Celeste Desjardins : Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Canada .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Seems to meet WP:NACTOR with a significant role in Lost & Found (2016 American film) (wide release film) and Flower Shop Mysteries (series of tv films) — siro χ o 22:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello siroxo .  Is there evidence that her role in Flower Shop Mysteries is significant?  If so, I would agree that WP:NACTOR is met.  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've never seen them so no direct evidence.  She apparently plays the daughter of the main character, which seems to be a plot element in the second movie at least.  — siro χ o 05:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's not a question of whether the role sounds significant to you or not — it's a question of whether she has enough reliable source coverage about her and her performances to pass WP:GNG for them or not.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  She's got the lead roles in several Hallmark and Lifetime films, that's indicative of a promising career ahead of her.  Jaiquiero ( talk ) 05:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia is WP:NOT a crystal ball, and the possibility of future notability is not an argument for notability today; see also WP:ATA#CRYSTAL .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 19:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; a keep pursuant to WP:NACTOR needs to be backed up by reliable sources, particularly the supposed significance of her roles in the notable works.  The role in Lost & Found (2016) is described here , and I'm not sure I'd call that significant.  Other than that, I could not find any reliable coverage of her acting that would establish notability under WP:NACTOR .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 20:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , obviously without prejudice against recreation if and when she passes the criteria.  The notability test for actors is not passed by having roles per se, because having roles is literally the job description — the notability test for actors is passed by the reception of third-party validation of the significance of her performances in those roles, such as notable award nominations (Emmy, Oscar, Canadian Screen Award, etc.) and/or sufficient reliable source coverage about her performances to pass WP:GNG .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NACTOR with no significant third-party coverage.  Heck, the article itself doesn't even have any content, let alone sources.  Her filmography isn't really all that either with a few TV movies and 2-3 episode guest appearances in a small number of shows.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 05:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources.  Seems to be a fan page.  128.252.154.3 ( talk ) 17:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete