hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph comcast the graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on comcast 2019s class a common stock during the five years ended december 31 , 2015 with the cumulative total returns on the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and with a select peer group consisting of us and other companies engaged in the cable , communications and media industries . this peer group consists of us , as well as cablevision systems corporation ( class a ) , dish network corporation ( class a ) , directv inc . ( included through july 24 , 2015 , the date of acquisition by at&t corp. ) and time warner cable inc . ( the 201ccable subgroup 201d ) , and time warner inc. , walt disney company , viacom inc . ( class b ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . ( class a ) , and cbs corporation ( class b ) ( the 201cmedia subgroup 201d ) . the peer group was constructed as a composite peer group in which the cable subgroup is weighted 63% ( 63 % ) and the media subgroup is weighted 37% ( 37 % ) based on the respective revenue of our cable communications and nbcuniversal segments . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in our class a common stock and in each of the following indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 12/1412/1312/1212/10 12/15 comcast class a s&p 500 peer group index .

Table:
 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
comcast class a | $ 110 | $ 177 | $ 250 | $ 282 | $ 279
s&p 500 stock index | $ 102 | $ 118 | $ 156 | $ 177 | $ 180
peer group index | $ 110 | $ 157 | $ 231 | $ 267 | $ 265
nbcuniversal nbcuniversal is a wholly owned subsidiary of nbcuniversal holdings and there is no market for its equity securities .
39 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what was the differencet in percentage 5 year cumulative total return for comcast class a stock and the s&p 500 stock index for the year ended 2015?
Answer: 99%
Calculation: subtract(279, 100), divide(#0, 100), subtract(180, 100), divide(#2, 100), subtract(#1, #3)
Reconciliation of segment EBITDA to total adjusted EBITDA is below:
For additional information on our reportable segments and product and services categories, see Note 17— Segment Information to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (Dollars in millions) | 
Adjusted EBITDA |  |  | 
International and Global Accounts | $2,286 | 2,341 | 821
Enterprise | 3,490 | 3,522 | 2,456
Small and Medium Business | 1,870 | 2,013 | 1,581
Wholesale | 3,427 | 3,666 | 2,566
Consumer | 4,914 | 5,105 | 5,136
Total segment EBITDA | $15,987 | 16,647 | 12,560
Operations and Other EBITDA | (7,216) | (8,045) | (6,504)
Total adjusted EBITDA | $8,771 | 8,602 | 6,056


Question: What are the segments under Adjusted EBITDA?
Answer: International and Global Accounts, Enterprise, Small and Medium Business, Wholesale, Consumer
part ii item 5 : market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities motorola 2019s common stock is listed on the new york and chicago stock exchanges . the number of stockholders of record of motorola common stock on january 31 , 2008 was 79907 . information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption 201cequity compensation plan information 201d of motorola 2019s proxy statement for the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders . the remainder of the response to this item incorporates by reference note 16 , 201cquarterly and other financial data ( unaudited ) 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements appearing under 201citem 8 : financial statements and supplementary data 201d . the following table provides information with respect to acquisitions by the company of shares of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 . issuer purchases of equity securities period ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 3 ) ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 ) .

Table:
period | ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 2 ) | ( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) | ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 )
9/30/07 to 10/26/07 | 2972951 | $ 18.84 | 2964225 | $ 4267375081
10/27/07 to 11/23/07 | 5709917 | $ 17.23 | 5706600 | $ 4169061854
11/24/07 to 12/31/07 | 25064045 | $ 16.04 | 25064045 | $ 3767061887
total | 33746913 | $ 16.49 | 33734870 | 
( 1 ) in addition to purchases under the 2006 stock repurchase program ( as defined below ) , included in this column are transactions under the company 2019s equity compensation plans involving the delivery to the company of 12043 shares of motorola common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to company employees .
( 2 ) through actions taken on july 24 , 2006 and march 21 , 2007 , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase an aggregate amount of up to $ 7.5 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over a period ending in june 2009 , subject to market conditions ( the 201c2006 stock repurchase program 201d ) .
( 3 ) average price paid per share of common stock repurchased under the 2006 stock repurchase program is execution price , excluding commissions paid to brokers. .

Question: what is the estimated value , in dollars , of the total number of shares purchased between 9/30/07 and 10/26/07?
Answer: 5601396
Calculation: multiply(18.84, 2972951)
Underlying operating profit and underlying operating margin
Underlying operating profit and underlying operating margin mean operating profit and operating margin before the impact of non-underlying items within operating profit. Underlying operating profit represents our measure of segment profit or loss as it is the primary measure used for making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the segments.
The Group reconciliation of operating profit to underlying operating profit is as follows:
Further details of non-underlying items can be found in note 3 on page 96 of the consolidated financial statements.
Refer to Note 2 on page 94 for the reconciliation of operating profit to underlying operating profit by Division. For each Division operating margin is computed as operating profit divided by turnover and underlying operating margin is computed as underlying operating profit divided by turnover.
Table:
 | € million | € million | € million
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (Restated)(a) | (Restated)(a)
Operating profit | 8,708 | 12,639 | 8,957
Non-underlying items within |  |  | 
operating profit (see note 3) | 1,239 | (3,176) | 543
Underlying operating profit | 9,947 | 9,463 | 9,500
Turnover | 51,980 | 50,982 | 53,715
Operating margin | 16.8% | 24.8% | 16.7%
Underlying operating margin | 19.1% | 18.6% | 17.7%


Question: How is the operating margin computed?
Answer: For each Division operating margin is computed as operating profit divided by turnover and underlying operating margin is computed as underlying operating profit divided by turnover.
8.1 CAPITAL STRUCTURE
The table below summarizes debt-related financial ratios over the last two fiscal years and the fiscal 2020 guidelines:
(1) Based on mid-range guidelines. (2) Excludes amortization of deferred transaction costs and commitment fees but includes the impact of interest rate swaps. Potential variations in the US LIBOR rates in fiscal 2020 have not been considered. (3) Taking into consideration the interest rate swaps in effect at the end of each fiscal year. (4) Net indebtedness is defined as the aggregate of bank indebtedness, balance due on business combinations and principal on long-term debt, less cash and cash equivalents. (5) Adjusted EBITDA and financial expense for fiscal year 2018 include only eight months of MetroCast operations. (6) Specific guidance on interest coverage cannot be provided given that financial expense guidance is not provided.
In fiscal 2019, the financial leverage ratio relating to net indebtedness over adjusted EBITDA has declined as a result of the sale of Cogeco Peer 1 on April 30, 2019 for a net cash consideration of $720 million and to a lesser extent growing adjusted EBITDA and a reduction in net indebtedness from generated free cash flow. In fiscal 2020, prior to the adoption of IFRS 16 Leases, the financial leverage ratio relating to net indebtedness over adjusted EBITDA should continue to decline as a result of growing adjusted EBITDA and a projected reduction in net indebtedness from generated free cash flow.
Table:
Years ended August 31, | 2020 Guidelines(1) | 2019 | 2018
Average cost of indebtedness(2) | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.4%
Fixed rate indebtedness(3) | 78% | 78% | 72%
Average term: long-term debt (in years) | 3.9 | 4.9 | 5.7
Net indebtedness(4) / adjusted EBITDA(5) | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.8
Adjusted EBITDA / financial expense(5) | N/A (6) | 6.3 | 5.4


Question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the Average cost of indebtedness from 2019 to 2020?
Answer: 0
Calculation: 4.4% - 4.4%
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to our company by KPMG for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018.
(1) Audit Fees consist of professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including audited financial statements presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.
(2) Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for professional services for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services could include accounting consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, due diligence procedures in connection with acquisition and procedures related to other attestation services.
(3) Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include consultation on tax matters and assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance.
(4) All Other Fees consist of license fees for the use of accounting research software.
Table:
 | 2017 | 2018
 | (In Thousands) | (In Thousands)
Audit Fees (1) | $3,747 | $4,476
Audit-Related Fees (2) | — | —
Tax Fees (3) | — | —
All Other Fees (4) | $3 | $3
Total Fees | $3,750 | $4,479


Question: What is the change of “All Other Fees” from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 0
Calculation: 3 - 3
Capital structure
The Group seeks to enhance shareholder value both by investing in the business so as to improve the return on investment and by managing the capital structure. The capital of the Group consists of equity, debt and a compound financial instrument. The Group aims to access both debt and equity capital markets with maximum efficiency and flexibility.
The key metrics used to monitor the capital structure of the Group are net external debt, debt to assets ratio and interest cover. The Group’s stated medium to long-term preference is for the debt to assets ratio to be within the 40–50 per cent range and interest cover to be greater than 1.60x. The debt to assets ratio has increased to 67.8 per cent in the year due to the deficit on property revaluation. As part of the revised strategy, the Group is looking to reduce net external debt as well as reduce the debt to assets ratio to below 50 per cent. Additional information on the Group’s revised strategy is provided in the chief executive’s review on pages 6 to 8. The interest cover ratio continues to be above the preferred level.
As the Group’s debt is sometimes secured on its interests in joint ventures, these metrics are monitored for the Group including share of joint ventures. Additional information including reconciliations from the relevant IFRS amounts to those including the Group’s share of joint ventures as presented below is provided in presentation of information on pages 157 to 161.
– net external debt
Table:
£m – including Group’s share of joint ventures | Group 2019 | Group 2018
Total borrowings | 4,916.8 | 5,331.0
Cash and cash equivalents | (223.0) | (274.3)
Net debt | 4,693.8 | 5,056.7
Less Metrocentre compound financial instrument | (195.4) | (189.5)
Net external debt | 4,498.4 | 4,867.2
Analysed as: |  | 
Debt including Group’s share of joint ventures | 4,721.4 | 5,141.5
Cash including Group’s share of joint ventures | (223.0) | (274.3)
Net external debt | 4,498.4 | 4,867.2


Question: What is the percentage of total borrowings in net debt in 2019?
Answer: 104.75
Calculation: 4,916.8/4,693.8
Beginning fiscal 2011, we replaced the ownership share grants with time-vested RSUs for certain Vice Presidents and Officers that vest ratably overfour to five years and have a 50% or 100% holding requirement on settled shares, which must be held until termination. There were146,268 of such RSUs outstanding as of September 29, 2019. RSUs issued to non-management directors and certain other employees vest12 months from the date of grant, or upon termination of board service if the director or employee elects to defer receipt, and totaled 69,411 units outstanding as of September 29, 2019. RSUs issued to certain other employees either cliff vest or vest ratably over three years and totaled 35,864 units outstanding as of September 29, 2019. These awards are amortized to compensation expense over the estimated vesting period based upon the fair value of our common stock on the award date discounted by the present value of the expected dividend stream over the vesting period.
The following is a summary of RSU activity for fiscal 2019:
As of September 29, 2019, there was approximately $7.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted was$86.08, $94.93, and $102.42 in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. In fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, the total fair value of RSUs that vested and were released was$4.7 million, $4.4 million, and $4.4 million, respectively.
Table:
 |  | Weighted-
 |  | Average Grant
 |  | Date Fair
 | Shares | Value
RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2018 | 288,098 | $64.57
Granted | 93,686 | $86.08
Released | (55,642) | $84.23
Forfeited | (14,297) | $94.00
RSUs outstanding at September 29, 2019 | 311,845 | $66.18


Question: What is the percentage change of RSUs outstanding from September 30, 2018 to September 29, 2019?
Answer: 8.24
Calculation: (311,845-288,098)/288,098
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
The Company expects the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe, or if the applicable statute of limitations lapses. The impact of the amount of such changes to previously recorded uncertain tax positions could range from zero to $53.0 million.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed and certain positions were effectively settled, which resulted in a decrease of $2.5 million, $9.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in the liability for uncertain tax benefits.
The Company recorded penalties and tax-related interest expense to the tax provision of $10.3 million, $8.0 million and $5.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In addition, due to the expiration of the statute of limitations in certain jurisdictions and certain positions that were effectively settled, the Company reduced its liability for penalties and income tax-related interest expense related to uncertain tax positions during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 by $2.7 million, $16.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in the consolidated balance sheets were $26.6 million and $19.1 million, respectively.
The Company has filed for prior taxable years, and for its taxable year ended December 31, 2019 will file, numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns, including U.S. federal and state tax returns and foreign tax returns. The Company is subject to examination in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions for certain tax years. As a result of the Company’s ability to carryforward federal, state and foreign NOLs, the applicable tax years generally remain open to examination several years after the applicable loss carryforwards have been used or have expired. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations. The Company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through December 31, 2019.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Balance at January 1 | $107.7 | $116.7 | $107.6
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 33.3 | 8.1 | 7.6
Additions and reductions for tax positions of prior years | 37.5 | 0.3 | —
Foreign currency | (1.6) | (8.1) | 1.9
Reduction as a result of the lapse of statute of limitations | (1.3) | (2.6) | (0.4)
Reduction as a result of effective settlements | — | (6.7) | —
Balance at December 31 | $175.6 | $107.7 | $116.7


Question: Which years was the balance at January 1 above $100 million?
Answer: 3
Calculation: 2019##2018##2017
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 18: INTEREST EXPENSE AND FINANCE COST
Interest expense and finance cost consisted of the following:
Table:
 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Interest expense | $125,496 | $129,941 | $115,099
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs | 7,746 | 7,866 | 6,391
Other | 237 | 109 | 121
Interest expense and finance cost | $133,479 | $137,916 | $121,611


Question: How many years did Other expense and cost exceed $100 thousand?
Answer: 3
Calculation: 2019##2018##2017
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE III—SCHEDULE OF REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (dollars in millions)
(7) Primarily includes foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and other deductions.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Gross amount of accumulated depreciation at beginning | $(5,724.7) | $(5,181.2) | $(4,548.1)
Additions during period: |  |  | 
Depreciation | (768.4) | (751.4) | (718.7)
Other | — | — | —
Total additions | (768.4) | (751.4) | (718.7)
Deductions during period: |  |  | 
Amount of accumulated depreciation for assets sold or disposed | 121.4 | 129.3 | 100.7
Other (7) | (10.5) | 78.6 | (15.1)
Total deductions | 110.9 | 207.9 | 85.6
Balance at end | $(6,382.2) | $(5,724.7) | $(5,181.2)


Question: What was the depreciation cost in 2019?
Answer: (768.4)
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
IV. Our 2019 Compensation Program and Components of Pay The table below shows (i) the length of the “protected period” afforded to officers following a change of control and (ii) the multiple of salary and bonus payment and years of welfare benefits to which officers will be entitled if change of control benefits become payable under our agreements and related policies:
For more information on change of control arrangements applicable to our executives, including our rationale for
providing these benefits, see “Executive Compensation—Potential Termination Payments—Payments Made
Upon a Change of Control.” For information on change of control severance benefits payable to our junior
officers and managers, see “—Severance Benefits” in the next subsection below.
Table:
 | Protected Period | Multiple of Annual Cash Compensation | Years of Welfare Benefits
CEO | 2 years | 3 times | 3 years
Other Executives | 1.5 years | 2 times | 2 years
Other Officers | 1 year | 1 time | 1 year


Question: Which types of officers are listed in the table?
Answer: CEO, Other Executives, Other Officers
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is managed to enable the Group to meet future payment obligations when financial liabilities fall due. Liquidity analysis is conducted to determine that sufficient headroom is available to meet the Group’s operational requirements and committed investments. The Group treasury policy aims to meet this objective by maintaining adequate cash, marketable securities and committed facilities. Undrawn borrowing facilities are detailed in note 23. The Group’s policy is to seek to optimise its exposure to liquidity risk by balancing its exposure to interest rate risk and to refinancing risk. In effect the Group seeks to borrow for as long as possible at the lowest acceptable cost.
Group policy is to maintain a weighted average debt maturity of over five years. At 31 December 2019, the maturity profile of Group debt showed an average maturity of five years (2018: six years). The Group regularly reviews the maturity profile of its borrowings and seeks to avoid concentration of maturities through the regular replacement of facilities and by arranging a selection of maturity dates. Refinancing risk may be reduced by doing so prior to the contracted maturity date. The change in valuation of an asset used as security for a debt facility may impact the Group’s ability to refinance that debt facility at the same quantum as currently outstanding.
The Group does not use supplier financing arrangements to manage liquidity risk.
The tables below set out the maturity analysis of the Group’s financial liabilities based on the undiscounted contractual obligations to make payments of interest and to repay principal. Where interest payment obligations are based on a floating rate, the rates used are those implied by the par yield curve for the relevant currency. Where payment obligations are in foreign currencies, the spot exchange rate at the balance sheet date is used.
Table:
 |  |  |  |  | 2019
£m | Within 1 year | 1–2 years | 2–5 years | Over 5 years | Total
Borrowings (including interest) | (249.5) | (1,091.3) | (2,600.9) | (1,716.1) | (5,657.8)
Finance lease obligations | (5.3) | (5.3) | (14.3) | (104.8) | (129.7)
Other financial liabilities | (15.4) | – | – | (1.2) | (16.6)
Net derivative payments | (34.3) | (28.8) | (78.4) | (222.9) | (364.4)
 | (304.5) | (1,125.4) | (2,693.6) | (2,045.0) | (6,168.5)
 |  |  |  |  | 
 |  |  |  |  | 2018
£m | Within 1 year | 1–2 years | 2–5 years | Over 5 years | Total
Borrowings (including interest) | (237.8) | (245.2) | (3,259.1) | (2,408.0) | (6,150.1)
Finance lease obligations | (4.4) | (4.4) | (13.4) | (104.8) | (127.0)
Other financial liabilities | (6.1) | (1.2) | – | – | (7.3)
Net derivative payments | (37.2) | (33.5) | (74.0) | (248.2) | (392.9)
 | (285.5) | (284.3) | (3,346.5) | (2,761.0) | (6,677.3)
 |  |  |  |  | 


Question: What is the average maturity of the Group debt in 2019?
Answer: five years