hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Keivan Zokaei: The attempted notability claim is that he won a minor special-interest award for his writing a decade ago, which would be fine if the article were properly sourced but is in no way "inherently" notable enough to hand him a "no sourcing required" inclusion freebie -- but the only source being cited here at all is a piece of his own writing being circularly cited to metaverify its own existence, which is not the kind of sourcing it takes: we need WP:GNG -worthy coverage and analysis about him, in third-party reliable sources (media, books, etc.) independent of himself, not just technical verification that he exists.  Bearcat ( talk ) 01:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United Kingdom .  Bearcat ( talk ) 01:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  subject has a fair number of citations in business/supply chain-related topics.  [2] — siro χ o 03:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  per WP:NPROF : While Zokaei is cited in some reputable publications, these references are largely tangential or self-written.  Additionally, the vast majority seem to reference only a single publication by Zokaei.  Together, I believe these facts would broadly rule out criteria 1 of WP:NPROF , the only criteria I can see possibly applying.  KJGinger ( talk ) 05:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Business ,  and Wales .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  BLP requires strong sourcing and none is in the article.  BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject (the individual) directly and indepth.  [3] shows they are cited, but none of these address the subject diretly and indepth .  If someone finds SIGCOV about the subject ping me.  // Timothy :: talk 16:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cornell 100+ MPG Team: [Should note that I attend Cornell, but have no connection to this project team] Eddie891 Talk Work 03:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Environment , Transportation ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete God that's ridiculous – sponsors and all the divisions?  This is a prime example of why we tend not to have articles on individual student clubs.  Reywas92 Talk 15:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this kind of feels feels like WP:NOTWEBHOST applies as well.  SportingFlyer T · C 21:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dimitrianos Juliou: Sims2aholic8 ( talk ) 18:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cyprus .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – WP:TOOSOON .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or draftify?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article are database records and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 17:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lesní stadion: Chris Troutman ( talk ) 14:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Czech Republic .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 14:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article claims it was home to the football team from 1957 for a long time, but their current stadium has been in use since 1966.  Even the club's own website doesn't mention that it used Na Lesní as a permanent home.  C 679 10:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above and no sources Yoblyblob ( talk ) 14:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dream Publisher: No sources on the page and a search for sources finds nothing that would meet WP:GNG or NCORP.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Slovenia .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete at this point.  Yes, they exist, but not under the name Dream Publisher, this is Založba Sanje.  And all other names seem to be rough translations that are not used in practice.  There is a chance that notability is demonstrated but it is better that the article is completely rewritten from scratch.  -- Tone 08:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT , continue under title Sanje (publishing house) or similar.  A09 | (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – May meet WP:GNG , but the article is a bit WP:PROMO at the moment.  WP:TNT is right play. .  TLA (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raktabeej: Unreleased films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability .   This article says nothing about production, and reads like advance publicity.   This article has already been draftified twice and moved back to article space twice, by User:Skarmory and by User: Tanbiruzzaman .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] When I draftified the article, the article looked the exact same, except it had 0 citations – it now has 8, primarily Bengali-language sources.  A few of them are from no consensus or generally unreliable sources, and the rest seem to just be parroting the fact that the film has started production without too much unique content.  Meanwhile, in its current state, the article doesn't really have any content past just being a cast and crew listing for a film that is in production.  I'm not familiar whatsoever with film notability debates, but I don't think this currently passes WP:GNG , so I'm going to say Delete , or draftify if the creator (or someone else) seems willing to work on it in draftspace despite moving it to mainspace twice.  (Also, I removed what I can only assume to have been a spare "Raktabeej" that was above the nomination.)  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NFF Donald D23 talk to me 12:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Skarmory Carpimaps talk to me!  12:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jocelyn Kapumealani Ng: Hitro talk 09:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and Hawaii .  Hitro talk 09:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Brief coverage with only four hits in Gnews, but nothing extensive that would help meet notability.  Sourcing in the article isn't useful, 3 and 4 are red per Cite Highlighter, with 5 being marginal.  On the whole, we don't have notability for this artist.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nii Atakora Mensah: Mccapra ( talk ) 07:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Ghana .  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination, appears to fail WP:BIO as only citation #1 seems reliable.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yuri Lushchai: He is unfortunately but one of many war casualties.  Projectify as an obit might be an option?  Star Mississippi 00:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Ukraine .  Star Mississippi 00:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Should this end up deleted, here's hoping someone adds this Wikipedian's death to Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/2024 .  He was one of us, and he should be remembered.  — Maile ( talk ) 02:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry , History ,  and Military .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I remember him as a good Wikipedian, but his notability is indeed very questionable (news reports about his death fall under WP:NOTNEWS).  Finstergeist ( talk ) 20:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Finstergeist , that shortcut tends to be an ambiguous WP:UPPERCASE problem.   Are you thinking of the " Wikipedia is not a newspaper " and does not engage in original reporting part, or the "most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion" part?  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I mean the latter (+ WP:BLP1E ).  Finstergeist ( talk ) 12:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - if final vote is delete, someone should merge this article, or post an archive link to his user webpage.   • Sbmeirow • Talk • 22:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] https://web.archive.org/web/20240413164446/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Lushchai https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:%D0%AE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%9B .  Delete .  Sad situation, but unless coverage can be found other than in death notices, passing mentions, and Wikipedia itself, this belongs elsewhere rather than as a Wikipedia article.  Persingo ( talk ) 01:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Is there a potential WP:NAUTHOR pass here?  Curbon7 ( talk ) 03:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the others above.  A summary of his current Wikipedia article could be copied to Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/2024 .  Some1 ( talk ) 23:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a discussion there - WT:Deceased Wikipedians#Yuri Lushchai .  Jay 💬 07:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : my saddest vote to date (maybe ever) but nothing to meet WP:42 (yes, he was 42).  RIP ♡ . .  what a legend!  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 13:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marianelys Pérez: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this interview.  There's a few quotes from her here as well, but everything else is just passing mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fsn (file manager): Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough.  killer bee 12:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:N -- Artene50 ( talk ) 23:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jayme de Amorim Campos: SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Music .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘮𝘈𝘺𝘩𝘢𝘯07 16:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:BIO or WP:MUSICBIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Moussa Muryango: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Timeline of the 2006 Lebanon War (September–October): No material is notable enough to include in the Hezbollah-Israel conflict article for the inter-war periods.  GreyShark ( dibra ) 20:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Israel ,  and Lebanon .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and improve - It is notable to have an orderly timeline of the war.  However, the article should be worked.  Perhaps a tag on the top of the page asking for verification is what's necessary.  Article should be expanded.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 10:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article doesn't describe a war timeline, but long after it ended.  It is WP:SYNTH .  GreyShark ( dibra ) 09:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The following apply: WP:SYNTH , WP:TNT , and WP:NOTNEWS .  NOTNEWS applies for the article as is, albeit not for topic.  gidonb ( talk ) 13:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I think there could be an article on the aftermath of the conflict, but it doesn't exist.  If someone wants to use this as a starting point for a proper article, I would agree to draft under a proper name.  Its not a suitable redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 14:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
European Cricket Network: Harrias (he/him) • talk 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions .  Harrias (he/him) • talk 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : After revision deletion there is no way that this organization is notable at the slightest; the only source provided is likely promotional.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 18:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Europe ,  and Switzerland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not noteable. -- AAonlyA ( talk ) 20:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per HarukaAmaranth.  This organisation has no governing remit over cricket in Europe.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 06:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - makes no odds if it "lacks remit" or "lacks jurisdiction", the criteria for notability and inclusion is being noted in reliable sources.  That's the only point to discuss.  I've been able to find a few sources that could be discussed for reliability including 1 and 2 and 3 .  I think there are probably more.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Although there is some sourcing, I don't believe there is enough here to suggest notability.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Despite some sources, the organization's lack of governing remit over European cricket, alongside insufficient evidence of notability, supports its removal.  -- Rodgers V ( talk ) 13:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen L. Fowler: None of the provided citations assert any notability.  Much of the article is unsubstantiated and uncited Vertigo Acid ( talk ) 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Engineering ,  and South Carolina .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I couldn't find any additional sources with the standard search tools.   There are some false hits for a historic supervisor of Sonoma County, California and some articles this Stephen Fowler may have written but nothing "about" him.   Nothing in the article or that I can find online suggests that he is notable as either an academic or media personality.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete