hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of second-tier formula racing champions : Unnecessary WP:FANCRUFT list that is only good for the most obsessive motorsport fans, also WP:LC and WP:NOTDIRECTORY applies.  Also, not notable enough to pass WP:LISTN , in fact fails all requirements.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people , Sports , Motorsport ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As I said on the first nomination in this set of articles, this is a very straightforward delete.  Procedure wise, this could definitely have been handled as a batch nomination as the reasoning is identical for all articles of this type.  5225 C ( talk • contributions ) 09:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not described as a group.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nominator and Let'srun.  EnthusiastWorld37 ( talk ) 07:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - Unlike many of the similar recent nominations, I think this has some potential.  At the moment this article is stuck trying to be multiple things at once.  I think it is possibly reasonable to keep a list of champions (and by default, seasons) of just the original F2 into F3000 into GP2 into the current F2.  It is not unusual for these to be grouped together (indeed the navboxes on our articles such as 1984 European Formula Two Championship and 1985 European Formula 3000 Championship reflect this), and for example Motorsport Magazine considers GP2/F2 to be one championship, and on [8] if under "group" you select "F2/F3000/GP2", it gives all of the above, plus the FIA Formula Two Championship (2009–2012) and 1960 Formula Two season .  So this is not a hard failure of WP:LISTN .  I would suggest removing all but the above mentioned championships, and probably mergeing it into one table (with perhaps the "revived" F2 as a separate section).  A7V2 ( talk ) 23:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Helmuth Ehrhardt : It is difficult to WP:V the information currently on the page or whether this is the same person that several sources name as involved directly in Nazi crimes.  Currently my thought is that this page should be WP:TNT until someone can do a better job of it, but I would be interested if others can find good sources to offer against the WP:GNG JMWt ( talk ) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychiatry and Germany .  JMWt ( talk ) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Girabola players during 2014 season : Random compilation of players, without references and seems to be completely out of scope.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Angola-related deletion discussions .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 15 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete arbitrary list.  We don't generally have article for squad lists for one season, these would be included in team season articles if those articles are created and notable, which wouldn't be the case for this team in my opinion.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per Joseph, just nonsense.  Giant Snowman 18:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with others, list serves no clear purpose as its own article.  Halfadaniel ( talk ) 05:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The list is pretty indiscriminate and unsourced, delete per nom.  Govvy ( talk ) 19:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per above!  Unsourced!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  13:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NBA Saturday Primetime on ABC results : Nor does this list serve a valid navigational purpose; the individual games are not notable.  Wikipedia is WP:NOT a collection of (even interesting) information.  Obviously a lot of work went into this page, but unfortunately I don't see any notability interest that warrants keeping it.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Basketball , Lists ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A list that can be useful as a seasonal page but it already exists.  Sources are more to do with the game itself, barely about the TV coverages.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT that fails WP:LISTN .  It's not even useful as trivia.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 16:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN as a grouping which is not discussed in secondary sources.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nathan Asiimwe : Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 10:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Uganda .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments - delete It appears you messaged the creator about the previous draft move and the guy recreated again in main space, this appears to have happened before.  SKennedy157 this is not healthy editing behaviour.  You should work on articles in draft space, not recreate them again in main space.  Govvy ( talk ) 12:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Callie Withers : Some coverage found here , but not enough to justify GNG being passed.  A little bit here , but not SIGCOV.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 15:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and United States of America .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 15:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Hebditch : A youth career in ice hockey and appearances for Saint Pierre and Miquelon is not much to go off either (just saying).  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 05:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 05:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably delete I am unsure, of the sources present in the article, none of them qualify for WP:GNG , I tried to look for secondary sources online, however the name Simon Hebditch, there are a number of different people.  But what I found on him was his name in those football databases, some hockey databases and a few one liners.  Nothing suggestive of basic GNG, unless someone proves me wrong and finds good sources.  It's a delete from me.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cristian Marchi : Nothing exists in native language wiki for the person and would appear to have been deleted on multiple occasions.   One should seriously question the notability in a case like this.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no WP:RS showing significant coverage.  Plenty of promotional articles in dubious sources repeating always the same information.  Broc ( talk ) 07:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
René van der Wouden : I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found references to add.  The biography section has recently been blanked by another editor, but it was unreferenced and there isn't anything in the content to indicate that this person meets WP:NMUSIC or WP:ANYBIO .  The article has been tagged with "no footnotes" since 2014.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 02:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Netherlands .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 02:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources used in the article, nothing found in my search.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If possible, I recommend investigating the edits made by a new editor called EM-Librairian , who has never done anything for WP outside of this article.  That person first added several items to the Discography section on 4 December, indicating a certain interest in improving the article, but then on 21 December they totally blanked out the Biography with no explanation, which seems quite fishy to me.   --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Before 21 December the article had a robust and rambling Biography of the musician, which was unsourced and probably copied from his personal website, but it included some facts that could be confirmed via a search for reliable sources.  I attempted to do just that and found that the biography was probably accurate but the musician simply hasn't been noticed by reliable music media despite his prolific output.  He plays occasional concerts which get basic newspaper listings, and he's present on all the usual self-upload and directory sites, but he simply hasn't broken through to the other side.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  MIA on Delpher and in the Dutch press.  Deleted from Nlwiki.  There's one book on Google Books that mentions him as notable in space music , with the name of a piece.  That's a very modest beginning of importance and nowhere near the beginning of SIGCOV.  Comes across as a music enthusiast who has recorded his own music and only occasionally performed.  Nothing wrong with that except not encyclopedic.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chuck Spano : popo dameron ⁠ talk 23:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Florida .  popo dameron ⁠ talk 23:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find anything about a musician with this name; first source is more about the St Patrick's Day event than this person.  Rest are about as non-helpful for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Absolutely does not pass in terms of notability, sourcing, or overall quality.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only coverage I am able to find that is not in the article is a trivial mention in The Palm Beach Post .  There is indeed a Florida-based percussionist who matches this article's description, but I don't think that person meets WP:NMUSICBIO or WP:NBASIC / WP:GNG .  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mitsuami Heroine : ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Japan .  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I couldn't find any evidence of notability in Japanese.  Dekimasu よ!  06:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This even appears to meet WP:A9 criteria for speedy deletion: "none of the contributing recording artists has an article and does not indicate why its subject is important or significant ".  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 08:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, I should've mentioned that I would've A9'd except that it was no consensused in 2013.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 08:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah I see, thanks!  It does say 2nd nomination, I should've spotted :) Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 08:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I cannot find sources to meet WP:NALBUM and the article does not describe meeting any other WP:NALBUM criteria.  - Lopifalko ( talk ) 09:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NALBUMS due to the complete absence of coverage in sources.  Also "unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs".  An artist article does not exist for the title to be redirected to. -- N Ø 13:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - In agreement with everyone above.  The album seems to be have gone unnoticed by the music media and I can only find brief mentions in lists of items tangentially associated with Polysics.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 21:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
UWC Heavyweight Championship : The promotion doesn't even have an article HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 18:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  LM2000 ( talk ) 12:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator and LM2000.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 20:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Avimator : Using Google Scholar, I can find plenty of mentions, but not anything substantial.  toweli ( talk ) 16:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software .  toweli ( talk ) 16:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There are a lot of these old non-notable software articles.  I usually find WP:PROD a good tool for dealing with them.  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 16:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fermax : TLA (talk) 02:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Spain .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] seems fine Jimrobbo2 ( talk ) 14:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Blatant advertisement which cites no sources.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 14:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muhammad Amin Zakaria : Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 20:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Malaysia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per NPOL.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 21:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES , county-level legislators, including state-level official in this context, are not presumed to be notable.  However, exceptions may apply if they receive significant coverage as outlined in WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG , which is not the case for this individual.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 23:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chameleon (GIS) : Boleyn ( talk ) 18:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:ORG and there are too many sections that sound promotional (especially the third paragraph).  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 01:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:NORG due to a lack of WP:CORPDEPTH .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stradr : yvanyblog (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, google hits go first to their website, their web support site, then a reddit thread, I'm going with not notable.  There is no sourcing for me to review in the article either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing, just a website with very little information, no press hits, nothing on scholar.   Seems this was launched in early 2023.  Perhaps just too soon, but quite possible it's just irrelevant.  Possible undisclosed COI as well.  The account that created this page declared a COI for a draft page called "FloatingPoint" which appears to be something created by Samuel Keller [17] .  Oblivy ( talk ) 00:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete