hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Earth Law Center: Of the 13 references, four are self-published, four are dead, three do not mention the organisation, one is a mention because it quotes someone from the organisation, and only one reference (the second one) might be about the center, but it requires registration.  Much or the article is unsourced; much looks like it has been copied from somewhere.  Curb Safe Charmer ( talk ) 14:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Environment , California ,  and Colorado .  Curb Safe Charmer ( talk ) 14:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep: Appears to be enough here in terms of in-depth secondary sources needed to pass GNG, although there is a lot of work needed to improve it to encyclopedia-level standards.  [ [1] ][ [2] ] User:Let'srun 15:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I appreciate Let'srun finding those refs, however I read them and I drew a different conclusion.  The first was about rights of nature ; it included the Earth Law Center, too, but most of that material was in the form of quotes from an Earth Law Center person.  The second didn't sufficiently cover Earth Law Center itself.   This is a borderline call either way - I encourage others to look at these 2 refs and decide for yourself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by A. B. ( talk • contribs ) 16:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This subject probably should have an article but references are admittedly weak as A.B. noted.  I think it would be nice to have preserved in draft space though.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 03:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Revisions since nominated for deletion --> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earth_Law_Center&diff=1170270345&oldid=1167728538 --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to fail WP:NORG at the moment, and has parts written non-encyclopedically.  If additional sources are found I have no problem with re-creation.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Portugal: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, the only one source are nothing but announcement, not asserting notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Portugal .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as simply a directory.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rel (DBMS): Two of the sources are simply about the relational model this product aims to implement, with no mention of the product itself.  The third source is a non-independent promotional page.  The website gives no indication that it's widely used, and the code has fewer than 100 stars on Github.  Ghosts of Europa ( talk ) 21:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Not an easy search term; I have added a notification to the article/software author who may be able to indicate any independent coverage which it has received.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Constance McKee: Only one reference which is from the non-notable company she is CEO of and even that is not in-depth.  Article creator seems to be WP:SPA to advertise Yale Alumni.  Imcdc Contact 09:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople .  Imcdc Contact 09:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails NBIO.  Only other sources I see are a similar profile from a seemingly related company and a few database profiles that just regurgitations of the others.  —⁠ PlanetJuice ( talk • contribs ) 15:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 08:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable subject.  No coverage exists.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naomi Bakr: Subject has two caps for Egypt, but there is no coverage of the subject except for a profile from UC Irvine and a profile in the Orange County Register.  Enos733 ( talk ) 18:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Egypt .  Enos733 ( talk ) 18:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC .  4meter4 ( talk ) 18:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Canadian Sleep Society: Bearcat ( talk ) 22:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:ORGCRITE and a cursory Google search doesn't turn up any independent sources.  The article itself is lacks encyclopedic coverage; its mostly lists of staff and statements about itself.  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 22:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BV Bhaskar: Previous edit looks like a fan page [9] .  Seems to only play a "notable" role in Salaga (film), can redirect there [10] .  Only one good source on entire internet which is not a passing mention which is already on the page.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 03:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Karnataka .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Utter nonsense regarding what has been written about him and cricket.  Has never played in the Ranji Trophy, and the 'English County Cricket League' is totally made up.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 20:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Global Mission: Pinging participants of the RfD discussion: @ Bkonrad , TartarTorte , Catfurball , The Banner ,  and Thryduulf : .  Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The RFD-nomination can be found here .  The Banner talk 08:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this article will never be notable, it should have never been created.  Catfurball ( talk ) 21:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Maryland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article looks promo to me, with only related sources.  No proof of notability.  The Banner talk 08:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails notability.  It is also unsourced.  Topjur01 ( talk ) 16:48, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If kept, rename with a disambiguator, such as Global Mission (Adventist) .   I would have expected  an article with this title to refer to the mission of the church as a whole, not that one one denomination.   However I doubt it is worth having.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 18:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alejandro Ruiz (footballer): He has also played domestically in the Cayman Islands top flight.  I see nothing that helps this person meet GNG and a search of local news services turned up very little.  There are some passing mentions in the Cayman Compass but it's not nearly enough.  PROD was removed without explanation by Ortizesp as part of a mass dePROD.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 14:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Football ,  and United Kingdom .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 14:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Caribbean and Costa Rica .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources found to prove notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  No sources to prove that this person is notable.  Not notable football player nothing more on google .  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Johnny Maroney: Appears to fail WP:GNG ; a WP:BEFORE search turned up no significant coverage of either him or his company.  Gnomingstuff ( talk ) 05:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Entertainment ,  and United States of America .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Could not find coverage of him, nothing in gnews.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nashville Kickoff Game: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and American football .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete article fails WP:GNG per nom and Google search that shows no references to a game of this title outside of Wiki mirrors.  Frank Anchor 18:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Another one of those non-notable 'neutral site' season launch games where the state's big team plays 'on the road' in an NFL stadium to a lesser team which got a big payoff to lose by five touchdowns in a de facto exhibition game.  This isn't anything that gained real N at all and was done after the original two-year deal.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Cape São Vicente (1676): It's just three lines in the source (wrong page btw, it's actually 149) that were hallucinated by an LLM into becoming an article.  – Hilst [talk] 00:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Africa ,  and Portugal .  – Hilst [talk] 00:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete to remove LLMCruft from Wikipedia.  Can we nominate all articles created by this user?  -1ctinus📝 🗨 19:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajmel Quereshi: .  "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 ( talk ) 22:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  Snickers2686 ( talk ) 22:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Maryland , Minnesota ,  and Wisconsin .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per precedent.  His selection as a magistrate judge of itself does not confer notability, and his legal work prior to that selection likely is typical of other attorneys in his field.  Kablammo ( talk ) 12:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject plainly does not pass WP:JUDGE or the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Article was originally created by the sockpuppet MIAJudges.  User:Let'srun 01:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 16:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Americas Energy and Climate Symposium: Longhornsg ( talk ) 07:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Environment ,  and Peru .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Greg Wilcock: Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  This one doesn't meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I restored some text that 122Monaro

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Asia Cup statistics: The main articles for these events have the key statistics (top 5 for most runs and most wickets) which is all that's needed for an encyclopedia.  These article just include way too much WP:TRIVIA like top partnership by wicket (there will only be a handful of 10th wicket partnerships each tournament, so this isn't at all a meaningful, encyclopedic statistic) Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Cricket , Lists ,  and Asia .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all per nom and WP:NOTSTATS / WP:NOTMIRROR .  All easily obtained by looking up ESPNCricinfo.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTDATABASE.  AryKun ( talk ) 13:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Relevant, notable statistics can go on the main article.  If this was a World Cup, you'd might have a better argument for it, but as it stands its WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:TRIVIA MarkiPoli ( talk ) 13:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDATABASE FatCat96 ( talk ) 17:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:NOTDATABASE .  Should be restricted to tables on the main article for the tournament, showing the top five leading run scorers and wicket takers during the competition.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 18:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all' Per nom and others.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTSTATS.  Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk ) 05:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  DSP2092 talk The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bansharaj Sun: I have searched ProQuest, Google and DDG but found nothing even close to being a decent source.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Meghalaya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of GNG-passing coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Women's EuroHockey5s Championship: ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 14:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Europe .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 14:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't look to meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete