hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
12. Geographic Information
The following table depicts the disaggregation of revenue by geographic region based on the ship to location of our customers and is consistent with how we evaluate our financial performance (in thousands)
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Americas | $89,944 | $112,506 | $122,893
Japan | 59,454 | 55,205 | 51,488
Asia Pacific, excluding Japan | 35,689 | 36,897 | 33,189
EMEA | 27,541 | 27,615 | 27,859
Total | $212,628 | $232,223 | $235,429


Question: What is the change in total revenue between 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -8.44
Calculation: ($212,628 - $232,223)/$232,223
2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue | $ 696.3
retail electric price | 12.9
volume/weather | 4.7
net wholesale revenue | -2.4 ( 2.4 )
reserve equalization | -2.8 ( 2.8 )
other | -3.3 ( 3.3 )
2016 net revenue | $ 705.4
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales .
the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry .
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 .
the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november other income statement variances 2017 compared to 2016 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 12 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs and a lower scope of work done during plant outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 3.6 million in storm damage provisions .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion on storm cost recovery .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 4.8 million in energy efficiency costs and an increase of $ 2.7 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to higher incentive-based compensation accruals in 2017 as compared to the prior year .
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Question: in 2016 what was the percentage change in net revenue
Answer: 1.3%
Calculation: subtract(705.4, 696.3), divide(#0, 696.3)
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognized total stock-based compensation cost related to equity incentive awards as follows (in thousands):
A small portion of stock-based compensation cost above is capitalized in accordance with the accounting guidance for internal-use software. The Company uses the straight-line attribution method for recognizing stock-based compensation expense.
Table:
 |  | For the Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Stock-based compensation cost: |  |  | 
Common stock warrants | $— | $512 | $484
Stock options | 16,489 | 13,279 | 11,295
Restricted stock units | 14,585 | 90 | —
Employee stock purchase plan | 3,326 | 2,069 | —
Total stock-based compensation cost | $34,400 | $15,950 | $11,779


Question: What is the percentage change in total stock based compensation cost between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 115.67
Calculation: (34,400 - 15,950)/15,950
NOTE 2 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding stock options and stock awards.
The components of basic and diluted EPS were as follows:
Anti-dilutive stock-based awards excluded from the calculations of diluted EPS were immaterial during the periods presented.
Table:
(In millions, except earnings per share) |  |  | 
Year Ended June 30, | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Net income available for common shareholders (A) | $  39,240 | $  16,571 | $  25,489
Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock (B) | 7,673 | 7,700 | 7,746
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards | 80 | 94 | 86
Common stock and common stock equivalents (C) | 7,753 | 7,794 | 7,832
Earnings Per Share |  |  | 
Basic (A/B) | $ 5.11 | $ 2.15 | $ 3.29
Diluted (A/C) | $ 5.06 | $ 2.13 | $ 3.25


Question: What was the % change in the common stock and stock equivalents from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -0.53
Calculation: (7,753-7,794)/7,794
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

Table:
2016 | $ 76676
2017 | 75874
2018 | 75849
2019 | 50320
2020 | 48000
thereafter | 64000
total minimum lease payments | 390719
less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments | -186742 ( 186742 )
net minimum lease payments | 203977
less : amount representing interest | -37485 ( 37485 )
present value of net minimum lease payments | 166492
less : current portion | -30849 ( 30849 )
long-term portion of capital lease obligations | $ 135643
the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2015 is included in the commitments table in note 15 .
11 .
income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .
deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .
we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .
determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .
we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .
the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .
tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .
as of december 31 , 2015 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 39 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes , which are partially offset by a valuation allowance .
the state nols begin to expire in the year 2017 .
in addition , there are $ 61 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance .
the state credit carryforwards began to expire in .

Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?
Answer: 16%
Calculation: divide(64000, 390719)
Deferred commissions
As a result of our adoption of ASC 606, we capitalize sales commissions that are incremental direct costs of obtaining customer contracts for which revenue is not immediately recognized. We then amortize capitalized commissions based on the transfer of goods or services to which they relate. The following tables summarize the activity related to deferred commissions and their balances as reported in our consolidated balance sheets (in millions):
Table:
 |  | Year Ended
 | April 26, 2019 | April 27, 2018
Other current assets | $ 75 | $ 66
Other non-current assets | 97 | 71
Total deferred commissions | $ 172 | $ 137


Question: Why did the company capitalize sales commissions that are incremental direct costs of obtaining customer contracts for which revenue is not immediately recognized?
Answer: a result of our adoption of ASC 606
Operating Income
Our operating income in fiscal year 2018 increased to $189.3 million, or 8.8 percent of net sales as compared with $121.5 million, or 6.8 percent in net sales in fiscal year 2017. Excluding surcharge revenue and special items, adjusted operating margin was 10.6 percent for the fiscal year 2018 and 8.0 percent for fiscal year 2017. The increase in the operating margin reflects the stronger demand and improved product mix coupled with operating cost improvements partially offset by higher variable compensation expense compared to fiscal year 2017.
Operating income has been impacted by special items. The following presents our operating income and operating margin, in each case excluding the impact of surcharge on net sales and the loss on divestiture of business. We present and discuss these financial measures because management believes removing the impact of these items provides a more consistent and meaningful basis for comparing results of operations from period to period. See the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for further discussion of these financial measures.
Table:
 | Fiscal Year | 
($ in millions) | 2018 | 2017
Net sales | $2,157.7 | $1,797.6
Less: surcharge revenue | 365.4 | 239.2
Net sales excluding surcharge revenue | $1,792.3 | $1,558.4
Operating income | $189.3 | $121.5
Special items: |  | 
Loss on divestiture of business | — | 3.2
Adjusted operating income excluding special items | $189.3 | $124.7
Operating margin | 8.8% | 6.8%
Adjusted operating margin excluding surcharge revenue and special items | 10.6% | 8.0%


Question: In which year was the operating margin larger?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: 8.8%>6.8%
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost. The following is a summary of property and equipment as of September 30, 2019 and 2018(amounts shown in thousands):
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to ten
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the assets. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment totaled $1.4 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations. Total repairs and maintenance expenses were $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Property and equipment—at cost: |  | 
Leasehold improvements | $3,575 | $3,825
Equipment | 3,041 | 2,604
Capitalized internal-use software development costs | 1,088 | 916
Furniture and fixtures | 526 | 425
 | 8,230 | 7,770
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (3,999) | (3,105)
Total property and equipment, net | $4,231 | $4,665


Question: What is the percentage change of net total property and equipment from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -9.3
Calculation: (4,231-4,665)/4,665
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .

Table:
 | 12/31/2002 | 12/31/2003 | 12/31/2004 | 12/31/2005 | 12/31/2006 | 12/31/2007
ventas | $ 100 | $ 206 | $ 270 | $ 331 | $ 457 | $ 512
nyse composite index | $ 100 | $ 132 | $ 151 | $ 166 | $ 200 | $ 217
all reit index | $ 100 | $ 138 | $ 181 | $ 196 | $ 262 | $ 215
healthcare reit index | $ 100 | $ 154 | $ 186 | $ 189 | $ 273 | $ 279
russell 1000 index | $ 100 | $ 130 | $ 145 | $ 154 | $ 178 | $ 188
ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the growth rate of reit index as of 12/31/2003
Answer: 38%
Calculation: subtract(138, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Item 2. PROPERTIES
We operate 31 distributions centers located in the United States and Canada totaling approximately 1.7 million square feet. We own a 59,500 square foot distribution center in Cincinnati, Ohio and a 10,000 square foot protein processing facility and distribution center in Chicago, Illinois. All of our other properties are leased. The following table sets forth our distribution, protein processing, corporate and other support facilities by state or province and their approximate aggregate square footage as of February 21, 2020 (1).
(1)  Excludes the impact of our recent acquisitions of Sid Wainer & Son and Cambridge Packing Co, Inc. more fully described in 'Management's Discussion and Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview and Recent Developments."
(2)  Represents our corporate headquarters in Ridgefield, Connecticut.
We consider our properties to be in good condition generally and believe our facilities are adequate for our operations and provide sufficient capacity to meet our anticipated requirements.
Table:
State / Province | Number of Facilities | Aggregate Size
California | 10 | 618,900
New York | 1 | 231,100
Texas | 3 | 214,300
Illinois | 3 | 144,200
Ohio | 2 | 120,400
Maryland | 3 | 115,300
Nevada | 1 | 74,000
Oregon | 1 | 55,500
Ontario | 1 | 51,300
Florida | 2 | 48,300
New Jersey | 1 | 38,400
Connecticut(2) | 1 | 29,200
British Columbia | 1 | 24,900
Alberta | 2 | 16,500
Arizona | 1 | 14,500
Washington | 1 | 10,500
Total | 34 | 1,807,300


Question: How many states have more than 5 facilities?
Answer: 1
Calculation: California
Note 9. Receivables, Net
Receivables, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Trade accounts receivable, current | $378,616 | $338,473
Income taxes receivable | 1,571 | 916
Other | 13,440 | 11,132
Receivables, gross | 393,627 | 350,521
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | 3,480 | 3,096
Receivables,net | $390,147 | $347,425
Allowance for doubtful accounts as a percent of trade accounts receivable, current | 0.9% | 0.9%


Question: What was the percentage change in Income taxes receivable in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 71.51
Calculation: (1,571-916)/916
Other non-current assets
Other non-current assets consisted of the following:
* As adjusted to reflect the impact of the full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15. See Note 2 for further details.
As of June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Group had certificates of deposit and time deposits totaling $3.7 million and $3.7 million which were classified as long-term and were included in security deposits. Included in the Group’s other non-current assets balance as of June 30, 2019 and 2018 were $7.1 million and $6.6 million respectively, of restricted cash used for commitments of standby letters of credit related to facility leases and were not available for the Group’s use in its operations.
Table:
 | As of June 30, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | (U.S. $ in thousands) | 
 |  | *As Adjusted
Marketable equity securities | $58,932 | $—
Non-marketable equity securities | 3,000 | —
Security deposits | 5,010 | 5,248
Other | 9,703 | 8,218
 | $76,645 | $13,466


Question: What was the adjustment done to figures in 2018?
Answer: to reflect the impact of the full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15
Note 8 Income taxes
The following table shows the significant components of income taxes deducted from net earnings.
Table:
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | 2019 | 2018
Current taxes |  | 
Current taxes | (761) | (775)
Uncertain tax positions | 6 | 8
Change in estimate relating to prior periods | 22 | 12
Deferred taxes |  | 
Deferred taxes relating to the origination and reversal of temporary differences | (322) | (352)
Change in estimate relating to prior periods | (8) | 8
Recognition and utilization of loss carryforwards | (106) | 44
Effect of change in provincial corporate tax rate | 27 | –
Uncertain tax positions | 9 | 60
Total income taxes | (1,133) | (995)


Question: What does the table show?
Answer: the significant components of income taxes deducted from net earnings
8. OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
* relates to certain office lease contracts. Optional periods are not included in the calculation.
Table:
All figures in USD ‘000  | 2019 | 2018
Fixture, Furniture and Equipment | 65 | 128
Right of Use Asset* | 1,412 | -
Other   | 57 | 83
Total as of December 31,   | 1,534 | 211


Question: What is the average other non-current assets as at December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 70
Calculation: (83 + 57)/2
DEVELOPMENT OF EMPLOYEE NUMBERS BY SEGMENTS
Full-time equivalents1 as of the closing date of 30/9
1 Excluding METRO China.
Table:
 | 2018 | 2019
METRO | 86,239 | 82,979
METRO Germany | 11,816 | 11,760
METRO Western Europe (excl.Germany) | 24,073 | 24,044
METRO Russia | 13,884 | 12,288
METRO Eastern Europe (excl.Russia) | 28,264 | 27,589
METRO Asia | 8,202 | 7,298
Others | 6,916 | 7,067
METROAG | 863 | 837
Total | 94,018 | 90,883


Question: What was excluded in the full-time equivalents as of the closing date of 30/9?
Answer: METRO China.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts of borrowings under credit facilities and under loans approximates fair value as interest rates on these instruments approximates current market rates.
Notes payable and long-term debt is carried at amortized cost; however, the Company estimates the fair value of notes payable and long-term debt for disclosure purposes. The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s notes payable and long-term debt, by hierarchy level as of the periods indicated:
(1) The fair value estimates are based upon observable market data.
(2) This fair value estimate is based on the Company’s indicative borrowing cost derived from discounted cash flows.
Refer to Note 9 – “Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits” for disclosure surrounding the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets.
Table:
 |  | August 31, 2019 |  | August 31, 2018 | 
(in thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value
Notes payable and long-term debt: (Note 8) |  |  |  |  | 
5.625% Senior Notes | Level 2(1) | $398,886 | $416,000 | $397,995 | $415,704
4.700% Senior Notes | Level 2(1) | 498,004 | 525,890 | 497,350 | 503,545
4.900% Senior Notes | Level 3(2) | 299,057 | 318,704 | 298,814 | 306,535
3.950% Senior Notes | Level 2(1) | 494,825 | 509,845 | 494,208 | 476,010


Question: What was the change in the fair value for the 4.700% Senior Notes between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 22345
Calculation: 525,890-503,545
Note 15—Segments and Geographic Information
We operate in two reportable segments consisting of the Probe Cards Segment and the Systems Segment. Our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") is our Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire company. The following table summarizes the operating results by reportable segment (dollars in thousands):
Operating results provide useful information to our management for assessment of our performance and results of operations. Certain components of our operating results are utilized to determine executive compensation along with other measures.
Corporate and Other includes unallocated expenses relating to amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation expense, acquisition-related costs, including charges related to inventory stepped up to fair value, and other costs, which are not used in evaluating the results of, or in allocating resources to, our reportable segments. Acquisition-related costs include transaction costs and any costs directly related to the acquisition and integration of acquired businesses.
Table:
 |  |  | Fiscal 2019 | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Revenues | $491,363 | $98,101 | $— | $589,464
Gross profit | $211,382 | $50,927 | $(24,813) | $237,496
Gross margin | 43.0 % | 51.9 % | — % | 40.3 %
 |  |  | Fiscal 2018 | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Revenues | $434,269 | $95,406 | $— | $529,675
Gross profit | $187,320 | $47,074 | $(24,055) | $210,339
Gross margin | 43.1 % | 49.3 % | — % | 39.7 %
 |  |  | Fiscal 2017 | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Revenues | $454,794 | $93,647 | $— | $548,441
Gross profit | $195,903 | $46,647 | $(26,953) | $215,597
Gross margin | 43.1 % | 49.8% | — % | 39.3 %


Question: What was the revenues from different segments in 2017?
Answer: 454,794, 93,647, 0
18. Geographic Information
Property and equipment, net by geography was as follows:
No individual international country represented more than 10% of property and equipment, net in any period presented.
Table:
 | Year Ended December31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
U.S. | 200.4 | 231.0
International | 58.2 | 68.0
 | $258.6 | $299.0


Question: What is the average net property and equipment for 2018 and 2019 in U.S?
Answer: 215.7
Calculation: (200.4+231.0)/2
4. Prepaid expenses
Prepaid expenses consisted of the following:
Table:
October 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018
(In thousands) |  | 
Parts and supplies | $33,617 | $28,287
Prepaid insurance | 8,859 | 8,232
Other prepaid expenses | 14,455 | 6,721
Total prepaid expenses | $56,931 | $43,240


Question: What is the value of Prepaid insurance for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: 8,859, 8,232