Mr. Pete: Being in the AVN hall of fame is swell, but we have no coverage in RS talking about the individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nevada .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mr. Pete has been performing regularly since 23 years ago.  According to IAFD.com he appears in over 3580 titles as a performer and 98 titles as a director.  In addition, he has been awarded by AVN, XRCO and XBIZ, the most relevant adult film companies at the present moment.  Finally, he has wikipedia pages in french, italian, spanish and swedish among other foreign languages.  Therefore, I do not get your point when you say Mr. Pete is a non-notable pornographic actor.  cantarach ( talk ) 22:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He has no coverage in reliable sources, see the links posted above under the nomination.  Wikipedia notability.  He isn't discussed in the New York Times or books.  We can't keep articles that aren't discussed by other individuals.  IAFD is not a source we recognize.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And your Mr. Pete article has already been turned down three times, per the discussion links on your talk page.  You should fully understand why it's not notable at this point.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I posted those links because I thought that obviously, they would be more interesting to Wikipedia.  cantarach ( talk ) 23:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As I said, you can find articles on Wikipedia about Mr. Pete in different languages, for example french, italian or spanish.  They look very similar to the one I wrote and I cannot understand why you do like those articles mentioned but not mine.  cantarach ( talk ) 23:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The sources in those Wikipedia articles are unreliable and unacceptable for biographies of living persons.  IMDb biographical information is user-generated content.  The Spanish Wikipedia page cites IMDb and Who Dated Who (also unreliable).  The French Wikipedia page is translated from the Italian page.  That one cites self-published aiwards.com.  Even if the sources were reliable, the awards roster listings don't constitute significant coverage.  The Russian page appears to be a translated from the English-language page deleted in 2022.  Swedish: no sources.  Unacceptable in all cases.  • Gene93k ( talk ) 03:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Currently this article is linked to the main companies.  I did that originally, because I thought that it would be more interesting to Wikipedia.  cantarach ( talk ) 23:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We don't need to keep discussing it at this point, we'll let the process play out.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 02:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sourcing in the article is exceptionally bad.  Searching for independent RS coverage comes up with nil.  Failure of WP:BASIC and WP:ENT .  Pretty much the same problems as the 2022 deletion.  • Gene93k ( talk ) 02:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Almost half the sourcing is Imdb is crowd sourced, i.e., the bio subject could have edited the source himself.  Much of the other sourcing is questionable.   Most of the awards are not sourced.  Only two sourced for all three main sections.  There's a reason this is a stub article - not much content or substance.  — Maile ( talk ) 22:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete GNG not there, nothing changed in notability since last deletion.  WikiVirus C (talk) 01:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete