C 7/10
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
9.1.2023
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil — Slovenia) — SHARENGO najem in zakup vozil d.o.o. v Mestna občina Ljubljana (Case C-486/21) (1) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public system for the rental and shared use of electric cars — Distinction between the concepts of ‘services concessions’ and ‘public supply contracts’ — Directive 2014/23/EU — Article 5(1)(b) — Article 20(4) — Concept of ‘mixed contracts’ — Article 8 — Determining the value of a services concession — Criteria — Article 27 — Article 38 — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 2(1), points 5 and 8 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1986 — Annex XXI — Possibility of imposing a condition concerning the registration of a specific professional activity under national law — Impossibility of imposing that condition on all members of a temporary business association — Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 — Article 1(1) — Obligation to refer exclusively to the ‘Common Procurement Vocabulary’ in concession documents — Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 — Article 1(2) — Impossibility of referring to the ‘NACE Rev. 2’ nomenclature in the concession documents) (2023/C 7/12) Language of the case: Slovenian Referring court Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil
Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: SHARENGO najem in zakup vozil d.o.o.
Defendant: Mestna občina Ljubljana
Operative part of the judgment 1.
Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1827 of 30 October 2019,
must be interpreted as meaning that
an operation whereby a contracting authority intends to entrust the establishment and operation of a service consisting of the hire and sharing of electric vehicles to an economic operator whose financial contribution is mostly allocated for the purchase of those vehicles, and in which the revenue of that economic operator will derive essentially from the fees paid by the users of that service constitutes a ‘services concession’, since such characteristics are such as to establish that the risk linked to the operation of the services under concession has been transferred to that economic operator.
2.
Article 8 of Directive 2014/23, as amended by Delegated Regulation 2019/1827,
must be interpreted as meaning that
in order to determine whether the threshold for applicability of that directive is reached, the contracting authority must estimate the ‘total turnover of the concessionaire generated over the duration of the contract, net of [value-added tax (VAT)]’, taking into account the fees which users will pay to the concessionaire, together with contributions and costs borne by the contracting authority.
However, the contracting authority may also take the view that the threshold laid down for the application of Directive 2014/23, as amended by Delegated Regulation 2019/1827, is reached where the investments and costs to be borne by the concessionaire, alone or with the contracting authority, throughout the period of application of the concession contract manifestly exceed that threshold of applicability.