hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Artdc.org: All external links are minor references and most of the links on the article are defunct.  Possibly could be salvaged at a later point, but WP:TNT seems the way to go unless it gets cleaned up.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 21:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Organizations ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I just massively stubbed it, but I'm still confused by what it is, or was.  It seems to have a tie to Artomatic , but I'm not sure a redirect there makes sense.  I'll try to keep working on it during the AfD if I can.  Star Mississippi 23:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – no independent citations, either.   The only citation is a self-reference.  Ira Leviton ( talk ) Delete .  Redirecting to Artomatic would make sense if the page mention it.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AdriPSX: Lack of SIGCOV.  I tried to PROD, but can't becuase a PROD was attempted in 2009.  TarkusAB talk / contrib 19:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero SIGCOV.  Fails WP:GNG completely.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV exists at all.  Only shady download reposting websites.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lesbian Gay Bi Transgender Community Center of Metropolitan St. Louis: Fails WP:ORG .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sexuality and gender ,  and Missouri .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Western Governors University College of Information Technology: The vast majority is unsourced, unnecessary, or about the parent institution.  ElKevbo ( talk ) 15:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Utah .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It has a large enrollment, but that's about it.  Redirect to main uni page.  Kiran_891 ( TALK ) 22:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Western Governors University as this faculty is not sufficiently notable for a standalone article.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 12:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - a redirect would be pointless as the search engine will bring up WGU before you even type the college name.  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 13:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and ORG, all sources relate to the school not the department.  A redirect would be pointless as mentioned above.  // Timothy :: talk 21:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amy Odell: 2A00:23C6:880C:E101:F5F5:614A:868:AB5A ( talk ) 20:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor.   Above rationale was copied from one of the several places where the IP manually added discussion sections to various delsort categories rather than transcluding.   I have no opinion of my own at this time.  -- Finngall talk 23:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Bands and musicians ,  and United Kingdom .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There is a review of a 2019 performance here , which could provide some basic verification as a reference, but doesn't demonstrate WP:MUSICBIO notability.  AllyD ( talk ) 05:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Poetry .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  From the article and the editing history, it looks to be an unsourced fan-page (or maybe an autobiography, as it was edited within 5 minutes of creation by an account matching the subject's name).  Does not look like a controversial case.  128.252.154.7 ( talk ) 17:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article authored by a WP:SPA (who also removed maintenance tags), subsequently also edited by further SPA and IP accounts.  Looking at the subject's activities, her music career seems well short of the WP:MUSICBIO criteria; offering a work for sale on the Saatchi Art site is not notable (and it is not a WP:RS ); no evidence of meeting the WP:NARTIST criteria.  AllyD ( talk ) 07:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've searched for sources, and after sifting through all the results for Amy Odell (author) , I'm not finding anything that suggests this Amy Odell meets our criteria for WP:NARTIST .  Elspea756 ( talk ) 13:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stanikzai: It's entirely possible that sources exist in Pashto, however it's long now beyond the point where the contents of the page either need verifying or the page needs deleting until someone can rewrite it with references JMWt ( talk ) 16:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 16:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify for the possibility of an Afghan adding sources for the page Delete .  Okay, 7,5 years is a lot.  Just delete at this point.  Youprayteas ( talk to me? | contribs ) 16:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Believing this article will get sources after 7.5 years is nothing short of wishful thinking.  Beside that, this article is a vandalism magnet.  As far as I can see, their are no sources available over this group.  The Banner talk 16:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Pomfret: Reads like a resume.  Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 04:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Finance , Law ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A few obituaries (not about this person) are all I find; this reads like a Linkedin biography.  Nothing notable, simply a working lawyer.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Not notable as a lawyer.  If notable at all, this would be as a gay-catholic author.  And then the article would need work.  That part was already implied above.  Rather than taking a clear position, providing my partial findings to those commenting after me. gidonb ( talk ) 19:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Christianity .  gidonb ( talk ) 19:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Caroline Shotton: Possible WP:ATD would be redirect to Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations , but I am not sure it would be helpful.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There is a review in the The Guardian by the art critic Jonathan Jones : [41] .   While this does count towards GNG - it is insufficient on its own.  Resonant Dis tor tion 23:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 02:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2013 PDC-E: This fails our notability guidelines .  Jontesta ( talk ) 21:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Jontesta ( talk ) 21:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'd expect there to be a Planetary Defense Conference article that this could be merged to.  Is the conference itself not notable?  SevenSpheres ( talk ) 14:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Good idea.  A quick Google search shows the conference to be held in every odd numbered year.  Last year was Vienna; next year Cape Town.  Each seems to be reported by the United Nations and by some other reliable source.  We could start by simply renaming the existing notional asteroid article to Planetary Defense Conference , then generalizing the first paragraph and adding bullet points or perhaps even sections about later editions.  Jim.henderson ( talk ) 15:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Without a convincing argument to Keep or an existing target article, it is likely this article will be deleted.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lanesborough School: The existing references are to the school's website.  I cannot see three independent, reliable, secondary refs, and so don't think the school meets WP:GNG , WP:NCORP or WP:NSCHOOL .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 21:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 21:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : agree with nom, does not meet GNG.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Slapsoftware: As far as I understand, this project is dead, I tried searching for independent sources on Google, couldn't find anything.  Official site shows something about music.  Sourceforge page doesn't even have neither code nor license information.  Most sources provided in the article are leading to 404 pages with no archived versions.  Sources which are live are either unreliable or just briefly mention the subject.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Software ,  and Brazil .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Did not find any sources for the same.  Sohom ( talk ) 21:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above.  Andre 🚐 06:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bath Simple: Looks like company no longer exists and could not find any results on Google.  Orange sticker ( talk ) 15:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete advert of a clearly nn business.  - Altenmann >talk 19:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom, just an ad page for a company with no SIGCOV .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coleman Tech Charter High School: The only source in the article talks about the small school that replaced it, "SET".  No article has been written for that school.  It is unclear that this SET school is notable either as that the source is a local news source which fails WP:CORPDEPTH , especially since that source only relies on school officials for information.  Mottezen ( talk ) 02:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Mottezen ( talk ) 02:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article has a 9 year old tag and hasn't been improved much since this article's creation in 2014.  Even searching the web, almost nothing is notable about the now defunct school.  🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 08:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexander Benard: Note that having notable parents does not make one notable as per WP:INVALIDBIO .  Socksage ( talk ) 17:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Austria and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this guy did nothing notable Hadal1337 ( talk ) 16:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  He's done a lot of things, but they are not covered in independent, reliable sources.  More is spent on his parents and what they did, than about him .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Single visit dentistry: Unsure if this term alone meets WP:GNG and especially a need for independent sourcing.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 08:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Medicine .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 08:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Tellingly, there is no source provided for the article's claim that "traditionally these procedures take upwards of two appointments," as it proceeds with marketing claims of CEREC supporting the creation of multiple dental restorations through rapid 3-D scans.  As noted by Sammi Brie, virtually every online use of the term appears on a dentistry practice advertising that their office has the CEREC equipment, reinforcing a lack of notability.  BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 08:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nuruddin Sarki: Unsurprisingly, I can't find any sourcing for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not a memorial.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete .  Not sufficiently notable.  Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk ) 03:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Rehsarb ( talk ) 01:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Al Badil Al Taharouri: The group's website has also been dead since 2009 and I can't find much information about them outside of the primary sources in this article.  The only reference to them I've managed to find in a reliable source was a passing reference in Laura Galián's 2020 book " Colonialism, Transnationalism, and Anarchism in the South of the Mediterranean ", which tells us that the group was the Lebanese counterpart of Alternative Libertaire founded in 1995 and dissolved in 2008, and provides a quote from their manifesto about libertarian communism.  Given that this appears to lack significant coverage in reliable sources , and it doesn't appear this will ever grow beyond a stub, I propose it be deleted.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 19:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Lebanon .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 19:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources establishing notability.  I did manage to find some mentions however [7] [8] GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 20:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kollavarsham 1975: The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 09:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 09:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete