hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Financing receivables primarily consist of client loan and installment payment receivables (loans), investment in sales-type and direct financing leases, and commercial financing receivables. Client loan and installment payment receivables (loans) are provided primarily to clients to finance the purchase of hardware, software and services.
Payment terms on these financing arrangements are generally for terms up to seven years. Client loans and installment payment financing contracts are priced independently at competitive market rates. Investment in sales-type and direct financing leases relates principally to the company’s Systems products and are for terms ranging generally from two to six years.
Commercial financing receivables relate primarily to inventory and accounts receivable financing for dealers and remarketers of IBM and OEM products. Payment terms for inventory and accounts receivable financing generally range from 30 to 90 days.
Table:
($ in millions) |  |  |  | 
At December 31, 2019: | Investment in Sales-Type and Direct Financing Leases | Commercial Financing Receivables | Client Loan and Installment Payment Receivables/ (Loans) | Total
Financing receivables, gross | $6,077 | $3,836 | $13,592 | $23,504
Unearned income | (509) | (4) | (570) | (1,083)
Recorded investment | $5,567 | $3,831 | $13,022 | $22,421
Allowance for credit losses | (72) | (11) | (138) | (221)
Unguaranteed residual value | 652 | — | — | 652
Guaranteed residual value | 53 | — | — | 53
Total financing receivables, net | $6,199 | $3,820 | $12,884 | $22,904
Current portion | $2,334 | $3,820 | $ 8,037 | $14,192
Noncurrent portion | $3,865 | $      — | $ 4,847 | $ 8,712


Question: What is the payment term for financing arrangements
Answer: Payment terms on these financing arrangements are generally for terms up to seven years. Client loans and installment payment financing contracts are priced independently at competitive market rates
Note 3. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Contract Assets
Our contract assets consist of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers. The current portion of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers are included in other current assets within our consolidated balance sheets. The non-current portion of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers are reflected in other assets within our consolidated balance sheets. Our amortization of contract assets during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $2.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively. There were no amortized commission costs during the year ended December 31, 2017.
We review the capitalized costs for impairment at least annually. Impairment exists if the carrying amount of the asset recognized from contract costs exceeds the remaining amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing the goods and services to which such asset relates, less the costs that relate directly to providing those good and services and that have not been recognized as an expense. We did not record an impairment loss on our contract assets during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The changes in our contract assets are as follows (in thousands):
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Beginning of period balance | $2,881 | $—
Commission costs and upfront payments to a customer capitalized in period | 4,141 | 4,864
Amortization of contract assets | (2,444) | (1,983)
End of period balance | $4,578 | $2,881


Question: Where does the company include the non-current portion of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers in their consolidated balance sheets?
Answer: other assets
D) SHARE-BASED PAYMENT PLANS
The Corporation offers an Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the benefit of its employees and those of its subsidiaries and a Stock Option Plan to its executive officers and designated employees. No more than 10% of the outstanding subordinate voting shares are available for issuance under these plans. Furthermore, the Corporation offers an Incentive Share Unit Plan ("ISU Plan") and a Performance Share Unit Plan ("PSU Plan") for executive officers and designated employees, and a Deferred Share Unit Plan ("DSU Plan") for members of the Board of Directors ("Board").
Stock purchase plan The Corporation offers, for the benefit of its employees and those of its subsidiaries, an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is accessible to all employees up to a maximum of 7% of their base annual salary and the Corporation contributes 25% of the employee contributions. The subscriptions are made monthly and employee subordinate voting shares are purchased on the stock market.
Stock option plan A total of 3,432,500 subordinate voting shares are reserved for the purpose of the Stock Option Plan. The minimum exercise price at which options are granted is equal to the market value of such shares at the time the option is granted. Options vest equally over a period of five years beginning one year after the day such options are granted and are exercisable over ten years.
Under the Stock Option Plan, the following options were granted by the Corporation and are outstanding at August 31:
(1) For the year ended August 31, 2019, the Corporation granted 97,725 (126,425 in 2018) stock options to Cogeco's executive officers as executive officers of the Corporation. (2) The weighted average share price for options exercised during the year was $92.43 ($83.46 in 2018).
Table:
Years ended August 31, |  | 2019 |  | 2018
 | Options | Weighted average exercise price | Options | Weighted average exercise price
 |  | $ |  | $
Outstanding, beginning of the year | 819,393 | 65.27 | 652,385 | 56.61
Granted (1) | 201,525 | 65.62 | 281,350 | 85.08
Exercised (2) | (170,754) | 57.28 | (60,337) | 57.77
Cancelled | (134,550) | 72.43 | (54,005) | 72.28
Outstanding, end of the year | 715,614 | 65.93 | 819,393 | 65.27
Exercisable, end of the year | 264,374 | 55.99 | 277,108 | 49.76


Question: What is the total number of shares under Stock option plan A?
Answer: 3,432,500 subordinate voting shares
We recorded $14.2 million, $15.2 million and $12.3 million of amortization related to our intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. There were no impairments of long-lived assets during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The following tables reflect the weighted-average remaining life and carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets (in thousands, except weighted-average remaining life):
Table:
 |  | December 31, 2019 |  | 
 | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | Weighted- Average Remaining Life
Customer relationships | $123,731 | $(39,335) | $84,396 | 9.8
Developed technology | 30,542 | (13,722) | 16,820 | 8.7
Trade name | 3,304 | (1,082) | 2,222 | 4.8
Other | 234 | (234) | — | —
Total intangible assets | $157,811 | $(54,373) | $103,438 | 


Question: How many intangible assets in 2019 had a net carrying value of more than $50,000 thousand?
Answer: 1
Calculation: Customer relationships
b. Categories of equity shareholding as on March 31, 2019:
c. Top ten equity shareholders of the Company as on March 31, 2019:
* Shareholding is consolidated based on Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the shareholder.
Table:
Category | Number of equity shares held | Percentage of holding
Promoters | 2,702,450,947 | 72.0
Other Entities of the Promoter Group | 1,091,053 | -
Mutual Funds & UTI | 93,357,668 | 2.5
Banks, Financial Institutions, States and Central Government | 2,750,113 | 0.1
Insurance Companies | 196,172,807 | 5.2
Foreign Institutional Investors and Foreign Portfolio Investors - Corporate | 592,842,601 | 15.8
NRI's / OCB's / Foreign Nationals | 4,854,682 | 0.1
Corporate Bodies / Trust | 26,208,151 | 0.7
Indian Public & Others | 130,744,399 | 3.6
Alternate Investment Fund | 1,663,495 | -
IEPF account | 248,790 | -
GRAND TOTAL | 3,752,384,706 | 100.0
 |  | 
Name of the shareholder* | Number of equity shares held | Percentage of holding
1. Tata Sons Private Limited | 2,702,450,947 | 72.0
2. Life Insurance Corporation of India | 152,493,927 | 4.1
3. SBI Mutual Fund | 21,680,561 | 0.6
4. First State Investments Icvc- Stewart Investors Asia Pacific Leaders Fund | 19,248,438 | 0.5
5. Government of Singapore | 18,028,475 | 0.5
6. Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund | 16,731,906 | 0.5
7. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd | 16,139,316 | 0.4
8. Axis Mutual Fund Trustee Limited | 15,244,614 | 0.4
9. Abu Dhabi Investment Authority | 15,036,984 | 0.4
10. Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund, A Series of Vanguard International Equity Index Funds | 14,112,213 | 0.4


Question: What is the difference in percentage shareholding between Tata Sons Private Limited and Life Insurance Corporation of India?
Answer: 67.9
Calculation: 72-4.1
Greenhouse gas emissions
In line with the Companies Act 2006, Sophos is required to measure and report on its Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) emissions disclosures. These have been calculated for the year-ending 31 March 2019, in line with the Group’s financial year. The calculation of the disclosures has been performed in accordance with Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard and using the UK government’s conversion factor guidance for the year reported.
The Group’s operations that primarily release GHG includes usage of electricity and gas of owned and leased offices, business travel and usage of vehicles. The Group keeps its data capture process under review, seeking to extend the availability of direct information wherever possible. Where direct information for certain sites is not available, estimates have been developed that enable reporting for them. These estimates are revised if new or improved data is obtained.
The Group will continue to build its GHG reporting capabilities. The Group’s chosen intensity ratio is ‘tonnes of CO2 equivalent per million US dollars of billings’ as it aligns with Sophos’ strategic growth ambitions.
Creating an environmentally friendly HQ
The Group commissioned a greening study of its global headquarters in Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The purpose of the study was to benchmark the current environmental, health and wellbeing performance of the building against current best practice and against direct and indirect competitors.
The findings of the study showed that the building performance was consistent with intermediate good practice and the building management was consistent with standard good practice. The study highlighted areas of future improvement. The findings and recommendations of this report will be a key driver for developing best practice in environmental sustainability to match the growth aspirations and objectives of the Company.
The Group is endeavouring to achieve the standards in environmental performance, health and wellbeing that is expected of a global technology organisation at the Group’s headquarters.
Table:
 |  | Year-ended 31 March 2019 | Year-ended 31 March 2018 | Year-ended 31 March 2017
 |  | tCO2e | tCO2e | tCO2e
Scope 1 | Combustion of natural gas and operation of owned vehicles | 220.9 | 320.0 | 251.8
Scope 2 | Electricity consumption in offices | 4,487.2 | 4,457.3 | 4,681.9
Scope 3 | Business travel (air and car) | 3,260.9 | 5,117.4 | 4,510.9
Total |  | 7,969.0 | 9,894.7 | 9,444.6
Intensity ratio |  |  |  | 
tCO2e per $M of billings |  | 10.5 | 12.9 | 14.9


Question: What was the change in the intensity ratio in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: -2.4
Calculation: 10.5-12.9
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes the components of total stock-based compensation included in VMware’s consolidated statements of income during the periods presented (table in millions):
As of January 31, 2020, the total unrecognized compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock was $1.8 billion and will be recognized through fiscal 2024 with a weighted-average remaining period of 1.5 years. Stock-based compensation related to VMware equity awards held by VMware employees is recognized on VMware’s consolidated statements of income over the awards’ requisite service periods.
Table:
 |  | For the Year Ended | 
 | January 31, 2020 | February 1, 2019 | February 2, 2018
Cost of license revenue | $1 | $1 | $2
Cost of subscription and SaaS revenue | 13 | 7 | 5
Cost of services revenue | 83 | 58 | 53
Research and development | 459 | 391 | 363
Sales and marketing | 293 | 226 | 205
General and administrative | 168 | 117 | 84
Stock-based compensation | 1,017 | 800 | 712
Income tax benefit | (347) | (253) | (232)
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax | $670 | $547 | $480


Question: What was the change in the Cost of subscription and SaaS revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 2
Calculation: 7-5
5. Operating Expenses
Notes: (1) Includes equipment costs related to ICT services.
(2) Includes supplies and services, as well as rentals of properties and mobile base stations.
Table:
 | Group | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | S$ Mil | S$ Mil
Cost of equipment sold (1) | 3,106.1 | 2,696.7
Other cost of sales | 2,767.1 | 2,499.2
Staff costs | 2,597.3 | 2,760.1
Selling and administrative costs (2) | 2,472.6 | 2,536.6
Traffic expenses | 1,573.4 | 1,615.8
Repair and maintenance | 388.0 | 367.9
 | 12,904.5 | 12,476.3


Question: In which year did Singtel had higher total operating expenses?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: 12,904.5 > 12,476.3
Note 6: Other Expense, Net
The significant components of other expense, net, were as follows:
Interest income in the year ended June 30, 2019, increased compared to the years ended June 24, 2018, and June 25, 2017, primarily as a result of higher yield. Interest expense in the year ended June 30, 2019, increased compared to the year ended June 24, 2018, primarily due to issuance of the $2.5 billion of senior notes. Interest expense in the year ended June 24, 2018, decreased compared to the year ended June 25, 2017, primarily due to the conversions of 2018 and 2041 Convertible Notes as well as the retirement of the 2018 Convertible Notes in May 2018.
The gain on deferred compensation plan related assets in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was driven by an improvement in the fair market value of the underlying funds.
The loss on impairment of investments in the year ended June 24, 2018 was the result of a decision to sell selected investments held in foreign jurisdictions in connection with the Company’s cash repatriation strategy following the December 2017 U.S. tax reform.
Net loss on extinguishment of debt realized in the year ended June 25, 2017, was primarily a result of the special mandatory redemption of the Senior Notes due 2023 and 2026, as well as the termination of the Term Loan Agreement.
Table:
 | June 30, 2019 | June 24, 2018 | June 25, 2017
 |  | (in thousands) | 
Interest income | $98,771 | $85,813 | $57,858
Interest expense | (117,263) | (97,387) | (117,734)
Gains on deferred compensation plan related assets, net | 10,464 | 14,692 | 17,880
Loss on impairment of investments | — | (42,456) | —
Gains (losses) on extinguishment of debt, net | 118 | 542 | (36,252)
Foreign exchange gains (losses), net | 826 | (3,382) | (569)
Other, net | (11,077) | (19,332) | (11,642)
 | $(18,161) | $(61,510) | $(90,459)


Question: What was the reason for the increase in interest income in 2019?
Answer: higher yield
Substantial shareholdings
The voting rights in the table below have been determined in accordance with the requirements of the UK Listing Authority’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules DTR 5, and represent 3% or more of the voting rights attached to issued shares in the Company as at 28th February 2020 and 31st December 2019. There are no Controlling Founder Shareholders.
Table:
 | As at 31.12.19 |  | As at 28.02.20 | 
Substantial shareholdings | Number of Ordinary shares | % of issued share capital | Number of Ordinary shares | % of issued share capital
The Capital Group Companies, Inc. | 6,584,006 | 8.9% | 6,598,428 | 8.9%
Sun Life Financial, Inc. | 5,566,823 | 7.5% | 5,481,561 | 7.4%
BlackRock, Inc. | 4,624,204 | 6.3% | 4,913,790 | 6.7%
Fiera Capital Corporation | 4,764,251 | 6.5% | 4,768,688 | 6.5%
APG Groep N.V. | 4,068,000 | 5.5% | 4,068,000 | 5.5%
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 2,569,081 | 3.5% | 2,637,287 | 3.6%


Question: What was the change in the number of ordinary shares for BlackRock, Inc. in 2020 from 2019?
Answer: 289586
Calculation: 4,913,790-4,624,204
2.6 Taxes (continued)
1 Net deferred tax liabilities include net deferred tax assets of $2,195,000 (2018: $1,937,000) from the iMoney Group.
Recognition and measurement
Our income tax expense is the sum of current and deferred income tax expenses. Current income tax expense is calculated on accounting profit after adjusting for non-taxable and non-deductible items based on rules set by the tax authorities. Deferred income tax expense is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period in which the deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled. Both our current and deferred income tax expenses are calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at reporting date.
Our current and deferred taxes are recognised as an expense in profit or loss, except when they relate to items that are directly recognised in other comprehensive income or equity. In this case, our current and deferred tax expenses are also recognised directly in other comprehensive income or equity.
We generally recognise deferred tax liabilities for all taxable temporary differences, except to the extent that the deferred tax liability arises from:
• the initial recognition of goodwill; and
• the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and affects neither our accounting profit nor our taxable income at the time of the transaction.
For our investments in controlled entities and associated entities, recognition of deferred tax liabilities is required unless we are able to control the timing of our temporary difference reversal and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carried forward unused tax losses and tax credits, can be utilised
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset in the statement of financial position where they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and to the extent that we intend to settle our current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
Table:
 | CONSOLIDATED | 
 | 2019 $’000 | 2018 $’000
Deferred taxes |  | 
Deferred tax assets relate to the following: |  | 
Trade and other payables | 2,312 | 1,558
Provisions | 4,759 | 2,230
Property, Plant and Equipment | - | 1,680
ITAA 97 Section 40-880 business related costs | 92 | 105
Unrealised foreign exchange differences | 58 | 56
Unused tax losses | 4,837 | 4,665
Other | 13 | 114
Total deferred tax assets | 12,071 | 10,408
 |  | 
Deferred tax liabilities relate to following: |  | 
Trail commission asset | (34,168) | (31,253)
Property, Plant and Equipment | (581) | -
Development costs | (2,109) | (2,359)
Total deferred tax liabilities | (36,858) | (33,612)
Net deferred tax liabilities1 | (24,787) | (23,204)


Question: When is the recognition of deferred tax liabilities not required?
Answer: we are able to control the timing of our temporary difference reversal and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse
NOTE 13—GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES
We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
(1) Includes interest up to maturity and principal payments. Please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" for more details
(2) Net of $30.7 million of sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to third parties.
Table:
 |  |  | Payments due between |  | 
 | Total | July 1, 2019— June 30, 2020 | July 1, 2020— June 30, 2022 | July 1, 2022— June 30, 2024 | July 1, 2024 and beyond
Long-term debt obligations (1) | $3,408,565 | $147,059 | $292,156 | $1,045,567 | $1,923,783
Operating lease obligations (2) | 318,851 | 72,853 | 106,394 | 59,441 | 80,163
Purchase obligations | 11,280 | 8,364 | 2,747 | 169 | —
 | $3,738,696 | $228,276 | $401,297 | $1,105,177 | $2,003,946


Question: What does the table represent?
Answer: contractual obligations with minimum payments for the indicated fiscal periods
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive officers of our Company are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all executive officers of our Company.
CHRISTOPHER H. ATAYAN has served in various senior executive positions with the Company since March 2006, including his service as Chairman of the Board since January 2008 and Chief Executive Officer since October 2006, and has been a director of the Company since 2004. Mr. Atayan has served as the Senior Managing Director of Slusser Associates, a private equity and investment banking firm, since 1988, and has been engaged in private equity and investment banking since 1982. He also serves on the Board of Eastek Holdings, LLC, a manufacturing company.
ANDREW C. PLUMMER has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2018, as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2007, and as our Secretary from January 2007 to October 2018. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Plummer served our company in various roles including Acting Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, and Manager of SEC Compliance. Prior to joining our company in 2004, Mr. Plummer practiced public accounting, primarily with the accounting firm Deloitte and Touche, LLP (now Deloitte).
CHARLES J. SCHMADERER has served as the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Controller since April 2018 and as Secretary since October 2018. From 2006 to 2018, Mr. Schmaderer served the Company in various roles including as the Vice President of Financial Reporting and Assistant Secretary, and as the Director of Financial and SEC Reporting. Prior to joining AMCON in 2006, Mr. Schmaderer practiced public accounting, primarily with the accounting firm Grant Thornton, LLP and also holds a Master of Business Administration (MBA).
Table:
Name | Age | Position
Christopher H. Atayan | 59 | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Andrew C. Plummer | 45 | President, Chief Financial Officer, Director
Charles J. Schmaderer | 50 | Vice President, Corporate Controller, Secretary


Question: What is the average age of the company's executive officers?
Answer: 51.33
Calculation: (59 + 45 + 50)/3