hpe-ai/customer-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2023-08-28
Product: Credit card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Company: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CA)

Complaint:
Late XX/XX/, I disputed the transaction with the company in regards to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX billed on XX/XX/2023 for {$350.00}. The company provided a temporary credit. On XX/XX/XXXX, the company provided a letter stating they reversed the transaction because of lack of " proof of cancellation ''. I submitted a response on XX/XX/XXXX stating the merchant " terminated '' the service with bogus reason hence no cancellation from my side was needed. On XX/XX/XXXX, I submitted the response again stating 1 ), the merchant breached the contract first thus no cancellation obligation is needed from me 2 ), the specific details why the merchant breached the contract. Capital One denied my claim immediately on the ground of " lack of requested documents ''. I called in to confirm the requested documents again, after 4 representatives, they confirmed with me 1 ), purchase agreement or invoice ; 2 ), proof of cancellation ; 3 ), terms and conditions ; 4 ), refund voucher or not ; 5 ), description on what happened. I explained to the rep that 1 ), I was never provided a purchase agreement or sales receipt, that's the fact from the initial filling ; 2 ), the merchant refused to provide service and breached the contract hence no cancellation needed from me ; 3 ), I have already provided a copy of the terms and conditions ; 4 ), I have already provided a description on what happened and details. 5 ), the merchant refused to provide a refund. 

Capital one refused to dispute this transaction on the ground of lack of sales invoice or purchase agreement. The reason is that because the merchant refused to provide me with those documents upon three attempts.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-03-18
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: CITIBANK, N.A. (TX)

Complaint:
In accordance to the fair credit reporting Act XXXX Account # XXXX has violated my rights. 

15 USC Section 602 There is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer 's right to privacy.

15 USC Section 604a In accordance with the written instructions of the consumer to whom it relates.

15 USC 1666b A creditor may not treat a payment on a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan as late for any purpose, unless the creditor has adopted reasonable procedures designed to ensure that each periodic statement including the information required by section 1637 ( b ) of this title is mailed or delivered to the consumer not later than 21 days before the payment due date.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-12
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (SC)

Complaint:
XXXX  XXXX XXXX / {$2100.00} / XX/XX/XXXX This debt is too old to be on my credit report. There are inaccuries in the dates reporting. The date this account was closed was XX/XX/XXXX. But then its also reporting a payment in XXXX which is inaccurate. I did not make any payment to this company after the closing of the account in XXXX. The account should have been off my credit as of XX/XX/XXXX. According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act as well as the statue of limitations

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2018-03-25
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: AUTOMOTIVE CREDIT CORPORATION (CA)

Complaint:
I am always CHECKING for TOTAL COMPLIANT & CERTIFIED COMPLIANT REPORTING that gives testimonial and irrefutable PROOF of the undeniable TRUTH, correctness, completion, timeliness, ownership of, responsibility of, and compliance and or else wise for any and all items accused, even any and all aspects of allegations. 
Per Federal reporting regulations and the MANDATED COMPLIANT XXXX XXXX format reporting standards of practice any and all items of adversary or derogatory nature must be certified as entirely true, accurate, complete, timely, of documented ownership, of undoubted responsibility, and documented testimonial certificate of compliance marking undeniable lawful standing of claim ( s ). Per law, any deficient of substantial and evident matters of fact ( s ) would be unethically reported and even illegally reported. My state and the federal laws alike agree that neither willful nor ignorant disregard is acceptable, so I demand here today, even RIGHT NOW, that the allegation in challenge be eradicated in full or else wise demonstrated in it's entirety to be compliant in every aspect of it's reporting. To retain much less report otherwise would be a vile misrepresentation and done so in unlawful and injurious infraction of mandated compliance laws. The currently unfounded and even not certified true or correct misinformation of which is misreporting is as follows and must be deleted immediately, so please do so without delay : Alleged Unauthorized/NOT COMPLIANT/or without Permissible Purpose Credit Inquiry dated : XX/XX/2017 by TOP FINANCE COMPANY IN

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-26
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Company: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (OH)

Complaint:
ON XX/XX/XXXX I submitted a request to rent a car using my credit card through a company called XXXX which would use XXXX to have my car ready at XXXX XXXX XXXX in Florida on XX/XX/XXXX. 

Due to a delayed flight, i immediately filed a contacted rental car company which instructed me to contact XXXX, I did promptly, XXXX said they can reassign my rental car but I'd have to talk to the company used to have them release it. XXXX XXXX did and said they'd be able to process a new rental with the roll over credit. Due to the flight delay, I had to change airports from XXXX XXXX to XXXX which XXXX allowed. 

Upon completing the rental and returning to my residence, I noticed I was charged twice from XXXX  I called XXXX about or around XX/XX/XXXX and they indicated XXXX & XXXX XXXX no refunds... despite them saying it otherwise on the call. I'd not have gone through the process if they would have told me. I filed a dispute with my credit card company USAA and attached the following information. 

ReRE : Dispute Case # XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Attached is an update from the previous update : XX/XX/XXXX - XXXX did indeed reference their terms and conditions, but at the same time offered to swap the rental. Because I was unable to pick it up in XXXX XXXX, they cancelled and changed the reservation. This was XXXX, not XXXX. The fact they are now attempting to assert the XXXX & XXXX are binding is irrelevant as they themselves waived the terms on a phone call on XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX has denied my request for the recorded call to confirm the waiver. I am asking you to reopen this investigation and charge back the amount for these conditions. I am happy to provide a phone log from my XXXX where you will see I spoke to XXXX, XXXX, then XXXX  again. 

XX/XX/XXXX - Rental Car submitted for pickup on XX/XX/XXXX. 
- Due to cancelled flight originating on XX/XX/XXXX was unable to pickup car and thus called XXXX who said Id have to contact XXXX ( the supplier ). XXXX changed the rental through their systems but then XXXX cancelled the original order and changed it to reflect new pickup date. 
- They stated that there was no additional charge as I hadnt ever picked up the car in the first place. 
I I did pick up the car from XXXX XXXX and then realized I was charged for the first car despite being told it was a simple transfer ( and the car was never picked up and XXXX was notified of the change prior to pick up time. ) - USAA denied stating autoeurope attached their XXXX & XXXX and USAA won't go against their conditions.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-10-10
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems — Other problem
Company: DISCOVER BANK (GA)

Complaint:
I opened my Discover credit card in XXXX of 2016 as a Secured Credit Card. Upon opening my card, Discover withdrew {$300.00} from me to hold as a secured payment and guaranteed me that my account would be re-evaluated after six months for me to receive my initial payment back. It has now been 3 years and 2 months and I have tried tirelessly to contact Discover and they will not give me my deposit back. They stated I would need to cancel the credit card to get the deposit back, but that would affect my credit report as it is the oldest card I have. This seems deceiving and I feel like Discover is using a deposit against me.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-06-05
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems — Other problem
Company: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (TX)

Complaint:
I am a retired military veteran and WAS a happy, loyal USAA member for more than 10 years. On XX/XX/XXXX, I got a text message from USAA that my credit card limit had been increased. That was great news because I use credit quite frequently needed a little more cushion. Unfortunately, when we tried to use the card later that day, it declined. I called the bank to find out why and they said rudely " What credit card? We don't show one on file. '' After several frantic phone calls, we finally discovered someone at USAA closed my account. This wasn't just a precautionary security lock ... ..it was force CLOSED. I demanded to know why, but no one had the answer. One guy from the credit card department said it looked like someone in the security department made a mistake and would be reprimanded. I was mad to say the least. As a military guy, a bunch of my friends and family work or bank with USAA so I posted on social media about the situation. Soon after, I received a message in my inbox from XXXX XXXX that my account was closed due to " unacceptable behavior ''. I found out later from an insider they were taking screenshots of my conversations on social media. This leads me to believe XXXX XXXX may have abused his power at the bank to punish me for complaining publicly. 

A few days later, I got a call from a bank employee who said she represents the CEO, XXXX XXXX. Apparently the executive board made a " business decision '' to close my account and they were in the process of closing my mother 's, brother 's, cousin 's and spouse 's accounts. She also said they are not going to tell me the real reason why because by law they don't have to and they have no record of the conversation I had with the credit card guy about them making a security mistake. It felt like a total abuse of power. I have reason to believe XXXX XXXX improperly used his position at the bank to influence this " business decision ''.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-03-13
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (NJ)

Complaint:
Based on, 15 U.S. Code $ 1681c-2 a consumer reporting agency shall block the reporting of any information in the file of a consumer that the consumer identifies as information that result from an alleged identity theft, no later than 4 business days after the date of receipt. It has been 30 days and you are in VIOLATION of this law because I am a victim of identity theft!! Please delete these items as soon as possible! These accounts should not be furnished on my consumer report as they are in VIOLATION Under, 15 U.S Code 1681b - Permissible purposes of consumer reports ( a ) IN GENERAL Subject to subsection ( c ) any consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report under the following circumstances and no other : ( 2 ) In accordance with the WRITTEN INSTRUCTION of the consumer to whom it relates. I NEVER gave any consumer reporting agency WRITTEN CONSENT to report anything on my consumer report which violates my rights as a federal protected consumer. NO CONSENT IS IDENTITY THEFT. As a consumer I am demanding the deletion of the accounts listed IMMEDIATELY.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-03-02
Product: Checking or savings account — Other banking product or service
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account — Transaction was not authorized
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (NJ)

Complaint:
I was chase private client customer, I was getting free safety deposit box, chase downgraded my account to premium checking back in XXXX XXXX, I was not charged any fees for safety deposit box till now, Chase is saying that they sent me letter back in XX/XX/XXXX about charges, I never received that letter, now they charged me unauthorized fees for locker and when I am telling them that please close locker and refund my fees, they are saying even if you close locker your fees will not be refunded.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-03-12
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement — Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement
Company: CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (DE)

Complaint:
We had closed our account with a cell phone company in XXXX of XXXX. All contract and billing requirements were met. In XXXX of XXXX ( 8 months after closing this account ) our credit card was charged for a phone that had not been returned. We disputed this charge with the cell phone company, but to no avail, and with our credit card company. 
Unfortunately, 8 months after the fact, we could not find the receipt for the phone return. 
We felt that since the cell phone company billing showed that it had been 8 months since our last business transaction, no charge should have been approved without a new contract. The credit card company upheld the billing stating that an investigation had been performed, and the original contract of XXXX was acceptable. As a result, we had to pay {$350.00} for a phone that had been return, 8 months after the fact.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2021-10-30
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem — Investigation took more than 30 days
Company: EQUIFAX, INC. (CA)

Complaint:
I purchased a certified pre-owned XXXX and financed it through XXXX XXXX, which is an affiliate of XXXX XXXX XXXX. The car was sold to be fraudulently and XXXX agreed to purchase the vehicle back in XXXX of 2021. Legal notarized agreements were signed between myself and XXXX. 

Despite this, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX have submitted a delinquency report to the credit bureaus and refused to rectify the situation.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-04-18
Product: Credit card or prepaid card — Store credit card
Issue: Fees or interest — Problem with fees
Company: SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL (IL)

Complaint:
1 ) Synchrony Bank is illegally charging improper late fees.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-13
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC. (TX)

Complaint:
This is my NUMEROUS request that I have been a victim of identity theft and that no one seems to care that I want to dispute specific records in my credit file that do not belong to me, or that I have signed any agreement. The items I'm challenging have nothing to do with any transactions I've done or authorized to gain products, services, or money. Please remove the following items listed below : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Date Opened XX/XX/2019 Balance {$2800.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX Date Opened XX/XX/XXXXBalance {$880.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date Opened XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$4400.00}

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-06-28
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Account status incorrect
Company: EQUIFAX, INC. (CO)

Complaint:
YOUR COMPLAINT It is Equifax is duty pursuant to the FCRA to be reporting correct and accurate information on my credit report and file, however they are NOT. Equifax is reporting three in accurate late payments for the XXXX XXXX account, which does not have an account numbers to reference to. These include two 30 day late payments posted in XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX and one 60 day late payment in XX/XX/XXXX. These are incorrect and supposed to be reported as PAID AS AGREED. Furthermore, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1681a ( d ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( I ), a consumer report does NOT contain information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report. A transaction constitutes these late payments resulting in Equifax violating my federally protected consumer rights. To add to this I did NOT give Equifax written instruction/permission to furnish these in accurate late payments on my consumer report or file, violating 15 U.S.C. 1681b ( a ) ( 2 ) it is clear that Equifax has violated my federally protected consumer rights under the FCRA, and the inaccurate reporting is causing me and my reputation severe harm and discrimination.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-11
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report — Reporting company used your report improperly
Company: EQUIFAX, INC. (NC)

Complaint:
In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting act XXXX  accounts XXXX 30 day late payments on XXXX XXXX, XXXX acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX XXXX XXXX  acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX XXXX XXXX  acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX, XXXX XXXX acct # XXXX has violated my rights. 

15 U.S.C. 1681 section A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S.C. 1681 section 604 A section 2 it aslo states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish an account without my written instructions.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-08-15
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action — Sued you without properly notifying you of lawsuit
Company: Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, LLP (FL)

Complaint:
A company by the name of XXXX submitted a lawsuit in XXXX XXXX Florida courts in the amount of {$19000.00} on XX/XX/2009 it was to late to file this lawsuit and I was not properly notified of the lawsuit and did not know it existed ... Years and years went past and I was not notified. I found out about this lawsuit after I purchased a vehicle, The Same company submitted for my license to be suspended in XX/XX/XXXX and I reached out to them to see what was going on and they never requested to meet with me, they demanded money. In XX/XX/XXXX I had to return my vehicle back to the finance company as a result of my license being suspended and tickets being issued for no license ... I began to research and came up with a company name XXXX  who is located out of state and posing as different congressman and congresswomen ... As a result.. XXXX closed down and transfered my information to someone name XXXX XXXX at Rodgers Morris and Zeigler located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL XXXX ... XXXX.. They left me with a suspended license and 3 tickets and filing for bankruptcy. Please look into this..

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-09-02
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report — Information belongs to someone else
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc. (NC)

Complaint:
Im submitting a complaint to you today to inform you I was the victim of identity theft. I researched on how to remove the fraudulent items in my report and found that I need to visit FEDERAL TRADE COMMISION or https : //www.ftc.gov to file a report and Per FCRA section 605b Credit Reporting Agencies are required to remove/block any items listed on an id theft report. Please find the ATTACHED documents to assist in the blocking of the erroneous information which is being posted to my report. 

Here are the list of items which do not belong to me or were opened without my permission. 

XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, NC XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, SC XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Bankruptcy Date Filed/Reported : XX/XX/XXXX Reference # : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Bankruptcy Date Filed/Reported : XX/XX/XXXX Reference # : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX According to FCRA Section 605B ( a ) the CREDIT REPORTING AGENCIES shall block any information in the file of a consumer that the consumer identifies as information that resulted from an alleged identity theft, not later than 4 business days after the date of receipt.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief