Izat Fateh Ali Khan: No in-depth coverage, multiple sources failed verification.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 15:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Pakistan .  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 15:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - Despite the apparent COI, there are some reliable sources that suggest notability to a certain extent: Daily Times , Daily Times , Dawn , Dawn .  Insight 3 ( talk ) 06:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified above by Insight that together shows a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Insight 3.  Daily Times article is in-depth enough.  BookishReader ( talk ) 20:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Coverage from the Daily Times is in-depth but that’s about it; the other sources are lacking.  116.92.232.6 ( talk ) 02:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No one has discussed the failed verification part of the nomination Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 20:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first source [27] does not contain information about Izat Ali Fateh Khan’s place and date of birth.  The third source [28] does not verify that Izat Fateh Ali Khan is the son of Ustad Fateh Ali Khan.  The subject is not mentioned in the fourth [29] , fifth [30] , and eleventh [31] sources.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 01:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If some cited sources fail to verify any stated fact in the article or do not mention the subject, we simply remove the sources.  This is no reason to delete the whole article.  Insight 3 ( talk ) 07:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] With all these badrefs, the article is left with few reliable sources (the Dawn articles being mostly trivial and the two nearly-identical Daily Times articles) with no other significant coverage.  The article claims that Izat Ali Fateh Khan has performed on television, radio, and “has appeared in several programs numerous times”, which is not supported by the source listed.  Claims of notability (particularly the claim that the subject has been featured on television, presumably national television) lack verifiability, hence failing notability guidelines.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 09:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gwalior gharana where mentioned.  The subject is clearly part of a dynastic musical tradition that collectively receives significant coverage, but the available sources provide little to no significant coverage of young Izat.  signed, Rosguill talk 01:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  08:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No Award, not any notable contribution, can't satisfy WP:GNG , Fast deletion recommended.  PARVAGE talk!  05:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect