hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Louise Camrass: - Rich T | C | E-Mail 18:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page would need rework.  Other sources on her individual work include: Museum of Motherhood article [16] https://disabilityarts.online/events/free-space-project-present-you-me-and-the-sky-by-louise-camrass-london/ Some awards/nominations/collective screenings/associated acts are mentioned by various sources, not all independent.  So...redirect to List of alumni of Central Saint Martins ? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BEFORE brings up only a reliable source for birth year and education.  Most of the other citations are passing mentions of being included in film screenings or exhibitions.  The Motherhood Museum link (above) is an illustration credit for an article and the other link to Kentish Town Health Centre is a press release for an exhibition.  I do not see any in-depth coverage and she fails WP:NARTIST - no notable exhibitions or collections.  I moved the passing mentions off the main space and into the talk.  Embedded links that can't be properly included in the article. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 22:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Surinder Sandhu: Much of the information in the article is asserting notability-by-association.  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so I really hope we can now establish it one way or the other.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  I cannot find WP:GNG material for this person, and reviewing WP:NMUSIC - even presuming there was WP:RS and WP:INDEPENDENT for the claims in the article - they wouldn't satisfy the relevant SNG.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 04:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Heritage Academy High school: Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG with flying colours.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 15:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and West Bengal .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 15:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Searched for sources with in-depth coverage to establish notability but did not find any.  I agree with the nominator; it fails WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 16:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organization.  Poor sources on the page with no significant coverage.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reliable sources to establish notability.  Pinakpani ( talk ) 07:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bhogalingeswara swamy temple: — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 18:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly non-notable; the only source that exists is not in English, which is treated as if there are no sources to begin with.  HarukaAmaranth ( 話 ) 17:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raspcontrol: Little referencing, and orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Links in Gsearch are straight to eLinux or github, so nothing discussing this software in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Like Oaktree, couldn't find any RS coverage.  DFlhb ( talk ) 19:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing in News, NYT , and a whole bunch of SPS that don't give information about Raspcontrol.  Tarantula TM ( speak with me ) ( my legacy ) 05:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of people from Ladera Heights: I could just as easily move the references there.  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 22:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No need for a standalone list for a dozen people.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 23:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unnecessary article for content copied from the Ladera Heights one.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  C-List celebrities do not need their own list , which is becoming a fork .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : insufficient content for a standalone.  She was a fairy 02:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gabriel Mendoza Gagnier: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.     Regarding GNG, none of the references really even cover him much less be of GNG scope.    Regarding SNG, it basically covers routine participation in three areas.  North8000 ( talk ) 13:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Sportspeople , Animal , Medicine , Horse racing ,  and Mexico .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Personally created stuff, Instagram accounts, and irrelevant articles are all that can be enlisted to support a non-existent notability.  Dare we spell "promotion" ?  And the fact that the text has been created by a kamikaze account , the same one who provided the portrait, does not help.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanjay Raval: Fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCER.  -- Gazal world ( talk ) 06:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Gazal world ( talk ) 06:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable.  MisterWizzy ( talk ) 06:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . Give chance to edit becauseit is partially notable.  Tablasingh ( talk ) 06:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Gujarat .  Kpg jhp jm 07:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails to meet WP:GNG.  Freinland ( talk ) 07:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable right now .  fails in WP:GNG Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet of

Discussion outcome: delete
Kimon Argyropoulo: The only claim to notability appears to be his position as ambassador.  It is possible references exist in languages I don't read.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Iran .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Malabo: — Biruitorul Talk 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as content fork of bilateral relations article.  All relevant text here was already merged into that article during the previous AfD.  Dan • ✉ 22:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete content fork of bilateral relations article.  Created during a spree of US embassy article creation.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Walkies: For one, the rapper's name is not walkies, but walkie.  Marsbar8 ( talk ) 20:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural close the disambiguation page can be combined for both singular and plural forms and the page in question is requested to be moved to "walkie", which if done would make the deletion rationale moot.  Therefore this AfD is too soon, considering a different consensus seeking process is underway that could renamed said page to "walkie" or "walkie (disambiguation)".  Also, this nomination is malformed and not nominated correctly, so should at least be closed until the name of said page is determined.  The nominator can renominate later, after the move request is processed.  -- 65.92.244.249 ( talk ) 04:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   "Walkies" appears to be a term for dog-walking, although I don't see any evidence of it in reliable secondary sources.   The current disambiguation page serves no discernible purpose.  162 etc. ( talk ) 07:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Walkies" does indeed refer to dog-walking in UK English; it's defined that way in OED2 with the first example being from 1939.  Adam Sampson ( talk ) 10:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per ongoing RM at talk page.  This is a valid dab as it disambiguates several topics with the name.  – Uanfala ( talk ) 14:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This word is not mentioned in what it disambiguates.  See WP:NOR .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm fine with deletion.  The hat on Walkie-talkie would just be changed to dab to the rapper.  SWinxy ( talk ) 20:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bent Burgess: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 07:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hasan Abdulwahab Al-Qadhi: Shellwood ( talk ) 09:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG as stated above, no sources in Arabic either.  Tails Wx 15:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Fails WP:GNG .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anani Mohamed: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean , South America ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
World TradeX: ACCEPTING FULL REGISTRATION FALL 2022
 PRE REGISTRATION IS OPEN NOW FOR APP FIRST ACCESS
 Click on the icon below" and doesn't have any further information doesn't really give much confidence either.  Fram ( talk ) 10:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Economics , Websites ,  and United States of America .  Fram ( talk ) 10:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete SEO spam sites and the like, nothing found for GNG.  Appears PROMO for what it is.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  〜 Festucalex • talk 11:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , garbage sources removed - mostly press releases and SEO/PR sink sites.  Sam Kuru (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Delaware .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - sought sourcing and came up slim.  Deleted promo and weak sourcing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justwatchmee ( talk • contribs ) 22:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghanim Alsheikh: As mentioned in the previous AfD, the citation numbers here are not enough to satisfy C1 of WP:NPROF , and Dean of a College of Medicine (not the entire university!) does not correspond to a named chair as required by C5.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 20:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Iraq .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 20:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not seeing notability, as discussed in the last AfD, does not seem to pass criteria for academics.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine , Egypt ,  and Yemen .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just noting User_talk:Star_Mississippi#What_happened_at_Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ghanim_Alsheikh?  .  I apparently closed the first AfD in error and didn't notice it even on restoration.  Oops.  Since it's already here, no harm no foul but just to save anyone else the huh?!  as I feel it too.  Star Mississippi 00:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Citation record is light for WP:NPROF C1; GNG looks unlikely (and I don't find sources).   Dean of the college of medicine is not a highest position at Tikrit University for WP:NPROF C6.   He is apparently a fellow of the American Academy of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgeons, but I don't think this [69] is sufficiently selective for WP:NPROF C3.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 12:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Citation numbers are low, fails WP:NPROF , I couldn't find sufficient sources for notability in either Arabic or English in my research.  Tehonk ( talk ) 00:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with others above that the citations are very light, far from WP:PROF#C1 , with User:JoelleJay on the first AfD and with Russ Woodroofe that his administrative position does not pass #C6, and with Russ Woodroofe that the fellowship is insufficiently selective to pass #C3.  That leaves no evidence of any kind of notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The situation has not changed since the last AfD, which apparently reached the correct outcome through some pseudo-Gettier situation.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeanne E. Davidson: Lacks the secondary sources needed to meet WP:SIGCOV .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for failing WP:GNG as article creator.  Safiel ( talk ) 15:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mexican Federal Highway 28: There's no information about where it is in the article, the only source is to a general map of Mexico that doesn't seem to have a Highway 28, and I can't find any other sources to confirm it exists.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 05:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Mexico .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fictional highway, as per Fandom: [67] .   No, that's not a RS, but all other sources found are WP mirrors, meaning that we're creating misinformation by keeping this article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Never meant as a hoax (I kind of doubt @ Dr. Blofeld : even remembers creating it sixteen years later), but created in bulk and in error when all the MFH articles were likely created (as we did in bulk for MFH shield images), but never assigned to an actual route; there is no matching article on es.wiki, which would have long been created by now.  Nate • ( chatter ) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I was reading off a list of red links, plus File:Carretera federal 28.svg exists.  According to Bing maps there is a Carretera Federal 28 in Playa del Carmen, Quintana Roo, Mexico, but doesn't look like a national highway. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nomination.  GeographicAccountant ( talk ) 13:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to failing WP:V .    I looked for reliable sources that proved it exists and could not locate any.  RecycledPixels ( talk ) 22:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rochelle Sceats-Basil: Only primary sources provided.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the only sources I could find were a few passing mentions ala this , no SIGCOV.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 05:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete