hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Arid García: I don't think there's enough here to pass WP:BIO .  John of Reading ( talk ) 15:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Venezuela .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't seem to be notable.  Aintabli ( talk ) 20:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article was created over ten years ago by a SPA, which has not edited again over all that time.  I have looked after sources as a Spanish speaker, and failed to see anything that would allow this to meet WP:GNG .  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 22:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2021 Hong Kong Women's Premier League: This is not a top-class tournament and the article fails WP:GNG.  A couple of sentences could perhaps be merged into Cricket in Hong Kong .  Batagur baska ( talk ) 06:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and Hong Kong .  Batagur baska ( talk ) 06:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Events .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per Batagur baska, just isn't notable.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 19:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  Not seeing any coverage on the competition in a search that would qualify it for GNG.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 20:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Same case as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Uzbek Women's Football Championship .  Svartner ( talk ) 10:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prabhat: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find anything for this, at least in English.  Saucysalsa30 ( talk ) 02:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Convert to disambig page for "Prabhat", which is a fairly common Indian name.  Furius ( talk ) 16:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donald D23 talk to me 02:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Merge window: If this concept is at all notable, then it can just be a one-sentence mention in software development process .  Zim Zala Bim talk 14:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk ) 22:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Han Won-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jim Allen (4x4 writer): Tagged as not meeting the notability guideline for biographies since 2018.  Schierbecker ( talk ) 00:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Schierbecker ( talk ) 00:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn’t pass WP:NAUTHOR .  McFilet O' Fish Fan ( talk ) 01:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Journalism .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above Salted and then canned meat product ( talk ) 03:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Salted and then canned meat product was indefinitely blocked as "an obvious sock" within 70 minutes of their first edit. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: This AFD received two editor's support for Deletion but they were both blocked so I'm relisting this discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Auslogics Disk Defrag: StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and as marginally WP:SPAM .  There are little more than a few "best of" lists as references.  That fails WP:SIGCOV .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajay Kumar (politician): The notability claim here is that he's general secretary of a political party's state-level chapter in one state, which is not an "inherently" notable role that would instantly guarantee inclusion in Wikipedia — but with just two short blurbs announcing his appointment to the role and absolutely no ongoing career coverage about his work in the role, he has not been demonstrated to pass WP:GNG for it.  There are also some BLP sensitivities here, because the article otherwise hinges on an unproven allegation of involvement in a murder case — but per WP:PERP , simply being accused of criminal activity is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself either.  He would have to be found guilty in a court of law before we could even begin to consider the possibility of notability as a criminal, and even that still wouldn't be an automatic inclusion freebie — but this has failed to establish that he already has any notability as a politician.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Secretary of a political entity isn't notable.  Unclear what being a vip in a court case has to do with anything; unclear if he's a suspect, a witness or something else.  Long way from notability either way.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly failed WP:NPOL .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 21:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article are not currently meet to WP:NPOL .  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 19:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A state general secretary position does not inherently establish notability.  I cannot find significant coverage to show how this person meets the criteria of WP:GNG.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If deleting, please restore this longstanding redirect .  Ajoy Kumar was born Ajay and is a politician.   The matching talk redirect still exists.  Certes ( talk ) 16:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that doesn't meet WP:NPOL .  I was almost trying to argue WP:ONEEVENT but after ASSESSMENT of SIGCOV; he is far way to notability.  Per nom.  !  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 13:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Static interpretation of time: No references, written like an essay, would already be WP:TNT .  All the useful content in this article is already covered under Eternalism (philosophy of time) .  .  Opal|zukor ( discuss ) 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Science .  Opal|zukor ( discuss ) 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  - car chasm ( talk ) 12:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -- no one's permission is necessary to redirect a page.  Why not just redirect it and discuss it with interested editors if anyone objects?  The page history shows that no one has tried this.  This would be much more appropriate than an AFD since nom's rationale already admits the subject is notable.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 12:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A synonym for an idea much more widely discussed under other names (eternalism, block universe, B-theory), and not a synonym that is common enough itself to justify being made into a redirect.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 20:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing to save here.  Next time try WP:PROD .  Johnjbarton ( talk ) 13:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , not a common term, not needed as a redirect.  Artem.G ( talk ) 17:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing to save.  My very best wishes ( talk ) 22:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Black Stump Music and Arts Festival: Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 07:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events ,  and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If someone wants to put forth some effort to improve this article's sourcing, i could easily change my mind.   As it stands, i agree that it fails GNG.  Bonewah ( talk ) 15:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of uncertainty propagation software: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see any links to Wikipedia articles in there, just links to external sites.  D r e a m Focus 21:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per XOR'easter , improving the list to cover (some of) the programs appropriately does not seem practical.  Keep .  According to WP:NLIST , individual items in a list need not be notable, while the category the list is about does.  As the category is already covered in its own article and is criticized as spammy/ indiscriminate , less notable entries should be culled as per WP:LSC .  Holzklöppel ( talk ) 22:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC) edited 03:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Propagation of uncertainty isn't about the software.   No software is mentioned at all.  Category:Lists of software shows how the many other lists of this type work, they list notable software that has its own Wikipedia articles.   This list is old.   Has any of the software listed on it gotten its own articles yet?  D r e a m Focus 00:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The software listed implements the concept described in the article and should probably be wikilinked there.  If lists of software on Wikipedia were just lists of Wikipedia articles covering software, deleting would be in the interest of consistency, but a cursory look at the category indicates otherwise .  Outdated information should be corrected by editing .  I don't know if any of the programs covered are notable enough to have an article.  Holzklöppel ( talk ) 01:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC) edited 03:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in the absence of sources that indicate this particular feature to be a noteworthy thing to organize software by, and the lack of secondary references to support the claims being made on behalf of these obscure tools/packages/scripting languages.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2008 Scottsdale mayoral election: Still probably falls under WP:MILL .  Okmrman ( talk ) 23:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Okmrman ( talk ) 23:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Arizona .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Scottsdale is large enough, being one of the 100 largest cities in the United States that its elections are almost certainly notable.  I'm not sure how someone can argue the politics of a large city like this one aren't at all notable.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 19:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a particularly notable election (no non-local coverage, so WP:MILL ), and only sourced to election results - fails GNG.  SportingFlyer T · C 00:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  04:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It stands alone as the only Scottsdale mayoral election listed in Wikipedia.   You should also delete the categories only associated with it and not other elections - Category:Mayoral elections in Scottsdale, Arizona and Category:Government of Scottsdale, Arizona — Maile ( talk ) 16:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Aerosvit destinations: To follow up as per subsequent AN discussion , it was discussed that subsequent AFDs may be nominated in a orderly fashion provided the link to the RFC is included and the closer takes the RFD discussion into consideration.  The airline lists specifically nominated for this AFD are largely defunct and are no longer operating services.   On their own, the lists fail WP:NOT#DIRECTORY and would largely fail WP:CORP .   Some of the airline destination lists for nominated carriers such as Balkan Bulgarian Airlines and Air Vietnam were at one point Government-owned airlines, but would still fail WP:CORP based on the No Inherited Notability guideline.   One other nominated airline destination list ( List of Continental Express destinations ) was part of a defunct mainline carrier ( Continental Airlines ) where some information could be merged into a few sentences in the article of the (now defunct) mainline carrier.  Per a brief WP:BEFORE check, most of the limited sources in the nominated articles are either from WayBack.org archives of the defunct airlines' websites, Airline blogs such as RoutesOnline or Airliners.net where users are allowed to put in their contributions, or mirror websites of Wikipedia.   For the most part, the articles also largely fail WP:V or WP:INDEPENDENT .  As per the past few AFDs, unless if there are any sources that may rescue the articles, I will nominate them for deletion as the nominator.  Coastie43 ( talk ) 00:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists , Ukraine , Mexico , Bolivia , France , Bulgaria , United States , Armenia , Indonesia , Vietnam , Italy ,  and Spain .  Coastie43 ( talk ) 00:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could be speedily deleted given the RFC consensus.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all - as far as the pages themselves suggest, these are defunct airlines.  As such this is essentually useless, probably inaccurate and unverifiable information that we don't need.  WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk ) 08:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete all per above.  The RfC presented a precedent for these kind of article's existence.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 22:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all per nom.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 06:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chhokar: So, this still fails WP:GNG .  GTrang ( talk ) 14:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam , Hinduism , Pakistan ,  and India .  GTrang ( talk ) 14:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , there does not seem to have been any attempt to find sources that actually prove notability, rather the reverse, a quick attempt to ignore the old AfD, notable or, as here, not.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 16:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The current sources don't seem to provide any substantial coverage.  Waqar 💬 17:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources with some failing verification and others that have no significant indepth coverage.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nuclear Medicine Oncology & Radiotherapy Institute Nawabshah: I don't see it passing WP:ORG either.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Applus+ IDIADA: Reliant almost entirely on primary sources.  No evidence of notability per WP:NORG * Pppery * it has begun... 16:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Engineering ,  and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete None of the references meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  Surprised nobody noticed this Salt evasion till now too.  HighKing ++ 11:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete