Title: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Office of Technology Assessment should be reestablished.
Policy area: Congress

Summary:
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) the legislative process would greatly benefit from once again having an office dedicated to giving nonpartisan, technical advice to Congress; (2) the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) represents a cost-effective improvement to the governance of the United States; and (3) funding should be restored for the OTA.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 849 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 849

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Office of 
             Technology Assessment should be reestablished.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2018

 Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Takano, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Ms. 
Clarke of New York, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Delaney, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Esty of 
  Connecticut, Ms. Hanabusa, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. 
    Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
McNerney, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rush, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Schiff, Mrs. Watson 
Coleman, and Ms. Lofgren) submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Office of 
             Technology Assessment should be reestablished.

Whereas the Office of Technology Assessment (hereinafter referred to as ``OTA'') 
        was created in 1972 to provide Members of Congress and congressional 
        committees with objective analysis of increasingly complex scientific 
        and technical issues faced by our country;
Whereas for over 20 years and 11 sessions of Congress, the OTA produced 
        trustworthy, nonpartisan technical reports on issues as far ranging as 
        nuclear arms control, electronic health records, and oil and shale 
        technologies;
Whereas the expertise provided by the OTA saved taxpayers billions of dollars by 
        identifying cost-effective areas for future investment and avoiding 
        wasting money on technologies and policies that did not and could not 
        work;
Whereas the OTA contributed to the security and economic growth of our Nation by 
        providing timely and forward looking analysis of technological threats 
        and opportunities;
Whereas it is frequently necessary for Members of Congress to make informed 
        policy decisions about rapidly changing technologies that are often 
        outside their technical areas of expertise;
Whereas in the 20 years since Congress has suspended appropriations for the OTA, 
        the United States has missed significant opportunities for reallocating 
        Federal spending to better align with current and future technological 
        reality; and
Whereas 90 organizations came together to call for the OTA to be funded once 
        again by Congress: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the legislative process would greatly benefit from once 
        again having an office dedicated to giving nonpartisan, 
        technical advice to Congress;
            (2) the Office of Technology Assessment represents a cost-
        effective improvement to the governance of the United States; 
        and
            (3) funding should be restored for the Office of Technology 
        Assessment.
                                 <all>