hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Emji Spero: As always, writers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work in third-party media -- but this is referenced entirely to sources directly affiliated with the claims, such as the promotional pages of the subject's books on the self-published websites of their own publishers, with not even one hit of proper GNG-building media coverage shown at all.  There is a literary award in the mix here which would be a valid notability claim if the article were properly sourced, but as a specialty award it still isn't "inherently" notable enough to confer an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of any GNG-worthy sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Sexuality and gender ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - This article is listed for consideration under "deletion sorting visual artists".  Perhaps a poet could take a look.  Should we remove the unreferenced stuff and duplicate sentences and see what is left?  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article relies on primary sources, specifically the publisher promotional website.  Several dead links.  WP:BEFORE shows a review in Los Angeles Review , an interview in Bomb (magazine) and Jacket2 .  They seem to have a presence on the west coast, but still, the sourcing is thin and I think it is WP:TOOSOON .   The claim that Spero was involved in the editing of "We Both Laughed in Pleasure: The Selected Diaries of Lou Sullivan" is not supported by the references.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Voznesensky Alexander Ernestovich: Article appears to be a rudimentary translation of the Russian one, down to the title (ru-wiki uses paper-encyclopedia conventions for names).  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 19:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Russia .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 19:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
En Idhaya Rani: The film released at an unfortunate time (early February 1993) when there are no archives of it here .  Kailash29792 (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some reviews about a musical album with the same name around 2018-2019, nothing found for this film.  What's used in the article is a single source, not enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reliable sources are available as well the used source is also uninformative.  Morekar ( talk ) 23:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Just one source in whole page and that isn't enough for significantly covering the entire article.  I would have voted for Draftify but after doing a little digging myself, I couldn't find reliable sources that can furnish this page.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Released film, so redirect to List of Tamil films of 1993#Movies (where it is listed) seems like a good ATD. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Goodwill Entertainments: No inherent notability.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 20:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Music .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 20:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  No significant coverage from multiple reliable sources to meet GNG.  116.68.98.76 ( talk ) 12:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relist, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the comments above.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 11:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Vagabond Queen (opera): Fails the general notability policy.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Music ,  and Theatre .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No WP:RSs at all.   It looks to me like all of the articles about works by Edward Barnes (composer) ought to be deleted, and his article is a jumble of WP:PROMO .  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 16:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All I could find was a one sentence entry in Operas in English .  Not enough to pass WP:GNG .  Jfire ( talk ) 01:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Santa Teresa (fictional city): This fails GNG and NLIST as well.  It might be the case this could be rescued by restoring it as an entry about the fictional town from Sue Grafton 's works, although the analysis in the article is limited to one sentence "Grafton chose the setting as a tribute to Macdonald, an acknowledged influence" and my BEFORE fails to locate anything more significant.  Old AfDs from 2008 are not helpful, as back then the consensus was that "it is notable because it is the setting of a notable work of fiction".  We have a bit higher standards these days, and pure plot summary, particularly degenerated by trivia about similarly named entities by other authors, likely merits WP:TNT or perhaps a redirect per WP:ATD .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Literature ,  and Lists .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not needed per nom.  GenuineArt ( talk ) 07:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As described by the nom, this article is not actually an article on a genuine topic, its a WP:OR listing of several completely unrelated books that happened to use the same name for a city.  The examples are very clearly not even supposed to be the same fictional city, making this a complete unfocused mess.  At best, this could be redirected to Sue Grafton , where the use of the fictional city name as the setting of her novels is already described.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:OR synthesis of the use of these words.  Not supported by reliable secondary sources, which is essential to meet WP:V and WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete seems to be a synthesis of unrelated works that happened to have a similarly named city.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Kuk-jin: Simione001 ( talk ) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: North Korea and Switzerland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sajin Ahmed Babu: Lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Macbeejack ☎ 17:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Bangladesh .  Macbeejack ☎ 17:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Created very recently so would prefer not to soft-delete.  Relisting to form consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 20:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No WP:SIGCOV .  -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 18:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 23:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fail s WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG no WP:SIGCOV . Seawolf35 T -- C 23:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLPs, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources found are all promos, interviews, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Source eval: Comments Source Name on page, no content  1. "Sajin Ahmed Babu" .  December 29, 2023.  Promo, interview  2. ^ "Mosharraf-Mamar Drama High Love" .  December 29, 2023.  Promo name mention  3. ^ "New series 'Corporate Love' and 'Google Village' coming up"".  December 29, 2023.  Interview, fails WP:IS  4. ^ "Writing novels now" .  December 28, 2023.  Interview, fails WP:IS  5. ^ "Plays have to be written within constraints: Babu" .  December 28, 2023.  Promo name mention  6. ^ "Padshi-Yash's romance in Eid special drama" .  December 29, 2023.  Promo name mention  7. ^ "Sajin Ahmed Babu's 'Corporate Love' Begins Today" .  December 29, 2023.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  If I missed something, post the best WP:THREE IS RS with SIGCOV and ping me.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Summit Power: As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on their coverage in reliable sources such as news media and books -- but this is referenced entirely to directly affiliated primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no reliable or GNG-building sources shown at all.  It also warrants note that this was recently hijacked to be about a completely different company with the same name, which was also referenced entirely to its own self-published website with no evidence of GNG-worthy reliable sourcing, and thus wasn't properly established as notable either.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Washington .  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All I'm finding is the usual directory listings and user-generated material, nothing independent.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rebecca Aguilar: I can't find any we can use either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , News media ,  and Texas .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 11:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  SaltLakeMists ( talk ) 16:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The nominator has no or few edits other than those related to this AfD.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 11:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe, but why does that matter?  If the reasons are good (and to my mind they are), who cares what edits the nominator has done?  Delete .  Athel cb ( talk ) 13:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] it's a red-flag.  we see it all too often here Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:34, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Consensus seems clear: Fails WP:GNG but most importantly the entire article is a clear WP:COI , fails WP:AUTO , entire article was written by subject Subject admits to this in Talk page and uses multiple accounts SaltLakeMists ( talk ) 02:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : references #6, #9, #10, and #11 collectively amount to SIGCOV Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources are promo and brief routine news, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from IS RS.  BEFORE only found promo materials.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 16:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
North Gate, Indiana: Searching is pretty hopeless given commonality of the name.  Mangoe ( talk ) 20:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it's on topo maps from after 1960 sometime and someone put up a little "Northgate" sign next to Northgate Road, but this appears to be a small housing development which got into GNIS because it was never incorporated into Columbus, Indiana proper and is therefore unincorporated.  I don't think it passes WP:GNG , I did search fairly thoroughly.  SportingFlyer T · C 21:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete First mention of of the place as a subdivision, no earlier named place found https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-republic-north-gate-subdivision/143312713/ GNIS provides no citation to explain their behavior.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KWCC-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Washington .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keyword Tool: I found a few such as those in TNW ( [51] ) and TechRadar ( [52] ), but it appears that they were either written by guest post writers/bloggers, thus being opinion pieces, or not written by staff.  The TechRadar Pro version of TechRadar appears similar to Wirecutter, so I'm uncertain whether it contributes to notability.  Mercenf ( talk ) 14:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The TNW source and both sources in the article only mention the tool or company in a list, with little actual content on either.  The TechRadar review looks like a good source though and I see no reason to doubt its independence.  As is, that one source doesn't bring it to WP:GNG , WP:NSOFT , or WP:NPRODUCT and I couldn't find anything else that appeared reliable (just a couple of blog posts).  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 16:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt The last AfD discussed possible paid editing - this is also likely paid editing to get this on here (one user with five edits made this page) and it doesn't otherwise pass notability guidelines.  SportingFlyer T · C 19:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roberto Ibarra: Broc ( talk ) 14:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Chile ,  and Peru .  Broc ( talk ) 14:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:BIO .  A google news search comes up with 1 relevant hit, and that's a 1 line mention.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aurangabad High Madrasha: A cursory Google search gives doesn't show anything noteworthy.  Lindsey40186 ( talk ) 17:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and West Bengal .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  The Bengali version of this article only has primary sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 12:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because I am unable to find enough independent sources with WP:SIGCOV to establish notability per WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 09:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Connor Rennie: A search through the Gale/newspapers.com/proquest and BNA archives found no SIGCOV of Rennie.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 12:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Easily fails GNG guidelines.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 19:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2010–11 Dundee F.C. season#Squad as this was apparently his best season (he appeared on the field more than once).  Doesn’t pass WP:SIGCOV .  Tau Corvi ( talk ) 19:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete