hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Holyman House: Boleyn ( talk ) 12:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment : Here’s a source that I found that seems to establish WP:N : [ [39] ].  AriTheHorse 14:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Aviation , Transportation ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep - it could have deserved a speedy keep if some attention had been made to https://trove.nla.gov.au/search? keyword=holyman%20house%20launceston , it seems the nature of the find sources might not have the capacity to raise the trove items.  JarrahTree 00:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep – article now meets WP:N for WP:BUILDING as much well-referenced detail has been added since the nomination was made.  -- Oronsay ( talk ) 03:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Remove nomination per comments above.  Thanks for proving me wrong, Boleyn ( talk ) 16:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Chaine FM: Entire article is WP:OR and cites no sources.  WP:BEFORE reveals no significant coverage.  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Ireland , United Kingdom ,  and Northern Ireland .  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am changing my ! vote to keep per WP:HEY due to the work done by User:Guliolopez .  I'm not sure why these sources didn't appear in my WP:BEFORE research.  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Mohamed Helmi: Might qualify as speedy per WP:G6 .  Ben5218 ( talk ) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Olympics ,  and Egypt .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To Mohamed Helmy .  Svartner ( talk ) 02:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Rintaro Okabe: Zero WP:SIGCOV per WP:BEFORE .  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 00:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Video games ,  and Anime and manga .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep After a quick glance, I managed to find four scholars that discuss Okabe's characterization and what is his purpose in the visual novel, focusing on various themes such as time travels and what exactly he can prevent by doing it.  Tintor2 ( talk ) 22:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Even at a glance, I can that there was sigcov before it was nominated with the Crunchyroll article.  It concerns me that this AfD may have been nominated without checking for sigcov or doing a BEFORE search, yet suggesting it was done.  @ Greenish Pickle!  : What did you do to verify the lack of notability before nomination?  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 23:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ughhh, sometimes it doesn't really aopear that much at mobile.  I'll take any criticism, but at least I managed to pull it off at Lucario's afd.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 23:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Govind Dholakia: Nominated to the Rajya Sabha but not elected, and has not yet taken on the role.  Remaining content is promotional in nature  ( WP:NEWSORGINDIA ), including his autobiography.  Charlie ( talk ) 15:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Charlie ( talk ) 15:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and Gujarat .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Members-elect to an WP:NPOL -passing office pass NPOL.  This source confirms he was elected.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 20:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree, we can make MP-elect articles per NPOL clause.  Read this, Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels.  This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them.  ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️ ( 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔 ) 00:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep He is a member-elect of the Rajya Sabha, so obviously meets WP:NPOL #1.  The article needs improvement and cleaning up, not deletion.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 03:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw and Keep Passes WP:NPOL criterion 1 for the member-elect.  Also, the reference from The Hindu , shared by Curbon7 and added by me, satisfies the requirements of WP:THREE ; which also dispelled my uncertainty regarding his appointment through election, as I had previously assumed it was merely a nomination.  Charlie ( talk ) 03:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Yan Ai-Lin: English language sources about this person are almost nonexistent, the few ones that I found don't have enough SIGCOV.  Taiwanese sources also don't seem to talk much about this person, though reading them is difficult for me since I don't speak the language.  This article was created at User:JJJoyyy/sandbox as part of this university education program .  It was recently moved to mainspace by User:Ytlin77 (who, judging by their name, may be Ai-Lin herself), who said in the talk page of this article that this page was written by her classmates.  SparklyNights ( t ) 19:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Arts , Poetry ,  and Taiwan .  SparklyNights ( t ) 19:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There's no evidence for a conflict of interest.  Per your link, the university course is instructed by Yen-Ting Megan Lin, who looks like a better fit for a username including Ytlin.  The "Lin" in Yan's name is 琳 and the instructor's name is likely 林, not the same word.  CohenTheBohemian ( talk ) 00:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, these seem to be two different people.  In that case there doesn't seem to be any coi here.  SparklyNights ( t ) 01:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for the comments.  I moved the article back to Draft status due to the quality concern and work on the revision later.  Ytlin77 ( talk ) 04:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the article itself.  Point 1 of WP:ANYBIO says "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor"; the Awards section lists several prizes, some are national and at least one international, which seem to fit the bill.  The statement that one of her books was "the first collection of erotic poems written by a female poet in Taiwan" implies that the spirit, if not the letter, of WP:POET 2 applies, and there's cites to criticism of her work, so it looks like point 3 also applies.  I don't see why the nomination describes this page as a "promo piece", nor the "no good indication of notability".  This, added to the nominator's incorrect claims about conflict of interest editing here and on the article's talk page, makes me wonder if the page is a candidate for speedy keep under WP:CSK point 3 "No accurate deletion rationale has been provided."  CohenTheBohemian ( talk ) 15:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw.  This page wasn't what I thought, it looks like it passes ANYBIO.  SparklyNights ( t ) 17:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Trinity Health: It seems that the Michigan-based Trinity Health is clearly the primary topic , as they are a massive system spanning half the country with 120,000 employees, whereas the North Dakota-based Trinity Health is a small local system primarily located in one town.  I propose that Trinity Health (Livonia, Michigan) be moved to Trinity Health and that a hatnote be added linking to Trinity Health (Minot, North Dakota) .  With that hatnote, this disambiguation page would become unnecessary and thus can be deleted.  Iago Qnsi ( talk ) 17:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Medicine , Disambiguations ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Let the RM run its course, if there is consensus the Michigan one is primary the DAB can be deleted under G14 but if there is no such consensus the DAB will need to stay at the base name.  Crouch, Swale ( talk )  19:33 10 March 2024 (UTC) @ IagoQnsi : Please withdraw this nomination and your instruction on the Move discussion to talk here.  The correct place for the discussion is at the Move discussion on Talk:Trinity Health (Livonia, Michigan)#Requested move 10 March 2024 : if there is agreement for the article to be moved, it will become the primary topic and the dab page will be unnecessary.  (There's the added complication of the proposed move at Talk:Mercy Health (Michigan)#Requested move 10 March 2024 , where the proposed new title of Trinity Health Michigan would probably merit inclusion in a dab page, or at least a hatnote ...).  Pam D 08:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
IGlue: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Companies , Technology , Websites ,  and Hungary .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Institute of IT Training: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Technology , Computing ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
J.A. Woollam Company: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Science , Engineering ,  and Nebraska .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Slender Rising: Slender Rising 2 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) The only reliable sources that have covered these two games are TouchArcade and Pocket Gamer.  There has not been enough written about these games from 2013 and 2014 to warrant their two articles ( WP:GNG ).  — V ORTEX 3427 ( Talk! ) 11:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I was unable to find any additional coverage for the sequel, but Slide to Play reviewed Slender Rising, and I think it meets GNG.  If nothing else can be found regarding the sequel, something about it could be merged into the article for the first game.  Waxworker ( talk ) 12:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Found this source [16] Timur9008 ( talk ) 16:03, May 28, 2023 (UTC) Keep Slender Rising ; Pocket Gamer, Touch Arcade and Slide to Play reviews.  Merge Slender Rising 2 into it.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw I have scoured the internet for sources and expanded and rewrote Slender Rising , now with twelve sources.  I apologize for not conducting a thorough WP:BEFORE search before nominating it for deletion.  However, I could not find anything for Slender Rising 2 .  It fits quite nicely in its own section on the Slender Rising article, so when this AfD finishes, I'll probably merge it.  Thanks, — V ORTEX 3427 ( Talk! ) 11:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 06:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Institute for International Research: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
International Labmate Ltd : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Companies , Science ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Charlie Fetoai : Primefac ( talk ) 12:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union , Australia ,  and New Zealand .  Primefac ( talk ) 12:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The crusade against sports continues while others skate by with a free pass.  Are we going to see the same standards applied to academics and artists or are they worthy pursuits unlike the undignified practice of grown men chasing around after a ball.  I've expanded the article to include coverage.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 04:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] sigh This is not a "crusade against sports".  I came across the article, found no significant coverage, and nominated it for deletion.  I would do the same if I came across an academic or an artist whose article was in a similar shape.  Primefac ( talk ) 07:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Think enough has been found here to suggest a GNG pass for him.  I imagine there will be more coverage out there if a further detailed search through Australian archives is done.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A quick ProQuest search results in 645 entries, so there's more than enough to justify WP:GNG , with references already in the article and the additional info here [14] and here [15] , an editor interested in this subject could expand this one out to be a better stub.  Storm machine ( talk ) 00:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hunter Motorcycles : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Transportation ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Kaffee Burger : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 06:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
1st Decamillennium: It seems unlikely to get any; there isn't even a page for the concept of a "decamillennium".  I draftified it but the creator brought it right back to article space.  AntiDionysius ( talk ) 06:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing to merge, and while I suppose there might be an argument to redirect to Detailed logarithmic timeline or timeline of the far future or something related, I just have a hard time believing that anyone is going to search using this, which leaves deletion as the only suitable option.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A108:2D79:9941:4429 ( talk ) 07:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If Indian English takes over primary status for the next 8 thousand years it would surely be a decilahkennium anyway.   ☺ " decamillennium " is not a neologism, but as mentioned no-one yet really demarcates history by this specific decamillennium, whose start point is proleptic and ahistoric and whose end point is speculative.   We have Category:Millennia with articles for the ways in which people do demarcate history.  When people write of decamillennia, a quick search indicates, they are writing of things happening 10 ka ago or of things that happen once in such a length of time, not about this specific time period.   The turn of the year 10,000 gets some attention, but that's not because it's a time period, and we already have the much-misnamed millennium bug for dealing with that.  Uncle G ( talk ) 08:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:03, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple: Note: this article was created through a cut-and-paste move from Draft:Selva Vinaaayagar Temple , which had been previously declined at AfC for notability and WP:NPOV issues.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 04:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Hinduism ,  and United Kingdom .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 04:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 08:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 08:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete without prejudice, assuming a neutral, reliably sourced article can be written on the topic.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. — Alalch E. 16:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Requesting a speedy close as nominator; the creator of this article was blocked for sockpuppeting and I have tagged it under CSD G5.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 17:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete