hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2023 Tunisian Cup Final: Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON , but currently fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 00:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with WP:TOOSOON also fails WP:GNG .  I found sources for this but they are all about the race happening in the future.  I would also support sending to draft since according to 2022–23 Tunisian Cup the race is happening at the end of May.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Tunisia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Happening in one month and participants have already been decided.  Not too soon.  -- SuperJew ( talk ) 08:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with 2022–23 Tunisian Cup , a standalone article is not needed for a minor soccer event.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments - Merge @ Sportsfan 1234 : First of all it's not a minor soccer event, it's the oldest and most coveted prise in Tunisian football!  But ye, outside of Tunisia, it doesn't really get the same coverage.  It might be possible it can pass GNG, but selectively the season articles for the competition are poor, easily expandable and should be enough without a separate article for the final.  Govvy ( talk ) 12:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022–23 Tunisian Cup .  No sourced content for a Merge , but if sources are added to the article, let me know, no objection to merging sourced content.  // Timothy :: talk 14:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 22:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Superjew.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 14:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022–23 Tunisian Cup : per Sportsfan 1234 and Timothy.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect As per Timothy's reasoning.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Donald Karl Schott: Some minor coverage exists regarding the failed nomination, but just like with politicians, this does not correlate to inherent notability.  Perhaps redirect this to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , United States of America ,  and Wisconsin .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete & redirect per nominator, as article creator.  Safiel ( talk ) 02:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as the article doesn't meet GNG.  -- JackFromWisconsin ( talk | contribs ) 02:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies#List of unsuccessful federal judicial nominations per nom.  and others.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mongolian Wikipedia: That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.  Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing?  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Internet , Websites , Asia ,  and Mongolia .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per WP:ATD-R — siro χ o 06:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect.  No need for a separate article.  Athel cb ( talk ) 12:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Previous AFD was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on individual Wikipedia language editions .  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Stumbledown Romancer: Fails the general and album-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to James Dewar (musician) : Found a couple brief mentions but nothing substantial enough for notability.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Why I'm Not... with Brant Pinvidic: The only good sources are about the films which inspired the podcast, not the actual podcast itself.  This should probably be either deleted or redirected to Brant Pinvidic .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 23:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Popular culture and Internet .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 23:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Brant Pinvidic because the subject is not notable.  The sources barely mention the podcast.  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 00:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Daniel Bartlett (footballer): Does not look notable Charsaddian ( talk ) 20:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 20:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2019–20 Coventry City F.C. season#Appearances , not independently notable.  Giant Snowman 19:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2019–20 Coventry City F.C. season#Appearances per above.  I only found minor coverage like this .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Embassy of Cape Verde, Washington, D.C.: No secondary sources and no in-depth coverage available.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Organizations , Ivory Coast ,  and United States of America .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to Babcock-Macomb House , its location.  The fact that it is now the embassy is stated there.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Babcock–Macomb House per Mangoe .  Excellent example of a subject that benefits from consolidation with an article covering the same topic.  BD2412 T 16:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jennifer Prescod May-Parker: Is seemingly a case of WP:BLP1E .  Redirecting to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies seems wise here.  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and North Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete & Redirect per nominator, as article creator.  Safiel ( talk ) 22:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fails GNG, there's just this one event.  Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies .  Jacona ( talk ) 19:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hoor Pari: Donald D23 talk to me 00:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Yes it fails to meet GNG because i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc.The article is based on some namechecks coverage.   — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While assessing the referencing of Pakistani dramas/series, the dynamics of Pakistani media industry should be considered wherein media groups have their own news and entertainment channels.  Normally a news channel from one media group doesn't give coverage to a project of a rival channel unless it's a big hit.  So for other dramas we have to rely on websites and links which otherwise may not be good sources but are sufficient for a Pakistani drama.  Muneebll ( talk ) 19:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Muneebll , But still you have to demonstrate that this TV dramas meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That assessment is not based on Wikipedia policy or guidance.  In order for an article to be kept it must be demonstrated that it meets WP:GNG at a minimum.  Saying that one media group doesn't cover another one is not a reason to keep an article.  Donald D23 talk to me 22:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A-Plus_TV#Drama_serials : listed there.  Some sources can be transferred.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 02:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
University of Ghana Toyota Training Center: Fails WP:NORG or WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 19:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Not enough WP:SIGCOV differentiating it from University of Ghana.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 20:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Ghana .  – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk ) 20:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  GoldRomean ( talk ) 22:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to University of Ghana .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Female sex: I see that it was redirected in 2018, and an IP editor changed it from a redirect on 8-19-23.  Lightburst ( talk ) 01:46, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Surely all that needs to be done is to undo the IP's recent edit, so it goes back to a redirect?  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 20:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Female : Restore redirect as unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER .  Lightoil ( talk ) 11:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Female : Restore previous redirect, terms are not ambiguous.  Demt1298 ( talk ) 17:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Female per above logic.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 18:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : if consensus is to redirect Female sex to Female , should the same be done with Male sex (where there is also currently a disambiguation page) and Male ?  A smart kitten ( talk ) 20:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mara (Doctor Who): Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters unless improved with reception/analysis.  Fails GNG as written ( WP:FANCRUFT ).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect couldn't find sources that help this subject pass WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Again, two different redirect targets mentioned at List of Doctor Who characters is not suitable as it is a redirect itself.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who characters .  I found no evidence that the charcater meets WP:GNG .  Please ping me if good sources are identified.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 10:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Like I said in my first relist, List of Doctor Who characters is not a suitable redirect target as it is, a redirect!  Agree on another redirect target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : if the list of characters isn't a suitable target, then List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens is fine.  The target is briefly discussed there.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shock at the Rock: I found only one reliable source which refers to the game as "Shock at the Rock", which was written by a journalist who follows the team, rather than a widespread name for the game.  When this article was in draft space, its merit was debated here .  Consensus then did not appear to be in favour of this article, and I have found no new research to support it passing GNG.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 13:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Ice hockey ,  and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Entirely routine game summary and coverage, no indication of substantial or lasting significance.  Reywas92 Talk 13:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Good grief, this is just another playoff game (in a preliminary round yet), and the number of unremarkable playoff games where a team's scored two goals in the final minutes to pull it out has to number in the hundreds at least, and this wouldn't be article-worthy if it had been the deciding game of the Cup Finals.  Fails WP:ROUTINE going away.  Ravenswing 20:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: Although I found two articles through a general Google search, including one with NBC Sports, I still do not find that this is worthy of its own article based on notability.  Rather, this content would work best as a section in the Carolina Hurricanes article.  As it is already mentioned in that article, a redirect makes the most sense.  Rublamb ( talk ) 20:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Carolina Hurricanes or another suitable target (maybe the season article): redirects are WP:CHEAP and preserve the page history better.  I had accepted this AfC submission because I thought the references established notability but now I realise that sources are WP:ROUTINE coverage more than WP:SIGCOV .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, routine game summary and coverage, no indication of substantial or lasting significance.  Fails GNG and NEVENT.  // Timothy :: talk 21:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rangiahua railway station: The line it was built for never opened.  A cursory before search found zero.  This is quite simply not a notable subject and the article never should have been created.  Article was previously PRODed and then dePRODed with a rationale of "you have to prove it's not notable" while providing zero evidence otherwise.  At best this should be a redirect to Okaihau Branch .  According to that article, "The Rangiahua section was essentially complete: the line wound downhill to the settlement and a station yard complete with platform was built, though the station building itself was not erected."  So, we are dealing with a station that wasn't even completed.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and New Zealand .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment what I actually said when deprodding was "If sources to expand this cannot actually be found (rather than just assumed not to exist) then it should be merged or redirected not deleted", based on an PROD rationale that appeared to based only the content of the article.  I do not appreciate the misrepresentation.  I do not assert that this is notable, just that if it is not it should be redirected not deleted.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 12:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Okaihau Branch ; that would appear to be the logical thing to do given that it had been built.  Schwede 66 19:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Non-notable, unused station.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  20:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Leticia Vasquez: No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL , coverage is all WP:ROTM .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing notable found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 09:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The secondary sources are all fairly WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  Shaws username .  talk .  22:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mayors of Lynwood, California Shaws username .  talk .  18:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to very obvious ATD >>>> List of mayors of Lynwood, California .  Djflem ( talk ) 18:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mayors of Lynwood, California per Djflem .  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect