hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sirang Lupa: Another barangay article made/maintained by the infamous Ivan Clarin or his socks.  The only references used – a page from Calamba's official website and a source from the Philippine Statistics Authority – are not strong enough to strengthen the notability of the topic.  The Calamba website may also lean towards non-independent source .  A casual search on news using keywords "Sirang Lupa" AND "Calamba" only yields two results ( source1 and source2 ), both only mentioning Sirang Lupa in a trivial, fleeting manner.  At worse, redirect ( again ) to Calamba, Laguna .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 09:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 09:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It appears to be a legally recognized administrative unit.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 16:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Crouch, Swale dozens of barangay articles have been redirected to their city/town articles, and a few were deleted through AfD's.  Too many barangays (numbering around 40,000) mean too many stubbish or poorly-referenced articles to maintain, leading to frequent vandalisms or addition of unencyclopedic content like lists of schools, hospitals, facilities, businesses, landmarks, or tourist attractions.  The issue was last discussed here (admittedly, there was no firm and final closure).  See also Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines/Frequent discussions/Articles on barangays .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 06:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Calamba,_Laguna#Barangays per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A Google Book search shows it's been discussed in parliament, is the site of a mango farm which has been studied a bit, and was on a map produced by a United States scout as early as 1902.  But it doesn't have a page in Tagalog and further sleuthing was unhelpful.  Not sure what to do here.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Calamba, Laguna .  There is not enough WP:SIGCOV right now for a separate page.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 05:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2018 Luzon lambanog deaths: Article has issues per WP:NOTNEWS .  While unfortunate, this incident is quite common.  See here for some articles from 2019 and 2020 .  I think methanol poisoning incidence are newsworthy yes but not as a Wikipedia article as the most reaction you'll get is either a temporary ban or a a warning given to local distillers.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Philippines . Lenticel ( talk ) 00:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why not a redirect or merge to lambanog ? (I also see that this was already listed in the list of methanol poisoning incidents . --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 07:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm fine with redirect per WP:ATD .  However, I think list of methanol poisoning incidents would be a better target.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] [Edited] Merge {Sorry, i mean} Delete and {i suggest} transfer its content (not necessarily the entire texts) to target aforementioned page .  The problem is that the article, regardless of having reliable sources, fails WP:N in the first place.  It happened that these incidents occurred in a span of less than two weeks, while each of them might be taken as headline story by some media outlets due to casualty counts; yet these incidents had no reported (or had little) impact to the country's lambanog production industry, as well as no known long-term effects.  By the way, please take a look on my searches in Google: (1) and (2) .  Based on these, aside from tallies , some of later events include FDA statement ; other results indicate that similar incidents occurred a year later .  A 2020 article and this study might not enough. — Raider000 ( talk ) 12:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of methanol poisoning incidents#Philippines as an WP:ATD .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 07:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Arrest of Carles Puigdemont in Italy: He was arrested on 23 September and freed without charge the next day, WP:NOTNEWS .  This is not a seriously large case like the charges against Donald Trump.  The Catalan Wikipedia article is long, but is mainly a turgid minute-by-minute of the filing of a legal case, which again is one which resulted in one night in jail and no charges.  As for wider sources of lasting impact, the Catalan website Vila Web's tab on the case jumps from December 2021 when Vox tried to sue to keep Puigdemont in jail, to March 2023 when the stale case was officially closed.  [1] The wider topic of the warrant against Puigdemont and the hypothetical legal basis for his home of Belgium or Italy to arrest and deport him is a subject for an enyclopedia, not this non-event Unknown Temptation ( talk ) 20:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Police ,  and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Carles Puigdemont per nom.  Even if we were to have a more detailed about the prosecution against him, we probably wouldn't want or need an article just about this arrest, but rather we might have an article about the entire case.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Carles Puigdemont and strip out some of the detail. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  No need whatsoever for a separate article.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Fasting during Maha Shivratri: Rules on a Shivaratra fast should be discussed at Maha Shivratri .  I am not seeing a proper WP:SCOPE for this article.  Content is mostly WP:NOT ; some dubious health claims and a general non-adherance to WP:NPOV .  Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism , Medicine , Nepal ,  and India .  Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Maha Shivratri : topic would be better incorporated under the main celebration's page.  What's given now is a strange bit of OR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Maha Shivratri under segment Fasting .  The page has good significant details from some reliable sources which could be merged to segment Fasting in page Maha Shivratri.  Health claims source would be more reliable if coming from a doctor or practitioner or someone from the medical field.  I would recommend only selective details to be merged that draws parallels with reliable sources.  RangersRus ( talk ) 20:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Euchre variations: For example: Dealing variations.  Uncited tactical comment about Euchre with additional cards - the latter is already covered at Euchre .  "Stealing the deal" is about cheating and not encyclopaedic.  McEvoy.  Uncited name for term already covered at Euchre .  Farmer's hand.  Uncited name for term already covered at Euchre .  Picking up the top card.  Options that could easily be added to Euchre if cited.  Making trump.  These are probably genuine options, but all are currently uncited.  Going alone.  These are probably genuine options, but all are currently uncited.  Throw-ins.  Miscellany of dubious options.  Lay-down hand.  Uncited commentary, but the term is covered at Euchre .  Scoring variations and rituals.  Most of this is covered at Euchre .  Bermicourt ( talk ) 19:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and United States of America .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Euchre .  Per nom, mostly covered in the North American rules section of the article.  ayakanaa ( t · c ) 20:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Ping our resident card expert @ Bermicourt : in case they can save this.  Ooops, didn't see they nominated it.  Well, this is a lost cause then -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Euchre variants (or possibly the other way around.  We only need of those two pages, but we definitely need one, as Euchre is large enough already, and most people don't care about the many, many variations.  And I should add that "stealing the deal" is absolutely one of those known variations, something that's legitimately negotiated by players all the time, so that should stay.  William Pietri ( talk ) 17:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Peter Le Marchant Trust: This is despite having a very notable patron.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Partial merge to Princess Caroline of Monaco § Activities which has a mention and could do with a very short note about what the trust does.  Doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG , but is mentioned enough in RS that it's DUE a sentence or two in the encyclopedia.  — siro χ o 06:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
S/2005 S 4: Shellwood ( talk ) 16:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Inuit group along with other similar members of the group as appropriate I guess.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Moons of Saturn or merge to Inuit group , and do the same for the other articles (obviously merging to a different group for moons not in the Inuit group).  The former list already has information about these moons, and it was the redirect target I proposed when this was discussed before (which ended in too many moons being redirected and all of them being turned back into articles).  SevenSpheres ( talk ) 15:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Moons of Saturn , which is the best target and has information on this moon and the others, but merge any extra pertinent information to Inuit group .  This moon clearly does not meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG .  Other moons can simply be WP:BLARed and information merged to the appropriate moon group article if it is clear that they are not notable, although it is worth sending more borderline cases to AfD to assess whether they should be kept.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect the article MICHAEL 942006 ( talk ) 03:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all of these newly-announced moons to Moons of Saturn per above.  Nrco0e ( talk ) 18:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To which article?  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Amitabh Bachchan Falls: — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 08:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 4 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Sikkim .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to Lachung River .  The falls themselves are mentioned in Emptying the landscape: outsider place-making, tourism and migration in Sikkim, India , as well as in a bit of news coverage ( [28] ).  However, I'm not really seeing sources that are ever going to get an article on the falls beyond a stub.  WP:GEONATURAL says that [i]f a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography .  In the spirit of both this and WP:NOPAGE , which says that at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic , I think we'd be better off merging this article on the falls into the article on the river itself, where the falls can be covered in sufficient depth in the greater context of the river where the falls are.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree.  — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 17:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 15:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Chris Krause: Founding a company does not bestow inherent notability, and I am concerned that the citations provided appear to either contain limited mention of the subject in the course of covering said company, or have a PR feel to them.  BD2412 T 22:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 22:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - not a whole lot about him outside of founding Next College Student Athlete.  Seems to be a case of WP:1EVENT .  If there is indeed any notability, then it lies with Next College Student Athlete .  - Knightoftheswords281 ( Talk · Contribs ) 22:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football ,  and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Next College Student Athlete per Knightoftheswords281 and WP:REDUNDANTFORK .  Agree with nom that the sources are aimed mostly at the company, not the founder.  A sentence or two about the subject can easily be included in the parent article.  Stony Brook babble 14:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Opinion polling for the 1980 Canadian federal election: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.  Also wp:not.  Only "Stats only" sources.  North8000 ( talk ) 19:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] BTW I did this for 4 of these articles at the same time: Opinion polling for the 1958 Canadian federal election , Opinion polling for the 1980 Canadian federal election , Opinion polling for the 1949 Canadian federal election and Opinion polling for the 1945 Canadian federal election North8000 ( talk ) 16:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I'm baffled why this was created as a stand-alone article rather than within 1980 Canadian federal election , which is quite short and can accomodate it without the need for a split.  Reywas92 Talk 23:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Reywas92.  — Joeyconnick ( talk ) 16:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a valid SPLIT, but the parent article is short enough to contain the information.  SportingFlyer T · C 00:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Champion Pizza : Does not meet WP:NORG Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  08:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure if we should keep and merge Hakki Akdeniz into this article, or merge this article into Hakki Akdeniz .  There's a good amount of coverage because it's a good story: immigrant comes to NYC, deals with homelessness, hustling at a pizza restaurant, becomes really good at making pizza, opens his own pizzeria, becomes very successful, and donates tons of pizzas to the homeless.  Having an article about Akdeniz -- an article I suspect has some paid editing behind it -- seems more promotional than including the story as part of this article?  But at the same time, the story is more about the man than the store, I guess.  Tough call.  There's definitely at least one notable subject, though.  I think I lean towards keeping and merging here.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 11:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hakki Akdeniz .   The sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT .   The Forbes article was written by a contributor so not WP:RS , Newsfile and the Yahoo articles are press releases, Pizza Today is a trade publication ( WP:TRADES ) and Creative Loafing is a routine announcement.   The Long Island Press article is ok but is mostly about him and largely based on what he says.   I would say merge but the content is already covered in Hakki Akdeniz and incorrect (it was founding in 2009 not 2019).  S0091 ( talk ) 15:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : The pizza chain's story fails WP:NORG .  Yet, it intertwines with its founder's story.  Merging would allow for a complete look at Akdeniz's story, showing his notable impact on the business.  It would focus on the narrative where it fits best and avoid making promotional content separate from its context. -- AstridMitch ( talk ) 04:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Azriel Brown : FULBERT ( talk ) 21:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Judaism ,  and New Jersey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret , of which he is founder.  Djflem ( talk ) 15:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge / Redirect to Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret as he is not independently notable and whatever relevant content here can be merged into the article for the yeshiva.  Alansohn ( talk ) 17:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge