Béatrice d'Hirson: entire section in the article about her apperance in fiction.  french article has no citations.  ltb d l ( talk ) 03:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and France .  ltb d l ( talk ) 03:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : appearance in fiction and film contributes to her notability and is a reason for Wikipedia to have the article, to satisfy the curiosity of the viewer/reader who wants to know "Who was she?" "Was she fact or fiction?".  Pam D 08:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is a badly worded deletion request, which makes it difficult to reply to.   However even significant fictional characters can be notable.   "The Accursed Kings" may not be well known in Britain, although the 1972 adaptation was shown on British television, but I believe it is well known in France.   Whether the French Wikipedia version has citations is completely irrelevant, this version now has some.  PatGallacher ( talk ) 14:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] irrelevant aside - I loved watching this on tv in the early seventies and have not seen any mention of it anywhere for more than fifty years until reading this AfD.  You’ve all made my day.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Even more irrelevant comment .  The original series is being shown on French television at the moment.  Athel cb ( talk ) 13:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : French article appears to be PROMO for the film listed, I think this was a translation of that effort.  I don't see anything about this person not related to the film.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thierry Larchier d'Hirson .  This article (Béatrice's uncle) already mentioned her, and the TV series, in which he also appears.  I've added the cast info for Béatrice there, so no info or sources will be lost with the redirect.  Thanks. — TAnthony Talk 19:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 08:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 03:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - reasonable presence in fiction and got reasonable coverage as fictional character regardless obscurity in flesh.  - Altenmann >talk 03:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Nothing found meeting WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  No sources provided by keep votes, which just boil down to ILIKEIT, not guidelines and sources, let alone sources with indepth content about subject.  // Timothy :: talk 03:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus