Contrastive Prefence Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL
Authors: name: Joey Hejna, name: Rafael Rafailov, name: Harshit Sikchi, name: Chelsea Finn, name: Scott Niekum, name: W. Bradley Knox, name: Dorsa Sadigh

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a popular
paradigm for aligning models with human intent. Typically RLHF algorithms
operate in two phases: first, use human preferences to learn a reward function
and second, align the model by optimizing the learned reward via reinforcement
learning (RL). This paradigm assumes that human preferences are distributed
according to reward, but recent work suggests that they instead follow the
regret under the user's optimal policy. Thus, learning a reward function from
feedback is not only based on a flawed assumption of human preference, but also
leads to unwieldy optimization challenges that stem from policy gradients or
bootstrapping in the RL phase. Because of these optimization challenges,
contemporary RLHF methods restrict themselves to contextual bandit settings
(e.g., as in large language models) or limit observation dimensionality (e.g.,
state-based robotics). We overcome these limitations by introducing a new
family of algorithms for optimizing behavior from human feedback using the
regret-based model of human preferences. Using the principle of maximum
entropy, we derive Contrastive Preference Learning (CPL), an algorithm for
learning optimal policies from preferences without learning reward functions,
circumventing the need for RL. CPL is fully off-policy, uses only a simple
contrastive objective, and can be applied to arbitrary MDPs. This enables CPL
to elegantly scale to high-dimensional and sequential RLHF problems while being
simpler than prior methods.