Installer VISE: The sources used in the article are mainly either primary sources or focus on the company rather than the software.  An earlier attempt in 2011 to remove the article was made due to the lack of detailed and in-depth coverage from reliable sources.  Currently, there is still a lack of widespread coverage in reliable sources for this article.  Barseghian Lilia ( talk ) 18:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Articles that have been proposed for deletion cannot be soft deleted.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 18:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Shadow311 you relisted this saying that articles that have been proposed for deletion cannot be soft deleted, yet this exact soft deletion has already happened for two other articles for which the deletion has been proposed by the exact same user: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMCO MSI Package Builder and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Install , so how is it at the end of the day?!? Thanks!  -- Vlad | -> @ Vlad : We're at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion , which is different from Wikipedia:Proposed deletion .  Comment Keep -  After looking at the nominator's edit history, I'm a little worried that there is some sort of vendetta, ulterior motives or conflict of interest going on here where aside from creating a couple of Armenian articles this editor appears to just be trying to delete installation technology-related articles.  Many of the articles that the nominator has suggested for deletion have been on Wikipedia for many years - in the case of the WiX article ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WiX ) it must rank among the oldest articles having been started in 2004, so my question is why are these all being nominated for deletion all of a sudden?  TubularWorld ( talk ) 13:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 19:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep .  It is easy to find independent WP:RS of very reasonable quality.  For example, here is an article in an IEEE publication reviewing a different installer and using Vise as a reference point for comparisons: [45] .  -- Викидим ( talk ) 00:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Any suggestions in keeping this article?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  06:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've changed my vote to keep after having done a little more research into this software (and added a few things to the article).  It appears that this was quite popular 20 something years ago, even to the point that Apple themselves distributed their own software using it.  TubularWorld ( talk ) 09:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus