Stan Rose : Couldn't find any mention of him in RS, only press releases.  Morbidthoughts ( talk ) 20:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Biology .  Morbidthoughts ( talk ) 20:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The references are a collection of company statements and press releases, many of which don't mention the article subject at all.  The article doesn't show that it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE .  - MrOllie ( talk ) 22:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have reviewed WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE.  Over the next few days, asap, I will be removing references that do not comply with those standards, as well as any content that does not, and including appropriate references throughout.  Kindly allow time to make the necessary updates so that the article does not need to be deleted Srose39 ( talk ) 22:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mr. Rose , please refrain from editing the article about you.  Please stick to one account, and please check whether you're logged in before editing.  Several editors here have put the time needed into looking for reliable sources for a biography.  More time won't help; it hasn't since 2009.  That said, closing admin, please note the subject/author's own implicit ! Keep vote, and his rationale.  Cheers!  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 20:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you.  I replied on the article's Talk page.  I'm new to this, not a regular editor, and have no interest in editing.  Was naively trying to be helpful.  Found another article that is more focused on me directly, but will leave it to others to consider: https://www.newspapers.com/image/529144177/? terms=%22Stanley%20Rose%22%20CEO%20&match=1 The Capital Times, 22 Apr 2004, Thu · Page 56-57 I'm a scientist and entrepreneur who has started, grown and sold multiple businesses of note in the fields of DNA analysis and genomics, but have never sought personal publicity.  I greatly appreciate everyone's help in trying to improve this article so that it is factually correct and compliant with your standards Srose39 ( talk ) 22:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm just not seeing enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO.  There is coverage, but it's all primary sources, business and local puff-piece coverage, trivial mentions, etc. —not significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.  Woodroar ( talk ) 01:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 17:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This seems to have been written mostly by User:Pioneer28 , whose only contributions have been to this article.  Is this COI promotional editing?  NeverRainsButPours ( talk ) 19:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It appears the subject has used at least two accounts to author/edit the article.  He also sometimes just doesn't log in.  It's textbook COI but not (yet) disruptive editing or intentional socking.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 20:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find any reliable, unrelated, third-party source providing substantial coverage, let alone several of them.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 20:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of meeting Wikipedia notability criteria.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 22:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , fails WP:BIO (and apparently also WP:AB ), and runs afoul of WP:PROMO .  No evident, independent coverage by reliable sources.  JoJo Anthrax ( talk ) 14:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Ed hist raises possibility this is a vanity autobio.  Certainly does not pass in the primary content category of PROF. 128.252.154.2 ( talk ) 19:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete