Asad Ali Palijo (singer): Appears to fail NMUSIC/NACTOR.  Background: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Ali Palijo , [3] , [4] KH-1 ( talk ) 12:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote , but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors.   Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.  However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome.  Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.  Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts : {{subst: spa | username }} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst: canvassed | username }} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry : {{subst: csm | username }} or {{subst: csp | username }} .  Delete - long-term abuse, see also this SPI .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails NMUSIC as stated above, no significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources found in a WP:BEFORE search, also the same for a search for Urdu-language sources.  Tails Wx 14:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage for this individual found, I'd SALT.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , another lazy nomination without a proper WP:BEFORE .  Easily passes WP:NACTOR as there is a ton of coverage: [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] .  Rahe Husain ( talk ) 6:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC) You'll have to do better than that.  Refs 3, 4, 5, 11 just list him a cast member (no  SIGCOV or indication of whether the role is notable), and he's not specifically mentioned in the rest.  Plus you'll need at least two notable credits to have a chance at WP:NACTOR. - KH-1 ( talk ) 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , Passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, Has played major and notable roles in movies.  M. Umar Lal‬ ( talk ) 02:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by M. Umar Lal ( talk • contribs ) [ reply ] None of these sources do not have significant coverage of the subject playing major and notable roles in movies.  Doesn't pass GNG nor NACTOR based on the given references.  Tails Wx 02:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Official accounts post [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] and others.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Wikee ( talk • contribs ) 14:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : After reviewing the article and looking at ALL the references, my conclusion is that this article about a actor is worth keeping.  I saw many references not only from the reliable sources like Dawn newspaper, The Express Tribune and Youlin magazine and others.  WP:NACTOR .  DKGS02 ( talk ) 15:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Pass in WP:NACTOR.  look like notable.  M. Umar Lal‬ ( talk ) 02:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by M. Umar Lal ( talk • contribs ) [ reply ] Keep :The actor has played supporting roles in Quaid-e-Azam Zindabad , London Nahi Jaunga and notable roles in other and There are also independent coverages of the person on web.  I strongly believe that the person is notable and passes WP:NACTOR.  Kiryaani‬ ( talk ) 13:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiryaani ( talk • contribs ) [ reply ] Delete fails in WP:NACTOR Worldiswide ( talk ) 03:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Notable person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.198.109.243 ( talk ) 07:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment All of these "keep" votes are coming from SPAs. - KH-1 ( talk ) 11:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I do not think there has been RS offered.  Many of the sources offered appear to be dubious.  Also, there is an SPA farm of keeps here.  Lightburst ( talk ) 15:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete