hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Abdou Manzo: The now-removed claim that he was the record holder in the marathon is disproven at this website , saying Mohammed Abbas defeated him by nearly 10 minutes.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 04:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Africa .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 04:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment You should retract the part about records faster than the wind, because your source is clearly named athleticsNIGERIA.org, whereas the subject is from NIGER.  Two different countries...  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yup I deserve a trout for that.  struck Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 20:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a national record holder and Olympic flagbearer for Niger.  I think that enduring coverage exists, and as evidence I found a 2009 article describing Manzo as a (translated) "glory of Nigerien athletics" showing he is still active in some form, which I added to the article.  -- Habst ( talk ) 15:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  Our access to sources from Niger is extremely poor; many of their sources from today remain offline, let alone newspaper articles from the 1980s and 1990s (when Manzo would most likely be covered).  There's about 15 newspapers currently operating in Niger , I don't think we really have access to coverage from the 1990s in any of them.  The fact that Habst found an article mentioning him as a "glory of Nigerien athletics" is very significant considering this.  Also pretty notable I think that he was able to make it to three straight Olympics – including when he was 37 – as a runner !  There has to be offline coverage of him based on what has been found.  It also seems that he may have played for the Niger national football team ?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 13:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  Per BeanieFan11's reasoning.  It's hard to believe someone who competed at 3 modern Olympics isn't really notable.  I know they don't get a presumption anymore but still.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 14:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per Habst and BeanieFan11 above.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Johann Eyfells: Insufficient WP:RS and WP:IS sources with WP:SIGCOV .  Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists ,  and Iceland .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG .  @ UtherSRG : , here is alot of significant coverage on him in the Icelandic newspaper database Tímarit.is , such as these [24] [25] [26] [27] .  More can be found here .  Any chance that you might reconsider this nomination?  Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] His death was also reported in the major news publications in Iceland [28] [29] [30] Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are also significant english sources on him on Newspapers.com , including this from the Orlando Sentinel Part I / Part II .  Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I think the 1993 Venice Biennale puts him into notable territory.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources found above.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 18:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Bowling Bowling Bowling Parking Parking: Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 14:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , meets criterion 2 of WP:NALBUMS as it charted in Japan .  Plus I added another reference.  J04n ( talk page ) 15:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , the Japanese chart source is dispositive.  Also discussed in reliable sources from BEFORE search: Rock Extreme and DiPerna .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 22:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per above.  JeffSpaceman ( talk ) 14:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Stnh1206 ( talk ) 04:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Big Bear (food company): I'm on the fence as to whether it IS notable or not, hence why I'm giving this an AfD instead of a PROD, but IMO, it's better safe to nominate this than sorry.  100.7.44.80 ( talk ) 01:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP nominator.   Above text is copied from article talk page.   As for my own view, the article definitely needs better sourcing, and on my first pass through Google there might be enough out there for to meet WP:GNG , but I haven't yet delved into it enough to justify a ! vote either way at this time.  -- Finngall talk 17:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I think I see enough sources to meet GNG here.  [1] [2] [3] [4] I don't know how reliable these sites are though.  Snowmanonahoe ( talk ) 17:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ https://www.confectionerynews.com/Article/2019/10/03/Leicester-s-Big-Bear-Confectionery-factory-to-close-after-122-years ^ https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/240218Z:LN ^ https://www.talkingretail.com/products-news/confectionery/big-bear-launch-halloween-friendly-poppets-format-26-06-2018/ ^ https://www.foodmanufacture.co.uk/Article/2018/08/09/Big-Bear-owner-buys-Black-Jack-chews-manufacturer Delete .  This was the norm back in the day, we used to have many articles like this.  The fact that it may pass WP:GNG doesn't mean it should exist.  It is the same as creating an article about this company in Albania or any company for that matter.  ▪︎ Some1 { talk } 05:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep A food company that was in business for 122 years is quite likely notable.  That doesn't mean sigcov is easy to find, though.  I'm a bit on the fence.  Valereee ( talk ) 15:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Big Bear as a company (which I believe to be the topic of this article) was formed in 2003 to take over brands being disposed of by Northern Foods .  [12] .  It's the factory that's been in operation for 122 years under different owners, not this company.  Rupples ( talk ) 20:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Exactly.  As I said, it is pointless to have bunch of articles about some not-so-notable company.  Some1 { talk } 12:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources by Snowmanonahoe.  // Timothy :: talk 12:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Dany Engobo: UtherSRG (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Africa ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Perhaps a weak keep.  I've done a rewrite of the article and found some sources including The New Yorker [45] , although, the mentions are a tad fleeting yet he is used as an example of popularising a musical style in an Encyclopedia.  I didn't do a check on French sources.  With WP:MUSICBIO , I think his band meets criteria 4 and 7.  I wouldn't oppose having a band page be created Les Coeurs Brises and a redirect made to it from Dany Engobo .  Meanderingbartender ( talk ) 20:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Meanderingbartender's decision.  CastJared ( talk ) 20:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 00:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For further input on Meanderingbartender's findings.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A . fr Google website search doesn't turn up much [46] mentioned about another person during Eurovision in 2010.  He has a listing at BNF (the French National Library), so I think he's released a few records/CDs'.  I'll keep digging.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He appears to have been making music as part of "Les Coeurs Brises" before 1991, then alone in the late 90's/early 2000s, so likely exists in paper sources.  He's mentioned in this book [47] , which Google doesn't have much of beyond a snippet view; it's published in the Congo, so I doubt it will be in many libraries.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I think his notability hangs on MUSIC #7 in particular.  He created a new musical style/dance as described in the article.  And about a paragraph in this book [48] , briefly talking about him, and this [49] , mentioned in an African cultural encyclopedia.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Did on search on BNF Gallica, hoping for newspapers, nothing turns up [50] .  Appears he was big in Africa in the pre-internet era, so not much has been digitized from that part of the planet and time.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Order of the Great Siberian Ice March: No sources provided.  Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards , Military ,  and Russia .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There appear to be plenty of sources in the much longer Russian article.  Meets WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Nominator failed to assess Russian sources.  There are mentions of the insignia even in non-phaleristics works.  Kges1901 ( talk ) 19:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the work done by Kges1901.  𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk ) 12:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of chairmen of the State Council of the Republic of Adygea: The criteria for lists is irrelevant to notability of politicians .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 05:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Russia .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 05:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 05:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and start creating articles on individual elected officials, such as ru:Иванов, Анатолий Георгиевич .  The people listed are all automatically notable under notability of politicians as elected officials of a subnational government.  Adygea is one of Russia's republics.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To be clear, I have never contested its notability.  However, this list contains no extant pages on English Wikipedia for more than 12 years since its creation, although it's not problematic on Russian Wikipedia.  That leads it to be a speedy deletion candidate under WP:G14 .  I will support keep once an article like Anatoly Georgievich Ivanov is created.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 07:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I have created Anatoly Ivanov (politician) , so by my understanding G14 no longer applies and we can keep the page.  Akakievich ( talk ) 10:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The English Wikipedia has an enormous problem with covering major politicians from non-English speaking countries and deleting this would be a step in the wrong direction.  DeVosMax [ contribs • talk • created media ] 11:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
John O'Brennan: -- HPfan4 ( talk ) 09:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politics ,  and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:Prof#C5 at least.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 10:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep .  As mentioned above, passes WP:PROF parts 5, and by the look of stuff like this ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ) from both Irish national news outlets and EuroNews, he passes part 7 (note part "a" of that) too.  ser!  ( chat to me - see my edits ) 11:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  WP:NPROF does appear to be met.  That said, the article needs significant cleanup.  In its current state it is a (frankly embarrassing) puff-piece in which the supposed "references" do not support the text, and it was clearly written by someone (apparently an SPA and/or COI contributor) who was more interested in promoting the subject than in creating neutral content based on reliable and verifiable sources (to discuss rather than to promote the topic/subject).  Guliolopez ( talk ) 16:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  My thoughts are the same as Guliolopez : While the article itself is in terrible shape, the subject of the article is above the threshold of notability.  CeltBrowne ( talk ) 09:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify until the article can be re-written properly.  It's in pretty bad shape.  Problem with WP:NPROF is that it's difficult to find good references to un-puff an article.  SportingFlyer T · C 22:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the usual approach is just to strip it down rather than trying to bolster the puffery that is already there.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep As noted above, the subject clearly passes WP:PROF #5 (and seemingly #7 as well).  Sal2100 ( talk ) 19:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Xela Arias: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Lots of coverage in Spanish, the look like RS [12] , [13] .  Could really use a rewrite.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Arias easily meets GNG as a basic internet search might show to anyone who might never have heard of her.... To make things short  simple and in English, just open Galician_Literature_Day#List of authors honoured on Galician Literature Day to have an idea of her notability.  I am inviting nominator to kindly withdraw.  ( Very strong Keep )- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Oaktree B, sources seem to demonstrate SIGCOV.  Also more coverage here [14] , so looks like there's enough for WP:GNG. - KH-1 ( talk ) 04:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep Reliable sources abound. --Asqueladd ( talk ) 10:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Aquamarine (video game): Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The references already in the article seem to establish notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wait, you mean this isn't about a mermaid?  Anyway, the sources currently in the article are very much trivial coverage, merely WP:MILL announcements, and some are strictly unreliable from WP:VG/S .  I could find WP:SIGCOV in this IGN source that wasn't in the article, but that's about it.  Which is strange since you'd think a game that nice-looking would get actual traction.  It seems like an example of "otherwise interesting game fails to market itself enough for notability".  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I wrote this article around a year or two ago assuming it would get coverage outside of previews, but it never did.  Before submitting this for Afd, I checked for any reviews, and I couldn't find a single one.  There's not enough sources to justify the article, which is a shame because it's actually really good.  FlyingKangeroo ( talk ) 18:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Even preview coverage is fine if it's significant, but most of the previews don't seem like it.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The PC Gamer, Rock Paper Shotgun, and IGN sources make this notable.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) I agree with IGN, but the other mentions are trivial.  Announcements should be distinguished from reviews.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Those are way too in-depth to be trivial.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Mobygames lists a review from "Gameplay (Benelux)" (print magazine) which appears to be same as "PC Gameplay", determined to be a reliable source at WP:VG/S .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 16:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's solid, I am still not convinced to change my ! vote to Keep however.  Besides that, reviews from WP:RS are extremely scant.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 17:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per QuicoleJR and Eastmain's decisions.  CastJared ( talk ) 21:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the IGN piece and PC Gamer review, plus the promise of the Gameplay (Benelux) review puts this over the line for me.  Yeah, the IGN piece isn't a full review, but it's got several paragraphs of description of the game's aesthetics, mechanics and development beyond what's quoted to the developers.  signed, Rosguill talk 02:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Per Rosguill, I think it just about makes it; and the article itself is not offensive so worth preserving.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 09:57, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Zain Masri: Existing media citations serve as a form of promotion.  Charlie ( talk ) 16:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and Jordan .  Charlie ( talk ) 16:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Could be the same person [54] , [55] , but I'm not sure.  The wiki article is about what looks like a tech executive, the sourcing I find is about a young person preserving embroidery; their ages could be about the same.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Maliner ( talk ) 19:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - She is the same person Oaktree b mentioned in the sources.  Masri is the one of the first women from her country to hold such a key position in Google and is known for her contributions to the technology industry.  She has been also the subject of a documentary.  There are also sources in Arabic language.  Jabralgi ( talk ) 04:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep sourcing found seems fine.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Seems to me to meet WP:GNG .  Tollens ( talk ) 00:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep