hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Oumou Tangara: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions in squad lists and match reports ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This could be better off as part of a List of Mali women's international footballers .  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NBLP and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of sources.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 04:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marcelo Moraes Caetano: The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators ,  and Brazil .  Sgubaldo Delete .  GS citations show negligible impact as yet.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KTVS-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Mexico .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to New Mexico LPTVs.  Logo kinda goes hard tho Danubeball ( talk ) 20:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
T.S. Idiot: Although this person is a performer, there is a lack of notability.  No wider impact of significant secondary sources beyond self-promotion and marketing.  Seaweed ( talk ) 15:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There's an exhibit at an art gallery, a personal Weebly site, and some promotional listings, but not any significant coverage to establish notability.  Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 19:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not demonstrate significant notability and the sources are mainly promotional.  The article is an autobiography originally made by the user of the same name as the subject and it has been nominated for deletion a couple times before and the user appears to recreate it every time.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first deletion discussion didn’t have much participation, so the author/subject was able to request undeletion .  Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 19:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:YOURSELF .  — Maile ( talk ) 22:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2030 European Women's Handball Championship: Event is 6 years away.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 16:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 17:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete way WP:TOOSOON .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  There was an indiscriminate creation of articles about upcoming sports events.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Боки ☎ ✎ 17:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Genrobotics: Notability still not clearly established.  * Pppery * it has begun... 18:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are plenty of sources to provide notability PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 23:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi PaulGamerBoy360 , can you point to even one source that meets GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability?  Please point to the particular para/section you believe meets CORPDEPTH/ORGIND.  Thank you.  HighKing ++ 14:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Many of the sources fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and are press releases or churnalism.  The others fail WP:ORGCRIT .  Pinging Lordofhunter and HighKing who were the only two votes in the recent nomination that ended in a soft delete. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  The sources listed in the article are entirely based on announcements and/or information provided by the company/execs.  HighKing ++ 14:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Next Goa Legislative Assembly election: Speculation about an election that may be held on or before 2027.   Article is 100% editor created/derived content/ wp:OR.  There are zero sources about the subject.   The one reference is a government document which does not discuss this but defines how elections are scheduled/run.  North8000 ( talk ) 16:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and Goa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and per all the comments that led to the deletion decision in the first AFD.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 19:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify Obviously notable, but WP:TOOSOON .  Sohom ( talk ) 07:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete still no sources since last creation/deletion to satisfy the GNG.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 00:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KJCS-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Religion ,  and Colorado .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This probably should have been bundled with the nomination for parent station KDEO-LD .  KJCS's pre-KDEO history was all-Daystar, and its current form has no separate notability from KDEO — which, when there's no notability there , is a problem.  (Non-notability isn't automatically handed down like that, much as notability isn't inherited either , but it's not a good sign.)  There are lists that this could be redirected to, but for the sake of consistency (given the KDEO deletion) it's probably best to jettison this entirely.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect if there is a suitable list as per  WCQuidditch's post.  Religious related broadcasting stations are more notable when we get info the physical paperwork.  After the work that's been put into it, it would be nice to preserve the history.  Karl Twist ( talk ) 11:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  If you are advocating a Redirect or Merge, you need to identify the target article in each AFD you participate in.  One link, and an argument, is what is being looked for.  Otherwise, it looks like this article will be Deleted.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Media in Colorado Springs, Colorado (where it is mentioned as an EWTN station).  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 12:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The information in RabbitEars suggests that article is the outdated one, Slgrandson .  This was once owned by a Catholic group, but it now is owned by Simchat Torah Beit Midrash and offers channels called Oorah TV, Torah TV, Vida Vision TV, and Grace TV.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 16:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of 68 Ventures Bowl broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources that is not a dead link per WP:RS ; one is WP:PRIMARY , one is a dead Twitter post, one is a media guide, and another is about the coverages to all 18 Bowl games.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  Besides being by a banned sock.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and Alabama .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  List of broadcasters for a low level, almost unknown (I'd never heard of it) bowl game.   Fails WP:LISTN and WP:GNG .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 19:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing WP:LISTN .  There is no way that we need a list of broadcasters for every game.  It is suitable for the fandom wiki.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 14:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced and non-notable article.  Policy citations have been said already.  Evident WP:LISTCRUFT .  Bgv.  ( talk ) 06:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jahrbuch: I doubt any of the journals listed are going to be referred to as just "Jahrbuch".  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete cf.  Yearbook (disambiguation) which is not a list of every single article that has Yearbook somewhere in the title.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Redaksi: Sources don't meet WP:GNG , and a search finds nothing better.  Previously draftified, but author insists on publishing, so here we are.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Indonesia .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete // Timothy :: talk 08:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suckapunch Records: Graywalls ( talk ) 11:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Nebraska .  Graywalls ( talk ) 11:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:AUD .  There's some coveranage from Lincoln, NE [47] [48] [49] but nothing else.  Mach61 13:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Even then, two of those look like "what to do in town" listings as indicated by show hours and location and those can be used to fact check artist's background but they shouldn't count towards notability credit.  Graywalls ( talk ) 19:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as not-notable organization.  WP:AUD point is also strong for Delete.  -- Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 10:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A. Q. M. Zainul Abedin: There are two brief obituaries (67 and 72 words).  How much weight should the obituaries be given with respect to notability ?  There's a brief mention that he was detained overnight on charges of defamation, a brief quote of him, and a link to one of the two newspapers he edited, showing his name on the masthead (the other, Dainik Kishan , had a circulation of 3,000 in the late 1970s, neither appears notable).  We have inclusion criteria because enough people need to have written about a person for a full and balanced biographical article to be constructed.  If the subject were notable , then he would have been written about in greater depth.  Worldbruce ( talk ) 05:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Bangladesh .  Worldbruce ( talk ) 05:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Isaac Oti-Boateng: One reference broken, other to self.  Orphan.  Can't see why it  would pass notability test.  Seaweed ( talk ) 18:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Christianity ,  and Ghana .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per several source searches, this subject does not meet WP:BASIC .  North America 1000 15:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emilson Rakotonarivo: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOM.  Greenman ( talk ) 22:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 12:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Bulgaria: Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Europe ,  and Bulgaria .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my rationale in my previous nomination, literally irredeemable list.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks significant coverage to meet WP:NLIST and possibly is NOTTVGUIDE or WP:NOTDIR per nom.  Might even be issues with WP:V too.  Maybe an article about sports broadcasting in Bulgaria would be notable but a live list of the current broadcasters is not an encyclopaedic topic.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Han Thae-hyok: Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV , but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 15:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete