Adetola Salau: 17:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Having a teaching license doesn't get you a wikipedia article.  Adjunct professor is not notable either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , Nigeria ,  and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not seem to pass PROF or NPOL.  Little to no sourcing found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Source 11 is puffy, the rest are only trivial mentions of the individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable politician or academic.  The article is bombarded with references in an attempt to get prove notability.  But none of these sources in my opinion are fully reliable, independent, secondary or have significant coverage .    Also, I have UPE or COI concerns as how these images ( File:Adetola Salau 01.jpg and File:Adetola Salau 02.jpg ) which has EXIF data intact, where gotten.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 19:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I have gone through the sources (and have improved the citations) and find most to be mainstream, major newspapers.  Sources 1, 5 and 10 are about her, not just mentions.  Although 10 is partially an interview, that is allowable when building a case for notability.   Source 8 is a magazine feature.  Source 16 is a print magazine feature from the University of Buffalo.  Although not all of the sources are significant coverage, they demonstrate a pattern of ongoing media coverage.  In addition, she has now been appointed to two government positions, meaning she is not known for just one thing.  Rublamb ( talk ) 22:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Source assessment table: prepared by User:Reading Beans Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://dailypost.ng/2023/11/11/kwara-gov-appoints-ex-lagos-sa-as-education-adviser/ "According to a press release by the Chief Press Secretary..."—Press release A strong source if you need information from Northern Nigeria ?  ✘ No https://thisislagos.ng/investing-in-great-teaching-to-truly-prepare-our-students-for-the-future-of-work-adetola-salau/ She wrote this piece herself ?  This is a blog of questionable notability This is not talking about her ✘ No https://www.gessleaders.com/dr-adetola-salau ?  Can't really tell if this is reliable She has significant coverage from this organisation ✘ No https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1099-162x.1978.tb01004.x Her father's book... ~ can’t judge ~ I don't have access to book (I didn't try to) ✘ No https://leadership.ng/kwara-gov-appoints-stem-expert-28-other-aides/ Press release, same as one National daily ?  see #1 above ✘ No https://newsbulletin.com.ng/2023/05/15/adetola-salau-graduates-from-us-varsity/ This information was gotten from her WhatsApp status and is the same author as #6 ~ ✘ No https://punchng.com/tags/dr-adetola-salau/ National daily ~ same as #1 and #5 above ✘ No https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/02/match-skills-with-opportunities-to-retain-skilled-workforce-in-country-adetola-salau-adviser-to-lsg-on-stem-education/ A lot concerns raised by some people concerning of some piece published by this newspaper cannot expressly remove its reliable (use with a pinch of salt though) It’s an interview, so... ✘ No https://sunnewsonline.com/lagos-govt-partners-getbundi-to-massify-stem-learning-across-state-schools/ Press release about a partnership National daily with no affiliation with UK's The Sun ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Continued below: Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2023/05/11/stakeholders-highlight-role-of-technology-in-digitalising-education-for-cognitive-learning-in-schools ?  couldn't even find her name mentioned here ✘ No https://ed.buffalo.edu/magazine/issues/fall-2021/salau.html ~ This is almost an interview about how great University of Buffalo's GSE program is and how it helped this lady in her job ✘ No https://www.citypeopleonline.com/we-need-to-focus-on-educational-programs-that-help-graduates-develop-skills-dr-adetola-salau/ ~ ✘ No https://www.womenspheremag.net/sphere-woman-of-the-month-opunimi-akinkugbe/ ~ Appearing on Forbes 30 Under 30 cannot make one notable exclusively... ~ ~ ~ Partial https://womenofrubies.com/9to5chick-recognises-top-100-career-women-in-africa/ apparently, a blog called "9to5 Chick" releases a list of people and Women of Rubies reprints it.  ?  ~ ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 15:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Thanks for the review.  Can you please revisit the Vanguard article?  Although part of it is an interview, it has a long intro written by the reporter.  I believe that does apply to notability.  Also, just because an article cites a press release does not mean that it is a complete copy or lacks review by a newspaper's staff.  For example, in the articles mentioned, several have a byline and some some rewriting.  Also, if the press release is from a governmental institution (which they are in this case), don't you think there is a different level of accountability and reliability?  At least, I do not think it is fair to say that an announcement of a government appointment is a puff piece; rather this should be considered news.  Rublamb ( talk ) 01:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't say it is a puff piece.  I only said it is a press release; which is what it is.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 15:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I concur with ReadingBeans' analysis of the sources.  These are largely non-independent puff pieces.  No evidence of meeting NPROF or GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 20:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete