Conor O'Callaghan (businessman): He received some attention from national outlets right when he announced his campaign in August of last year, but that's to be expected of any candidate in a competitive House race.  From what I can see, he's received zero national news coverage since September 2023.  All of the articles cited on the page are campaign-related, and I can't find any non-campaign-related coverage of him on Google from any time, so I don't think he meets GNG.  Very much reminiscent of Kellen Curry , another 2024 congressional candidate who got national news attention right when he launched and promptly faded from view.  I'd support a redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona#District 1 .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Ireland , Arizona ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support either redirect or outright delete ing, as even with the bit of coverage he has received more recently (he appears to be running a generally more negative campaign rel. to the other 5 in the race) I don't believe he meets notability standards.  Buggie111 ( talk ) 14:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not meeting criminal notability; simply being a political candidate isn't notable.  Can be re-created if he wins the political seat, otherwise, not meeting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Weak keep : I support a redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona .  That being said, while he doesn't meet WP:NPOL for being a candidate, it's possible he meets WP:BASIC .  What makes this different from other cases, in my opinion, is that the candidature coverage is not WP:MILL .  He's received a significant amount of coverage that specifically goes into detail about his career before running for office.  For example, this Bloomberg article and this MSNBC article.  C F A 💬 01:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that the national coverage of him isn't run of the mill, but the problem is that the only non-ROTM coverage he ever received came right when he announced his campaign.  As I said in the nomination, he's received no national attention since September 2023.  It seems like he made a splash right when he announced because he's running in a competitive congressional race, but I don't think that translates to lasting notability.  If he loses this race, will anyone be searching his name in 5-10 years?  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 04:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi!  I made this article...I lost my login for AZVoter so I'll go in my thought process here.  Conor has the most cash on hand out of any candidate other than the incumbent in this race.  He is polling alright and has four endorsements from people in the US house of reps. So he definitely is getting national recognition.  But you are correct, if he loses he will probably be irrelevant.  The negative campaigning is something I wanted to add but this was my first article so I did not really know what to write about.  JustMadeThis4Discussion ( talk ) 02:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Raising money and getting a couple endorsements from members of Congress is not what I meant by "national attention" (we're talking about news coverage here) and does not establish notability.  See WP:NPOL .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect