(This discussion is) Off the Record: Someone should search in dutch but subject might not have another name based off filmfonds.nl source in article.  (pinging Mushy Yank de-prodded)  Just i yaya 13:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Police , Internet ,  and Netherlands .  Just i yaya 13:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the ping and note.  I deproDed the page because I believed that what is said in Screen Daily (although presented in an interview, and brief) + screening/nomination would make an Afd more suitable.  It's probably not enough.  The film/piece/project are covered partially elsewhere, but it's hard to say if the IDFA grant is significant enough or if w hat IDFA says about the film can be considered independent.  There are the Variety and BDE mentions (see above and article); Yahoo News has a similar mention ; there's other overage that might be judged significant and independent about the work: Then back to the algorithmic crime prevention Nirit Peled delved into.  Not a futuristic AI fantasy, but something already very concrete.  The latter also applies to the performance inspired by it (this conversation is) Off the Record.  In front of a room full of audience, a police officer (actor Janneke Remmers, with texts from real interviews) and human rights lawyer Jelle Klaas explain both sides of this stigmatising technique.  Concluding with Peled wondering where empathy has gone, and why the algorithm's checklist does not look at the children's positive traits.  They have all been given a digital copy of themselves, but where have they themselves gone?  At that moment, it slowly starts to become clear how we can see this beautiful animation with figures wandering across a hall-wide screen.  They are people, youngsters no doubt, but all wonderfully distorted.  Towards the end, one slowly comes closer and closer, and behind that bizarre, digitally animated mask I thought I could actually see a pair of children's eyes.  An unexpectedly touching moment.  It just makes the thought that we could all be relegated to digital files all the more oppressive.  in Cultuurpeers Filmmaker Nirit Peled will introduce her extensive investigative research into the development of crime prevention algorithms in Amsterdam.  Peled converts information, which is otherwise invisible, or simply incomprehensible, into narratives and images.  Through her forthcoming documentary film Moeders and performative lecture Off the Record she offers a vivid account of the lived experiences and emotions of mothers whose sons have been impacted by algorithmic policing.  ( Fotodok )  All in all (and maybe there's more), I'd rather keep this, but that's just me.  There's no page about the artist so far.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 15:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the Yahoo News page duplicates the variety article I put in the nomination.  I haven't seen the other two before but I don't think fotodok would be independent or significant as it appears to be from a bio of the artist.  The Cultuurpeers page looks reasonably reliable and gives a fine amount coverage.  Let's see we could get another source.  Just i yaya 04:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 15:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage for this film project.  The Fr wiki article is tagged for notability and it relies on mostly primary sources, so not really meeting requirements there either.  I can't see anything that is in a RS; the blurb above is a brief mention.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not independently notable.  gidonb ( talk ) 18:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete