hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nathaniel Kong: The attempted notability claim here is a minor bit part in an as-yet-unaired future television series, which is not sufficient in and of itself, and the only source shown is an unreliable franchise fansite which is not a WP:GNG -worthy source.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim and better sourcing for it, but nothing here is already enough as of right now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] hi Bearcat ( talk · contribs ), since I "created" it, can we have it redirected to the show page?  and call it a day.  Ebbedlila ( talk ) 18:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's for the discussion to decide, but for what it's worth it isn't generally good practice to redirect an actor to one specific work he was in, unless that's absolutely the only acting role he or she ever had in his or her entire career.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Religious person in Sacramento that was shot, with the same name, is about all you pull up in Google I find nothing for an actor with this name.  The one source used in the article from Tumblr doesn't show notability.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Likely not meeting notability for actors.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , lets just redirect the page to the tv show.  Ebbedlila ( talk ) 19:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Inga S. Bernstein: All sources are primary or namedrops.  Let'srun ( talk ) 09:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and Massachusetts .  Let'srun ( talk ) 09:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies as we're generally doing for these now — siro χ o 10:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The reason I'm not proposing a redirect is that there isn't much to suggest that Bernstein was a controversial nominee, and her WP:BLP1E isn't covered in that article, as seen by her passing through the Senate Judiciary Committee with only 1 senator voting against the nomination.  It appears that she simply never received a vote before the end of Obama's 2nd term, and I don't see any other possible redirect targets Let'srun ( talk ) 13:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect, support siroχo 's suggestion, above.  While that article includes information about controversy in Obama's nominations, it's also a comprehensive list of all his nominees that were never confirmed.  Many of them have their own pages, since becoming a nominee for the federal bench usually includes achievements that pass WP:GNG .  In the interest of keeping that list complete, she should probably be redirected there even if her page is deleted.  Kalethan ( talk ) 18:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Doc Hudson: Most of it were just talking about its mysterious death.   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 03:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 03:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Disney .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 04:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Cars characters .  Article is all cruft, most of it unsourced.  Extensive BTS content doesn't automatically make a subject notable, while there's no independent coverage or reception.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 07:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Cars characters - There isn't much in the way of non-primary sources on the character that go beyond trivial mentions or basic plot summaries.  I am not finding enough significant coverage that would allow them to pass the WP:GNG on their own.   Most of the actual sources being used in the Reception section are not even about the character, and many of them do not even mention them - that strikes me as being pretty heavy on WP:SYNTH .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  I found an article on the real Hudson Hornet driven by Herb Thomas, but it merely mentions the film.  Most of this article is WP:PLOTSUMMARY .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the specified page per above comments.  This is consistent with other character redirects which have significant roles in the film plots, such as Forky , Hopper (A Bug's Life) , Boo (Monsters, Inc.) .  Iggy ( Swan ) ( Contribs ) 20:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with his section at List of Cars characters in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 16:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mayra de la Rosa: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Panama .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 23:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 09:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
MV Linga: Only references are primary.  No independent coverage online.  Clear friend a 💬 01:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Scotland .  Kpg jhp jm 07:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There aren't many references that can be used other the primary sources from the owner/operator of the vessel, there is also this one though: https://www.faktaomfartyg.se/linga_2002.htm I don't understand how MV Linga is the only Shetland Islands Council ferry article that has been getting brought up for editor issues, despite it being the same layout and similar text style to the rest of the ferry articles that I have made.  It would also be better to be more explicit with which changes would be good as it doesn't make sense that you're not allowed to make an article using references to the owners website.  ZetShip ( talk ) 13:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to SIC Ferries .   The most applicable guideline appears to be WP:NVEHICLES , which is an essay, and anyway pretty much defaults to WP:GNG for individual vehicles.   Thus secondary sourcing beyond database entries would be needed here.   Unfortunately the most I can find is a fairly routine news source [6] .   I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but unless more sources come up - such as an offline news feature on the vessel - as an WP:ATD I recommend redirect to SIC Ferries .  Resonant Dis tor tion 15:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  23:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to SIC Ferries .  I have carried out an extensive search of news databases and have been unable to locate any coverage around the time of its construction which might help to meet GNG.  All recent coverage is WP:ROUTINE .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 09:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Veluwana College: Maliner ( talk ) 20:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Buddhism ,  and Sri Lanka .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NSCHOOL , was recreated after being deleted via PROD.  Still lacks any sources or references.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 22:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails GNG and NSCHOOL, no indication of any importance beyond that this school exists Josey Wales Parley 22:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dematagoda#Schools the locality where it is listed, as an AtD if notability is not established.  Rupples ( talk ) 00:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources.  This article in the Sunday Times (Sri Lanka) looks to be about the school's cricket team [2] although bit of uncertainty as it places the school in neighbouring Kolonnawa .  Also, this [3] in the Sunday Observer (Sri Lanka) — so the school may have a degree of notability in cricket.  Rupples ( talk ) 01:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Recession Proof (House): Nothing found in a BEFORE.  Tagged for notability since 2011.  Only one review found.  PROD removed with "deprod; all House episodes have articles", which is not true.  Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid keep arguement.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 01:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to House (season 7)#Episodes .  BD2412 T 03:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  It's not a valid keep argument, but it's a valid argument against prodding, which is only for uncontroversial deletion.  Something which many editors seem to fail to understand.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to be a non-notable episode, based on the lack of sourcing in the article and that I can't find any either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] or Redirect is fine as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Edinburgh Labour Students: PatGallacher ( talk ) 13:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is some dispute about whether student clubs are notable, but the consensus appears to be that generally they are not.   See this discussion where it was decided to delete Glasgow University Labour Club, a club of similar importance.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow University Labour Club PatGallacher ( talk ) 13:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Scotland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or maybe redirect to Scottish Labour Students .  The universities I attended also had clubs/chapters for political parties, but student organizations are rarely notable.  Most sources are indirect.  Reywas92 Talk 14:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Not strongly opposed to turning into a redirect, but if we had a redirect for every student club to its national parent body then we could end up with a very large number of redirects.  PatGallacher ( talk ) 19:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - to Scottish Labour Students .  National organization is notable, chapter is not.  Carrite ( talk ) 23:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1892 Livingstone football team: 'season'.  The single game is already mentioned at Livingstone College#Athletics , and is a possible redirect/merge target.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and North Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A merger of both this and the Biddle article to a creation of 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game would probably be a decent idea; the first black college football game ever is probably a notable topic.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 18:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll try to make an article for it soon...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 18:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I assume you mean the first game involving 2 HBCUs?  There appear to have been some games involving schools such as North Carolina A&M playing different academies prior to this game, and such an article still would need more sourcing beyond the single secondary source currently present.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Meant A&T Let'srun ( talk ) 19:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A&T doesn't seem to have played prior to this; per our article: In 1901, the team played its first game, losing to Livingstone College.  The team played only one game during the 1901 season and did not field another team until 1906.  The game appears to be prominently featured in the book Black College Football, 1892-1992 and its author, a "foremost authority" on black college history, said "Before Biddle and Livingston no there were no black colleges participating in college football."  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game if such page exists, otherwise keep .  jp × g 🗯️ 05:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Let'srun and JPxG : Created the article for 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game .  Suggest redirect .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 22:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks good, I agree with the merge.  jp × g 🗯️ 06:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support redirecting here.  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game .  Thanks to Beanie for creating the target article.  A worthwhile topic -- well done.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 21:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game per above.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 11:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1892 Biddle vs. Livingstone football game .  Carrite ( talk ) 03:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Captain Apollo: Therefore, the character fails GNG.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Tor retrospective after Hatch's death seems to contain enough RS commentary to count as one, which is more than nominator found, which suggests that there are others out there on a more probable than not basis.  Given the age and cult status of the original BSG, there are almost certainly dead tree books covering the character, and that the nominator has been unable to find them does not mean they don't exist.  Jclemens ( talk ) 22:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect to List of Battlestar Galactica characters#Original_1978_movie_and_series .  The source Jclemens found seems good, but GNG requires multiple sources, which I interpret as at least two.  We have one.  If any other source is found, ping me and I'll reconsider my vote to a likely keep.  If not, one source does not, I fear, warrant keeping this as a stand-alone article, but that source should definetly be used in the list (or in the article if kept).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Apollo (Battlestar Galactica) Xx236 ( talk ) 06:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What about it?  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've turned it into a dab, as that's effectively what it was; I'm not sure it warrants an article...  Josh Milburn ( talk ) 07:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or selective merge, per Piotrus.  Character has some WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs that we can WP:PRESERVE , even if it does not have enough to qualify as WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Khalga and Kaban: This shows a strong possibility of a lack of interest and/or notability on the part of the subject.  The article should be deleted until such time that an editor cares enough to find reliable secondary sources, if they exist.  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 20:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History ,  and Royalty and nobility .  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 20:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not attested to in sources other than the one listed, tells us there are no other sources.  I can't find any in my search as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok there's this: [19] a one liner in a chart.  Long way from extensive coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Good job finding that chart, though.  Thanks for contributing.  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 20:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Khazar rulers#Khazar Khagans (Ashina dynasty) : where they are detailed with more context.  As I stated in this WP:RSN discussion from last year, the Cäğfär Taríxı is a fabrication created by the NKVD to sow division amongst the Tatars during a period of increased nationalism for that group.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Curbon7 That is not a bad solution, but it also seems unnecessary since there are only five articles that link to it, including List of Khazar rulers.  They are List of Khazar rulers , Cäğfär Taríxı , Khalga (a redirect), Kaban (a disambiguation page), and List of state leaders in the 7th century .  I think it would be cleaner to just delete it entirely.  🌿MtBotany ( talk ) 23:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirects are cheap and alternatives to deletion should always be prioritized if one is clearly available.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 23:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Central Asia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  In the text they seem to be between dozens of names like that, so I also doubt notability for each one and I question their pairing for this article.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 11:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Curbon7.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 15:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kendriya Vidyalaya, NTPC Dibiyapur: This article fails WP:NSCHOOL and only primary sources are provided.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uttar Pradesh .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOLS .  I can not find any relevant WP:SIGCOV .  Listings and passing mentions are not enough.  The Banner talk 13:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan as ATD.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan .  Lankanrhino ( talk ) 22:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect