hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $4.4 million, $4.2 million
and $3.8 million, respectively. Accrued interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits is recognized as part of
our income tax provision in our consolidated statements of operations and is immaterial for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018. Our policy for classifying interest and penalties associated with unrecognized income
tax benefits is to include such items in income tax expense.
The activity related to the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
These amounts are related to certain deferred tax assets with a corresponding valuation allowance. As ofDecember 31, 2019, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, that would affect the effective taxrate is $1.0 million. We do not anticipate a material change to our unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelvemonths. Unrecognized tax benefits may change during the next twelve months for items that arise in the ordinarycourse of business.
We are subject to taxation in the United States, various states, and several foreign jurisdictions. Because we havenet operating loss and credit carryforwards, there are open statutes of limitations in which federal, state and foreigntaxing authorities may examine our tax returns for all years from 2005 through the current period. We are notcurrently under examination by any taxing authorities.
Table:
 | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Gross unrecognized tax benefits —beginning balance | $4,191 | $3,782 | $3,360
Increases (decrease) related to tax positions from prior years | (280) | (266) | (151)
Increases related to tax positions taken during current year | 530 | 675 | 573
Decreases related to tax positions taken during the current year | — | — | —
Gross unrecognized tax benefits —ending balance | $4,441 | $4,191 | $3,782


Question: What is the company's unrecognized tax benefit in 2019?
Answer: $4,441
The assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2019.
(2) Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEO. Instead, the amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of stock options issued pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and certain inducement grants, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2019.
(3) All non-equity incentive plan compensation was paid pursuant to the Variable Pay Plan.
(4) The amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal 2019 include: $4,000 401(k) matching contribution by the Company for each NEOs other than Mr. McNab.
(5) The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Maletira a one-time discretionary bonus in the amount of $180,000 in connection with his work on the AvComm and Wireless acquisition. Please see “Discretionary Bonuses” under the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 36 of this proxy statement.
(6) Mr. Staley was awarded a $60,000 sign-on bonus when he joined the Company in February 2017.
The amounts in the salary, bonus, and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table reflect actual amounts paid for the relevant years, while the amounts in the stock awards column reflect accounting values. The tables entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table” provide further information on the named executive officers’ potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect to their equity awards. The Summary Compensation Table should be read in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative descriptions.
Table:
Name | Fiscal Year | Maximum Possible Value of MSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value | Maximum Possible Value of PSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Oleg Khaykin | 2019 | 4,067,526 | —
 | 2018 | 2,457,750 | 909,900
 | 2017 | 659,618 | —
Amar Maletira | 2019 | 1,379,350 | —
 | 2018 | 1,015,870 | 454,950
 | 2017 | 574,500 | —
Paul McNab | 2019 | 591,150 | —
 | 2018 | 442,395 | —
 | 2017 | 373,425 | —
Luke Scrivanich | 2019 | 591,150 | —
 | 2018 | 442,395 | —
 | 2017 | 393,600 | —
Gary Staley | 2019 | 591,150 | —
 | 2018 | 943,527 | —
 | 2017 | 303,948 | —


Question: How much does the top 2 maximum possible value of MSUs in 2019 add up to?
Answer: 5446876
Calculation: (4,067,526+1,379,350)
6 Other assets (continued)
(a) Security deposits
Included in the security deposits was $8.8 million (2018: $4.2 million) relating to deposits held as security for bank guarantees.
(b) Customer incentives
Where customers are offered incentives in the form of free or discounted periods, the dollar value of the incentive is capitalised and amortised on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the contract.
(c) Contract Costs
From 1 July 2018, eligible costs that are expected to be recovered will be capitalised as a contract cost and amortised over the expected customer life.
Table:
 |  | 30 June 2019 | 30 June 2018
 | Note | $'000 | $'000
CURRENT |  |  | 
Prepayments |  | 2,631 | 3,827
Capitalised transaction costs |  | 1,496 | -
Security deposits | 6(a) | 8,822 | 4,151
Customer incentives | 6(b) | 625 | 764
Other current assets |  | 412 | 412
Contract costs 6(c) | 6(c) | 446 | -
Total other assets - current |  | 14,432 | 9,154


Question: How was customer incentives amortised?
Answer: on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the contract
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 19: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company through August 30, 2019 had three reportable segments from which it derived its revenues: Dry Bulk Vessel Operations, Logistics Business and Containers Business. The Containers Business became a reportable segment as a result of the consolidation of Navios Containers since November 30, 2018 (date of obtaining control) (see also Note 3). Following the reclassification of the results of Navios Containers as discontinued operations (see also Note 3), the Company currently has two reportable segments from which it derives its revenues: Dry Bulk Vessel Operations and Logistics. The reportable segments reflect the internal organization of the Company and are strategic businesses that offer different products and services. The Dry Bulk Vessel Operations consists of the transportation and handling of bulk cargoes through the ownership, operation, and trading of vessels. The Logistics Business consists of operating ports and transfer station terminals, handling of vessels, barges and pushboats as well as upriver transport facilities in the Hidrovia region.
The Company measures segment performance based on net income/ (loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders. Inter-segment sales and transfers are not significant and have been eliminated and are not included in the following tables. Summarized financial information concerning each of the Company’s reportable segments is as follows:
Table:
 | Dry Bulk Vessel Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 | Logistics Business for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 | Total for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenue | $254,178 | $228,271 | $482,449
Administrative fee revenue from affiliates | 16,991 | — | 16,991
Interest income | 9,610 | 1,052 | 10,662
Interest expense and finance cost | (92,948) | (40,531) | (133,479)
Depreciation and amortization | (52,288) | (29,435) | (81,723)
Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliated companies | (9,185) | — | (9,185)
Net (loss)/ income attributable to Navios Holdings common |  |  | 
stockholders | (212,623) | 20,513 | (192,110)
Total assets | 1,511,517 | 631,338 | 2,142,855
Goodwill | 56,240 | 104,096 | 160,336
Capital expenditures | (36,628) | (7,943) | (44,571)
Investment in affiliates | 64,352 | — | 64,352
Cash and cash equivalents | 32,386 | 45,605 | 77,991
Restricted cash | 736 | — | 736
Long-term debt, net (including current and noncurrent portion) | $1,048,318 | $514,929 | 1,563,247


Question: What was the difference in interest income between dry bulk vessel operations and logistics business?
Answer: 8558
Calculation: 9,610-1,052
2019 vs 2018
SMB segment net revenue was flat for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decline in net revenue of our
network storage products, substantially offset by growth in net revenue of our switch products. Geographically, net revenue grew in APAC, but declined in Americas and EMEA.
Contribution income decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year, primarily as a result of lower gross margin attainment, partially offset by lower operating expenses as a proportion of net revenue. Contribution margin decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year, primarily lower gross margin attainment mainly resulting from foreign exchange headwinds due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar as well as higher provisions for sales returns.
2018 vs 2017
SMB segment net revenue increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year, primarily due to growth in switches, partially offset by the decrease in network storage. SMB experienced growth in net revenue across all regions. SMB net revenue was further benefited by lower provisions for sales returns deemed to be a reduction of net revenue.
Contribution income increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year, primarily due to increasing net revenue and improved gross margin performance not being met with proportionate increases in operating expense compared to the prior period.
Table:
 |  |  | Year Ended December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | % Change | 2018 | % Change | 2017
 |  |  | (in thousands, except percentage data) |  | 
Net revenue | $287,372 | (0.1)% | $287,756 | 6.2% | $270,908
Percentage of net revenue | 28.8% |  | 27.2% |  | 26.1%
Contribution income | $67,282 | (4.1)% | $70,142 | 9.8% | $63,865
Contribution margin | 23.4% |  | 24.4% |  | 23.6%


Question: Which regions did the net revenue decline in 2019?
Answer: Americas and EMEA
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 466.1
base revenue | 7.9
volume/weather | 4.5
transmission revenue | 4.1
transmission equalization | 4.0
reserve equalization | 3.8
attala costs | -10.2 ( 10.2 )
other | 6.7
2007 net revenue | $ 486.9
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .
the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 .
billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh .
the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector .
the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies .
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: what is the percentage change in net revenue in 2007 compare to 2006?
Answer: 4.5%
Calculation: subtract(486.9, 466.1), divide(#0, 466.1)
Pro forma consolidated results of operations
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents combined results of operations for each of the periods presented as if the acquisitions of MOI and GP had been completed on January 1, 2018. The pro forma information includes adjustments to depreciation expense for property and equipment acquired and amortization expense for the intangible assets acquired and the elimination of transaction expenses recognized in each period. Transaction-related expenses associated with the acquisition and excluded from pro forma income from continuing operations were $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no transaction-related expenses associated with the acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2018. The pro forma data are for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations or the combined business had the acquisitions of MOI and GP occurred on January 1, 2018, or the results of future operations of the combined business. For instance, planned or expected operational synergies following the acquisition are not reflected in the pro forma information. Consequently, actual results will differ from the unaudited pro forma information presented below.
Table:
 | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | (unaudited)  | (unaudited)
Revenue | $72,576,902 | $60,249,896
Income from continuing operations | $6,912,802 | $1,559,008


Question: In which year was Revenue less than 65,000,000?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: locate and analyze Revenue in row 4
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 16.4%
Calculation: subtract(139.55, 119.89), divide(#0, 119.89)
29. Related party transactions
The Group has a number of related parties including joint arrangements and associates, pension schemes and Directors and Executive Committee members (see note 12 “Investments in associates and joint arrangements”, note 24 “Post employment benefits” and note 22 “Directors and key management compensation”).
Transactions with joint arrangements and associates
Related party transactions with the Group’s joint arrangements and associates primarily comprise fees for the use of products and services including network airtime and access charges, fees for the provision of network infrastructure and cash pooling arrangements.
No related party transactions have been entered into during the year which might reasonably affect any decisions made by the users of these consolidated financial statements except as disclosed below.
Note: 1 Amounts arise primarily through VodafoneZiggo, Vodafone Idea, Vodafone Hutchison Australia and Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Limited. Interest is paid in line with market rates.
Dividends received from associates and joint ventures are disclosed in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 | €m | €m | €m
Sales of goods and services to associates | 27 | 19 | 37
Purchase of goods and services from associates | 3 | 1 | 90
Sales of goods and services to joint arrangements | 242 | 194 | 19
Purchase of goods and services from joint arrangements | 192 | 199 | 183
Net interest income receivable from joint arrangements1 | 96 | 120 | 87
Trade balances owed: |  |  | 
by associates | 1 | 4 | –
to associates | 3 | 2 | 1
by joint arrangements | 193 | 107 | 158
to joint arrangements | 25 | 28 | 15
Other balances owed by joint arrangements1 | 997 | 1,328 | 1,209
Other balances owed to joint arrangements1 | 169 | 150 | 127


Question: Which financial years' information is shown in the table?
Answer: 2017, 2018, 2019
Commitments
At March 31, 2019, we had contractual obligations in the form of non-cancellable operating leases and debt, including interest payments (see Note 3, “Debt” and Note 15, “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements), European social security, pension benefits, other post-retirement benefits, inventory purchase obligations, fixed asset purchase obligations, acquisition related obligations, and construction obligations as follows (amounts in thousands):
(1) Refer to Note 3, “Debt” for additional information. Repayment of the Customer Capacity Agreements assumes the customers purchase products in a quantity sufficient to require the maximum permitted debt repayment amount per quarter.
(2) Reflects expected benefit payments through fiscal year 2029.
(3) In addition to amounts reflected in the table, an additional $2.9 million has been recorded in the line item "Accrued expenses," for which the timing of payment has not been determined.
Table:
 |  |  | Payment Due by Period |  | 
Contractual obligations | Total | Year 1 | Years 2 - 3 | Years 4 - 5 | More than 5 years
Debt obligations (1) | $305,927 | $28,430 | $59,509 | $55,708 | $162,280
Interest obligations (1) | 28,200 | 6,326 | 11,039 | 8,928 | 1,907
Operating lease obligations | 48,311 | 10,898 | 14,302 | 9,402 | 13,709
Pension and other post-retirement benefits (2) | 94,178 | 6,758 | 15,184 | 18,024 | 54,212
Employee separation liability | 7,640 | 594 | 674 | 674 | 5,698
Restructuring liability | 2,181 | 1,869 | 312 | — | —
Purchase commitments | 31,468 | 31,468 | — | — | —
Capital lease obligations | 2,049 | 993 | 888 | 168 | —
Anti-trust fines and settlements (3) | 34,880 | 21,712 | 10,203 | 2,965 | —
Total | $554,834 | $109,048 | $112,111 | $95,869 | $237,806


Question: What were the total debt obligations?
Answer: 305,927
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost and consists of furniture, computers, other office equipment, and leasehold improvements. We depreciate the cost of furniture, computers, and other office equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (five years for office equipment, seven years for furniture and fixtures). Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of their useful lives or the term of the lease. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2019, 2018, and 2017 was approximately $8.0 million, $8.6 million, and $9.1 million, respectively, and was included in “Depreciation and amortization” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Amortization expense on intangible assets in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was immaterial.
Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following (in thousands):
Table:
 | December 31 | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Office equipment | $ 38,373 | $ 39,633
Furniture and fixtures | 5,017 | 4,610
Leasehold improvement | 23,534 | 19,430
Property and equipment, gross | 66,924 | 63,673
Less accumulated depreciation | (44,199 ) | (49,355 )
Property and equipment, net | $ 22,725 | $ 14,318


Question: What is the change in depreciation and amortization cost between 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 0.6
Calculation: $8.6-8.0