hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
NOTE 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The classification of property and equipment, together with their estimated useful lives is as follows:
(1) Excludes assets held for sale
(2) Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life
The change in property and equipment in accrued liabilities was $14,315 and $15,674 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts were excluded from capital expenditures on the statements of cash flows.
No impairments of property and equipment were recorded in fiscal 2019 or 2018.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company received an unsolicited offer to purchase its Houston, TX, facility. At June 30, 2019, the facility included assets with a carrying value of approximately $5,055. Although management has not committed to the sale, a sale of the facility during fiscal 2020 is likely and the Company expects to record a gain on the sale upon closing, since the offer represents full appraisal value for the facility. Therefore, the assets are considered held for sale at June 30, 2019. Also held for sale at June 30, 2019, was the Company’s Elizabethtown, KY facility. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company reached a definitive agreement to sell the property for $1,300 pending an expected closing date during the second quarter of fiscal 2020. An impairment loss was recorded on this facility during fiscal 2017 as disclosed in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Total assets held for sale by the Company at June 30, 2019 and 2018 were $6,355 and $1,300, respectively, and were included in assets held for sale on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet for each year. Those balances are not included on the above table.
Table:
 | June 30, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | Estimated Useful Life
Land (1) | $23,243 | $24,845 | 
Land improvements (1) | 25,209 | 25,383 | 5 - 20 years
Buildings (1) | 147,220 | 143,918 | 20 - 30 years
Leasehold improvements | 48,478 | 48,060 | 5 - 30 years(2)
Equipment and furniture | 365,101 | 328,864 | 3 - 10 years
Aircraft and equipment | 39,293 | 38,761 | 4 - 10 years
Construction in progress | 12,411 | 39,872 | 
 | 660,955 | 649,703 | 
Less accumulated depreciation | 388,481 | 364,153 | 
Property and equipment, net | $272,474 | $285,550 | 


Question: What is the estimated useful life of land improvements?
Answer: 5 - 20 years
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
We regularly review the services and fees from our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG. These services and fees are also reviewed with the Audit Committee annually. In accordance with standard policy, KPMG periodically rotates the individuals who are responsible for our audit. Our Audit Committee has determined that the providing of certain non-audit services, as described below, is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.
In addition to performing the audit of our consolidated financial statements, KPMG provided various other services during fiscal years 2019 and 2018. Our Audit Committee has determined that KPMG’s provisioning of these services, which are described below, does not impair KPMG’s independence from NortonLifeLock. The aggregate fees billed for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 for each of the following categories of services are as follows:
The categories in the above table have the definitions assigned under Item 9 of Schedule 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act, and these categories include in particular the following components:
(1) ‘‘Audit fees’’ include fees for audit services principally related to the year-end examination and the quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements, consultation on matters that arise during a review or audit, review of SEC filings, audit services performed in connection with our acquisitions and divestitures and statutory audit fees.
(2) ‘‘Audit related fees’’ include fees which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit fees.
(3) ‘‘Tax fees’’ include fees for tax compliance and advice.
(4) ‘‘All other fees’’ include fees for all other non-audit services, principally for services in relation to certain information technology audits.
An accounting firm other than KPMG performs supplemental internal audit services for NortonLifeLock. Another accounting firm provides the majority of NortonLifeLock’s outside tax services..
Table:
Fees Billed to NortonLifeLock | FY19 | FY18
Audit fees(1) | $12,464,329 | $11,370,525
Audit related fees(2) | 1,142,383 | 753,689
Tax fees(3) | 161,685 | 469,449
All other fees(4) | 0 | 311,000
Total fees | $13,768,398 | $12,904,663


Question: What fiscal years are in the table?
Answer: FY19, FY18
5. Software Development and Intellectual Property Licenses
The following table summarizes the components of our capitalized software development costs (amounts in millions):
As of both December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, capitalized intellectual property licenses were not material.
Table:
 | At December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Internally-developed software costs | $345 | $291
Payments made to third-party software developers | 31 | 38
Total software development costs | $376 | $329


Question: What was the amounts of Payments made to third-party software developers in 2019?
Answer: 31
Contract costs As discussed in the Significant Accounting Policies Note, Topic 606 requires the recognition of an asset for incremental costs to obtain a customer contract, which is then amortized to expense, over the respective period of expected benefit. The Partnership recognizes a contract asset for incremental commission costs paid to Verizon Wireless personnel and agents in conjunction with obtaining customer contracts.
The costs are only deferred when it is determined the commissions are incremental costs that would not have been incurred absent the customer contract and are expected to be recovered. Costs to obtain a contract are amortized and recorded ratably as commission expense over the period representing the transfer of goods or services to which the assets relate. Costs to obtain contracts are amortized over the customers' estimated device upgrade cycle of two to three years, as such costs are typically incurred each time a customer upgrades their equipment.
The amortization periods for the costs incurred to obtain a customer contract is determined at a portfolio level due to the similarities within these customer contract portfolios. Other costs, such as general costs or costs related to past performance obligations, are expensed as incurred. Deferred contract costs are classified as current or non-current within prepaid expenses and other, and other assets – net, respectively. The balances of deferred contract costs as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, included in the balance sheet were as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership recognized expense of $3,126 and $2,161, respectively, associated with the amortization of deferred contract costs, primarily within selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.
Deferred contract costs are assessed for impairment on an annual basis. An impairment charge is recognized to the extent the carrying amount of a deferred cost exceeds the remaining amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for the goods and services related to the cost, less the expected costs related directly to providing those goods and services that have not yet been recognized as expenses. There have been no impairment charges recognized for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Assets |  | 
Prepaid expenses and other | $ 3,027 | $ 2,347
Other assets - net | 1,824 | 1,831
Total | $ 4,851 | $ 4,178


Question: What was the expense recognized by the Partnership in 2019? 
Answer: $3,126
Earnings Per Share
Calculations of net income per common share attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation are as follows (in millions, except per share data):
Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
To calculate the diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding, the number of incremental shares from the assumed exercise of stock options and assumed issuance of shares relating to RSUs is calculated by applying the treasury stock method. Share-based awards whose impact is considered to be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method were excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation.
The excluded number of anti-dilutive share-based awards was approximately 0.8 million, 0.6 million and 0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The dilutive impact related to the Company’s 1.00% Notes and 1.625% Notes is determined in accordance with the net share settlement requirements, under which the Company’s convertible notes are assumed to be convertible into cash up to the par value, with the excess of par value being convertible into common stock.
Additionally, if the average price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $ 25.96 per share, with respect to the 1.00% Notes, or $30.70 per share, with respect to the 1.625% Notes, during the relevant reporting period, the effect of the additional potential shares that may be issued related to the warrants that were issued concurrently with the issuance of the convertible notes will also be included in the calculation of diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding.
Prior to conversion, the convertible note hedges are not considered for purposes of the earnings per share calculations, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Upon conversion, the convertible note hedges are expected to offset the dilutive effect of the 1.00% Notes and 1.625% Notes, respectively, when the stock price is above $18.50 per share, with respect to the 1.00% Notes, and $20.72 per share, with respect to the 1.625% Notes.
Table:
 |  | Year ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Net income attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation | $211.7 | $627.4 | $810.7
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 410.9 | 423.8 | 421.9
Add: Incremental shares for: |  |  | 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards | 1.9 | 4.3 | 5.5
Dilutive effect of convertible notes | 3.2 | 7.8 | 0.9
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 416.0 | 435.9 | 428.3
Net income per common share attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation: |  |  | 
Basic | $0.52 | $1.48 | $1.92
Diluted | $0.51 | $1.44 | $1.89


Question: How much is the excluded number of anti-dilutive share-based awards for the year ended December 31, 2019?
Answer: 0.8 million
3. Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
The Company has several investments in unconsolidated entities that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Red River Valley Egg Farm, LLC ("Red River") operates a cage-free shell egg production complex near Bogota, Texas. Specialty Eggs, LLC ("Specialty Eggs") owns the Egg-Land's Best franchise for most of Georgia and South Carolina, as well as a portion of western North Carolina and eastern Alabama. Southwest Specialty Eggs, LLC ("Southwest Specialty Eggs") owns the Egg-Land's Best franchise for Arizona, southern California and Clark County, Nevada (including Las Vegas). As of June 1, 2019, the Company owns 50% of each of Red River, Specialty Eggs, and Southwest Specialty Eggs. Equity method investments are included in “Investments in unconsolidated entities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and totaled $60.7 million and $64.2 million at June 1, 2019 and at June 2, 2018, respectively.
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities of $4.8 million, $3.5 million, and $1.4 million from these entities has been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The condensed consolidated financial information for the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures was as follows (in thousands):
The Company is a member of Eggland’s Best, Inc. (“EB”), which is a cooperative. At June 1, 2019 and June 2, 2018, “Other long-term assets” as shown on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet includes the cost of the Company’s investment in EB plus any qualified written allocations. The Company cannot exert significant influence over EB’s operating and financial activities; therefore, the Company accounts for this investment using the cost method. The carrying value of this investment at June 1, 2019 and June 2, 2018 was $2.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
Table:
 |  | For the fiscal year ended | 
 | June 1, 2019 | June 2, 2018 | June 3, 2017
Net sales | $112,396 | $107,705 | $86,072
Net income | 9,490 | 7,071 | 2,804
Total assets | 128,470 | 134,056 | 131,871
Total liabilities | 7,600 | 5,859 | 6,543
Total equity | 120,870 | 128,197 | 125,328


Question: Which method is used by the company to account for investments?
Answer: investment using the cost method
the fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2006 , 2005 and 2004: .

Table:
 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
weighted average fair value of options granted | $ 20.01 | $ 9.48 | $ 7.28
expected volatility | 0.3534 | 0.3224 | 0.3577
distribution yield | 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) | 0.98% ( 0.98 % ) | 1.30% ( 1.30 % )
expected life of options in years | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3
risk-free interest rate | 5% ( 5 % ) | 4% ( 4 % ) | 4% ( 4 % )
the black-scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable .
in addition , option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions , including the expected stock price volatility .
because the company 2019s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options , and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate , in management 2019s opinion , the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options .
the total fair value of shares vested during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 was $ 9413 , $ 8249 , and $ 6418 respectively .
the aggregate intrinsic values of options outstanding and exercisable at december 30 , 2006 were $ 204.1 million and $ 100.2 million , respectively .
the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended december 30 , 2006 was $ 42.8 million .
aggregate intrinsic value represents the positive difference between the company 2019s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period , which was $ 55.66 on december 29 , 2006 , and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding .
as of december 30 , 2006 , there was $ 64.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation awards granted to employees under the option plans .
that cost is expected to be recognized over a period of five years .
employee stock purchase plan the shareholders also adopted an employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
up to 2000000 shares of common stock have been reserved for the espp .
shares will be offered to employees at a price equal to the lesser of 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the stock on the date of purchase or 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value on the enrollment date .
the espp is intended to qualify as an 201cemployee stock purchase plan 201d under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , 124693 , 112798 , and 117900 shares were purchased under the plan for a total purchase price of $ 3569 , $ 2824 , and $ 2691 , respectively .
at december 30 , 2006 , approximately 1116811 shares were available for future issuance. .

Question: considering the weighted average fair value of options , what was the decrease between shares that vested in 2006 and 2005?
Answer: 400
Calculation: divide(9413, 20.01), divide(8249, 9.48), subtract(#1, #0)
6. Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Current: |  |  | 
Federal  | $15,160 | $63,814 | $78
State  | — | 234 | 33
Foreign  | 11,943 | 10,134 | 10,016
 | 27,103 | 74,182 | 10,127
Deferred: |  |  | 
Federal  | (3,498) | (2,958) | 77
State  | 827 | (447) | 38
Foreign  | (7,093) | 23,793 | (481)
 | (9,764) | 20,388 | (366)
 | $17,339 | $94,570 | $9,761


Question: What was the deferred federal income tax expense  in 2018?
Answer: (2,958)
(1)  The bonus paid in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was approved by the compensation Committee and Supervisory Board with respect to the 2018, 2017 and 2016 financial year, respectively, based on the evaluation and assessment of the actual fulfillment of a number of pre-defined objectives for such year.
(2)  Including stock awards, employer social contributions, company car allowance, pension contributions, complementary pension contributions, miscellaneous allowances as well as one-off contractually obligated deferred compensation paid to Mr. Bozotti in 2019.
In accordance with the resolutions adopted at our AGM held on May 30, 2012, the bonus of our former President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Bozotti, in 2018 and 2017 included a portion of a bonus payable in stock awards and corresponding to 86,782 and 59,435 vested shares, respectively, based on fulfillment of a number of pre-defined objectives.
In addition, our sole member of our Managing Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Chery, was granted, in accordance with the compensation policy adopted by our General Meeting of Shareholders and subsequent shareholder authorizations, up to 100,000 unvested Stock Awards. The vesting of such stock awards is conditional upon the sole member of our Managing Board, President and Chief Executive Officer’s, continued service with us.
(3) In 2019, the total compensation of the sole member of our Managing Board, President and Chief Executive Officer was 46% fixed to 54% variable, compared to 12% fixed to 88% variable in 2018 and 44% fixed to 56% variable in 2017.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Salary | $896,297 | $927,820 | $903,186
Bonus(1) | $1,280,173 | $3,214,578 | $1,044,514
Charges and Non-cash Benefits(2) | $5,618,382 | $6,971,946 | $1,828,814
Total(3) | $7,794,852 | $11,114,344 | $3,776,514


Question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Salary from the period 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 24634
Calculation: 927,820-903,186
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $269.4 million, or 45.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. As a percentage of total revenues, gross profit decreased from 55.6% in the year ended December 31, 2018 to 54.9% in the year ended December 31, 2019, due to Shopify Payments representing a larger percentage of total revenue and an increase in amortization of technology related to the 6RS acquisition as well as other platform enhancements. This was partly offset by lower third-party infrastructure and hosting costs and employee-related costs as a percentage of revenues as well as the relative growth of higher-margin merchant solutions products, namely Shopify Capital and referral fees from partners.
Gross profit increased $216.0 million, or 56.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. As a percentage of total revenues, gross profit decreased from 56.5% in the year ended December 31, 2017 to 55.6% in the year ended December 31, 2018, due to Shopify Payments representing a larger percentage of total revenue, increasing the functionality and flexibility of our hosting infrastructure, and higher product costs associated with expanding our product offerings. This was partly offset by the relative growth of higher-margin merchant solutions products, namely referral fees from partners, Shopify Capital, and Shopify Shipping.
Table:
 | Years ended December 31 |  |  | 2019 vs 2018 | 2018 vs 2017
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | % Change | % Change
 | (in thousands, except percentages) |  |  |  | 
Gross profit | $ 865,643 | $ 596,267 | $ 380,253 | 45.2 % | 56.8 %
Percentage of total revenues | 54.9 % | 55.6 % | 56.5 % |  | 


Question: Between year ended 2017 and 2018, which year had higher gross profit?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: 596,267>380,253
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue | $ 486.9
attala costs | 9.9
rider revenue | 6.0
base revenue | 5.1
reserve equalization | -2.4 ( 2.4 )
net wholesale revenue | -4.0 ( 4.0 )
other | -2.7 ( 2.7 )
2008 net revenue | $ 498.8
the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider .
the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes .
the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below .
the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 .
the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .
the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Question: what is the net difference in net revenue in 2008 compare to 2007?
Answer: 11.9
Calculation: subtract(498.8, 486.9)
Expected Cash Flows
The Combined Pension Plan payments, post-retirement health care benefit payments and premiums, and life insurance premium payments are either distributed from plan assets or paid by us. The estimated benefit payments provided below are based on actuarial assumptions using the demographics of the employee and retiree populations and have been reduced by estimated participant contributions.
Table:
 | Combined Pension Plan | Post-Retirement Benefit Plans | Medicare Part D Subsidy Receipts
 |  | (Dollars in millions) | 
Estimated future benefit payments: |  |  | 
2020 | $971 | 242 | (6)
2021 | 921 | 238 | (6)
2022 | 893 | 232 | (6)
2023 | 868 | 226 | (5)
2024 | 842 | 219 | (5)
2025-2029 | 3,813 | 986 | (20)


Question: Which payments are either distributed from plan assets or paid by the company?
Answer: The Combined Pension Plan payments, post-retirement health care benefit payments and premiums, and life insurance premium payments