Title: James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023
Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security

Summary:
Water Resources Development Act of 2022
This bill authorizes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to carry out activities concerning water resources development projects, water supply and wastewater infrastructure, flood control, navigation, or ecosystem restoration, such as shoreline restoration. In addition, it modifies the process used to deauthorize certain inactive water resources development projects.

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7776 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7776

  To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United 
 States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and 
               related resources, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2022

Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mrs. Napolitano, and 
 Mr. Rouzer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United 
 States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and 
               related resources, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2022''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 101. Federal breakwaters and jetties.
Sec. 102. Emergency response to natural disasters.
Sec. 103. Shoreline and riverine restoration.
Sec. 104. Tidal river, bay, and estuarine flood risk reduction.
Sec. 105. Removal of man-made obstruction to aquatic ecosystem 
                            restoration projects.
Sec. 106. National coastal mapping study.
Sec. 107. Public recreational amenities in ecosystem restoration 
                            projects.
Sec. 108. Preliminary analysis.
Sec. 109. Technical assistance.
Sec. 110. Corps of Engineers support for underserved communities; 
                            outreach.
Sec. 111. Project planning assistance.
Sec. 112. Managed aquifer recharge study and working group.
Sec. 113. Flood easement database.
Sec. 114. Assessment of Corps of Engineers levees.
Sec. 115. Technical assistance for levee inspections.
Sec. 116. Assessment of Corps of Engineers dams.
Sec. 117. National low-head dam inventory.
Sec. 118. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 119. Tribal liaison.
Sec. 120. Tribal assistance.
Sec. 121. Cost sharing provisions for the territories and Indian 
                            Tribes.
Sec. 122. Sense of Congress on COVID-19 impacts to coastal and inland 
                            navigation.
Sec. 123. Assessment of regional confined aquatic disposal facilities.
Sec. 124. Strategic plan on beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 125. Funding to review mitigation banking proposals from non-
                            Federal public entities.
Sec. 126. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 127. Reserve component training at water resources development 
                            projects.
Sec. 128. Payment of pay and allowances of certain officers from 
                            appropriation for improvements.
Sec. 129. Civil works research, development, testing, and evaluation.
Sec. 130. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 131. Washington Aqueduct.
                     TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS

Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies.
Sec. 202. Expedited completion.
Sec. 203. Expedited modifications of existing feasibility studies.
Sec. 204. Corps of Engineers reservoir sedimentation assessment.
Sec. 205. Assessment of impacts from changing operation and maintenance 
                            responsibilities.
Sec. 206. Report and recommendations on dredge capacity.
Sec. 207. Maintenance dredging data.
Sec. 208. Report to Congress on economic valuation of preservation of 
                            open space, recreational areas, and habitat 
                            associated with project lands.
Sec. 209. Disposition study on Salinas Dam and Reservoir, California.
Sec. 210. Excess lands report for Whittier Narrows Dam, California.
Sec. 211. Colebrook River Reservoir, Connecticut.
Sec. 212. Comprehensive central and southern Florida study.
Sec. 213. Report on South Florida ecosystem restoration plan 
                            implementation.
Sec. 214. Review of recreational hazards at Buford Dam, Lake Sidney 
                            Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 215. Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 216. Hydraulic evaluation of Upper Mississippi River and Illinois 
                            River.
Sec. 217. Rend Lake, Carlyle Lake, and Lake Shelbyville, Illinois.
Sec. 218. Disposition study on hydropower in the Willamette Valley, 
                            Oregon.
Sec. 219. Houston Ship Channel Expansion Channel Improvement Project, 
                            Texas.
Sec. 220. Sabine-Neches waterway navigation improvement project, Texas.
Sec. 221. Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Virginia.
Sec. 222. Coastal Virginia, Virginia.
Sec. 223. Western infrastructure study.
Sec. 224. Report on socially and economically disadvantaged small 
                            business concerns.
Sec. 225. Report on solar energy opportunities.
Sec. 226. Assessment of coastal flooding mitigation modeling and 
                            testing capacity.
Sec. 227. Report to Congress on easements related to water resources 
                            development projects.
Sec. 228. Assessment of forest, rangeland, and watershed restoration 
                            services on lands owned by the Corps of 
                            Engineers.
Sec. 229. Report on status of development of electronic system.
Sec. 230. GAO studies on mitigation.
Sec. 231. Study on waterborne statistics.
             TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects.
Sec. 302. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 303. Forecast-informed reservoir operations.
Sec. 304. Lakes program.
Sec. 305. Invasive species.
Sec. 306. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 307. Los Angeles County, California.
Sec. 308. Deauthorization of designated portions of the Los Angeles 
                            County Drainage Area, California.
Sec. 309. San Francisco Bay, California.
Sec. 310. Columbia River basin.
Sec. 311. Port Everglades, Florida.
Sec. 312. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force.
Sec. 313. Chicago shoreline protection.
Sec. 314. Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon 
                            Road, Will County, Illinois.
Sec. 315. Southeast Des Moines levee system, Iowa.
Sec. 316. Lower Mississippi River comprehensive management study.
Sec. 317. Lower Missouri River streambank erosion control evaluation 
                            and demonstration projects.
Sec. 318. Missouri River interception-rearing complexes.
Sec. 319. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, 
                            and Nebraska.
Sec. 320. Northern Missouri.
Sec. 321. Israel River, Lancaster, New Hampshire.
Sec. 322. Middle Rio Grande flood protection, Bernalillo to Belen, New 
                            Mexico.
Sec. 323. Southwestern Oregon.
Sec. 324. Wolf River Harbor, Tennessee.
Sec. 325. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, Texas.
Sec. 326. Water level management pilot project on the Upper Mississippi 
                            River and Illinois Waterway System.
Sec. 327. Upper Mississippi River protection.
Sec. 328. Treatment of certain benefits and costs.
Sec. 329. Debris removal.
Sec. 330. General reauthorizations.
Sec. 331. Conveyances.
Sec. 332. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 333. Additional assistance for critical projects.
                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

Sec. 401. Project authorizations.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 101. FEDERAL BREAKWATERS AND JETTIES.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out repair or maintenance activity of 
a Federal jetty or breakwater associated with an authorized navigation 
project, the Secretary shall, notwithstanding the authorized dimensions 
of the jetty or breakwater, ensure that such repair or maintenance 
activity is sufficient to meet the authorized purpose of such project, 
including ensuring that any harbor or inland harbor associated with the 
project is protected from projected changes in wave action or height 
(including changes that result from relative sea-level change over the 
useful life of the project).
    (b) Classification of Activity.--The Secretary may not classify any 
repair or maintenance activity of a Federal jetty or breakwater carried 
out under subsection (a) as major rehabilitation of such jetty or 
breakwater--
            (1) if the Secretary determines that--
                    (A) projected changes in wave action or height, 
                including changes that result from relative sea-level 
                change, will diminish the functionality of the jetty or 
                breakwater to meet the authorized purpose of the 
                project; and
                    (B) such repair or maintenance activity is 
                necessary to restore such functionality; or
            (2) if--
                    (A) the Secretary has not carried out regular and 
                routine Federal maintenance activity at the jetty or 
                breakwater; and
                    (B) the structural integrity of the jetty or 
                breakwater is degraded as a result of a lack of such 
                regular and routine Federal maintenance activity.

SEC. 102. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO NATURAL DISASTERS.

    Section 5(a)(1) of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
701n(a)(1)), is amended by striking ``in the repair and restoration of 
any federally authorized hurricane or shore protective structure'' and 
all that follows through ``non-Federal sponsor.'' and inserting ``in 
the repair and restoration of any federally authorized hurricane or 
shore protective structure or project damaged or destroyed by wind, 
wave, or water action of other than an ordinary nature to the pre-storm 
level of protection, to the design level of protection, or, 
notwithstanding the authorized dimensions of the structure or project, 
to a level sufficient to meet the authorized purpose of such structure 
or project, whichever provides greater protection, when, in the 
discretion of the Chief of Engineers, such repair and restoration is 
warranted for the adequate functioning of the structure or project for 
hurricane or shore protection, including to ensure the structure or 
project is functioning adequately to protect against projected changes 
in wave action or height or storm surge (including changes that result 
from relative sea-level change over the useful life of the structure or 
project), subject to the condition that the Chief of Engineers may 
include modifications to the structure or project to address major 
deficiencies or implement nonstructural alternatives to the repair or 
restoration of the structure if requested by the non-Federal 
sponsor.''.

SEC. 103. SHORELINE AND RIVERINE RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 212 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``flood mitigation 
        and riverine restoration program'' and inserting ``shoreline 
        and riverine protection and restoration'';
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``undertake a program for the 
                purpose of conducting'' and inserting ``carry out'';
                    (B) by striking ``to reduce flood hazards'' and 
                inserting ``to reduce flood and hurricane and storm 
                damage hazards (including erosion)''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``and shorelines'' after 
                ``rivers'';
            (3) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``In carrying out the 
                        program, the'' and inserting ``The'';
                            (ii) by inserting ``and hurricane and 
                        storm'' after ``flood''; and
                            (iii) by inserting ``erosion mitigation,'' 
                        after ``reduction,'';
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``flood damages'' 
                and inserting ``flood and hurricane and storm damages, 
                including the use of natural features and nature-based 
                features, as defined in section 1184(a) of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 
                2289a(a))''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (4)--
                            (i) by inserting ``and hurricane and 
                        storm'' after ``flood'';
                            (ii) by inserting ``, shoreline,'' after 
                        ``riverine''; and
                            (iii) by inserting ``and coastal barriers'' 
                        after ``floodplains'';
            (4) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in the paragraph heading, by striking 
                        ``flood control''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or 
                        hurricane and storm damage reduction'' after 
                        ``flood control''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting 
                        ``or hurricane and storm damage reduction'' 
                        after ``flood control''; and
                            (ii) by inserting ``or hurricane and storm 
                        damage reduction'' after ``flood control'';
            (5) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows:
    ``(d) Project Justification.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law or requirement for economic justification established under 
section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), the 
Secretary may implement a project under this section if the Secretary 
determines that the project--
            ``(1) will significantly reduce potential flood, hurricane 
        and storm, or erosion damages;
            ``(2) will improve the quality of the environment; and
            ``(3) is justified considering all costs and beneficial 
        outputs of the project.'';
            (6) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) in paragraph (32), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (33), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(34) City of Southport, North Carolina.''; and
            (7) by striking subsections (f) through (i) and inserting 
        the following:
    ``(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 269) is amended 
by striking the item relating to section 212 and inserting the 
following:

``Sec. 212. Shoreline and riverine protection and restoration.''.

SEC. 104. TIDAL RIVER, BAY, AND ESTUARINE FLOOD RISK REDUCTION.

    At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary is 
authorized, as part of an authorized feasibility study for a project 
for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, to investigate measures 
to reduce the risk of flooding associated with tidally influenced 
portions of rivers, bays, and estuaries that are hydrologically 
connected to the coastal water body and located within the geographic 
scope of the study.

SEC. 105. REMOVAL OF MAN-MADE OBSTRUCTION TO AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM 
              RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out an aquatic ecosystem restoration 
project, at the request of a non-Federal interest and with the consent 
of the owner of a man-made obstruction, the Secretary shall determine 
whether the removal of such obstruction from the aquatic environment 
within the geographic scope of the project is necessary to meet the 
aquatic ecosystem restoration goals of the project.
    (b) Removal Costs.--If the Secretary determines under subsection 
(a) that removal of an obstruction is necessary, the Secretary shall 
consider the removal of such obstruction to be a project feature and 
the cost of such removal shall be shared between the Secretary and non-
Federal interest as a construction cost.
    (c) Applicability.--The requirements of subsection (a) shall apply 
to any project for ecosystem restoration authorized on or after June 
10, 2014.

SEC. 106. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Director of the 
Engineer Research and Development Center, is authorized to carry out a 
study of coastal geographic land changes, with recurring national 
coastal mapping technology, along the coastal zone of the United States 
to support Corps of Engineers missions.
    (b) Study.--In carrying out the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall identify--
            (1) new or advanced geospatial information and remote 
        sensing tools for coastal mapping;
            (2) best practices for coastal change mapping; and
            (3) how to most effectively--
                    (A) collect and analyze such advanced geospatial 
                information;
                    (B) disseminate such geospatial information to 
                relevant offices of the Corps of Engineers, other 
                Federal agencies, States, Tribes, and local 
                governments; and
                    (C) make such geospatial information available to 
                other stakeholders.
    (c) Demonstration Project.--
            (1) Project area.--In carrying out the study under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall carry out a demonstration 
        project in the coastal region covering the North Carolina 
        coastal waters, connected bays, estuaries, rivers, streams, and 
        creeks, to their tidally influenced extent inland.
            (2) Scope.--In carrying out the demonstration project, the 
        Secretary shall--
                    (A) identify potential hazards, such as debris, 
                sedimentation, dredging effects, and flood areas;
                    (B) identify best practices described in subsection 
                (b)(2), including best practices relating to 
                geographical coverage and frequency of mapping;
                    (C) evaluate and demonstrate relevant mapping 
                technologies to identify which are the most effective 
                for regional mapping of the transitional areas between 
                the open coast and inland waters; and
                    (D) demonstrate remote sensing tools for coastal 
                mapping.
    (d) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with other Federal and State agencies that are 
responsible for authoritative data and academic institutions and other 
entities with relevant expertise.
    (e) Panel.--
            (1) Establishment.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall establish a panel of senior leaders from the 
        Corps of Engineers and other Federal agencies that are 
        stakeholders in the coastal mapping program carried out through 
        the Engineer Research and Development Center.
            (2) Duties.--The panel established under this subsection 
        shall--
                    (A) coordinate the collection of data under the 
                study carried out under this section;
                    (B) coordinate the use of geospatial information 
                and remote sensing tools, and the application of the 
                best practices identified under the study, by Federal 
                agencies; and
                    (C) identify technical topics and challenges that 
                require multiagency collaborative research and 
                development.
    (f) Use of Existing Information.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall consider any relevant information developed under 
section 516(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326b(g)).
    (g) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
that describes--
            (1) the results of the study carried out under this 
        section; and
            (2) any geographical areas recommended for additional 
        study.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 107. PUBLIC RECREATIONAL AMENITIES IN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 
              PROJECTS.

    At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary is 
authorized to study the incorporation of public recreational amenities, 
including facilities for hiking, biking, walking, and waterborne 
recreation, into a project for ecosystem restoration, including a 
project carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), if the incorporation of such 
amenities would be consistent with the ecosystem restoration purposes 
of the project.

SEC. 108. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) is amended by striking 
subsections (e) and (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(e) Preliminary Analysis.--
            ``(1) In general.--At the request of a non-Federal 
        interest, the Secretary shall, prior to executing a cost 
        sharing agreement for a feasibility study described in 
        subsection (a), carry out a preliminary analysis of the water 
        resources problem that is the subject of the feasibility study 
        in order to identify potential alternatives to address such 
        problem.
            ``(2) Considerations.--In carrying out a preliminary 
        analysis under this subsection, the Secretary shall include in 
        such analysis--
                    ``(A) a preliminary analysis of the Federal 
                interest, costs, benefits, and environmental impacts of 
                the project;
                    ``(B) an estimate of the costs of, and duration 
                for, preparing the feasibility study; and
                    ``(C) for a flood risk management or hurricane and 
                storm risk reduction project, at the request of the 
                non-Federal interest, the identification of any 
                opportunities to incorporate natural features or 
                nature-based features into the project.
            ``(3) Deadline.--The Secretary shall complete a preliminary 
        analysis carried out under this subsection by not later than 
        180 days after the date on which funds are made available to 
        the Secretary to carry out the preliminary analysis.
            ``(4) Cost share.--The cost of a preliminary analysis 
        carried out under this subsection--
                    ``(A) shall be at Federal expense; and
                    ``(B) shall not exceed $200,000.
            ``(5) Treatment.--
                    ``(A) Timing.--The period during which a 
                preliminary analysis is carried out under this 
                subsection shall not be included for the purposes of 
                the deadline to complete a final feasibility report 
                under subsection (a)(1).
                    ``(B) Cost.--The cost of a preliminary analysis 
                carried out under this subsection shall not be included 
                for the purposes of the maximum Federal cost under 
                subsection (a)(2).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 905(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)(2)) is amended by striking 
``a preliminary analysis'' and inserting ``an analysis''.

SEC. 109. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Planning Assistance to States.--Section 22 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``local government,'' after 
                ``State or group of States,''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``local government,'' after ``such 
                State, interest,'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``$15,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking ``The cost-share for assistance'' 
                and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Tribes and territories.--The cost-share for 
        assistance''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Economically disadvantaged communities.--
        Notwithstanding subsection (b)(1) and the limitation in section 
        1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as 
        applicable pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, the 
        Secretary is authorized to waive the collection of fees for any 
        local government to which assistance is provided under 
        subsection (a) that the Secretary determines is an economically 
        disadvantaged community, as defined by the Secretary under 
        section 160 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 
        U.S.C. 2201 note).''.
    (b) Watershed Planning and Technical Assistance.--In providing 
assistance under section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16) or pursuant to section 206 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), the Secretary shall, upon 
request, provide such assistance at a watershed scale.

SEC. 110. CORPS OF ENGINEERS SUPPORT FOR UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES; 
              OUTREACH.

    (a) In General.--It is the policy of the United States for the 
Corps of Engineers to strive to understand and accommodate and, in 
coordination with non-Federal interests, seek to address the water 
resources development needs of all communities in the United States, 
including Indian Tribes and urban and rural economically disadvantaged 
communities (as defined by the Secretary under section 160 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note)).
    (b) Outreach and Access.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop, support, and 
        implement public awareness, education, and regular outreach and 
        engagement efforts for potential non-Federal interests with 
        respect to the water resources development authorities of the 
        Secretary, with particular emphasis on--
                    (A) technical service programs, including the 
                authorities under--
                            (i) section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 
                        1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a);
                            (ii) section 22 of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16); 
                        and
                            (iii) section 203 of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269); and
                    (B) continuing authority programs, as such term is 
                defined in section 7001(c)(1)(D) of the Water Resources 
                Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d).
            (2) Implementation.--In carrying out this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall--
                    (A) develop and make publicly available (including 
                on a publicly available website), technical assistance 
                materials, guidance, and other information with respect 
                to the water resources development authorities of the 
                Secretary;
                    (B) establish and make publicly available 
                (including on a publicly available website), an 
                appropriate point of contact at each district and 
                division office of the Corps of Engineers for inquiries 
                from potential non-Federal interests relating to the 
                water resources development authorities of the 
                Secretary;
                    (C) conduct regular outreach and engagement, 
                including through hosting seminars and community 
                information sessions, with local elected officials, 
                community organizations, and previous and potential 
                non-Federal interests, on opportunities to address 
                local water resources challenges through the water 
                resources development authorities of the Secretary;
                    (D) issue guidance for, and provide technical 
                assistance through technical service programs to, non-
                Federal interests to assist such interests in pursuing 
                technical services and developing proposals for water 
                resources development projects; and
                    (E) provide, at the request of a non-Federal 
                interest, assistance with researching and identifying 
                existing project authorizations or authorities to 
                address local water resources challenges.
            (3) Prioritization.--In carrying out this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall prioritize awareness, education, and outreach 
        and engagement efforts for urban and rural economically 
        disadvantaged communities and Indian Tribes.

SEC. 111. PROJECT PLANNING ASSISTANCE.

    Section 118 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note)--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``publish'' 
                and inserting ``annually publish''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``select'' and 
                inserting ``, subject to the availability of 
                appropriations, annually select''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2), in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A), by striking ``projects'' and inserting 
        ``projects annually''.

SEC. 112. MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE STUDY AND WORKING GROUP.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall, in consultation with 
        applicable non-Federal interests, conduct a study at Federal 
        expense to determine the feasibility of carrying out managed 
        aquifer recharge projects to address drought, water resiliency, 
        and aquifer depletion.
            (2) Requirements.--In carrying out the study under this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) assess and identify opportunities to support 
                non-Federal interests, including Tribal communities, in 
                carrying out managed aquifer recharge projects;
                    (B) identify opportunities to carry out managed 
                aquifer recharge projects in areas that are 
                experiencing, or have recently experienced, prolonged 
                drought conditions, aquifer depletion, or water supply 
                scarcity; and
                    (C) assess preliminarily local hydrogeologic 
                conditions relevant to carrying out managed aquifer 
                recharge projects.
            (3) Coordination.--In carrying out the study under this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall coordinate, as appropriate, 
        with the heads of other Federal agencies, States, regional 
        governmental agencies, units of local government, experts in 
        managed aquifer recharge, and Tribes.
    (b) Working Group.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment, the Secretary shall establish a managed aquifer 
        recharge working group within the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Composition.--In establishing the working group under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that members of the 
        working group have expertise working with--
                    (A) projects providing water supply storage to meet 
                regional water supply demand, particularly in regions 
                experiencing drought;
                    (B) protection of groundwater supply, including 
                promoting infiltration and increased recharge in 
                groundwater basins, and groundwater quality;
                    (C) aquifer storage, recharge, and recovery wells;
                    (D) dams that provide recharge enhancement 
                benefits;
                    (E) groundwater hydrology; and
                    (F) conjunctive use water systems.
            (3) Duties.--The working group established under this 
        subsection shall--
                    (A) advise and assist in the development and 
                execution of the feasibility study under subsection 
                (a);
                    (B) coordinate Corps of Engineers expertise on 
                managed aquifer recharge;
                    (C) share Corps of Engineers-wide communications on 
                the successes and failures, questions and answers, and 
                conclusions and recommendations with respect to managed 
                aquifer recharge projects;
                    (D) assist Corps of Engineers offices at the 
                headquarter, division, and district levels with raising 
                awareness to non-Federal interests on the potential 
                benefits of carrying out managed aquifer recharge 
                projects; and
                    (E) develop the report required to be submitted 
                under subsection (c).
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on 
managed aquifer recharge that includes--
            (1) the results of the study conducted under subsection 
        (a), including data collected under such study and any 
        recommendations on managed aquifer recharge opportunities for 
        non-Federal interests, States, local governments, and Tribes;
            (2) a status update on the implementation of the 
        recommendations included in the report of the U.S. Army Corps 
        of Engineers Institute for Water Resources entitled ``Managed 
        Aquifer Recharge and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Water 
        Security through Resilience'', published in April, 2020 (2020-
        WP-01); and
            (3) an evaluation of the benefits of creating a new or 
        modifying an existing planning center of expertise for managed 
        aquifer recharge, and identify potential locations for such a 
        center of expertise, if feasible.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Managed aquifer recharge.--The term ``managed aquifer 
        recharge'' means the intentional banking and treatment of water 
        in aquifers for storage and future use.
            (2) Managed aquifer recharge project.--The term ``managed 
        aquifer recharge project'' means a project to incorporate 
        managed aquifer recharge features into a water resources 
        development project.

SEC. 113. FLOOD EASEMENT DATABASE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and maintain a 
database containing an inventory of--
            (1) all floodplain and flowage easements held by the Corps 
        of Engineers; and
            (2) other federally held floodplain and flowage easements 
        with respect to which other Federal agencies submit information 
        to the Secretary.
    (b) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the database 
established under subsection (a)--
            (1) with respect to each floodplain and flowage easement 
        included in the database--
                    (A) the location of the land subject to the 
                easement (including geographic information system 
                information);
                    (B) a brief description of such land, including the 
                acreage and ecosystem type covered by the easement;
                    (C) the Federal agency that holds the easement;
                    (D) any conditions of the easement, including--
                            (i) the amount of flooding, timing of 
                        flooding, or area of flooding covered by the 
                        easement;
                            (ii) any conservation requirements; and
                            (iii) any restoration requirements;
                    (E) the date on which the easement was acquired; 
                and
                    (F) whether the easement is permanent or temporary, 
                and if the easement is temporary, the date on which the 
                easement expires; and
            (2) any other information that the Secretary determines 
        appropriate.
    (c) Availability of Information.--The Secretary shall make the full 
database established under subsection (a) available to the public in 
searchable form, including on the internet.
    (d) Other Federal Easements.--The Secretary shall request 
information from other Federal agencies to incorporate other federally 
held floodplain and flowage easements into the database established 
under subsection (a).

SEC. 114. ASSESSMENT OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS LEVEES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall, at Federal expense, 
periodically conduct an assessment of levees constructed by the 
Secretary or for which the Secretary has financial or operational 
responsibility, to identify opportunities for the modification 
(including realignment or incorporation of natural and nature-based 
features) of levee systems to--
            (1) increase the flood risk reduction benefits of such 
        systems;
            (2) achieve greater flood resiliency; and
            (3) restore hydrological and ecological connections with 
        adjacent floodplains.
    (b) Assessment.--
            (1) Considerations.--In conducting an assessment under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider and identify, with 
        respect to each levee--
                    (A) an estimate of the number of structures and 
                population at risk and protected by the levee that 
                would be adversely impacted if the levee fails or water 
                levels exceed the height of the levee (which may be the 
                applicable estimate included in the levee database 
                established under section 9004 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303), if 
                available);
                    (B) the number of times the non-Federal interest 
                has received emergency flood-fighting or repair 
                assistance under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 
                1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), for the levee, and the total 
                expenditures on post-flood repairs over the life of the 
                levee;
                    (C) the functionality of the levee with regard to 
                higher precipitation levels, including due to changing 
                climatic conditions and extreme weather events; and
                    (D) the potential costs and benefits (including 
                environmental benefits) from modifying the applicable 
                levee system to restore connections with adjacent 
                floodplains.
            (2) Prioritization.--In conducting an assessment under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall prioritize levees--
                    (A) associated with an area that has been subject 
                to flooding in two or more events in any 10-year 
                period; and
                    (B) for which the non-Federal interest has received 
                emergency flood-fighting or repair assistance under 
                section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
                701n), with respect to such flood events.
            (3) Coordination.--In conducting an assessment under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall coordinate with any non-
        Federal interest that has financial or operational 
        responsibility for a levee being assessed.
    (c) Flood Plain Management Services.--In conducting an assessment 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider information on 
floods and flood damages compiled under section 206 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a).
    (d) Report to Congress.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
        enactment of this section, and periodically thereafter, the 
        Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
        report on the results of the assessment conducted under 
        subsection (a).
            (2) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in each report 
        submitted under paragraph (1)--
                    (A) identification of any levee for which the 
                Secretary has conducted an assessment under subsection 
                (a);
                    (B) a description of any opportunities identified 
                under such subsection for the modification (including 
                realignment or incorporation of natural and nature-
                based features) of a levee system, including the 
                potential benefits of such modification for the 
                purposes identified under such subsection; and
                    (C) a summary of the information considered and 
                identified under subsection (b)(1).
    (e) Incorporation of Information.--The Secretary shall include in 
the levee database established under section 9004 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303) the information 
included in each report submitted under subsection (d).
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 115. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR LEVEE INSPECTIONS.

    In any instance where the Secretary requires, as a condition of 
eligibility for Federal assistance under section 5 of the Act of August 
18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), that a non-Federal sponsor of a flood 
control project constructed by the Secretary undertake an electronic 
inspection of the portion of such project that is under normal 
circumstances submerged, the Secretary shall provide credit or 
reimbursement to the non-Federal sponsor of the cost of carrying out 
such inspection against the non-Federal share of the cost of repair or 
restoration of such project carried out under such section.

SEC. 116. ASSESSMENT OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS DAMS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of dams 
constructed by the Secretary or for which the Secretary has financial 
or operational responsibility, to identify--
            (1) any dam that is meeting its authorized purposes and 
        that may be a priority for rehabilitation, environmental 
        performance enhancements, or retrofits to add or replace power 
        generation (at a powered or non-powered dam), and the 
        recommendations of the Secretary for addressing each such dam; 
        and
            (2) any dam that does not meet its authorized purposes, has 
        been abandoned or inadequately maintained, or has otherwise 
        reached the end of its useful life, and the recommendations of 
        the Secretary for addressing each such dam, which may include a 
        recommendation to remove the dam.
    (b) National Dam Inventory and Assessment.--The Secretary shall 
include in the inventory of dams required by section 6 of the National 
Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467d) any information and 
recommendations resulting from the assessment of dams conducted under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on 
the results of the assessment of dams conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 117. NATIONAL LOW-HEAD DAM INVENTORY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the heads of 
appropriate Federal and State agencies, shall--
            (1) establish and maintain a database containing an 
        inventory of low-head dams in the United States that includes--
                    (A) the location (including global information 
                system information), ownership, description, current 
                use condition, height, and length of each low-head dam;
                    (B) any information on public safety conditions, 
                including signage, at each low-head dam;
                    (C) public safety information on the dangers of 
                low-head dams; and
                    (D) any other relevant information concerning low-
                head dams; and
            (2) include in the inventory of dams required by section 6 
        of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467d) the 
        information described in paragraph (1).
    (b) Inclusion of Information.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall include in the database information described in 
subsection (a)(1) that is provided to the Secretary by Federal and 
State agencies pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Public Availability.--The Secretary shall make the database 
established under subsection (a) publicly available, including on a 
publicly available website.
    (d) Low-Head Dam Defined.--In this section, the term ``low-head 
dam'' means a man-made structure, built in a river or stream channel, 
that is designed and built such that water flows continuously over all, 
or nearly all, of the crest from bank to bank.

SEC. 118. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    Section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2269) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (B), by striking 
                        ``and'' at the end;
                            (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                        subparagraph (D); and
                            (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (B) 
                        the following:
                    ``(C) technical assistance to an Indian tribe, 
                including--
                            ``(i) assistance for planning to ameliorate 
                        flood hazards, to avoid repetitive flooding 
                        impacts, to anticipate, prepare, and adapt to 
                        changing climatic conditions and extreme 
                        weather events, and to withstand, respond to, 
                        and recover rapidly from disruption due to 
                        flood hazards; and
                            ``(ii) the provision of, and integration 
                        into planning of, hydrologic, economic, and 
                        environmental data and analyses; and''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ``$18,500,000'' 
                each place it appears and inserting ``$23,500,000'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Technical assistance.--The Federal share of the cost 
        of activities described in subsection (b)(2)(C) shall be 100 
        percent.''; and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking ``2024'' and inserting 
        ``2026''.

SEC. 119. TRIBAL LIAISON.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, for each Corps of Engineers district that contains a 
Tribal community, the Secretary shall establish a permanent position of 
Tribal Liaison to--
            (1) serve as a direct line of communication between the 
        Secretary and the applicable Tribal communities; and
            (2) ensure consistency in government-to-government 
        relations.
    (b) Duties.--Each Tribal Liaison shall make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding, and be responsible for--
            (1) removing barriers to access to, and participation in, 
        Corps of Engineers programs for Tribal communities, including 
        by improving implementation of section 103(m) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m));
            (2) improving outreach to, and engagement with, Tribal 
        communities about relevant Corps of Engineers programs and 
        services;
            (3) identifying and engaging with Tribal communities 
        suffering from water resources challenges;
            (4) improving, expanding, and facilitating government-to-
        government consultation between Tribal communities and the 
        Corps of Engineers;
            (5) coordinating and implementing all relevant Tribal 
        consultation policies and associated guidelines, including the 
        requirements of section 112 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2356);
            (6) training and tools to facilitate the ability of Corps 
        of Engineers staff to effectively engage with Tribal 
        communities in a culturally competent manner, especially in 
        regards to lands of ancestral, historic, or cultural 
        significance to a Tribal community, including burial sites; and
            (7) such other issues identified by the Secretary.
    (c) Uniformity.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall finalize guidelines for--
            (1) the duties of Tribal Liaisons under subsection (b); and
            (2) required qualifications for Tribal Liaisons, including 
        experience and expertise relating to Tribal communities and 
        water resource issues, and the ability to carry out such 
        duties.
    (d) Funding.--Funding for the position of Tribal Liaison shall be 
allocated from the budget line item provided for the expenses necessary 
for the supervision and general administration of the civil works 
program, and filling the position shall not be dependent on any 
increase in this budget line item.
    (e) Tribal Community Defined.--In this section, the term ``Tribal 
community'' means a community of people who are recognized and defined 
under Federal law as indigenous people of the United States.

SEC. 120. TRIBAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Bonneville dam.--The term ``Bonneville Dam'' means the 
        Bonneville Dam, Columbia River, Oregon, authorized by the first 
        section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1038), and the 
        first section and section 2(a) of the Act of August 20, 1937 
        (16 U.S.C. 832, 832(a)).
            (2) Dalles dam.--The term ``Dalles Dam'' means the Dalles 
        Dam, Columbia River, Washington and Oregon, authorized by 
        section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179).
            (3) John day dam.--The term ``John Day Dam'' means the John 
        Day Dam, Columbia River, Washington and Oregon, authorized by 
        section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179).
            (4) Village development plan.--The term ``village 
        development plan'' means the village development plan required 
        by section 1133(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        2018 (132 Stat. 3782).
    (b) Clarification of Existing Authority.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        heads of relevant Federal agencies, the Confederated Tribes of 
        the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes 
        and Bands of the Yakama Nation, the Nez Perce Tribe, and the 
        Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, shall 
        revise and carry out the village development plan for the 
        Dalles Dam to provide replacement villages for each Indian 
        village submerged as a result of the construction of the 
        Bonneville Dam and the John Day Dam.
            (2) Examination.--Before revising and carrying out the 
        village development plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
        shall conduct an examination and assessment of the extent to 
        which Indian villages, housing sites, and related structures 
        were displaced by the construction of the Bonneville Dam and 
        the John Day Dam.
            (3) Requirements.--In revising the village development plan 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall include, at a 
        minimum--
                    (A) an evaluation of sites on both sides of the 
                Columbia River;
                    (B) an assessment of suitable private, State, and 
                Federal lands; and
                    (C) an estimated cost and tentative schedule for 
                the construction of each replacement village.
    (c) Provision of Assistance on Federal Land.--In carrying out 
subsection (b)(1), the Secretary may construct housing or provide 
related assistance on land owned by the United States.
    (d) Acquisition and Disposal of Land.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out subsection (b)(1), the 
        Secretary may acquire land or interests in land for the purpose 
        of providing housing and related assistance.
            (2) Advance acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire land or 
        interests in land under paragraph (1) before completing all 
        required documentation and receiving all required clearances 
        for the construction of housing or related improvements on the 
        land.
            (3) Disposal of unsuitable land.--In the event the 
        Secretary determines that land or an interest in land acquired 
        by the Secretary under paragraph (2) is unsuitable for the 
        purpose for which it was acquired, the Secretary is authorized 
        to dispose of the land or interest in land by sale and credit 
        the proceeds to the appropriation, fund, or account used to 
        purchase the land or interest in land.
    (e) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1178(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1675; 132 Stat. 3781) is repealed.

SEC. 121. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR THE TERRITORIES AND INDIAN 
              TRIBES.

    Section 1156(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) for any organization that--
                    ``(A) is composed primarily of people who are--
                            ``(i) recognized and defined under Federal 
                        law as indigenous people of the United States; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) from a specific community; and
                    ``(B) assists in the social, cultural, and 
                educational development of such people in that 
                community.''.

SEC. 122. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COVID-19 IMPACTS TO COASTAL AND INLAND 
              NAVIGATION.

    It is the sense of Congress that, for fiscal years 2023 and 2024, 
the Secretary should, to the maximum extent practicable, seek to 
maintain the eligibility of a donor port, energy transfer port, or 
medium-sized donor port, as defined in section 2106(a) of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c(a)), that 
received funding under section 2106 of such Act in fiscal year 2020, 
but that the Secretary determines would no longer be eligible for such 
funding as a result of a demonstrable impact on the calculations 
required by the definitions of a donor port, energy transfer port, or 
medium-sized donor port contained in such section due to a reduction in 
domestic cargo shipments related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

SEC. 123. ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL CONFINED AQUATIC DISPOSAL FACILITIES.

    (a) Authority.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct assessments 
of the availability of confined aquatic disposal facilities for the 
disposal of contaminated dredged material.
    (b) Information and Comment.--In conducting an assessment under 
this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) solicit information from stakeholders on potential 
        projects that may require disposal of contaminated sediments in 
        a confined aquatic disposal facility;
            (2) solicit information from the applicable division of the 
        Corps of Engineers on the need for confined aquatic disposal 
        facilities; and
            (3) provide an opportunity for public comment.
    (c) North Atlantic Division Region Assessment.--In carrying out 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall prioritize conducting an assessment 
of the availability of confined aquatic disposal facilities in the 
North Atlantic Division region for the disposal of contaminated dredged 
material in such region.
    (d) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on 
the results of any assessments conducted under this section, including 
any recommendations of the Secretary for the construction of new 
confined aquatic disposal facilities or expanded capacity for confined 
aquatic disposal facilities.
    (e) Definition.--In this section, the term ``North Atlantic 
Division region'' means the area located within the boundaries of the 
North Atlantic Division of the Corps of Engineers.

SEC. 124. STRATEGIC PLAN ON BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
strategic plan that identifies opportunities and challenges relating to 
furthering the policy of the United States to maximize the beneficial 
use of suitable dredged material obtained from the construction or 
operation and maintenance of water resources development projects, as 
described in section 125(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2326g).
    (b) Consultation.--In developing the strategic plan under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with relevant Federal agencies involved in the 
        beneficial use of dredged material;
            (2) solicit and consider input from State and local 
        governments and Indian Tribes, while seeking to ensure a 
        geographic diversity of input from the various Corps of 
        Engineers divisions; and
            (3) consider input received from other stakeholders 
        involved in beneficial use of dredged material.
    (c) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in the strategic plan 
developed under subsection (a)--
            (1) identification of any specific barriers and conflicts 
        that the Secretary determines impede the maximization of 
        beneficial use of dredged material at the Federal, State, and 
        local level, and any recommendations of the Secretary to 
        address such barriers and conflicts; and
            (2) identification of specific measures to improve 
        interagency and Federal, State, local, and Tribal 
        communications and coordination to improve implementation of 
        section 125(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 
        (33 U.S.C. 2326g).

SEC. 125. FUNDING TO REVIEW MITIGATION BANKING PROPOSALS FROM NON-
              FEDERAL PUBLIC ENTITIES.

    Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2352) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``and review 
        proposals'' after ``permits'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f) and 
        inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Funding To Review Mitigation Bank Proposals.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the terms 
        `mitigation bank' and `mitigation bank instrument' have the 
        meanings given those terms in section 230.91 of title 40, Code 
        of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).
            ``(2) Proposal review.--The Secretary, after public notice, 
        may accept and expend funds contributed by a non-Federal public 
        entity to expedite the review of a proposal for a mitigation 
        bank for which the non-Federal public entity is the sponsor, 
        without regard to whether the entity plans to sell a portion of 
        the credits generated by a mitigation bank instrument of the 
        entity to other public or private entities, if the entity 
        enters into an agreement with the Secretary that requires the 
        entity to use for a public purpose any funds obtained from the 
        sale of such credits.
            ``(3) Effect on other entities.--To the maximum extent 
        practicable, the Secretary shall ensure that expediting the 
        review of a proposal for a mitigation bank through the use of 
        funds accepted and expended under this subsection does not 
        adversely affect the timeline for review (in the Corps of 
        Engineers district in which the mitigation bank is to be 
        located) of such proposals of other entities that have not 
        contributed funds under this subsection.
            ``(4) Effect on review.--In carrying out this subsection, 
        the Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds accepted under 
        paragraph (1) will not impact impartial decision making with 
        respect to proposals for mitigation banks, either substantively 
        or procedurally.
            ``(5) Public availability.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
                all final decisions regarding proposals for mitigation 
                banks carried out using funds authorized under this 
                subsection are made available to the public in a common 
                format, including on the internet, and in a manner that 
                distinguishes final decisions under this subsection 
                from other final actions of the Secretary.
                    ``(B) Decision document.--The Secretary shall--
                            ``(i) use a standard decision document for 
                        reviewing all proposals using funds accepted 
                        under this subsection; and
                            ``(ii) make the standard decision document, 
                        along with all final decisions regarding 
                        proposals for mitigation banks, available to 
                        the public, including on the internet.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (f), as so 
        redesignated--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon; and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (D) and inserting after subparagraph (B) 
                the following:
                    ``(C) a comprehensive list of the proposals for 
                mitigation banks reviewed and approved using funds 
                accepted under subsection (e) during the previous 
                fiscal year; and''.

SEC. 126. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, other Federal and 
State agencies, and the applicable non-Federal interest, shall 
coordinate efforts to remove or remediate contaminated sediments 
associated with the following water resources development projects:
            (1) The project for ecosystem restoration, South Fork of 
        the South Branch of the Chicago River, Bubbly Creek, Illinois, 
        authorized by section 401(5) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2740).
            (2) The project for ecosystem restoration and recreation, 
        Willamette River, Oregon, authorized by section 1401(7) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1714).
            (3) The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mahoning 
        River, Ohio, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (4) The project for navigation, South Branch of the Chicago 
        River, Cook County, Illinois, in the vicinity of Collateral 
        Channel.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall jointly submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
report on efforts to remove or remediate contaminated sediments 
associated with the projects identified in subsection (a), including, 
if applicable, any specific recommendations for actions or agreements 
necessary to undertake such work.

SEC. 127. RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT 
              PROJECTS.

    In carrying out military training activities or otherwise 
fulfilling military training requirements, units or members of a 
reserve component of the Armed Forces may perform services and furnish 
supplies in support of a water resources development project or program 
of the Corps of Engineers without reimbursement.

SEC. 128. PAYMENT OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CERTAIN OFFICERS FROM 
              APPROPRIATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS.

    Section 36 of the Act of August 10, 1956 (33 U.S.C. 583a), is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Regular officers of the Corps of 
        Engineers of the Army, and reserve officers of the Army who are 
        assigned to the Corps of Engineers,'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) In General.--The personnel described in subsection (b)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Personnel Described.--The personnel referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:
            ``(1) Regular officers of the Corps of Engineers of the 
        Army.
            ``(2) The following members of the Army who are assigned to 
        the Corps of Engineers:
                    ``(A) Reserve component officers.
                    ``(B) Warrant officers (whether regular or reserve 
                component).
                    ``(C) Enlisted members (whether regular or reserve 
                component).''.

SEC. 129. CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND EVALUATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out basic, 
applied, and advanced research needs as required to aid in the 
planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of water 
resources development projects and to support the missions and 
authorities of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Demonstration Projects.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary is authorized to test and apply technology, tools, 
techniques, and materials developed pursuant to such subsection at 
authorized water resources development projects, in consultation with 
the non-Federal interests for such projects.
    (c) Other Transactional Authority.--
            (1) Authority.--In carrying out subsection (a), and 
        pursuant to the authority under section 4022 of title 10, 
        United States Code, the Secretary is authorized to enter into a 
        transaction to carry out prototype projects to support basic, 
        applied, and advanced research needs that are directly relevant 
        to the civil works missions and authorities of the Corps of 
        Engineers.
            (2) Notification.--Not later than 30 days before the 
        Secretary enters into a transaction under paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of--
                    (A) the dollar amount of the transaction; and
                    (B) the entity carrying out the prototype project 
                that is the subject of the transaction.
            (3) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report describing the use of the 
        authority under this subsection.
            (4) Termination of authority.--The authority provided under 
        this subsection shall terminate 5 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
    (d) Coordination and Consultation.--In carrying out this section, 
the Secretary may coordinate and consult with Federal agencies, State 
and local agencies, Indian Tribes, universities, consortiums, councils, 
and other relevant entities that will aid in the planning, design, 
construction, operation, and maintenance of water resources development 
projects.
    (e) Establishment of Account.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall establish a 
separate appropriations account for administering funds made available 
to carry out this section.
    (f) Sense of Congress on Focus Areas.--It is the sense of Congress 
that the Secretary should prioritize using amounts made available to 
carry out this section for the research, development, testing, and 
evaluation of technology, tools, techniques, and materials that will--
            (1) advance the use of natural features and nature-based 
        features, as defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a));
            (2) improve the reliability and accuracy of technologies 
        related to water supply;
            (3) improve the management of reservoirs owned and operated 
        by the Corps of Engineers; and
            (4) lead to future cost savings and advance project 
        delivery timelines.

SEC. 130. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    Notwithstanding section 4141 of title 10, United States Code, the 
Secretary may provide assistance through contracts, cooperative 
agreements, and grants to--
            (1) the University of Missouri to conduct economic analyses 
        and other academic research to improve water management, 
        enhance flood resiliency, and preserve water resources for the 
        State of Missouri, the Lower Missouri River Basin, and Upper 
        Mississippi River Basin; and
            (2) Oregon State University to conduct a study on the 
        associated impacts of wildfire on water resource ecology, water 
        supply, quality, and distribution in the Willamette River Basin 
        and to develop a water resource assessment and management 
        platform for the Willamette River Basin.

SEC. 131. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT.

    (a) Capital Improvement Authority.--The Secretary may carry out 
capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct that the Secretary 
determines necessary for the safe, effective, and efficient operation 
of the Aqueduct.
    (b) Borrowing Authority.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraphs (2) through (4) and 
        subsection (c), the Secretary is authorized to borrow from the 
        Treasury of the United States such amounts as are sufficient to 
        cover any obligations that will be incurred by the Secretary in 
        carrying out capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct 
        under subsection (a).
            (2) Limitation.--The amount borrowed by the Secretary under 
        paragraph (1) may not exceed $40,000,000 in any fiscal year.
            (3) Agreement.--Amounts borrowed under paragraph (1) may 
        only be used to carry out capital improvements with respect to 
        which the Secretary has entered into an agreement with each 
        customer.
            (4) Terms of borrowing.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), the 
                Secretary of the Treasury shall provide amounts 
                borrowed under paragraph (1) under such terms and 
                conditions as the Secretary of Treasury determines to 
                be necessary and in the public interest.
                    (B) Term.--The term of any loan made under 
                paragraph (1) shall be for a period of not less than 20 
                years.
                    (C) Prepayment.--There shall be no penalty for the 
                prepayment of any amounts borrowed under paragraph (1).
    (c) Contracts With Customers.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may not borrow any amounts 
        under subsection (b) until such time as the Secretary has 
        entered into a contract with each customer under which the 
        customer commits to pay a pro rata share (based on water 
        purchase) of the principal and interest owed to the Secretary 
        of the Treasury under subsection (b).
            (2) Prepayment.--Any customer may pay, in advance, the pro 
        rata share of the principal and interest owed by the customer, 
        or any portion thereof, without penalty.
            (3) Risk of default.--A customer that enters into a 
        contract under this subsection shall, as a condition of the 
        contract, commit to pay any additional amount necessary to 
        fully offset the risk of default on the contract.
            (4) Obligations.--Each contract entered into under 
        paragraph (1) shall include such terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary of the Treasury may require so that the total value 
        to the Government of all contracts entered into under paragraph 
        (1) is estimated to be equal to the obligations of the 
        Secretary for carrying out capital improvements for the 
        Washington Aqueduct.
            (5) Other conditions.--Each contract entered into under 
        paragraph (1) shall--
                    (A) include other conditions consistent with this 
                section that the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
                Treasury determine to be appropriate; and
                    (B) provide the United States priority in regard to 
                income from fees assessed to operate and maintain the 
                Washington Aqueduct.
    (d) Customer Defined.--In this section, the term ``customer'' 
means--
            (1) the District of Columbia;
            (2) Arlington County, Virginia; and
            (3) Fairfax County, Virginia.

                     TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    (a) New Projects.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct a 
feasibility study for the following projects for water resources 
development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the 
reports titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or 
otherwise reviewed by Congress:
            (1) Dudleyville, arizona.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Dudleyville, Arizona.
            (2) Conn creek dam, california.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Conn Creek Dam, California.
            (3) City of huntington beach, california.--Project for 
        hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, including sea level 
        rise, and shoreline stabilization, City of Huntington Beach, 
        California.
            (4) Napa river, california.--Project for navigation, 
        Federal Channel of Napa River, California.
            (5) Petaluma river wetlands, california.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration, City of Petaluma, California.
            (6) City of rialto, california.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration and flood risk management, City of Rialto and 
        vicinity, California.
            (7) North richmond, california.--Project for hurricane and 
        storm damage risk reduction, including sea level rise, and 
        ecosystem restoration, North Richmond, California.
            (8) Upper yuba river basin, california.--Project for flood 
        risk management, Upper Yuba River, California.
            (9) Stratford, connecticut.--Project for hurricane and 
        storm damage risk reduction and flood risk management, 
        Stratford, Connecticut.
            (10) Woodbridge, connecticut.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Woodbridge, Connecticut.
            (11) Federal triangle area, washington, district of 
        columbia.--Project for flood risk management, Federal Triangle 
        Area, Washington, District of Columbia, including construction 
        of improvements to interior drainage.
            (12) Potomac and anacostia rivers, washington, district of 
        columbia.--Project for recreational access, including enclosed 
        swimming areas, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, District of 
        Columbia.
            (13) Washington metropolitan area, washington, district of 
        columbia, maryland, and virginia.--Project for water supply, 
        including the identification of a secondary water source and 
        additional water storage capability for the Washington 
        Metropolitan Area, Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland, 
        and Virginia.
            (14) Duval county, florida.--Project for periodic beach 
        nourishment for the project for hurricane and storm damage risk 
        reduction, Duval County shoreline, Florida, authorized by the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092; 90 Stat. 2933), 
        for an additional period of 50 years, Duval County shoreline, 
        Florida.
            (15) Town of longboat key, florida.--Project for whole 
        island hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Town of 
        Longboat Key, Florida.
            (16) Lake runnymede, florida.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Lake Runnymede, Florida.
            (17) Tampa back bay, florida.--Project for flood risk 
        management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        including the use of natural features and nature-based features 
        for protection and recreation, Tampa Back Bay, Florida.
            (18) Port tampa bay and mckay bay, florida.--Project for 
        hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Port Tampa Bay, 
        Florida, including McKay Bay.
            (19) Lake tohopekaliga, florida.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration and flood risk management, Lake Tohopekaliga, 
        Florida.
            (20) City of albany, georgia.--Project for flood risk 
        management, City of Albany, Georgia.
            (21) City of east point, georgia.--Project for flood risk 
        management, City of East Point, Georgia.
            (22) Flint river basin headwaters, clayton county, 
        georgia.--Project for flood risk management and ecosystem 
        restoration, Flint River Basin Headwaters, Clayton County, 
        Georgia.
            (23) Tybee island, georgia.--Project for periodic beach 
        nourishment for the project for hurricane and storm damage risk 
        reduction, Tybee Island, Georgia, authorized by section 201 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5), for an 
        additional period of 50 years, Tybee Island, Georgia.
            (24) Waikiki, hawaii.--Project for ecosystem restoration 
        and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Waikiki, Hawaii.
            (25) Assawompset pond complex, massachusetts.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration, flood risk management, and water supply, 
        Assawompset Pond Complex, Massachusetts.
            (26) Charles river, massachusetts.--Project for flood risk 
        management and ecosystem restoration, Charles River, 
        Massachusetts.
            (27) Chelsea creek and mill creek, massachusetts.--Project 
        for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration, including 
        bank stabilization, City of Chelsea, Massachusetts.
            (28) Connecticut river streambank erosion, massachusetts, 
        vermont, and new hampshire.--Project for streambank erosion, 
        Connecticut River, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire.
            (29) Deerfield river, massachusetts.--Project for flood 
        risk management and ecosystem restoration, Deerfield River, 
        Massachusetts.
            (30) Town of north attleborough, massachusetts.--Project 
        for ecosystem restoration and flood risk management between 
        Whiting's and Falls ponds, North Attleborough, Massachusetts.
            (31) Town of hull, massachusetts.--Project for flood risk 
        management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Hull, 
        Massachusetts.
            (32) City of revere, massachusetts.--Project for flood risk 
        management and marsh ecosystem restoration, City of Revere, 
        Massachusetts.
            (33) Lower east side, detroit, michigan.--Project for flood 
        risk management, Lower East Side Detroit, Michigan.
            (34) Elijah root dam, michigan.--Project for dam removal, 
        by carrying out a disposition study under section 216 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), Elijah Root Dam, 
        Michigan.
            (35) Grosse pointe shores and grosse pointe farms, 
        michigan.--Project for ecosystem restoration and flood risk 
        management, Grosse Pointe Shores and Grosse Pointe Farms, 
        Michigan.
            (36) Southeast michigan, michigan.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties, Michigan.
            (37) Tittabawassee river watershed, michigan.--Project for 
        flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and related 
        conservation benefits, Tittabawassee River, Chippewa River, 
        Pine River, and Tobacco River, Midland County, Michigan.
            (38) Southwest mississippi, mississippi.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration and flood risk management, Wilkinson, 
        Adams, Warren, Claiborne, and Jefferson counties, Mississippi.
            (39) Camden and gloucester counties, new jersey.--Project 
        for tidal and riverine flood risk management, Camden and 
        Gloucester counties, New Jersey.
            (40) Edgewater, new jersey.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Edgewater, New Jersey.
            (41) Maurice river, new jersey.--Project for navigation and 
        for beneficial use of dredged materials for hurricane and storm 
        damage risk reduction and ecosystem restoration, Maurice River, 
        New Jersey.
            (42) Northern new jersey inland flooding, new jersey.--
        Project for inland flood risk management in Hudson, Essex, 
        Union, Bergen, Hunterdon, Morris, Somerset, Warren, Passaic, 
        and Sussex counties, New Jersey.
            (43) Riser ditch, new jersey.--Project for flood risk 
        management, including channel improvements, and other related 
        water resource needs related to Riser Ditch in the communities 
        of South Hackensack, Hasbrouck Heights, Little Ferry, Teterboro 
        and Moonachie, New Jersey.
            (44) Rockaway river, new jersey.--Project for flood risk 
        management and ecosystem restoration, including bank 
        stabilization, Rockaway River, New Jersey.
            (45) Tenakill brook, new jersey.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Tenakill Brook, New Jersey.
            (46) Verona, cedar grove, and west caldwell, new jersey.--
        Project for flood risk management along the Peckman River Basin 
        in the townships of Verona (and surrounding area), Cedar Grove, 
        and West Caldwell, New Jersey.
            (47) Whippany river watershed, new jersey.--Project for 
        flood risk management, Morris County, New Jersey.
            (48) Lake farmington dam, new mexico.--Project for water 
        supply, Lake Farmington Dam, New Mexico.
            (49) Mcclure dam, new mexico.--Project for dam safety 
        improvements and flood risk management, McClure Dam, City of 
        Santa Fe, New Mexico.
            (50) Brooklyn navy yard, new york.--Project for flood risk 
        management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        Brooklyn Navy Yard, New York.
            (51) Upper east river and flushing bay, new york.--Project 
        for ecosystem restoration, Upper East River and Flushing Bay, 
        New York.
            (52) Hutchinson river, new york.--Project for flood risk 
        management and ecosystem restoration, Hutchinson River, New 
        York.
            (53) Mohawk river basin, new york.--Project for flood risk 
        management, navigation, and environmental restoration, Mohawk 
        River Basin, New York.
            (54) Newtown creek, new york.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Newtown Creek, New York.
            (55) Saw mill river, new york.--Project for flood risk 
        management and ecosystem restoration to address areas in the 
        City of Yonkers and the Village of Hastings-on-Hudson within 
        the 100-year flood zone, Saw Mill River, New York.
            (56) Mineral ridge dam, ohio.--Project for dam safety 
        improvements and rehabilitation, Mineral Ridge Dam, Ohio.
            (57) Brodhead creek watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration and flood risk management, Brodhead Creek 
        Watershed, Pennsylvania.
            (58) Chartiers creek watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        flood risk management, Chartiers Creek Watershed, Pennsylvania.
            (59) Coplay creek, pennsylvania.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Coplay Creek, Pennsylvania.
            (60) Berkeley county, south carolina.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration and flood risk management, Berkeley 
        County, South Carolina.
            (61) Big sioux river, south dakota.--Project for flood risk 
        management, City of Watertown and vicinity, South Dakota.
            (62) Tennessee-tombigbee river basins, tennessee.--Project 
        to deter, impede, or restrict the dispersal of aquatic nuisance 
        species in the Tennessee-Tombigbee River Basins, Tennessee.
            (63) El paso county, texas.--Project for flood risk 
        management for economically disadvantaged communities, as 
        defined by the Secretary pursuant to section 160 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note), along 
        the United States-Mexico border, El Paso County, Texas.
            (64) Gulf intracoastal waterway-channel to palacios, 
        texas.--Project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway-
        Channel to Palacios, Texas.
            (65) Sikes lake, texas.--Project for ecosystem restoration 
        and flood risk management, Sikes Lake, Texas.
            (66) Southwest border region, texas.--Project for flood 
        risk management for economically disadvantaged communities, as 
        defined by the Secretary pursuant to section 160 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note), along 
        the United States-Mexico border in Webb, Zapata, and Starr 
        counties, Texas.
            (67) Lower clear creek and dickinson bayou, texas.--Project 
        for flood risk management, Lower Clear Creek and Dickinson 
        Bayou, Texas.
            (68) Cedar island, virginia.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration, hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, and 
        navigation, Cedar Island, Virginia.
            (69) Ballinger creek, washington.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration, City of Shoreline, Washington.
            (70) City of north bend, washington.--Project for water 
        supply, City of North Bend, Washington.
            (71) Taneum creek, washington.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Taneum Creek, Washington.
            (72) City of huntington, west virginia.--Project for flood 
        risk management, Huntington, West Virginia.
    (b) Project Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct 
a feasibility study for the following project modifications:
            (1) Shingle creek and kissimmee river, florida.--
        Modifications to the project for ecosystem restoration and 
        water storage, Shingle Creek and Kissimmee River, Florida, 
        authorized by section 201(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2670), for flood risk 
        management.
            (2) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--Modifications to the 
        project for navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida, 
        authorized by section 7002 of the Water Resources Reform and 
        Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1364), for outer channel 
        improvements.
            (3) Cedar river, cedar rapids, iowa.--Modifications to the 
        project for flood risk management, Cedar River, Cedar Rapids, 
        Iowa, authorized by section 7002(2) of the Water Resources 
        Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1366), consistent 
        with the City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Cedar River Flood Control 
        System Master Plan.
            (4) Yabucoa harbor, puerto rico.--Modification to the 
        project for navigation, Yabucoa Harbor, Puerto Rico, authorized 
        by section 3 of the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 
        Stat. 1048), for assumption of operations and maintenance.
            (5) Salem river, salem county, new jersey.--Modifications 
        to the project for navigation, Salem River, Salem County, New 
        Jersey, authorized by section 1 of the Act of March 2, 1907 
        (chapter 2509, 34 Stat. 1080), to increase the authorized 
        depth.
            (6) Everett harbor and snohomish river, washington.--
        Modifications to the project for navigation, Everett Harbor and 
        Snohomish River, Washington, authorized by section 101 of the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 732), for the Boat 
        Launch Connector Channel.
            (7) Hiram m. chittenden locks, lake washington ship canal, 
        washington.--Modifications to the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks 
        (also known as Ballard Locks), Lake Washington Ship Canal, 
        Washington, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 (chapter 
        382, 36 Stat. 666), for the construction of fish ladder 
        improvements, including efforts to address elevated temperature 
        and low dissolved oxygen levels in the Canal.
            (8) Port townsend, washington.--Modifications to the 
        project for navigation, Port Townsend, Washington, authorized 
        by section 110 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 
        169), for the Boat Haven Marina Breakwater.

SEC. 202. EXPEDITED COMPLETION.

    (a) Feasibility Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the 
completion of a feasibility study for each of the following projects, 
and if the Secretary determines that the project is justified in a 
completed report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, 
engineering, and design of the project:
            (1) Project for navigation, Branford Harbor and Stony Creek 
        Channel, Connecticut.
            (2) Project for navigation, Guilford Harbor and Sluice 
        Channel, Connecticut.
            (3) Project for ecosystem restoration, Western Everglades, 
        Florida.
            (4) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        Miami, Dade County, Florida.
            (5) Project for ecosystem restoration, recreation, and 
        other purposes, Illinois River, Chicago River, Calumet River, 
        Grand Calumet River, Little Calumet River, and other waterways 
        in the vicinity of Chicago, Illinois, authorized by section 
        201(a)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 
        Stat. 2670).
            (6) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        Chicago Shoreline, Illinois, authorized by section 101(a)(12) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664; 
        128 Stat. 1372).
            (7) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        South Central Coastal Louisiana, Louisiana.
            (8) Modifications to the project for navigation, Baltimore 
        Harbor and Channels-Seagirt Loop Deepening, Maryland, including 
        to a depth of 50 feet.
            (9) Project for New York and New Jersey Harbor Channel 
        Deepening Improvements, New York and New Jersey.
            (10) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        South Shore of Staten Island, New York.
            (11) Project for flood risk management, Rio Grande de 
        Loiza, Puerto Rico.
            (12) Project for flood risk management, Rio Guanajibo, 
        Puerto Rico.
            (13) Project for flood risk management, Rio Nigua, Salinas, 
        Puerto Rico.
            (14) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        Charleston Peninsula, South Carolina.
            (15) Project for navigation, Tacoma Harbor, Washington.
    (b) Post-Authorization Change Reports.--The Secretary shall 
expedite completion of a post-authorization change report for the 
following projects:
            (1) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and Southern 
        Florida, Indian River Lagoon, Florida, authorized by section 
        1001(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
        Stat. 1051).
            (2) Project for water supply and ecosystem restoration, 
        Howard A. Hanson Dam, Washington, authorized by section 
        101(b)(15) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
        Stat. 281).
    (c) Great Lakes Coastal Resiliency Study.--The Secretary shall 
expedite the completion of the comprehensive assessment of water 
resources needs for the Great Lakes System under section 729 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), as required 
by section 1219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 
Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2683).
    (d) Maintenance of Navigation Channels.--The Secretary shall 
expedite the completion of a determination of the feasibility of 
improvements proposed by a non-Federal interest under section 
204(f)(1)(A)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2232(f)(1)(A)(i)), for the following:
            (1) Deepening and widening of the navigation project for 
        Coos Bay, Oregon, authorized by the Act of March 3, 1879 
        (chapter 181, 20 Stat. 370).
            (2) Improvements to segment 1B of the navigation project 
        for Houston Ship Channel Expansion Channel Improvement Project, 
        Harris, Chambers, and Galveston Counties, Texas, authorized by 
        section 401(1)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        2020 (134 Stat. 2734).

SEC. 203. EXPEDITED MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the following 
feasibility studies, as modified by this section, and if the Secretary 
determines that a project that is the subject of the feasibility study 
is justified in the completed report, may proceed directly to 
preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the project:
            (1) Mare island strait, california.--The study for 
        navigation, Mare Island Strait channel, authorized by section 
        406 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
        323), is modified to authorize the Secretary to consider the 
        economic and national security benefits from recent proposals 
        for utilization of the channel for Department of Defense 
        shipbuilding and vessel repair.
            (2) Lake pontchartrain & vicinity, louisiana.--The study 
        for flood risk management and hurricane and storm damage risk 
        reduction, Lake Pontchartrain & Vicinity, Louisiana, authorized 
        by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
        1077), is modified to authorize the Secretary to investigate 
        increasing the scope of the project to provide protection 
        against a 200-year storm event.
            (3) Blackstone river valley, rhode island and 
        massachusetts.--
                    (A) In general.--The study for ecosystem 
                restoration, Blackstone River Valley, Rhode Island and 
                Massachusetts, authorized by section 569 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788), is 
                modified to authorize the Secretary to conduct a study 
                for water supply, water flow, and wetland restoration 
                and protection within the scope of the study.
                    (B) Incorporation of existing data.--In carrying 
                out the study described in subparagraph (A), the 
                Secretary shall use, to the extent practicable, any 
                existing data for the project prepared under the 
                authority of section 206 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (4) Lower saddle river, new jersey.--The study for flood 
        control, Lower Saddle River, New Jersey, authorized by section 
        401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
        Stat. 4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to review 
        the previously authorized study and take into consideration 
        changes in hydraulic and hydrologic circumstances and local 
        economic development since the study was initially authorized.

SEC. 204. CORPS OF ENGINEERS RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION ASSESSMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall conduct 
an assessment of sediment in reservoirs owned and operated by the 
Secretary.
    (b) Contents.--For each reservoir for which the Secretary carries 
out an assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary shall include in 
the assessment--
            (1) an estimation of the volume of sediment in the 
        reservoir;
            (2) an evaluation of the effects of such sediment on 
        reservoir storage capacity, including a quantification of lost 
        reservoir storage capacity due to the sediment and an 
        evaluation of how such lost reservoir storage capacity affects 
        the allocated storage space for authorized purposes within the 
        reservoir (including, where applicable, allocations for dead 
        storage, inactive storage, active conservation, joint use, and 
        flood surcharge);
            (3) the identification of any additional effects of 
        sediment on the operations of the reservoir or the ability of 
        the reservoir to meet its authorized purposes;
            (4) the identification of any potential effects of the 
        sediment over the ten-year period beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this Act on the areas immediately upstream and 
        downstream of the reservoir;
            (5) the identification of any existing sediment monitoring 
        and management plans associated with the reservoir;
            (6) for any reservoir that does not have a sediment 
        monitoring and management plan--
                    (A) an identification of whether a sediment 
                management plan for the reservoir is under development; 
                or
                    (B) an assessment of whether a sediment management 
                plan for the reservoir would be useful in the long-term 
                operation and maintenance of the reservoir for its 
                authorized purposes; and
            (7) any opportunities for beneficial use of the sediment in 
        the vicinity of the reservoir.
    (c) Report to Congress; Public Availability.--Not later than 2 
years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress, and make publicly available (including on a 
publicly available website), a report describing the results of the 
assessment carried out under subsection (a).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 205. ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS FROM CHANGING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
              RESPONSIBILITIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out an assessment of the 
consequences of amending section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(b)) to authorize the operation 
and maintenance of navigation projects for a harbor or inland harbor 
constructed by the Secretary at 100 percent Federal cost to a depth of 
55 feet.
    (b) Contents.--In carrying out the assessment under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall--
            (1) describe all existing Federal navigation projects that 
        are authorized or constructed to a depth of 55 feet or greater;
            (2) describe any Federal navigation project that is likely 
        to seek authorization or modification to a depth of 55 feet or 
        greater during the 10-year period beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this section;
            (3) estimate--
                    (A) the potential annual increase in Federal costs 
                that would result from authorizing operation and 
                maintenance of a navigation project to a depth of 55 
                feet at Federal expense; and
                    (B) the potential cumulative increase in such 
                Federal costs during the 10-year period beginning on 
                the date of enactment of this section; and
            (4) assess the potential effect of authorizing operation 
        and maintenance of a navigation project to a depth of 55 feet 
        at Federal expense on other Federal navigation operation and 
        maintenance activities, including the potential impact on 
        activities at donor ports, energy transfer ports, emerging 
        harbor projects, and projects carried out in the Great Lakes 
        Navigation System, as such terms are defined in section 
        102(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 
        U.S.C. 2238 note).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make 
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a 
report describing the results of the assessment carried out under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 206. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DREDGE CAPACITY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make 
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a 
report that includes--
            (1) a quantification of the expected hopper and pipeline 
        dredging needs of authorized water resources development 
        projects for the 10 years after the date of enactment of this 
        Act, including--
                    (A) the dredging needs to--
                            (i) construct deepenings or widenings at 
                        authorized but not constructed projects and the 
                        associated operations and maintenance needs of 
                        such projects; and
                            (ii) operate and maintain existing Federal 
                        navigation channels;
                    (B) the amount of dredging to be carried out by the 
                Corps of Engineers for other Federal agencies;
                    (C) the dredging needs associated with authorized 
                hurricane and storm damage risk reduction projects 
                (including periodic renourishment); and
                    (D) the dredging needs associated with projects for 
                the beneficial use of dredged material authorized by 
                section 1122 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note);
            (2) an identification of the Federal appropriations for 
        dredging projects and expenditures from the Harbor Maintenance 
        Trust Fund for fiscal year 2015 and each fiscal year 
        thereafter;
            (3) an identification of the dredging capacity of the 
        domestic hopper and pipeline dredge fleet, including publicly 
        owned and privately owned vessels, in each of the 10 years 
        preceding the date of enactment of this Act;
            (4) an analysis of the ability of the domestic hopper and 
        pipeline dredge fleet to meet the expected dredging needs 
        identified under paragraph (1), including an analysis of such 
        ability in each of the following regions--
                    (A) the east coast region;
                    (B) the west coast region, including the States of 
                Alaska and Hawaii;
                    (C) the gulf coast region; and
                    (D) the Great Lakes region;
            (5) an identification of the dredging capacity of domestic 
        hopper and pipeline dredge vessels that are under contract for 
        construction and intended to be used at water resources 
        development projects;
            (6) an identification of any hopper or pipeline dredge 
        vessel expected to be retired or become unavailable during the 
        10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
        section;
            (7) an identification of the potential costs of using 
        either public or private dredging to carry out authorized water 
        resources development projects; and
            (8) any recommendations of the Secretary for adding 
        additional domestic hopper and pipeline dredging capacity, 
        including adding public and private dredging vessels to the 
        domestic hopper and pipeline dredge fleet to efficiently 
        service water resources development projects.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the Corps 
of Engineers should add additional dredging capacity if the addition of 
such capacity would--
            (1) enable the Corps of Engineers to carry out water 
        resources development projects in an efficient and cost-
        effective manner; and
            (2) be in the best interests of the United States.

SEC. 207. MAINTENANCE DREDGING DATA.

    Section 1133(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 
(33 U.S.C. 2326f(b)(3)) is amended by inserting ``, including a 
separate line item for all Federal costs associated with the disposal 
of dredged material'' before the semicolon.

SEC. 208. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON ECONOMIC VALUATION OF PRESERVATION OF 
              OPEN SPACE, RECREATIONAL AREAS, AND HABITAT ASSOCIATED 
              WITH PROJECT LANDS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of the 
existing statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements related to the 
determination of the economic value of lands that--
            (1) may be provided by the non-Federal interest, as 
        necessary, for the construction of a project for flood risk 
        reduction or hurricane and storm risk reduction in accordance 
        with section 103(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(i));
            (2) are being maintained for open space, recreational 
        areas, or preservation of fish and wildlife habitat; and
            (3) will continue to be so maintained as part of the 
        project.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
report containing the results of the review conducted under subsection 
(a), including--
            (1) a summary of the existing statutory, regulatory, and 
        policy requirements described in such subsection;
            (2) a description of the requirements and process the 
        Secretary uses to place an economic value on the lands 
        described in such subsection;
            (3) an assessment of whether such requirements and process 
        affect the ability of a non-Federal interest to provide such 
        lands for the construction of a project described in such 
        subsection;
            (4) an assessment of whether such requirements and process 
        directly or indirectly encourage the selection of developed 
        lands for the construction of a project, or have the potential 
        to affect the total cost of a project; and
            (5) the identification of alternative measures for 
        determining the economic value of such lands that could provide 
        incentives for the preservation of open space, recreational 
        areas, and habitat in association with the construction of a 
        project.

SEC. 209. DISPOSITION STUDY ON SALINAS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CALIFORNIA.

    In carrying out the disposition study for the project for Salinas 
Dam (Santa Margarita Lake), California, pursuant to section 202(d) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2675), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) ensure that the County of San Luis Obispo is provided 
        right of first refusal for any potential conveyance of the 
        project; and
            (2) ensure that the study addresses any potential repairs 
        or modifications to the project necessary to meet Federal dam 
        safety requirements prior to transferring the project.

SEC. 210. EXCESS LANDS REPORT FOR WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
that identifies any real property associated with the Whittier Narrows 
Dam element of the Los Angeles County Drainage Area project that the 
Secretary determines--
            (1) is not needed to carry out the authorized purposes of 
        the Whittier Narrows Dam element of such project; and
            (2) could be transferred to the City of Pico Rivera, 
        California, for the replacement of recreational facilities 
        located in such city that were adversely impacted by dam safety 
        construction activities associated with the Whittier Narrows 
        Dam element of such project.
    (b) Los Angeles County Drainage Area Project Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``Los Angeles County Drainage Area project'' means 
the project for flood control, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, 
California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611; 130 Stat. 1690).

SEC. 211. COLEBROOK RIVER RESERVOIR, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report that summarizes the benefits, costs, and other effects of 
terminating the contract described in subsection (b) between the United 
States and the Metropolitan District, Hartford, Connecticut, relating 
to reservoir water storage space, including--
            (1) a description of entities that currently use (or have 
        expressed an interest in using) the water provided pursuant to 
        the contract;
            (2) an accounting of the current annual costs, including 
        annual operations and maintenance costs, owed by the 
        Metropolitan District to use the water provided pursuant to the 
        contract;
            (3) an accounting of any unrecovered capital or operation 
        and maintenance costs incurred by the Federal Government in 
        constructing or maintaining the reservoir to accommodate water 
        supply storage as an authorized purpose of the reservoir;
            (4) an accounting of any potential transfer or increase in 
        costs to the Federal Government, to the Metropolitan District, 
        or to any water users that could result from the termination of 
        the contract; and
            (5) any additional information that the Secretary 
        determines appropriate for consideration of termination of the 
        contract.
    (b) Contract.--The contract referred to in subsection (a) is the 
contract between the United States and the Metropolitan District, 
Hartford, Connecticut, for the use of water supply storage space in the 
Colebrook River Reservoir, entered into on February 11, 1965, and 
modified on October 28, 1975, and titled Contract DA-19-016-CIVENG-65-
203.

SEC. 212. COMPREHENSIVE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
feasibility study for resiliency and comprehensive improvements or 
modifications to existing water resources development projects in the 
central and southern Florida area, for the purposes of flood risk 
management, water supply, ecosystem restoration (including preventing 
saltwater intrusion), recreation, and related purposes.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the feasibility study under 
subsection (a), the Secretary--
            (1) is authorized to--
                    (A) review the report of the Chief of Engineers on 
                central and southern Florida, published as House 
                Document 643, 80th Congress, 2nd Session, and other 
                related reports of the Secretary; and
                    (B) recommend cost-effective structural and 
                nonstructural projects for implementation that provide 
                a systemwide approach for the purposes described in 
                subsection (a); and
            (2) shall ensure the study and any projects recommended 
        under paragraph (2) will not interfere with the efforts 
        undertaken to carry out the Comprehensive Everglades 
        Restoration Plan pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680; 132 Stat. 3786).

SEC. 213. REPORT ON SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PLAN 
              IMPLEMENTATION.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that provides an 
update on--
            (1) Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan projects, as 
        authorized by or pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680; 121 U.S.C. 1269; 132 
        U.S.C. 3786);
            (2) the review of the Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule 
        pursuant to section 1106 of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2018 (132 Stat. 3773) and section 210 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2020 (134 U.S.C. 2682); and
            (3) any additional water resources development projects and 
        studies included in the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration 
        Plan Integrated Delivery Schedule prepared in accordance with 
        part 385 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations.
    (b) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted 
under subsection (a) the status of each authorized water resources 
development project or study described in such subsection, including--
            (1) an estimated implementation or completion date of the 
        project or study; and
            (2) the estimated costs to complete implementation or 
        construction, as applicable, of the project or study.

SEC. 214. REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL HAZARDS AT BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY 
              LANIER, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall--
            (1) carry out a review of potential threats to human life 
        and safety from use of designated recreational areas at the 
        Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia, authorized by section 
        1 of the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 635); and
            (2) install such technologies and other measures, including 
        sirens, strobe lights, and signage, that the Secretary, based 
        on the review carried out under paragraph (1), determines 
        necessary for alerting the public of hazardous water conditions 
        or to otherwise minimize or eliminate any identified threats to 
        human life and safety.

SEC. 215. PORT FOURCHON BELLE PASS CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.

    With respect to the project for navigation, Port Fourchon Belle 
Pass Channel, Louisiana, authorized by section 403(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2743), the Secretary is 
authorized to--
            (1) undertake a feasibility study to modify the project to 
        include the dredged material disposal plan recommended in the 
        document published by the Secretary in April 2020, titled 
        ``Review Assessment of Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel 
        Deepening Project Section 203 Feasibility Study (January 2019, 
        revised January 2020)''; or
            (2) review under section 203 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) any further 
        feasibility study undertaken by the non-Federal interest to 
        modify the project to include a dredged material disposal plan.

SEC. 216. HYDRAULIC EVALUATION OF UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS 
              RIVER.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator 
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall, at Federal expense, 
periodically carry out a study to--
            (1) evaluate the flow frequency probabilities of the Upper 
        Mississippi River and the Illinois River; and
            (2) develop updated water surface profiles for such rivers.
    (b) Area of Evaluation.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall conduct analysis along the mainstem of the Mississippi 
River from upstream of the Minnesota River confluence near Anoka, 
Minnesota, to just upstream of the Ohio River confluence near Cairo, 
Illinois, and along the Illinois River from Dresden Island Lock and Dam 
to the confluence with the Mississippi River, near Grafton, Illinois.
    (c) Reports.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, and not less frequently than every 20 years thereafter, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report containing the 
results of a study carried out under subsection (a).
    (d) Public Availability.--Any information developed under 
subsection (a) shall be made publicly available, including on a 
publicly available website.

SEC. 217. REND LAKE, CARLYLE LAKE, AND LAKE SHELBYVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report that summarizes the benefits, costs, and other effects of 
terminating the contracts described in subsection (b) between the 
United States and the State of Illinois, relating to reservoir water 
storage space, including--
            (1) a description of entities that currently use (or have 
        expressed an interest in using) the water provided pursuant to 
        the contracts;
            (2) an accounting of the current annual costs, including 
        annual operations and maintenance costs, owed by the State of 
        Illinois to use the water provided pursuant to the contracts;
            (3) an accounting of any unrecovered capital or operation 
        and maintenance costs incurred by the Federal Government in 
        constructing or maintaining the reservoirs to accommodate water 
        supply storage as an authorized purpose of the reservoirs;
            (4) an accounting of any potential transfer or increase in 
        costs to the Federal Government, to the State of Illinois, or 
        to any water users that could result from the termination of 
        the contracts; and
            (5) any additional information that the Secretary 
        determines appropriate for consideration of termination of the 
        contracts.
    (b) Contracts.--The contracts referred to in subsection (a) are the 
following contracts between the United States and the State of 
Illinois:
            (1) Contract DACW43-88-C-0088, entered into on September 
        23, 1988, for utilization of storage space for water supply in 
        Rend Lake, Illinois.
            (2) Contract DA-23-065-CIVENG-65-493, entered into on April 
        28, 1965, for utilization of storage space for water supply in 
        Rend Lake, Illinois.
            (3) Contract DACW43-83-C-0008, entered into on July 6, 
        1983, for utilization of storage space in Carlyle Lake, 
        Illinois.
            (4) Contract DACW43-83-C-0009, entered into on July 6, 
        1983, for utilization of storage space in Lake Shelbyville, 
        Illinois.

SEC. 218. DISPOSITION STUDY ON HYDROPOWER IN THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY, 
              OREGON.

    (a) Disposition Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
        disposition study to determine the Federal interest in, and 
        identify the effects of, deauthorizing hydropower as an 
        authorized purpose, in whole or in part, of the Willamette 
        Valley hydropower project.
            (2) Contents.--In carrying out the disposition study under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall review the effects of 
        deauthorizing hydropower on--
                    (A) Willamette Valley hydropower project 
                operations;
                    (B) other authorized purposes of such project;
                    (C) cost apportionments;
                    (D) dam safety;
                    (E) compliance with the requirements of the 
                Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (F) the operations of the remaining dams within the 
                Willamette Valley hydropower project.
            (3) Recommendations.--If the Secretary, through the 
        disposition study authorized by paragraph (1), determines that 
        hydropower should be removed as an authorized purpose of any 
        part of the Willamette Valley hydropower project, the Secretary 
        shall also investigate and recommend any necessary structural 
        or operational changes at such project that are necessary to 
        achieve an appropriate balance among the remaining authorized 
        purposes of such project or changes to such purposes.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Willamette Valley 
hydropower project'' means the system of dams and reservoir projects 
authorized to generate hydropower and the power features that operate 
in conjunction with the main regulating dam facilities, including the 
Big Cliff, Dexter, and Foster re-regulating dams in the Willamette 
River Basin, Oregon, as authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1222; 62 Stat. 1178; 64 Stat. 177; 
68 Stat. 1264; 74 Stat. 499; 100 Stat. 4144).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall issue a report to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate that 
describes--
            (1) the results of the disposition study on deauthorizing 
        hydropower as a purpose of the Willamette Valley hydropower 
        project; and
            (2) any recommendations required under subsection (a)(3).

SEC. 219. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL EXPANSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, 
              TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a feasibility study 
for modifications of the project for navigation, Houston Ship Channel 
Expansion Channel Improvement Project, Harris, Chambers, and Galveston 
counties, Texas, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2734), to incorporate into the 
project the construction of barge lanes immediately adjacent to either 
side of the Houston Ship Channel from Bolivar Roads to Morgan's Point 
to a depth of 12 feet.

SEC. 220. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall expedite the review and coordination of the 
feasibility study for the project for navigation, Sabine-Neches 
Waterway, Texas, under section 203(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(b)).

SEC. 221. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a feasibility study 
for the modification of the project for navigation, Norfolk Harbor and 
Channels, Virginia, authorized by section 201 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4090; 132 Stat. 3840) to incorporate 
Anchorage F into the project.

SEC. 222. COASTAL VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out the feasibility study for the 
project for flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and 
navigation, Coastal Virginia, authorized by section 1201(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3802), the Secretary 
is authorized to enter into a written agreement with any Federal agency 
that owns or operates property in the area of the project to accept and 
expend funds from such Federal agency to include in the study an 
analysis with respect to property owned or operated by such Federal 
agency.
    (b) Information.--The Secretary shall use any relevant information 
obtained from a Federal agency described in subsection (a) to carry out 
the feasibility study described in such subsection.

SEC. 223. WESTERN INFRASTRUCTURE STUDY.

    (a) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
comprehensive study to evaluate the effectiveness of carrying out 
additional measures, including measures that use natural features or 
nature-based features, at or upstream of covered reservoirs, for the 
purposes of--
            (1) sustaining operations in response to changing 
        hydrological and climatic conditions;
            (2) mitigating the risk of drought or floods, including the 
        loss of storage capacity due to sediment accumulation;
            (3) increasing water supply; or
            (4) aquatic ecosystem restoration.
    (b) Study Focus.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall include all covered reservoirs located in the South 
Pacific Division of the Corps of Engineers.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--
            (1) Consultation.--In conducting the study under subsection 
        (a), the Secretary shall consult with applicable--
                    (A) Federal, State, and local agencies;
                    (B) Indian Tribes;
                    (C) non-Federal interests; and
                    (D) stakeholders, as determined appropriate by the 
                Secretary.
            (2) Use of existing data and prior studies.--In conducting 
        the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, to the 
        maximum extent practicable and where appropriate--
                    (A) use existing data provided to the Secretary by 
                entities described in paragraph (1); and
                    (B) incorporate--
                            (i) relevant information from prior studies 
                        and projects carried out by the Secretary; and
                            (ii) the relevant technical data and 
                        scientific approaches with respect to changing 
                        hydrological and climatic conditions.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that describes--
            (1) the results of the study; and
            (2) any recommendations for additional study in specific 
        geographic areas.
    (e) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section provides authority 
to the Secretary to change the authorized purposes of any covered 
reservoir.
    (f) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered reservoir.--The term ``covered reservoir'' 
        means a reservoir owned and operated by the Secretary or for 
        which the Secretary has flood control responsibilities under 
        section 7 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 709).
            (2) Natural feature and nature-based feature.--The terms 
        ``natural feature'' and ``nature-based feature'' have the 
        meanings given such terms in section 1184(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)).

SEC. 224. REPORT ON SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL 
              BUSINESS CONCERNS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make 
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a 
report that describes and documents the use of contracts and 
subcontracts with Small Disadvantaged Businesses in carrying out the 
water resources development authorities of the Secretary.
    (b) Information.--The Secretary shall include in the report under 
subsection (a) information on the distribution of funds to Small 
Disadvantaged Businesses on a disaggregated basis.
    (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Small Disadvantaged 
Business'' has the meaning given that term in section 124.1001 of title 
13, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).

SEC. 225. REPORT ON SOLAR ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES.

    (a) Assessment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall 
        conduct an assessment, in consultation with the Secretary of 
        Energy, of opportunities to install and maintain photovoltaic 
        solar panels (including floating solar panels) at covered 
        projects.
            (2) Contents.--The assessment conducted under paragraph (1) 
        shall--
                    (A) include a description of the economic, 
                environmental, and technical viability of installing 
                and maintaining, or contracting with third parties to 
                install and maintain, photovoltaic solar panels at 
                covered projects;
                    (B) identify covered projects with a high potential 
                for the installation and maintenance of photovoltaic 
                solar panels and whether such installation and 
                maintenance would require additional authorization;
                    (C) account for potential impacts of photovoltaic 
                solar panels at covered projects and the authorized 
                purposes of such projects, including potential impacts 
                on flood risk reduction, recreation, water supply, and 
                fish and wildlife; and
                    (D) account for the availability of electric grid 
                infrastructure close to covered projects, including 
                underutilized transmission infrastructure.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress, and make 
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a 
report containing the results of the assessment conducted under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``covered project'' 
means--
            (1) any property under the control of the Corps of 
        Engineers; and
            (2) any water resources development project constructed by 
        the Secretary or over which the Secretary has financial or 
        operational responsibility.

SEC. 226. ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL FLOODING MITIGATION MODELING AND 
              TESTING CAPACITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Director of the 
Engineer Research and Development Center, shall carry out an assessment 
of the current capacity of the Corps of Engineers to model coastal 
flood mitigation systems and test the effectiveness of such systems in 
preventing flood damage resulting from coastal storm surges.
    (b) Considerations.--In carrying out the assessment under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) identify the capacity of the Corps of Engineers to--
                    (A) carry out the testing of the performance and 
                reliability of coastal flood mitigation systems; or
                    (B) collaborate with private industries to carry 
                out such testing;
            (2) identify any limitations or deficiencies at Corps of 
        Engineers facilities that are capable of testing the 
        performance and reliability of coastal flood mitigation 
        systems;
            (3) assess any benefits that would result from addressing 
        the limitations or deficiencies identified under paragraph (2); 
        and
            (4) provide recommendations for addressing such limitations 
        or deficiencies.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and 
make publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a 
report describing the results of the assessment carried out under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 227. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON EASEMENTS RELATED TO WATER RESOURCES 
              DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of the 
existing statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements and procedures 
related to the use, in relation to the construction of a project for 
flood risk management, hurricane and storm risk reduction, or 
environmental restoration, of covered easements that may be provided to 
the Secretary by non-Federal interests.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
containing the results of the review conducted under subsection (a), 
including--
            (1) the findings of the Secretary relating to--
                    (A) the minimum rights in property that are 
                necessary to construct, operate, or maintain projects 
                for flood risk management, hurricane and storm risk 
                reduction, or environmental restoration;
                    (B) whether increased use of covered easements in 
                relation to such projects could promote greater 
                participation from cooperating landowners in addressing 
                local flooding or environmental restoration challenges;
                    (C) whether such increased use could result in cost 
                savings in the implementation of the projects, without 
                any reduction in project benefits; and
                    (D) whether such increased use is in the best 
                interest of the United States; and
            (2) any recommendations of the Secretary relating to 
        whether existing requirements or procedures related to such use 
        of covered easements should be revised to reflect the results 
        of the review.
    (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``covered easement'' 
means an easement or other similar interest in real property that--
            (1) reserves for the Secretary rights in the property that 
        are necessary to construct, operate, or maintain a water 
        resources development project;
            (2) provides for appropriate public use of the property, 
        and retains the right of continued use of the property by the 
        owner of the property, to the extent such uses are consistent 
        with purposes of the covered easement;
            (3) provides access to the property for oversight and 
        inspection by the Secretary;
            (4) is permanently recorded; and
            (5) is enforceable under Federal and State law.

SEC. 228. ASSESSMENT OF FOREST, RANGELAND, AND WATERSHED RESTORATION 
              SERVICES ON LANDS OWNED BY THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out an assessment of 
forest, rangeland, and watershed restoration services on lands owned by 
the Corps of Engineers, including an assessment of whether the 
provision of such services on such lands by non-Federal interests 
through good neighbor agreements would be in the best interests of the 
United States.
    (b) Considerations.--In carrying out the assessment under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) describe the forest, rangeland, and watershed 
        restoration services provided by the Secretary on lands owned 
        by the Corps of Engineers;
            (2) assess whether such services, including efforts to 
        reduce hazardous fuels and to restore and improve forest, 
        rangeland, and watershed health (including the health of fish 
        and wildlife habitats) would be enhanced by authorizing the 
        Secretary to enter into a good neighbor agreement with a non-
        Federal interest;
            (3) describe the process for ensuring that Federal 
        requirements for land management plans for forests on lands 
        owned by the Corps of Engineers remain in effect under good 
        neighbor agreements;
            (4) assess whether Congress should authorize the Secretary 
        to enter into a good neighbor agreement with a non-Federal 
        interest to provide forest, rangeland, and watershed 
        restoration services on lands owned by the Corps of Engineers, 
        including by assessing any interest expressed by a non-Federal 
        interest to enter into such an agreement;
            (5) consider whether implementation of a good neighbor 
        agreement on lands owned by the Corps of Engineers would 
        benefit State and local governments and Indian Tribes that are 
        located in the same geographic area as such lands; and
            (6) consult with the heads of other Federal agencies 
        authorized to enter into good neighbor agreements with non-
        Federal interests.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and 
make publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a 
report describing the results of the assessment carried out under 
subsection (a).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Forest, rangeland, and watershed restoration 
        services.--The term ``forest, rangeland, and watershed 
        restoration services'' has the meaning given such term in 
        section 8206 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 2113a).
            (2) Good neighbor agreement.--The term ``good neighbor 
        agreement'' means a cooperative agreement or contract 
        (including a sole source contract) entered into between the 
        Secretary and a non-Federal interest to carry out forest, 
        rangeland, and watershed restoration services.
            (3) Lands owned by the corps of engineers.--The term 
        ``lands owned by the Corps of Engineers'' means any land owned 
        by the Corps of Engineers, but does not include--
                    (A) a component of the National Wilderness 
                Preservation System;
                    (B) land on which the removal of vegetation is 
                prohibited or restricted by law or Presidential 
                proclamation;
                    (C) a wilderness study area; or
                    (D) any other land with respect to which the 
                Secretary determines that forest, rangeland, and 
                watershed restoration services should remain the 
                responsibility of the Secretary.

SEC. 229. REPORT ON STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEM.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section, 
the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of 
the implementation of section 2040 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345).

SEC. 230. GAO STUDIES ON MITIGATION.

    (a) Study on Mitigation for Water Resources Development Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 
        States shall conduct, and submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate, a report on the results of a study on 
        projects and activities to mitigate fish and wildlife losses 
        resulting from the construction, or operation and maintenance, 
        of an authorized water resources development project.
            (2) Requirements.--In conducting the study under paragraph 
        (1), the Comptroller General shall--
                    (A) investigate the extent to which--
                            (i) mitigation projects and activities 
                        (including the acquisition of lands or 
                        interests in lands) restore the natural 
                        hydrologic conditions, restore native 
                        vegetation, and otherwise support native fish 
                        and wildlife species, as required under section 
                        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283);
                            (ii) mitigation projects or activities 
                        (including the acquisition of lands or 
                        interests in lands) are undertaken before, or 
                        concurrent with, the construction of the 
                        project;
                            (iii) mitigation projects or activities 
                        (including the acquisition of lands or 
                        interests in lands) are completed;
                            (iv) ongoing mitigation projects or 
                        activities are undertaken to mitigate for fish 
                        and wildlife losses from the operation and 
                        maintenance of a project (including periodic 
                        review and updating of such projects or 
                        activities);
                            (v) the Secretary includes mitigation plans 
                        (as required under subsection (d) of such 
                        section 906) in any project study, as such term 
                        is defined in section 2034(l) of the Water 
                        Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
                        2343);
                            (vi) processing and approval of mitigation 
                        projects and activities (including the 
                        acquisition of lands or interests in lands) 
                        affects the timeline of completion of projects; 
                        and
                            (vii) mitigation projects and activities 
                        (including the acquisition of lands or 
                        interests in lands) affect the total cost of 
                        projects;
                    (B) review any reports submitted to Congress in 
                accordance with section 2036(b) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1094) on the status 
                of construction of projects that require mitigation; 
                and
                    (C) consult with independent scientists, 
                economists, and other stakeholders with expertise and 
                experience.
    (b) Study on the Compensatory Mitigation.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 
        States shall conduct, and submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate, a report on the results of a study on 
        performance metrics for, compliance with, and adequacy in 
        addressing project impacts of, potential mechanisms for 
        fulfilling compensatory mitigation obligations pursuant to the 
        Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
            (2) Requirements.--The Comptroller General shall include in 
        the study under paragraph (1) an analysis of--
                    (A) the primary mechanisms for fulfilling 
                compensatory mitigation obligations, including--
                            (i) mitigation banks;
                            (ii) in-lieu fee programs; and
                            (iii) direct mitigation by permittees;
                    (B) the timeliness of initiation and successful 
                completion of compensatory mitigation activities in 
                relation to when the permitted activity occurs;
                    (C) the timeliness of processing and approval of 
                compensatory mitigation activities;
                    (D) the costs of carrying out compensatory 
                mitigation activities borne by the Federal government, 
                permittee, or any other involved entity;
                    (E) Federal and State agency oversight and short 
                and long-term monitoring of the compensatory mitigation 
                activities;
                    (F) whether the compensatory mitigation activity 
                successfully replaces any lost or adversely affected 
                habitat with habitat having similar functions of equal 
                or greater ecological value; and
                    (G) the continued, long-term success of the 
                compensatory mitigation activities over a 5-, 10-, 20-, 
                and 50-year period.
            (3) Update.--In conjunction with the study under paragraph 
        (1), the Comptroller General shall review and update the 
        findings and recommendations, including a review of Federal 
        agency compliance with such recommendations, in the report of 
        the Comptroller General entitled, ``Corps of Engineers Does Not 
        Have an Effective Oversight Approach to Ensure That 
        Compensatory Mitigation Is Occurring'' and dated September 2005 
        (GAO-05-898).

SEC. 231. STUDY ON WATERBORNE STATISTICS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall carry out a review of the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center 
of the Corps of Engineers that includes--
            (1) an assessment of ways in which the Waterborne Commerce 
        Statistics Center can improve the collection of information 
        relating to all commercial maritime activity within the 
        jurisdiction of a port, including the collection and reporting 
        of records of fish landings; and
            (2) recommendations to improve the collection of such 
        information from non-Federal entities, taking into 
        consideration--
                    (A) the cost, efficiency, and accuracy of 
                collecting such information; and
                    (B) the protection of proprietary information.
    (b) Report.--Upon completion of the review carried out under 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
report containing the results of such review.

             TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS.

    (a) Purposes; Proposed Deauthorization List; Submission of Final 
List.--Section 301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 
U.S.C. 579-2) is amended by striking subsections (a) through (c) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
            ``(1) to identify water resources development projects, and 
        separable elements of projects, authorized by Congress that are 
        no longer viable for construction due to--
                    ``(A) a lack of local support;
                    ``(B) a lack of available Federal or non-Federal 
                resources; or
                    ``(C) an authorizing purpose that is no longer 
                relevant or feasible;
            ``(2) to create an expedited and definitive process for 
        Congress to deauthorize water resources development projects 
        and separable elements that are no longer viable for 
        construction; and
            ``(3) to allow the continued authorization of water 
        resources development projects and separable elements that are 
        viable for construction.
    ``(b) Proposed Deauthorization List.--
            ``(1) Preliminary list of projects.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall develop a 
                preliminary list of each water resources development 
                project, or separable element of a project, authorized 
                for construction before November 8, 2007, for which--
                            ``(i) planning, design, or construction was 
                        not initiated before the date of enactment of 
                        this Act; or
                            ``(ii) planning, design, or construction 
                        was initiated before the date of enactment of 
                        this Act, but for which no funds, Federal or 
                        non-Federal, were obligated for planning, 
                        design, or construction of the project or 
                        separable element of the project during the 
                        current fiscal year or any of the 10 preceding 
                        fiscal years.
                    ``(B) Use of comprehensive construction backlog and 
                operation and maintenance report.--The Secretary may 
                develop the preliminary list from the comprehensive 
                construction backlog and operation and maintenance 
                reports developed pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                579a).
            ``(2) Preparation of proposed deauthorization list.--
                    ``(A) Proposed list and estimated deauthorization 
                amount.--The Secretary shall--
                            ``(i) prepare a proposed list of projects 
                        for deauthorization comprised of a subset of 
                        projects and separable elements identified on 
                        the preliminary list developed under paragraph 
                        (1) that are projects or separable elements 
                        described in subsection (a)(1), as determined 
                        by the Secretary; and
                            ``(ii) include with such proposed list an 
                        estimate, in the aggregate, of the Federal cost 
                        to complete such projects.
                    ``(B) Determination of federal cost to complete.--
                For purposes of subparagraph (A), the Federal cost to 
                complete shall take into account any allowances 
                authorized by section 902 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied to 
                the most recent project schedule and cost estimate.
            ``(3) Public comment and consultation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall solicit 
                comments from the public and the Governors of each 
                applicable State on the proposed deauthorization list 
                prepared under paragraph (2)(A).
                    ``(B) Comment period.--The public comment period 
                shall be 90 days.
            ``(4) Preparation of final deauthorization list.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall prepare a 
                final deauthorization list by--
                            ``(i) considering any comments received 
                        under paragraph (3); and
                            ``(ii) revising the proposed 
                        deauthorization list prepared under paragraph 
                        (2)(A) as the Secretary determines necessary to 
                        respond to such comments.
                    ``(B) Appendix.--The Secretary shall include as 
                part of the final deauthorization list an appendix 
                that--
                            ``(i) identifies each project or separable 
                        element on the proposed deauthorization list 
                        that is not included on the final 
                        deauthorization list; and
                            ``(ii) describes the reasons why the 
                        project or separable element is not included on 
                        the final deauthorization list.
    ``(c) Submission of Final Deauthorization List to Congress for 
Congressional Review; Publication.--
            ``(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        the close of the comment period under subsection (b)(3), the 
        Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) submit the final deauthorization list and 
                appendix prepared under subsection (b)(4) to the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives and the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and
                    ``(B) publish the final deauthorization list and 
                appendix in the Federal Register.
            ``(2) Exclusions.--The Secretary shall not include in the 
        final deauthorization list submitted under paragraph (1) any 
        project or separable element with respect to which Federal 
        funds for planning, design, or construction are obligated after 
        the development of the preliminary list under subsection 
        (b)(1)(A) but prior to the submission of the final 
        deauthorization list under paragraph (1)(A) of this 
        subsection.''.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 301(d) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 579-2(b)) is repealed.

SEC. 302. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2267a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) sea level rise;
            ``(8) coastal storm damage reduction; and
            ``(9) streambank and shoreline protection.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (9), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (10), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(11) New York-New Jersey Watershed Basin, which 
        encompasses all the watersheds that flow into the New York-New 
        Jersey Harbor and their associated estuaries, including the 
        Hudson, Mohawk, Raritan, Passaic, Hackensack, and Bronx River 
        Watersheds and the Hudson River Estuary;
            ``(12) Mississippi River Watershed; and
            ``(13) Chattahoochee River Basin, Alabama, Florida, and 
        Georgia.''.

SEC. 303. FORECAST-INFORMED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS.

    (a) Additional Utilization of Forecast-Informed Reservoir 
Operations.--Section 1222(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2018 (132 Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2661) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``the Upper Missouri 
        River Basin and the North Platte River Basin'' and inserting 
        ``the Upper Missouri River Basin, the North Platte River Basin, 
        and the Apalachicola Chattahoochee Flint River Basin''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``the Upper 
                Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin'' 
                and inserting ``the Upper Missouri River Basin, the 
                North Platte River Basin, or the Apalachicola 
                Chattahoochee Flint River Basin''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``the Upper 
                Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin'' 
                and inserting ``the Upper Missouri River Basin, the 
                North Platte River Basin, or the Apalachicola 
                Chattahoochee Flint River Basin''.
    (b) Completion of Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite completion 
of the reports authorized by section 1222 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2661).

SEC. 304. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 104 Stat. 4646; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295; 121 Stat. 
1076; 134 Stat. 2703) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (29), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (30), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(31) Salisbury Pond, Worcester, Massachusetts;
            ``(32) Baisley Pond, New York;
            ``(33) Legacy Park, Decatur, Georgia; and
            ``(34) White Rock Lake, Dallas, Texas.''.

SEC. 305. INVASIVE SPECIES.

    (a) Aquatic Invasive Species Research.--Section 1108(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2263a(a)) is amended 
by inserting ``, hydrilla'' after ``elodea''.
    (b) Harmful Algal Bloom Demonstration Program.--Section 128(c) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 610 note) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Focus Areas.--In carrying out the demonstration program under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall undertake program activities 
related to harmful algal blooms in--
            ``(1) the Great Lakes;
            ``(2) the tidal and inland waters of the State of New 
        Jersey, including Lake Hopatcong, New Jersey;
            ``(3) the coastal and tidal waters of the State of 
        Louisiana;
            ``(4) the waterways of the counties that comprise the 
        Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California;
            ``(5) the Allegheny Reservoir Watershed, New York;
            ``(6) Lake Okeechobee, Florida;
            ``(7) Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia;
            ``(8) Rio Grande River Basin, Colorado, New Mexico, and 
        Texas;
            ``(9) Detroit Lake, Oregon; and
            ``(10) Ten Mile Lake, Oregon.''.
    (c) Update on Invasive Species Policy Guidance.--Section 501(b) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 610 note) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.''.

SEC. 306. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) New York Harbor, New York and New Jersey.--The New York Harbor 
collection and removal of drift project authorized by section 2 of the 
Act of March 4, 1915 (38 Stat. 1051; 88 Stat. 39; 104 Stat. 4615), and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary.
    (b) Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico.--The project for flood control, 
Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 101 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), and deauthorized 
pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development 
Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.
    (c) Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico.--The project for flood 
control, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 101 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary.
    (d) Rio Grande De Loiza, Puerto Rico.--The project for flood 
control, Rio Grande De Loiza, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 101 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary.

SEC. 307. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Los Angeles County, California.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Los Angeles County, California, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section to a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall enter 
        into a partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with the non-Federal 
        interest with respect to the project to be carried out with 
        such assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
                with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a 
                facilities or resource protection and development plan, 
                including appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of grants 
                        or reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the Federal share of a project that is the 
                subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share of 
                the project cost.
                    (C) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(G)), the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project cost (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (D) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
            (2) Corps of engineers expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
        of the amounts made available to carry out this section may be 
        used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
        projects under this section at Federal expense.

SEC. 308. DEAUTHORIZATION OF DESIGNATED PORTIONS OF THE LOS ANGELES 
              COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the project for flood risk 
management, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, authorized by 
section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 (49 Stat. 1589; 50 Stat. 
167; 52 Stat. 1215; 55 Stat. 647; 64 Stat. 177), consisting of the 
debris basins described in subsection (b), is no longer authorized 
beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Debris Basins Described.--The debris basins referred to in 
subsection (a) are the following debris basins operated and maintained 
by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District: Auburn Debris Basin, 
Bailey Debris Basin, Big Dalton Debris Basin, Blanchard Canyon Debris 
Basin, Blue Gum Canyon Debris Basin, Brand Canyon Debris Basin, Carter 
Debris Basin, Childs Canyon Debris Basin, Dunsmuir Canyon Debris Basin, 
Eagle Canyon Debris Basin, Eaton Walsh Debris Basin, Elmwood Canyon 
Debris Basin, Emerald East Debris Basin, Emerald West Debris Retention 
Inlet, Hay Debris Basin, Hillcrest Debris Basin, La Tuna Canyon Debris 
Basin, Little Dalton Debris Basin, Live Oak Debris Retention Inlet, 
Lopez Debris Retention Inlet, Lower Sunset Canyon Debris Basin, 
Marshall Canyon Debris Retention Inlet, Santa Anita Debris Basin, 
Sawpit Debris Basin, Schoolhouse Canyon Debris Basin, Shields Canyon 
Debris Basin, Sierra Madre Villa Debris Basin, Snover Canyon Debris 
Basin, Stough Canyon Debris Basin, Wilson Canyon Debris Basin, and 
Winery Canyon Debris Basin.

SEC. 309. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Amendment.--Section 203(a)(1)(A) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2675) is amended by 
striking ``ocean shoreline'' and inserting ``bay and ocean 
shorelines''.
    (b) Implementation.--In carrying out a study under section 142 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2930; 100 Stat. 
4158), pursuant to section 203(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020 (as amended by this section), the Secretary 
shall not differentiate between damages related to high tide flooding 
and coastal storm flooding for the purposes of determining the Federal 
interest or cost share.

SEC. 310. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN.

    (a) Study of Flood Risk Management Activities.--
            (1) In general.--Using funds made available to carry out 
        this section, the Secretary is authorized, at Federal expense, 
        to carry out a study to determine the feasibility of a project 
        for flood risk management and related purposes in the Columbia 
        River basin and to report to the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate with 
        recommendations thereon, including recommendations for a 
        project to potentially reduce the reliance on Canada for flood 
        risk management in the basin.
            (2) Coordination.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        activities described in this subsection in coordination with 
        other Federal and State agencies and Indian Tribes.
    (b) Funds for Columbia River Treaty Obligations.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to expend 
        funds appropriated for the purpose of satisfying United States 
        obligations under the Columbia River Treaty to compensate 
        Canada for operating Canadian storage on behalf of the United 
        States under such Treaty.
            (2) Notification.--If the U.S. entity calls upon Canada to 
        operate Canadian reservoir storage for flood risk management on 
        behalf of the United States, which operation may incur an 
        obligation to compensate Canada under the Columbia River 
        Treaty--
                    (A) the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure and Appropriations of 
                the House of Representatives and the Committees on 
                Environment and Public Works and Appropriations of the 
                Senate, by not later than 30 days after the initiation 
                of the call, a written notice of the action and a 
                justification, including a description of the 
                circumstances necessitating the call;
                    (B) upon a determination by the United States of 
                the amount of compensation that shall be paid to 
                Canada, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure and Appropriations of 
                the House of Representatives and the Committees on 
                Environment and Public Works and Appropriations of the 
                Senate a written notice specifying such amount and an 
                explanation of how such amount was derived, which 
                notification shall not delay or impede the flood risk 
                management mission of the U.S. entity; and
                    (C) the Secretary shall make no payment to Canada 
                for the call under the Columbia River Treaty until such 
                time as funds appropriated for the purpose of 
                compensating Canada under such Treaty are available.
            (3) Definitions.--In this section:
                    (A) Columbia river basin.--The term ``Columbia 
                River basin'' means the entire United States portion of 
                the Columbia River watershed.
                    (B) Columbia river treaty.--The term ``Columbia 
                River Treaty'' means the Treaty relating to cooperative 
                development of the water resources of the Columbia 
                River Basin, signed at Washington January 17, 1961, and 
                entered into force September 16, 1964.
                    (C) U.S. entity.--The term ``U.S. entity'' means 
                the entity designated by the United States under 
                Article XIV of the Columbia River Treaty.

SEC. 311. PORT EVERGLADES, FLORIDA.

    Section 1401(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 
Stat. 1709) is amended, in row 4 (relating to the project for 
navigation, Port Everglades, Florida)--
            (1) by striking ``$229,770,000'' and inserting 
        ``$561,455,000'';
            (2) by striking ``$107,233,000'' and inserting 
        ``$361,302,000''; and
            (3) by striking ``$337,003,000'' and inserting 
        ``$922,757,000''.

SEC. 312. SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION TASK FORCE.

    Section 528(f)(1)(J) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3771) is amended by striking ``2 representatives of the 
State of Florida,'' and inserting ``3 representatives of the State of 
Florida, including at least 1 representative of the Florida Department 
of Environmental Protection and 1 representative of the Florida Fish 
and Wildlife Conservation Commission,''.

SEC. 313. CHICAGO SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shoreline erosion 
protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the 
Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to provide 65 percent of the cost of the 
locally preferred plan, as described in the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated April 14, 1994, for the construction of the following 
segments of the project:
            (1) Shoreline revetment at Morgan Shoal.
            (2) Shoreline revetment at Promontory Point.

SEC. 314. GREAT LAKES AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER INTERBASIN PROJECT, BRANDON 
              ROAD, WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

    Section 402(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 
(134 Stat. 2742) is amended by striking ``80 percent'' and inserting 
``90 percent''.

SEC. 315. SOUTHEAST DES MOINES LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Des Moines, 
        Iowa.
            (2) Flood protection project.--The term ``Flood Protection 
        Project'' means the project on the Des Moines River for local 
        flood protection of Des Moines, Iowa, authorized by the Act of 
        December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 896).
            (3) Red rock dam project.--The term ``Red Rock Dam 
        Project'' means the project for the Red Rock Dam on the Des 
        Moines River for flood control and other purposes, authorized 
        by the Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 896).
    (b) Project Modifications.--The Red Rock Dam Project and the Flood 
Protection Project shall be modified as follows, subject to a new or 
amended agreement between the Secretary and the City, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b):
            (1) That portion of the Red Rock Dam Project consisting of 
        the segment of levee from Station 15+88.8W to Station 77+43.7W 
        shall be transferred to the Flood Protection Project.
            (2) The relocated levee improvement constructed by the 
        City, from Station 77+43.7W to approximately Station 20+00, 
        shall be included in the Flood Protection Project.
    (c) Federal Easement Conveyances.--
            (1) Flood protection easements.--The Secretary is 
        authorized to convey, without consideration, to the City the 
        following easements to become part of the Flood Protection 
        Project in accordance with subsection (b):
                    (A) Easements identified as Tracts 3215E-1, 3235E, 
                and 3227E.
                    (B) Easements identified as Partial Tracts 3216E-2, 
                3216E-3, 3217E-1, and 3217E-2.
            (2) Additional easements.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        convey, without consideration, to the City or to the Des Moines 
        Metropolitan Wastewater Reclamation Authority the following 
        easements:
                    (A) Easements identified as Tracts 3200E, 3202E-1, 
                3202E-2, 3202E-4, 3203E-2, 3215E-3, 3216E-1, and 3216E-
                5.
                    (B) Easements identified as Partial Tracts 3216E-2, 
                3216E-3, 3217E-1, and 3217E-2.
            (3) Costs.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under 
        this subsection shall be responsible for all administrative 
        costs associated with the conveyance.

SEC. 316. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT STUDY.

    Section 213 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 
Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Cost-Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
comprehensive study carried out under subsection (a), and any 
feasibility study carried out under subsection (e), shall be 100 
percent.''.

SEC. 317. LOWER MISSOURI RIVER STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION 
              AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration projects in the 
Lower Missouri River through contracts with non-Federal interests, 
including projects for streambank protection and stabilization.
    (b) Area.--The Secretary shall carry out demonstration projects 
under this section on the reach of the Missouri River between Sioux 
City, Iowa, and the confluence of the Missouri River and the 
Mississippi River.
    (c) Requirements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) conduct an evaluation of the extent of streambank 
        erosion on the Lower Missouri River; and
            (2) develop new methods and techniques for streambank 
        protection, research soil stability, and identify the causes of 
        erosion.
    (d) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment of the Senate a report describing the results of the 
demonstration projects carried out under this section, including any 
recommendations for methods to prevent and correct streambank erosion.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
    (f) Sunset.--The authority of the Secretary to enter into contracts 
under subsection (a) shall expire on the date that is 5 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 318. MISSOURI RIVER INTERCEPTION-REARING COMPLEXES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 129 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2643), and subject to subsection 
(b), the Secretary is authorized to carry out the construction of an 
interception-rearing complex at each of Plowboy Bend A (River Mile: 
174.5 to 173.2) and Pelican Bend B (River Mile: 15.8 to 13.4) on the 
Missouri River.
    (b) Analysis and Mitigation of Risk.--
            (1) Analysis.--Prior to construction of the interception-
        rearing complexes under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
        perform an analysis to identify whether the interception-
        rearing complexes will--
                    (A) contribute to an increased risk of flooding to 
                adjacent lands and properties, including local levees;
                    (B) affect the navigation channel, including 
                crossflows, velocity, channel depth, and channel width;
                    (C) affect the harvesting of sand;
                    (D) affect ports and harbors; or
                    (E) contribute to bank erosion on adjacent private 
                lands.
            (2) Mitigation.--The Secretary may not construct an 
        interception-rearing complex under subsection (a) until the 
        Secretary successfully mitigates any effects described in 
        paragraph (1) with respect to such interception-rearing 
        complex.
    (c) Study.--Not later than 1 year after completion of the 
construction of the interception-rearing complexes under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
extent to which the construction of such interception-rearing complexes 
affected the population recovery of pallid sturgeon in the Missouri 
River.

SEC. 319. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, KANSAS, IOWA, 
              AND NEBRASKA.

    Section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 306) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Use of Other Funds.--Any acres acquired using Federal funds 
for purposes described in subsection (a) shall be considered toward the 
total number of acres required under such subsection, regardless of the 
source of the Federal funds.''.

SEC. 320. NORTHERN MISSOURI.

    (a) Northern Missouri Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Northern Missouri'' means the counties of Buchanan, Marion, Platte, 
and Clay, Missouri.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Northern Missouri.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Northern Missouri, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section to a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall enter 
        into a partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with the non-Federal 
        interest with respect to the project to be carried out with 
        such assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
                with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a 
                facilities or resource protection and development plan, 
                including appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project carried out under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of grants 
                        or reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the Federal share of a project that is the 
                subject of a partnership agreement under this section, 
                the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project cost.
                    (C) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(G)), the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, and rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                the non-Federal share of project cost (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (D) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
            (2) Corps of engineers expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
        of the amounts made available to carry out this section may be 
        used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
        projects under this section at Federal expense.

SEC. 321. ISRAEL RIVER, LANCASTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

     The project for flood control, Israel River, Lancaster, New 
Hampshire, carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is no longer authorized beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 322. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NEW 
              MEXICO.

    The non-Federal share of the cost of the project for flood risk 
management, Middle Rio Grande, Bernalillo to Belen, New Mexico, 
authorized by section 401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2020 (134 Stat. 2735), shall be 25 percent.

SEC. 323. SOUTHWESTERN OREGON.

    (a) Southwestern Oregon Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Southwestern Oregon'' means the counties of Benton, Coos, Curry, 
Douglas, Lane, Linn, and Josephine, Oregon.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Southwestern Oregon.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Southwestern Oregon, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section to a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall enter 
        into a partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with the non-Federal 
        interest with respect to the project to be carried out with 
        such assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
                with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a 
                facilities or resource protection and development plan, 
                including appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project carried out under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of grants 
                        or reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the Federal share of a project that is the 
                subject of a partnership agreement under this section, 
                the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project cost.
                    (C) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(G)), the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project cost (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (D) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
            (2) Corps of engineers expense.--Not more than 10 percent 
        of the amounts made available to carry out this section may be 
        used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
        projects under this section at Federal expense.

SEC. 324. WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TENNESSEE.

    Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the project for 
navigation, Wolf River Harbor, Tennessee, authorized by the Act of 
August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 1034), is modified to reduce, in 
part, the authorized dimensions of the project, such that the remaining 
authorized dimensions are as follows:
            (1) A 250-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a center 
        line beginning at an approximate point of 35.139634, -90.062343 
        and extending approximately 1,300 feet to an approximate point 
        of 35.142077, -90.059107.
            (2) A 200-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a center 
        line beginning at an approximate point of 35.142077, -90.059107 
        and extending approximately 1,800 feet to an approximate point 
        of 35.1467861, -90.057003.
            (3) A 250-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a center 
        line beginning at an approximate point of 35.148791, -90.05642 
        and extending approximately 5,550 feet to an approximate point 
        of 35.160848, -90.050566.

SEC. 325. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is authorized to provide, pursuant to section 206 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), information and advice 
to non-Federal interests on the removal of sediment obstructing inflow 
channels to the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, authorized pursuant to 
the project for Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries, Texas, under section 
3a of the Act of August 11, 1939 (chapter 699, 53 Stat. 1414; 68 Stat. 
1258).

SEC. 326. WATER LEVEL MANAGEMENT PILOT PROJECT ON THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI 
              RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a pilot project on 
water level management, as part of the operations and maintenance of 
the 9-foot channel projects of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois 
Waterway System, to help redress the degrading influences of prolonged 
inundation or sedimentation on such projects, and to improve the 
quality and quantity of habitat available for fish and wildlife.
    (b) Conditions on Drawdowns.--In carrying out the pilot project 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall carry out routine and 
systemic water level drawdowns of the pools created by the Upper 
Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System locks and dams, 
including drawdowns during the growing season, when--
            (1) hydrologic conditions allow the Secretary to carry out 
        a drawdown within applicable dam operating plans; or
            (2) hydrologic conditions allow the Secretary to carry out 
        a drawdown and sufficient funds are available to the Secretary 
        to carry out any additional activities that may be required to 
        ensure that the drawdown does not adversely affect navigation.
    (c) Coordination and Notification.--
            (1) Coordination.--The Secretary shall use existing 
        coordination and consultation processes to regularly consult 
        with other relevant Federal agencies and States regarding the 
        planning and assessment of water level management actions 
        implemented under this section.
            (2) Notification.--Prior to carrying out any water level 
        management plan pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall 
        provide notice to the public and to navigation interests and 
        other interested stakeholders.
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Upper Mississippi 
River and Illinois Waterway System'' has the meaning given that term in 
section 8001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
652 note).

SEC. 327. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER PROTECTION.

    Section 2010 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (128 Stat. 1270; 132 Stat. 3812) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(f) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not recommend 
deauthorization of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam pursuant to 
the disposition study carried out under subsection (d) unless the 
Secretary identifies a willing and capable non-Federal public entity to 
assume ownership of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam.
    ``(g) Modification.--The Secretary is authorized to investigate the 
feasibility of modifying, prior to deauthorizing, the Upper St. Anthony 
Falls Lock and Dam to add ecosystem restoration, including the 
prevention and control of invasive species, water supply, and 
recreation as authorized purposes.''.

SEC. 328. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN BENEFITS AND COSTS.

    Section 152(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 
U.S.C. 2213a(a)) is amended by striking ``a flood risk management 
project that incidentally generates seismic safety benefits in 
regions'' and inserting ``a flood risk management or coastal storm risk 
management project in a region''.

SEC. 329. DEBRIS REMOVAL.

    Section 3 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), is amended 
by striking ``or recreation'' and inserting ``ecosystem restoration, or 
recreation''.

SEC. 330. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Levee Safety Initiative.--Section 9005(g)(2)(E)(i) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303a(g)(2)(E)(i)) is 
amended by striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2026''.
    (b) Transfer of Excess Credit.--Section 1020 of the Water Resources 
Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2223) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``10 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on December 31, 
        2026''; and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``10 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on December 31, 
        2026''.
    (c) Rehabilitation of Existing Levees.--Section 3017(e) of the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3303a 
note) is amended by striking ``the date that is 10 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``December 31, 2026''.
    (d) Invasive Species in Alpine Lakes Pilot Project.--Section 507(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (16 U.S.C. 4701 note) is 
amended by striking ``2024'' and inserting ``2026''.
    (e) Environmental Banks.--Section 309(e) of the Coastal Wetlands 
Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 3957(e)) is amended 
by striking ``10'' and inserting ``12''.

SEC. 331. CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of any real property or easement to 
        be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a survey 
        that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
        is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
        reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
        transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated 
        with the conveyance.
            (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
        conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
        date, on the real property conveyed.
            (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
    (b) Rogers County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        convey to the City of Tulsa-Rogers County Port Authority, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        real property described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed under this 
        subsection is the approximately 19 acres of Federal land 
        located on the following 3 parcels in Rogers County, Oklahoma:
                    (A) Parcel 1 consists of U.S. tract 119 (partial), 
                U.S. tract 123, U.S. tract 120, U.S. tract 125, and 
                U.S. tract 118 (partial).
                    (B) Parcel 2 consists of U.S. tract 124 (partial) 
                and U.S. tract 128 (partial).
                    (C) Parcel 3 consists of U.S. tract 128 (partial).
            (3) Reservation of rights.--The Secretary shall reserve and 
        retain from any conveyance under this subsection such 
        easements, rights-of-way, and other interests that the 
        Secretary determines to be necessary and appropriate to ensure 
        the continued operation of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River 
        navigation project (including Newt Graham Lock and Dam 18) 
        authorized under the comprehensive plan for the Arkansas River 
        Basin by the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1218; 
        60 Stat. 634; 60 Stat. 647; 101 Stat. 1329-112; 117 Stat. 
        1842).
            (4) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (5) Consideration.--The City of Tulsa-Rogers County Port 
        Authority shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less 
        than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this 
        subsection, as determined by the Secretary.
    (c) Regional Corps of Engineers Office, Corpus Christi, Texas.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--At such time as new facilities 
        are available to be used as the office for the Galveston 
        District of the Corps of Engineers, the Secretary shall convey 
        to the Port of Corpus Christi, all right, title, and interest 
        of the United States in and to the property described in 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Description of property.--The property referred to in 
        paragraph (1) is the land known as ``Tract 100'' and ``Tract 
        101'', including improvements on that land, in Corpus Christi, 
        Texas, and described as follows:
                    (A) Tract 100.--The 1.89 acres, more or less, as 
                conveyed by the Nueces County Navigation District No. 1 
                of Nueces County, Texas, to the United States by 
                instrument dated October 16, 1928, and recorded at 
                Volume 193, pages 1 and 2, in the Deed Records of 
                Nueces County, Texas.
                    (B) Tract 101.--The 0.53 acres as conveyed by the 
                City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, to the 
                United States by instrument dated September 24, 1971, 
                and recorded at Volume 318, pages 523 and 524, in the 
                Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas.
                    (C) Improvements.--
                            (i) Main Building (RPUID AO-C-3516), 
                        constructed January 9, 1974.
                            (ii) Garage, vehicle with 5 bays (RPUID AO-
                        C-3517), constructed January 9, 1985.
                            (iii) Bulkhead, Upper (RPUID AO-C-2658), 
                        constructed January 1, 1941.
                            (iv) Bulkhead, Lower (RPUID AO-C-3520), 
                        constructed January 1, 1933.
                            (v) Bulkhead Fence (RPUID AO-C-3521), 
                        constructed January 9, 1985.
                            (vi) Bulkhead Fence (RPUID AO-C-3522), 
                        constructed January 9, 1985.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (4) Consideration.--The Port of Corpus Christi shall pay to 
        the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market 
        value of the property (including improvements) conveyed under 
        this subsection, as determined by the Secretary.

SEC. 332. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) New Projects.--Section 219(f) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1258) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(274) Chandler, arizona.--$18,750,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Chandler, Arizona.
            ``(275) Pinal county, arizona.--$40,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Pinal County, Arizona.
            ``(276) Tempe, arizona.--$37,500,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and 
        groundwater recharge, for the City of Tempe, Arizona.
            ``(277) Bell gardens, california.--$12,500,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and 
        water supply, in the city of Bell Gardens, California.
            ``(278) Calimesa, california.--$3,500,000 for stormwater 
        management and water supply infrastructure, including 
        groundwater recharge and water recycling, in the city of 
        Calimesa, California.
            ``(279) Compton creek, california.--$6,165,000 for 
        stormwater management infrastructure in the vicinity of Compton 
        Creek, city of Compton, California.
            ``(280) Downey, california.--$100,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of Downey, 
        California.
            ``(281) Lomita, california.--$4,716,600 for stormwater 
        management infrastructure in the city of Lomita, California.
            ``(282) East san diego county, california.--$70,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling 
        and water supply, in East County, San Diego County, California.
            ``(283) Eastern los angeles county, california.--
        $25,000,000 for the planning, design, and construction of water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and 
        water supply, for the cities of Azusa, Baldwin Park, Covina, 
        Duarte, El Monte, Glendora, Industry, Irwindale, La Puente, La 
        Verne, Monrovia, San Dimas, and West Covina, and for Avocado 
        Heights, Bassett, and Valinda, California.
            ``(284) Escondido creek, california.--$34,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, 
        in the vicinity of Escondido Creek, city of Escondido, 
        California.
            ``(285) Fontana, california.--$16,000,000 for stormwater 
        management infrastructure in the city of Fontana, California.
            ``(286) Healdsburg, california.--$23,500,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and water 
        supply, in the city of Healdsburg, California.
            ``(287) Inland empire, california.--$60,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in 
        Riverside County and San Bernardino County, California.
            ``(288) Marin county, california.--$28,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in Marin 
        County, California.
            ``(289) Maywood, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in the city of Maywood, California.
            ``(290) Monterey peninsula, california.--$20,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure and water supply, on the 
        Monterey Peninsula, California.
            ``(291) North richmond, california.--$45,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including coastal flooding 
        resilience measures for such infrastructure, in North Richmond, 
        California.
            ``(292) Ontario, california.--$40,700,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and water 
        supply, in the city of Ontario, California.
            ``(293) Paramount, california.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the city of Paramount, California.
            ``(294) Petaluma, california.--$13,700,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling, in the 
        city of Petaluma, California.
            ``(295) Rialto, california.--$27,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in the city of Rialto, California.
            ``(296) Rincon reservation, california.--$38,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure on the Rincon Band of 
        Luiseno Indians reservation, California.
            ``(297) Sacramento-san joaquin delta, california.--
        $50,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
        stormwater management, and water supply, in Contra Costa 
        County, San Joaquin County, Solano County, Sacramento County, 
        and Yolo County, California.
            ``(298) South san francisco, california.--$270,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
        management and water recycling, at the San Francisco 
        International Airport, California.
            ``(299) San joaquin and stanislaus, california.--
        $200,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
        stormwater management, and water supply, in San Joaquin County 
        and Stanislaus County, California.
            ``(300) Santa rosa, california.--$19,400,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, in the city of Santa Rosa, 
        California.
            ``(301) Sierra madre, california.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure and water supply, including 
        earthquake resilience measures for such infrastructure and 
        water supply, in the city of Sierra Madre, California.
            ``(302) Smith river, california.--$25,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure in Howonquet Village and Resort and 
        Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation, Smith River, California.
            ``(303) Torrance, california.--$100,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including groundwater recharge and 
        water supply, in the city of Torrance, California.
            ``(304) Western contra costa county, california.--
        $15,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, in the cities of 
        Pinole, San Pablo, and Richmond, and in El Sobrante, 
        California.
            ``(305) Hebron, connecticut.--$3,700,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the town of Hebron, Connecticut.
            ``(306) New london, connecticut.--$16,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure in the town of Bozrah and the City of 
        Norwich, Connecticut.
            ``(307) Windham, connecticut.--$18,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the town of Windham, Connecticut.
            ``(308) New castle, delaware.--$35,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        New Castle County, Delaware.
            ``(309) Washington, district of columbia.--$1,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
        management, in Washington, District of Columbia.
            ``(310) Longboat key, florida.--$12,750,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the town of Longboat Key, Florida.
            ``(311) Martin, st. lucie, and palm beach counties, 
        florida.--$100,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        including stormwater management, to improve water quality in 
        the St. Lucie River, Indian River Lagoon, and Lake Worth Lagoon 
        in Martin County, St. Lucie County, and Palm Beach County, 
        Florida.
            ``(312) Polk county, florida.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Polk 
        County, Florida.
            ``(313) Okeechobee county, florida.--$20,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure in Okeechobee County, Florida.
            ``(314) Orange county, florida.--$50,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and 
        water supply, in Orange County, Florida.
            ``(315) Guam.--$10,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, in Guam.
            ``(316) County of hawai`i, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, 
        in the County of Hawai`i, Hawaii.
            ``(317) Honolulu, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii.
            ``(318) Kaua`i, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the County of Kaua`i, Hawaii.
            ``(319) Maui, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the County 
        of Maui, Hawaii.
            ``(320) Dixmoor, illinois.--$15,000,000 for water and water 
        supply infrastructure in the village of Dixmoor, Illinois.
            ``(321) Forest park, illinois.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the village 
        of Forest Park, Illinois.
            ``(322) Lake county, illinois.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Lake 
        County, Illinois.
            ``(323) Lemont, illinois.--$3,135,000 for water 
        infrastructure in the village of Lemont, Illinois.
            ``(324) Lockport, illinois.--$6,550,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of 
        Lockport, Illinois.
            ``(325) Montgomery and christian counties, illinois.--
        $30,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including 
        water supply, in Montgomery County and Christian County, 
        Illinois.
            ``(326) Will county, illinois.--$30,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        Will County, Illinois.
            ``(327) Orleans parish, louisiana.--$100,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in Orleans Parish, Louisiana.
            ``(328) Fitchburg, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Fitchburg, 
        Massachusetts.
            ``(329) Haverhill, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Haverhill, 
        Massachusetts.
            ``(330) Lawrence, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Lawrence, 
        Massachusetts.
            ``(331) Lowell, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Lowell, 
        Massachusetts.
            ``(332) Methuen, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Methuen, 
        Massachusetts.
            ``(333) Boonsboro, maryland.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure, including water supply, in the town of 
        Boonsboro, Maryland.
            ``(334) Brunswick, maryland.--$15,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Brunswick, Maryland.
            ``(335) Cascade charter township, michigan.--$7,200,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure in Cascade Charter 
        Township, Michigan.
            ``(336) Macomb county, michigan.--$40,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, 
        Macomb County, Michigan.
            ``(337) Northfield, minnesota.--$33,450,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Northfield, Minnesota.
            ``(338) Centertown, missouri.--$15,900,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the village of Centertown, 
        Missouri.
            ``(339) St. louis, missouri.--$45,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of St. Louis, Missouri.
            ``(340) St. louis county, missouri.--$45,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in St. Louis County, Missouri.
            ``(341) Meridian, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the city of Meridian, Mississippi.
            ``(342) Oxford, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the City of Oxford, Mississippi.
            ``(343) Manchester, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in the city of 
        Manchester, New Hampshire.
            ``(344) Bayonne, new jersey.--$825,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management (including 
        combined sewer overflows), in the city of Bayonne, New Jersey.
            ``(345) Camden, new jersey.--$119,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, city of 
        Camden, New Jersey.
            ``(346) Essex and sussex counties, new jersey.--$60,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water 
        supply, in Essex County and Sussex County, New Jersey.
            ``(347) Flemington, new jersey.--$4,500,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the 
        Borough of Flemington, New Jersey.
            ``(348) Jefferson, new jersey.--$90,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Jefferson 
        Township, New Jersey.
            ``(349) Kearny, new jersey.--$69,900,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management (including 
        combined sewer overflows), in the town of Kearny, New Jersey.
            ``(350) Long hill, new jersey.--$7,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Long Hill 
        Township, New Jersey.
            ``(351) Morris county, new jersey.--$30,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in Morris County, New Jersey.
            ``(352) Passaic, new jersey.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the Passaic 
        County, New Jersey.
            ``(353) Phillipsburg, new jersey.--$2,600,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the town of Phillipsburg, New Jersey.
            ``(354) Rahway, new jersey.--$3,250,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Rahway, New Jersey.
            ``(355) Roselle, new jersey.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the Borough 
        of Roselle, New Jersey.
            ``(356) South orange village, new jersey.--$7,500,000 for 
        water infrastructure, including water supply, in the Township 
        of South Orange Village, New Jersey.
            ``(357) Summit, new jersey.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of 
        Summit, New Jersey.
            ``(358) Warren, new jersey.--$4,550,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Warren 
        Township, New Jersey.
            ``(359) Espanola, new mexico.--$21,995,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Espanola, New Mexico.
            ``(360) Farmington, new mexico.--$15,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of 
        Farmington, New Mexico.
            ``(361) Mora county, new mexico.--$2,874,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in Mora County, New Mexico.
            ``(362) Santa fe, new mexico.--$20,700,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation, in the 
        city of Santa Fe, New Mexico.
            ``(363) Clarkstown, new york.--$14,600,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, town of 
        Clarkstown, New York.
            ``(364) Genesee, new york.--$85,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and 
        water supply, in Genesee County, New York.
            ``(365) Queens, new york.--$119,200,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management 
        (including combined sewer overflows), in Queens, New York.
            ``(366) Yorktown, new york.--$40,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the town of 
        Yorktown, New York.
            ``(367) Brunswick, ohio.--$4,510,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of 
        Brunswick, Ohio.
            ``(368) Brookings, oregon.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in the City and Port of Brookings, Oregon.
            ``(369) Monroe, oregon.--$6,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Monroe, Oregon.
            ``(370) Newport, oregon.--$60,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city 
        of Newport, Oregon.
            ``(371) Lane county, oregon.--$25,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and storage, 
        distribution, and treatment systems, in Lane County, Oregon.
            ``(372) Palmyra, pennsylvania.--$36,300,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in Palmyra Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(373) Pike county, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for water 
        and stormwater management infrastructure, including water 
        supply, in Pike County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(374) Pittsburgh, pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the city of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
            ``(375) Pocono, pennsylvania.--$22,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Pocono Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(376) Westfall, pennsylvania.--$16,880,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in Westfall Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(377) Whitehall, pennsylvania.--$6,000,000 for stormwater 
        management infrastructure in Whitehall Township and South 
        Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(378) Beaufort, south carolina.--$7,462,000 for 
        stormwater management infrastructure in Beaufort County, South 
        Carolina.
            ``(379) Charleston, south carolina.--$25,583,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the city of Charleston, South Carolina.
            ``(380) Mount pleasant, south carolina.--$7,822,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the town of Mount Pleasant, South Carolina.
            ``(381) Portland, tennessee.--$1,850,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city 
        of Portland, Tennessee.
            ``(382) Smith county, tennessee.--$19,500,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        Smith County, Tennessee.
            ``(383) Trousdale, macon, and sumner counties, tennessee.--
        $178,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Trousdale County, Macon County, and Sumner County, Tennessee.
            ``(384) Virgin islands.--$1,584,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure in the United States Virgin Islands.
            ``(385) Bonney lake, washington.--$3,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in the city of Bonney Lake, 
        Washington.
            ``(386) Burien, washington.--$5,000,000 for stormwater 
        management infrastructure in the city of Burien, Washington.
            ``(387) Ellensburg, washington.--$3,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of 
        Ellensburg, Washington.
            ``(388) North bend, washington.--$30,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of 
        North Bend, Washington.
            ``(389) Port angeles, washington.--$7,500,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in 
        the City and Port of Port Angeles, Washington.
            ``(390) Snohomish, washington.--$56,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in Snohomish 
        County, Washington.
            ``(391) Western washington state.--$200,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, 
        water supply, and conservation, in Chelan County, King County, 
        Kittitas County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, Skagit 
        County, and Whatcom County, Washington.
            ``(392) Milwaukee, wisconsin.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, including stormwater management (including 
        combined sewer overflows), in the city of Milwaukee, 
        Wisconsin.''.
    (b) Project Modifications.--
            (1) Consistency with reports.--Congress finds that the 
        project modifications described in this subsection are in 
        accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by the 
        Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
        Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled ``Report to 
        Congress on Future Water Resources Development'', or have 
        otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
            (2) Modifications.--
                    (A) Sacramento area, california.--Section 
                219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840; 
                134 Stat. 2718) is amended by striking ``Suburban''.
                    (B) Los angeles county, california.--Section 
                219(f)(93) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840; 
                121 Stat. 1259) is amended--
                            (i) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and 
                        inserting ``$103,000,000'';
                            (ii) by striking ``wastewater and water 
                        related infrastructure,'' and inserting ``water 
                        and wastewater infrastructure, including 
                        stormwater management,''; and
                            (iii) by inserting ``Dominguez Channel, 
                        Santa Clarita Valley,'' after ``La Habra 
                        Heights,''.
                    (C) Boulder county, colorado.--Section 219(f)(109) 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
                Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is 
                amended by striking ``$10,000,000 for water supply 
                infrastructure'' and inserting ``$20,000,000 for water 
                and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater 
                management and water supply''.
                    (D) Charlotte county, florida.--Section 219(f)(121) 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
                Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended 
                by striking ``$3,000,000 for'' and inserting 
                ``$33,000,000 for wastewater and''.
                    (E) Miami-dade county, florida.--Section 
                219(f)(128) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is 
                amended by striking ``$6,250,000 for'' and inserting 
                ``$190,250,000 for wastewater infrastructure, 
                including''.
                    (F) Albany, georgia.--Section 219(f)(130) of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
                4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended by 
                striking ``$4,000,000 for a storm drainage system,'' 
                and inserting ``$109,000,000 for wastewater 
                infrastructure, including stormwater management 
                (including combined sewer overflows),''.
                    (G) Atlanta, georgia.--Section 219(e)(5) of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
                4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is amended by 
                striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
                    (H) East point, georgia.--Section 219(f)(136) of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
                4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended by 
                striking ``$5,000,000 for'' and inserting ``$15,000,000 
                for stormwater management and other''.
                    (I) Cook county, illinois.--Section 219(f)(54) of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
                4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by 
                striking ``$35,000,000 for'' and inserting 
                ``$100,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including 
                stormwater management, and other''.
                    (J) Calumet region, indiana.--Section 219(f)(12)(A) 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
                Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended 
                by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$125,000,000''.
                    (K) Baton rouge, louisiana.--Section 219(f)(21) of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
                4835; 113 Stat. 336) is amended by striking 
                ``$35,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''.
                    (L) South central planning and development 
                commission, louisiana.--Section 219(f)(153) of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
                4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1262) is amended by 
                striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting ``$12,500,000''.
                    (M) St. charles, st. bernard, plaquemines, st. john 
                the baptist, st. james, and assumption parishes, 
                louisiana.--
                            (i) St. charles, st. bernard, and 
                        plaquemines parishes, louisiana.--Section 
                        219(c)(33) of the Water Resources Development 
                        Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 
                        Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by striking ``Water 
                        and wastewater infrastructure'' and inserting 
                        ``Water supply and wastewater infrastructure, 
                        including stormwater infrastructure''.
                            (ii) St. john the baptist, st. james, and 
                        assumption parishes, louisiana.--Section 
                        219(c)(34) of the Water Resources Development 
                        Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 
                        Stat. 2763A-219) is amended--
                                    (I) in the paragraph heading, by 
                                striking ``Baptist and st. james'' and 
                                inserting ``Baptist, st. james, and 
                                assumption''; and
                                    (II) by striking ``Baptist and St. 
                                James'' and inserting ``Baptist, St. 
                                James, and Assumption''.
                            (iii) Authorization of appropriations for 
                        construction assistance.--Section 219(e) of the 
                        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
                        Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 121 
                        Stat. 1192) is amended--
                                    (I) by striking the ``and'' at the 
                                end of paragraph (16);
                                    (II) by striking the period at the 
                                end of paragraph (17) and inserting a 
                                semicolon; and
                                    (III) by adding at the end the 
                                following:
            ``(18) $70,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(33); and
            ``(19) $36,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(34).''.
                    (N) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--Section 
                219(f)(157) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1262) is 
                amended by striking ``correction of combined sewer 
                overflows'' and inserting ``water and wastewater 
                infrastructure, including stormwater management 
                (including correction of combined sewer overflows)''.
                    (O) Allegheny county, pennsylvania.--Section 
                219(f)(66)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1992 (106 Stat 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat 2763A-221) 
                is amended by striking ``$20,000,000 for'' and 
                inserting ``$30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, 
                including stormwater management, and other''.
                    (P) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--
                Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development 
                Act of 1992 (106 Stat 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat 
                2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 
                3818; 134 Stat. 2719) is amended by striking 
                ``$110,000,000'' and inserting ``$165,000,000''.
                    (Q) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--Section 
                219(f)(10)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1992 (106 Stat 4835; 113 Stat. 336) is amended by 
                striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$52,000,000''.
            (3) Effect on authorization.--Notwithstanding the operation 
        of section 6001(e) of the Water Resources Reform and 
        Development Act of 2014 (as in effect on the day before the 
        date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        2016), any project included on a list published by the 
        Secretary pursuant to such section the authorization for which 
        is amended by this subsection remains authorized to be carried 
        out by the Secretary.

SEC. 333. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

    (a) Consistency With Reports.--Congress finds that the project 
modifications described in this section are in accordance with the 
reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of 
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 
2282d), titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development'', or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
    (b) Projects.--
            (1) Chesapeake bay.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759; 121 Stat. 
        1202; 128 Stat. 1317) is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``infrastructure and'' before 
                ``resource protection'';
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) as 
                subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively; and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the 
                following:
                    ``(E) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
                    ``(F) water supply and related facilities;''.
            (2) New york city watershed.--Section 552(a)(2) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3780) is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking ``design and construction 
                assistance'' and inserting ``design, repair, 
                replacement, and construction assistance''; and
                    (B) by striking ``treatment, and distribution 
                facilities'' and inserting ``treatment, stormwater 
                management, and water distribution facilities''.
            (3) Southeastern pennsylvania.--Section 566 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3786; 113 Stat. 
        352) is amended--
                    (A) by striking the section heading and inserting 
                ``southeastern pennsylvania and lower delaware river 
                basin.'';
                    (B) in subsection (a), by inserting ``and the Lower 
                Delaware River Basin'' after ``southeastern 
                Pennsylvania'';
                    (C) in subsection (b), by striking ``southeastern 
                Pennsylvania, including projects for waste water 
                treatment and related facilities,'' and inserting 
                ``southeastern Pennsylvania and the Lower Delaware 
                River Basin, including projects for wastewater 
                treatment and related facilities (including sewer 
                overflow infrastructure improvements and other 
                stormwater management),'';
                    (D) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
    ``(g) Areas Defined.--In this section:
            ``(1) Southeastern pennsylvania.--The term `southeastern 
        Pennsylvania' means Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and 
        Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania.
            ``(2) Lower delaware river basin.--The term `Lower Delaware 
        River Basin' means the Schuylkill Valley, Upper Estuary, Lower 
        Estuary, and Delaware Bay sub-watersheds of the Delaware River 
        Basin in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the States of New 
        Jersey and Delaware.''; and
                    (E) in subsection (h), by striking ``to carry out 
                this section $25,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000 
                to provide assistance under this section to non-Federal 
                interests in southeastern Pennsylvania, and $20,000,000 
                to provide assistance under this section to non-Federal 
                interests in the Lower Delaware River Basin''.
            (4) Florida keys water quality improvements, florida.--
        Section 109 of division B of appendix D of the Consolidated 
        Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763A-
        222; 121 Stat. 1217) is amended in subsection (f) by striking 
        ``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$200,000,000''.
            (5) Northeastern minnesota.--Section 569(h) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368; 121 Stat. 
        1232) is amended by striking ``$54,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$80,000,000''.
            (6) Mississippi.--Section 592 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 379; 117 Stat. 1837; 121 
        Stat. 1233; 123 Stat. 2851) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b), by striking ``and surface 
                water resource protection and development'' and 
                inserting ``surface water resource protection and 
                development, stormwater management, and drainage 
                systems''; and
                    (B) in subsection (g), by striking ``$200,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$300,000,000''.
            (7) Lake tahoe basin restoration, nevada and california.--
        Section 108(g) of division C of the Consolidated Appropriations 
        Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 2942) is amended by 
        striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
            (8) Central new mexico.--Section 593 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 380) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (c), by inserting ``water 
                reuse,'' after ``conservation,''; and
                    (B) in subsection (h), by striking ``$50,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$100,000,000''.
            (9) South central pennsylvania.--Section 313(g)(1) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109 
        Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 121 
        Stat. 1146; 134 Stat. 2719) is amended by striking 
        ``$400,000,000'' and inserting ``$410,000,000''.
            (10) Ohio and north dakota.--Section 594 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 381; 119 Stat. 
        2261; 121 Stat. 1140; 121 Stat. 1944) is amended in subsection 
        (h), by striking ``$240,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$250,000,000''.
            (11) Texas.--Section 5138 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1250) is amended in 
        subsection (g) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$80,000,000''.
            (12) Lake champlain, vermont and new york.--Section 542 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2671; 
        121 Stat. 1150; 134 Stat. 2652) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b)(2)(C), by striking 
                ``planning'' and inserting ``clean water infrastructure 
                planning, design, and construction''; and
                    (B) in subsection (g), by striking ``$32,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
            (13) Western rural water.--Section 595 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 
        139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat. 
        1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681; 134 Stat. 
        2719) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (i)(1), by striking 
                ``$435,000,000'' and inserting ``$800,000,000''; and
                    (B) in subsection (i)(2), by striking 
                ``$150,000,000'' and inserting ``$200,000,000''.
    (c) Effect on Authorization.--Notwithstanding the operation of 
section 6001(e) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2016), any project included on a list 
published by the Secretary pursuant to such section the authorization 
for which is amended by this section remains authorized to be carried 
out by the Secretary.

                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    The following projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled 
``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted 
to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by 
Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports or decision documents 
designated in this section:
            (1) Navigation.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AK     Elim Subsistence    March 12,      Federal: $74,905,000
           Harbor Study,       2021          Non-Federal: $1,896,000
           Elim                              Total: $76,801,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CA     Port of Long Beach  October 14,    Federal: $71,985,500
           Deep Draft          2021          Non-Federal: $73,447,500
           Navigation, Los                   Total: $145,433,000
           Angeles County
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. GA     Brunswick Harbor    March 11,      Federal: $10,774,500
           Modifications,      2022          Non-Federal: $3,594,500
           Glynn County                      Total: $14,369,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (2) Flood risk management.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AL     Selma Flood Risk    October 7,     Federal: $15,533,100
           Management and      2021          Non-Federal: $8,363,900
           Bank                              Total: $23,897,000
           Stabilization
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. AL     Valley Creek Flood  October 29,    Federal: $17,725,000
           Risk Management,    2021          Non-Federal: $9,586,000
           Bessemer and                      Total: $27,311,000
           Birmingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CA     Lower Cache Creek,  June 21, 2021  Federal: $215,152,000
           Yolo County,                      Non-Federal: $115,851,000
           Woodland and                      Total: $331,003,000
           Vicinity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. NE     Papillion Creek     January 24,    Federal: $91,491,400
           and Tributaries     2022          Non-Federal: $52,156,300
           Lakes                             Total: $143,647,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. OR     Portland Metro      August 20,     Federal: $77,111,100
           Levee System        2021          Non-Federal: $41,521,300
                                             Total: $118,632,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (3) Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CT     Fairfield and New   January 19,    Federal: $92,937,000
           Haven Counties      2021          Non-Federal: $50,043,000
           Coastal Storm                     Total: $142,980,000
           Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. FL     Florida Keys,       September 24,  Federal: $1,513,531,000
           Monroe County,      2021          Non-Federal: $814,978,000
           Coastal Storm                     Total: $2,328,509,000
           Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. FL     Pinellas County,    October 29,    Initial Federal: $8,627,000
           Treasure Island     2021          Initial Non-Federal:
           and Long Key                       $5,332,000
           Segments, Coastal                 Total: $13,959,000
           Storm Risk                        Renourishment Federal:
           Management                         $92,000,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $101,690,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $193,690,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. LA     Upper Barataria     January 28,    Federal: $1,005,001,000
           Basin Hurricane     2022          Non-Federal: $541,155,000
           and Storm Damage                  Total: $1,546,156,000
           Risk Reduction
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. PR     San Juan            September 16,  Federal: $245,418,000
           Metropolitan Area   2021           Non-Federal: $131,333,000
           Coastal Storm                     Total: $376,751,000
           Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. SC     Folly Beach,        October 26,    Initial Federal:
           Coastal Storm       2021           $45,490,000
           Risk Management                   Initial Non-Federal:
                                              $5,054,000
                                              Total: $50,544,000
                                             Renourishment Federal:
                                              $164,424,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $26,767,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $191,191,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (4) Flood risk management and ecosystem restoration.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. TX     Coastal Texas       September 16,  Federal: $19,237,894,000
           Protection and      2021          Non-Federal:
           Restoration                        $11,668,393,000
                                             Total: $30,906,287,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (5) Ecosystem restoration.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CA     Prado Basin          April 22,     Federal: $33,976,000
           Ecosystem           2021          Non-Federal: $18,294,000
           Restoration, San                  Total: $52,270,000
           Bernardino,
           Riverside and
           Orange Counties
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (6) Modifications and other projects.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
A. State       B.  Name          Decision        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                 Document
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. DC     Washington, DC,     July 22, 2021  Federal: $17,740,000
           and Vicinity                      Non-Federal: $0
           Flood Risk                        Total: $17,740,000
           Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. LA     Lake Pontchartrain  December 16,   Federal: $807,000,000
           and Vicinity        2021          Non-Federal: $434,000,000
                                             Total: $1,241,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. LA     West Bank and       December 17,   Federal: $431,000,000
           Vicinity            2021          Non-Federal: $232,000,000
                                             Total: $663,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 <all>