hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mona Przanowska: This is a case study for WP:BLP violations.  Kleuske ( talk ) 20:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  Kleuske ( talk ) 20:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and Poland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The unsourced fantasy claims of holding long-extinct noble titles and mostly-redlinked genealogy have to go.  And if all you can say about her academic career is the vague and unsourced  "professor at multiple schools in Sweden as well as in the United Kingdom", then that's not good enough for WP:PROF either, and Google Scholar turns up nothing relevant.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 21:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I get more hits Googling myself (3,160) than I do for the Grand Princess (406.) I tried to find any scholarly articels or papers she may have published but got nothing.  Pascalulu88 ( talk ) 22:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The whole article violates WP:V .  Two of the three footnotes don't even mention the subject and the third one is some self-published page saying only that someone with the similar name Mona Perzanowska paints watercolors.  Google suggests that someone with a similar name is a Swedish high school teacher.  Google has zero hits outside Wikipedia for the spelling of the name used in the article.  For all I can tell this could be a hoax by a Swedish high schooler centered around the name of their teacher.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 01:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing how this meets NBIO, seems like some version of nobility WP:FANCRUFT with WP:OR issues.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Definitely not notable on own merits, and no meaningful sourcing of the multiple nobility/royalty titles, even disregarding that notability is not inherited .  Also, most likely WP:COI issues; for example, the photo in the article is claimed to be the creator's "own work", based on subject's old passport photo.  Creator has also recently added lots of dubiously sourced information to related articles, such as the subject's ancestor supposedly being an illegitimate child of Alexander I of Russia .  Hqb ( talk ) 13:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Swedish news sources return nothing.  The subjects own homepage linked in the bio gives no hints of anything conferring notability.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 08:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yosmeli Cabarroca: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no GNG-passing sources to be found.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
H M Khoja Complex Nawabshah: AriTheHorse talk to me!  18:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 18:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails to meet WP:NGEO and WP:GNG , no significant coverage and have passing mentions in the refs.  M.Ashraf333 ( talk ) 17:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Citizens of the Czech Republic: Nagsb ( talk ) 08:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 12:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions .  Nagsb ( talk ) 08:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The corresponding article in the Czech Wikipedia has been deleted four times.  https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ob%C4%8Dan%C3%A9_%C4%8Cesk%C3%A9_republiky Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 21:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete - tempted to just speedy this as WP:CSD#A7 .  No content, no assertion of notability, no coverage.  – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 10:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  Vejvančický ( talk / contribs ) 08:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence that this meets GNG.  WJ94 ( talk ) 11:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Brawlers (Brawl Stars): Wikipedia is not a WP:GAMEGUIDE , not notable.  soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Lists .  soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Yeah, no.  One reliable source in the entire article (unsure about the usability of "Young Posts" so best to not use for notability in my opinion) makes this a blatant GAMEGUIDE.  Something like this should only exist if it's a list of in-game characters that are actually notable or if the game's competitive scene is of incredibly large scale (ex. List of Super Smash Bros. series characters ).  Negative MP1 20:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While I don't mind the listing by rarity, I was unable to find any sources that significantly covered these characters outside of routine announcements.  There is also not really any information included to justify it as a spin-off from the main article.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 20:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not a game guide.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:GAMECRUFT .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 21:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Brawl Stars : Seems to be fine to include in the article about the game.  No discussion given in this list, just a long wall of text.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Oaktree b , I don't think there's anything to merge.  A list of non-notable characters are to be avoided in video game articles.  soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete is ok too if it goes that way.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 10:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a game guide.  This article is a game guide.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 04:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:GAMECRUFT , we generally don't even want this as a section, let alone a stand-alone article.  Sergecross73 msg me 12:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge with Brawl Stars Lightburst ( talk ) 20:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SEC Newgate: Brochure article.  Refs are routine annoucements and PR.  scope_creep Talk 12:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Lets examine the references: Ref 1 [12] Routine coverage.  Not independent.  Ref 2 [13] Press-release.  Not independent.  Ref 3 [14] Press-release Ref 4 [15] Interview with founder.  Also a profile.  Not independent.  Ref 5 [16] Another press-release.  Ref 6 [17] Another press-release.  Not a single one of the first 6 references pass WP:SIRS in the frst block.  It fails WP:NCORP .  scope_creep Talk 12:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article describing the rebrands, office expansions, acquisitions, AIM-listing and -delisting of a PR firm.  All of these are events which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH , and press mentions of periodic research studies by a firm falls under dependent coverage .  (I note that when first created, both this and an AfC-declined draft article about the company founder, authored by the same editor, carried COI declarations.)  Neither the present article text, nor anything that I can see on searches, is indicative of attained encyclopaedic notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 15:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A. K. Khan Tower: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete This why we have WP:NOTCRYSTAL , as I see no evidence, eight yeas later, that this building was even started, much less that it will ever be completed to specs.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angelo Calfo: Joeykai ( talk ) 06:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 21:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Corey Rozzoni: References all mention him a single time as a former member of said band and I could find no other sigcov.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Wisconsin .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm not finding sigcov either.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 21:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zsolt Kosz: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Romania .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't know much about WP:NSKATE but for WP:SPORTSBIO and WP:GNG , this is not notable.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  01:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG as a BLP.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaizen Academy: A BEFORE also doesn't help but turn out profiles, etc.  NAN and Guardian Nigeria pieces are obviously press releases.  Also, generally fails WP:GNG .  Thus, non-notable entity.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 18:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , Education ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 18:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  very weak news coverage also some sources unreliable.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matt Larsen: Nswix ( talk ) 00:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Martial arts .  Nswix ( talk ) 00:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete PROMO out the wazoo, with podcasts he hosts as sourcing, this is far off from GNG territory, soldier.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clear vanity article.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP REDIRECT to Modern Army Combatives .   Larsen is the creator of an original martial art style and the author of a reference book on the subject, therefore clears both "Founder of notable style" and "Author of significant book(s) on their style" in Martial artists notability .  In addition he's a black belt hall of fame inductee, the creator of a dedicated  school, a tournament and a belt system (former UFC fighter Tim Kennedy being one of the first promoted).  I do agree though that it is badly written and referenced and that it sounds like a vanity project, but please follow Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and "consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted".  There enough RS out there to fix this one up.  Best, Lewolka ( talk ) 19:08, 30 April 2023 (UTC) edited Lewolka ( talk ) 19:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Besides the fact this was most likely written by the subject about himself (much like his wife's page ), it just looks like a WP:MASK to me.  There are plenty of better known instructors (countless members of Gracie family and people with better known students) who still don't meet notability.  Nswix ( talk ) 03:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Nswix I agree that it is a vanity article but we still need to follow GNG and he is the founder of a notable style.  I have changed to Redirect as I have found a link to the style and per WikiProject Martial arts/Notability "even if an artist is notable - if there is only one paragraph or so of material about them, then that should be included in the article about their style or school if that is notable," Lewolka ( talk ) 11:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG with massive CoI/vanity/promo issues.  Mztourist ( talk ) 07:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Xhersild Haka: The latter explicitly states that articles such as this must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources , which does not seem to be met here.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even in Albanian there is no source providing any significant coverage of this player.  Ktrimi991 ( talk ) 17:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 12:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tiger Reth: He's been in teams of several performers at the openings of national sports events, but this doesn't bring him over the line for WP:GNG or WP:BIO.  Couldn't find any significant secondary coverage of him in English or Khmer, just passing mentions and social media.  Declined three times at draft.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Cambodia and Sportspeople .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] hello sir Tiger Reth he is an actor, martial artist he play his role around more than 10 film the international film has 2 ( First they kill my father and jailbreak ) and now he is filming upcoming international film in cambodia( Phnom Penh Ground Zero ), You can check film list in tiger reth page wikipedia.  Thank You.  Songha Mao ( talk ) 07:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] — Songha_Mao ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Papaursa ( talk ) 01:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is no indication of WP notability.   He has no major acting roles that would meet WP:NACTOR , no martial arts accomplishments that would meet WP:MANOTE , and lacks the coverage to meet WP:GNG .   Database entries, passing mentions, and being part of large performances at Cambodian athletic events (although not a competitor), fail to show significant independent coverage.  Papaursa ( talk ) 01:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cheetham Tenants' and Residents' Alliance: Mccapra ( talk ) 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England .  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Lack of coverage due to being relatively new.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Could not find any independent coverage, subject seems to fail WP:ORGCRIT .  Besides, the article itself seems to be promotional.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vorann Gencov ( talk • contribs ) 19:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Pallotta: Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 04:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and WP:MILL and WP:BLP .  We need much better sources than IMdB and the like.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete