hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sundaranarayana: Promotional.  Of the four sources cited, none are RS.  The article has been speedy deleted by A7, but I think AfD is the way to go here.  Cheers, -- The Lonely Pather ( talk ) 15:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable, clearly a mostly uncited essay and clearly virtually unsourced.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 12:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - promotional material without indication of importance.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 12:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Layle Delo: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find anything close to SIGCOV here Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Cherry: only database entries/wikipedia copies.  Password (talk) (contribs) 08:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Canada .  CptViraj ( talk ) 09:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Articles look like it got information from IMDb , which is a not recommended source, but the author decided not to add the reference that they did use it.  See Wikipedia:Reliable Sources -⚒️ MinecraftPlayer 321 ⚒️ | 💬 23:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clipgenerator: Graywalls ( talk ) 03:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Technology , Software ,  and Germany .  Graywalls ( talk ) 03:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep: While I agree that the article is terribly sourced and reads like an advert, it can be improved by adding better secondary sources that verify the app meets WP:N .  If this doesn't happen, I will advocate for delete.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 10:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Mjks28 : , What evidence do you have suggesting this product meets WP:NCORP ?  I've done the WP:BEFORE search and came up with none.  The most in-depth piece I came upon was https://www.pressetext.com/news/na-20080110015.html but this is of course nothing, because it's a press release.  Graywalls ( talk ) 17:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I just did a search and can't find any sources either that prove the subject of the article is WP:N , so I change my argument to delete.  Mjks28 ( talk ) 00:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: reads like an advertisement.  . .  Mean as custard ( talk ) 12:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to see more opinions here from experienced editors.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jub Kabud-e Sofla: Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MRSM Kuching: However, there just aren't the reliable, quality sources to establish it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG .  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Malaysia .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , does not have any reliable sources.  Delete per nom.  Iljhgtn ( talk ) 16:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HAL School Korwa: This one fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Schools ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find sources to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with the updated criteria, merely being a secondary school is no longer deemed sufficient to attain notability.  It now necessitates the presence of credible sources that can substantiate its significance.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 09:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rhona Who Lives by the River: No indication of WP:NOTABILITY and even indication of whether this will ever exist.  The only source is a 2021 story that they plan to make this series.  North8000 ( talk ) 13:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Television .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Per 2021 source, weak draftify until evidence of production surfaces; otherwise, delete .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 07:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , until sources are provided that this is actually happening it fails WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 11:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  We have no idea how this will fare in the future.  Yet, apparently, there are contributors who can see the future .  Telegraphically: we have no sources STOP.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:TOOSOON .  TheBritinator ( talk ) 23:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : We know that.  That won't happen in the future.  There is no proof.  Suleeabc2 ( talk ) 07:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank Feys: The closest may be the role in "La hija de un ladrón" but the subject is mentioned just in routine listings and by Lanaja Factory, which does not appear independent of the subject (see [15] ); he is unmentioned on the film production company's page on the film [16] .  AllyD ( talk ) 17:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Actors and filmmakers , Belgium ,  and Spain .  AllyD ( talk ) 17:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MotesBooks: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Organizations , Business , Companies , United States of America ,  and Kentucky .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I find a few mentions about the publisher but nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ayesha Singh: Bringing it here for discussion and if it closes the same way, suggest protection to avoid a return trip without AfC.  Star Mississippi 20:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Star Mississippi 20:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No significant update since the last AfD from a year back.  Delete and salt per nom, and my vote from the previous AfD.  Once protected, the request for unprotection would have to establish notability.  Jay 💬 18:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:N .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 19:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] On what basis can the article be put under Wikipedia:Notability Tarun Kancherla Chowdary ( talk ) 16:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Does the award listed here [11] (an Editorial Choise award for Best Actress at the Indian Telly Awards) count toward notability at all?   That might put here over the top of notability if it is considered major.   Otherwise I'd consider the sources no better than borderline.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The link you provided does not mention her award, but her article does mention it as Most Promising Actress , and it was already part of the article during this AfD nomination.  Indian Telly Awards does not mention such a category, and the official website of the awards does not work.  It may be a category introduced this year, or it may be the new name of an existing category.  I could not find their 2022 awards, and there is no mention of such a category in their 2021 or 2019 awards.  I would not consider it significant enough for WP:ANYBIO .  Jay 💬 05:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It has been introduced this year , they even posted this on their official youtube channel as well !!  I had only one article to show that she won an award under that category Tarun Kancherla Chowdary ( talk ) 15:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But doesn't the article meet the requirements of WP:SINGLEEVENT ??  Tarun Kancherla Chowdary ( talk ) 15:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC) — Tarun Kancherla Chowdary ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] In the event this is kept or draftified, flagging existence of Draft:Ayesha Singh .  Star Mississippi 16:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Provincial Institute of Teacher Education Nawabshah: I don't see it passing WP:ORG either.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thea Hail: However, the same issues still apply, so I am simply going to copypaste their nominating rationale, "Non-notable WWE wrestler. Article contains only two primary references, one is from the WWE, and the other is just a database profile. Per WP:NSPORT , wrestlers are classified as entertainers and not sportspeople. This WWE wrestler has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, TV shows, performances, or productions. Nor has she made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. There is also no significant coverage in any reliable, secondary sources. All sourcing I can find is linked directly to the sport of wrestling and routine in nature. There is no mention of this subject in any media not linked to her time at the WWE, and as wrestling is not a recognised sport for notability purposes, she fails both the applicable WP:ENTERTAINER criteria, and the general notability guideline which requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject."  Onel 5969 TT me 13:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Wrestling ,  and Pennsylvania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my own rationale provided by nominator.  To add to this, the author who recreated this previously deleted article has had countless other articles nominated for deletion per their talk page MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 14:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's some coverage on Fox Sports [33] , but most is related to the Rock's daughter, I think they wrestle as a team together.  Nothing found for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of investments by Microsoft Corporation: There is no other article titled "List of investments by..."  Most companies make a fantastical number of investments, since that it is the very nature of business.  We oughtn't be in the business of tracking that business.  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 23:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 23:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as an abandoned draft.   The attention paid to Microsoft's investment in OpenAI suggests this could be a topic of interest.   But the current article is too incomplete to keep.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 20:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Major investments can be added to the main article, but not every single one.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  LISTCRUFT.  // Timothy :: talk 17:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 04:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Beside violating WP:LIST , it's a WP:FORK of another list.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
José Jorquera: Spanish Wikipedia and my own WP:BEFORE does not show that any decent sources exist.  Even a Chilean source search did not seem to yield anything decent about the Chilean goalkeeper of this name.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Chile .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability and fails WP:GNG .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 20:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per my BEFORE search.  Jogurney ( talk ) 13:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Glover (composer): 141 Pr { contribs } 15:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There is a list of sources without in-line citations.  If someone with access to these articles could evaluate them, a clearer determination of notability could be made.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 01:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paschal Ekeji: The most I found was a few sentences of coverage here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Nigeria ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Few bits that look close to being WP:GNG relevant, but not really enough.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete