hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jana Seppelt : The sources are either from organisations she works for, or an article she wrote.  Looking for better sources only produced a short list of similar sources, and some passing mentions.  Nothing in Google News.  Her function of "deputy leader" is an internal job in the party, not a position in a parliament.  Fram ( talk ) 07:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Journalism , Politics ,  and Germany .  Fram ( talk ) 07:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I started the stub for Women in Red .  As a deputy leader of a political party the article will likely be expanded in future.  If there's an issue I can redirect to Die Linke .  Moondragon21 ( talk ) 20:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC) < [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to have been significantly covered by GNG sources, the articles linked in the article have the problems identified by the nominator, there's no German language article to easily check to see if we've missed sources here, and a quick search brings up nothing else of note.  Since I may have missed German sources and this was a Women in Red stub, I have absolutely no problem having the article recreated if it meets GNG.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , albeit without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she's got more coverage.  Deputy leader of a political party is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees automatic inclusion in Wikipedia per se, but the referencing here is far, far too heavily dependent on primary sources that aren't support for notability at all — we require reliable source coverage independently analyzing her work in media and/or books, not content self-published by her own party or other organizations she's been directly affiliated with.  And if she's already held the role for five months, then the possibility of more media coverage appearing in the future isn't enough to overrule the lack of any media coverage already existing now: the time to start an article about her will be if and when that possible future media coverage actually happens.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 06:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rocket Festival Spain : Boleyn ( talk ) 19:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Music , Events ,  and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Shewmaker : Big Island Video News appears to have the only coverage that is independent and more than a brief mention, but even that article is rather fleeting in depth.  Source #5's coverage would be excellent, except that it's not independent, as it primarily discusses works featured on the resort's own property.  Searching online, there appears to be a potentially-notable poet by this name, but I'm not finding relevant search results about the sculptor who is the subject of this article.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Hawaii .  signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California , Florida ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This person does not meet notability for an artist.  In addition, some statements in the article are not found in the sources (e.g. "Over time, the personal collection grew, and have more than 25 monumental sculptures made from various materials, including stainless steel, aluminium, bronze, and concrete" is not stated in the two sources - in fact, he is only name-checked in them).  If the article were reduced to what is in the sources it would consist of only a few sentences.  Lamona ( talk ) 05:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
History of A-Scan (1 Dimension) OCT (1981-1990) : Instead, this could best be included in Optical coherence tomography or even as part of a new " History of optical coherence tomography " article, although the content isn't optimal for mainspace.  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 00:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ultra-niche "history" article, heavy reliance on primary sources.   With major cleanup I might consider a merge with Optical coherence tomography , but the information here is so specific and so poorly-framed I wouldn't know what to do with it as-is.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Medicine ,  and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Little too niche for a wiki article.  Could perhaps be worked into the main OCT article, but seems pointless, given how technical this information is.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of living former members of the New Zealand Parliament elected earliest : Living former members of the NZ Parliament who were elected more than 40 years ago .  We do need frequent reminders that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information .  Surtsicna ( talk ) 10:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and New Zealand .  Surtsicna ( talk ) 10:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTIINFO .  If people really wanted to know this information, all the election dates of former MPs are available on the election articles in which they were first elected.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 11:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  'who were elected more than 40 years ago' is a completely arbitrary cut-off point, which will also shift as the article ages.  It's also WP:ONESOURCE from one single 1985 book, which miraculously already seems to know which people would still be alive as of June 2023.  (Did Nostradamus write it?!).  By contrast, List of longest-serving members of the New Zealand Parliament may be said to be defining.  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 11:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete another one of those “list of famous persons, by non-defining criteria X, by completely arbitrary criteria Y” lists that makes zero sense whatsoever.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 18:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gerardo Ablaza : No indication of notability.  Pepper Beast (talk) 17:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Philippines .  Pepper Beast (talk) 17:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Largely a professional profile , including awards which themselves do not seem to be significant enough for ANYBIO.  — siro χ o 18:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Sources seem to only mention him as someone with a job, as OP said.  You could make a similar article about anyone who is mentioned on a few professional websites.  ForksForks ( talk ) 18:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A search found no evidence of notability.  Feels like a resumé.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 21:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While there is 2 reliable sources this is obviously a resume so WP:TNT is needed.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 22:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yuriy Esaulov : This article was draftified once by User:Onel5969 , and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement.   This article has been tagged for notability three times by User: Anwegmann and Onel5969, and the tags have been removed twice.   An article should speak for itself , but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject.   The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 20:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agreed: No in-depth coverage, and it does not come close to fulfilling the basic standards for notability.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 23:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - There doesn't appear to be any online Ukrainian-language SIGCOV; the best thing I found was a story and interview about his ex-wife in ГАРТ (a Chernihiv -based newspaper) which briefly mentions him.  I'll try Azerbaijani sources next.  Jogurney ( talk ) 00:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there's a long way until the article meets WP:GNG guidelines.  Other than this, I suggest this being removed for insufficient notability which is only confirmed once more when looking at the sources.  NiftyyyNofteeeee ( talk ) 10:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was unable to find enough sources with WP:SIGCOV of the subject to establish notability.  The subject currently fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Existing sources are WP:PRIMARY or WP:ROUTINE coverage, so they do not establish notability.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - creator is now pblocked from mainspace for disruptive creations/lacking the English language competence to edit here.  Star Mississippi 19:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Swami Vivekanand International School and Junior College : Ratnahastin ( talk ) 01:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Education , Schools ,  and Maharashtra .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 01:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - First two references are passing mentions, not indepth coverage.  Third reference is an alumni portfolio.  Not sufficient to establish the school's notability.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 01:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Probably notable for the performance of its cricket teams as well as its other strengths.  I added some references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Strength of its cricket team doesn't necessarily add to notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohanjit : Remsense 诉 10:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry , Delhi ,  and Punjab .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination, clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Côme Ferrand : Not eligible for BLP PROD as contains two external links in the infobox.  Already exists in draft at Draft:Come so sending to draft again would be pointless.  Due to the notability concerns, I request deletion of the article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Internet , France ,  and Poland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  This is in French, that's wrong language regardless of other issues.  This qualifies for WP:SPEEDY I am sure.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately we can only tag for WP:A2 if the article exists in a similar form on another Wikimedia project already.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Other than in cases meeting WP:A2 , you're incorrect.  The treatment of pages posted in a language other than English is discussed at WP:Pages needing translation to English .  Largoplazo ( talk ) 22:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even if this was machine-translated, it's an article about a non-notable influencer that just has no place here.  Nate • ( chatter ) 14:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of notability: the only "references" are to his Instagram and TikTok pages, and the latter leads to a 404.  AndrewWTaylor ( talk ) 21:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find no sources associating "côme ferrand" or "come.frnd" with "Touch pas à mon poste" and scant sources, on social media/wikis only, mentioning either name in conjunction with "Kev Adams" or with "TikTok".  If there are no useful sources associating this person with the main claims to fame being made for him, then it isn't surprising that I'm unable to find anything useful about this person when searching simply on those names, among sources that are about people other than him.  Not notable.  Largoplazo ( talk ) 23:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RooR : Flounder fillet ( talk ) 12:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Germany .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 12:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A not-notable bong maker in Germany.  The article was created 15 years ago, and only has four sentences.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kate Hodgson (disambiguation) : Leschnei ( talk ) 13:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Kline | yes?  14:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not needed.  Pam D 08:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEOTHER .  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 11:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 07:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Capakhchur : Nevertheless, I am unable to make an informed decision whether this is a hoax as I lack the necessary language skills to evaluate the Turkish and Azerbaijani versions of the article.  — Kusma ( talk ) 12:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Iran , Azerbaijan ,  and Turkey .  — Kusma ( talk ) 12:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per the article talk page, Beshogur states no information in either English or Turkish sources mentioning this battle.  -- Kansas Bear ( talk ) 13:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I can see sufficient Turkish sources to be confident that a battle took place there in 1387, but it’s not clear how significant it was.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This machine translation from here was unattributed – now remedied.  I can't read Turkish, but this source (page 223) confirms that there was an engagement at Çapakçur at this time; whatever else, this doesn't seem to be fully a hoax.  Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 11:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If this article is kept, we will need hatnotes to distinguish it from the almost identically titled Battle of Chapakchur .  Otherwise, a redirect may be a good idea.  — Kusma ( talk ) 12:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete per Kansas Bear, but I have not checked whether the current sources verify the content, and several editors above appear to confirm such a skirmish took place in 1387.  Nevertheless, the notability of the battle should be established, and the article should be moved to a more appropriate title.  Aintabli ( talk ) 18:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] UTC) Comment I have fixed cite 12 in the Turkish article (the source mentioned by Justlettersandnumbers above which is now at https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/368093 ) and I see that in turn cites (their cite 20) "History of Tamerlane and His Successors" which is available in English but unfortunately not as an ebook Chidgk1 ( talk ) 18:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ciano Joasil : Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Run-of-the-mill businessman.  Edwardx ( talk ) 21:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Haiti ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator - all sources are primary or passing mentions.  A redirect to Principal Financial Group probably wouldn't make sense either.  While doing research, one should note that there's an unrelated pastor with the same name.  NotAGenious ( talk ) 12:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gallanosa family : No reliable source hits on Google, GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Honestly, reading the article, I couldn't find any reason in favor of its notability.  Also couldn't find any good sources for this.  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 06:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of the family being notable.  This was created by an SPA so this could be a case of WP:NOTGENEALOGY from a member of the family.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete