hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Yonatan Goitum: Fails wp:gng .  By the way, according to the external link, the last name is Goitom, not Goitum.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 04:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 04:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete little coverage to meet Wikipedia:NSPORT .  Only two pages of sources, all I'm seeing is name on name lists and minor references that won't be SIGCOV.  Karnataka ( talk ) 07:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bimala Devi: Possible redirect to Adi Parashakti .  - UtherSRG (talk) 01:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 01:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are two citations in the article (each is cited twice giving the illusion that there are four).  [28] is a Bengali Wikipedia article.  [29] tells a mythological story about Shiva , and mentions in passing the temple at Vimala (which is also mentioned in passing in the Wikipedia article).  In real life there is a place called Bimala Devi; a Google search produces a few results concerning it, but the present article is on a religious subject.  Nothing would be lost if the present article were deleted.   It is possible that the topic might be notable under a different name.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Don Emilio Macias Memorial National High School: Unless Filipino-language sources can be found, article does not seem to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  18:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Philippines .  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  18:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no hits on Google Books, Google News and Google News Archives -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nom in whole.  Does not pass WP:NSCHOOL or any other notability guideline.  User:Let'srun 20:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing came up in my searches either, seems to not meet WP:NSCHOOL per above.  Utopes ( talk / cont ) 07:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] (Also, this page was seemingly created by an SPA with one total contribution, which was creating this page in 2011 via one edit.) Utopes ( talk / cont ) 07:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chidera Anthony: The article claims that "He is regarded as one of the top artists in his area." but no proof of this.  No evidence of WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG .  This article was moved out of draftspace prematurely.  A previous version was already sent to draft by Liz under the name of Draft:Luckystarzs .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] clear "delete", no notability — billinghurst sDrewth 13:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Entirely fails WP:ANYBIO .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 18:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage for this individual found.  And this version of article appears to be an unfinished template.  PROMO, very much spam.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom- does not meet notability requirements.  Editing84 ( talk ) 09:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I recently declined AFC submission Draft:Luckystarzs with same content as this article.  The mastermind behind both articles is named user:Luckystarzs , a clear/possble vandal/sock.  ANU writes 18:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The article creator has move this article to Draft space and then removed the AFD tag.  They have been blocked for self-promotional as all of their articles involve them and their career.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - blatant example of self-promotion with no coverage whatsoever.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 06:15, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ana Griselda Vegas: Non-notable person, fails WP:NBEAUTY , having not won one of the Big Four beauty pageants , fails WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG as well.  Sources found no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources .   v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 03:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Beauty pageants ,  and Venezuela .   v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 03:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Almost Speedy , I can't find any secondary references at all MNewnham ( talk ) 01:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of secondary coverage.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ak47 (rapper): I can't find any reliable sources that discuss him in any significant way.  (Apparently there is more than one rapper that goes by this name.)  The original article gave his real name as Ibrahim Kouacou, of which I can also not find any significant discussion.  ... disco spinster talk 21:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Switzerland .  ... disco spinster talk 21:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ivory Coast-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Do not confuse with another rapper of nearly the same name in Do or Die (group) .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - In agreement with the nominator.  I can also find nothing informative about this rapper's one album or the record company that he supposedly founded.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Attila Császár (footballer): I am not seeing any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC being met.  Best sources seem to be Csornai SE , which is not WP:RS , Dunaújváros , a mere squad list mention, and Papa ma , which is trivial match report coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Hungary .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO. No sources and two primary ELs. BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 16:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The list of Political Repression Related Event: Sadads ( talk ) 21:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 22:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as WP:SYNTH.  I don't see much point in redirecting to Political repression , as the title is a very unlikely search term.  Owen× ☎ 22:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a notable topic in itself, not a helpful navigation aid, and lacking clear inclusion criteria.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename .  In fact, the main article had these contents at the beginning, and these were regarded as the "Gallery" part.  However, as the editor, I believe that these examples do not have any partisan bias.  -- Hzt0208042508415531 tw ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 05:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hzt0208042508415531 tw I don't think you are understanding our arguments.  We are not discussing the current scope of the article, but rather if its notable in a persistent, lasting sense: unfortunately political repression events or political repression related events is not a clear scope - -and the current list emphasizes that, its a random mix of murders, genocides and intelligence operations.   Its impossible to maintain this list without causing conflict, where we have plenty of other lists that use more concrete definitions, such as List of genocides and the examples integrated in Political murder Sadads ( talk ) 12:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have a point.  I think the "constantly updated" template should be added to this form.  Hzt0208042508415531 tw ( talk ) 14:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:SYNTH The article is unsourced and rambling too.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- This is random list of conflicts, mixing up assassinations (normally one person), the suppression of insurrections, and other sorts of political persecution.   I do not see how it can be rescued.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 17:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aabs Animals: It has one reliable review from Push Square : [32] .  The review is partially a joke review, as the game consists of rotating 3D models of cats.  The game has minor commentary on how it was characteristic of practices that prompted Microsoft to review its achievement and gamerscore standards: [33] But those articles lack any commentary on the actual game too.  Largely because there hardly is a game to discuss.  So I pawsonally don't think this article has furry much notability at all.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not seem to pass WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ‍ Relativity 21:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fitch Law Firm: None of the secondary sources actually mention the firm itself, rather they are quotes from the founder about some cases and issues.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Ohio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A law firm would fall under either GNG or WP:NCORP .  My search for references found nothing that would meet either.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete very obviously fails WP:CORP due to a lack of significant coverage.  Steven Walling • talk 01:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Summit Public Radio: This is not "inherently" notable in its own right -- it isn't an originating broadcaster for the purposes of satisfying WP:BCAST , but simply contracts to help other broadcasting companies extend their signal service areas, so we would have to see passage of basic WP:CORP or WP:ORG criteria, specifically a depth and range of reliable sourcing that would get it over WP:GNG .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is The Current Website: http://www.sprtv.org/summit/ PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 19:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; despite the name of the organization, this is just an operator of translator stations and not a separate public radio network of its own.  (Also, despite the article title, it does operate TV transmitters in addition to radio, but that's neither here nor there.)  I can't see much reason why it would or could get the requisite significant coverage to meet the GNG , much less the slightly-more-stringent NCORP or ORG .  The call signs for their stations — which aren't even mentioned anywhere in this article, anyway — appear to redirect to their actual parent stations (or at least the parent entity of one such station) if a title even exists as a page at all, which is generally the correct practice for translators.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Transformers comics characters: Most sections consist solely of brief summaries of these comic-exclusive characters, if they include any summaries at all.  PanagiotisZois ( talk ) 18:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 20:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You forgot to tell the creator of the page that you nominated it.   That would be User:JIP who made the page back in 17:32, 9 April 2005‎.  D r e a m Focus 22:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment https://www.cbr.com/best-comic-transformers-ranked/ that gives coverage to ten of them found only in the comics.   Any reviews for this comics or notable arcs would've mentioned some notable characters such as Rung.  D r e a m Focus 02:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Of these, none are non-Transformer characters, and only five appear in the Marvel Comics titles in the first place.  However, the source could be of some use at the main article about the Marvel Comics title.  J I P | Talk 08:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE as an indiscriminate list.  It could potentially be a viable list, but would require a full rewrite to accomplish that.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE - Character lists can be viable spinouts, but they still need to be sourced and have some kind of inclusion criteria enforced.  This current list is not that, and is just a list of every minor character that appeared in the comic, most of which have zero context outside of a name.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  There are already other lists of transformers, and this one is completely unsourced.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Major Street-basketball Foundation: Close to G11-worthy.  I'm stunned this article has managed to stick around in this state since 2006 and even gets a link in Index of Australia-related articles .  Only bringing to AfD since it does get a paragraph in the Sydney Morning Herald The only other sources I found were short pieces in local newspapers that fail WP:AUD .  I'm happy to email full text to anyone who is interested, but they really weren't adequate.  – Tera tix ₵ 03:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Basketball ,  and Australia .  – Tera tix ₵ 03:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete .  close to no presence in the internets.  - Altenmann >talk 03:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources don't establish notability.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 08:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete poorly sourced, in any case fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vishnu Venu: Monhiroe ( talk ) 07:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reliable references talking about the person.  I agree with the nominator that being the producer of 2 small movies does not impart any notability.  Fails WP:GNG Jupitus Smart 13:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Admiral's Arms: Newspapers.com had no hits, Google did not have anything more than the briefest of passing mentions.  The SandDoctor Talk 14:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  The SandDoctor Talk 14:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete English Gsearch goes straight to Bandcamp and streaming sites, the French search on . fr sites is about the same [41] .  Nothing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete