EN
C 207/6
Official Journal of the European Union
23.5.2022
Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: LB Defendant: Smetna palata na Republika Bulgaria
Operative part of the judgment 1.
Article 58(1) and (4) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2365 of 18 December 2017, must be interpreted as not precluding, in a public procurement procedure, a contracting authority from being able to impose, under the selection criteria relating to the technical and professional abilities of the economic operators, stricter requirements than the minimum requirements set by the national legislation, provided that such requirements are appropriate to ensure that a candidate or tenderer has the technical and professional abilities to perform the contract to be awarded, that they are related to the subject matter of the contract and that they are proportionate to it. 2.
Article 8(3) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests, read in conjunction with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013, laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, must be interpreted as meaning that, subject to the principle of proportionality, it does not preclude national authorities protecting the financial interests of the European Union from assessing the same facts in a public procurement procedure differently.
(1)
OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — IA v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Case C-231/21) (1) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Dublin system — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 29(2) — Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection — Six-month time limit for transfer — Possibility of extending that time limit up to a maximum of one year in the event of imprisonment — Definition of ‘imprisonment’ — Court-authorised non-voluntary committal of the asylum seeker to a hospital psychiatric department) (2022/C 207/08) Language of the case: German Referring court Verwaltungsgerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: IA Defendant: Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl