EN
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/37
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Toolstream Ltd (Yeovil, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Hourigan, Solicitor)
Re: Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2020 (Case R 550/2020-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Perry Street Software and Toolstream.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Dismisses the action; 2.
Orders Perry Street Software, Inc. to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO COUTURE) (Case T-30/21) (1) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE — EU word mark SO …? — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) (2022/C 207/48) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: L’Oréal (Clichy, France) (represented by: M. Treis and E. M. Strobel, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: J. Quirin and J. P. Jacquey, lawyers)
Re: Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 November 2020 (Case R 158/2016 5), relating to opposition proceedings between Debonair Trading Internacional and L’Oréal.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Dismisses the action; 2.
Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.