hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Elmir Valiyev : Created for advertising and PR purposes.  There is no criterion that makes a person encyclopedic. -- Correspondentman ( talk ) 10:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article claims that he is "Head of the Administrative Legislation Sector of the National Assembly of Azerbaijan", which would seem to pass WP:NPOL .  I haven't found any sources that would verify that claim, though.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 03:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The original Azerbaijani term that's being translated as "Administrative Legislation Sector" seems to be İnzibati qanunvericilik sektorunun .  The current head of that sector, according to the official website , is Kamala Maarif ghizi Pashayeva, but that doesn't rule out Elmir Valiyev having been the head in 2017.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 03:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Wayback Machine only goes back to 2021 for that page.  The 2017 version of the website wasn't available in English as far as I can tell, but I was able to find a photo of him on there from 2017, suggesting that he had at least some kind of position in the National Assembly.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 03:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, the URL of that image contains the words yeni ("new") and sektorlari ("sectors").  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The URL also spells his name as "elmir_vliyev", but a search for "Elmir Vliyev" doesn't turn up anything.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] On the other hand, this article about his resignation as "Board Chairman of the Public Union Kapaz Professional Club" in 2018 doesn't mention any connection with the National Assembly, and instead gives context about his father.  That would be a strange omission if he actually was head of a sector of the National Assembly.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing WP:GNG , unless his claimed position in the National Assembly can be verified.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Park Primary School : Currently zero references, but searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 19:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The article author blanked the page .  I reverted, but this may qualify it for speedy deletion under WP:G7 .  TornadoLGS ( talk ) 20:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Generally primary schools are not notable enough to justify them having a Wikipedia article and I am not seeing anything to suggest that this is an exception (eg extensive coverage or of particular significance in the history of education in Scotland).  Dunarc ( talk ) 22:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WXON-LD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks WP:SIGCOV with which to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TBL-37 : Boleyn ( talk ) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , United States of America ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jon B. Perdue : Does not meet WP:GNG since there is not significant coverage by independent sources; most references are about self articles by Jon B. Perdue himself or from organizations he was directly involved with.  The one decent source, ProPublica , describes him as "a self-described guerrilla warfare expert" and "a onetime contributor to Breitbart ".  Individual (and possibly edits) are also linked to the now-deleted Center for a Secure Free Society [13] .  WMrapids ( talk ) 18:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages because they were created by the possible WP:COI account, lacks notability and is written like and advertisement : Packbow ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Bundling with Jon B. Perdue . -- WMrapids ( talk ) 18:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Television ,  and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: In addition, the ProPublica journalist speaks about the individual beginning at 3:30 in this video , saying he "has worked for a sort of fringe think tank" and that the Packbow was created for "societal collapse". -- WMrapids ( talk ) 19:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : an interesting person but non-notable based on sources provided.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a lot of WP:SIGCOV .  Many of the refs are self-works or profiles (such as his general Amazon one).  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 11:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saptagandaki Multiple Campus : UtherSRG (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom, was also draftified and moved back with no improvements.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 21:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Al-Abdooli : This article is completely lacking in decent sourcing for a BLP and WP:GNG doesn't seem to be met.  The best source that I could find was UAE FA , which only mentions him once in passing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tarmon : Per WP:GEOLAND , "Census tracts ... are not presumed to be notable".  I can't see any other distinguishing features for this area.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 13:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 13:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - definitely not notable.  Spleodrach ( talk ) Delete per nom, and own review - census and electoral component, neither qualifying under any policy.  SeoR ( talk ) 00:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  12:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GEOLAND ; this is just a census tract with no good coverage about it to establish notability.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 15:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Fern : Not finding enough here to see a pass of WP:GNG , anything that talks about Stephen directly is either an interview, a passing mention, or just a quick blurb about him as a speaker at an event.  A WP:BEFORE mostly finds articles about the other Stephen Fern.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 06:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment as nominator Closer inspection reveals that almost none of the included citations even support the text they follow.  All instances marked in article.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 22:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The article content is predominantly about Ark2030 and might be better pivoted to be an article about that organisation, consideration of whose notability would fall under WP:ORGDEPTH .  ?  AllyD ( talk ) 08:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Upon reading all sources in the article, and looking for more, there's far from enough to demonstate ORGDEPTH for Ark2030.  Basically every source is an identical couple sentences blurb that is likely just their own PR given to conferences where they have speaking arrangements.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 22:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A numerous work he has done can’t be overemphasized.  I can see multiple reliable sources that said much about him.  102.91.4.246 ( talk ) 12:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC) — 102.91.4.246 ( talk ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Care to link to any of those multiple reliable sources?  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 11:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yeah, even if all those sources were about the guy the article is about, they still would not qualify as reliable.  Promotional page.  Bremps ... 21:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 102.91.4.246 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as an unsourced mess.  I can't see one truly independent reliable source in there that says anything meaningful about Fern.  I'm keeping an open mind about Ark2030 which as a British community-interest company has an extremely unconvincing existence; Companies house records merely show that it has shuffled directors and that it's twice been threatened with compulsory strike-off, which is impressive for a mere 3 years of existence.  If someone independent writes about it, it'd be an appropriate redirect target for Fern, but at the moment I don't see either of them reaching WP's notability requirements.  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angela Humphries : J2m5 ( talk ) 08:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a local councillor clearly fails WP:NPOL .  Most of the sources are not significant coverage of her.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on GNG grounds, as a local politician who is not otherwise notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Councillors are rarely notable as a consequence of doing councillor things.  Tar nis hed Path talk 12:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As much as WP:SIGCOV exists, its activities are completely restricted to local politics.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laura Lindner : Maybe there are mentions in German sources I missed, but the most I found were mentions on the German Football Association website similar to the ones already in the article.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Germany .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Commment - Sportfrauen.net has a good piece on Lindner.  I need to look some more.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per my BEFORE search.  Other than the sportfrauen.net article linked above, I can't find any SIGCOV.  There is a fairly decent piece from the DFB that is linked in the article, but it is not an independent source and doesn't count toward notability.  Local newspapers provide no help (pnn.de and lr-online.de only have match reports and contract announcements).  Unfortunately, I think the lack of coverage is to be expected for a player who only once played in more than half of her club's Bundesliga matches (during 2016–17).  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ibrahim Barssi : I wasn’t able to find any RS sources to fulfill WP:GNG PigeonChickenFish ( talk ) 07:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  PigeonChickenFish ( talk ) 07:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Egypt , Sudan ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage found for an artist, only hits on a cricket player with the same name.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If that website is the references is that all that can be found then this person is a long way from notable.  TarnishedPath talk 12:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Beyond the website listed here I found a flickr page for him [44] .  That obviously doesn't help though.  No evidence of WP:ARTIST or other notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject not Notable.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 11:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Subject not have much coverage.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 02:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shahan Kabondho : Quick search reveals only one direct news mention, this article , which is already cited in the article.  It's possible there's more coverage in non-English sources, but appears to be non-notable without significant coverage at time of nomination.  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 02:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 02:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism , Poetry ,  and Bangladesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet SIGCOV or NMUSIC .  Drowssap SMM 19:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The first article is the only one strictly about this person that I can find.  I suppose there could be more in the local language, but I can't find any.  Lack of sourcing unless others are found, so not meeting notability at this time.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Logan Cousins : Does not yet meet GNG, only gets passing mentions and routine coverage.  The article in a club magazine isn't independent.  Could also be draftified as an ATD.  March OfThe Greyhounds 08:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Football , United Kingdom ,  and England .  March OfThe Greyhounds 08:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – WP:TOOSOON .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Not enough of a career to draftify.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of notability and to encourage editors to postpone the article creation until there are good sources for a biography.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rajasthan bus crash : Only a brief burst of coverage without any sustained secondary coverage, failing WP:N .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Rajasthan .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Clear violation of WP:NOTNEWS , and a perusal of the available sources turns up little WP:SUSTAINED coverage beyond the date of the accident.  Fails WP:NEVENT due to a lack of enduring significance and coverage.  The Night Watch (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Singapore–Spain relations : I found no third party coverage of notable bilateral relations, such as state visits, agreements, significant trade or migration.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Singapore ,  and Spain .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect The only non-government sources I could find for this were 1 and 2 They focus exclusively on the economic relations between Spain and Singapore, and I don't think they constitute stand alone notability, as most of the content of those sources speaks in the larger context of EU-Singapore relations.  I might suggest redirecting to Singapore-European Union relations .  Gödel2200 ( talk ) 21:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  06:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of sources.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 15:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I oppose redirect as an unlikely search term plus Singapore-European Union relations makes no mention of Spain.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sreshth Movies : Would recommend a merge as an WP:ATD but know it would likely be contested based on recent editing I have seen in Indian film-related pages so taking to AfD for editors to decide.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 23:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 23:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete