EN
C 463/22
Official Journal of the European Union
5.12.2022
GENERAL COURT Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Leino-Sandberg v Parliament (Case T-421/17 RENV) (1) (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document relating to a decision refusing a third party full access to trilogue tables relating to the proposal for a regulation of the Parliament and of the Council on Europol and repealing Decisions 2009/371/JHA and 2005/681/JHA — Refusal to grant access — Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception for the protection of court proceedings and legal advice) (2022/C 463/29) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer, B. Verheijen and S. Schubert, lawyers) Defendant): European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and J.C. Puffer, acting as Agents) Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, H. Eklinder, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents) Re: By her action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant her access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Annuls Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani; 2.
Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg; 3.
Orders the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own respective costs.
(1)
OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.
Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2022 –Corneli v ECB (Case T-502/19) (1) (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions — Early intervention measures — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige under temporary administration — Action for annulment — Action brought by a shareholder — Standing to bring proceedings — Interest separate from that of the bank — Admissibility — Error of law in the determination of the legal basis — Interpretation of national law by the EU Courts in conformity with EU law — Limit — Prohibition on interpreting national law contra legem) (2022/C 463/30) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicant: Francesca Corneli (Velletri, Italy) (represented by: M. Condinanzi, L. Boggio and F. Ferraro, lawyers)