hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Benika Bisht: Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please don't delete the article Benika Bisht as it is posted from reliable sources. .  I have added many other sources as references that I could found.  Please improve the article, don't delete it.  116.206.202.14 ( talk ) 10:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non-notable actress that has only had minor roles in notable productions.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shinichiro Ohta (musician): The reliability of source 1 is unknown and the website does not adequately describe the musician.  Source 2 is his band's website.  Source 3 and 4 basically mention him by name only.  日期20220626 ( talk ) 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I tried a search on Jstage ( https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/ ), nothing.  I tried using only . jp sites, all you get are concert listings or bloggy type fan sites.  I don't see sourcing we can use with what's given now in the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : completely personal interview [17] .  153.121.72.12 ( talk ) 02:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I feel like a sufficiently dedicate Japanese speaker might be able to find more, but it seems like we have exactly one source at the moment, and that's not enough.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Japanese article also has no source.  日期20220626 ( talk ) 11:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Xicheng Han: There are mentions and routine sports coverage, but no in-depth coverage.  Onel 5969 TT me 10:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and China .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Have attempted to find Chinese language sources (via Google, Baidu, Sohu) and came up with nothing.  I don't feel like I know enough about sports notability to weigh in on the deletion, but he seems to have few accomplishments.  Oblivy ( talk ) 10:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thirteenth Step (band): Couldn't find anything additional, and nothing on this page suggests notability that I can see.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Kentucky .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Since I nominated the first go-round, please feel to disregard my position here.  However, the last time, we got a "keep" mainly due to a "ridiculous number of refs".  Well, as you can see from an analysis from the nominator (independent from me), it's not the number that's ridiculous.  This band doesn't even have a listing on Discogs!  As Discogs is a very thorough database of recorded music in my decade+ experience with that site, that means this band hasn't recorded anything of note.  Since I nominated this article the first time, I've believed the Wikipedia is being played - we are being baffled with BS.  There is practically no WP:GNG coverage of this band.  It's cool they got to play on some tours, but where is the genuine secondary coverage (not just an artist roster line item) for that?  Stefen Tower s among the rest!  Gab • Gruntwerk 02:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I also want to note there are myriad bands from Louisville who are clearly notable and have released recordings.  This hasn't proven to be one of those bands.  Stefen Tower s among the rest!  Gab • Gruntwerk 02:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hadn't thought to check Discogs, but since you mention it I checked Rate Your Music (also quite thorough) and the band isn't listed there either.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 02:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for looking there.  Another note about Discogs.  I run into bands there all the time who have put out any number of recordings, and some quite nice ones, yet still haven't been considered notable for having articles here.  So the idea of having an article here for a band who hasn't been proven to produce a darn thing is a head-scratcher.  Stefen Tower s among the rest!  Gab • Gruntwerk 02:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Pretty much all of those sources are primary and/or unreliable in some sort of way.  This article has a disturbing amount of maintenance tags, and I just don't think anybody is going to fix that any time soon.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  16:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I actually had the tab open on my browser to address some of those tags, but it would basically involve the nuclear option , after which I would find what both 1st and 2nd noms found, that all the provided sources are routine/promo.  So delete is best.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 12:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pasang Lhamu bus crash: No lasting coverage or effects to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Nepal .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no lasting coverage Claire 26 ( talk ) 03:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Is This Tomorrow?: , then deprodded by StarTrekker ( talk · contribs ) for alleged mass PROD, but then reinstated by BoomboxTestarossa.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Webcomics .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per prod, unable to see any noteworthy places to redirect to.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 16:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As an addendum the article is also confusing as the more famous Is This Tomorrow is often referred to as the name as this article.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 18:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to 2003 in webcomics .  Hiding T 12:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am finding pretty much nothing regarding this comic in reliable sources - a few mentions here and there, but nothing close to significant coverage.  I would be opposed to merging anything to the proposed 2003 in webcomics , and would in fact recommend removing its listing on that page, as it just does not seem like a notable enough example to be included there.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hicaz Hümâyun Saz Semâisi: Boleyn ( talk ) 22:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 22:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NMG due to lack of significance.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 04:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom does not meet NMG.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 02:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bays Brewery: The business is no longer operational and permanently closed and even when open was a very small local brewery in New Zealand not notable or well known to the public (lived there for 15 years).  I raised a PROD recently on this article but was not aware that there had been a previous failed PROD long before oldprods were added to talk pages, hence an AfD.  Whisky and more ( talk ) 08:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Organizations ,  and Companies .  Whisky and more ( talk ) 08:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  "established in December 1993. It is no longer in operation." and nothing much else pretty well says it all.  Bduke ( talk ) 10:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable.  Not much exposure outside of the region it originated in.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I believe removing this article is the best course of action.  The information provided indicates the subject lacks notability.  Waqar 💬 17:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable and no sigcov.  Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 01:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Not sold in stores: -- D'n'B - t -- 11:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Advertising . -- D'n'B - t -- 11:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : You can find mentions of the term in many articles, but that's all it is, just the phrase being used.  I don't see analysis of this in any sort of retail journal or business journal.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Uses of the phrase abound, but I can't find anything discussing it as a concept.   No sources, no article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Formerly notable when mail order via television and catalog was common and items were shipped direct from the warehouse, but as that fine line has been erased with the age of e-commerce, this is an out-of-date term that is an artifact of the 80s and 90s.  Nate • ( chatter ) 15:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : WP:NTEMP states that "Notability is not temporary", so a "formerly notable" topic would still meet notability guidelines.  — Ost ( talk ) 17:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gene Grimaldi: I don't think its unreasonable to state that "winning" awards by preforming audio work on albums released by other people doesn't count towards WP:MUSICBIO ,  unless the awards are specifically for audio technicians.  This Pro Sound News piece is the only good profile of this guy I could find, and it alone isn't enough to show notability.  Mach61 15:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and California .  Mach61 15:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as per nomination, also t's not entirely precise to attribute him Grammy nominations that were really for Lady Gaga and her album, not for it's mastering work.  InDimensional ( talk ) 00:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete regretfully.  The consensus has been that engineers and producers are run of the mill .  They just don't get the coverage they deserve .  Until that consensus changes , we have been deleting a lot of these articles.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Metra Electronics: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Holding this to the same standard as biographies of living persons and articles at AFC:  There has never been (apart from a whole load of external hyperlinks back in the 2011 revisions, that are now broken except for the 1 that turns out to be a corporate press release) anything but pointers to the company's own various WWW sites here.   Not a single independent reliable source cited in 12 years.   (And the deleted revisions turn out to be company promotional blurb written in the first person.)  This wouldn't meet our standards for draft articles these days, and those can get deleted after 6 months.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 14:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jasmina Cunmulaj: – Davey 2010 Talk 19:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   No notability or any importance.  —— Notorious4life ( talk ) 04:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to support an article.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NMODEL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dewayne Dwyer: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kristen Onsgard: Seems like a total failure of WP:GNG .  Specifically, there is not a single independent source in the article, and I was not able to find any either.  From WP:GNG: "Independent of the subject excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it".  Within bridge, "affiliated with the subject" means bridge federations, leagues, and tournaments - and of course also the subject herself (here, I'm referring to the Amazon page for a book.) Prolonged attempts to explain the creator what a significant and independent source is, have not bore fruit at all; a discussion of this nature might also come up during this discussion.  References to a bridge SNG might also come up, which is irrelevant as long as GNG is not met.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - We have already gone through this review process with this user.  My account is autopatrolled, new articles I create should not have to go through the review process as I am supposed to be trusted to know what types of articles meet Wikipedia guidelines.  Kristen won a North American Bridge Championship (NABC).  These Bridge events are open to players around the world and many fly in, including the world's top professional players, to compete at these 10 day tournaments.  Winning an unlimited event at an NABC is very prestigious achievement.  I created Kristen's page, and also included a picture.  Geschichte decided to move this new article to Draft space.  There was discussion on this user's Talk page about this.  I asked for more senior Wikipedia editors to review the submission.  They decided that the page was notable, overruled Geschichte , and Star Mississippi moved the article to the main Wikipedia on April 7, asking Geschichte to take it to AfD if there was any issues.  One would have thought the discussion was over, but Geschichte retaliated by adding This sports biography does not cite any sources containing significant coverage .  Please help improve this article by adding citations to sources containing significant coverage .  Sports biographies without significant coverage violate the requirement for such articles and may be deleted .

Discussion outcome: delete
Dance Contempra: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 03:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance , Companies ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enuough reliable sources provided BoraVoro ( talk ) 08:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chandralekha (TV series): Clearly does not fit WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Karnataka ( talk ) 20:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Karnataka ( talk ) 20:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - FilmiBeat is unreliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 12:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete