hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sons of Alpha Centauri (demo album) : All sources either are bare mentions, crowdsourced, or affiliated.  Paid creator.  Valereee ( talk ) 11:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Valereee ( talk ) 11:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sons of Alpha Centauri : Found no additional coverage.  Two of the four sources are primaries from the band's own website, one is from Discogs , and the last is a single sentence in their AllMusic bio.  I know nothing about any PAID / COI violations.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 12:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sons of Alpha Centauri#2001–2007: Formation and Sons of Alpha Centauri per above, citations support the existence, but not the details, I don't think there is anything properly sourced for a merge that isn't in the target already.  // Timothy :: talk 11:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Unified Code Count : No evidence of significant coverage in independent sources.  Tagged for notability for a decade .  PROD was declined due to a prior REFUND at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 81#Unified Code Count (UCC) , but no party has done anything to address the lack of sourcing.  * Pppery * it has begun... 01:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge extremely selectively to Source lines of code .  This was important work and is still in use by the US Department of Defense.  However there is almost no independent material available for a separate article.  As a note about the earlier days of Wikipedia, one of the papers on the project reports: A Wikipedia® [6] page was set up for the UCC as a structured software environment to record and present project information to the software community.  This wiki is periodically updated by student teams at USC.  StarryGrandma ( talk ) 21:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "periodically updated" in this case appears to have only lasted until 2011.  * Pppery * it has begun... 21:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nina Menegatto : It presents the subject as holding actual positions and titles, which do not exist.  Not to mention that the page uses a few primary sources from the micronation itself.  Presenting a micronation roleplayer as a real head of state is misinformation at best .  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 06:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Women ,  and Italy .  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 06:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak keep - there are a few fairly long media reports in addition to those on the page.  There may also be more in non-English publications.  On that basis, in my opinion the GNG is met.  JMWt ( talk ) 06:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the content from reliable secondary sources to Principality of Seborga .  Insufficient independent coverage for a stand-alone article per Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event .  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 08:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as subject meets GNG (mostly established in non-English sources: [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] , although English sources also exist: [51] [52] [53] ).  Notability is not determined by the validity of her claims/titles/positions/offices.  Many articles exist on pretenders and claimants to defunct and non-existant monarchies.  The question is if Menegatto is has received significant media coverage, and the answer to that is yes.  -- Willthacheerleader18 ( talk ) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Willthacheerleader18 ( talk ) 14:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Willthacheerleader18 ( talk ) 14:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Principality of Seborga .  She is no more notable than her so-called predecessors, Giorgio and Marcello .  Keivan.f Talk 19:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per the user above.  Wolverine XI ( talk to me ) 15:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I sincerely disagree with Di's and Celia Homeford's arguments, however I believe it indeed deserves a redirect as per the user above.  Dem a goras talk 18:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect I don't see how she's notable on her own.  She can be adequately covered on the main page for Seborga.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 08:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Robert T. Huang : Refs are entirely routine.  scope_creep Talk 09:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Taiwan ,  and United States of America .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Synnex (with the history preserved under the redirect) , where the subject is mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 10:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fuckin' 'Ell It's Fred Titmus : I've created several dozen {{ R from song }} s to the band's albums.  I didn't mark any as {{ R with possibilities }} because I didn't think any had them.  This album track and crowd favourite is no different, much as I've enjoyed it for nearly 40 years.  The sources are WP:REFBOMBINGs of track listings and gig reviews.  None suffices to meet WP:NSONG .  Redirect to Back in the DHSS as {{ R from song }} while keeping the categories .  I'm bringing this article to AfD rather than WP:BOLDly WP:BLARing it because it's been around since 2009.  I haven't notified the article creator because they were WP:BLOCKed in 2018 for reasons which at passing glance look irrelevant to this discussion.  Narky Blert ( talk ) 17:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  I love it, but it's just an album track with nothing in particular to merit a standalone article.  -- Michig ( talk ) 11:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  I know this song but wouldn't expect it to have its own entry outside the album page.  Orange sticker ( talk ) 12:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
UW Aquilae : Article likely only exists on the basis of it being a very large star.  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 09:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CU Note : The main author was a sock - it would have been a candidate for G5 deletion had Ozzie10aaaa not done a fair bit of tidying up on the article - their thoughts on its retention or otherwise would probably be relevant.  Girth Summit (blether) 09:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep there are sources that indicate its notable per [31] ,-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk ) 12:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which ones?  All the ones I could find are catalogues which do not establish notability.  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I did find a couple for studies that make mention of "UW Aql", but no more than a few sentences.  I'm on the fence about this one.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 19:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest known stars , where it is mentioned.  This is fairly an obscure star, it doesn't has even a Henry Draper or HIP designation despite its modest brightness of 8.8.  I was planning to redirect it to List of stars in Aquila , but it fails the criteria of inclusion for these lists.  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 19:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Can't redirect to List of largest known stars as that page is a redirect.  At least when I edit Wikipedia, redirects show up as a different color font (green links) rather than articles (blue links).  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Then redirect to List of largest stars because the name changed recently.  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to List of largest stars which is the target of the redirect.  Mangoe ( talk ) 05:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest stars .  User:Hamterous1 ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ ) 11:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ned Napier : While he was the lead in Worst Year of My Life Again I don't think he passes WP:NACTOR as he hasn't had multiple significant roles.  A possible redirect could be to Worst Year of My Life Again.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 01:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 01:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 01:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Worst Year of My Life Again as an alternative to deletion.  The current sourcing of the article is insufficient to serve as a standalone article.  Bandit Heeler ( talk ) 09:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR , no multiple significant roles.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Worst Year of My Life Again : fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  S0091 ( talk ) 14:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
San Rafael National High School (Tigaon, Camarines Sur) : Tooncool64 ( talk ) 02:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tigaon, Camarines Sur#Education where the schools is listed if notability cannot be established, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  Rupples ( talk ) 14:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tigaon, Camarines Sur#Education .  Fails WP:NSCHOOL per nom.  Could've ! voted delete since it's several schools bear the name, but the name is specified to a certain town.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above discussion.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 06:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tigaon, Camarines Sur#Education per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lively Laddie : Tkaras1 ( talk ) 20:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is just a line in the Guinness Book of World Records .   It is not a suitable topic for an article.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bob Champion (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  I added to the article a sentence about Bob Champion in his youth riding Lively Laddie.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 11:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Tkaras1 ( talk · contribs ) and Walsh90210 ( talk · contribs ), would you support a redirect to Bob Champion per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion ?  Cunard ( talk ) 06:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All right.  Tkaras1 ( talk ) 12:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't know why we need to mention a low-visibility jockey 's childhood pet donkey at all, but YMMV.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it complies with the due weight policy to mention the donkey in one sentence of his article to provide more information about his early life before he became a racehorse jockey.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mouse Fitzgerald : The subject is about a single character in a niche show that aired on Adult Swim, hardly the notability required of a Wikipedia article.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 06:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 06:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per nomination.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 07:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Television ,  and Comics and animation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse .  There isn't enough WP:SIGCOV to support a full article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 11:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse ; I'm in genuine shock that someone was even able to give the smallest of detail about this character considering that 95% of the show's viewers (and even their writers) couldn't.  😂 Nate • ( chatter ) 13:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or redirect --even if this were found to be notable, this is still a NOPAGE situation where the content is better covered in the sole media appearance article for this fictional character.  Jclemens ( talk ) 19:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse , which this article was initial created to do until being changed last year.  Zero sources, but it is still a valid search term for a redirect.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse : Per reasons above.  Frankly I'm surprised people care enough about this show to make a page for one of its characters.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse , lacks GNG compliant sources that are needed to show independent notability.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5423:227C:96C8:FF0C ( talk ) 04:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse is appropriate.  Captain ☎ 09:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 12 oz.  Mouse : this is the logical alternative to deletion here, especially since that is what it was for seven years before being converted into an article only last year.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Warwick Police Department : WP:FAILN - organizations local to a city, town or country maybe added to respective article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warwick,_Rhode_Island Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 6:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC) Note : I have fixed spacing in the header that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Rhode Island .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redir to the city government, as the only non-routine information has to do with it being featured on a reality show, a matte which can be disposed of in a sentence.  Mangoe ( talk ) 10:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the applicable city government, as Mangoe suggests.  71.246.78.77 ( talk ) 12:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Checkuser blocked.  Queen of Hearts talk 23:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Mangoe; ping me if sources are found.  Queen of Hearts talk 23:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hessenford railway station : Any content would be better at St Germans & Looe Railway - but not convinced even a redirect is necessary.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and England .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merging if NN to St Germans & Looe Railway would probably make sense as it does seen like a useful term as we normally do have articles for completed stations.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 17:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to St Germans & Looe Railway .  There's nothing here to merge, but it's a useful redirect to capture the search term.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 03:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DYAN-TV : A search by "One Sports 29" "Cebu" and DYAN-TV does not seem to yield any results providing significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources.  MarioGom ( talk ) 17:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 17:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment a possible alternative to deletion would be redirecting to One Sports (TV channel) .  MarioGom ( talk ) 17:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to One Sports (TV channel) unless the Cebu transmitter had local programming, which I doubt.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 18:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tsvetana Mancheva : JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect