hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mod parrot: No third-party references in the article, and I wasn't able to find any online either.  Omphalographer ( talk ) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Omphalographer ( talk ) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Article does not qualify for soft-deletion, as PROD was previously declined.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 22:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with nom - no independent sources, I also searched and could not find any.  Does not meet WP:NSOFTWARE .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 21:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Parrot virtual machine based on sources available sources, possibly targeting the "Implementations" subsection.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some works of art with a mod theme involving parrots, nothing about this software that I can find.  Trivial coverage even now with the few sources we have.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Parrot virtual machine , it would be better in that article.  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 01:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Parrot virtual machine : As a WP:ATD .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital: The coverage I found were like incidents involving nurses but nothing indepth to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and Singapore .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Mount Elizabeth Hospital : parent subject, if there is no improvement to the article.  – robertsky ( talk ) 02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Mount Elizabeth Hospital .  This appears to be a 2nd campus of the same hospital.  Meets WP:GNG , and in the context of the parent article also meets WP:NORG / WP:NHOSPITAL .  Does not appear to have a substantial coverage independently for a standalone article.  Bgv.  ( talk ) 22:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2023 Joe Biden speech in Vilnius: Politicians give a million of them in thousands of venues.  Coverage is routine and expected of a US President.  Zaathras ( talk ) 21:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Lithuania ,  and United States of America .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 2023 Vilnius summit , the most reasonable place to cover it.  Don't think the speech needs its own article, but it can be mentioned there.  Reywas92 Talk 02:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete did not go off script about Putin, not notable.  I don't see anything about this speech specifically that needs merging, vis a vis just stating the US position on relevant issues in the summit article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Draken Bowser ( talk • contribs ) 07:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 2023 Vilnius summit .  Seems appropriate.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 08:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 2023 Vilnius summit .  The speech itself does not merit an article but it can be covered within an article with a broader scope.  — Prodraxis { talk • contribs } (she/her) 14:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Potentially keep or find another target : the speech seems to received WP:SIGCOV well over a tune of meeting both WP:GNG , WP:EVENT guidelines, for example [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , and etc pieces made in other medias, other than the news stories.  Glaringly, it also wasn't a part of the NATO Vilnius summit's program [9] [10] and as such merging it with the event's article wouldn't be suitable as it is an independent, unrelated event.  Respublik ( talk ) 10:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into 2023 Vilnius summit per Reywas92 and Prodraxis.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into 2023 Vilnius summit .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Hulk (Ultimate Marvel character): One reference to a third-party source, but the mention of this character is very much in passing.  Josh Milburn ( talk ) 07:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  — Karnataka talk 07:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Alternative versions of the Hulk .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 08:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Don't see what to merge, TBH, it's literally just pure plot the entire way through and clearly fails GNG.  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of info.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete excessive information, most of which is already included in multiple different articles.  — Karnataka talk 08:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and possibly merge to Hulk .  The same should be done with Alternative versions of the Hulk .  This is way too much fancruft and too much detail.  Hulk is obviously famous and notable, his alt variants are obscure fan trivia that deserve only to be mentioned in the main article.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hulk .  This article is nowhere near meeting GNG, and falls short of NOTPLOT as well.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with Hulk#Alternative versions of Hulk in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE , but after the results of the other related discussion .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 14:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , i agree with @ Rtkat3 with Alt.  Hulks JosephWC ( talk ) 20:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge, per Rtkat3.  Does not pass WP:GNG and might even be a fork.  Deletion would be appropriate but we should consider WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Small Pieces Loosely Joined: Could just be a mention in David Weinberger 's article.  Zim Zala Bim talk 20:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge - This book seems to meet WP:NBOOK per these two reviews I found on Google Scholar 1 (PDF) 2 .  Also, the phrase "Small pieces loosely joined" seems to have quite a bit of currency even within the citing articles [2] .  Psychastes ( talk ) 07:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge is fine.  There's room in David Weinberger for it, and if anyone wants to expand it they can spin it back out.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Minh Khai station: Cited source doesn't mention this station.  Only other sources I found are three nearly identical articles about a safety drill held near (but not at) this station: [42] [43] [44] Toadspike [Talk] 14:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations , Transportation ,  and Vietnam .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the position data, etc. to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) and redirect there if sources cannot be found (they're most likely to be in Vietnamese, so do check in that language).  There is no reason to delete the information present in the article which will be useful if it is expanded in future.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 18:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge there isn't enough coverage (or content) for a separate article from Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) yet, but there might be in the future.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Functional analog (electronic): I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 06:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete or merge to Analogical models .  Artem.G ( talk ) 07:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Midlands Rugby League Division Two: Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable competition.  Fails WP:GNG .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 12:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Establish how it fits into the British rugby league system - Merge and Redirect to Midlands Rugby League .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of organisations with Morrison in their name: -- T avix ( talk ) 16:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  -- T avix ( talk ) 16:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. AryKun ( talk ) 17:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Lists . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Morrison (disambiguation) . Just about any organization whose name starts with the word will be likely to be abbreviated to the word in some contexts. BD2412 T 19:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Morrison (disambiguation) — Maile ( talk ) 22:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Morrison (disambiguation) per above. // Timothy :: talk 02:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hah! This is like someone took WP:NAMELIST and brought it to its logical conclusion :) -- Joy ( talk ) 08:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with the disambiguation page.  Dympies ( talk ) 02:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
KRPV-DT: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Mexico .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support merge Especially given that this is the only article related to the network that has a single secondary source.  I only made it since somehow there was no article even covering it at the time.  The material in here would be immensely useful for improving God's Learning Channel , which also frankly needs additional historical info if there was significant coverage in the Midland and Odessa papers once they moved their headquarters down to Odessa.  You probably could have tagged this as a merge instead of an AfD.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with God's Learning Channel : It certainly would appear that, for all intents and purposes, the history of KRPV is the history of God's Learning Channel, give-or-take some cable-only years before 1986.  I've wondered at times whether we've needed articles on most of its transmitters — I don't think there's much separate programming on any of them — but never got around to doing anything about it.  (For what it's worth, the lack of an article before 2020 was because a previous article on the station was deleted via PROD in 2011.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It turns out I already have a number of clippings from the Odessa American on them.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Pharagos: The Battleground: I'd have prodded it but frankly I wonder if this is not an outright WP:HOAX as I cannot find any reliable source that even confirms this is a thing (three sources cited are not online and do not mention this in their heading).  Assuming this is not a hoax, I am not sure if there is a possible redirect target (merge is unlikely to make sense, either, given a single footnoote).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Games .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Never heard of it either, but it seems plausible but NN, rather than a hoax.  It references real magazines; someone with access to the archives could check, but it's not clear what should be done with this.  Jclemens ( talk ) 06:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is mention of Phargos here , so maybe not a hoax, but still would struggle to be notable.  It is close to "thing someone made up one day" level.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Illithid .  BOZ ( talk ) 07:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BOZ Why?  And merge what, exactly?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The one paragraph that is sourced can be merged.  BOZ ( talk ) 08:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would also dispute this, since it appears to be fanmade lore and has nothing to do with official lore.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 09:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A second mention, it's real: [26] BOZ ( talk ) 17:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Illithid based on the primary, non-fanmade sources found.  Also appears, without much detail, in this The Gamer article .  Daranios ( talk ) 10:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Jameson Crested Ten: I think the contents of this page should be in a section listing other varieties of the company's products, in the same way as Powers (whiskey) does.  Personally I think short stubs like this about individual products belong in the parent article and not very useful as a stand alone without sufficient prose.  Perhaps the products require their own section.  ww2censor ( talk ) 10:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Ireland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Jameson Irish Whiskey : Nothing terribly notable for the sub-brand, that can't be said by incorporating it into the main brand.  Very fine product too, I do enjoy it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect (or failing that, simply delete ).  Nothing to indicate that this product meets WP:PRODUCT for independent notability.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 16:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above - Spleodrach ( talk ) 12:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2019 Emirates Cup: I'm not sure this isn't just WP:ROUTINE coverage.  It's currently at GA, so wanted a consensus on its status.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 00:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England .  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 00:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per GAR discussion.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 01:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Emirates Cup : per below.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 05:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a very small amount of WP:ROUTINE coverage surrounded by lots of tangents.  And I say this as a die-hard Gooner.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 01:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to 2019–20 Arsenal F.C. season , where it is already mentioned, but any merge should see the content trimmed down hugely, as it's all trivial/fluff.  I note there are articles on other editions of the same tournament that need a look, see {{ Emirates Cup }} .  Giant Snowman 11:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ GiantSnowman : I thought it would have been better to redirect straight to Emirates Cup , :/ Govvy ( talk ) 09:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Even better!  Giant Snowman 18:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge any pertinent information then Redirect to Emirates Cup .  The preseason "tournament" might itself be notable, but I do not see how individual editions consisting of one women's match and one men's match meet GNG.  — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is any more support for a Merge.  And there are two different Merge/Redirect target articles suggested.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It's worth noting that the 2022 edition also redirects to Emirates Cup .  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 10:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Emirates Cup , which is consistent with the 2022 edition, which also redirects there.  No need for separate article, as coverage is WP:ROUTINE .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge