Jake Bongiovi: Known for being Millie Bobby Brown’s boyfriend and Jon Bon Jovi‘s son, not independently notable.  He may be in the future with 2 movies coming out but even then, wont meet NACTOR for a bit.  Merge into Jon Bon Jovi until he becomes independently notable LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New Jersey .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep :  Perhaps to my surprise, this is already a well-sourced article and meets WP:GNG. -- Milowent • has spoken 13:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well sourced but look at the articles: -Millie Bobby Brown and Jake Bongiovi's relationship timeline >>> MBB's boyfriend -Coronavirus in NJ: Bon Jovi son had symptoms, family self-quarantined in Middletown >>> Bon Jovi's son -Who is Jacob Hurley Bongiovi?  Millie Bobby Brown announces engagement to boyfriend >>> MBB's boyfriend -Bon Jovi’s son will run away from N.J. He’s chosen an out-of-state college >>> Bon Jovi's son -Jon Bon Jovi's son Jake says he'll attend Syracuse University >>> Bon Jovi's son -Millie Bobby Brown engaged to Syracuse University alum Jake Bongiovi >>> MBB's boyfriend -Millie Bobby Brown's beau Jake Bongiovi watches her film beach scene for The Electric State in GA >>> MBB's boyfriend -Millie Bobbie Brown Sparks Rumours She's Engaged To Boyfriend Jake Bongiovi >>> MBB's boyfriend -Millie Bobby Brown and Jake Bongiovi's Relationship Timeline >>> MBB's boyfriend -Millie Bobby Brown announces her engagement to Jake Bongiovi >>> MBB's boyfriend -Millie Bobby Brown and Jake Bongiovi hint they're engaged >>> MBB's boyfriend -Millie Bobby Brown Engagement Joke Goes Viral After Age Controversy >>> MBB's boyfriend -Why has Jake Bongiovi proposed to Millie Bobby Brown so young?  >>> MBB's boyfriend -Stranger Things' teenage star Millie Bobby Brown wants to marry Jake Bongiovi – so what?  >>> MBB's boyfriend If he wasn't with Millie Bobbie Brown or Bon Jovi's son would he even have these articles write about him?  There are 3 articles about him joining the cast of an upcoming movie.  That doesn't meet WP:GNG , if and when he becomes more established then yes to his own article but now?  Should be merged with his dad's.  LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I fully accept that you disagree, but under this theory of notability, we would be deleting massive numbers of BLPs.   Just the reduction of Kardashian related articles alone would probably measurably reduce the world's CO2 production for maintaining them.    Alas to all the worthy scientists that have articles, that they must slum with the significant others of celebs who get 10x more coverage and become celebs themselves, not to mention minor British royals who literally have done nothing except get photographed. -- Milowent • has spoken 19:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The sources already in the article and those identified above demonstrate that the Wikipedia notability standard has been met.  Alansohn ( talk ) 20:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree with Lady Lotus 's analysis of the sources. Yes, there are a lot, but the vast majority relate to Bongiovi's relationships to his fiancee or father, and notability is not inhereited . The sources relating to his role in an upcoming film are not sufficient to demonstrate that he meets WP:NACTOR ; at best this is a case of WP:TOOSOON . Without the early life and personal life material, all that this article says about Bongiovi is that he may appear in two as yet unreleased films. The point of WP:GNG is to ensure that sufficient encyclopedic material can be written about the subject of an article; an article which consists largely of personal information is not encycopedic. WJ94 ( talk ) 15:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete he exists, and has notable relations but no evidence of N:ACTOR or other notability himself. Star Mississippi 16:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh ( talk ) 05:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG, significant coverage.-- Ortizesp ( talk ) 05:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , BLP shows significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.-- Hildreth gazzard ( talk ) 06:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Agreed with Ortizep and Hildreth gazzard, it passes WP:GNG . CastJared ( talk ) 18:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep