hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Bilal Abu Samaan : The SPORTSPERSON and NATH is questionable.  With regards, Oleg Y. ( talk ) 18:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Coverage is in Arabic, and there are references in English as well!  Bilal is the coach of the Palestinian national athletics team, and represented Palestine in many international tournaments.  It meets the criteria of notability. --— Osama Eid ( talk ) 19:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you please specify which criteria for notability, as outlined in our rules, it satisfies?  With regards, Oleg Y. ( talk ) 17:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NATH .  Zanahary ( talk ) 05:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Based on WP:NATH , there is a clause that says: Coaches who have coached many notable athletes, including at least one non-relay Olympic medalist, World champion, or senior World Record holder during the time of the athletes' notable accomplishments.  Referring to the article, the Palestinian team, which was coached by Bilal, won the silver medal in the athletics delegation in Sharm El-Sheikh.  He also " was the official coach of the Palestine Olympic track and field team. " — Osama Eid ( talk ) 10:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article talks about a well-known sports figure in Palestine.  He is the international coach of the Palestine Olympic Games and long track team.  He won the gold medal in the Olympic Games tournaments in Sharm El-Sheikh, and he represents Palestine in international sports competitions. --— Osama Eid ( talk ) 12:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is not well known.  He has no proper coverage.  There is no info on any medals.  And he doesn't comply with the Wikipedia rules.  With regards, Oleg Y. ( talk ) 21:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Striking duplicate ! vote.  What even is "the gold medal in the Olympic Games tournaments in Sharm El-Sheikh"?  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rudi Bogaerts : Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 21:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Arts , Photography ,  and Belgium .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 21:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting list for People .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 22:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , despite being a translation, this article is basically a professional profile and WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  The article itself doesn't establish notability.  BEFORE shows a couple passing references in books and web, but nothing that establishes notability of the subject.  — siro χ o 22:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I too am leaning towards d*elete, but will hold off on ! voting after I see what might be out there for sourcing.  I think it is a COI or UPE creation for two reasons,  1) the promotional quality of it per Siroxo 's observation and  2) because the professional, posed profile photo of the person was uploaded by the article creator as their "own work" so it is clear that there is a connection between the artist and the article creator, or perhaps it is an autobiography.  While that is not necessarily a reason for deletion, it could mean that claims (esp. unsourced) are puffed up.  Netherzone ( talk ) 22:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Well, it did not take long to find that there are not reliable sources that we would normally find for an artist, such as reviews of exhibitions in art magazines or newspapers, chapters in art history books or journal articles, works in the permanent collections of notable museums or national galleries, and the like.  What I did find a lot of is social media where it seems this artist is active in promoting themselves, as well as a few primary sources and user-submitted content.  He does not pass WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG for notability.  Netherzone ( talk ) 22:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ARTIST .  I am not finding any RS on the subject.  I took a look at the images of work included in the article and have nominated them for deletion over at the commons.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Dniproavia destinations : EDIT: A subsequent AN discussion concluded that these articles should be AFD'd in an orderly manner with a link to the original RFC discussion and that it should be taken into account in any close .  Additionally fails WP:NOT (specifically WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTDIRECTORY ).  Even if the RFC were to be overturned somehow, and the NOT issues removed - neither of which appears possible - WP:CORP would still be failed since the only source for this article that is clearly about the activities of a commercial organisation and falls within CORP, is the website of the company itself and an article on a blog/specialist website.  WP:BEFORE searching is not required here since the failures of this article are more fundamental than a mere lack of notability (and BEFORE is anyway not a strict requirement), but I did a search anyway and found nothing that would remedy this.  I note from the talk-page of this article that it was previously nominated for deletion in 2015.  With all respect to the people who ! voted in that AFD, I think we can now see that this was a mistake, and was super-ceded by the 2018 RFC which was at a higher WP:CONLEVEL .  FOARP ( talk ) 10:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Ukraine .  FOARP ( talk ) 10:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL, and the AfD on the exact subject of lists of airline destinations.  So, specifically not encyclopedic.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 11:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom but prefer WP:BUNDLE henceforth.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 07:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carlos Ariel Then : Gseach goes straight to social media, no mentions in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , New York ,  and Rhode Island .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nominator.  Alexcalamaro ( talk ) 03:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , removed common paid-placement garbage.  Remaining sources are a blog-like post in a sketchy "magazine", and a self-published pamphlet.  Sam Kuru (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bob Pool : LA Times sources are not WP:Independent , and thus I do not see them as justifying notability.  Couldn't find any independent coverage of him.  — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum .  ♠ 19:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism .  — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum .  ♠ 19:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No independent sources turn up in WP:BEFORE search.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 20:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  No independent coverage.  Ktkvtsh ( talk ) 04:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sweble : Their rationale is as follows: I am really struggling to see how this wikitext parser is notable.  The page has been tagged as being of questionable notability and using primary sources since 2011, so I think it's about time it went to AFD.  There doesn't seem to be a single source in the article that demonstrates third party coverage of this software.  Citations 1, 2 and 3 are links to the software's own website.  Citation 4 is an announcement that the authors of the software will be presenting it at a conference.  Citations 5, 7, 10 and 11 are papers written by the authors of Sweble.  Citation 6 is a dead link to what seems to have been an open source community page?  Citations 8 and 9 are pages on the mediawiki wiki, unusable as sources.  A few google searches failed to turn up anything usable, mostly software repositories and the papers written by the software's authors.  86.23.109.101 ( talk ) 11:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Liu1126 ( talk ) 12:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Liu1126 ( talk ) 12:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Little to no independent, reliable coverage.   The top Google Scholar hits are student theses from advisees of the software creators.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Nasman : Longhornsg ( talk ) 03:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politics , Internet ,  and Palestine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found for this person.  Non-notable person before dying, the death doesn't add to notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 05:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  nf utvol ( talk ) 14:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No indication of notability, Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE Seawolf35 T -- C 18:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In addition to the questionable notability of the article, it also has problems with neutrality.  Deckkohl ( talk ) 20:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per all forementioned reasons above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Not notable before death, only press coverage due to his death.  Can be redirected to List of journalists killed in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atighot ( talk • contribs ) 01:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nulloy : HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 18:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nom.  failed WP:GNG .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 19:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This article has been edited quite a lot since the nomination.  What did you think of the additions, Youknowwhoistheman ?  L iz Read!  Talk!  08:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think so.  Thanks, you with warm Regards!  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 11:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I don’t think any of the sources that have been added thus far establish notability, because there is no way to establish the reliability of the sources.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 18:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cecilie Bjergen : I found no evidence of significant coverage in a Danish source search despite playing in the internet era.  I found some coverage in a local Nibe -based newspaper but Nibe Avis 1 and Nibe Avis 2 clearly both fail criterion 2 of WP:YOUNGATH , which states The second clause excludes the majority of local coverage in both news sources and sports specific publications.  It especially excludes using game play summaries, statistical results, or routine interviews as sources to establish notability.  Routine game summaries in a local paper are not enough.  The only other non-database source that I found was Badminton Bladet , which is also entirely trivial coverage of Bjergen.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Denmark .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete I agree with this recommendation and the points that have been made.  This seems like a clear delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 10:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Micro-Cosmos: A Science Fiction Podcast : TipsyElephant ( talk ) 02:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Radio ,  and Entertainment .  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 02:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Unable to find a significant amount of GNG level coverage here to warrant an article about this subject.  User:Let'srun 13:46, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sydonia : Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  Wow, how are you finding all of these band articles?  I'm impressed.  IncompA 18:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "tagged for notability since 2010", as they said in their many previous deletion statements.  casualdejekyll 23:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Solarball : Reywas92 Talk 15:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It seems like every 5 years one of these water purification devices is the next big thing but sadly....  MNewnham ( talk ) 02:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Products , Environment ,  and Australia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 18:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Searches via WikiLibrary and Newsbank databases failed to find any reliable sources.  Given the product was launched over 10 years ago, if it was going to garner notability, we should have seen it by now.  Fails WP:GNG .  Cabrils ( talk ) 21:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of The Incredible Hulk home video releases : Ajf773 ( talk ) 01:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:NOTCATALOGUE -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 17:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vicente Delfin : Also the source that was cited in the article is an incomplete external wiki entry.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 00:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass WP:NPOL , searched to find other sources but was unable to locate any.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete functionally unsourced, fails NPOL and GNG.  SportingFlyer T · C 03:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rick Burke (musician) : What little coverage I can find featuring this person's name is about his bands, not Burke himself Mach61 14:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  Mach61 14:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This page we should keep given that the musician written about has a long-term and ongoing authentic discography as cited on reliable archival / data sites such as Discogs with news features on various media outlets.  If for some reason it is a problem for the information to be listed under “Rick Burke (musician)”, I would strongly recommend that rather than deleting the article on superfluous grounds, the content should be split into 2 pages: one for “Comacozer” and one for “Tropical Sludge” with a redirect from the original “Rick Burke (musician)” page.  In saying that, it does not make sense to split the information into several pages therefore it should be retained as one to keep the information tidy on Wikipedia.  NEXUS6N6MAA10816 ( talk ) 06:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ NEXUS6N6MAA10816 Having a long-term and ongoing authentic discography does not count towards inclusion in Wikipedia.  With regard to your suggestion the article be split, there is not enough content about those bands for one to be viable.  Mach61 16:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Mach61, thanks for your kind suggestions.  The article is important as it streamlines information on Rick Burke which people actively search for on the internet within the context of "Underground Music" (see Wiki entry for this) and fits into the scope of "WikiProject Music".  Associated acts such as Kikagaku Moyo, Electric Wizard, It's Psychedelic Baby and so on have existing entries on Wikipedia and this article will complete a missing part of that academic puzzle as it increasingly gets fleshed out as a public document.  Best wishes.  NEXUS6N6MAA10816 ( talk ) 05:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ NEXUS6N6MAA10816 I see no indication Burke is connected to any of those people, and even if he were that would be irrelevant (see WP:notability is not inherited .  Mach61 15:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO .  If the band is notable, there can be option for redirecting/merging by "hell no!", it isn't either.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  07:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources do not establish that WP:MUSICBIO is met.  LibStar ( talk ) 20:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete