hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
The Prime Show: Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Lots of promo, database listings.  // Timothy :: talk 13:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fahim Rahim: Article itself was written by one User:Khocon , a sockpuppeteer.  We also have an article for Fahim's brother which might also be worthy of deletion.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Medicine , Pakistan ,  and Idaho .  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This BLP appears to be highly PROMO, written by a blocked sockpuppet, and reads more like a resume to promote themselves and their business.  While the subject has won some awards, it's unclear if any of them are notable.  According to ANYBIO, we may have to keep the BLP if any of the awards are significant.   — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Saqib : Can we draftify the article for now?  Once the promotional content is removed, it can be published again.  Additionally, there is not participation to prove these awards are notable.  Grab Up - Talk 15:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Grabup , I'm afraid this cannot be draftify now as it's AfD'd.  See WP:DONTDRAFTIFY .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe If we build consensus then the article will be Draftify.  Grab Up - Talk 15:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Grabup , You've my vote!  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : As said before “ Once the promotional content is removed, it can be published via AfC review again. Additionally, there is not participation to prove these awards are notable.”  Grab Up - Talk 15:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Samoht27 : Are you willing to withdraw this nomination ?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes.  Drafification seems optimal.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Samoht27 , Thank you.  Grabup , You'll have to ensure that the review cannot pass unless WP:GNG are met.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] 😗 I never said that I am the person who will take all the responsibilities to publish this.  Someone will do it in future maybe.  Grab Up - Talk 16:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Continenttimes.com: Also see WP:NPERIODICAL .  Further noting that this was previously deleted under a different name, see Contínent Times (digital newspaper) .  B3251 ( talk ) 04:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  B3251 ( talk ) 04:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
OSRMT (software): Logan Talk Contributions 20:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Logan Talk Contributions 20:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article have all necessary sources and references.  I think it is meeting all the Wikipedia guidelines.  And should remain on Wikipedia.  Problem can be fixed But that doesn't mean it should be deleted Mukarram ( talk ) 20:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find any independent coverage.  Fails NSOFT.  Owen× ☎ 23:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable software without any reliable sourcing or significant and/or independent coverage.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 14:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zachary Goodwin: He is not known to have continued playing past his college career.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and Pennsylvania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William David Volk: NinjaRobotPirate ( talk ) 14:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and New York .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Wikipedia is WP:NOTPROMO and the coverage of this person does not pass WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think that's true in total: For example: "Volk has worked extensively with Activison, he designed the (M.A.D.E) game engine and was technical producer of the 1992 game Leather Goddesses of Phobos 2, Return to Zork, The Manhole, Rodney's Funscreen and other adventure games" Two of those games in the above passage is liked to articles that specify Volk's role: Leather Goddesses of Phobos 2: Gas Pump Girls Meet the Pulsating Inconvenience from Planet X!  - Programmer Return to Zork - Producer (in the case of Manhole it lists Activision as the original publisher).  Additionally later on: From there he moved to Avalon Hill Game Co. where he started the quality assurance division for the Microcomputer Game Division at Avalon Hill.  from 1979-1982 where he created the games " Conflict 2500 ", " Voyager 1 " and " Controller " Conflict links to him (designer), Voyager has him listed as designer/programmer but does not link back, and Controller links back to his page.  Then: In October 2019 William Volk produced and published The Climate Trail, a post-climate apocalypse game based on the classic game Links to the Climate Trail website that has Volk as the Designer/Developer on the TEAM page: https://www.theclimatetrail.com/climate-trail-team If wished, I would like to edit and take out items without references and place references in the article.  VideoGameVet ( talk ) 02:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: He is credited for The Pyramid of Peril and Mac Challenger in the GAMES section as well.  VideoGameVet ( talk ) 03:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Plenty of hits in Crypto blogs or websites, which seem associated with him; this is typical of them [55] .  Anything crypto is a huge red flag.  This in the IBT [56] is about all there is, and it's an iffy source.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Pretty evidently non-notable, and seems to be made for promotional reasons.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 09:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elyzabeth Pham: Does not meet the WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Wisconsin .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sourcing found for this person, unless she married Sysqo (plenty of coverage about his wife).  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ervin Hasalliu: I found one passing mention in Panorama , which just looks like a squad list of every single team in the division and is not significant coverage by any means.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mampuzha Madhava Panicker: This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now get this resolved.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and India .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - insufficiently sourced, but Kathakali dance is an important South Indian classical dance form revived in the early to mid 20th century and winning the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award is a big deal.  I think it would be a mistake to delete this biographical information, which is not duplicated in any other language on WP.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Normally at least leads can be found on at least one other lang wiki but here nothing.  Ping me if sources are found, I'm open to a redirect if sources can be found showing that the redirect is appropriate.  // Timothy :: talk 18:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natalia Mitsuoka: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Argentina .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject meets the WP:GNG with the SkateToday article already in the article in addition to [ [43] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a living subject and the best we can find is one connected source (faph.org) and one interview (SkateToday), both from when she was a junior in high school 16 years ago?  That's all?  WP:SPORTSPERSON requires at least one RS which directly details the subject.  Nothing close to that here.  BusterD ( talk ) 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, I have long felt that none of this qualifies as “significant coverage” when I keep getting chewed out for these AFD’s.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails NSKATE.  The one SkateToday article, while impressive, is the only SIGCOV I've been able to find towards GNG.  The other source linked by Let'srun doesn't count towards the GNG as it isn't independent or sigcov.  Toadspike [Talk] 11:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulelah Al-Zahrani: My searches in Arabic don't yield anything other than social media posts, which do not indicate notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV .  As the athlete played for Al-Ansar for several years, if sources are located, I will change my vote.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sufficient sourcing meeting BLP and other guidelines.  -- Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Would have suggested a draftify, but his age suggests might have been retired.  Was only finding statistics on google search Otbest ( talk ) 18:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Pamoja Art Society: No rth of the Zam bezi 05:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Organizations ,  and Louisiana .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: blatantly promotional, created by an account now blocked for spam.  In fact in my opinion it qualifies for speedy deletion as promotional, but now this discussion has been started we may as well let it run its course, I suppose.  JBW ( talk ) 14:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional and only 1 gnews hit.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ఐ 20: 2 of the 3 sources appear to be copies of each other (I couldn't access the third), and no reliable sources were found online.  Does not meet WP:NFILM .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : I have the feeling that this wasn't released on the announced date (14 June), so let's wait for release and reviews.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could the article title instead be the English translation?  — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 12:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 14:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the title using another script doesn't help searching; regardless, I can't find mentions of this.  The sources are listed as marginal reliability per Cite Highlighter, and I don't see any others we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CorpWatch: However, it is frequently used as a source , see Newspapers.com for example.  Would like to see what others think.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Environment ,  and California .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unless we can find more sources about them, there doesn't seem to be enough to keep the article.  This [17] , then this brief mention [18] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This [19] ?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unless more work has been done to it.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 13:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Vets (company): No evidence of wp:notability.    The sources are just either announcements (e.g. on securing funding) or republishing of their press releases/self-bio.    Same for the content of the article,.   Creator is indeffed for COI promotional creation.  North8000 ( talk ) 14:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Florida .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Was originally soft-deleted after being nominated for failure to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG .  Coverage is limited to news about product launches and market openings that are excluded from consideration as trivial under WP:ORGTRIV .  Even after refund, there are not multiple examples of significant, secondary, independent coverage.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 15:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Nomandbou , who created the account only for the article's restoration at RfU , assured us with sure! when asked if he has at least two deep or significant sources as per the previous AfD.  Jay 💬 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I reviewed the sources in the refunded article, and they do not meet WP:ORGCRIT .  See source analysis/comments below: Calcalist , TechCrunch , VC News Daily , NoCamels , Calcalist (in Hebrew) , FinsMes , PYMNTS , and Globes : WP:PRESSRELEASE -based ( WP:CHURNALISM ) routine coverage of a capital raise and thus ineligible under WP:ORGTRIV .  New year's eve fireworks : More churnalism based on press releases.  The Times doesn't even reference this company, it's an editorial generically talking about "the vets" in Britain as an industry sector.  KPTV is sponsored content (read down to the bottom) and thus not independent.  DVM 360 , Community Impact , Pet Age , and ABC6 : coverage of new location openings and thus ineligible under WP:ORGTRIV .  Spectrum News 1 , Tampa Beacon , WFTS Tampa Bay : local news and thus of questionable value for WP:NCORP per WP:AUD .  -- Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 16:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the source analysis above, an abuse of the refund procedure, topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing ++ 19:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete