hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Toyota Legendary Moments : Gibbsy spin 09:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Advertising .  Gibbsy spin 09:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I've just noticed that this was AfD'd 16(!) years ago and while the consensus was a strong delete , nothing happened.  It is surely time to go now.  Gibbsy spin 00:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking at the deletion log it's been deleted and recreated several times.  – Tera tix ₵ 07:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there are several references from independent sources,  news articles etc which for individual television ads meets a WP:SIGCOV standard.  Sourcing needs improvement for completeness but GNG itself looks to be well met.  Aspirex ( talk ) 02:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  15:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete search I conducted would indicate it lacks WP:GNG with most results being to social media postings containing the adverts themselves.  The very few news newspaper articles that do reference the subject matter I found, only do so in passing in reference to discussions about other things.  Additionally this reads as advertising.  This has already been deleted four times.  TarnishedPath talk 22:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete discarding all the social media fluff, Newsbank actually brings up quite a few decent-length news reports on the campaign – there's a strong case for GNG here.  However, there seems to be indications that Toyota, though perhaps not going as far to write the articles themselves, has had a hand in bringing them about.  For example, one author in the Herald Sun mentions basing their coverage on a "sneak peek", presumably orchestrated by Toyota itself.  If this were a non-commercial subject I would give it the benefit of the doubt, but there seems to be too much self-promotion poisoning the waters here to be confident the subject genuinely meets our notability standards.  – Tera tix ₵ 09:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Comparison of DNS blacklists : I was unable to find much sourcing specifically about comparison of different blacklists, so I believe WP:LISTN is not met even if the NOR issues (i.e. categorization of different blacklists into reputable and "suspect" lists based on primary sources) could be overcome.  I don't see any content with sufficient sourcing to preserve.  ( t · c ) buidhe 08:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet .  ( t · c ) buidhe 08:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  While the blacklists may be notable, the construction of a comparison is basically WP:OR and probably falls foul of WP:NOTCATALOG ; it'll also be utterly unmaintainable as lists change.  This isn't Wikipedia's business.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 13:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 19:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all of the above, and as violating WP:HOWTO .  These types of lists almost always violate the rule against creating directories of how to compare one things to another.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Demetrio Cortes : TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 08:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Politics ,  and Philippines .  TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 08:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Found a couple passing mentions in books, but nothing to establish WP:NBIO .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 09:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emerge Desktop : Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , not notable.  Artem.G ( talk ) 07:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Hourican (businessman) : Many of the sources are not indepth about Hourican as a person failing WP:SIGCOV but include him merely talking about the company he works for.  Many of the sources are not entirely independent as they are tech related media.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Computing ,  and Ireland .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTCV , doesn't appear especially notable - ran a company that bought out a couple of others then got acquired itself.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  12:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG .  Spleodrach ( talk ) 17:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
C.I.D. Investigators : Could redirect to List of Catch-22 characters as AtD JMWt ( talk ) 09:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTPLOT and WP:SIGCOV both apply if this hasn't earned enough reception in reliable independent sources.  Older books like this can sometimes have hidden coverage deep in other print sources, but WP:BEFORE indicates there isn't enough to separate this topic from the main book article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 21:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no coverage.  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 06:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scarborough Rugby League Festival : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Rugby league ,  and England .  Owen× ☎ 14:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable tournament with minimal coverage.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 14:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Riyadh School of Tourism and Hospitality : I don’t think this organisation is yet notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism , Education ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raw Deal (card game) : Of the four sources cited, only two are independent, and neither appears to include anything approaching the level of significant coverage necessary to meet Wikipedia notability criteria.  Almost all the content is entirely unsourced, and consists of a how-to guide for playing the game, rather than anything approaching secondary-sourced encyclopaedic commentary.  A Google search finds nothing that might rectify the problems.  In short, non-notable fancruft.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 12:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 12:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO for a defunct card game, with primary sourcing used.  There might be coverage in the Dummies book, but we'd need more than that.  I don't find anything, and it's been almost 20 yrs now, likely nothing else will be found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : If it makes a difference, there are some links in the "Further reading" section about articles found in Scrye .  BOZ ( talk ) 16:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One of the articles was written by "Barron Vangor Toth, Raw Deal co-designer", and is clearly not an independent source.  The remaining two actually say very little regarding the merits of the game, or anything else of consequence to anyone not already intimately familiar with it.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ISA World Junior Surfing Games Ecuador : Instead, the article is a collection of scattered facts about Surfing in Ecuador , which an article already exists for.  There also seems to be a lot of WP:OR , not to mention that the "Surfing in Ecuador" section is plagiarized from the article of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Ecuador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Awn Hussain Al Khashlok : No independent reliable sources anywhere.  〜 Festucalex • talk 15:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Iraq ,  and Greece .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a single source in Greek.  Totally unknown ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη ( talk ) 00:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Portuguese in Latvia : Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Latvia ,  and Portugal .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this latest iteration in the 'Portuguese in the Falkland Islands' etc articles.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete seriously man, the article says "0.004%" of the Latvian population is Portuguese.  A community of 70 people is clearly not notable.  AryKun ( talk ) 12:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough here or sufficiently notable to warrant an article or satisfy GNG.  I note there is an article called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_people#Portuguese_diaspora in need of work that could reasonable incorporate a sentence or a line in a table on Latvia.  Hmee2 ( talk ) 18:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  There is no Latvia–Portugal relations , too.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jo Jong-chul : Simione001 ( talk ) 02:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 10:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Nothing here.  Clearly fails WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bahri Tufina : Note that the current sources in the article mention other members of the Tufina family, but not Bahri himself.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Albania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article does not lack in coverage.  With the current information that is available and trusted, I have created this document.  To say it lacks in depth coverage you should be more specific as to what aspect it does and not only throw words.  With more information coming to light, this page might be updated and the extra information can be added.  Family members are only mentioned to reinforce Bahri Tufina connection to his family and watchemaking in general.  Also they are mentioned because Bahri Tufina has worked with them as partners or have had them as mentors.  MuhamedK10 ( talk ) 08:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Three out of the four cited sources never mentioned the subject, and the one that did only mentioned him in passing.  Found no significant coverage to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as explained above, sourcing not mentioning the subject, rest of the sources are of poor quality.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:14, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ZERO hits in Gnews or Gnewspapers.  I would have expected someone as well-known as the article claims to have some sort of coverage when they passed away, there isn't.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bosnian names of primate families : Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [ T / C ] 17:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Animal , Lists ,  and Bosnia and Herzegovina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 22:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Way out of scope.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 05:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and violation of WP:DICDEF .  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete along with most of the exonym lists!  —Tamfang ( talk ) 17:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Ummm...  This is pretty much WP:DICT .  Don't think this is comparable to the exonym lists, though.  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - violates everything, actually.  Utterly non-encyclopedic.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - in 2024, everybody knows we are not a directory.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scilla Sclanizza : Southati ( talk ) 11:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Women .  Southati ( talk ) 11:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No news coverage.  does not satisfy WP:NACTOR .  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Verseone : McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 04:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Business ,  and United States of America .  McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 04:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP .  Sources are press releases or sponsored content so not independent.   I checked Google News but did not find any independent reliable sources.  S0091 ( talk ) 13:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ari Rennert : No WP:SIGCOV or WP:RS about him, only claim to fame is taking over the business that his notable father started, but WP:NOTINHERITED .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 06:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Finance ,  and United States of America .  — Karnataka talk 08:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The article also only has a single source.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 00:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There is plenty out there to meet WP:SIGCOV if one searches for Ari Rennert Renco .  It appears that the nominator and TheLonelyPather may not have looked for these sources, per WP:BEFORE .  AfD is not clean-up!  It should also be noted that the article has had 1,875 pageviews in the last 30 days, so our readers are interested in the subject.  Edwardx ( talk ) 23:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi @ Edwardx : , I did do a WP:BEFORE , which comes up with no WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS that is not about the subject's father, who does have [[WP:GNG], or the company itself.  If I'm missing something, please share.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 03:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  If you have found sources that represent SIGCOV, please share links to them so other editors can assess them.  Being vague and saying sources are out there is not an indication that, as avowed, these sources exist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete