hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Marlabs: Previous AfD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marlabs_(2nd_nomination) 扱.  し.  侍.  ( talk ) 18:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Engineering , Technology ,  and New Jersey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Salt This company does not have any WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NCORP .  Sourcing is limited to interviews and press releases.  I was unable to find anything other than press releases/churnalism by websites such as "PR Newswire."  Please note the Forbes article is by the CEO so it does not count as secondary coverage.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Salt both Marlabs and Marlabs LLC : A new instance on a previously deleted topic, supported by a summary and announcement-based coverage of routine company history, falling under WP: ORGTRIV .  I see no reason to set aside the previous AfD decisions.  Given this 3rd AfD, plus previous G11 deletions, if this current instance is deleted, it also seems appropriate to salt the variant names.  AllyD ( talk ) 10:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is a completely different from previous versions which are so old.  Now it is backed with multiple reliable secondary sources, passes GNG.  Graze Wood ( talk ) 13:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Houston Scott: Of the two references here, both are dead links.  After searching, I found several sources, but for other people with this same name.  The article was created by a new user on 10 April 2011 (their only contribution to Wikipedia), and previously PROD on the same day.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 19:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Business ,  and Virginia .  — Karnataka talk 19:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - since posting here, a bot rescued the first reference Okay, however the second reference Failed verification.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 01:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only links found are for a Travis Scott, nothing for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:MUSICBIO He is one of 541 million people who have a Twitter account.  This article was the only edit by the editor, most likely himself.  No real mentions on a Google search.  At best, harmonica playing is his hobby, not anything that makes him notable.  — Maile ( talk ) 14:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Grant (footballer, born 1988): signed, Rosguill talk 23:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  signed, Rosguill talk 23:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep 144 games for Alloa, with some sources like Herald Scotland , The Times .  Regards.  Govvy ( talk ) 09:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Both articles are match reports; the first mentions his sending off, the second mentions goals scored by him.  Coverage doesn't get more routine than that.  The two articles do not contribute to WP:GNG being met.  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 12:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Robby.is.on : If you're going to do that, then you need to delete every season article, every footballer article there is, match reports do contribute to GNG, to say they are all routine coverage is not a practical way to run wikipedia guidelines.  Govvy ( talk ) 13:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let's not go down the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS rabbit hole.  The mentions of Grant in the two articles are "trivial mentions" as explained in WP:SIGCOV .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 13:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, let's delete the other articles with inadequate sourcing.  March OfThe Greyhounds 15:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree, we should start with deleting BLPs that don't meet WP:BLP policy for strong sourcing, even if the subject played with balls, regardless of type.  // Timothy :: talk 15:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there is no evidence of this article meeting GNG.  The sources provided aren't significant.  March OfThe Greyhounds 15:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing // Timothy :: talk 15:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phalloides: If this page is deleted, Phalloides (disambiguation) should be deleted per WP:G14 .  Consider adding phalloides to List of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names .  Narky Blert ( talk ) 18:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Done!  Elemimele ( talk ) 19:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Disambiguations .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm in two minds.  I'm okay with delete on this specific list, but I think it's really important this doesn't become a campaign to delete (willy-nilly?!) all list articles concerning Latin words used as species names.  For example, Officinalis is a well-written list of considerable encyclopaedic value, and Palustris isn't bad.  The main objections to Phalloides is that it's really only useful to a handful of people interested in mycological smuttiness, and the list is too small to be particularly useful.  Elemimele ( talk ) 19:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as none of these dab entries is ever referred to by just the species epithet alone.  Loopy30 ( talk ) 16:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Somali Inside News: Doesn't meet GNG or NME 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Organizations .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] since WP: NEO is cited, let us see what it says, Articles on Somali Inside News that have little or no usage in reliable sources are commonly deleted, but in this case, this phrase is very widely cited across an enormous variety of reliable sources.  The phrase probably should also be mentioned Mass media in Somalia .  if anyone can tell us why it should be deleted.  @ Rydex64 HelperWik25 ( talk ) 14:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Websites ,  and Somalia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We really need a lot more editors participating in AFD discussions.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination, this fails WP:NME and WP:GNG as there are no secondary, reliables sources available.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katie Fang: Sources are primary Cossyno ( talk ) 05:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Film ,  and Canada .  Cossyno ( talk ) 05:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Internet ,  and Taiwan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No secondary sources found.  Doesn't qualify Wikipedia:NBLP .   – Nirvana Today t@lk 05:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO Graywalls ( talk ) 08:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No secondary coverage whatsoever.  Banks Irk ( talk ) 13:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Lead and portions of her Career strikes me as strangely promotional as though the article is an extension of her TikTok page.  RetroCosmos ( talk ) 18:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above; probably could even be speedy deleted AriTheHorse talk to me!  13:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC) @ AriTheHorse : , just a note, before suggesting speedy, it is worth remembering that articles deleted as CSD are susceptible to WP:REFUND claim by other users, including subject involved public relations editor whereas a full stop AfD are resistant to re-creation as it receives protection through G4 CSD to enforce AfD.  Graywalls ( talk ) 09:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Singapore Business Review: It may be worth reevaluating its notability merits to stay.  Donaldherald ( talk ) 12:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  Donaldherald ( talk ) 12:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Of the three sources in the article, one is the company's Twitter page, another a page that makes no mention to the subject, and another one that may be reliable, but mostly just links a bunch of articles from the company.  Other than hat, I didn't really see anything else of note.  Lynch44 ( talk ) 15:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yusnelvis Espinosa: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  IncompA 01:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christina Olmi: Falls into WP:BLP1E .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and New Mexico .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A search found nothing on the subject that shows notability.  Does not come even close to passing WP:GNG and is an example of WP:BLP1E .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 22:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
François Mathieu: Gedaali ( talk ) 02:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Arts ,  and Visual arts .  Gedaali ( talk ) 02:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There are other potentially notable people with this name, including fr:François Mathieu , a French senator, as well as a Quebec sculptor.  I don't see an article about this painter in the French Wikipedia.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 15:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mario Gomez (politician): Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 22:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable per WP:NPOL Adhi2004 ( talk ) 10:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't imagine how someone whose sole claim to fame was two years as mayor of quite a small city could meet notability requirements.  Perhaps this is why the article has very little to say other than that he was indeed mayor for two years.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 11:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmed Shayan F Rahman: I was not able to find any sources that establish notability WP:NBIO or WP:GNG — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 15:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Bangladesh .  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 15:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - sources provided do not establish notability, some are primary.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 15:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree with Upper Deck Guy .  Sources have no notability in them.  Fails WP:GNG The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Our Lady of Maulawin: While source #2 presents itself as an academic source, it appears to be self-published, and tellingly includes no bibliography.  I was unable to find coverage on Google Scholar, Google Books, or the internet searching in English, Spanish and Filipino.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Christianity ,  and Philippines .  signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no good hits on GNews and GBooks.  GNews Archives just have a wedding and a funeral announcement that were held in the said Parish.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liban Soleman: – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 16:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This article may be eligible for speedy deletion via G4.  – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 16:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a promo page (unspecified "key positions", "successfully participated", "unique experience", "comprehensive knowledge", etc) that was already deleted once.  Two sources are trivial mentions and others are primary (interview, direct quoted, or official web-site of affiliated organization).  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eusebio Edjang: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless significant coverage of this athlete can be found in independent, reliable sources.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 02:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 06:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Devoke water 15:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wassila Alouache: The closest thing I found in my searches was this interview.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Algeria .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zuleira Abisheva: The closest things to WP:SIGCOV that I found in my searches were this 2020 interview and this 2016 interview with her mother.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kazakhstan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Ref and ELs in article is to database style listings.  Nothing found in BEFORE (Зулейра Абишева) that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth , more name mentions and listings.  BLPs requires strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 19:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete