Chloe Lewis (figure skater) : Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator.  I withdraw this nomination.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Sports ,  and Oregon .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   This is a useful short article on a skater who was successful in international junior skating tournaments; her best result was the Youth Olympics.  Articles such as Figure skating at the Winter Youth Olympics work in their current format because there are articles on most of the medalists; there is therefore no need to say anything about the medalists in such articles.  Deleting articles such as this one, through an over-zealous application of rules to borderline cases such as this one, has a detrimental effect on other articles.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 04:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that there is significant coverage in independent reliable sources, as mentioned below. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't pass wp:gng Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 03:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock.  Daniel ( talk ) 21:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSKATE and fails WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 19:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 May 1 , consensus was to relist for further discussion.  I will strike the sockpuppetry above.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Previous votes failed to assess the article's sourcing.  At the time of the nomination, it was sufficient to pass WP:GNG —namely this profile in the Oregonian and this briefer one in the Colorado Gazette .  The nominator has also since said I felt my original nomination was flawed , given that GNG tops an SNG.  Hameltion ( talk | contribs ) 21:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am unable to close this as a "speedy keep" because there are additional "delete" votes, but I would endorse this being closed as "keep".  Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   Passes GNG per the references provided by Hamelton.   These in-depth profiles offer SIGCOV of the subject.  Frank Anchor 00:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There's WP:SIGCOV in multiple WP:RS and therefore the subject passes WP:GNG .  Tar nis hed Path talk 06:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep