hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Pavlo Borysenko: Joeykai ( talk ) 14:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : appears to have significant third-party coverage: Interview with Ukrainian sports outlet iSport Interview with Latvian news website Interview on the official website of the Ukrainian Hockey Super League Coverage on Ukrainian sports website XSport: interview , news story , there are many others Interview on Ukrainian hockey fansite Coverage on Ukrainian news website LBua As Borysenko is now a naturalised Romanian citizen, I suspect there will also be significant coverage on the Romanian internet, but I haven't checked, as I don't speak Romanian.  At the very least, it would be unacceptable to delete this article without asking for the input of a Romanian speaker.  All the best, Akakievich ( talk ) 10:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep ; based on the sources listed above I feel comfortable affirming that GNG has been met.   I cannot say with any certainty how reliable those sources are though and I welcome discussion on that.  18abruce ( talk ) 21:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Lutz Heinemann: There are one or two interviews, but these also do not count towards notability.  The WP:GNG is not met, and I do not think any criteria from WP:NPROF apply here.  Toadspike [Talk] 18:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep >30,000 citations according to Google Scholar suggests that criterion 1 of WP:PROF has been met.  Uhooep ( talk ) 18:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Medicine ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : per Uhooep, although I could be convinced either way.  Queen of Hearts ( talk ) 03:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .   Looking at the most cited papers on GS, they are also highly coauthored.   Middle author (in a field where that matters) on a highly coauthored paper does not convince me of so much.   However, I am seeing enough highly cited papers as first or last author that I think this is a pass of NPROF.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 10:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Week keep , for the same reasons as Russ.  Like experimental physics, clinical medicine is extremely highly-cited and flooded with consortium findings and recommendations with hundreds of coauthors, which really should not count at all towards any author's citation record.  Even so, within Heinemann's top 10 articles on Scopus I count 5 research pieces that have fewer than 15 coauthors (including two as first-author), totaling over 2200 citations.  My ! vote is "weak" only because it is hard to tell whether that is typical among diabetes clinical researchers and I'm not particularly inclined to write a script analyzing the low-author-number scholarly output of his 1000+ coauthors.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 16:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Leopold Z. Goldstein: UtherSRG (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New Jersey and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to be a notable academic from the pre-Internet era.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Has about 10 papers in Pubmed, using the sourcing given in the article.  Would appear notable, but wow it needs a TNT or at least a rewrite.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep per Oaktree b and Eastmain.  I think there might just be enough for WP:PROF here.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Midlands Rugby League Premier Division: Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : As it is known where this league falls into the wider structure via refs on the RLC page, I would lean towards keeping the article if a few more references could be found.  Will work on incorporating those refs onto this page.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Establish how it fits into the British rugby league system plus found a few sources not yet added - Keep and rename Midlands Rugby League .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Robin (TV series): Tagged for notability since January 2023 Citations on other language pages do not appear to support notability either.  Donald D23 talk to me 13:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation , Sweden , Canada ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 13:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Television series for national television.  AlexandraAVX had already added a good secondary source.  I've added a couple of other Swedish articles, and I think this lives up to our requirements.  / Julle ( talk ) 02:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Julle's reasoning.  The Dagens Nyheter source looks solid: a national newspaper with an article called " Robin hopes to become hip in the whole world".  The Expressen article is called "Prized friends got drunk. But now Magnus figures are child-friendly" — this is referring to Carlsson's next series for children, comparing it to the adult-oriented Robin .  This series got national attention.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 02:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , there's now three sources in Swedish national newspapers that discuss the subject, it definitely seems to meet GNG to me at this point.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 17:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per improvements made since nom.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 19:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jack Meltzer: Boleyn ( talk ) 11:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Social science , Illinois , Michigan , Texas ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Does seem to have been a notable academic and planner.  Full length obituary in the Chicago Tribune : [9] .  The University of Texas at Dallas issues their own obituary: [10] .  (It's not independent, but WP:NACADEMIC does not require independent sources.)  Often mentioned or discussed in scholarship about urban planning in Chicago, e.g. [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] .  His book Metropolis to Metroplex received several scholarly reviews: [15] , [16] , [17] .  He and his firm are discussed extensively in this doctoral dissertation: [18] .  Jfire ( talk ) 17:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  He appears to be a person of significance and finding references from 1950s-1960s is probably not easy given that those were pre-digital media times.  BulgarianCat ( talk ) 07:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- Subject is clearly notable per sources already in the article in addition to Explicit 's argument.  The real problem is that great swaths of the article are copyvio from the cited Hyde Park Journal obit.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 17:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jessica Kingsley Publishers: The sources are VERY weak, and these are not within the standards expected to Wiki.  As such, this should be deleted in accordance with Wiki policy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkinspyce ( talk • contribs ) 20:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkinspyce ( talk • contribs ) 20:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , England ,  and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Gosh thank you for fixing this for me. I could NOT figure out what part of the code was keyed wrong.  Pumpkinspyce ( talk ) 00:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the sources are all fine.  This meets WP:GNG .  At worse this could be merged into John Murray Press , but I don't see the need.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 07:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 29 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , seems to meet WP:NCORP based on existing sources (van Goidsenhoven, Leni, The Bookseller , PW ).  While a minor edit pass could help it's not even a bad case of WP:PROMO .  — siro χ o 07:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , widely & internationally known publisher of books on topics related to autism with numerous notable authors. -- TempusTacet ( talk ) 11:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions .  Randykitty ( talk ) 12:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Probably redirect to Hachette UK, seems to be a sub-unit of that company now.  [10] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm surprised that the nominator has characterised the sources in this way.  For example, what is wrong with the van Goidsenhoven source?  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 14:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Britt Richardson: Coverage exists, but is routine coverage on the subjects gold medal win at a Junior Worlds.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 02:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Canada .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 02:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The subject is also a World Championship medalist for seniors, specifically at FIS Alpine World Ski Championships 2023 – Nations team event .  The subject has also finished several times among the top 20 in the entire world, namely in World Cup events in 15th, 18th and 19th place.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree Kasper2006 ( talk ) 22:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The skier has received significant coverage as Geschichte has explained.  -- Kasper2006 ( talk ) 22:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We do have to locate the coverage though.  For a contemporary world championship medalist in a somewhat big sport in an English-speaking country, that should be possible.  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Where is the significant coverage?  There is no GNG for this subject.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I found [22] mentioning the team bronze in 2023, [23] about the recent GS victory, and [24] includes the 3 top-20 World Cup GS finishes this year.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 23:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I upgraded the article.  I would also like to point out that the article is present in 5 other Wikipedias around the world.  -- Kasper2006 ( talk ) 05:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Very clearly a world-level skier, [25] [26] [27] [28] etc.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jahzir Bruno: Not meeting ACTOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:NACTOR #1: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films , television shows, stage performances, or other productions .  He's had significant roles in The Witches (Hero Boy was the lead character and being the lead in a mainstream feature film is a notable role), The Christmas Chronicles 2 (main cast), The Loud House (main voice cast) and The Really Loud House (starring cast).  Pamzeis ( talk ) 04:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Plays several notable roles, therefore he meets WP:NACTOR .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 12:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Lead role in The Witches seems to meet WP:NACTOR #1.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Hassan Golestaneh: The 2017 "win" (although sourcing says runner up) doesn't appear to be the Arnold, which has a stronger pull for anybio.   This is not about the state of the article, which can be cleaned up if he is indeed notable.  Star Mississippi 20:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Health and fitness ,  and Iran .  Star Mississippi 20:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – I edited this article for a Guild of Copy Editors.  At the time, I looked closely at the sources used.  I agree the case for notability seems thin but there truly are adequate sources to document notability.  These sources are mostly Iranian publications and were, therefore, printed in Persian.  There are several feature articles about him, including his competing and being an international judge.  BTW, he did indeed place in two categories in the Arnold 2017: Men’s Physique Class F Over 182 cm (11th place) and 2017 Arnold Classic USA Men’s Model Search (6th place).  Not significant wins IMO but it really doesn't matter because there are other sources that are feature articles to prove notability.  Rublamb ( talk ) 21:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep examining the sources there appears to be enough for WP:BASIC (excluding interviews etc), but I am not positive as I'm both unfamiliar with the sources and reading through Google translate.  I am unsure about ANYBIO re nom.  — siro χ o 22:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - did a spot check on some of the Iranian references as well, I think probably has enough to indicate notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Game Boy Micro: Kpg jhp jm 06:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  The nominator has not made an argument for deleting this article, and links to a different nomination.  What they say there suggests that they're attempting to open a merge request (mistakenly doing so at AfD), saying in their nomination that they suggest merging with Game Boy Advance .  Apart from that, the idea that "few would care about" a topic is very much not an admissible argument at AfD.  jp × g 08:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep GNG — siro χ o 09:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This current rush to merge every single Nintendo handheld has become irrational.  This is very clearly a notable separate system.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2023 Chelmsford City Council election: Was returned to mainspace without a single in-depth source.   Waited several weeks to see if there was going to be any effort to improve the article, and then after the election was weeks in the past, redirected to the council page, which was immediately reverted without improvement.   Another week has gone by, and still not a single in-depth source.   Currently fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Election results are here: https://www.chelmsford.gov.uk/voting-and-elections/results-of-elections/local-election-results/ I have tried and failed to work out where or how to add that URL to the page.  ChelmsfordEditor ( talk ) 17:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The sources are now added.  The source is the council's own website.  Unfortunately the format of that website does not allow in to do it by individual ward, instead displaying dynamically Deletion would not be approriate, considering this page leads to here and has many other council elections without sources - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_United_Kingdom_local_elections Horizon22 ( talk ) 18:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only primary sourcing provided so fails GNG.  The summary can be included in Chelmsford City Council .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Took a few seconds to find sources.  [24] [25] [26] Also relevant are the outcomes of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Luton Borough Council election , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Hyndburn Borough Council election , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Cheshire West and Chester Council election , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Fenland District Council election and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Cambridge City Council election , all from the last couple of months.  Number 5 7 11:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Number57.  Alexcs114 ( talk ) 16:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Have now added media coverage demonstrating notability and reliable secondary sources in addition to the primary source of the council's formal declaration of results.  Have also added narrative summary for context.  Stortford ( talk ) 21:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Number57; there is enough RS that covered this election (which should be added to the article) to make it notable.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 15:49, 3 June 2023‎ (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
WVMA-CD: Let'srun ( talk ) 21:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Massachusetts ,  and New Hampshire .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep At least for this case it had a past history of competitiveness as a satellite station, and has not been turned into a non-competitive subfarm yet.  Nate • ( chatter ) 02:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 02:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - well sourced by the standards of radio tv stations and notable.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep