hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Justin Ackerman: All I found were routine transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Max Media Business: Emeraude ( talk ) 19:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Architecture , Organizations , Business , Companies ,  and Bosnia and Herzegovina .  — Karnataka talk 20:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Close – no reason given for deletion.  Thincat ( talk ) 20:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete definitely not notable.  Local planning dispute.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No trace of notability.  P.S. "Public toilet" purpose mention just made my day.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 18:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fascism in Africa: The current article consists essentially of three parts.  First well-referenced overview where with inputs from academics questioning the existence of the article subject.  Then a few examples of presence of fascist movements on the continent, but with the exception of SA these are essentially presence of European fascist movements in diaspora/colonial frameworks.  Here there is really no WP:RS that connect the dots.  Even if we are to accept the argument that Egyptian Greenshirts was a fascist movement, there is nothing sourced that would connect the Egyptians with South African far right politics.  Whether And lastly some listing of leaders and groups that have been accused of fascism (with 'fascism' being reduced to a pejorative), conflating authoritarianism and fascism.  There is nothing that glues together the article, apart from OR.  Soman ( talk ) 13:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I have just spent quite a while looking at the article and thinking and I agree with User:Soman|Soman.  This article should have no place here.  -- Bduke ( talk ) 07:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Africa . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A Google Scholar and books search on the topic yields a few sources discussing fascism in Africa. Perhaps TNT should be considered instead Chamaemelum ( talk ) 09:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, but isn't this more or less what we have in the article at the moment, different scholars debating whether some aspects of African politics can be referred to 'fascism' or not? In that case we should have an article on the scholarly debate in itself, without any pretense of listing different organizations. -- Soman ( talk ) 13:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Decision House: Only passing coverage ViperSnake151 Talk 22:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  ViperSnake151 Talk 22:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 01:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the only coverage I could find beyond IMDb and a couple of tv guides was a single NYT article from 2007 .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 10:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conway Pretorius: All I found was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Berti Brandon Diau: Not a G4, but perilously close to G11 with text such as " His charismatic approach and evident desire to succeed" Star Mississippi 00:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Germany .  Star Mississippi 00:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Enough evidence for notability!  Googling the Name shows enough News Articles from reliable sources Dietermueller76 ( talk ) 23:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Googling the Name Brandon Diau shows enough reliable News Articles.  So many footballers on here who don’t have one mention in news articles are on Wikipedia Dietermueller76 ( talk ) 23:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per prior AfD.  Appearing in news articles is not enough for GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 19:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Read into: Wikipedia is not Wiktionary, and the sources available are not seem notable or relevant by themselves.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obscure term of art; someone searching for the phrase "read into" is more likely looking for information on the term meaning "to infer".   This is not only a WP:NOTDICT violation, it's confusing to boot.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arctic7: signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Companies ,  and Texas .  signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Coverage is a bit light, but several articles have detailed info.  The Forbes Article is by senior contributor and is acceptable.  These also help: gamedeveloper.com and gamesindustry.biz .  Royal88888 ( talk ) 20:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:FORBESCON says senior contributors are not reliable.  signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  gamedeveloper.com and gamesindustry.biz articles are PR reprints.  ~ A412 talk!  20:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify Putting aside that the current sourcing has a WP:PROMO tone, the article is WP:TOOSOON given the studio has no history and no product yet announced.  As a WP:ATD , given the pedigree of the team, it is better to shelve this to a draft until there is notable coverage of something the studio is up to.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 05:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think there's any reason to expect the situation to change within the next 6 months so I'm not sure I see the motivation for a move to draftspace.  If things change a few years down the line the page can always be undeleted.  signed, Rosguill talk 13:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kingsbury Family: As far as I can tell, this family is not notable enough to have its own Wikipedia page Pecopteris ( talk ) 23:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , History , England ,  and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 00:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article doesn't even say anything, so trying to find sources only based off the non-uncommon surname and the fact they were colonial is impossible to ensure you're discussing the right one.  Nothing would be lost with deletion, even if the family was notable.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 03:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Pecopteris is an old IRL friend of mine.  He told me today that he had gotten back into editing Wikipedia, and that he was deleting an article I made back in the day.  Surprisingly I remembered my old password and got into this account again.  I agree with deleting the article, because it's garbage, and I made it when I was 11 years old.  Chesslover96 ( talk ) 03:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's tough to beat an explanation that compelling.  I too endorse the delete .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 04:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete .  This article was only twice since its creation back in 2009.  Clearly not notable.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 06:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 10:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  AryKun ( talk ) 15:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Just in case consensus was not already rock solid — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Taylor Bennett: But this is not linkedin WP:NOTCV .  Not notable enough to have a page.  JMWt ( talk ) 11:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , England ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Plenty of her interviews from Vice come up, but no sources talking about her.  Routine position, working reporter.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Julius Oyedemi: Puff piece for yet another entrepreneur.  How rarely are they notable.   Fails WP:BIO .  WP:ROTM businessman doing business.   I doubt there to be any point in sending back to draft 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non notable businessman Princess of Ara 16:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — entity does not meet the general notability guidelines .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 08:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per norm... another PR/PUFF article.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 12:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Renzo Vitale: PROD declined.  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , Bands and musicians ,  and Italy .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — the subject has had an ordinary career, with no indication of encyclopedic notability.  — Biruitorul Talk 12:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lisa Filipetto: The 2 sources provided are primary.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Ethiopia , Cambodia ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable.  If there were more sources then it would've been fine.  Wolverine XI ( talk to me ) 15:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Moesa Pancho: Hence, seems to fail WP:GNG Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 12:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Indonesia .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 12:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is no indication that the nominator has done WP:BEFORE before creating a deletion page [9] .  He also lack the ability to understand about Indonesian subject and notability of sources used in the article as he did here in other nomination page that he created [10] [11] .  And there also other notable sources from CNN and a book that was cited in the article [12] [13] 202.43.93.9 ( talk ) 03:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] — 202.43.93.9 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  — Struck per WP:SOCKSTRIKE Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 02:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 08:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerry Estrin: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I couldn't find anything on Newspapers Extended on either the books or on Estrin himself.  No obituary, nothing.  The magazines look self-published.  Fails WP:GNG .  BBQ boffin grill me 00:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wait - Even though I’m the editor who started this page back in September 2010, I agree that as the article now stands, it does not meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG and it is justifiable to propose deletion if these issues can’t be fixed.  I’m going to try to fix these issues in the coming week, if possible.  But if after that it is the consensus that the article should face deletion, I’m going to suggest merging this page or redirecting it to Laura Moriarty (poet and novelist) who was Jerry Estrin’s wife at the time of his death and Moriarty is the executor of Estrin’s estate and thus an important part of Estrin’s legacy and notability.  I think a redirect page Estrin~~>to Moriarty is a good faith compromise.  Obviously these issues with the Estrin page would need to be cleaned up so an not to move the same housekeeping issues involving WP:BIO & WP:GNG over to Laura Moriarty (poet and novelist) page.  - Christian Roess ( talk ) 18:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Laura Moriarty (poet and novelist) seems to suffer from the same notability issues and lack of sourcing.  Maybe draftify both until sources can be found?  BBQ boffin grill me 23:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes the Laura Moriarty page has issues, too.  But that’s probably an easier fix.  Jerry Estrin is a tough one.  It’s difficult to establish notability.  I’m surprised that he’s kind of fallen off the grid in the last decade.  But yes, I may have to follow your suggestion and re-do these as drafts, so we can get additional input and hope they don’t get deleted.  Christian Roess ( talk ) 03:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Last Empire-War Z: TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 23:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No coverage whatsoever, apart from download links and databases.  I've always found the gap between popularity and coverage in mobile games to be bizzare though.  ~ A412 talk!  01:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Article cites no sources because there is no coverage.  YordleSquire ( talk ) 15:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I have not been able to find any significant coverage of this topic.  It therefore fails WP:GNG .  Knox490 ( talk ) 00:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hallie Lauer: Text used in the article is somewhat PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks coverage in independent sources.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator; subject simply fails WP:GNG .  User:Let'srun 18:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Slavcho Boychev: There are no other sources referenced, and nothing shows up in a search for news articles or other sourceable media.  This article clearly doesn't meet the notability requirements.  Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 14:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Seems like he went on to have a political career .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete