List of La Liga broadcasters : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  No context to assert notability either.  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Spain .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, Not a tv guide. .  Govvy ( talk ) 14:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Relevant information and sources have been added that give it notability.  [37] , [38] , [39] -- Claudio Fernag ( talk ) 01:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Worthy in an article itself but we don't need a broadcasting list so you can watch in whoever country.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on sourcing found by Claudio Fernag .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 15:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:LISTCRUFT also applies.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just a reminder, that page is an essay, not a policy or guideline.  L iz Read!  Talk!  15:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Relevant and comprehensive information with references and sources.  Puente aereo ( talk ) 13:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Relevant and necessary article, its sources are the best PIKACHUNESS ( talk ) 18:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ITSUSEFUL applies.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Needs more policy-based discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 14:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the sources provided above fall under WP:ROUTINE and are not effective to complete WP:LISTN .  This is a trivial list and does not withstand the WP:SIGCOV to remain as an article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NLIST.  Refs in article do not discuss the subject - the broadcasters - as a group by independent sources, they are routine sports news;  the list serves no CLN purpose.  // Timothy :: talk 18:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep :The article is no longer just a list of broadcasters as it was in the beginning, a context has been added that gives it notability, and verifiable and reliable sources were also included.  It is also one of the most important soccer leagues in the world, not the San Marino league.  It has the same or more merit of existing than articles like List of NBA broadcasters , MLB broadcasters or NFL broadcasters .  It has potential to continue improving, perhaps some things can be corrected but it should not be eliminated. -- Edu1388 ( talk ) 19:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep article has been substantially expanded since nomination and is no longer a mere channel listing. Pinguinn 🐧 21:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep More information that gives notability has been added and also more sources [40] GNG is well passed-- Claudio Fernag ( talk ) 07:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You voted this twice already.  Are you really this desparate?  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus