Western Caribbean zone: Searching for "Western Caribbean zone" yields no useful results at all, and while the sources here are citations for specific facts, I can't find anything that discusses this as a region as a whole.  Describing these historical eras seems like original research when combining what happened in some places over a long time without being able to describe their relationships to a specific region, rather than just about Central America or History of Central America with a bit of adjacent Mexico and Colombia tossed in.  Reywas92 Talk 20:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Geography ,  and Caribbean .  Reywas92 Talk 20:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:OR / WP:SYNTH .  Indeed it is very similar to the other 3 Caribbean subregion articles I nominated for deletion earlier today.  It has sources, but those usually only deal with specific countries and not the purported wider region as a whole.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 21:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge...  In response here, I initiated this article in 2010 as a way to incorporate the Afro-Carribean diaspora into Central American history.   Typically as it appears to me, work focused on Central America tends to leave out the important role played, as the original contribution did, that there is a complex set of African components in the region that were always connected to the the Caribbean, hence the Western Caribbean zone.  This includes, initially, the role of African groups like the Miskitos or Miskitos Zambos, with their international connections, to English colonies in particular, and then the use the English made of them to promote their own illegal (in Spanish eyes) trade with the region.  This was followed by the large scale migration from the English speaking Caribbean in conjunction with the building of the Panama Canal, and the actions of the fruit companies in particular.   These communities are connected thought their adherence (today) to the English language (though many are bi-lingual), English customs, such as the Anglican church and other lesser religious groups that have home in the English Caribbean, to include customs like playing cricket.  I am perfectly willing to accept a merger with other areas, or a renaming, but I think that deletion of its content at least along the lines established here, is unnecessary and the piece is worthy of retention as a topic in Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beepsie ( talk • contribs ) 21:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think History of Central America would be a good place to include most of this then.  I agree with your comments that this is an important part of history, but even if this "zone" term is sometimes used, I don't think it needs to be a separate page like this.  Reywas92 Talk 00:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are definitely sources to support the term.  I don't know why the conclusion is that there are no useful results at all - it seems to have been a British geographic term, and countries self-describe as being inside the zone.  [45] SportingFlyer T · C 22:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I DO NOT agree on deleting this article because there is some important components that can help with the article.  I'm currently not certain if a merger is possible while there there's a way to improve the nature of this article or we could just keep it as is while improving it.  20chances ( talk ) 19:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 20:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  07:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus