hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Professor Edward Travers: Relies almost entirely on primary sources, and does not meet the GNG.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 23:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 23:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters unless improved with reception/analysis.  Fails GNG as written ( WP:FANCRUFT ).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect per Piotrus.  Without third-party sources, there isn't enough WP:SIGCOV to support this article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Halocene: Fails WP:GNG , should be a redirect, since it is mentioned at the The Masked Singer article.  Onel 5969 TT me 11:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Arizona ,  and Tennessee .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Redirect to The Masked Singer (Australian TV series) , but do not delete.  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 15:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Masked Singer (Australian TV series) . Either way, this is an unsigned indie band that is notable simply for a (minor) controversy.-- Gen. Quon [Talk] 21:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I feel that I have provided many sources that show this band is not notable simply for the controversy but because of their multi-platform online presence.  I would have continued to work on a draft after it was rejected by but that was not an option.  Brian.butt ( talk ) 22:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would have continued to work on a draft after it was rejected by but that was not an option.  I have added more sources using the search link that is provided in the deletion flag.  The current "notability" standards are not sufficient for a streaming music society.  Because the streaming platforms do not share total streams in a similar method to radio stations artists that are not associated with established record companies are held to a higher standard than those that are signed but have a smaller fan base.  Brian.butt ( talk ) 22:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I have found one source from a French magazine, listing Halocene among other famous Youtube cover bands.  This indicates the notability of the band outside of the controversy with Masked Singer.  Skimel ( talk ) 03:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you please site it in the article or provide a link so that I can?  Brian.butt ( talk ) 20:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zinda Dil (2003 film): DareshMohan ( talk ) 20:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If no improvement seems expectable in the near future, I would suggest Redirect to Ashima Bhalla (or Abbas, both are on the theatrical poster)- MY, OH MY!  (mushy yank) 13:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 13:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Spirits Reawaken: In a WP:BEFORE search, all I could find on reliable secondary sources was a few passing mentions, in articles about the actors.  Not all programmes released by notable outlets are themselves inherently notable, and I can't see how this web series merits a separate article.  WP:SPA article creator since June.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Philippines .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of iWantTFC original programming#Drama Spirits (TV series)#Remake : I found only 2 sources about the show, but it seems to not fully pass GNG: [14] [15] .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 23:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Changed redirect target per Mushy Yank's suggestion.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , as ThisIsSeanJ suggests, but maybe rather to Spirits (TV series)#Remake , of which this is a remake?  Both are OK, I suppose. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment two spellings are used in primary sources: Spirits Reawaken and Spirits: Reawaken , so if the outcome here is to redirect, then the second redirect should also be created and subject to the same consensus.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 13:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, true.  But I'd say that whatever the outcome is, it applies to both pages.  (Maybe that was exactly what you meant!) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Actually, I only meant for redirection.  But thinking about it, I agree with you: whatever the outcome, it should apply to both.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 22:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hail Mary (Dark New Day album): Despite that, I am now sure whether this album actually meets WP:NALBUM , so I am sending it to AfD to determine notability.  GTrang ( talk ) 15:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  GTrang ( talk ) 15:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dark New Day : This article is not remotely borderline.  There is one reliable source (Blabbermouth.net) and two blatantly not (one from their own record label, the other from Amazon).  I found no other coverage of the album, and no evidence of notability.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KAJF-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Kansas ,  and Missouri .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  Plain no GNG or previous history before DTV/HC2.  Nate • ( chatter ) 15:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corporation/HC2 Broadcasting Not notable and is rarely if not impossible to be seen in Kansas City, Missouri or in its City of license , Topeka, Kansas.  mer764 KC TV ( Talk ) 15:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : there's not much to say about this mid-2010s-launched DTV America/HC2/Innovate station that hasn't already been said, other than that this was yet another technical survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nanette Salomons Cohen: Notability is not inherited , her being related to someone as well-known as Karl Marx doesn't make her inherently notable.  toweli ( talk ) 17:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Judaism ,  and Netherlands .  toweli ( talk ) 17:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to her daughter, Henriette Pressburg , as an WP:ATD .  Otherwise, I agree with the intro.  Fair disclosure: we are related through the husband, the cantor/textile merchant.  Neither the husband nor Nanette Cohen are notable.  It's important to apply the same criteria for relatives and nonrelatives alike.  gidonb ( talk ) 18:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If not kept, Redirect to her daughter Henriette Pressburg .  Well-sourced but questionable notability.  Pam D 08:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Being grandmother of Karl Marx appears to be only claim of notability.  No evidence she had any strong relationship with or influence on Karl, who lived 170 miles away in Trier, and who she would only have seen during visits.  Karl was only 14 when she died.  Agree, if not kept, Redirect to her daughter.  Henriette Pressburg .  Hsq7278 ( talk ) 14:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Karel Destovnik Kajuh (district): As a result, it doesn't meet general notability guidelines .  That Tired Tarantula Burrow 17:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to Karel Destovnik .  - Altenmann >talk 23:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Celje#Districts and local communities .  We might want to discuss other Celje district and local communities stubs together with this.  -- Upwinxp ( talk ) 10:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Celje#Districts and local communities . There is not much content and it can safely be added to the said article. In general, it would be best to have a comprehensive article/list on all the communities of Celje. -- TadejM my talk 03:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Muhabbat Yun Bhi Hoti Hai: Received some ROTM "Pakistan Media Awards" — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A-Plus_TV#Drama_serials : Not fiercely opposed to Keep, though (awards, so-so coverage) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Marjorie Raistrick-Carter: All I could find is this - [ [20] ] Let'srun ( talk ) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Women ,  and England .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Olympedia piece is decent.  I would expect there to be further coverage available for this multi-time Olympian from an English-speaking country.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Aside from the usual snippets in contemporary sports reports, there's a little bit of significant coverage: marriage report , comeback in 1963 .  wjemather please leave a message... 17:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  Ingratis ( talk ) 01:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Olympic female artistic gymnasts for Great Britain Coverage in databases is not considered sufficient to show WP notability.   In 1952 she finished 131st out of 134 in the women's all around and in 1960 she finished 110th out of 124.   Since Olympic participation is no longer enough to show notability, we need more coverage.   Failing to break the top 100 is not enough.  Papaursa ( talk ) 23:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Abt Ur Luv: The article has been unsourced for over a decade, and there don't seem to be any sources to draw from anyway.  Checking through newspaper archives only shows trivial mentions in schedules and catalogs.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 03:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 03:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Plenty of coverage in the Tagalog wikipedia.  English news has this as confirmation [33] somewhat brief but mentions the show years after the fact.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : Could you direct me to where the subject is covered on the Tagalog Wikipedia?  w:tl:Abt Ur Luv redirects to a list of ABS-CBN programs which doesn't have a source related to this subject.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 20:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh ok, I hadn't bothered to translate the page, I assumed it was a long list of episodes.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No problem!  The news article you've provided above also seems to be only a passing mention of the show, and I couldn't find any more sources; the subject still does not pass any notability criteria.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 23:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NTVNATL .  Google News Archives only show passing mentions.  Alternatively, redirect to List_of_ABS-CBN_original_programming#Youth-oriented where it is mentioned.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above seems like the better choice.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
I-News: Google News Archives and Google News did not turn up reliable sources.  Strongest claim for notability is a 2009 Anak TV Seal nomination but that's it.  Alternatively , redirect to List of programs previously broadcast by Net 25 .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 07:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs previously broadcast by Net 25 as an WP:ATD .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 07:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gohar Armenyan: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Armenia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KRFT-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 11:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Missouri .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 11:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in Missouri#LPTV stations : I suppose it's possible that this 32-year-and-counting station has garnered some of the now-required significant coverage , but a station that mainly carries minor digital subchannel networks, and holds no area cable coverage and is largely only known to have carried full-time national services tends not to get that much (if any) coverage.  This is another remnant of the looser "standards" of 2006 and no longer requires anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} as an alternative to deletion .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tiger (2007 film): Speedy G4 removed without comment, so here we go again.  As in the last AFD, couldn't find a single reliable source in English or Bengali (টাইগার 2007 মিঠুন).  The only source cited so far that actually mentions the film is a copy of the film posted to Dailymotion.  Recently declined twice at draft by same article creator.  A case can be made for salting it now, I think.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and West Bengal .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete current sourcing is inadequate to satisfy WP:NFILM , no good sourcing came up when searching and none was found during the first AFD either; given the age of the film and elapsed time since the last AFD it is unlikely new sourcing would be available anyway.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:1823:FC07:8CDE:1454 ( talk ) 18:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swapan Saha#Filmography : director (verifiable: TOI, TV Guide ).  If the claims on the page are verified, not opposed to keep.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC) (that was my !vote in the 1st AfD, more or less) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Surinder_Films#Films .  Poor sources with no indepth coverage and reliable critic reviews.  Fails WP:NFILM .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All current sources are passing mentions.  The film released during the Internet era and should only be recreated with reliable reviews.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 06:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning Delete , per reasons given not to keep this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.81.183.250 ( talk ) 01:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Assembly of God Church School: A search for sources only turned up primary sources or unreliable sources such as databases etc.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 13:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Christianity ,  and West Bengal .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 13:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Within reliable sources, I can only find passing mentions of this school (eg. [14] ) or articles not relating to the school itself (eg. [15] ), therefore I do not believe it passes WP:NSCHOOL or WP:GNG .  pinktoebeans (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Assemblies of God schools as an ATD, because there are multiple worldwide schools with this name; certainly the one in Kolkata would not meet WP:PRIMARY .  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Assemblies of God schools per Nate and per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect