hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Our 2019 net revenues decreased 1.1% compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in volumes of approximately 8%, partially compensated by an increase in average selling prices of approximately 7%. The increase in the average selling prices was driven by favorable product mix of approximately 10%, partially offset by a negative pricing effect of approximately 3%.
Our 2018 net revenues increased 15.8% compared to the prior year, primarily due to increase in average selling prices of approximately 16%, while volumes remained substantially flat. The increase in the average selling prices was driven by favorable product mix of approximately 18%, partially offset by a negative pricing effect of approximately 2%. Our net revenues registered double-digit growth across all product groups and geographies.
In 2019, 2018 and 2017, our largest customer, Apple, accounted for 17.6%, 13.1% and 10.5% of our net revenues, respectively, reported within our three product groups.
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | % Variation | % Variation
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 vs 2018 | 2018 vs 2017
 | (in millions) | (in millions) | (in millions) |  | 
Net sales | $9,529 | $9,612 | $8,308 | (0.9)% | 15.7%
Other revenues | 27 | 52 | 39 | (49.0) | 36.1
Net revenues | $9,556 | $9,664 | $8,347 | (1.1)% | 15.8%


Question: What was the share of Apple in the net revenues in 2019, 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 17.6%, 13.1% and 10.5%
12 Directors’ Remuneration
Directors’ emoluments represent all earnings and aggregate contributions to pension schemes made during the year as a Director of Sophos Group plc and its subsidiaries. Further details can be found in the Group’s Remuneration Report on pages 91 to 101.
Table:
 | Year-ended 31 March 2019 | Year-ended 31 March 2018
 | $M | $M
Directors’ emoluments | 2.3 | 3.3
Gains on exercise of share options | 3.6 | 3.5
Gains on vesting of LTIP awards | 14.5 | 4.2
Total Directors’ remuneration | 20.4 | 11.0


Question: What was the percentage change in Total Directors’ remuneration in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 85.45
Calculation: (20.4-11.0)/11.0
As described in Note 7, the acquisition of Norstel resulted in the recognition of $43 million in goodwill which has been included in the ADG segment to align the goodwill of the acquired Company with the segment under which the related activities will be reported.
As of the end of the third quarters of 2019 and 2018, the Company performed its annual impairment test. The Company did not elect to perform a qualitative assessment. The impairment test was conducted following a two-step process. In the first step, the Company compared the fair value of the reporting units tested to their carrying value. Based upon the first step of the goodwill impairment test, no impairment was recorded since the fair value of the reporting units exceeded their carrying value.
Goodwill as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 is net of accumulated impairment losses of $102 million, of which $96 million relates to the MDG segment and $6 million to Others. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, no impairment loss was recorded by the Company.
Table:
 | Automotive and Discrete Group (ADG) | Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG) | Analog, MEMS & Sensors Group AMS) | Total
December 31, 2017 | — | 121 | 2 | 123
Foreign currency translation | — | (2) | — | (2)
December 31, 2018 | — | 119 | 2 | 121
Business combination | 43 | — | — | 43
Foreign currency translation | — | (2) | — | (2)
December 31, 2019 | 43 | 117 | 2 | 162


Question: What is the average goodwill for the period December 31, 2018?
Answer: 60.5
Calculation: 121 / 2
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .

Table:
december 31 | citigroup | s&p 500 index | s&p financial index
2005 | 104.38 | 104.83 | 106.30
2006 | 124.02 | 121.20 | 126.41
2007 | 70.36 | 127.85 | 103.47
2008 | 18.71 | 81.12 | 47.36
2009 | 9.26 | 102.15 | 55.27
.

Question: what was the percent of the decline on the citigroup cumulative total return from 2007 to 2008
Answer: -73.4%
Calculation: subtract(18.71, 70.36), divide(#0, 70.36)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in thousands )
2012 | $ 49959
2013 | 50546
2014 | 51637
2015 | 52253
2016 | -
years thereafter | -
total | 204395
less : amount representing interest | 25611
present value of net minimum lease payments | $ 178784
.

Question: in how many years will is the company expected to pay off all its future minimum lease payments?
Answer: 4
Calculation: subtract(2015, 2011)
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
For the Assemble Systems, PlanGrid, and BuildingConnected acquisitions that were accounted for as business combinations, Autodesk recorded the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned to the identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. Autodesk recorded the excess of consideration transferred over the aggregate fair values as goodwill. The goodwill recorded is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. There is no amount of goodwill that is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class for the business combinations that were completed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019:
(1) During Q4 of fiscal 2019, Autodesk recorded a measurement period adjustment related to the valuation of the deferred tax liability associated with the Assemble Systems acquisition. This adjustment increased goodwill and reduced net tangible assets by $0.1 million.
For the three business combinations in fiscal 2019, the determination of estimated fair values of certain assets and liabilities is derived from estimated fair value assessments and assumptions by Autodesk. For PlanGrid and BuildingConnected, Autodesk's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). For the three business combinations in fiscal 2019, the tax impact of the acquisition is also subject to change within the measurement period. Different estimates and assumptions could result in different valuations assigned to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting amount of goodwill.
Table:
 | Assemble Systems (1) | PlanGrid | BuildingConnected | Total
Developed technologies | $4.4 | $78.0 | $12.5 | $94.9
Customer relationships and other non-current intangible assets | 12.0 | 98.0 | 26.9 | 136.9
Trade name | 2.8 | 20.0 | 6.8 | 29.6
Goodwill | 72.0 | 588.7 | 206.3 | 867.0
Deferred revenue (current and non-current) | (1.7) | (25.5) | (2.8) | (30.0)
Net tangible assets | 4.1 | 18.4 | 3.5 | 26.0
Total | $93.6 | $777.6 | $253.2 | $1,124.4


Question: What is the total amount of developed technologies for Assemble Systems and Plan Grid?
Answer: 82.4
Calculation: 4.4+78
Restricted Cash
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the amounts reported on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted cash included a security deposit that is set aside in a bank account and cannot be withdrawn by the Company under the terms of a lease agreement. The restriction will end upon the expiration of the lease.
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Cash and cash equivalents | $172,960 | $172,704
Restricted cash included in other long-term assets | 116 | 114
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | $173,076 | $172,818


Question: What was the percentage change in Cash and cash equivalents from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 0.15
Calculation: (172,960-172,704)/172,704
The following table reconciles the expected income tax expense, computed by applying our combined German tax rate of 26.4% (2018: 26.4%; 2017: 26.4%), to the actual income tax expense. Our 2019 combined German tax rate includes a corporate income tax rate of 15.0% (2018: 15.0%; 2017: 15.0%), plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% (2018: 5.5%; 2017: 5.5%) thereon, and trade taxes of 10.6% (2018: 10.6%; 2017: 10.6%).
Relationship Between Tax Expense and Profit Before Tax
Table:
€ millions, unless otherwise stated | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Profit before tax | 4,596 | 5,600 | 5,029
Tax expense at applicable tax rate of 26.4% rate of 26.4% (2018: 26.4%; 2017: 26.4%) | 1,212 | 1,478 | 1,327
Tax effect of: |  |  | 
Foreign tax rates | –209 | –147 | –403
Changes in tax laws and tax rates | 10 | 0 | –212
Non-deductible expenses | 116 | 106 | 82
Tax-exempt income | –93 | –38 | –95
Withholding taxes | 138 | 91 | 131
Research and development and foreign tax credits | –89 | –33 | –26
Prior-year taxes | 80 | –17 | –26
Reassessment of deferred tax assets, research and development tax credits, and foreign tax credits | 48 | 58 | 185
Other | 13 | 13 | 20
Total income tax expense | 1,226 | 1,511 | 983
Effective tax rate (in %) | 26.7 | 27.0 | 19.5


Question: What was the percentage change in Other in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 0
Calculation: (13-13)/13
Disaggregation of Total Net Sales: We disaggregate our sales from contracts with customers by end customer, contract type, deliverable type and revenue recognition method for each of our segments, as we believe these factors affect the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows.
Sales by Geographic Region (in millions):
Table:
 |  | Years Ended September 30, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
United States | $  956.6 | $  627.8 | $  522.8
United Kingdom | 218.2 | 240.7 | 219.4
Australia | 163.5 | 166.7 | 175.6
Far East/Middle East | 74.0 | 86.4 | 112.7
Other | 84.2 | 81.3 | 77.2
Total sales | $1,496.5 | $1,202.9 | $1,107.7


Question: What is the change in the amount of Other in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 2.9
Calculation: 84.2-81.3
Other Defined Benefit Plans
We maintain various defined benefit plans to provide termination and postretirement benefits to certain eligible employees outside of the U.S. We also provide disability benefits to certain eligible employees in the U.S. Eligibility is determined based on the terms of our plans and local statutory requirements.
Funded Status
The funded status of our postretirement health care and other defined benefit plans, which is recognized in other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, was as follows (in millions):
Table:
 | April 26, 2019 | April 27, 2018
Fair value of plan assets | $ 31 | $ 25
Benefit obligations | (61) | (53)
Unfunded obligations | $(30) | $(28)


Question: What was the fair value of plan assets in 2019?
Answer: 31
N. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:
(1) Incremental shares from the assumed conversion of the convertible notes was calculated using the difference between the average Teradyne stock price for the period and the conversion price of $31.62, multiplied by 14.5 million shares. The result of this calculation, representing the total intrinsic value of the convertible debt, was divided by the average Teradyne stock price for the period.
(2) Convertible notes hedge warrant shares were calculated using the difference between the average Teradyne stock price for the period and the warrant price of $39.68, multiplied by 14.5 million shares. The result of this calculation, representing the total intrinsic value of the warrant, was divided by the average Teradyne stock price for the period.
The computation of diluted net income per common share for 2018 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock options to purchase approximately 0.1 million shares and restricted stock units to purchase approximately 0.5 million shares because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
The computation of diluted net income per common share for 2017 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock options to purchase approximately 0.1 million shares because the effect would have been antidilutive.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (in thousands, except per share amounts) | 
Net income for basic and diluted net income per share | $467,468 | $451,779 | $257,692
Weighted average common shares-basic | 170,425 | 187,672 | 198,069
Effect of dilutive potential common shares: |  |  | 
Incremental shares from assumed conversion of convertible notes (1) | 4,909 | 2,749 | 1,298
Convertible note hedge warrant shares (2) | 2,698 | 485 | 112
Restricted stock units | 1,236 | 1,385 | 1,800
Stock options | 178 | 278 | 335
Employee stock purchase rights | 13 | 36 | 27
Dilutive potential common shares | 9,034 | 4,933 | 3,572
Weighted average common shares-diluted | 179,459 | 192,605 | 201,641
Net income per common share-basic | $2.74 | $2.41 | $1.30
Net income per common share-diluted | $2.60 | $2.35 | $1.28


Question: What was the percentage change in Net income per common share-diluted in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 10.64
Calculation: (2.60-2.35)/2.35
DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
In connection with the issuance of Series A-1 Preferred Stock in June 2017, the Company issued a warrant with variable consideration through September 2018. The Company determined that this instrument is an embedded derivative pursuant to ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the warrant, at its fair value as of the inception date of the agreement and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date through the expiration of the variable consideration. Any change in fair value is recorded as a change in the fair value of derivative liabilities for each reporting period at each balance sheet date. The Company reassesses the classification at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification. On September 19, 2018, upon expiration of the variable consideration, the warrant liability of $4.5 million was reclassified to equity.
The Monte Carlo Valuation model is used to estimate the fair value of the warrant. The model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options or warrants. The expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time equal to the weighted average life of the instrument granted.
The risk-free interest rate used is the United States Treasury rate for the day of the grant having a term equal to the life of the equity instrument. The volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s share price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The dividend yield is zero as the Company has not made any dividend payment and has no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company determines the expected term of its warrant awards by using the contractual term.
The principal assumptions used in applying the model were as follows:
Table:
 | Upon 2018 Expiration | December 31, 2017
Assumptions: |  | 
Risk-free interest rate | 2.3% - 2.5% | 1.5% - 2.0%
Expected life | 1.8 - 2.2 Years | 2.5 - 3 Years
Expected volatility | 65% - 70% | 50% - 60%
Dividends | 0% | 0%


Question: What is the average expected volatility of derivative liabilities due on December 31, 2017?
Answer: 55
Calculation: ( 50 + 60)/2
Changes in Estimates on Contracts
Changes in estimates related to contracts accounted for using the cost-to-cost method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes, with the exception of contracts acquired through a business combination, where the adjustment is made for the period commencing from the date of acquisition.
Changes in estimates on contracts for the periods presented were as follows:
The impact on diluted EPS attributable to Leidos common stockholders is calculated using the Company's statutory tax rate.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended | 
 | January 3, 2020 | December 28, 2018 | December 29, 2017
 |  | (in millions, except for per share amounts) | 
Favorable impact | $95 | $167 | $185
Unfavorable impact | (52) | (62) | (82)
Net favorable impact to income before income taxes | $43 | $105 | $103
Impact on diluted EPS attributable to Leidos common stockholders | $0.23 | $0.52 | $0.41


Question: What was the Favorable impact in 2020, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
Answer: $95, $167, $185
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 644.2
net wholesale revenue | -35.1 ( 35.1 )
purchased power capacity | -5.9 ( 5.9 )
transmission revenue | -5.4 ( 5.4 )
reserve equalization | 5.6
retail electric price | 19.0
other | 4.4
2017 net revenue | $ 626.8
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso .
the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: what percent change did the drop in net wholesale revenue cause for 2017 net revenue?
Answer: -5.3%
Calculation: add(626.8, 35.1), divide(35.1, #0)
3.3 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
(1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" and "Discontinued operations" sections.
Fiscal 2019 depreciation and amortization expense increased by 10.9% resulting mainly from the impact of the MetroCast acquisition combined with additional depreciation from the acquisitions of property, plant and equipment during the fiscal year and the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar compared to the prior year.
Table:
Years ended August 31, | 2019 | 2018 (1) | Change
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages) | $ | $ | %
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 423,432 | 387,726 | 9.2
Amortization of intangible assets | 57,293 | 45,928 | 24.7
 | 480,725 | 433,654 | 10.9


Question: What was the Depreciation of property, plant and equipment in 2019?
Answer: 423,432
Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly financial information for the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years. In the opinion of management, this information has been presented on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere, and all necessary adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the unaudited quarterly results when read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
(1) Includes acquisition and integration charges related to our strategic collaboration with JJMD of $17.6 million, $13.4 million, $12.8 million, $8.9 million and $8.1 million for the three months ended August 31, 2019, May 31, 2019, February 28, 2019, November 30, 2018 and August 31, 2018, respectively.
(2) Includes ($13.3 million), $111.4 million and $30.9 million of income tax (benefit) expense for the three months ended November 30, 2018, August 31, 2018 and February 28, 2018, respectively, related to the Tax Act.
(4) Includes a distressed customer charge of $6.2 million, $18.0 million and $14.7 million during the three months ended August 31, 2019, August 31, 2018 and February 28, 2018, respectively.
(5) Includes $32.4 million of stock-based compensation expense for the modification of certain performancebased restricted stock units and a one-time cash settled award during the three months ended November 30, 2017.
Table:
 |  |  | Fiscal Year 2018 | 
 |  |  | Three Months Ended | 
(in thousands, except for per share data) | August 31, 2018 | May 31, 2018 | February 28, 2018 | November 30, 2017
Net revenue | $5,771,831 | $5,436,952 | $5,301,101 | $5,585,532
Gross profit(4) | 442,147 | 398,227 | 397,133 | 469,285
Operating income(1)(4)(5) | 153,896 | 112,971 | 129,532 | 145,754
Net (loss) income(2)(4)(5) | (56,608) | 42,702 | 37,528 | 63,919
Net (loss) income attributable to Jabil Inc.(2)(4)(5) | $(57,314) | $42,541 | $37,308 | $63,795
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to the stockholders of Jabil Inc. |  |  |  | 
Basic | $(0.34) | $0.25 | $0.21 | $0.36
Diluted | $(0.34) | $0.25 | $0.21 | $0.35


Question: What were the distressed customer charges for  the three months ended August 31, 2019, August 31, 2018 and February 28, 2018, respectively?
Answer: $6.2 million, $18.0 million, $14.7 million
NOTE 13 – INCOME TAX
The domestic and foreign components of loss before income taxes from operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
Table:
 |  | For the Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (in thousands) | 
Domestic | $(22,708) | $29,110 | $17,120
Foreign | — | (320) | (469)
 | $(22,708) | $28,790 | $16,651


Question: What is the percentage change in total income before tax between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 72.9
Calculation: (28,790-16,651)/16,651