Title: SAFE TECH Act
Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications

Summary:
Safeguarding Against Fraud, Exploitation, Threats, Extremism, and Consumer Harms Act or the SAFE TECH Act
This bill limits federal liability protection that applies to a user or provider of an interactive computer service (e.g., a social media company) for claims related to content provided by third parties.
Specifically, the bill applies the liability protection to claims arising from third-party speech rather than third-party information. Additionally, the liability protection shall not apply if a user or provider (1) accepts payment to make the speech available, or (2) creates or funds (in whole or in part) the speech.
The bill changes legal procedures concerning the liability protection by (1) requiring a defendant in a lawsuit to raise the liability protection as an affirmative defense, and (2) placing the burden of proving that the defense applies on the defendant.
Some courts have held that the current liability protection bars claims for civil penalties and injunctive relief. The bill expressly excludes from the liability protection requests for injunctive relief arising from a provider's failure to remove, restrict access to, or prevent dissemination of material likely to cause irreparable harm. However, the bill protects a provider from liability for actions taken to comply with such injunctions.
Under current law, the liability protection does not apply to federal criminal law, intellectual property law, and other designated areas of law. The bill further specifies that the liability protection shall not apply to civil rights law; antitrust law; stalking, harassment, or intimidation laws; international human rights law; and civil actions for wrongful death.

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3421 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3421

  To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to reaffirm 
        civil rights, victims' rights, and consumer protections.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2021

  Mr. McEachin (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, and Mr. Levin of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to reaffirm 
        civil rights, victims' rights, and consumer protections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safeguarding Against Fraud, 
Exploitation, Threats, Extremism, and Consumer Harms Act'' or the 
``SAFE TECH Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT IMPROVEMENTS.

    Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``No provider'' and 
                        inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph 
                (3), no provider'';
                            (ii) by striking ``any information'' and 
                        inserting ``any speech'';
                            (iii) by inserting before the period at the 
                        end the following: ``, unless the provider or 
                        user has accepted payment to make the speech 
                        available or, in whole or in part, created or 
                        funded the creation of the speech''; and
                            (iv) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Affirmative defense.--In any action in which 
                the defendant raises subparagraph (A) as a defense, the 
                defendant shall have the burden of persuasion, by a 
                preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant is a 
                provider or user of an interactive computer service and 
                is being treated as the publisher or speaker of speech 
                provided by another information content provider.'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``paragraph 
                (1)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (A)''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Exclusion from `good samaritan' immunity.--
                    ``(A) Injunctive relief.--Paragraph (1) shall not 
                apply to any request for injunctive relief arising from 
                the failure of an interactive computer service provider 
                to remove, restrict access to or availability of, or 
                prevent dissemination of material that is likely to 
                cause irreparable harm.
                    ``(B) Limitation of liability.--In the case of an 
                interactive computer service provider that complies 
                with an order granting injunctive relief described in 
                subparagraph (A), such compliance shall not subject the 
                interactive computer service provider to liability for 
                removing, restricting access to or availability of, or 
                preventing dissemination of material subject to the 
                order.''; and
            (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) No effect on civil rights laws.--Nothing in this 
        section shall be construed to limit, impair, or prevent any 
        action alleging discrimination on the basis of any protected 
        class, or conduct that has the effect or consequence of 
        discriminating on the basis of any protected class, under any 
        Federal or State law.
            ``(7) No effect on antitrust laws.--Nothing in this section 
        shall be construed to prevent, impair, or limit any action 
        brought under Federal or State antitrust law.
            ``(8) No effect on stalking, harassment, or intimidation 
        laws.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent, 
        impair, or limit any action alleging stalking, cyberstalking, 
        harassment, cyberharassment, or intimidation based, in whole or 
        in part, on sex (including sexual orientation and gender 
        identity), race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, or 
        physical or mental disability brought under Federal or State 
        law.
            ``(9) No effect on international human rights law.--Nothing 
        in this section shall be construed to prevent, impair, or limit 
        any action brought under section 1350 of title 28, United 
        States Code.
            ``(10) No effect on wrongful death actions.--Nothing in 
        this section shall be construed to prevent, impair, or limit 
        any civil action for a wrongful death.''.
                                 <all>