hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Vasudevaperumal Temple (Kolathanvalsu) : Sohom ( talk ) 16:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Google Maps link provided shows a rather modest temple in the middle of the field, while I'm not doubting the temple's existence, I don't see it being notable :( Sohom ( talk ) 16:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Sohom ( talk ) 16:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ketchum Sun Valley Historical Society Heritage & Ski Museum : Found mentions of the Historical Society in the news, but nothing on the museum itself.  Article was created by User:Ksvhs ; blatant CoI.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 13:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Idaho .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 13:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] if you found more sources then link them 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As I said, they're not about the museum, so it would be a waste of time to include them here.  If you want them, I believe everything I found that I note was on archive.org, but there's really no point.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 00:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] my bad, I misread the nom-statement 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Sports .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:NOTADVERT with no sourced hint at notability.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 14:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ●Delete- Per WP:NOTADVERT & Nominator.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Centers and institutes of Washington University in St. Louis : Only 6 of the almost 40 entries have articles.  SWinxy ( talk ) 00:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Missouri .  SWinxy ( talk ) 00:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIR .  Those six institutes that do have articles are referenced in the parent article Washington University in St. Louis anyhow.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 00:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Duplication of information already covered in Washington University in St. Louis .  — Maile ( talk ) 03:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 00:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keith Tucker : Greatest claim of notability is a song that charted; I not that makes the song notable, not the musician.  Fails the general and musician-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , United States of America ,  and Michigan .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: If deleted, then Keith Tucker (footballer) should be moved into its place.  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage found for this musician, should be deleted.  Charting could indicate notability, but there are no sources discussing him.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I don't consider charting at 170 on a mix album that notable either; tried to find mentions of him in . fr websites, still no luck.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b .  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 15:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gulay Zeynalli : In my opinion, the article was utilized to get the verification badge on social media.  All three of them has been created by the same user — Toghrul R ( t ) 12:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  — Toghrul R ( t ) 12:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Azerbaijan .  — Toghrul R ( t ) 12:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Toghrul R ( t ) 10:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I can't judge the quality of the sources, appears somewhat PROMO though.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Non-notable local artist.  - K evo 3 2 7 ( talk ) 08:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lucky Luke: End of Legend : Cabrils ( talk ) 22:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; I've been unable to find reliable sources supportin notability for the article, and there are certainly none in the article.  The alternative of a merge to Lucky Luke#Tributes to Lucky Luke is a possibility, but there's not enough in the article to warrant that.  Klbrain ( talk ) 23:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Comics and animation ,  and Iran .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines with no reliable sources to establish it.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 21:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lewis Church : Does not appear to meet the notability criteria JMWt ( talk ) 11:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and England .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  A List of D. R. Jardine's XI cricketers needs to be created and him redirected to there.  Interestingly, in 5 years time he could become another FC centurion.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 17:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems like if you wanted it redirected then you first have to create the page - because we can't redirect to a redlink JMWt ( talk ) 18:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a GNG fail, and the suitable list to redirect to doesn't exist, so delete for now.  If list is created in the meantime, then my vote would change to redirect.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Transmission risks and rates : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 19:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced... the term is used, but in everything from Covid articles to AIDS in peer-reviewed journals.  I'd delete and use the term if needed elsewhere.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajay Singh Naruka : Shellwood ( talk ) 14:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He has not held any office that would constitute an "inherent" notability claim under WP:NPOL #1, and the article is referenced nowhere near well enough to earn him a sourceability-based notability pass under WP:NPOL #2.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  NPOL is a great guide to show the clearly notable, but in the great grey area of local pols and appointees, I think the BLP policy would defer to GNG and this article does not have the sources to pass GNG.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  BLP is policy, and has priority over the other BIO SNGs (including NPOL) which are guidelines and essays.  // Timothy :: talk 21:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olivier Guillon : While I suspect there might be coverage in French that I am not seeing, my search for anything related to Guillon has turned up little more than stats pages, photographs, and brief mentions (i.e. WP:GNG does not appear to be met).  The fr-Wiki article has more information but similar sourcing issues.  Primefac ( talk ) 07:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Olympics ,  and France .  Primefac ( talk ) 07:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Also seems to own a stables in Ladiville - Les Ecuries du Grand Guillon.  Kingsif ( talk ) 21:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - Stub biography of sportsperson who does not satisfy the current sports notability guideline .   The subject previously qualified under the Olympic notability guideline for having competed in the 2012 Olympics, but the current guideline grants presumed notability to sportspeople who have received a medal in the Olympics.   The one reference is a database entry, which is not significant secondary coverage.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 01:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wanted to save it, but the best looking French links didn't resolve here for whatever reason.  I think it's possibly sourceable so don't mind an AtD or if someone wants to re-create it with better sources?  SportingFlyer T · C 13:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shane Merrill : WP:GNG is not passable as the sources are WP:RUNOFTHEMILL / WP:ROUTINE and do not provide WP:SIGCOV .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 09:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and South Dakota .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 11:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being the Chairman of a political party is not enough to bear notability per WP:NPOL .  However, good redirecting to the party will be good also.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  20:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of UWC Championships : The promotion doesn't even have an article HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 18:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and New Jersey .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The titles have as much notability as their parent promotion - none.  LM2000 ( talk ) 12:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable wrestling group.  Their championships obviously aren’t notable either.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 12:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As nominator and other said.  Promotion page that this title belonged was deleted because it wasn't notable enough.  Not notable title.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 20:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carlo Gariglio : Not notable.  Broc ( talk ) 13:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Italy .  Broc ( talk ) 13:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG pretty clearly.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shelflife Records : It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  No obvious WP:ATD , though there are pages on some of its artists.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies , California ,  and Oregon .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sources located.  Mach61 ( talk ) 17:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No readily available independent sources.  DJ Cane (he/him) ( Talk ) 23:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe van der Hoogt : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  I can't also find a possible redirect.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Vivas Barandica : Several sources are interviews conducted by or articles written by the subject, and thus not contributing toward notability.  Three articles ostensibly about the subject are virtually identical ( [69] , [70] , [71] ) and thus likely marketing/bio copy; they do not demonstrate independence cannot be relied on.  There are two articles about a social media controversy Vivas was involved in, but if this is all we have to go on, WP:BLP1E applies.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Colombia .  Kpg jhp jm 07:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Choi Gwan-il : Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not much sources found.  Fails WP:NFOOTBALL .  CSMention269 ( talk ) 02:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  A single appearance for North Korea in 1988 and nothing about his club career Svartner ( talk ) 23:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
K21JQ-D : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Washington .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  If it is a rebroadcaster, merge to the parent station.  Otherwise, merge to the owner.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's nothing to merge to.  The owner doesn't even have an article.  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  I don't see any redirect or merge target.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While this is mentioned at list of television stations in Washington (state)#Translators , it is as as relay of K36EW-D , which does not have (and never has had) an article.  I suppose the whole Blue Mountain Television operation is a run-of-the-mill religious station that does have some locally/regionally-produced material and is not entirely national programming, but lacks the significant coverage we require.  A remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ebenezer Andrews : Also, there is nothing significant about this person when searching about him in Google, which makes him fail WP:GNG as well.  zoglophie •talk• 10:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Ghana .  zoglophie •talk• 10:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete