hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value .

Table:
 | share awards | weighted average grant-date fair value
non-vested at may 31 2007 | 278 | $ 37
granted | 400 | 38
vested | -136 ( 136 ) | 30
forfeited | -24 ( 24 ) | 40
non-vested at may 31 2008 | 518 | 39
granted | 430 | 43
vested | -159 ( 159 ) | 39
forfeited | -27 ( 27 ) | 41
non-vested at may 31 2009 | 762 | 42
the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively .
the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively .
we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .
as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years .
employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized .
employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock .
the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period .
as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount .
note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure .
we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion .
beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer .
the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .

Question: what is an employees total annual compensation?
Answer: $ 125000
Calculation: divide(25000, 20%)
5. Earnings per Common Share
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
Table:
 |  | Years Ended June 30, | 
(in millions, except per share data) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Net income | $167.0 | $188.5 | $47.0
Less: earnings and dividends allocated to participating securities | (1.9) | (1.7) | (0.3)
Earnings available for common shareholders used in calculation of basic earnings per share | $165.1 | $186.8 | $46.7
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic | 47.7 | 47.2 | 47.0
Basic earnings per common share | $3.46 | $3.96 | $0.99
Net income | $167.0 | $188.5 | $47.0
Less: earnings and dividends allocated to participating securities | (1.9) | (1.7) | (0.3)
Earnings available for common shareholders used in calculation of diluted earnings per share | $165.1 | $186.8 | $46.7
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic | 47.7 | 47.2 | 47.0
Effect of shares issuable under share-based compensation plans | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted | 48.1 | 47.6 | 47.1
Diluted earnings per common share | $3.43 | $3.92 | $0.99


Question: What was the change in Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 0.5
Calculation: 47.7-47.2
Other payables and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
Derivative instruments are further described in Note 27.
As of December 31, 2019, payables to equity-method investments was nil compared to $49 million as of December 31, 2018, as a result of the wind-down of the joint venture with Ericsson.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new guidance on lease accounting and the current portion of the lease obligation is now included in other payables and accrued liabilities. The impact of the adoption of this new guidance is further described in Note 11.
Other payables and accrued liabilities also include individually insignificant amounts as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, presented cumulatively in line “Others”.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
Employee related liabilities | 375 | 384
Employee compensated absences | 138 | 125
Taxes other than income taxes | 53 | 60
Advances | 63 | 77
Payables to equity-method investments | — | 49
Derivative instruments | 7 | 34
Provision for restructuring | 10 | 22
Defined benefit plans – current portion | 10 | 12
Defined contribution plans – accrued benefits | 20 | 18
Other long-term benefits – current portion | 7 | 6
Royalties | 21 | 26
Current lease obligation | 55 | —
Deferred consideration for business combinations | 10 | —
Others | 62 | 61
Total | 831 | 874


Question: What is the average Employee compensated absences?
Answer: 131.5
Calculation: (138+125) / 2
The Company evaluates these assumptions on a periodic basis taking into consideration current market conditions and historical market data. The discount rate is used to calculate expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date, which is December 31. This rate represents the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate would increase the present value of benefit obligations. Other assumptions include demographic factors such as retirement, mortality and turnover.
The following table provides information about the net periodic benefit cost and other accumulated comprehensive income for the Pension Plans (in thousands):
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) – Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). These amendments require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component outside of a subtotal of income from operations. If a separate line item is not used, the line items used in the income statement to present other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. These amendments were applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit in assets. The amendments allow a practical expedient that permits an employer to use the amounts disclosed in its pension and other postretirement benefit plan note for the prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation requirements.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Service cost | $405 | $448 | $443
Interest cost | 254 | 196 | 194
Recognized actuarial (gains) | (86) | (58) | (43)
Net periodic benefit cost | 573 | 586 | 594
Unrealized net actuarial (gains), net of tax | (2,324) | (2,256) | (1,574)
Total amount recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $(1,751) | $(1,670) | $(980)


Question: In which years is the information about the net periodic benefit cost and other accumulated comprehensive income for the Pension Plans provided?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $259.1 million of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include liquid investments, primarily money market funds, with maturities of less than 90 days at the time of purchase. Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and at each balance sheet date.
As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had restricted cash of $0.3 million, representing the amount pledged as collateral to the issuer of a standby letter of credit (the “LC”). The LC, which expires in August 2021, has been provided as a guaranty to the lessor of our corporate offices.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheet to the consolidated statement of cash flows (in thousands):
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Cash and cash equivalents | $259,067 | $256,947
Restricted cash included in other assets | 304 | 304
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows | $259,371 | $257,251


Question: What is the percentage change in the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 0.82
Calculation: (259,371 - 257,251)/257,251
The following table sets forth activity during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 related to finite-lived intangible assets:
The Company regularly reviews the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets subject to depreciation and amortization, as well as the related useful lives, to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist which warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. An impairment loss is recognized when the sum of the expected future undiscounted net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset.
Should impairment exist, the impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over the asset’s fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, no impairment losses related to finite-lived intangible assets were recognized. Impairment loss related to finite-lived intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $2.2 million and related to acquired developed technology.
Table:
 | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | (in thousands) | 
Beginning balance | $240,500 | $310,645
Other additions | 86 | —
Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D | 4,400 | —
Amortization | (57,015) | (67,947)
Impairment losses | — | (2,198)
Ending balance | $187,971 | 240,500


Question: What is the average other additions for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 43
Calculation: (86 + 0) / 2
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock-based awards, stock options, and shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
(1) These weighted shares relate to anti-dilutive restricted stock-based awards and stock options as calculated using the treasury stock method and contingently issuable shares under PSO and PSU agreements. Such shares could be dilutive in the future. See Note 13 for information regarding the exercise prices of our outstanding, unexercised stock options.
Table:
Year Ended May 31, |  |  | 
(in millions, except per share data) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Net income | $11,083 | $3,587 | $9,452
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 3,634 | 4,121 | 4,115
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans | 98 | 117 | 102
Dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding | 3,732 | 4,238 | 4,217
Basic earnings per share | $3.05 | $0.87 | $2.30
Diluted earnings per share | $2.97 | $0.85 | $2.24
Shares subject to anti-dilutive restricted stock-based awards and stock options excluded from calculation (1) | 71 | 64 | 74


Question: Does the table show the calculations for basic or diluted earnings per share, or both?
Answer: The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers are appointed annually by our Board of Directors or, in some cases, appointed in accordance with our bylaws. Each officer holds office until
the next annual appointment of officers or until a successor has been duly appointed and qualified, or until the officer’s death or resignation, or until the officer has
otherwise been removed in accordance with our bylaws. The following table provides certain information regarding the current executive officers of the Company.
John Sarvis
Chief Executive Officer and President since April 2015. Chairman of the Board since 2016. Vice President of Ceramic Products from 2005 to 2015. Divisional Vice President
– Ceramics Division from 1998 to 2005. Prior to 1998, held various Marketing and Operational positions. Employed by the Company since 1973
Jeffrey Schmersal
Chief Operating Officer since April 2018. Senior Vice President since 2017. Divisional Vice President of Specialty Products from 2014 to 2017. Global Business Manager of
various product groups from 2006 to 2014. Prior to 2006, held various Quality and Supply Chain positions. Employed by the Company since 1994.
Michael Hufnagel
Chief Financial Officer since July 2018. Vice President of Corporate Finance since 2016. Director of Corporate Finance from 2015 to 2016. Director of Accounting and
Reporting from 2002 to 2015. Employed by the Company since 2002.
John Lawing
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since 2015. Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from April 2014 to 2015. President and Chief Operating
Officer from 2013 to March 2014. Vice President of Advanced Products from 2005 to April 2013. Divisional Vice President of Advanced Products from 2002 to 2005 and
Divisional Vice President of Leaded Products from 1997 to 2002. Prior to 1997, held positions in Engineering, Technical, Operational, and Plant management. Employed by
the Company since 1981.
S. Willing King
Senior Vice President of Tantalum Products since 2015. Vice President of Tantalum Products from 2013 to 2015. Deputy General Manager of Tantalum Products from 2012
to 2013. Vice President of Product Marketing from 2004 to 2012. Director of Product Marketing from 2000 to 2004. Prior to 2000, held positions in Technical Service, Sales,
and Marketing. Employed by the Company since 1984.
Table:
Name | Age | Position
John Sarvis | 69 | Chief Executive Officer and President
Jeffrey Schmersal | 50 | Chief Operating Officer
Michael Hufnagel | 65 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
John Lawing | 68 | Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
S. Willing King | 56 | Senior Vice President of Tantalum Products
Eric Pratt | 59 | Senior Vice President of Marketing
Evan Slavitt | 61 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary
Steven Sturgeon | 50 | Senior Vice President of Connector Products
Alexander Schenkel | 44 | Senior Vice President of Sales


Question: How many Senior Vice Presidents are there in the company?
Answer: 7
Calculation: Michael Hufnagel ## John Lawing ## S. Willing King ## Eric Pratt ## Evan Slavitt ## Steven Sturgeon ## Alexander Schenkel
2. Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the sum of (a) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and
(b) the dilutive effect of potential common stock equivalents during the period. Stock options and unvested service-based RSU awards make up the common stock
equivalents and are computed using the treasury stock method.
The table below represents the basic and diluted earnings per share, calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potential
common stock equivalents outstanding for the years ended March 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019:
(1) Common stock equivalents not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the impact would have been anti-dilutive were 1,381 shares, 1,733
shares, and 4,375 shares for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Net income | $125,785 | $4,910 | $271,813
Computation of Basic EPS: |  |  | 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding used in Computing Basic EPS | 167,506 | 168,262 | 168,713
Basic earnings per share | $0.75 | $0.03 | $1.61
Computation of Diluted EPS: |  |  | 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding used in Computing Basic EPS | 167,506 | 168,262 | 168,713
Effect of stock options | 311 | 663 | 609
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding used in Computing Diluted EPS (1) | 167,837 | 168,925 | 169,322
Diluted earnings per share | $0.75 | $0.03 | $1.61


Question: What is the percentage of common stock equivalents not included in the computation of diluted earnings as a percentage of the weighted average shares outstanding used in computing diluted EPS in 2019?
Answer: 2.58
Calculation: 4,375/169,322
As lessee — We lease restaurants and other facilities, which generally have renewal clauses of 1 to 20 years exercisable at our option. In some instances, these leases have provisions for contingent rentals based upon a percentage of defined revenues. Many of our restaurant and other facility leases also have rent escalation clauses and require the payment of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs. We also lease certain restaurant and office equipment. Minimum rental obligations are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the initial lease, plus lease option terms for certain locations.
The components of rent expense were as follows in each fiscal year (in thousands):
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Minimum rentals | $184,587 | $184,106 | $185,696
Contingent rentals | 2,255 | 2,221 | 2,419
Total rent expense | 186,842 | 186,327 | 188,115
Less rental expense on subleased properties | (170,651) | (162,640) | (145,728)
Net rent expense | $16,191 | $23,687 | $42,387


Question: What is the difference in net rent expense between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 18700
Calculation: $42,387 - $23,687
Review of operations
The Group’s operating performance for the fiscal year compared to last year is as follows:
1. The Directors believe the information additional to IFRS measures included in the report is relevant and useful in measuring the financial performance of the Group. These include: EBITDA, NPATA and EPSa. These measures have been defined in the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer’s Joint Report on page 2.
In 2019 the business continued to deliver strong results after the record 2018 year. Revenues and EBITDA were in line with guidance. Further details on the Group’s results are outlined in the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer’s Joint Report on page 2.
On 1 June 2019, Hansen acquired the Sigma Systems business (Sigma) and one month of these results are included in the FY19 result. Also included in the results are the transaction and other restructuring costs related to the acquisition, which we have identified as separately disclosed items in our results.
This acquisition has also resulted in the re-balancing of the Group’s market portfolio which, post the acquisition of Enoro in FY18, was initially weighted towards the Utilities sector. With Sigma’s revenues concentrated in the Communications sector, the Group’s revenue portfolio is now re-balanced to ensure greater diversification across multiple industries, regions and clients.
The Group has generated operating cash flows of $39.7 million, which has been used to retire external debt and fund dividends of $12.6 million during the financial year. With the introduction of a higher level of debt in June 2019 to fund the Sigma acquisition, the Group has, for the first time, used the strength of the Group’s balance sheet to fund 100% of an acquisition. With the Group’s strong cash generation, Hansen is well placed to service and retire the debt over the coming years.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 
 | A$ Million | A$ Million | Variance %
Operating revenue | 231.3 | 230.8 | 0.2%
EBITDA1 | 53.0 | 59.3 | (10.6%)
NPAT | 21.5 | 28.9 | (25.6%)
NPATA1 | 31.2 | 38.0 | (17.9%)
Basic earnings per share (EPS) (cents) | 10.9 | 14.8 | (26.4%)
Basic EPSa1 (cents) | 15.8 | 19.4 | (18.6%)


Question: What was the average difference between basic EPS and basic EPSa for both FYs?
Answer: 4.75
Calculation: ((15.8 - 10.9) + (19.4 - 14.8)) / 2
kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. .

Table:
 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
trading during non-u.s . hours | 13% ( 13 % ) | 9% ( 9 % ) | 11% ( 11 % )
trading through telecommunication hubs | 8 | 7 | 8
available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com .
information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document .
we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec .
our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site .
copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms .
beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .

Question: what is the increase percentage of trading during the us hours between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 2%
Calculation: subtract(const_100, 11), subtract(const_100, 9), subtract(#1, #0)