hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Fernand Gandaho: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 02:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cycling ,  and Africa .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 02:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete upon research, the only thing I can find of him is some reference websites that briefly mention his one year at the Olympics, and one interview of him about him that isn't even about him cycling.  Heart (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep WP needs more Africa content, even if short; WP:IAR Jack4576 ( talk ) 09:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Heartglow's search confirms WP:BIO is not met.  Being African is not a criterion for notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Benin at the 1992 Summer Olympics .  I couldn't find sources to show notability.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 17:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment His full name is Fernand Coffi Gandaho, perhaps something could be found with this more precise search?  Kingsif ( talk ) 20:09, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cycling at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's individual road race or Benin at the 1992 Summer Olympics .  Seacactus 13 ( talk ) 22:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Benin at the 1992 Summer Olympics .  BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Single source in article is not SIGCOV, keep votes provide no sources.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  No objection to Cycling at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's individual road race as target.  // Timothy :: talk 21:45, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cycling at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's individual road race .  Non-notable athlete only competed in the road race event.  Paulpat99 ( talk ) 03:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fictional geography: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 03:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , or redirect to Fantasy cartography .  All the info in Fictional geography should be (and most or all already is) in Worldbuilding and/or Fantasy cartography .  Mark in wiki ( talk ) 06:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Fantasy cartography , per

Discussion outcome: redirect
Holley Motor Car: JMWt ( talk ) 19:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Retain as there are independent sources about the article subject, though it was originally poorly written.  I'm going to rewrite it within the next few days.  AriTheHorse 19:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Though you could possibly merge it with Holley Performance Products AriTheHorse 20:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm disagreeing with myself.  All of the relevant contents of this article, except for a small description of their first car, is contained within Holley Performance Products .  Agree that this one should be deleted.  AriTheHorse 03:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] AriTheHorse , if you no longer hold an opinion that you've bolded, then please strike it out like this .  Thank you.  L iz Read!  Talk!  05:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the tip!, will do.  AriTheHorse 05:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Holley Performance Products .  The car manufacturer is more or less a predecessor of that firm, and such information is worthy of inclusion there.  -- Sable232 ( talk ) 02:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Basically the entirety of the article is already contained in Holley Performance Products … AriTheHorse 02:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anna.aero: As this has been in CAT:NN for 14 years , I really hope we can now get this resolved.  It exists, but I couldn't find that sources to show it meets WP:N.  Boleyn ( talk ) 05:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it's a WP:RS , but there isn't much coverage on the publication itself.  feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 ( talk ) 07:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aviation Week : Defunct website, with little notability found per the sources used.  I don't find mentions of them beyond passing mentions.  I'd be ok with a selective ! merge into the same article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
RanoGaz Company - LPG: Refs are not about the company, rather about people complaining about the high price of gas.  Fails WP:GNG .  There remains a draft ( Draft:RanoGaz Company - LPG ) which has had several reviews but remain unapproved.  This new version appears to be an attempt to avoid review.  Velella Velella Talk 21:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Velella Velella Talk 21:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to AA_Rano_Industries#Subsidiaries .  Lacks individual sigcov to meet WP:NCORP .  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 14:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to AA_Rano_Industries#Subsidiaries .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star (series 4): Star Mississippi 22:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Star Mississippi 22:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star#Series 4 (2022) .  Fails GNG, sources found are primary, listings, and promo.  // Timothy :: talk 16:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star#Series_4_(2022) : no sources to support a standalone article about Series 4.  Owen× ☎ 01:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Phantom Steve / talk ¦ contribs \ 08:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Godzilla Trading Battle: Searches in either English or Japanese only yielded trivial mentions or entry on websites of its fans.  Lacks enough coverage from IS to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Note that I already found this review and it's really hard to believe there is nothing about it in Japanese language print sources given it was a Godzilla franchise game.  So there is probably something else out there.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've checked Newspapers.com and the company's website [1] but there is nothing about the game.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 10:05, May 28, 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG.  It exists, but it's certainly not notable, to the point where none of the companies involved (Toho/U/Tao) have ever showcased the game on their website or elsewhere.  Outside of that, and apart from a short interview from one of the game's illustrators, I could not find anything substantial, both for the game's translated and original title.  Toyota Impreza ( talk ) 14:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Toyota Impreza : Given that its existence can be confirmed by reliable sources, a deletion wouldn't be proper.  At the very least it would merit a redirect to List of Godzilla games .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Godzilla games .  Unable to find any further sources - no prejudice towards recreation if sources are found.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Godzilla games .  Fails GNG, only source isn’t reliable, appears to be a forum type site.  - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 01:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pretoria Wireless Users Group: Virtually all the news about this organization comes from 'mybroadband.co.za', a rather niche trade publication focused on broadband which does not appear in the searches.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 04:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and South Africa .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 04:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to South African wireless community networks as ATD.  There is a plausible claim of notability in the article but I can’t find sources to support it.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to South African wireless community networks : Per ATD.  Can be expanded in future if needed from the history preserved under redirect.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
ARIA Country Album Chart: I suggest merging this to the article ARIA Charts .  Ippantekina ( talk ) 03:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Popular culture .  Ippantekina ( talk ) 03:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Country music is just as popular in Australia as it is in the US; sources could be used for the longest-runners part, but you clearly can't dismiss this as a 'niche' chart in the discussion of music in Oz and its otherwise a finely-sourced article you'd expect about a domestic chart.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ MrSchimpf : We don't even have an article for the all-genre album chart ARIA Albums Chart (which is a redirect to ARIA Charts ) let alone a genre-specific chart. .  I never argued that country music was not popular in Australia, my argument is that if the only references used are from ARIA itself and not other third-party sources, it is not notable.  Ippantekina ( talk ) 02:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Got a point, ARIA sources are considered primary, article needs sources independent from the subject.  dxneo ( talk ) 04:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not just Aria write about this chart whichh is not surprising due to the popularity of the genre i have added a record to the page i want this page kept ( talk ) 17:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Ippantekina - the sourcing's pretty scanty.  Not sure what's in there of significance to merge...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , complete lack of SIGCOV.  All mentions are for an individual artists' performance on the chart.  Mach61 ( talk ) 00:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
John Murphy (1900s footballer): * Pppery * it has begun... 21:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 21:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 21:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Bradford City A.F.C. players (1–49 league appearances) - firstly, the claim that there was "general agreement" at the RM mentioned by the nominator is misleading at best; one user said "I'm not sure if this player is even notable with just one appearance but that can be discussed separately" and that's it.  Secondly, at the RM I suggested a redirect, and that seems the most sensible ATD.  If the nominator had taken the time to consider that then we could have saved a lot of time with this AFD.  Giant Snowman 21:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There was also Govvy's comment Close and delete No point in a redirect .  I'm more in line with Govvy's thinking - the title is both ambiguous and not a likely search term so a deletion is IMO better than a redirect.  * Pppery * it has begun... 22:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Supporting redirect per GiantSnowman and what I said on that RM in December 2023, where the quoted text is used above.  Iggy ( Swan ) ( Contribs ) 21:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 14:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  I'm tempted just to vote delete, though, given that he made exactly one appearance.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ah Pak: This is an important figure only in regards to their role in the Ningpo Massacre , so I recommend to delete per WP:NOPAGE .  SilverStar54 ( talk ) 08:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and China .  SilverStar54 ( talk ) 08:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Portugal .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 08:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note to admins: Idk if relisting is required in this sort of circumstance, but given that this is (at least in my opinion) a non-notable article, there might not be any other editors interested in commenting.  SilverStar54 ( talk ) 05:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ningpo Massacre where he is mentioned.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eugene Concrete: I can only find mentions in passing in Korean of this company (e.g. [20] ).  The parent company Eugene Group is notable though.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 03:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Korea .  toobigtokale ( talk ) 03:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eugene Group , where it is listed as a subsidiary.  ✗ plicit 05:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Our A-Story Is a 'D' Story: Tagged for notability since 2019.  A BEFORE yielded zero reliable and independent reviews.  This episode is already covered in BoJack Horseman (season 1) , so a REDIRECT may be a viable WP:ATD .  Donald D23 talk to me 22:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 22:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  174.27.4.51 ( talk ) 02:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems fine, I can't see any sourcing showing this episode is notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect just like what you said... 174.27.4.51 ( talk ) 03:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to BoJack Horseman (season 1) .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 03:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Yard (podcast): It's been redirected to Ludwig Ahgren a few times so it's probably good to get consensus on what to do with it at this point.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 00:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The first Esports Insider is a RS per sourcetool, but it's not about this podcast.  I don't find any other mentions of this.  I don't think a redirect to the Ludwig person is warranted, the podcast seems to have a few other individuals involved with it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Entertainment , Internet ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I added most of the sourcing after the article had been created, and admittedly there aren't any great secondary sources one could point to.  I think podcasts of its size should generally have an article, but the lack of references certainly makes it hard.  Regarding what Oaktree b said, the three other hosts are his friends/former roommates and all work for Ludwigs production company and unlikely to ever get their own articles, so a redirect and section in his article should be fine in that regard (at least better than nothing at all).  Coverage of influencers has improved over the years, but their side-projects are still lacking, even if they are the same size as something like Chapo .  -- jonas ( talk ) 11:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirct to Ludwig Ahgren .  When looking for sources I'm not finding much more than social media .  Whenever I see a list of guests like the one currently in the article I normally blank it and the show does not WP:INHERIT notability fron its guests.  Also, YouTube is not a reliable source and that currently makes up the majority of the cited sources.  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 12:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The YouTube sources are links to episodes where the guests have appeared.  Arnar with rn ( talk ) 14:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ludwig Ahgren .  per above.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 10:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect