hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in thousands )
2009 | $ 32452
2010 | 35138
2011 | 50421
2012 | 39067
2013 | 26301
years thereafter | 137858
total | 321237
less : amount representing interest | 73512
present value of net minimum lease payments | $ 247725
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf .
the leases expire in 2015 .
under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases .
at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate .
in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf .
the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: not including years 'thereafter' , what is the total lease payments ? ( in $ thousands )
Answer: 183379
Calculation: subtract(321237, 137858)
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis at December 31,
2019:
The carrying amount of money market funds approximates fair value as of each reporting date because of the short maturity of those
instruments.
The Company did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that were recognized or disclosed at fair value as of
December 31, 2019.
Table:
 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3
 | (In thousands) |  | 
Assets |  |  | 
Cash equivalents: Money market funds | $256,915 | $ - | $ -
Other current assets: |  |  | 
Indemnification - Sale of SSL | $ - | $ - | $ 598
Liabilities |  |  | 
Long term liabilities: |  |  | 
Indemnification - Globalstar do Brasil S.A. | $ - | $ - | $145


Question: What is the company's net assets measured at fair value as at December 31, 2019?
Answer: 257368
Calculation: $256,915 + $598 - $145
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

Table:
 | 2012 | 2011
statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes | 35% ( 35 % ) | 35% ( 35 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 18 | 6
change in permanent reinvestment assertion | 2014 | 5
adjustments to valuation allowances | 21 | 14
tax law changes | 2014 | 1
effective income tax rate on continuing operations | 74% ( 74 % ) | 61% ( 61 % )
the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income .
the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments .
the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below .
effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent .
change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s .
tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations .
offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million .
in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s .
tax on previously undistributed earnings .
adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s .
benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes .
discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: by what percentage did adjustments to valuation allowances increase from 2011 to 2012>
Answer: 50%
Calculation: subtract(21, 14), divide(#0, 14)
During the period 5.0 million (2017/18: 5.0 million) options were granted under the Sharesave Plan, with a weighted average exercise price at the date of exercise of 30 pence per ordinary share (2017/18: 33 pence).
The options outstanding at 30 March 2019 had a weighted average exercise price of 32 pence (2017/18: 33 pence), and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.6 years (2017/18: 1.6 years).
In 2018/19, the Group recognised an expense of £2.1m (2017/18: £2.8m), related to all equity-settled share-based payment transactions.
Premier Foods plc Sharesave Plan
Table:
 | 2018/19 |  | 2017/18 | 
 |  | Weighted average exercise price |  | Weighted average exercise price
 | Options | (p) | Options | (p)
Outstanding at the beginning of the period | 17,835,628 | 33 | 20,231,334 | 35
Exercised during the period | (4,306,470) | 32 | (3,536,539) | 34
Granted during the period | 5,022,240 | 30 | 4,988,669 | 33
Forfeited/lapsed during the period | (2,447,511) | 33 | (3,847,836) | 44
Outstanding at the end of the period | 16,103,887 | 32 | 17,835,628 | 33
Exercisable at the end of the period | 2,673,154 | 32 | 792,451 | 35


Question: What was the change in the Outstanding at the beginning of the period for options from 2017/18 to 2018/19?
Answer: -2395706
Calculation: 17,835,628 - 20,231,334
Note: 1 See “Alternative performance measures” on page 231 for further details and reconciliations to the respective closest equivalent GAAP measure.
The Group’s adjusted effective tax rate for its controlled businesses for the year ended 31 March 2019 was 24.4% compared to 20.6% for the last financial year. The higher rate in the current year is primarily due to a change in the mix of the Group’s profit, driven by the financing for the Liberty Global transaction. The tax rate in the prior year also reflected the consequences of closing tax audits in Germany and Romania. We expect the Group’s adjusted effective tax rate to remain in the low-mid twenties range for the medium term.
The Group’s adjusted effective tax rate for both years does not include the following items: the derecognition of a deferred tax asset in Spain of €1,166 million (2018: €nil); deferred tax on the use of Luxembourg losses of €320 million (2018: €304 million); an increase in the deferred tax asset of €488 million (2018: €330 million) arising from a revaluation of investments based upon the local GAAP financial statements and tax returns.
The Group’s adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended 31 March 2018 does not include the recognition of a deferred tax asset of €1,603 million due to higher interest rates; and a tax charge in respect of capital gains on the transfer of share in Vodafone Kenya Limited to the Vodacom Group of €110 million.
Table:
Taxation |  | 
 | 2019 €m | 2018 €m
Income tax (expense)/credit: | (1,496) | 879
Tax on adjustments to derive adjusted profit before tax | (206) | (188)
Deferred tax following revaluation of investments in Luxembourg | (488) | (330)
Luxembourg deferred tax asset recognised | – | (1,603)
Deferred tax on use of Luxembourg losses in the year | 320 | 304
Tax on the Safaricom transaction | – | 110
Derecognition of a deferred tax asset in Spain | 1,166 | –
Adjusted income tax expense for calculating adjusted tax rate1 | (704) | (828)
Loss)/profit before tax | (2,613) | 3,878
Adjustments to derive adjusted profit before tax (see earnings per share) | 5,149 | 530
Adjusted profit before tax1 | 2,536 | 4,408
Share of adjusted results in associates and joint ventures | 348 | (389)
Adjusted profit before tax for calculating adjusted effective tax rate | 2,884 | 4,019
Adjusted effective tax rate1 | 24.4% | 20.6%


Question: How much is the income tax expense/credit in 2019?
Answer: (1,496)
GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 18. Quarterly Consolidated Results of Operations Data (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth our quarterly consolidated results of operations data for each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2019. GS Holdings is our predecessor for accounting purposes and, accordingly, amounts prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO represent the historical consolidated operations of GS Holdings and its subsidiaries. The amounts during the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018 represent those of consolidated GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock is applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period following the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. Prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO, GreenSky, Inc. did not engage in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and initial capitalization. See Note 1 for further information on our organization and see Note 2 for further information on our earnings per share.
(1) Year-to-date results may not agree to the sum of individual quarterly results due to rounding.
Table:
 |  |  | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |  | 
 | First
Quarter | Second
Quarter | Third Quarter | Fourth
Quarter | Total
Total revenue | $85,326 | $105,704 | $113,912 | $109,731 | $414,673
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation
and amortization) | 36,130 | 33,765 | 35,374 | 55,170 | 160,439
Total costs and expenses | 61,749 | 58,896 | 59,655 | 81,583 | 261,883
Operating profit | 23,577 | 46,808 | 54,257 | 28,148 | 152,790
Total other income (expense), net | (4,973) | (4,398) | (5,170) | (4,735) | (19,276)
Income before income tax expense (benefit) | 18,604 | 42,410 | 49,087 | 23,413 | 133,514
Net income | 18,604 | 40,816 | 45,712 | 22,848 | 127,980
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests | 18,604 | 35,266 | 33,711 | 16,143 | 103,724
Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | N/A | 5,550 | 12,001 | 6,705 | 24,256
Earnings per share of Class A common stock: |  |  |  |  | 
Basic | N/A | $0.10 | $0.21 | $0.12 | $0.43
Diluted(1) | N/A | $0.09 | $0.20 | $0.11 | $0.41


Question: What was the cost of revenue in the fourth quarter?
Answer: 55,170
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located in Culver City, California, where we occupy facilities totaling approximately 8,000 square feet on a monthto-month basis pursuant to a Shared Services Agreement with NantWorks. We use these facilities for administration, sales and marketing, research and development, engineering, client support, and professional services. In addition, we have 5 U.S. locations across four states and one international location. Our key facilities include the following:
United States
Boston, Massachusetts
Panama City, Florida
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Phoenix, Arizona
International
◦ Belfast, Northern Ireland
Note that on February 3, 2020, the Company completed the sale of its Connected Care business which includes the Panama City, Florida property.
We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our needs in the near term, and that, if needed, suitable additional space will be available to accommodate any expansion of our operations.
The following table outlines our facilities location, square footage, and use:
Table:
City | State | Country | Sq ft | Type | Business Nature/Use
Boston | MA | USA | 31,752 | Lease | Administrative, sales, client support, R&D, engineering, professional services
Panama City | FL | USA | 51,288 | Lease | Administrative, sales, client support, R&D, engineering, professional services
Belfast | NI | UK | 15,500 | Lease | R&D, engineering, administrative
Phoenix | AZ | USA | 4,865 | Lease | Data Centre
Philadelphia | PA | USA | 14,183 | Lease | Administrative, sales, client support, R&D, engineering, professional services
 |  |  | 117,588 |  | 


Question: Where is the company's corporate headquarters located?
Answer: Culver City, California
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
13. INCOME TAXES
Beginning in the taxable year ended December 31, 2012, the Company has filed, and intends to continue to file, U.S. federal income tax returns as a REIT, and its domestic TRSs filed, and intend to continue to file, separate tax returns as required. The Company also files tax returns in various states and countries. The Company’s state tax returns reflect different combinations of the Company’s subsidiaries and are dependent on the connection each subsidiary has with a particular state and form of organization. The following information pertains to the Company’s income taxes on a consolidated basis.
The income tax provision from continuing operations consisted of the following:
The effective tax rate (“ETR”) on income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the Company’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, as well as adjustments for state and foreign items. As a REIT, the Company may deduct earnings distributed to stockholders against the income generated by its REIT operations. In addition, the Company is able to offset certain income by utilizing its NOLs, subject to specified limitations.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Current: |  |  | 
Federal | $(1.7) | $(1.4) | $(0.1)
State | (5.0) | (1.8) | (3.8)
Foreign | (48.2) | (189.7) | (113.4)
Deferred: |  |  | 
Federal | 1.4 | 4.0 | 0.2
State | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.0
Foreign | 53.2 | 298.3 | 85.4
Income tax benefit (provision) | $0.2 | $110.1 | $(30.7)


Question: What was the deferred Federal Income tax benefit (provision) in 2017?
Answer: 0.2
Gross Profit and Gross Margin (exclusive of amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets described below)
Our gross profit by reportable segment was as follows (dollars in millions):
(1) Certain of the amounts may not total due to rounding of individual amounts. (2) Unallocated manufacturing costs are presented as a percentage of total revenue (includes expensing of the fair market value step-up of inventory of $19.6 million during 2019 and $1.0 million during 2018).
The decrease in gross profit of $265.1 million, or approximately 12%, was primarily due to the impact of the decrease in sales volume, higher fixed costs due to the expansion in our manufacturing capacity as well as the expensing of $19.6 million excess over book value of inventory, commonly referred to as the fair market value step-up, from the Quantenna acquisition.
Gross margin decreased to 35.8% during 2019 compared to 38.1% during 2018. The decrease was due to a competitive pricing environment resulting in a decline in average selling prices, higher demand for lower margin products, increased manufacturing costs due to a higher mix of external manufacturing and decreased demand for our products, as explained in the revenue section.
Table:
 | 2019 | As a % of Segment Revenue (1) | 2018 | As a % of Segment Revenue (1)
PSG | $976.0 | 35.0 % | $ 1,110.1 | 36.5 %
ASG | 794.8 | 40.3 % | 878.3 | 42.4 %
ISG | 275.4 | 36.4 % | 317.1 | 41.2 %
Gross profit for all segments | $ 2,046.2 |  | $ 2,305.5 | 
Unallocated manufacturing costs (2) | (72.6) | (1.3) % | (66.8) | (1.1) %
Total gross profit | $ 1,973.6 | 35.8 % | $ 2,238.7 | 38.1 %


Question: What is the change in gross profit from PSG from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -134.1
Calculation: 976.0-1,110.1
Periodic Benefit Costs The aggregate net pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations were costs of $6.5 million and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (in millions):
Of the amounts presented above, income of $1.4 million has been included in cost of revenue and loss of $7.9 million included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2019, and income of $2.1 million has been included in cost of revenue and loss of $6.7 million included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Table:
 | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Service cost—benefits earning during the period | $- | $-
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 5.3 | 5.3
Expected return on assets | (6.7) | (7.5)
Actuarial (gain) loss | 7.9 | 6.7
Foreign currency gain (loss) | - | 0.1
Net pension (benefit) cost | $ 6.5 | $ 4.6


Question: What is the average actuarial (gain) loss?
Answer: 7.3
Calculation: (7.9 + 6.7) / 2
Our product categories are:
Drinkable Kefir, sold in a variety of organic and non-organic sizes, flavors, and types, including low fat, non-fat, whole milk, protein, and BioKefir (a 3.5 oz. kefir with additional probiotic cultures).
European-style soft cheeses, including farmer cheese in resealable cups.
Cream and other, which consists primarily of cream, a byproduct of making our kefir.
ProBugs, a line of kefir products designed for children.
Other Dairy, which includes Cupped Kefir and Icelandic Skyr, a line of strained kefir and yogurt products in resealable cups.
Frozen Kefir, available in soft serve and pint-size containers.
Lifeway has determined that it has one reportable segment based on how our chief operating decision maker manages the business and in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing our performance, has been identified collectively as the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Executive Officer, and Chairperson of the board of directors. Substantially all of our consolidated revenues relate to the sale of cultured dairy products that we produce using the same processes and materials and are sold to consumers through a common network of distributors and retailers in the United States.
Net sales of products by category were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(a) Includes Lifeway Kefir Shop sales
Significant Customers – Sales are predominately to companies in the retail food industry located within the United States. Two major customers accounted for approximately 22% and 21% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Two major customers accounted for approximately 17% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Our ten largest customers as a group accounted for approximately 57% and 59% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
 |  | 2019 |  | 2018
In thousands | $ | % | $ | %
Drinkable Kefir other than ProBugs | $ 71,822 | 77% | $ 78,523 | 76%
Cheese | 11,459 | 12% | 11,486 | 11%
Cream and other | 4,228 | 4% | 5,276 | 5%
ProBugs Kefir | 2,780 | 3% | 2,795 | 3%
Other dairy | 1,756 | 2% | 3,836 | 4%
Frozen Kefir (a) | 1,617 | 2% | 1,434 | 1%
Net Sales | $ 93,662 | 100% | $ 103,350 | 100%


Question: What is net sales from cream and other in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
Answer: 5,276, 4,228
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data set forth below was derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical results of operations are not indicative of our future results of operations.
(2) Fiscal 2018 and 2017 have been adjusted for our retrospective adoption of the new accounting standard Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). Refer to Note 7 – Revenue of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details.
Table:
 | April 26, 2019 | April 27, 2018 (2) | April 28, 2017 (2) | April 29, 2016 | April 24, 2015
 |  |  |  | (In millions) | 
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments | $ 3,899 | $ 5,391 | $ 4,921 | $ 5,303 | $ 5,326
Working capital | $ 1,743 | $ 3,421 | $ 2,178 | $ 2,786 | $ 4,064
Total assets | $ 8,741 | $ 9,991 | $ 9,562 | $ 10,037 | $ 9,401
Total debt | $ 1,793 | $ 1,926 | $ 1,993 | $ 2,339 | $ 1,487
Total deferred revenue and financed unearned services revenue | $ 3,668 | $ 3,363 | $ 3,213 | $ 3,385 | $ 3,197
Total stockholders' equity | $ 1,090 | $ 2,276 | $ 2,949 | $ 2,881 | $ 3,414


Question: What was the change in working capital between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: -1278
Calculation: 2,786-4,064