hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Salaga Senior High School : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There are many reports of one event where a teacher at the school shot at students and injured one.  E.g. [32] , but this is very much a single event.  However this research paper [33] studies knowedge of cervival cancer amongst school students.  This one uses the school as a case study for sculpture technique [34] , PDF available here [35] .  This one recruits 330 of the schools students for a mental health study [36] .  This study of high school student/teacher conflict may have been predicated on the above incident.  [37] and there are a few other related papers.  That's a lot of published research carried out at this school, and some of it (especially the conflict study) speaks to notability of the institution itself.  It has an enrolment of 1800 students and has been established for 50 years.  It can be hard to find information in English on schools in some locales, but that does not mean they are not notable.  The state of the article is indeed parlous, but deletion is not for cleanup.  I fully understand why the nom.  brought this, but it is a keep for me.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 08:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Mahmoud Eskandari : Article had significant promo issues, but author requested AFD.  Removed promo material.  Unable to determine validity of claims.  UtherSRG (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military ,  and Iran .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Besides confirmation of him flying, the sources don't prove notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  I believe that original creator doesn't understand notability as this is one of a number of their articles that has come to AFD recently.  Mztourist ( talk ) 04:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe you are wrong-- Patricia (Talk) 12:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep Actually appears to pass WP:GNG even with the sources in the article. 2 sources add-- Patricia (Talk) 12:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And I've added two more - British sources in English fwiw.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 09:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per new sources added by @ Phil Bridger .  Okoslavia ( talk ) 16:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It looks like we may have a case of WP:HEY ; in addition to seeking further editors' input, editors who have argued for deletion are invited to reaffirm or revise their ! votes in response to the new sources.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 04:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I'm going to say keep on the basis that there appear to be Persian references that support the idea that he is/was a prominent Iranian aviator and that this would be enough to show inclusion if he had a different nationality.  That said, some more tidying is necessary to ensure a neutral tone.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: What Rosguill said.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete - This article sources doesn't prove WP:GNG and WP:V also.  Àvî Râm7 (talk) 04:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: see the Persian (Farsi) article for more potential refs: fa:محمود اسکندری .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] these refs are good enough-- Patricia (Talk) 13:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: :added two refs: in english:no: 3:here and no. 4 here -- Patricia (Talk) 11:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Ri Un-il: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – no coverage available.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Measuring principle: WP:BEFORE search was unsurprisingly all over the place with things that seem unrelated to whatever this is.  Gnomingstuff ( talk ) 22:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Mathematics .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced, incomprehensible article created in 2008.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 10:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wow, that's a mess.  It's beyond salvaging; there's no coherent topic here.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The principles of RADAR, SONAR and similar systems are included in their respective articles.  This is not only unsourced, but entirely superfluous.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 16:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dynamic Diagrams: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully it can now be resolved.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Rhode Island .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – all of the information is based on the company's WP:SELFPUB website.  I can't find anything online, maybe it's due to the generic name, but I doubt it meets WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Niki Heat: Sourced to promotional content and/or press releases.  KH-1 ( talk ) 12:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  KH-1 ( talk ) 12:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cameroon-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep I'm newer on this wikipedia.  I try to modify as english wikipedia recommandations.  The aim of wikipedia is not to delete but to add knowledge and to ameliorate if there are mistakes.  I hope that you (admins) could help in this. -- Bile rene ( talk ) 04:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete So it's beauty salon, a studio that records Christian music and a broadcaster?  Um, that's a strange combination.  I'm not seeing GNG and the article appears PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG and NCORP.  Promo sources, but nothing else.  If this is a keep due to found sources, it needs drafting, I was not able to identify what the subject actually is until I looked at the sources.  // Timothy :: talk 15:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bea Proo: No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A worthy citizen but no evidence of notability apparent.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 07:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG The source (the only one) doesn't elaborate and fails SIGCOV.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 15:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 01:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , barely any secondary sources which are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  Shaws username ( talk ) 16:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seeds of Hope Publishers: The only references not published by the organization itself is a trivial mention in the NYT and a profile of the editor, Katie Cook, in bpfna.org, who was (at the time) an editor of bpfna.org as well.  While there is a list of articles under the "Further Reading" section, one of the articles was written by a student newspaper, one from Baptists Today, and the others all seem to be limited to the Waco Tribune-Herald.  They are mostly from the 1990s- and I have been able to find no significant coverage since.  This is the second deletion debate this article will go through- but editors should note that the only two "keep" votes came from new accounts that did not edit anything but their own user page and the deletion discussion.  While that has no bearing on the organization's notability, new Wikipedia editors will want to read the policies on canvassing and recruiting people off-Wiki before they contribute.  (Unless you want to provide more sources- please, if you have them, I would like them very much)  GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 05:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity ,  and Texas .  GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 05:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Full of primary sources and only 2 gnews hits which is surprising for an American organization.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Not eligible for Soft Delete Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 08:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability.  A mixture of references, including sourced published by Seeds of Hope Publishers, at least on not mentioning the company at all, ones which are only just mention it,  and so on...  JBW ( talk ) 20:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quiz Show Q: Tagged for notability since 2013.  Donald D23 talk to me 12:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Games ,  and South Korea .  Donald D23 talk to me 12:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and could not find much significant coverage searching Google and Naver searching in both English and Korean.  Furthermore, it is sourced only by Allkpop which is considered unreliable per WP:KO/RS#UR Lightoil ( talk ) 11:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andorra women's national ice hockey team: I had moved this to draft, but user moved it straight back.  No evidence of any notability for this national team of a very minor sport in a very small country.  Fram ( talk ) 16:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports , Ice hockey ,  and Andorra .  Fram ( talk ) 16:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: This isn't a hoax, as was my initial impression; Andorra is an IIHF member, and has a record of a women's team from the country playing in a single international competition back this fall.   But this falls far, far, far short of notability by any standard, and reliable sources discussing the team in detail don't exist.   I'd be able to find considerably more sources for any given women's high school hockey team in my area.  Ravenswing 20:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete just because it is a "national-level team" doesn't automatically make it notable.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 21:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - little bit amazed that there isn't enough coverage of a national team, but I can't find any.  Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 18:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found what looks like a short piece discussing it here .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lance A. Slatton: As always, Wikipedia is not a free LinkedIn alternative on which people are entitled to have articles just because they exist -- meeting our inclusion test requires passing WP:GNG on third party reliable source coverage about their work in order to establish its significance.  But the main notability claim here is that he exists, eight of the nine footnotes are primary sources (staff or contributor profiles on the self-published websites of companies or organizations he's directly affiliated with, directory entries, press releases, etc.) that are not support for notability, and the one footnote that does come from a third party source is a fluff piece in a minor local-interest magazine that reads more like an advertorial than a real piece of objective journalism, and thus is not sufficient to singlehandedly vault him over GNG all by itself if all the rest of the sourcing is garbage.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Michigan .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found for this person.  Gnews has an article about an Elvis impersonator, a man that attacked people with a sword and stuff about crop production levels.  None of which help here.  What's used for sourcing in the article is primary or promotional.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NBIO, found little to no third party coverage. - KH-1 ( talk ) 00:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per those above.  The article on his podcast All Home Care Matters should probably also be deleted given it is referenced by press releases and non-independent sources.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Astha Agarwal: Does not satisfy GNG or NACTOR, and the closest to a significant role is for the show Kya Haal, Mr. Paanchal?  where it is of one of the five wives of the titular character.  She is also a beauty pageant winner.  But while we have two articles on the Mrs. India pageant ( Persona , Haut Monde ), the one that she won in 2014 - Gladrags Mrs. India had its article deleted in 2015 with no assertion of notability .  The actress article was created and majorly edited by an SPA who may have a COI, or may be AUTOBIO.  I did ask at the user's talk page but got no response.  The image at the article was uploaded and linked by a sock (see investigation ) whose first edit was also to the actress page.  I would recommend deletion.  Jay 💬 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Television , Beauty pageants ,  and India .  Jay 💬 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some history: After the article was deleted at the first AfD two years back, an editor in what was his only edit, highlighted the deletion at the Teahouse, where it turned out that the AfD nom and the supporter had been blocked as socks.  This led to a DRV , where, while there was some support for deletion, the AfD close was vacated and article restored because of sock reasons, for it to be renominated, however it was not renominated.  Jay 💬 16:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is certainly an interesting story for an article.  Based on the lack of GNG sources and failure to meet the thresholds of NACTOR, I think it's a fair (lack-of-)notability delete.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 17:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Insecurity Insight: Preliminary BEFORE does not reveal obvious passing of the GNG or NONPROFIT.   No concern to withdraw if adequate reliable sourcing can be demonstrated.  Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk ) 10:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Switzerland .  Goldsztajn ( talk ) 10:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benoît Allauzen: Theroadislong ( talk ) 09:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 09:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hong Kong and France .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  prominent French sommelier - it's borderline WP:G11 .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is all there is [9] .  Pure PROMO, non-notable and no sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete