Sumit Kadel: Instead, they link to one-off mentions of his reviews of other popular work.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 17:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC) Correction: one of the sources address the subject directly, but I question it's reliability.  The other one is a collection of information that doesn't even contain the information it is cited to in the article.  I have already removed the birthdate as per WP:BLP .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 17:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Film ,  and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Made some changes and added relevant references, feel free to guide me to improve the article further more Thank You MdShahFahad786 ( talk ) 06:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The two centered articles and the various references to his work in reliable newspapers (like this one ) seem to attest a certain notability.  Rather Keep. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Added articles for references , please review and guide me further MdShahFahad786 ( talk ) 14:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As for reviews of the article by other users (not sure what you mean), it is not technically needed.  If you have other sources about him (t his one may be considered disputable, perhaps) even in other languages, feel free to add them to the page or here, that's all I can say.  The future of the article depends on what consensus emerges from this discussion.  I for one, think he should rather be considered notable as meeting the criteria for creative professionals (which includes journalists, Sumit Kadel being presented as a f ilm critic among other things))  "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors" (I think you can reasonably argue that he is widely cited by his peers) but I can only speak for myself.  MicrobiologyMarcus was not, I think, satisfied with the current sourcing, so I guess you can only wait.  I won't have time to comment here any further, I'm afraid.  Best, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sumit Kadel is well known film critic and trade analyst and he is considered in top critic in indian cinema now a days.  He has been quoted in many newspapers and news channels for his criticism and analysis of films.  He has got 180k followers on Twitter(X), 197K followers on Instagram, 193K followers on Facebook and 39.6k subsribers on Youtube Channel.  I hope this will prove his presence and notability.  Feel free to suggest further on this.  Thank You MdShahFahad786 ( talk ) 16:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2023-10 ✗ deleted -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP, added some reliable references for his notability and provided social media followers data for his authority in his field.  Don't delete this article.  Thank You MdShahFahad786 ( talk ) 08:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails BLP sourcing.  Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in the article and BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE showed name mentions, and an interview, nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV with indepth independent coverage of the subject.  // Timothy :: talk 13:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L Faraone 23:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete