Prince Inigo of Urach: Marcelus ( talk ) 22:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Germany and Lithuania .  Marcelus ( talk ) 22:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Royalty and nobility .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Numerous self-proclaimed pretenders have articles dedicated to them.  Royals that never ruled anything also have articles dedicated to them, e.g. Iniga von Thurn und Taxis . -- +JMJ+ ( talk ) 12:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I hope you know a bunch of non-notable modern day nobles have articles about them, and they never ruled anything in their lives.  Also, his grandfather was officially elected as the King, whether you like it or not.  If anything, this is more worth keeping than the other articles about people of noble/royal blood who are part of deposed dynasties.  YT DomDaBomb20 ( talk ) 15:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wilhelm was elected, but this election was reversed after a few months by the same body.  It was also never accepted by Germany, which controlled Lithuania at the time.  His grandson never laid claim to the throne, nor did any major political party or group ever do so.  Inigo is a completely private person.  Marcelus ( talk ) 21:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't use the existence of another article to prove that this article should remain.  See WP:WAX for more info.  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 15:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just because other "self-proclaimed pretenders have articles dedicated to them" is not an argument to keep this specific article WP:ALLORNOTHING .  And I would also be in favor of deleting Iniga von Thurn und Taxis for what it's worth.  As for his grandfather being elected king or not that doesn't make Inigo notable as notability is not inherited WP:INHERIT .  D1551D3N7 ( talk ) 00:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update - the Iniga von Thurn und Taxis article has been deleted for lack of notability for what it's worth.  D1551D3N7 ( talk ) 02:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Passes WP:GNG with Lithuanian RS: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 .  -- StellarHalo ( talk ) 12:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any comment on the sources found by StellarHalo?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, asilvering ( talk ) 04:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist for the verification of new sources provided.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per StellarHalo.  Mach61 ( talk ) 03:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep notability according to StellarHalo.  Axisstroke ( talk ) 10:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per stellar DarmaniLink ( talk ) 18:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per StellarHalo.  Azarctic ( talk ) 10:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep