hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Consulate General of The People's Republic of Bangladesh, Milan : I can find no significant coverage about this consulate to establish notability .  Whpq ( talk ) 21:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Bangladesh ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Embassies are not inherently notable and consulates even less so.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect - to Bangladesh–Italy relations .  Not independently notable.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 07:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of diplomatic missions in Italy as an WP:ATD .  I think that list is a slightly better target than Bangladesh-Italy relations .  In any case, I agree with everyone that the consulate isn't independently notable.  @ Whpq and LibStar : Would you find redirect acceptable, and if so, where would you recommend redirecting to?  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 17:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no preference.  With either redirect target's current state, the reader really gains nothing by being sent there. -- Whpq ( talk ) 18:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Derek Morgan (Criminal Minds) : If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Criminal Minds characters#Derek Morgan .  Spinixster (chat!) 09:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 09:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  This time we have a Reception section, limited to the sentence "Morgan was included in TV Guide's list of "TV's Sexiest Crime Fighters"."  If anyone thinks this is not the very definition of laughable, raise your hand.  For me, well, this is an obvious fail of GNG in need of redirecting if not deletion (but since redirects are WP:CHEAP , let's be merciful...).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Restore Redirect - This was just Redirected via an AFD consensus a couple of weeks ago, and then the article was reverted back to an article with absolutely no changes.   This should not even be at AFD again - it should just be immediately reverted back to the redirect that was already decided on, and then protected to keep this from happening again.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] " Redirect , as this could be considered a subtopic and just deleting it wouldn't be helpful.  - Sumanuil .  (talk to me) 06:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sri Paramakalyani College : I cannot find anything of particular note about the College (except what it says on its own website).  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 13:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University as we usually do in these circumstances.  Mccapra ( talk ) 09:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Mccapra.  Seems sensible, and there is no automatic notability for colleges of a federated university, nor for a university itself (for instance, see this AfD close [20] ).  Sourcing not there to sustain this page.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 10:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
N-Toons (French TV programming block) : Listed this as a CSD G2 (Test edit) which was reverted, so listing it here.  This has to go!  Intrisit ( talk ) 12:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : My suggestion is to merge this article with a related topic.  At present, it is a single paragraph on the subject's history, thus it fails GNG, NMEDIA, and NTV.  A merger would result in a more coherent and informative article for readers interested in French TV. -- AstridMitch ( talk ) 02:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nickelodeon : as a WP:ATD . Does not have any coverage in reliable sources to justify for a merge. Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 19:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge: Per @ AstridMitch 's recommendation, I agree with the merging proposal. Would also help if some citations were added, as it currently violates WP:OR . -- Mjks28 ( talk ) 04:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nickelodeon .  The problem with merging is that none of this is sourced.  It should be BLARed .  Even if there were sources, adding this content to the Nickelodeon article would probably be undue weight for such a minor...TV schedule timeslot?  I'm not even sure what to call this.  Toadspike [Talk] 22:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DYVB-TV : A possible redirect target would be List of GMA Network stations .  MarioGom ( talk ) 17:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 17:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on merging?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 01:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of GMA Network stations per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 11:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
CurveBall : As it currently stands I do not think it is notable enough for a standalone entry.  Sohom ( talk ) 03:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Websites .  Sohom ( talk ) 03:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS , WP:ROUTINE .  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 05:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Microsoft CryptoAPI .  Not independently notable, but because this vulnerability made the news, it is WP:DUE to mention it in the article about the software component that contained the vulnerability.  Jfire ( talk ) 22:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
UWSP Albertson Center for Learning Resources : If kept, needs significant cleanup.  Some of this information may be able to be merged elsewhere, but I'm not sure where.  SportingFlyer T · C 19:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Wisconsin .  SportingFlyer T · C 19:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a former library on a university campus.  Absolutely nothing here is cited to independent sources.  Most of the sources provided are from this library's website itself; the rest are from the websites of the university it served.  A redirect to the university campus is probably warranted; unfortunately, that article is a mess, too.  There's probably citable material for the decision to demolish the structure and the plans to replace it, but I hesitate to suggest "merge" per se when the level of detail here is so excessive.  Lubal ( talk ) 21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  The Banner talk 15:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article requires independent verification.  The cited sources are primary and from the subject, which does not provide a balanced perspective.  If kept, it will be of utmost importance to rewrite the article in a professional, encyclopedic tone.  Its excessive detail does not warrant a merge.  Instead, we could condense and redirect relevant information to the university’s article (which itself needs much improvement).  AstridMitch ( talk ) 6:01, 19 June 2024 The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Flashpoint (Elseworlds) : Industrial Insect (talk) 23:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge to List of Elseworlds publications as it a notable Flash comic book story.  Dwanyewest ( talk ) 23:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notable how?  It only has one citation and it's an interview.  Industrial Insect (talk) 23:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the information with merge being the best option at present .  It's a story of some note even if it doesn't meet that GNG that I helped come up with all those years ago, which I mention just so I don't have to argue about what notability means.  There's something here that needs to be conveyed to the reader and we need to work out how and where, but deletion isn't the answer to the problem here.  Working out how and where to present the information is the problem, and deleting doesn't do that.  As per the Editing policy, can I ask that we look at other options before deletion.  Would love to merge, but don't have the time and deletion debate is now underway.  H i ding T 11:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So far the only argument so far for keeping is "it's notable" with no explanation of why.  Flashpoint is already listed in the List of Elseworlds publications , so there is no reason to keep this article.  Industrial Insect (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia:LOSE and Wikipedia:JNN pretty much sums up the arguments made so far.  Industrial Insect (talk) 14:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Elseworlds publications#DC Universe Elseworlds - It does not appear to be a particularly notable storyline.  The few sources that come up on it are basically just a few short "Did you know that there was another Flash story called "Flashpoint" before the actually notable Flashpoint (comics) ?" type articles.  And when the most notable thing about the comic is that its not the notable comic with the same title, that is probably a sign that it does not pass the WP:GNG .   It it already listed and briefly described at List of Elseworlds publications#DC Universe Elseworlds , so a Redirect there would be fine.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  The only coverage I can find is of the " actually , there was another Flashpoint first" and then going on to talk about the one that was interesting instead.  It's a footnote.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 19:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect/merge Babysharkboss2 was here!!  — Preceding undated comment added 14:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Elseworlds publications#DC Universe Elseworlds , not notable enough for a separate article and it's already mentioned in that section.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
AISINDO : Google searches showed multiple passing mentions - this organization conducted forums and meetings, but none has shown in-depth coverage.  The parent organization Association for Information Systems is notable, but the organization in Indonesia isn't notable enough.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Technology , Computing ,  and Indonesia .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment redirect to Association for Information Systems or try to find sources and keep the page.  NiLok223 ( talk ) 10:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added recently one source.  Maybe more good are still somewhere NiLok223 ( talk ) 10:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Polish–Ottoman Wars : It makes more sense to make a new article called "List of wars between Poland and the ottoman Empire", just like: Polish-Russian wars and Polish-Swedish Wars Olek Novy ( talk ) 07:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Another proposal Another proposal by me is not deleting the page but Reverting all edits done since January 5th and Rewriting the article with the lists of wars Involving Poland and the Ottoman Empire.  Olek Novy ( talk ) 23:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Lithuania , Poland ,  and Turkey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment that Infobox is seriously crazy!  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore to disambig .  This was a disambig until a new user rewrote it (sadly, they also got banned, which I don't think was fair, but that's off topic here).  Anyway.  this should be restored to a disambig.  No prejudice to creating an article that is an overview of Polish–Ottoman Wars.  In fact, the disambig should be at Polish–Ottoman Wars (singular), so we need a move as well.  What the new editor did was to create a poorly referenced overview topics, good effort but the low density of references reminds me of what we used to do 10-15 years ago.  Sadly, I cannot recommend keeping their article; if they were not blocked I'd encourage them to work in this in their sandbox.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it makes more sense to make a List of wars just like Polish-Russian wars and Polish-Swedish wars Olek Novy ( talk ) 08:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore to disambig per Pioturs.  No prejudice to a future broad concept article, but this is just recycled material that competes with dedicates pages.  Srnec ( talk ) 23:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dental surgery : The article has also been unsourced for 16 years, and i cannot find any non-commercial web articles that cover this concept in depth.  At this point I feel like WP:TNT is the best route to go for this article.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 22:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to dentistry .  Left guide ( talk ) 23:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dentistry : this seems to be a content fork based on WP:SYNTH of existing articles.  Owen× ☎ 13:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Dentistry is the best target.  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 15:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 15:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disambiguate : keeping only what is under the "types".  This is a common search term.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 05:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Party of Freedom and Solidarity : Clearly fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."  AusLondonder ( talk ) 05:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 05:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the party fielded candidates in 61 ( see p.483 ) seats in the 2014 elections (out of a possible 250) - in any country that would be substantial, in a country like Mozambique that suggests something even more.  Quite a good likelihood given country and timing that there would be offline media sources.   Nevertheless, on a very precursory search, online sourcing is weak - a redirect to List of political parties in Mozambique might be appropriate at this time.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 09:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of political parties in Mozambique as an ATD , per Goldsztajn.  As noted above, the available sourcing at this point is not quite enough to pass WP:GNG .  No prejudice against recreation should more RS-based coverage eventually become available.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 16:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1995–96 Bracknell Bees season : No notable content, so no need to salvage information.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 16:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Ice hockey .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 16:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (a summary) to a higher level article.  I agree there isn't a need for a standalone article, but straight deletion will not benefit readers.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 17:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please specify a Merge target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as unverified tables of statistics do not an article make.   — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bees IHC , per much the same rationale as given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Invicta Dynamos season , and per indication there that the club article is an acceptable target, at least for the interim.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 09:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect