EN
C 198/32
Official Journal of the European Union
16.5.2022
Re: APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1835 of 30 October 2019 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2019 L 279, p. 98), in so far as it relates to certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1835 of 30 October 2019 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes a flat rate correction of 2 % on the Italian Republic relating to area aid granted in Italy in the amount of EUR 143 924 279,14 for the claim years 2015 and 2016 and a flat rate correction of 10 % in the amount of EUR 72 704,23 relating to sample/payment No 8 concerning the commune of Campoli Monte Taburno, pursuant to Measure 322, included in rural development measures for the claim years 2014, 2015 and 2016; 2.
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; 3.
Orders the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs.
(1)
OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — BSEF v Commission (Case T-113/20) (1) (Energy — Directive 2009/125/EC — Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays — Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 — Ban on halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays — Competence of the author of the act — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Equal treatment) (2022/C 198/44) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Bromine Science Environnemental Forum (BSEF) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and L. Haasbeek, acting as Agents) Re: Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for electronic displays pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1275/2008 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 642/2009 (OJ 2019 L 315, p. 241), in so far as it bans the use of halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays.
Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1.
Dismisses the action; 2.
Orders Bromine Science Environnemental Forum (BSEF) to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.