hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Brian Solis : TLA (talk) 00:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Advertising , Technology , Internet ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article has always been a puff-piece in my opinion.  Most media articles are either not notable or only mention this person in passing.  I do acknowledge that they have two books with their own entries - Engage! and The End of Business as Usual - but I still lean on the side of delete.  Shritwod ( talk ) 14:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, not enough significant coverage.  Note that this article has recently been edited by Pohzxd , a paid-editing sockpuppet.  Graham87 ( talk ) 19:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Concept Medical : Fails WP:RSP .  Sponsored content published at supplements ( WP:NEWSORGINDIA ).  Renomination reason: sock puppet activity in the prior AfD discussion , also six months have passed since the last AfD.  Charlie ( talk ) 04:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Medicine , Technology , India ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A Florida company, with an article sourced to Indian news sources, seems a bit odd...  They exist, but there is no coverage of them we'd use, that isn't PR-ish.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:NCORP , also appears to violate WP:SOAPBOX .  ADifferentMan ( talk ) 10:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omotoso Oluwabukunmi : He has not been discussed in reliable sources.  Majority of the sources cited in the article are about his clothing line and not about him.  Since the subject's clothing line already has a stand-alone aritcle, this BLP article should be redirected to that article.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  02:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Fashion ,  and Nigeria .  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  02:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  Doesn't meet general notability.  Most sources are not about him.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 03:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find any sources solely about him or not published by him.  Probably doesn't meet the notability guideline .  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 03:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails CREATIVE and GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 19:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kirill Chereshko : I am completing this nomination on their behalf but will remain neutral myself for the time being.  Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Source eval: Comments Source Name in list  1.  "» Докладчики".  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Name mention in database record  2. ^ "Черешко Кирилл - MEMORYON".  memoryon.net (in Russian).  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Name mention in database record  3. ^ "Кирилл Черешко, Москва, Россия".  personbase.com.  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Name mention in database record  4. ^ "Кирилл Черешко, Мытищи Россия".  poiski.pro.  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Interview work, primary  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c Синхронист о своей работе: перевёл – как вагон разгрузил. , retrieved 2023-10-11 Resume type page Авторская платформа Pandia.ru".  pandia.ru.  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Resume type page  7. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Кирилл Викторович Черешко на "Профи". Рейтинг "5,0", 2 отзыва. Английский язык, немецкий язык, манекенщицы".  Profi.ru.  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Resume type page  8. ^ "Персональный сайт - Опыт работы".  perevodchik-chereshko.narod.ru.  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Primary, video Услуги".  Авито (in Russian).  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Primary, annoucement of appointment  10. ^ "Знакомьтесь, новый член Союза МТПП ИП Черешко К.В. — последовательный и синхронный переводчик английского языка".  mytischi.tpprf.ru.  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Database record  11. ^ "Черешко Кирилл Викторович, Мытищи".  Налоговая. ру (in Russian).  Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Primary, video  12. ^ Кирилл Черешко.  В здоровом теле – здоровый дух: спорт в жизни переводчика. , retrieved 2023-10-12 Primary, video  13. ^ Память переводчика, retrieved 2023-10-12 BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 01:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Timothy.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Sammarinese films of 2014 : Standard practice of WikiProject Film is that a country gets one base list of its films first, with separate by-year lists spun off only when that base list has become too large and needs to be chunked out for size management purposes -- but specifically in 2014, one user undertook a misguided project of creating standalone "list of country films of 2014" for every single country where they could find even one film to list, which has never otherwise been done for any other year before or since. But this is a list of just one film that doesn't even have an article to link to, and San Marino doesn't even have a base list at all -- it's such a small country that it's deeply unlikely to have any significant film industry of its own, and is likely at best an annex to the Italian film industry (even the one film listed here is tagged by IMDb as a San Marino-Italy coprod), so that we don't even have a Cinema of San Marino overview, or a Category:Sammarinese films category, either.  So no prejudice against the creation of List of Sammarinese films if somebody with some knowledge of the subject can be arsed to find more than one film to list in it, but we don't need a 2014-specific list, and with just one unlinked film here I can't mentally justify moving this to the general title myself if I can't find any other films to add to it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Lists ,  and Europe .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, no need to list a single non-notable film.  I would recommend mass-deletion/redirection of most of this user's 2014 articles, few of which make any sense as standalone pages.  Reywas92 Talk 15:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Why state that it produced over 200 films in that year if you're only just going to list one film that doesn't even have an article?  Makes no sense to me.  Hell, even the IMDb source only has one entry, so I have no clue where the 200 figure came from.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 17:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I suspect the "200" figure may have just been uncorrected copy-pasting from the creator's boilerplate starter text, because it does seem incredibly implausible that a tiny country with only one-fifth the population of my own not-especially-large hometown actually produced that many films in one year when even the US generally only pulls off about 600.  Also, even List of Italian films of 2014 features exactly the same "over 200 feature films" claim too, while also not listing anywhere near 200 films either, which bolsters my suspicion that the creator just copy-pasted boilerplate text without adjusting it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Gu-nam : toobigtokale ( talk ) 18:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 19:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Only 10 professional matches, poorly sourced.  If the athlete's career resumes to this, fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  I don’t see neither enough coverage nor WP:Nexist or WP:Basic.  185.104.138.35 ( talk ) 03:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nadia Burger : No sources found that discuss her in Gnews; only sources used for the article are a gov't website and some small biographical article.  Not meeting BLP, has not done anything to warrant notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Bilateral relations .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, diplomats are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and get Wikipedia articles only if they can be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage and analysis about their work in media — but this cites absolutely none of the kind of sourcing that's required.  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  The only coverage seems to be her making statements as ambassador but nothing with her as the subject.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Though she passes WP:NPOL , there is no significant coverage aside from routine stuff that are brought by her office.  Merko ( talk ) 19:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WKOG-LP : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Indiana .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Only source I could find was a passing mention in a 7,000 page FCC document. — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I came closer with 1990s Indianapolis papers, but not enough.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 04:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Texas Shootout : Fails the general notability policy.  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , United States of America ,  and Nevada .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find enough in my BEFORE to even recommend a a merge/redirect, but I am open to revising my vote if someone finds better sources (please ping me if this happens).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 23:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
George McGovern in popular culture : Very few references and is mostly trivia.  Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 03:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America .  Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 03:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with his page Couldn't agree with you more.  Add a section to his page.  Doesn't need its own MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And so the same old unwanted "in popular culture" cycle progresses .  Lather .  Rinse .  Repeat - Repeat - Repeat .  Uncle G ( talk ) 08:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, don't merge .   I created this spinoff many years ago because I was tired of this kind of stuff populating the main article that I was working on getting to the GA level.   Hopefully there is less of that kind of editing regarding the subject now than there was then.  Anything worth mentioning, such as his hosting SNL , is already included in the narrative text of the main article.   In other words, there is no reason for creating an "In popular culture" section in the main article.  Wasted Time R ( talk ) 11:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Per Wasted Time R.  This reads like a user sub page or sandbox, with the author making a list of various subjects.  Scant references.  — Maile ( talk ) 14:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  and Wasted Time R. A. Randomdude0000 ( talk ) 18:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am seeing this type of article for the first time.  ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 08:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rekky : One source appears to be published by the company behind the app.  Most of its notability seems to come from WP:INHERITORG , by the "tastemakers" mentioned in the information section.  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Singer now using this name.  Only other hits are PR from when this app was active.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - One of many apps that have come and gone and left very little trace that can be found as far as significant coverage.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non notable.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Presidents Cup broadcasters : Just another case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS ; one is a dead link and the other two is a YouTube link; neither doing anything to establish notability and the rest is unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Golf , Lists ,  and United States of America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing WP:LISTN , all the sources I found were press releases or WP:ROUTINE mentions.  This is just WP:TRIVIA .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 15:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above.  Perhaps an article about which US network broadcasts which golf events, but this level of details is not required.  Nigej ( talk ) 17:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rana Arif Kamal Noon : There is no reference that is directly about him.  Fails WP:GNG .  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 12:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is former Elected Chairman Executive of Punjab Bar Council and former Prosecutor General Punjab, If he non-notable then who is notable?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.25.233 ( talk ) 20:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage of this individual.  Being elected president of the bar council isn't terribly notable, and we don't have reliable sources about this person upon which to build an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] News hits are simply name drops of him appearing in court for various cases; that's what a lawyer does, not indicating notability for our standards here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Looking at WP:NPOL - he's a lawyer who has held a state-wide office (Prosecutor General of Punjab) - however, that is a secondary criterion, and I am struggling to find reliable english sources discussing him and his career.  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 14:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  WP:BEFORE reveals nothing of note.  105.103.152.170 ( talk ) 20:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep .  he held important offices, chairman executive for punjab bar council, and Prosecutor General for Punjab, hence Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN .  user who recommended it for deletion was a sockpuppet 175.107.25.206 ( talk ) 06:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MUN TV : I don't see it passing WP:ORG either — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NCORP .  103.151.0.166 ( talk ) 00:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 19:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ballymoreen (disambiguation) : See Talk:Ballymoreen (disambiguation)#Merger proposal which appears to have been executed.  A disambiguation page is therefore not now required ( WP:ONEOTHER ).  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 10:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 10:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Ireland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find any other uses on GeoNames, Wikidata or Geograph search.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 17:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete