hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nick Kaufman: WP:COI with uncited statements.  TLA (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt .  Fails GNG.  There are also 5 (!) editors who contributed to this whose first edits were to this article.  Most of them single-purpose accounts.  Also, this edit is a pretty compelling one that hints at all of these SPAs being Nick himself.  Requesting salt so Nick can't re-create his own article down the road once eyes are off of it.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 00:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , Law , Israel ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for reasons well covered by SportsGuy789 WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 04:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete was involved in notable court cases, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED .  I do not seem a strong reason to WP:SALT .  Marokwitz ( talk ) 14:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lawyer with interests, experience and expertise in fields that are currently closely followed in Israel.  An accessible chap who likes to write and share.  As a result, he has written opinion pieces and has been interviewed for distinguished Israeli newspapers and TV shows.  He also shared his biographies with Enwiki and Hewiki.  Hewiki was deleted after much debate.  We should do the same because virtually all his coverage is primary.  gidonb ( talk ) 05:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Viera Mašlejová: I am unable to find sufficient coverage on the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All that came up in searches were passing mentions ( 2007 , 2009 , 2010 , 2012 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Slovakia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I concur with the @GiantSnowman statement.  KeepItGoingForward ( talk ) 02:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I was going to comment the same thing as JTtheOG.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 11:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I see no evidence of sources that would bring this to WP:GNG .  Jacona ( talk ) 18:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 21:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dmitri Antoni: Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Estonia .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 08:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Svartner -- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 11:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Japanese fashion as social resistance: Half of is unreferenced, half of it is/was referenced to low quality souces (blogs), most of the other sources are low quality (one academic book is cited without a page number, NYT is invoked for a mostly irrelevant claim) it still sports an essay style "conclusion" section.  Worse, there are obviously "fake" references, for example the first paragraph of the "Analysis of Ganguro as Resistance" is referenced to Sacred Sites and Pilgrimage in Japan site, which aside from not being reliable doesn't even mention anything related to Ganguro or resistance.  The concept of social resistance is not defined nor do we have an article on this; and the article doesn't mention this word outside the lead and two headings and two sentences in one of those.  I don't think there is anything salvageable here to even suggest a merge (to Japanese street fashion , which already covers almost all that is here).  If someone wants to work on this, they should start by adding a sociological analysis to that article, and then split it off.  It's time to put this editing experiment out of everyone's misery.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion , Social science ,  and Japan .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : I found a couple of scholarly pieces that might count as RS: [90] and [91] .   Those actually use the term "social resistance" at least once.   But as it stands this is a term paper, not an encyclopedia article, and it's packed with WP:SYNTH drawn from low-quality sources.   Someone must care enough about this topic to write a decent article, but this isn't it and won't be until it's bombed and rebuilt.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nominator, I think anything sporting fake references is worthy of TNT.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : we already have articles on lolita fashion and Ganguro , both much better cited (and written) than this article.  Further, the article is based on 2 premises: that Lolita and Ganguro both involve "social resistance" (not proven), and that scholars have grouped the two fashions together for their social resistance (doesn't seem to be true, so the conjunction is WP:OR ).  Since it is unlikely there's anything in this essay that can be merged to either target, we should delete it now.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 13:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WP:OR .  Dekimasu よ!  01:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carr Cavender: Film festival award is non-notable.  No sourcing found other than social media.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Has starred in multiple previously released feature films.  More than enough RS are referenced in article including Newspapers.com .  I believe WP:PRODUCER applies here with their involvement in To Hell and Gone .  – Filmforme ( talk ) 19:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Filmforme doesn't WP:PRODUCER require that someone's work be significant?  To Hell and Gone was a barely notable movie, let alone significant.  If I'm missing something, let me know.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ A. B. You may know more about it, but it is widely distributed by Gravitas Ventures .  A google search says it’s on 10+ major streamers and physical media.  That with the RS coverage for the film, it’s significant enough for me.  – Filmforme ( talk ) 21:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Anyone?  Bueller?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I tried hard.  He's got refs for wining some routine awards (student of the week) [56] [57] [58] in high school but, gosh, I just can't bring myself to say he's notable because of that.  Post-school, there are interesting articles in small press sites that talk about movies he's making but they're more about them than him.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 06:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
C-Sick: Did WP:BEFORE and was unable to find anything that would help this article pass WP:ARTIST .  Article claims that C-Sick was nominated for a Grammy in 2019 for an album he and 32 other people helped produce.  I don't think just being a producer on an album passes WP:ARTIST .  As for the Grammy nomination this is not true, the album was not nominated for a Grammy according the list of winners and nominated albums on the awards website.  "2019 GRAMMY Awards: Complete Nominees And Winners List" .  www.grammy.com .  Retrieved 2023-05-17 .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , and Bands and musicians .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This discussion has been included in the Music and suggesting WP:MUSICBIO rather than WP:ARTIST .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 23:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find anything online to establish notability under GNG or NSINGER.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 14:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment re: the Grammy nomination.  The album in reference indeed was nominated for best Rap Album of 2019.  The confusion is that awards for 2019 works are handed out in 2020.  You'll find it listed there.  That said, the claim of it being a nomination for this person is disingenuous, as it was Meek Mill who was nominated as Executive Producer.  The 34 other people who get listed as "producers" range widely in their contributions, but it's really only the Executive Producer who was nominated.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 19:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Doh thanks @ ShelbyMarion for pointing that out to me, I'll make a mental note to check that in the future.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per my comment above.  Not enough accomplishments or RS references.  Page the product of an SP editor with inflated claims for promotional purposes.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 19:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ange Keffa: I suggest redirecting to Ma Famille .  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 03:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless references to significant coverage of this actress in reliable, independent sources can be added to the article.  The two current sources simply report that an actress who appeared in a television series has died.  She is otherwise a mystery, based on what the article says and does not say.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 04:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Television ,  and Ivory Coast .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question Instead of translating this article from French should I have redirected it to Ma Famille instead?  Moondragon21 ( talk ) 11:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I did suggest that but it's too late since the page already has been made.  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 20:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails the notability criteria .  A little known artist who met a painful death.  We have no more than that.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HB Arcade Cards: QuietCicada chirp 13:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada chirp 13:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The game got a short review in Nintendo Power #246 (October 2009) on page 26.  Waxworker ( talk ) 02:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Nintendo Life and IGN are significant coverage (although IGN barely qualifies), Nintendo Power review is not SIGCOV.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 14:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per this source assessment table.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 17:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://archive.org/details/Nintendo_Power_Issue_246_October_2009/page/n27/mode/2up Games journal Only 3 sentences ✘ No https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/2009/07/hb_arcade_cards User-created review ✘ No https://www.ign.com/games/hb-arcade-cards ~ Though it is listed as reliable in WP:NPPSG , there is only a single summary sentence and the review consists of user-generated content Insufficient coverage, only one sentence in the game's summary ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Renee Biautubu: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Yet another example of WP:MILL .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
All India Tanzeem-e-Insaaf: DSP2092 talk 14:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep per what I have found at a cursory look: this , this , a bit of this and this is pretty much Good ; and these make a good case for my week keep argument.  Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] the article does not meet WP:NORG .  Most of the article's references are not independent and reliable .  It also doesn't have indepth coverage .  DSP2092 talk 15:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's a reason I didn't argue for a full keep.  The sources are independent and reliable (you can comment on the quality though), and I agree with WP:SIGNIFICANT being absent to some extent, however, if we combine all of these, this makes a good Basic case.  A borderline notability for me, hence Weak Keep.  ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 02:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom article's references are not are not independent and reliable it fails to meet WP:GNG .  Divesome ( talk ) 04:44, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tommy Coster: The only vaguely reliable source I could find in a WP:BEFORE is this The Union story that I'm having trouble accessing, but even if it was excellent and detailed, one source is not sufficient for WP:GNG / WP:NBASIC .  Google books doesn't show anything useful at least in the first pages.  Various (self-authored?) bios describe him as grammy awardee etc., but I can't substantiate these claims to any reliable source and suspect the claimed awards were not for him, specifically, but rather some affiliated person/group/project.  I thus don't think WP:ANYBIO #1 is met.  The relevant SNG is WP:NMUSIC , which states at WP:BANDMEMBER : Members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability.  .  WP:BANDMEMBER states articles such as this should be redirected, but I'm not seeing an obvious target.  WP:NCOMPOSER similarly states that composers or lyricists with insufficient verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article should be merged into the article about their work .  Suggestions welcome.  Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Bands and musicians ,  and United States of America .  Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced BLP.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from IS RS.  // Timothy :: talk 12:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was unable to find anything outside of his own web site to back up the statements in the article.  I tried to find his alleged grammy awards but could not - search on his name at grammy.com got me nothing.  Everything else I find, and there is little of it, is not in significant or reliable sources.  Lamona ( talk ) 04:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Deans Trophy season: Mccapra ( talk ) 03:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and Fiji .  Mccapra ( talk ) 03:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   Article about high-school sports, sourced only to local newspaper coverage.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Make A Difference Now: I could not find independent sources discussing the organization.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 01:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the history was a problem from this article and its already removed, And i am try to figure out to make the article follow the guidelines Hussein m mmbaga ( talk ) 04:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Tanzania ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is sourced from a website that belongs to the org.  Not enough sources.  killer bee 05:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Completely and utterly non-notable with no secondary sources available.  User:Let'srun 16:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete