hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Cornwall Emards : Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Canada .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - did some digging in Newspapers.com and found a decent number of references to their matches against various teams in Canada and New York, have added to article.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 19:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG .  Bit more to add to above comment [13] [14] — siro χ o 19:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Broken Script : A small number of poor reviews in local media do not get us past criteria 1 of WP:NFILM, "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." while it simultaneously fails all other criteria with gusto.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep have 2 Notable review Monhiroe ( talk ) 14:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: There is more than one reliable review, and that satisfies WP:NFILM .  Kailash29792 (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it satisfies the same criteria that you said it fails: The Hindu is nationally known in India and Virakesari is widely known in Sri Lanka.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 18:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The 3 ! votes above made it clear there are enough independent sources on the film to prove it can be considered notable. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per above.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  05:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - passes WP:NFILM Neutral Fan ( talk ) 16:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above ,passes WP:NFILM .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Unjaded Jade : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Coverage with two articles in the Times, a RS.  Rest are helpful.  Plenty notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I agree with Oaktree b on this one.  Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk ) 18:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] •Keep- I agree with Oaktree b on this, the article is well written and well sources with reliable sources that prove notability.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of carnivorans by population : I would also like to bundle List of even-toed ungulates by population and List of odd-toed ungulates by population in this nomination, for the same reasons (out of date content forks to List of artiodactyls & daughters, and List of perissodactyls ).  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 02:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 02:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of felidaes by population was that the population figures were also present in List of felids .  But for List of carnivorans and List of artiodactyls the population estimates are not included so the same reasoning does not apply and the lists are not redundant.  List of perissodactyls does indeed include population figures but before supporting the deletion of List of odd-toed ungulates by population I'd like to be sure I am not misunderstanding the whole situation.  Thincat ( talk ) 10:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It's an "X by Y" list that fulfills WP:LISTPURP .  The lists currently seem to fulfill different informational purposes, as well.  I would not be fundamentally opposed to a merge, but it would have to be done with care as each list has a purpose in its current state, so I'm not sure an AFD is the right place to make that determination.  — siro χ o 20:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  Agletarang ( talk ) 15:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Can split off into other lists if it gets too long.   This seems to be a valid navigational and information list.   Having a column listing what year the information was gotten from would be useful.  D r e a m Focus 23:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Thincat.  The previous article that was cited as precedent was redundant, while this is not.  Steven Walling • talk 06:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
MetaZoo : There is a article from Professional Sports Authenticator but I don't think that one article pushes this over the notability guidelines.  BEFORE did not bring up anything that is not already amongst the references.  Sohom ( talk ) 09:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  Sohom ( talk ) 09:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] week keep Between coverage in Polygon and Den of Geek, this is probably notable.  Hobit ( talk ) 23:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Polygon, Den of Geek, https://www.journal-news.com/what-to-do/events/metazoo-trading-card-game-tourney-in-mason-to-be-streamed-on-twitch/YL6AHKB2QJBAJE7MMKS6RDIK7E/ , and https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/55088/metazoo-games-reveals-hello-kitty-crossover-set demonstrate there is notable activity.  Needs clean up though.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Notable enough with coverage from Polygon and Den of Geek.  RowanJ LP2 ( talk ) 00:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Anton Berisha : Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Literature ,  and Albania .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep His life and career have been elaborated on by sources such as Robert Elsie , one of the most prominent Albanologists who is already cited in the article, and The Encyclopedia of Albanian Writers [49] .  Ktrimi991 ( talk ) 16:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per WP:NOTABILITY .  He is a renowned Albanologist .  – Βατο ( talk ) 07:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - Considering the above mentioned points, and after going through the sources, I am not in favour of deletion!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 13:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep given his importance for the local culture, importance as a scholar (even in a niche field), inclusion in an encyclopedia etc as mentioned above.  -- hroest 18:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Searching Google Books finds an in-depth entry on him in Historical Dictionary of Kosova [50] which appears to be from a reputable publisher (and is referred to indirectly above by its author, Elsie).  Together with the link already given by Ktrimi991 (which I verified to contain an in-depth entry on Berisha, although Google Books would not show me a preview of it) we have a clear pass of WP:GNG , better here than arguments based on his expertise or unsourced opinions of his importance.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Lidy Nacpil : Most are mentions of things she's involved with.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Philippines .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think we can keep per WP:BASIC .  Here's some of the sources I found via TWL some background, not counting the interview short background some more background, and description of work short description of some of subjects work dissertation with a few pages of coverage — siro χ o 01:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:BASIC - I have been reviewing coverage and have started to update the article; Nacpil appears to be nationally and internationally known as an activist, particularly for climate justice, and appears to be recognized as such by national and international press and scholarly sources.  Due to the amount of coverage over time and the breadth of her activism since the 1980s/1990s, further expansion of the article seems possible based on available sources in e.g. GNews, GBooks, GScholar, and the Wikipedia Library.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 15:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep (but I'm leaning more into a delete .  I mean...as a Filipino living in the Philippines, I'm not 100% sure about how notable she is here.   Her first husband for sure is a much more well known activist (and was even the subject of a musical).  There are other activists who have a much higher public profile than her.  The way this article was written looks a bit more PR-ish to me than encyclopedic.  But, yeah, sure, if there are sources then we can keep it, just that it's gonna be a weak one for me.  -- Tito Pao ( talk ) 05:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:BASIC with sources presented by Siroxo.  They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 07:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per WP:BASIC on the sources mentioned above.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 00:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Thanks to the sources listed by Siroxo above.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sidssy : the real "notable" thing that she did is "talking in congress"?  ---- modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and Colombia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - she appears to have received coverage over time for her role as a high-profile human rights activist.  She is "Sidssy Uribe, sister of Lucas Villa, who was murdered in May 2021 in the city of Pereira during the days of the national strike" (according to Colombian president calls for talks with victims of the State , Prensa Latina , 2023); see also “A mí no me pueden venir a exigir que yo no debería hablar”: hermana de Lucas Villa ( El Espectador , 2021 interview with secondary context, referring to her as Sidssy Uribe Vásquez); “Nos informaron que el asesino de Lucas Villa fue sacado del país”: Sidssy Uribe ( El Espectador , 2022, secondary context and some interview, also referring to her as Sidssy Uribe Vásquez); Colombia: mayoría en el Senado respalda actuación del ministro de Defensa ( France24 , 2021, quoting her Congreso de la República testimony, which was about more than her brother).  Other examples of her apparent high-profile role as an activist include Hermana de Lucas Villa propone que grupo ilegal 'La Cordillera' esté en diálogos de paz , RCN Radio Jan. 2023; Muerte de Lucas Villa: Dos años sin entregar respuestas a todo un país ( Caracol Radio , May 2023, secondary context and quotes).  I think the article can be reworked with available sources (identified here, in the article, and otherwise available online) to clarify translations from sources and to more clearly present her activist career over time.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 16:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It looks like there is more than enough coverage to meet notability guidelines and build a reasonably broad page.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sarik Minasyan : He seems to be an elected official but per WP:POLITICIAN "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political officedoes not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. " Shinadamina ( talk ) 05:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Armenia .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 05:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : A member of parliament is a clear WP:NPOL #1 pass, I would encourage the nominator to read the guideline more thoroughly.  There are additional sources at the hy.wp article .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article could do with some more content but nom has misunderstood WP:POLITICIAN .  An "elected local official" refers to a local councillor, not a member of the national parliament.  In fact, members of national legislatures are presumed notable per WP:POLITICIAN .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above rationale.  Archives908 ( talk ) 13:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Maggie Szabo : Jdcooper ( talk ) 00:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Canada ,  and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There are enough sources out there to meet WP:NMUSIC / WP:GNG .  "Szabo happy singing her own tune" .  The Hamilton Spectator .  2010-04-01.  p. 41 .  Retrieved 2024-02-10 .  "Dundas singer Maggie Szabo making her mark in L.A."  The Hamilton Spectator .  2016-03-26.  p. 41 .  Retrieved 2024-02-10 .  "34 Canadian Songwriters Honoured in US-Based 2014 International Songwriting Competition".  The Canadian Music Educator .  Vol.  56, no. 4.  ProQuest 1710994371 .  It notes: A soulful Canadian singer who has won over audiences worldwide, with 13 million views on YouTube, Maggie Szabo honed her craft at a young age in her hometown of Dundas.  Following her high school graduation, she moved to Nashville to continue the quest to improve her writing and performing.  Her original sound, infused with soulful pop melodies, secured Maggie a record deal with Linus Entertainment in Ontario.  Her debut pop album Now Hear Me Out was released in November, 2012.  Maggie was named Bell Media's Emerging chosen by famed blogger Perez Hilton as his "Can YOU Sing?" contest winner.  He hailed Maggie as a superstar on the rise.  She also is the winner of the 2014 Toronto Independent Music Award in the Best Pop category.  Crowley, Patrick (2017-09-19).  "Maggie Szabo Premieres 'Don't Give Up' Music Video As a Love Letter To Trans Youth" .  Billboard .  Retrieved 2024-02-10 .  Tagat, Anurag (2020-10-16).  "Premiere: Canadian Pop Artist Maggie Szabo Sings About Taking Chances in Love for 'Worth The Weight' " .  Rolling Stone India .  Retrieved 2024-02-10 .  Jfire ( talk ) 06:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - this article needs clean up, but there is also coverage in American Songwriter [1] , [2] and The Advocate [3] that could help.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 05:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : New sources identified above seem to satisfy GNG Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : And Billboard [4] Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : undoubtedly, especially the Billboard source, which is most reliable for musician pages.  Password (talk) (contribs) 01:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Robin Drysdale : Secondary sources cannot be found in the article, and no SIGCOV can be found on the web.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 10:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Tennis ,  and United Kingdom .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 10:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - what?  This guy made the 3rd Round of the Australian Open and Wimbledon (Australia twice!)... the biggest tennis tournaments in the world.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 07:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] NTENNIS (part of SNG) cannot supersede GNG.  Coverage is coverage.  Anyway sources were added later.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 10:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's your opinion and not universally accepted.  Guidelines are not etched in stone no matter where they are located.  They get crushed by the weight of consensus over and over again.  You would do better to put up a template that more sources are needed rather than deletion nominations.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 19:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Fyunck(click).  Clearly notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Clearly notable, plenty of sources in Newspaper archives, a couple of examples: Drysdale bids to topple Mcenroe, Coventry Evening Telegraph - Thursday 15 November 1979 and Drysdale improves with age, The Times (London, England) - Wednesday, 11 October 1989 Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Dasht-e Sar-e Gharbi Rural District : No notable source.  OpenStreetMap doesn't make it notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Reference #2 is the official Census of Iran .  If a town or district is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#02 in this case), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable.  @ Hongsy , is the Dasht-e Sar-e Gharbi Rural District listed?  Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE .  Thanks, -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Basically per the sources on FA wiki.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it seems to be a local government district which are normally notable per WP:GEOLAND .  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 17:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep