hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
The assets and liabilities of OpCo that are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
The assets of OpCo are restricted for OpCo’s use and are not available for the general operations of Cubic. OpCo’s debt is non-recourse to Cubic. Cubic’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its equity interest in the P3 Venture is limited to the $2.7 million outstanding letter of credit, which will be converted to a cash contribution upon completion of the design and build phase of the MBTA Contract.
Table:
 |  | September 30,
 | 2019 | 2018
 |  | (in thousands)
Cash | $  347 | $  374
Restricted cash | 9,967 | 10,000
Other current assets | 33 | —
Long-term capitalized contract costs | — | 33,818
Long-term contracts financing receivable | 115,508 | —
Other noncurrent assets | 1,419 | 810
Total assets | $  127,274 | $  45,002
Trade accounts payable | $  25 | $  165
Accrued compensation and other current liabilities | 191 | —
Due to Cubic | 25,143 | 11,724
Other long-term liabilities | 21,605 | 13
Long-term debt | 61,994 | 9,056
Total liabilities | $  108,958 | $  20,958
Total Cubic equity | (603) | (304)
Noncontrolling interests | 18,919 | 24,348
Total liabilities and owners' equity | $ 127,274 | $ 45,002


Question: What is the percentage change in cash?
Answer: -7.22
Calculation: (347-374)/374
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity as discussed in note 2 , we elected to early adopt new guidance related to accounting for employee share-based payments prospectively effective january 1 , 2016 . the adoption of this new guidance resulted in the recognition of approximately $ 20 million of tax benefits in net income in our consolidated statement of income for the three months ended march 31 , 2016 that had previously been recorded as additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheet . dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
paymentdate | amountper share | totalamount ( in millions )
2014 | $ 1.10 | $ 170
2015 | $ 1.14 | $ 170
2016 | $ 1.16 | $ 172
under the terms of the merger agreement , we agreed with aetna that our quarterly dividend would not exceed $ 0.29 per share prior to the closing or termination of the merger .
on october 26 , 2016 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 27 , 2017 to stockholders of record on january 12 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million .
on february 14 , 2017 , following the termination of the merger agreement , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share , to be paid on april 28 , 2017 , to the stockholders of record on march 31 , 2017 .
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .
stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .
under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .
pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .
accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program. .

Question: in 2014 what was the number of shares issued a dividend in millions
Answer: 154.54
Calculation: divide(170, 1.10)
2019 Performance Target and Payout: The ultimate number of our PBRS that vest, can range between 0% to 200%, and will be based on our achievement of the absolute Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate target (measured from fourth quarter of 2018 to fourth quarter of 2020), as illustrated in the table below.
(1) Determined by dividing (i) the Adjusted EBITDA actually attained for the fourth quarter of 2020 minus the Adjusted EBITDA actually attained for the fourth quarter of 2018 by (ii) the Adjusted EBITDA actually attained for the fourth quarter of 2018.
(2) Linear interpolation is used when our Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate performance is between the threshold, target and maximum amounts to determine the corresponding percentage of target award earned.
Table:
Performance Level | Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate(1) | Payout as % of Target Award(2)
Maximum | ≥ 2.8% | 200%
Target | 0.0% | 100%
Threshold | (2.8)% | 50%
Below Threshold | < (2.8)% | 0%


Question: How many performance levels would the payout as % of target award be above 50%?
Answer: 2
Calculation: Maximum##Target
OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES
1 Holders of our Class B Non-Voting Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend shareholder meetings; however, they are not entitled to vote at these meetings except as required by law or stipulated by stock exchanges. If an offer is made to purchase outstanding Class A Shares, there is no requirement under applicable law or our constating documents that an offer be made for the outstanding Class B Non-Voting Shares, and there is no other protection available to shareholders under our constating documents. If an offer is made to purchase both classes of shares, the offer for the Class A Shares may be made on different terms than the offer to the holders of Class B Non-Voting Shares.
As at February 29, 2020, 111,154,811 Class A Shares, 393,770,507
Class B Non-Voting Shares, and 3,145,274 options to purchase
Class B Non-Voting Shares were outstanding.
Table:
 | As at December 31 | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Common shares outstanding 1 |  | 
Class A Voting | 111,154,811 | 111,155,637
Class B Non-Voting | 393,770,507 | 403,657,038
Total common shares | 504,925,318 | 514,812,675
Options to purchase Class B |  | 
Non-Voting Shares |  | 
Outstanding options | 3,154,795 | 2,719,612
Outstanding options exercisable | 993,645 | 1,059,590


Question: What is the average Class B Non-Voting shares?
Answer: 398713772.5
Calculation: (393,770,507 + 403,657,038) / 2
Debt
At both December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our total outstanding debt was $2.7 billion, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 3.18%.
A summary of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2019, is as follows (amounts in millions):
Table:
 |  | December 31, 2019 | 
 | Gross Carrying Amount | Unamortized Discount and Deferred Financing Costs | Net Carrying Amount
2021 Notes | $650 | $(2) | $648
2022 Notes | 400 | (2) | 398
2026 Notes | 850 | (7) | 843
2027 Notes | 400 | (5) | 395
2047 Notes | 400 | (9) | 391
Total debt | $2,700 | $(25) | $2,675


Question: What was the gross carrying amount in the 2022 Notes?
Answer: 400
The Systems gross profit margin increased 3.2 points to 53.1 percent in 2019 compared to the prior year. The increase was driven by actions taken in 2018 to better position the cost structure over the longer term, a mix to IBM Z hardware and operating systems and margin improvement in Storage Systems.
Pre-tax income of $701 million declined 22.4 percent and pre-tax margin of 8.4 percent decreased 1.8 points year to year driven by the declines in Power Systems and Storage Systems revenue and the continued investment in innovation across the Systems portfolio, mitigated by the benefit from the new hardware launches in the second-half 2019.
Table:
($ in millions) |  |  | 
For the year ended December 31: | 2019 | 2018 | Yr.-to-Yr Percent/ Margin Change
Systems |  |  | 
External Systems Hardware gross profit | $2,622 | $2,590 | 1.2%
External Systems Hardware gross profit margin | 44.3% | 40.7% | 3.6pts.
External Operating Systems Software gross profit | $1,412 | $1,412 | 0.0%
External Operating Systems Software gross profit margin | 83.8% | 84.5% | (0.7)pts.
External total gross profit | $4,034 | $4,002 | 0.8%
External total gross profit margin | 53.1% | 49.8% | 3.2pts.
Pre-tax income | $701 | $904 | (22.4)%
Pre-tax margin | 8.4% | 10.2% | (1.8)pts.


Question: What was the average External Systems Hardware gross profit?
Answer: 2606
Calculation: (2,622 + 2,590) / 2
As of December 31, 2019, we had 19,577 employees, which included 11,328 engineers, 7,416 technicians and 833 administrative staff performing administrative functions on a consolidated basis. We have in the past implemented, and may in the future evaluate the need to implement, labor redundancy plans based on the work performance of our employees.
Employee salaries are reviewed annually. Salaries are adjusted based on industry standards, inflation and individual performance. As an incentive, additional bonuses in cash may be paid at the discretion of management based on the performance of individuals. In addition, except under certain circumstances, R.O.C. law requires us to reserve from 10% to 15% of any offerings of our new common shares for employees’ subscription.
Our employees participate in our profit distribution pursuant to our articles of incorporation. Employees are entitled to receive additional bonuses based on a certain percentage of our allocable surplus income. On February 26, 2020, our board of directors proposed an employee bonus in cash in the aggregate amount of NT$1,133 million (US$38 million) in relation to retained earnings in 2019.
Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreements. We believe we have a good relationship with our employees.
Table:
 |  | As of December 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Employees |  |  | 
Engineers | 11,846 | 11,651 | 11,328
Technicians | 7,432 | 7,494 | 7,416
Administrative Staff | 798 | 784 | 833
Total | 20,076 | 19,929 | 19,577


Question: As of December 31, 2019, how many individual were employed under various departments?
Answer: As of December 31, 2019, we had 19,577 employees, which included 11,328 engineers, 7,416 technicians and 833 administrative staff performing administrative functions on a consolidated basis.
Subsequent to origination, the delinquency and write-off experience is monitored as key credit quality indicators for the portfolio of device payment plan agreement receivables and fixed-term service plans. The extent of collection efforts with respect to a particular customer are based on the results of proprietary custom empirically derived internal behavioral-scoring models that analyze the customer’s past performance to predict the likelihood of the customer falling further delinquent.
These customer-scoring models assess a number of variables, including origination characteristics, customer account history and payment patterns. Based on the score derived from these models, accounts are grouped by risk category to determine the collection strategy to be applied to such accounts.
Collection performance results and the credit quality of device payment plan agreement receivables are continuously monitored based on a variety of metrics, including aging. An account is considered to be delinquent and in default status if there are unpaid charges remaining on the account on the day after the bill’s due date.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance and aging of the device payment plan agreement receivables on a gross basis was as follows:
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Unbilled | $ 22,827 | $ 24,282
Billed: |  | 
Current | 1,286 | 1,465
Past due | 236 | 271
Device payment plan agreement receivables, gross | $ 24,349 | $ 26,018


Question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the past due from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -35
Calculation: 236 - 271
Annual Contract Value (“ACV”) (1) (2)
The change in ACV measures the growth and predictability of future cash flows from committed Pega Cloud and Client Cloud arrangements as of the end of the particular reporting period.
Total ACV, as of a given date, is the sum of the following two components:
• Client Cloud: the sum of (1) the annual value of each term license contract in effect on such date, which is equal to its total license value divided by the total number of years and (2) maintenance revenue reported for the quarter ended on such date, multiplied by four. We do not provide hosting services for Client Cloud arrangements.
• Pega Cloud: the sum of the annual value of each cloud contract in effect on such date, which is equal to its total value divided by the total number of years.
(1) Data Table
(2) As foreign currency exchange rates are an important factor in understanding period to period comparisons, we believe the presentation of ACV growth rates on a constant currency basis enhances the understanding of our results and evaluation of our performance in comparison to prior periods.
Table:
 | December 31, |  | Change |  | 
(Dollars in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | Reported |  | Constant currency
Maintenance | $292,696 | $269,708 | $22,988 | 9% | 8%
Term | 231,267 | 190,349 | 40,918 | 21% | 21%
Client Cloud | 523,963 | 460,057 | 63,906 | 14% | 14%
Pega Cloud | 169,329 | 109,973 | 59,356 | 54% | 54%
Total ACV | $693,292 | $570,030 | $123,262 | 22% | 22%


Question: What is the value of Client Cloud as a percentage of the total ACV in 2019?
Answer: 75.58
Calculation: 523,963/693,292
Underlying effective tax rate
The underlying effective tax rate is calculated by dividing taxation excluding the tax impact of non-underlying items by profit before tax excluding the impact of non-underlying items and share of net profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates. This measure reflects the underlying tax rate in relation to profit before tax excluding non-underlying items before tax and share of net profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates.
Tax impact on non-underlying items within operating profit is the sum of the tax on each non-underlying item, based on the applicable country tax rates and tax treatment. This is shown in the table:
(a) Restated following adoption of IFRS 16. See note 1 and note 24 for further details.
(b) Refer to note 3 for further details on these items.
(c) Excludes €3 million (2018: €32 million) gain on disposal of spreads business by the joint venture in Portugal which is included in the share of net profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates line. Including the gain, total non-underlying items not in operating profit but within net profit before tax is €35 million (2018: €154 million). See note 3.
Table:
 | € million | € million
 | 2019 | 2018
 |  | (Restated)(a)
Taxation | 2,263 | 2,572
Tax impact of: |  | 
Non-underlying items within operating profit(b) | 309 | (259)
Non-underlying items not in operating profit  Taxation before tax impact of non-underlying | (196) | (29)
Taxation before tax impact of non-underlying | 2,376 | 2,284
Profit before taxation | 8,289 | 12,360
Non-underlying items within operating profit before tax(b) | 1,239 | (3,176)
Non-underlying items not in operating profit but within net profit before tax(c) | (32) | (122)
Share of net (profit)/loss of joint ventures and associates | (176) | (185)
Profit before tax excluding non-underlying items before tax and share of net profit/ (loss) of joint ventures and associates | 9,320 | 8,877
Underlying effective tax rate | 25.5% | 25.7%


Question: What is the Underlying effective tax rate change from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -0.2
Calculation: 25.5 - 25.7
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenues
Our Products and Licensing segment included revenues from sales of test and measurement systems, primarily representing sales of our Optical Backscatter Reflectometer, ODiSI, and Optical Vector Analyzer platforms, optical components and sub-assemblies and sales of our Hyperion and Terahertz sensing platforms. Our Products and Licensing segment revenues increased $22.5 million to $44.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $21.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The increase resulted primarily from $10.8 million of revenues realized from the legacy business of MOI and $10.5 million of revenues realized from the legacy business of GP during the year ended December 31, 2019. Continued growth in sales of our fiber-optic sensing products, including our ODiSI products directed toward the expanding use of composite materials and the need for improved means of testing their structural integrity, and our communications test instruments also contributed to this increase.
Our Technology Development segment revenues increased $5.1 million to $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $21.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Revenues within this segment increased due to additional contract awards, including higher value Phase 2 SBIR contracts. The increase continues a growth trend experienced over the past two years largely driven by successes in Phase 2 SBIR awards. The increase was realized primarily in our intelligent systems, advanced materials, optical systems and terahertz research groups. As Phase 2 SBIR contracts generally have a performance period of a year or more, we currently expect Technology Development segment revenues to remain at a similar level for the near term.
Table:
 | Years ended December 31, |  |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | $ Difference  | % Difference
Products and licensing revenues | $44,491,041 | $21,949,689 | $22,541,352 | 102.7%
Technology development revenues | 26,024,674 | 20,967,556 | 5,057,118 | 24.1%
Total revenues | $70,515,715 | $42,917,245 | $27,598,470 | 64.3%


Question: What was the Technology development revenues in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: 26,024,674, 20,967,556
2. Property and equipment:
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment and finance leases was $80.2 million, $81.2 million and $75.9 million, for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company capitalizes the compensation cost of employees directly involved with its construction activities. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company capitalized compensation costs of $10.7 million, $10.5 million and $9.7 million respectively. These amounts are included in system infrastructure costs.
Exchange agreement
In 2019, 2018 and 2017 the Company exchanged certain used network equipment and cash consideration for new network equipment. The fair value of the new network equipment received was estimated to be $3.3 million, $3.2 million and $9.1 million resulting in gains of $1.0 million, $1.0 million and $3.9 million respectively. The estimated fair value of the equipment received was based upon the cash consideration price the Company pays for the new network equipment on a standalone basis (Level 3).
Installment payment agreement
The Company has entered into an installment payment agreement (“IPA”) with a vendor. Under the IPA the Company may purchase network equipment in exchange for interest free note obligations each with a twenty-four month term. There are no payments under each note obligation for the first six months followed by eighteen equal installment payments for the remaining eighteen month term. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was $12.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively, of note obligations outstanding under the IPA, secured by the related equipment. The Company recorded the assets purchased and the present value of the note obligation utilizing an imputed interest rate. The resulting discounts totaling $0.4 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, under the note obligations are being amortized over the note term using the effective interest rate method.
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Owned assets: |  | 
Network equipment | $566,936 | $538,761
Leasehold improvements | 227,388 | 214,495
System infrastructure | 134,726 | 124,018
Software | 10,035 | 9,963
Office and other equipment | 18,169 | 16,711
Building | 1,252 | 1,277
Land | 106 | 108
 | 958,612 | 905,333
Less—Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (790,033) | (736,356)
 | 168,579 | 168,977
Assets under finance leases: |  | 
IRUs | 408,170 | 395,170
Less—Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (207,820) | (188,822)
 | 200,350 | 206,348
Property and equipment, net | $368,929 | $375,325


Question: What is the percentage change in the value of network equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 5.23
Calculation: (566,936 - 538,761)/538,761
9. Debt
Silicon Valley Bank Facility
We maintained a Loan and Security Agreement with SVB (the "Credit Facility") under which we had a term loan with an original borrowing amount of $6.0 million (the “Original Term Loan”). The Original Term Loan carried a floating annual interest rate equal to SVB’s prime rate then in effect plus 2%. The Original Term Loan matured and was repaid in May 2019.
On October 10, 2019, we entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with SVB, which amended and restated in its entirety our previous Credit Facility. Under the Loan Agreement, SVB agreed to make advances available up to $10.0 million (the “Revolving Line”). If we borrow from the Revolving Line, such borrowing would carry a floating annual interest rate equal to the greater of (i) the Prime Rate (as defined in the Loan Agreement) then in effect plus 1% or (ii) 6%. Amounts borrowed under the Revolving Line may be repaid and, prior to the Revolving Line Maturity Date (defined below), reborrowed. The Revolving Line terminates on October 10, 2020 (the “Revolving Line Maturity Date”), unless earlier terminated by us. No amounts have been borrowed under this Loan Agreement.
Amounts due under the Loan Agreement are secured by our assets, including all personal property, inventory and bank accounts; however, intellectual property is not secured under the Loan Agreement. The inventory used to secure the amount due does not include demo or loaner equipment with an aggregate book value up to $1.0 million. The Loan Agreement requires us to observe a number of financial and operational covenants, including maintenance of a specified Liquidity Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement), protection and registration of intellectual property rights and customary negative covenants. If any event of default occurs SVB may declare due immediately all borrowings under the Credit Facility and foreclose on the collateral. Furthermore, an event of default under the Credit Facility would result in an increase in the interest rate on any amounts outstanding. As of December 31, 2019, there were no events of default on the Credit Facility.
Interest expense, net for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
Table:
 | Years ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Interest expense on Term Loans | $8,073 | $101,087
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 5,685 | 16,308
Other interest expense  | 2,120 | 6,949
Total interest expense, net | $15,878 | $124,344


Question: What was the Total interest expense, net in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: $15,878, $124,344