21.11.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 441/13
— refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellants’ action at first instance is well founded; — order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal.
Grounds of appeal and main arguments In support of their appeal, the appellants rely on three grounds: The first ground of appeal alleges infringement of Article 45 TFEU, infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons, error of legal characterisation and distortion of the contents of the file; The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of the purpose of Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, breach of the general principle of the right of an official to retain personal links with the place where his or her principal interests are situated, infringement of Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and distortion of the contents of the file; The third ground of appeal alleges breach of the principle of equal treatment.
Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by YT, YU against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-532/16, YT and YU v Commission (Case C-568/22 P) (2022/C 441/18) Language of the case: French Parties Appellants: YT, YU (represented by: L. Levi, J.-N. Louis, avocats) Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union
Form of order sought The appellants claim that the Court should: — set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 June 2022 in Case T-532/16, YT and YU v Commission; — refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellants’ action at first instance is well founded; — order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal.
Grounds of appeal and main arguments In support of their appeal, the appellants rely on two grounds: The first ground of appeal alleges infringement of Article 45 TFEU, infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons, error of legal characterisation and distortion of the contents of the file; The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of the purpose of Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and breach of the general principle of proportionality.