hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Renjilal Damodaran : Not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  Just passing mentions.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:56, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , India ,  and Kerala .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:56, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets criterion#3 for Creative professionals: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series)". - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 12:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG .  An "important figure"?  "Originated a significant new concept, theory, or technique"?  "Created a significant or well-known work or collective body of work"?  His "work has become a significant monument? "No" to all, so he fails WP:NCREATIVE as well. - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:29, 15 August 2023  (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 18:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I can't find sourcing for this person. The assertion above that Criteria 3 is met, needs an explanation; what did this guy do to merit the "keep"?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, ’this guy’ has directed 2 notable films and written one.  See his Filmography please.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 15:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 00:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Summit Open Source Development Group : Either a redirect or delete would be a good outcome.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 06:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Technology , Internet ,  and Software .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 06:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I wouldn't mind getting rid of this article.   Honestly it only really exists because of a situation a long time ago and really the org is in almost read-only state at this point since I'm retired from IT.  Brielle ( talk ) 01:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajay Lobo : Google Scholar and JSTOR have nothing about him.  Source 1 - Music listing Source 2 - Movie listing Source 3 - Movie listing on Rotten tomatoes Source 4 - is a book authored by the subject Source 5 - looks like a comic?  Fails WP:GNG , WP:NACTOR and WP:NMG .  Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 08:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Music .  Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 08:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete additional search at ProQuest pulled up nothing.  Mach61 ( talk ) 17:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Quite apart from anything else, this should never have been published in the first place, on account of the author's paid-editing status.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] yes i have mentioned as paid as per wikipedia community guidelines for paid. Wikipedia i have read carefully Wikipedia guidelines on paid Wikipedia has been Mention you need to mention on your profile that's your Doing paid editing and i am following guidelines of Wikipedia i am not violating aby Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you Surajsinghl ( talk ) 14:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Right. Other than socking... -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 17:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly a vanity page Nswix ( talk ) 17:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If this isn’t paid editing, this is clearly a vanity page.  Search engines don’t pull up ratios relevant to the subject, and the sources don’t say much either.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 18:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quatuor Habanera : Boleyn ( talk ) 19:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment found this album review here .  Haven't done a full search yet, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A Figa : I did not find evidence of notable archaeology.  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Archaeology , Geography ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't find any reference to a site by this name in Corsica, and am curious where it came from originally.  @ Ser Amantio di Nicolao : your initial edit summary suggests that you might have been working from a list or database?  – Joe ( talk ) 11:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Co and Fr articles don't list any sources.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 17:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2SSR : No sources, and my BEFORE check did not find any SIGCOV.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only 5 gnews hits.  The first 2 may be considered indepth but they are an industry related source and a local newspaper.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Annette Nainima : The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was a half-dozen sentences of coverage here from the Fiji Sun , which probably fails WP:YOUNGATH .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fiji-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Idiosincrático ( talk ) 12:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Cogswell (psychologist) : Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't see anything either.  Spiralwidget ( talk ) 12:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychology and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only relevant results for this John Cogswell in Newspapers.com are "Community Calendar" listings for The Walking Theatre Group in the Los Angeles Times .  ProQuest turns up a dissertation that cites his 1993 article in the Journal of Humanistic Psychology .  But neither of these are sufficient to establish notability per WP:BASIC , let alone WP:GNG .  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 02:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International reactions to the al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion : Removing all of that, it only contains a few paragraphs about the actual explosion, and does not contain anything not already covered at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion .  This is an unnecessary content fork.  -- Orgullomoore ( talk ) 20:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military . -- Orgullomoore ( talk ) 20:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing that isn't covered in the main article.  "Unnecessary content fork" sums it up well.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 20:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per above, it's an unnecessary fork.  Delete : I would ! vote to merge sourced content not in article into Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion#Aftermath , but there is none.  Unneeded CFORK at this point, if the section grows into something it can be split.  // Timothy :: talk 07:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beysim Beysim : There are trivial mentions in a few places but nothing that can be considered as WP:SIGCOV .  Beysim doesn't seem to even meet the minimum of WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  All 4 references used are trivial mentions.  My own searches yielded more of the same.  Gong mentions the player in two lists but does not address him in depth.  Blitz merely says Besim Besim scored the only goal in the 85th minute.  Xnews is just a simple passing mention in a match report.  Those were the best sources that I could find.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nomination.  -- Nk ( talk ) 10:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
21st Digital Century : This appears to be intended for self-promotion.   It is also a weird conflation between a company and a human.  Bovlb ( talk ) 17:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Internet ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Article has few references and those that do exist reads like spam-- Trade ( talk ) 21:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Basically no sources that we use that contribute to WP:NBASIC or WP:NCORP .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 18:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dan Rogers : As always, mayors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just by virtue of existing -- the notability of a mayor hinges on writing and sourcing substantive content about his political impact : specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  But this is strictly on the level of "Dan Rogers is a mayor who existed, the end", and is "referenced" solely to his "meet your mayor" profile on the self-published website of the city government, which is a primary source that does not support notability at all.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to hand him an automatic inclusion freebie without WP:GNG -worthy coverage.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero secondary sources, no evidence of meeting notability requirements.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Compugoal College : Boleyn ( talk ) 19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Kenya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable subject for Wikipedia -- Improvised but so real unicorn ( talk ) 15:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kashi Mitra Ghat crematorium : It is possible they exist in Bengali however I note that our friends at bn.wiki do not have much else on their page either JMWt ( talk ) 20:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India .  JMWt ( talk ) 20:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Significance unestablished; only one source that merely confirms location.  Sunshine1191 ( talk ) 11:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Article provides no real info and I am unable to find anything in RS reference material to establish notability (or, in fact, verify anything other than that it exists).  Fails GNG.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 14:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Calvin Maglinger : An online BEFORE search reveals nothing except places to buy his prints, but no SIGCOV in reliable, independent published sources.  The subject does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST .  Netherzone ( talk ) 22:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Businesspeople , Visual arts , Indiana ,  and Kentucky .  Netherzone ( talk ) 22:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding RS for this artist.  I am only finding the local obituary.  Fails WP:NARTIST , not in notable collection or exhibitions The article reads like an obituary and I am do not see a way to improve it.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 18:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Verification tag unhandled for more than a decade, too. And orphaned apart from a pair of lists. Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Delete , but, for the record, Maglinger's art work was the subject of a solo exhibition at the Evansville Museum ... discussed in the Evansville Courier & Press , 2005 . This story notes that his "paintings are in private and public collections throughout the region."  One of his paintings also illustrated the cover of a local history book about the city of Evansville . [1] Deleting would mean that the solo show in the Evansville Museum is NOT per WP:ARTIST 4. "(b) ... a substantial part of a significant exhibition, ..." and that its holdings are not "(d) ... several notable galleries or museums." -- Jaireeodell ( talk ) 00:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zia Shaoul : Simione001 ( talk ) 21:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 22:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG , even basic player information is unknown.  Svartner ( talk ) 10:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mone Wamowe : He did score twice in a game against Fiji , leading to a number of passing mentions to this effect, but does not satisfy notability requirements.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmed Al-Malki : Transfermarkt and Soccerway confirm existence but not notability.  I found Alyaum but it's a basic Q&A with the footballer and with no analysis.  This doesn't count towards WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 22:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's nothing here.  Fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete