hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Histioea excreta: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Not sure why the nom says it doesn't meet WP:NSPECIES .  It appears to be a validly named species, so it would actually meet that expectation.  Unless there's been some name changes, disputes, etc. I missed, I don't see the article going anywhere.  KoA ( talk ) 12:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Perfectly fine taxon, valid name; LepIndex is reliable, and other DBs agree [23] .  Why would this not meet WP:NSPECIES ?  What's up with all these weird taxon nominations these last few days?  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 07:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - notable.  Meets WP:NSPECIES -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Edwin Smith (rower): I have been unable to find enough reliable references.  TheSwamphen ( talk ) 05:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Bibliographies ,  and New Zealand .  TheSwamphen ( talk ) 05:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have reconsidered this nomination and now believe the subject is probably notable.  TheSwamphen ( talk ) 04:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree.  A silver medal at the Empire Games should make him notable.  Bduke ( talk ) 08:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree that he’s notable.  TheSwamphen , as long as nobody has ! voted "delete".  you can withdraw an AfD.  Schwede 66 19:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator TheSwamphen ( talk ) 23:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Amit Bhatia: Sources are mentions only.  Failing WP:GNG , WP:INVALIDBIO as well as WP:THREE per WP:RS .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 15:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , India ,  and United Kingdom .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 15:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi , England ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Treasure Island (1999 film): I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found one review from the Edmonton Journal via Newspapers.com .   It needs one more reliable and suitable review per NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 04:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 04:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , one more reliable review: Variety [20] Donald D23 talk to me 11:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I speedy withdraw this nomination.   Excellent work, Donaldd23 .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 12:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
K.B.N. Singh: It is not eligible to exist as standalone article.  Admantine123 ( talk ) 04:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 04:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN as the Governor of Bihar and the  Chief Justice of Patna High Court .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Passes WP:NPOL as they were, at one point, the governor of the Indian state of Bihar .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Both the Judgeship and Governorship meet WP:NPOL .  It's highly likely more WP:RS exist about this person, especially in non-English sources.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Passes WP:NPOL as a governor, even an acting one.  Plenty of coverage on GBooks in English, including [28] .  Also, move the article to "K. B. N. Singh", incorporating the spacing.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 20:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW .  Per others above, this is a clear WP:NPOL pass.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Snow Keep Per others above.  Meets WP:NPOL .  Perhaps someone could look for reliable sources in non-english formats and help the article out?  D u s t i *Let's talk! * 23:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Global Alliance of Affirming Apostolic Pentecostals: There's also no information found suitable for the article's preservation on Wikipedia.  TheLionHasSeen ( talk ) 22:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sexuality and gender , Christianity , Florida ,  and Indiana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article is a mess, but the (mostly defunct) organization will continue to factor in the history of Pentecostal churches that affirm LGBT persons.  I added some, but not all, of the references from scholarly sources that mention GAAAP in their studies of the topic.  -- Jaireeodell ( talk ) 23:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, as you have referenced some feasible sources, I'd say keep.  TheLionHasSeen ( talk ) 13:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article definitely needs more sources and a bit of work on tone but I think that due to the sources already referenced, it's kind of a big deal and could get rescued.  ❤History Theorist❤ 23:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Team Klaksvík: Sources in article are what appears to be a team site and a database.  WP:BEFORE finds coverage only for the similarly-named Klaksvíkar Ítróttarfelag , an unrelated football team, and https://partillecup.com/en/post/handball-is-getting-bigger-in-the-faroe-islands , which I don't think is independent.  Perhaps Faroese-language sources exist, but I couldn't find them.  A412 ( Talk • C ) 17:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 18:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep a lot of Faroese-language sources exist.  On the Faroe Islands handball is the second biggest sport and Klaksvík plays in the highest league.  They also play in the continental cup.  Clearly notable.  Search results of nordlysid and article & [9] .  Also a lot of results if you google "Team Klaksvík site:sosialurin.fo" like [10] .   Or if you google "Team Klaksvík site:kvf.fo" there are a lot of articles from the local tv station.  🤾‍♂️ Malo95 ( talk ) 15:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Palm Bus: In addition, some false information has crept in.  Pacatransports ( talk ) 21:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed the template loop situation that this nomination was created with.  I offer no opinion at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep WP:CSK#1 None of the issues provided by nominator require deletion, they can just edit the article and update it.  Jumpytoo Talk 06:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep: per WP:CSK#1 .  No deletion rationale is being proposed here.  AfD is not cleanup.  User:Let'srun 18:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1 or WP:CSK#3 .  Strongly advise the nominator to read WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP .  S5A-0043 Talk 05:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Martin D. Smith: I have done a quick BEFORE without finding information outside of general sports databases (e.g., Soccerway).  Sources exist for other footballers named Martin Smith (see Martin Smith (footballer) ).  Sources may also exist in Danish.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 20:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Denmark .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 20:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Granted, this was not exactly a very comprehensive article, but now I found [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] .  The coverage looks unusually in-depth and sustained, e.g. looking back on his career 20 years later.  PS.  These all pertain to the correct Martin Smith, and quite naturally they are all in Danish.  Furthermore, I will take it upon myself to actually improve the article with these sources.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, @ Geschichte !  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 03:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources above which show notability.  Giant Snowman 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Geschichte.  Played for one of most prominent teams in fully pro Danish leagues and already has online sources and definitly has more offline sources.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 18:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Elizabeth Purbeck: The entire article is about the two subjects' works, none of which have articles, and the article clearly states that little is known about the authors at all.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and England .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP .  Of course I may be biased as I drafted the article and first posted it not five minutes ago.  The Purbeck sisters are included in several well-established reference works on women's writing, as noted in the references, which indicates sufficient notability to my mind:
 They have entries in the following: Blain, Virginia, et al., eds.  The Feminist Companion to Literature in English .  New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1990.  ( Internet Archive )  Orlando: Women’s Writing in the British Isles from the Beginnings to the Present The Women's Print History Project "Elizabeth Purbeck": Corvey Women Writers on the Web Author's Page "Jane Purbeck": Corvey Women Writers on the Web Author's Page They are also referred to in at least one piece of scholarship on another author: Butler, Cheryl.  " Jane Austen, Netley Abbey, and Gothic Tourism ."  Persuasions Online .  Jane Austen Society of North America (JASNA) 40.1 (Winter 2019).  Accessed 2023-08-07.  — scribbling woman 16:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
DWAC-TV: ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is one of the major UHF TV stations in Metro Manila before ABS-CBN's franchise expired in 2020.  Why nominate this for deletion in the first place?  - WayKurat ( talk ) 14:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 'Lacks coverage'=A way too lazy nominator not wanting to do WP:BEFORE .  We have articles about the networks it originated, where plenty of sources for this station also reside.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Pickle Wars: A few quick WP:BEFORE searches on WP:VG/SE and some skimming of the reference library showed nothing, meaning this game possibly fails WP:N .  Negative MP1 23:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Negative MP1 23:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Reaches into the ancient archives and blows dust off a book - The game seems to have gotten a decent number of reviews such as This , this , this and this , which is already enough to demonstrate GNG is passed.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Christ that was quick.  Withdrawing and adding a sources exist tag to the article.  Negative MP1 01:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 00:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Battle of Haidru (1828): The third and fourth refs, "Journal of the United Service Institution of India" and "Selections from the records of the government of Punjab" are WP:RAJ era sources and thus not allowed.  The last source seems to be merely a Google snapshot.  Here is what Hari Ram Gupta says of the battle: "Having failed at Peshawar, Sayyid Ahmad planned to seize Attock fort from the Sikhs. Its possession by him would automatically clear Hazara and Peshawar from the Sikhs, and it would open the gateway for the invasion of the Panjab. Khadi Khan of Hund secretly alerted the Sikh commander of the fort, and the plan fell through. Sayyid Ahmad, in anger attacked the village Haidru, and put to the sword all the inhabitants, both Hindus and Muslims. On hearing this news Hari Singh Nalwa suddenly appeared on the scene and massacred nearly three-fourths of Khalifa's Ghazis. Sayyid Ahmad managed to escape to the west of the Indus."  Rishi Singh says: "It appears that even when he seemed successful, Syed Ahmad began losing his control over the tribal leadership. Many tribal chiefs began betraying him. For instance, at the time of taking over the fort of Attock, Khadi Khan  of Hund alerted the Sikh commander, Hari Singh Nalwa, who with his 20,000 men attacked Syed Ahmad’s forces and killed three-fourths of the Khalifa’s Ghazis".  I think this content would be better suited in the exploits and military campaigns of both Hari Singh Nalwa and Syed Ahmed Barelvi, I don't think the amount of coverage in both sources, which are small paragraphs, justifies an entire article, though I could be wrong.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 15:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps this could be redirected to the page Military campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa ?  The battle is already listed there- [11] , and I think that on its own is sufficient.  An entire article is superflous.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 16:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Pakistan ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator: Best suited for a RFD to Military campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa instead.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 02:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ladies and gentlemen (salutation): Thanks, DIVC.  Drowssap SMM 13:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Drowssap SMM 23:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTDICT ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 04:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Keep since the article is now cited, and the article is now going into the significance of the salutation historically.  ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Delete -- Weak Keep -- The recent changes by Darcyisverycute just barely (imho) move this to the 'good' side of DICTDEF.  There is just enough backgound and foundational info to make it 'more than'.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 13:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC) // Original: The article as it stands is a DICTDEF, but a future article could be created by someone knowledgeable in the field.  The phrase has a storied history and has evolved over the last century.  Without subject-matter expertise, however, there is virtually no method to research this.  I know some of the that history and I can't even come up with WP:THREE .  There just is no way to separate the wheat from the chaff in searching books, journals or other sources with two of the most common salutatory terms in the English language.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 17:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge -- I believe that we should merge this article with Salutations , more specifically, be put under the English section Положение - Userpage 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC) 22:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak merge : Unsourced dicdef.  Ping if sources found.  Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 02:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, with thanks to DIVC.  Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 13:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have found some sources and rewrote the article, I kindly ask participants in the AfD to examine and reconsider deletion.  I cannot find citations supporting specific usage or the irreversible binomial nature in Vaudeville material, so I have removed these statements that would be otherwise unsourced, with no prejudice to adding the statements back at a later date if sources can be found (likely WP:OFFLINE ).  @ Queen of Hearts Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 13:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Obadiah H. Platt: Not to mention the article is orphaned, so there's no reason for this to exist.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  TheBritinator ( talk ) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Christianity .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Was a WP:BEFORE search conducted?  Judging by the nomination statement, it does not seem like it.  Please see WP:NEXIST for why a before search is important.  Also, being an orphan or very short are not valid reasons for deletion, as WP:Deletion is not cleanup .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, for a start it wasn't actually orphaned: he is mentioned in the History of Tampa, Florida article.  St Anselm ( talk ) 21:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I have added several sources to the article.  St Anselm ( talk ) 21:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep