Enterprise Wolves Basketball: In my WP:BEFORE search, only routine coverage shows up regarding game recaps; the article's actual subject matter – a Utah high school's boy's basketball program – is non-notable.  Enterprise High School is not a national powerhouse a la The Patrick School (NJ), Mater Dei (CA), IMG Academy (FL) etc.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Utah and Basketball SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – parallel AfD discussion opened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Wolves Baseball .  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 23:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator Grahaml35 ( talk ) 19:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 00:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article states names, dates, and information that is factual.  The information is referenced to the Deseret News, which is the oldest continuously operating publication in the American west since 1850.  It also references the Utah High School Activities Association, which is the governing body of Utah high school sports and keeps all the sports information and sports record book in the state of Utah.  The article summarizes the basketball history of Enterprise High School in a clear and concise way.  People have said thank you for creating the page.  Yotejonga ( talk ) 02:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It might be factual, but it isn't a notable subject.  High school sports association record books are primary sources and local coverage of local high school sports is not really notability-lending.  To further SportsGuy789 's rationale, not even high schools like IMG Academy or Oak Hill have independent articles for their sports programs regardless of their success.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] IMG Academy and Oak Hill should have independent articles for their sports programs, as well as Enterprise.   I don't believe there should be a limit on the number of independent articles out there.   Wikipedia is a great online encyclopedia where people search for this kind of information.   Why not have Wikipedia be THE Source for where ALL people can obtain the information and knowledge they are searching for.  Yotejonga ( talk ) 02:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Because that is very much not Wikipedia’s purpose.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable topics, what you are describing is a database of indiscriminate information, which is explicitly against Wikipedia’s mission and against policy.  GPL93 ( talk ) 03:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator regarding GNG and is not notable otherwise.  Seems to be some fandom going on here.  User:Let'srun 16:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete