hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rap Rakesh Sethulingam: I can't find any notable works or significant coverage about the subject.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find any notable works either.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 06:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Devart Ltd.: All I find it self-published sources, press releases and listings.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Czech Republic .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Recreation of content previously deleted and salted at Devart / Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devart * Pppery * it has begun... 17:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Linux (detergent): This does not appear to be a valid notability justification.  I think whether this type of page belongs should be discussed.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 09:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 09:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  In the paragraph headed Controversy (by far the longest part of the article) the article itself provides the reasons why it should never have been accepted in the first place.  Athel cb ( talk ) 16:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Other than being a running gag in Linux forums since the early 2000s (it's not even controversial, everybody just thinks it's funny), there's nothing noteworthy about this product.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's okay I understand you, but please don't delete it, because it is an article that has several translations, give me time to improve it Luisattack1000 ( talk ) 20:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arghushal Swati: Article was previously deleted and creator is blocked and indicated they are Swati and wanted to get the word out.  The nature of the material appears editor generated with references cited only for factoids in that creation.   One reference is just for land ownership, one for a geographic fact, and two are a blog talking about info derived from DNA.  North8000 ( talk ) 13:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage found for this sub-group/ethnic group.  I tried using the native language, but I can't tell which sources are RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Qasim Ali Shah: This same story also states he has "no credentials or experience."  Most of the media coverage he's received  stem from his controversial appointment as chairman of the Lahore Arts Council, which itself isn't a notable position or office.  Additionally, while there is some press coverage on "Qasim Ali Shah" it's difficult to say if it all pertains to this same individual, given the commonality of the name in Pakistan.  Moreover, considering his self-proclaimed status, it's plausible that he may have paid for promotional interviews like this one .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  samee converse 18:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find coverage of the the controversial statements made; the Dawn source used seems RS but it's still a small article.  I don't think he's notable just for being shot down on Twitter over things said.  I can't find sourcing about his other activities, so doesn't seem to be notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and especially WP:SIGCOV .  Corporate trainers are too common to have an article on every one of them .  We have been very hesitant to keep article that are only sourced to "controversial statements" of BLPs .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Systogram: However, of all the references in the article, none appear to actually refer to a "systogram" apart from those authored by Dikian.   So I can only suppose that the concept is not-notable and the article was created only for self-promotion.  Black Kite (talk) 09:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article creator edits practically only to promote himself, this article is nothing more than advertising for himself.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 10:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing I can say that the original nom hasn't already said better.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Wikipedia isn't for things made up one day .  Samoht27 ( talk ) 17:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as self-promotional and maybe block creator too as a spammer Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article appears to be primarily promotional in nature.  Waqar 💬 18:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vipul Shah (businessman): He's interviewed in The Week as cited, but that's a primary source.  Passing mentions, routine coverage in trade blogs and softball interviews was all else I could find in a WP:BEFORE search.  Promotional tone and editing history of article creator suggests UPE.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Gujarat-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Page is of a businessman but it is notabke as per wikipedia guidelines.News coverage is enough in News media 60.254.0.91 ( talk ) 05:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC) — 60.254.0.91 ( talk ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage in secondary independent reliable sources.  The page has mostly routine news coverage and announcements that are not sufficient basis for a page on this subject.  Fails WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All of the cited sources are trivial mentions and I can't find any significant coverage.  — hako9 ( talk ) 15:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asha Empire Online: This article features 0 secondary sources nor could I find any secondary sources when searching for this game either, outside of a lot NFT/crypto related websites.  Just seemingly nothing is keeping this article afloat.  Captain Galaxy 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Captain Galaxy 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Cryptocurrency .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The reason why there is not much information on the internet is that the game is released on Sunday, March 3.  But the NFTs that will be used in the game have been previously published for Mint, so there is a lot of information for its NFT. -- VatooVatoo ( talk ) 04:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately that's not how notability works.  You might like to familiarise yourself with the general notability guideline .  Generally, upcoming recently-released games that have no coverage are considered to be released too soon to justify an article.  Happy to help if you have any questions.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 07:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per no coverage indicating no notability.  Suggest not draftifying as there is nothing indicating pending coverage for a recent release.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 07:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Vrxces.  WP:BEFORE doesn't show sufficient sources to meet WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Lahore (1800): Noorullah ( talk ) 20:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete none of the sources in the article are verifiable and I can’t find any other sources that talk about a “siege of Lahore” in 1800.  There was a conflict and apparently Gulab Singh Bhangi drank himself to death, but there wasn’t a siege.  Mccapra ( talk ) 00:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yusofjerd: Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A small settlement with nothing much notable.  And as per above does not meet WP: GEOLAND .  killer bee 05:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DXBM-TV: Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD ?  Note that I created this page manually, since a previous redirect stopped the script from working.  Apologies if I've messed anything up.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bon Parfumeur: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carrie Keller-Lynn: Sources are weak, either not third-party (itrek) or sourced to a "site readers can rely on for smart, engaged, entertaining writing about all things books." (Subject is not a book, nor an author of a book.) Brazilian Forum source, whether RS or not, has only eight sentences in the article which are about Keller-Lynn, even broadly considered.  Searching found no better sources.  Note: I have edited the article since filing the AfD in two ways: removed an unsourced claim that the subject is American-Israeli", and remove a claim that a photo was deleted from a website, which was both not in the given source and provably false, as I indicated on the talk page.  This claim had been being used to justify a fair-use basis for hosting a copyrighted photo, so I removed the photo itself from the article.  Further: I have now removed claims sourced to a self-published source added after the start of the AfD, in violation of WP:BLPSPS -- Nat Gertler ( talk ) 15:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism ,  and Israel .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:JOURNALIST by a country mile.  The irony is that often bios of journalists are puffery and apparently self-written.  This article gives the opposite impression.  That said, we have an article here that totally fails to show reliable sourcing such as to satisfy the stringent requirements of the guideline.  A WP:MILL writer albeit one who has received negative attention from people who don't like her.  Coretheapple ( talk ) 20:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A regular person at work.  Nothing that makes her stand out from the rest of the journalists.  Fails JOURNALIST and even the GNG.  gidonb ( talk ) 21:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom.  also Fails WP:JOURNALIST Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 09:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails notability requirements.  BobFromBrockley ( talk ) 17:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Morgan (architect): Fails to meet WP:ARCHITECT .  Sources are either passing mentions or not independent.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 14:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Architecture ,  and Australia .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 14:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Currently citations are from the subject's personal website and a Wordpress page.  Several pages of Google results also don't turn up any reliable sources covering him.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 21:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like a resume and mainly based on primary sources.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seeed (disambiguation): Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  This probably qualifies for speedy, but it's nice to give people a chance to find possible new listings.  NotAGenious ( talk ) 16:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : to all: could you please help in improving the Seeed Studio page (currently machine-translated from Japanese Wikipedia)?  Thanks in advance!  -- Yuriz ( talk ) 19:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G14 .  Seeed Studio has now been deleted per A7 and G11 , leaving only the band Seeed .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 02:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Per Unnecessary disambiguation pages .  dxneo ( talk ) 22:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wang Meng (figure skater): PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and China .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there is sufficient independent coverage. -- Wish for Good ( talk ) 04:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wish for Good , are you going to share with the rest of the class or should we just take your word for it?  Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wishfully thinking keep assertions don't put a subject past GNG, ANYBIO, or WP:SPORTSPERSON (which requires at least one source which directly details the subject).  Such sourcing hasn't been applied, presented or found.  BusterD ( talk ) 22:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find the requisite WP:SIGCOV for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
U.S. Army Medical Materiel Center – Korea: I can find a few references in TWL but generally written by Army-affiliated people, destroying their independence .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 15:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and South Korea .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 15:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Appears to have been copied from a US Gov. source, as public domain text.  But all I find are various Army sites that talk about the place, put out by the "PR department" of the Army.  It doesn't have non-primary sourcing, but it's still reliable, I'm not sure how we handle this.  We've always allowed PD text for the US Gov't to be copied...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources found are always on dvids, [12] , which the military uses to publish their media, photos etc.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I've pulled up various US Army wiki articles at random, to see how often they are only sourced to US Army or gov't websites.  Most aren't and have RS in things not related to the army.  I suppose in this case it should be deleted for a lack of non-primary sourcing.  I can't find any news articles not published by dvids.  Even in Gbooks or Scholar, it's all sourced to military publications.  We'd require sourcing not from the US Gov't or Army/military, that I can't find...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't find any non-US govt news sources about it in either Korean or English.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 13:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can find no evidence of SIGCOV in independent sources.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 22:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article (same article also published in Yonhap) is all I can find and is definitely routine .  ~ F4U ( talk • they/it ) 13:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete