hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
15. Vessel Operating and Supervision Costs
An analysis of vessel operating and supervision costs is as follows:
Table:
 |  | For the year ended December 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Crew wages and vessel management employee costs | 72,652 | 79,624 | 80,713
Technical maintenance expenses | 28,736 | 28,694 | 37,653
Other vessel operating expenses | 21,098 | 19,766 | 21,296
Total | 122,486 | 128,084 | 139,662


Question: What was the percentage change in total vessel operating and supervision costs from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 9.04
Calculation: (139,662 - 128,084)/128,084
iv. Details of the Remuneration for the year ended March 31, 2019:
a. Non-Executive Directors:
@ As a policy, N Chandrasekaran, Chairman, has abstained from receiving commission from the
Company.
@@ In line with the internal guidelines of the Company, no payment is made towards commission to
the Non-Executive Directors of the Company, who are in full time employment with any other Tata
company.
* Relinquished the position of Independent Director w.e.f. July 10, 2018.
** Relinquished the position of Independent Director w.e.f. September 28, 2018.
*** Appointed as an Additional and Independent Director w.e.f. December 18, 2018.
**** Appointed as an Additional and Independent Director w.e.f. January 10, 2019.
Table:
 |  | (` lakh)
Name | Commission | Sitting Fees
N Chandrasekaran, Chairman@ | - | 3.60
Aman Mehta | 315.00 | 4.80
V Thyagarajan* | 100.00 | 3.00
Prof Clayton M Christensen** | 75.00 | 0.30
Dr Ron Sommer | 220.00 | 5.10
O P Bhatt | 215.00 | 7.50
Aarthi Subramanian@@ | - | 5.70
Dr Pradeep Kumar Khosla | 150.00 | 2.10
Hanne Sorensen*** | 50.00 | 0.60
Keki Mistry*** | 50.00 | 0.60
Don Callahan**** | 35.00 | 0.30
Total | 1,210.00 | 33.60


Question: What is the difference between the maximum and minimum sitting fee?
Answer: 7.2
Calculation: 7.5-0.3
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will fail to discharge its obligations and cause a financial loss and arises from cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, favorable derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to customers, including trade and other receivables, dividends receivable and other amounts due from related parties. The Group is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by any of its counterparties. To limit this risk, the Group currently deals primarily with financial institutions and customers with high credit ratings.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, 70.0% of the Group’s revenue was earned from Shell (December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 74.2% and 92.6%, respectively) and accounts receivable were not collateralized; however, management believes that the credit risk is partially offset by the creditworthiness of the Group’s counterparties. BG Group was acquired by Shell on February 15, 2016. This acquisition does not impact the contractual obligations under the existing charter party agreements. The Group did not experience significant credit losses on its accounts receivable portfolio during the three years ended December 31, 2019. The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the consolidated financial statements represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk. Management monitors exposure to credit risk, and they believe that there is no substantial credit risk arising from the Group’s counterparties.
The credit risk on liquid funds and derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies.
Table:
 | As of December 31, | 
 | 2018 | 2019
Cash and cash equivalents | 342,594 | 263,747
Short-term investments | 25,000 | 4,500
Trade and other receivables | 20,244 | 24,900
Dividends receivable and other amounts due from related parties | 33,395 | 573
Derivative financial instruments | 15,188 | 4,001


Question: How does the Group limit its exposure to credit risk?
Answer: To limit this risk, the Group currently deals primarily with financial institutions and customers with high credit ratings.
Capital and financial risk management
13 Capital risk management
The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can continue to provide returns to its shareholders and benefits to its stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
In the future, the Directors may pursue funding options such as debt, sale and leaseback of assets, additional equity and various other funding mechanisms as appropriate in order to undertake its projects and deliver optimum shareholders’ return.
The Group intends to maintain a gearing ratio appropriate for a company of its size and growth.
The Group manages its capital structure by regularly reviewing its gearing ratio to ensure it maintains an appropriate level of gearing within facility covenants. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total capital. Net debt is calculated as total interest bearing financial liabilities, less cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as equity, as shown in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, plus net debt.
Table:
 | 30 June 2019 | 30 June 2018
 | $'000 | $'000
Total borrowings and lease | 867,177 | 302,954
Less: cash and cash equivalents | (398,999) | (417,982)
Net debt (surplus cash) | 468,178 | (115,028)
Total equity | 875,303 | 893,977
Total capital | 1,343,481 | 778,949
Gearing ratio | 35.0% | -%


Question: What was the percentage change in total borrowings and lease between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 186.24
Calculation: (867,177 - 302,954) / 302,954
Performance Share Units
The following table illustrates the number and WASP on date of award, and movements in, performance share units (“PSUs”) granted under the 2015 LTIP:
PSUs vest on one vesting date following a three year vesting period which will comprise three financial years. The awards are divided into three equal parts which will each be subject to a separate annual performance condition linked to the financial performance of the Group.
Table:
 | Year-ended 31 March 2019 |  | Year-ended 31 March 2018 | 
 | Number | WASP | Number | WASP
Performance share units | 000’s | £ pence | 000’s | £ pence
Outstanding at the start of the year | 7,546 | 269.65 | 6,024 | 219.41
Awarded | 1,721 | 506.74 | 1,719 | 440.50
Forfeited | (2,234) | 414.51 | (197) | 223.96
Released | (2,949) | 262.64 | – | –
Outstanding at the end of the year | 4,084 | 295.41 | 7,546 | 269.65


Question: What is the  Outstanding at the start of the year  for 2019?
Answer: 7,546
Disaggregation of Revenue
We generate revenue from the sale of services and sale of software for end-user software products provided through direct customer downloads and through the sale of these end-user software products via partners. The following table depicts the disaggregation of revenue (in thousands) according to revenue type and is consistent with how we evaluate our financial performance:
Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
Table:
 | Twelve months ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Services  | $59,545 | $64,476
Software and other   | 3,788 | 5,073
             Total revenue  | $63,333 | $69,549


Question: What was the percentage change in total revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -8.94
Calculation: ($63,333 - $69,549)/$69,549
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Net interest-bearing debt:
Net interest-bearing debt is defined as borrowings (current and noncurrent) less loans receivables and cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash. Net interest-bearing debt depicts the net capital resources, which cause net interest expenditure and interest rate risk and which, together with equity, are used to finance the Company’s investments. As such, TORM believes that net interest-bearing debt is a relevant measure which Management uses to measure the overall development of the use of financing, other than equity. Such measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Net interest-bearing debt is calculated as follows:
Table:
USDm | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Borrowings | 863.4 | 754.7 | 753.9
Loans receivables | -4.6 | - | -
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash | -72.5 | -127.4 | -134.2
Net interest-bearing debt | 786.3 | 627.3 | 619.7


Question: In which year was the amount of Borrowings the lowest?
Answer: 2017
Calculation: 753.9<754.7<863.4
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
15. Vessel Operating and Supervision Costs
An analysis of vessel operating and supervision costs is as follows:
Table:
 |  | For the year ended December 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Crew wages and vessel management employee costs | 72,652 | 79,624 | 80,713
Technical maintenance expenses | 28,736 | 28,694 | 37,653
Other vessel operating expenses | 21,098 | 19,766 | 21,296
Total | 122,486 | 128,084 | 139,662


Question: What is being analyzed as shown in the table?
Answer: Vessel operating and supervision costs
(8) Accounts Receivable
The following table presents details of our accounts receivable balances:
We are exposed to concentrations of credit risk from residential and business customers. We generally do not require collateral to secure our receivable balances. We have agreements with other communications service providers whereby we agree to bill and collect on their behalf for services rendered by those providers to our customers within our local service area. We purchase accounts receivable from other communications service providers primarily on a recourse basis and include these amounts in our accounts receivable balance. We have not experienced any significant loss associated with these purchased receivables.
Table:
 | As of December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | (Dollars in millions) | 
Trade and purchased receivables | $1,971 | 2,094
Earned and unbilled receivables | 374 | 425
Other | 20 | 21
Total accounts receivable | 2,365 | 2,540
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts | (106) | (142)
Accounts receivable, less allowance | $2,259 | 2,398


Question: How is the purchase of accounts receivable from other communications service providers done?
Answer: primarily on a recourse basis
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue | $ 1110.6
rider revenue | 13.6
purchased power capacity | 4.8
volume/weather | -14.6 ( 14.6 )
other | 3.5
2008 net revenue | $ 1117.9
the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 .
the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income .
also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues .
the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class .
billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 0.7%
Calculation: subtract(1110.6, 1117.9), divide(#0, 1117.9)
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES – continued
Return on Invested Capital (RoIC): TORM defines RoIC as earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) less tax, divided by the average invested capital for the period. Invested capital is defined below.
RoIC expresses the returns generated on capital invested in the Group. The progression of RoIC is used by TORM to measure progress against our longer-term value creation goals outlined to investors. RoIC is calculated as follows:
Table:
USDm | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Operating profit/(loss) (EBIT) | 205.9 | 2.8 | 39.5
Tax | -0.8 | -1.6 | -0.8
EBIT less Tax | 205.1 | 1.2 | 38.7
Invested capital, opening balance | 1,469.4 | 1,406.0 | 1,387.7
Invested capital, ending balance | 1,786.0 | 1,469.4 | 1,406.0
Average invested capital for the year | 1,627.7 | 1,437.7 | 1,396.9
Return on Invested Capital (RoIC) | 12.6% | 0.1% | 2.8%


Question: What is the progression of RoIC used by TORM for?
Answer: The progression of RoIC is used by TORM to measure progress against our longer-term value creation goals outlined to investors.
22. JOINT VENTURES (Cont’d)
‘‘NA’’ denotes Not Applicable.
Notes:
(1) Based on the Group’s direct equity interest in AIS.
(2) Others include adjustments to align the respective local accounting standards to SFRS(I).
Table:
 | Airtel | Telkomsel | Globe | AIS
Group - 2017 | S$ Mil | S$ Mil | S$ Mil | S$ Mil
Statement of financial position |  |  |  | 
Current assets | 4,378.4 | 3,546.3 | 1,481.6 | 1,368.4
Non-current assets | 45,611.2 | 6,169.6 | 5,548.1 | 10,027.2
Current liabilities | (13,568.3) | (2,547.9) | (2,344.3) | (2,994.1)
Non-current liabilities | (20,676.7) | (886.5) | (2,909.5) | (6,816.6)
Net assets | 15,744.6 | 6,281.5 | 1,775.9 | 1,584.9
Less: Non-controlling interests | (1,399.0) | - | 0.4 | (5.7)
Net assets attributable to equity holders | 14,345.6 | 6,281.5 | 1,776.3 | 1,579.2
Proportion of the Group’s ownership | 36.5% | 35.0% | 47.1% | 23.3% (1)
Group’s share of net assets | 5,230.4 | 2,198.5 | 837.4 | 368.2
Goodwill capitalised | 1,229.0 | 1,403.6 | 381.7 | 293.3
Others (2) | 387.6 | - | (139.9) | (2.4)
Carrying amount of the investment | 6,847.0 | 3,602.1 | 1,079.2 | 659.1
Other items |  |  |  | 
Cash and cash equivalents | 348.7 | 2,371.9 | 229.1 | 522.0
Non-current financial liabilities excluding trade  Current financial liabilities excluding trade and other payables | (19,774.0) | (570.2) | (2,658.7) | (3,690.1)
Current financial liabilities excluding trade and other payables | (3,884.7) | (76.6) | (353.6) | (187.4)
Group's share of market value | 10,995.3 | NA | 3,544.1 | 5,013.9


Question: Which is the largest joint venture of Singtel, in terms of the carrying amount of investment?
Answer: Airtel
Calculation: 6,847.0 > 3,602.1 > 1,079.2 > 659.1
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2019 (in thousands):
Our principal executive offices, as well as our research and development facility, are located in approximately 29,000 square feet of office space in San Diego, California and the term of the lease continues through June 30, 2024. The average annual base rent under this lease is approximately $1.0 million per year. In connection with this lease, we received tenant improvement allowances totaling approximately $1.0 million. These lease incentives are being amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease.
Our other offices are located in Paris, France; Amsterdam, The Netherlands; New York, New York; Barcelona, Spain; and London, United Kingdom. The
term of the Paris, France lease continues through July 31, 2021, with an annual base rent of approximately €0.4 million (or $0.4 million). The term of the
Amsterdam, The Netherlands lease continues through December 31, 2022, with an annual base rent of approximately €0.2 million (or $0.2 million). The term of
the New York, New York lease continues through November 30, 2024, with an annual base rent of approximately $0.2 million. The term of the Barcelona, Spain lease continues through May 31, 2023, with an annual base rent of approximately €0.1 million (or $0.1 million). The term of the London, United Kingdom lease continues through May 31, 2020, with an annual base rent of approximately £63,000 (or approximately $78,000). Our other offices are located in Paris, France; Amsterdam, The Netherlands; New York, New York; Barcelona, Spain; and London, United Kingdom. The term of the Paris, France lease continues through July 31, 2021, with an annual base rent of approximately €0.4 million (or $0.4 million). The term of the Amsterdam, The Netherlands lease continues through December 31, 2022, with an annual base rent of approximately €0.2 million (or $0.2 million). The term of the New York, New York lease continues through November 30, 2024, with an annual base rent of approximately $0.2 million. The term of the Barcelona, Spain lease continues through May 31, 2023, with an annual base rent of approximately €0.1 million (or $0.1 million). The term of the London, United Kingdom lease continues through May 31, 2020, with an annual base rent of approximately £63,000 (or approximately $78,000).
Other than the lease for our office space in San Diego, California, we do not believe that the leases for our offices are material to the Company. We believe our existing properties are in good condition and are sufficient and suitable for the conduct of its business.
Table:
 | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | Total
Operating lease obligations | $1,699 | $3,950 | $2,707 | $36 | $8,392
Other borrowings | 131 | 145 | 219 | 61 | 556
Total | $1,830 | $4,095 | $2,926 | $97 | $8,948


Question: What is the ratio of contractual obligations that expire in less than 1 year to the ones that expire in 3-5 years?
Answer: 0.63
Calculation: 1,830/2,926
5. Other operating expenses
The expenses from logistics services provided by METRO LOGISTICS to companies intended for sale and non-group companies are offset by income from logistics services, which are reported under other operating income.
Table:
€ million | 2017/2018 | 2018/2019
Expenses from logistics services | 272 | 254
Losses from the disposal of fixed assets | 4 | 6
Impairment losses on goodwill | 0 | 3
Miscellaneous | 17 | 17
 | 293 | 279


Question: In which year was the amount of Losses from the disposal of fixed assets larger?
Answer: 2018/2019
Calculation: 6>4
table of contents celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

Table:
period | totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ) | averageprice paidper share | total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program | approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )
october 1 - 31 2017 | 10676 | $ 104.10 | 2014 | $ 1531000000
november 1 - 30 2017 | 924 | $ 104.02 | 2014 | $ 1531000000
december 1 - 31 2017 | 38605 | $ 106.36 | 2014 | $ 1531000000
total | 50205 |  | 2014 | 
___________________________ ( 1 ) represents shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units .
( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 .
see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information. .

Question: what is the total value of purchased shares during october 2017 , in millions?
Answer: 1.1
Calculation: multiply(10676, 104.10), divide(#0, const_1000000)
(b) Purchase Commitments with Contract Manufacturers and Suppliers
We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for our products. During the normal course of business, in order to manage manufacturing lead times and help ensure adequate component supply, we enter into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by us or establish the parameters defining our requirements. A significant portion of our reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements consists of firm, noncancelable, and unconditional commitments. Certain of these purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers relate to arrangements to secure long-term pricing for certain product components for multi-year periods. In certain instances, these agreements allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders being placed.
The following table summarizes our purchase commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers (in millions):
We record a liability for firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of our future demand forecasts consistent with the valuation of our excess and obsolete inventory. As of July 27, 2019 and July 28, 2018, the liability for these purchase commitments was $129 million and $159 million, respectively, and was included in other current liabilities.
Table:
Commitments by Period | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018
Less than 1 year | $4,239 | $5,407
1 to 3 years | 728 | 710
3 to 5 years | — | 360
Total | $4,967 | $6,477


Question: What were the purchase commitments with commitments that were 3 to 5 years in 2018?
Answer: 360