hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Tirukkural translations into Japanese : Already covered in Tirukkural translations .  No proof of WP:Notability of the the 2 transalations on its own accord.  Redtigerxyz Talk 17:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Philosophy , Japan ,  and India .  Redtigerxyz Talk 17:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : More info and citations added to establish notability.  Kural translations are a highly notable topic and the addition of citations asserts the notability of individual translations, as noted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tirukkural translations into Rajasthani .  Article passes WP:GNG .  Rasnaboy ( talk ) 09:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 18:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Rasnaboy.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per citations in articles.  Works into WP:SUMMARYSTYLE format as child articles of Tirukkural translations .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Heritage International Xperiential School : Charlie ( talk ) 18:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Haryana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - unlike many other schools, there seems to be enough coverage to support meeting on notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP , per the definition of notability for WP:NSCHOOL .  As a privately run public school, most of the references fails WP:SIRS as routine coverage, and as they are not independent of the subject.  scope_creep Talk 09:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Notable content changes have been made, and a substantial number of additional sources have been incorporated.  HIXS is a top school in India, covered by many mainstream media outlets.  The school was ranked 3rd among India's top 5 schools by India League IB Table Zehnasheen ( talk ) 14:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The sources that are now in the article are sufficient to satisfy WP:NSCHOOL .  Jacona ( talk ) 14:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  As it now satisfies the WP:NSCHOOL — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 15:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
May 2023 Pakistan by-elections : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep for the same reason cancelled video games also have articles/sections , anything that was planned but didn't happen (as long as it's properly sourced)  has an article/section.  Being a cancelled election could probably be reflected in the title somehow or the article's contents be merged someplace, but just because it got cancelled doesn't magically mean erase the validity of the content.  This nomination is throwing the baby out with the bathwater basically. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs ) 20:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per Mythdon's reasoning.  IncompA 20:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why not merging into 2023 Pakistani parliamentary crisis ?  Panam2014 ( talk ) 21:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I would agree to Panam2014 's proposal as a fallback, but I think there is plenty here to justify a separate article.  Something not happening due to crises or simple cancellation has never been a valid cause for deletion, especially where there is reasonable, sustained, non-local coverage (all of which are shown by the cites).  As an extreme example, The world completely failed to end in 2012, but we still have a superb ~130kb article on it.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 17:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Manav Bhinder : The page was recently vandalized and subsequently protected for a few days.  However, Mr. Bhinder has since expressed a clear desire for privacy and has requested that the page be removed to respect his wishes.  Manav Bhinder has reviewed the article on " Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects " suggested by one of the user and is now convinced that Wikipedia can handle vandalism.  Therefore, he no longer wishes to proceed with the deletion and would like to withdraw the nomination for this page.  Pradeepsethi.in ( talk ) 21:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please ask Mr. Bhinder to read Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects and take action (or decline to take action) accordingly.  Gottagotospace ( talk ) 21:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Manav Bhinder has reviewed the recommended article on " Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects ", and is now convinced that Wikipedia can handle vandalism.  Therefore, he no longer wishes to proceed with the deletion of the article.  Pradeepsethi.in ( talk ) 19:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Pradeepsethi.in We have no idea whi you are, nir any evidence of any delegated authority by Bhinder.  For all we know you are unconnected and making mischief.  Bhinder should approach WP:VRT himself, directly, and make his personal case there.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Setting aside any notability in the article and focussing solely on the deletion rationale, I see nothing to suggest that Wikipedia accede to the nominator's request.  Manav Bhinder must make his own case correctly according to the advice given above.  There is absolutely no proof that the nominator is acting on Bhinder's behalf.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What kind of proof or evidence do I need to provide to demonstrate that I am acting on Bhinder's behalf?  He is not comfortable editing wikipedia pages to raise a request, which is why he asked me to represent him.  Pradeepsethi.in ( talk ) 06:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Regardless of the request above, I don't find sourcing about this individual that would meet GNG.  Article is sourced to imdb and stories about other people where this person is mentioned.  I don't find coverage we'd use to build an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Robert P. Watson : The information for the candidate for the House of Representatives specifically states he was considering running and formed an exploratory committee.  This does not meet the requirements for notability.  The article was created in 2005 so there has been plenty of opportunities to add reliable sourced content if it existed, but from what I can see it doesn't exist.  This individual does not meet the requirements for notability to have a stand alone Wikipedia article.  VViking Talk Edits 15:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians ,  and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Academic notability in the subject's field would probably be established via reviews of his books.  Checking JSTOR finds at least one for The Ghost Ship of Brooklyn [7] , Affairs of State [8] , George Washington's Final Battle [9] [10] , The Presidents' Wives [11] [12] , The Nazi Titanic [13] , and America's First Crisis [14] .  So, there may be a WP:PROF / WP:AUTHOR pass here.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 17:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:AUTHOR and the many published reviews I found for his many books.  He also has a distinguished professorship but the case for WP:PROF#C5 hinges on whether one counts Lynn University as "a major institution of higher education and research".  He's not notable as a politician but that's irrelevant; he's also not notable as an astronomical body nor as a species of insect.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] PS I removed the political campaign from the article altogether, refocusing it on his academic career, as I could not find good enough sourcing.  The best I found was this dubiously-reliable interview (also potentially WP:CIRCULAR ) which mentions the campaign without any specifics in response to which Watson states "I plead temporary insanity."  I don't think that's good enough.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as WP:AUTHOR is met.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 18:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Nick Winston : The article is of significant length, but there are few sources and none inline.  2003 LN 6 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  2003 LN 6 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Theatre ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Highly promotional and is practically a list of accomplishments without sourcing.  Shadow311 ( talk ) 15:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   There are hundreds of reviews of his work , and he has directed and/or choreographed numerous West End musicals.  Obviously, no one did the research to add references to this article, but that is not a justification for deletion at AfD.  I agree that the massive list of credits should be severely culled, but that is a task for another day.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 17:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Strong news coverage exists as stated by Ssilvers .  He seems to have some awards as well.  IMO, it should not have been nominated.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep definitely meets WP:GNG although article needs clean up.  Orange sticker ( talk ) 10:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Yes the writing is crummy needing a rewrite but notability is met here.  X ( talk ) 13:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jeniffer Barrios: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Guatemala .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article fails WP:GNG .  References 1 and 2 are rosters, 3 is broken and 4 is a stat site.  After a quick search, more stat sites are found.  IncompA 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clearly fails WP:GNG Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 08:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Guatemala women's international footballers per GNG failure Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lack of SIGCOV reliable sources, failing GNG.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 16:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Olga Sagan: Non-notable businessperson otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Women .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Washington .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, appears promotional.  W C M email 07:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Piroshky Piroshky : A redirect to the bakery they own seems fair.  Clearly fails to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 20:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] She is a well-known figure in Seattle amongst small business owners.  Yesterday is tomorrow ( talk ) 18:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect As per TulsaPoliticsFan.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Akish: RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] By the way, this was PRODded in 2008 and then not sent here for some reason.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 03:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Does that comment mean I’m supposed to read the relevant guidelines and then summon a bunch of people here?  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 09:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ RadioactiveBoulevardier : Not at all.  The patrolling admin extended this AfD discussion for another week due to lack of participation, and this article is not eligible for a soft delete .  Grab Up - Talk 08:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Book of Ether : It would be better to redirect this article to Book of Ether .  The subject is not eligible for a standalone article due to the lack of coverage.  Grab Up - Talk 08:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 22:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Swaret: The justification, based on the edit history, is that a singular user on a public forum said that they used the package some unknown amount of time ago.  I'm sending this to AfD because this added source does not establish notability.  It's not reliable, does not provide extensive coverage, and it isn't clear whether the source is necessarily secondary.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 03:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD"d so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Found on a few linux discussion boards, then nothing...  I don't see notability for this software.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Slackware#Dependency resolution , where it's mentioned, and honestly the content there is already better.  ~ A412 talk!  22:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arta Rama: Perhaps the former since she made more appearances for Albania?  All I can find on the subject are passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 ).  Not to be confused with the judge of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Albania ,  and Kosovo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 11:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Antria Kirkini: The subject has earned at least three caps for the Cyprus women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cyprus .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 16:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sabalom Glitz: Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters unless improved with reception/analysis.  Fails GNG as written ( WP:FANCRUFT ).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters .  Who made an article for like every single reoccurring classic Dr. Who thing ever?  Because the dedication is both tragic and impressive, and if active they should really go to Tardis Data Core where they’d fit in perfectly .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV without reception/analysis.  The redirect target is a valid WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dozy Mmobuosi Foundation: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dozy Mmobuosi : Almost repeated content from the founder.  I fund no reason why it shouldn't be redirected.  There is an atom of notability per the allegations about the foundation not the founder that is keepable; though I have see almost all of them in the main founder article.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Andrew Tompkins: Relies exclusively on primary sources.  He has not demonstrated individual notability outside of Paramaecium, therefore he shouldn't have his own Wikipedia page, per WP:BANDMEMBER .  JMB1980 ( talk ) 21:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Paramaecium .  Per nominator, a quick Google and Wikipedia Library search suggests he doesn't have individual notability outside of Paramaecium.  He does appear to have a few positive mentions in album reviews, but these currently are not cited in this article and could be added to the article on the band itself.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 02:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect