hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mordva (slur): Such opinion indeed exists, but it's a fringe one, and no reliable dictionary marks those words as "slurs".  The article is mostly unsourced; the only source in the article that might be reliable is the 1990 discussion on whether the titular word may be pejorative or not (both opinions are represented).  Other than that, there's only an entry from the 19th century Belarusian dictionary describing a homophonic word that was used as a pejorative term for Jews, but it's clearly unrelated to the main topic (Mordvins don't have anything to do with Jews).  Overall, I don't think the word on its own is notable enough for a separate article: a section in Mordvins about the etymology and perceived connotations of the term would be enough.  Finstergeist ( talk ) 20:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Belarus ,  and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A single reliable article directly discussing the topic is not enough to make this notable.  I also nominated a related article Mordvins (term for Jews) for deletion.  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 13:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and History .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Brusquedandelion ( talk ) 02:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SNOW , and as noted.  One mention at an academic conference is by definition WP:OR .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jim Thorpe Classic: Let'srun ( talk ) 18:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football , Colorado ,  and Virginia .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Article creator here - I have no opinion either way so I won't argue whether these sources meet SIGCOV/GNG, but I was able to find mentions of the game in quite a few places: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] .  I'll leave it up to others to decide either way.  PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs ) 19:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Was unable to find any SIGCOV on this.  A short lived preseason venture that lasted two games.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 10:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aggelos Zefkis: An English-language search reveals no substantive sources.  A comprehensive Greek-language search was able to produce the following sources: [20] Routine transfer announcement with minimal coverage regarding the player.  [21] Announcement of the renewal of his contract, evidently just copied from the club's announcement.  Overall there is no evidence of significant coverage that would be sufficient to merit an article.  GGT ( talk ) 08:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cyprus .  GGT ( talk ) 08:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - in addition to the sources above, I found Sigma Live , but it's just a copy and paste from a club press release, so fails to confer notability Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Cinadon 36 08:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 12:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mannadiyar: Considering the edit wars and kerffufle which the conflation of these three distinct topics has resulted into here i.e. a poor article with no legs to stand on, this should be blown up.  Anyone who wants to make an article on any of these topics should start anew (better be with a disambiguating title).  Gotitbro ( talk ) 20:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , India ,  and Kerala .  Gotitbro ( talk ) 20:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm not convinced that any of these possible topics are notable, so I'm not sure this is a WP:TNT delete so much as a regular-old "it just isn't a notable topic" delete.  Existing similar articles we have (eg Madampi (Nair title) ) tend to be very poorly sourced.  I've seen several of these come through AfC and don't believe I've ever seen one accepted.  They end up being fought over by various POV-pushing editors, to no obvious end.  If someone has seen otherwise, please ping me, I'd love to know.  I know our notability guidelines tend towards "typically topics like x are found to be notable" rather than "typically topics like y are found to not be notable", but... -- asilvering ( talk ) 22:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michel Shamil Orloff: Essentially a WP:MILL business person.  No SNGs apply here and there is no independent, significant coverage in reliable sources.  A Google search only returns his Linkedin and a Google News search returns nothing at all.  I've manged to find one 2008 NYT article (referenced in the article) which trivially mentions his name once in a quote/interview and that's it.  C F A 💬 17:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Switzerland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  See this discussion at SPA article creator's user talk , and their subsequent good faith disclosure at their user page .  Initial version was full of original research, apparently sourced only by discussion with the client Mr. Orloff, which I cleared out three times.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Douglas Rosenberg: The only sources available mention him because he donated/invested a large amount related to research on Alzheimer's disease.  I don't think this could satisfy notability and the coverage was not sustained .  Bendegúz Ács ( talk ) 11:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Even the coverage described by nom is in local sources only.  No grounds for notability. — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails WP:GNG and fails WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 21:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Only of local relevance.  -- Melchior2006 ( talk ) 09:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTRESUME .  In 2007, I would have excused this gently , but in 2024, everyone knows that we are not a free web host .  Bearian ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mr. Pregnant: Gulte , GreatAndhra , tollywoodtimes , tupaki , mirchi9 , and teluguvision are all unreliable sources.  The film was previously deleted along with other films at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootcut Balaraju (ctrl-f Mister Pregnant ).  Good option would be to draftify if the film is notable after release.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 10:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to meet notability guidance WP:NFILM — Mgp28 ( talk ) 22:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Man on the Hill: mwwv converse ∫ edits 15:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  mwwv converse ∫ edits 15:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chancellor Miller: The article only cites an IMDB page, and my Google searches could not find any major SIGCOV.  Per the notability guideline for entertainers, Miller does not seem to have played substantial roles in any notable pieces of entertainment based on his filmography section.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 19:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Kentucky .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 19:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  SmartSE ( talk ) 01:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no evidence of GNG coverage.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 20:39, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ayberk Erkay: Near-complete lack of sourcing in the article, including why the subject is notable/relevant.  I'm also concerned that the article seems to be a copy-paste translation of the Turkish version , with little regard given for ensuring accurate English grammar/style.  The Kip 02:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Turkey ,  and People .  The Kip 04:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:39, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability.  Fails to meet criteria of WP:GNG .  Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.  ContributorMix ( talk ) 22:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Have there been any notability-related discussions or proceedings on Turkish Wikipedia?  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 07:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Doesn't appear so.  The Kip 17:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Could not find any sources in which he is more than just a passing mention/citation/reference as the author, translator of some works without any explanation on who exactly he is.  The sources used in this article are brief biographical entries.  One is from a publishing press website and another is a website that sells tickets/lists theatrical plays.  No indication of notability.  Aintabli ( talk ) 20:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CCTRL: Was PROD'ed in 2007 but the creator quickly removed the PROD tag.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find anything indicating notability here.  Fails the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It exists [23] but no sourcing is used I can't find much of anything to say why this string of characters is important.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rachid Aliaoui: Dougal18 ( talk ) 11:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Violates WP:GNG and is a database entry, which is not allowed .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It wasn't a database entry, there was a reference on the page...-- Ortizesp ( talk ) 16:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; unfortunately someone introduced misleading information (and an inaccurate reference to the article) recently but there is no significant coverage of Rachid Aliaoui (born 1986 in Arles).  There is plenty of coverage of Rachid Alioui (born 1992 in La Rochelle), and the Le Télégramme reference covers that footballer.  I couldn't find anything useful at all on the Aliaoui born in 1986.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manoj Tiwari (film director): Came here to remove a reference that falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and found that out of all the references on the page, only one would be considered reliable and it is about a film, not in-depth about the director.  An online search founding nothing better.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete : Although some of their later works appear to be notable, they themselves don't seem to have garnered much media attention, based on the sources of the article at least.  The sources discuss about his work (film reviews), but the articles focus is not him.  Obviously, sources about a film director will definitely discuss their work, but to meet notability, some of the sources need to focus mainly on the subject, then discussing their works.  This is not the case here.  So, delete for now.  X ( talk ) 18:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] REDIRECT : redirecting to any of his last two sole directed films would be ideal AnkkAnkur ( talk ) 20:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC) — AnkkAnkur ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Redirect so we can deal with the constant attempts to remove that redirect??  No thanks.  If redirect is an acceptable WP:ATD I would recommend protecting the title from creation.  Also, welcome to Wikipedia.  Strange you found AfD so quickly with only your third edit.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:DIRECTOR with at least 3 notable films directed (that received coverage mentioning him) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Curious which references you feel count towards notability that do not fall under NEWSORGINDIA. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 23:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails notability.  The director has not made a remarkable or significant achievement, enough to deserve attention.  A search on his name would bring up more result on different Manoj Tiwari, a politician.  The sources on the page do not have coverage on the director himself to pass WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG , there are no much reliable secondary sources found where the subject got in-depth coverage.  Grabup ( talk ) 07:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Graham Sandercock: Subject does not fulfill notability requirements, neither per WP:NAUTHOR , WP:POLITICIAN or WP:SINGER .  Broc ( talk ) 13:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Bands and musicians , Politicians ,  and England .  Broc ( talk ) 13:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero hits for the person.  Running for an election isn't notable, not sure being the head of the geography department at a boys school is notable enough either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not satisfy WP:NPROF .  Being the head of a school is nowhere near that mark.  Qflib ( talk ) 17:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
English Jamaicans: This should be deleted OR redirected to British Jamaicans .  What little info is on here is likely already in that article.  Omnis Scientia ( talk ) 09:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , England ,  and Jamaica .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or possibly redirect.  No good reason for this fork.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to British Jamaicans – Pharyngeal Implosive7 (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too short and not enough reliable sources.  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Complex / Rational 17:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The redirect is a problem because, as it stands, the two phrases mean reversed things: one is about people in the UK, and the other is about people in Jamaica.  They aren't claimed to be synonyms, so we shouldn't make a redirect that says they are.  And this article really says nothing about people of English descent in Jamaica, so it needs to go.  Mangoe ( talk ) 20:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to British Jamaicans would be the best option.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Mangoe is correct in stating that the term as currently used on Wikipedia isn't a subset of British Jamaicans .  Going by a cursory search, it doesn't appear to be commonly used in that sense either, so it doesn't make sense to redirect there.  ― novov (t c) 07:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing useful here.  Will only cause confusion if redirected to British Jamaicans because, what about Jamaican Americans ?  They are also "English" I must say.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete