C 252/32
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
17.7.2023
Second, France has failed to take the measures necessary to ensure that, in 13 agglomerations which discharge urban waste water to sensitive areas, the said waste water is subject, before being discharged, to more stringent treatment than secondary treatment or an equivalent treatment in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 91/271 in conformity with the parameters prescribed in Annex I.B thereto.
Third, France has failed to take the measures necessary to ensure that, in 87 agglomerations, urban waste water treatment plants are designed, constructed, operated and maintained to ensure sufficient performance under all normal local climatic conditions and that their design takes into account seasonal variations of the load in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 91/271.
Fourth, France has failed to take the measures necessary to ensure that competent authorities or appropriate bodies monitor discharges from urban waste water treatment plants in 87 agglomerations to verify compliance with the requirements of Annex I.B in accordance with the control procedures laid down in Annex I.D, as is required by the first indent of Article 15(1) of Directive 91/271.
(1)
Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40).
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 April 2023 — Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others v Telecom Italia SpA and Others (Case C-273/23, Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others) (2023/C 252/35) Language of the case: Italian Referring court Consiglio di Stato
Parties to the main proceedings Appellants: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Telecom Italia SpA Respondents: Telecom Italia SpA, Vodafone Italia SpA, Fastweb SpA, Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Tiscali Italia SpA, BT Italia SpA
Question referred Must Directive 97/33/EC, (1) and in particular Article 5 thereof, and Directive 2002/22/EC, (2) and in particular Article 13 thereof, applicable ratione temporis, and the principles of transparency, least market distortion, non-discrimination and proportionality, be interpreted as meaning that: (a) it is permissible for national legislation to impose by law the extension to mobile telephone operators of obligations to contribute to the financing of unfair burdens arising from the provision of the same universal service, without making such cases subject to verification by the NRA that there is a competitive relationship or substitutability between the contributing operators and the designated operator for the provision of that service within the same relevant market under competition law; (b) NRAs are permitted, in addition to or as an alternative to the criterion of substitutability between fixed and mobile network services, for the purposes of verifying the unfair nature of the burden, to use other criteria — and if so, which ones — to establish a financing obligation on mobile operators?
(1) (2)
Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in Telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP) (OJ 1997 L 199, p. 32).
Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51).