hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Laith Saad Abdullah: Fram ( talk ) 10:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Literature ,  and Iraq .  Fram ( talk ) 10:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Given his novels and play I think he may possibly be notable under WP:AUTHOR but I can’t search for reviews in Arabic without the original names of his works.  It’s unfortunate when editors rush to create an en.wiki article when there isn’t yet one in the mother language.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Draft:Shemaroo Umang (TV channel): Jeromeenriquez ( talk ) 19:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I think the nominator meant the article Shemaroo Umang rather than this draft.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Akshar Árbol International School: Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   It seems to me the deletion nominator recognizes this is significant.  wp:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP .   See the Google news hits in this search , including educational excellence awards from two organizations (one at top, another from an "IDE" down about 10 hits).   Search also on "AAIS", sometimes used for the school, in conjunction with other terms.   Sorry, I am not ggoing to slave away at developing this just because the deletion nominator doesn't like the current state of the article, and doesn't want to do the work themself.  --Doncram ( talk , contribs ) 04:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sports broadcasting contracts in Canada: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 14:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Canada .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 14:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in the United States .  162 etc. ( talk ) 21:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I cannot see how a bunch of news announcments make a subject notable.  Keep?  Look at the state of this?  Almost everything is unsourced.  Tells you the low-quality state of Wikipedia.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , I found [39] , [40] , and [41] , which may help determine notabilty.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 23:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 16:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Math house: Sources in article and found in BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.  // Timothy :: talk 10:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Biology , Mathematics , Computing ,  and Iran .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://search.brave.com/goggles? q=%22isfahan+mathematics+house%22&source=web&q=%22isfahan+mathematics+house%22 Baratiiman ( talk ) 16:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - our colleague above unhelpfully provided a search engine result, however it did actually provide a source to discuss.  This is a a conference presentation which was then published as an academic proceeding, and appears to be on topic.  There appears to be another published paper that cites it, but I have not been able to establish the reliability of that journal.  I see other whispers, it seems like there may be other sources (including non-English ones) if we dig a bit deeper.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment , no opinion on the notability (at most borderline, it looks), but it should be moved to Isfahan Mathematics House or similar should it be kept.  - Nabla ( talk ) 22:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 00:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kattankudy Central College: PROD declined in 2012 but guideline changed in 2017, see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  Web search only brings up Facebook & other social media.  – Fayenatic L ondon 14:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Sri Lanka .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ● Comment- Ok so i found this , it is most definitely significant coverage but the problem is it is a blog which makes it unreliable and most likely a primary source.  If this much can be written there must be reliable sources out there somewhere, the problem is finding them.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 16:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also Found this which I believe shows that the college is notable.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found this too.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found this .  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ●Keep- I got 3 results from Google Books, 4 direct mentions in Google Scholar, 2 results from Google News, & 4 reliable Results from a basic Google Search.  Due to this school opening in Jan 1930 most news article about this school are going to be found offline.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Dead Guitars: Boleyn ( talk ) 11:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : the German Wikipedia article contains 11 references.  Left guide ( talk ) 23:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The German article cites Rheinische Post and Weser Kurier multiple times, which are IMO reliable sources, and the coverage is decent and specific to the band.  Cortador ( talk ) 16:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Wang Qingyun: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and China .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Mohamed Ashmalee: Generally, ministers (and subordinates) there are not presumed notable.  Otherwise, independent sources lack in-depth coverage on which to base an encyclopedic biography.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 03:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Maldives .  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 03:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Cabinet ministers are generally presumed notable via WP:NPOL as national officeholder; is this ministerial position a cabinet position or is it a civil service one?  Curbon7 ( talk ) 04:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks to be civil service (appointed bureaucrat, no mention of cabinet or the like).  A presumption of notability does not apply here per the subnational politicians country listing for the Maldives.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
List of former programs broadcast on TV Globo: Let'srun ( talk ) 17:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television , Lists ,  and Brazil .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It's a highly-common practice to split off older programming from the main page (i.e., List of programs broadcast by TV Globo ).  It does not need sourcing because it meets a basic WP:LISTPURP of a category turned into a list.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 08:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - for the same reason explained by editor above (Why? I Ask).  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Maicol Azzolini: I found this interview and a couple of transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 , 3 ), but nothing substantial.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Italy .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I think there is just about enough here to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  Obviously a lot of team announcements and transactional stuff, but there are a few bits in there that could pass WP:GNG .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
The Legend of Zeta & Ozz: Not convinced the current citations are enough Donald D23 talk to me 23:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and Chile .  Donald D23 talk to me 23:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep May not have been a particularly relevant show but the sources seem to regard it as significant, especially as it seems to be the first  or one of the  first Chilean cartoon show to be on Cartoon Network.  Referencing could be improved but a simple search shows there are sufficient sources.  -- Bedivere ( talk ) 00:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 23:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Yes, it seems like we're talking about a notable Chilean cartoon show, particularly because it may have been one of the first to air on Cartoon Network in Chile.-- Correspondentman ( talk ) 08:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: If you can find reliable sources to support the notability of this subject, please share them here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Barry Onouye: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Architecture , Engineering , Hawaii ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage other than book listings on various sites, might have a pass at AUTHOR, but I can't find reviews.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The page needs improvement but should be kept.  This is an educator who has spent most of his professional career in architectural practice in an impactful way within the city of Seattle; see C7 of WP:NPROF .  In addition his book with Kevin Kane, Statics and Strengths of Materials for Architecture and Building Construction; 3rd Ed. ,(Prentice Hall, 2006), didn't go into multiple editions by accident - it's been used at lots of colleges and universities, which speaks to C4 of WP:NPROF .  A distinguished chair and an annual studio have been named in his honor at the University of Washington, which are closely connected to C5 of WP:NPROF .  See https://onouye.be.uw.edu/ and https://arch.be.uw.edu/people/barry-s-onouye/ and https://openpublishing.library.umass.edu/btes/article/id/1928/ .  Qflib ( talk ) 19:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per Qflib - he's not exactly famous but his career has been impactful, and seems to squeak by the requirements in WP:PROF.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Stefano De Marchi: Stefano De Marchi .  – 64andtim ( talk ) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Mathematics ,  and Italy .  – 64andtim ( talk ) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It would be a weak keep based on his citations, but I think the existence of a special issue dedicated to him , with in-depth coverage of him, makes the case stronger.  As for the existence of left-behind draft versions, I think that is an irrelevancy.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Professor De Marchi runs a research group which does a variety of important work in numerical analysis.  A number of his/their papers are highly cited and influential (as one example, the Padua points ).  – jacobolus (t) 21:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (visit) 17:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus