hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dhok Gujran: It is also all unreferenced and unencyclopaedic, so would need to be nuked either way.  Boleyn ( talk ) 21:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:TNT, if the subject meets GNG/GEOLAND at some point an article can be written, there is nothing salvageable here.  // Timothy :: talk 15:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard Moser: I couldn't find significant independent coverage of him, so I believe he does not warrant his own article per the General notability guideline .  HenryMP02 ( talk ) 21:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There does not seem to be any references in the article.  It also fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 21:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Television ,  and Austria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Checking the main Inspector Rex article, it seems at a glance that all relevant info is already covered there, and I can't find much of anything else.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 22:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
From Six to Ten: Nothing found in a BEFORE.  Tagged for notability since 2016 Donald D23 talk to me 20:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Greece .  Donald D23 talk to me 20:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources cited in article.  Only media coverage found were passing mentions in articles about the individual hosts.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 07:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steven R. Carter: His publications have not held a significant influence over his field, much less in general.  Not too different from the regular university professor.  GuardianH ( talk ) 16:19, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Concur with original opinion.  Aside from a singular (rather minor) award, there does not seem to be anything conferring notability to the point of having a biographical page.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 16:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United States of America .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 19:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication that WP:NPROF is met.  The American Book Award is unsourced (and the website of the host doesn't seem to list recipients of previous years), but even with that, notability isn't established.  No sources to fulfill WP:BASIC either.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 16:54, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1893 Western Maryland Green Terror football team: All I can find is some brief coverage, with nothing substantial present (although of note, one article I found covering the Baltimore City game says that Western Maryland lost, which directly contradicts the media guide, and also says they played a set of games on the weekend of November 4th, which is not noted in the media guide [ [63] ].  Bottom line, there isn't enough to justify keeping this.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football ,  and Maryland .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or delete : Closest sign of notability I could find is to the 1891 season, their first.  [64] Such early history could easily fit into the modestly-sized McDaniel Green Terror football .  Also note the same arguments will apply to the article for the 1892 team .  AfD page [65] Wizmut ( talk ) 18:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Crofts: There is some coverage of his resignation as a councillor but nothing independent about his political or professional career.  Reads like a CV.  Orange sticker ( talk ) 17:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United Kingdom .  Orange sticker ( talk ) 17:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I tend to agree with the nominator.  The news about resigning from councilor and the profile from the LGBT award provide some coverage, but I don't think it's sufficient to fulfill WP:GNG .  Broc ( talk ) 20:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francis Foster (comedian): Sources are opinion, unreliable or otherwise general fluff.  See also related issue at fringe theories noticeboard .  A source assessment table will follow shortly after the creation of this page.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: prepared by User:Fermiboson Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  [33] Site appears to be catalogue of people; information likely provided by the subject himself.  ?  N/A N/A ✘ No [34] WP:OPINION WP:SPECTATOR N/A ✘ No [35] Self-published podcast and interview WP:UGC , WP:INTERVIEW ✘ No [36] ?  No apparent affiliation of publisher with subject.  WP:INTERVIEW ?  Podcast is no longer available.  ✘ No [37] ?  No apparent affiliation of reviewer with subject.  ~ Reviews would normally be uncurated content and unreliable, but per WP:NARTIST 4(c) it could be significant.  ~ One paragraph at the end.  Normally would be a no, but since the rest of the sources are so bad some leeway is fine.  ?  Unknown [38] Site is a catalogue of events; information provided by subject.  One would be reasonably confident that the person at least is a comedian from the page.  ✘ No [39] WP:IMDB ✘ No [40] WP:UGC , WP:INTERVIEW ✘ No [41] WP:DAILYEXPRESS ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Sources in the article excluded from this article are nearly identical in nature to those listed in the table.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support, I can't find sufficient evidence of notability.  Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk ) 18:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Entertainment , Internet ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The occasional fluff listicle is not enough to base a biography upon.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 17:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abubakar Suleymanov: Nswix ( talk ) 22:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet criteria for WP:NBOX and WP:GNG .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Isn't covered in any of the sources under WP:NBOX as others have said.  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 03:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Page as whole looks bad, doesn't pass general notability either.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:NBOX and coverage seems to fail WP:GNG .   No evidence of any major boxing accomplishments.   The claim of a 3rd at the world championships appears to be false.   The 2008 world championships the article claims he competed in was a youth tournament and no Russian is listed at winning a medal in the division claimed.  Papaursa ( talk ) 15:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Fund of Aid for Youth: There is no sourcing in the article that is independent of the Azerbaijan government.  The page appears intended to promote the Azerbaijan government.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 13:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SmartCam: Was PROD'ed before, but some random IP just deleted PROD without providing any reason.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , agree with the PROD from 15 years ago that this was unremarkable software, and the passage of time only reaffirms that view that this is entirely non notable.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 18:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Orphaned apart from disamb.  No good place to redirect.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nico Rizzelli: The most I found were transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league , Italy ,  and England .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - professional rugby league footballer who played in the Super League.  6 sources.  Fleets ( talk ) 20:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He barely played, and several of the sources are statistical in nature, and some are not about him but about matches.  I advise you to read WP:SPORTCRIT .  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - One top tier appearances three years ago, no sign of taking career any further.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  Making one professional appearance is no longer enough to satisfy NSPORT.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 17:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sourcing to demonstrate the subject meets GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 01:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conference on Semantics in Healthcare and Life Sciences: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Health and fitness ,  and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Event fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT .  A WP:BEFORE search returns only passing mentions, promotional webpages, Wikipedia mirrors and other text which seems to confirm that the subject existed (and supports some of the related text).  But I can find no sources which establish any lasting relevance or any indication of significant coverage.  The COI/SPA overtones do very little to help...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If it were a conference notable in its own right, I'd expect much better google scholar hits than these: [7] .  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, not notable, not covered in RS.  Cinadon 36 16:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Thai representatives at international male beauty pageants: There is no way to improve this without starting over with real sources, it should be WP:TNT .  ☆ Bri ( talk ) 14:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Beauty pageants ,  and Thailand .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The main issue is whether this is a notable grouping that has been covered by independent reliable sources.  Notwithstanding that, the entire page is just a table of plain information, which should be trivially verifiable.  I don't see why this would fall into WP:TNT territory.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Looking into this article (which has been a magnet for sockpuppet and blocked accounts), it was originally at AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister Thailand before it was renamed so it is not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Hopefully, another relisting will bring out editors who have opinions about the value (or lack of it) for articles on national representatives at beauty pageants.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with the same rationale as held at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vietnam representatives at international male beauty pageants .  No evidence this set of contestants has been discussed as a whole in RIS, and the article is little more than a directory.  Mccapra ( talk ) 09:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Mccapra .  No evidence that these subjects are discussed in RS as a group per WP:NLIST .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 16:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leeds International School: Dan arndt ( talk ) 09:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Sri Lanka .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 09:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This school might possibly be notable.  Coverage on this two is not  great, but it's start.  [13] [14] .  This seems to have significant coverage: [15] Carpimaps talk to me!  10:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lefter Koxhaj: I do see some sources but nothing that looks like in depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  I would have draftified it but a draft already exists.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Albania ,  and Kosovo .  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If the draft exists, it can be moved to mainspace after being improved to proper standards.  He might be notable, but the news sites I found having coverage of him are not the kind of source I would prefer to establish notability.  Ktrimi991 ( talk ) 20:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 08:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not appear to be notable, apart from Albanian news sources.  I have not encountered him in any reliable sources.  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 14:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - useless article.  Jingiby ( talk ) 18:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No credible claim of notability.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non notable -- Devoke water 09:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kathering Jarquín: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Nicaragua .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Attempted to look for sources for this player, didn't see any references for this player which means that it does fail WP:GNG .  HawkAussie ( talk ) 11:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of GNG-passing coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Usmart Securities: Amigao ( talk ) 14:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  Mentioned in articles about suspending trading accounts, which are glossed over here.  One is paywalled, the others aren't strictly about this firm.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : sources 3 and 8 are about Brightsmart, which seems to be a different company.  I'm not seeing how they're related to this company, unsure why they're being used for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Hong Kong ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough reliable sources are available.  There is even a press release used.  Z3r0h3r000 ( talk ) 07:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete