hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Iskandar Shirali: Thenightaway ( talk ) 12:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Badly sourced and promotional.  As the nominator states, he does not appear to meet WP:GNG , WP:NPOL , nor WP:PROF .  I tried multiple spellings of his name in Google Scholar but did not find publications with significant citations.  The closest thing to a claim of notability is "Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Engineering" but as a lower-level membership in an association that prominently charges a membership fee [30] I'm skeptical that this is the sort of scholarly honor that passes WP:PROF#C3 .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 08:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmad J. Naous: It's a bit hard because the critieria mention the subject's "discipline" and stratetxology is not a conventional discipline (like chemistry or English literature).  Most of the sources appear to be interview puff pieces.  The article was not ready for mainspace, but the author insisted it be moved from draft space.  Bbb23 ( talk ) 02:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Economics ,  and Lebanon .  Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing for WP:PROF ; I think "their scholarly discipline, broadly construed" suggests we should look at the discipline of "business".  Nothing for WP:NAUTHOR ; only one book and I can't turn up any RS reviews for it.  I haven't found a single source that looks like solid WP:GNG coverage.  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 03:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability very distant.  Xxanthippe ( talk ).  Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF .  Maliner ( talk ) 04:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Making up a word and then calling yourself an expert in it is not by itself enough for notability, but we seem to have nothing else.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , WP:G5 .  Aintabli ( talk ) 03:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Search for sources to see the possibility of him passing WP:BASIC but couldn't find any.  Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 07:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Myriam Joire: Of numerous refs, only 3 are not by her: two are intervierws  with her (one of which which descrives her "...a technological pioneer has a diverse career behind her, during which, as one of the world's leading technology journalists..." -- oh, rlly?, another is 100% about her sexuality, hardly a claim of notability today) and one more is a brief note that she was fired without explanations.  So much for WP:GNG .  - Altenmann >talk 22:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 22:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Video games , Technology , France , Canada ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lots of articles written by her for Endgadget and TechRadar, nothing about her.  Delete for lack of sourcing; what's used in the article isn't helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Sourcing in the article is mostly primary; TechCrunch is an iffy source per source toolbot.  Rest aren't helpful Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  On Newspapers Extended she's quoted in 2007 (re keyboards) and again in 2014 (Oakland Tribune, re Pebble product) but no SIGCOV on her.  BBQ boffin grill me 20:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Meridean Overseas Education: Most sources are based on PR releases, thus inherently not independent.  Churnalism.  It is likely that this is a result of WP:UPE as the creator Zehnasheen has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion.  A dime a dozen edutech company.  Recommend deletion.  Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  18:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Education , Technology ,  and India .  Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  18:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Page reads as advertising and promotion.  Fails WP:NCORP .  The sources do not meet the criterias to be counted towards establishing notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP .  Promotional article with PR sources.  Ciudatul ( talk ) 09:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Era Tak: Current references are mostly primary or from YouTube.  There are a couple to Amar Ujala , but they don't seem to meet WP:SIGCOV .  There doesn't seem to be much improvement in terms of references when compared to the previous afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Tak .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  23:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Artists ,  and India .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  23:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Rajasthan ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, still not yet notable per WP:CREATIVE .  Couldn't find SIGCOV in RS in English or Hindi (इरा टाक) - apart from what's cited here already all I could find was a typical WP:NEWSORGINDIA softball interview on News 18.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV .  The article seems to be more promotional.  Ciudatul ( talk ) 10:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor unreliable sources on the page.  Page reads as publicity WP:PROMO .  Fails notability with no significant achievement or influence notable by the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Agree with others that this is a poorly ref-bombed WP:PROMO .  No significant coverage.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Talakayan Ng Bayan: No good hits on GSearch, GNews and GNews Archives.  Found several false positive as Talakayan ng Bayan means "People's Dialogue" and is used by several entities aside from DWBL.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 05:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I created the article almost 15 years ago without being aware about WP:GNG .  I haven't touched the article since then.  Safe to say, I barely found any source about the now-defunct radio show.  ASTIG 😎 🙃 13:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 06:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since the creator agrees the topic isn’t notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vishuddhananda Paramahansa: While some attempts have been made, no edits have stuck due to unreliable sources (blogs or wikiclones that clearly sourced past versions of this page which again, offered no reliable sources).  Zinnober9 ( talk ) 01:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Hinduism .  Zinnober9 ( talk ) 01:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems to have a website and several facebook pages, about the extent of coverage I see for this person.  Not meeting notability with a lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless reliable independent sources are found in Bengali or other languages.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources on the page and simple search brings up blogs and Facebook pages.  No independent reliable source I can find that can run parallel with what's on the page.  Page fails notability guidelines.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please don't delete this page.  He is a great spiritual master and was extremely influential in his era and  has done huge amounts of service to humanity.  We will update the page soon with all details.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.47.72 ( talk ) 17:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete After removal of CV, there is effectively nothing remaining.  Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) ( Talk ) 22:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please dont delete this page.  Vishudhananda Paramhanshaji is a Jesus Christ like figure among his his followers.   Below are some credible links that support his existence and contribution:- Credible news reposts like indiatimes have quoted and acknowledged his contribution  1) Refer the below link in Hindi https://www.indiatimes.com/hindi/trending/human-interest/gyanganj-math-land-of-immortal-mysterious-places-in-himalaya-614266.html  2) refer chapter 5 of this book 184.19.192.234 ( talk ) 22:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WXSX-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 16:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 16:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing but national programming services, undoubtedly no significant coverage — this article is a clear remnant of the much looser standards of 2006.  (Disclosure: I was the creator of this article back in those long-ago days and would never create anything like today.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samuel Adeyemi: Even WP:NBASIC is mostly impossible.  As such, non-notable pastor.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Christianity , Africa ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing is largely interviews or asking his opinion on topics.  Rest are in non-RS.  I don't see anything further we'd use for sourcing in my web travels.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tommaso Cancelloni: Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV , as all I could find was nothing more but passing mentions, empty stats pages (mostly automatically generated), occasional transfer reports and little more, including passing references to his current professional activity in the food industry (he has apparently retired from the game).  [1] Angelo ( talk ) 23:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Angelo ( talk ) 23:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources that showed sufficient notability.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 14:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Children of Vietnam: Only one source provided in 15 years.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Vietnam ,  and North Carolina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stc Bahrain: BEFORE shows no substantial RS.  StartGrammarTime ( talk ) 08:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Bahrain ,  and Saudi Arabia .  StartGrammarTime ( talk ) 08:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ian Brumby: There are quite a few matches in the British Newspaper Archive, but none of the ones I saw provided significant coverage.  I also checked the issue of Snooker Scene that reported on Brumby turning professional, and that contains only a passing mention (and the results of his play-off match).  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 01:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cue sports ,  and England .  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 01:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for reasons stated above Montgomery15 ( talk ) 19:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanjiv Ahuja: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - this is not Sanjeev Ahuja , who is probably notable.  (Erased prior erroneous post).  Bearian ( talk ) 12:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Geadly Salome: A web search finds articles about BV Veendam mentioning him but no WP:SIGCOV .  The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 12:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Netherlands .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Qazi Jamil ur Rehman: Of the 5 references, 3 are announcement of his promotion to the same office and two are announcements for his demotion from that office.    Reviewed during NPP.  North8000 ( talk ) 15:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Pakistan .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 15:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable person and sources are not enough.  Citadeol (talk) 07:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appointed to the position for less than a year and sacked for non-performance.  Didn't have much time in the position to become notable.  Google search mostly shows him being quoted because of events which are not to do with him, he just happened to be there doing his job.  No broad in-depth coverage of him in and off himself.  TarnishedPath talk 07:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bagumbong High School: Alternatively , redirect to Caloocan#Education .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines . Lenticel ( talk ) 03:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , there are over 60,000 public high schools in the Philippines, and there isn't enough information that would make this article notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 09:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting given recent expansion of article.  I'm surprised the editor didn't come here to comment.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article was expanded with the directory type websites that I mentioned in the nomination.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete