Bahujan Samaj Party +: No sourcing that demonstrates the name of the electoral alliance is called  + ("plus"); original research .  Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk ) 20:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and India .  Goldsztajn ( talk ) 20:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] :See no one is interested in discussion.  Very soon it will be named as Third Front or Federal Front George Simon Ohm ( talk ) 01:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find any source terming it as Bahujan Samaj Party +.  It is a small alliance of only three parties that too one is not even a state party.  12 out of 14 sources given in the article are for ideology that too is copied from pages of member political party.  Rest two sources given in the lead section, the one of Hindustan Times has nothing to do with this article.  The other source of New Indian Express too just has a passing mention of BSP and SAD alliance.  No mention of the subject.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 07:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no connection with BSP+.  In my state there is no party name BSP.  George Simon Ohm ( talk ) 13:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ George Simon Ohm I never took your name.  Can't understand what made you write this.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 16:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It has been created by me and here it's written I want to promote my party, "The article is taken from the source and you can visually perceive the news that the coalition is called BSP+, during the elections these member parties were represented by BSP+. Secondly, maybe some users want to expunge it because they peregrinated here to promote their parties,..".  My age is 19 or 20.  How I can found a national party like BSP.  Is there any logic.  George Simon Ohm ( talk ) 16:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I HAVE NEVER EVEN VOTED IN A LEGISLATIVE OR GNERAL ELECTION IN MY LIFE.  HOW I CAN BECOME A POLITICAL PARTY.  George Simon Ohm ( talk ) 16:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] George Simon Ohm , so far, no one has made any accusations about you, they been critiquing the sources in the article and whether they can establish this subject's notability.  This is the way all AFD discussions tend to go, please do not take this personally.  I don't know where you get the quote that you cite (above) but it's not from this discussion.  This AFD will run at least one week so if you want to spend the time, you can look for additional sources that can provide SIGCOV of this subject.  L iz Read!  Talk!  19:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article is taken from the source and you can visually perceive the news that the coalition is called BSP+, during the elections these member parties were represented by BSP+.  Secondly, maybe some users want to expunge it because they peregrinated here to promote their parties, Wikipedia is not for these things, I have optically discerned many users who peregrinated here to promote some political parties, they expunge or disrupt pages of other political parties, the page should not be effaced, whoever engendered it would have researched about it and then engendered it.  The coalition is simply called BSP+ because BSP is the most sizably voluminous among them and the party has more vote share than others in the coalition, hence it is counted as BSP+.  Third, there are only 2-3 parties in this coalition, there is no reason to abstract it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Simon Ohm ( talk • contribs ) Blocked sockpuppet.  -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 04:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] George Simon Ohm as I said above too, that no sources cited in the article mention anything like BSP + also just one article has a passing mention of the alliance that too as BSP amd SAD alliance.  It is pretty clear that the article and the subject in its current form donot pass Wikipedia:Notability and is just another example of Original Research because of missing Inline Citations and lack of Reliable sources cited .  And what you have done in your comments is accused fellow editors of running propaganda and doing promotion.  Can you please give examples of it or are you going to continue making baseless allegations on others.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 16:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is minimal reference of the party’s name in the article, plus there are very few members representing it.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 12:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete