16.5.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 198/5
2.
Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that proceedings for the enforcement of competition law, in which, owing to the participation of the party concerned in the national leniency programme, only a declaration of the infringement of that law can be made, are liable to be covered by the non bis in idem principle.
(1)
OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — X, Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Case C-245/20) (1) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Competence of the supervisory authority — Article 55 (3) — Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity — Concept — Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data) (2022/C 198/06) Language of the case: Dutch Referring court Rechtbank Midden-Nederland
Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: X, Z Defendant: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Operative part of the judgment Article 55(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that a court makes temporarily available to journalists documents from court proceedings containing personal data in order to enable them better to report on the course of those proceedings falls within the exercise, by that court, of its ‘judicial capacity’, within the meaning of that provision.
(1)
OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG (Case C-433/20) (1) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 2 — Reproduction — Article 5(2)(b) — Private copying exception — Concept of ‘any medium’ — Servers owned by third parties made available to natural persons for private use — Fair compensation — National legislation that does not make the providers of cloud computing services subject to the private copying levy) (2022/C 198/07) Language of the case: German Referring court Oberlandesgericht Wien