hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Aromanticism (disambiguation): The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Delete - per my edit note for the prod, the HAT notes for the primary topic are already complex enough including the not to be confused with aromatic which is listed in the See also on the DAB page as a misspelling of Aromantic per MOS:DABMISSPELL , but is recommended to be listed in See also (or a Common misspelling section), but is thus more than one other topic for the DAB page.  Raladic ( talk ) 01:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, any entry in "see also" section doesn't warrant a topic for the title, including that of MOS:DABMISSPELL .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 02:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] retracting vote, changing to delete per your and other other people's explanation, apologies for the churn.  Raladic ( talk ) 02:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The hatnote can not be made more complex by replacing the disambiguation link with the one other meaning.  BD2412 T 02:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly an unnecessary dab page.  Only WP:ONEOTHER meaning for the exact term, hence a hatnote is preferable.  estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 02:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Takeshi Nakashima: 日期20220626 ( talk ) 01:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Without being able to read, write, or search reasonably in Japanese, I am trusting the nom that they could not find any sources on this player in that language.  As I see it, though, a four-year career in the Japanese top flight and nearly 30 total appearances verges on notability.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aldin Aganovic: My own Austrian search yields only user-generated content and database sources, which are clearly not acceptable per SPORTBASIC.  I found Sky Sports , which mentions him once, Lokal Sport , which is just standard match report coverage, and Fan Report , which mentions him only twice.  Soccerway suggests that he's been playing at a low level for the last few years, which explains why coverage is hard to find.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Austria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 12:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Higher Education and Research Opportunities in the UK: previous AfD was "no consensus" but keep arguments didn't seem to go past USEFUL (even then I can't tell if they were saying that the article is useful or the website itself) and the article has not had any sources since then.  The generic name makes searching difficult, but I find it highly unlikely that what was only ever an information portal would have seen significant coverage.  I did find all of one entry in a directory which doesn't really establish anything.  -- D'n'B - t -- 10:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Websites ,  and United Kingdom . -- D'n'B - t -- 10:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk ) 04:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced and nothing to suggests notability.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: Does not pass WP:GNG, no RS presented and no enduring record of creative impact or literary review/recognition.  Own website, PR Newswire and a divers mixture of sources about poetry and the remittances business.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Poetry ,  and United States of America .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete PROMO.  He's likely using this to help build notability for his remittances business, sending money to relatives overseas.  I can't find sourcing for this person, most of what's in the article are orange or red sources per sourcebot, so non-useful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the existing sources are not reliable, not independent, or not in-depth.  Cannot find any coverage that would suggest notability in Spanish-language media.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 20:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Khalfan (footballer, born 1994): Soccerway shows a very brief pro career but I can't find any evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC being met from my Arabic searches.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Fails in WP:GNG .  I can't find out if there are sources in Arabic, if anything comes up I'll rectify my vote.  Svartner ( talk ) 17:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Covenanting Association of Reformed and Presbyterian Churches: All but one citation (which is trivial coverage) are to self-published material, the organization's own website, or other non- RS .  Further research indicates that significant coverage does not exist and thus the subject fails the notability test.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 20:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : being a denomination does not make you notable.  Jfhutson ( talk ) 13:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Ronald Tovey: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only information I found on him is referenced back to Wikipedia.  Does not meet WP:GNG .  Paulpat99 ( talk ) 21:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jessi Jae Joplin: Article orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Fashion ,  and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most of the independent coverage is focussed on the band rather than the individual.  Therefore the sources don't seem to support that the WP:NBASIC threshold is met.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Garcia: Article was deleted by discussion in 2007 and then recreated in 2014.  It's different enough to not be speedily deleted, I think.  Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 00:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Baseball ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per nom.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 19:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The various stat sites (baseballreference.com, milb.com), one scouting report, but that's about the extent of coverage.  Nothing at length beyond confirmation of his playing days.  Not meeting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  The sources are all stats databases or are primary, and a WP:BEFORE check didn't find anything better.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 838: C messier ( talk ) 07:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it shows up in a few studies, but there isn't a significant amount of coverage.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Alawi: Every Wikipedia that has an article on him only uses database sources, which do not confer notability.  I can find plenty on Ali Allawi but nothing about the footballer of this name.  Even his Goalzz page makes no suggestion of notability, only showing 2 goals from over a decade ago in the 'Syrian Youth League', which does not give me any confidence that we will see significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG . Jogurney ( talk ) 22:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Databases records and a few promo mentions, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 14:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Ujjain rape case: Black Kite (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Wikipedia is not the place for news.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 19:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per WP:NOTNEWS .  This article hasn't changed much since October of last year, and I did make an argument around that time on the talk page that this would most likely qualify for deletion under said policy.  I will not object to recreation if circumstances change regarding this case.  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 21:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 14:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Empire of Kitara: This article conflates 4 things: legends of "The Bachwezi", a legendary group of "ghost people" said in the local oral tradition to have had an empire and then "gone away", (as an absolutely last straw maybe this article could be converted to articles on the mythology of the Nyoro people), the Kitara historical sites, which have been analyzed to some degree but are not the same thing, the Kitara language, and the similarly-named-but-completely different Bunyoro .  There are no reliable sources discussing an "Empire of Kitara" (outside of sources referring to the Bunyoro, which are again, a whole other thing).  This whole article is just WP:SYNTH .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 17:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tanzania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Democratic Republic of the Congo-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Azerbaijan in the Turkvision Song Contest 2016: Except for ref #2, all refs are eurovoix.com.  More generally, this is about a country's possible participation in a cancelled event.  How relevant is that?  See also previous AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of languages in the Turkvision Song Contest .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 13:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Events .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 13:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Relies on a single source and the contest in general is not notable enough to warrant a spin-off article on a specific country's participation for an event that was subsequently cancelled ( WP:GNG ).  Sims2aholic8 ( talk ) 08:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party: Sohom ( talk ) 11:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , India ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  Sohom ( talk ) 11:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sofía Mendoza Valencia: The only sources I can find are forums, the gerontology wiki, which notes her claim as unverified, and then a bunch of Facebook posts from her family.  Although she may very well jave been 114 years old at the time of her death, there is no documentation to suggest such, and even doing sleuthing myself in the 1930 Mexican census of Michoacan fails to find any reference of Sofia in the Michoacan state.  EytanMelech ( talk ) 02:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources found, in regular Gsearch and Gnews, and using . mx sites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Mexico .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination and Oaktree b, found nothing about her online in RS including Gbooks, though nominator's search of the 1930 Mexican census of Michoacan is impressive.  If reliable sources could be found, her name could be added to Oldest people or List of the verified oldest people .  Note that not all entries in those lists have separate articles, and some are redirects to a list.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WRBD-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 06:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Florida .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 06:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely unsourced and no evidence to suggest notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 13:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete