hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Adwaith PV : The only claim of significance is holding the Indian record for number of karate punches by a teen from a horse stance.   Its a record that does not give rise to notability by itself, nor if there any coverage about this record beyond it being documented in a book about India records.  Whpq ( talk ) 20:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, I couldn't find any coverage of him in RS, and it's been back and forth to draft, where it was declined.  Highly persistent SPA creator suggests autobiography, COI or UPE.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 21:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts , India ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Holding a world record is not an automatic notability pass.  This will probably need WP:SALT at some point as it has been deleted 3 times in the past 24 hours and I imagine that the creator will just keep restoring it until they are blocked from doing so.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for now.  If they manage to advance their career to a point of notability, then the article can be recreated.  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 22:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly a vanity page.  Nswix ( talk ) 23:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A vanity page with no evidence of meeting any WP notability criteria.  Being an Indian, or even a world, record holder does not guarantee notability.  Papaursa ( talk ) 00:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt Blatant vanity page/COI probably written by the subject.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 08:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andriy Nikolaychuk : Sources in article are OBITs with all the normal problems.  BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military ,  and Ukraine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there is no reason to delete this article Salfanto ( talk ) 17:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What could keep the article from being deleted?  Also I got a notification saying that the article had been reviewed Salfanto ( talk ) 16:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Salfanto ( talk ) 17:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC) (you can only cast one "vote" L iz Read!  Talk!  02:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  The reason for deleting this article is stated in the deletion nomination.  There has been no rebuttal of these points of policy and simply stating "Keep" is not an effective argument on why they are not accurate.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cadet College Rawalpindi : Still fails notability criteria.  BookishReader ( talk ) 12:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Lacks SIGCOV in RS, hence fails WP:GNG .  Insight 3 ( talk ) 14:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TVBully : Issues have been left unaddressed since 2015.  Sources is about the criticism of the TV network, nothing on the website at all except for a dead Facebook link.  A CSD would be worthier for this non-notable organization SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Organizations ,  and Hong Kong .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Facebook groups are very rarely notable.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard A. Miller : GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 06:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Oklahoma .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 06:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Miller's biggest claim to notability is his appointment to the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board , a five member appointed state agency that is required to approve pardons.  I'm not convinced either way whether that position meets WP:NPOL , but in a state that is doing more executions than most others the people in charge of determining whether to pardon those to be executed have some degree of notability.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 15:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don’t see the argument here or why it’s open for debate.  He clearly does not meet WP:Notable guidelines and does not merit his own article.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 19:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not sure what is behind this article creator's interest in the parole board, but I see nothing here beyond regular government agency work.  I haven't dug into it but I would not be surprised if other related articles also fail GNG.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marthaline Moore : I am unable to find anything more than passing mentions of the subject.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Liberia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found a squad listing in Inquirer and a passing mention in 2022 Mag but nothing that we can build an article from.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No claim of importance, nothing to establish notability.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 15:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2013 Rajya Sabha election in Tamil Nadu : I suggest it be either merged or redirected to the page, 2013 Rajya Sabha elections .  — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 01:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 02:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 06:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emma Essex : Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lack of reliable sourcing.  The article cites two sources: Mobygames.com is an indiscriminate directory that provides no significant coverage, and Livore.it is a music review site with a short history - and no established track record of reliability.  This doesn't meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST - MrOllie ( talk ) 21:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Heida Mobeck : Perhaps simply WP:TOOSOON Aza24 (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians .  Aza24 (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete , she seems notable by performing a simple Google search but the article only contains 3 references.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 15:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Linda Thwala : All I found were transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
History of alien abduction claims : Delete and redirect to Alien_abduction#History (which could, itself use some sourcing review and improvement).  - LuckyLouie ( talk ) 15:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Paranormal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to Alien_abduction#History as the nominator proposes.  This is just a history of claims, not proven events.  Interested editors can add the Category:Alien abduction reports template at the bottom of appropriate UFO articles, which would then aid researchers with a list.  5Q5 | ✉ 11:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect (or merge) as suggested.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 16:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect .  Yilangderen ( talk ) 06:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Johan Styren : Shellwood ( talk ) 11:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete mentioned in a ton of press releases, but there is no coverage at all that is both independent and in-depth.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 07:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Relatively standard professional profile, WP:NOTLINKEDIN . — siro χ o 05:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J Maine : The page only cites one secondary source and I could find only a single other one on Google.  Loytra ( talk ) 22:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , Radio ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC with no viable third-party coverage.  Any variation of a search of his name turns up next to no results.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 04:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , only sources I was able to find include interviews ( Vibe and VoyageLA ) and brief mentions about his TikTok account ( Variety and Nylon ).  Mbdfar ( talk ) 19:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Neville Grech : Co-founded a company (Dedaub), but I didn't see enough independant coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Seems like WP:TOOSOON .  Kj cheetham ( talk ) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Computing .  Kj cheetham ( talk ) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  This is a high-citation field, so even though he has three publications with triple-digit citations on Google Scholar [5] , I think that is not enough to make a convincing case for WP:PROF#C1 .  Additionally, they are all on cryptocurrency-related projects, so we should maybe also consider WP:NCRYPTO , which sets a higher bar for notability in this area (although not specifically for biographies).  None of the rest rises to the level of notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete cause I don't think this passes PROF. In addition, I think this is a paid creation.  Kj cheetham , did you see Mihir Bhatt ?  Drmies ( talk ) 17:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How can we proceed with the deletion 78.133.60.29 ( talk ) 21:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A patrolling admin will process it after 7 days from this discussion being opened.  - Kj cheetham ( talk ) 21:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bhavan's Lloyds Vidya Niketan : Ratnahastin ( talk ) 01:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 01:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Comment.  Fixed malformed nomination with nested span with subst:afd2 Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG.  AryKun ( talk ) 14:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of recurring Orange Is the New Black characters : Some of it is cited to Twitter and Instagram, plus three sources that tell us that one of the characters is inspired by Martha Stewart.  This fails WP:GNG (and is a fork of the equally badly sourced article List of Orange Is the New Black characters ).  Jontesta ( talk ) 23:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Television ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article is what Wikipedia is not , a massive list of minor characters.  There is already a character list; any character who is actually relevant to readers should be mentioned there, minus the cruft.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of Orange Is the New Black characters : This article feels unnecessary when there is already an article which details all the main characters.  I suggest just merging this article into that one, and remove the unnotable ( WP:N ) characters.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 08:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : just looks to be a retelling of individual plots, precisely what we're WP:NOT .  -- D'n'B - t -- 09:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This material would be better used for an Orange Is The New Black Wiki page, not Wikipedia itself.  TH1980 ( talk ) 00:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not have the requisite sourcing to meet the WP:NLIST .  I'd encourage the article creator and any other interested editors to WP:TRYANOTHER .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gurhan Orhan : My WP:BEFORE did not yield satisfactory results.  Tehonk ( talk ) 00:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete .  Given that all coverage of him is in relation to his eponymous brand, I think we have to evaluate this under WP:NCORP guidelines.  While I was able to find coverage of him and his brand beyond what is already cited in the article, it is almost all built around interviews of Gurhan and therefore does not satisfy WP:SIRS .  Jfire ( talk ) 01:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete