hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Joe Wragg: The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per my BEFORE search.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Soniat: Nothing much on the page seems to be sufficient notability for a BLP.  Seems unlikely that being a talented amateur musician is notable, and I'm dubious whether being the director of a botanical garden is enough.  Either way, this page has been unreferenced for way too long.  JMWt ( talk ) 20:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Louisiana .  JMWt ( talk ) 20:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG by the looks of it. - KH-1 ( talk ) 01:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
South Bay Tower: LynxesDesmond 🐈 (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Massachusetts .  LynxesDesmond 🐈 (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with your assessment Sgroey ( talk ) 02:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see any further news (or anything) about this proposed tower that I think was never built.  The small one paragraph now hardly seems worth keeping.  Nothing has appeared since the two sources used, and I don't think anything will at this point...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and others.  I'm not convinced work for this tower was ever even started based on an apparent lack of news coverage.  Bsoyka ( talk ) 05:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Skyscraper (Dubai): I'm sending this to AfD rather than using PROD because the title is so generic that it's basically impossible to search for sources.  * Pppery * it has begun... 19:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If any skyscrapers in Dubai are not notable, this article, along with The Peninsula will be removed as it fails WP:GNG .  CastJared ( talk ) 21:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Another Dubai vaportower that has no tenant or use information listed.  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Signally fails WP:GNG.  You'd have to try pretty hard to make a tower stand out around here, particularly one that is still to be constructed...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Fails WP:GNG , Alex-h ( talk ) 16:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 08:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanders Saurajen: Now, GIFC is obviously not an independent source as it was his employer at the time, so does not count towards WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC , both of which require multiple sources independent of the subject.  In terms of independent sourcing, I found nothing better than Straits Times , a trivial mention, SPL , also a trivial mention and from the FA of Singapore as well so probably not independent, and Active SG Circle , which contains 4 mentions in a match report.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  Two partial matches in an entire career...no shot.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruno Rendón: Coverage is limited to affiliated press, and even then is light on biographical detail.  I was unable to find additional coverage searching online and on Newspapers.com signed, Rosguill talk 16:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cuba .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tax attribute: It seems to me like the most sensible option would be to merge with Tax accounting in the United States but I'm not sure about a redirect, as it appears that the term is used outside of the USA and as it stands the page doesn't mention other jurisdictions.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and United States of America .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also to add: little cleanup action has occurred since the last nom in 2010.  I think it now needs attention.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is a specific taxation code definition, that has several meanings in various jurisdictions.  This would need a clean up and re-write, but tax law isn't my forté.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment feel free to merge anything that you think is mergeable, but I see no merit in this article as it stands.  It reads like the personal statement of a tax advisor (i.e. I agree about OR), it plunges straight into a discussion of how to get out of paying tax in the US jurisdiction by exploiting a particular piece of tax legislation, without explaining what this has to do with the term "Tax attribute", and yes, those words are used for other concepts outside the US, which should at least be acknowledged.  I'd have no objection to straightforward deletion.  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1900 CCNY Lavender football team: Let'srun ( talk ) 12:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football ,  and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Merger into a grouped season article is not viable as an WP:ATD as this is the only CCNY season article from the 40-year period from 1882 to 1921.  If and when someone cares enough to create such a grouped season article, this topic might later be revived, but as things now stands deletion appears to be the only viable option.  Moreover, given that this is a one-sentence sub-stub, nothing of real substance will be lost as a result of the deletion.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 00:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Teachers RFC: Broc ( talk ) 13:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Rugby union ,  and Caribbean .  Broc ( talk ) 13:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , doesn't appear to be a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
K30MF-D: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arkansas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : About the only thing that sets this apart from many of the other run-of-the-mill short-lived defunct HC2/Innovate LPTVs (though the "defunct" status is a bit of a red herring — notability is not temporary when there is notability to speak of) was that potential MyNetworkTV affiliation — but absent any substantial sourcing (that was only sourced to their own, not always updated well, affiliate list, and most of the other sources in this article are about other subjects and don't count for notability), that counts for very little (MyNetworkTV isn't even much of a "network", anyway).  Much of the article has always tried to peer into the crystal ball — we don't allow that , and there's probably some OR and synthesis somewhere in there too.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All sources in article are listings, none provide any in-depth coverage.  Also found no sources online that meet WP:GNG .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 01:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andre Olwagen: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article do not meet WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIRS.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 19:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jana Labáthová: Corresponding article on Slovak Wikipedia is an unsourced stub, which may help copy over English article otherwise.  No news about Labáthová have been reported since then either.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Olympics ,  and Slovakia .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A few things I located: [31] [32] [33] .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 18:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Source #1 mentions Labáthová in the first five paragraphs, Source #2 does not address her in-depth, and Source #3 mentions her in one paragraph repeated from the title.  None of these provide significant coverage that is required for notability; Labáthová still needs to meet SIGCOV and GNG.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 09:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete could not find anything that would help the subject to pass WP:GNG , and I don’t think the links given by @BeanieFan11 help a lot.  Could not locate anything that would help the subject to meet WP:SIGCOV .  All in all, doesn’t fit WP:SPORTCRIT Vorann Gencov ( talk ) 16:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fallen (Transformers): Most articles that mention him are just about the film and don't go in depth on this character.  Searching for the alt name Megatronus gives no better results, just TFwiki and sporadic toy announcements from Transformers fan sites.  The previous AfD had one keep vote without policy rationale and closed due to the nominator being blocked, the article has not improved since then.  Impressive piece of WP:FANCRUFT though, but we're WP:NOTFANDOM .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Comics and animation .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources seem to be either announcements or the script of the Revenge of the Fallen movie, which cannot be used as it is a primary source.  Industrial Insect (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Industrial Insect.  Doesn't appear to reach WP:SIGCOV and it's already covered in other related articles.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 15:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charley McMillan-Lopez: Fails WP:GNG .  Hack ( talk ) 01:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -This article is a mess from long-standing edit wars.  As it stands, it does not appear that the player meets the most recent GNG requirements but I suspect that there are a decent amount of sources about the player that have been lost or overlooked along the way-- Gri3720 ( talk ) 01:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Caribbean .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Johan Hallström: Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Sweden .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Bit-part actor.  Nothing major.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  scope_creep Talk 05:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Garvita Sadhwani: The article has no substancial work, awards, roles aur sources to pass WP:GNG Sssaaraa ( talk ) 21 August 2023 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 21 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not only are none of these sources independent, they're all about a single thing: that makeup for this role took three hours.  Extremely trivial.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 21:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No independent reliable source available supporting notability; clearly fails GNG.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 07:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rolph Gobits: UtherSRG (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Photography , Netherlands , United Kingdom ,  and England .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable at all, Fails WP:GNG .  PARVAGE talk!  05:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Commercial photographer.  Fails WP:ARTIST .  - WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I think WomenArtistUpdates summarizes it best thus far.  There were some beginnings of a diversified career and early hints at emerging notability.  Now he is just a professional.  Probably a good one.  That does not equal notability.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anna Stolli: No prose, but simply a list of credits which makes this akin to a WP:RESUME for an actor as opposed to encyclopedia entry.  Not clear the subject passes WP:GNG .  4meter4 ( talk ) 03:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Music , Theatre ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . I believe that this article is worthy of being kept.   It has 12 different footnotes and would seem to, therefore be relevant.   Also, Anna Stolli is mentioned by name in the online footnoted references.   -- Howard352 ( talk ) 20:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The citations are mainly to self published and primary sources.  We require independent secondary references to prove notability per WP:GNG .  The few secondary references that are there only mention the actress briefly in cast lists, and do not address Stolli's work as an actress in detail as required by WP:SIGCOV .  4meter4 ( talk ) 21:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Unable to find significant coverage in independent sources. — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  There are many sources on the internet about her work, but none of them are independent sources unfortunately.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 00:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete