hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Henry Robinson (scientist): In 1850 he was listed as auditor and council member of the same, [1] and that's all I got from a BEFORE .  Seems like a very odd choice for an article to be honest.  -- D'n'B - t -- 19:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Annual Report of the Yorkshire Philsophical Society MDCCCL Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and England . -- D'n'B - t -- 19:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Way too little here to justify notability under WP:BIO .  Nsk92 ( talk ) 19:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  For a little while, I thought this Henry Robinson might have been the civil engineer who was the author of "River Pollution" and Sewerage and Sewer Disposal (1896).  I don't think that Henry Robinson is notable either , but his writing was at least influential in the late 19th century debate in England about whether rivers were inherently "self-cleaning" or whether pollution needed to be managed.  However, they're not the same person.  This is clearly about the Henry Robinson who is the subject of this "article"; his son Charles Best Norcliffe discusses his "late" father.  That was published in 1884, so the author of the 1896 book cannot be the same man.  With that in mind, I have absolutely no idea what this article was trying to accomplish.  I think I can find references for the claims it makes, but why ?  There's nothing here or, so far as I can tell, elsewhere to suggest any particular level of notability or importance.  Lubal ( talk ) 19:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not enough here for notability.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 00:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] delete the only references to him were in the YPS minutes and the York directories.  I suspect that he may have been a fine fellow, but not especially notable even during his lifetime — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Is this him [7] ?  Talks a bit about the person, but still not enough for keeping the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nope, that Henry Robinson wrote in the 17th century, while the article's Henry Robinson was active in the mid-1800s.  Lubal ( talk ) 00:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no allegation of notability nor any evidence therefor.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HTML-Kit: There's some brief coverage in books but nothing significant other than "it's an HTML editor you can use," and nothing else I could find that seemed reliable.  Survived an AfD in 2005 solely on the basis of being "well-known."  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : The prior AfD (which was long enough ago that it was actually a V fD) is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTML Kit ; the article was renamed a few months after that nomination.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Because of prior deletion discussion, a Soft Deletion is not an option here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Usual software fluffery.  Unreferenced since 2005.  * Pppery * it has begun... 16:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG, unsourced, nothing found that meets WP:SIRS .  // Timothy :: talk 10:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chae Tu-yong: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 08:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: This subject fails all notability guidelines.  User:Let'srun 00:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
8964 (disambiguation): ltbdl ( talk ) 06:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  ltbdl ( talk ) 06:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree there appear to only be two pages that are likely to be sought by visitors to this disam page, and this can be sorted out by a hatnote.  I'm not sure which is the more likely target tho.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : have retargetd 8964 to the section on "Naming" where it is mentioned, and moved the redirect hatnote there too.  No link needed to the 9th millennium, any more than for the other 999 years of that millennium.  Pam D 08:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is barely even a ONEOTHER situation: other four-digit numbers do not redirect to the minor planets they are associated with, even when (unlike 8964 Corax) they actually have articles: e.g. 8013 does not redirect to 8013 Gordonmoore .  There's certainly no need to include 9th millennium , which redirects to timeline of the far future and has nothing to say about the year 8964.  Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk ) 11:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Susan Binau: Does not meet WP:N , references cited are either not connected to notability, or passing remarks or self-published/promotional material, or completely irrelevant of the subject.  Strong indication of WP:COI .  Bulk of the article is written like a promotional material for subject's books and charity, violating WP:PROMOTION .  Sabih omar 18:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Denmark .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 18:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , very PROMO.  Sources 17-19 are synth.  They don't discuss this person, only the sound method used in treatments.  Too many sources to wade through in Danish, no article in any other language wiki is a red flag.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aaliya Siddiqui: The films perhaps are.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't pass as per WP:PRODUCER , no notable films and no in-depth coverages from reliable sources.  DSN18 ( talk ) 21:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Holy Cow (film) already gives her producer credits.  WonderCanada ( talk ) 10:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SS Jassim: Doesn;t appear to have enough coverage to meet GNG.  Acroterion (talk) 01:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  First two sources in the article are unreliable.  Web searches aren't convincing either, and do not have signficant coverage of the event.  Delete per nominator.  Tails Wx ( they/them ) ⚧ 02:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sudan-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete after a unconvincing source search though note I didn't search in Sudanese media.  Would like to keep this if any other sources beyond "cool places in Google maps" can be found - there's a mention in a diving the Red Sea book though.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation , Norway ,  and Bolivia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no WP:RS sources cited, so fails WP:GNG .  Seems to be just another non-notable shipwreck.  - Ahunt ( talk ) 12:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Šimon Horniak: Had a first-tier career that lasted one or two minutes , and nothing in the way of biographical sourcing.  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 09:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – I can't find any coverage of him on Slovak news websites.  SME sub-website My Nitra is only a passing mention in squad announcement, and very unlikely to coverage due to being paywalled.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 10:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Just Visiting (band): WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources provided and it is hard to find anything in Google due to do commonality of the name.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 01:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parmatma Ek Sevak: No WP:RS coverage found.  Redtigerxyz Talk 17:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Hinduism , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Redtigerxyz Talk 17:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep  - 1. The sect has significant following in eastern part of Vidarbha.  2. Chief Minister of Maharashtra praised their work.  https://x.com/cmomaharashtra/status/815528360415621121? s=46&t=WEvzL9ICcN6GgmjJ3HjA4g  3. Govt of India, Department of Post, released a post ticket featuring founder of the sect, released by vice-president of India.  https://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/amp/vice-president-of-india-released-a-commemorative-postage-stamp-of-baba-jumdev-1380607652-1  4. The article does need a cleanup, but it certainly meets notability criteria.  Not many sources available in English as the sect works in marginalized sections and is not well-documented in academia.  GD ( talk ) 18:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being thanked by someone on Twitter isn't notable.  This article has one source and the rest appears to be copied verbatim from the scriptures/holy texts this religion uses.  I can't find mention of them.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based the lack of sources I can find in English.  If there are sources shown in other languages I’m happy to reconsider.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Drowssap SMM ( talk ) ( contributions ) 02:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No WP:SIGCOV .  Interestingly someone in the early page history pasted a huge dump of unsourced text that is probably a copyvio (though the detector doesn't come up with any significant hits) that still lives on the page today.  It should have been reverted but never was.  Uhai ( talk ) 12:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fabrizio Tassinari: Seems a lot like advertising.  HPfan4 ( talk ) 23:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politics ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I haven't done a WP:BEFORE search, but the nom is correct, the article fails GNG on its face.  (I looked into this very quickly but wanted to leave a quick note.)  SportingFlyer T · C 19:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I think since there is no secondary sources to satisfy WP:V and decent WP:BEFORE should be done per best practice.  I found this book review [2] which might go some way towards WP:NAUTHOR .   I think probably the book The Pursuit of Governance at [3] may be notable, but I suspect he is not.  It needs a better academic search, but no other reviews on any of this work turned up.  scope_creep Talk 11:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - a Google Scholar search indicates he's a prolific academic writer and widely cited.  He's notable per criteria #1 of WP:NACADEMIC .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have replaced two useless citations to books that he wrote himself with citations to independent reviews.  More needs to be done.  Why is it that most of our articles about academics seem to cite their own writings rather than independent sources?  Are academics uniquely thick in that they write this way?  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 13:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete His G-Scholar showing is actually pretty low - a total of 650 cites, and most of his articles have cites in the low 2 digits.  That isn't enough for WP:NACADEMIC .  I found a few places where he is quoted, but that's all.  I also checked Italian newspapers and he doesn't turn up there either.  This was done by an SPA, and the entire upper portion of the article is unsourced, so possibly the creator got the info from him directly.  I don't think we have enough here to keep this.  Lamona ( talk ) 17:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Lamona .  I trust their understanding of WP:NACADEMIC more than my own.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Duwayne Smart: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  18:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Firefly (film series) characters: Has been in CAT:NN and CAT:UNREF for years.  Possible redirect to TV series, but unsure merge is a good WP:ATD as this is all unsourced.  Boleyn ( talk ) 11:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Lists .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This article is completely unrelated to the TV series Firefly (TV series) , so don't redirect there.  Firefly (film series) doesn't exist anymore (speedied in April). – sgeureka t • c 10:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If the film series was speedied, this subsarticle has even less reason to exist.  WP:FANCRUFT .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 20:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete even the main flim article was deleted.  There is already a character list for the overall series at List of Firefly (TV series) characters .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lensa Indonesia: Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Lots of promo, database listings.  Bringing it to AfD instead of CSD or PROD because of past contested nominations.  // Timothy :: talk 12:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as nommed.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 12:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet inclusion criteria for an encyclopedia.  --  Deepfriedokra ( talk ) 17:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; promotional and fails WP:GNG .  141 Pr { contribs } 19:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete