hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kamacuras: The article itself is all plot, and unlike a lot of other Godzilla Kaiju, there isn't much developmental info that would warrant the article sticking around either.  I just don't think there's enough to justify the article's existence separately from anything else.  An AtD could be a redirect to Son of Godzilla, given that it seems to be where Kamacuras are most notable, but if anyone has a better suggestion, or found sources that may justify the article's existence that I may have missed in my BEFORE, then feel free to suggest or mention it.  I'd like to keep this around, but as it stands, I don't think Kamacuras has much to stand on.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 16:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Film .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 16:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Not seeing how the article even tries to estabilish notability, and my BEFORE just gave few mentions in passing.  Ping me if SIGCOV coverage that goes beyond plot summary is found.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: If you recommend a Redirect or Merge, please supply the target article you are proposing this article be directed to.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Godzilla (franchise) per Piotrus.  If someone wanted to start organizing a character list from the franchise, that might be useful.  There isn't enough WP:SIGCOV to pass our guidelines.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 14:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Godzilla (franchise)#Filmography - No sources really showing that they're particularly notable, and since they have never really been the "featured" kaiju of a movie, always just appearing in films with an ensemble of monsters or as stock footage/cameos, there's not really a single movie that would serve as a great target for a redirect.  The film list for the franchise, which already includes a column showing which monsters appeared in each film, would thus be the best target, as anyone searching for the monster would be redirected straight to a list where they can easily see their appearances.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 06:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ireland–Zambia relations: It's been 14+ years since the first AFD , consensus on what constitutes WP:SIGCOV can change, and many of the original participants have retired or been banned.  As I said in my original nomination: "Topic fails general notability requirements, specifically there does not appear to be significant coverage of these countries' relations in sources which reliable, independent, and secondary. None are cited in article, and I couldn't locate in any myself."  Yes there are now a few links to newspaper articles, but most are dead, and those that aren't are hardly coverage of these countries relations, in my opinion.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 04:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see notable relations like significant trade or migration or state visits.  Many countries give aid to Zambia, so the few million Ireland gives is rather routine.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Foreign relations of Ireland#Zambia .  As an ATD .  Otherwise, as noted in the nom, there seems to be insufficient notability/coverage to warrant a standalone article.  And, while I have read the earlier AfD and understand the "keep" arguments, they all seem to be based entirely on ROTM coverage of aid packages.  Which don't discuss the topic (diplomatic relations between the two countries) in any material depth.  That the article seems to stand almost ENTIRELY as a list of the loosely related news sources, found in the previous BEFORE but not associated with the text in ANY WAY, suggests (to me at least) that a standalone article isn't warranted.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 10:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Foreign relations of Ireland#Zambia .  Having read the previous discussion, like Guliolopez said; I don't see anything discussing the diplomatic relations between the countries, only ones about the aid packages.  There doesn't seem to be much to merge either, so just going for a redirect, though, if something does come up, I'm happy to add on to the redirect target.  NotAGenious ( talk ) 17:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just a note to say that as the nominator, I could get behind a redirect as an alternative to straight up deletion.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 21:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mir Mohammed Helal Uddin: He has never been elected to public office, but is active within the party.  The cited sources are passing mentions, not significant coverage .  Searches found slightly deeper news coverage of his conviction for helping his dad conceal illegally acquired assets (he got 3 years, daddy got 13).  [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] He has only been written about in the context of his father, so my sense is that he is not notable .  He is not a suitable subject for a stand alone article; he is a footnote to his father's biography.  There is no content worth merging, but I could agree to a redirect to Mir Mohammad Nasiruddin , where his conviction is already mentioned.  Worldbruce ( talk ) 18:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Crime ,  and Bangladesh .  Worldbruce ( talk ) 18:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator's solid research .  ——Serial Number 54129 18:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 17:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do not delete.  This is authentic bio — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Nationalist 80 ( talk • contribs ) 18:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC) — The Nationalist 80 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] @ The Nationalist 80 Nothing in the nomination suggested that it was a hoax.  Instead, the concern is that the subject is not notable.  — C.Fred ( talk ) 19:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete he never got as far as the ballot paper, so really just an aspiratoinal politician.  He may have inhereted a perchant for doing crime, but notability is not inhereted.  ---- D'n'B - t -- 18:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Camden Health Partners: AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to GP federation .  I couldn't find enough to meet WP:NORG , beyond those on the article already it was just coverage of some contracts , a hospital upgrade , and an industry award they were nominated for , nothing in-depth about them.  Shaws username .  talk .  22:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Carbon positive: It talks mainly about the article "Carbon Is Not The Enemy", which may be notable itself, but then also attempts to discuss the concept of "carbon positive".  The problem is that the term can't be accurately covered when the topic is written from the perspective of McDonough's article.  — Lights and freedom ( talk ~ contribs ) 04:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Environment .  — Lights and freedom ( talk ~ contribs ) 04:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to carbon sink .  Ultimately, this could be a useful redirect term for someone searching for the term carbon sink but not really knowing the exact terminology.  That said, I could see this being a case for delete then redirect.  The article comes across as very promotional, and the creator looks like they're closely tied to McDonough from what little I can see.  The term itself as they try to use it is a bit of a WP:NEOLOGISM , and there isn't notability for the article as it stands.  The word itself is also a bit troublesome since what they really seem to be alluding to is net negative carbon,  which can be a bit counterinuitive if you're using "carbon positive".  Either way, redirecting to somewhere that focuses on carbon source/sink would get readers in the right place without confusing them with an article like this.  KoA ( talk ) 14:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect per KoA.  Artem.G ( talk ) 09:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  2001:4455:636:D900:94A8:7FBB:249D:9ECA ( talk ) 12:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Joe Bereta: There are no reliable sources talking about this person outside the context of the show he was a part of.  This page was already redirecting to there before, but someone decided to remove the redirect.  Bolt and Thunder ( talk ) 19:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Artists , Internet ,  and United States of America .  Bolt and Thunder ( talk ) 19:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , California , Montana ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect.  Barats and Bereta seems to be notable, so it's reasonable.  Better Nuncio ( talk ) 09:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barats and Bereta, isn't notabale enough for a separate article.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 23:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zero One (album): All but two sources here are either Spotify or a blatant primary source like a merchandise store.  The two sources that are actually reliable are 1 and 11, with 1 being a passing mention and 11 not even mentioning the album once.  Any material worthwhile for this album is already included in the article for the band itself.  λ Negative MP1 06:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  λ Negative MP1 06:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This appears to completely over rely on primary sources.  As such there is no evidence of notability.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 15:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Living Tombstone : as an WP:ATD since I found no adequate sourcing for this album.  Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jirón de la Unión (Metropolitano): The sources only give passing coverage at best.  Should be redirected to Metropolitano (Lima) .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 14:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Peru .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 14:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While this is certainly not a policy-based reason to delete, just take a look at the photo of the stop in the infobox--it should be obvious that this is not a notable stop in and of itself.  No real sources to be found, and the eswiki article doesn't provide any helpful sources, either.  The street itself , however, does appear to be notable (the street is what's covered in most of the sources if you do a search), and that could also be a possible redirect/(small) merge target.  Bestagon ⬡ 01:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Redirect or delete Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no objection to a redirect per OP.  Bestagon ⬡ 10:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
On & On (Cartoon song): Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Estonia and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Redirect to Cartoon (band) which probably just passes the notability requirements. Pichpich ( talk ) 17:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above and because the article in its current form neither cites any sources nor provides any significant information about the song or its importance. A reader coming here looking for information about this song would be disappointed. Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 18:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of MÄR chapters: This is probably one of the most obscure series out there, we don’t need multiple articles of exhaustive documentation on it.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Lists .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MÄR .  References also seem to be to web listings by publishers and/or sellers.  And yeah on the "WHY"... is anyone even reading that?  What purpose does it serve having the information broken down like that?  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 19:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it’s mainly a holdover from when FANDOM wasn’t really a thing Dronebogus ( talk ) 13:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep ; per WP:NOTPAPER : Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility, especially for readers with low-bandwidth connections and on mobile platforms, since it directly affects page download time (see Wikipedia:Article size).  Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries is a natural part of growth for a topic (see Wikipedia:Summary style) , which generally allows for size splits like this.  However, this series isn't super long and not many of the volumes have summaries.  At the very least, the content should be preserved, be it here or in the main article via a merge.  Link20XX ( talk ) 03:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MÄR .  The list isn't that prominent and could be better off merged with the main article.  Only split if there is a valid reason for it.  Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk ) 19:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cabinet Man: 00:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  wizzito | say hello!  00:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Spirit Phone per nom.  Found no coverage myself.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Spirit Phone.  A bunch of Lemon Demon articles got created since the last time I checked, and I was hoping there was some new coverage or something, but no dice.  casualdejekyll 00:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WQDH-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Carolina .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  Station's history has only been as an automated operation from out of state.  Nate • ( chatter ) 15:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : there's not much to say, or can be said, about a 2010s-launched DTV America/HC2/Innovate LPTV without significant or any coverage.  Yet another technical survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cyrus Lupo: If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters .  Spinixster (chat!) 07:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 07:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list.  This is just a plot summary, nothing here suggests GNG is met.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
GMA Saturday/Sunday Report: No good hits on GNews, GSearch and GNews Archives.  Most hits are old TV guide lists.  Suggest redirecting to List_of_GMA_Network_original_programming#Former_original_programming as WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Philippines . Lenticel ( talk ) 08:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment on  the last Afd The suggested reference in the old AfD is from GMA's news network. The suggested essay WP:TVSHOW that is used to argue for keep is well, an essay. It's better to follow WP:GNG and cite a reliable sources to support its notability. It was part of a mass AfD which probably made it harder for editors then to scrutinize each article's merit during that particular period. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, also there is also lack of coverage by GMA programming (old shows) and reliable source is original research.  This article should be delete per WP:SIGCOV , WP:OR and WP:RS .  Icarus58 ( talk ) 12:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So I decided to delete no redirect immediately to avoid multiple redirects for old programs since it is not advisable.  Icarus58 ( talk ) 00:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of GMA Network original programming#Former original programming per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Simone Buttigieg: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Malta .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Malta women's international footballers - this seems like the best WP:ATD as those searching her name would likely still expect to find out about a footballer.  I can't remember if this had better sources when I wrote the article but the best I can find now are things like Times of Malta , some award announcement on Facebook and Independent which don't cut it.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Malta women's international footballers as per Spiderone. Can't keep up with the mass AfDing of footballers but WP:ATD should hold for all of them whenever possible. - Socccc ( talk ) 22:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 19:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above per Spiderone.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect