hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jóannes Lamhauge: WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 22:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Denmark .  WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 22:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:BEFORE does not turn up any information on Jóannes Lamhauge, visual artist.  There is an architect and a musician.  2 of the references in this short stub fail verification.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 02:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks references fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mark McDowell (entrepreneur): 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears vanity spam, nothing for notability found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clearly promotional and not notable enough for Wikipedia.  Graham 87 14:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I checked every source in the present version that didn't have Thai in its title, and all of them are either database entries (or equivalently short content), by contributors, non-independent, or PR pieces.  A news search gives 3 results, 1 of which is already in the article and is from a contributor.  Checking other sources, such as the WP:TWL , is a non-sequitar due to the commonness of his name.  Using the entrepreneur discriminator doesn't help.  Non-notable.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 06:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cameron Stracher: AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 20:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Law ,  and Politics .  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 20:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Iowa , Massachusetts ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication that this attorney himself is notable.  He was once general counsel for a notable company; and represented that company in negotiating agreements that related to notable people; but nothing indicates that the attorney himself is notable.  The closest thing to it is the WSJ article, but it's not really close at all; the WSJ article is not about the attorney himself, and merely sets out his involvement in a larger story as routine news coverage of that story.  TJRC ( talk ) 18:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks sufficient coverage for notability.  agt x 01:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Back to Front TV: There were a couple of media mentions in 2013, but I couldn't find any evidence that it actually ever produced anything.  Pepper Beast (talk) 06:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Pepper Beast (talk) 06:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTPROMO .  As written, this is promotional and fixing it would reduce it to a microstub.  I agree with the PROD removal comment that the digital trends source may be usable in some context, but probably not as a SIRS source for a production company -- more likely as a source for the Back to Front show, if it ever got made, which I am not really sure of.  — siro χ o 06:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'd perhaps redirect to the TV show of the same name, it has some coverage.  Nothing found for the company alone.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I didn't find an article on a TV series with this name.  Any other Redirect suggestions?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any sources that meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 18:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of tallest buildings in Thrissur: The sources used are either dead or primary, with no SIGCOV in any independent reliable sources justifying the existence of any such list.  Except one, none of the buildings listed aren't notable by itself, and hence WP:SALAT is not justified.  WP:NOTDIR applies too.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , India ,  and Kerala .  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  03:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) 122.3.167.234 ( talk ) 03:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NLIST and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 04:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 18:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST .  Grabup ( talk ) 09:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Belmont Greene: Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Belmont, Virginia , but it might not fit well to have information on it there.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there's a potential to merge some of the content, especially about the railroad station, but the sourcing here is so poor (archived Geocities site) someone will need to re-source that information, so an ATD doesn't really make sense.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's just another housing development article that's been coatracked.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  What links here shows Stone Bridge High School and Virginia State Route 659 , but they are no good as redirect options Better Nuncio ( talk ) 10:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WIIC-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pennsylvania .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG .   This station is only notable at a local level (if even that, due to its checkered history).  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Couldn’t find any sources even mentioning this station.  -- Danubeball ( talk ) 13:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  No significant coverage of the television station at all.  — Young Forever (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asy Syifa Kaila Saidah: Their only notable accomplishments include winning a local English-speaking competition and being selected as one of 60 participants to present their work in a local gallery.  Additionally, the article's existence is partly attributed to their relation to Zakaria, which provides another reason for considering its removal under WP:BIOFAMILY .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 01:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women , Islam ,  and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No notability here at all.  Why wasn't this prodded?  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] @ Xxanthippe : Because PROD will be blocked by sock/editor, these are such examples 1 , 2 and 3 .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 06:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Other than the subject has lack of notability, one of the sources that the user cited, which was from Saputra, did not mention Saidah at any pages.  Faldi00 ( talk ) 02:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arabesque TV: I tried clicking "The official homepage" link on the bottom of the article, but the site doesn't mention any "Arabesque".  Was previously nominated for AfD but speedy kept because nominator gave the wrong reason.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , an article with the correct name already exists at Arab Radio and Television Network .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 22:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fond My Mind: AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If they are any reliable sources about this, then possibly Pyraminxsolver ( talk ) 05:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Dance ,  and Brazil .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't seem to find any reliable, independent sources to warrant a merge.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 17:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I WP:PRODded this article some time ago, since I could not find a single reliable source that provides significant coverage of the topic (bearing in mind WP:NEXIST ), only for it to be undone by Kvng with the argument that it could be merged into Lostwave .  I would be willing to go that route if there was even a single reliable source discussing this song.  Alas, there is not.  If such a merger does occur, I then imagine the following happening: The content is tagged as needing citations.  For lacking citations, the entry is deleted.  The redirects relating to this song ( Fond My Mind , Edde Edman , Andre Nobrega , William Paiva , Feels Like A Wish , Feels Like a Wish , Station K. ) go to RfD because there's no information on the page that makes the redirects plausible, leading to someone unsuccessfully pushing to restore the information on the Lostwave page .  As much as I love this song, I unfortunately do not think we are ready for an article on it.  I will happily accept undeletion, though, if and when this gets attention from reliable sources.  It is a story as fascinating as its sound, and it sucks that it's not getting the attention it deserves.  I suppose if someone wants to make this a userspace draft, that's fine by me, too.  - B RAINULATOR 9 ( TALK ) 05:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well put.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 06:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - There is some excitement about it on Reddit .  I have asked the subreddit for help finding sources.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RC Slovan Bratislava: While there might be WP:SIGCOV for the league in which they compete, I couldn't find any for the club.  Page is unsourced.  Broc ( talk ) 11:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Rugby union ,  and Slovakia .  Broc ( talk ) 11:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , no suitable WP:ATD also.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tush (band): It's one claim to fame was that the guitarist Phil Collen played for them for a short time.  It's been unsourced since March 2008.  I did just add a singular primary source from Phil Collen's autobiography.  Annwfwn ( talk ) 17:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 18:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Thanks to the nominator for adding the reference to the Def Leppard biography, but that does not really matter because the band is not notable.  They are only mentioned occasionally, and very briefly, as an early gig for Phil Collen and those sources are about him and not the band.  He was not even a significant part of the band's history.  Via a search for the other band members, all I can find are occasional social media posts and blogs from the now 60-something members and club attendees claiming that they have a connection to someone famous.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thai bombing of Phnom Penh: None of the claimed book references mention anything remotely close to a bombing of Phnom Penh on 13 January 1941, and a Google Books search reveals no mention anywhere else.  This looks very much like a hoax, but it's probably not blatant enough for G3.  Paul_012 ( talk ) 02:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Cambodia , Thailand ,  and France .  Paul_012 ( talk ) 02:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as made up.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 06:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Reference 2 exists, but never mentions Phnom Penh at all: [16] .   Seems to be a hoax.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doubts exist around the bombing's occurrence.  The provided sources don't mention it, and wider searches haven't yielded any results.  Deleting this article for potential factuality issues might be best.  Waqar 💬 16:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Green Globe Company Standard: Largely unsourced and does not seem to warrant a standalone article.  CycloneYoris talk!  09:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Travel and tourism .  CycloneYoris talk!  09:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Article provides no sources, The external link section only contains a link to the website of the article's subject.  Shadow311 ( talk ) 15:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Most sources I can find are commercial sources that do not meet WP:RS , specifically websites of other companies with the certification that are providing customer-oriented information about it.  Redtree21 ( talk ) 08:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Babatunde Bayo Lawal: Others are press releases.  Nothing secondary or independent found.  PS: Article was previously draftified by Jamiebuba.  Reading Beans ( talk ) 16:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 16:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] • Delete .  Leaning delete because most of the references are interviews which make the article fails WP:GNG .  Ezra Cricket ( talk ) 18:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Choi Won-nam: Simione001 ( talk ) 21:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1994 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC) , he is mentioned there, it's the only tournament he played in and scored two goals.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear to pass WP:NSPORT .  toobigtokale ( talk ) 17:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete