C 380/18
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
3.10.2022
Action brought on 20 July 2022 — PW v EEAS (Case T-448/22) (2022/C 380/21) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: PW (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers) Defendant: European External Action Service Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — annul the implicit decision of the defendant dated 30 July 2021 refusing to correct the calculation of the reimbursement of his annual travel expenses for 2020 as regards his children and, in as far as necessary, the annulment of the decision of the defendant, dated 14 April 2022, rejecting his complaint filed on 28 October 2021, under Article 90(2) of the EU Staff Regulations; and, — order the defendant to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law. 1.
First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and a breach of the principle of good administration. 2.
Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care.
Action brought on 20 July 2022 — Evonik Operations v Commission (Case T-449/22) (2022/C 380/22) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Evonik Operations GmbH (Essen, Germany) (represented by: J.-P. Montfort and T. Delille, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — declare the application admissible and well-founded; — annul the Commission’s Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 of 16 February 2022 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures and correcting that Regulation insofar as it introduces an harmonised classification and labelling for the substance silanamine, 1,1,1-trimethyl-N- (trimethylsilyl)-, hydrolysis products with silica; pyrogenic, synthetic amorphous, nano, surface treated silicon dioxide (‘the Substance’, or ‘SAS-HMDS’) (CAS No. 68909-20-6) (‘the Contested Regulation’’) (1); — order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings; and — take such other or further measure as justice may require.