EN
C 121/12
Official Journal of the European Union
3.4.2023
Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — annul the contested decision; — order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law — Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) read in conjunction with Article 8(2)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Action brought on 15 February 2023 — Oriflame Cosmetics v EUIPO — Caramé Holding (Representation of a stylised O) (Case T-74/23) (2023/C 121/16) Language in which the application was lodged: English Parties Applicant: Oriflame Cosmetics AG (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Gerling and U. Pfleghar, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caramé Holding AG (Sulzbach, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of a figurative mark (Representation of a stylised O) — International registration designating the European Union No 1 303 496 Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2022 in Case R 938/2022-2
Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 4 April 2022 and refuse international registration designating the European Union No 1 303 496; — Order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in addition to bearing their own costs.
Pleas in law — Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2007/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; — Infringement of Article 10(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.