hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Peninsula Engineering Group, Inc.: Appears to fail WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Appears to mainly cite primary sources, with none sustaining a claim to notability.  Various searches are struggling to turn up anything.  Mdann52 ( talk ) 06:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The company went through a few name changes: first to Peninsula Wireless Communications, and then to Repeater Technologies.  The company was taken public and then went bankrupt under the name Repeater Technologies.   Peninsula Engineering Solutions is a successor organization, which was acquired by Infinity Wireless.  https://www.infinitiwireless.com/we-are-pleased-to-announce-the-merger-of-their-two-companies/ The company's patent on split band filtering was a foundational patent in on frequency repeaters for cellular mobile radio.  It is cited by 36 other patents, see: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4783843A/en Rabcfi ( talk ) 16:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 08:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 08:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 11:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources about the company found, some patents and government decisions.  Listed in a paper here [19] , but not really about the organization.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ilya Pekaruk: Dougal18 ( talk ) 14:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 14:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : this person appears to be early in their career, so it's entirely possible that they might become notable later.  But for now, I'm struggling to find sources that meet GNG.  Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://dartsnews.com/pdc/northern-ireland-ease-past-ukraine-at-world-cup-of-darts-hungary-whitewash-india passing reference ✘ No https://energodar.city/articles/46510/illya-pekaruk-ta-andrij-lagutin-posili-prizovi-miscya-na-turniri-z-dartsu-v-melitopoli ~ Pekaruk gets a photograph and a paragraph of prose, but is not the subject of the article ~ Partial https://skeptik.com.ua/ykrayinec-vpershe-zigraye-na-chempionati-svity-z-dartsy/ ?  passing reference ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  All the best, Akakievich ( talk ) 17:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jordan Casanova: It appears the subject received a scholarship to play at Angelina College in Texas, but I could not find SIGCOV on his club, college, or international careers.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; I couldn't find anything better than what the nominator mentions (just routine stuff like this ).  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not any notable work, meets WP:FAILN .  PARVAGE talk!  06:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 16:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Desarrollos Industriales Casanave SC-2005: Elshad ( talk ) 18:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Firearms and Peru .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or if a citation is added then merge into FN FAL.  Flurrious ( talk ) 15:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Presidents Leadership Class: I found no widespread evidence of significant coverage by WP:RS.  There is only one source; most of the article's actually relevant organizational information is unsourced with a large amount of WP:NOR .  It reads as a promotional showcase to a minor college program.  GuardianH ( talk ) 13:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Schools ,  and Colorado .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Schneider Crossroads, Virginia: WP:BEFORE pulls up nothing useful.  Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , United States of America ,  and Virginia .  Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The sole supporting source in the article is a GNIS computer database record, and that is false sourcing, as the original feature class for that record was "locale", not "ppl".   There's no source for this being a community, unincorporated or otherwise, nor even a populated place of any sort.   No source for all of the material in Special:Diff/518903976 has been proffered, and the Virginia Department of Transport WWW site turns up nothing for a "Schneiders" or a "Schneider's" and its search engine results break for "Schneider" although the titles returned seem to indicate completely different roads and places to this one.   This is at best road junction work that is unverifiable by me from VDOT records, and at the moment worse than that a completely fictitious "unincorporated community" with false sourcing.  Uncle G ( talk ) 11:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Well, Cox Farms is certainly there (started in 1979 as an outgrowth of the the original Vienna VA site), and the roundabout got built, but it's still just a intersection in a still rural part of of No.  VA.  Go back into the past, any way you like, and there's simply nothing there.  It's just not a notable spot/locale.  Mangoe ( talk ) Delete I don't think you would be able to find any hits if it hadn't been for other sites repeating the GNIS record.  Kill it.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is a basically a strip mall : "little more than a florists' and a site called Cox Farms."  Totally run of the mill locality.  It badly fails my own long time standards .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Greenville Triumph SC head coaches: I see no reason this very short article shouldn't be merged into the main Greenville Triumph SC article, which is also fairly short.  Iago Qnsi ( talk ) 02:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete You have to be kidding me.   A list with one entry, when WP:NLIST specifies that the entrieS (plural) on a list must have been discussed as a group in RS to be notable?   Flagrant, obvious violation of notability.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - Created by a banned sock puppeteer.  — Maile ( talk ) 02:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5 .  Also, doesn't meet WP:NLIST , as this "list" contains one person.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Football ,  and South Carolina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Greenville Triumph as there's nothing wrong with the actual content of this page (which consists of a table with one row), but absolutely should not be a stand-alone page.  SportingFlyer T · C 08:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as above.   There is literally no need for a separate list article with literally one entry -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 10:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as superfluous.  The substantive content, i.e John Harkes was appointed head coach before the team's first season, and as far as we know is still in post, is already in the main article, and the stats haven't been updated since this list was created 4+ years ago.  There's nothing to merge.  cheers, Struway2 ( talk ) 10:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A list with all of one entry, and the club itself has existed for five whole years.  Jiminy Christmas.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 19:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - absolutely pointless.  Giant Snowman 16:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thomas Toivonen: His side project Kaburu is likewise listed at AfD.  Drmies ( talk ) 01:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The references in the corresponding Polish article at pl:Thomas_Toivonen may be helpful.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Finland ,  and Sweden .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I can't read Polish, but based on the urls the pl.wiki sources appear all suspect.  It's blogs, an amazon page, etc. I did find a Polish newspaper bio about him [29] , and there's maybe a couple of hits from Swedish newspapers, but the latter are all paywalled and I can't access them [30] , [31] .  Someone of the same name appears to have also written opinion pieces for Fria Tidningen , but those obviously don't count even if it is the same person.  I'll refrain from ! voting for now in the hopes that someone else has access to the paywalled newspaper links.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's been a couple of days, so absent confirmation that the paywalled Swedish language sources I linked above are sufficient for GNG, I'll mark myself down as a delete .  That said, I'll happily reconsider if someone can provide a description of them.  Ljleppan ( talk ) 11:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hwem ( AfD discussion ) and Kaburu ( AfD discussion ) were created by an account claiming (via the copyright on the image) to be Thomas Toivonen ( AfD discussion ), which has also edited this article.   Interestingly, some 13 years later another account claiming to be Toivonen came along, requested that the biography be deleted , and proceeded in concert with an IP address editor to remove quite a lot of content.   That was 3 years ago.   The early versions from 2007 were very clearly someone writing about xyrself in the third person.   The current version is fairly well aligned with the Polish Wikipedia article, whose sourcing is somewhat shaky, I agree.   Some similarly poor sources were removed from this article in 2020.  Uncle G ( talk ) 10:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Panchkot Raj: It is an unnecessary standalone article as it can exist as part of Damodar Sekhar . ~ Admantine123 ( talk ) 18:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 18:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Jharkhand and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sardar Khan Niazi: The only participant who voted to keep it was a sock account who provided no strong sourcing based on GNG.    The sockpuppet also claimed that the subject had received one award.  However, per WP:NBIO, receiving a single award does not automatically guarantee  that a subject should get a WP BLP.  Saqib ( talk ) 11:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk ) 11:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:ANYBIO #2 - he has received Tamgha-i-Imtiaz for his work.  Editor-in-chief of a number of licensed newspapers, founder of a PEMRA -licensed TV station is enough to show his notability.  2400:ADC7:5101:2500:B17C:9657:E301:EFD4 ( talk ) 22:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In the last nomination, @ Lourdes : shared a good rationale to keep this article.  2400:ADC7:5101:2500:B17C:9657:E301:EFD4 ( talk ) 22:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sachi Baat SK Niazi k Sath should be a redirect to this article.  2400:ADC7:5101:2500:B17C:9657:E301:EFD4 ( talk ) 22:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] IP - I guess I pointed out that per WP:NBIO, receiving a single award does not automatically guarantee that a subject should get a WP BLP.  Similarly, positions such as "Editor-in-chief of a number of licensed newspapers, founder of a PEMRA-licensed TV station" do not inherently establish WP:N or automatically justify a WP BLP.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 06:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Failed WP:GNG .  No in-depth coverage.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 17:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Searched for sources with significant coverage of the subject to meet notability, but couldn’t find any.  Being an editor-in-chief of newspapers does not make someone notable.  Similarly, the award is not exclusive; many who have received this award are not notable.  Grab Up - Talk 11:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bikwasi Haruna: At first glance, Place and See might appear to be WP:SIGCOV but the content is entirely copied from Wikipedia so fails WP:RS standards.  I can't find anything better in my WP:BEFORE .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Uganda .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTPROMO / WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:BASIC .  — siro χ o 23:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I didn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources .  Jacona ( talk ) 01:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fatjon Muhameti: Newsport has an article on him but the majority of the post is copied from Muhameti's social media post.  Likewise, Bold News is based entirely off Muhameti's Facebook post too.  Telegrafi is an independent source in this case but it only mentions him twice so isn't WP:SIGCOV .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obviously not notable by all measures.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lisbeth Moreno: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Nicaragua .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AMGTV: A BEFORE check only found some minor and routine coverage regarding confirmation of certain shows the network was set to air, such as [ [46] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Florida .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete