hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Xhulia Xhindole: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as I am unable to find coverage of the footballer outside of squad lists and match reports.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Albania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
P/1997 C1: They may sound enough, but this is just routine coverage for a numbered comet, and thus fails in WP:NASTCRIT , according to which multiple non-trivial published works, which contain significant commentary on the object are needed (eg. it doesn't have a dedicated page in Kronk's cometography ).  270P/Gehrels is currently a redirect to List of numbered comets#270P and so this could become a redirect to that page too, with a note that a more appropriate page name exists (with template {{ R avoided double redirect }} ).  C messier ( talk ) 14:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Only found a bunch of data about the subject, does not seem to be notable.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 17:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of numbered comets#270P as an {{ R avoided double redirect }} : coverage is WP:ROUTINE and there are not enough sources to establish notability per WP:NASTCRIT .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 06:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  // Timothy :: talk 04:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mission sui iuris of Lunda: Possibly it could be merged somewhere but I don't see how it is even vaguely notable considering the utter lack of secondary interest.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Angola .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Apostolic Prefecture of Lower Congo where it is already mentioned.  Nothing else to be said about it apparently.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Adventures of Massey Ferguson: Donald D23 talk to me 15:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jim Mora (broadcaster) : mentioned there.  I personally would rather keep this and have added a few things (see page) but it might not be enough in terms of independent coverage.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 07:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jim Mora (broadcaster) (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Psichologija: Article dePRODded because contested on its talk page.  No convincing arguments for notability have been brought forward, hence: delete .  Randykitty ( talk ) 14:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and Psychology .  Randykitty ( talk ) 14:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lithuania#Science_and_technology .  According to the secondary source added to the article during this AfD, this is a historically important journal.  It doesn't look like it has WP:GNG in itself, but a short paragraph about psychology in Lithuania could be added to that article using the new source.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 06:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Lithuania#Science_and_technology per Asilvering.  — Prodraxis { talk • contribs } (she/her) 17:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1892 Biddle football team: As it stands, this does not meet the WP:NSEASONS or WP:GNG as a one game season, per WP:NOPAGE this does not provide any additional context on its own page.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and North Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A merger of both this and the Livingstone article to a creation of 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game would probably be a decent idea; the first black college football game ever is probably a notable topic.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 18:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll try to make an article for it soon...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 18:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I assume you mean the first game involving 2 HBCUs?  There appear to have been some games involving schools such as North Carolina A&M playing different academies prior to this game, and such an article still would need more sourcing beyond the single secondary source currently present.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I may be missing something, but where does it say that NC State was historically black?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game if such page exists, otherwise keep .  jp × g 🗯️ 05:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Let'srun and JPxG : Created the article for 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game .  Suggest redirect .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 22:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support redirecting here as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game .  Thanks to Beanie for creating the target article.  A worthwhile topic -- well done.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 21:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game per above.  Great work.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 11:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Horní Poustevna railway station: It's not even a building, just a stop on request.  The timetable is not a sufficient reference and there are no others.  FromCzech ( talk ) 12:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Czech Republic .  FromCzech ( talk ) 12:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The station is a real building.  I added a photo by Palickap

Discussion outcome: redirect
Coco Mosquito: Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Croatia .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] {{ R from member }} Jinx (band) ?  -- Joy ( talk ) 19:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jinx (band) per Joy - not notable enough for its own article NotAGenious ( talk ) 11:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Found a couple of interviews, one quite detailed [6] , [7] but not much else.  Seems to be quite well known.  Perhaps there is more out there with the right person doing the search.  Redirect otherwise.  scope_creep Talk 07:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject clearly does not meet the criteria set by WP:GNG or even WP:NCREATIVE for independent notability .  We often operate as article creators under the implicit assumption that Wikipedia is some kind of directory; it is not .  Many musicians or, in general, artists, might be important to us personally but this means little in terms of the project.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 12:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jinx (band) Elttaruuu ( talk ) 14:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Trump Death Clock: FMSky ( talk ) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  FMSky ( talk ) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Websites ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect at most.  No sustained notability.  Barely had any when it was active.  All sources, save the last, were published within two weeks of each other, and most of them are actually op-ed pieces, one written by the guy who sponsored the billboard in the first place, Eugene Jarecki , so questionable sourcing at best.  If there's anything to WP:PRESERVE , it's at most a redirect to Jarecki's article, where it's mentioned.  oknazevad ( talk ) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Clever idea to bring forward a serious problem and better than the simplistic national debt billboard, But I'm not seeing the notability for a standalone article.  O3000, Ret.  ( talk ) 01:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jarecki's article per above.  It fails WP:SUSTAINED and, if I recall correctly, was never a permanent fixture.  Rather, it was one of many things displayed on one of the digital billboards in Times Square, with an accompanying website.  (The national debt clock nearby, incidentally, is a permanent fixture that has its own dedicated display, which kind of underlines the sharp contrast with the "death clock" here.)  Epicgenius ( talk ) 11:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eugene Jarecki#Public policy per all above.  Fails WP:SUSTAINED .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 22:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect by above.  AnOpenBook ( talk ) 13:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Eugene Jarecki : The Jarecki article currently only has an uncited paragraph.  The cited content here should be moved over.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Emily Prentiss: If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Criminal Minds characters#Emily Prentiss .  Spinixster (chat!) 10:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 10:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect ,  not seeing much to merge - this is just a very lenghty plot summary.  Ping me if sources on reception or scholarly analysis of this character are found and I'll reconsider my vote.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as unsourced.  Would consider a merge, but I definitely don't see enough WP:SIGCOV for a separate article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Herbert Nowell: Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Medicine ,  and Canada .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Redirecting to the college he founded would seem possible.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 16:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the college.   A founder of a university may be notable via WP:PROF criteria about university presidents, etc. but an online search suggests that this article will never be more than this stub and mentions of him seem to come not from the mainstream herbalist community but from fringe views ("Cure any disease with Cayanne Pepper," etc.) -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dominion Herbal College (which appears to have pretty terrible referencing btw) as an alternative to deletion.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 15:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dwight (The Walking Dead): This is far cry from what is needed per WP:GNG .  Per ATD, redirecting this to the list of characters from the franchise should be all we need.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is appropriate for Fandom, not Wikipedia.  Redirect to the list of Walking Dead characters as per nomination, as Dwight doesn't appear to be independently notable from the series.  Redirect This character does not have nearly enough SIGCOV.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 02:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Fear the Walking Dead characters#Dwight .  The Optimistic One ( talk ) 16:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , personally I don't think it is redirecting it as there really isn't anything to preserve.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to lack of sources with nothing to WP:PRESERVE .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 15:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Albanian-Epirote War of 1359: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Convenience link Special:ComparePages.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 19:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Deleting an entire page on the grounds of its minor similarities with another page is excessive and absurd.  The Battle of Achelous (1359) was a battle in the Albanian-Epirote War of 1359 which is crucial to know.  It's also worth noting that this conflict had a relatively short duration and culminated in a single battle.  As a result, it is entirely justifiable for the page to incorporate information regarding this singular engagement.  Based.shqiptar.frompirok ( talk ) 10:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's the majority of the article copied  with minor copy edits and most significantly only a single extra  source added.  As rightly you point out it's a campaign with a single battle.  There no need for two articles.  Lokosos ( talk ) 18:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and clean up if needed.  It is notable and referenced. .  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 15:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] this isn't a question about the referencing - it's two essentially identical articles that should be merged for what extremely small difference there is between them.  37.245.43.164 ( talk ) 04:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Policy based input would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  03:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a content fork.  BLAR also acceptable.  Srnec ( talk ) 14:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Battle of Achelous (1359) content fork describing same events.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 09:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 01:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Based.shqiptar.frompirok GermanManFromFrankfurt ( talk ) 18:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge this content fork to Battle of Achelous (1359) Polyamorph ( talk ) 19:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as I don't reallly see anything there beyond what is already in Battle of Achelous (1359) .  Owen× ☎ 20:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Domenica Ercolani: Interstellarity ( talk ) 12:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete - dubious notability that could be summed up in her inclusion in the List of Italian supercentenarians .  9H48F ( talk ) 22:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete per WP:ONEEVENT .  Only mentions of the subject are related to her age.  I support the inclusion in a list -- Broc ( talk ) 10:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I understand the rational, but this is not one event - it is what she was notable for years (for her age), and even after her death she will still be notable.  If it is deleted, it should be merged to List of Italian supercentenarians#Biographies to ensure that the information is not lost.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 01:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] VERY Weak Keep I think this one just about has potential to be a standalone article, there are a good number of reliable sources and significant coverage but I'm not certain it's sufficient.  At the very least, Redirect ,  a mini biography can be made in List of Italian supercentenarians N1TH Music ( talk ) 14:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Italian supercentenarians .  Per WP:PEOPLEOUTCOMES : Articles about people known only for being the oldest person in a country, etc., at any given time are normally redirected or merged to a list of oldest people .  The article may need proof of additional coverage, using reliable sources, to justify a biographical inclusion in List of Italian supercentenarians#Biographies .  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 21:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect