hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Promine: Only dependent on two sources which a large part of the article left totally unsourced since 2016.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Author here, I did some scanning online and have found very little additional sources of quality according to WP:ORGDEPTH .  I have to agree with Jamiebuba on lack of conformity to WP:SIGCOV as well.  Not my best work, I agree with proposal for deletion.  Ruminater ( talk ) 14:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  All I can find is one iffy source, the Mining Suppliers Trading Association .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 02:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicholas Weise: He is a lecturer with a reasonable but not exceptional number of publications, won one university-internal non-funded award (of which a bunch seem to be given [13] ) and was nominated for two more, and did some outreach.  This doesn't get us to either GNG or NPROF level.  Newish academic (PhD 7 years ago) at the beginning of his career; WP:TOOSOON .  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 18:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 18:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTCV .  At best WP:TNT but i doubt WP:ACADEMIC is met.  — siro χ o 22:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He has a promising Google Scholar citation record, but not a strong enough one to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1 .  And local awards that are not even university-wide, but only from his faculty within his university, with 10 winners/year, are far from the level of significance that could contribute to #C2.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Umbrella title: Dawkin Verbier ( talk ) 14:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Dawkin Verbier ( talk ) 14:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Most of the sources use the word "umbrella" exactly once, and none appear to discuss this as a broad topic.  LittlePuppers ( talk ) 22:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darlene Jones: Fails WP:GNG Hirolovesswords ( talk ) 14:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and United States of America .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Sportspeople , Women ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unfortunately, the Concho Valley piece is best here, but is relatively limited.  Others are passing mentions, failing WP:GNG .  Some claims aren't sourced.  TLA (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Howe (wrestler): Just worked on independent promotions (one exception, when he appeared a few times in TNA).  No in-deep coverage sabout him in sources, just WP:ROUTINE results.  HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 09:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Wrestling ,  and Indiana .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Belgians: gidonb ( talk ) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Belgium .  gidonb ( talk ) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Belgium is a densely populated country of 11.7 million people.  Category:Belgian people cannot be counted by PetScan, and a large share of the articles are not about Belgians, but there are likely tens of thousands articles about Belgians in Category:Belgian people .  Category:Belgian scientists alone contains 1038 articles , more than enough to support a standalone list of Belgian scientists .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 02:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Category:Belgian people by century contains 4569 results .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 02:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree the scope of such list is too broad.  But as WP:ATD , this list could be transformed in a list of lists following the example of Lists of Americans , by splitting into sub-lists.  However, I tend towards Delete as I don't see the value in having lists of people for which we already have categories with thousands of entries, unless said lists have more stringent criteria than the categories themselves and are heavily curated.  Otherwise we end up having patchwork lists of dubious worth.  I am looking forward to reading the opinions of fellow editors.  Broc ( talk ) 04:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: The article is way too vague, as it includes people who were citizens of Belgium for at least some part of their lives (which could include a small portion of their lives), people who weren't Belgium at the time but were born where Belgium is now (which I don't think should qualify as "Belgian"), and even fictional characters whose citizenship isn't even know.  There are way too many leaniant parameters for what qualifies as "Belgian".  I think @ Broc 's solution to turn the article into a list of lists could work, but I think deletion or making stricter qualifications for what "Belgian" means would be better suited.  Mjks28 ( talk ) 04:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A list on its own is far too broad and unwieldy.  Possible alternative is a list of lists in a more specific sense.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ettore Casadei: All the sources I could find, apart from transfer reports, stats reports and non-independent sources from the clubs he played for at the time, are about him being the boyfriend of some minor starlet in 2021 [34] and little more [35] , none of which are either independent enough (including article sources) or covering the subject in thorough detail to be defined as WP:GNG .  Angelo ( talk ) 11:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Angelo ( talk ) 11:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Italy and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Player with an ongoing career, off the back of a good season in the United States at college level and the potential to continue his career there.  Has a decent amount of coverage, especially for the level he's played at, and this interview, and especially this one are independent and decently in-depth.  At worst draftify.  Davidlofgren1996 ( talk ) 12:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first one you've cited is barely one paragraph long...  The second isn't much longer.  Interviews don't count towards notability as they are primary sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Having the "potential" to continue his career indicates he's not at notability, but perhaps in the future.  TOOSOON applies.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment to other users: the user above is the author of the article.  That said, the sources you came up with are nowhere close to WP:SIGCOV (they are either non-independent, or are not secondary sources).  Angelo ( talk ) 15:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The second one is literally a Q&A interview, those never count towards notability.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Match reports from Old Dominion University I find, some limited coverage in Italian media.  TOOSOON and should be ! deleted for lack of extensive sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per all forementioned reasons above.  Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- 12:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) Delete .  Zero independent sources to support GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ron Fish: Boleyn ( talk ) 21:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete ; he seems notable and has worked on quite a few critically acclaimed games, but it seems to be fairly hard to find reliable sources on him.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 22:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Note that all three sources currently in the article are dead (at least for me).  Mr. Fish is visible at various video game fan pages such as [20] , but I can find no in-depth and reliable coverage of his video game work.  Therefore, the article is serving as a basic resume and is not supported by notability.  As for Mr. Fish's connection to Dick Dale , he is not mentioned at Dale's article and he appears to be much younger than Dale, so he was probably a late-period sideman when Dale went on non-notable nostalgia tours.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tartu Rugby Klubi Lelo: I can't see any passing of WP:GNG here and a rugby club simply existing does not automatically make it notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and Estonia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , doesn't appear to be a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Bombsters: The notability claim on offer here is that they exist (or existed, because a lot of the information here is very outdated), and the referencing is entirely to primary sources (music sourced to its own presence on iTunes or YouTube, etc.) that are not support for notability.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , definitely unnotable.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage in RS and the band appears to have fizzled out.  Their youtube channel only has 300 something subscribers...  There is no news about them, other than a few places to stream their music.  I doubt they were ever notable by our standards, even less today.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carl Berger (cinematographer): Fails WP:NFILMMAKER UtherSRG (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , United States of America ,  and California .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - here is one possible source Marineland .  There is also a mention in White Zombie: Anatomy of a Horror Film .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting for a second go around Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 01:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lots of mentions in books, but nothing in-depth to satisfy WP:SIGCOV , including the sources from SailingInABathTub above.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 04:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nabakhsh: Hongsy ( talk ) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran .  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] From WP:GEOLAND : Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Flynn, Oregon: Only source is GNIS, and no other information could be found.   Satellite images suggest this is just an industrial area on the outskirts of Philomath, OR.   Apparently there was once a Flynn Covered Bridge in the area: [147] , which might be notable, but nothing about a "community" of Flynn was found, so this is a failure of WP:GEOLAND .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Oregon .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete If there was ever a time when this wasn't right on the outskirts of Philomath, it's before topo coverage.  And curiously, it doesn't show up as a label until the industrial spur into the lumberyard also appears, and a short siding shows up as well.  That rail point seems to be what the label is for, when it first appears.  At any rate the lack of a clear characterization of the spot is reason for deletion.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find no additional sources than presented already.  I add that the Bridge was short lived, and while it's plausible that it was at this location, I couldn't prove it.  James.folsom ( talk ) 21:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Danylo Safonov: My own Ukrainian searches found nothing better than Kramatorsk Post , a hyper local news source that only mentions him once.  I have checked the Ukrainian Wikipedia article and all of the sources used are database sources, so don't confer notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gheorghe Bantîș: Best sources were FMF and NOI , both trivial mentions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Moldova .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 17:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 03:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DZVG-TV: Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD ?  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:14, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete