When Do We Not Need Larger Vision Models?
Authors: name: Baifeng Shi, name: Ziyang Wu, name: Maolin Mao, name: Xin Wang, name: Trevor Darrell

Scaling up the size of vision models has been the de facto standard to obtain
more powerful visual representations. In this work, we discuss the point beyond
which larger vision models are not necessary. First, we demonstrate the power
of Scaling on Scales (S^2), whereby a pre-trained and frozen smaller vision
model (e.g., ViT-B or ViT-L), run over multiple image scales, can outperform
larger models (e.g., ViT-H or ViT-G) on classification, segmentation, depth
estimation, Multimodal LLM (MLLM) benchmarks, and robotic manipulation.
Notably, S^2 achieves state-of-the-art performance in detailed understanding
of MLLM on the V* benchmark, surpassing models such as GPT-4V. We examine the
conditions under which S^2 is a preferred scaling approach compared to
scaling on model size. While larger models have the advantage of better
generalization on hard examples, we show that features of larger vision models
can be well approximated by those of multi-scale smaller models. This suggests
most, if not all, of the representations learned by current large pre-trained
models can also be obtained from multi-scale smaller models. Our results show
that a multi-scale smaller model has comparable learning capacity to a larger
model, and pre-training smaller models with S^2 can match or even exceed the
advantage of larger models. We release a Python package that can apply S^2 on
any vision model with one line of code:
https://github.com/bfshi/scaling_on_scales.