hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Cachet Lue : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Canada ,  and Jamaica .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above. -- Grandmaster Huon ( talk ) 03:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rutherford, Virginia : WP:BEFORE pulls up nothing useful.  Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , United States of America ,  and Virginia .  Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The parks mentioned, including Rutherford Park and Long Branch Stream Valley Park, are all run by the county, specifically by the

Discussion outcome: delete
Jarrod Halliday : Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and New Zealand .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lots of squad announcements etc, but not really enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  Has not played top club level which is Super Rugby .  LibStar ( talk ) 20:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A.R.S. Public School : McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India .  McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - NPOV is absent, it says The school is running under the kind partonage of A.R.S. EDUCATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY, a voluntary charitable organization imparting quality education since a long time ago.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As far as I can tell, it doesn't meet the basic notability criterion (or WP:ORG ).  Google turns up lots of listings and many one-paragraph presentations of the school which are probably not independent of the subject.  In particular, I found no in-depth coverage in reliable sources.  Pichpich ( talk ) 18:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Josh Katz (journalist) : Reywas92 Talk 13:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism .  Reywas92 Talk 13:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is an interesting, well-sourced article as far as I can see.  If someone can improve it, great, but I see no reason for deletion-- Hazooyi ( talk ) 08:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The reason for deletion is that none of the sources are independent significant coverage...  Cites 1 and 2 are just his own works, 3 is a short employee bio, 4 literally doesn't mention him, 5 is an interview about the piece (not biographical or independent), 6 is about the work, not him.  I see you're new here so please review WP:GNG .  Reywas92 Talk 14:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Source 4 is fine , 6 to a lesser extent.  I was hoping to find book reviews about "Speaking American"; there's an earlier book with many reviews, none for this person's book.  There's also a foodie/chef in the UK with the same name that pops up.  I just don't think we have enough for BLP or AUTHOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC) : Source 4 is a RS, but not about this person.  Even less of a chance at notability now.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Upshot as an alternative to deletion per @ Oaktree b and nom's source analysis and my own search turning up no sources.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 23:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find articles about his set of maps that went viral, but nothing about him in independent sources.  Since he works for the NY Times, those sources, while they could provide some facts, don't count toward GNG.  Lamona ( talk ) 05:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Panglong (24°3′N 98°9′E) : Google Earth source cited doesn't show it, Mapcarta source shows it but does not meet WP:GEOLAND .  There are other Panglong-named villages in northern Shan State, but the closest recognized by the General Administration Department is about 49 miles southwest of stated coords in Kutkai Township (according to this MIMU map and place codes database ).  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 18:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 18:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 18:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I also nominated Panglong (23°53′N 98°22′E) ( AfD link ) for similar reasons EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 18:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Wikipedia is not a directory of every location in the globe.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Station (Florida) : Some passing mentions, but that's all I can locate.  -- Mike 🗩 19:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Music ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP it's a good article.  Evangp ( talk ) 17:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC) — Note to closing admin : Evangp ( talk • contribs )  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD .  Richard3120 ( talk ) 21:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Note to closing admin Richard3120 is a person that wants to delete this article.  Evangp ( talk ) 00:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) It's necessary to mark who created the article in these discussions.  – The Grid ( talk ) 15:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do you have any policy-based arguments for keeping?  'It's a good article' is a textbook example of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions ( WP:LIKE ).  -- Mike 🗩 17:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] no, that is plenty sufficient as a basis to keep this article. Evangp ( talk ) 00:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP it's a good article. Evangp ( talk ) 00:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Duplicate vote stricken. -- Mike 🗩 20:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails WP:GNG , WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH .  The only thing that can be verfied is that this was a venue in Fern Park, Florida – everything else is original research by the article creator.  Setlist.fm fails WP:USERG and is not a reliable source, and for some reason a picture of a T-shirt with the venue's logo is considered evidence of notability.  That leaves two very brief passing mentions in the local newspaper, which tell you nothing about the venue.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 21:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable.  And not a good article either.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 13:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christian Carlo Cilli : TLA (talk) 21:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  TLA (talk) 21:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : SEO expert, likely using Wikipedia as an SEO boost.  PROMO.  This is about all I found, article about why having friends is important [30] , which doesn't get you notability here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b MNewnham ( talk ) 21:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Computing ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - every single source was a cheesy blackhat SEO blog.  I've removed them, you can dig them out of the history if needed.  Sam Kuru (talk) 14:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SPAM and User:Largoplazo#Telltale_signs_of_candidates_for_deletion .  Potentially salt .  In 2024, everybody knows this is not allowed.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Domingo Manami : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdullah Eksioglu : No cited sources, looked up the subject under "news" and ultimately found nothing.  shelovesneo ( talk ) 11:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Turkey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season Eleven : The cited sources come from Darkhorse, who publishes the comic book.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olga Diaz : Most of the available coverage is routine and local or not significant enough.  Funny enough, there's this 2010 article in The San Diego Union-Tribune reporting that "Wikipedia officials have deleted the entry for Escondido Councilwoman Olga Diaz on their site, contending that she is not notable enough to have her own page on the popular online encyclopedia."  Mooonswimmer 03:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet WP:NPOL as she is not a major local official.  But LMAO over the article cited about.  Rublamb ( talk ) 14:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luca Palazzo : He fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV ( [10] ), all sources in the article are non-independent (transfer reports from his clubs at the time, and name mentions from Football League reports).  I could not find anything relevant or even close to noteworthy by searching for the subject around the Web.  Angelo ( talk ) 17:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep From my view, the general criteria is fine for GNG, there is just enough for me.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep enough coverage to pass GNG. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 09:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG.   The only independent source currently in the article (notiziariocalcio.com) isn't enough to pass GNG.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 11:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete , Does indeed fail GNG per nom, but I tend to try and not side with deletionist thinking and aim to keep when possible.  Iljhgtn ( talk ) 21:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 03:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above - sources not showing in-depth coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 05:31, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Chol-ryong : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not notable.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 04:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV , but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 15:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdullah Rava : Then stumbled upon this article via some relevant sock accounts.  It looks like this was also deleted a lot of times on fawiki as non-notable and even salted indefinitely [16] , so nominating it here as well.  Tehonk ( talk ) 02:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless reliable English translations of references, establishing notability, can be provided.  While foreign language references are fine per WP:RSUEC , there's no mention of "Abdullah Rava" or "Abdullah Rawa" in any English language searches.  If you haven't already, I'd file at SPI if you suspect sockpuppetry.  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nathan Wade : No notability outside of that.  Tar nis hed Path talk 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politics , Georgia (U.S. state) ,  and Texas .  Tar nis hed Path talk 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BIO1E states The general rule is to cover the event, not the person .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 16:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Minor coverage Hi Bree!  ( talk ) 18:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC) sock strike [ reply ] Delete will second the WP:BLP1E claim here.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 19:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP and not encyclopedic.  We are not X formerly known as Twitter .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As a perfect example of WP:BLP1E .  There's actually not enough to even create a substantial article.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete