hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kimber Henry: A quick Google search gives episodes recaps, interviews and information unrelated to the character.  Spinixster (chat!) 10:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 10:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I couldn't find anything either, and despite the article's numerous sources, I don't believe most of them demonstrate notability, as the vast majority are primary.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Intelitek: scope_creep Talk 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Education , Technology ,  and New Hampshire .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : The nominator deleted a substantial amount of sourced (perhaps not pristinely-sourced, but sourced) content before then making this call for deletion.  A scan of old newspaper archives does show about a half-dozen independently published stories that at least mention Intelitek, some in more than just passing detail.  Seems that this article easily could be rescued, but as its creator, I hesitate to do so myself.  Community consensus should prevail; but it just felt like this wasn't an objective nomination, initiated after nearly half the article had been gutted without any discussion.  - Swiss Mister in NY ( talk ) 14:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Passing mentions and churnalism don't make notability.  There's a strong possibility that UPE were involved which is why you get such coverage of non-notable subjects.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 15:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the editor is a WP:UPE as well.  scope_creep Talk 15:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Aarons: Entirely void of reliable sources—removing uncited BLP content would leave the article blank.  Other than IBDB and Playbill credits, the only source I can see mentioning Aarons at all is a passing reference in the NYT .  Probably borderline A7.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 21:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Theatre .  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 21:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I cannot find significant coverage of this musician outside of irregular mentions in various Broadway blog sites, and I see nothing in the article which would suggest notability.  Spiralwidget ( talk ) 22:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .   I have removed the obvious WP:PROMO and WP:PEACOCK .  IBDB confirms that he played the guitar in at least 10 Broadway productions from 2004 to at least 2018, and has served as musical coordinator for more than two dozen Broadway productions since 2014.  I don't think these roles necessarily convey notability, but just pointing out that the info in his article is now at least partly easy to verify.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 22:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Here is a link to AllMusic where it lists credits: https://www.allmusic.com/artist/michael-aarons-mn0000547167#credits More sources for Film and TV on IMDB.com https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0007497/? ref_=fn_al_nm_2 108.53.237.198 ( talk ) 00:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (Speedy) delete No indication of notability - fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:BASIC .  Completely unsourced BLP.  C F A 💬 00:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Here are some other articles: https://guitarcenterprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/05/ https://www.local802afm.org/allegro/articles/how-do-i-get-a-gig-on-broadway/ 108.53.237.198 ( talk ) 00:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television , Advertising , New York ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fail WP:MUSICBIO AND WP:GNG .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per the multiple issues identified by editors above.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 21:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3403: C messier ( talk ) 10:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WEYS-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Florida .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Honestly surprised because this is a Franken-FM for one of the largest media markets.  Would’ve thought there’d been more coverage aside from mentions.  Danubeball ( talk ) 20:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clinton Theron: All that comes up in my searches are trivial mentions in match reports and lineup announcements.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ætherverse: DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 06:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – 2004 game with practically no active sources.  Svartner ( talk ) 11:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing in the article suggests this is notable (no reviews, no awards).  My BEFORE found nothing.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William Rollason: No evidence of significant coverage.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 23:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 23:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article was first created around the time of European Home Retail / Farepak's collapse and has never been more than a summary of firms with which the subject has been associated.  Despite the actions around Farepak, I don't see evidence that this person has had distinct biographic notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Per nom.  not a notable businessman.  Alex-h ( talk ) 11:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Michaels: The best I could find in a WP:BEFORE search was a few interviews in essentiallysports.com, and the rest is social media, press releases, and some coverage in WP:THESUN and WP:DAILYEXPRESS.  Strong aroma of UPE here, including this addition today of a selfie , unavailable on the source claimed at Commons.  Please note that the first AFD was about a writer and filmmaker, and not about the football businessman.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 19:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Football ,  and England .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 19:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Obviously promotional.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Almost feels like self-promotion.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does feel somewhat promo, agree with nomination, this should be a straight up delete.  Govvy ( talk ) 21:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Myanmar representatives at international male beauty pageants: The sources in the article are primarily social media posts.  Let'srun ( talk ) 10:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Beauty pageants , Lists ,  and Myanmar .  Let'srun ( talk ) 10:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete without prejudice in the event that better sourcing is found.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 19:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Associate-O-Matic: No independent sources with significant coverage.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found online for this defunct software "thing".  Sourcing used now is barely anything...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Kee (lawyer): I see no other route to biographic notability as it news coverage seemed to come from the appointment Star Mississippi 03:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Law ,  and New Zealand .  Star Mississippi 03:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find sources demonstrating that he meets WP:GNG , WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO from a WP:BEFORE search.  Looks like he's been a Tenancy Tribunal adjudicator in recent years, which is a fairly low-level judicial appointment (the tribunal doesn't even have a Wikipedia page; arguably it should, but kind of demonstrates that the role doesn't add anything to notability).  The press around his appointment to an HRC role (and not even the top role!) was mainly about the fact that he was appointed instead of a woman lawyer recommended by officials.  Also seems the article creator was blocked for sockpuppeting during which they created several articles about non-notable alumni from St Peter's College ...  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 04:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  The association with St Peter's College also struck me.  We had another editor who mass-produced bios for non-notable St Peter's College alumni and that was a different editor to this article's creator (or any of their socks).  We should go through the contributions and PROD other bios, too.  Schwede 66 17:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not 100% convinced the "other editor" is not a sock, it's too much of a coincidence that there are 2 different St Peter's College promoters with the second account starting shortly after the first was blocked.  I agree that there are bound to be many more articles of similar non-notability to this one created by both accounts.  DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs ) 10:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Schwede66 , I do believe you may have erred here.  Rick570 created a lot of St Peter's cruft articles that were deleted here and went on to sock with Dome1000, Jam6700, Emendment and Yelsorc.  If there is another could you please enlighten us as to who so we can check their contributions.  Thanks.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 06:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only non press release is single about how a politician gave a mate a high paid job over the recommended candidate.  Not enough for a BLP.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Franciscan Bowl: Joeykai ( talk ) 00:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  My search at Newspapers.com turns up hundreds of hits for pottery "Franciscan bowls" popular in the 1930s but not much on the football game.  The best I found was this and this which are coverage of particular games lacking depth on the rivalry or trophy.  We need better than that to satisfy NRIVALRY/GNG.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As noted above, my searches failed to turn up SIGCOV, and after ten days at AfD, no SIGCOV presented.  Will reconsider if SIGCOV is found.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this to meet the GNG.  The only source currently in the article is not independent as it originates from one of the participating schools.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Funsho Oladipo: Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO .  Sources are just name drops and passing mentions of the subject.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 21:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 21:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He's not notable, I'd perhaps merge to an article about the hospital, most coverage seems to be about that.  He's just a working physician it appears.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Likewise; most of the sources if not all are not reliable, while the hospital is either.  Nothing to WP:PRESERVE .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 16:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:ANYBIO and per nom and Oaktree b.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a medical person who is the owner of a neither notable company.  Sources doses of unreliable written works; more focus on the hospital to the subject.  Per WP:NGRS , few if not all seems reliable (but promotional).  Case of inherent notability.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 16:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT , WP:MILL , WP:PROF , and WP:SPAM .  This is written as a press release, not an article.  Besides that, he runs a 200-odd bed clinic, not what most people would call a hospital.  Just to be fair, I checked Google Scholar and found single digits of cites.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Managing director of a non-notable hospital; his position in a non-notable organisation from 2019 to 2023 cannot confer notability either.  There are no significant coverage in independent reliable sources either.  Best, Reading Beans 06:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Revenue On-Line Service: If it was innovative in any way, a sentence or two on Revenue Commissioners , with an appropriate reference, would surely suffice.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 09:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 09:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Completely unsourced, reads like an advert, and non-notable.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  11:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a line in Revenue Commissioners will be enough.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 18:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  On initial review I had considered proposing a "redirect" (as an WP:ATD ).  However, as noted above, there is no supported/non-promotional/appropriate content that could reasonably be merged to the Revenue Commissioners article.  Absent anything to merge, there is nothing to which to redirect.  Just delete this SPAM.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2004–05 Royal League statistics: – Aidan721 ( talk ) 23:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Europe .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 23:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark , Norway ,  and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  All the reasons listed for deletion at the linked AFD also apply here.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all on first look I thought this needed to be merged, but no, unnecessary, delete under WP:NOSTATS .  Govvy ( talk ) 16:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Green Day related projects: This seems like a no-brainer to me, though I am opening this up for discussion so others can have a say.  JeffSpaceman ( talk ) 17:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A completely unnecessary list of brief summaries of other articles for six different bands and one musical.  Every single one of those seven articles are significantly more informative than this one, and all seven subjects are easily found via links in Green Day's main article and elsewhere.  I'm not sure what policy is most relevant here -- possibly WP:CONTENTFORK but in an inverse fashion, or WP:NLIST as a non-notable list article that happens to have some extra padding.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete