Aquadoodle: A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , There is only PR type articles about the product [10] is typical.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Originally PROD'd, so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge content to Pilot (pen company) and Spin Master .  - Indefensible ( talk ) 18:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Indefensible : I do not think we should be merging a mess of unsourced content.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to decide between Deletion and Merging.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: As above.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SIGCOV to prove notability has been found.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A search will show that references exist online such as https://www.proquest.com/docview/2055576160/C889464995794866PQ/4 - Indefensible ( talk ) 15:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In that case, I would be fine with a redirect since it is a plausible search term.  However, the article content has no sources, so I would prefer to not drop it into another article.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We cannot redirect to 2 article targets.  My point is the content needs to be merged to multiple places and references can be found online to source it.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 16:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Actually, it turns out neither article mentions this product.  What I am saying is that you should add new content about this product to the articles instead of merging content from here, since this article is in very bad condition.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding content for this subject on those articles would be a merge.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 17:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not if you don't copy anything from this article.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There would be material copied from here such as being toy of the year, it just needs referencing.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 18:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why copy it when you could just summarize it from the sources?  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 18:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Besides, a merge would have to leave a redirect behind, and where would the redirect point?  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 18:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The main point is to appropriately preserve the information somewhere on Wiki, not the redirect.  When the article says things like it earned toy of the year, that is already largely summarized.  It just needs to be packaged into the other target articles with suitable referencing, which is the merge.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete