hheiden/us-congress-bill-policy-115_117 huggingface dataset:
Title: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule.
Policy area: Environmental Protection

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the Stream Protection Rule finalized by the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 20, 2016. The rule addresses the impacts of surface coal mining operations on surface water, groundwater, and the productivity of mining operation sites.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 11 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 11

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
                     as the Stream Protection Rule.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Mr. Jenkins of West Virginia (for himself, Mr. Barr, Mr. Rogers of 
 Kentucky, Mr. Griffith, and Mr. Tipton) submitted the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
                     as the Stream Protection Rule.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 
Enforcement of the Department of the Interior relating to the ``Stream 
Protection Rule'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 93066 (December 20, 
2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the National Park Service relating to "General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights".
Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the National Park Service titled "General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights."	The rule published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2016, addresses non-federal oil and gas rights within National Park Service units outside of Alaska.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 46 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 46

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the final rule of the National Park Service 
 relating to ``General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

  Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Black, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. 
 Newhouse, and Mr. Gohmert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the final rule of the National Park Service 
 relating to ``General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to ``General 
Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights'' (81 Fed. Reg. 77972 
(November 4, 2016)), and such policy shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to "Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska".
Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Department of the Interior on August 5, 2016, relating to non-subsistence takings of wildlife and public participation and closure procedures on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior 
      relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                               Alaska''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

Mr. Young of Alaska submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior 
      relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                               Alaska''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to ``Non-
Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 
Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska'' (81 Fed. Reg. 
52247 (August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Restoring Internet Freedom".
Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission entitled "Restoring Internet Freedom." The rule published on February 22, 2018: (1) restores the classification of broadband Internet access service as a lightly-regulated "information service"; (2) reinstates private mobile service classification of mobile broadband Internet access service; (3) requires Internet service providers to disclose information about their network management practices, performance characteristics, and commercial terms of service; and (4) eliminates the Internet Conduct Standard and the bright-line rules.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 131 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 131

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2018

  Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania submitted the following joint 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
``Restoring Internet Freedom'' (83 Fed. Reg. 7852 (February 22, 2018)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services".
Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission entitled "Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services." The rule published on December 2, 2016: (1) applies the customer privacy requirements of the Communications Act of 1934 to broadband Internet access service and other telecommunications services, (2) requires telecommunications carriers to inform customers about rights to opt in or opt out of the use or the sharing of their confidential information, (3) adopts data security and breach notification requirements, (4) prohibits broadband service offerings that are contingent on surrendering privacy rights, and (5) requires disclosures and affirmative consent when a broadband provider offers customers financial incentives in exchange for the provider's right to use a customer's confidential information.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 86 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 86

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
    Commission relating to ``Protecting the Privacy of Customers of 
           Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2017

  Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Flores, Mr. Olson, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
 Scalise, Mr. Latta, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Kinzinger, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, 
Mr. Long, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mrs. Mimi Walters of California, Mr. 
  Cramer, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. Costello of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Bilirakis, and Mr. Shimkus) submitted the following joint resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
    Commission relating to ``Protecting the Privacy of Customers of 
           Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
``Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other 
Telecommunications Services'' (81 Fed. Reg. 87274 (December 2, 2016)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.
Policy area: Government Operations and Politics

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution states that nothing in the U.S. Constitution shall prohibit Congress and the states from imposing content-neutral regulations and restrictions on the expenditure of funds for political activity by any corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity, including but not limited to contributions in support of, or in opposition to, a candidate for public office.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 90

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2017

 Ms. Shea-Porter (for herself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Hastings, 
  Mr. Raskin, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Soto) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution shall prohibit Congress 
and the States from imposing content-neutral regulations and 
restrictions on the expenditure of funds for political activity by any 
corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity, 
including but not limited to contributions in support of, or in 
opposition to, a candidate for public office.
    ``Section 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed 
to abridge the freedom of the press.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibiting the United States Government from increasing its debt except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the membership of each House of Congress.
Policy area: Economics and Public Finance

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting the U.S. government from increasing its debt except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the membership of each house of Congress.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 12

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   prohibiting the United States Government from increasing its debt 
 except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the 
                 membership of each House of Congress.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Mr. McClintock (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. 
  Duncan of South Carolina) submitted the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   prohibiting the United States Government from increasing its debt 
 except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the 
                 membership of each House of Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The United States government may not increase its debt 
except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the 
membership of each House of Congress.
    ``Section 2. This article shall take effect beginning ten years 
after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Disapproving the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior relating to management of non-Federal oil and gas rights.
Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service titled "Management of Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights."	The rule published in the Federal Register on November 14, 2016, addresses non-federal oil and gas rights within the National Wildlife Refuge System outside of Alaska.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 45

Disapproving the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife 
  Service of the Department of the Interior relating to management of 
                    non-Federal oil and gas rights.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

 Mr. Cramer (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Gohmert, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. 
  Biggs, and Mr. Newhouse) submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife 
  Service of the Department of the Interior relating to management of 
                    non-Federal oil and gas rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the 
Department of the Interior relating to ``Management of Non-Federal Oil 
and Gas Rights'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 79948 (November 14, 2016)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give States the authority to repeal Federal rules and regulations when the repeal is agreed to by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States.
Policy area: Government Operations and Politics

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing states to repeal, in whole or in part, any presidential executive order, rule, regulation, other regulatory action, or administrative ruling issued by an agency or instrumentality of the United States when the legislatures of two-thirds of the states approve resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the provisions to be repealed.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 32 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 32

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 
 States the authority to repeal Federal rules and regulations when the 
 repeal is agreed to by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several 
                                States.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2017

 Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers) submitted 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 
 States the authority to repeal Federal rules and regulations when the 
 repeal is agreed to by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The several States may repeal, in whole or in part, 
any Presidential Executive order, rule, regulation, other regulatory 
action, or administrative ruling issued by a department, agency, or 
instrumentality of the United States. Such repeal shall take effect 
upon approval by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States 
of resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same 
whole or part of the Executive order, rule, regulation, other 
regulatory action, or administrative ruling to be repealed.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act.
Policy area: Finance and Financial Sector

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on November 22, 2016, relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act. The rule establishes various consumer protections with respect to prepaid accounts.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 73

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic 
            Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2017

    Mr. Williams (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Lucas, Mr. 
  McHenry, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Posey, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. 
Duffy, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Ross, Mr. Pittenger, Mrs. Wagner, 
 Mr. Barr, Mr. Rothfus, Mr. Messer, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Hollingsworth, Mr. 
 Poliquin, Mr. Hensarling, Mrs. Love, Mr. Hill, Mr. Emmer, Mr. Zeldin, 
Mr. Trott, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. MacArthur, 
Mr. Davidson, Mr. Budd, Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Royce 
of California, and Mr. Graves of Georgia) submitted the following joint 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic 
            Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to prepaid accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 
1693 et seq.) and the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (81 
Fed. Reg. 83934 (November 22, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force 
or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of years an individual may serve as a Member of Congress.
Policy area: Congress

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment limiting the total period an individual may serve as a Member of Congress to 12 years.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 24

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of years an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2017

Mr. Marino submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of years an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. An individual may not serve as a Senator or a Member 
of the House of Representatives if the period of the individual's 
service as a Senator or Member of the House of Representatives (or, in 
the case of an individual who has served as both a Senator and as a 
Member of the House of Representatives, the combined period of the 
individual's service as a Senator and Member of the House of 
Representatives) exceeds 12 years.
    ``Section 2. No period occurring before the date of the 
ratification of this article shall be taken into account in determining 
the period of an individual's service under this article.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving compensation for any period during which a Government shutdown is in effect.
Policy area: Congress

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting Members of Congress from receiving compensation for any period a government shutdown is in effect.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 146 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 146

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
prohibit Members of Congress from receiving compensation for any period 
            during which a Government shutdown is in effect.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 21, 2018

 Mr. Norman (for himself, Mr. Olson, Mr. Posey, Mr. Hern, Mr. Curtis, 
 Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Biggs) submitted the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
prohibit Members of Congress from receiving compensation for any period 
            during which a Government shutdown is in effect.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. A Representative or Senator may not receive 
compensation with respect to any period during which a Government 
shutdown is in effect. For purposes of this article, a Government 
shutdown shall be considered to be in effect if there is a lapse in 
appropriations for any Federal agency or department as a result of a 
failure to enact a regular appropriations bill or continuing 
resolution.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
through appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to "Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska".
Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Department of the Interior on August 5, 2016, relating to non-subsistence takings of wildlife and public participation and closure procedures on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 49

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior 
      relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                               Alaska''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

Mr. Young of Alaska submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior 
      relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                               Alaska''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to ``Non-
Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 
Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska'' (81 Fed. Reg. 
52248 (August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Arbitration Agreements".
Policy area: Finance and Financial Sector

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies a rule submitted by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding arbitration agreements.
(The rule regulates the use of arbitration agreements in contracts for specific consumer financial products and services. It prohibits the use of a predispute arbitration agreement to prevent a consumer from filing or participating in certain class action suits. The rule also requires consumer financial product and service providers to furnish the CFPB with particular information regarding arbitrations.)

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 111

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2017

  Mr. Rothfus (for himself, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. King of New York, Mr. 
Royce of California, Mr. Lucas, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Posey, Mr. 
 Luetkemeyer, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Duffy, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. 
Ross, Mr. Pittenger, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Barr, Mr. Messer, Mr. Tipton, Mr. 
Williams, Mr. Poliquin, Mrs. Love, Mr. Hill, Mr. Emmer, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. 
Trott, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. MacArthur, Mr. 
   Davidson, Mr. Budd, Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee, Ms. Tenney, and Mr. 
  Hollingsworth) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Arbitration Agreements'' (82 Fed. Reg. 33210 (July 19, 2017)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.
Policy area: Congress

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring Representatives to be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by counting the number of U.S. citizens in each state.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 106

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2017

  Mr. Davidson (for himself, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. Brooks of Alabama) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States 
according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by 
counting the number of persons in each State who are citizens of the 
United States.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to end the practice of including more than one subject in a single law by requiring that each law enacted by Congress be limited to only one subject and that the subject be clearly and descriptively expressed in the title of the law.
Policy area: Congress

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring: (1) each bill, order, resolution, or vote that must be submitted to the President under the U.S. Constitution to embrace no more than one subject; and (2) such subject to be clearly and descriptively expressed in the title of the bill, order, resolution, or vote.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 25

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to end 
  the practice of including more than one subject in a single law by 
  requiring that each law enacted by Congress be limited to only one 
subject and that the subject be clearly and descriptively expressed in 
                         the title of the law.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2017

Mr. Marino submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to end 
  the practice of including more than one subject in a single law by 
  requiring that each law enacted by Congress be limited to only one 
subject and that the subject be clearly and descriptively expressed in 
                         the title of the law.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Each bill, order, resolution, or vote which must be submitted to 
the President under section 7 of article I of this Constitution shall 
embrace no more than one subject and that subject shall be clearly and 
descriptively expressed in the title of the bill, order, resolution or 
vote.''.
                                 <all>
Title: Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Kenya of Air Tractor aircraft with weapons, and related support.
Policy area: International Affairs

Summary:
This joint resolution prohibits the issuance of a letter of offer with respect to any of the following proposed sales to the government of Kenya, as described in the certification Transmittal No. 16-79 sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate pursuant to the Arms Export Control Act on January 19, 2017:

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 72 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 72

 Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to 
   the Government of Kenya of Air Tractor aircraft with weapons, and 
                            related support.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2017

  Mr. Budd (for himself and Mr. Hunter) submitted the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
 Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to 
   the Government of Kenya of Air Tractor aircraft with weapons, and 
                            related support.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a letter 
of offer with respect to any of the following proposed sales to the 
Government of Kenya (described in the certification Transmittal No. 16-
79, sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate pursuant 
to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2776(b)(1))) on January 19, 2017, is hereby prohibited:
            (1) Twelve Air Tractor AT-802L.
            (2) Two AT-504 trainer aircraft.
            (3) Weapons package, technical support and program 
        management.
                                 <all>
Title: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.
Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources

Summary:
This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Department of the Interior on December 12, 2016, relating to revising regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
 relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the 
procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to 
          the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

Ms. Cheney (for herself, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Gosar, 
  Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Bishop of 
Utah, and Mr. Sessions) submitted the following joint resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 
 relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the 
procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to 
          the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of 
the Interior relating to ``Resource Management Planning'' (published at 
81 Fed. Reg. 89580 (December 12, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms a Representative or Senator may serve.
Policy area: Congress

Summary:
Constitutional Amendment
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment limiting Members of the Senate to two terms and Members of the House of Representatives to four terms.

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 13

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    limit the number of terms a Representative or Senator may serve.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

   Mr. O'Rourke submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    limit the number of terms a Representative or Senator may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has been a Senator for two terms shall 
again be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate.
    ``Section 2. No person who has been a Representative for four terms 
shall again be eligible for election to the House of Representatives.
    ``Section 3. For purposes of this article, any term a person serves 
as a Senator or Representative to fill a vacancy shall not be included 
in determining the number of terms that the person has been a Senator 
or Representative unless the period of time for which the person fills 
the vacancy is greater than three years in the case of a Senator or 
greater than one year in the case of a Representative.
    ``Section 4. For the purposes of this article, any term that began 
before the date of the ratification of this article shall not be 
included in determining the number of terms that a person has been a 
Senator or Representative.''.
                                 <all>