List of NFL Championship Game broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced; besides being minimal, none of the two are extant, not helping this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and United States of America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This would have to have been from a while ago, so sources could exist on newspapers.com.  However, this article stands as WP:LISTCRUFT and mainly consists of WP:OR .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I have agreed with the previous AfDs directed at lists of broadcasters of various college bowl games and conference championship games, but there is room in the encyclopedia for a list when it is about the biggest game of the year.   In recent history, that's the Super Bowl, and nobody has questioned the notability of List of Super Bowl broadcasters .  The Super Bowl is not only the pinnacle of careers on the field but also in the broadcast booth.  The best of the best are tabbed to broadcast the Super Bowl, and a list of its broadcasters serves a valid purpose as a navigational list.  In the pre-Super Bowl era, the NFC Championship Game was the pinnacle, and the same rationale applies.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 08:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] My take: There is room for these lists in a legitimate encyclopedia if limited to top-level events.  E.g., List of Super Bowl broadcasters , List of World Series broadcasters , List of NBA Finals broadcasters , List of Wimbledon broadcasters , List of Indianapolis 500 broadcasters , List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters .  Being the broadcaster at such an event is the pinnacle for sports broadcasters, and the lists serve a useful navigational function in tracking sports broacasting history at the highest level.  It is when we allow these things to creep to the middle and lower levels that we risk dippig into fancruft.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 09:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is not the Super Bowl though.  I'd be willing to change my ! vote if sources are found regarding these specific game(s)' broadcasting crews.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 16:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The NFL Championship Game was the top championship game in pro football during its time.  The Super Bowl is that today.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nobody can doubt that.  The can't be said for the one about the FA Cup final, Moto GP, Ligue 1, Serie A, Bundesliga and the French Open ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French Open broadcasters (2nd nomination) ) SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per Cbl62, being what was at the time the biggest American football game of the year.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 14:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We can all agree with that.  This is not intended to be a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT but I wish people stop using "the biggest sporting event of the year" as an excuse to keep.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SpacedFarmer : You wish people would stop referencing the fact that a list is based on a notable event, and the notability of said event, as a reason/relevant point when voting to keep something?  That's a silly concept and definitely not an "excuse".  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Reliable sources discussing the broadcasters for this game as a group seemingly do not exist, and as such, this article fails to meet WP:LISTN .  Notability is WP:NOTINHERETED .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A list can serve valid navigational purpose and not have sources discussing all entries as a group.  In any event, here ( link ) is a piece by the Pro Football Researchers Association that does exactly what you ask.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 21:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That is a good start, but I'd need to see at least one more source like that before I'd be inclined to switch my vote.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Again, this functions as a navigational list such that we don't need sources dealing with all entries as a group (even though such a source has been found).  This was the top pro football game in the world in the years prior to the Super Bowl (where nobody questions the validity of the List of Super Bowl broadcasters ) and has equal historical value.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 10:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per Cbl62.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  04:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Cbl62.  Rlendog ( talk ) 16:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I think the problem with this article is that it only gives a list format of who did play-by-play, color commentating, and also on-field reporting.  The notes section is actually much more reliable as a History of the NFL championship broadcasts article startup than maintaining it as a list.  However, with only one good source from Cbl62, it doesn't seem like this article maintains WP:LISTN .  Saying, "it was the biggest event of the time, surely sources exist...", please provide more and I will change my ! vote.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 07:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but move to History of the NFL championship broadcasts , per Conyo14 , with the footnote material about the various quirks of the broadcasts being moved to the body of the article ahead of the list, and the list being made a lesser section of the article.  BD2412 T 14:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Keep and move?  Or delete?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  05:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and move per BD2412 .  My previous rationale still applies, this does not meet the WP:LISTN but can meet the GNG though a rewrite.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep