hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Risingbd.com : Online-only news site with numerous vanity articles.  Much of the content in the article cannot be verified or failed verification.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Internet ,  and Bangladesh .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All the cited sources either have no mention or only trivial mention of the subject.  The sources in Bengali article aren't any better.  Searches yield no significant coverage.  Fails WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Being online-only is not a reason for deletion.  If it has numerous vanity articles, that would affect its reputation, but not its notability.  My own impression is that although it reprints press releases (vanity articles), it does so to no greater degree than many other Bangladeshi news outlets ( Daily Sun , The Daily Observer , Banglanews24.com , Jagonews24.com , ...) And risingbd.com does real reporting too, for which its reporters get beaten up, [56] shot, [57] and punished by the government.  [58] -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 06:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some background is available from risingbd.com, [59] but there isn't significant coverage in independent reliable sources, only brief mentions of a change in editorship [60] and membership in various journalists' associations.  Newspapers often have difficulty meeting WP:GNG , so essays Wikipedia:Notability (media) and Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals) suggest other criteria for evaluating notability.  Risingbd.com has garnered an independent award for reporting on corruption, [61] but it isn't a notable or well-known award.  It is cited now and then by other newspapers and by academic works, but probably not enough to rise to the level of "regular and significant usage" or "authoritative or influential".  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 06:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oluwadunsin Oyekan : There is nothing in this article that satisfies musical notability or general notability .   The one reference says that he exists.   Existence ! = Notability.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 04:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Christianity ,  and Nigeria .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 04:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , this is a recreation of salted Dunsin Oyekan , deleted in 2020 following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunsin Oyekan and recreated twice there.  Draft by same article creator declined yesterday and today at Draft:Oluwadunsin Oyekan .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply fails WP:GNG .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 12:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note The article's main author is the sock of an account blocked for UPE.  Girth Summit (blether) 12:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, fails WP:MUSICBIO.  Looking at the May 2021 version of Dunsin Oyekan , all that's changed is he was in a car accident, released a new album, and was nominated for (but did not win) the "Gospel Touch Music Awards", an award of unclear notability and no significant coverage in RS.  Most of the sources cited (e.g. for his concert in Canada) read like paid placement, and the few RS cited are interviews, not WP:SECONDARY sources.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 14:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:NMUSICIAN .  Awards are considered for WP:ANYBIO not for nomination except in multiple years.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ellie Hack : Dougal18 ( talk ) 15:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Danny Mastrogiorgio : Fails WP:BIO .  Capt. Milokan ( talk ) 21:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Theatre , Video games , Comics and animation ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR .  Starring roles in My Italy Story, Rocky the Musical , and Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories .  The reviews for My Italy Story seem to be only ones that mention his performance (Hartford Courant review the only one that isn't a permanent dead link: [2] ).  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 13:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NBIO , I don't see any sources indicating significant coverage.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 18:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vanuza : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  The most I was able to find was this short piece from 2021 about her recovering from an injury.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Angola .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Insufficient coverage to satisfy the WP:GNG .  Although the article that JT linked did say that she was the captain of the Angolan women's national team, there is still a lack of the coverage needed to satisfy WP:SPORTBASIC .  The Night Watch (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just a note that she actually captained the Angola women's national under-20 football team .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wilderness Films India Ltd. : Having 4.38 million subscribers on a YouTube channel also fails to establish notability for a company.  Charlie ( talk ) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Charlie ( talk ) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shania Vogt : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Europe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm assuming this doesn't cover news from their site or any assosiated one?  TheBritinator ( talk ) 14:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ TheBritinator : Correct, the Liechtenstein Football Association , for example, would not be an independent source.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ella Franklin-Fraiture : Dougal18 ( talk ) 13:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 06:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jamia Baitussalam : Sh eri ff | ☎ 911 | 13:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , Companies , Education , Schools , Religion , Islam ,  and Pakistan .  Sh eri ff | ☎ 911 | 13:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm glad to hear your acknowledgment of GVS as a dubious source.  I fully agree that this promotional page should be removed, as it clearly fails to meet WP:N.  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 17:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I did not acknowledge no such thing (I said mostly dubious), even if GVS is a valid source, it still does not meet notability criteria.  Sh eri ff | ☎ 911 | 17:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the way it's written, this madrassa seems to be a one man show - clearly promotional.  Crosji ( talk ) 04:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khosi : No coverage outside the context of winning a reality TV show, a lot of promotional coverage but little in-depth.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 12:14, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Africa .  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 12:14, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep : Khosi won big brother.  And you know why that is a big deal?  Because there is even a category on Wikipedia called “Category:Big Brother (franchise) winners” in which she is one for the few people to fall into.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 08:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Journalism .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a case of WP:BIO1E .  If coverage of other achievements is found, I would be happy to reconsider my ! vote.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with SnoozyTurtle; this person is notable only in the context of this event, and BIO1E applies.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 18:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Treamis World School : Articles found have been about students or brief passing mentions.  pinktoebeans (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  pinktoebeans (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The existence of the school is not a question but the page about this school has no reliable and independent sources that can give particulars about the school.  Fails WP:N .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2026 Kerala Legislative Assembly election : Bringing it here once more to see if editors agree on keeping it.  CycloneYoris talk!  22:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  CycloneYoris talk!  22:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt : It's clearly too early.  This could have been speedy deleted as a recreation of content that was opposed by a majority in the last AFD. -- Gan Favourite ( talk ) 09:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Too early and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kautilya Government Sarvodaya Bal Vidyalaya : Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since the previous deletion discussion.  The sources that I could find are mostly either primary, or school/college databases.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Delhi .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It is just one of 1093 schools run by  by Delhi Directorate of Education.  There are no notable achievements of the school or any notable alumni.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 11:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor source and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
6mm Optimum : PROD was rejected because a magazine article exists, but that is a primary source written by the person who created this hypothetical round.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is no independent coverage about this concept.   It's just one person's opinion on an optimal caliber.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 22:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - one non-notable person's opinion is original research ; writing about that is an essay , not an encyclopedia article .  I could have been gentler in 2006 , but in 2024, everyone knows what a hunting license is, and that we are not Hyde Park Corner .  Go to X or what they used to call Twitter.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stamped (application) : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shebeshxt : The article (and most sourcing found in BEFORE) is largely related to the legal problems the individual is facing.  Likely WP:BLP1E Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's difficult to judge how well known he is.  The only coverage I've found is news reports that he's facing criminal charges.  There's pieces on social media and on websites but these don't appear to be reliable sources and what coverage there is lacks depth, so I don't think he passes WP:BIO or the WP:GNG .  Doesn't satisfy the conditions of WP:CRIME as he's not been convicted.  Nothing found on his musical career.  Checked the South African official charts website https://theofficialsacharts.co.za and got zero results under both "Shebeshxt" and "Malome Shebe" so doubt he passes criterion 2 of WP:SINGER and nothing came up on Discogs search to support criterion 5.  Rupples ( talk ) 01:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Found this: https://sundayworld.co.za/shwashwi/celebrity-news/shebeshxt-releases-new-single-from-behind-bars/ Rupples ( talk ) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benedetta Wenzel : The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that that up in my searches was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Germany .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Small nucleolar RNA Me28S-Gm3255 : No source besides one paper.  The first paper by Galardi S, Fatica A, Bachi A, Scaloni A, Presutti C, Bozzoni I (October 2002) does not mention this RNA at all.  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless secondary sources can be found.  Owen× ☎ 17:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete