We All Love Ella: Celebrating the First Lady of Song: No valid redirect targets that I'm aware of.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Could it be the soundtrack for this PBS special [1] ?  They both came out about the same time...  Very minimal review in a Seattle newspaper [2] .  I'm not seeing enough extensive coverage to build an article here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I can't wrap my head around the idea to delete an album that shows various musicians paying tribute to another.  Many of them are a surprise in this context, so the tracks are a valuable addition to their discography too.  The album had an international release in eight countries, it comprises original material, some nowhere else to be found, others featured on later compilations (eg k.d. lang, m.bublé) Discogs .  I understand the point of the album not being better documented.  But on the web it is is a little harder to find reviews from 2007, many papers don't have a proper archive that is easy to access.  There are many lemmas of albums with only a reference to AllMusic where this album has also a review .  (It is actually found everywhere my search shows, deezer, jazzecho, jambase, spotify, apple...)  It is a release of the Ella Fitzgerald Charitable Foundation, who has heard about that?  archieved booklet It is certainly good music.  So why would you want to delete it!  Isn't there anything else to do?  Improve this article? / MenkinAlRire 08:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The concern is with notability , i.e. encyclopedias (and thus Wikipedia) do not include all available information indiscriminately.  If there isn't reliable coverage available that shows notability, then there's nothing to be improved upon.  The AllMusic review is useful in this regard, but the rest of your links aren't for various reasons.  And we can't just keep the album because notable artists were involved, as notability is not inherited .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 09:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ QuietHere : , I've added numerous reviews from The Wikipedia Library.  No Swan So Fine ( talk ) 20:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment but most likely keep--It charted on the Billboard 200 and gets lots of hits in ProQuest, for one--granted, that is picking up "release date" articles and some repeated wire service articles.  It was reviewed in Popular Music and Society and other publications.  We're paying for The Wikipedia Library [3] , folks...  Caro7200 ( talk ) 14:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which I checked, saw a bunch of announcements, and moved on from.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 21:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have added reviews from The Boston Globe , The Philadelphia Daily News , The Baltimore Sun , The Buffalo News and The Evening Standard found in The Wikipedia Library.  No Swan So Fine ( talk ) 14:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as multiple reviews have now been located to show that it has received enough coverage to be considered notable enough for a separate article.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 23:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , thanks for NSSF for looking through TWL.  Hameltion ( talk | contribs ) 06:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , excellent expansion shows it comfortably meeting notability guidelines.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : notability demonstrated satisfactory to the GNG.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 16:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep