hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Islamabad court attack : No lasting effects or coverage to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2014 .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 02:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is sufficient coverage of this event. -- Ameen Akbar ( talk ) 19:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It does not receive WP:LASTING coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2014 where this is already covered.  With no sustained significant coverage, there's no reason for this to have its own article.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 18:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2014 .  Lack of lasting impact.  Rzvas ( talk ) 15:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Michael Kulich : Star Mississippi 00:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Star Mississippi 00:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Entertainment , Sexuality and gender , California ,  and Connecticut .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Because rather recent decisions have made WP notability criteria   incredibly hard to meet for pornographic entertainers, redirect to skweezme , where sources like this can be added if needed.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 17:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , to Skweez Media per WP:ATD-R - otherwise fails WP:NBIO .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 14:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hospital trust : "Hospital trust" is not a legally or otherwise defined term, all trusts which run hospitals are either NHS trusts or NHS foundation trusts .  Single cited source also is not specific to the term.  Contains no information of value that isn't already covered at NHS trust and therefore does not even need merging, simple delete and perhaps redirect will suffice.  Article can essentially be summed up "a hospital trust is a NHS trust which runs hospital services".  That does not need an article Elshad ( talk ) 19:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England .  Elshad ( talk ) 19:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to NHS trust .  Owen× ☎ 20:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bhitabaria : NGA is considered an unreliable source.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 16:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 16:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Added two more references to verify existence.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 14:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bhitabaria Union - Places are not notable simply because they exist.  WP:GEOLAND gives a presumption of notability to legally recognised populated places, but the only thing that has legal recognition demonstrated in the sourcing is the union parishad (Union council) of Bhitabaria, which we already have an article about at Bhitabaria Union .  We have no information about the village separate to this union council.  FOARP ( talk ) 20:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bhitabaria Union.  Not seeing multiple sources meeting general notability.  Flurrious ( talk ) 00:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KQML-LD : Article technically survived a bulk AfD last year but there is nothing to show this station meets the notability guidelines on its own.  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Kansas ,  and Missouri .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  Only history is as an automated operation from out of state.  Nate • ( chatter ) 15:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : you can only say so much about a mid-2010s-launched DTV America/HC2/Innovate LPTV with little-to-no significant coverage , and none of it warrants a separate article these days.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Oisis Sediles : The subject has earned at least one cap for the Nicaragua women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Nicaragua .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 10:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ankara'dan Abim Geldi : Kadı Message 19:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and Turkey .  Kadı Message 19:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Grup Gündoğarken : No appearance of notability.  tr:Ankara'dan Abim Geldi has other sources, but is also up for deletion with two votes in favor so far, so I imagine those are no good anyway.  Band doesn't appear to be notable either and could easily also go, but redirecting there in the meantime is fine.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 11:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Article makes no claim of notability, simply states, "is a Turkish popular song" followed by five paragraphs of bland WP:OR much of which is from tr.wp.  BEFORE showed nothing that would make the song meet WP:N.  Sources from tr.wp: Comments Source Fails SIGCOV  1. ^ "POPULAR MUSIC SOUND PERFORMANCE" (PDF) .  Ankara Music and Fine Arts University.  Dup of #1  2. ^ "POPULAR MUSIC SOUND PERFORMANCE" (PDF) .  Ankara Music and Fine Arts University.  Album booklet, primary  3. ^ My Brother Came from Ankara (Album booklet).  Group at Sunrise .  Kervan Plakcılık .  1993.  8691575026780.  Album booklet, primary  4. ^ Mest of Gündoğarken (Album booklet).  Group at Sunrise .  Universal Music Production .  1998.  8691024008480.  About an album, no SIGCOV about the song  5. ^ Salik, Ruya.  " How many times can the album ' İlhan Şeşen: My Gift' be listened to?" .  Molatic .  Nationality .  Access date: 21 November 2023 .  Mention in album review  6. ^ Nakitoğlu, Emre (12 November 2018).  "A living tribute to the doyen composer of love songs: İlhan Şeşen - My Gift…" .  Bi'Kuble .  Access date: 21 November 2023 .  Fails SIGCOV  7. ^ "Joint rally from Ekrem İmamoğlu, Mansur Yavaş and Meral Akşener" .  Real Agenda No objection to a consensus Redirect to Grup Gündoğarken .  // Timothy :: talk 16:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
CFAV Haro : There is no reason for this article to exist separately from Naval Large Tugboat .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Naval Large Tugboat , no notability independent of the class a a whole.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 20:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nonsuch station : – dlthewave ☎ 04:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a list or another suitable page would be the best idea indeed.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lesego Keleboge : The subject has played for the Botswana women's national football team , but I cannot confirm the number of games.  Regardless, I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Botswana .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect as above.  Botswana seems to have relatively robust sports journalism infrastructure and subject is only mentioned in match summaries.  Danish Ranger ( talk ) 13:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 16:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KYNM-CD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Mexico .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , This article needs reducing, not deleting.  Searched the station, and was able to pick up a source from the LPTV Report, and even then, the article seems to have enough to justify saving it.  -- Danubeball ( talk ) 20:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 05:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet WP:GNG and I did not find any significant coverage on the article or online.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect This station started as a translator for, and is still related in ownership to, KCHF .  The only independent SIGCOV, and probably the only time it aired any locally originating programming, come from the period in the early 2000s when it aired Christian music videos as YTV.  I have two feature articles in the Albuquerque Journal from that period.  I cannot shake the feeling that the YTV period alone is insufficient.  This thing was mostly a translator and/or diginet coatrack.  [29] and [30] Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 01:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Sammi Brie makes a good case for redirecting as an AtD.  // Timothy :: talk 12:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KCHF : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent WP:SIGCOV .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
To Mars and Providence : The article is just a plot summary, catalogue information, and said notes (OR commentary).  My BEFORE failed to find anything but passing mentions (the best one is a paragraph in Gizmodo here , but I think it is not enough per SIGCOV and like).  Per ATD I suggest redirecting this to the anthology it was published in ( War of the Worlds: Global Dispatches ), which seems notable.  Said anthology had a number of reviews, some of wich likely mention the story - there is a tiny chance this could be salvaged if anyone could access them.  The one I found here sadly fails SIGCOV with regards to this story.  ISFDb notes that the story has been reprinted in several venues ( [52] ) but lists no reviews.  For now, I fear the dedicated entry for this can just exist on fandom ( https://lovecraft.fandom.com/wiki/To_Mars_and_Providence ).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Literature ,  and United States of America .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Partial merge to War of the Worlds: Global Dispatches .  — siro χ o 21:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bapaiya : The subject does not appear to be notable , as none of the sources provide significant coverage of the subject, only passing references.  A check before the nomination turned up no other useful sources I could find to establish notability.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 22:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Mythology ,  and Gujarat .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 22:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy ping for Be Brave AI , who created/moved the article into mainspace .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 22:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bahuchara Mata as an WP:ATD for now.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect a minor character in the goddess' legend. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 07:15, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question At the suggested target, Bapaiya only appears in the footnotes, while the spelling Bapiya appears in the article text.  Is that a mistake or a spelling variant?  If the latter, a redirect should probably point to an WP:Anchor .  Daranios ( talk ) 10:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
College of Business (Minnesota State University, Mankato) : The sources cited don't come even close to establishing notability, and a search finds only the usual social media accounts, rankings and directory listings, capsule profiles in course guides, etc. (and for that reason there is also no point in draftifying).  Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 08:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , United States of America ,  and Minnesota .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 08:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - to the university's article, or if one exists, the campus article as an ATD .  Nominator's rationale is spot on.  This is generally what we do per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 16:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep per sources in the article.  // Timothy :: talk 08:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] TimothyBlue , could you expand on that please?  Although there are a large number of references, only one is an independent secondary source, and it references a transactional event (staff change).  I'd argue there isn't a single source on the article that speaks to notability.  What am I missing?  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 23:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I'm ok with a redirect to the school's page here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  // Timothy :: talk 15:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment just to say that I've no issue with a redir, I just can't quite see anyone searching for "College of Business (Minnesota State University, Mankato)".  But I guess it will at least keep the place warm in case someone does manage to develop something notable in the future.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 15:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't either, but we need a consensus, redirects are cheap, and that is the direction this is headed.  I'd support the closer deciding the redirect is unneeded and deleting.  // Timothy :: talk 18:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect