hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
A.2.6 Calculation of return on capital employed
For purposes of calculating ROCE in interim periods, income before interest after tax is annualized. Average capital employed is determined using the average of the respective balances as of the quarterly reporting dates for the periods under review.
[1] Item Other interest expenses / income, net primarily consists of interest relating to corporate debt, and related hedging activities, as well as interest income on corporate assets.
Table:
(in millions of €) | 2019 | 2018
Net income | 5,648 | 6,120
Less: Other interest expenses / income, net 1 | (529) | (482)
Plus: SFS Other interest expenses / income | 763 | 721
Plus: Net interest expenses related to provisions for pensions and similar |  | 
obligations | 148 | 164
Less: Interest adjustments |  | 
(discontinued operations) | – | –
Less: Taxes on interest adjustments |  | 
(tax rate (flat) 30%) | (115) | (121)
(I) Income before interest after tax | 5,916 | 6,401
(II) Average capital employed | 53,459 | 50,715
(I) / (II) ROCE | 11.1 % | 12.6 %


Question: What is the average net income for the 2 years?
Answer: 5884
Calculation: (5,648 + 6,120) / 2
Fair Value of Convertible Notes held at amortized cost
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value and carrying value of the Company's Convertible Notes were:
The fair value shown above represents the fair value of the debt instrument, inclusive of both the debt and equity components, but excluding the derivative liability. The carrying value represents only the carrying value of the debt component.
The fair value of the Convertible Notes was determined by using unobservable inputs that are supported by minimal non-active market activity and that are significant to determining the fair value of the debt instrument. The fair value is level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Table:
 | Fair value | Carrying value | Face value
5.5% convertible senior notes due December 15, 2021: |  |  | 
Balance as of December 31, 2019 |  |  | 
Related party | $6,727 | $8,864 | $10,000
Others | 65,257 | 84,648 | 97,000
 | $71,984 | $93,512 | $107,000
Balance as of December 31, 2018 |  |  | 
Related party | $5,879 | $8,378 | $10,000
Others | 57,031 | 79,433 | 97,000
 | $62,910 | $87,811 | $107,000


Question: What is the total fair value of related party 5.5% convertible senior notes due December 15, 2021 in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 12606
Calculation: 6,727 + 5,879
Year ended December 31, 2019 compared with the year ended December 31, 2018:
Revenue in 2019 is derived from license agreements that we entered into with third-parties following negotiations pursuant to our patent licensing and enforcement program. The revenue decrease is primarily due to timing of revenues, as further described in "Item 1. Business" - "Licensing and Enforcement - Current Activities, Post 2013".
Cost of revenues includes contingent legal fees directly associated with our licensing and enforcement programs. Cost of revenues primarily decreased in proportion to the decrease in revenues.
Operating expenses consists of sales and marketing, general and administrative, and research and development. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") consisted primarily of legal fees incurred in operations and employee headcount related expenses. These comprise approximately 60% of total SG&A expense. Litigation expenses increased $3.0 million to $19.4 million in 2019 compared to 2018 and are primarily due to the timing of various outstanding litigation actions. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings". Employee headcount related expenses decreased $2.0 million to $3.6 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower incentive bonuses.
Research and development expense remained flat between years.
Other expense decreased in 2019 as we no longer have exposure from the warrant liability, and included $0.7 million related to the sale of our investment in JVP, offset by $0.3 million of net interest income.
Income tax provision (benefit) is primarily a function of income (loss) before income, state income tax expense (benefit) and federal benefit of foreign derived intangible tax benefit related to 2018.
Table:
For the Years Ended December 31, |  |  |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | Change | % Change
(In millions, except percentages) |  |  |  | 
Revenues | $13.2 | $82.3 | $(69.1) | (84)%
Cost of revenues | 1.9 | 15.3 | (13.4) | (88)%
Gross profit | 11.3 | 67.0 | (55.7) | (83)%
Gross margin | 86 % | 81 % |  | 
Operating expenses: |  |  |  | 
Selling, general and administrative | 31.7 | 32.2 | (0.5) | (2)%
Research and development | 2.0 | 2.1 | (0.1) | (5)%
Total operating expenses | 33.7 | 34.3 | (0.6) | (2)%
Other expense | (0.3) | (4.0) | 3.7 | (93)%
Income (loss) before income taxes | (22.7) | 28.7 | (51.4) | (179)%
Income tax provision (benefit) | (6.2) | 8.0 | (14.2) | (178)%
Net income (loss) | $(16.5) | $20.7 | $(37.2) | (180)%


Question: What is the value of litigation expenses in 2019 as a percentage of the 2019 gross profit?
Answer: 171.68
Calculation: 19.4/11.3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts) Private Brands Operations
On February 1, 2016, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, we completed the disposition of our Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("TreeHouse").
The summary comparative financial results of the Private Brands business, included within discontinued operations, were as follows:
We entered into a transition services agreement with TreeHouse and recognized $2.2 million and $16.9 million of income for the performance of services during fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Loss on sale of business | $— | $— | $(1.6)
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings | 0.9 | 0.4 | 3.9
Income before income taxes and equity method investment earnings . | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.3
Income tax expense (benefit) . | — | 0.5 | (0.3)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | $0.9 | $(0.1) | $2.6


Question: When did the company complete the disposition of their Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc.? 
Answer: February 1, 2016
The following unaudited pro forma financial information is presented as if the acquisitions had taken place at the beginning of the periods presented and should not be taken as representative of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations. The following unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments for the amortization expense related to the identified intangible assets.
The following table summarizes the Company’s unaudited pro forma financial information is presented as if the acquisitions occurred on October 1, 2017 (amounts shown in thousands):
For the year ended September 30, 2018, revenue of $9.1 million and a net loss of $5.3 million related to the A2iA and ICAR businesses since the respective acquisition dates are included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.
Table:
 | For the years ended September 30, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Pro forma revenue | $86,206 | $78,130
Pro forma net income (loss) | $889 | $(12,268)


Question: Which year has a higher amount of pro forma revenue?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: 86,206> 78,130
The Group’s measure of segment profit, adjusted EBITDA, excludes depreciation, amortisation, impairment loss, restructuring costs, loss on disposal of fixed assets, the Group’s share of results in associates and joint ventures and other income and expense. A reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to operating profit is shown below. For a reconciliation of operating profit to profit for the financial year, see the Consolidated income statement on page 111.
Note: 1 Share of adjusted results in equity accounted associates and joint ventures excludes amortisation of acquired customer bases and brand intangible assets, restructuring costs and other costs of €0.6 billion (2018: €0.4 billion, 2017: €0.1 billion) which are included in amortisation of acquired customer base and brand intangible assets, restructuring costs and other income and expense respectively
2 See note 31 “IAS 18 basis primary statements” for further details.
Table:
 | 2019 €m | 2018 €m | 2017 €m
Adjusted EBITDA | 14,139 | 14,737 | 14,149
Depreciation, amortisation and loss on disposal of fixed assets | (9,665) | (9,910) | (10,179)
Share of adjusted results in equity accounted associates and joint ventures1 | (291) | 389 | 164
Adjusted operating profit | 4,183 | 5,216 | 4,134
Impairment losses | (3,119) | – | –
Restructuring costs | (486) | (156) | (415)
Amortisation of acquired customer based and brand intangible assets | (583) | (974) | (1,046)
Other (expense)/income | (262) | 213 | 1,052
Operating (loss)/profit (IAS 18 basis) | (267) | 4,299 | 3,725
Impact of adoption of IFRS 152 | (684) |  | 
Operating loss (IFRS 15 basis) | (951) |  | 


Question: How much is the 2019 adjusted EBITDA?
Answer: 14,139
Hardware
Hardware sales, net decreased $1.5 million, or -10% in 2019 compared to 2018. We adopted the new ASC 606 standard as of January 1, 2018 and elected to use the modified retrospective method. Historical hardware sales prior to the adoption of ASC 606 were recorded on a gross basis, as we were the principal in the transaction in accordance with the previous standard, ASC 605-45. Under the new standard, we are an agent in the transaction as we do not physically control the hardware which we sell. Accordingly, starting January 1, 2018, we recognize our hardware revenue net of related cost which reduces both hardware revenue and cost of sales as compared to our accounting prior to 2018. For comparison purposes only, had we implemented ASC 606 using the full retrospective method, we would have also presented hardware revenue net of cost for prior periods as shown below.
The majority of hardware sales are derived from our Americas segment. Sales of hardware are largely dependent upon customer- specific desires, which fluctuate.
Table:
 |  |  |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 |  |  |  | % Change vs.Prior Year | 
2019 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 | 2018
Hardware Revenue (Pre ASC 606 Adoption) | $44,972 | $49,914 | $43,190 | -10% | 16%
Cost of hardware | -32,455 | -35,947 | - 32,205 | -10% | 12%
Hardware Revenue, net (Post ASC 606 Adoption) | $12,517 | $13,967 | $ 10,985 | -10% | 27%


Question: What is the sum of cost of hardware for 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 68402
Calculation: $32,455+$35,947
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( 3 ) multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals , multilaterals , development banks and other similar institutions . ( 4 ) non-recourse debt of $ 708 million as of december 31 , 2009 was excluded from non-recourse debt and included in current and long-term liabilities of held for sale and discontinued businesses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . non-recourse debt as of december 31 , 2010 is scheduled to reach maturity as set forth in the table below : december 31 , annual maturities ( in millions ) .

Table:
december 31, | annual maturities ( in millions )
2011 | $ 2577
2012 | 657
2013 | 953
2014 | 1839
2015 | 1138
thereafter | 7957
total non-recourse debt | $ 15121
as of december 31 , 2010 , aes subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $ 432 million of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs .
excluding these facilities under construction , aes subsidiaries had approximately $ 893 million in a number of available but unused committed revolving credit lines to support their working capital , debt service reserves and other business needs .
these credit lines can be used in one or more of the following ways : solely for borrowings ; solely for letters of credit ; or a combination of these uses .
the weighted average interest rate on borrowings from these facilities was 3.24% ( 3.24 % ) at december 31 , 2010 .
non-recourse debt covenants , restrictions and defaults the terms of the company 2019s non-recourse debt include certain financial and non-financial covenants .
these covenants are limited to subsidiary activity and vary among the subsidiaries .
these covenants may include but are not limited to maintenance of certain reserves , minimum levels of working capital and limitations on incurring additional indebtedness .
compliance with certain covenants may not be objectively determinable .
as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , approximately $ 803 million and $ 653 million , respectively , of restricted cash was maintained in accordance with certain covenants of the non-recourse debt agreements , and these amounts were included within 201crestricted cash 201d and 201cdebt service reserves and other deposits 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .
various lender and governmental provisions restrict the ability of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries to transfer their net assets to the parent company .
such restricted net assets of subsidiaries amounted to approximately $ 5.4 billion at december 31 , 2010. .

Question: what percentage of non-recourse debt is current as of december 31 , 2010?
Answer: 17%
Calculation: divide(2577, 15121)
Note 8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
The changes in goodwill by reportable segment are outlined below (in thousands):
On October 21, 2019, we acquired 85% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of OpenEye and recorded $41.4 million of goodwill in the Alarm.com segment. There were no impairments of goodwill recorded during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 or 2017. As of December 31, 2019, the accumulated balance of goodwill impairments was $4.8 million, which is related to our acquisition of EnergyHub in 2013.
Table:
 | Alarm.com | Other | Total
Balance as of January 1, 2018 | $63,591 | $— | $63,591
Goodwill acquired | — | — | —
Balance as of December 31, 2018 | 63,591 | — | 63,591
Goodwill acquired | 41,372 | — | 41,372
Balance as of December 31, 2019 | $104,963 | $— | $104,963


Question: What was the balance as of December 31, 2019?
Answer: 104,963
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Table:
 | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61
the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .
total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .
we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .
there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stocks in 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 16.97%
Calculation: divide(63.59, 54.36), subtract(#0, const_1)
Director Compensation
In 2019, we compensated each non-management director of our Company by granting to each such outside director 15,000 RSUs. The RSUs vested in equal amounts of 3,750 RSUs on each of March 15, 2019, June 15, 2019, September 15, 2019 and December 15, 2019. In addition, we pay our non-management directors cash director fees of $40,000 per annum ($10,000 per quarter). Non-management directors also receive additional cash compensation on an annual basis for serving on the following Board committees: The Audit Committee Chairperson receives $7,500 and members receive $5,000; the Chairperson and members of each of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive annual fees of $3,750 and $2,500, respectively.
In consideration for serving as the sole member of our Strategic Development Committee, in June 2013 we issued to Niv Harizman a five-year stock option to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $1.88 per share, which option vested 100,000 shares on the date of grant, 100,000 shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vested 100,000 shares on the second anniversary from the grant date. On June 17, 2018, Mr. Harizman exercised the aforementioned stock option on a net (cashless) exercise basis by delivering to us 181,936 shares of our common stock and he received 118,064 shares of our common stock.
The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to all persons who served as members of our board of directors (other than our Named Executive Officers) during the year ended December 31, 2019. No director who is also a Named Executive Officer received any compensation for services as a director in 2019.
(1) Represents directors’ fees payable in cash to each non-management director of $10,000 per quarter ($40,000 per annum) for 2019 plus additional cash fees for serving on Board committees as disclosed in the text above.
(2) The amounts included in this column represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards (RSUs) granted to directors, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions see Note B[11] to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The 15,000 RSUs granted to each non-management director vested on a quarterly basis beginning March 15, 2019. Each restricted stock unit represents the contingent right to receive one share of common stock.
(3) As of December 31, 2019, each of the above listed directors held outstanding stock options to purchase 35,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.34 per share.
(4) Includes payment of dividends (dividend equivalent rights) on RSUs for 2019.
Table:
Name | Fees earned or paid in cash ($) (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) (3) | All other compensation ($) (4) | Total ($)
Emanuel Pearlman | $ 50,000 | $ 39,000 | $ 750 | $  89,750
Niv Harizman | $ 46,250 | $ 39,000 | $ 750 | $  86,000
Alison Hoffman | $ 48,890 | $ 39,000 | $ 750 | $ 88,640


Question: Which director was compensated the most in 2019?
Answer: Emanuel Pearlman
Calculation: 89,750>88,640>86,000
Net periodic benefit cost — The components of the fiscal year net periodic benefit cost were as follows (in thousands):
Changes in presentation —As discussed in Note 1, Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, we adopted ASU 2017-07 during the first quarter of 2019 using the retrospective method, which changed the financial statement presentation of service costs and the other components of net periodic benefit cost. The service cost component continues to be included in operating income; however, the other components are now presented in a separate line below earnings from operations captioned “Other pension and post-retirement expenses, net” in our consolidated statements of earnings. Further, in connection with the adoption, plan administrative expenses historically presented as a component of service cost are now presented as a component of expected return on plan assets. The prior year components of net periodic benefit costs and assumptions on the long-term rate of return on assets have been recast to conform to current year presentation.
Prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis from date of participation to full eligibility. Unrecognized gains or losses are amortized using the “corridor approach” under which the net gain or loss in excess of 10% of the greater of the PBO or the market-related value of the assets, if applicable, is amortized. For our Qualified Plan, actuarial losses are amortized over the average future expected lifetime of all participants expected to receive benefits. For our SERP, actuarial losses are amortized over the expected remaining future lifetime for inactive participants, and for our postretirement health plans, actuarial losses are amortized over the expected remaining future lifetime of inactive participants expected to receive benefits.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Qualified Plan: |  |  | 
Interest cost | $19,825 | $19,463 | $19,889
Expected return on plan assets | (26,334) | (26,467) | (26,811)
Actuarial loss | 2,754 | 3,331 | 4,455
Net periodic benefit credit | $(3,755) | $(3,673) | $(2,467)
SERP: |  |  | 
Service cost | $— | $490 | $855
Interest cost | 3,080 | 2,894 | 2,850
Actuarial loss | 1,207 | 1,538 | 1,659
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost | 115 | 146 | 153
Net periodic benefit cost | $4,402 | $5,068 | $5,517
Postretirement health plans: |  |  | 
Interest cost | $997 | $955 | $1,003
Actuarial (gain) loss | (159) | (27) | 162
Net periodic benefit cost | $838 | $928 | $1,165


Question: How are prior service costs amortized?
Answer: On a straight-line basis from date of participation to full eligibility