hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Tempography: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Tempographs and Tempography is a thing that exists (I found references for the use of the term that go back to 1911), however, this article is about a "conceptual video art project" by Anthony Bannwart from 2003 that was titled Tempography.  According to the article history, the article was originally about the technique/technology of Tempography, but was hijacked in 2008 by an editor named Anthonybannwart who turned it into an article about his video art project.  The art project is a non-notable art work failing GNG.  With the exception of one news article all I can find on it are primary sources and social media.  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Photography , Sweden ,  and Switzerland .  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails to meet WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WOCB-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Ohio .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Zero independent coverage.  — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rubén González Sosa: As always, every diplomat is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists or existed, and instead diplomats only get articles if they can be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability -- but existence is the only notability claim being made here, and the only sources are a short biographical blurb on one page of a book with over 2,000 pages and a very brief blurb about his death in a source that isn't even dated at all in order to replace the incorrect Category:Living people (which I've already removed) with an actual death year category.  The article further asserts that he was a politician, but says absolutely nothing about any political roles he might have held to determine whether he would pass WP:NPOL or not.  This is not enough sourcing to secure the notability of a diplomat all by itself, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable to exempt him from having to have more sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Mexico .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He appears to have been the vice-minister for foreign affairs [7] , but this seems to be a bureaucratic position rather than a political one, so I don't think it can be considered WP:NPOL -conferring as it is not a cabinet position.  Besides that, there is a complete lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 03:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tintumon: Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  While I'm unfamiliar with the subject, I can't seem to find much.  Granted, I feel there may be sources out there, so if anything winds up from others' searches, let me know and I'd be willing to change my vote.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete insufficient WP:SIGCOV that can be found.  Looks to be a neologism or thing made up.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 04:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chhangte Lalhriatpuia: An Indian source search yielded only database sources and Google gives me the same plus a few Football Manager sites.  The best I can find in WP:RS is Football Counter , which only mentions him once.  Likewise with the Football Counter source already cited.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Mizoram .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Margaret Clark (politician): While the subject does have some media coverage, I don't believe that any of it meets WP:SIGCOV , therefore failing WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep -  I found this [25] and [26] Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 06:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As Shaws username said, those two sources are not independent of the subject and therefore do not contribute towards notability.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 22:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing remotely notable.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 08:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete , all the secondary sources are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  The two links above are both from bodies that she was a member of and not secondary sources.  Shaws username ( talk ) 13:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NPOL and not otherwise notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 00:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Salyan: The Yengin source is just a diary from over a century ago, not reliable per WP:PRIMARY .  Güzel, Oğuz, and Karatay are genocide deniers .  Page 483 : "This is an important proof, demonstrating that Armenians were not subjected to genocide before and after the deportation."  Güçlü is very apologetic to genocide denial and portrays it as a legitimate view, such as ( Page 179 ) writing genocide deniers like Heath W. Lowry and Justin McCarthy "both dispute that the evidence supports a verdict of genocide" as opposed to "other historians...take a very different view".  Also on Page 44: "Yet unlike the denial of the Holocaust that nourishes anti-Semitism, denial of the Armenian genocide is not part of a racist anti-Armenian ideology".  The Altayli website is not a credible or established source, and includes articles denying genocide .  I also found very little information about these writers, and suspect they would not pass Wikipedia:Notability (academics) .  - K evo 3 2 7 ( talk ) 07:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Azerbaijan ,  and Turkey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per the above arguments.  Once again, could not find anything on google books stating that this battle happened.  Sources cited are undoubtedly biased and not reliable.  محرر البوق ( talk ) 03:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per norm.  -- HistoryofIran ( talk ) 14:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom: Seems like a fairly clear violation of WP:NOTDIR .  Hobit ( talk ) 17:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and United Kingdom .  Hobit ( talk ) 17:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTDIR is a Wikipedia policy.  Parkrun itself is notable but there is simply no need for an exhaustive list of every single event.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per list of Parkruns in Australia.  Clearly WP:NOTDIR .  The very exceptional few notable ones can probably be mentioned on the parent article.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 18:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is the sort of thing that readers would be better directed to the official source like https://www.parkrun.org.uk/events/events/#geo=4.03/55.05/-2.95 rather than Wikipedia attempting to maintain its own duplicate directory of non-notable small, local events like this.  Reywas92 Talk 18:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Every link to a "parkrun" is actually just a link to a park or other location.  D r e a m Focus 21:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  On top of NOTDIR and NLIST add other WP:NOTs .  Wikipedia is not a free web host for an organisations event listings.  Is not a mirror of primary content.  Is not a link farm.  Is not a means of promotion.  WP:PRIMARY , Do not base an entire article on primary sources.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Reywas92.  Clear NOTDIR violation, and advertising concerns also.  Stifle ( talk ) 08:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clear WP:NOTDIRECTORY violation.  Can't believe this and the US equivalent survived AFDs in 2017, since no evidence has ever been given that these lists meet WP:GNG or WP:NLIST , and they clear violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 15:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
M. L. Ashwini: Was never elected into a political office that makes one inherently notable TheWikiholic ( talk ) 18:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  TheWikiholic ( talk ) 18:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass NPOL and not otherwise notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sudokuro: QuietCicada ( talk ) 16:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 16:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn't find anything but the one IGN review, and a few announcement posts.  Everything else was database entries or compilation posts about release days, i.e. "released this week" lists.  -- ferret ( talk ) 16:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found this South Florida Sun Sentinel article mention [2] but nothing else.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 20:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I hate to delete an obscure DS game, but it does seem like it got virtually no review coverage besides the two noted reviews.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 17:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The IGN review is hardly a significant coverage, given the fact it spends almost 3 out of 4 paragraphs not talking much about the game itself.  GamesRadar is a usual routine coverage of an announcement and the Sun Sentinel spends around 3 longer sentences only (after the intro about its publisher).  Fails WP:GNG and I wasn't able to find much in my searches either.  Jovanmilic97 ( talk ) 11:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Plush Mush: Google search for "Plush Mush" results in about 65 sites, consisting of places to hear the songs and sites to buy mushroom plushies.  Sources provided in the article are interviews at sites that basically exist for promotional purposes (e.g. Blaster Magazine's tagline is "Get interviewed today!"), or short news items declaring that a new song has been released.  ... disco spinster talk 03:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Puerto Rico .  ... disco spinster talk 03:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with the nominator's assessment.  Searching news, news archive, the web normally, and WP:TWL brings nothing up.  What's there isn't usable.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 05:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing for notability for this musical artist found, all are mentions of plush items you can mush.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
San Joaquin River Estates, California: Reywas92 Talk 21:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete See my comments about River Road Estates, above.   Another GNIS copy-paste job.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing is here to indicate notability.  Concur with the nom regarding GEOLAND.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RevPro Uprising 2022: I can't find any significant journalistic news coverage about the event Sionk ( talk ) 22:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  Sionk ( talk ) 22:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sarah Dugdale: Sourcing is scant and mostly goes to social media sites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Canada .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : She got major roles in major network shows (read the opening lead) Jaiquiero ( talk ) 13:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] They say "major roles" but I couldn't find sourcing that supported that statement.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NACTOR .  No evidence of  "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows ..." or "unique, prolific or innovative contributions".  Most of the shows listed in the lead do not even include her name as one of the stars, and the sourcing is very poor (IMDB and an Indian wikia).  Much of the bio material is unsourced, and some of it is inappropriate (for example, why would we include the information that her brother is gay and when he married his partner?).  Meters ( talk ) 00:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm French-Canadian and have no idea what a B2 francophone is either (as in the article).  Seems to not help the notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and improve.   Article was nominated less than 7 hrs after it was created, articles need some time for improvement.   Not convinced WP:NACTOR is failed, since there are notable roles listed at IMDB.  W C M email 07:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - No references to verify notability, fails WP:NACTOR .  Mentioned notable roles but no references to support it.  Mentioned the article is new, can be improved and for same can be moved to draft rather then deletion.  DSN18 ( talk ) 18:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wee Curry Monster , an WP:ATD is to move the article could be moved to draftspace so that you could improve it, if you like?  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Another nothing article by an editor with a history of disruptive editing about another non-notable actress.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 07:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is only one source that points to her personal life.  None of her films she has participated in were sourced.  HarukaAmaranth ( talk ) 22:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Needs more citations for verification and notability.  Naomijeans ( talk ) 21:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
25th Bangladesh Infantry Regiment: Extensive searches in English and Bengali found nothing deeper than a couple of passing mentions.  The unit exists, but no significant coverage of it exists, so fails WP:MILUNIT and WP:GNG .  No reliably sourced content to merge.  Worldbruce ( talk ) 13:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Bangladesh .  Worldbruce ( talk ) 13:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete