Information to be included with request
 33. (1) A person who makes a request under section 32 shall include the following in the request: 0.1 A statement specifying an averaging period for the purpose of the request in accordance with subsection (1.1). 1. A report prepared in accordance with section 26. 2. If, according to the approved dispersion model that was used for the purpose of preparing the report referred to in paragraph 1, discharges of the contaminant may result in a contravention of section 20 because of the concentration of the contaminant at a point of impingement, i. a written statement or map identifying the location of the point of impingement, ii. a written statement specifying the highest concentration of the contaminant that the approved dispersion model predicts for the point of impingement, and iii. a written statement specifying the number of averaging periods for which the approved dispersion model predicts that discharges of the contaminant may result in a contravention of section 20 because of the concentration of the contaminant at the point of impingement, expressed as a percentage of the number of averaging periods in, A. a period equal to the length of the period over which the meteorological data was collected, if the approved dispersion model was used in accordance with local or site-specific meteorological data described in paragraph 3 of subsection 13 (1), or B. a period equal to the length of the period that was used for the purposes of the computational method, if the approved dispersion model was used in accordance with meteorological data obtained from a computational method in accordance with paragraph 4 of subsection 13 (1). 3. A list of all the methods that are used by other persons, or are available for use, to reduce concentrations of the contaminant at any point, including methods such as the use of pollution control technology or changes to equipment, processes or materials. 4. An analysis of the methods identified under paragraph 3, and combinations of those methods, to determine which are technically feasible with respect to the sources of contaminant to which the request relates. 5. A list of the methods and combinations of methods that are determined under paragraph 4 to be technically feasible. 6. A ranking of the methods and combinations of methods identified under paragraph 5, based on the maximum concentration of the contaminant that, according to an approved dispersion model, would result at a point of impingement if each method or combination of methods were used with respect to the sources of contaminant to which the request relates. 7. Unless a plan is included under paragraph 4 of subsection (4), a plan on how to implement, i. the method or combination of methods that is ranked under paragraph 6 as the method or combination of methods that predicts the lowest maximum concentration of the contaminant at a point of impingement, or ii. a method or combination of methods that, according to an approved dispersion model, would not result in a contravention of section 20. 8. If a public meeting is held under subsection 34 (1) before the request is made under section 32, a description of the steps taken under section 34 by the person making the request, including a summary of the questions asked and comments made by persons who attended the public meeting and the responses of the person making the request.  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1); O. Reg. 282/11, s. 7 (1, 2). (1.1) The averaging period specified under paragraph 0.1 of subsection (1) must be an averaging period for which a standard is set out for the contaminant in Schedule 3 or in an amendment to Schedule 3 that has not yet come into force.  O. Reg. 282/11, s. 7 (3). (2) Paragraph 2 of subsection (1) does not apply if the Director gives the person a written notice requiring that the request include the following in accordance with the notice: 1. A written statement or map identifying the location of points of impingement specified in the notice. 2. A written statement specifying the concentration of the contaminant that the approved dispersion model predicts at points of impingement specified in the notice. 3. A written statement specifying the number of averaging periods for which the approved dispersion model predicts that discharges of the contaminant may result in a contravention of section 20 or cause an adverse effect because of the concentration of the contaminant at points of impingement specified in the notice, expressed as a percentage of the number of averaging periods in, i. a period equal to the length of the period over which the meteorological data was collected, if the approved dispersion model was used in accordance with local or site-specific meteorological data described in paragraph 3 of subsection 13 (1), or ii. a period equal to the length of the period that was used for the purposes of the computational method, if the approved dispersion model was used in accordance with meteorological data obtained from a computational method in accordance with paragraph 4 of subsection 13 (1).  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (3) A person who makes a request under section 32 shall prepare the report required by paragraph 1 of subsection (1), and provide the information required by paragraph 2 of that subsection or by subsection (2), using, (a) the AERMOD dispersion model described in paragraph 1 of subsection 6 (1); or (b)  Revoked: O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (4). (c) a dispersion model or combination of dispersion models that, (i) pursuant to subsection 7 (3), is deemed to be included in references in this Part to approved dispersion models, and (ii) is capable of providing the information referred to in paragraph 2 of subsection (1) or in subsection (2), as the case may be.  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1, 4). (4) A person who makes a request under section 32 may include the following in a part of the request that is separate from the part of the request that contains the material required by subsection (1): 1. An analysis of the economic feasibility of the methods and combinations of methods that are determined under paragraph 4 of subsection (1) to be technically feasible. 2. A list of the methods and combinations of methods that are determined under paragraph 1 to be economically feasible. 3. A ranking of the methods and combinations of methods identified under paragraph 2, based on the maximum concentration of the contaminant that, according to an approved dispersion model, would result at a point of impingement if each method or combination of methods were used with respect to the sources of contaminant to which the request relates. 4. A plan on how to implement, i. the method or combination of methods that is ranked under paragraph 3 as the method or combination of methods that predicts the lowest maximum concentration of the contaminant at a point of impingement, or ii. a method or combination of methods that, according to an approved dispersion model, would not result in a contravention of section 20.  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (5) Subsection (4) does not apply to a person who makes a request under section 32 that relies on paragraph 4 of subsection 32 (1).  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (6) If a person makes a request under section 32 and section 20 does not apply to the person in respect of the contaminant that is the subject of the request, section 20 shall be deemed to apply to the person in respect of the contaminant for the purpose of preparing the report required by paragraph 1 of subsection (1).  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (7) Despite subsections 10 (1) and (2), a person who prepares a report required by paragraph 1 of subsection (1) shall, for the contaminant that is the subject of the request, use an approved dispersion model in accordance with both of the scenarios described in subsection 10 (1).  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (8) Paragraphs 1 and 2 of subsection 11 (1) do not apply to a person who prepares a report required by paragraph 1 of subsection (1).  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (9) Despite subsection (8), a person who prepares a report required by paragraph 1 of subsection (1) may use an approved dispersion model with an emission rate determined in accordance with paragraph 2 of subsection 11 (1), if the Director is of the opinion that the report will accurately determine the concentrations of contaminants.  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1). (10) Paragraphs 1, 1.1 and 2 of subsection 13 (1) do not apply to a person who prepares a report required by paragraph 1 of subsection (1).  O. Reg. 507/09, s. 32 (1, 5).