hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Net Profit After Tax
Net profit after tax increased by 41.1% to US$52.9 million from US$37.5 million in the previous year.
The effective tax rate for the year was 8% (2018: 6%). This reflects the tax utilisation of the deferred tax asset recognised as a result of both temporary differences arising on relocation of Altium’s core business assets to the USA. Altium will continue to utilize the tax benefits and re-evaluate the valuation of the deferred tax asset on an annual basis.
For more details on revenue, refer to Note 3 of the annual report.
Table:
 |  | Consolidated | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | Change
Product Revenue | US$’000 | US$’000 | %
Altium Designer software licenses | 62,377 | 51,309 | 22%
Altium Designer subscriptions | 58,468 | 51,522 | 13%
Octopart search advertising | 17,940 | 11,968 | 50%
TASKING software licenses | 12,293 | 8,526 | 44%
TASKING maintenance | 5,741 | 4,709 | 22%
Altium Nexus | 6,635 | 4,848 | 37%
Service revenue | 3,655 | 4,833 | (25%)
Other | 4,710 | 2,461 | 91%
Total Product Revenue | 171,819 | 140,176 | 23%


Question: What is the percentage change in the total product revenue from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 23%
18. Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists of the following:
Table:
 |  | Years Ended June 30, | 
($ in millions) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Unrealized gains on company owned life insurance contracts and investments held in rabbi trusts | $0.8 | $1.5 | $1.7
Interest income | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3
Foreign exchange | (0.4) | (0.7) | (0.4)
Pension earnings, interest and deferrals | (0.1) | (2.1) | (23.8)
Pension curtailment | — | — | (0.5)
Other | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2
Total other income (expense), net | $0.6 | $(0.8) | $(21.5)


Question: What was the Total other income (expense), net in 2018?
Answer: $(0.8)
In fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company recorded charges of $5.1 million, $3.4 million, and $1.2 million, respectively, reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability.
The Company recorded an expense of $0.3 million (primarily within restructuring activities), $0.6 million (primarily within restructuring activities), and $4.0 million ($2.1 million was recorded in discontinued operations and $1.9 million was recorded in restructuring activities) during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, related to our expected incurrence of certain multi-employer plan withdrawal costs.
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) were:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Table:
 | Pension Benefits |  | Other Benefits | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018
Net actuarial gain (loss) | $(72.1) | $120.0 | $25.1 | $16.8
Amendments | (1.4) | (0.6) | 0.8 | 17.2
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) . | 3.1 | 2.9 | (2.2) | (3.4)
Settlement and curtailment loss (gain) . | — | 2.0 | (1.6) | —
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) | 5.1 | 3.4 | (1.4) | —
Net amount recognized . | $(65.3) | $127.7 | $20.7 | $30.6


Question: How much were the charges of the year-end write-off of actuarial losses during fiscal 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively?
Answer: $1.2 million, $3.4 million, $5.1 million
(c) Allowance for Credit Loss Rollforward
The allowances for credit loss and the related financing receivables are summarized as follows (in millions):
Table:
 |  |  | CREDIT LOSS ALLOWANCES | 
 | Lease Receivables | Loan Receivables | Financed Service Contracts | Total
Allowance for credit loss as of July 28, 2018 | $135 | $60 | $10 | $205
Provisions (benefits) | (54) | 11 | 27 | (16)
Recoveries (write-offs), net | (14) | — | (28) | (42)
Foreign exchange and other | (21) | — | — | (21)
Allowance for credit loss as of July 27, 2019 | $46 | $71 | $9 | $126


Question: What was the allowance for credit loss for financed service contracts as a percentage of total allowance for credit loss in 2018?
Answer: 4.88
Calculation: 10/205
Our product categories are:
Drinkable Kefir, sold in a variety of organic and non-organic sizes, flavors, and types, including low fat, non-fat, whole milk, protein, and BioKefir (a 3.5 oz. kefir with additional probiotic cultures).
European-style soft cheeses, including farmer cheese in resealable cups.
Cream and other, which consists primarily of cream, a byproduct of making our kefir.
ProBugs, a line of kefir products designed for children.
Other Dairy, which includes Cupped Kefir and Icelandic Skyr, a line of strained kefir and yogurt products in resealable cups.
Frozen Kefir, available in soft serve and pint-size containers.
Lifeway has determined that it has one reportable segment based on how our chief operating decision maker manages the business and in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing our performance, has been identified collectively as the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Executive Officer, and Chairperson of the board of directors. Substantially all of our consolidated revenues relate to the sale of cultured dairy products that we produce using the same processes and materials and are sold to consumers through a common network of distributors and retailers in the United States.
Net sales of products by category were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(a) Includes Lifeway Kefir Shop sales
Significant Customers – Sales are predominately to companies in the retail food industry located within the United States. Two major customers accounted for approximately 22% and 21% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Two major customers accounted for approximately 17% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Our ten largest customers as a group accounted for approximately 57% and 59% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
 |  | 2019 |  | 2018
In thousands | $ | % | $ | %
Drinkable Kefir other than ProBugs | $ 71,822 | 77% | $ 78,523 | 76%
Cheese | 11,459 | 12% | 11,486 | 11%
Cream and other | 4,228 | 4% | 5,276 | 5%
ProBugs Kefir | 2,780 | 3% | 2,795 | 3%
Other dairy | 1,756 | 2% | 3,836 | 4%
Frozen Kefir (a) | 1,617 | 2% | 1,434 | 1%
Net Sales | $ 93,662 | 100% | $ 103,350 | 100%


Question: What is net sales from cheese in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
Answer: 11,486, 11,459
Cash Flows
The following table provides a summary of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (in millions):
Operating Activities
The $57.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2019 compared to 2018 is primarily related to the timing and amount of cash receipts for Trade receivables, net, higher payments primarily related to income taxes and incentive bonus, and the timing of payments for Trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities. The $84.4 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily related to increased earnings excluding the prior year effect of the Tax Reform Act and the timing and amount of cash receipts for Trade receivables, net.
Investing Activities
The $406.9 million increase in cash used in investing activities in 2019 compared to 2018 is primarily related to our D&B Investment and our acquisition of Compass Analytics. The $59.4 million increase in cash used in investing activities in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily related to the HeavyWater and Ernst acquisitions and higher capital expenditures in 2018.
Financing Activities
The $455.1 million increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2019 compared to 2018 is primarily related to an incremental borrowing to fund our D&B Investment as well as fewer share repurchases. The $96.8 million decrease in cash used in financing activities in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily related to tax distributions to BKFS LLC members and the senior notes redemption fee in 2017.
Table:
 | Year ended December 31, |  |  | Variance | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 v. 2018 | 2018 v. 2017
Cash flows provided by operating activities | $378.3 | $435.5 | $351.1 | $(57.2) | $84.4
Cash flows used in investing activities | (551.0) | (144.1) | (84.7) | (406.9) | (59.4)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities | 167.8 | (287.3) | (384.1) | 455.1 | 96.8
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | $(4.9) | $4.1 | $(117.7) | $(9.0) | $121.8


Question: What was the change in operating activities between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: (57.2)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents increased to $93,628 at June 30, 2019 from $31,440 at June 30, 2018. Cash at the end of fiscal 2018 was lower due primarily to the acquisition of Ensenta and higher repayment of debt in fiscal 2018.
The following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows:
Cash provided by operating activities increased 5% compared to fiscal 2018. Cash from operations is primarily used to repay debt, pay dividends and repurchase stock, and for capital expenditures.
Table:
 | Year Ended | 
 | June 30 | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Net income | $271,885 | $365,034
Non-cash expenses | 180,987 | 87,906
Change in receivables | (11,777) | 21,489
Change in deferred revenue | 23,656 | 1,255
Change in other assets and liabilities | (33,623) | (63,542)
Net cash provided by operating activities | $431,128 | $412,142


Question: What is the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 18986
Calculation: $431,128-$412,142
Segment Product Revenue, Operating Income and Operating Income as a Percentage of Revenue
Infrastructure and Defense Products
IDP revenue increased $104.2 million, or 13.2%, in fiscal 2019, compared to fiscal 2018, primarily due to higher demand for our base station products.
IDP operating income increased $31.6 million, or 13.4%, in fiscal 2019, compared to fiscal 2018, primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by lower gross margin (which was negatively impacted by lower factory utilization).
See Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a reconciliation of segment operating income to the consolidated operating income for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Table:
Fiscal Year |  | 
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2019 | 2018
Revenue | $892,665 | $788,495
Operating income | $267,304 | $235,719
Operating income as a % of revenue | 29.9% | 29.9%


Question: What is the percentage change in the 2018 and 2019 revenue?
Answer: 13.21
Calculation: (892,665 - 788,495)/788,495
Restricted Stock Units
Certain key employees have been granted time-based, performance-based and market-based restricted stock units. The time-based restricted stock units granted generally vest on a graded vesting schedule over three years. The performance-based restricted stock units generally vest on a cliff vesting schedule over three years and up to a maximum of 150%, depending on the specified performance condition and the level of achievement obtained. The performance-based restricted stock units have a vesting condition that is based upon the Company’s cumulative adjusted core earnings per share during the performance period. The market-based restricted stock units generally vest on a cliff vesting schedule over three years and up to a maximum of 200%, depending on the specified performance condition and the level of achievement obtained. The market-based restricted stock units have a vesting condition that is tied to the Company’s total shareholder return based on the Company’s stock performance in relation to the companies in the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) Super Composite Technology Hardware and Equipment Index excluding the Company.
On October 6, 2017, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the modification of vesting criteria for certain performance-based restricted stock units granted in fiscal year 2015. As a result of the modification, 0.8 million awards vested during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, which resulted in approximately $24.9 million of stock-based compensation expense recognized.
The following table summarizes restricted stock units activity from August 31, 2018 through August 31, 2019:
(1) For those shares granted that are based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, the amount represents the maximum number of shares that can vest. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019, the Company awarded approximately 1.6 million time-based restricted stock units, 0.4 million performance based restricted stock units and 0.4 million market-based restricted stock units based on target performance criteria.
Table:
 | Shares | Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding as of August 31, 2018 | 8,352,307 | $24.34
Changes during the period |  | 
Shares granted(1) | 3,144,205 | $25.25
Shares vested | (1,983,411) | $25.07
Shares forfeited | (2,347,628) | $24.78
Outstanding as of August 31, 2019 | 7,165,473 | $26.27


Question: What was the percentage change in the number of shares between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -14.21
Calculation: (7,165,473-8,352,307)/8,352,307
Note 9. Intangible Assets, net
The Company’s definite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets is provided over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis or the pattern in which economic benefits are consumed, if reliably determinable. The Company reviews its definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Amortization expense from continuing and discontinued operations was $8,879 and $9,150 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively
Table:
December 31, 2019 |  |  |  | 
 | Customer Relationships | Developed Technologies | Trade Name | Total
Gross carrying amount | $52,000 | 32,000 | 3,000 | 87,000
Accumulated amortization | (13,866) | (18,286) | (3,000) | (35,152)
Intangible assets, net | $38,134 | $13,714 | $— | $51,848


Question: What is the value of the Trade Name as a percentage of the total gross carrying amount in 2019?
Answer: 3.45
Calculation: 3,000/87,000
NOTE 22. INCOME TAXES
Amounts recognized in profit or loss
The income tax expense consists of:
Table:
 | Year ended December 31, | 
 | 2018 | 2019
Current: |  | 
The Netherlands | (4,128) | (28,409)
Other countries | (6,374) | (9,011)
 | (10,502) | (37,420)
Deferred: |  | 
The Netherlands | 1,944 | (6,860)
Other countries | (6,878) | (9,370)
Income tax expense | (15,436) | (53,650)


Question: What is the Current income tax expense for The Netherlands expressed as a percentage of Total income tax expense?
Answer: 52.95
Calculation: -28,409/-53,650
The table below presents estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Messrs. Lien, Walcott and Bertz, assuming their respective qualifying terminations as of December 31, 2019. As a condition of receiving any severance benefits in connection with the change in control agreements, each named executive officer must execute a full waiver and release of all claims in our favor. In addition to the benefits described in the tables below, upon termination of employment each executive officer may be eligible for other benefits that are generally available to all salaried employees, such as life insurance, long-term disability, and 401(k) benefits.
(1) Mr. Lien would receive 18 months of base salary and 150% of his annual target bonus. Mr. Walcott would receive 12 months of base salary and 100% of his annual target bonus. Mr. Bertz would receive six months of base salary, 50% of his annual target bonus and the pro rata portion of his unpaid annual target bonus for the period of completed service.
(2) Mr. Lien would receive 18 months of COBRA benefits reimbursement and Mr. Bertz would receive six months of COBRA benefits reimbursement. Mr. Walcott elected not to receive benefits from the Company that would be eligible for continuation under COBRA. As a result, Mr. Walcott would not be eligible for post-termination COBRA benefits reimbursement.
(3) As of December 31, 2019, Mr. Walcott held a stock option with 13,006 unvested shares subject to such option with an exercise price of $17.15 per share. The exercise price of each of these stock options is greater than $1.38, the closing price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, Mr. Walcott had 78,750 unvested RSUs and Mr. Bertz had 40,000 unvested RSUs.
(4) Mr. Lien would receive nine months of base salary and 75% of his annual target bonus; Mr. Walcott would receive six months of base salary and 50% of his target bonus; Mr. Bertz would receive three months of base salary and 25% of his target bonus.
(5) Mr. Lien would receive nine months of COBRA benefits reimbursement and Mr. Bertz would receive three months of COBRA benefits reimbursement. Mr. Walcott elected not to receive benefits from the Company that would be eligible for continuation under COBRA. As a result, Mr. Walcott would not be eligible for post-termination COBRA benefits reimbursement.
Table:
 | Chris Lien | Wister Walcott | Robert Bertz
Termination after Change of Control: |  |  | 
Cash Severance(1) | $1,200,000 | $450,000 | $254,063
Post-termination COBRA Reimbursement(2) | 48,160 | — | 11,098
Acceleration of Stock Options and RSUs(3) | — | 108,675 | 55,200
Total | $1,248,160 | $558,675 | $320,361
Termination not in connection with Change of Control: |  |  | 
Cash Severance(4) | $600,000 | $225,000 | $103,125
Post-termination COBRA Reimbursement(5) | 24,080 | — | 5,549
Total | $624,080 | $225,000 | $108,674


Question: Under termination after Change of Control, what is the average value of Chris Lien's and Robert Bertz's post-termination COBRA Reimbursement?
Answer: 29629
Calculation: (48,160 +  11,098)/2
Financial Results and Key Performance Metrics Overview
The following table provides an overview of some of our key financial metrics for each of the last three fiscal years (in millions, except per share amounts, percentages and cash conversion cycle):
• Net revenues: Our net revenues increased 4% in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018. This was primarily due to an increase of 7% in product revenues, partially offset by a 3% decrease in software and hardware maintenance and other services revenues.
• Gross profit margin percentage: Our gross profit margin as a percentage of net revenues increased by one percentage point in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, reflecting an increase in gross profit margin on product revenues, and, to a lesser extent, an increase in gross profit margin on hardware maintenance and other services revenues.
• Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues: Our income from operations as a percentage of net revenues remained relatively flat in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018.
• Provision for income taxes: Our provision for income taxes decreased significantly in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 as significant charges were recorded in fiscal 2018 in connection with U.S. tax reform.
• Net income and Diluted income per share: The increase in both net income and diluted net income per share in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 reflect the factors discussed above. Diluted net income per share was favorably impacted by a 6% decrease in the annual weighted average number of dilutive shares, primarily due to share repurchases.
• Operating cash flows: Operating cash flows decreased by 9% in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, reflecting changes in operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by higher net income.
Table:
 |  |  | Year Ended
 | April 26, 2019 | April 27, 2018 | April 28, 2017
Net revenues | $ 6,146 | $ 5,919 | $ 5,491
Gross profit | $ 3,945 | $ 3,709 | $ 3,364
Gross profit margin percentage | 64 % | 63% | 61 %
Income from operations | $ 1,221 | $ 1,158 | $ 621
Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues | 20% | 20% | 11 %
Provision for income taxes | $ 99 | $ 1,083 | $ 140
Net income | $ 1,169 | $ 116 | $ 481
Diluted net income per share | $ 4.51 | $ 0.42 | $ 1.71
Operating cash flows | $ 1,341 | $ 1,478 | $ 986


Question: Which years does the table provide information for some of the company's key financial metrics?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017
Contractual Obligations
Our principal commitments consist of obligations for outstanding debt, leases for our office space, contractual commitments for professional service projects, and third-party consulting firms. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
Table:
 |  |  | Payment Due by period |  | 
 | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | More than 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations including interest | $334,500 | $17,250 | $317,250 | $— | $—
Operating lease obligations | 82,895 | 9,434 | 47,410 | 15,226 | 10,825
Software subscription and other contractual obligations | 18,726 | 12,371 | 6,355 | — | —
 | $436,121 | $39,055 | $371,015 | $15,226 | $10,825


Question: What is the percentage of the total obligations that consists of payments due in 1-3 years?
Answer: 85.07
Calculation: (371,015/436,121)
The following table years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 related to the Company’s PSU awards, SLO awards and restricted stock awards.
(1) On May 18, 2017, The Organization and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (“O&C Committee”) approved a change in the vesting policy regarding the existing 2017 Three-year PSU Awards and 2016 Three-year PSU Awards for Ilham Kadri. The approved change resulted in a pro-rata share of vesting calculated on the close date of the sale of Diversey. Dr. Kadri’s awards were still subject to the performance metrics stipulated in the plan documents, and will be paid out in accordance with the original planned timing.
(2) The amount does not include expense related to the 2014 Special PSU awards that were settled in cash of $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2017.
(3) The amount includes the expenses associated with the restricted stock awards consisting of restricted stock shares, restricted stock units and cash-settled restricted stock unit awards.
(4) On August 4, 2017, the Equity Award Committee approved a change in the vesting condition regarding the existing long-term share-based compensation programs transferring to Diversey as part of the sale of Diversey. The approved change resulted in a pro-rata share of vesting calculated on the close date of the sale of Diversey. In December 2018, the Equity Award Committee approved a change in the vesting condition for certain individuals who would be leaving the Company under a phase of our Reinvent SEE Restructuring program. For both modifications, we recorded the cumulative expense of the higher fair value of the impacted awards at modification approval.
(5) The amounts do not include the expense related to our U.S. profit sharing contributions made in the form of our common stock as these contributions are not considered share-based incentive compensation.
Table:
(In millions) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
2019 Three-year PSU Awards | $ 4.3 | $ — | $ —
2018 Three-year PSU Awards | 0.2 | 2.7 | —
2017 Three-year PSU Awards(1) | — | 3.7 | 9.8
2017 COO and Chief Executive Officer-Designate 2017 New Hire Equity Awards | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1
2016 Three-year PSU Awards(1) | — | (3.0 ) | 2.0
2016 President & CEO Inducement Award | — | — | 0.5
2015 Three-year PSU Awards | — | — | (0.8)
2014 Special PSU Awards(2) | — | — | 3.2
SLO Awards | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.1
Other long-term share-based incentive compensation programs(3)(4) | 26.5 | 24.7 | 32.6
Total share-based incentive compensation expense(5) | $ 34.4 | $ 29.9 | $ 48.5
Associated tax benefits recognized | $ 5.8 | $ 4.9 | $ 11.8


Question: What is the sum of Three-year PSU awards for all years as of 2019?
Answer: 4.5
Calculation: 4.3+0.2