hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Hirokazu Kobayashi (figure skater): PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Japan .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was not able to find any sources that meet GNG.  Fails WP:NSKATE .  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 15:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This user nominated 49 different figure skaters for deletion within approximately 30 mins which leaves me doubting that a WP:BEFORE search has been conducted, let alone one that includes native language sources.  I'm categorically opposed to AfDs without a proper BEFORE, so I would argue for keep (while knowing this is not a !vote).  While I also haven't done a extensive BEFORE search but was quickly able to find an interview with TV Tokyo [46] and a feature on him in J-Sport [47] in the Japanese article.  DCsansei ( talk ) 00:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DCsansei is absolutely correct in demanding a proper review of potentially available sources before proceeding with a deletion nomination .  However, the short window of time within which many similar nominations were submitted is most certainly not proof the required search was not made.  I, for example, work as much as I find necessary to prepare a Wikipedia contribution.  Sometimes, this involves multiple AfD's, and, when all are ready, I post them up in one go.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on account of the serious dearth of sources testifying to our subject's notability .  Routine listings by the International Skating Union or interviews simply do not do.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kalpataru Projects International: Also note that page was created by a paid account.  Charlie ( talk ) 09:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 09:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - PROMO.  Llajwa ( talk ) 14:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abiyyu Fauzan Majid: Per BEFORE there is no SIGCOV article about Abiyyu Fauzan Majid.  Stvbastian ( talk ) 16:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Indonesia .  Stvbastian ( talk ) 16:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - good nomination.  Appears to get only trivial coverage in the likes of Bola and Tribun News , despite winning a doubles title in Iran.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mount Zion, Red River Parish, Louisiana: I cannot find evidence that this is a notable place as it's not even included in GNIS.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 22:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Louisiana .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even valueless sites like Hometown Locator don't have anything about this place.   I can find (low-quality) references to a Mount Zion in Linn Parish, but nothing about this place.   Delete, complete waste of space.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I found the GNIS record: U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Mount Zion, Red River Parish, Louisiana But since  (a) this is the product of a sock-puppeteer with a bad track record of (being gradually deleted) fact-free GNIS imports, and  (b) the GNIS record says that this is from "The Greater Slidell Area Chamber of Commerce City Map" when Slidell, Louisiana is on the other side of the state making this look like an extreme GNIS error, or a highly erroneous map; any attempt to salvage this is an utter waste of our time.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 00:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Uncle G; the entries sourced to local Chamber of Commerce, real estate, etc. maps are some of the least reliable in the GNIS.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 19:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Google Earth shows nothing.  Old United States Geological Survey maps going back to 1935 show nothing other than an isolated Mount Zion Church on the highway out in the country.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The coordinates pointed to the place in Winn County, but there is not much more at the Red River Parish location - a church and a cemetery, a few buildings nearby but not anything to verify this as a populated place.  Peter James ( talk ) 17:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahmudul Hasan Gunovi: No coverage beyond arrest.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 20:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Islam ,  and Bangladesh .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO .  Coverage does not transcend his arrest.  LocomotiveEngine ( talk ) 07:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kerala Samajam Model School: A search for sources only turned up primary sources or unreliable sources such as databases etc.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shadaab–Abhik: In my initial search, I couldn't find any coverage that would qualify as GNG-worthy.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 13:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 13:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find anything about the duo.   There is some coverage about Shadaab Hashmi but not enough for notability and only mentions about Abhik Chatterjee.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  wound theology ◈ 09:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BK Skottfint: Modest history peaking on the 6th tier.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DXJC-TV: Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD ?  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, redirect, and SALT : Fails GNG, so delete, but is also a frequent UPE farm target, so redirect and SALT.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of being notable.  scope_creep Talk 11:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anar Baghirov: It was recreated in 2018 and still does not meet notability requirements.  It also appears to have been created by a COI account.  The subject does not meet notability requirements for academics or officials.  The subject is the head of Azerbaijan's Bar Association but that does not seem to give notability to the subject.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 12:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Resume BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Even a brief look at the article content and sources show the refs do not meet WP:IS.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Ping me if WP:THREE sources are found that meet WP:SIGCOV and are not routine mill news.  // Timothy :: talk 06:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : part of a COI/SPA campaign about Azerbaijan topics.  This one fails NBIO.  Owen× ☎ 21:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Five grains in world culture: I think we would need a source for that significance, rather than a list of things chosen by the author in a fit of original research .  Mangoe ( talk ) 01:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Mangoe ( talk ) 01:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with regret as it’s fascinating but a textbook case of WP:OR .  Mccapra ( talk ) 10:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a wild-growth abnormality of a disambiguation page that is contrary in almost every way to MOS:DAB and while it could be fixed, there is a "five grains" disambiguation page at Five grains (disambiguation) , so the result would be a duplicate of that page at the wrong name—or—the page is a spectacular free-association style failure of a set-index article, and we can not and should not have such a set index article and in this respect the page can not be fixed.  I am against redirecting because the name is nonsensical. — Alalch E. 12:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unless we can copy some of it to WP:OR as an example, after all it's CC-by-SA so why not.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 12:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could move to a subpage of Wikipedia:No original research/Examples . — Alalch E. 15:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , for reasons stated above.  The article is a pretty clear case of WP:OR and a wonderful example of what not to do when writing an article.  ArkHyena ( talk ) 15:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kannedhirey Thondrinal (TV series): Source 2 is a routine entertainment update on the serial starting.  Source 3 is about the actress Source 4 is routine updates on two serials starting Source 5 is same as source 2 Source 6 is the serial promo on YouTube Source 7 is routine promotional fluff about the serial starting Source 8 is tabloid news on the serial starting Source 9 is routine entertainment updates on serial starting Source 10 is routine updates about the actress This article heavily relies on promotional sources that don't show the subject's notability Karnataka ( talk ) 14:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2022-12 ✍️ create ← 2022-06 move to → Draft:Kannedhirey Thondrinal (TV series) -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muse (Valery Leontiev album): The article was deleted twice in the Russian Wikipedia [27] [28] . -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk ) 07:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd and at AFD before so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While I was researching A Matter of Taste (album) , I came across this project and I thought if maybe it is notable then it would help me find sources or chart data of the aforementioned album, but I couldn't find anything on both.  Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG .  ihateneo ( talk ) 00:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd and at AFD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse (Valery Leontiev album) ) so Soft Deletion is not an option.  This AFD page actually has to be moved as it links to the first AFD, not its own page.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Link fixed but this discussion page should be moved, maybe after it is closed.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse (Valery Leontiev album) 2 is not the standard nomenclature for a second nomination.  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG and WP:V .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahdi Ahmadian: also whoever created the article used lots of fake references to makes it look better.  most of Persian references are referring to his brother Amin Ahmadian who is a national team player.  Sports2021 ( talk ) 15:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Iran .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chino Sing: Ré union!  10:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Dominican Republic .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Seems likely to be notable via WP:MUSICBIO#C2 and #C8, but not much in the article is verifiable at the moment.  — siro χ o 07:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abhilasha (2023 film): This does not look notable; moreover the page has no About Us section.  Has one okay production source and one trailer source.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 19:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Karnataka talk 20:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Given there's only one review, I'd suggest a Redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023 . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I don't think a Redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023 is the best idea considering it's not mentioned on that page.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I will add reliable sources to the article.  thanks. -- Batthini Vinay Kumar Goud ( talk ) 02:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A small film with no notability (fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM lacks significant coverage ). Batthini Vinay Kumar Goud added one citation, which other than reciting the bare facts of production, says: The trailer of this movie was released by famous actor Prithvi at Prasad Preview Theater in Hyderabad. On this occasion, he said, "There is no difference between a small movie and a big movie. Whatever is played is a big movie. The trailer is very good. Happy to make this film with a good point. -- Bejnar ( talk ) 18:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete