EN
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/55
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2022 in Case R 172/2021-4 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — annul the contested decision, by which the Board of Appeal confirmed that Opposition No B 3 054 342 against figurative mark No 17 838 178 was successful, and remit the case to EUIPO for reconsideration.
Plea in law — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Action brought on 11 April 2022 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (EF) (Case T-183/22) (2022/C 207/73) Language in which the application was lodged: English Parties Applicant: Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: E. & J. Gallo Winery (Modesto, California, United States) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark EF — Application for registration No 17 927 894 Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2022 in Case R 729/2021-5 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: — annul the contested decision; — order EUIPO and in case of an intervention also the intervener to pay the costs.
Plea in law — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Action brought on 12 April 2022 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (E & F) (Case T-184/22) (2022/C 207/74) Language in which the application was lodged: English Parties Applicant: Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)