hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents the payments due by fiscal year for our outstanding contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
(1) Includes estimated cash interest to be paid over the remaining terms of the underlying debt. Interest payments are based on fixed and floating rates as of December 31, 2019.
(2) Purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or services, including open purchase orders and contracts with fixed volume commitments, that are noncancelable or cancelable with a significant penalty. Purchase obligations for our long-term supply agreements for the purchase of substrate glass and cover glass represent specified termination penalties, which are up to $430 million in the aggregate under the agreements. Our actual purchases under these supply agreements are expected to be approximately $2.4 billion of substrate glass and $500 million of cover glass.
(3) In connection with business or project acquisitions, we may agree to pay additional amounts to the selling parties upon achievement of certain milestones. See Note 14. “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for further information.
(4) Transition tax obligations represent estimated payments for U.S. federal taxes associated with accumulated earnings and profits of our foreign corporate subsidiaries. See Note 18. “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements for further information.
(5) Includes expected letter of credit fees and unused revolver fees.
We have excluded $72.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits from the amounts presented above as the timing of such obligations is uncertain.
Table:
 |  |  | Payments Due by Year |  | 
 |  | Less Than | 1 - 3 | 3 - 5 | More Than
 | Total | 1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations | $482,892 | $17,684 | $98,571 | $37,496 | $329,141
Interest payments (1) . | 168,040 | 17,276 | 29,533 | 27,409 | 93,822
Operating lease obligations | 162,913 | 15,153 | 28,771 | 26,708 | 92,281
Purchase obligations (2) . | 1,424,267 | 900,200 | 221,888 | 187,277 | 114,902
Recycling obligations . | 137,761 | — | — | — | 137,761
Contingent consideration (3) . | 6,895 | 2,395 | 4,500 | — | —
Transition tax obligations (4) . | 76,667 | 6,620 | 14,747 | 32,259 | 23,041
Other obligations (5) . | 10,527 | 2,933 | 5,164 | 2,430 | —
Total . | $2,469,962 | $962,261 | $403,174 | $313,579 | $790,948


Question: What difference between total interest payments and total operating lease obligations?
Answer: 5127
Calculation: 168,040 - 162,913
ASSUMPTIONS USED IN STOCK OPTION PRICING MODEL
The fair value of options granted was determined using a variation of a binomial option pricing model that takes into account factors specific to the share incentive plans, such as the vesting period. The following table shows the principal assumptions used in the valuation.
Expected dividend growth is commensurate with BCE’s dividend growth strategy. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of BCE’s share price. The risk-free rate used is equal to the yield available on Government of Canada bonds at the date of grant with a term equal to the expected life of the options
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Weighted average fair value per option granted | $2.34 | $2.13
Weighted average share price | $58 | $57
Weighted average exercise price | $58 | $56
Expected dividend growth | 5% | 5%
Expected volatility | 14% | 12%
Risk-free interest rate | 2% | 2%
Expected life (years) | 4 | 4


Question: What is the change in the expected volatility in 2019?
Answer: 2
Calculation: 14%-12%
The pension expenses of the direct and indirect company pension plan commitments can be broken down as follows:
1 Netted against employees’ contributions.
2 Included therein: Interest effect from the adjustment of the asset ceiling.
The entire loss to be recognised outside of profit or loss in the other comprehensive income amounts to €90 million in financial year 2018/19. This figure is comprised of the effect from the change in actuarial parameters in the amount of €+247 million and the experience-based adjustments of €+4 million. It was offset by income from plan assets of €103 million and a gain of €58 million resulting from the change in the effect of the asset ceiling in the Netherlands.
In addition to expenses from defined benefit commitments, expenses for payments to external pension providers relating to defined contribution pension commitments of €82 million in financial year 2018/19 (2017/18: €82 million) were recorded. These figures also include payments to statutory pension insurance.
The provisions for obligations similar to pensions essentially comprise commitments from employment anniversary allowances, death benefits and partial retirement plans. Provisions amounting to €34 million (30/9/2018: €41 million) were allocated for these commitments. The commitments are valued on the basis of actuarial expert opinions. The valuation parameters used for this purpose are generally determined in the same way as for the company pension plan.
Table:
€ million | 2017/2018 | 2018/2019
Current service cost1 | 24 | 21
Net interest expenses2 | 11 | 9
Past service cost (incl. curtailments and changes) | 0 | 0
Settlements | 0 | 0
Other pension expenses | 1 | 1
Pension expenses | 36 | 31


Question: In which year were the pension expenses larger?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: 36>31
The Company has adopted five share option schemes, namely, the Pre-IPO Option Scheme, the Post-IPO Option Scheme I, the Post-IPO Option Scheme II, the Post-IPO Option Scheme III and the Post-IPO Option Scheme IV. The Pre-IPO Option Scheme, the Post-IPO Option Scheme I, the Post-IPO Option Scheme II and the Post-IPO Option Scheme III expired on 31 December 2011, 23 March 2014, 16 May 2017 and 13 May 2019 respectively.
As at 31 December 2019, there were a total of 20,722,380 outstanding share options granted to a director of the Company, details of which are as follows:
1. For options granted with exercisable date determined based on the grant date of options, the first 20% of the total options can be exercised 1 year after the grant date, and each 20% of the total options will become exercisable in each subsequent year.
2. For options granted with exercisable date determined based on the grant date of options, the first 25% of the total options can be exercised 1 year after the grant date, and each 25% of the total options will become exercisable in each subsequent year.
3. The closing price immediately before the date on which the options were granted on 4 April 2019 was HKD378.
4. No options were cancelled or lapsed during the year.
Table:
 |  |  | Number of share options |  |  |  | 
Name of director | Date of grant | As at 1 January 2019 | Granted during the year | Exercised during the year | As at 31 December 2019 | Exercise price | Exercise period
 |  |  |  |  |  | HKD | 
Lau Chi Ping Martin | 25 March 2014 | 5,000,000 | - | - | 5,000,000 | 114.52 | 25 March 2015 to 24 March 2021 (Note 2)
 | 21 March 2016 | 3,750,000 | - | - | 3,750,000 | 158.10 | 21 March 2017 to 20 March 2023 (Note 2)
 | 24 March 2017 | 5,250,000 | - | - | 5,250,000 | 225.44 | 24 March 2018 to 23 March 2024 (Note 2)
 | 9 April 2018 | 3,215,800 | - | - | 3,215,800 | 410.00 | 9 April 2019 to 8 April 2025 (Note 2)
 | 4 April 2019 | - | 3,506,580 (Note 3) | - | 3,506,580 | 376.00 | 4 April 2020 to 3 April 2026 (Note 2)
 | Total: | 17,215,800 | 3,506,580 | - | 20,722,380 |  | 


Question: How many percent of the total shares granted as at 1 January was the 25 March 2014 grant?
Answer: 29.04
Calculation: 5,000,000/17,215,800
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Amounts in thousands)
(1) Fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
(2) Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Net income (1) | $206,587 | $254,127 | $47,157
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |  |  | 
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) (2) | (24,065) | 35,271 | (15,284)
Defined benefit pension plans | (927) | 167 | 163
Defined benefit post-retirement plan adjustments | (86) | (255) | 20
Equity interest in investee’s other comprehensive income (loss) | (11) | 5,584 | 1,440
Foreign exchange contracts | (588) | (1,753) | 3,274
Excluded component of fair value hedges | (2,249) | — | —
Other comprehensive income (loss) (2) | (27,926) | 39,014 | (10,387)
Total comprehensive income (1) | $178,661 | $293,141 | $36,770


Question: How many years did net income exceed $100,000 thousand?
Answer: 2
Calculation: 2019##2018
11 Dividends
The proposed dividend is subject to approval in 2020. It is therefore not included as a liability in these Financial Statements. No scrip alternative to the cash dividend is being offered in respect of the proposed final dividend for the year ended 31st December 2019.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | £m | £m
Amounts paid in the year: |  | 
Final dividend for the year ended 31st December 2018 of 71.0p (2017: 62.0p) per share | 52.3 | 45.7
Interim dividend for the year ended 31st December 2019 of 32.0p (2018: 29.0p) per share | 23.6 | 21.3
Total dividends paid | 75.9 | 67.0
Amounts arising in respect of the year: |  | 
Interim dividend for the year ended 31st December 2019 of 32.0p (2018: 29.0p) per share | 23.6 | 21.3
Proposed final dividend for the year ended 31st December 2019 of 78.0p (2018: 71.0p) per share | 57.5 | 52.3
Total dividends arising | 81.1 | 73.6


Question: For which years are the amounts of total dividends paid calculated?
Answer: 2019, 2018
Production start-up
Production start-up expense consists primarily of employee compensation and other costs associated with operating a production line before it is qualified for full production, including the cost of raw materials for solar modules run through the production line during the qualification phase and applicable facility related costs. Costs related to equipment upgrades and implementation of manufacturing process improvements are also included in production start-up expense as well as costs related to the selection of a new site, related legal and regulatory costs, and costs to maintain our plant replication program to the extent we cannot capitalize these expenditures. In general, we expect production start-up expense per production line to be higher when we build an entirely new manufacturing facility compared with the addition or replacement of production lines at an existing manufacturing facility, primarily due to the additional infrastructure investment required when building an entirely new facility.
The following table shows production start-up expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
During 2019, we incurred production start-up expense at our new facility in Lake Township, Ohio. We also incurred production start-up expense at our second facility in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam in early 2019. During 2018, we incurred production start-up expense for the transition to Series 6 module manufacturing at our facilities in Kulim, Malaysia and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We also incurred production start-up expense for the transition to Series 6 module manufacturing at our facility in Perrysburg, Ohio in early 2018.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended |  |  | Change |  | 
(Dollars in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 over 2018 |  | 2018 over 2017 | 
Production start-up | $45,915 | $90,735 | $42,643 | $(44,820) | (49)% | $48,092 | 113%
% of net sales | 1.5% | 4.0% | 1.4% |  |  |  | 


Question: What is the difference in net sales amount in 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 792625
Calculation: (45,915 / 1.5%) - (90,735 / 4%)
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
Chartered-out vessels, barges and pushboats:
The future minimum revenue, net of commissions, (i) for dry bulk vessels, expected to be earned on non-cancelable time charters; and (ii) for the Company’s logistics business, expected to be earned on non-cancelable time charters, COA’s with minimum guaranteed volumes and contracts with minimum guaranteed throughput in Navios Logistics’ ports expected to be earned on non-cancelable time charters, are as follows:
Revenues from time charters are not generally received when a vessel is off-hire, which includes time required for scheduled maintenance of the vessel.
Table:
 | Dry bulk vessels | Logistics business
2020 | 22,266 | 129,437
2021 | 4,607 | 97,544
2022 | 3,445 | 75,425
2023 | — | 69,250
2024 | — | 60,200
2025 and thereafter | — | 642,479
Total minimum revenue, net of commissions | $30,318 | $1,074,335


Question: What was the difference in the minimum revenue for logistics business between 2022 and 2023?
Answer: 6175
Calculation: 75,425-69,250
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company calculates net income (loss) per share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260,Earnings per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share also gives effect to all potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period, such as restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock options, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") shares, if dilutive. In a period with a net loss position, potentially dilutive securities are not included in the computation of diluted net loss because to do so would be antidilutive, and the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted net loss is the same.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the following potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the net income (loss)
per share calculation, as they would have been antidilutive (amounts in thousands):
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Stock options | 1,687 | 2,806 | 569
RSUs | 2,352 | 2,580 | 83
ESPP common stock equivalents | 74 | 71 | —
ID Checker earnout shares | — | — | 24
Total potentially dilutive common shares outstanding | 4,113 | 5,457 | 676


Question: What is the percentage change in the amount of potentially dilutive common shares outstanding of ESPP common stock equivalents from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 4.23
Calculation: (74-71)/71
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 644.2
net wholesale revenue | -35.1 ( 35.1 )
purchased power capacity | -5.9 ( 5.9 )
transmission revenue | -5.4 ( 5.4 )
reserve equalization | 5.6
retail electric price | 19.0
other | 4.4
2017 net revenue | $ 626.8
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso .
the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: what percent did net revenue decrease between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 2.7%
Calculation: subtract(644.2, 626.8), divide(#0, 644.2)
Free cashflow
The Group achieved another year of strong cashflow performance with operating cashflow for FY19 of $836.3m again exceeding EBITDA. Tax payments in FY19 were significantly lower than the prior year because FY18 included tax paid on the capital gain realised on the sale of investments in FY17.
Capital expenditure
Business as usual (‘BAU’) capital expenditure of $198.7m was $59.3m lower than last year principally due to the substantial completion in the prior year of the build for the VHA fibre contract.
Mobile spectrum capex of $352.4m in FY19 reflects the payment during the year of the second instalment for the Australian 700MHz spectrum acquired at auction in April 2017. The first instalment of $597.3m was paid in FY18 and the third and final instalment of $352.4m is payable in January 2020. A further $86.1m of capex was also incurred in FY19 in relation to the Australian mobile network rollout up until the project ceased. This expenditure on spectrum and mobile assets in Australia was partly impaired as part of the impairment review that was undertaken following the cessation of the project as described above.
Capex for the mobile network build in Singapore in FY19 was $80.1m taking the aggregate capex incurred on the project up to $147m (excluding spectrum).
Table:
 | FY19 | FY18
 | $m | $m
Operating cashflow | 836.3 | 868.3
Tax | (128.6) | (194.5)
IRU / finance lease payments | (5.5) | (34.1)
Capex - BAU | (198.7) | (258.0)
Capex - mobile spectrum | (352.4) | (597.3)
Capex - mobile networks (Aus) | (86.1) | (38.7)
Capex - mobile networks (Sg) | (80.1) | (62.3)
Free cashflow | (15.1) | (316.6)


Question: Which capital expenditures had increased from FY18 to FY19?
Answer: Capex - mobile networks (Aus), Capex - mobile networks (Sg)
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, as a percentage of total revenues, the results from our operations for the periods indicated.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Revenues | 100.0% | 100.0%
Cost of revenues | 10.6 | 11.0
Gross profit | 89.4 | 89.0
Operating expenses: |  | 
Sales and marketing | 54.2 | 52.6
Product development | 6.2 | 8.1
General and administrative | 20.5 | 20.9
Total operating expenses | 80.9 | 81.6
Income from operations | 8.5 | 7.4
Other income (loss), net | (0.5) | —
Income before income taxes | 8.0 | 7.4
Income tax expense | 4.3 | 3.2
Net income | 3.7% | 4.2%


Question: What is the average net income for 2018 and 2019 as a percentage of total revenues?
Answer: 3.95
Calculation: (3.7+4.2)/2
C. Remuneration to Key Managerial Personnel other than MD / Manager / WTD
Note: For more information, please refer to the Corporate Governance Report.
Table:
Particulars of Remuneration | Key Managerial Personnel |  | 
 | Ramakrishnan V Chief Financial Officer | Rajendra Moholkar Company Secretary | Total
1. Gross salary |  |  | 
(a) Salary as per provisions contained in Section 17(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | 72.06 | 21.66 | 93.72
(b) Value of perquisites u/s 17(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | 43.54 | 1.20 | 44.74
(c) Profits in lieu of salary under Section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | - | - | -
2. Stock Option | - | - | -
3. Sweat Equity | - | - | -
4. Commission | - | - | -
as % of profit | - | - | -
5. Others, Allowances | 297.47 | 117.29 | 414.76
Total | 413.07 | 140.15 | 553.22


Question: What is the value of Stock Option given to the Company Secretary?
Answer: 0
Revenue
We manage our business on a geographic basis, organized into three geographic segments. Our revenue, which includes product and service for each segment, is summarized in the following table (in millions, except percentages):
Amounts may not sum and percentages may not recalculate due to rounding.
Total revenue in fiscal 2019 increased by 5% compared with fiscal 2018. Product revenue increased by 6% and service revenue increased by 2%. Our total revenue reflected growth across each of our geographic segments. Product revenue for the BRICM countries, in the aggregate, experienced 1% product revenue decline, driven by a 16% decrease in product revenue in China and a decrease of 1% in Brazil. These decreases were partially offset by increased product revenue in Mexico, Russia and India of 26%, 6% and 5%, respectively.
In addition to the impact of macroeconomic factors, including a reduced IT spending environment and reductions in spending by government entities, revenue by segment in a particular period may be significantly impacted by several factors related to revenue recognition, including the complexity of transactions such as multiple performance obligations; the mix of financing arrangements provided to channel partners and customers; and final acceptance of the product, system, or solution, among other factors. In addition, certain customers tend to make large and sporadic purchases, and the revenue related to these transactions may also be affected by the timing of revenue recognition, which in turn would impact the revenue of the relevant segment.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended |  | 2019 vs. 2018 | 
 | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018 | July 29, 2017 | Variance in Dollars | Variance in Percent
Revenue: |  |  |  |  | 
Americas | $ 30,927 | $ 29,070 | $28,351 | $1,857 | 6%
Percentage of revenue | 59.6% | 58.9% | 59.1% |  | 
EMEA | 13,100 | 12,425 | 12,004 | 675 | 5%
Percentage of revenue | 25.2% | 25.2% | 25.0% |  | 
APJC | 7,877 | 7,834 | 7,650 | 43 | 1%
Percentage of revenue | 15.2% | 15.9% | 15.9% |  | 
Total | $51,904 | $49,330 | $48,005 | $2,574 | 5%


Question: How many years did total revenue from all segments exceed $50,000 million?
Answer: 1
Calculation: 2019
Foreign Currency Risk
The Group is exposed to translation and transaction foreign exchange risk. Several other currencies in addition to the reporting currency of US dollar are used, including sterling and the euro. The Group experiences currency exchange differences arising upon retranslation of monetary items (primarily short-term inter-Company balances and long-term borrowings), which are recognised as an expense in the period the difference occurs. The Group endeavours to match cash inflows and outflows in the various currencies; the Group typically invoices its customers in their local currency and pays its local expenses in local currency, as a means to mitigate this risk.
The Group is also exposed to exchange differences arising from the translation of its subsidiaries’ Financial Statements into the Group’s reporting currency of US dollar, with the corresponding exchange differences taken directly to equity.
The following table illustrates the movement that ten per cent in the value of sterling or the euro against the US dollar would have had on the Group’s profit or loss for the period and on the Group’s equity as at the end of the period.
Any foreign exchange variance would be recognised as unrealised foreign exchange in the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and have no impact on cash flows.
Table:
 | Year-ended 31 March 2019 | Year-ended 31 March 2018
 | $M | $M
10% movement in sterling to US dollar value |  | 
Profit or loss | 1.7 | 5.1
Equity | 33.8 | 37.4
10% movement in euro to US dollar value |  | 
Profit or loss | 1.5 | 7.5
Equity | (9.8) | (10.8)


Question: For which currencies does the table record the effect of a 10% movement against the US dollar?
Answer: Sterling, Euro