Tetramind : None of the references pass the quality bar being typical PR generated stuff.  MarcGarver ( talk ) 17:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies , India ,  and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep rewrote the article, there's obviously little to no coverage for agencies, I contest, with its notable campaigns with Mattle & Sunrisers shows it.  bɑʁɑqoxodaraP ( talk ) 22:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable company.  After Paradoxodarap and Queen-ambi's cleanups, the remaining references are: [2] : an article about social media and affiliate marketing for the hospitality industry, which mentions Tetramind only once to identify the speaker in a short quote.  ( WP:PASSINGMENTION ) [3] : the program of a youth conference which is used to support the finish results of a sailing team which the company sponsored.  The company is not mentioned in the source at all.  [4] : reference cites a marketing campaign with a shoe brand and a cricket team; article is paywalled but the company doesn't appear to be mentioned at all.  [5] : article about a marketing campaign with a popular toy car brand.  This article not only doesn't mention this agency, but mentions a different agency that the brand worked with.  I'm not sure why this is used as a source at all.  [6] and [7] both refer to the agency winning a "Foxglove Award" in 2017, also for the Hot Wheels campaign mentioned above.  The awards recognize young and small agencies in India, and indicates that Tetramind won one of the organization's "regional" awards, a step down from their "national" winners, and shared a silver medal in their category.  There were roughly 100 of these awards given out in that year.  Googling just gives the usual business directory websites; no significant coverage whatsoever.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 19:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Revert to Draft at this moment, a lot of these comments are seeming like a target on my back, I am moving this article back to draft and will later resubmit via AfC and let other admins decide it.  Thank you everyone who took time on this.  bɑʁɑqoxodaraP ( talk ) 09:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Moving a page to avoid a deletion discussion is disruptive ; I've reverted your move.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 15:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose draftification per my comment directly above.  This is a topic which does not merit inclusion; no amount of work here or elsewhere will improve that.  The draft namespace is not meant for indefinite storage of draft articles on non-notable topics.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 15:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per Ivanvector.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as demonstrated by Ivanvector the sourcing fails to meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  While moving to Draft is an option if the author wishes to address the sourcing deficiencies, it is not for the purpose of avoiding AFD in the hope that "other admins" will allow the topic.  HighKing ++ 11:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per Ivanvector.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 13:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Ivanvector DSP2092 talk 05:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment as I mentioned it above already, please allow me to rephrase that.  I have based my study and research on DDB Mudra and Savage Humans , the only two other "agencies" from India on Wikipedia.  So, if I have it right according to my knowledge, either all three (DDB Mudra, Savage Humans and Tetramind) can stay or all three have to go.  do give it a thought!  Thank you :) bɑʁɑqoxodaraP ( talk ) 15:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete