hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Operating Results – Teekay Tankers
The following table compares Teekay Tankers’ operating results, equity income and number of calendar-ship-days for its vessels for 2019 and 2018.
(1) Calendar-ship-days presented relate to owned and in-chartered consolidated vessels.
Teekay Tankers' income from vessel operations increased to $123.9 million in 2019 compared to $7.2 million in 2018, primarily as a result of: • an increase of $129.3 million due to higher overall average realized spot tanker rates earned by Teekay Tankers' Suezmax, Aframax and LR2 product tankers; • an increase of $3.5 million due to improved net results from Teekay Tankers' full service lightering (or FSL) activities from more voyage days and higher realized spot rates earned;
• an increase of $3.4 million resulting from lower general and administrative expenses primarily due to non-recurring project expenses incurred in 2018; • a net increase of $2.3 million primarily due to the delivery of three Aframax and two LR2 chartered-in tankers in late 2018 and throughout 2019, partially offset by the redeliveries of various in-chartered tankers to their owners in the second and third quarters of 2018; and • an increase of $1.2 million as a result of restructuring charge incurred in the prior year;
partially offset by
• a decrease of $10.2 million due to a higher number of off-hire days in 2019 resulting from dry dockings and higher off-hire bunker expenses compared to the prior year; • a decrease of $6.9 million due to lower revenues and loss on the sale of one Suezmax tanker in 2019 and the write-down of two Suezmax tankers that were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2019; and • a decrease of $6.4 million due to the amortization of first dry dockings for various former Tanker Investments Ltd. (or TIL) vessels subsequent to Teekay Tankers' acquisition of TIL in late 2017.
Equity income increased to $2.3 million in 2019 from $1.2 million in 2018 primarily due to higher earnings recognized in 2019 from the High-Q Investment Ltd. joint venture as a result of higher spot rates earned in 2019.
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, | 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days) | 2019 | 2018
Revenues | 943,917 | 776,493
Voyage expenses | (402,294) | (381,306)
Vessel operating expenses | (208,601) | (209,131)
Time-charter hire expense | (43,189) | (19,538)
Depreciation and amortization | (124,002) | (118,514)
General and administrative expenses | (36,404) | (39,775)
Write-down and loss on sale of vessels | (5,544) | 170
Restructuring charges | — | (1,195)
Income from vessel operations | 123,883 | 7,204
Equity income | 2,345 | 1,220
Calendar-Ship-Days (1) |  | 
Conventional Tankers | 22,350 | 21,226


Question: What led to increase in Equity income in 2019?
Answer: primarily due to higher earnings recognized in 2019 from the High-Q Investment Ltd. joint venture as a result of higher spot rates earned in 2019.
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

Table:
period | total number of shares purchased [a] | average price paid per share | total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b] | maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]
oct . 1 through oct . 31 | 3247731 | $ 92.98 | 3221153 | 56078192
nov . 1 through nov . 30 | 2325865 | 86.61 | 2322992 | 53755200
dec . 1 through dec . 31 | 1105389 | 77.63 | 1102754 | 52652446
total | 6678985 | $ 88.22 | 6646899 | n/a
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .
[b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 .
these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .
our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what percentage of total shares purchased were purchased in december?
Answer: 17%
Calculation: divide(1105389, 6678985)
(a) Revenue and Gross Margin by Segment
We conduct business globally and are managed on a geographic basis consisting of three segments: the Americas, EMEA, and APJC. Our management makes financial decisions and allocates resources based on the information it receives from our internal management system. Sales are attributed to a segment based on the ordering location of the customer. We do not allocate research and development, sales and marketing, or general and administrative expenses to our segments in this internal management system because management does not include the information in our measurement of the performance of the operating segments. In addition, we do not allocate amortization and impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets, sharebased compensation expense, significant litigation settlements and other contingencies, charges related to asset impairments and restructurings, and certain other charges to the gross margin for each segment because management does not include this information in our measurement of the performance of the operating segments.
Summarized financial information by segment for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, based on our internal management system and as utilized by our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), is as follows (in millions):
Amounts may not sum and percentages may not recalculate due to rounding.
Revenue in the United States was $27.4 billion, $25.5 billion, and $25.0 billion for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Table:
Years Ended | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018 | July 29, 2017
Revenue: |  |  | 
Americas  . | $30,927 | $29,070 | $28,351
EMEA  . | 13,100 | 12,425 | 12,004
APJC . | 7,877 | 7,834 | 7,650
Total | $51,904 | $49,330 | $48,005
Gross margin: |  |  | 
Americas . | $20,338 | $18,792 | $18,284
EMEA  . | 8,457 | 7,945 | 7,855
APJC . | 4,683 | 4,726 | 4,741
Segment total . | 33,479 | 31,463 | 30,880
Unallocated corporate items . | (813) | (857) | (656)
Total | $32,666 | $30,606 | $30,224


Question: What was the percentage change in the total gross margin from all segments between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 6.73
Calculation: (32,666-30,606)/30,606
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

Table:
 | ( in millions )
2002 net revenue | $ 1130.7
volume/weather | 17.8
fuel write-offs in 2002 | 15.3
net wholesale revenue | 10.2
base rate decreases | -23.3 ( 23.3 )
nisco gain recognized in 2002 | -15.2 ( 15.2 )
rate refund provisions | -11.3 ( 11.3 )
other | -14.1 ( 14.1 )
2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory .
billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors .
the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration .
the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 .
in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend .
the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning .
the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction .
the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life .
in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale .
entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income .
rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power .
other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy gulf states , inc.?
Answer: -20.6
Calculation: subtract(1110.1, 1130.7)
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net decreased by $4.3 million in 2018 compared to 2017 as a result of an increase in interest expense of $5.7 million related to interest expense due under our convertible senior notes. This increase was offset by an increase of $1.4 million of interest income earned on our short-term investments.
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, |  | Change | 
 | 2018 | 2017 | $ | %
 |  | (dollars in thousands) |  | 
Other expense, net | $ 4,628 | $ 302 | $ 4,326 | 1432.5%
% of revenue | 3% | 0% |  | 


Question: What is the average Other expense, net for 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 2465
Calculation: (4,628 + 302) / 2
Stock-Based Compensation Award Activity
The following table summarizes the shares available for grant under the 2019 Plan and 2009 Plan (in thousands):
Table:
 | Shares Available for Grant | 
 | 2019 Plan | 2009 Plan
Balance at December 30, 2018 | — | 483
Authorized | 357 | —
Options granted | — | —
Options forfeited or expired | 26 | 2
RSUs granted | (113) | (240)
RSUs forfeited | 2 | 54
Plan Shares expired | — | (299)
Balance at December 29, 2019 | 272 | —


Question: What are the respective number of options forfeited or expired in the 2019 and 2009 plans?
Answer: 26, 2
We do not allocate to our operating segments certain operating expenses that we manage separately at the corporate level and are not used in evaluating the results of, or in allocating resources to, our segments. These unallocated expenses consist primarily of stock-based compensation expense; amortization of intangible assets; restructuring, transition and other costs; and acquisition-related costs.
The following table provides a reconciliation of our total reportable segments’ operating income to our total operating income (loss):
Table:
 |  | Year Ended | 
(In millions) | March 29, 2019 | March 30, 2018 | March 31, 2017
Total segment operating income | $1,414 | $1,584 | $1,026
Reconciling items: |  |  | 
Stock-based compensation expense | 352 | 610 | 440
Amortization of intangible assets | 443 | 453 | 293
Restructuring, transition and other costs | 241 | 410 | 273
Acquisition-related costs | 3 | 60 | 120
Other | (5) | 2 | -
Total consolidated operating income (loss) from continuing operations | $380 | $49 | $(100)


Question: What is the  Total consolidated operating income (loss) from continuing operations expressed as a percentage of  Total segment operating income for fiscal year 2019?
Answer: 26.87
Calculation: 380/1,414
18. Other taxes
The other taxes (for example property tax, motor vehicle tax, excise tax and transaction tax) have the following effects on the income statement:
Table:
€ million | 2017/2018 | 2018/2019
Other taxes | 79 | 79
thereof from cost of sales | (1) | (1)
thereof from selling expenses | (65) | (62)
thereof from general administrative expenses | (13) | (16)


Question: What are the costs or expenses under Other taxes in the table?
Answer: thereof from cost of sales, thereof from selling expenses, thereof from general administrative expenses
8. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, based on weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, RSUs, and certain contingently issuable shares for which performance targets have been achieved.
The following table reconciles the weighted average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
The diluted earnings per share computation excludes 1.8 million, 2.2 million, and 3.9 million options to purchase shares, RSUs, and contingently issuable shares during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, as their effect would be antidilutive.
Common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, was 115,986,352 and 116,123,361, respectively.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Weighted average shares outstanding: |  |  | 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 116,175 | 116,057 | 118,059
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, RSUs, and contingently issuable |  |  | 
shares | 2,396 | 1,575 | 1,385
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 118,571 | 117,632 | 119,444


Question: How were diluted earnings per share computed by the company?
Answer: based on basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, RSUs, and certain contingently issuable shares for which performance targets have been achieved.
b. Employee Performance Rights Plan
The Employee Performance Rights Plan (the Rights Plan) was approved by shareholders at the Company’s AGM on 23 November 2017. Under the Rights Plan, awards are made to eligible executives and other management personnel who have an impact on the Group’s performance. Rights Plan awards are granted in the form of performance rights over shares, which vest over a period of three years subject to meeting performance measures and continuous employment with the Company. Each performance right is to subscribe for one ordinary share upon vesting and, when issued, the shares will rank equally with other shares.
Performance rights issued under the Employee Performance Rights Plan are valued on the same basis as those issued to KMP, which is described in Note 16(d).
1. The vesting date for rights granted on 2 July 2017 and 2 July 2018 is the date on which the Board notifies the executive that the rights have vested, after the outcomes for the measurement period have been determined and satisfaction of performance conditions have been assessed. This is likely to be 31 August 2020 and 31 August 2021 respectively.
No performance rights vested or lapsed during the financial year. The number of performance rights issued and outstanding at 30 June 2018 was 355,316, consisting solely of the performance rights granted on 2 July 2017.
The weighted average contractual life of outstanding performance rights at the end of the financial year is 1.77 years (2018: 2.17 years).
Table:
Performance rights issued and outstanding at 30 June 2019 |  |  |  | 
Grant Date | Vesting Date1 | Fair Value per Right $ | Rights Granted | No. of Rights at 30/6/2019
2 Jul 2017 | 31 Aug 2020 | 3.815 | 355,316 | 355,316
2 Jul 2018 | 31 Aug 2021 | 3.01 | 530,652 | 530,652
Total |  |  | 885,968 | 885,968


Question: What was the percentage change in number of rights granted?
Answer: 49.35
Calculation: (530,652 - 355,316) / 355,316
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1043.7
mark-to-market tax settlement sharing | -195.9 ( 195.9 )
retail electric price | 32.5
volume/weather | 11.6
other | -5.7 ( 5.7 )
2011 net revenue | $ 886.2
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .
see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: what is change in percentage points in net income margin in 2011?
Answer: 27.4
Calculation: divide(242.5, 886.2)
Note 15—Segments and Geographic Information
We operate in two reportable segments consisting of the Probe Cards Segment and the Systems Segment. Our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") is our Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire company. The following table summarizes the operating results by reportable segment (dollars in thousands):
Operating results provide useful information to our management for assessment of our performance and results of operations. Certain components of our operating results are utilized to determine executive compensation along with other measures.
Corporate and Other includes unallocated expenses relating to amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation expense, acquisition-related costs, including charges related to inventory stepped up to fair value, and other costs, which are not used in evaluating the results of, or in allocating resources to, our reportable segments. Acquisition-related costs include transaction costs and any costs directly related to the acquisition and integration of acquired businesses.
Table:
 |  |  | Fiscal 2019 | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Revenues | $491,363 | $98,101 | $— | $589,464
Gross profit | $211,382 | $50,927 | $(24,813) | $237,496
Gross margin | 43.0 % | 51.9 % | — % | 40.3 %
 |  |  | Fiscal 2018 | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Revenues | $434,269 | $95,406 | $— | $529,675
Gross profit | $187,320 | $47,074 | $(24,055) | $210,339
Gross margin | 43.1 % | 49.3 % | — % | 39.7 %
 |  |  | Fiscal 2017 | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Revenues | $454,794 | $93,647 | $— | $548,441
Gross profit | $195,903 | $46,647 | $(26,953) | $215,597
Gross margin | 43.1 % | 49.8% | — % | 39.3 %


Question: What is the increase / (decrease) in the probe cards revenue from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 57094
Calculation: 491,363 - 434,269
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
(1) Lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, which generally may be up to 5 years.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $2.2 million, $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
Table:
 |  | As of December 31, | 
 | Useful life in years | 2019 | 2018
Furniture and equipment | 5 | $1,785 | $1,189
Leasehold improvements (1) | 5 | 4,074 | 2,776
System hardware | 5 | 1,596 | 1,404
Office computers | 3 | 5,309 | 3,745
Computer and system software | 3 | 1,451 | 1,385
 |  | 14,215 | 10,499
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |  | (7,931) | (5,849)
Property and equipment, net |  | $6,284 | $4,650


Question: What is the change in System hardware from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Answer: 192
Calculation: 1,596-1,404
The following table presents the effect of the adoption of the new revenue guidance on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019 (in thousands):
(1) Differences primarily relate to the timing of revenue recognition for over-time customers and to the recovery of fulfillment costs.
(2) Differences primarily relate to the timing of cost recognition for over-time customers and the recognition of fulfillment costs.
Table:
 | Fiscal Year Ended | 
 | August 31, 2019 | 
 | As reported | Balance without the adoption of ASU 2014-09
Net revenue(1) | $25,282,320 | $24,864,754
Cost of revenue(2) | $23,368,919 | $23,057,603
Operating income | $701,356 | $595,105
Income tax expense | $161,230 | $164,054
Net income | $289,474 | $180,399


Question: What do the differences in amount of net revenue between as reported and balance without the adoption of ASU 2014-09 primarily relate to?
Answer: the timing of revenue recognition for over-time customers and to the recovery of fulfillment costs.