hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Maty Cissokho: All I found was passing mentions like 1 , 2 and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Senegal .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trevor Fetter: Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:BIO .  UPE.  scope_creep Talk 09:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He's a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School, not sure if that would make him notable?  [14] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Might do if he has published a good bit, if he is doing that.  I don't think a lecturer position is particular notable.  See what turns up.  He has an award the "2017 Henry Cohn Humanitarian Award" which may be something.  scope_creep Talk 14:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ho Jong-min: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mashroom: A WP:BEFORE search did not turn up any evidence of notability.  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 23:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and United Kingdom .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 23:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim to notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 00:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim to notability and no source, not even a reliable source.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 18:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of New England Revolution broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS , only consist of a single one about the 2023 season; not helping this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Massachusetts .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Are we just going to keep nominating anything related to do with television on shoddy deletion premises?  At worst this should be merged into individual season articles.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
City of Blacktown Pipe Band: Cannot locate sufficient sourcing to indicate notability per WP:NORG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 13:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Australia .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 13:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no usable secondary sources found in my search.  Yes, the competitions technically make a WP:NBAND #9 case, but it seems to me that piping is an insular world, and that success in that field in no way correlates to actual coverage.   Even in the three specialty sources for piping I found (pipedrums.com, pipingpress.com, bagpipe.news)  this band lacked coverage.  Searches in Trove, ProQuest, newspapers.com and NewspaperArchive also failed to find anything other than routine coverage, which convinces me that other offline sources probably don't exist.  Mach61 ( talk ) 16:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced, Mach61's comprehensive searches above prove that no reliable sourcing is available.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the only sourcing that exists online stem from publications about piping.  WP:BAND #9 is loosely met but they aren't really major , couple of local/regional competitions, some national wins, though, but it's not only unsourced and doesn't seem notable.  there's WP:OR here as well.  She was a fairy 01:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Zettel: Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV .  CycloneYoris talk!  09:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , Television ,  and Brazil .  CycloneYoris talk!  09:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Indian general election in South India: A general regional election article isn't needed as each state in South India has an article about the general election taking place in the respective state.  Regional articles for India would only create more for the sake of more and would be more stats articles and wouldn't provide meaningful context.  Articles about the election in each state and territory for the country is enough outside the main election article.  And the creator who contest the speedy deletion tag, states article like UK elections in England is a precenident type article.  However, England is not a region in the UK.  It is one of the countries part of the UK thus an article for each UK member country makes sense.  Regions in England like Midlands, London, etc don't need articles for each general election result as that would be overkill.  Articles like these would be overkill as well.  WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 14:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 14:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see why this article is needed independently from the main article.  Cortador ( talk ) 15:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are already articles for each state in Category:2024 Indian general election by state or union territory , not sure why this is needed.  Reywas92 Talk 00:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary fork of main article given we have 'by state' articles.  Number 5 7 21:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose This article can kept as 2024 Indian general election may be too long to read and navigate comfortably.  As this splits data for South India, which would make ease of navigation.  As the election proceed there would be increase in length of 2024 Indian general election.  Pagers ( talk ) 07:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Too long is generally considered about 8k words of readable prose.  These 2 combined is barely half that.  Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No need for this page when a page for 2024 elections by different states is on wikipedia Category:2024 Indian general election by state or union territory .  This is simply an overkill.  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basic Education High School No. 5 Botataung: It reads like a simple fanpage/vanity article.  A BEFORE search came up with nothing useable.  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 00:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Myanmar .  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 00:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL , seems to be a vanity page.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 05:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 14:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per those above, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article doesn't meet the general notability and verifiability requirements.  There are no reliable sources at all.  Ertrinken ( talk ) 18:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marvin Blapoh: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this short piece.  Everything else that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2016 , 2019 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mumbai–Madgaon line: The subject does not appear to be notable .  A check before the nomination turned up no useful sources that I could find, and the article currently has no sources either.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 18:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation , India , Goa ,  and Maharashtra .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 18:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable railway line GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 19:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Comment - Feels like a weird argument to make that suggests a long rail line (I've seen 600km but the page says nearer 2000km) is not notable.  I've not looked extensively for sources, but I'd be surprised if nothing exists.  JMWt ( talk ) 20:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - on further examination, I think this page is inaccurate and unhelpful, because it is describing a "line" when it actually means a "route".  The route is covered extensively elsewhere under Konkan Railway zone and Mumbai Suburban Railway which operate the connections.  As the topic of the page is not really understood as being a consistent line, might be a reason why finding sources it difficult.  I could be wrong so I welcome correction.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tony Kaltak: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 04:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 04:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vanessa Fox: Refs are a mix of 404's, profiles and blog entries for what is a WP:BLP .  Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO .  scope_creep Talk 14:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per current standards.  Jehochman Talk 16:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all I find are articles about the CEO of Jack in the Box, who shares the same name as this individual.  Nothing found for sourcing for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG, in my opinion.  Carrite ( talk ) 10:22, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ma Jong-u: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , although he competed at the Olympics he did not win a medal and I couldn't find sources which passed WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CCI Group: Akshith manya talk 04:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Canada ,  and United States of America .  Akshith manya talk 04:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The company website is there as a reference, there are articles by the Vancouver Sun and Insights Success.  It is a very short article about a well established company in British Columbia.  As a fairly new contributor, I would be grateful for any suggestions or guidelines- like how many links are considered necessary to create an article.  My focus is on the construction sector of Canada, in which I happen to work.  The sector is underrepresented on wikipedia.  Simplyarnab ( talk ) 17:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Besides the Vancouver Sun mention, I couldn't really find any coverage at all, let alone anything significant.  Mooonswimmer 13:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Insights Success CADCR These are already there.  I have added 2 more The Tribune Drishti Magazine Simplyarnab ( talk ) 19:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If these arent sufficient, I would be grateful if you can tell me how many more I need to add, so that future articles on the same topic can be accepted without any hitches Simplyarnab ( talk ) 20:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
UM.SiteMaker: Non-notable web software.  SL93 ( talk ) 19:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  SL93 ( talk ) 19:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails notability and certainly doesn't seem to have significant coverage.  Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 20:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet , Canada ,  and Michigan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Little coverage.  TappyTurtle [ talk | contribs ] 15:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of football stadiums in the Republic of Artsakh: This list also doesn't cite any sources and has had a notability orange tag for almost 3 years.  Dan the Animator 01:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Lists ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete // Timothy :: talk 05:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unnecessary WP:CFORK from List of football stadiums in Azerbaijan .  Doesn't seem like a useful enough search term to warrant a redirect either.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 02:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete