hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Yutaka Kurita: This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Japan .  Owen× ☎ 19:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am not sure there is any assertion of notability in the article, and only the birthdate is cited.  I could not find anything better in a search.  Dekimasu よ!  05:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I did some searches and added some content, an image and references.  According to the International Aikido Federation he was a notable person, see here .  It looks to be notable person, but can't find many secondary sources.   It would be good to do a search in Japanese, but I can't speak Japanese.  82.174.61.58 ( talk ) 12:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Source eval: Comments Source Could not find source, no pp  # 1.  The Way of Aiki, by Jose Carlos Escobar, MA. , Trafford Publishing Obit, all the normal problems with Obits  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "RIP Yutaka Kurita Shihan".  International Aikido Federation.  11 March 2022.  Blog post  3. ^ "The great masters: Yutaka Kurita Sensei (Part 1)".  boec.com.  3 October 2021.  Part 2 of blog post above  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c "The great masters: Yutaka Kurita Sensei (Part 2)".  boec.com.  4 October 2021.  The one source above I couldn't find a copy of has no page number, doubtful the entire book is about the subject and a single source won't meet WP:N.  Ping me if sources are posted with WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 20:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Callum Ryan-Phillips: Southern Football League is the best that I could find but it's only a basic transfer announcement and there is consensus among a number of editors that the league website is not an independent source, see here for example.  South Wales Argus mentions him just once and Severn Sport is just trivial match report coverage so my own searches have not found anything useful here.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Wales .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muhammad Yahman: Being a local preacher, it's probable that his recognition is confined to his immediate region.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 22:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Indonesia .  Owen× ☎ 23:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability not found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete : Census info and primary sourcing aren't what's needed here.  There's nothing I can find about this person, very likely not meeting notability requirements either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Best sources found are wikipedia mirrors and social media, none of which help here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a before search popped up several similar names but nothing significant about this person.  TunGunPun ( talk ) 07:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence of notability.  -- 95.233.51.253 ( talk ) 18:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : my reference search doesn't bring up anything that would pass NBIO.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 18:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Development Counsellors International: Google News does not show any real secondary sourcing, besides the usual mentions in rankings and business listings.  No secondary sources are supplied, so that's not helpful.  Drmies ( talk ) 14:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I'm having trouble finding much of anything that would qualify towards WP:CORPDEPTH .  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katrina Akursmørk: All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2014 , 2018 , 2019 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Europe ,  and Denmark .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG as I couldn't find any sigcov of her.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 16:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
City Center-Raipur: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Chhattisgarh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails notability.  The sources are not verifiable though the location exists.  There is no reliable or independent source on the page to warrants its own article.  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alyosha (tank): WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there is video footage of the tank's actions Salfanto ( talk ) 12:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge to T-80 models .  The article is very poorly sourced, and "video footage" is not going to add reliability or credibility (it's easy to fabricate).  In the doctrine of Russian military deception there is explicitly a measure named "Disinformation" (дезинформация).  Under this measure, Russia actively seeks military advantage by tactics such as "untrue information to journalists".  This accompanies concealment, imitation, simulation, and demonstrative manoeuvres (false trails).  In other words, denial and deception come as standard in war or peace, and this is war.  Do we believe that Putin congratulated some soldiers as heroes, etc?  Yes.  Do we believe that this was the work of one super-tankish-tank and its heroic crew?  Not especially.  Is this an encyclopedic article?  No.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 13:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The purpose of this article is to tell the history of the tank similarly to other articles about named tanks such as Eagle 7 or Bomb Salfanto ( talk ) 15:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also I believe that wikipedia is best when not biased to one side Salfanto ( talk ) 15:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As with Tsar (tank) and several other articles by this user, there is minimal coverage by secondary sources, and as such it is padded out with WP:COATRACK content.  Loafiewa ( talk ) 16:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Mr. Komori ( talk ) 18:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Han Song-hyok: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG .  Google search brings up only press releases.  Again the article has no sources at all beside external links. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Same case as previous AfD regarding North Korean players.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Certainly fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV , but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Dark Roses: Uffda608 ( talk ) 19:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark and Visual arts .  Uffda608 ( talk ) 19:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication of notability or supporting references, even on the native language Wiki.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manish Kashyap: ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 07:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies and Journalism .  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 07:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 09:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E ; subject received notability in the situation of the arrest and trial, that's it.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 06:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Castle Group: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New Jersey .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  It is difficult to tell whether the subject has any major holding on the structural engineering industry, just as it is difficult to tell from a citation search whether the article's expansiveness covers a justifiable range of points.  One would find that the vast majority of citations have to do with either self-published sources or notations to do with awards granted to the company (all of which are from New Jersey , the company's founding region, I noticed), and one would also find that the lack of widespread coverage on the subject apart from the already-embedded sources make little more than a mere trivial mention of the subject or its active projects over time.  As such, I would agree - the subject definitely fails to meet WP:ORGDEPTH as well as other critical criteria and should therefore be deleted.  TheMysteriousShadeheart ( talk ) 18:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hispanos: The Census citation's link no longer works, but from what I can tell the US Census Bureau does not recognize "Hispano" or anything similar as a cohesive ancestry or ethnic group (a code list from 2010, pages 295-296, I've found doesn't use the term at all).  "The Spanish Surname Criterion" defines "Hispano" as equivalent to the modern category "Hispanic and Latino Americans" - although the "native Spanish Americans" it mentions seem to be the descendants of Spanish-speaking settlers in the Southwest this article claims to describe.  The two sources with archived links are both about Hispanos of New Mexico specifically, and the Alexander B. King source is just about historical Californios .  So, none of this article's sources actually establish that the term "Hispanos" is widely used to refer to the descendants of early Spanish and Mexican settlers in the American Southwest as a whole.  Additionally, this article's exact scope is unclear.  The lead sentence mentions "independent Mexico" but the article also mentions Louisiana Isleños .  Speaking of scope, I'm not sure the article's subject, descendants of Spanish-speaking inhabitants of the territories Mexico ceded to the US in 1848, actually do constitute a meaningful ethnic or cultural group - the sources cited don't establish this.  It's also noteworthy that several people in this article's talk page have previously objected to its existence and that most of the article's content is unsourced.  Erinius ( talk ) 08:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Erinius ( talk ) 08:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a notable subgroup of latinos in the United States, very unclear scope, fails GNG.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Avivah Wittenberg-Cox: WP:NOT and TOU violations.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Women .  CptViraj ( talk ) 12:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This does seems to be more of a LinkedIn profile of a successful person in business than someone who meets WP:GNG, so deletion seems to be in order unless significant coverage of her directly is found. -- Milowent • has spoken 13:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , professional profile , WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  — siro χ o 15:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Plenty of Forbes contributor pieces written by this person in Gnews, no sources about this person.  What's used now isn't good enough to keep the article.  Delete for lack of coverage in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Has written a few books, but I can't find reviews for any of them.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have two references, out of interest this woman is notable.  There's notability associated with. [ [23] ], [ [24] ] and [ [25] ] only are enough to establish notability.  Thus generally pass GNG 102.91.71.127 ( talk ) 05:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure the first is an independent/reliable source.  The other two quote the subject but don't give much information about her.  Looks marginal with what's currently on the table.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] First is not independent coverage so no good for GNG.  Others are just comments from her, not coverage about her so also not good for GNG.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 02:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No WP:SIGCOV , fails WP:NIO .  Sources provided here are insufficient per above.  Admittedly, it was difficult to search for coverage due to the large amount of articles she wrote.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  21:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kunduana House: Fails WP:GNG .  BookishReader ( talk ) 00:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Pakistan .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I can't find anything about the building, but perhaps the article's creator used a non-standard English spelling.  The claims in the article (being a listed building, being "one of the finest country houses in Pakistan") would indicate notability if they can be verified.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete my first reaction was the same as Eastmain’s, but I can’t turn up any sources for this in English or Urdu.  Oddly the article describes the building as unfinished, suggesting it’s not a historic palace at all.  Anyway the whole thing is so garbled there’s no real way of knowing what is going on, so we should not keep this hanging around any longer.  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] also here’s the article listing both protected and unprotected sites in Gujrat district.  Kunduana House isn’t on the list.  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is probably a WP:HOAX .  this version - they tried to built it based on Montacute House .  Why I can't find this house on maps?  BookishReader ( talk ) 11:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG .  Insight 3 ( talk ) 05:03, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on lack of sources.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 07:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Speakerpunch: This award has zero coverage and neither does the band, clearly not passing WP:BAND InDimensional ( talk ) 23:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Netherlands .  InDimensional ( talk ) 23:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage for this band that I can find in RS.  Gsearch is simply their website and various download or streaming sites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tried . nl sites, you only get about 5 hits in Gnews for concert listings.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete