imo that we need to have an outstanding merge waiting for someone willing to do it (I'm not willing to).  I think a delete is ok toobigtokale ( talk ) 16:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and South Korea .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .   If an active WP:Reliable source can be found, merge into Namsangol Hanok Village .  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 22:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1990s): These lists are full of trivial WP:LISTCRUFT and are all sourced by YouTube videos or Twitter.  I am also nominating these articles for the same reason: List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1980s) List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1970s) List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1960s) Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) Update The three articles above have been redirected to List of Hockey Night in Canada commentators with the exception of List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1990s) .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List of Hockey Night in Canada commentators .  -- GoodDay ( talk ) 17:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merged please.  Khoa41860 ( talk ) 17:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Hockey Night in Canada commentators Khoa41860 ( talk ) 17:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This one should be merged Khoa41860 ( talk ) 17:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all for failure to meet WP:LISTN for a standalone list.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 14:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to List of Hockey Night in Canada commentators , which seems to be the parent list.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Earthsearch Mindwarp: I'm not seeing any RS to consider against the inclusion criteria - not all BBC radio dramas are notable.  WP:NOTEVERYTHING WP:NOTPLOT JMWt ( talk ) 08:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and United Kingdom .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a very condensed version to author James Follett#Radio and redirect as WP:Alternative to deletion .  Daranios ( talk ) 11:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to James Follett#Radio , nothing to merge since the article is unreferenced.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 11:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Karl Schwegler: I'm not sure simply winning a silver medal in the coxed fours competition is enough to meet WP:ATHLETE , though that may be interpreted differently.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 16:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Switzerland .  TheBritinator ( talk ) 16:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rowing at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed four at the very least.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Has any in-depth search in historical Swiss newspaper archives taken place?  If not, then I believe the presumption of significant coverage given to Olympic medalists at WP:NOLYMPICS should stand.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rowing at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed four : Subject lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Have you done a search in historical Swiss newspaper archives?  If not, then the presumption of significant coverage afforded to Olympic medalists should stand.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 01:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Whether or not there is any presumption of coverage, this article still needs to cite an IRS SIGCOV source, and none have been unearthed.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But how can we when no one has even looked in relevant sources?  "Significant coverage is likely to exist" has to mean something ...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WNCR-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Carolina .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in North Carolina#LPTV stations : The article at least claims that there at least was some local programming (a newscast), but that statement has been there since the article's creation, and the only real "expansion" since then has been to the usual solely-database-sourced permastub of the type that is finally being rejected in this topic area.  Maybe there's more significant coverage out there, but by and large this is another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006 that no longer warrants anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} as an alternative to deletion .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Atsuko Natsume: UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku , fails WP:GNG , nothing in my BEFORE.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku .  Couldn't find any significant coverage, although some may exist in Japanese sources I was unable to check.  Mooonswimmer 15:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku per WP:ATD .  4meter4 ( talk ) 15:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Liuba Dragomir: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Moldova .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support redirect Traumnovelle ( talk ) 02:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers due to subject's lack of WP:GNG.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cabin Fever Media: ~ T P W 14:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sweden .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Niklas Sundin : A primary-sourced article on a musician's business providing graphic design for his own and others' projects.  No evidence provided or found to demonstrate attained notability in its own right.  A redirect is an option , though it is worth noting similarly-named companies in Australia and the US.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't think redirecting to Sundin's article is a good idea, given the existence of other companies with similar names.  As for this one, it does not meet the requirements at WP:NCOMPANY due to a lack of independent coverage of its history and operations.  It can be mentioned briefly at Sundin's article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Niklas Sundin per above.  Subject is not notable apart from target.  Unneeded CFORK, only serves to make readers chase links.  // Timothy :: talk 06:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Niklas Sundin per ATD, this topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing ++ 17:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I'd be happy with a redirect to Niklas Sundin .  Don't believe it meets the requirements at WP:NCOMPANY due to a lack of independent coverage, to remain a standalone article.  Equine-man ( talk ) 09:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Magicite: The reviewers at Capsule Computers (the only non-primary source used in the article) don't seem to have much in the way of credentials, so I don't think that that review can be used for notability.  QuietCicada ( talk ) 23:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 23:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to Final Fantasy from 2014.  As nom states, it has insufficient significant coverage, despite the lengthy Rock Paper Shotgun article.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 23:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series - it seems like the concept of magicite is addressed there.  Game is patently non-notable and lacks secondary coverage.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 08:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I'm not sure that redirecting to Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series is the best option as that article is also at AFD right now.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series .  I don't agree it's a bad option since it looks like the AFD discussion there is a WP:SNOWBALL towards keep.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series .  Not notable on its own.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 15:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series .  The consensus for the AFD there seems to be reaching keep, so I don't think there's a problem there.  Industrial Insect (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
PSKBS Kuta Binjai: The club existed but sources didn't show that this club passes WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS .  Sources shown the games that the team played, but no in-depth coverage of this team.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Indonesia .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aceh the town the club is in, needs a sports section on that article.  I don't see much notability for such a young football club.  Someway off from being independently notable.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Hmm, What town is this club actually in?  I just realised that Aceh is a massive area.  Govvy ( talk ) 19:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to East Aceh Regency , more accurate than the suggested above.  Giant Snowman 18:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DYHH: Can be redirected to Bantay Radyo .  MarioGom ( talk ) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : All the sources in the article are reliable.  The first two sources state that the station is licensed.  Source 3 ) talks about the station's updates.  The rest of the sources talk about the station under its former ownership.  That said, though the station is off the air since 2015, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG .  ASTIG 😎 🙃 13:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Here's my source assessment: Created with templates {{ ORGCRIT assess table }} and {{ ORGCRIT assess }} This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Secondary?  Overall value toward ORGCRIT CEBU BROADCAST STATIONS 2021 NTC AM Stations Bantay Radyo moves to new home Nadela: Bangon Tipolo, mga hinabang gipaabot – WP:RSOPINION Bangon, mga Kauban DYSB 864 kHz San Miguel Broadcasting Corp.  Yes, there are some reliable sources, but that is not sufficient to pass WP:GNG .  For example, the first two sources are mere records (not significant coverage ) and are primary sources .  The third is not about DYHH specifically but about Bantay Radyo .  It is only a passing mention, one sentence, about DYHH .  For DYHH to pass WP:GNG , it requires multiple independent, secondary and reliable sources with significant coverage.  That significant coverage needs to be specific about DYHH, because notability is not inherited.  MarioGom ( talk ) 22:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument.  Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 23:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Nothing found with SIGCOV that would support a stand alone article.  Name mentions, promo, database listings, are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV.  Redirect per nom as an WP:ATD.  // Timothy :: talk 04:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bantay Radyo#Radio stations ; MarioGom's source assessment table above is spot-on, and demonstrates why this subject fails WP:N criteria.  Left guide ( talk ) 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Tower (Dubai): Basically impossible to search for sources due to the generic title.  * Pppery * it has begun... 20:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So it actually exists under this name [17] , and also Union Properties Tower .  I suggest a redirect to Union Properties PJSC .  I have just created a similar redirect for its alternate name, if the article ends up kept it should be updated.  — siro χ o 21:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Union Properties PJSC is a messy promotional article that violates WP:NOTDIR .  I suspect if I were to clean it up it would no longer mention the project, but I guess until that happens a redirect there would make sense.  * Pppery * it has begun... 21:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and United Arab Emirates .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' delete just a building. Mangoe ( talk ) 23:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect