hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Killer symbol: I can't find anything else that demonstrates sufficient notability.  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 00:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 00:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As noted above, the term "killer symbol" only appears in one of the cited articles.  Otherwise, the articles discuss a few  bugs that caused devices to crash.  A quick Google search doesn't seem to bring up any sources either -- only information about the Zodiac killer.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 01:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  These separate bugs don't appear to be treated as a singular concept; the title itself isn't notable under WP:WORDISSUBJECT ; and the material would be too trivial to merge anywhere.  I found no sources besides passing news coverage.  DFlhb ( talk ) 19:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dvojka: Integer Sequences ( talk | contribs ) 08:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Integer Sequences ( talk | contribs ) 08:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The Slovak article is likewise unsourced.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 14:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article is very short and has no sources.  I do not see any notability.  🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 19:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sonic Violence: Possible WP:ATD is merge or merge/redirect to Peaceville Records , though it may unbalance that article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no claim or evidence of notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Travis Mager: Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Maryland .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Since it has already been PROD'ed, it is ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 21:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with recommendation to delete , fails both general and specific notability rules-- TJS808 ( talk ) 22:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NSKATE and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hutniki: As it says on the PL Wiki article , this is an "unofficial settlement" of the village of Przeborowo ( nieoficjalna osady wsi Przeborowo ).  This is not listed on the TERYT database (despite the TERYT database being listed as the source...)  nor is it listed on the Polish regulation of place-names .  From the over-head satellite pictures you can see that this is just a couple of random buildings in the middle of nowhere .  Fails WP:GEOLAND since there is no legal recognition, nor evidence of an actual population.  FOARP ( talk ) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 16:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not in TERYT.  Article claims it is a "woodland area", so was this even a populated place, or just a name for some nearby forest (unofficial at that?).  I nominated it for deletion on pl wiki (article there has different sources, but first one does not mention this entity, and I can't access the second one).  Just in case, it may be good to wait till pl wiki discussion is closed and monitor it for arguments: pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:10:19:Hutniki .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Piotrus . Another bogus bot creation. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CapoeirArab: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect too narrow field of work and coverage.  Redirect to Damascus or some sports related pages in Syria topic.  -- NiLok223 ( talk ) 09:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The city it operates in, at least in this case, is too distant of a connection in my opinion, so it should not redirect there (or anywhere ekse).  None other article appears to include information that is relevant to this organization, so if someone actually searches this term, they will be redirected to a page that includes no useful information.  This topic does not have much WP:SIGCOV , and so the article should just be deleted.  Aintabli ( talk ) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Every link in the reference section is a 404 page MNewnham ( talk ) 20:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard Osborne (singer): A WP:BEFORE search turned up only music blogs, and the local news story cited here.  He's worked with a few notable musicians, but on WP, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : there is a music historian, Dr. Richard Osborne, I don't think it's this fellow...  Delete for lack of sourcing.  What's used in the article is orange or red per source tool.  I can't any sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matthew Gay: the only news about any "matthew gay" or "matt gay" I can find in the past 10 years are about a footballer with that name, not a basketball pro.  There's no secondary sourcing or news coverage about Gay being signed to FIATC Joventut or his play with them.  The original article as created only says "Gay helped FIATC Joventut in 2011 play for a championship" which is just one year of play, and has somehow never been reported anywhere, no evidence of Gay being on their roster ever.  Further, it looks like the article was created by a SPA named "Matt" that also included a number of purported autobiographical details of that person's family leading me to believe it's a WP:AUTOBIO problem.  lizthegrey ( talk ) 21:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions .  lizthegrey ( talk ) 21:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV .  I did find a mention of a Matthew Gay playing for Rochester College's junior varsity [3] in 2009 which likely is this guy.  In 2011, Joventut was the runner-up in the Catalan Basketball League , which is a pre-season league, but nobody with that name played for the team at least in the semi-final and final.  Furthermore, Joventut is a major Spanish team.  Snowball chance in hell that they would even look in the general direction of a guy who hadn't played on a higher level that JV ball in junior college.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 23:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Spain and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, fails GNG.  Other than the newspaper mention above, I couldn't find other newspaper clippings or sources.  ProQuest doesn't bring up anything either.  There's a LinkedIn profile that's likely him but the source obviously isn't reliable.  Tails Wx 17:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Kierzek ( talk ) 00:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails GNG per nom and Alvaldi.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all, fails GNG Rikster2 ( talk ) 12:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kadhum Auda: The current archived reference seems to only be a single sentence database entry, and a WP:BEFORE search revealed only similarly trivial mentions/database entries.  As an aside, I believe that this is the first article I have nominated for deletion, so please let me know if I have missed something here.  All the best, ‍—‍ a smart kitten [ meow ] 01:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Iraq .  ‍—‍ a smart kitten [ meow ] 01:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - in Arabic (كاظم عودة لازم), I can only really find Kooora , but not really anything with WP:SIGCOV .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
VINAStech: Fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Computing ,  and Uganda .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Coverage in IRS appears to be approximately zero.  Being a brochure doesn't help here either.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 09:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom it does fail WP:NCORP lacks sources.  Dowrylauds ( talk ) 16:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Franyeli Brazobán: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bongofari: Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  16:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , Bands and musicians , Africa ,  and Ghana .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  16:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ravens Košice RC: Broc ( talk ) 11:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Rugby union ,  and Slovakia .  Broc ( talk ) 11:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , no suitable redirect here either per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darryl Glenn: Since then, he has still not received consistent, in-depth coverage from national news outlets.  Of the 6 cited sources, 2 are election databases and the other 4 are routine coverage of his political campaigns by local news outlets in Colorado.  Being a county commissioner and a party's nominee for U.S. Senate doesn't inherently establish notability.  Seems to violate WP:GNG .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 19:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Colorado .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:NPOL .  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete city council members are not de facto notable, and failed political campaigns are not de facto notable, and there's nothing showing otherwise.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
InFORM Decisions: Let'srun ( talk ) 02:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Computing , Software ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No secondary sources cited and a search didn’t produce evidence that any exist.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 03:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lara Aishah: Niafied ( talk ) 04:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Malaysia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of attacks on civilians attributed to United States government forces: Per WP:NLIST, " list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources," which this list has not.  Besides, the items here are covered with further depth and proper context in United States war crimes .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 22:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Also, by the criteria specified, the Kent State shootings , the Waco siege and practically every police incident of note would have to be included.  It also defines "government forces" as including NATO forces for some (non)reason.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 02:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Lists ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  This is clearly WP:SYNTH , and is an untenable topic for an article given the vague scope (the current content includes deliberate attacks authorised by the US government, accidents and unauthorised and criminal acts by individual military personnel).  Including attacks by "North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces under U.S. control" is odd.  The article also duplicates the superior United States war crimes article.  Nick-D ( talk ) 01:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom and all of the above.  The list is unwieldy and somewhat patchy too.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nomination -- Shrike ( talk ) 14:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with a bang; not a whimper.  A list of atrocious uselessness.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 11:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A useful article might exist in just the military events that had significant civilian casualties, but the list as formulated is unworkable and unencyclopaedic.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 16:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert D. Williams: None of the sources provided are about him, but rather about NPR.  PK650 ( talk ) 00:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  PK650 ( talk ) 00:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I was unable to find any significant coverage.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete