hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mildura Senior College : Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Australia .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote , but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors.   Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.  However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome.  Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.  Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts : {{subst: spa | username }} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst: canvassed | username }} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry : {{subst: csm | username }} or {{subst: csp | username }} .  Delete : I found some local coverage of this school, but that was not in sufficiently reliable publications to establish notability.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 12:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most of the hits in gnews are from the local paper "Sunraysia Daily" as per WP:AUD .  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Are we really saying that a large, century-old secondary school in a western country has no sources, not even printed ones?  I really cannot believe that.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why don't you look for some? I could find mainly coverage in very local press. LibStar ( talk ) 12:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I said print sources, not online sources. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I mean, it‘s neither particularly big, nor does it seem to be very special in any other specific way.  I‘m not sure that the fact that it‘s old by itself guarantees that appropriate sources exist .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 15:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nearly 1,000 pupils is hardly small!  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The size is irrelevant, what is relevant is how it meets WP:NSCHOOL . LibStar ( talk ) 12:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . I could not find any reliable sources via  Newsstream (database of Australia & New Zealand newspapers-- wider and deeper than Google), just many passing and routine mentions like this but nothing substantive that would meet GNG.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Cabrils ( talk ) 00:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DDamage : Fails WP:NBAND .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete even in the French article, it's not much of anything for sourcing.  This is the best I can find and it doesn't help [9] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Franco Vermeulen : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 12:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Sugar Bowl broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; one is about an announcer, each one of the others is about the Bowl games, with this being given a passing mention.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep with sourcing from [28] and [29] .  Delete : the sources provided above fall under WP:ROUTINE and are not effective to complete WP:LISTN .  This is a trivial list and does not withstand the WP:SIGCOV to remain as an article.  Sources above are merely routine mentions or ratings numbers.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yanet Núñez Mojarena : I can't find any evidence that this player complies with this guideline.  She also doesn't meet WP:NTENNIS as playing in the Fed Cup is no longer part of that guideline.  She does meet the essay detailed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines but the notability guidelines do supersede WikiProject essays and, in any case, her achievements don't give any room for WP:IAR imho.  She has never played in a major tournament, never won a tournament above 10K nor has she ever held a decent ranking (she hasn't even ever been in the top 400).  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Tennis ,  and Cuba .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  She is more notable than most, but still not notable enough.  The fact that she never played, or won in any notable tournament is the nail in the coffin.  IncompA 20:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colleen Madden : A Google search doesn't return much, such as an IMDB which may or may not be her, a news article that is definitely about a different Colleen Madden, and an obituary.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 19:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists ,  and Women .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 19:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unless additional and more substantial WP:RS guidelines can be identified, this seems like an easy call.  One does not become notable by referencing themselves in their own books.  This article fails to meet WP:GNG guidelines.  I vote to delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are very weak, her agent has edited this article, and seems to function as promotional vehicle.  128.252.154.2 ( talk ) 21:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maxime Jobe : JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and France .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - professional footballer who played at the elite level, multiple sources to prove that fact.  Fleets ( talk ) 10:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 11:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 19:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of IRS SIGCOV, which is required to be cited in the article for all sportspeople.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Undecided (leaning keep/move to draft) : Young Catalans player and will likely have more coverage later in his career.  Should be expanded, but currently not sufficient coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So you agree that there is not sufficient coverage?  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Nothing found that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found routine mill news, name mentions, listings, nothing with SIGCOV from independent reliable sources.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Sources in article are a database record and a name mention in routine game news.  Ping me if indepth SIGCOV is found.  // Timothy :: talk 09:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francisco Andra : A Chilean source search failed to provide any suitable sources for WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Best source that I can find is Soccerway , a database source which SPORTBASIC specifically says does not confer notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Chile .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per my BEFORE search.  Jogurney ( talk ) 13:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monkey tree phenomenon : Also primarily created by Sengkang , so WP:PDEL might apply.  Darylgolden ( talk ) Ping when replying 09:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Singapore .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions .  5Q5 | ✉ 12:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:NOTNEWS and a probably a candidate for speedy deletion: G12 Unambiguous copyright infringement , see [55] .  Article was created by Sengkang who was blocked indefinitely for copyright violations [56] .  JimRenge ( talk ) 11:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find articles about monkeys in trees, nothing for this cultural item Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Story has no lasting impact.  It is just a naturally caused illusion that would no longer be visible today with the tree constantly growing.  Delete "Monkey tree" redirect also.  5Q5 | ✉ 11:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  EVENT notability is not exactly fulfilled.  Highly doubt the long term effects.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per G12 and WP:NOT NEWS .  Scorpions1325 ( talk ) 03:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Property Institute of New Zealand : Fails the general and organizaiton-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New Zealand .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG.  It would be helpful if someone familiar with the colloquialism of New Zealand could explain what this article even means.   I assume it is related to real estate.   It reads to me like it's a real estate group, that offers the services of "Web advertisement, conferences, networking, websites", etc.  Something along the lines of a real estate umbrella group.  The Wikipedia Pageviews Analysis shows mostly no views, with one or two views here and there.  — Maile ( talk ) 20:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sydney Cooke : A PROD was converted to redirect, redirect into a recreated mini-stub, thus listing here.  Викидим ( talk ) 06:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Women .  Викидим ( talk ) 06:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Aside from failing WP:NSKATE , I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since out subject fails WP:GNG and meets none of the five criteria demanded by WP:NSKATE .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Absolutely fails WP:NSKATE .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elena Dahl : The main notability claim on offer here is that her work exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient coverage and analysis about her work to get her over WP:GNG -- but the only reference cited here is a primary source that isn't support for notability at all. As I don't read Swedish, I'm perfectly willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to archived Swedish media coverage than I've got can find enough to salvage it -- but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and Sweden .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, I think that ISBN to my books can meet the case, but pl let me know if you need additional information: 1 Seven Russian poets in Stockholm: ISBN 91-7906-004-8 2 Collection of poems "Summer time and Winter Clocks": ISBN 9189424069 (1999), ISBN 91-89424360 (2000) 3 Novel "Always returning to you", ISBN 978-91-7327-089-2 My translations of Swedish poets are published in four literary magazines.  Shall I provide publication years/numbers?  My membership in Swedish Writers' Union can be confirmed by the Union.  My Ph D about Boris Pasternak is from 1978, it can be confirmed by Göteborg University, the only number I can find is 9 9901417317.  If you search my name (Dahl, Elena) in Libris, the database of all books in Swedish libraries, you will find a complete list of my published work.  Sincerely Elena Dahl 178.174.247.84 ( talk ) 21:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A writer's notability is not established by citing the article to the publication details of her own work as proof that it exists — a writer's notability is established by third party coverage about her and her books in media , as proof that they've been externally validated as culturally significant by somebody other than the writer's own employers.  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I searched in 2 major Swedish newspapers (Aftonbladet and Dagens Nyheter) for her name and got nothing.  I don't speak Swedish so I can't go further than that, but we would need 3rd party sources to keep this.  (I think WP is being confused with LinkedIn, which is designed for self-promotion.)  Lamona ( talk ) 15:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
College of International Education : It is clearly not notable - there are no articles online about it I can find.  It seems to be largely sourced from the CIE website itself, or unsourced.  DansterTheManster ( talk ) 17:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I totally agree.  The organization seems completely unimportant in the scheme of things and surely not deserving of an article.  Gnilhtrae ( talk ) 17:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per SCHOOLOUTCOME.  Fails GNG.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 10:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Credit Insurance & Surety Association : Tagged for over 10 years - Altenmann >talk 00:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Organizations ,  and Netherlands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Tiny organization.  Seems confused about the "Netherlands".  gidonb ( talk ) 05:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks proper sources.  Is sourced from their own website.  killer bee 06:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete obvious WP:ADVERT and likely not WP:NCORP passing.  Graywalls ( talk ) 09:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a WP:BROCHURE .  — siro χ o 10:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There are sources to support the notability of the organization.  See here .  The reports published by ICISA are considered relevant, see here and here .  True, the article as it stands is promotional, not encyclopedic, etc.  But the organization is notable.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 22:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not properly sourced with reliable independent of the subject sources.  In its current form, it resembles a brochure, as someone previously noted.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 10:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete