EN
20.2.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/47
Order of the General Court of 15 December 2022 — Leonardo v Frontex (Case T-675/20) (1) (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Tendering procedure — Aerial surveillance service — Remotely piloted aircraft system — Refusal to grant access — Application of the two main parties for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate — No discontinuance or withdrawal — Sound administration of justice — No need to adjudicate) (2023/C 63/60) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Esposito, F. Caccioppoli and G. Calamo, lawyers) Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: H. Caniard, T. Knäbe and W. Szmidt, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re: By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) of 5 October 2020, by which it rejected the confirmatory application for access to documents submitted by the applicant under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
Operative part of the order 1.
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. 2.
Leonardo SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex).
(1)
OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.
Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — XH v Commission (Case T-522/21) (1) (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2020 promotion exercise — Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file — Decision not to promote the applicant — Time limits for lodging an appeal — Public policy nature — Starting point — Application for legal aid — Suspension of time limits — Computation of time limits — Lateness — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Excusable error — Inadmissibility) (2023/C 63/61) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny-Salwarowska, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff, L. Hohenecker and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re: By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 24 November 2020 refusing to amend her Sysper 2 file, confirmed by decision of 16 June 2021 rejecting her complaint, secondly, annulment of the decision of the Commission of 12 November 2020 not to include her name on the list of officials promoted in 2020, confirmed by decision of 8 June 2021 rejecting her complaint, and, thirdly, compensation for the damage suffered.