:: A Tree of Execution of a Macroinstruction :: by Artur Korni{\l}owicz environ vocabularies NUMBERS, ORDINAL1, RELAT_1, FUNCOP_1, FUNCT_1, CARD_1, WELLORD2, XBOOLE_0, TARSKI, SUBSET_1, ZFMISC_1, WELLORD1, ORDINAL2, FINSEQ_2, FINSEQ_1, TREES_1, TREES_2, NAT_1, XXREAL_0, ARYTM_3, ORDINAL4, GOBOARD5, AMI_1, AMISTD_1, GLIB_000, AMISTD_2, AMISTD_3, PARTFUN1, EXTPRO_1, QUANTAL1, MEMSTR_0; notations TARSKI, XBOOLE_0, ZFMISC_1, SUBSET_1, CARD_1, ORDINAL1, ORDINAL2, NUMBERS, XXREAL_0, XCMPLX_0, NAT_1, RELAT_1, FUNCT_1, PARTFUN1, FUNCT_2, BINOP_1, WELLORD1, WELLORD2, FUNCOP_1, FINSEQ_1, FINSEQ_2, TREES_1, TREES_2, VALUED_1, MEASURE6, STRUCT_0, MEMSTR_0, COMPOS_1, EXTPRO_1, AMISTD_1; constructors WELLORD2, BINOP_1, AMISTD_2, RELSET_1, TREES_2, PRE_POLY, AMISTD_1, FUNCOP_1, DOMAIN_1, NUMBERS, TREES_3; registrations RELAT_1, ORDINAL1, FUNCOP_1, XXREAL_0, CARD_1, MEMBERED, FINSEQ_1, TREES_2, FINSEQ_6, VALUED_0, FINSEQ_2, CARD_5, TREES_1, AMISTD_2, COMPOS_1, EXTPRO_1, MEASURE6; requirements BOOLE, SUBSET, NUMERALS; definitions RELAT_1, TARSKI, XBOOLE_0, FUNCT_1; equalities FINSEQ_2, FUNCOP_1, AFINSQ_1, COMPOS_1, ORDINAL1; expansions TARSKI, FUNCT_1; theorems AMISTD_1, NAT_1, ORDINAL1, CARD_1, TREES_2, TREES_1, FINSEQ_1, FUNCT_1, RELAT_1, FINSEQ_3, FINSEQ_5, TARSKI, CARD_5, FINSEQ_2, FUNCOP_1, XXREAL_0, PARTFUN1, TREES_9, VALUED_1; schemes TREES_2, NAT_1, HILBERT2, ORDINAL2, BINOP_1; begin reserve x, y, z, X for set, m, n for Nat, O for Ordinal, R, S for Relation; reserve N for with_zero set, S for standard IC-Ins-separated non empty with_non-empty_values AMI-Struct over N, L, l1 for Nat, J for Instruction of S, F for Subset of NAT; :: LocSeq definition let N be with_zero set, S be standard IC-Ins-separated non empty with_non-empty_values AMI-Struct over N, M be Subset of NAT; deffunc F(object) = canonical_isomorphism_of (RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl M,RelIncl M).$1; func LocSeq(M,S) -> Sequence of NAT means :Def1: dom it = card M & for m being set st m in card M holds it.m = (canonical_isomorphism_of (RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl M, RelIncl M).m); existence proof consider f being Sequence such that A1: dom f = card M and A2: for A being Ordinal st A in card M holds f.A = F(A) from ORDINAL2: sch 2; f is NAT-valued proof let y be object; assume y in rng f; then consider x being object such that A3: x in dom f & y = f.x by FUNCT_1:def 3; reconsider x as set by TARSKI:1; F(x) in NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12; hence thesis by A1,A2,A3; end; then reconsider f as Sequence of NAT; take f; thus dom f = card M by A1; let m be set; assume m in card M; hence thesis by A2; end; uniqueness proof let f, g be Sequence of NAT such that A4: dom f = card M and A5: for m being set st m in card M holds f.m = F(m) and A6: dom g = card M and A7: for m being set st m in card M holds g.m = F(m); for x being object st x in dom f holds f.x = g.x proof let x be object such that A8: x in dom f; thus f.x = F(x) by A4,A5,A8 .= g.x by A4,A7,A8; end; hence thesis by A4,A6; end; end; theorem F = {n} implies LocSeq(F,S) = 0 .--> n proof assume A1: F = {n}; then A2: card F = {0} by CARD_1:30,49; {n} c= omega by ORDINAL1:def 12; then A3: canonical_isomorphism_of(RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl {n}, RelIncl { n} ).0 = (0 .--> n).0 by CARD_5:38 .= n by FUNCOP_1:72; A4: dom LocSeq(F,S) = card F by Def1; A5: for a being object st a in dom LocSeq(F,S) holds (LocSeq(F,S)).a = (0 .--> n ) . a proof let a be object; assume A6: a in dom LocSeq(F,S); then A7: a = 0 by A4,A2,TARSKI:def 1; thus (LocSeq(F,S)).a = (canonical_isomorphism_of (RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl F, RelIncl F).a) by A4,A6,Def1 .= (0 .--> n).a by A1,A3,A7,FUNCOP_1:72; end; thus thesis by A1,A4,A5,CARD_1:30,49; end; registration let N be with_zero set, S be standard IC-Ins-separated non empty with_non-empty_values AMI-Struct over N, M be Subset of NAT; cluster LocSeq(M,S) -> one-to-one; coherence proof set f = LocSeq(M,S); set C = canonical_isomorphism_of (RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl M,RelIncl M); let x1,x2 be object such that A1: x1 in dom f & x2 in dom f and A2: f.x1 = f.x2; A3: dom f = card M by Def1; then A4: f.x1 = C.x1 & f.x2 = C.x2 by A1,Def1; A5: card M c= order_type_of RelIncl M by CARD_5:39; consider phi being Ordinal-Sequence such that A6: phi = C and A7: phi is increasing and A8: dom phi = order_type_of RelIncl M and rng phi = M by CARD_5:5; phi is one-to-one by A7,CARD_5:11; hence thesis by A1,A2,A3,A4,A6,A8,A5; end; end; :: Tree of Execution definition let N be with_zero set, S be standard IC-Ins-separated non empty with_non-empty_values AMI-Struct over N, M be non empty preProgram of S; func ExecTree(M) -> DecoratedTree of NAT means :Def2: it.{} = FirstLoc(M) & for t being Element of dom it holds succ t = { t^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(it.t),it.t) } & for m being Nat st m in card NIC(M/.(it.t),it.t) holds it.(t^<*m*>) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(it.t),it.t),S)).m; existence proof defpred S[Nat,Nat] means $1 in card NIC(M/.$2,$2); reconsider n = FirstLoc(M) as Nat; defpred P[set,Nat,set] means ex l being Nat st l = $1 & ($2 in dom LocSeq(NIC(M/.l,l),S) implies $3 = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.l,l),S)).$2) & (not $2 in dom LocSeq(NIC(M/.l,l),S) implies $3 = 0); set D = NAT; A1: for x, y being Element of NAT ex z being Element of NAT st P[x,y,z] proof let x, y be Element of NAT; reconsider z = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.x,x),S)).y as Element of NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12; per cases; suppose A2: y in dom LocSeq(NIC(M/.x,x),S); take z; thus thesis by A2; end; suppose A3: not y in dom LocSeq(NIC(M/.x,x),S); reconsider il = 0 as Element of NAT; take il; thus thesis by A3; end; end; consider f be Function of [:D,NAT:],D such that A4: for l,n being Element of NAT holds P[l,n,f.(l,n)] from BINOP_1:sch 3(A1); A5: for d being Element of NAT, k1, k2 being Nat st k1 <= k2 & S[k2,d] holds S[k1,d] proof let d be Element of NAT, k1, k2 be Nat such that A6: k1 <= k2 and A7: S[k2,d]; Segm k2 in card NIC(M/.d,d) by A7; then Segm k1 in card NIC(M/.d,d) by A6,NAT_1:39,ORDINAL1:12; hence thesis; end; reconsider n as Element of NAT; consider T being DecoratedTree of NAT such that A8: T.{} = n and A9: for t being Element of dom T holds succ t = { t^<*k*> where k is Nat: S[k,T.t]} & for n being Nat st S[n,T.t] holds T.(t^ <*n*>) = f.(T.t,n) from TREES_2:sch 10(A5); take T; thus T.{} = FirstLoc(M) by A8; let t be Element of dom T; thus succ t ={ t^<*k*> where k is Nat: S[k,T.t]} by A9; reconsider n = T.t as Element of NAT; let m be Nat; A10: m in NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12; consider l being Nat such that A11: l = n and A12: m in dom LocSeq(NIC(M/.l,l),S) implies f.(n,m)= (LocSeq(NIC(M/.l,l),S)).m and not m in dom LocSeq(NIC(M/.l,l),S) implies f.(n,m) = 0 by A4,A10; assume m in card NIC(M/.(T.t),T.t); hence thesis by A9,A11,A12,Def1; end; uniqueness proof let T1,T2 be DecoratedTree of NAT such that A13: T1.{} = FirstLoc(M) and A14: for t being Element of dom T1 holds succ t = { t^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.t),T1.t)} & for m being Nat st m in card NIC(M/.(T1.t),T1.t) holds T1.(t^<*m*>) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(T1.t),T1.t),S)).m and A15: T2.{} = FirstLoc(M) and A16: for t being Element of dom T2 holds succ t = { t^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T2.t),T2.t)} & for m being Nat st m in card NIC(M/.(T2.t),T2.t) holds T2.(t^<*m*>) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(T2.t),T2.t),S)).m; defpred P[Nat] means dom T1-level $1 = dom T2-level $1; A17: for n being Nat st P[n] holds P[n+1] proof let n be Nat such that A18: P[n]; set U2 = { succ w where w is Element of dom T2 : len w = n }; set U1 = { succ w where w is Element of dom T1 : len w = n }; A19: dom T2-level n = {v where v is Element of dom T2: len v = n} by TREES_2:def 6; A20: dom T1-level n = {v where v is Element of dom T1: len v = n} by TREES_2:def 6; A21: union U1 = union U2 proof hereby let a be object; assume a in union U1; then consider A being set such that A22: a in A and A23: A in U1 by TARSKI:def 4; consider w being Element of dom T1 such that A24: A = succ w and A25: len w = n by A23; w in dom T1-level n by A20,A25; then consider v being Element of dom T2 such that A26: w = v and A27: len v = n by A18,A19; A28: w = w|Seg len w by FINSEQ_3:49; defpred R[Nat] means $1 <= len w & w|Seg $1 in dom T1 & v |Seg $1 in dom T2 implies T1.(w|Seg $1) = T2.(w|Seg $1); A29: for n being Nat st R[n] holds R[n+1] proof let n be Nat; assume that A30: R[n] and A31: n+1 <= len w and A32: w|Seg (n+1) in dom T1 and A33: v|Seg (n+1) in dom T2; set t1 = w|Seg n; A34: 1 <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; A35: len(w|Seg(n+1)) = n+1 by A31,FINSEQ_1:17; then len(w|Seg(n+1)) in Seg(n+1) by A34,FINSEQ_1:1; then A36: w.(n+1) = (w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1)) by A35,FUNCT_1:49; n+1 in dom w by A31,A34,FINSEQ_3:25; then A37: w|Seg(n+1) = t1^<*(w|Seg(n+1)).len (w|Seg(n+1))*> by A36, FINSEQ_5:10; A38: n <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; then A39: Seg n c= Seg(n+1) by FINSEQ_1:5; then v|Seg n = v|Seg(n+1)|Seg n by RELAT_1:74; then A40: v|Seg n is_a_prefix_of v|Seg(n+1) by TREES_1:def 1; w|Seg n = w|Seg(n+1)|Seg n by A39,RELAT_1:74; then w|Seg n is_a_prefix_of w|Seg(n+1) by TREES_1:def 1; then reconsider t1 as Element of dom T1 by A32,TREES_1:20; reconsider t2 = t1 as Element of dom T2 by A26,A33,A40,TREES_1:20; A41: succ t1 = { t1^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC (M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1)} by A14; t1^<*(w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1))*> in succ t1 by A32,A37, TREES_2:12; then consider k being Nat such that A42: t1^<*(w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1))*> = t1^<*k*> and A43: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1) by A41; A44: (w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1)) in card NIC(M/.(T2.t2),T2.t2) by A30,A31,A33,A38,A40,A42,A43,FINSEQ_2:17,TREES_1:20,XXREAL_0:2; k = (w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1)) by A42,FINSEQ_2:17; hence T1.(w|Seg(n+1)) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1),S)).((w|Seg(n+1 )).len (w|Seg(n+1))) by A14,A37,A43 .= T2.(w|Seg(n+1)) by A16,A30,A31,A33,A38,A40,A37,A44, TREES_1:20,XXREAL_0:2; end; A45: R[0] by A13,A15; for n being Nat holds R[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A45,A29); then A46: T1.w = T2.w by A26,A28; A47: succ v in U2 by A27; succ v = {v^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T2.v),T2.v)} & succ w = {w^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.w),T1.w)} by A14,A16; hence a in union U2 by A22,A24,A26,A46,A47,TARSKI:def 4; end; let a be object; assume a in union U2; then consider A being set such that A48: a in A and A49: A in U2 by TARSKI:def 4; consider w being Element of dom T2 such that A50: A = succ w and A51: len w = n by A49; w in dom T2-level n by A19,A51; then consider v being Element of dom T1 such that A52: w = v and A53: len v = n by A18,A20; A54: w = w|Seg len w by FINSEQ_3:49; defpred R[Nat] means $1 <= len w & w|Seg $1 in dom T1 & v| Seg $1 in dom T2 implies T1.(w|Seg $1) = T2.(w|Seg $1); A55: for n being Nat st R[n] holds R[n+1] proof let n be Nat; assume that A56: R[n] and A57: n+1 <= len w and A58: w|Seg (n+1) in dom T1 and A59: v|Seg (n+1) in dom T2; set t1 = w|Seg n; A60: 1 <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; A61: len(w|Seg(n+1)) = n+1 by A57,FINSEQ_1:17; then len(w|Seg(n+1)) in Seg(n+1) by A60,FINSEQ_1:1; then A62: w.(n+1) = (w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1)) by A61,FUNCT_1:49; n+1 in dom w by A57,A60,FINSEQ_3:25; then A63: w|Seg(n+1) = t1^<*(w|Seg(n+1)).len (w|Seg(n+1))*> by A62,FINSEQ_5:10; A64: n <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; then A65: Seg n c= Seg(n+1) by FINSEQ_1:5; then v|Seg n = v|Seg(n+1)|Seg n by RELAT_1:74; then A66: v|Seg n is_a_prefix_of v|Seg(n+1) by TREES_1:def 1; w|Seg n = w|Seg(n+1)|Seg n by A65,RELAT_1:74; then w|Seg n is_a_prefix_of w|Seg(n+1) by TREES_1:def 1; then reconsider t1 as Element of dom T1 by A58,TREES_1:20; reconsider t2 = t1 as Element of dom T2 by A52,A59,A66,TREES_1:20; A67: succ t1 = { t1^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC( M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1)} by A14; t1^<*(w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1))*> in succ t1 by A58,A63, TREES_2:12; then consider k being Nat such that A68: t1^<*(w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1))*> = t1^<*k*> and A69: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1) by A67; A70: (w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1)) in card NIC(M/.(T2.t2),T2.t2) by A56,A57 ,A59,A64,A66,A68,A69,FINSEQ_2:17,TREES_1:20,XXREAL_0:2; k = (w|Seg(n+1)).len(w|Seg(n+1)) by A68,FINSEQ_2:17; hence T1.(w|Seg(n+1)) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1),S)).((w|Seg(n+1)) .len(w|Seg(n+1))) by A14,A63,A69 .= T2.(w|Seg(n+1)) by A16,A56,A57,A59,A64,A66,A63,A70, TREES_1:20,XXREAL_0:2; end; A71: R[0] by A13,A15; for n being Nat holds R[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A71,A55); then A72: T1.w = T2.w by A52,A54; A73: succ v in U1 by A53; succ v = {v^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.v),T1.v)} & succ w = {w^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T2.w),T2.w)} by A14,A16; hence thesis by A48,A50,A52,A72,A73,TARSKI:def 4; end; dom T1-level (n+1) = union U1 by TREES_9:45; hence thesis by A21,TREES_9:45; end; dom T1-level 0 = {{}} by TREES_9:44 .= dom T2-level 0 by TREES_9:44; then A74: P[0]; A75: for n being Nat holds P[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A74,A17); for p being FinSequence of NAT st p in dom T1 holds (T1 qua Function ).p = (T2 qua Function).p proof let p be FinSequence of NAT; defpred P[Nat] means $1 <= len p & p|Seg $1 in dom T1 implies T1.(p|Seg $1) = T2.(p|Seg $1); A76: p|Seg len p = p by FINSEQ_3:49; A77: for n being Nat st P[n] holds P[n+1] proof let n be Nat; assume that A78: P[n] and A79: n+1 <= len p and A80: p|Seg (n+1) in dom T1; set t1 = p|Seg n; A81: 1 <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; A82: len(p|Seg(n+1)) = n+1 by A79,FINSEQ_1:17; then len(p|Seg(n+1)) in Seg(n+1) by A81,FINSEQ_1:1; then A83: p.(n+1) = (p|Seg(n+1)).len(p|Seg(n+1)) by A82,FUNCT_1:49; n+1 in dom p by A79,A81,FINSEQ_3:25; then A84: p|Seg(n+1) = t1^<*(p|Seg(n+1)).len (p|Seg(n+1))*> by A83,FINSEQ_5:10; A85: n <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; then Seg n c= Seg(n+1) by FINSEQ_1:5; then p|Seg n = p|Seg(n+1)|Seg n by RELAT_1:74; then p|Seg n is_a_prefix_of p|Seg(n+1) by TREES_1:def 1; then reconsider t1 as Element of dom T1 by A80,TREES_1:20; reconsider t2 = t1 as Element of dom T2 by A75,TREES_2:38; A86: succ t1 = { t1^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1)} by A14; t1^<*(p|Seg(n+1)).len (p|Seg(n+1))*> in succ t1 by A80,A84, TREES_2:12; then consider k being Nat such that A87: t1^<*(p|Seg(n+1)).len (p|Seg(n+1))*> = t1^<*k*> and A88: k in card NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1) by A86; A89: (p|Seg(n+1)).len (p|Seg(n+1)) in card NIC(M/.(T2.t2),T2.t2) by A78,A79 ,A85,A87,A88,FINSEQ_2:17,XXREAL_0:2; k = (p|Seg(n+1)).len (p|Seg(n+1)) by A87,FINSEQ_2:17; hence T1.(p|Seg (n+1)) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(T1.t1),T1.t1),S)).((p|Seg(n+1)). len (p|Seg(n+1))) by A14,A84,A88 .= T2.(p|Seg (n+1)) by A16,A78,A79,A85,A84,A89,XXREAL_0:2; end; A90: P[0] by A13,A15; for n being Nat holds P[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A90,A77); hence thesis by A76; end; hence thesis by A75,TREES_2:31,38; end; end; theorem for S being standard halting IC-Ins-separated non empty with_non-empty_values AMI-Struct over N holds ExecTree Stop S = TrivialInfiniteTree --> 0 proof set D = TrivialInfiniteTree; let S be standard halting IC-Ins-separated non empty with_non-empty_values AMI-Struct over N; set M = Stop S; set E = ExecTree M; defpred R[set] means E.$1 in dom M; defpred X[Nat] means dom E-level $1 = D-level $1; A2: M.0 = halt S by FUNCOP_1:72; A3: for t being Element of dom E holds card NIC(halt S,E.t) = {0} proof let t be Element of dom E; reconsider Et = E.t as Nat; NIC(halt S,Et) = {Et} by AMISTD_1:2; hence thesis by CARD_1:30,49; end; A4: for f being Element of dom E st R[f] for a being Element of NAT st f^<*a*> in dom E holds R[f^<*a*>] proof let f be Element of dom E such that A5: R[f]; A6: M/.(E.f) = M.(E.f) by A5,PARTFUN1:def 6; reconsider Ef = E.f as Nat; A7: E.f = 0 by A5,TARSKI:def 1; then NIC(halt S,E.f) = {0} by AMISTD_1:2; then canonical_isomorphism_of (RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f), RelIncl NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f)) = 0 .--> Ef by A2,A7,A6,CARD_5:38; then A8: canonical_isomorphism_of (RelIncl order_type_of RelIncl NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f), RelIncl NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f)).0 = Ef by FUNCOP_1:72 .= 0 by A5,TARSKI:def 1; A9: card NIC(halt S,E.f) = {0} by A3; then A10: 0 in card NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f) by A2,A7,A6,TARSKI:def 1; A11: succ f = { f^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(E.f) ,E.f) } by Def2; A12: succ f = { f^<*0*> } proof hereby let s be object; assume s in succ f; then consider k being Nat such that A13: s = f^<*k*> and A14: k in card NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f) by A11; k = 0 by A2,A9,A7,A6,A14,TARSKI:def 1; hence s in { f^<*0*> } by A13,TARSKI:def 1; end; let s be object; assume s in { f^<*0*> }; then s = f^<*0*> by TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A11,A10; end; let a be Element of NAT; assume f^<*a*> in dom E; then f^<*a*> in succ f by TREES_2:12; then f^<*a*> = f^<*0*> by A12,TARSKI:def 1; then E.(f^<*a*>) = (LocSeq(NIC(M/.(E.f),E.f),S)).0 by A10,Def2 .= 0 by A10,A8,Def1; hence thesis by TARSKI:def 1; end; E.{} = FirstLoc(M) by Def2; then A15: R[<*>NAT] by VALUED_1:33; A16: for f being Element of dom E holds R[f] from HILBERT2:sch 1(A15,A4); A17: for x being object st x in dom E holds (E qua Function).x = 0 proof let x be object; assume x in dom E; then reconsider x as Element of dom E; E.x in dom M by A16; hence thesis by TARSKI:def 1; end; A18: for n being Nat st X[n] holds X[n+1] proof let n be Nat; set f0 = n |-> 0; set f1 = (n+1) |-> 0; A19: dom E-level (n+1) = {w where w is Element of dom E: len w = n+1} by TREES_2:def 6; A20: len f1 = n+1 by CARD_1:def 7; assume A21: X[n]; dom E-level (n+1) = {f1} proof hereby let a be object; assume a in dom E-level (n+1); then consider t1 being Element of dom E such that A22: a = t1 and A23: len t1 = n+1 by A19; reconsider t0 = t1|Seg n as Element of dom E by RELAT_1:59,TREES_1:20; A24: succ t0 = { t0^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(E.t0),E.t0) } by Def2; E.t0 in dom M by A16; then A25: E.t0 = 0 by TARSKI:def 1; A26: card NIC(halt S,E.t0) = {0} & M/.(E.t0) = M.(E.t0) by A3,A16, PARTFUN1:def 6; then A27: 0 in card NIC(M/.(E.t0),E.t0) by A2,A25,TARSKI:def 1; A28: succ t0 = { t0^<*0*> } proof hereby let s be object; assume s in succ t0; then consider k being Nat such that A29: s = t0^<*k*> and A30: k in card NIC(M/.(E.t0),E.t0) by A24; k = 0 by A2,A25,A26,A30,TARSKI:def 1; hence s in { t0^<*0*> } by A29,TARSKI:def 1; end; let s be object; assume s in { t0^<*0*> }; then s = t0^<*0*> by TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A24,A27; end; t1.(n+1) is Nat & t1 = t0^<*t1.(n+1)*> by A23,FINSEQ_3:55; then t0^<*t1.(n+1)*> in succ t0 by TREES_2:12; then A31: t0^<*t1.(n+1)*> = t0^<*0*> by A28,TARSKI:def 1; A32: n in NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12; n <= n+1 by NAT_1:11; then Seg n c= Seg(n+1) by FINSEQ_1:5; then Seg n c= dom t1 by A23,FINSEQ_1:def 3; then dom t0 = Seg n by RELAT_1:62; then dom E-level n = {w where w is Element of dom E: len w = n} & len t0 = n by FINSEQ_1:def 3,TREES_2:def 6,A32; then A33: t0 in dom E-level n; A34: dom E-level n = {f0} by A21,TREES_2:39; for k being Nat st 1 <= k & k <= len t1 holds t1.k = f1.k proof let k be Nat; assume 1 <= k & k <= len t1; then A35: k in Seg(n+1) by A23,FINSEQ_1:1; now per cases by A35,FINSEQ_2:7; suppose A36: k in Seg n; hence t1.k = t0.k by FUNCT_1:49 .= f0.k by A34,A33,TARSKI:def 1 .= 0 by A36,FUNCOP_1:7; end; suppose k = n+1; hence t1.k = 0 by A31,FINSEQ_2:17; end; end; hence thesis by A35,FUNCOP_1:7; end; then t1 = f1 by A20,A23,FINSEQ_1:14; hence a in {f1} by A22,TARSKI:def 1; end; defpred P[Nat] means $1 |-> 0 in dom E; let a be object; A37: for n being Nat st P[n] holds P[n+1] proof let n be Nat; assume P[n]; then reconsider t = n |-> 0 as Element of dom E; A38: succ t = { t^<*k*> where k is Nat: k in card NIC(M/.(E.t),E.t) } by Def2; E.t in dom M by A16; then A39: E.t = 0 by TARSKI:def 1; card NIC(halt S,E.t) = {0} & M/.(E.t) = M.(E.t) by A3,A16,PARTFUN1:def 6; then 0 in card NIC(M/.(E.t),E.t) by A2,A39,TARSKI:def 1; then t^<*0*> in succ t by A38; then t^<*0*> in dom E; hence thesis by FINSEQ_2:60; end; A40: P[0] by TREES_1:22; for n being Nat holds P[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A40,A37); then A41: f1 is Element of dom E; assume a in {f1}; then a = f1 by TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A19,A20,A41; end; hence thesis by TREES_2:39; end; dom E-level 0 = {{}} by TREES_9:44 .= D-level 0 by TREES_9:44; then A42: X[0]; for x being Nat holds X[x] from NAT_1:sch 2(A42,A18); then dom E = D by TREES_2:38; hence thesis by A17,FUNCOP_1:11; end;