hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Biaklian Paite : Best sources found were Arunfoot , Goal.com and Indians in Kuwait , all of which only mention Paite once and are clearly not WP:SIGCOV .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Manipur .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katerin Alfaro : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and El Salvador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trance Fury : Google search shows no reliable secondary coverage, and the only source in this article seems unreliable .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  01:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable and likely written for money by BheekAam along with other articles .  If someone should turn up refs, please ping me.  See also these articles by the same editor: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.  Luke Bennecke Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Daro Buy one, get two free!  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See also this conversation about an earlier deletion: User talk:Jmertel23/Archive 2018 11#re: Deletion of Trance Fury page Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 322#Trance Fury - deletion recovery We appear to have an entitled, persistent self-promoter.  Consider salting after deletion -- this will be the third deletion. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] COI user accounts that have edited this material over time: TFRRecords

Discussion outcome: delete
Untitled A. L. Vijay film : Film does not yet exist and does not have a title.  Right now coverage is more just about the "event" of announcing in November 2023 that they plan to make a film.  North8000 ( talk ) 14:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would have said Dratify but as the case has been where many such drafts get added back to the mainspace, its better off to delete it.  Way too early for an unnamed movie to have a page of its own.  There is not enough significant coverage and there is no title given to the film.  RangersRus ( talk ) 20:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RAAM BAND : Macbeejack ☎ 15:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing for this person found.  Many hits for a group called Hypernova, one member shares a similar name I think.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Majority of the sources that featured RAAM BAND are in Arabic (Eypytian language) where he's well known.  I've also added a few.  I guess he met the WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG Endik Zamuiri ( talk ) 05:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to assess new sources added.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing stated in the article, which is just that he's played a few shows, is notable enough for WP:MUSICBIO InDimensional ( talk ) 14:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kozłowski coat of arms : I cannot find any sources demonstrating notability for this coat-of-arms.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 07:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft delete - I deprodded this unintentionally.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Sepiol : Doesn't meet WP:NBIO .  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Games ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep World Championship win + bracelet win should merit inclusion.  Now satisfactory backed up.  PsychoticIncall ( talk ) 10:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ PsychoticIncall : As I've asked in other AFDs, please read and understand WP:SIRS and then list WP:THREE references you feel are SIRS.  WP:BURDEN is on you to prove notability, not just assert it through non-policy means (which is what you are attempting).  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And again - the sources are all there backing up the main statement probably even more obvious than ever before (Las Vegas Review Journal isn't just providing routine match reports).  PsychoticIncall ( talk ) 11:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 17:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak delete sourcing depth just isn't there for a biography IMO.   It might just scoot over WP:N, but I really don't think we have enough for a biography.  Hobit ( talk ) 17:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Of the current sources, the only one I'd say meets the WP:GNG (marginally) is the first one from the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which does delve into a significant event.  The remaining sources are of the routine coverage variety with little in the way of actual in-depth coverage needed to meet notability guidelines.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Wonder Woman storylines : Seems like a fairly indiscriminate list of books that the character has appeared in.  WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk ) 06:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Comics and animation .  JMWt ( talk ) 06:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTCATALOG states "Wikipedia articles are not: Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit...".  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 08:51, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enderson George : JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monika Grikšaitė : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Lithuania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of night vision devices : It also does not indicate what the criterion is for inclusion, and so does not satisfy list notability .   The criterion isn't having a Wikipedia article, since some of the entries are not linked to articles.   This list was moved to draft space by User:BoyTheKingCanDance with the statement that it has no sources (because it has no sources).   It was then moved back to article space by its creator without adding sources.   This is a contested draftification and so is being sent to AFD .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 05:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Technology .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 05:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the lack of sourcing is a red-herring.  Our List of botanists , for example, has no sources, and rightly so: it's a navigational aid to find articles on notable botanists, and all the sourcing required to establish that they are botanists and notable is to be found in the articles on each botanist.  The question is whether we really need a navigational aid to find articles on individual night-vision devices.  Lists can also be useful to keep articles on the general topic more concise, but since our article on night-vision devices already lists everything, mixed up with the text, this stand-alone list isn't achieving anything particularly useful.  Also stand-alone navigational lists shouldn't contain items that don't have a corresponding article.  Elemimele ( talk ) 06:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I generally prefer lists to categories, but this list is not in a good state yet.  Either this ends up no different from Category:Night vision devices , or it adds red links, or the non-linked entries need sources so they aren't removed.  — siro χ o 09:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per siro 's point above.  This list already exists as a category and has nothing to add to that category.  Night vision devices that are notable will end up in the category, while non-notable devices don't really belong in the list anyway, because they end up running afoul of WP:NOTADVERT and the list specificity requirements.My vote could be swayed under the condition that the list adds something that the category does not while also having strict enough entry requirements to avoid just becoming a list of every night vision device ever invented (or dreamed of, for that matter).  -- Licks-rocks ( talk ) 12:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reason for the article to exist.  Article creator even moved the article back to the mainspace after another editor moved it to the draft space for incubation!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urban Versis 32 ( talk • contribs ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Road crime unit : Elshad ( talk ) 18:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Police , Transportation ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources or claim to notability.  Reywas92 Talk 23:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of companies of Australia : It has everything from large listed companies to small family businesses.  The article may have been more relevant when created in 2002, but as Wikipedia has evolved, lists of companies with more defined boundaries have emerged, e.g. List of largest Australian companies , List of banks in Australia etc making this one redundant.  The only criteria for inclusion appears to be that the organisation operates through a Ltd or Pty Ltd company.  Hamienet ( talk ) 02:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems far too ill-defined a criterion to have a list, especially when more narrowly-tailored lists exist.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Lists ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with everything above.  Bduke ( talk ) 04:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I tend to agree that the current list is overly broad.  But I don't think history needs deleting.  I'd suggest cutting this down to the "See also" section and renaming to Lists of companies in Australia to improve the navigational utility.  Preserving history can be useful for editors looking to continue to improve organization of articles about Australian companies.  — siro χ o 06:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Have no idea what this page is doing here.  Pure clutter.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Narrowly defined list of companies articles are a better alternative.  Knox490 ( talk ) 08:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't necessarily disagree with anyone above but looking at Category:Lists of companies by country it appears this type of list is very common.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 08:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 11:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , other countries have these lists too.  Besides, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database.  You can't expect a single article to include every company in a country with millions of people.  This article should be improved instead of being deleted.  SouthParkFan2006 ( talk ) 16:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The fact that Wikipedia is not a database is the exact reason this page should be deleted .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 15:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:KITCHENSINK .  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  TarnishedPath talk 00:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Drowssap SMM ( talk ) ( contributions ) 02:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HeavenMayFade : It was listed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 June 16 by User:Sapols .  No consensus was found in the DRV, and as such it is being listed here.  Delete .  Clearly fails WP:NMG ; sources are not from significant publications and merely prove the band existed.  Stifle ( talk ) 16:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Stifle ( talk ) 16:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clear failure of WP:GNG and the WP:NMG (the appropriate SNG to this field).  Sources found in the article and on a basic Google search are promotional in nature.   Only claim to significance is that a member of this band joining Miss Fortune (a more notable band) and that does not make a band notable.   Willing to reconsider if more SIGCOV is made available.  Frank Anchor 16:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 21:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Frank Anchor .  The deficient sources in the article and per my before search demonstrate a patently obvious failure of GNG and NMG.  VickKiang (talk) 11:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not satisfy either musical notability or general notability .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert McClenon ( talk • contribs ) 22:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - In agreement with everyone above.  The band only released a single EP locally and are only visible in the usual streaming services.  The article's content is copied from their own social media self-promotions.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 22:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article does not meet notability guidelines.-- Trey Wainman ( talk ) 05:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 16:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hasan Hüseyin Can : This screams not WP:N .  Aintabli ( talk ) 04:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  It's a bad sign that there doesn't even seem to be an article in Turkish for them.  If there are insufficient sources to support an article about a person in their native language, it's doubtful we'll be able to do any better.  The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk ) 09:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alyson Avenue : I am also nominating the following related pages because they do not meet notability or WP:NALBUM either: Presence of Mind (album) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Omega (Alyson Avenue album) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Changes (Alyson Avenue album) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 23:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Sweden ,  and Bands and musicians .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 23:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All Fails WP:NBAND , WP:GNG , and WP:NALBUM .  I found absolutely no coverage at all on newspapers.com, EBSCO, ProQuest, archive.org, or Google Books.  General web hits are all streaming services, directory listings, or content farms.  As the sole WP:ATD I would support a redirect of Alyson Avenue to Anette Olzon .  Jfire ( talk ) 02:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete