EN
31.10.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 418/17
Interveners in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by G. Aiello, P. Garofoli and A. Giordano, avvocati dello Stato), EP Produzione SpA (Rome) (represented by: D. Gullo and M. Bozzo, lawyers), A2A SpA (Brescia, Italy) (represented by: D. Gullo and M. Bozzo, lawyers), Edison SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Luciani, G. Roberti, A. Travi, R. Villata and I. Perego, lawyers), Enel Produzione SpA (Rome) (represented by: V. Cannizzaro, S. Ventura and L. Caroli, lawyers), Elettricità Futura — Unione delle imprese elettriche italiane (Rome) and Utilitalia (Rome) (represented by: M. Merola and L. Perfetti, lawyers), Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA (Rome) (represented by: A. Catricalà, D. Lipani, F. Sbrana, C. Cazzato, F. Baglivo and M. Pirozzi, lawyers), Alperia Trading Srl (Bolzano, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, L. Perfetti and A. Rosi, lawyers) Re: By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 4509 final of 14 June 2019 concerning State Aid SA.53821 (2019/N) — Italy Modification of the Italian capacity mechanism, by which the Commission decided not to raise objections to the aid scheme relating to that modified capacity market, on the ground that it is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU, and to authorise it until 31 December 2028.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Dismisses the action; 2.
Orders Set SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; 3.
Declares that the Italian Republic is to bear its own costs; 4.
Declares that EP Produzione SpA, A2A SpA, Edison SpA, Alperia Trading Srl, Elettricità Futura — Unione delle imprese elettriche italiane, Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA and Enel Produzione SpA are to bear their own costs.
(1)
OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.
Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission (Case T-91/20) (1) (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of good administration — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time — Psychological harassment — Principle of legal certainty — Material and non-material damage) (2022/C 418/20) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: WT (represented by: V. Villante, D. Rovetta and D. Birkenmaier, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon and L. Vernier, acting as Agents) Re: By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 by which the Commission imposed on her a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand and, second, compensation for the non-material and material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Dismisses the action; 2.
Orders WT to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.