hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Martin Brown (fighter): Not having WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS , WP:RS where by the subject is talk about i length and in dept and not passing mentioned for WP:V .  Sources talking about announcements and results of fights are considered routing report and can not be contribute to the subject notability.  Cassiopeia talk 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Boxing , Martial arts ,  and Florida .  Cassiopeia talk 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: no coverage other than autogenerated/boilerplate profiles.  Hi!  ( talk ) 10:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete He's never been close to being ranked in the world top 10 for MMA, which is what WP:NMMA requires.   Appearing in multiple databases and an article on one of his fights does not constitute significant independent coverage.   I found nothing that shows he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO or any SNG.  Papaursa ( talk ) 18:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sourcing I find is largely match reports.  What's used isn't enough for notability.  This is typical of what I find [1] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG , WP:NMMA and WP:NBOX .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexandra Maksimova: Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.  Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Skating ,  and Belarus .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I found nothing beyond routine mentions.  Owen× ☎ 22:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brunei–Spain relations: voters saying relations exist and sources would be available, I find no evidence of WP:SIGCOV of these relations.  The article is still largely based on a primary source.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Brunei ,  and Spain .  Kpg jhp jm 07:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Per lack of significant coverage.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 15:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Many of the keep ! votes in the last AfD were based off of the fact that relations exist, which doesn't necessarily mean notability.  Some of the keep ! votes mentioned a war between Spain and Brunei in 1578, however as Curbon7 said at that AfD, there has been little diplomatic interaction since.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 23:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quintin King: I don't have an opinion either way J2m5 ( talk ) 10:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  J2m5 ( talk ) 10:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability.  Hunter region ( talk ) 22:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC) — Hunter region ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Delete .  "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline." from WP:POLITICIAN .  But the subject of the article doesn't satisfy WP:GNG .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL .  Created by a single purpose editor so possible self promotion or promotion.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL .  Additionally this reads like campaign advertisement material and should be removed per WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT .  Tar nis hed Path talk 01:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a venue for self promotion or a political campaigning platform.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they didn't win — the inclusion test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while unelected candidates get articles only if either  (a) they were already notable for other reasons that would already have gotten them into Wikipedia anyway regardless of their success or failure in the election, or  (b) the article shows credible evidence that their candidacy should be seen as a special case of significantly greater notability than everybody else's candidacies.  But neither of those things are in evidence here.  Additionally, the existence of campaign coverage is not sufficient to claim that the candidate passes WP:GNG instead of having to be measured against NPOL — every candidate in every election always gets some campaign coverage, so if that were how it worked then every candidate would get that exemption and NPOL itself would be meaningless and unenforceable.  So campaign coverage still gets an unelected candidate around NPOL only if it supports one of the special conditions I outlined above.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charles Pickering (footballer): Two of the sources in the reference section are from Facebook.  The article also provides little context other than that he was on some teams.  Shadow311 ( talk ) 13:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople .  Shadow311 ( talk ) 13:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Philippines .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- I draftified the page to give the page creator more time to look for sources.  The same user moved it back to the mainspace after adding a stats database and a Facebook link to the page.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per @ JTtheOG .  Since the incubation time as a draft wasn't respected, it's up to deletion.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and the fact that it fails notability Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 01:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ross McNicol: JMWt ( talk ) 15:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable artist; hits are social media, sites to buy artworks, then peter off...  Nothing in Gbooks GScholar; name is too common, you get hits on all kids of people.  Lack of sourcing and not meeting notability criterial for artists or authors.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails  notability per nomination.  I am not finding anything useful in WP:BEFORE .  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 02:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The subject received mentions in coverage of the opening and closure of The Wallis Gallery, including a 2007 mention that "McNicol was recently taken up by Hugh Allen, who works with Damien Hirst" [10] , but I am not seeing sufficient to demonstrate that any of the notability criteria are met.  AllyD ( talk ) 16:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – In sources that meet WP:RELIABLE and WP:INDEPENDENT , there exists only passing mentions.  TLA tlak 02:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zeh Badi: From WP:GEOLAND : Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran .  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Interdimensional being: I have not attempted to assess notability as a literary trope or as a Spiritualist belief like that connection to the IH suggested in the Jeffrey J. Kripal source at the IH article.  I brought this to AfD after a user raised a concern at Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Single_top_for_interdimensional_hypothesis/being that the article is also too similar to Interdimensional hypothesis , which is the claim that UFOs are interdimensional phenomena.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Paranormal .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I mean, it's a "thing" in literature.  Using Buffy as a ref is, well, novel.  Nothing I can find beyond DICDEF in sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The book is an academic analysis about Buffy the Vampire Slayer .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 18:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] …so?  That doesn't make it a good source.  This is a literary trope at best.  If you want to frame it as that, then no problem.  But to try and portray it as a serious phenomenon, the old adage of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" rings true.  TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 12:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oaktree b's comment was a bit misleading as worded, and it is unclear what you mean by "try and portray it as a serious phenomenon".  The article does not seem to support, or even discuss, fringe theories related to its topic.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 14:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment What we have is a dictionary definition (plus an example farm).   Would a soft-redirect to wikt:interdimensional be reasonable?  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 21:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While there's a small chance this could be a notable concept, the current execution (contents, references) are very subpar.  WP:TNT applies.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and add template at top {{lacking overview}}.  Agree the article needs improvement and expansion from its current state.  The topic fits in with other alleged beings that have articles at List of alleged extraterrestrial beings .  5Q5 | ✉ 12:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , no notability, just several examples from fiction that have nothing in common.  (Really, mice, beings from Flatland, and somwthing from Buffy all bundled together?)  Artem.G ( talk ) 20:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to be just different meanings of the word "dimension" thrown together.  Not even TV Tropes.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Design Society: Needs a review to decide on notability.  UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Engineering , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Al-Rahim Mosque: Possible merge/redirect to Dubai Marina , but could unbalance that article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexee Trevizo: No indication the virtual court case, which happened subsequent to the first AfD, has made this unfortunate incident nor the folks involved notable.  Star Mississippi 12:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Crime ,  and New Mexico .  Star Mississippi 12:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete as a WP:ONEEVENT .  Graeme Bartlett ( talk ) 22:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete as a WP:ONEEVENT .  Major BLP fail.  -- Tagishsimon ( talk ) 19:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Philip Masi: Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , New York ,  and Virginia .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines.  No reliable sources found to establish notability whatsoever.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 16:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This was originally a redirect to Phil Masi , who was a baseball player.  It may be better to restore that redirect.  Drowssap SMM 19:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mary Ikoku: Per Before gave articles linking only to her campaign like this one although have no results nor passes WP:NPOL .  SIGCOV is also a problem and judging from the media aspect, the subject fails ANYBIO.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 15:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 15:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , England ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2026 South American U-17 Women's Championship: Way too early yet for this article to exist.  CycloneYoris talk!  02:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Football .  CycloneYoris talk!  02:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and South America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , essentially a placeholder/template.  There is a need to stamp out the practice of creating of event articles so far ahead of the event that nothing substantial can be said about it.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per @ Geschichte .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 18:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Way WP:TOOSOON .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It is WP:TOOSOON .  Maybe drafting it may help a little.  - Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 21:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - way too early.  Giant Snowman 09:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Claes Nobel: The organisation's website protests (I think too much) that it is "not a scam", but see sample complaint: https://www.bbb.org/us/ga/brookhaven/profile/educational-consultant/the-national-society-of-high-school-scholars-0443-12000946/complaints Also very strange to show a photo with Kento Masuda , an obscure musician, added by an editor with a (deliberately?) difficult name in Georgian script, who has been blocked for paid-for editing.  Imaginatorium ( talk ) 16:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators .  Imaginatorium ( talk ) 16:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The main source for the article is a paid family obituary whose verifiability is somewhat tarnished by claims like "Claes, a native of Sweden, was born in Copenhagen".  In any case it is not independent.  Neither is the "World Peace One" page.  I suspect the WKI page is not, either, but it's hard to tell because I see no mention of him on it.  The NYT article namechecks him but has no depth of coverage.  That leaves only family connections and a press release about an apparently non-notable award.  None of these convey any WP:NBIO notability.  I found this through the academic deletion sorting list but founding an organization that claims to be not a scam is not the same thing as being an academic, and there is no hint of a pass of WP:NPROF notability either.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete