\chapter{Limits in categories (TO DO)} We saw near the start of our category theory chapter the nice construction of products by drawing a bunch of arrows. It turns out that this concept can be generalized immensely, and I want to give a you taste of that here. To run this chapter, we follow the approach of \cite{ref:msci}. \todo{write introduction} \section{Equalizers} \prototype{The equalizer of $f,g : X \to Y$ is the set of points with $f(x) = g(x)$.} Given two sets $X$ and $Y$, and maps $X \taking{f,g} Y$, we define their \vocab{equalizer} to be \[ \left\{ x \in X \mid f(x) = g(x) \right\}. \] We would like a categorical way of defining this, too. Consider two objects $X$ and $Y$ with two maps $f$ and $g$ between them. Stealing a page from \cite{ref:msci}, we call this a \vocab{fork}: \begin{center} \begin{tikzcd} X \ar[r, "f", shift left] \ar[r, "g"', shift right] & Y \end{tikzcd} \end{center} A cone over this fork is an object $A$ and arrows over $X$ and $Y$ which make the diagram commute, like so. \begin{center} \begin{tikzcd} A \ar[d, "q"'] \ar[rd, "f \circ q = g \circ q"] & \\ X \ar[r, "f", shift left, near start] \ar[r, "g"', shift right, near start] & Y \end{tikzcd} \end{center} Effectively, the arrow over $Y$ is just forcing $f \circ q = g \circ q$. In any case, the \vocab{equalizer} of $f$ and $g$ is a ``universal cone'' over this fork: it is an object $E$ and a map $E \taking{e} X$ such that for each $A \taking q X$ the diagram \begin{center} \begin{tikzcd} & A \ar[dd, "\exists! h"] \ar[lddd, "q"'] \ar[rddd, dashed, bend left] \\ \\ & E \ar[ld, "e"', near start] \ar[rd, dashed] & \\ X \ar[rr, "f", shift left] \ar[rr, "g"', shift right] && Y \end{tikzcd} \end{center} commutes for a unique $A \taking h E$. In other words, any map $A \taking{q} X$ as above must factor uniquely through $E$. Again, the dotted arrows can be omitted, and as before equalizers may not exist. But when they do exist: \begin{exercise} If $E \taking{e} X$ and $E' \taking{e'} X$ are equalizers, show that $E \cong E'$. \end{exercise} \begin{example} [Examples of equalizers] \listhack \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii In $\catname{Set}$, given $X \taking{f,g} Y$ the equalizer $E$ can be realized as $E = \{x \mid f(x) = g(x)\}$, with the inclusion $e : E \injto X$ as the morphism. As usual, by abuse we'll often just refer to $E$ as the equalizer. \ii Ditto in $\catname{Top}$, $\catname{Grp}$. One has to check that the appropriate structures are preserved (e.g.\ one should check that $\{\phi(g) = \psi(g) \mid g \in G\}$ is a group). \ii In particular, given a homomorphism $\phi : G \to H$, the inclusion $ \ker\phi \injto G $ is an equalizer for the fork $G \to H$ by $\phi$ and the trivial homomorphism. \end{enumerate} \end{example} According to (c) equalizers let us get at the concept of a kernel if there is a distinguished ``trivial map'', like the trivial homomorphism in $\catname{Grp}$. We'll flesh this idea out in the chapter on abelian categories. \section{Pullback squares (TO DO)} \todo{write me} Great example: differentiable functions on $(-3,1)$ and $(-1,3)$ \begin{example} \label{ex:diff_pullback} \end{example} \section{Limits} We've defined cones over discrete sets of $X_i$ and over forks. It turns out you can also define a cone over any general \vocab{diagram} of objects and arrows; we specify a projection from $A$ to each object and require that the projections from $A$ commute with the arrows in the diagram. (For example, a cone over a fork is a diagram with two edges and two arrows.) If you then demand the cone be universal, you have the extremely general definition of a \vocab{limit}. As always, these are unique up to unique isomorphism. We can also define the dual notion of a \vocab{colimit} in the same way. \section{\problemhead} \begin{sproblem}[Equalizers are monic] Show that the equalizer of any fork is monic. \label{prob:equalizer_monic} \end{sproblem} pushout square gives tenor product p-adic relative Chinese remainder theorem!!