hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
I'll Do It: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable musical piece.  If it had some sort of coverage for the TikTok thing I might look at keeping it, there is none.  Doesn't meet any of the music criteria for notability.  SALT as well, 3 times at AfD is getting silly.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Superficial (album) : Found one article on the song from Dazed which I included in the target article , but that's all I could get.  SALTing would be overkill for an article that has only been at AfD twice (one of those listed is clearly for a different subject altogether and shouldn't be there), especially when the latter is now after the song has had a viral moment and it makes sense that someone would throw an article up for it.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 13:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Superficial (album) as suggested per QuietHere.  I would agree that salting is a step too far for what it is, but this shouldn't be its own article unless it gets resurrected the same way that Fleetwood Mac's song "Dreams" was (see CNN ) Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 22:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Regents (punk rock band): Tails Wx 14:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Tails Wx 14:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Maryland and Washington, D.C. .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no reliable sources found.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 04:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a sentence or two to Jason Hamacher where it is already mentioned, as ATD.  — siro χ o 05:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ghilene Joseph: Former college soccer player who earned at least one cap with the Guyana women's national football team .  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Caribbean , South America ,  and New Jersey .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 11:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Black Major: To wit: - research conducted during creation of Action Force (comic strip) and update of Battle Picture Weekly found no sources to support a standalone page for the character.  The one sources on the article is weak, it's very OR-y and really the character is a cypher.   BEFORE brings up only passing references.  Not against redirecting to either Action Force or Action Force (comic strip) .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 18:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems like redirect to Action Force (comic strip) gives the reader the most information on the character.  — siro χ o 04:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I lazily copied much of the nomination from that of Baron Ironblood, so would just like to note that describing the character as a cypher in this case is inaccurate as over the course of the comic the Black Major actually has a bit of interesting development, both with a dedicated origin arc and his continuation of the Red Shadows after the emergence of Cobra.  However, this does not affect the actual nomination as none of this is covered by secondary sources.  Just wanted to clarify.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 08:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Action Force per nom.  There doesn't seem to be much for him.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Action Force (comic strip) .  This character has no SIGCOV.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 14:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect Not enough WP:SIGCOV for a separate article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 21:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Death Is the Only Answer: four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Television .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to Doctor Who (series 6) .  The article fails to estabilish notability for itself.  No reception/legacy/analysis/etc.  Most of the sources are not independent (the show itself, BBC, etc.).  Doctor Who Magazine seems reliable and the content sourced to it could be merged there, but I don't think what we have suggests SIGCOV is met, plus GNG requires coverage in multiple independent, reliable soruces.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I agree with that for a place specificly Doctor Who (series 6)#Supplemental episodes .  Doctor Who Magazine is the offical magazine of the show.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/partial merge to Doctor Who (series 6)#Supplemental episodes per

Discussion outcome: redirect
KAJS-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 07:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Nebraska .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 07:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : It had been a while since the last nomination of a run-of-the-mill 2010s-established nothing-local DTV America/HC2/Innovate station that nominally survived a 2023 bulk nomination ; as ever, the amount of significant coverage and the likelyhood of SIGCOV are the same (i.e. zero).  No reason to have anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Meg Austin: Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Military ,  and United States of America .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non notable character, fails GNG and fails WP:NCHAR .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per Nagol0929.  Does not have enough coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 14:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to List of JAG characters , per WP:ATD .  Obviously the link should exist, and freestanding notability is not required for a redirect.  BD2412 T 01:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of JAG characters#Lieutenant, Junior Grade Meg Austin, USN (JAGC) .  As User:BD2412 states above, this is an appropriate alternative to deletion .  It is very likely readers will search for this character, and while the role doesn't have the clear claim to notability to justify a freestanding article, redirects are cheap .  Redirecting will also preserve the edit history on this article should it later achieve stand-alone status.  Jacona ( talk ) 11:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per Jacona.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 14:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is: It's like how even though She sells sea shells by the sea shore is a common tongue twister, yet it doesn't have it's own article.  I am aware of the previous AfD, but that was 15 years ago, there wasn't as much emphasis on SIGCOV, and half of the ! votes seem nonsensical.  I propose redirecting to List of linguistic example sentences .  — MATRIX!  ( a good person! ) [ citation unneeded ] 21:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_linguistic_example_sentences#Lexical_ambiguity (+ add sources there).  No WP:SIGCOV per nom.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 21:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as proposed.  Bduke ( talk ) 23:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ian Tomlin School of Music: Other than a few brief press articles relating to the funding which was used to set it up, I'm not seeing much.  I don't think it meets the notability criteria.  JMWt ( talk ) 13:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Scotland .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - to Edinburgh Napier University as an ATD per SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  Article at hand fails GNG.  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 00:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Edinburgh Napier University .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Edinburgh Napier University .  A nicely written article but standalone notability is too thin at present; redirect as an ATD.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 18:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WFWG-LD: Should be redirected to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Virginia .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : pretty much per nom.  It's a run-of-the-mill 2010s-established DTV America/HC2/Innovate station where the non-national content and the significant coverage are equally nonexistent.  Another nominal survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dyce station (Manitoba): – dlthewave ☎ 04:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Dlthewave : Can you consider bundling these?  Easier to get them all done with Jumpytoo Talk 04:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I can't find out anything about the station, but I expect that it was once more than just a signpost.  Here are a few resources that may include significant coverage of individual railway stations in Manitoba: https://www.gov.mb.ca/chc/hrb/internal_reports/pdfs/railway_stations_full.pdf https://yourrailwaypictures.com/trainstations/manitoba-train-stations/ https://www.mhs.mb.ca/docs/business/cnr.shtml Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:52, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per the above would be the best choice.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kholida Dadaboeva: I am unable to find coverage outside of passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , and 3 ), failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  // Timothy :: talk 13:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as on top.  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 16:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Words (Piri & Tommy song): I'd suggest a redirect to Froge.mp3 .  theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her) 04:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United Kingdom .  theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her) 04:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Froge.mp3 as suggested above.  Agree that it doesn't have sigcov.  Also, there are plenty of bigger artists that don't have articles for songs.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 14:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Froge.mp3 per the above.  Viriditas ( talk ) 02:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Try to Remember (film) : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television ,  and Canada .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk ) 03:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] According to this search , this comment is one of 67 AfD comments Okmrman made in the 04:00 hour.  The user was blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing.  Cunard ( talk ) 07:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Added reliable sources for verification.  The film was internationally distributed (in German , French , at least).  Rather notable cast.  No page for the director.  Redirect to Mary_Higgins_Clark#Selected_television_adaptations (where it is obviously listed and the refs can be moved) seems a good ATD imv, if this is judged insufficient.  (Personally not opposed to Keep). - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mary Higgins Clark#Selected television adaptations (with the history preserved under the redirect) , where the subject is already mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  I did not find significant coverage in independent reliable sources about Try to Remember .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 07:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Antti Anatomy : KaisaL ( talk ) 13:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  KaisaL ( talk ) 13:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Negative (Finnish band) , as he has done nothing notable outside of the band.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pete Capella : Of the sources here, #1 is barely about Capella, #2 even less so, #3 is an interview, and the rest are unreliable.  Found no additional coverage for GNG, and he only passes WP:NACTOR for having played the one role multiple times.  May as well be redirected to List of Sonic the Hedgehog characters#Silver the Hedgehog at that point.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 18:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Video games ,  and New Jersey .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 18:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested in nom.  Coverage is absent and unlikely to be found - he only seems to voice very minor characters.  Sergecross73 msg me 18:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, I could not find enough (or any) significant coverage of the subject himself.  I see little point in redirecting.  Merko ( talk ) 11:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a plausible search term, and the closest thing to something he'd be "known for".  Sergecross73 msg me 14:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect No good sources.  Redirecting instead of deleting per Sergecross.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per valid arguments by Sergecross73 .  Merko ( talk ) 01:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per all.  Coverage does not pass WP:GNG .  Redirect is a valid alternative to deletion.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect