hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
JJ (Trainee A): KH-1 ( talk ) 12:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Japan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no indication of notability.  Dekimasu よ!  13:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If this article is kept, its title will have to change because Trainee A is a band in which he was briefly a member.  A better title would be something like JJ (Japanese singer) .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 22:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Charitably it is WP:TOOSOON , while none of WP's notability guidelines have been met.  A search for his Japanese and Korean names reveals a fair number of hits in the media of those countries, but they appear to be universally unreliable gossip and self-promotional sites.  JJ has done little of note beyond a gig as a backup dancer and his career is just getting started.  Good luck to him as he promotes himself, but Wikipedia must not be part of that effort.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 22:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Subodh Patnaik (disambiguation): Shellwood ( talk ) 20:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Hardly makes sense, such a disambiguation page is absolutely unnecessary!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 14:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yesha Camile: PRmaster1 ( talk ) 16:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR .  GNews has articles which mention her as part of a cast for a television series but nothing in-depth about her.  No hits on GNews archives as well.  It's probably also a bad idea to have an poorly referenced article for a minor.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep She was winner of Promil Pre-School i-Shine Talent Camp and bagged only 2 leading roles on TV .  Can't find anything else beyond that, but it's close to meeting WP:ENT IMV.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 06:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG, BIO.  This might be TOOSOON, but BLPs should have solid references.  BEFORE showed promo and primary, nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 06:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (soft) because of the total lack of reliable sources and it being WP:TOOSOON for a child actress in reality shows.  In a pinch, I could reach out to my niece in Manila for sources.  Bearian ( talk ) 01:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Doug Storer: The only claim of notability being attempted here is that he existed, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy coverage about his work in sources independent of himself -- but the only "reference" cited here is an archival fond of his own personal papers, which is not independent of himself, and the article has existed in this state since 2008 without ever having even one other source added to it.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to say more than just "he existed", or having to cite more sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Radio ,  and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Murder of Louise Smith: A Google search for "Louise Smith Shane Mays" for results after 1 January 2021 (days after the sentencing) reveals only two main events which are both routine: the appeal to increase the sentence was rejected [12] in February 2021, and a review in January 2022 [13] found that the victim received no support after reporting an unrelated rape a year earlier.  While it may sound callous to say, there is little that points to any lasting notability of this crime, which occurred in a year of 594 homicides in the UK .  When I see the other few crimes in Category:2020 murders in the United Kingdom , they received heavy coverage for wider issues or unusual aspects: the Murders of Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman involved racist and sexist gross police misconduct and a truly senseless motive; the murder of Matt Ratana was of a serving policeman in his station by a handcuffed man who then became severely disabled in a suicide attempt; the killing of Emily Jones was a stranger attack on a child and involved mental health and immigration controversies.  Again, it may sound callous but females being killed by men known to them is not unusual and the lack of extensive coverage besides news updates shows that Unknown Temptation ( talk ) 11:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and lack of WP:LASTING effect.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Note that this is not the same crime described in the now-deleted Draft:Murder of Louise Smith , which was briefly in the mainspace under the same title in 2017.  Mackensen (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with the nomination.  Such is the risk of creating articles on events as they happen ProcrastinatingReader ( talk ) 15:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Textbook example of a newsworthy tragic incident that isn't a suitable topic for a general encyclopaedia.  Would be suitable as a mention in a Crime in Havant , Murders in the United Kingdom in 2020 or similar article but not worthy of inclusion as a standalone subject.  W a g ge r s TALK 08:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Horrible horrific event that seems to be NEWS.  RIP poor girl.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 19:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alphonse Teste: In this context, I bring it for community evaluation.  Sturm ( talk ) 04:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Animal , Medicine ,  and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sunday Alhassan: There is some coverage in Football Made in Ghana but it's little more than a basic transfer announcement, although it does mention how many games he played for King Faisal and that he had a few injuries.  Modern Ghana has a trivial mention.  In any case, even if Football Made in Ghana is considered to be good, one decent source does not equal a GNG pass.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The FMIG source mentioned by the nominator looks and reads exactly like a club press release, and is unlikely to be secondary coverage.  In any case, it's not in-depth coverage by itself and the other sources available are woefully inadequate in terms of meeting WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 22:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Historical sizes of railroads: It's a list of those railroad companies in North America which in 1948 had 1000 or more steam locomotives.  It might be sourced.  It's definitely not encyclopedic, and I don't see how it could be.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steam locomotive production , a similar article of the same vintage from the same author.  Mackensen (talk) 00:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Lists .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A strange remnant indeed.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 01:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The title is misleading.   This is essentially a list of North American railroads by number of steam locomotives in 1948, an impossibly niche criterion for a list.   I would not oppose an article resembling Timeline of largest passenger ships , except of course it would be something like Timeline of largest North American railroads by mileage or something like that.   But the title is vague and the article seems all but abandoned, since there were no edits at all between 2012 and 2020 (and no non-minor edits between 2007 and 2020).   This vestige of early Wikipedia is pointless.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Whatever the original intent, this seems a very short and incomplete list.   There are numerous railroads/rail lines in the United States.   Looks like the editor just went by info in the two books listed, but there are no details of which pages, etc.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This list of steam locomotives seems like a niche curiosity, and it's not really the kind of in-depth information most readers would expect from an encyclopedia.  Waqar 💬 17:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is clearly not an encyclopedic subject, much the same as the former steam locomotive production article Mackensen mentions (I happened to be the nominator for that AfD).  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 13:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTDB.  Did consider a redirect yet the name is too confusing.  gidonb ( talk ) 23:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raewyn Murphy: Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject totally lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Norman Anderson (footballer): Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 07:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivana Varagić: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Montenegro .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No coverage that meets WP:SIGCOV , just WP:SPORTSTATS .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Syed Yaqub: References are based on local folklore.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 15:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh , India and Islam .  -- Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 15:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Local folklore can still be a valid subject assuming the sources are suitable and the information if verifiable.  Do the existing sources not check out?  The figure is a little hard to search for as it's quite a generic name.  There is of course the possibility of alternative spellings, as well as further local language sources.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 17:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There does seem to be coverage of his reputed shrine in local media .  𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk ) 16:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ficaia : The existing coverage of our subject seems to always be in reference to the location/holder of tomb.  As notability is not inherited , it cannot be shown that our subject is notable enough to have its own article on Wikipedia as an individual and not as a tomb resident.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 16:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Your opinions on what should happen with this article are welcome.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with the caveat that there might be foreign language sources I don't have access to, I cannot find anything that demonstrates Yuqub himself is notable; anything I found was as mentioned by Jaun above relating to the tomb itself.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 20:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom lacks indepth references.  Lankanrhino ( talk ) 22:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bendancer: Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of being notable.  Coverage is typical of a performer who is at the beginning of their career.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 08:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete definitely WP:PROMO , WP:UPE and created by a WP:SOCK and fails WP:RS and WP:GNG .  Could be G5 'able as well.  Wesoree ( Talk ) 13:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hamid Ibrahim: MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation , Uganda ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Zimula Carol ( talk ) 07:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete written like a promo and not notable Hadal1337 ( talk ) 15:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bernard Chong: By himself, there's not enough for a biographical article.  In its current form it's largely a puff piece, with claims that the subject is visionary, etc, which I unsuccessfully tried to tone down.  But even if all that were to be removed (again), there isn't any real notability.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 03:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the only cited WP:RS that names him is the Rappler story.  Though not mentioned in the WP page he did make the national news after being charged in an alleged methamphetamine trafficking scheme although he was subsequently cleared.  [64] [65] The PhilStar article (#2) is pretty good for biography and involvement in esports and doesn't mention him being involved in content production.  I just don't know enough about esports to say if he's notable for that.  Oblivy ( talk ) 03:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would like to include contributions in the Lords Mobile and Clash Royale Mobile Game community, as he is really an icon in Esports Industry in the Philippines.  akosiken ( talk ) 16:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Philippines .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence of notability from RS coverage, repeated attempts to spam this article - see also Bernard Chong .  Salt both.  At best, redirect to Bren Esports - David Gerard ( talk ) 11:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] How come it's a spam article, how can i discuss other companies he invested or even those movies or animations he produce?  Those things are no longer Bren Esports related.  akosiken ( talk ) 16:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] One start would be to find reliable sources showing he is known for this other activity.  Those sections of the article link to content that doesn't mention his name.  May I ask if you have a connection to the article subject?  Others have mentioned WP:COI and your edit history shows you have recently only focused on this article and Bren Esports Oblivy ( talk ) 02:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Does not satisfy WP:NBIO .  NPOV issues smell like a COI as well.  – Pbrks ( t • c ) 14:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and salt all variants to prevent recreation.  — hueman1 ( talk • contributions ) 01:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment while not completely relevant in this case (since this deals with an unrelated article), the primary contributor has also heavily edited another article which has been raised as a possible COI (and since been speedily deleted as WP:G11 ).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.147.67.216 ( talk ) 07:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt per nom and possible COI issues.  ParadaJulio ( talk ) 10:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete