hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Yaw Safo Boafo : Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 13:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Ivory Coast .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:BIO .  And the awards he won don't really add to notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  None of his jobs, accomplishments, or awards are notable.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jan Kadlec : He finished his career at the age of 22 with only 8 top-tier matches and 40 in the 2nd tier.  Do not confuse occasional mentions with a footballer of the same name.  FromCzech ( talk ) 07:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Czech Republic .  FromCzech ( talk ) 07:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; I can only find routine coverage like this match report showing he received a red card.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siraj Mia Memorial Model School : Fails WP:GNG .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 06:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Bangladesh .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete After searches of the usual types, I concur with the nominator that there is no significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources, so it fails WP:NSCHOOL .  It is listed in the article on the surrounding community, Badda Thana .  So in principle it could be redirected there, but it isn't clear why it, alone out of a dozen secondary schools in the area, even rates a mention there.  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 05:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Indian Premier League umpires : Umpiring in the IPL is routine for the profession; nothing remarkable; no significant coverage of this list.  I completely agree, scoring a 100, taking 5-for or even getting selected to play in a premier tournament like IPL is a significant achievement, all these having articles make sense.  But what is the credit of umpires here?  Umpiring is a normal profession, simply an appointment.  If you have a look at the list, there seems to be many non-notable persons umpiring in IPL.  All the sources are just database or stat-based about how many umpired who who umpired .  Couldn't find sources which discuss about the subject in a group.  Yes, umpiring in 50 or 100 IPL matches might have some coverage, but that's enough to be included in the biography of that umpire.  I know it's a featured list- but still challenging.  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Cricket , Lists ,  and India .  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NOTDATABASE.  AryKun ( talk ) 14:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Certainly fails the number of policies/guidelines nom has suggested.  I don't think there's a suitable redirect here to the parent article either as there is no mention of umpiring in it.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 20:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY , no encyclopedic value, and isn't significant coverage of the IPL umpires in sources.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  But isn't this list serving a useful navigational function per WP:LISTPURP-NAV ?  Rupples ( talk ) 08:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You could just make a category for IPL umps instead.  The list doesn't have any RS that cover the group as a whole, besides ESPN's database that store basically every form of trivia imaginable.  AryKun ( talk ) 08:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of adventure parks in Hungary : Almost none of the parks are bluelinks, very difficult to assess what the page is specifically about or whether the contents are relevant.  WP:NOTGUIDE JMWt ( talk ) 13:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this seems like a travel guide so per WP:NOTGUIDE i say delete.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIR .  Only one article has a bluelink and even that article is a bare stub.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 12:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Created by a single purpose account, originally linking to the websites of everything listed.   Only three links to things on the list.   One is to the town of Balatonboglár which doesn't list anything about any adventure park, just has a picture of statues.  Tordas links to a one sentence article about a village.  Annagora Aquapark links to a two sentence article for a place with "3 water slides for children, 12 big slides".  D r e a m Focus 19:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gina Cavallaro : Main refs are an article she wrote and her wedding announcement.  I also nominated her husband Matt Larsen .  Nswix ( talk ) 00:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Nswix ( talk ) 00:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment this feels PROMO, but she might have a shot at AUTHOR if we can find decent book reviews.  I'll take a look later.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Beyond every site selling her book, I can't find critical reviews of it.  Delete for lack of sourcing, not meeting AUTHOR.  Rest of her life doesn't seem to meet GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A brief mention of the book here [34] , and this [35] about being a war correspondent.  I don't think these qualify, willing to change my ! vote if others can evaluate.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 03:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As it fails WP:GNG .  CastJared ( talk ) 15:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not pass WP:AUTHOR / WP:JOURNALIST notability guidelines.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sleeth, Indiana : There is the usual square pattern of roads just to the east of the (now taken up) rail line, but the aerials and topos show that this wasn't always there: the oldest topos I found (from the 1960s) don't show it at all, and the aerials show it apparently coming into being.  Given the location of the label by the grade crossing, I have to suspect this was a rail point for a town which never really materialized.  Perhaps someone else can find more info, but searching was surprisingly difficult: Sleeth is apparently a very common name in Indiana.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete According to sources on the article it was a post office.  I can't find anything in the newspapers about it.  But I believe the second source that is on that article just assumed that a post office = town.  James.folsom ( talk ) 03:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suzanne Davies : Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I did browse newspapers to see if I can find any WP:SIGCOV but was not successful.  Best I could find were The Star , The Guardian and Nottingham Evening Post .  With the last one, she is mentioned in the title but the actual article only trivially mentions her.  I couldn't find anything that addressed her with any actual depth.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KNDRGRTN : Cornmazes ( talk ) 18:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete TOOSOON and PROMO.  My fave is the first ref from 1978, per the citation...  If he's been a new artist for the last 40 years, he's not at GNG.  No sort of extensive coverage, no charted singles, refs are PR links.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] that was an error, the article is from 2018 Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG ; most of what I can find is self-published or not significant.  There is an interview in Flaunt that might be notable ( [4] ) but it's all I could find and Flaunt is not on the pretty extensive list at WP:RSMUSIC .  And I also laughed at the 1979 (though it's certainly a typo), but definitely seems WP:TOOSOON .  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 22:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : G11ish.  Fails BLP, GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE only showed promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 19:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DYXX-TV : There's certainly listings, and given the age of the Wikipedia article, there are hundreds if not thousands of Wikipedia mirror results.  However, I still cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources.  And the article still stands mostly unsourced since last AFD.  MarioGom ( talk ) 20:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 20:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  Fails GNG and NORG/CORP.  Found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  No objection if a consensus redirect emerges, but I can't find one I think is useful.  // Timothy :: talk 13:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] List of GMA Network stations could be a redirect target.  MarioGom ( talk ) 07:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
China–India football rivalry : All the sources revolves around 1 match held in 2018, that too held after 30 years since 1988 match.  The political rivalry and the geopolitical issues between two countries cannot be a reason of a sport rivalry.  Even the statistics shows there is not established rivalry.  They did not even face each other in the knockouts regional, continental cups or world stage like AFC Asia Cup, Asian Games or the WorldCup and the Olympics.  And it cannot be called a rivalry if a country have zero wins against the other.  Hardly played 11 matches and India won zero.  Seems like some sort of WP:HOAX Drat8sub ( talk ) 10:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , China ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't see how this is even a thing.  There isn't a rivalry as far as this article suggests.  We don't just have articles on "rivalries" because two teams play each other occasionally.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 19:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : One can check. .Similar article created by same user is in AfD discussion now.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India–Pakistan football rivalry .  Drat8sub ( talk ) 19:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : i dont think the sport is notable enough in those countries for there to be a serious rivalry Muur ( talk ) 02:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks nothing more than a trivia.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 11:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this "rivalry" isn't really a rivalry, and doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samir Thapar : User4edits ( talk ) 06:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – appears to be notable for only WP:ONEEVENT , the viral video.  Almost all online coverage relates to that incident, although some articles ( [69] , [70] ) seem to exist about his local rally wins.  Feel free to tag me if anyone finds more convincing WP:SIGCOV .  MSport1005 ( talk ) 14:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ed Slott : There are a lot of results on Google, but they largely appear to be press releases or very brief references to/quotes by Slott.  WP:SIGCOV seems lacking.  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk ) 01:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Finance .  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk ) 01:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - especially shameless advert.  I started to trim the junk, and realize it was melting away.  -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per User:Orangemike .  Originally created by User:Edslott , too.  MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!  ( talk or whatever ) 10:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Not much in terms of WP:SIGCOV .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 01:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fazila Chiyembekezo : I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  The most I was able to find was this transfer piece, which is already in the article.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ormeau Woods State High School : There is no significant coverage of this school to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article does not have any sources to show notability, and there appear to be no other SIGCOV sources.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 11:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete