Title: Water Resources Development Act of 2020
Policy area: Water Resources Development

Summary:
Water Resources Development Act of 2020
This bill modifies water resources infrastructure funding and addresses Army Corps of Engineers projects for navigation, flood damage reduction, and ecosystem restoration.
The bill removes certain funds appropriated for harbor operations and maintenance from annual discretionary spending limits. This allows additional funds to be appropriated for these purposes without the amounts counting against annual discretionary spending limits. Further, the bill increases the percentage of available funds allocated annually to emerging harbors (i.e., those that handle less than 1 million tons of cargo annually).
Additionally, the bill modifies cost-sharing requirements for the construction of inland waterway projects for FY2021-FY2027.
Further, the Corps of Engineers must establish a pilot program to address the flood and storm damage risk reduction needs of economically disadvantaged communities. The Corps of Engineers may also construct projects for flood and coastal storm risk management in areas that have had been impacted by repetitive flooding. The Corps of Engineers must also identify any engineering or maintenance defects for levees in the national database.
The bill also creates a process to de-authorize projects that are no longer viable for construction and authorizes new projects, including projects for navigation, flood damage reduction, shoreline protection, and ecosystem restoration.
In addition, the Government Accountability Office must study (1) consideration by the Corps of Engineers of natural and nature-based features during project planning, (2) mitigation of the impact of water resources development projects, and (3) the operation and maintenance needs of federally authorized harbors and inland harbors.

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7575 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7575

  To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United 
 States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and 
               related resources, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2020

Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mrs. Napolitano, and 
Mr. Westerman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United 
 States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and 
               related resources, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2020''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 101. Budgetary treatment expansion and adjustment for the Harbor 
                            Maintenance Trust Fund.
Sec. 102. Funding for navigation.
Sec. 103. Annual report to Congress on the Harbor Maintenance Trust 
                            Fund.
Sec. 104. Additional measures at donor ports and energy transfer ports.
Sec. 105. Assumption of maintenance of a locally preferred plan.
Sec. 106. Coast Guard anchorages.
Sec. 107. State contribution of funds for certain operation and 
                            maintenance costs.
Sec. 108. Inland waterway projects.
Sec. 109. Implementation of water resources principles and 
                            requirements.
Sec. 110. Resiliency planning assistance.
Sec. 111. Project consultation.
Sec. 112. Review of resiliency assessments.
Sec. 113. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 114. Conforming amendment.
Sec. 115. Feasibility studies; review of natural and nature-based 
                            features.
Sec. 116. Report on corrosion prevention activities.
Sec. 117. Quantification of benefits for flood risk management projects 
                            in seismic zones.
Sec. 118. Federal interest determination.
Sec. 119. Economically disadvantaged community flood protection and 
                            hurricane and storm damage reduction study 
                            pilot program.
Sec. 120. Permanent measures to reduce emergency flood fighting needs 
                            for communities subject to repetitive 
                            flooding.
Sec. 121. Emergency response to natural disasters.
Sec. 122. Study on natural infrastructure at Corps of Engineers 
                            projects.
Sec. 123. Review of Corps of Engineers assets.
Sec. 124. Sense of Congress on multi-purpose projects.
Sec. 125. Beneficial reuse of dredged material; dredged material 
                            management plans.
Sec. 126. Aquatic ecosystem restoration for anadromous fish.
Sec. 127. Annual report to Congress.
Sec. 128. Harmful algal bloom demonstration program.
Sec. 129. Update on Invasive Species Policy Guidance.
Sec. 130. Report on debris removal.
Sec. 131. Missouri River interception-rearing complex construction.
Sec. 132. Cost and benefit feasibility assessment.
Sec. 133. Materials, services, and funds for repair, restoration, or 
                            rehabilitation of projects.
Sec. 134. Levee safety.
Sec. 135. National Dam Safety Program.
Sec. 136. Rehabilitation of Corps of Engineers constructed pump 
                            stations.
Sec. 137. Non-Federal Project Implementation Pilot Program.
Sec. 138. Definition of economically disadvantaged community.
                     TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS

Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies.
Sec. 202. Expedited completions.
Sec. 203. Feasibility study modifications.
Sec. 204. Selma, Alabama.
Sec. 205. Comprehensive study of the Sacramento River, Yolo Bypass, 
                            California.
Sec. 206. Great Lakes Coastal Resiliency Study.
Sec. 207. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, Iowa.
Sec. 208. Report on the status of restoration in the Louisiana coastal 
                            area.
Sec. 209. Lower Mississippi River comprehensive study.
Sec. 210. Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Plan.
Sec. 211. Lower Missouri Basin Flood Risk and Resiliency Study, Iowa, 
                            Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri.
Sec. 212. Cougar and Detroit Dams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon.
Sec. 213. Port Orford, Oregon.
Sec. 214. Wilson Creek and Sloan Creek, Fairview, Texas.
Sec. 215. GAO study on mitigation for water resources development 
                            projects.
Sec. 216. GAO study on application of Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 
                            expenditures.
Sec. 217. Study on water supply and water conservation at water 
                            resources development projects.
Sec. 218. PFAS review and inventory at Corps facilities.
             TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects.
Sec. 302. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 303. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 304. Lakes program.
Sec. 305. Watercraft inspection stations.
Sec. 306. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Restoration and Protection 
                            Program.
Sec. 307. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management 
                            Program.
Sec. 308. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System.
Sec. 309. Ouachita-Black River Navigation Project, Arkansas.
Sec. 310. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 311. Lake Isabella, California.
Sec. 312. Lower San Joaquin River flood control project.
Sec. 313. San Diego River and Mission Bay, San Diego County, 
                            California.
Sec. 314. San Francisco, California, Waterfront Area.
Sec. 315. Western Pacific Interceptor Canal, Sacramento River, 
                            California.
Sec. 316. Rio Grande Environmental Management Program, Colorado, New 
                            Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 317. New London Harbor Waterfront Channel, Connecticut.
Sec. 318. Washington Harbor, District of Columbia.
Sec. 319. Central Everglades, Florida.
Sec. 320. Miami River, Florida.
Sec. 321. Taylor Creek Reservoir and Levee L-73 (Section 1), Upper St. 
                            Johns River Basin, Florida.
Sec. 322. San Juan-Chama project; Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico.
Sec. 323. Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, 
                            Rhode Island and Connecticut.
Sec. 324. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 325. Cap Sante Waterway, Washington.
Sec. 326. Additional assistance for critical projects.
Sec. 327. Project modification authorizations.
Sec. 328. Application of credit.
Sec. 329. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 330. Conveyances.
Sec. 331. Repeals.
                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

Sec. 401. Project authorizations.
Sec. 402. Special rules.
Sec. 403. Authorization of projects based on feasibility studies 
                            prepared by non-Federal interests.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 101. BUDGETARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR THE HARBOR 
              MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 14003 of division B of the CARES Act 
(Public Law 116-136) is amended to read as follows:
    ``Sec. 14003.  Section 251(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
                    ```(H) Harbor maintenance activities.--If, for any 
                fiscal year, appropriations for the Construction, 
                Mississippi River and Tributaries, and Operation and 
                Maintenance accounts of the Corps of Engineers are 
                enacted that are derived from the Harbor Maintenance 
                Trust Fund established under section 9505(a) of the 
                Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and that the Congress 
                designates in statute as being for harbor operations 
                and maintenance activities, then the adjustment for 
                that fiscal year shall be the total of such 
                appropriations that are derived from such Fund and 
                designated as being for harbor operations and 
                maintenance activities.'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the CARES Act (Public 
Law 116-136).

SEC. 102. FUNDING FOR NAVIGATION.

    (a) Funding for Navigation.--Section 210 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238) is amended, in the section 
heading, by striking ``authorization of appropriations'' and inserting 
``funding for navigation''.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance of Harbor Projects.--Section 210(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(c)) is 
amended--
            (1) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--For each fiscal year, of the funds made 
        available under this section (including funds appropriated from 
        the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund), the Secretary shall make 
        expenditures to pay for operation and maintenance costs of the 
        harbors and inland harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2), 
        using--
                    ``(A) not less than 20 percent of such funds for 
                emerging harbor projects, to the extent there are 
                identifiable operations and maintenance needs, 
                including eligible breakwater and jetty needs, at such 
                harbor projects;
                    ``(B) not less than 12 percent of such funds for 
                projects that are located within the Great Lakes 
                Navigation System;
                    ``(C) 10 percent of such funds for expanded uses 
                carried out at donor ports, as such term is defined in 
                section 2106 of the Water Resources Reform and 
                Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c); and
                    ``(D) any remaining funds for operation and 
                maintenance costs of any harbor or inland harbor 
                referred to in subsection (a)(2) based on an equitable 
                allocation of such funds among such harbors and inland 
                harbors.'';
            (2) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
            ``(3) Additional uses at emerging harbors.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In each fiscal year, the 
                Secretary may use not more than $5,000,000 of funds 
                designated for emerging harbor projects under paragraph 
                (1)(A) to pay for the costs of up to 10 projects for 
                maintenance dredging of a marina or berthing area, in 
                an emerging harbor, that includes an area that is 
                located adjacent to, or is accessible by, a Federal 
                navigation project, subject to subparagraphs (B) and 
                (C) of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Eligible emerging harbors.--The Secretary may 
                use funds as authorized under subparagraph (A) at an 
                emerging harbor that--
                            ``(i) supports commercial activities, 
                        including commercial fishing operations, 
                        commercial fish processing operations, 
                        recreational and sport fishing, and commercial 
                        boat yards; or
                            ``(ii) supports activities of the Secretary 
                        of the department in which the Coast Guard is 
                        operating.
                    ``(C) Cost sharing requirements.--The Secretary 
                shall require a non-Federal interest to contribute not 
                less than 25 percent of the costs for maintenance 
                dredging of that portion of a maintenance dredging 
                project described in subparagraph (A) that is located 
                outside of the Federal navigation project, which may be 
                provided as an in-kind contribution, including through 
                the use of dredge equipment owned by non-Federal 
                interest to carry out such activities.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Emergency expenditures.--Nothing in this subsection 
        prohibits the Secretary from making an expenditure to pay for 
        the operation and maintenance costs of a specific harbor or 
        inland harbor, including the transfer of funding from the 
        operation and maintenance of a separate project, if--
                    ``(A) the Secretary determines that the action is 
                necessary to address the navigation needs of a harbor 
                or inland harbor where safe navigation has been 
                severely restricted due to an unforeseen event; and
                    ``(B) the Secretary provides within 90 days of the 
                action notice and information on the need for the 
                action to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
                and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and 
                the Committee on Appropriations of the House of 
                Representatives.''.
    (c) Prioritization.--Section 210 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238) is amended by striking subsection (d) and 
redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (d) and (e), 
respectively.
    (d) Assessment of Harbors and Inland Harbors.--Section 
210(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (as so 
redesignated) is amended by striking ``expanded uses at eligible 
harbors or inland harbors referred to in subsection (d)(2)'' and 
inserting ``uses described in paragraphs (1)(C) and (3) of subsection 
(c)''.
    (e) Definitions.--Section 210(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (as so redesignated) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraphs (6) through (9);
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (5) as 
        paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively;
            (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Emerging harbor.--The term `emerging harbor' means a 
        harbor or inland harbor referred to in subsection (a)(2) that 
        transits less than 1,000,000 tons of cargo annually.
            ``(3) Emerging harbor project.--The term `emerging harbor 
        project' means a project that is assigned to an emerging 
        harbor.''; and
            (4) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), by adding at the 
        end the following:
                    ``(C) An in-water improvement, if the improvement--
                            ``(i) is for the seismic reinforcement of a 
                        wharf or other berthing structure, or the 
                        repair or replacement of a deteriorating wharf 
                        or other berthing structure, at a port 
                        facility;
                            ``(ii) benefits commercial navigation at 
                        the harbor; and
                            ``(iii) is located in, or adjacent to, a 
                        berth that is accessible to a Federal 
                        navigation project.
                    ``(D) An activity to maintain slope stability at a 
                berth in a harbor that is accessible to a Federal 
                navigation project if such activity benefits commercial 
                navigation at the harbor.''.

SEC. 103. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST 
              FUND.

    Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (26 
U.S.C. 9505 note; 106 Stat. 4851) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``and annually thereafter,'' and 
                inserting ``and annually thereafter concurrent with the 
                submission of the President's annual budget request to 
                Congress,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Public Works and Transportation'' 
                and inserting ``Transportation and Infrastructure''; 
                and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1) by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(D) A description of the expected expenditures 
                from the trust fund to meet the needs of navigation for 
                the fiscal year of the budget request.''.

SEC. 104. ADDITIONAL MEASURES AT DONOR PORTS AND ENERGY TRANSFER PORTS.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 2106(a) of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)(A)--
                    (A) by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:
                            ``(ii) at which the total amount of harbor 
                        maintenance taxes collected (including the 
                        estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and 
                        cruise passengers) comprise not less than 
                        $15,000,000 annually of the total funding of 
                        the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund in each of 
                        the previous 3 fiscal years;'';
                    (B) in clause (iii), by inserting ``(including the 
                estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and cruise 
                passengers)'' after ``taxes collected''; and
                    (C) in clause (iv), by striking ``fiscal year 
                2012'' and inserting ``each of the previous 3 fiscal 
                years'';
            (2) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking ``fiscal year 2012'' 
        each place it appears and inserting ``each of the previous 3 
        fiscal years'';
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (9) and 
        inserting after paragraph (7) the following:
            ``(8) Harbor maintenance trust fund.--The term `Harbor 
        Maintenance Trust Fund' means the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 
        established by section 9505 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986.''; and
            (4) in paragraph (9), as so redesignated--
                    (A) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as 
                follows:
                    ``(B) at which the total amount of harbor 
                maintenance taxes collected (including the estimated 
                taxes related to domestic cargo and cruise passengers) 
                comprise annually more than $5,000,000 but less than 
                $15,000,000 of the total funding of the Harbor 
                Maintenance Trust Fund in each of the previous 3 fiscal 
                years;'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``(including 
                the estimated taxes related to domestic cargo and 
                cruise passengers)'' after ``taxes collected''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``fiscal year 
                2012'' and inserting ``each of the previous 3 fiscal 
                years''.
    (b) Report to Congress; Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 
2106 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 
U.S.C. 2238c) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e) and redesignating 
        subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (e) and (f), 
        respectively; and
            (2) in subsection (e), as so redesignated--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2020'' and 
                inserting ``2030''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (3).

SEC. 105. ASSUMPTION OF MAINTENANCE OF A LOCALLY PREFERRED PLAN.

     Section 204(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2232(f)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(f) Operation and Maintenance.--
            ``(1) Assumption of maintenance.--Whenever a non-Federal 
        interest carries out improvements to a federally authorized 
        harbor or inland harbor, the Secretary shall be responsible for 
        operation and maintenance in accordance with section 101(b) 
        if--
                    ``(A) before construction of the improvements--
                            ``(i) the Secretary determines that the 
                        improvements are feasible and consistent with 
                        the purposes of this title; and
                            ``(ii) the Secretary and the non-Federal 
                        interest execute a written agreement relating 
                        to operation and maintenance of the 
                        improvements;
                    ``(B) the Secretary certifies that the project or 
                separable element of the project is constructed in 
                accordance with applicable permits and appropriate 
                engineering and design standards; and
                    ``(C) the Secretary does not find that the project 
                or separable element is no longer feasible.
            ``(2) Federal financial participation in the costs of a 
        locally preferred plan.--In the case of improvements determined 
        by the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(i) to deviate 
        from the national economic development plan, the Secretary 
        shall be responsible for all operation and maintenance costs of 
        such improvements, as described in section 101(b), including 
        costs in excess of the costs of the national economic 
        development plan, if the Secretary determines that the 
        improvements satisfy the requirements of paragraph (1).''.

SEC. 106. COAST GUARD ANCHORAGES.

    The Secretary is authorized to perform dredging at Federal expense 
within and adjacent to anchorages on the Columbia River established by 
the Coast Guard pursuant to section 7 of the Act of March 14, 1915 (33 
U.S.C. 471), to provide safe anchorage for deep draft vessels 
commensurate with the authorized Federal navigation channel depth, 
including advanced maintenance.

SEC. 107. STATE CONTRIBUTION OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN OPERATION AND 
              MAINTENANCE COSTS.

    In carrying out eligible operations and maintenance activities 
within the Great Lakes Navigation System pursuant to section 210 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238) in a State 
that has implemented any additional State limitation on the disposal of 
dredged material in the open waters of such State, the Secretary may, 
pursuant to section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), 
receive from such State, and expend, such funds as may be contributed 
by the State to cover the additional costs for operations and 
maintenance activities for a harbor or inland harbor within such State 
that result from such limitation.

SEC. 108. INLAND WATERWAY PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 102 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212), 35 percent of the costs of 
construction of a project to which such section applies shall be paid 
from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund--
            (1) during each of fiscal years 2021 through 2027; and
            (2) for a project the construction of which is initiated 
        during such period, in each fiscal year until such construction 
        is complete.
    (b) Prioritization.--In selecting projects described in subsection 
(a) for which to initiate construction during any of fiscal years 2021 
through 2027, the Secretary shall prioritize projects that are included 
in the most recent 20-year program for making capital investments 
developed under section 302(d) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2251(d)).

SEC. 109. IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue final agency-specific 
procedures necessary to implement the principles and requirements and 
the interagency guidelines.
    (b) Development of Future Water Resources Development Projects.--
The procedures required by subsection (a) shall ensure that the 
Secretary, in the formulation of future water resources development 
projects--
            (1) develops such projects in accordance with--
                    (A) the guiding principles established by the 
                principles and requirements; and
                    (B) the national water resources planning policy 
                established by section 2031(a) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962-3(a)); and
            (2) fully identifies and analyzes national economic 
        development benefits, regional economic development benefits, 
        environmental quality benefits, and other societal effects.
    (c) Review and Update.--Every 5 years, the Secretary shall review 
and, where appropriate, revise the procedures required by subsection 
(a).
    (d) Public Review, Notice, and Comment.--In issuing, reviewing, and 
revising the procedures required by this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) provide notice to interested non-Federal stakeholders 
        of the Secretary's intent to revise the procedures;
            (2) provide opportunities for interested non-Federal 
        stakeholders to engage with, and provide input and 
        recommendations to, the Secretary on the revision of the 
        procedures; and
            (3) solicit and consider public and expert comments.
    (e) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Interagency guidelines.--The term ``interagency 
        guidelines'' means the interagency guidelines contained in the 
        document finalized by the Council on Environmental Quality 
        pursuant to section 2031 of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962-3) in December 2014, to implement the 
        principles and requirements.
            (2) Principles and requirements.--The term ``principles and 
        requirements'' means the principles and requirements contained 
        in the document prepared by the Council on Environmental 
        Quality pursuant to section 2031 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962-3), entitled 
        ``Principles and Requirements for Federal Investments in Water 
        Resources'', and dated March 2013.

SEC. 110. RESILIENCY PLANNING ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 206(a) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 
(33 U.S.C. 709a(a)) is amended by inserting ``, to avoid repetitive 
flooding impacts, to anticipate, prepare, and adapt to changing 
climatic conditions and extreme weather events, and to withstand, 
respond to, and recover rapidly from disruption due to the flood 
hazards'' after ``in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard''.
    (b) Prioritizing Flood Risk Resiliency Technical Assistance for 
Economically Disadvantaged Communities.--In carrying out section 206 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), the Secretary shall 
prioritize the provision of technical assistance to support flood risk 
resiliency planning efforts of an economically disadvantaged community.

SEC. 111. PROJECT CONSULTATION.

    (a) Reports Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit the following 
reports:
            (1) The report required under section 1214 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3809).
            (2) The report required under section 1120(a)(3) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1643).
    (b) Consultation.--
            (1) Agencies and tribes.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
        all covered community consultation policies, regulations, and 
        guidance of the Corps of Engineers continue to be implemented, 
        and that consultations with Federal and State agencies and 
        Indian Tribes required for a water resources development 
        project are carried out.
            (2) Communities.--The Secretary shall ensure that any 
        covered communities, including such communities identified in 
        the reports submitted under subsection (a), that are found to 
        be disproportionately or adversely affected are included in 
        consultation policies, regulations, and guidance of the Corps 
        of Engineers.
            (3) Project planning and construction.--The Secretary shall 
        ensure that covered communities are consulted in the 
        development of water resources development project planning and 
        construction, for the purposes of achieving environmental 
        justice and addressing any disproportionate or adverse effects 
        on such communities.
    (c) Environmental Justice Updates.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall update any policies, 
        regulations, and guidance of the Corps of Engineers related to 
        achieving environmental justice for covered communities.
            (2) Recommendations and consultation.--In carrying out 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) consult with a wide array of representatives of 
                covered communities; and
                    (B) use the recommendations from the reports 
                submitted under subsection (a).
    (d) Community Engagement.--The Secretary shall ensure that in 
carrying out authorized water resources development projects in, and 
all other activities of the Corps of Engineers related to, covered 
communities, the Corps of Engineers--
            (1) promotes the meaningful involvement of such communities 
        in the project development and implementation, enforcement 
        efforts, and other activities of the Corps of Engineers;
            (2) provides guidance and technical assistance to such 
        communities to increase understanding of the project 
        development and implementation activities, regulations, and 
        policies of the Corps of Engineers; and
            (3) cooperates with State, Tribal, and local governments 
        with respect to activities carried out pursuant to this 
        subsection.
    (e) Tribal Lands and Consultation.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
in carrying out authorized water resources development projects and in 
all other activities of the Corps of Engineers, that the Corps of 
Engineers--
            (1)(A) consults with Indian Tribes specifically on any 
        Tribal lands near or adjacent to any activities of the Corps of 
        Engineers, for purposes of identifying lands of ancestral, 
        cultural, or religious importance; and
            (B) cooperates with Indian Tribes to avoid, or otherwise 
        find alternate solutions with respect to, such lands; and
            (2)(A) consults with Indian Tribes specifically on any 
        Tribal areas near or adjacent to any activities of the Corps of 
        Engineers, for purposes of identifying lands, waters, and other 
        resources critical to the livelihood of the Indian Tribes; and
            (B) cooperates with Indian Tribes to avoid, or otherwise 
        find alternate solutions with respect to, such areas.
    (f) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Community of color.--The term ``community of color'' 
        means a community of individuals who are--
                    (A) American Indian or Alaska Native;
                    (B) Asian or Pacific Islander;
                    (C) Black, not of Hispanic origin; or
                    (D) Hispanic.
            (2) Covered community.--The term ``covered community'' 
        means each of the following:
                    (A) A community of color.
                    (B) An economically disadvantaged community.
                    (C) A rural community.
                    (D) A Tribal or indigenous community.

SEC. 112. REVIEW OF RESILIENCY ASSESSMENTS.

    (a) Resiliency Assessment.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this section, and in conjunction with the 
        development of procedures under section 109 of this Act, the 
        Secretary is directed to review, and where appropriate, revise 
        the existing planning guidance documents and regulations on the 
        assessment of the effects of sea level rise on future water 
        resources development projects to ensure that such guidance 
        documents and regulations are based on the best available, 
        peer-reviewed science and data on the current and future 
        effects of sea level rise on coastal communities.
            (2) Coordination.--In carrying out this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall--
                    (A) coordinate the review with the Engineer 
                Research and Development Center, other Federal and 
                State agencies, and other relevant entities; and
                    (B) to the maximum extent practicable and where 
                appropriate, utilize data provided to the Secretary by 
                such agencies.
    (b) Assessment of Benefits of Sea Level Rise Resiliency in 
Feasibility Reports.--
            (1) In general.--Upon the request of a non-Federal 
        interest, in carrying out a feasibility study for a project for 
        flood risk mitigation, hurricane and storm damage risk 
        reduction, or ecosystem restoration under section 905 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), the 
        Secretary shall consider whether the need for the project is 
        predicated upon or exacerbated by conditions related to sea 
        level rise.
            (2) Sea level rise resiliency benefits.--To the maximum 
        extent practicable, in carrying out a study pursuant to 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall document the potential 
        effects of sea level rise on the project, and benefits of the 
        project relating to sea level rise, during the 50-year period 
        after the date of completion of the project.

SEC. 113. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by inserting ``, and projects that use natural features or 
nature-based features (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)),'' 
after ``nonstructural projects''.

SEC. 114. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    Section 103(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Nonstructural 
        Flood Control Projects'' and inserting ``Projects Using 
        Nonstructural, Natural, or Nature-based Features''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``nonstructural flood 
        control measures'' and inserting ``a flood risk management or 
        hurricane and storm damage risk reduction measure using a 
        nonstructural feature, or a natural feature or nature-based 
        feature (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 
        2289a(a)),''.

SEC. 115. FEASIBILITY STUDIES; REVIEW OF NATURAL AND NATURE-BASED 
              FEATURES.

    (a) Technical Correction.--Section 1149(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2282 note; 132 Stat. 3787) is 
amended by striking ``natural infrastructure alternatives'' and 
inserting ``natural feature or nature-based feature alternatives (as 
such terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2016 (32 U.S.C. 2289a))''.
    (b) Summary of Analysis.--To the maximum extent practicable, the 
Secretary shall include in each feasibility report developed under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2282) for a project that contains a flood risk management or hurricane 
and storm damage risk reduction element, a summary of the natural 
feature or nature-based feature alternatives that were evaluated in the 
development of the feasibility report, and, if such alternatives were 
not included in the recommended plan, an explanation of why such 
alternatives were not included into the recommended plan.

SEC. 116. REPORT ON CORROSION PREVENTION ACTIVITIES.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly 
available, a report that describes--
            (1) the extent to which the Secretary has carried out 
        section 1033 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
        of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2350);
            (2) the extent to which the Secretary has incorporated 
        corrosion prevention activities (as defined in such section) at 
        water resources development projects constructed or maintained 
        by the Secretary since the date of enactment of such section; 
        and
            (3) in instances where the Secretary has not incorporated 
        corrosion prevention activities at such water resources 
        development projects since such date, an explanation as to why 
        such corrosion prevention activities have not been 
        incorporated.

SEC. 117. QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECTS 
              IN SEISMIC ZONES.

    (a) In General.--Upon the request of the non-Federal interest for a 
flood risk management project in a seismic zone, the Secretary shall 
quantify the seismic hazard risk reduction benefits for the project if 
the non-Federal interest identifies, and the Secretary approves, an 
acceptable methodology to quantify such benefits.
    (b) Applicability.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) include all associated seismic hazard risk reduction 
        benefits approved by the Secretary in the calculation of the 
        national economic development benefit-cost ratio for a flood 
        risk management project in a seismic hazard zone for purposes 
        of plan formulation pursuant to section 905 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986; and
            (2) seek to maximize the combination of flood risk 
        reduction and seismic hazard risk reduction benefits in the 
        formulation of the national economic development alternative 
        for such project.

SEC. 118. FEDERAL INTEREST DETERMINATION.

    Section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2282) is amended by inserting after subsection (a) the 
following:
    ``(b) Federal Interest Determination.--
            ``(1) In general.--In preparing a feasibility report under 
        subsection (a) for a study that will benefit an economically 
        disadvantaged community, upon request by the non-Federal 
        interest for the study, the Secretary shall first determine the 
        Federal interest in carrying out the study and the projects 
        that may be proposed in the study.
            ``(2) Cost-share.--The costs of a determination under 
        paragraph (1)--
                    ``(A) shall be at Federal expense; and
                    ``(B) shall not exceed $200,000.
            ``(3) Deadline.--A determination under paragraph (1) shall 
        be completed by not later than 120 days after the date on which 
        funds are made available to the Secretary to carry out the 
        determination.
            ``(4) Treatment.--
                    ``(A) Timing.--The period during which a 
                determination is being completed under paragraph (1) 
                for a study shall not be included for purposes of the 
                deadline to complete a final feasibility report under 
                section 1001(a)(1) of the Water Resources Reform and 
                Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c(a)(1)).
                    ``(B) Cost.--The cost of a determination under 
                paragraph (1) shall not be included for purposes of the 
                maximum Federal cost under section 1001(a)(2) of the 
                Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 
                U.S.C. 2282c(a)(2)).
            ``(5) Report to non-federal interest.--If, based on a 
        determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary determines 
        that a study or project is not in the Federal interest because 
        the project will not result, or is unlikely to result, in a 
        recommended plan that will produce national economic 
        development benefits greater than cost, but may result in a 
        technically sound and environmentally acceptable plan that is 
        otherwise consistent with section 904 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281), the Secretary shall 
        issue a report to the non-Federal interest with recommendations 
        on how the non-Federal interest might modify the proposal such 
        that the project could be in the Federal interest and 
        feasible.''.

SEC. 119. ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY FLOOD PROTECTION AND 
              HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION STUDY PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and implement a 
pilot program to evaluate opportunities to address the flood risk 
management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction needs of 
economically disadvantaged communities.
    (b) Participation in Pilot Program.--In carrying out subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) publish a notice in the Federal Register that requests 
        from non-Federal interests proposals for the potential 
        feasibility study of a flood risk management project or 
        hurricane and storm damage risk reduction project for an 
        economically disadvantaged community;
            (2) upon request of a non-Federal interest for such a 
        project, provide technical assistance to such non-Federal 
        interest in the formulation of a proposal for a potential 
        feasibility study to be submitted to the Secretary under the 
        pilot program; and
            (3) review such proposals and select 10 feasibility studies 
        for such projects to be carried out by the Secretary, in 
        coordination with the non-Federal interest, under this pilot 
        program.
    (c) Selection Criteria.--In selecting a feasibility study under 
subsection (b)(3), the Secretary shall consider whether--
            (1) the percentage of people living in poverty in the 
        county or counties in which the project is located is above the 
        percentage of people living in poverty in the State, based on 
        Census Bureau data;
            (2) the percentage of families with income above the 
        poverty threshold but below the average household income in the 
        county or counties in which the project is located is above the 
        percentage of the same for the State, based on Census Bureau 
        data;
            (3) the percentage of the population that identifies as 
        belonging to a minority or indigenous group in the county or 
        counties in which the project is located is above the average 
        percentage in the State, based on Census Bureau data; and
            (4) the project is addressing flooding or hurricane or 
        storm damage effects that have a disproportionate impact on a 
        rural community or a community of color (as such term is 
        defined in section 111 of this Act), including Tribal or 
        indigenous peoples.
    (d) Administration.--Notwithstanding the requirements of section 
105(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2215), the Federal share of the cost of a feasibility study carried out 
under the pilot program shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Geographic Diversity.--When selecting feasibility studies under 
subsection (b)(3), the Secretary shall consider the geographic 
diversity among proposed projects.
    (f) Study Requirements.--Feasibility studies carried out under this 
subsection shall, to the maximum extent practical, incorporate natural 
features or nature-based features (as such terms are defined in section 
1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a)), 
or a combination of such features and nonstructural features, that 
avoid or reduce at least 50 percent of flood or storm damages in one or 
more of the alternatives included in the final alternatives evaluated.
    (g) Notification.--The Secretary shall notify the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of the 
selection of each feasibility study under the pilot program.
    (h) Completion.--Upon completion of a feasibility report for a 
feasibility study selected to be carried out under this section, the 
Secretary shall transmit the report to Congress for authorization, and 
shall include the report in the next annual report submitted under 
section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 
(33 U.S.C. 2282d).
    (i) Sunset.--The authority to commence a feasibility study under 
this section shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    (j) Report.--Not later than 5 years and 10 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make 
publicly available, a report detailing the results of the pilot program 
carried out under this section, including--
            (1) a description of proposals received from non-Federal 
        interests pursuant to subsection (b)(1);
            (2) a description of technical assistance provided to non-
        Federal interests under subsection (b)(2); and
            (3) a description of proposals selected under subsection 
        (b)(3) and criteria used to select such proposals.

SEC. 120. PERMANENT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMERGENCY FLOOD FIGHTING NEEDS 
              FOR COMMUNITIES SUBJECT TO REPETITIVE FLOODING.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Affected community.--The term ``affected community'' 
        means a legally constituted public body (as that term is used 
        in section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5b(b))--
                    (A) with jurisdiction over an area that has been 
                subject to flooding in two or more events in any 10-
                year period; and
                    (B) that has received emergency flood-fighting 
                assistance, including construction of temporary 
                barriers by the Secretary, under section 5 of the Act 
                of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), with respect to 
                such flood events.
            (2) Natural feature; nature-based feature.--The terms 
        ``natural feature'' and ``nature-based feature'' have the 
        meanings given those terms in section 1184 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a).
    (b) Program.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
        program to study, design, and construct water resources 
        development projects through measures involving, among other 
        things, strengthening, raising, extending, realigning, or 
        otherwise modifying existing flood control works, designing new 
        works, and incorporating natural features, nature-based 
        features, or nonstructural features, as appropriate to provide 
        flood and coastal storm risk management to affected 
        communities.
            (2) Considerations.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practical, review and, 
        where appropriate, incorporate natural features or nature-based 
        features, or a combination of such features and nonstructural 
        features, that avoid or reduce at least 50 percent of flood or 
        storm damages in one or more of the alternatives included in 
        the final alternatives evaluated.
            (3) Construction.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a 
                project described in paragraph (1) without further 
                congressional authorization if--
                            (i) the Secretary determines that the 
                        project--
                                    (I) is advisable to reduce the risk 
                                of flooding for an affected community; 
                                and
                                    (II) produces benefits that are in 
                                excess of the estimated costs; and
                            (ii) the Federal share of the cost of the 
                        construction does not exceed $15,000,000.
                    (B) Specific authorization.--If the Federal share 
                of the cost of a project described in paragraph (1) 
                exceeds $15,000,000, the Secretary shall submit the 
                project recommendation to Congress for authorization 
                prior to construction, and shall include the project 
                recommendation in the next annual report submitted 
                under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
                Development Act of 2014.
                    (C) Financing.--
                            (i) Contributions.--If, based on a study 
                        carried out pursuant to paragraph (1), the 
                        Secretary determines that a project described 
                        in paragraph (1) will not produce benefits 
                        greater than cost, the Secretary shall allow 
                        the affected community to pay, or provide 
                        contributions equal to, an amount sufficient to 
                        make the remaining costs of design and 
                        construction of the project equal to the 
                        estimated value of the benefits of the project.
                            (ii) Effect on non-federal share.--Amounts 
                        provided by an affected community under clause 
                        (i) shall be in addition to any payments or 
                        contributions the affected community is 
                        required to provide towards the remaining costs 
                        of design and construction of the project under 
                        section 103 of the Water Resources Development 
                        Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
            (4) Ability to pay.--
                    (A) In general.--Any cost-sharing agreement for a 
                project entered into pursuant to this section shall be 
                subject to the ability of the affected community to 
                pay.
                    (B) Determination.--The ability of any affected 
                community to pay shall be determined by the Secretary 
                in accordance with procedures established by the 
                Secretary.
                    (C) Effect of reduction.--Any reduction in the non-
                Federal share of the cost of a project described in 
                paragraph (1) as a result of a determination under this 
                paragraph shall not be included in the Federal share 
                for purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph 
                (3).

SEC. 121. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO NATURAL DISASTERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
701n) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following--
            ``(5) Feasibility study.--
                    ``(A) Determination.--Not later than 180 days after 
                receiving, from a non-Federal sponsor of a project to 
                repair or rehabilitate a flood control work described 
                in paragraph (1), a request to initiate a feasibility 
                study to further modify the relevant flood control work 
                to provide for an increased level of protection, the 
                Secretary shall provide to the non-Federal sponsor a 
                written decision on whether the Secretary has the 
                authority under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a) to undertake the requested 
                feasibility study.
                    ``(B) Recommendation.--If the Secretary determines 
                under subparagraph (B) that the Secretary does not have 
                the authority to undertake the requested feasibility 
                study, the Secretary shall include the request for a 
                feasibility study in the annual report submitted under 
                section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
                Development Act of 2014.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Levee 
                Owners Manual'' and inserting ``Eligibility'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), in the heading, by striking 
                ``In general'' and inserting ``Levee owner's manual'';
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively, and inserting 
                after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Compliance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Notwithstanding the status of 
                compliance of a non-Federal interest with the 
                requirements of a levee owner's manual described in 
                paragraph (1), or with any other eligibility 
                requirement established by the Secretary related to the 
                maintenance and upkeep responsibilities of the non-
                Federal interest, the Secretary shall consider the non-
                Federal interest to be eligible for repair and 
                rehabilitation assistance under this section if the 
                non-Federal interest--
                            ``(i) enters into a written agreement with 
                        the Secretary that identifies any items of 
                        deferred or inadequate maintenance and upkeep 
                        identified by the Secretary prior to the 
                        natural disaster; and
                            ``(ii) pays, during performance of the 
                        repair and rehabilitation work, all costs to 
                        address--
                                    ``(I) any items of deferred or 
                                inadequate maintenance and upkeep 
                                identified by the Secretary; and
                                    ``(II) any repair or rehabilitation 
                                work necessary to address damage the 
                                Secretary attributes to such deferred 
                                or inadequate maintenance or upkeep.
                    ``(B) Eligibility.--The Secretary may only enter 
                into one agreement under subparagraph (A) with any non-
                Federal interest.
                    ``(C) Sunset.--The authority of the Secretary to 
                enter into agreements under paragraph (2) shall 
                terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of 
                enactment of this Act.''; and
                    (D) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated), by 
                striking ``this subsection'' and inserting ``paragraph 
                (1)''.

SEC. 122. STUDY ON NATURAL INFRASTRUCTURE AT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
              PROJECTS.

    (a) Definition of Natural Feature and Nature-Based Feature.--In 
this section, the terms ``natural feature'' and ``nature-based 
feature'' have the meanings given those terms in section 1184(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)).
    (b) Study.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct, 
and submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate, a report on the results of a study on the 
consideration by the Secretary of natural infrastructure, natural 
features, and nature-based features in the study of the feasibility of 
projects for flood risk management, hurricane and storm damage risk 
reduction, and ecosystem restoration.
    (c) Requirements.--The study under subsection (b) shall include--
            (1) a description of guidance or instructions issued, and 
        other measures taken, by the Secretary to consider natural 
        infrastructure, natural features, and nature-based features in 
        project feasibility studies;
            (2) an assessment, based on information from relevant 
        Federal and non-Federal sources, of--
                    (A) the costs, benefits, and effects associated 
                with natural infrastructure, natural features, and 
                nature-based features recommended by the Secretary for 
                flood risk management, hurricane and storm damage risk 
                reduction, and ecosystem restoration; and
                    (B) the effectiveness of natural infrastructure, 
                natural features, and nature-based features;
            (3) an analysis of projects for flood risk management, 
        hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, and ecosystem 
        restoration that have incorporated natural infrastructure, 
        natural features, or nature-based features to identify best 
        practices, including for measuring project benefits and costs;
            (4) a description of any statutory, fiscal, regulatory, or 
        other policy barriers to the appropriate consideration and use 
        of a full array of natural infrastructure, natural features, 
        and nature-based features in carrying out feasibility studies 
        and projects; and
            (5) any recommendations for changes to law, or to fiscal, 
        regulatory, or other policies, to improve the use of natural 
        infrastructure, natural features, and nature-based features by 
        the Corps of Engineers in carrying out feasibility studies and 
        projects.

SEC. 123. REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS.

    Section 6002 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (128 Stat. 1349) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 6002. REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS.

    ``(a) Assessment.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of 
projects constructed by the Secretary for which the Secretary continues 
to have financial or operational responsibility.
    ``(b) Inventory.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, the Secretary 
shall, based on the assessment carried out under subsection (a), 
develop an inventory of projects or portions of projects--
            ``(1) that are not needed for the missions of the Corps of 
        Engineers; or
            ``(2) the modification of which, including though the use 
        of natural features or nature-based features (as those terms 
        are defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)), could improve the 
        sustainable operations of the project, or reduce operation and 
        maintenance costs for the project.
    ``(c) Criteria.--In conducting the assessment under subsection (a) 
and developing the inventory under subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
use the following criteria:
            ``(1) The extent to which the project aligns with the 
        current missions of the Corps of Engineers.
            ``(2) The economic and environmental impacts of the project 
        on existing communities in the vicinity of the project.
            ``(3) The extent to which the divestment or modification of 
        the project could reduce operation and maintenance costs of the 
        Corps of Engineers.
            ``(4) The extent to which the divestment or modification of 
        the project is in the public interest.
            ``(5) The extent to which investment of additional Federal 
        resources in the project proposed for divestment or 
        modification, including investment needed to bring the project 
        to a good state of repair, is in the public interest.
            ``(6) The extent to which the authorized purpose of the 
        project is no longer being met.
    ``(d) Recommendations of Non-Federal Interests.--A non-Federal 
interest for a project may recommend that the Secretary include such 
project in the assessment or inventory required under this section.
    ``(e) Report to Congress.--
            ``(1) In general.--Upon completion of the inventory 
        required by subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, and make publicly available, a report 
        containing the findings of the Secretary with respect to the 
        assessment and inventory required under this section.
            ``(2) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall list in an appendix 
        any recommendation of a non-Federal interest made with respect 
        to a project under subsection (d) that the Secretary determines 
        not to include in the inventory developed under subsection (b), 
        based on the criteria in subsection (c), including information 
        about the request and the reasons for the Secretary's 
        determination.''.

SEC. 124. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS.

    It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary, in coordination 
with non-Federal interests, should maximize the development, 
evaluation, and recommendation of project alternatives for future water 
resources development projects that produce multiple project benefits, 
such as navigation, flood risk management, and ecosystem restoration 
benefits, including through the use of natural or nature-based features 
and the beneficial reuse of dredged material.

SEC. 125. BENEFICIAL REUSE OF DREDGED MATERIAL; DREDGED MATERIAL 
              MANAGEMENT PLANS.

    (a) National Policy on the Beneficial Reuse of Dredged Material.--
            (1) In general.--It is the policy of the United States for 
        the Corps of Engineers to maximize the beneficial reuse, in an 
        environmentally acceptable manner, of suitable dredged material 
        obtained from the construction or operation and maintenance of 
        water resources development projects.
            (2) Placement of dredged materials.--
                    (A) In general.--In evaluating the placement of 
                dredged material obtained from the construction or 
                operation and maintenance of water resources 
                development projects, the Secretary shall consider--
                            (i) the suitability of the dredged material 
                        for a full range of beneficial uses; and
                            (ii) the economic and environmental 
                        benefits, efficiencies, and impacts (including 
                        the effects on living coral) of using the 
                        dredged material for beneficial uses, 
                        including, in the case of beneficial reuse 
                        activities that involve more than one water 
                        resources development project, the benefits, 
                        efficiencies, and impacts that result from the 
                        combined activities.
                    (B) Calculation of federal standard.--The economic 
                benefits and efficiencies from the beneficial use of 
                dredged material considered by the Secretary under 
                subparagraph (A) shall be included in any determination 
                relating to the ``Federal standard'' by the Secretary 
                under section 335.7 of title 33, Code of Federal 
                Regulations for the placement or disposal of such 
                material.
    (b) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--
            (1) Pilot program projects.--Section 1122 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note) is 
        amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``20'' and 
                inserting ``30''; and
                    (B) in subsection (g), by striking ``20'' and 
                inserting ``30''.
            (2) Sense of congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
        the Secretary, in selecting projects for the beneficial reuse 
        of dredged materials under section 1122 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note), should ensure 
        the thorough evaluation of project submissions from rural, 
        small, and economically disadvantaged communities.
    (c) Five-Year Regional Dredged Material Management Plans.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the District 
        Commander of each district of the Corps of Engineers that 
        obtains dredged material through the construction or operation 
        and maintenance of a water resources development project shall, 
        at Federal expense, develop and submit to the Secretary a 5-
        year dredged material management plan in coordination with 
        relevant State agencies and stakeholders.
            (2) Scope.--Each plan developed under this subsection shall 
        include--
                    (A) a dredged material budget for each watershed or 
                littoral system within the district;
                    (B) an estimate of the amount of dredged material 
                likely to be obtained through the construction or 
                operation and maintenance of all water resources 
                development projects projected to be carried out within 
                the district during the 5-year period following 
                submission of the plan, and the estimated timing for 
                obtaining such dredged material;
                    (C) an identification of potential water resources 
                development projects projected to be carried out within 
                the district during such 5-year period that are 
                suitable for, or that require, the placement of dredged 
                material, and an estimate of the amount of dredged 
                material placement capacity of such projects;
                    (D) an evaluation of--
                            (i) the suitability of the dredged material 
                        for a full range of beneficial uses; and
                            (ii) the economic and environmental 
                        benefits, efficiencies, and impacts (including 
                        the effects on living coral) of using the 
                        dredged material for beneficial uses, 
                        including, in the case of beneficial reuse 
                        activities that involve more than one water 
                        resources development project, the benefits, 
                        efficiencies, and impacts that result from the 
                        combined activities; and
                    (E) the district-wide goals for beneficial reuse of 
                the dredged material, including any expected cost 
                savings from aligning and coordinating multiple 
                projects (including projects across Corps districts) in 
                the reuse of the dredged material.
            (3) Public comment.--In developing each plan under this 
        subsection, each District Commander shall provide notice and an 
        opportunity for public comment.
            (4) Public availability.--Upon submission of each plan to 
        the Secretary under this subsection, each District Commander 
        shall make the plan publicly available, including on a publicly 
        available website.
    (d) Dredge Pilot Program.--
            (1) Revisions.--Section 1111 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``for the 
                operation and maintenance of harbors and inland 
                harbors'' and all that follows through the period at 
                the end and inserting the following: ``for the--
            ``(1) harbors and inland harbors referred to in section 
        210(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2238(a)(2)); or
            ``(2) inland and intracoastal waterways of the United 
        States described in section 206 of the Inland Waterways Revenue 
        Act of 1978 (33 U.S.C. 1804).''; and
                    (B) in subsection (b), by striking ``or inland 
                harbors'' and inserting ``, inland harbors, or inland 
                or intracoastal waterways''.
            (2) Coordination with existing authorities.--The Secretary 
        may carry out the dredge pilot program authorized by section 
        1111 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 
        2326 note) in coordination with Federal regional dredge 
        demonstration programs in effect on the date of enactment of 
        this Act.

SEC. 126. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FOR ANADROMOUS FISH.

    (a) Anadromous Fish Habitat and Passage.--Section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Anadromous fish habitat and passage.--
                    ``(A) Measures.--A project under this section may 
                include measures to improve habitat or passage for 
                anadromous fish, including--
                            ``(i) installing fish bypass structures on 
                        small water diversions;
                            ``(ii) modifying tide gates; and
                            ``(iii) restoring or reconnecting 
                        floodplains and wetlands that are important for 
                        anadromous fish habitat or passage.
                    ``(B) Benefits.--A project that includes measures 
                under this paragraph shall be formulated to maximize 
                benefits for the anadromous fish species benefitted by 
                the project.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Prioritization.--The Secretary shall give projects that 
include measures described in subsection (a)(3) equal priority for 
implementation as other projects under this section.''.

SEC. 127. ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    Section 7001(c)(4)(B) of the Water Resources Reform and Development 
Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d(c)(4)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
                            ``(ii) the Secretary shall not include 
                        proposals in the appendix of the annual report 
                        that otherwise meet the criteria for inclusion 
                        in the annual report solely on the basis that 
                        the proposals are for the purposes of 
                        navigation, flood risk management, ecosystem 
                        restoration, or municipal or agricultural water 
                        supply; and''.

SEC. 128. HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a demonstration 
program to determine the causes of, and implement measures to 
effectively detect, prevent, treat, and eliminate, harmful algal blooms 
associated with water resources development projects.
    (b) Consultation; Use of Existing Data and Program Authorities.--In 
carrying out the demonstration program under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with the heads of appropriate Federal and State 
        agencies; and
            (2) make maximum use of existing Federal and State data and 
        ongoing programs and activities of Federal and State agencies, 
        including the activities of the Secretary carried out through 
        the Engineer Research and Development Center pursuant to 
        section 1109 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 
        U.S.C. 610 note).
    (c) Focus Areas.--In carrying out the demonstration program under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall undertake program activities 
related to harmful algal blooms in the Great Lakes, the tidal and 
inland waters of the State of New Jersey, and Lake Okeechobee, Florida.

SEC. 129. UPDATE ON INVASIVE SPECIES POLICY GUIDANCE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall periodically update the 
Invasive Species Policy Guidance, developed under section 104 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) and the Nonindigenous 
Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4701 et 
seq.), in accordance with the most recent National Invasive Species 
Council Management Plan developed pursuant to Executive Order 13112.
    (b) Inclusion.--The Secretary may include in the updated guidance 
invasive species specific efforts at federally authorized water 
resources development projects located in--
            (1) high-altitude lakes; and
            (2) the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins.

SEC. 130. REPORT ON DEBRIS REMOVAL.

    Section 1210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 
Stat. 3808) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1210. REPORT ON DEBRIS REMOVAL.

    ``Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2020, the Secretary shall submit to 
Congress and make publicly available a report that describes--
            ``(1) the extent to which, during the 10 fiscal years prior 
        to such date of enactment, the Secretary has carried out 
        section 3 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a);
            ``(2) how the Secretary has evaluated potential work to be 
        carried out under that section; and
            ``(3) the extent to which the Secretary plans to start, 
        continue, or complete debris removal activities in the 3 years 
        following submission of the report.''.

SEC. 131. MISSOURI RIVER INTERCEPTION-REARING COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate a report on the effects of any interception-rearing complex 
constructed on the Missouri River on--
            (1) flood risk management and navigation; and
            (2) the population recovery of the pallid sturgeon, 
        including baseline population counts.
    (b) No Additional IRC Construction.--The Secretary may not 
authorize construction of an interception-rearing complex on the 
Missouri River until the Secretary--
            (1) submits the report required by subsection (a);
            (2) acting through the Engineer Research and Development 
        Center, conducts further research on interception-rearing 
        complex design, including any effects on existing flows, flood 
        risk management, and navigation; and
            (3) develops a plan--
                    (A) to repair dikes and revetments that are 
                affecting flood risk and bank erosion; and
                    (B) to establish, repair, or improve water control 
                structures at the headworks of constructed shallow 
                water habitat side-channels.
    (c) Future IRC Construction.--
            (1) Public comment.--The Secretary shall provide an 
        opportunity for comment from the public and the Governor of 
        each affected State on any proposals to construct an 
        interception-rearing complex after the date of enactment of 
        this Act.
            (2) Period.--The public comment period required by 
        paragraph (1) shall be not less than 90 days for each proposal 
        to construct an interception-rearing complex on the Missouri 
        River.

SEC. 132. COST AND BENEFIT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT.

    Section 5(a)(2)(B) of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
701n(a)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)(I), by inserting ``or contribute'' after 
        ``pay''; and
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) in the heading, by inserting ``and 
                contributions'' after ``of payments'';
                    (B) by inserting ``or contributions'' after ``Non-
                Federal payments''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``or contributions'' after ``non-
                Federal payments''.

SEC. 133. MATERIALS, SERVICES, AND FUNDS FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR 
              REHABILITATION OF PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In any area covered by an emergency or major 
disaster declaration declared under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), the 
Secretary is authorized to accept and use materials, services, and 
funds, during the period the declaration is in effect, from a non-
Federal interest or private entity to repair, restore, or rehabilitate 
a federally authorized water resources development project, and to 
provide reimbursement to such non-Federal interest or private entity 
for such materials, services, and funds, in the Secretary's sole 
discretion, and subject to the availability of appropriations, if the 
Secretary determines that reimbursement is in the public interest.
    (b) Additional Requirement.--The Secretary may only reimburse for 
the use of materials or services accepted under this section if such 
materials or services meet the Secretary's specifications and comply 
with all applicable laws and regulations that would apply if such 
materials and services were acquired by the Secretary, including 
sections 3141 through 3148 and 3701 through 3708 of title 40, United 
States Code, section 8302 of title 41, United States Code, and the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
    (c) Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Prior to the acceptance of materials, 
        services, or funds under this section, the Secretary and the 
        non-Federal interest shall enter into an agreement that 
        specifies--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest shall hold and save 
                the United States free from any and all damages that 
                arise from use of materials or services of the non-
                Federal interest, except for damages due to the fault 
                or negligence of the United States or its contractors;
                    (B) the non-Federal interest shall certify that the 
                materials or services comply with all applicable laws 
                and regulations under subsection (b); and
                    (C) any other term or condition required by the 
                Secretary.
            (2) Exception.--If an agreement under paragraph (1) was not 
        entered prior to materials or services being contributed, a 
        non-Federal interest shall enter into an agreement with the 
        Secretary that--
                    (A) specifies the value, as determined by the 
                Secretary, of those materials or services contributed 
                and eligible for reimbursement; and
                    (B) ensures that the materials or services comply 
                with subsection (b) and paragraph (1).

SEC. 134. LEVEE SAFETY.

    Section 9004 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 
U.S.C. 3303) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Identification of Deficiencies.--
            ``(1) In general.--For each levee included in an inventory 
        established under subsection (b) or for which the Secretary has 
        conducted a review under subsection (c), the Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) identify the specific engineering and 
                maintenance deficiencies, if any; and
                    ``(B) describe the recommended remedies to correct 
                each deficiency identified under subparagraph (A), and, 
                if requested by owner of a non-Federal levee, the 
                associated costs of those remedies.
            ``(2) Consultation.--In identifying deficiencies and 
        describing remedies for a levee under paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary shall consult with relevant non-Federal interests, 
        including by providing an opportunity for comment by those non-
        Federal interests.''.

SEC. 135. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 2 of the National Dam Safety Program Act 
(33 U.S.C. 467) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking clause (iii) and inserting the 
                following:
                            ``(iii) has an emergency action plan that--
                                    ``(I) is approved by the relevant 
                                State dam safety agency; or
                                    ``(II) is in conformance with State 
                                law and pending approval by the 
                                relevant State dam safety agency;''; 
                                and
                    (B) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the 
                following:
                            ``(iv) fails to meet minimum dam safety 
                        standards of the State in which the dam is 
                        located, as determined by the State; and
                            ``(v) poses an unacceptable risk to the 
                        public, as determined by the Administrator, in 
                        consultation with the Board.'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting ``under a 
        hydropower project with an authorized installed capacity of 
        greater than 1.5 megawatts'' after ``dam''; and
            (3) in paragraph (10)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``Non-federal 
                sponsor'' and inserting ``Eligible subrecipient''; and
                    (B) by striking ``The term `non-Federal sponsor''' 
                and inserting ``The term `eligible subrecipient'''.
    (b) Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dams.--
            (1) Establishment of program.--Section 8A(a) of the 
        National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(a)) is 
        amended by striking ``to non-Federal sponsors'' and inserting 
        ``to States with dam safety programs''.
            (2) Eligible activities.--Section 8A(b) of the National Dam 
        Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(b)) is amended, in the 
        matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``for a project may 
        be used for'' and inserting ``to a State may be used by the 
        State to award grants to eligible subrecipients for''.
            (3) Award of grants.--Section 8A(c) of the National Dam 
        Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(c)) is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``non-Federal 
                sponsor'' and inserting ``State''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``an 
                        eligible high hazard potential dam to a non-
                        Federal sponsor'' and inserting ``eligible high 
                        hazard potential dams to a State'';
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B)--
                                    (I) in the subparagraph heading, by 
                                striking ``Project grant'' and 
                                inserting ``Grant'';
                                    (II) by striking ``project grant 
                                agreement with the non-Federal 
                                sponsor'' and inserting ``grant 
                                agreement with the State''; and
                                    (III) by striking ``project,'' and 
                                inserting ``projects for which the 
                                grant is awarded,'';
                            (iii) by amending subparagraph (C) to read 
                        as follows:
                    ``(C) Grant assurance.--As part of a grant 
                agreement under subparagraph (B), the Administrator 
                shall require that each eligible subrecipient to which 
                the State awards a grant under this section provides an 
                assurance, with respect to the dam to be rehabilitated 
                by the eligible subrecipient, that the dam owner will 
                carry out a plan for maintenance of the dam during the 
                expected life of the dam.''; and
                            (iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``A 
                        grant provided under this section shall not 
                        exceed'' and inserting ``A State may not award 
                        a grant to an eligible subrecipient under this 
                        section that exceeds, for any 1 dam,''.
            (4) Requirements.--Section 8A(d) of the National Dam Safety 
        Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(d)) is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``to an eligible 
                subrecipient'' after ``this section'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in the paragraph heading, by striking 
                        ``Non-federal sponsor'' and inserting 
                        ``Eligible subrecipient'';
                            (ii) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
                        (A), by striking ``the non-Federal sponsor 
                        shall'' and inserting ``an eligible 
                        subrecipient shall, with respect to the dam to 
                        be rehabilitated by the eligible 
                        subrecipient,'';
                            (iii) in subparagraph (A), by striking 
                        ``participate in, and comply with,'' and 
                        inserting ``demonstrate that the community in 
                        which the dam is located participates in, and 
                        complies with,'';
                            (iv) in subparagraph (B), by striking 
                        ``have'' and inserting ``beginning not later 
                        than 2 years after the date on which the 
                        Administrator publishes criteria for hazard 
                        mitigation plans under paragraph (3), 
                        demonstrate that the Tribal or local government 
                        with jurisdiction over the area in which the 
                        dam is located has''; and
                            (v) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``50-
                        year period'' and inserting ``expected life of 
                        the dam''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Hazard mitigation plan criteria.--Not later than 1 
        year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the 
        Administrator, in consultation with the Board, shall publish 
        criteria for hazard mitigation plans required under paragraph 
        (2)(B).''.
            (5) Floodplain management plans.--Section 8A(e) of the 
        National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(e)) is 
        amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph 
                        (A), by striking ``the non-Federal sponsor'' 
                        and inserting ``an eligible subrecipient''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``1 
                        year'' and inserting ``2 years'' each place it 
                        appears; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(3) Plan criteria and technical support.--The 
        Administrator, in consultation with the Board, shall provide 
        criteria, and may provide technical support, for the 
        development and implementation of floodplain management plans 
        prepared under this subsection.''.
            (6) Contractual requirements.--Section 8A(i)(1) of the 
        National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467f-2(i)(1)) is 
        amended by striking ``a non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting 
        ``an eligible subrecipient''.

SEC. 136. REHABILITATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTED PUMP 
              STATIONS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Eligible pump station.--The term ``eligible pump 
        station'' means a pump station--
                    (A) constructed, in whole or in part, by the Corps 
                of Engineers for flood risk management purposes;
                    (B) that the Secretary has identified as having a 
                major deficiency; and
                    (C) the failure of which the Secretary has 
                determined would impair the function of a flood risk 
                management project constructed by the Corps of 
                Engineers.
            (2) Rehabilitation.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``rehabilitation'', with 
                respect to an eligible pump station, means to address a 
                major deficiency of the eligible pump station caused by 
                long-term degradation of the foundation, construction 
                materials, or engineering systems or components of the 
                eligible pump station.
                    (B) Inclusions.--The term ``rehabilitation'', with 
                respect to an eligible pump station, includes--
                            (i) the incorporation into the eligible 
                        pump station of--
                                    (I) current design standards;
                                    (II) efficiency improvements; and
                                    (III) associated drainage; and
                            (ii) increasing the capacity of the 
                        eligible pump station, subject to the condition 
                        that the increase shall--
                                    (I) significantly decrease the risk 
                                of loss of life and property damage; or
                                    (II) decrease total lifecycle 
                                rehabilitation costs for the eligible 
                                pump station.
    (b) Authorization.--The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation of 
an eligible pump station, if the Secretary determines that the 
rehabilitation is feasible.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal interest for the eligible pump 
station shall--
            (1) provide 35 percent of the cost of rehabilitation of an 
        eligible pump station carried out under this section; and
            (2) provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
        necessary relocations associated with the rehabilitation 
        described in subparagraph (A), at no cost to the Federal 
        Government.
    (d) Agreement Required.--The rehabilitation of an eligible pump 
station pursuant to this section shall be initiated only after a non-
Federal interest has entered into a binding agreement with the 
Secretary--
            (1) to pay the non-Federal share of the costs of 
        rehabilitation under subsection (c); and
            (2) to pay 100 percent of the operation and maintenance 
        costs of the rehabilitated eligible pump station, in accordance 
        with regulations promulgated by the Secretary.
    (e) Treatment.--The rehabilitation of an eligible pump station 
pursuant to this section shall not be considered to be a separable 
element of the associated flood risk management project constructed by 
the Corps of Engineers.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 137. NON-FEDERAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 1043(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ``the date that is 5 
        years after the date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
        ``September 30, 2026'';
            (2) in paragraph (8), by striking ``2023'' and inserting 
        ``2026''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Implementation guidance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Not later than 120 days after 
                the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary 
                shall issue guidance for the implementation of the 
                pilot program that, to the extent practicable, 
                identifies--
                            ``(i) the metrics for measuring the success 
                        of the pilot program;
                            ``(ii) a process for identifying future 
                        projects to participate in the pilot program;
                            ``(iii) measures to address the risks of a 
                        non-Federal interest constructing projects 
                        under the pilot program, including which entity 
                        bears the risk for projects that fail to meet 
                        the Corps of Engineers standards for design or 
                        quality;
                            ``(iv) the laws and regulations that a non-
                        Federal interest must follow in carrying out a 
                        project under the pilot program; and
                            ``(v) which entity bears the risk in the 
                        event that a project carried out under the 
                        pilot program fails to be carried out in 
                        accordance with the project authorization or 
                        this subsection.
                    ``(B) New project partnership agreements.-- The 
                Secretary may not enter into a project partnership 
                agreement under this subsection during the period 
                beginning on the date of enactment of this paragraph 
                and ending on the date on which the Secretary issues 
                the guidance under subparagraph (A).''.

SEC. 138. DEFINITION OF ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance defining the 
term ``economically disadvantaged community'' for the purposes of this 
Act and the amendments made by this Act.
    (b) Considerations.--In defining the term ``economically 
disadvantaged community'' under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, to 
the maximum extent practicable, utilize the criteria under paragraphs 
(1) or (2) of section 301(a) of the Public Works and Economic 
Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3161), to the extent that such 
criteria are applicable in relation to the development of water 
resources development projects.

                     TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct a 
feasibility study for the following projects for water resources 
development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the 
reports titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or 
otherwise reviewed by Congress:
            (1) Tonto creek, gila river, arizona.--Project for flood 
        risk management, Tonto Creek, Gila River, Arizona.
            (2) Sulphur river, arkansas and texas.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Sulphur River, Arkansas and Texas.
            (3) Cable creek, california.--Project for flood risk 
        management, water supply, and related benefits, Cable Creek, 
        California.
            (4) Del mar bluffs, california.--Project for shoreline 
        stabilization, Del Mar Bluffs, San Diego County, California.
            (5) Redbank and fancher creeks, california.--Project for 
        water conservation and water supply, Redbank and Fancher 
        Creeks, California.
            (6) Rio hondo channel, california.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Rio Hondo Channel, San Gabriel River, California.
            (7) Southern california, california.--Project for coastal 
        storm damage reduction, Southern California.
            (8) Shingle creek and kissimmee river, florida.--Project 
        for ecosystem restoration and water storage, Shingle Creek and 
        Kissimmee River, Osceola County, Florida.
            (9) St. john's river and lake jesup, florida.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration, St. John's River and Lake Jesup, 
        Florida.
            (10) Waimea river, hawaii.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii.
            (11) Chicago area waterways system, illinois.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration, recreation, and other purposes, Illinois 
        River, Chicago River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, 
        Little Calumet River, and other waterways in the vicinity of 
        Chicago, Illinois.
            (12) Fox river, illinois.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Fox River, Illinois.
            (13) Lower missouri river, kansas.--Project for bank 
        stabilization and navigation, Lower Missouri River, Sioux City, 
        Kansas.
            (14) Tangipahoa parish, louisiana.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana.
            (15) Kent narrows and chester river, maryland.--Project for 
        navigation, Kent Narrows and Chester River, Queen Anne's 
        County, Maryland.
            (16) Lower st. croix river, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        risk management, ecosystem restoration, and recreation, Lower 
        St. Croix River, Minnesota.
            (17) Escatawpa river basin, mississippi.--Project for flood 
        risk management and ecosystem restoration, Escatawpa River, 
        Jackson County, Mississippi.
            (18) Long beach, bay st. louis and mississippi sound, 
        mississippi.--Project for hurricane and storm damage risk 
        reduction and flood risk management, Long Beach, Bay St. Louis 
        and Mississippi Sound, Mississippi.
            (19) Pascagoula river basin, mississippi.--Project for 
        comprehensive watershed study, Pascagoula, Mississippi.
            (20) Tallahoma and tallahala creeks, mississippi.--Project 
        for flood risk management, Leaf River, Jones County, 
        Mississippi.
            (21) Lower osage river basin, missouri.--Project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Lower Osage River Basin, Missouri.
            (22) Upper basin and stony brook (green brook sub-basin), 
        raritan river basin, new jersey.--Reevaluation of the Upper 
        Basin and Stony Brook portions of the project for flood 
        control, Green Brook Sub-basin, Raritan River Basin, New 
        Jersey, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4119), including the 
        evaluation of non-structural measures to achieve the project 
        purpose.
            (23) Lake ontario shoreline, new york.--Project for coastal 
        storm resiliency, Lake Ontario shoreline, New York.
            (24) Wading river creek, new york.--Project for hurricane 
        and storm damage risk reduction, flood risk management, 
        navigation, and ecosystem restoration, Wading River Creek, New 
        York.
            (25) Reel point preserve, new york.--Project for navigation 
        and shoreline stabilization, Reel Point Preserve, New York.
            (26) Goldsmith inlet, new york.--Project for navigation, 
        Goldsmith Inlet, New York.
            (27) Tuscarawas river basin, ohio.--Project for 
        comprehensive watershed study, Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio.
            (28) Lower columbia river basin (turning basin), oregon and 
        washington.--Project to improve turning basins for the project 
        for navigation, Columbia River Channel, Oregon and Washington, 
        authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 280).
            (29) Williamsport, pennsylvania.--Project for flood risk 
        management and levee rehabilitation, greater Williamsport, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (30) City of charleston, south carolina.--Project for 
        tidal- and inland-related flood risk management, Charleston, 
        South Carolina.
            (31) Tennessee and cumberland river basins, tennessee.--
        Project to deter, impede, or restrict the dispersal of aquatic 
        nuisance species in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins, 
        Tennessee.
            (32) Port arthur and vicinity, texas.--Modification of the 
        project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Port 
        Arthur and vicinity, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1184), to reduce the 
        residual risk of flooding through the construction of 
        improvements to interior drainage.
            (33) Port of victoria, texas.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Port of Victoria, Texas.
            (34) Lower fox river basin, wisconsin.--Project for 
        comprehensive watershed study, Lower Fox River Basin, 
        Wisconsin.
            (35) Upper fox river and wolf river, wisconsin.--Project 
        for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration, Upper Fox 
        River and Wolf River, Wisconsin.
    (b) Special Rule.--The Secretary shall consider any study carried 
out by the Secretary to formulate the modifications to the project for 
hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Port Arthur and vicinity, 
Texas, identified in subsection (b)(32) shall be considered a 
continuation of the study carried out for Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, 
Texas, authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate, approved June 23, 2004.

SEC. 202. EXPEDITED COMPLETIONS.

    (a) Feasibility Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite the 
completion of a feasibility study for each of the following projects, 
and if the Secretary determines that the project is justified in a 
completed report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, 
engineering, and design of the project:
            (1) Project for navigation, St. George Harbor, Alaska.
            (2) Project for shoreline stabilization, Aunu`u Harbor, 
        American Samoa.
            (3) Project for shoreline stabilization, Tutuila Island, 
        American Samoa.
            (4) Project for flood risk management, Lower Santa Cruz 
        River, Arizona.
            (5) Project for flood control, water conservation, and 
        related purposes, Coyote Valley Dam, California.
            (6) Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
        restoration, Del Rosa Channel, city of San Bernardino, 
        California.
            (7) Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
        restoration, Mission-Zanja Channel, cities of San Bernardino 
        and Redlands, California.
            (8) Project for flood risk management, Prado Basin, 
        California.
            (9) Project to modify the project for navigation, San 
        Francisco Bay to Stockton, California.
            (10) Project to modify the Seven Oaks Dam, California, 
        portion of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River 
        Mainstem, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113; 101 Stat. 
        1329-111; 104 Stat. 4611; 110 Stat. 3713; 121 Stat. 1115), to 
        include water conservation as an authorized purpose.
            (11) Project to modify the project for navigation, Delaware 
        River Mainstem and Channel Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey, and 
        Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101(6) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802; 113 Stat. 
        300; 114 Stat. 1262) to include the construction of a turning 
        basin located near the Packer Avenue Marine Terminal.
            (12) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and 
        Southern Florida Project Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County, 
        Florida.
            (13) Project for comprehensive hurricane and storm damage 
        risk reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Chicago, 
        Illinois, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664; 113 Stat. 
        302).
            (14) Project for flood risk management, Wheaton, DuPage 
        County, Illinois.
            (15) Project for flood damage reduction, ecosystem 
        restoration, and recreation, Blue River Basin, Kansas City, 
        Kansas, carried out pursuant to the resolution of the Committee 
        on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives adopted on September 24, 2008 (docket number 
        2803).
            (16) Project to deepen the project for navigation, Gulfport 
        Harbor, Mississippi, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4094).
            (17) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Highlands, New Jersey.
            (18) Project for navigation, Shark River, New Jersey.
            (19) Project for flood risk management, Rondout Creek-
        Wallkill River Watershed, New York, carried out pursuant to the 
        resolution of the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on May 
        2, 2007 (docket number 2776).
            (20) Project for ecosystem restoration and hurricane and 
        storm damage risk reduction, Spring Creek South (Howard Beach), 
        Queens, New York.
            (21) Project for flood control, 42nd Street Levee, 
        Springfield, Oregon, being carried out under section 205 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (22) Project for ecosystem restoration, Hood River at the 
        confluence with the Columbia River, Oregon.
            (23) Project for flood risk management, Rio Culebrinas, 
        Puerto Rico.
            (24) Project for flood risk management, Rio Grande de 
        Manati, Puerto Rico.
            (25) Project for flood risk management, Rio Guayanilla, 
        Puerto Rico.
            (26) Project for flood risk management, Dorchester County, 
        South Carolina.
            (27) Project for navigation, Georgetown Harbor, South 
        Carolina.
            (28) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, 
        Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            (29) Project to modify the projects for navigation and 
        other purposes, Old Hickory Lock and Dam and the Cordell Hull 
        Dam and Reservoir, Cumberland River, Tennessee, authorized by 
        the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 636), to add 
        flood risk management as an authorized purpose.
            (30) Project for flood risk management, ecosystem 
        restoration, water supply, and related purposes, Lower Rio 
        Grande River, Cameron County, Texas, carried out pursuant to 
        the resolution of the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted on May 
        21, 2003 (docket number 2710).
            (31) Project for flood risk management, Savan Gut Phase II, 
        St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands.
            (32) Project for flood risk management, Turpentine Run, St. 
        Thomas, United States Virgin Islands.
            (33) Project for navigation, North Landing Bridge, Atlantic 
        Intracoastal Waterway, Virginia.
    (b) Post-Authorization Change Reports.--The Secretary shall 
expedite completion of a post-authorization change report for the 
following projects:
            (1) Project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Arizona.
            (2) Project for flood control, San Luis Rey River, 
        California.
            (3) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and Southern 
        Florida Project Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County, Florida.
            (4) Project for ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive 
        Everglades Restoration Plan, Caloosahatchee River C-43, West 
        Basin Storage Reservoir, Florida.
            (5) Project for flood risk management, Des Moines Levee 
        System, including Birdland Park Levee, Des Moines and Raccoon 
        Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa.
    (c) Watershed and River Basin Assessments.--The Secretary shall 
expedite the completion of an assessment under section 729 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), for the following:
            (1) Kansas River Basin, Kansas.
            (2) Merrimack River Basin, Massachusetts.
    (d) Disposition Study.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion 
of a disposition study, carried out under section 216 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), for the project for Salinas 
Reservoir (Santa Margarita Lake), California.

SEC. 203. FEASIBILITY STUDY MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) San Francisco Bay, California.--Section 142 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2930) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, San Francisco, Marin,'' after 
        ``Sonoma'';
            (2) by inserting ``, and along the ocean shoreline of San 
        Mateo, San Francisco, and Marin Counties,'' after ``Sacramento 
        and San Joaquin Rivers'';
            (3) by inserting ``and, with respect to the bay and ocean 
        shorelines of San Mateo, San Francisco, and Marin Counties, the 
        feasibility of and the Federal interest in providing measures 
        to adapt to rising sea levels'' after ``tidal and fluvial 
        flooding'';
            (4) by striking ``investigation'' and inserting in its 
        place ``investigations''; and
            (5) by inserting after ``San Francisco Bay region'' the 
        following: ``and, with respect to the bay and ocean shorelines 
        and streams running to the bay and ocean shorelines of San 
        Mateo, San Francisco, and Marin Counties, the effects of 
        proposed measures or improvements on the local economy; habitat 
        restoration, enhancement, or expansion efforts or 
        opportunities; public infrastructure protection and 
        improvement; stormwater runoff capacity and control measures, 
        including those that may mitigate flooding; erosion of beaches 
        and coasts; and any other measures or improvements relevant to 
        adapting to rising sea levels''.
    (b) Sacramento River, Southern Sutter County, California.--The 
study for flood control and allied purposes for the Sacramento River 
Basin, authorized by section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
Stat. 1197), is modified to authorize the Secretary to conduct a study 
for flood risk management, southern Sutter County between the 
Sacramento River and Sutter Bypass, California.
    (c) Salton Sea, California.--In carrying out the program to 
implement projects to restore the Salton Sea, California, authorized by 
section 3032 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 
1113; 130 Stat. 1677), the Secretary is authorized to carry out a study 
for the construction of a perimeter lake, or a northern or southern 
subset thereof, for the Salton Sea, California.
    (d) New York and New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries, New York and 
New Jersey.--The study for flood and storm damage reduction for the New 
York and New Jersey Harbor and Tributaries project, authorized by Act 
of June 15, 1955 (chapter 140, 69 Stat. 132), and being carried out 
pursuant to the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 
113-2), is modified to require the Secretary to--
            (1) evaluate and address the impacts of low-frequency 
        precipitation and sea-level rise on the study area;
            (2) consult with affected communities; and
            (3) ensure the study is carried out in accordance with 
        section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
        of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c).

SEC. 204. SELMA, ALABAMA.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that--
            (1) provides an update on the study for flood risk 
        management and riverbank stabilization, Selma, Alabama, 
        authorized by resolutions of the Committees on Public Works and 
        Rivers and Harbors of the House of Representatives on June 7, 
        1961, and April 28, 1936, respectively, the completion of which 
        the Secretary was required to expedite by section 1203 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3803); and
            (2) identifies project alternatives necessary to--
                    (A) assure the preservation of cultural and 
                historic values associated with national historic 
                landmarks within the study area; and
                    (B) provide flood risk management for economically 
                disadvantaged communities within the study area.

SEC. 205. COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER, YOLO BYPASS, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
comprehensive study of the Sacramento River in the vicinity of the Yolo 
Bypass System, California, to identify actions to be undertaken by the 
Secretary for the comprehensive management of the Yolo Bypass System 
for the purposes of flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, water 
supply, hydropower, and recreation.
    (b) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--
            (1) Consultation.--In conducting the comprehensive study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the 
        Governor of the State of California, applicable Federal, State, 
        and local agencies, non-Federal interests, the Yolo Bypass and 
        Cache Slough Partnership, and other stakeholders.
            (2) Use of existing data and prior studies.--To the maximum 
        extent practicable and where appropriate, the Secretary may--
                    (A) make use of existing data provided to the 
                Secretary by the entities identified in paragraph (1); 
                and
                    (B) incorporate--
                            (i) relevant information from prior studies 
                        and projects carried out by the Secretary 
                        within the study area; and
                            (ii) the latest technical data and 
                        scientific approaches to changing hydrologic 
                        and climatic conditions.
    (c) Recommendations.--
            (1) In general.--In conducting the comprehensive study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary may develop a 
        recommendation to Congress for--
                    (A) the construction of a water resources 
                development project;
                    (B) the structural or operational modification of 
                an existing water resources development project;
                    (C) additional monitoring of, or adaptive 
                management measures to carry out with respect to, 
                existing water resources development projects, to 
                respond to changing hydrologic and climatic conditions; 
                or
                    (D) geographic areas within the Yolo Bypass System 
                for additional study by the Secretary.
            (2) Additional considerations.--Any feasibility study 
        carried out pursuant to a recommendation under paragraph (1)(D) 
        shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive 
        study authorized under subsection (a).
    (d) Completion of Study; Report to Congress.--Not later than 3 
years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate a report detailing--
            (1) the results of the comprehensive study conducted under 
        subsection (a), including any recommendations developed under 
        subsection (c);
            (2) any additional, site-specific areas within the Yolo 
        Bypass System where additional study for flood risk management 
        or ecosystem restoration projects is recommended by the 
        Secretary; and
            (3) any interim actions relating to existing water 
        resources development projects undertaken by the Secretary 
        during the study period.
    (e) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Yolo bypass system.--The term ``Yolo Bypass System'' 
        means the system of weirs, levees, bypass structures, and other 
        water resources development projects in California's Sacramento 
        River Valley, extending from the Fremont Weir near Woodland, 
        California, to the Sacramento River near Rio Vista, California, 
        authorized pursuant to section 2 of the Act of March 1, 1917 
        (chapter 144; 39 Stat. 949).
            (2) Yolo bypass and cache clough partnership.--The term 
        ``Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough Partnership'' means the group of 
        parties to the Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough Memorandum of 
        Understanding, effective May 2016, regarding collaboration and 
        cooperation in the Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough region.

SEC. 206. GREAT LAKES COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDY.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out the comprehensive assessment of 
water resources needs for the Great Lakes System under section 729 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), as 
required by section 1219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 
(132 Stat. 3811), the Secretary shall--
            (1) taking into account recent high lake levels within the 
        Great Lakes, assess and make recommendations to Congress on--
                    (A) coastal storm and flood risk management 
                measures, including measures that use natural features 
                and nature-based features, as those terms are defined 
                in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act 
                of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a);
                    (B) operation and maintenance of the Great Lakes 
                Navigation System, as such term is defined in section 
                210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2238);
                    (C) ecosystem protection and restoration;
                    (D) the prevention and control of invasive species 
                and the effects of invasive species; and
                    (E) recreation associated with water resources 
                development projects;
            (2) prioritize actions necessary to protect critical public 
        infrastructure, communities, and critical natural or cultural 
        resources; and
            (3) to the maximum extent practicable and where 
        appropriate, utilize existing data provided to the Secretary by 
        Federal and State agencies, Indian Tribes, and other 
        stakeholders, including data obtained through other Federal 
        programs.
    (b) Recommendations; Additional Study.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the comprehensive 
        assessment described in subsection (a), the Secretary may make 
        a recommendation to Congress for--
                    (A) the construction of a water resources 
                development project;
                    (B) the structural or operational modification of 
                an existing water resources development project;
                    (C) such additional monitoring of, or adaptive 
                management measures to carry out with respect to, 
                existing water resources development projects, to 
                respond to changing hydrologic and climatic conditions; 
                or
                    (D) geographic areas within the Great Lakes System 
                for additional study by the Secretary.
            (2) Additional considerations.--Any feasibility study 
        carried out pursuant to a recommendation under paragraph (1)(D) 
        shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive 
        assessment described in subsection (a).
    (c) Exemption From Maximum Study Cost and Duration Limitations.--
Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 
(33 U.S.C. 2282c) shall not apply to any study recommended under 
subsection (b)(1)(D).

SEC. 207. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IOWA.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that evaluates--
            (1) the existing allocations of storage space for Rathbun 
        Lake, authorized pursuant to the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 
        Stat. 1262; 121 Stat. 1124), including the existing allocation 
        for municipal water supply;
            (2) the feasibility of expanding the existing allocation of 
        storage for municipal water supply; and
            (3) the affordability of future municipal water supply 
        allocations from Rathbun Lake, for residential users of such 
        future allocations, at projected future costs.

SEC. 208. REPORT ON THE STATUS OF RESTORATION IN THE LOUISIANA COASTAL 
              AREA.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
established by section 7004 of Water Resources Development Act of 2007 
(121 Stat. 1272) shall submit to Congress a report that summarizes the 
activities and recommendations of the task force, including--
            (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, and 
        activities undertaken for addressing conservation, protection, 
        restoration, and maintenance of the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem; and
            (2) financial participation by each agency represented on 
        the Task Force in conserving, protecting, restoring, and 
        maintaining the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.

SEC. 209. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE STUDY.

    (a) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
comprehensive study of the Lower Mississippi River basin, from Cape 
Girardeau, Missouri, to the Gulf of Mexico, to identify actions to be 
undertaken by the Secretary for the comprehensive management of the 
basin for the purposes of flood risk management, navigation, ecosystem 
restoration, water supply, hydropower, and recreation.
    (b) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In conducting the 
comprehensive study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult 
with applicable Federal, State, and local agencies, Indian Tribes, non-
Federal interests, and other stakeholders, and, to the maximum extent 
practicable and where appropriate, make use of existing data provided 
to the Secretary by such parties.
    (c) Recommendations.--
            (1) In general.--In conducting the comprehensive study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary may develop a 
        recommendation to Congress for--
                    (A) the construction of a water resources 
                development project;
                    (B) the structural or operational modification of 
                an existing water resources development project;
                    (C) such additional monitoring of, or adaptive 
                management measures to carry out with respect to, 
                existing water resources development projects, to 
                respond to changing conditions; or
                    (D) geographic areas within the Lower Mississippi 
                River basin for additional study by the Secretary.
            (2) Additional considerations.--Any feasibility study 
        carried out pursuant to a recommendation under paragraph (1)(D) 
        shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive 
        study required under subsection (a).
    (d) Completion of Study; Report to Congress.--Not later than 3 
years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate a report detailing--
            (1) the results of the comprehensive study required by this 
        section, including any recommendations developed under 
        subsection (c); and
            (2) any interim actions relating to existing water 
        resources development projects undertaken by the Secretary 
        during the study period.

SEC. 210. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) Assessment.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of the 
water resources needs of the Upper Mississippi River under section 729 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a).
    (b) Requirements.--The Secretary shall carry out the assessment 
under subsection (a) in accordance with the requirements in section 
1206(b) of Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1686).

SEC. 211. LOWER MISSOURI BASIN FLOOD RISK AND RESILIENCY STUDY, IOWA, 
              KANSAS, NEBRASKA, AND MISSOURI.

    (a) Additional Studies.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), upon 
        the request of the non-Federal interest for the Lower Missouri 
        Basin study, the Secretary shall expand the scope of such study 
        to investigate and provide recommendations relating to--
                    (A) modifications to projects in Iowa, Kansas, 
                Nebraska, and Missouri authorized under the Pick-Sloan 
                Missouri River Basin Program (authorized by section 
                9(b) of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 
                (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 891)) and the Missouri River 
                Bank Stabilization and Navigation project (authorized 
                by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 
                59 Stat. 19)), including modifications to the 
                authorized purposes of such projects to further flood 
                risk management and resiliency; and
                    (B) modifications to non-Federal, publicly owned 
                levees in the Lower Missouri River Basin.
            (2) Exception.--If the Secretary determines that expanding 
        the scope of the Lower Missouri Basin study as provided in 
        paragraph (1) is not practicable, and the non-Federal interest 
        for such study concurs in such determination, the Secretary 
        shall carry out such additional studies as are necessary to 
        investigate the modifications described in paragraph (1).
            (3) Continuation of lower missouri basin study.--The 
        following studies shall be considered a continuation of the 
        Lower Missouri Basin study:
                    (A) Any additional study carried out under 
                paragraph (2).
                    (B) Any study recommended to be carried out in a 
                report that the Chief of Engineers prepares for the 
                Lower Missouri Basin study.
                    (C) Any study recommended to be carried out in a 
                report that the Chief of Engineers prepares for an 
                additional study carried out under paragraph (2).
                    (D) Any study spun off from the Lower Missouri 
                Basin study before the completion of such study.
                    (E) Any study spun off from an additional study 
                carried out under paragraph (2) before the completion 
                of such additional study.
            (4) Reliance on existing information.--In carrying out any 
        study described in or authorized by this section, the 
        Secretary, to the extent practicable, shall rely on existing 
        data and analysis, including data and analysis prepared under 
        section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
        U.S.C. 1962d-16).
            (5) Consideration; consultation.--In developing 
        recommendations under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) consider the use of--
                            (i) structural and nonstructural measures, 
                        including the setting back of levees and 
                        removing structures from areas of recurring 
                        flood vulnerability, where advantageous, to 
                        reduce flood risk and damages in the Lower 
                        Missouri River Basin; and
                            (ii) where such features are locally 
                        acceptable, natural features or nature-based 
                        features (as such terms are defined in section 
                        1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                        2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a); and
                    (B) consult with applicable Federal and State 
                agencies, Indian Tribes, and other stakeholders within 
                the Lower Missouri River Basin and solicit public 
                comment on such recommendations.
            (6) Exemption from maximum study cost and duration 
        limitations.--Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
        Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) shall not apply to 
        the Lower Missouri Basin study or any study described in 
        paragraph (3).
            (7) Preconstruction, engineering, and design.--Upon 
        completion of a study authorized by this section, if the 
        Secretary determines that a recommended project, or 
        modification to a project described in paragraph (1), is 
        justified, the Secretary may proceed directly to 
        preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the 
        project or modification.
            (8) Technical assistance.--
                    (A) In general.--For the provision of technical 
                assistance to support small communities and 
                economically disadvantaged communities in the planning 
                and design of flood risk management and flood risk 
                resiliency projects in the Lower Missouri River Basin, 
                for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2026, there are 
                authorized to be appropriated--
                            (i) $2,000,000 to carry out section 206 of 
                        the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), 
                        in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to 
                        carry out such section; and
                            (ii) $2,000,000 to carry out section 
                        22(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act 
                        of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16), in addition to 
                        amounts otherwise authorized to carry out such 
                        section.
                    (B) Conditions.--
                            (i) Limitations not applicable.--The 
                        limitations on the use of funds in section 
                        206(d) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 and 
                        section 22(c)(2) of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 1974 shall not apply to the 
                        amounts authorized to be appropriated by 
                        subparagraph (A).
                            (ii) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this 
                        paragraph restricts the authority of the 
                        Secretary to use any funds otherwise 
                        appropriated to carry out section 206 of the 
                        Flood Control Act of 1960 or section 22(a)(2) 
                        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 
                        to provide technical assistance described in 
                        subparagraph (A).
            (9) Completion of study; report to congress.--Not later 
        than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
        report detailing--
                    (A) the results of the study authorized by this 
                section;
                    (B) any additional, site-specific areas within the 
                Lower Missouri River Basin for which additional study 
                for flood risk management projects is recommended by 
                the Secretary; and
                    (C) any interim actions relating to existing water 
                resources development projects undertaken by the 
                Secretary during the study period.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Lower missouri basin study.--The term ``Lower Missouri 
        Basin study'' means the Lower Missouri Basin Flood Risk and 
        Resiliency Study, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri, 
        authorized pursuant to section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a).
            (2) Small community.--The term ``small community'' means a 
        local government that serves a population of less than 15,000.

SEC. 212. COUGAR AND DETROIT DAMS, WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly 
available, a report providing an initial analysis of deauthorizing 
hydropower as a project purpose at the Cougar and Detroit Dams project.
    (b) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted 
under subsection (a)--
            (1) a description of the potential effects of deauthorizing 
        hydropower as a project purpose at the Cougar and Detroit Dams 
        project on--
                    (A) the operation of the project, including with 
                respect to the other authorized purposes of the 
                project;
                    (B) compliance of the project with the Endangered 
                Species Act;
                    (C) costs that would be attributed to other 
                authorized purposes of the project, including costs 
                relating to compliance with such Act; and
                    (D) other ongoing studies in the Willamette River 
                Basin; and
            (2) identification of any further research needed.
    (c) Project Defined.--In this section, the terms ``Cougar and 
Detroit Dams project'' and ``project'' mean the Cougar Dam and 
Reservoir project and Detroit Dam and Reservoir project, Willamette 
River Basin, Oregon, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1950 (64 Stat. 179).

SEC. 213. PORT ORFORD, OREGON.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall, at Federal expense, submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a summary 
report on the research completed and data gathered by the date of 
enactment of this Act with regards to the configuration of a breakwater 
for the project for navigation, Port Orford, Oregon, authorized by 
section 117 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1822; 106 
Stat. 4809), for the purposes of addressing shoaling issues to minimize 
long-term maintenance costs.

SEC. 214. WILSON CREEK AND SLOAN CREEK, FAIRVIEW, TEXAS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a written status update 
regarding efforts to address flooding along Wilson Creek and Sloan 
Creek in the City of Fairview, Texas.

SEC. 215. GAO STUDY ON MITIGATION FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT 
              PROJECTS.

    Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall--
            (1) conduct a study on the mitigation of the impact of 
        water resources development projects, including the impact on 
        fish and wildlife, consistent with the requirements of section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2283), section 307(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1990 (33 U.S.C. 2317(a)), and section 2036(b) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2283a), 
        including--
                    (A) an evaluation of guidance or instructions 
                issued, and other measures taken, by the Secretary to 
                ensure successful mitigation of such impacts;
                    (B) a review of the methods of mitigation, 
                including the use of in-lieu fees, mitigation banking, 
                and permittee-responsible mitigation, and their long-
                term effectiveness of restoring or mitigating ecosystem 
                services impacted by such projects;
                    (C) a review of how the use of the different 
                mitigation methods for such projects varies across 
                Corps of Engineers districts;
                    (D) an assessment of the backlog of mitigation 
                projects, including the number of mitigation projects 
                pending completion to address such impacts resulting 
                from constructed water resources development projects;
                    (E) an evaluation of how the Secretary tracks 
                compliance with the mitigation requirements across 
                Corps of Engineers districts;
                    (F) a review of how the mitigation requirements for 
                water resources development projects contributes to the 
                resilience of water resources in the United States;
                    (G) an assessment of whether mitigation is being 
                done prior to or contemporaneously with the 
                construction of projects, as required by section 906 of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2283);
                    (H) an evaluation of compliance with section 906(d) 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2283(d)) for the development of specific 
                mitigation plans for projects, whether such plans were 
                successful in mitigating the designated impacts of the 
                projects, and, in instances where such plans were not 
                successful, what actions the Secretary is taking to 
                modify the plans such that they will be successful; and
                    (I) an assessment of how the Secretary might take 
                advantage of natural infrastructure in mitigation 
                planning to reduce flood risks and flood recovery costs 
                for some communities; and
            (2) submit to Congress a report that--
                    (A) describes the results of the study conducted 
                under paragraph (1);
                    (B) includes recommendations to ensure compliance 
                with and successful implementation of mitigation 
                requirements for water resources development projects; 
                and
                    (C) includes recommendations to ensure existing 
                programs and authorities include the use, to the 
                maximum extent practicable, of natural infrastructure.

SEC. 216. GAO STUDY ON APPLICATION OF HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 
              EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a 
study of the operation and maintenance needs of federally authorized 
harbor and inland harbor projects, including--
            (1) an inventory of all federally authorized harbor and 
        inland harbor projects;
            (2) an assessment of current uses of such projects (and, to 
        the extent practicable, the national, regional, and local 
        benefits of such uses), including the uses listed in section 
        210(d)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986;
            (3) an assessment of the annual operation and maintenance 
        needs associated with harbors and inland harbors referred to in 
        subsection (a)(2) of section 210 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238), including a breakdown 
        of such needs for each of the following types of projects--
                    (A) emerging harbor projects (as defined in such 
                section);
                    (B) moderate-use harbor projects (as defined in 
                such section on the day before the date of enactment of 
                this Act);
                    (C) high-use harbor projects (as defined in such 
                section on the day before the date of enactment of this 
                Act); and
                    (D) projects assigned to harbors and inland harbors 
                within the Great Lakes Navigation System (as defined in 
                such section);
            (4) an assessment of any deferred operation and maintenance 
        needs for such projects;
            (5) an assessment of projected needs associated with donor 
        ports, medium-sized donor ports, and energy transfer ports (as 
        such terms are defined in section 2106 of the Water Resources 
        Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201)); and
            (6) an itemization of expenditures provided to donor ports, 
        medium-sized donor ports, and energy transfer ports under 
        section 2106 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
        of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201).
    (b) Report to Congress.--Upon completion of the report under 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall submit such report to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate.

SEC. 217. STUDY ON WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CONSERVATION AT WATER 
              RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of the Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
report that analyses the benefits and consequences of including 
municipal water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of 
the Corps of Engineers in carrying out water resources development 
projects.
    (b) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted 
under subsection (a)--
            (1) a description of existing water resources development 
        projects with municipal water supply or water conservation as 
        authorized purposes, and the extent to which such projects are 
        utilized for such purposes;
            (2) a description of existing water resources development 
        projects with respect to which--
                    (A) municipal water supply or water conservation 
                could be added as a project purpose, including those 
                with respect to which a non-Federal interest has 
                expressed an interest in adding municipal water supply 
                or water conservation as a project purpose; and
                    (B) such a purpose could be accommodated while 
                maintaining existing authorized purposes;
            (3) a description of ongoing water resources development 
        project studies the authorizations for which include 
        authorization for the Secretary to study the feasibility of 
        carrying out the project with a purpose of municipal water 
        supply or water conservation;
            (4) an analysis of how adding municipal water supply and 
        water conservation as a primary mission of the Corps of 
        Engineers would affect the ability of the Secretary to carry 
        out future water resources development projects; and
            (5) any recommendations of the Secretary relating to 
        including municipal water supply and water conservation as a 
        primary mission of the Corps of Engineers.

SEC. 218. PFAS REVIEW AND INVENTORY AT CORPS FACILITIES.

    (a) Inventory of PFAS at Corps Facilities.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
        enactment of this section, and annually thereafter the 
        Secretary shall complete an inventory of Corps of Engineers 
        civil works facilities that are or may be contaminated, or 
        could become contaminated, by PFAS.
            (2) Contents of inventory.--In carrying out this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall review and identify--
                    (A) all facilities owned or operated by the Corps 
                of Engineers, for which there is a civil works 
                function, that are or may be contaminated, or could 
                become contaminated, by PFAS;
                    (B) the nature and extent of any such contamination 
                or potential for contamination, including any potential 
                pathways for human exposure to PFAS;
                    (C) response measures taken to monitor, control, 
                remove, or remediate PFAS, or otherwise reduce the risk 
                of human exposure to PFAS;
                    (D) for facilities identified under subparagraph 
                (A), the extent to which such facilities (or any such 
                contamination or potential for contamination at such 
                facilities) are related to the civil works functions of 
                the Corps of Engineers;
                    (E) the extent to which the Secretary, or other 
                entities, may have responsibility for such 
                contamination or potential for contamination; and
                    (F) for facilities identified under subparagraph 
                (A), the costs to remediate and reduce the risk of 
                human exposure to PFAS.
            (3) Coordination with other federal agencies.--To the 
        maximum extent practicable, the actions taken under this 
        subsection shall supplement and support work undertaken by 
        other Federal agencies, including actions taken pursuant to the 
        plan published by the Administrator of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency, titled ``EPA's Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl 
        Substances (PFAS) Action Plan'' and dated February 2019.
            (4) Report to congress.--Upon completion of the inventory 
        under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter concurrent with 
        the President's annual budget request to Congress, the 
        Secretary shall submit the inventory to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.
    (b) PFAS Technology Research.--
            (1) Research support.--The Secretary, acting through the 
        Hazardous Waste Research Center located at the Engineer 
        Research and Development Center, shall, to the maximum extent 
        practicable, support the efforts of other Federal agencies in 
        the development of innovative technologies and methodologies 
        for the detection, treatment, and cleanup of PFAS associated 
        with Federal facilities, including groundwater associated with 
        such facilities.
            (2) Duplication of efforts.--Nothing in this subsection is 
        intended to duplicate the activities undertaken by other 
        Federal agencies as identified in subsection (a)(3).
    (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``PFAS'' means a 
perfluoroalkyl substance or polyfluoroalkyl substance with at least one 
fully fluorinated carbon atom.

             TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS.

    (a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
            (1) to identify water resources development projects 
        authorized by Congress that are no longer viable for 
        construction due to--
                    (A) a lack of local support;
                    (B) a lack of available Federal or non-Federal 
                resources; or
                    (C) an authorizing purpose that is no longer 
                relevant or feasible;
            (2) to create an expedited and definitive process for 
        Congress to deauthorize water resources development projects 
        that are no longer viable for construction; and
            (3) to allow the continued authorization of water resources 
        development projects that are viable for construction.
    (b) Proposed Deauthorization List.--
            (1) Preliminary list of projects.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall develop a 
                preliminary list of each water resources development 
                project, or separable element of a project, authorized 
                for construction before November 8, 2007, for which--
                            (i) planning, design, or construction was 
                        not initiated before the date of enactment of 
                        this Act; or
                            (ii) planning, design, or construction was 
                        initiated before the date of enactment of this 
                        Act, but for which no funds, Federal or non-
                        Federal, were obligated for planning, design, 
                        or construction of the project or separable 
                        element of the project during the current 
                        fiscal year or any of the 10 preceding fiscal 
                        years.
                    (B) Use of comprehensive construction backlog and 
                operation and maintenance report.--The Secretary may 
                develop the preliminary list from the comprehensive 
                construction backlog and operation and maintenance 
                reports developed pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                579a).
            (2) Preparation of proposed deauthorization list.--
                    (A) Deauthorization amount.--The Secretary shall 
                prepare a proposed list of projects for deauthorization 
                comprised of a subset of projects and separable 
                elements identified on the preliminary list developed 
                under paragraph (1) that have, in the aggregate, an 
                estimated Federal cost to complete that is at least 
                $10,000,000,000.
                    (B) Determination of federal cost to complete.--For 
                purposes of subparagraph (A), the Federal cost to 
                complete shall take into account any allowances 
                authorized by section 902 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied to 
                the most recent project schedule and cost estimate.
                    (C) Inclusion of deauthorization of antiquated 
                projects.--The Secretary shall reduce the amount 
                identified for deauthorization under paragraph (2)(A) 
                by an amount equivalent to the estimated current value 
                of each project, or separable element of a project, 
                that is deauthorized by subsection (f).
            (3) Sequencing of projects.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall identify 
                projects and separable elements for inclusion on the 
                proposed list of projects for deauthorization under 
                paragraph (2) according to the order in which the 
                projects and separable elements were authorized, 
                beginning with the earliest authorized projects and 
                separable elements and ending with the latest project 
                or separable element necessary to meet the aggregate 
                amount under paragraph (2)(A).
                    (B) Factors to consider.--The Secretary may 
                identify projects and separable elements in an order 
                other than that established by subparagraph (A) if the 
                Secretary determines, on a case-by-case basis, that a 
                project or separable element is critical for interests 
                of the United States, based on the possible impact of 
                the project or separable element on public health and 
                safety, the national economy, or the environment.
            (4) Public comment and consultation.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall solicit 
                comments from the public and the Governors of each 
                applicable State on the proposed deauthorization list 
                prepared under paragraph (2)(A).
                    (B) Comment period.--The public comment period 
                shall be 90 days.
            (5) Preparation of final deauthorization list.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall prepare a 
                final deauthorization list by--
                            (i) considering any comments received under 
                        paragraph (4); and
                            (ii) revising the proposed deauthorization 
                        list prepared under paragraph (2)(A) as the 
                        Secretary determines necessary to respond to 
                        such comments.
                    (B) Appendix.--The Secretary shall include as part 
                of the final deauthorization list an appendix that--
                            (i) identifies each project or separable 
                        element on the proposed deauthorization list 
                        that is not included on the final 
                        deauthorization list; and
                            (ii) describes the reasons why the project 
                        or separable element is not included on the 
                        final deauthorization list.
    (c) Submission of Final Deauthorization List to Congress for 
Congressional Review; Publication.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        the close of the comment period under subsection (b)(4), the 
        Secretary shall--
                    (A) submit the final deauthorization list and 
                appendix prepared under subsection (b)(5) to the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives and the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and
                    (B) publish the final deauthorization list and 
                appendix in the Federal Register.
            (2) Exclusions.--The Secretary shall not include in the 
        final deauthorization list submitted under paragraph (1) any 
        project or separable element with respect to which Federal 
        funds for planning, design, or construction are obligated after 
        the development of the preliminary list under subsection 
        (b)(1)(A) but prior to the submission of the final 
        deauthorization list under paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection.
    (d) Deauthorization; Congressional Review.--
            (1) In general.--After the expiration of the 2-year period 
        beginning on the date of publication of the final 
        deauthorization list and appendix under subsection (c)(1)(B), a 
        project or separable element of a project identified in the 
        final deauthorization list is hereby deauthorized, unless 
        Congress passes a joint resolution disapproving the final 
        deauthorization list prior to the end of such period.
            (2) Non-federal contributions.--
                    (A) In general.--A project or separable element of 
                a project identified in the final deauthorization list 
                under subsection (c) shall not be deauthorized under 
                this subsection if, before the expiration of the 2-year 
                period referred to in paragraph (1), the non-Federal 
                interest for the project or separable element of the 
                project provides sufficient funds to complete the 
                project or separable element of the project.
                    (B) Treatment of projects.--Notwithstanding 
                subparagraph (A), each project and separable element of 
                a project identified in the final deauthorization list 
                shall be treated as deauthorized for purposes of the 
                aggregate deauthorization amount specified in 
                subsection (b)(2)(A).
            (3) Projects identified in appendix.--A project or 
        separable element of a project identified in the appendix to 
        the final deauthorization list shall remain subject to future 
        deauthorization by Congress.
    (e) Special Rules.--
            (1) Post-authorization studies.--A project or separable 
        element of a project may not be identified on the proposed 
        deauthorization list developed under subsection (b), or the 
        final deauthorization list developed under subsection (c), if 
        the project or separable element received funding for a post-
        authorization study during the current fiscal year or any of 
        the 10 preceding fiscal years.
            (2) Treatment of project modifications.--For purposes of 
        this section, if an authorized water resources development 
        project or separable element of the project has been modified 
        by an Act of Congress, the date of the authorization of the 
        project or separable element shall be deemed to be the date of 
        the most recent such modification.
    (f) Deauthorization of Antiquated Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Any water resources development project, 
        or separable element of a project, authorized for construction 
        prior to November 17, 1986, for which construction has not been 
        initiated prior to the date of enactment of this Act, or for 
        which funds have not been obligated for construction in the 10-
        year period prior to the date of enactment of this Act, is 
        hereby deauthorized.
            (2) Identification.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report that identifies--
                    (A) the name of each project, or separable element 
                of a project, deauthorized by paragraph (1); and
                    (B) the estimated current value of each such 
                project or separable element of a project.
    (g) Economic and Environmental Review of Inactive Water Resources 
Development Projects.--The Secretary or the non-Federal interest may 
not carry out any authorized water resources development project, or 
separable element of such project, for which construction has not been 
initiated in the 20-year period following the date of the authorization 
of such project or separable element, until--
            (1) the Secretary provides to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a post-authorization change report that 
        updates the economic and environmental analysis of the project 
        or separable element; and
            (2) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate take appropriate action to 
        address any modifications to the economic and environmental 
        analysis for the project or separable element of the project 
        contained in the post-authorization change report.
    (h) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Post-authorization change report.--The term ``post-
        authorization change report'' has the meaning given such term 
        in section 1132(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        2016 (33 U.S.C. 2282e).
            (2) Post-authorization study.--The term ``post-
        authorization study'' means--
                    (A) a feasibility report developed under section 
                905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2282);
                    (B) a feasibility study, as defined in section 
                105(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                (33 U.S.C. 2215(d)); or
                    (C) a review conducted under section 216 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), including 
                an initial appraisal that--
                            (i) demonstrates a Federal interest; and
                            (ii) requires additional analysis for the 
                        project or separable element.
            (3) Water resources development project.--The term ``water 
        resources development project'' includes an environmental 
        infrastructure assistance project or program of the Corps of 
        Engineers.

SEC. 302. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

    Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting 
``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 303. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    Section 203(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2269) is amended by striking ``$12,500,000'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``$15,000,000''.

SEC. 304. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(Public Law 99-662, 100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295; 121 
Stat. 1076) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (27), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (28), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(29) Ellis Pond and Guild Pond, Norwood, Massachusetts; 
        and
            ``(30) Memorial Pond, Walpole, Massachusetts.''.

SEC. 305. WATERCRAFT INSPECTION STATIONS.

    Section 104(d)(1)(A) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
610(d)(1)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in clause (iii), by striking ``Arizona River Basins.'' 
        and inserting ``Arkansas River Basins; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iv) to protect the Russian River Basin, 
                        California.''.

SEC. 306. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 510 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (Public Law 104-303, 110 Stat. 3759; 121 Stat. 1202; 128 Stat. 
1317) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i) and 
        inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Project Cap.--The total cost of a project carried out under 
this section may not exceed $15,000,000.''; and
            (2) in subsection (i) (as so redesignated), by striking 
        ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.
    (b) Outreach and Training.--The Secretary shall conduct public 
outreach and workshops for non-Federal interests to provide information 
on the Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection program 
established under section 510 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996, including how to participate in the program.

SEC. 307. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1103(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 652(e)(3)) is amended by striking ``$22,750,000'' and 
inserting ``$40,000,000''.

SEC. 308. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM.

    Any Federal funds, regardless of the account from which the funds 
were provided, used to carry out construction of the modification to 
the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, authorized in 
section 136 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
2004 (117 Stat. 1842), shall be considered by the Secretary as 
initiating construction of the project such that future funds will not 
require a new investment decision.

SEC. 309. OUACHITA-BLACK RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, ARKANSAS.

    The project for navigation, Ouachita-Black River, Arkansas, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (Public 
Law 86-645), is modified to include water supply as a project purpose, 
subject to completion by the Secretary of a feasibility study and any 
other review necessary for such modification.

SEC. 310. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

     The portion of project for flood control, Sacramento River, 
California, authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 1, 1917 
(chapter 144, 39 Stat. 949; 103 Stat. 649; 110 Stat. 3709; 112 Stat. 
1841; 113 Stat. 299), consisting of a riverbed gradient restoration 
facility at the Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Intake, is no longer 
authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 311. LAKE ISABELLA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
Secretary, when evaluating alternative locations for construction of a 
permanent Isabella Lake Visitor Center by the Corps of Engineers to 
replace the facility impacted by the Isabella Dam safety modification 
project, should afford substantial weight to the site preference of the 
local community.
    (b) Authority.--The Secretary may acquire such interests in real 
property as the Secretary determines necessary or advisable to support 
construction of the Isabella Dam safety modification project.
    (c) Transfer.--The Secretary may transfer any real property 
interests acquired under subsection (b) to any other Federal agency or 
department without reimbursement.
    (d) Isabella Dam Safety Modification Project Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``Isabella Dam safety modification project'' means 
the dam safety modification project at the Isabella Reservoir in the 
San Joaquin Valley, California (authorized by Act of December 22, 1944 
(chapter 665, 58 Stat. 901)), including the component of the project 
relating to construction a visitor center facility.

SEC. 312. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT.

    The Secretary shall align the schedules of, and maximize 
complimentary efforts, minimize duplicative practices, and ensure 
coordination and information sharing with respect to--
            (1) the project for flood risk management, Lower San 
        Joaquin River, authorized by section 1401(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3836); and
            (2) the second phase of the feasibility study for the Lower 
        San Joaquin River project for flood risk management, authorized 
        for expedited completion by section 1203(a)(7) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act 2018 (132 Stat. 3803).

SEC. 313. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The portion of the project for flood control and navigation, San 
Diego River and Mission Bay, San Diego County, California, authorized 
by the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 636), identified in 
the National Levee Database established under section 9004 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303) as the San Diego 
River 3 segment and consisting of a 785-foot-long segment of the right 
bank levee from Station 209+41.75 to its end at Station 217+26.75, as 
described in construction plans dated August 30, 1951, is no longer 
authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 314. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

    (a) In General.--Section 114 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 
(33 U.S.C. 59h) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 114. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

    ``(a) Area To Be Declared Nonnavigable.--The following area is 
declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States: All of that 
portion of the City and County of San Francisco, California, lying 
shoreward of a line beginning at the intersection of the southerly 
right of way line of Earl Street prolongation with the Pierhead United 
States Government Pierhead line, the Pierhead line as defined in the 
State of California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended 
in 1961; thence northerly along said Pierhead line to its intersection 
with a line parallel with and distant 10 feet easterly from, the 
existing easterly boundary line of Pier 30-32; thence northerly along 
said parallel line and its northerly prolongation, to a point of 
intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 10 feet northerly 
from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 30-32; thence westerly 
along last said parallel line to its intersection with said Pierhead 
line; thence northerly along said Pierhead line, to the intersection of 
the easterly right of way line of Van Ness Avenue, formerly Marlette 
Street, prolongation to the Pierhead line.
    ``(b) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the 
area described in subsection (a) that are or will be bulkheaded, 
filled, or otherwise occupied or covered by permanent structures and 
does not affect the applicability of any Federal statute or regulation 
that relates to filling of navigable waters or to other regulated 
activities within the area described in subsection (a), including 
sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401, 403), 
section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
    ``(c) Inclusion of Embarcadero Historic District.--Congress finds 
and declares that the area described in subsection (a) contains the 
seawall, piers, and wharves that comprise the Embarcadero Historic 
District listed on the National Register of Historic Places on May 12, 
2006.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 5052 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 59h-1) is repealed.

SEC. 315. WESTERN PACIFIC INTERCEPTOR CANAL, SACRAMENTO RIVER, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The portion of the project for flood protection on the Sacramento 
River, authorized by section 2 of the of March 1, 1917 (chapter 144, 39 
Stat. 949; 45 Stat. 539; 50 Stat. 877; 55 Stat. 647; 80 Stat. 1422), 
consisting of the portion of the levee from GPS coordinate N2147673.584 
E6690904.187 to N2147908.413 E6689057.060 associated with the Western 
Pacific Interceptor Canal, is no longer authorized beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 316. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
              MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

    Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 
(Public Law 110-114, 121 Stat. 1213; 128 Stat. 1314) is amended by 
striking ``2019'' and inserting ``2029''.

SEC. 317. NEW LONDON HARBOR WATERFRONT CHANNEL, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, New 
London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act 
of June 13, 1902 (chapter 1079, 32 Stat. 333), described in subsection 
(b) is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (b) Area Described.--The area referred to in subsection (a) is 
generally the portion between and around the 2 piers at the State Pier 
in New London, specifically the area--
            (1) beginning at a point N691263.78, E1181259.26;
            (2) running N 3501'50.75'' W about 955.59 feet to a point 
        N692046.26, E1180710.74;
            (3) running N 5458'06.78'' E about 100.00 feet to a point 
        N692103.66, E1180792.62;
            (4) running S 3501'50.75'' E about 989.8 feet to a point 
        N691293.17, E1181360.78; and
            (5) running S 7351'15.45'' W about 105.69 feet to the 
        point described in paragraph (1).

SEC. 318. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the project for 
navigation, Washington Harbor, District of Columbia, authorized by the 
Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 1031), is modified to 
reduce, in part, the authorized dimensions of the project, such that 
the remaining authorized dimensions are as follows:
            (1) A 200 foot wide, 15 foot deep channel with a center 
        line beginning at a point East 1,317,064.30 and North 
        440,373.32, thence to a point East 1,316,474.30 and North 
        440,028.31, thence to a point East 1,315,584.30 and North 
        439,388.30, thence to a point East 1,315,259.31 and North 
        438,908.30.
            (2) A transition area 200 foot wide to 300 foot wide, 15 
        foot deep, with a center line beginning at a point East 
        1,315,259.31 and North 438,908.30 to a point East 1,315,044.31 
        and North 438,748.30.
            (3) A 300 foot wide, 15 foot deep channel with a centerline 
        beginning a point East 1,315,044.31 and North 438,748.30, 
        thence to a point East 1,314,105.31 and North 438,124.79, 
        thence to a point East 1,311,973.30 and North 438,807.78, 
        thence to a point East 1,311,369.73 and North 438,577.42, 
        thence to a point East 1,311,015.73 and North 438,197.57, 
        thence to a point East 1,309,713.47 and North 435,678.91.
            (4) A transition area 300 foot wide to 400 foot wide, 15 
        foot deep to 24 foot deep, with a center line beginning at a 
        point East 1,309,713.47 and North 435,678.91 to a point East 
        1,307,709.33 and North 434,488.25.
            (5) A 400 foot wide, 24 foot deep channel with a centerline 
        beginning at a point East 1,307,709.33 and North 434,488.25, 
        thence to a point East 1,307,459.33 and North 434,173.25, 
        thence to a point East 1,306,476.82 and North 1,306,476.82, 
        thence to a point East 1,306,209.79 and North 431,460.21, 
        thence to a point at the end of the channel near Hains Point 
        East 1,305,997.63 and North 429,978.31.

SEC. 319. CENTRAL EVERGLADES, FLORIDA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Central Everglades, 
authorized by section 1401(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2016 (130 Stat. 1713), is modified to include the project for ecosystem 
restoration, Central and Southern Florida, Everglades Agricultural 
Area, authorized by section 1308 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2018 (132 Stat. 3819) and to authorize the Secretary to carry out 
the project as so combined.

SEC. 320. MIAMI RIVER, FLORIDA.

     The portion of the project for navigation, Miami River, Florida, 
authorized by the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 925; 59 Stat. 16; 74 
Stat. 481; 100 Stat. 4257), beginning at the existing railroad bascule 
bridge and extending approximately 1,000 linear feet upstream to an 
existing salinity barrier and flood control structure, is no longer 
authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 321. TAYLOR CREEK RESERVOIR AND LEVEE L-73 (SECTION 1), UPPER ST. 
              JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    The portions of the project for flood control and other purposes, 
Central and Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), consisting of the Taylor Creek 
Reservoir and Levee L-73, Section 1, within the Upper St. Johns River 
Basin, Florida, are no longer authorized beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 322. SAN JUAN-CHAMA PROJECT; ABIQUIU DAM, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Abiquiu Reservoir.--Section 5(b) of Public Law 97-140 (43 
U.S.C. 620a note) is amended by striking ``a total of two hundred 
thousand acre-feet of''.
    (b) Water Storage at Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico.--Section 1 of Public 
Law 100-522 (43 U.S.C. 620a note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``200,000 acre-feet of'';
            (2) by inserting ``and San Juan-Chama project'' after ``Rio 
        Grande system''; and
            (3) by striking ``, in lieu of the water storage authorized 
        by section 5 of Public Law 97-140, to the extent that 
        contracting entities under section 5 of Public Law 97-140 no 
        longer require such storage''.
    (c) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) store up to elevation 6230.00 NGVD29 at Abiquiu Dam, 
        New Mexico, to the extent that the necessary real property 
        interests have been acquired by any entity requesting such 
        storage; and
            (2) amend the March 20, 1986, contract between the United 
        States of America and the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water 
        Utility Authority (assigned by the City of Albuquerque, New 
        Mexico to the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility 
        Authority) for water storage space in Abiquiu Reservoir to 
        allow for storage by the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water 
        Utility Authority of San Juan-Chama project water or native Rio 
        Grande system water up to elevation 6230.00 NGVD29.
    (d) Storage Agreements With Users Other Than the Albuquerque 
Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) retain or enter into new agreements with entities for a 
        proportionate allocation of 29,100 acre-feet of storage space 
        pursuant to section 5 of Public Law 97-140; and
            (2) amend or enter into new storage agreements for storage 
        of San Juan-Chama project water or native Rio Grande system 
        water up to the space allocated for each entity's proportionate 
        share of San Juan-Chama water.
    (e) Operations Documents.--The Secretary shall amend or revise any 
existing operations documents, including the Water Control Manual or 
operations plan for Abiquiu Reservoir, as necessary to meet the 
requirements of this section.
    (f) Limitations.--In carrying out this section, the following 
limitations shall apply:
            (1) The storage of native Rio Grande system water shall be 
        subject to the provisions of the Rio Grande Compact and the 
        resolutions of the Rio Grande Compact Commission.
            (2) The storage of native Rio Grande system water shall 
        only be authorized to the extent that the necessary water 
        ownership and storage rights have been acquired by the entity 
        requesting such storage.
            (3) The storage of native Rio Grande system water or San-
        Juan Chama project water shall not interfere with the 
        authorized purposes of the Abiquiu Dam and Reservoir project.
            (4) Each user of storage space, regardless of source of 
        water, shall pay for any increase in costs attributable to 
        storage of that user's water.

SEC. 323. PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY AND WATCH HILL COVE, 
              RHODE ISLAND AND CONNECTICUT.

    Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, that portion of the 
project for navigation, Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and 
Watch Hill Cove, Rhode Island and Connecticut, authorized by section 2 
of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 13), consisting of a 
10-foot deep, 16-acre anchorage area in Watch Hill Cove is no longer 
authorized.

SEC. 324. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is repealed.

SEC. 325. CAP SANTE WATERWAY, WASHINGTON.

    Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the project for 
navigation, Cap Sante Waterway and Navigation Channel, Skagit County, 
Washington, authorized by the Act of March 2, 1919 (chapter 95, 40 
Stat. 1285), is modified to deauthorize the portion of the project 
consisting of an approximately 334,434 foot area of the Federal channel 
within Anacortes Harbor inside and directly adjacent to the Federal 
breakwater and training wall structure, starting at a point with 
coordinates N557015.552, E1210819.619, thence running S88 13'2.06''E 
approximately 200 feet to a point with coordinates N557009.330, 
E1211019.522, thence running S01 46'58.08''W approximately 578 feet to 
a point with coordinates N556431.405, E1211001.534, thence running S49 
49'50.23''W approximately 69 feet to a point with coordinates 
N556387.076, E1210949.002, thence running S51 53'0.25''E approximately 
35 feet to a point with coordinates N556365.662, E1210976.316, thence 
running S49 38'58.48''W approximately 112 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556292.989, E1210890.775, thence running N88 13'1.87''W 
approximately 109 feet to a point with coordinates N556296.367, 
E1210782.226, thence running S46 46'58.97''W approximately 141 feet to 
a point with coordinates N556199.527, E1210679.164, thence running N88 
13'1.77''W approximately 700 feet to a point with coordinates 
N556221.305, E1209979.502, thence running N01 46'58.08''E approximately 
250 feet to a point with coordinates N556471.184, E1209987.280, thence 
running S88 13'1.77''E approximately 815 feet to a point with 
coordinates N556445.828, E1210801.886, thence running N01 46'58.08''E 
approximately 570 feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 326. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

    (a) Consistency With Reports.--Congress finds that the project 
modifications described in this section are in accordance with the 
reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of 
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 
2282d), titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development'', or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
    (b) Modifications.--
            (1) Sacramento area, california.--Section 219(f)(23) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
        Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(23) Sacramento area, california.--$45,000,000 for 
        regional water conservation, recycling, reliability, and 
        resiliency projects in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento 
        Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water District, 
        California.''.
            (2) South perris, california.--Section 219(f)(52) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
        Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking 
        ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
            (3) Southern and eastern kentucky.--Section 531 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3773; 113 
        Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1226) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (g), by inserting ``Boyd, Carter, 
                Elliott, Lincoln,'' after ``Lee,''; and
                    (B) in subsection (h), by striking ``$40,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$80,000,000''.
            (4) Desoto county, mississippi.--Section 219(f)(30) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
        Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 Stat. 2257; 
        122 Stat. 1623) is amended by striking ``$75,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$130,000,000''.
            (5) Jackson county, mississippi.--Section 219(e)(1) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 
        Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 1494; 121 Stat. 1258) is amended by 
        striking ``$32,500,000'' and inserting ``$57,500,000''.
            (6) St. louis, missouri.--Section 219(f)(32) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 
        337; 121 Stat. 1233) is amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$70,000,000''.
            (7) Midwest city, oklahoma.--Section 219(f)(231) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
        Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1266) is amended by striking 
        ``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$5,000,000''.
            (8) South central pennsylvania.--Section 313 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 
        407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 
        1146) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (g)(1), by striking 
                ``$200,000,000'' and inserting ``$400,000,000''; and
                    (B) in subsection (h)(2), by inserting ``Beaver, 
                Jefferson,'' after ``Washington,''.
            (9) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--Section 
        219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
        Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838; 
        130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818) is amended by striking 
        ``$89,550,000'' and inserting ``$110,000,000''.
            (10) El paso county, texas.--Section 219(f)(269) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 
        Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1268) is amended by striking 
        ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
            (11) Western rural water.--Section 595 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 
        139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat. 
        1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681) is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking the section heading and inserting 
                ``western rural water.'';
                    (B) in subsections (b) and (c), by inserting 
                ``Arizona,'' before ``Idaho'' each place it appears; 
                and
                    (C) in subsection (i), by striking ``for the period 
                beginning with fiscal year 2001, $435,000,000, to 
                remain available until expended.'' and inserting the 
                following: ``, to remain available until expended--
            ``(1) for the period beginning with fiscal year 2001, 
        $435,000,000 for Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, 
        rural Utah, and Wyoming; and
            ``(2) $150,000,000 for Arizona.''.
            (12) Central west virginia.--Section 571(h) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 371; 121 Stat. 
        1257) is amended by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$40,000,000''.
            (13) Southern west virginia.--Section 340(g) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 110 Stat. 
        3727; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by striking ``$40,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$120,000,000''.
    (c) Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.--Section 5032(a)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114, 121 Stat. 
1205) is amended by striking ``15'' and inserting ``20''.

SEC. 327. PROJECT MODIFICATION AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Water Supply.--The following project modifications for water 
supply, as identified in the report entitled ``Report to Congress on 
Future Water Resources Development'' dated February 2019, and submitted 
to Congress on June 3, 2019, pursuant to section 7001 of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or 
otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary substantially in accordance with the recommendations, 
included in such report pursuant to section 301(c) of the Water Supply 
Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b(c)):
            (1) The project modification for the State of Missouri, 
        Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Lake Project Salt River, 
        Missouri.
            (2) The project modification for the City of Plattsburg, 
        Smithville Lake, Missouri.
            (3) The project modification for the City of Smithville, 
        Smithville Lake, Missouri.
    (b) Flood Risk Management.--The following project modifications for 
flood risk management, as identified in a report entitled ``Report to 
Congress on Future Water Resources Development'', and submitted to 
Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by 
Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) Modification of the project for flood risk management, 
        lower Mississippi River, authorized by the Act of May 15, 1928 
        (chapter 569, 45 Stat. 534), to incorporate the Wolf River 
        Backwater and Nonconnah Creek levee systems into the project, 
        authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 
        688, 49 Stat. 1575; 50 Stat. 881), subject to the determination 
        of the Secretary that such systems meet all requirements 
        applicable to such project.
            (2) Modification of the project for flood risk management, 
        Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas, 
        authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 
        1219) to incorporate the Cherokee Park Levee into the project, 
        subject to the determination of the Secretary that such levee 
        meets all requirements applicable to such project.

SEC. 328. APPLICATION OF CREDIT.

     Section 7007(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 
(121 Stat.1277; 128 Stat. 1226) is amended by inserting ``, or may be 
applied to reduce the amounts required to be paid by the non-Federal 
interest under the terms of the deferred payment agreements entered 
into between the Secretary and the non-Federal interest for the 
projects authorized by section 7012(a)(1)'' before the period at the 
end.

SEC. 329. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Muddy river, massachusetts.--The separable elements for 
        ecosystem restoration of the project for flood damage reduction 
        and environmental restoration, Muddy River, Brookline and 
        Boston, Massachusetts, authorized by section 522 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656), and 
        deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources 
        Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), are 
        authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, subject to 
        subsection (b).
            (2) East chester creek, new york.--Notwithstanding section 
        1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        579a), the project for navigation, East Chester Creek, New 
        York, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1950 (64 Stat. 164; 100 Stat. 4181), and deauthorized pursuant 
        to section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 579(a)), is authorized to be carried out by the 
        Secretary, subject to subsection (b).
            (3) Christiansted harbor, united states virgin islands.--
        Notwithstanding section 1002 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), the portion of the project for 
        navigation, Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, United States 
        Virgin Islands, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 167), and deauthorized under 
        section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4221) is authorized to be carried out by the 
        Secretary, subject to subsection (b).
            (4) Charlotte harbor, united states virgin islands.--
        Notwithstanding section 1002 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4221), the portion of the project for 
        navigation, Charlotte Amalie (St. Thomas) Harbor, St. Thomas, 
        United States Virgin Islands, authorized by the Act of August 
        26, 1937 (chapter 832, 50 Stat. 850), and deauthorized under 
        section 1002 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4221) is authorized to be carried out by the 
        Secretary, subject to subsection (b).
    (b) Report to Congress.--The Secretary shall complete and submit to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate a post-authorization change report (as such term is defined 
in section 1132(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 
U.S.C. 2282e(d)) prior to carrying out a project identified in 
subsection (a).

SEC. 330. CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
        under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
        is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
        reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
        transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated 
        with the conveyance.
            (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
        conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
        date, on the real property conveyed.
            (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
    (b) Eufaula, Alabama.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to 
        the City of Eufaula, Alabama, all right, title, and interest of 
        the United States in and to the real property described in the 
        Department of the Army Lease No. DACW01-2-17-0747, containing 
        56.76 acres, more or less, and being a part of Tracts L-1268 
        (26.12 acres), L-1273 (13.71 acres), L-1278 (6.75 acres), and 
        L1279 (10.36 acres) of the Walter F. George Lock and Dam and 
        Lake project.
            (2) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (3) Consideration.--The City of Eufaula, Alabama, shall pay 
        to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair 
        market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as 
        determined by the Secretary.
    (c) Montgomery, Alabama.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to 
        the City of Montgomery, Alabama, all right, title, and interest 
        of the United States in and to the real property described in 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is the 62.38 
        acres of land and water under the primary jurisdiction of the 
        Secretary in the R.E. ``Bob'' Woodruff Project Area that is 
        covered by lease number DACW01-1-05-0037, including the parcels 
        and structure known as ``Powder Magazine''.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States, to include retaining the 
        right to inundate with water any land transferred under this 
        subsection.
            (4) Consideration.--The City of Montgomery, Alabama, shall 
        pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair 
        market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as 
        determined by the Secretary.
    (d) Ohio River Lock and Dam Number 52, Massac County, Illinois.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to 
        the Massac-Metropolis Port District, Illinois, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to any real 
        property located north of the south bank of the Ohio River in 
        Massac County, Illinois, that is associated with the Ohio River 
        Lock and Dam 52.
            (2) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (3) Consideration.--The Massac-Metropolis Port District, 
        Illinois, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less 
        than fair market value of the property conveyed under this 
        subsection, as determined by the Secretary.
    (e) Clinton, Missouri.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to 
        the City of Clinton, Missouri, without consideration, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        real property described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is a tract of 
        land situated in the S \1/2\ of Section 12 and the N \1/2\ of 
        Section 13, Township 41 North, Range 26 West of the Fifth 
        Principal Meridian, Henry County, Missouri, more particularly 
        described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of 
        the north line of said S \1/2\ of Section 12 and the easterly 
        right-of-way of State Highway No. 13; thence easterly along the 
        north line of said S \1/2\ to the northeast corner of the W \1/
        2\ NW \1/4\ NE \1/4\ SW \1/4\ of said Section 12; thence 
        southerly along the east line of said W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NE \1/4\ 
        SW \1/4\ to the southeast corner thereof; thence easterly along 
        the north line of the S \1/2\ NE \1/4\ SW \1/4\ of said Section 
        12 to the southwest corner of the W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NW \1/4\ SE 
        \1/4\ of said Section 12; thence in a northeasterly direction 
        to the northeast corner of said W \1/2\ NW \1/4\ NW \1/4\ SE 
        \1/4\ ; thence easterly along the north line of said S \1/2\ to 
        the westerly right-of-way of the County Road; thence in a 
        southeasterly and southerly direction along the westerly right-
        of-way of said County Road approximately 2500 feet to the 
        center of Deer Creek; thence in a southwesterly direction along 
        the center of said Deer Creek, approximately 3900 feet to the 
        south line of said N \1/2\ of Section 13; thence westerly along 
        the south line of said N \1/2\ to the easterly right-of-way 
        line of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad; thence in a 
        northwesterly direction along the easterly right-of-way of said 
        railroad to the easterly right-of-way of said State Highway No. 
        13; thence in a northeasterly direction along the easterly 
        right-of-way of said State Highway No. 13 to the point of the 
        beginning; and including a roadway easement for ingress and 
        egress, described as a strip of land 80 feet in width, lying 40 
        feet on each side of the following described line, the initial 
        extremities of the following described strip being extended or 
        reduced as required to exactly adjoin the boundary lines which 
        they meet, situated in the S \1/2\ of Section 12, Township 41 
        North Range 26 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Henry 
        County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: 
        Commencing at the center of said Section 12, thence 
        Sl24'56''W, 1265.52 feet to a point, thence N8829'02''W, 
        483.97 feet to the point of beginning of the strip of land 
        herein described; thence in a northeasterly direction along a 
        curve to the right, said curve having an initial tangent 
        bearing of N344'4l''E, a radius of 238.73 feet and an interior 
        angle of 6129'26'', an arc distance of 256.21 feet to a point; 
        thence N6514'07''E 218.58 feet to a point; thence in a 
        northeasterly direction along a curve to the left, having a 
        radius of 674.07 feet and an interior angle of 3600'01'', an 
        arc distance of 423.53 feet to a point; thence N2914'07''E, 
        417.87 feet to a point; thence northeasterly along a curve to 
        the right, having a radius of 818.51 feet and an interior angle 
        of 1430'01'', an arc distance of 207.15 feet to a point; 
        thence N4344'07''E, 57.00 feet to the southerly right-of-way 
        line of a county road, containing 2,948 acres, more or less; 
        Excluding therefrom a tract of land situated in the S \1/2\ of 
        said Section 12, said Township and Range, described as 
        commencing at the center of said Section 12; thence 
        S124'56''W, 1265.52 feet to the point of beginning of the 
        tract of land herein described; thence N8829'02"W, 1122.50 
        feet; thence S143'26"W, 872.62 feet; thence S8829'02''E, 
        1337.36 feet; thence Nl43'26''E, 872.62 feet; thence 
        N8829'02''W, 214.86 feet to the point of beginning, containing 
        26.79 acres, more or less. The above described tract contains, 
        in the aggregate, 177.69 acres, more or less.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under this subsection is not being used for a 
        public purpose, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to 
        the United States.
    (f) City of Clinton, Old Orchard Addition, Missouri.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to 
        the City of Clinton, Missouri, all right, title, and interest 
        of the United States in and to the real property described in 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is Lot 28 in Old 
        Orchard Addition, a subdivision of the City of Clinton, Henry 
        County, Missouri, containing 0.36 acres, more or less, 
        including any improvements thereon.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States, including such 
        reservations, terms, and conditions as the Secretary determines 
        necessary to allow the United States to operate and maintain 
        the Harry S. Truman Reservoir Project.
            (4) Consideration.--The City of Clinton, Missouri, shall 
        pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair 
        market value of the property conveyed under this subsection, as 
        determined by the Secretary.
    (g) Tri-County Levee District, Missouri.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary shall convey to 
        the Tri-County Levee District, Missouri, all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States in and to the real property 
        described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Property.--The property to be conveyed is the part of 
        Sections 1 and 12 Township 45 North Range 6 West of the 5th 
        P.M. in Montgomery County, Missouri, described as follows: A 
        tract of land being 60' wide and lying South and East of and 
        adjoining the centerline of the existing levee and being 
        described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of Section 
        12, thence S 87 52' 35'' E 587.4', thence S 01 29' 25'' W 
        453.68' to the point of the beginning; said point being in the 
        center of the levee, thence with the centerline of the levee N 
        77 01' 30'' E 164.92', thence N 74 26' 55'' E 250.0', thence 
        N 72 27' 55'' E 270.0', thence N 69 06' 10'' E 300.0', thence 
        N 66 42' 15'' E 500.0', thence N 64 14' 30'' E 270.0', thence 
        N 61 09' 10'' E 800.0', thence N 60 58' 15'' E 1724.45', 
        thence leaving the centerline S 01 10' 35'' W 69.43', thence 
        parallel with the above described centerline S 60 58' 15'' W 
        1689.62', thence S 61 09' 10'' W 801.71', thence S 64 14' 
        30'' W 272.91', thence S 66 42' 15'' W 502.55', thence S 69 
        06' 10'' W 303.02', thence S 72 27' 55'' W 272.8', thence S 
        74 26' 55'' W 252.39', thence S 77 01' 30'' W 181.75', thence 
        leaving the South side of the levee N 01 26' 25'' E 61.96' to 
        the point of beginning and containing 5.89 acres more or less.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (4) Consideration.--The Tri-County Levee District, 
        Missouri, shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less 
        than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this 
        subsection, as determined by the Secretary.
    (h) Judge Joseph Barker, Jr., House, Ohio.--
            (1) Non-federal entity.--In this subsection, the term 
        ``non-Federal entity'' means the Friends of Joseph Barker, Jr., 
        House, a nonprofit organization in the State of Ohio.
            (2) Conveyance authorized.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to paragraph (6), the 
                Secretary shall convey to the non-Federal entity, 
                without consideration, all right, title, and interest 
                of the United States in and to the property described 
                in paragraph (3)(A).
                    (B) Easement.--Upon conveyance of the property 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide to 
                the non-Federal entity, without consideration, an 
                easement over the property described in paragraph 
                (3)(B) for access to the conveyed property for as long 
                as the non-Federal entity is in legal possession of the 
                conveyed property.
            (3) Descriptions of property.--
                    (A) In general.--The property referred to in 
                paragraph (2)(A) is the following (as in existence on 
                the date of enactment of this Act):
                            (i) Judge joseph barker, jr., house.--The 
                        tract of land situated in the State of Ohio, 
                        Washington County, on the Ohio River, and being 
                        particularly bounded and described as follows: 
                        Beginning at a point located on the southern 
                        right-of-way line of Ohio Route 7, a new corner 
                        to the land now or formerly owned by the United 
                        States of America; thence, leaving the right-
                        of-way of said Route 7 and severing the land of 
                        said United States of America parallel to and 
                        approximately 10 feet easterly of the toe of 
                        the existing dredge disposal berm, 
                        southeasterly approximately 326 feet to a point 
                        prior to the current Corps of Engineers access 
                        to the dredging spoil area; thence, 
                        northeasterly approximately 480 feet 
                        paralleling the top of the slope to the 
                        riverbank side of the house and approximately 
                        25 feet northerly therefrom; thence, northwest 
                        approximately 302 feet to a point in the 
                        southern right-of-way of Ohio Route 7; thence 
                        with the right-of-way of said Route 7, 
                        southwesterly approximately 485 feet to the 
                        point of beginning, containing approximately 
                        3.51 acres.
                            (ii) Road tract.--The tract of land 
                        situated in the State of Ohio, Washington 
                        County, on the Ohio River, and being 
                        particularly bounded and described as follows: 
                        Beginning at a point located on the southern 
                        right-of-way line of Ohio Route 7, a new corner 
                        to the land now or formerly owned by the United 
                        States of America; thence, leaving the right-
                        of-way of said Route 7 and severing the land of 
                        said United States of America and with the 
                        House Parcel southeasterly 25 feet; thence, 
                        northeast, running parallel to said Route 7 
                        right-of-way, approximately 994 feet to a point 
                        of deflection; thence northeasterly 368 feet to 
                        a point beyond the existing fence corner; 
                        thence, east 140 feet to the edge of the 
                        existing Willow Island access road; thence with 
                        said access road, northwesterly approximately 
                        62 feet to a point in the southern right-of-way 
                        of Ohio Route 7; thence with the right-of-way 
                        of said Route 7, southwesterly approximately 
                        1,491 feet to the point of beginning, 
                        containing approximately 1 acre.
                    (B) Easement.--The property referred to in 
                paragraph (2)(B) is the following: The tract of land 
                situated in the State of Ohio, Washington County, on 
                the Ohio River, and being particularly bounded and 
                described as follows: Beginning at a point at the 
                intersection of the southern right-of-way of Ohio Route 
                7 and the northeast side of the existing Willow Island 
                access road, a new corner to the land now or formerly 
                owned by the United States of America; thence, 
                southwest, running with said Route 7 right-of-way, 
                approximately 30 feet to a point on the southwest side 
                of the existing access road, and corner to the road 
                tract; thence with said access road and the line of the 
                road parcel, southeasterly approximately 62 feet to a 
                point; thence leaving the road parcel and crossing the 
                existing access road northeasterly approximately 30 
                feet to a point located on the northeast side of the 
                existing access road; thence, northwesterly 
                approximately 62 feet, to the point of beginning, 
                containing approximately 0.04 acre.
            (4) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (5) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under this subsection is not being used by 
        the non-Federal entity for a public purpose, all right, title, 
        and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the 
        discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
            (6) Requirements.--
                    (A) Improvements.--The Secretary shall make such 
                improvements and alterations to the property described 
                in paragraph (3)(A)(i) as the Secretary, in 
                consultation with the non-Federal entity and relevant 
                stakeholders, determines to be appropriate to 
                facilitate conveyance of the property and provision of 
                the easement under this subsection, subject to the 
                condition that the total cost of those improvements and 
                alterations undertaken by the Secretary shall be not 
                more than $120,000.
                    (B) Environmental assessment.--Before making a 
                conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall--
                            (i) conduct, with respect to the property 
                        to be conveyed, an assessment of the 
                        environmental condition of the property, 
                        including an investigation of any potential 
                        hazardous, toxic, or radioactive waste present 
                        on such property; and
                            (ii) submit to the non-Federal entity a 
                        report describing the results of such 
                        assessment.
                    (C) Refusal by non-federal entity.--
                            (i) In general.--Upon review by the non-
                        Federal entity of the report under subparagraph 
                        (B), the non-Federal entity may elect to refuse 
                        the conveyance under this subsection.
                            (ii) Election.--An election under clause 
                        (i)--
                                    (I) shall be at the sole discretion 
                                of the non-Federal entity; and
                                    (II) shall be made by the non-
                                Federal entity by not later than the 
                                date that is 30 days after the date of 
                                submission of the report under 
                                subparagraph (B)(ii).
                    (D) Dredged material placement activities.--The 
                Secretary shall--
                            (i) notify and coordinate with the non-
                        Federal entity and relevant stakeholders before 
                        carrying out any dredged material placement 
                        activities associated with the property 
                        described in paragraph (3)(A) after the date on 
                        which such property is conveyed under this 
                        subsection; and
                            (ii) in carrying out a dredged material 
                        placement activity under clause (i), act in 
                        accordance with Engineer Manual EM 1110-2-5025 
                        (or a subsequent version of that manual).
            (7) Reservation of rights.--The Secretary may reserve and 
        retain from any conveyance under this subsection a right-of-way 
        or any other right that the Secretary determines to be 
        necessary for the operation and maintenance of the authorized 
        Federal channel along the Ohio River.
            (8) Treatment.--Conveyance to the non-Federal entity under 
        this subsection of property described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) 
        shall satisfy all obligations of the Secretary with respect to 
        such property under--
                    (A) section 306101 of title 54, United States Code; 
                and
                    (B) section 306108 of title 54, United States Code, 
                with respect to the effects on the property of dredged 
                material placement activities carried out by the 
                Secretary after the date of the conveyances.
            (9) Inapplicability.--Subtitle I of title 40, and chapter 4 
        of title 41, United States Code shall not apply to any 
        conveyance or easement provided under this subsection.
    (i) Leaburg Fish Hatchery, Lane County, Oregon.--
            (1) Conveyance authorized.--Subject to the provisions of 
        this subsection, the Secretary shall convey, without 
        consideration, to the State of Oregon, acting through the 
        Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States in and to the real property 
        comprising the Leaburg Fish Hatchery, consisting of 
        approximately 21.55 acres, identified as tracts Q-1500, Q-
        1501E, and 300E-1 and described in Department of the Army Lease 
        No. DACW57-1-18-0009, together with any improvements on the 
        property.
            (2) Water rights.--The Secretary may transfer to the State 
        of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Department of Fish and 
        Wildlife, any water rights held by the United States that are 
        appurtenant to the property conveyed under this subsection.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States, including a condition that 
        all of the property conveyed under this subsection be used and 
        maintained by the State of Oregon for the purpose of operating 
        a fish hatchery in perpetuity.
            (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under this subsection is not being used or 
        maintained by the State of Oregon for the purpose of operating 
        a fish hatchery in perpetuity, all or any portion of the 
        property, including any water rights transferred under this 
        subsection, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to 
        the United States.
            (5) Savings clause.--If the State of Oregon does not accept 
        the conveyance under this subsection, the Secretary may dispose 
        of the property, including appurtenant water rights, under 
        subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code.
    (j) Willamette Falls Locks, Willamette River, Oregon.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this section:
                    (A) Real estate appendix.--The term ``real estate 
                appendix'' means Appendix A of the document published 
                by the District Commander of the Portland District of 
                the Corps of Engineers, titled ``Willamette Falls Locks 
                Willamette River Oregon Section 216 Disposition Study 
                with Integrated Environmental Assessment''.
                    (B) Receiving entity.--The term ``receiving 
                entity'' means an entity identified by the State of 
                Oregon, in consultation with the Willamette Falls Locks 
                Commission, to receive the conveyance under paragraph 
                (2).
                    (C) Willamette falls locks project.--The term 
                ``Willamette Falls Locks project'' means the project 
                for navigation, Willamette Falls Locks, Willamette 
                River, Oregon, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 
                (36 Stat. 664, chapter 382).
                    (D) Willamette falls locks report.--The term 
                ``Willamette Falls Locks report'' means the memorandum 
                of the Director of Civil Works with the subject 
                ``Willamette Falls Locks (WFL), Willamette River Oregon 
                Section 216 Disposition Study with Integrated 
                Environmental Assessment (Study)'', dated July 11, 
                2019.
            (2) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        convey to the receiving entity, without consideration, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to any 
        land in which the Federal Government has a property interest 
        for the Willamette Falls Locks project, together with any 
        improvements on the land, subject to the requirements of this 
        subsection and in accordance with the Willamette Falls Locks 
        report.
            (3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under 
        this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
            (4) Subject to existing easements and other interests.--The 
        conveyance of property under paragraph (2) shall be subject to 
        all existing deed reservations, easements, rights-of-way, and 
        leases that are in effect as of the date of the conveyance.
            (5) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under this subsection cease to be held in 
        public ownership, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to 
        the United States.
            (6) Requirements before conveyance.--
                    (A) Perpetual road easement.--Before a making the 
                conveyance under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall 
                acquire a perpetual road easement from an adjacent 
                property owner for use of an access road, which 
                easement shall convey with the property conveyed under 
                such paragraph.
                    (B) Environmental compliance.--Before making the 
                conveyance under paragraph (2), in accordance with the 
                real estate appendix, the Secretary shall complete a 
                Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment pursuant to the 
                Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
                Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.).
                    (C) Historic preservation.--The Secretary may enter 
                into a memorandum of agreement with the Oregon State 
                Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council 
                on Historic Preservation that identifies actions the 
                Secretary shall take before making the conveyance under 
                paragraph (2).
                    (D) Repairs.--Before making the conveyance under 
                paragraph (2), the Secretary shall carry out repairs to 
                address primary seismic and safety risks in accordance 
                with the recommendations approved in the Willamette 
                Falls Locks report.
            (7) Deauthorization.--Beginning on the date on which the 
        Secretary makes the conveyance under paragraph (2), the 
        Willamette Falls Locks project is no longer authorized.

SEC. 331. REPEALS.

    (a) Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 579a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (2) and 
        redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); and
            (2) by striking subsection (c).
    (b) Section 6003 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 579c) is repealed.
    (c) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 
U.S.C. 579d) is repealed.
    (d) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 
U.S.C. 579c-1) is repealed.
    (e) Section 1301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 
U.S.C. 579d-1) is repealed.
    (f) Section 1302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 
U.S.C. 579c-2) is repealed.

                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    The following projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled 
``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted 
to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by 
Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports or decision documents 
designated in this section:
            (1) Navigation.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AK     Port of Nome        May 29, 2020   Federal: $368,173,000
           Modifications                     Non-Federal: $122,746,000
                                             Total: $490,919,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. AK     Unalaska (Dutch     February 7,    Federal: $26,202,750
           Harbor) Channels    2020          Non-Federal: $8,734,250
                                             Total: $34,937,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CT      New Haven Harbor   May 7, 2020    Federal: $53,489,000
           Navigation                        Non-Federal: $18,822,000
           Improvement                       Total: $72,311,000
           Project
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. NY,    New York and New    April 23,      Federal: $18,940,000
 NJ        Jersey Harbor       2020          Non-Federal: $6,310,000
           Anchorages                        Total: $25,250,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. TX     Gulf Intracoastal   October 23,    Total: $409,777,000, to be
           Waterway, Brazos    2019           derived \1/2\ from the
           River Floodgates                   general fund of the
           and Colorado                       Treasury and \1/2\ from
           River Locks                        the Inland Waterways Trust
                                              Fund.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. TX     Houston Ship        April 23,      Federal: $462,803,000
           Channel Expansion   2020          Non-Federal: $414,045,000
           Channel                           Total: $876,848,000
           Improvement
           Project, Harris,
           Chambers, and
           Galveston
           Counties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. TX     Matagorda Ship      November 15,   Federal: $138,660,000
           Channel             2019          Non-Federal: $79,664,000
           Improvement                       Total: $218,324,000
           Project, Port
           Lavaca
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (2) Flood risk management.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AZ     Little Colorado     December 14,   Federal: $52,462,000
           River at Winslow,   2018          Non-Federal: $28,249,000
           Navajo County                     Total: $80,711,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CA     Westminster, East   July 9, 2020   Federal: $314,506,000
           Garden Grove,                     Non-Federal: $910,092,000
           California Flood                  Total: $1,224,598,000
           Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CT,    Westchester County  May 7, 2020    Federal: $14,702,500
 NY        Streams, Byram                    Non-Federal: $14,702,500
           River Basin,                      Total: $29,405,000
           Fairfield County,
           Connecticut, and
           Westchester
           County, New York
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. ND     Souris River Basin  April 16,      Federal: $58,041,750
           Flood Risk          2019          Non-Federal: $31,253,250
           Management                        Total: $89,295,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. NJ     Peckman River       April 29,      Federal: $95,022,000
           Basin               2020          Non-Federal: $51,166,000
                                             Total: $146,188,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. NM     Middle Rio Grande   March 13,      Federal: $190,538,000
           Flood Protection,   2020          Non-Federal: $102,598,000
           Bernalillo to                     Total: $293,136,000
           Belen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. OK     Tulsa and West-     April 23,      Federal: $86,780,000
           Tulsa Levee         2020          Non-Federal: $46,728,000
           System, Tulsa                     Total: $133,508,000
           County
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (3) Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. DE     Delaware            March 6, 2020  Initial Federal:
           Beneficial Use of                  $53,220,000
           Dredged Material                  Initial Non-Federal:
           for the Delaware                   $28,660,000
           River                             Total: $81,880,000
                                             Renourishment Federal:
                                              $116,380,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $116,380,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $232,760,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. NJ     New Jersey          April 8, 2020  Initial Federal:
           Beneficial Use of                  $80,780,000
           Dredged Material                  Initial Non-Federal:
           for the Delaware                   $43,500,000
           River                             Total: $124,280,000
                                             Renourishment Federal:
                                              $82,140,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $82,140,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $164,280,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. NJ     Rahway River        June 9, 2020   Federal: $46,754,000
           Basin, New Jersey                 Non-Federal: $25,175,000
           Coastal Storm                      Total: $71,929,000
           Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. NY     East Rockaway       August 22,     Initial Federal:
           Inlet to Rockaway   2019           $604,203,000
           Inlet and Jamaica                 Initial Non-Federal: $0
           Bay, Atlantic                     Total: $604,203,000
           Coast of New York                 Renourishment Federal:
                                              $189,763,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $189,763,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $379,526,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. NY     Hashamomuck Cove    December 9,    Initial Federal:
           Coastal Storm       2019           $11,549,000
           Risk Management                   Initial Non-Federal:
                                              $6,218,000
                                             Total: $17,767,000
                                             Renourishment Federal:
                                              $23,481,500
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $23,481,500
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $46,963,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. RI     Pawcatuck River     December 19,   Federal: $37,848,000
           Coastal Storm       2018           Non-Federal: $20,379,000
           Risk Management                   Total: $58,227,000
           Project
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. VA     Norfolk Coastal     February 5,    Federal: $909,040,000
           Storm Risk          2019          Non-Federal: $489,480,000
           Management                         Total: $1,398,520,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (4) Flood risk management and ecosystem restoration.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CO     South Platte River  July 29, 2019  Federal: $334,412,000
           and Tributaries,                  Non-Federal: $200,406,000
           Adams and Denver                  Total: $534,818,000
           Counties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. NY     Fire Island Inlet   July 9, 2020   Initial Federal:
           to Montauk Point,                  $1,541,981,000
           New York                          Initial Non-Federal: $0
           Reformulation                     Total: $1,541,981,000
                                             Renourishment Federal:
                                              $742,926,500
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $742,926,500
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $1,485,853,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (5) Ecosystem restoration.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CA     Delta Islands and    December 18,  Federal: $16,746,395
           Levees              2018          Non-Federal: $9,016,736
                                             Total: $25,763,131
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CA     Yuba River          June 20, 2019  Federal: $65,014,326
           Ecosystem                         Non-Federal: $35,008,268
           Restoration                       Total: $100,022,594
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. FL     Comprehensive       April 8, 2020  Federal: $372,232,000
           Everglades                        Non-Federal: $368,528,000
           Restoration Plan,                 Total: $740,760,000
           Loxahatchee River
           Watershed
           Restoration
           Project, Martin
           and Palm Beach
           Counties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. IL     The Great Lakes     May 23, 2019   Federal: $690,643,200
           and Mississippi                   Non-Federal: $172,660,800
           River Interbasin                  Total: $863,304,000
           Study - Brandon
           Road, Will County
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. IL     South Fork of the   July 9, 2020   Federal: $11,657,000
           South Branch of                   Non-Federal: $6,277,000
           the Chicago                       Total: $17,934,000
           River, Bubbly
           Creek, Ecosystem
           Restoration
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. MD     Anacostia           December 19,   Federal: $23,171,000
           Watershed           2018          Non-Federal: $12,476,000
           Restoration,                      Total: $35,647,000
           Prince George's
           County
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. MO     St. Louis           November 1,    Federal: $60,124,000
           Riverfront-         2019          Non-Federal: $32,375,000
           Meramec River                     Total: $92,499,000
           Basin Ecosystem
           Restoration
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. NM     Rio Grande,         August 5,      Federal: $16,163,000
           Environmental       2019          Non-Federal: $8,703,000
           Management                        Total: $24,866,000
           Program, Sandia
           Pueblo to Isleta
           Pueblo, New
           Mexico Ecosystem
           Restoration
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. NY,    Hudson-Raritan      May 26, 2020   Federal: $265,320,000
 NJ        Estuary Ecosystem                 Non-Federal: $142,864,000
           Restoration                       Total: $408,184,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. TX    Jefferson County    September 12,  Federal: $37,615,000
           Ecosystem           2019          Non-Federal: $20,254,000
           Restoration                       Total: $57,869,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (6) Water supply.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. OR     Willamette River    December 18,   Federal: $0
           Basin Review        2019          Non-Federal: $0
           Reallocation,                     Total: $0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (7) Modifications and other projects.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
A. State       B.  Name          Decision        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                 Document
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. KY     Kentucky Lock       June 9, 2020   Total: $1,152,769,000 (to
                                              be derived \1/2\ from the
                                              general fund of the
                                              Treasury and \1/2\ from
                                              the Inland Waterways Trust
                                              Fund)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. NC     Carolina Beach      June 16, 2020  Federal: $24,205,000
           Integrated Beach                  Non-Federal: $24,205,000
           Renourishment                     Total: $48,410,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. NC     Wrightsville Beach  July 2, 2020   Federal: $53,788,000
                                             Non-Federal: $22,329,000
                                             Total: $76,117,000
                                             Renourishment Federal:
                                              $14,553,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $14,553,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $29,106,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. TX     Corpus Christi      May 4, 2020    Federal: $403,000,000
           Ship Channel,                     Non-Federal: $273,010,000
           Deepening and                     Total: $676,010,000
           Widening and
           Barge Shelves
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 402. SPECIAL RULES.

    (a) Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Project, Brandon 
Road, Will County, Illinois.--The Secretary shall carry out the project 
for ecosystem restoration, Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin 
project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois, authorized by section 401 
of this Act, substantially in accordance with the terms and conditions 
described in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 23, 2019, 
with the following modifications:
            (1) The Federal share of the cost of construction shall be 
        80 percent.
            (2) The Secretary may include the addition or substitution 
        of technologies or measures not described in the report, as the 
        Secretary determines to be advisable.
    (b) Willamette River Basin Review Reallocation Study.--The 
Secretary shall carry out the project for water supply, Willamette 
River Basin Review Reallocation, Oregon, authorized by section 401 of 
this Act, substantially in accordance with the terms and conditions 
described in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 18, 
2019, with the following modifications:
            (1) The Secretary shall meet the obligations of the Corps 
        of Engineers under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 by 
        complying with the June 2019 NMFS Willamette Basin Review Study 
        Biological Opinion Reasonable and Prudent Alternative until 
        such time, if any, as it is modified or replaced, in whole or 
        in part, through the consultation process under section 7(a) of 
        the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
            (2) The Secretary may reallocate not more than 10 percent 
        of overall storage in the joint conservation pool, as 
        authorized by this Act and without further Congressional 
        action, if such reallocation is consistent with the ongoing 
        consultation under section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act 
        of 1973 related to Willamette Valley System operations.
            (3) The Secretary shall ensure that the revised 
        reallocation is not reallocated from a single storage use, does 
        not seriously affect authorized project purposes, and does not 
        otherwise involve major operational changes to the project.
    (c) Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.--Section 5127 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1242) is amended by 
striking ``$150,000,000'' and inserting ``$232,430,000''.

SEC. 403. AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS BASED ON FEASIBILITY STUDIES 
              PREPARED BY NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out the 
following projects for water resources development and conservation and 
other purposes, subject to subsection (b):
            (1) Fort pierce, st. lucie county, florida.--The project 
        for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Fort Pierce, St. 
        Lucie County, Florida, as described in the review assessment of 
        the Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of St. Lucie County, 
        Florida Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project Section 203 
        Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment (June 
        2018)'' and dated July 2018, at a total cost of $33,107,639, 
        and at an estimated total cost of $97,958,972 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project.
            (2) Baptiste collette bayou, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana, as described in 
        the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review 
        Assessment of Plaquemines Parish Government's Section 203 Study 
        Baptiste Collette Bayou Navigation Channel Deepening Project 
        Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment 
        (January 2017, Amended April 2018)'' and dated June 2018, at a 
        total cost of $44,920,000.
            (3) Houma navigation canal, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Houma Navigation Canal, Louisiana, as described in 
        the review assessment of the Secretary, titled ``Review 
        Assessment of Houma Navigation Canal Deepening Project Section 
        203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT Environmental 
        Impact Statement (June 2018)'' and dated July 2018, at a total 
        cost of $253,458,000.
            (4) Chacon creek, texas.--The project for flood risk 
        management, ecosystem restoration, and other purposes, Chacon 
        Creek, Texas, as described in the review assessment of the 
        Secretary, titled ``Review Assessment of Chacon Creek, Texas 
        Section 203 Integrated Feasibility Report and DRAFT 
        Environmental Assessment (August 2018)'' and dated September 
        2018, at a total cost of $51,973,000.
    (b) Requirements.--The Secretary may only carry out a project 
authorized under subsection (a)--
            (1) substantially in accordance with the applicable review 
        assessment for the project submitted by the Secretary under 
        section 203(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 
        as identified in subsection (a) of this section, and subject to 
        such modifications or conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate and identifies in a final assessment that addresses 
        the concerns, recommendations, and conditions identified by the 
        Secretary in the applicable review assessment; and
            (2) after the Secretary transmits to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate such final assessment.
    (c) Technical Correction.--Section 203(c)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(c)(1)) is amended, in the 
matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ``a report'' and 
inserting ``an assessment''.
                                 <all>