hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Clayton Scrivner : His notoriety seems to arise entirely from his band and thus I would suggest that we merge the pages, delete Scrivner's, or delete the band's (as no other members have pages) and fold it into Scrivner's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeacockShah ( talk • contribs ) 17 June 2023 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Nevada , Pennsylvania ,  and Utah .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No notability outside of his bands, which themselves are barely notable.  He has received no media coverage except for a few mentions within articles about The Rodeo Boys, and even those are sparse.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - While researching for my vote on Scrivner (above), I looked into his band The Rodeo Boys as well.  I have seriously considered nominating them for deletion too, but it might be a close call because they got some local feature articles: [41] , [42] ; and some local album reviews: [43] , [44] .  That's the only useful coverage I can find on them.  Any thoughts?  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would say they are worth deleting as well, honestly not sure why either had a page in the first place or how they made it this far.  PeacockShah ( talk ) 19:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
EIU Canback : Searches did not turn up significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources .  Note: I'm nominating this at AfD instead of using PROD in the hopes of getting some extra eyes on the deletion request, since the page only has three followers.  No objection to soft deletion if it comes to that.  Ks0stm ( T • C • G • E ) 09:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts .  Ks0stm ( T • C • G • E ) 09:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
First Intuition : Other sources on the net such as this and this are also self-published.  Request delete per WP:ORGCRITE .  AbsoluteWissen ( talk ) 04:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom .  AbsoluteWissen ( talk ) 04:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Has been tagged for multiple issues for years without improvement.  Little more than an advertisement.  Completely fails WP:ORGCRIT .  Created by an editor with virtually no other edits.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GSSS Kot Beja : The website is sparse and does not appear to have been updated since 2016.   Most of the wiki page is copied from the school website.   No other online references in English that I can find.   There may of course be notable info about the school in other languages.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 10:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Himachal Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NSCHOOL , WP:GNG and I did not find any reliable sources.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Satish Awasthi : None of the sources in the article confer notability, most of them are either paid-for promotional pieces or listicals.  Might potentially even be UPE or DUCKY.  Sohom ( talk ) 17:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astrology , Internet ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astrology , Internet ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete G11.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't think this subject is notable under WP:NBIO from anywhere and it's references seem to be unreliable to me but I think article is only creating for a purpose of conflict of Interest .  ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє] , 01:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Notable I found that he has 2 YouTube Channels with million’s of Subscribers and but there are something missing in reference you can check after that it will not claim wiki guidelines please delete.  Metaxtech ( talk ) 18:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've edited your comment to correctly format it.  (You used {{ notable }} which creates a template and not a bolded !vote).  Regarding your statement, the number of youtube followers does not have any relation with the notability of a person (please review WP:ENT and WP:GNG both of which need to satisfied for the subject to be notable).  Sohom ( talk ) 19:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - G11.  Promotional nonsense.  jellyfish ✉ 19:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The author of this article is currently blocked for using multiple accounts to socking on Wikipedia.  Happy editing ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє] 17:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy : Created by a blocked contributor and promotional.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 17:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - zero reliable sources , which are required for a WP:BLP .  The current consensus is that even 8 million followers is not enough for automatic inclusion at the English Wikipedia, although I would be more lenient .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of French Open broadcasters : WP:NOTGUIDE applies.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Tennis , Lists ,  and France .  signed, Rosguill talk 18:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure on this - Is this up for deletion because the article is in bad shape, or that it shouldn't be here regardless?  We have List of Wimbledon broadcasters and List of Australian Open broadcasters articles that appear to be sourced much better and are laid out in a satisfactory style.  The flags for countries would certainly have to go as against MOS.  If this was done in a Wimbledon like style would there be objections?  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 09:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that if there are secondary sources that back up the level of detail included at the Wimbledon article, that would be a good model to follow.  The Australian Open article seems lighter on analysis and less obviously makes a case for meeting WP:LISTN , but is still as you note in better shape than the French Open article at issue.  signed, Rosguill talk 12:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per my previous nomination.  This was soft deleted and should remain deleted.  No merit for keeping this.  Again, WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, all but one are unsourced - has anything improved since then?  No.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP per listn.  Desertarun ( talk ) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Red Flag (Jericho) : This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid.  In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show.  Donald D23 talk to me 18:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 18:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not appear to meet WP:NEPISODE ; there's no extensive coverage outside of the normal fansite recaps and a single review at IGN ( [2] ).  Article contents is mostly just an extensive plot summary too.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 19:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NEPISODE .  Qytz ( talk ) 20:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  // Timothy :: talk 15:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KTBV-LD : Let'srun ( talk ) 02:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Even in Los Angeles, a relatively-new low-power station that seems to have only carried national (mostly religious) networks doesn't seem like the type to get much significant coverage .  (While not itself a reason to delete, these smaller LA stations also tend to attract IP edits of questionable accuracy and nonexistent sourcing.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dumitru Radu : Dumitru Radu is a quite common name in Romanian.  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Moldova .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Just few appearances in Moldavian football.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marcos Flegmann : My searches yielded many passing mentions and non-independent coverage.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Mexico ,  and Massachusetts .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 08:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Minimal coverage, what's there is mostly not about his rugby career.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zaira Meneses : It was accepted through AfC by an inexperienced user.  The reference to The New York Times is merely a passing mention and is behind a paywall.  Hitro talk 13:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Mexico .  Hitro talk 13:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - I have added in citations and removed statements where I could not find reliable sources.  I think the best coverage of her work is here.  [1] [2] [3] As noted above, the New York Times article also includes a few sentences on her performance in New York; I think that this is an acceptable citation even if it is behind a paywall or available at ProQuest.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 11:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My mention of the paywall was merely for informational purposes and not to express any opposition to the source.  Whether behind a paywall or freely accessible, a good reference is always valuable.  Hitro talk 11:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Shaw, Punch (2008-05-24).  "Guitarists' concert is well worth the wait" .  Fort Worth Star-Telegram .  pp.  A16 .  Retrieved 2024-05-17 .  ^ Siegel, Steve (2013-10-06).  "Music is family affair for guitarist Eliot Fisk" .  The Morning Call .  pp.  [1] , [2] .  Retrieved 2024-05-17 .  ^ Small, Mark (2021).  "An Afro-Cuban Legacy".  Acoustic Guitar ; San Anselmo .  No. 331.  pp. 30–33 – via Proquest .  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The NY Times is a trivial mention; all I find are streaming sites and record label profiles.  Nothing to satisfy musical notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on account of failing general and specific criteria of notability , a fact unshaken by the abundance of what the main contributor wants to pass as sources, which are, actually, trivial listings, passing  references, and name-drops; nothing affirming independent notability.  And advertorials such as the gem in NY Latin Culture : "As you can see from the picture, Zaira puts a lot of energy into her career and plays with a wide open heart," etc. (The NYT article is explicitly dedicated to "guitarist Eliot Fisk".) Our subject is a  classical guitarist like millions of others.  And it truly does not help that the article has been created and curated by a kamikaze account .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Soares : Ineligible for PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 12:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 08:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Miller (music producer) : Appears to be sourced mostly by press releases and dead links.  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Wisconsin .  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Philadelphia School (Architecture and City Planning) : One of the previous editors is the author of that book, which leads me to believe this is a lot of original research and violates WP:MOS in several ways.  This should be sent back to drafts at the very least.  Lindsey40186 ( talk ) 01:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Additional info: I've found that there is a question about the existence of a "Philadelphia School" of architecture.  A magazine article asked as much in 2017: Was There Really a “Philadelphia School of Architecture”?  - Philadelphia Magazine (phillymag.com) Much of these points could be best summed up as a section in the Architecture of Philadelphia article.  Lindsey40186 ( talk ) 14:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: WP:TNT it.  Going off the book preview alone, I've already found paragraphs worth of copyright violations.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  16:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Full Moon Hotel : Currently, there is the Deniz Mall shopping center in its place.  Sura Shukurlu ( talk ) 20:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Travel and tourism ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Planned and unbuilt hotels can be notable.  Haven't performed a source search, just scanned the article and other wikis and it looks like it could pass GNG.  Possibly oddly the Armenian article is the best sourced...  SportingFlyer T · C 00:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Little real information in the article, no coverage online and no real sources in the article.  InDimensional ( talk ) 14:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I followed what SportingFlyer said he did, and came to the opposite conclusion.  This is a nonexistant building.  James.folsom ( talk ) 18:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manoj Jat : The sources cited do not mention Manoj Jat and both were taken from Manoj Thonipurakkal Manoharan , which the same article creator hijacked previously.  Appears to fail WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Sportspeople , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Since AFD nomination, page originator has moved the page to Manoj Jat (Indian Kabaddi Player) and tried redirects to Jat , Manoj , and Manoj Jaat .  This is in addition to attempting to remove the AFD template.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 21:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - article creator now indefinitely blocked for disruption and promotion relating to Manoj Jat.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article seems to be a self insert with no sources Adler3 ( talk ) 00:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of attained biographical notability.  AllyD ( talk ) 07:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Warehouse (Dave Matthews Band) : Subject lacks independent notability.  If appropriate citations can be found, suggest merge and redirect to Dave Matthews Band .  Failing that, suggest to simply redirect to Warehouse (song) , although this may be the wiser option for redirect, regardless, to avoid confusion.  Skipple ☎ 03:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music .  Skipple ☎ 03:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 12:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete Purely an unsourced advertisement for a fan club.  How it's stuck around for that long is truly baffling.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 17:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is blatantly just a puff piece by a fan club.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheInsatiableOne ( talk • contribs ) 09:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete