hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company measures and reports certain cash equivalents, including money market funds and certificates of deposit, in addition to its long-term investments at fair value in accordance with the provisions of the authoritative accounting guidance that addresses fair value measurements. This guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available
The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: Other inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are based on management’s assumptions, including fair value measurements determined by using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques
The financial assets carried at fair value were determined using the following inputs (in thousands):
The Company’s other financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other current liabilities, are carried at cost, which approximates fair-value due to the relatively short maturity of those instruments.
Table:
 | Fair value at December 31, 2019 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3
Cash equivalents: |  |  |  | 
Money market funds | $297,311 | $297,311 | $ - | $ -
Noncurrent assets: |  |  |  | 
Long-term investments | 132,188 | - | - | 132,188
 | Fair value at December 31, 2018 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3
Cash equivalents: |  |  |  | 
Money market funds | $485,872 | $485,872 | $ - | $ -
Noncurrent assets: |  |  |  | 
Long-term investments | - | - | - | -


Question: What does Level 2 input in the fair value hierarchy refer to?
Answer: Other inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability
Share-based payments expense for the period was $62,028,117 (2018: $57,710,434).
The variables in the table below are used as inputs into the model to determine the fair value of performance rights.
(1) Grant date represents the offer acceptance date.
(2) The expected volatility is based on the historical implied volatility calculated based on the weighted average remaining life of the performance rights adjusted for any expected changes to future volatility due to publicly available information.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | F19 LTI | F18 LTI
Grant date (1) | 30 Nov 2018 | 31 Oct 2017
Performance period start date | 1 Jul 2018 | 1 Jul 2017
Exercise date | 1 Jul 2021 | 1 Jul 2020
Expected volatility (2) | 15.0% | 16.0%
Expected dividend yield | 4.0% | 4.0%
Risk-free interest rate | 2.1% | 1.9%
Weighted average fair value at grant date | $24.63 | $20.23


Question: What is the change in expected volatility between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 1
Calculation: 16.0% - 15.0%
23. Associates (Cont'd)
The summarised financial information of the Group’s significant associate namely Intouch Holdings Public Company Limited (“Intouch”), based on its financial statements and a reconciliation with the carrying amount of the investment in the consolidated financial statements was as follows –
Note: (1) Others include adjustments to align the respective local accounting standards to SFRS(I).
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 | S$ Mil | S$ Mil | S$ Mil
Statement of comprehensive income |  |  | 
Revenue | 250.1 | 353.9 | 144.1
Profit after tax | 451.7 | 488.2 | 166.1
Other comprehensive (loss)/ income | (0.9) | 10.9 | (1.6)
Total comprehensive income | 450.8 | 499.1 | 164.5
Statement of financial position |  |  | 
Current assets | 743.1 | 720.0 | 701.9
Non-current assets | 1,532.5 | 1,554.3 | 1,629.3
Current liabilities | (305.1) | (444.4) | (483.6)
Non-current liabilities | (205.5) | (313.4) | (395.3)
Net assets | 1,765.0 | 1,516.5 | 1,452.3
Less: Non-controlling interests | (304.6) | (342.2) | (411.6)
Net assets attributable to equity holders | 1,460.4 | 1,174.3 | 1,040.7
Proportion of the Group’s ownership | 21.0% | 21.0% | 21.0%
Group’s share of net assets | 306.7 | 246.6 | 218.5
Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets | 1,441.7 | 1,417.6 | 1,371.7
Others (1) | (46.8) | (23.0) | (8.4)
Carrying amount of the investment | 1,701.6 | 1,641.2 | 1,581.8
Other items |  |  | 
Group’s share of market value | 1,653.2 | 1,639.6 | 1,525.0
Dividends received during the year | 78.5 | 77.8 | -


Question: What information does the line item 'Others' relate to?
Answer: adjustments to align the respective local accounting standards to SFRS(I)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 9 — Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
The components of accrued expenses and other liabilities are as follows:
Table:
 | As of December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Accrued product-related costs | $4,464 | $4,377
Accrued income taxes | 7,903 | 6,914
Accrued property and other taxes | 1,574 | 1,976
Accrued professional fees | 1,599 | 3,350
Contract liabilities | 2,877 | 1,981
Dividends payable | 1,299 | 1,310
Remediation reserves | 11,444 | 11,274
Other accrued liabilities | 5,218 | 6,165
Total accrued expenses and other liabilities | $36,378 | $37,347


Question: What was the change in contract liabilities between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 896
Calculation: 2,877-1,981
The following table provides detail of amounts reclassified from AOCL:
(1) These accumulated other comprehensive components are included in our derivative and hedging activities. See Note 15, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Table:
(In millions) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | Location of Amount Reclassified from AOCL
Defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits: |  |  |  | 
Prior service credits | $ 0.1 | $0.3 | $ 1.3 | 
Actuarial losses | (4.9) | (3.1) | (10.0) | 
Total pre-tax amount | (4.8) | (2.8) | (8.7) | Other (expense) income, net
Tax benefit | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 
Net of tax | (3.6) | (2.1) | (6.2) | 
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives:(1) |  |  |  | 
Foreign currency forward contracts | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | Cost of sales
Interest rate and currency swaps | — | — | (3.4) | 
Treasury locks | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Interest expense, net
Total pre-tax amount | 1.7 | 0.3 | (2.4) | 
Tax (expense) benefit | (0.6) | (0.1) | 0.8 | 
Net of tax | 1.1 | 0.2 | (1.6) | 
Total reclassifications for the period | (2.5 ) | (1.9 ) | (7.8 ) | 


Question: What does the table represent?
Answer: detail of amounts reclassified from AOCL
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
For the Assemble Systems, PlanGrid, and BuildingConnected acquisitions that were accounted for as business combinations, Autodesk recorded the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned to the identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. Autodesk recorded the excess of consideration transferred over the aggregate fair values as goodwill. The goodwill recorded is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. There is no amount of goodwill that is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class for the business combinations that were completed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019:
(1) During Q4 of fiscal 2019, Autodesk recorded a measurement period adjustment related to the valuation of the deferred tax liability associated with the Assemble Systems acquisition. This adjustment increased goodwill and reduced net tangible assets by $0.1 million.
For the three business combinations in fiscal 2019, the determination of estimated fair values of certain assets and liabilities is derived from estimated fair value assessments and assumptions by Autodesk. For PlanGrid and BuildingConnected, Autodesk's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). For the three business combinations in fiscal 2019, the tax impact of the acquisition is also subject to change within the measurement period. Different estimates and assumptions could result in different valuations assigned to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting amount of goodwill.
Table:
 | Assemble Systems (1) | PlanGrid | BuildingConnected | Total
Developed technologies | $4.4 | $78.0 | $12.5 | $94.9
Customer relationships and other non-current intangible assets | 12.0 | 98.0 | 26.9 | 136.9
Trade name | 2.8 | 20.0 | 6.8 | 29.6
Goodwill | 72.0 | 588.7 | 206.3 | 867.0
Deferred revenue (current and non-current) | (1.7) | (25.5) | (2.8) | (30.0)
Net tangible assets | 4.1 | 18.4 | 3.5 | 26.0
Total | $93.6 | $777.6 | $253.2 | $1,124.4


Question: What is the total amount of net tangible assets for PlanGrid and BuildingConnected?
Answer: 21.9
Calculation: 18.4+3.5
5 Staff costs and numbers
The aggregate payroll costs of persons employed by the Group were as follows:
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | £m | £m
Wages and salaries | 345.6 | 325.9
Social security costs | 71.6 | 58.7
Pension costs | 21.5 | 19.3
Total payroll costs | 438.7 | 403.9


Question: What was the total payroll costs in 2018?
Answer: 403.9
Fiscal 2017 acquisitions
On August 1, 2016, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Blue Coat, Inc. (Blue Coat), a provider of advanced web security solutions for global enterprises and governments. The addition of Blue Coat’s suite of network and cloud security products to our innovative Enterprise Security product portfolio has enhanced our threat protection and information protection products while providing us with complementary products, such as advanced web and cloud security solutions, that address the network and cloud security needs of enterprises.
On February 9, 2017, we completed the acquisition of LifeLock, Inc. (LifeLock) a provider of proactive identity theft protection services for consumers and consumer risk management services for enterprises. LifeLock’s services are provided on a monthly or annual subscription basis and provide identification and notification of identity-related and other events and assist users in remediating their impact.
The total consideration for the acquisitions, net of cash acquired, consisted of the following:
Table:
(In millions) | Blue Coat | LifeLock | Total
Goodwill | $4,084 | $1,397 | $5,481
Intangible assets | 1,608 | 1,247 | 2,855
Net liabilities assumed | (1,019) | (361) | (1,380)
Total purchase price | $4,673 | $2,283 | $6,956


Question: What is the Goodwill for Blue Coat expressed as a percentage of Total purchase price?
Answer: 87.4
Calculation: 4,084/4,673
Options outstanding that are exercisable and that have vested and are expected to vest as of January 31, 2020 were as follows (outstanding options in thousands, aggregate intrinsic value in in millions):
(1) The aggregate intrinsic values represent the total pre-tax intrinsic values based on VMware's closing stock price of $148.06 as of January 31, 2020, which would have been received by the option holders had all in-the-money options been exercised as of that date.
The total fair value of VMware stock options that vested during the years ended January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 was $64 million, $35 million and $32 million, respectively. Total fair value of Pivotal stock options that vested during the years ended January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 was $27 million, $41 million and $23 million, respectively.
The VMware stock options exercised during the years ended January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 had a pre-tax intrinsic value of $103 million, $56 million, and $62 million, respectively. The Pivotal options exercised during the years ended January 31, 2020 and February 1, 2019 had a pre-tax intrinsic value of $278 million and $97 million, respectively, and was not material during the year ended February 2, 2018. The pre-tax intrinsic value of Pivotal options exercised during the year ended January 31, 2020 includes vested options that were settled in cash as part of the Pivotal acquisition.
Table:
 |  | VMware Stock Options |  | 
 | Outstanding Options | Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1)
Exercisable | 945 | $47.24 | 3.81 | $95
Vested and expected to vest | 2,589 | 56.13 | 6.41 | 238


Question: What was the amount of exercisable outstanding options?
Answer: 945
FLNG segment
Total operating revenues: On May 31, 2018, the Hilli was accepted by the Customer and, accordingly, commenced operations. As a result, she generated $127.6 million total operating revenues in relation to her liquefaction services for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Vessel operating expenses: This represents the vessel operating expenses incurred by the Hilli since she commenced operations.
Project development expenses: This relates to non-capitalized project-related expenses comprising of legal, professional and consultancy costs. The increase for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 was primarily as a result of increased engineering consultation fees and front-end engineering and design costs in relation to the Gimi GTA project.
Depreciation: Subsequent to the Customer's acceptance of the Hilli, we determined her to be operational and, therefore, depreciation commenced during the second quarter of 2018.
Other operating gains: Includes the realized and unrealized gain on the oil derivative instrument. In 2018, we recognized a realized gain of $26.7 million, and an unrealized fair value loss of $10.0 million, relating to the LTA oil derivative instrument as a result of the increased price of Brent Crude during the year. The derivative asset was recognized upon the LTA becoming effective in December 2017. In 2017, we recognized an unrealized fair value gain of $15.1 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, this is partially offset by a $1.3 million write off of capitalized conversion costs in relation to the Gandria. In addition, subsequent to the decision to wind down OneLNG, we wrote off $12.7 million of the trading balance with OneLNG as we deem it to be no longer recoverable.
Equity in net losses of affiliates: Pursuant to the formation of OneLNG in July 2016, we equity account for our share of net losses in OneLNG. Given the difficulties in finalizing an attractive debt financing package along with other capital and resource priorities, in April 2018, Golar and Schlumberger decided to wind down OneLNG and work on FLNG projects as required on a case-by-case basis. As a result, activity levels have been substantially reduced for the year ended December 31, 2018 and the carrying value of the investment was written down to $nil.
Table:
 |  | December 31, |  | 
(in thousands of $) | 2018 | 2017 | Change | % Change
Total operating revenues | 127,625 | — | 127,625 | 100%
Vessel operating expenses | (26,317) | (2) | (26,315) | 1,315,750%
Voyage expenses | (1,363) | (121) | (1,242) | 1,026%
Administrative expenses | 175 | (1,736) | 1,911 | (110)%
Project development expenses | (16,526) | (2,506) | (14,020) | 559%
Depreciation and amortization | (28,193) | — | (28,193) | 100%
Other operating gains | 2,749 | 15,100 | (12,351) | (82)%
Operating income | 58,150 | 10,735 | 47,415 | 442%
Equity in net losses of affiliates | (2,047) | (8,153) | 6,106 | (75)%


Question: What was the percentage change in operating income between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 441.69
Calculation: (58,150 - 10,735)/10,735
Note: Net loss equals to comprehensive loss for all years presented.
(1) Net loss per share and weighted average shares, basic and diluted are adjusted to reflect 1-for-14 reverse stock split effected on December 23, 2019.
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share amounts)
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Statements of Operations: |  |  | 
Revenue | $10,310 | $12,629 | $12,149
Cost of revenue | 4,405 | 6,295 | 6,627
Gross profit | 5,905 | 6,334 | 5,522
Operating expenses: |  |  | 
Research and development | 12,350 | 9,948 | 9,572
Selling, general and administrative | 8,918 | 9,982 | 9,900
Loss from operations | (15,363) | (13,596) | (13,950)
Interest expense | (350) | (108) | (115)
Interest income and other expense, net | 189 | 77 | 21
Loss before income taxes | (15,524) | (13,627) | (14,044)
(Benefit from) Provision for income taxes | (80) | 152 | 87
Net loss | $(15,444) | $(13,779) | $(14,131)
Net loss per share: (1) |  |  | 
Basic and diluted | $(2.02) | $(2.16) | $(2.56)
Weighted average shares: |  |  | 
Basic and diluted | 7,663 | 6,365 | 5,521


Question: What is the percentage change in cost of revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -30.02
Calculation: (4,405 - 6,295)/6,295
a. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, the Company recognized NT$118,252 million, NT$123,795 million and NT$122,999 million, respectively, in operating costs, of which NT$2,256 million, NT$1,698 million and NT$820 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, were related to write-down of inventories.
b. None of the aforementioned inventories were pledged.
Table:
As of December 31, |  | 
 | 2018 | 2019
 | NT$ | NT$
 | (In Thousands) | (In Thousands)
Raw materials | $3,766,056 | $5,102,571
Supplies and spare parts | 3,133,737 | 3,548,376
Work in process | 10,034,488 | 11,309,718
Finished goods | 1,268,838 | 1,754,137
Total | $18,203,119 | $21,714,802


Question: How many inventories were pledged?
Answer: None
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES – continued
Liquidity: TORM defines liquidity as available cash, comprising cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, as well as undrawn credit facilities.
TORM finds the APM important as the liquidity expresses TORM’s financial position, ability to meet current liabilities and cash buffer. Furthermore, it expresses TORM’s ability to act and invest when possibilities occur.
Table:
USDm | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash | 72.5 | 127.4 | 134.2
Undrawn credit facilities | 173.1 | 278.7 | 270.7
Liquidity | 245.6 | 406.1 | 404.9


Question: In which year was liquidity the largest?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: 406.1>404.9>245.6
GWL Corporate Free Cash Flow(1)
Following the reorganization of Choice Properties to GWL, management evaluates the cash generating capabilities of GWL Corporate(2) based on the various cash flow streams it receives from its operating subsidiaries. As a result, the GWL Corporate free cash flow(1) is based on the dividends received from Loblaw, distributions received from Choice Properties and net cash flow contributions received from Weston Foods less corporate expenses, interest and income taxes paid. Lease payments are excluded from the calculation of GWL Corporate free cash flow(1) to normalize for the impact of the implementation of IFRS 16.
(i) Included in Other and Intersegment, GWL Corporate includes all other company level activities that are not allocated to the reportable operating segments, such as net interest expense, corporate activities and administrative costs. Also included are preferred share dividends paid.
Table:
For the quarters and years ended December 31 | Quarters ended |  | Yeas ended | 
($ millions) | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018
Weston Foods adjusted EBITDA(1) | 56 | 59 | 223 | 233
Weston Foods capital expenditures | (70) | (91) | (194) | (212)
Distributions from Choice Properties | 82 | 43 | 325 | 43
Dividends from Loblaw | – | – | 233 | 212
Weston Foods income taxes paid | – | (2) | (7) | (32)
Other | 64 | 21 | (41) | (23)
GWL Corporate cash flow from operating businesses (1) | 132 | 30 | 539 | 221
GWL Corporate and financing costs (i) | (24) | (33) | (109) | (108)
Income taxes paid | (4) | (2) | (19) | (14)
GWL Corporate free cash flow (1) | 104 | (5) | 411 | 99


Question: What is the percentage increase in the GWL Corporate cash flow from operating businesses for quarters ended 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 340
Calculation: 132 / 30 - 1
11 Intangible assets (continued)
(a) Intangible assets
RIGHTS AND LICENCES
Certain licences that NEXTDC possesses have an indefinite useful life and are carried at cost less impairment losses and are subject to impairment review at least annually and whenever there is an indication that it may be impaired.
Other licences that NEXTDC acquires are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation is recognised on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life. The estimated useful life and amortisation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period.
INTERNALLY GENERATED SOFTWARE
Internally developed software is capitalised at cost less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line basis over the asset’s useful economic life which is generally two to three years. Their useful lives and potential impairment are reviewed at the end of each financial year.
SOFTWARE UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Costs incurred in developing products or systems and costs incurred in acquiring software and licenses that will contribute to future period financial benefits through revenue generation and/or cost reduction are capitalised to software and systems. Costs capitalised include external direct costs of materials and services and employee costs.
Assets in the course of construction include only those costs directly attributable to the development phase and are only recognised following completion of technical feasibility and where the Group has an intention and ability to use the asset.
Table:
 | Rights and licenses | Internally generated software | Software under development | Total
Movements | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000
At 30 June 2019 |  |  |  | 
Cost | 13 | 12,961 | 16,284 | 29,259
Accumulated amortisation | - | (5,580) | - | (5,580)
Netbook amount | 13 | 7,381 | 16,284 | 23,678
30 June 2018 |  |  |  | 
Opening net book amount at 1 July 2017 | 43 | 442 | 8,053 | 8,538
Additions – externally acquired | 13 | - | 5,253 | 5,266
Additions – internally developed | - | - | 1,256 | 1,256
Amortisation | (43) | (1,746) | - | (1,789)
Transfers | - | 7,563 | (7,563) | -
Transfer between classes | - | 744 | - | 744
Disposals | - | (618) | (490) | (1,108)
Closing net book amount | 13 | 6,385 | 6,509 | 12,907
At 30 June 2018 |  |  |  | 
Cost | 104 | 9,555 | 6,509 | 16,168
Accumulated amortisation | (91) | (3,170) | - | (3,261)
Net book amount | 13 | 6,385 | 6,509 | 12,907


Question: How was internally developed software capitalised?
Answer: at cost less accumulated amortisation.