Sirens (2014 TV series): Agusmagni Agusmagni Agusmagni 00:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television ,  and United States of America .  Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 9 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is another nuisance AfD nomination, just like the others from this OP.  The series is clearly notable, the article has plenty of sources.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 21:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I removed PROD.  Has plenty of critic reviews on RT.  Other reviews are also available.  Donald D23 talk to me 21:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Sources in the article and found in BEFORE do not meet WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Found promo, listings, nothing that meets the indepth independent requirement of SIRS.  // Timothy :: talk 07:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ¿Why do you should delete a page of an American show that aired on a network owned by a bigger multinational group?  Agusmagni ( talk ) 23:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep in addition to sources in the article, we have: Dennis Leary brings 'Sirens' to USA review (I think from the Washington Post originally but clearly syndicated also).  The sound of Sirens: Denis Leary's new comedy series from goes topless, sort of feature story/semi-review from Sun Media .  'Sirens', 'Suits' are silly and serious , story about its upcoming release.  'Sirens' an enjoyable trip to the emergency room a full page(!) positive review in the Boston Globe .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Skynxnex.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to USA Network , not all of USA Network's shows are notable Agusmagni ( talk ) 22:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Skynxnex, in addition to the article already looking fine in its current state.  A quick check of AFDStats shows nothing but controversial nominations from this user.  AviCapt ( talk to me! ) 05:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Obvious fulfillment of WP:NTV .  There are more than thirty sources currently in the article, all of which are strong and reliable sources.  In addition, there are reviews from Variety [56] and Time Out [57] , and coverage from Deadline [58] and The Hollywood Reporter [59] on the renewal and cancellation.  There is even an interview with the series' creators from Collider , which emphasizes that the series is USA Network's first original comedy series.  [60] Quite ridiculous to be even filed for deletion, in my opinion. — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 20:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Very clearly meets GNG.  Besides the reviews already listed above, there are also reviews in Collider , Common Sense Media , The Chicago Tribune , Paste , The Orlando Sentinel , AV Club , The Boston Globe , the South Florida Sun-Sentinel , Deseret News , the Baltimore Sun , People Magazine , the Salt Lake Tribune , the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette , the New York Daily News , the Los Angeles Times , USA Today , Newsday , the San Francisco Chronicle , The New York Times , the Philadelphia Daily News , DVD Talk , TV Guide , the Winnipeg Free Press and the Orange County Register .  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 13:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep