hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Debt Activity
The table below presents the effects of issuances, prepayments, and conversions of debt in 2019. When we receive a notice of conversion for any of our convertible notes and elect to settle in cash any amount of the conversion obligation in excess of the principal amount, the cash settlement obligations become derivative debt liabilities subject to mark-to-market accounting treatment based on the volume-weighted-average price of our common stock over a period of 20 consecutive trading days. Accordingly, at the date of our election to settle a conversion in cash, we reclassify the fair value of the equity component of the converted notes from additional capital to derivative debt liability within current debt in our consolidated balance sheet.
In 2018, we repurchased or redeemed $6.96 billion of principal amount of notes (carrying value of $6.93 billion) for an aggregate of $9.42 billion in cash and 4 million shares of our treasury stock. As of August 30, 2018, an aggregate of $35 million principal amount of our 2033F Notes (with a carrying value of $165 million) had converted but not settled. These notes settled in 2019 for $153 million in cash and the effect of the settlement is included in the table above. In connection with these transactions, we recognized aggregate non-operating losses of $385 million in 2018.
In 2017, we repurchased or redeemed $1.55 billion of principal amount of notes (carrying value of $1.54 billion) for an aggregate of $1.63 billion in cash. In connection with these transactions, we recognized aggregate non-operating losses of $94 million in 2017.
(1)  Issued February 6, 2019.
(2)  Issued July 12, 2019.
(3)  As of August 29, 2019, an aggregate of $44 million principal amount of our 2033F Notes (with a carrying value of $179 million) had converted but not settled. These notes settled in the first quarter of 2020 for $192 million in cash.
Table:
 | Increase (Decrease) in Principal | Increase (Decrease) in Carrying Value | Increase (Decrease) in Cash | Decrease in Equity | Gain (Loss)
Issuances |  |  |  |  | 
2024 Notes(1) | $600 | $597 | $597 | $— | $—
2026 Notes(1) | 500 | 497 | 497 | — | —
2027 Notes(2) | 900 | 895 | 895 | — | —
2029 Notes(1) | 700 | 695 | 695 | — | —
2030 Notes(2) | 850 | 845 | 845 | — | —
Prepayments |  |  |  |  | 
2022 Term Loan B | (728) | (721) | (728) | — | (7)
Settled conversions |  |  |  |  | 
2032D Notes | (10) | (9) | (35) | (28) | 2
2033F Notes | (45) | (175) | (192) | (28) | 11
2043G Notes | (1,019) | (691) | (1,426) | (326) | (400)
Conversions not settled |  |  |  |  | 
2033F Notes(3) | — | 135 | — | (133) | (2)
 | $1,748 | $2,068 | $1,148 | $(515) | $(396)


Question: How much principal amount of notes did the company repurchased or redeemed in 2018?
Answer: $6.96 billion
Uncertain Tax Positions
In accordance with authoritative guidance, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018,and 2017 (amounts shown in thousands):
Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2019, $1.6 million will impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate that there will be a substantial change in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
The Company's practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2019, no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is subject to income taxation in the U.S. at the federal and state levels. All tax years are subject to examination by U.S., California, and other state tax authorities due to the carryforward of unutilized net operating losses and tax credits. The Company is also subject to foreign income taxes in the countries in which it operates. The Company’s U.S. federal tax return for the year ended September 30, 2017 is currently under examination. To our knowledge, the Company is not currently under examination by any other taxing authorities.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year | $1,321 | $1,181 | $—
Additions from tax positions taken in the current year | 213 | 140 | 140
Additions from tax positions taken in prior years | 73 | — | 1,041
Reductions from tax positions taken in prior years | — | — | —
Tax settlements | — | — | —
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of the year | $1,607 | $1,321 | $1,181


Question: What is the percentage change in gross unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 11.85
Calculation: (1,321-1,181)/1,181
2018 Compensation
The following table provides information regarding the total compensation that was earned by each of our non-employee directors in 2018.
(1) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). The amount does not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized by the non-employee director. The valuation assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
(2) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column representing the annual awards or initial awards, as applicable, granted to our non-employee directors in 2018 are detailed below. Each of these awards vests and settles on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date or the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to the director’s continued service through the vesting date.
(3) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column representing the awards of RSUs granted to our non-employee directors in lieu of cash retainers in 2018 are described below. Each of these awards vested and settled in full on the grant date.
(4)  As of December 31, 2018, Dr. Simmons also held a fully vested option to purchase 38,000 shares of our Class B common stock.
(5)  As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Viniar also held 8,750 RSUs granted in 2015 to be settled in shares of our Class B common stock, which shares vest in full on the earlier of June 21, 2019 or the 2019 annual meeting subject to Mr. Viniar’s continued service with us through such vesting date. As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Viniar also held a fully vested option to purchase 326,950 shares of our Class B common stock.
Table:
Director | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)(3) | Total ($)
Roelof Botha | — | 305,119 | 305,119
Paul Deighton | 45,000 | 249,998 | 294,998
Randy Garutti | 42,500 | 249,998 | 292,488
James McKelvey | — | 290,041 | 290,041
Mary Meeker | — | 305,119 | 305,119
Anna Patterson | 50,000 | 249,988 | 299,988
Naveen Rao | 45,000 | 249,988 | 294,988
Ruth Simmons (4) | — | 300,132 | 300,132
Lawrence Summers | 50,903 | 249,988 | 300,891
David Viniar (5) | — | 382,610 | 382,610


Question: What is the total compensation earned by Paul Deighton in 2018?
Answer: 294,998
(d) Product Warranties
The following table summarizes the activity related to the product warranty liability (in millions):
We accrue for warranty costs as part of our cost of sales based on associated material product costs, labor costs for technical support staff, and associated overhead. Our products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to five years, and for some products we provide a limited lifetime warranty.
Table:
 | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018 | July 29, 2017
Balance at beginning of fiscal year | $359 | $407 | $414
Provisions for warranties issued | 600 | 582 | 691
Adjustments for pre-existing warranties | (12) | (38) | (21)
Settlements | (603) | (592) | (677)
Acquisitions and divestitures | (2) | — | —
Balance at end of fiscal year | $342 | $359 | $407


Question: What were the Acquisitions and divestitures in 2019?
Answer: (2)
3. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Revenues and related costs on construction contracts are recognized as the performance obligations are satisfied over time in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under ASC 606, revenue and associated profit, will be recognized as the customer obtains control of the goods and services promised in the contract (i.e., performance obligations). The cost of uninstalled materials or equipment will generally be excluded from the Company’s recognition of profit, unless specifically produced or manufactured for a project, because such costs are not considered to be a measure of progress.
The following table represents a disaggregation of revenue by customer type from contracts with customers for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Agricultural, Commercial, and Industrial (ACI) | $28,940 | $33,193
Public Works | 12,128 | 17,986
Residential | 18,762 | 19,786
Total | 59,830 | 70,965


Question: What is the percentage change in the revenue from agricultural, commercial and industrial group from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -12.81
Calculation: (28,940-33,193)/33,193
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue | $ 1110.6
rider revenue | 13.6
purchased power capacity | 4.8
volume/weather | -14.6 ( 14.6 )
other | 3.5
2008 net revenue | $ 1117.9
the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 .
the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income .
also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues .
the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class .
billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008 for entergy arkansas?
Answer: 0.7%
Calculation: subtract(1117.9, 1110.6), divide(#0, 1110.6)
24. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table set forth the computation for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock (in thousands, except per share data):
As of September 27, 2019, we had warrants outstanding which were reported as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet. During fiscal years 2019 and 2018, we recorded gains of $0.8 million and $27.6 million, respectively, associated with adjusting the fair value of the warrants, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations primarily as a result of declines in our stock price.
When calculating earnings per share we are required to adjust for the dilutive effect of outstanding common stock equivalents, including adjustment to the numerator for the dilutive effect of contracts that must be settled in common stock. During the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019, we excluded the effects of the warrant gain and the 214,303 of potential shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, we adjusted the numerator to exclude the warrant gain $27.6 million, and we also adjusted the denominator for the dilutive effect of the incremental warrant shares of 569,667 under the treasury stock method. For the fiscal years 2018, the table above excludes the effects of 375,940 shares of potential shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
The table excludes the effects of 386,552 and 1,877,401 shares for fiscal years 2019 and 2017, respectively, of potential shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and warrants as the inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Years | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Numerator:      |  |  | 
Loss from continuing operations | $(383,798) | $(133,762) | $(150,416)
Loss from discontinued operations | — | (6,215) | (19,077)
Net loss | (383,798) | (139,977) | (169,493)
Warrant liability gain | — | (27,646) | —
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $(383,798) | $(167,623) | $(169,493)
Denominator:      |  |  | 
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic | 65,686 | 64,741 | 60,704
Dilutive effect of warrants | — | 570 | —
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted | 65,686 | 65,311 | 60,704
Common stock earnings per share-basic:      |  |  | 
Continuing operations | $(5.84) | $(2.07) | $(2.48)
Discontinued operations | — | (0.10) | (0.31)
Net common stock earnings per share-basic | $(5.84) | $(2.16) | $(2.79)
Common stock earnings per share-diluted: |  |  | 
Continuing operations | $(5.84) | $(2.47) | $(2.48)
Discontinued operations | — | (0.10) | (0.31)
Net common stock earnings per share-diluted | $(5.84) | $(2.57) | $(2.79)


Question: What was the Loss from continuing operations in 2019?
Answer: $(383,798)
Net Pool Allocation: Net pool allocation increased by $10.5 million, from $7.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 to $17.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in net pool allocation was attributable to the movement in the adjustment of the net pool results earned by the GasLog vessels in accordance with the pool distribution formula. GasLog recognized gross revenues and gross voyage expenses and commissions of $102.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively, from the operation of its vessels in the Cool Pool during the year ended December 31, 2018 (December 31, 2017: $38.0 million and $9.1 million, respectively). The increase in GasLog’s total net pool performance was driven by higher spot rates and higher utilization achieved by all vessels trading in the Cool Pool. GasLog’s total net pool performance is presented below:
Voyage Expenses and Commissions: Voyage expenses and commissions increased by 32.5%, or $5.0 million, from $15.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 to $20.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in voyage expenses and commissions is mainly attributable to an increase of $3.6 million in bunkers consumed and voyage expenses during certain unchartered and off-hire periods, an increase of $0.3 million in voyage expenses of the vessels operating in the spot market and an increase of $1.1 million in brokers’ commissions.
Table:
 | For the year ended | 
 | 2017 | 2018
Amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars |  | 
Pool gross revenues (included in Revenues) | 38,046 | 102,253
Pool gross voyage expenses and commissions (included in Voyage expenses and commissions) | (9,122) | (10,154)
GasLog’s adjustment for net pool allocation (included in Net pool allocation) | 7,254 | 17,818
GasLog’s total net pool performance | 36,178 | 109,917


Question: In which years was the total net pool performance recorded for?
Answer: 2018, 2017
(6) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
During 2019, we periodically assessed whether any indicators of impairment existed related to our intangible assets. As of each interim period end during the year, we concluded that a triggering event had not occurred that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our intangible assets below their carrying values.
Amortization expense recognized in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $23,671,000, $15,737,000 and $16,812,000, respectively.
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Customer relationships | $336,455 | $159,566
Other | 15,621 | 5,555
 | 352,076 | 165,121
Accumulated amortization | (73,492) | (52,942)
Intangible assets, net | 278,584 | 112,179


Question: What is the average Accumulated amortization for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 63217
Calculation: (73,492+52,942) / 2
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Below is a summary of the difference between income tax expense computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before income tax expense and the actual income tax expense for the year.
Our effective income tax rate this year was 25.8% compared to 26.9% for 2018. The effective income tax rate for 2019 was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily as a result of a reduction to the Alberta corporate income tax rate over a four-year period.
Cash income taxes paid increased this year primarily as a result of the timing of installment payments.
Table:
 | Years ended December31 | 
(In millions of dollars, except tax rates) | 2019 | 2018
Statutory income tax rate | 26.7% | 26.7%
Income before income tax expense | 2,755 | 2,817
Computed income tax expense | 736 | 752
Increase (decrease) in income tax expense resulting from: |  | 
Non-deductible stock-based compensation | – | 5
Non-deductible portion of equity losses | 7 | 1
Income tax adjustment, legislative tax change | (23) | -
Non-taxable portion of capital gains | (2) | (9)
Other items | (6) | 9
Total income tax expense | 712 | 758
Effective income tax rate | 25.8% | 26.9%
Cash income taxes paid | 400 | 370


Question: What was the effective tax rate in 2018?
Answer: 26.9%
Operating profit/loss
Our operating profit in 2019 was EUR 485 million, a change of EUR 544 million, compared to an operating loss of EUR 59 million in 2018. The change in operating result was primarily due to lower selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses and a net positive fluctuation in other operating income and expenses, partially offset by lower gross profit. Our operating margin in 2019 was 2.1%, compared to approximately breakeven in 2018.
(1) Excludes costs related to the acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments, restructuring and associated charges and certain other items.
The following table sets forth the impact of unallocated items on operating profit/loss:
Table:
EURm | 2019 | 2018
Total segment operating profit(1) | 2,003 | 2,180
Amortization and depreciation of acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment | (924) | (940)
Restructuring and associated charges | (502) | (321)
Gain on defined benefit plan amendment | 168 | -
Product portfolio strategy costs | (163) | (583)
Transaction and related costs, including integration costs relating to the acquisition of Alcatel Lucent | (48) | (220)
Impairment of assets, net of impairment reversals | (29) | (48)
Operating model integration | (12) | -
Release of acquisition-related fair value adjustments to deferred revenue and inventory | (6) | (16)
Divestment of businesses | (2) | (39)
Fair value changes of legacy IPR fund | - | (57)
Other | - | (15)
Total operating profit/(loss) | 485 | (59)


Question: What was the divestment of business in 2019?
Answer: (2)
Periodic Benefit Costs The aggregate net pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations were costs of $6.5 million and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (in millions):
Of the amounts presented above, income of $1.4 million has been included in cost of revenue and loss of $7.9 million included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2019, and income of $2.1 million has been included in cost of revenue and loss of $6.7 million included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Table:
 | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Service cost—benefits earning during the period | $- | $-
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 5.3 | 5.3
Expected return on assets | (6.7) | (7.5)
Actuarial (gain) loss | 7.9 | 6.7
Foreign currency gain (loss) | - | 0.1
Net pension (benefit) cost | $ 6.5 | $ 4.6


Question: What was the service cost in 2019?
Answer: -
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

Table:
 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
state street corporation | $ 100 | $ 111 | $ 118 | $ 105 | $ 125 | $ 198
s&p 500 index | 100 | 126 | 146 | 149 | 172 | 228
s&p financial index | 100 | 117 | 132 | 109 | 141 | 191
kbw bank index | 100 | 98 | 121 | 93 | 122 | 168
.

Question: how much higher are the returns of the s&p 500 in the same period ( 2008-2013 ) ? as a percentage .
Answer: 30%
Calculation: divide(228, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Note 13: Supplemental Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations Detail
(1) Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
Table:
 | March 31, | 
(amounts in thousands) | 2019 | 2018
Accounts receivable: |  | 
Trade | $176,715 | $166,459
Allowance for doubtful accounts reserve | (1,206) | (1,210)
Ship-from-stock and debit (“SFSD”) reserve | (18,862) | (17,362)
Returns reserves (1) | (964) | (131)
Rebates reserves | (967) | (446)
Price protection reserves | (657) | (420)
Other | — | (329)
Accounts receivable, net (1) | $154,059 | $146,561


Question: Which years does the table provide information for the Supplemental Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations Detail for the company?
Answer: 2019, 2018