hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dhananjaya Das Kathiababa: This article was a Frankenstein’s monster of religious fancruft, repeated material and appalling referencing.  I removed unsourced material and then went through all the refs.  Most were utter nonsense that had nothing to do with the article subject, or just mentioned his name but did not support the content of the article.  There are only three sources left.  One is not independent and I can’t access the other two.  I’m prepared to believe that the subject may indeed be notable, but if they are this very poor article does them no favours.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Religion , Hinduism , India ,  and West Bengal .  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poorly sourced article and does not corroborate with the subject.  I do not see any beneficial contribution and significant notability from this poorly sourced article.  RangersRus ( talk ) 03:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable person.   It is a recreation of an article that has been to AFD twice before.   Most of the article appears to have been written by Srabanta Deb using various accounts to evade his/her block.  Srabanta Deb usually recreates deleted articles using slightly different versions of the same name to make it harder to spot what he/she is doing.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 17:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Federalism in Indonesia: This article adds almost no information not included in that article.  It is not being proposed by any parties.  The article appears to be machine translated from the Indonesian, hence the lack of tenses.  Davidelit (Talk) 12:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Indonesia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the existence already of a collection of articles about the federal state suggests the creation of this article is a problem, Federal_Consultative_Assembly Federal Constitution of 1949 for example, and the template for United States of Indonesia show the component articles and the range of events leading to the rejection of the notion of federalism, It is hard to understand why this article was created...  JarrahTree 14:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sajjad Jani: Just moved back to mainspace by the creator without improvements that address the issues raised.  Star Mississippi 12:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Entertainment ,  and Pakistan .  Star Mississippi 12:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  agree with nom... not have any rs Worldiswide ( talk ) 03:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per nom.  Mason ( talk ) 01:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Middle Walter: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  He was connected to notable musicians and there are small mentions, but not enough.  Boleyn ( talk ) 12:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Indiana .  Owen× ☎ 13:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Barely any coverage from this book [26] , which is only sourced to his obituary.  Does not appear to have left a lasting musical legacy.  Other than the book, there is nothing I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MDTA Mahbatul Ulum: Firstly, their activities should have a national or international scope.  Secondly, the organization must have received substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.  However, in the case of this school, there are only two references available, and they do not directly pertain to the school.  Moreover, there is no evidence indicating that the school is known nationally.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I cannot find sources about the school in a web search, hence there is no evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Redtree21 ( talk ) 07:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maksim Kazlovich: I've searched in Russian, Belarusian and English and can find nothing better than Soccernet , which is clearly not significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belarus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per a lack of GNG-passing sources.  Agree with nomination's analysis.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
8XR (game engine): Created by a sockmaster (prior to block, not G5 eligible).  I found that nearly every source used made no mention of 8XR at all.  The two remaining sources are interviews/promo/non-independent.  WP:VG/S 's reliable source search has zero results.  General efforts to search up any other coverage, reliable or not, for an "8XR engine" found essentially nothing.  -- ferret ( talk ) 15:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  -- ferret ( talk ) 15:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I can't access one of the sources (it's a dead link), but the one I can access, while it is a suspiciously promotive interview, does have a significant amount of non-interview content.  It's like the first half of the article.  You can maybe argue it's not reliable (it does seem suspicious), but it can't be immidiately dismissed as just an interview.  Also googled and could not find sources, so I'll vote Delete if no one can find any more sources than this.  (given we have 1 dubious source and an unarchived dead link)  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 17:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair enough, the top half isn't really an interview (though highly promotional).  But there's no way I'd view that blockchain site as a reliable source.  They are a paid group blog without apparent oversight.  -- ferret ( talk ) 17:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del no independent evidence of notability.  - Altenmann >talk 16:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless any reliable sources can be found, given that the sources available are (1) unreliable (see https://blockster.com/membership ) or (2) inaccessible and unarchived, and also odd given the earliest available blog post on that website is from 2023 Mrfoogles ( talk ) 18:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , only sources given to indicate notability are deadlinks/primary.  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 19:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per the nomination.  I can't find any evidence of it meeting the WP:GNG .  Sergecross73 msg me 00:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Argentine Primera División broadcasters: The most fancrufty list to appeal to the most ardent fans.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are basically news announcement and does not help to assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Argentina .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charter Vocational High School: Their original rationale follows: This school seems to fail WP:NORG and really all of WP:N as well.
 Oddly enough in my research to check if reached notability I found https://web.archive.org/web/20090315093609/http://www.redorbit.com/news/education/217375/state_warns_2_albuquerque_charter_schools__boards_could_face/index.html which *might* be enough for Danny Moon to get his own page but I still feel like the school is ancillary in all this.  My involvement in this nomination is entirely procedural; I have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and New Mexico .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] OMG, thanks I must have not been paying attention when checking if there was any prior discussion on the talk page.  Moritoriko ( talk ) 23:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:ORGIN and WP:GNG .  The article has only one source and the subject doesn't seem to have significant coverage to prove its notability either.  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carinthian Matadors Rugby Football Club: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , no suitable redirect here either per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 20:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DCAP-BTLS: PROD was contested without explanation * Pppery * it has begun... 16:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as DICDEF.  Already exists on Wiktionary .  Owen× ☎ 16:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since it already exists on Wikitionary and while some acronyms are notable enough for their own wikipedia page there really isn't much information on this particular one.  CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath ( talk ) 03:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Najmuddin: Does not have coverage to establish notability WP:GNG or WP:NBIO , no evidence of research work for WP:NPROF for the claims of being a researcher.  Also, created by an WP:UPE sockfarm — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 14:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Medicine , India , Andhra Pradesh ,  and Telangana .  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 14:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nomination.  Clearly fails WP:NPROF as well as general notability.  -- hroest 18:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 14:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Theo Klein: No indication of WP:Notability under GNG or SNG.   No GNG references,  In fact, no references at all  except for a database entry on a website.   Previously deleted.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Laos-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find any significant coverage in English and the Laotian version of his name (ທີໂອ ຄຣາຍ) used in the article brings up zero results Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
West Coast Cricket Association: Sources in article are all primary or passing mentions.  Search for additional sources did not uncover any WP:SIGCOV .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 23:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Cricket ,  and New Zealand .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 23:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as their own entry on sporty.co.nz describes them as one of the smallest clubs in New Zealand.  Can't see any coverage in NZ media.  David Palmer aka cloventt ( talk ) 02:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daily, North Dakota: Searching is hopeless.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and North Dakota .  North America 1000 06:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could probably eventually find sources for the Sorenson Mill and James Daily the bridge builder [62] [63] [64] but should go in the county or township articles.  fiveby ( zero ) 02:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per Mangoe's argument against redirects.  fiveby ( zero ) 04:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of battles in Kinmen: toweli ( talk ) 07:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Lists , China ,  and Taiwan .  toweli ( talk ) 07:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nom.  WP:SALAT and WP:NOTDIRECTORY per previous discussion .  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 10:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nom.  Unneeded content fork, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Kierzek ( talk ) 15:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : as a sort of set index page.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No need of this index.  Zakaria ښه راغلاست ( talk ) 11:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unneeded WP:CFORK .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 00:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This feels more like an index than a full article.  The Kinmen article already covers the conflicts, so why have a separate page?  Waqar 💬 17:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fork.  Lightburst ( talk ) 01:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
S Sacchidananda: -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 16:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , India ,  and Karnataka .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 16:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Dear Wikipedia Editors and Contributors, I wanted to inform you that we have made significant updates to the article about S Sacchidananda in an effort to address concerns regarding notability.  We have carefully reviewed the notability guidelines (WP:NPOL and WP:GNG) and have made revisions to ensure the article better aligns with these standards.  We encourage you to revisit the article and provide your feedback.  Your input is highly valuable in helping us improve the quality and verifiability of the content.  We are committed to making this article a valuable resource for Wikipedia readers.  Blackanu20 ( talk ) 07:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] May I ask why you are referring to yourself as "we"?  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 16:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete notability for politicians is for office holders, not candidates.  No other notability requirements are met.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish • growths ) 17:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've updated the content.  Instead of removing the article, please try to improve it.  Blackanu20 ( talk ) 11:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Still doesn't meet notability standards.  If a subject doesn't meet the standard, there is no "improvement" or "update in content" that will change the result to a keep.  GPL93 ( talk ) 12:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete