Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election : Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it.  Should be recreated closer to the election, once actual sources start discussing it.  For similar recent AfDs, see - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Next_Goa_Legislative_Assembly_election (July 2022), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Goa Legislative Assembly election (2nd nomination) (2 April), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Goa Legislative Assembly election (19 May), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election (19 May) I've found some sources for this election, but they're mostly in passing, so I don't think an article right now is appropriate - [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Soni ( talk ) 13:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  Soni ( talk ) 13:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Next elections pass WP:CRYSTAL .  I'm not sure what makes this one different.  (Especially considering the sourcing.)  SportingFlyer T · C 23:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There will be a number of duplicate comments on this given how 5 different AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read).  So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation of NCRYSTAL and similar on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Assam Legislative Assembly election instead of replying the same things 5x.  I'll keep finding sources or replying about sources in each specific AFD.  Soni ( talk ) 23:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SportingFlyer The problem is that the sourcing is completely in passing or just vaguely alludes to things.  1 literally mentions the assembly elections once (in title) saying "The upcoming Lok Sabha elections will be a test for the 2027 assembly elections (this article)." 2 is the same, it's a listicle style video news, asking "Why is Akhilesh Yadav not fighting in Lok Sabha elections" and answering with 5-6 reasons, only one of which is "Because he has an eye out on 2027".  3 is similar.  The only mention of this article is in one throwaway line saying "They're ready to make OBC govt in 2027" 4's only mention is "Congress may extend their Lok Sabha election alliance to 2027" 5 is again only saying "The Lok Sabha elections may tell us how the 2027 elections will turn" Each of those sources have exactly 1 sentence that talks about the article (the next UP LA election) and it's always in context of the Lok Sabha.  It's consistently throwaway and never actually covering the topic in any way.  There is no electoral plans or promises or schedules or anything, it's pretty much just "What we do in this election may also affect the future".  That's not coverage Soni ( talk ) 23:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The event is a notable one and almost certain to take place, which is your only deletion rationale - there's no rule that we have to have specific election dates in order to include an article on an upcoming election, and there are sources which do clearly allude that it will be taking place.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, I'm just rebutting your "Especially given the sourcing" because I have gone through the sources and noted that none of them actually discuss this election other than to say "Something in this other election may also affect the next UP LA elections".  And that's as good as passing.  Compare this to the next Tamil Nadu elections , where there's multiple sources about parties directly discussing the specific next election ( "PMK aims to form TN government in 2026: Anbumani" , for example).  There's a more general discussion to be had on "Should we have an article even if no sources discuss the next election".  I don't plan on repeating my arguments for it in all 5 related (but not the same) XFDs, so mentioning in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Assam Legislative Assembly election .  I believe there should only be an article if we also have some sources about the election, and local consensus at other AFDs agrees.  Soni ( talk ) 02:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Yet another WP:TOOSOON article.  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 07:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Same here.  WP:TOOSOON .  Way down in the future and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content.  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete