Albert Tjåland: It happened at a time when the player was looking to be moving up in the football hierarchy, but with all due respect to the player, the career has stagnated, which I think allows us to see the subject in a clearer light.  In an encyclopedic sence, Albert Tjåland fails WP:NOTINHERITED , WP:SUSTAINED , WP:TOOSOON , WP:SIRS and as a consequence WP:SPORTCRIT .  ABT was a child whom international media took a novelty interest to.  His football career has not panned out.  He plays on the fourth tier, has never played a league game for a first team, only reaching as far as appearing 6 times on Bryne's bench - as well as playing a cup game for Molde, which for WP:PEACOCK reasons is called "a professional debut".  Nothing he has done remotely resembles a significant accomplishment within sport.  While there was coverage in many countries, there reports about various accomplishments in children's games lack significance, and was all the more packed with speculation and hot air.  A big breakthrough is not currently looming on the horizon, and while it might of course happen one day, we have the too soon guideline for a reason.  The press coverage was exclusively motivated by him having a famous relative.  Albert and Erling have similar names and likenesses, and joined the same club (Molde) as a youth player.  Take the relative out of the equation, and what are you left with?  Notability is not inherited from relatives.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 10:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Norway .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG with significant coverage. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 12:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no significant coverage, just churnalism .  As I took the time to explain why I think so above, I think you should explain your view as well.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You call it churnalism, I call it journalism.  Ortizesp ( talk ) 12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Ortizesp.  Young player with ongoing career with pro Norwegian top flight team and many good sources already.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 07:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  06:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  My further thoughts are that the keep opinions are annulled by their lack of explanation and non-existing response as to the nomination statement, which detailed a failure of several policies.  "significant coverage" and "many good sources" are unfounded opinions; "ongoing career with pro Norwegian top flight team" is false, Tjåland has an ongoing career with a semi-pro B team on the fourth tier.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Policy based input please, especially please provide the significant coverage alleged Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 12:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Each of the keep assertions in this process make claims of notability.  Let's examine those claims:  1) Passes WP:GNG with WP:Significant coverage ?  The burden is on those wanting to keep, and this page is wanting sourcing which directly details, as WP:SPORTSPERSON requires.  2) Young player with ongoing career with pro Norwegian top flight team and many good sources ?  So what?  None of those adjectives or sources directly details the subject in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject.  We have stats and routine sportsnews mostly linked to a relative.  This is a biography for a living person.  Delete.  BusterD ( talk ) 14:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify —This is very obviously an example of WP:TOOSOON .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject currently does not have the independent, reliable coverage providing WP:SIGCOV of the subject.  As such, this BLP does not meet the WP:GNG .  The first 5 sources are primary, while most of the remainder are routine.  Possibly WP:TOOSOON .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete