hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
FASCIA (database): One of many databases used by the security agency.  Fails WP:SUSTAINED and independent notability as a database separate from its use by the NSA and its inclusion in the global surveillance disclosures .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 21:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Military .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 21:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Needs expansion, but here is a source from 2016.  jp × g 🗯️ 08:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:TRIVIALMENTION , not WP:SIGCOV .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 17:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to NSA per nom.  Lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable , independent sources , per the cited sources and above listed source.  ( ? )  Cover as an NSA program, which is the context in which sources cover it.  Next time I suggest boldly doing so as an alternative before deletion .  czar 15:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Jai Mahabharat: Tagged for notability since 2022 Donald D23 talk to me 00:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Donald D23 talk to me 00:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a much shorter portion of the text onto Mahabharata#In film and television , since, on its own, the article's subject possesses no independent notability.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Guy (Final Fight): This is just another minor character clearly fails WP:GNG .  Despite being written long, sources were mostly from trivia mentions and listicles.  Showing zero WP:SIGCOV afterall as per WP:BEFORE .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per failed WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV Blitzfan51 the manager 14:07, 23 May (UTC) Merge I will admit part of the problem of finding sources is due to his name, but even then after extensive looking I found nothing, and what's there is flimsy. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 17:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Riddell Airfield: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Maybe merge into Riddells Creek ?  Alvaldi ( talk ) 19:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unpaved airstrips are not notable for existing as a place to land unless there's significant coverage about them, which is often not the case for private fields of grass.  There's nothing to say at the town article, it's not for public use and these are not uncommon.  Reywas92 Talk 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Reywas92 according to https://www.airsports.net/RiddellAirfield/ there is one sealed main runway of 880 metres.  However that source does not appear to be independent of the subject.  Tar nis hed Path talk 07:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article's coordinates are wrong (35S instead of 37S).  If this is a legitimate paved airfield I don't have as strong an argument for deletion or against merging.  Reywas92 Talk 14:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of megalithic monuments in Cork: There is a separate List of megalithic monuments in Ireland , which probably needs more maintenance, but is a good starting page.  This one for Cork then seems redundant.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 14:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Archaeology and Ireland .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 14:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , take the content and cross reference with the List of megalithic monuments in Ireland page.  Iljhgtn ( talk ) 16:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Nine cork county places are in the other list, this list has 10, so one needs to be added.   Don't need references for a list article when the information is clearly listed in the article linked to.  D r e a m Focus 21:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (any missing entries) and redirect to List of megalithic monuments in Ireland .  As per nom, the topic does not have sufficiently independent notable for a standalone article - nor is the project improved by having two/separate entries covering (effectively) the same thing.  Suggest merge/redirect as an WP:ATD .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 12:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (additional items) as above, and redirect - no purpose to a distinct list.  SeoR ( talk ) 00:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Valuation of nonmarket housework: Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- There is secondary sourcing specific to the subject beyond the Unpaid work article.  I feel that the sourcing already in the article is sufficient to pass GNG, and there is a lot more out there if anyone comes along who is motivated to improve the article.  The article as it stands needs cleanup, but it not misleading or inaccurate.  Deleting it does not improve the encyclopaedia and is not required by policy.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 18:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to unpaid work - this article does have some good content in it that is sourced, and with a bit of cleanup would fit nicely in unpaid work.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 03:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to unpaid work.  The merge target is currently 4443 words i.e. likely within WP:SIZERULE post-merge, and the sourced statements are worth salvaging.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 13:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per the above.   Given the substantial overlap in the two topics it makes sense to cover them in a single article and this one has the less obvious name and contents though there is some sourced content worth preserving.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 09:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
No. 677 (Suffolk and Norfolk Yeomanry) Squadron AAC: Only one reference is listed and it is not independent of the topic of the article.  In the case of this article, the squadron is company-sized.  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 19:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom .  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 19:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Aviation squadrons normally warrant their own articles.  Predecessor units were larger: Norfolk Yeomanry and Suffolk Yeomanry have their own articles.  And sources do not have to be independent of the topic of an article,.  We don't need to write articles on football from sources on cricket.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Secondary or tertiary sources determine notability ( WP:PSTS ) so if they are not included in the article, notability cannot be proven.  This article is about an army squadron ( company -sized) instead of an RAF squadron ( battalion -sized).  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 21:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no requirement for the secondary or tertiary sources that establish notability to actually be used in an article.  Notability is proven by their existence, not their presence.  WP:BEFORE : If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect to 6 Regiment Army Air Corps .  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 12:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 6 Regiment Army Air Corps , the information on the regiment article is virtually the same as what is in the article.  Gavbadger ( talk ) 12:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect to 6 Regiment Army Air Corps .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Roderick Kingsley: There's also a random link to some dude's let's play... as a source??? Additionally, we already have a hobgoblin article, (which, to be fair, probably isn't great either), so this is entirely unnecessary.  Industrial Insect (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: R in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  I'd suggest the Hobgoblin page, but Kingsley has also operated as Devil-Spider at some point.  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 20:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Who the heck is Devil-Spider?  And why does his existence mean this article needs to exist?  Industrial Insect (talk) 03:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This was a costumed alias that Roderick Kingsley operated when he was in Ecuador as seen in Amazing Spider-Man #691.  He also sold this costume to an unnamed criminal when putting together the different franchises that are mentioned in the article.  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 02:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Hobgoblin .  Agree that the individual aliases of Hobgoblin are not likely to be notable on their own.  Yes he also used to alias Devil-Spider, but he is far more well-known as Hobgoblin.  Rhino131 ( talk ) 13:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Rocket Racer: Industrial Insect (talk) 01:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 01:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: R in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 20:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: R in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment "Rocket Racer" is also the name of the final boss in the Lego Racers and Lego Racers 2 video games, which should maybe be taken into consideration here (hatnote?).  TompaDompa ( talk ) 12:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: R - The only non-primary sources being used in the article are a couple of "Top Ten" lists that are generally not considered valid reliable sources for establishing notability.   Further searches turned up much of the same - a few more "Top Ten" lists, a few plot summaries/recaps of issues, and entries in fan-generated databases.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Britannica International Encyclopedia: Could probably be merged and mentioned somewhere if there aren't other sources.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to History of the Encyclopædia Britannica#Global Edition (or create a separate section in that article for non-English editions).  Dekimasu よ!  00:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is additional support for a Merge or Redirection.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to History of the Encyclopædia Britannica#Global Edition seems most sensible.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 02:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Podiuming: The article is poorly written and sourced.  The concept of podiuming does not strike me as meeting criteria of notability.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Olympics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ATD : Redirect or merge with Podium .  -- Habst ( talk ) 00:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Podium as suggested by Habst, or possibly to Sport or to Competition .  'Podium' is probably best, as it mentions "the top three competitors".  Cnilep ( talk ) 02:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Podium .  There's a sentence in the lead of that article already about the use of the word as a verb; that's about as much coverage as this deserves on Wikipedia, and there's really nothing to merge per se.  Brusquedandelion ( talk ) 04:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Podium : or redirect.  Can't see any expansion potential for this beyond a DICTDEF that isn't already covered there.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Craig Marduk: "At 8 feet tall, with a chest like a beer keg, Marduk is a man's man – a hairy, barroom brawler."  Failing WP:GNG .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 23:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 23:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 23:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters - every single source concerns the characters as a group, with small amounts of coverage individually, so there is no indication he passes WP:GNG .  Sources elsewhere are only trivial mentions in announcements.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 02:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : Well, here's one I can get behind.  In sources I've searched for per WP:BEFORE , I'm not seeing much, beyond what's already cited in the article.  That being said, I think it's time to give these AFDs a rest for a while, GlatorNator.  I know I'm not alone with this mindset.  MoonJet ( talk ) 03:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] umm, maybe no.  An admin like Sergecross73 made a comment like this [1] .    Stating that nominations are acceptable "especially if many have been closed as merge/redirect".  So far with dozens of character articles were nom'ed only Reptile did survived.  Again, that's your opinion.  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 04:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Like, optimally, it would have been great to bundle them as a group nomination, but then it risks something like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warcraft character articles where it ends in an utter disaster and trainwreck.  So I think nominating individually is fine even if some people are interpreting it as spamming the process.  So far there has been little in the way of sources presented that might suggest the AfDs are off the mark somehow.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, while I have some concerns about the declining quality of some of these nominations (not this one) you're unlikely to be declared disruptive or anything of the sort of they keep largely closing as merge/delete, which most still are.  Sergecross73 msg me 13:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge The sources are discussing everyone in Tekken, not just him.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Kazama16 ( talk ) 11:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  Fails WP:GNG as a character.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 04:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Hetty Naaijkens-Retel Helmrich: Not seeing any significant coverage of this person other than a few brief mentions.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Scarabeefilms .  Fails WP:NFSOURCES .  MNewnham ( talk ) 03:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Netherlands .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (selectively) into Scarabeefilms .  There are sufficient sources (i.e. not references) to merge some of the content and it will be reasonable to expand the target with some of the materials in the article.  Note that their main director has an article at Nlwiki.  Can also have a short bio at the target, instead of rehashing all these awards time and again.  gidonb ( talk ) 04:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  gidonb ( talk ) 06:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge