hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2023 World Junior Short Track Speed Skating Championships: Onel 5969 TT me 12:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Sports ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep .  There are independent reliable sources.  The CBC , Xinhua and likely sources in other languages such as Dutch, Korean, Chinese etc where the sport is more popular and they are more successful at it.  I just don't have the time right now to search for them.  oncamera (talk page) 07:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to World Junior Short Track Speed Skating Championships .  Lacks sources with SIGCOV from IS RS showing notability.  Before found nothing that meets SIGCOV.  If there is no consensus for a redirect, support Delete .  01:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 16:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Third party coverage is extremely limited.  Fails GNG.  There are a whole series of World Junior Short Track Speed Skating Championships that should be all considered for deletion.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clear fails of the nominator not doing WP:BEFORE .  [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] and [36] among sources I found doing a 2 minute google search.  I'm sure there is more.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: There's still no agreement in sight… Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Enough reliable sources available.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 01:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lack of reliable resources and in-depth coverage.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 05:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
2023 Anantnag encounter: I am not seeing from the sources how this is notable as a standalone or any lasting significance of it.  Gotitbro ( talk ) 23:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Pakistan , India ,  and Jammu and Kashmir .  Gotitbro ( talk ) 23:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Terrorism .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I am not disputing what the nominator says, but our threshold for acceptance is not commonality or lasting significance but widespread coverage in reliable sources.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] With events, lasting significance is very much a factor, which I think this fails.  An event can get a lot of reliable coverage at the time, but without lasting significance, it is usually deleted at AfD.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 12:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Routine news coverage of Insurgency in Kashmir region are not sufficient basis to warrant this page.  No significance of this newsworthy event to qualify for inclusion.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It was notable at that time and it is notable today as well.  The article has to be updated and content about NIA charging the individuals involved in this incident on 16 March 2024 should be included.  ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 02:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - mostly routine coverage, and it appears the article has copyvio problems (as per my tagging today).  Maybe needs a more general page with the history of this and similar insurgency operations?  Mdann52 ( talk ) 05:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : as per Hawkeye7, also article need to clean up!  Thank you.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per the several opinions above.  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 08:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The subjects seems to have widespread coverage which makes it notable, maybe it needs to be improved but not deleted EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 18:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No lasting significance or retrospective coverage.  Wikipedia is not a collection of news stories .  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 05:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
List of A.D. Isidro Metapan players: As it stands, this is an indiscriminate list of mostly non-notable people.  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people , Sports , Football , Lists ,  and El Salvador .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It desperately needs an update, but this is another misuse of the term "indiscriminate" in a list deletion discussion - there is crystal clear inclusion criteria.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep —Likewise falls under WP:NLIST , by my reading.  It's not the individuals who are notable.  It's the "group or set" at is notable as such.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yet this list only includes a self-selected number of players, many of whom have no article themselves, and has no sources discussing these players as a group.  In my opinion, it is much more appropriate to have a category for the notable players who played here.  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which is fixable through editing, and nowhere in NLIST does it require sources to discuss the list as a group, since there are several valid reasons for creating lists.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – a category for the players from this club is enough.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still no consensus.  User:SportingFlyer , I see your remarks as a Keep vote, no?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz : I specifically didn't ! vote keep because the article's not in good shape, but I'm not a delete.  The deletion rationale is flawed - LISTN does not require a source listing the subjects as a group, and it's not indiscriminate.  SportingFlyer T · C 08:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep notable group of individuals covered by a group in reliable sources.   The article needs improved, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP .  Frank Anchor 19:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Gregg Henriques: – MrPersonHumanGuy ( talk ) 23:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Psychology , North Carolina , Pennsylvania ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral -- the article is a mess, but the subject has a credible claim at notability as a full professor of psychiatry at a well-known university, with a pretty good citation trail.   The impact does, however, look a little bit low for the field; if someone with more domain-specific knowledge could weigh it I'd appreciate it.  (Adding signature -- -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relistiing due to low participation.  Please remember to sign all comments made in a deletion discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Valiollah Khakdan: I'm not sure it passes WP:BIO .  Losipov ( talk ) 03:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Film , Iran ,  and Azerbaijan .  Losipov ( talk ) 03:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The Persian page does include some references, but even those seem pretty scant and don't seem to pass WP:BIO .  StereoFolic ( talk ) 03:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Important Iranian art director.  See here or here for example.  Or even here for information.  He is credited for "production design" for notable films ( https://mubi.com/en/films/the-bride-of-the-sea/cast ; https://mubi.com/pt/films/the-midnight-terror etc), which makes him meet requirements for notability of Creative professionals.  The page needs improvements.  As is the case with various pages on Iranian cinema. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
The Devotchkas: A google search couldn't find much else of use.  Biggest contributor (and I suspect other substantial editors) have a WP:COI - [14] .  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 15:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and New York .  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 15:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The references in the article seem to be sufficient.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 23:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I did a source assess table.  See below: Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://www.laweekly.com/cy-fest-brings-the-punks-out-to-play/ ~ Alternative news site Only one mention ✘ No https://www.accum.se/~samhain/summerofhate/devotchkas.html ?  Permanent dead link ?  Permanent dead link ?  Permanent dead link ?  Unknown https://web.archive.org/web/20200113052743/http://www.punkoiuk.co.uk/interviews/devoc.htm It is an interview Doesn't meet wikipedia standards ✘ No https://www.rarepeace.com/post/20-important-female-led-rock-bands-you-should-know Doesn't meet wikipedia standards ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  ––– GMH MELBOURNE 00:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It could do with some work, and punk by nature is not exactly the easiest thing to find durable references for, but I'll have a go.  Here's a couple for starters.  — Jon ( talk ) 04:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hefflon, Scott (29 March 2002).  "Review: Devotchkas – Live Fast...Die Young" .  Lollipop Magazine .  Retrieved 20 October 2023 .  "Line Up 2024: Early Confirmations" .  Rebellion Festivals .  Retrieved 20 October 2023 .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Meltdown Records: Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and Slovakia .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Started to edit the article - only really relevant ot the New Zealand music scene and nothing related to Slovakia NealeWellington ( talk ) 09:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and merge I note there are a number of articles about minor New Zealand recording studios and record companies.  As individual items they wouldn't meet WP:GNG but as a collective history of the New Zealand industry would.  I recommend that the article be kept until these can be collated andm merged into a single item on the industry.  NealeWellington ( talk ) 10:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note from the reference there is likely to be more information in publications such as the Manawatu Evening Standard , Rip-it-up magazine, and the Massey University Student Association publications of the era with which to improve this article, none of which I have access to.  NealeWellington ( talk ) 10:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Gansz Trophy: Per WP:NOPAGE , this can be covered briefly at the articles for the respective schools.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football , United States of America , Maryland ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  At first glance, the coverage doesn't look too deep, but there's a lot of it.  Haven't had a chance to review it all and make a decision, but here are some examples found in my WP:BEFORE search: [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 22:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 19:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  We really a few editors reviewing these sources.  Thanks.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : this is a tough one.  I reviewed the sources presented above and in general, each piece of coverage is about 80% run-of-the-mill sports reporting with 1-2 short paragraphs at the end actually discussing the trophy/rivalry as an overview-level topic.  As for the references currently in the article, the Dallas Morning News piece similarly offers one short paragraph discussing the matchup, this one is merely a stats database, and the last two are primary sources published by the involved schools' websites.  Left guide ( talk ) 23:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Strat Andriotis: The notability claim here is that he and his music exist, which is not automatically enough all by itself in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy coverage about him in reliable sources to validate its significance -- but the referencing here is entirely to primary sources (directory entries, content self-published by his record label) and blogs that are not support for notability, with not one shred of GNG-worthy reliable source coverage in real media shown at all.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - This looks like a substantial article in Fanfare - ProQuest 1615777790 Nfitz ( talk ) 20:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Even just basic "notable because GNG" requires more than just one "substantial" article.  Especially when even that one source is a Q&A interview in which the subject is talking about himself in the first person: an interview source can be used amid a mixture of solid GNG-worthy sourcing, but it can't singlehandedly vault a person over GNG all by itself if it's the only media coverage he's got.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:GNG does not say "requires more than just one "substantial" article".  It literally says "multiple sources are generally expected" not "multiple sources are required".  Please don't turn shades of grey into non-existent black and white rules.  Nfitz ( talk ) 04:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] One source is only sufficient if it explicitly verifies a hard notability pass on the order of "won a Juno Award".  One source has never, ever been enough all by itself if you were going for "because media coverage exists" as the notability claim, especially if that one source was a Q&A interview in which the subject was talking about himself in the first person.  Bearcat ( talk ) 01:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Museo Interactivo Kaná: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Mexico .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and move to Museo de Ciencia y Tecnologia Veracruz under which it has better sourcing albeit very local.  I think there's enough to get it to WP:ORG.  Star Mississippi 21:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with @ Boleyn , I do not believe it meets Wikipedia:GNG and Wikipedia:ORG .  Avishai11 ( talk ) 21:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 06:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Switch Scotland: There is ! precedent for redirecting these articles to the article for their parent company [12] .  Most of this article consists of unsourced WP:OR about stations being added, deleted and moved around on various digital radio multiplexes.  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : No issue with notability, and the article contains a history, stations broadcast, transmitter information and references.  Rillington ( talk ) 00:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus