EN
31.10.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 418/53
— annul Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 of 9 March 2022 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities (1); — order the Commission to pay the amount of EUR 3 000 to the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law. 1.
First plea in law, alleging irregularity of the procedure in that it infringed the provisions of Regulation No 2020/852 of 18 June 2020. (2) 2.
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rules of taxonomy. 3.
Third plea in law, alleging that the provisions of Article 19 of Regulation No 2020/852 of 18 June 2020 were infringed and that the objectives were insufficiently ambitious. 4.
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the general criteria of Community law. 5.
Fifth plea in law, alleging incompatibility between investments in nuclear energy and green investments with regard to financial information.
(1) (2)
OJ 2022 L 188, p. 1.
Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ 2020 L 198, p. 13).
Action brought on 15 September 2022 — XNT v EUIPO — Exane (EXANE) (Case T-568/22) (2022/C 418/68) Language in which the application was lodged: English Parties Applicant: XNT ltd.
(St. Julian’s, Malta) (represented by: A. Renck, C. Stöber and M.-A. de Dampierre, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Exane (Paris, France)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark EXANE — European Union trade mark No 14 289 433 Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 June 2022 in Case R 2093/2020-2
Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — annul the contested decision; — order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, and in the event that the other party before the Board of Appeal joins the proceedings, the intervener.