hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Riaz Ahmed Kataria: — Wasell ( T ) 🌻🇺🇦 16:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians .  — Wasell ( T ) 🌻🇺🇦 16:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails GNG.  JoinFluffy250 ( talk ) 16:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject is yet another "businessman and politician" and the article created by a contributor who "likes to create Articles about Politicians, Businessmans and other famous personalities" from the same region as Kataria.  The ground is already unsteady.  The dearth of sources (we only have routine listings, announcements, etc) hastens our work.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete hoax and sockpuppetry, see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sazmancrpo .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 14:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amas–Darbhanga Expressway: Boleyn ( talk ) 14:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Bihar .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Cryptoverse: The first Bloomberg site looks fishy, due to the font and the mention that it's published by a PR company copyright down at the bottom.  Rest of the sourcing is of zero importance for notability, a combination of PR and non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree that this is not notable.  Crypto companies have a strong motive to create a Wikipedia page for apparent credibility despite lack of notability.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 20:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency , Companies ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is a G11.  some of the sources appear to be dubious paid promotional blogs pretending to be news outlets.  I removed those and the press releases and the coverage is one Bloomberg article, which doesn't mention the article topic - David Gerard ( talk ) 08:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Failed notability requirement.  Crypto platforms are quite notorious in trying to be included in Wikipedia.  Noneate ( talk ) 14:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very short, not notable in any way, and possibly promotional content.  HarukaAmaranth ( talk ) 13:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elke Jeinsen: Bild is sensationalist tabloid and the rest of the sources that don't cover Trump are meh.  The context of notability is Trump so it should be covered as a footnote there or in a jumbo article covering DJTs alleged infidelities.  Spartaz Humbug!  07:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Beauty pageants , Fashion , Germany ,  and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Items in Bild, The Sun and what looks like a Swedish tabloid.  Not seeing notability based on the lack of proper RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 15:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and California .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 15:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sent this back to Afc where some minor work was done to it, but it can't really disguise the lack of notabilty.  As far as I can see there is not an indication of significance and the coverage, which is all the article and is very poor.  Fail WP:BIO .  scope_creep Talk 21:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Kutais: Admittedly is harder to research something that happened so long ago, but I haven't even been able to verify in an RS that this happened.  Eddie891 Talk Work 13:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Georgia (country) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ad with so many dubious battle articles the sources in the article are all mysteriously offline.  I’ve looked at histories of Georgia in several languages (not Georgian or Russian) and find no reference at all to this alleged battle.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I searched for information on this battle in Russian through Google, Yandex and Google Scholar and found nothing. -- Catlemur ( talk ) 19:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arkansas–Arkansas State rivalry: Let'srun ( talk ) 17:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football , Basketball ,  and Arkansas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The very first reference: Demirel, Evin (3 February 2021).  "Inside Story: How Arkansas State vs Arkansas Happened" .  Best of Arkansas Sports .  Retrieved 17 November 2023 .  — Maile ( talk ) 20:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That does not look like a reliable source.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 21:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmmm.   Well, then perhaps you could lend a hand and find a reliable source.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This appears to be manufactured WP:OR .  Teams from these schools were not playing each other in any sport until recently.  The sources: First mentions nothing about a rivalry.  Second is about a planned football game, the first ever between the two colleges, in 2025, and supposes that it will become a rivaly.  Third mentions the word "rivalry", but in relation to other institutions.  Fourth isn't a source, it's just stats from 3 women's basketball games over the years; nothing about a rivalry.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  User:SMcCandlish hit the nail on the head.  The football programs will meet for the first time in two years.  This is not a rivalry now, and we don't use a crystal ball to predict that one will develop when the meet in 2025.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 18:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per SMcCandlish, Cbl.  PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs ) 20:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leanne Callaghan: Zero SIGCOV in any mainline RS, and she makes tiny appearances in any of the main climbing media (e.g. only logs of her doing a route) as per WP:NCLIMBER .   Her climbing career is over now so her climbing notability will not improve.   She would not rank as an important British female climber (like Alison Hargreaves ) and has no substantive climbing notability.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 16:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 16:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete woman connected with tourism in Australia with the same name has coverage, nothing for this person found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:53, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   No claim of notability and no substantial coverage.   If I read the reference correctly, she wasn't even "first woman to climb Neanderthal ", but the first woman to (co-)lead an expedition.   Maybe, since that is so trivial an honor the source isn't sure if it is accurate.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 23:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article makes no compelling claim for the notability of the subject.  128.252.154.2 ( talk ) 19:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olivia Nicole Martins: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesnt satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3625: C messier ( talk ) 12:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable galaxy.  I didn't see any significant coverage in scholarly studies or observer's guide books.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 14:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : does not appear developable now nor in the near future.  ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf ) 15:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 20:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matty Fenton: Non-notable footballer that does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Best I can find is a passing mention in the Northwich Guardian .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails SPORTBASIC and would not even have passed the old NFOOTY....  -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 07:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with assessment, delete per nom.  Govvy ( talk ) 08:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gasable: The Jordan Times reference reads more like an ad and comes from a source of questionable reliability, and the second source only mentions it in passing.  I could find an article by the UN environment programme [47] , but I don't think that comes anywhere close to establishing notability.  OzzyOlly ( talk ) 01:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Jordan .  OzzyOlly ( talk ) 01:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about an e-business app, unchanged since it was restored at request of the article creator after a previous AfD soft deletion.  Since the previous AfD, the company appears to have moved its base and broadened its operation.  An article here describes the company's change in personnel / location, but this still appears to be coverage promoting a niche startup; I am not seeing the depth of coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per AllyD.  Raymond3023 ( talk ) 06:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacqueline M. Arroyo: No indicia of encyclopedic notability.  BD2412 T 15:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 15:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was able to find only one news article of a passing mention and this fails GNG.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 15:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CGIProxy: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Another software article from the early days; one gets the feeling that for this type of article the normal rules about references just didn't apply.  I looked through Google Books but found nothing that discussed this specific program; it just seems like one of many freeware application that exist but aren't notable by our standards.  Drmies ( talk ) 18:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vipul Dhanaker: — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , India ,  and Delhi .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Both references in the article, The Hindustan Times and Times Now News , are non-independent as they're mere interviews.  Otherwise, no other sources found that are WP:NBASIC nor WP:MUSICBIO -worthy, both in English or Hindi languages.  ~ Tails Wx 19:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It fails to satisfy WP:GNG since the references solely consist of interviews, and no sources aligning with the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO have been found.  Dcotos ( talk ) 22:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bonn–Bamberg basketball brawl: Even with an expansion earlier this year, it's still a barebones article with 0 citations and 2 dead links.  I believe the info described in this article would be better covered in the articles of the two teams involved.  100.7.34.111 ( talk ) 16:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP nominator--above text is copied from their request at WT:AFD .  I have no opinion of my own at this time. -- Finngall talk 17:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - As always with anything foreign, the article should be searched in its native language.  I was able to find four sources in German: 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 .  I also found another mention of it here 5 .  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 05:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:NOTNEWS, no indication this is anything other than a news item, not an encyclopedic topic with WP:LASTING impact.  // Timothy :: talk 11:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clear case of WP:NOTNEWS and doesn't appear to have sustained coverage.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aquarium (video game): Article has been tagged for notability concerns since 2013.  Waxworker ( talk ) 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Waxworker ( talk ) 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet notability guidelines; completely unsourced.  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 00:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Surprisingly large number of Aquarium video games [76] , [77] , neither of which are this particular game.  I don't see anything for a 1996 Japan-only video game.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Definitely exists, Moby has it in the database , but without a single review even there.  -- ferret ( talk ) 00:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per above.  Lionel Cristiano ?  01:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I couldn't find sources.  🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page!  Talk 03:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not seeing anything.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 08:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per everyone else.  Still a blank slate after eleven years.  HopalongCasualty ( talk ) 21:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pusher trailer: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nom that this is lacking in enough sources to show notability.  WikiMane (TP2001) ( talk ) 17:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete