hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Simon T. Bailey: Zero in-depth secondary source about him.  A few mentions in promotional guest posts or invitations of his events.  Tagged since 2015 but has been continously attracting COI/UPE editors.  Fails WP:GNG .  Teltle ( talk ) 05:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Florida , New York ,  and Oklahoma .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the only thing here that qualifies as a claim of notability is the CPAE Speakers Hall of Fame, and doing a newspapers.com search for that Hall, the 34 times I find of it being mentioned are basically all clearly quoting press release materials about a given speaker, or flat out ads.  Web search is not finding the sort of results that suggest it should be given more consideration.  -- Nat Gertler ( talk ) 14:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maradhoo Feydhoo School: There are no reliable sources currently cited and I wasn't able to find any sources satisfying WP:GNG or WP:NORG in my own searches.  AO News (translated from Dhivehi) was the best that I could find and it's nowhere near good enough on its own.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Maldives .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clearly not notable like most schools.  -- Bduke ( talk ) 02:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete One Wikimapia reference.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Council Wars: Sadly (I liked this in my younger days...) this article seems to fail WP:GNG .  Unreferenced too.  My BEFORE fails to find anything.  ISFDb lists only one review for first and third book in the series ( [5] ) so it may be hard to even try to argue that book reviews for individual books here might save this.  In either case, what we have is just a plot summary with some old and unreferenced fan speculation about the series' future.  Per WP:ATD-R , this can be redirected to the author's bio, where the series is mentioned (or maybe better, to John Ringo bibliography ).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found a newspaper source and according to the ISFDb there were reviews in two zines, Deep Magic and FOSFAX , for two of the novels.  Not sure how usable those would be but worth mentioning.  It looks like this certainly wasn't one of Ringo's most notable series, though.  ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like there was an official review from RPGnet ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also a SF Site review - I can't remember if they're usable or not.  ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SF Site is fine I think, at least we describe it as magazine.  But RPGNet is not reliable (AFAIK those are just forum reviews, user generated) and zines are generally not reliable (they are also tagged in red by Headbomb's reliable sources script).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Aw, that stinks - it looked like it was posted by the site rather than a random user.  I'll keep looking when I can!  ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 14:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suat Onur Ayas: If we ignore that the prose is entirely uncited for two seconds, we can see that 19 of the references are from IMDb, while two are similar databases.  The only source left now is Ref 3, which is just a photo and doesn't confirm anything.  Appears to have won an award in 2017, though checking the article of the award it's evident that this wouldn't result in auto-notability.  This is a rather poor attempt to refbomb a topic into notability.  A search for "Suat Onur Ayas" or "Suat Onur Aya ş " results in no other sources.  Lacks significant coverage from reliable and independent sources.  Styyx ( talk ) 20:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Turkey .  Styyx ( talk ) 20:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no WP:SIGCOV .  Aintabli ( talk ) 04:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I know the incident from trwiki.  The article fails WP:GNG . -- Kadı Message 09:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no notability.  Tehonk ( talk ) 22:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Keadle: Only elected office is hyper-local county commissioner which would not normally qualify as notable outwith exceptional circumstances.  Somewhat of a perennial candidate, but given that they generally failed to get past primaries (much less general elections) and lack the WP:SIGCOV that would be needed for a perennial candidate to be notable (c.f. Howling Laud Hope or Count Binface ), I don't believe they're over the line.  Promo/Peacock in "Community and family" section implies originally written by someone associated with his campaigns.  That can be fixed/rewritten, but he's not notable to start with.  A previous AfD in 2013 came to no consensus, seemingly based on currency/recency of elections.  But 12 years later I don't see that any enduring notability has been demonstrated.  Hemmers ( talk ) 10:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Conservatism , North Carolina ,  and West Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable county commissioner/congressional candidate.  No real claim to notability BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 08:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree not notable lower office-holder and frequent candidate.  Shrikesong ( talk ) 06:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Claude Wasserstein: The sources are connected with her and her work, or are passing mentions.  Star Mississippi 15:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women .  Star Mississippi 15:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France and United States of America .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Note that the description of the Chevalier of the Legion of Honor as France's highest honor is misleading; Chevalier is the lowest rank of the Legion of Honor, awarded to thousands of people yearly. — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Television , United Arab Emirates , Ireland , England , New York ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
News Watch (Indonesian TV series): Tagged for notability since 2016.  PROD removed because "it ran for 3 years".   Still needs reliable sources though Donald D23 talk to me 03:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Indonesia .  Donald D23 talk to me 03:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There's not any evidence of WP:SIGCOV in WP:SECONDARY reliable sources.  Fails GNG, fails NTV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacona ( talk • contribs ) 14:46, September 28, 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist, already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mouth Sweet: The article has 8 sources.  Only the 8th is a reliable secondary source that says anything significant, and it's a listicle of 10 games chosen by "Colin Spacetwinks" for Giant Bomb.   Sources 1 and 3 are primary, while sources 2 is likely unreliable.  Sources 4, 6 and 7 are probably unreliable, but also non-independent interviews.  Source 5's reliability is irrelevant, as it's a trivial name drop.  WP:VG/S uncovers nothing more.  -- ferret ( talk ) 13:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  -- ferret ( talk ) 13:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No game reviews that I can see in any of the acceptable sources.  TV Tropes is about the best site with a review I can find and it's not an RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Creator Delete No objection here.  Open and shut to me that there's not enough reliable sources.  I'll look into source discussions for the potentially unreliable sites that remain unconfirmed.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 17:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There does not seem to be enough mentions in reliable sources.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 12:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Navid Ghasemi: Matingholami ( talk ) 15:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cycling ,  and Iran .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no accomplishments that would indicate notability.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 05:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Claire Rochecouste: 2 of The 3 sources are primary.  A Google News search yielded nothing in-depth.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Portugal ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable like the other article.  Fails WP:BIO too.  Wolverine XI ( talk to me ) 15:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen López: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Serge Boutouli: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - best I can find is a mention in Taringa , which doesn't look like WP:RS Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NFL Network Exclusive Game Series results (2006–present): Let'srun ( talk ) 20:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and American football .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , it is a split of the very long List of Thursday Night Football results (2006–present) .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 00:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The network a football game is on outside of its production, scorebug and announcers/analysts is not a defining characteristic, and these are all standard regular season games.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Independence Bowl broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; one is a 404, one are announcments of the BCS coverages, not just this.  The rest is about the games itself, far less for the broadcasting of this game.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and Louisiana .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jackie Adedeji: As always, journalists are not "inherently" notable just because content they created exists, and the notability test hinges on the reception of significant third-party coverage about them and their work -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that were self-published by companies or organizations she was directly affiliated with (e.g. documentary films that she appeared in "sourced" to their own presence on a streaming platform rather than media coverage about the films, podcast directories, etc.) or glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage that isn't about her (e.g. her name getting briefly mentioned in coverage whose primary subject is the celebrities who were on her podcast rather than her).  There's only one footnote here, #6, that actually represents coverage about her in a WP:GNG -worthy source, and that isn't enough by itself.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United Kingdom .  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , Television ,  and Sexuality and gender .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BBC ref is solid, rest are in sources of iffy reliability.  Most coverage I find is in tabloids or other websites mostly describing her ample chest.  There seems to have been a documentary on Channel 4 about her struggles with body image and large breasts, but most coverage is not in RS, more focused on her chest.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I feel if we had at least one other decent source about her, we'd be at notability.  I'm surprised more media hasn't picked up on her message of positivity and acceptance.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Only other sources I find are in Nigerian media [18] and [19] , which are trivial coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Armenian-Sasanian war (363–371): None of the citations have pages cited.  First source is from 1903 and is about geography (?) Second source is good, though no page.  It's only used to cite "In 363 Armenia".  Third source is published by Lulu.com , a self-published source.  In other words, article seems to be WP:OR .  HistoryofIran ( talk ) 17:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Iran ,  and Armenia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above.  Even if a better article could be written it would need to be completely recreated with different sources.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 00:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Meathead (band): I don't see much that would suggest the notability criteria is met for a page on en.wiki - there are a few refs on it.wiki but these seem to be databases or encyclopedia JMWt ( talk ) 13:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Italy .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete