hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
NOTE 15 – INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The cumulative tax effect of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount at the expected rate of 21% is as follows as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income during the periods in which the net operating losses expire and the temporary differences become deductible. The Company has determined that there is significant uncertainty that the results of future operations and the reversals of existing taxable temporary differences will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets; therefore, a valuation allowance has been recorded. In making this determination, the Company considered historical levels of income as well as projections for future periods.
The tax years 2016 to 2019 remain open for potential audit by the Internal Revenue Service. There are no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2019, and none are expected in the next 12 months. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries are cost centers that are reimbursed for expenses, so generate no income or loss. Pretax book income (loss) is all from domestic operations. Up to four years of returns remain open for potential audit in foreign jurisdictions, however any audits for periods prior to ownership by the Company are the responsibility of the previous owners.
Under certain circumstances issuance of common shares can result in an ownership change under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which limits the Company’s ability to utilize carry-forwards from prior to the ownership change. Any such ownership change resulting from stock issuances and redemptions could limit the Company’s ability to utilize any net operating loss carry-forwards or credits generated before this change in ownership. These limitations can limit both the timing of usage of these laws, as well as the loss of the ability to use these net operating losses. It is likely that fundraising activities have resulted in such an ownership change.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Deferred tax asset attributable to:       |  | 
Net operating loss carryover  | $3,839,000 | $2,290,000
Stock compensation   | 320,000 | 535,000
Intangible Assets   | - | 124,000
Other   | 36,000 | 3,000
Deferred tax asset  | 4,195,000 | $2,952,000
Deferred tax liabilities attributable to:         |  | 
Fixed assets  | $(13,000) | $(5,000)
Intangibles   | (2,438,000) | -
Other   | (16,000) | (9,000)
Valuation allowance   | (1,728,000) | (2,938,000)
Deferred tax liability  | $(4,195,000) | $(2,952,000)
Net deferred tax asset  | $- | $-


Question: Which tax years remain open for potential audit by the Internal Revenue Service?
Answer: 2016 to 2019
as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Table:
2018 | $ 9127
2019 | 8336
2020 | 8350
2021 | 7741
2022 | 7577
thereafter | 9873
total minimum future lease payments | $ 51004
rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters .
the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 .
based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period .
upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting .
we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate .
therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building .
at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation .
as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively .
land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .

Question: what is the total rent expense for the period from december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 in millions
Answer: 22.9
Calculation: add(9.4, 8.1), add(#0, 5.4)
5.2 Key Management Personnel Compensation
Notes: (1) Comprise base salary, bonus, contributions to defined contribution plans and other benefits, but exclude performance share and share option expenses disclosed below.
(2) The Group Chief Executive Officer, an executive director of Singtel, was awarded up to 1,030,168 (2018: 1,712,538) ordinary shares of Singtel pursuant to Singtel performance share plans, subject to certain performance criteria including other terms and conditions being met. The performance share award in the previous financial year included a one-off Special Share Award (“SSA”). The performance share expense computed in accordance with SFRS(I) 2, Share-based Payment, was S$1.5 million (2018: S$3.3 million).
(3) The other key management personnel of the Group comprise the Chief Executive Officers of Consumer Singapore, Consumer Australia, Group Enterprise, Group Digital Life and International Group, as well as the Group Chief Corporate Officer, Group Chief Financial Officer, Group Chief Human Resources Officer, Group Chief Information Officer and Group Chief Technology Officer. The other key management personnel were awarded up to 3,537,119 (2018: 4,391,498) ordinary shares of Singtel pursuant to Singtel performance share plans, subject to certain performance criteria including other terms and conditions being met. The performance share award in the previous financial year included a one-off SSA. The performance share expense computed in accordance with SFRS(I) 2 was S$6.1 million (2018: S$8.5 million).
(4) Directors’ remuneration comprises the following: (i) Directors’ fees of S$2.7 million (2018: S$2.5 million), including fees paid to certain directors in their capacities as members of the Optus Advisory Committee and the Technology Advisory Panel, and as director of Singtel Innov8 Pte. Ltd. (ii) Car-related benefits of the Chairman of S$24,557 (2018: S$20,446). In addition to the Directors’ remuneration, Venkataraman Vishnampet Ganesan, a non-executive director of Singtel, was awarded 831,087 (2018: Nil) of share options pursuant to the Amobee Long-Term Incentive Plan during the financial year, subject to certain terms and conditions being met. The share option expense computed in accordance with SFRS(I) 2 was S$104,278 (2018: S$21,607).
Table:
 |  | Group
 | 2019 | 2018
 | S$ Mil | S$ Mil
Key management personnel compensation (1) |  | 
Executive director (2) | 3.5 | 6.1
Other key management personnel (3) | 15.9 | 22.4
 | 19.4 | 28.5
Directors' remuneration (4) | 2.7 | 2.5
 | 22.1 | 31.0


Question: How many subcategories are there that make up key management personnel compensation?
Answer: 3
Calculation: Executive director##Other key management personnel##Directors' remuneration
The three levels are described below:
Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that is accessible by the Company;
Level 2 Inputs – Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;
Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability including significant assumptions of the Company and other market participants.
The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of
the short maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings
may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to
those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
The assets or liability’s fair value measurement within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table provides a summary of financial instruments that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2019.
Table:
 |  | Fair Value Measurement Using |  |  | 
 | Carrying Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total
Marketable securities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0
Derivative warrants liabilities | $(332,222) | $- | $- | $(332,222) | $(332,222)


Question: What does a Level 3 input refer to?
Answer: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability including significant assumptions of the Company and other market participants
Consolidated Results
The table below sets forth for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018, the percentage of consolidated net sales represented by certain items in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Revenues |  | 
FEI-NY | 76.9% | 68.4%
FEI-Zyfer | 24.7 | 38.8
Less intersegment revenues | (1.6) | (7.2)
 | 100.0 | 100.0
Cost of Revenues | 68.1 | 86.9
Gross profit | 31.9 | 13.1
Selling and Administrative expenses | 24.5 | 26.9
Research and Development expenses | 13.1 | 17.6
Operating Profit/(Loss) | (5.7) | (31.4)
Other Income (Expenses), net | 0.7 | 2.8
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes | 0.1 | 28.4
Loss from continuing operations | (5.1) | (57.0)
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | - | (2.5)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations | - | (0.9)
Net Loss | (5.1)% | (60.4)%


Question: What is the percentage of revenue from FEI-Zyfer in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
Answer: 38.8, 24.7
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
Depreciation expense was $1.2 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Amortization of capitalized internal-use software and website development costs was $157,000 and $247,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Computer hardware and software | $3,427 | $3,353
Office equipment and office furniture | 8,148 | 7,814
Capitalized internal-use software and website development | 4,390 | 4,383
Leasehold improvements | 6,247 | 6,140
 | 22,212 | 21,690
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (19,230) | (17,900)
Total | $2,982 | $3,790


Question: What is the amount of office equipment and office furniture for 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: 8,148, 7,814
21 Called up share capital and reserves
Other reserves in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity on pages 151 to 152 are made up as follows:
The change in translation reserve includes a £1.4m credit transferred from retained earnings.
Table:
 | 1st January 2019 | Change in year | 31st December 2019
 | £m | £m | £m
Translation reserve | 30.3 | (45.0) | (14.7)
Net investment hedge reserve | (7.4) | 12.9 | 5.5
Cash flow hedges reserve | – | 3.3 | 3.3
Capital redemption reserve | 1.8 | – | 1.8
Employee Benefit Trust reserve | (2.5) | (4.0) | (6.5)
Total other reserves | 22.2 | (32.8) | (10.6)


Question: What was the percentage change in the amount of  Translation reserve  from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019?
Answer: -148.51
Calculation: (-14.7-30.3)/30.3
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Table:
in millions of dollars | december 31 , 2017 | december 31 , 2016
receivables from customers | $ 19215 | $ 10374
receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations | 19169 | 18513
total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) | $ 38384 | $ 28887
payables to customers | $ 38741 | $ 37237
payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations | 22601 | 19915
total brokerage payables ( 1 ) | $ 61342 | $ 57152
payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: what was the percentage increased in the total brokerage payables from 2016 to 2017
Answer: 7.3%
Calculation: subtract(61342, 57152), divide(#0, 57152)
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis (in thousands):
The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value as of each reporting date because of the short maturity of those instruments.
The Company did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that were recognized or disclosed at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 |  |  | December 31, 2018 |  | 
 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3
Assets |  |  |  |  |  | 
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  |  |  |  | 
Money market funds | $256,915 | $ - | $ - | $254,552 | $ - | $ -
Other current assets: |  |  |  |  |  | 
Indemnification - Sale of SSL | $ - | $ - | $598 | $ - | $ - | $2,410
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  | 
Long term liabilities |  |  |  |  |  | 
Indemnification - Globalstar do Brasil S.A. | $ - | $ - | $145 | $ - | $ - | $184


Question: What are the company's respective Level 3 fair value assets and liabilities in 2018?
Answer: $2,410, $184
Item 2. Properties
The Company operates out of several facilities located around the world. Each facility is used for manufacturing its products and for administrative activities. The following table presents the location, size and terms of ownership/occupation:
The Company’s facility located in Mitchel Field, Long Island, New York, is part of the building that the Company constructed in 1981 and expanded in 1988 on land leased from Nassau County. In January 1998, the Company sold this building and the related land lease to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (“Reckson”), leasing back the space that it presently occupies.
The Company leased its manufacturing and office space from Reckson under an initial 11-year lease followed by two five-year renewal periods which ended in January 2019. On July 25, 2018, the Company signed an amendment to the lease with RA 55 CLB LLC (as successor-in-interest to Reckson) which extended the current lease terms ten years and eight months through September 30, 2029. Pursuant to the amendment to the lease agreement, the Company shall pay a gradually increasing annual rent of $1,046,810 in 2019 to $1,276,056 in 2029. The Company believes the leased space is adequate to meet the Company’s domestic operational needs which encompass the principal operations of the FEI-NY segment and also serves as the Company’s world-wide corporate headquarters.
The Garden Grove, California facility is leased by the Company’s subsidiary, FEI-Zyfer. The facility consists of a combination office and manufacturing space. The Company has signed a second amendment to the lease, which extends the lease an additional 88 months, beginning October 1, 2017 and expiring January 31, 2025. The average annual rent over the period of the amendment is approximately $312,000. The Company believes the leased space is adequate to meet FEI-Zyfer’s operational needs.
The Tianjin, China facility is the location of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, FEI-Asia. The subsidiary’s office and manufacturing facility is located in the Tianjin Free-Trade Zone. The lease was renewable annually with monthly rent of $8,500 through August 2019. As mentioned in Footnote 3, below, FEI-Asia was sold on May 21, 2019 and as a result the lease commitment transferred with the sale.
FEI-Elcom entered into a new lease agreement on February 1, 2018 regarding its Northvale, New Jersey facility. The facility consists of a combination office and manufacturing space. The lease, which expires in January 31, 2021, requires monthly payments of $9,673. The Company believes the leased space is adequate to meet FEI-Elcom’s operational needs.
Table:
Location | Size (sq. ft.) | Own or Lease
Long Island, NY | 93,000 | Lease
Garden Grove, CA | 27,850 | Lease
Tianjin, China | 28,000 | Lease
Northvale, NJ | 9,000 | Lease


Question: What is the total size of all the four facilities leased by the company in sq ft?
Answer: 157850
Calculation: 93,000+27,850+28,000+9,000
9. Available-for-Sale Debt Investments and Equity Investments
The following table summarizes our available-for-sale debt investments and equity investments (in millions):
(1) We held equity interests in certain private equity funds of $0.6 billion as of July 27, 2019 which are accounted for under the NAV practical expedient following the adoption of ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments, starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
Table:
 | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018
Available-for-sale debt investments | $21,660 | $37,009
Marketable equity securities | 3 | 605
Total investments | 21,663 | 37,614
Non-marketable equity securities included in other assets (1) | 1,113 | 978
Equity method investments included in other assets | 87 | 118
Total | $22,863 | $38,710


Question: What was the percentage change in the total available-for-sale debt investments and equity investments between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -40.94
Calculation: (22,863-38,710)/38,710
Note 3: Revenue and Segment Information
Revenue recognized for sales agreements amounted to $5,492.0 million and $5,849.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Revenue recognized for product development agreements amounted to $25.9 million and $29.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The Company is organized into three operating and reportable segments consisting of PSG, ASG and ISG. The Company's wafer manufacturing facilities fabricate ICs for all business units, as necessary, and their operating costs are reflected in the segments' cost of revenue on the basis of product costs. Because operating segments are generally defined by the products they design and sell, they do not make sales to each other.
The Company does not allocate income taxes or interest expense to its operating segments as the operating segments are principally evaluated on gross profit. Additionally, restructuring, asset impairments and other charges, net and certain other manufacturing and operating expenses, which include corporate research and development costs, unallocated inventory reserves and miscellaneous nonrecurring expenses, are not allocated to any segment.
In addition to the operating and reportable segments, the Company also operates global operations, sales and marketing, information systems and finance and administration groups. A portion of the expenses of these groups are allocated to the segments based on specific and general criteria and are included in the segment results.
Revenue and gross profit for the Company’s operating and reportable segments are as follows (in millions):
Table:
 | PSG | ASG | ISG | Total
For year ended December 31, 2019:   |  |  |  | 
Revenue from external customers | $2,788.3 | $1,972.3 | $757.3 | $5,517.9
Segment gross profit | 976.0 | 794.8 | 275.4 | 2,046.2
For year ended December 31, 2018:   |  |  |  | 
Revenue from external customers | $3,038.2 | $2,071.2 | $768.9 | $5,878.3
Segment gross profit | 1,110.1 | 878.3 | 317.1 | 2,305.5
For year ended December 31, 2017:   |  |  |  | 
Revenue from external customers   | $2,819.3 | $1,950.9 | $772.9 | $5,543.1
Segment gross profit   | 959.8 | 817.8 | 302.6 | 2,080.2


Question: What is the change in ASG Revenue from external customers from year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -98.9
Calculation: 1,972.3-2,071.2