hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Victory Worship: Hariboneagle927 ( talk ) 12:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Christianity ,  and Philippines .  Hariboneagle927 ( talk ) 12:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:GARAGEBAND BrigadierG ( talk ) 13:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The first "reference" is "Log in or sign up to view", only to link to a dead Facebook page.  The rest are just YouTube videos.  Not notable.  Cortador ( talk ) 14:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I recommend looking at the arguments made in the first AfD for this group from last year, in which it was noted the group has some possibly notable achievements in their home country (see also WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP ).  The group also has two somewhat more robust album articles and possibilities for redirecting instead of deleting.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect I don't see anything that makes it warrant to have a seperate article. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Consensus split between delete and redirect.  Relisting.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 01:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I voted a ! weak keep last time, but I just don't see it now with a second look.  Sourcing in the article is all to youtube or primary things.  I can't find anything that discusses this group.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Victory (church)#Victory Worship where it is already covered, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Victory (church)#Victory Worship : current sourcing is only facebook and youtube, that's WP:PRIMARY.  other than that, not notable enough itself.  Password (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Around The World In Seven Minutes And Four Times On Saturday: PROD removed Donald D23 talk to me 22:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Donald D23 talk to me 22:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Robert Sidaway#Best of British and Winchester Pictures , where the production is mentioned. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WYGA-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 09:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 09:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : This station has been around a bit longer than many other HC2/Innovate stations, but it doesn't appear to have ever been anything other than a carrier of full-time national services—or, more relevantly, the subject of any significant coverage —in all that time.  A remnant of the looser inclusion standards of 2006, and another nominal survivor of the 2023 bulk nomination of many HC2/Innovate station articles, WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Corey Makelim: There are a couple of interviews available ( 1 , 2 ), but nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) A possible redirect is 2017 Rugby League World Cup squads .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league , Australia ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Undecided Given his career their should be more sources available.  Current level of sourcing is borderline for notatability in my opinion, but more closer to delete than keep.  Mn1548 ( talk ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Maguire Seven: Article length at primary topic does not justify a split.  Split article creation seems fairly recent, and the subject can be covered with the Guildford Four at the primary article.  Redirect to that article looks like the preferred outcome.  — Paper Luigi T • C 04:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree per nom.  Much of the two topics overlaps.  Any valid additions can be made to the combined article.  The newly split article already gets on a wrong foot with a strange introduction.  Str1977 (talk) 10:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment John Donaldson, of Lymington presided over the trials of the Maguire Seven in 1976 and the Guildford Four in 1975- They are different subjects each meeting the requirements for a unique wiki page.  Hazardous to Health ( talk ) 13:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How is the fact that the same judge presided over these two trials an argument for separate Wikipedia articles.  The two subjects have a lot of material in common - only the details of the allegations and the original trial - minus the common judge - are different.  Str1977 (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Yes, the Maguire Seven are generally covered in the context of the Guildford Four, but not exclusively.  A paper from 2022 compares them to the Birmingham Six , as does an academic book from 2019.  There's also some coverage in Russian of them as a standalone group of people.  I understand the reason to merge here is WP:NOPAGE , but I do think it's possible to have a separate article on the seven without overduplication occurring.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Guildford Four and Maguire Seven : I see no advantage to keeping the new, inferiorly-sourced page as a content fork.  The encyclopedic value of the two cases is combined: anyone looking for one is likely to be interested in the other as well.  There's little point in splitting the two and requiring readers to click the "See also:" link.  Owen× ☎ 13:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jethro Felemi: JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Tonga national rugby union players Coverage does seem to be limited to match reports, team announcements etc, @ Jevansen : has created/updated a number of Tongan internationals from the period, he might be able to find more, however for now the redirect is a suitable WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yoke Kuan High School: N niyaz ( talk ) 10:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 8 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of schools in Selangor .  I suggests to refer to the

Discussion outcome: redirect
Haka in popular culture: My BEFOFE does not suggest that the broad concept of "Haka in popular culture" exists outside Wikipedia.  The article simply discusses some uses of this dance outside traditional venues.  Some facts like this can be mentioned in the article about haka, but there is no need to split that, and titling this "in popular culture" is pure OR.  Please note tha that much of this article is a copy of Haka#Cultural_influence , so an WP:ATD can involve redirecting this there (that said, that section likely needs trimming for the same reasons as outlined here).  Half if not more of what we have here is also a dupe of the better defined Haka in sports .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance , Popular culture ,  and New Zealand .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This particular list-disguised-as-article does at least cite some decent references.   But they are all simply verifying that a group of people did the Haka at some event; none of the sources I can access discussed Haka in popular culture at all.   Nom's suggestion of a redirect would also work for the reason given.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Haka#Cultural_influence - This seems to be a rather unnecessary WP:SPLIT , as the Haka article is not so long that a spinout would have really been needed, and most of the information here, including the links to the related full articles, is already present there.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zujkowszczyzna: Similar case as Czarnorzeczka .  It is a small colony within Kamienna Stara .  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 15:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:GEOLAND as a populated place, there's at least one car repair place located there.  Agree there's not much we can say about it but it's not fictional, wouldn't be adverse to merging this into a new article of a list of villages in the area somewhere.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SportingFlyer It is legally recognized, but it is merely a sub-unit of Kamienna Stara (see Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka or here ).  Most parts of settlements don't get their own pages (a car repair place definitely wouldn't differentiate it), so it would probably be better to redirect it to Kamienna Stara .  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 23:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kamienna Stara of which it seems to be a part.   The list of villages is at Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka but I think the parent village is the better target.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kamienna Stara .  No stand-alone notability apparent, part of a village.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to an appropriate target.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
JungleTac: ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: China and Hong Kong .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I could not find significant coverage in my searches for sources.  The company's website is no longer available.  I could not find the company's Chinese-language name even after checking archived versions of the company's website like this one from 2010 .  The company does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria .  Cunard ( talk ) 07:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If it isn't notable, it could possibly be made into a redirect page to the Vii?  That was the most notable JungleTac product as far as I could tell.  Dr. Precursor ( talk ) 20:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Dr. Precursor ( talk · contribs ), that's a good suggestion.  Redirect to Vii (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  This article from PCMag verifies the connection: The massive success of the Wii was a boon for bootleggers.  Since Nintendo's console wasn't particularly beefy from a technical standpoint, cheap knock-offs didn't have far to go to catch up.  Chinese bootleg manufacturer JungleTac rushed the hilariously ratty "Vii" to market in 2007 to capitalize on buyer confusion.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails WP: N .  I found a mention of one of their consoles in a PCMag article and a few mentions in a book, but nothing more.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 00:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Vii PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 12:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Operation Sand Flea: RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 05:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Panama ,  and United States of America .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 05:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with United_States_invasion_of_Panama .  killer bee 08:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with United_States_invasion_of_Panama .   – Nirvana Today t@lk 05:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to United States invasion of Panama#U.S. rationale , where this is mentioned.  I say this, instead of arguing for a merge, out of a concern regarding the quality of this article's content; much appears uncited or cited to an unreliable source.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with the United States invasion of Panama article.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 00:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Queen Industries: My WP:BEFORE is not showing anything except some plot summaries (unless you count the the tirial list of media this entity appeared in), which is what is also solely present in the article.  Redirect to Green Arrow per WP:CHEAP / WP:ATD ?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green Arrow - Fairly obvious redirect case.  Searches for sources are not really turning up anything that isn't just mentioning/describing the company as an important component to Green Arrow's character, making it a pretty clear WP:NOPAGE situation.  The company is mentioned throughout the Green Arrow article already, so a merge would not be needed.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 14:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green Arrow agree that its a natural redirect target and there is really no information to merge.  Rhino131 ( talk ) 16:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green Arrow .  No reliable coverage to merge, but there is a valid WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KUAM-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KUAM-TV : in some ways, this LPTV was essentially a "subchannel" before digital subchannels could even exist.  Despite its major network affiliation, I doubt any coverage that might exist here would still establish any separate notability from the larger KUAM-TV.  (Owing to the lack of present sourcing there is nothing to merge.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Barbie Fashion Show: An Eye for Style: QuietCicada - Talk 00:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Toys .  QuietCicada - Talk 00:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : page 300 of this non-English book appears to have a few sentences covering the game, and IGN published this article about the game around the time of its release.  Left guide ( talk ) 07:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't access the book, but the IGN's article is just a republished press release from the publisher, so a WP:PRIMARY source.  Jovanmilic97 ( talk ) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jovanmilic97 : it should be accessible through the book's search/preview function here (it is for me anyways).  Result 3 of 3 is the index listing and results 1 and 2 are for the actual passage (I think the book is in Spanish), feel free to take a look.  Left guide ( talk ) 09:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Barbie video games .  Not seeing the standalone notability here.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Barbie video games as suggested - the sources as they stand fall fairly short of notability, and I was unable to find anything else that would help get closer to that.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 08:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DZRH Hataw: No awards or any good supporting references from GBooks, GNews and GNews Archives.  Alternatively , redirect to List of programs broadcast by DZRH/DZRH News Television .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 11:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs broadcast by DZRH/DZRH News Television#DZRH News Television-produced Although we generally don't keep radio show articles, this has a programming list to redirect to as a good ATD.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Before we can consider redirecting, the topic should be mentioned in the target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 17:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Sandstein : clarified that Radyo Hataw is the televised adaptation/simulcast of DZRH Hataw in proposed target article.  Lenticel ( talk ) 23:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs broadcast by DZRH/DZRH News Television#DZRH News Television-produced .  Fails WP:RPRGM per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 06:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect