hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Item 2. Properties
The Company operates out of several facilities located around the world. Each facility is used for manufacturing its products and for administrative activities. The following table presents the location, size and terms of ownership/occupation:
The Company’s facility located in Mitchel Field, Long Island, New York, is part of the building that the Company constructed in 1981 and expanded in 1988 on land leased from Nassau County. In January 1998, the Company sold this building and the related land lease to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (“Reckson”), leasing back the space that it presently occupies.
The Company leased its manufacturing and office space from Reckson under an initial 11-year lease followed by two five-year renewal periods which ended in January 2019. On July 25, 2018, the Company signed an amendment to the lease with RA 55 CLB LLC (as successor-in-interest to Reckson) which extended the current lease terms ten years and eight months through September 30, 2029. Pursuant to the amendment to the lease agreement, the Company shall pay a gradually increasing annual rent of $1,046,810 in 2019 to $1,276,056 in 2029. The Company believes the leased space is adequate to meet the Company’s domestic operational needs which encompass the principal operations of the FEI-NY segment and also serves as the Company’s world-wide corporate headquarters.
The Garden Grove, California facility is leased by the Company’s subsidiary, FEI-Zyfer. The facility consists of a combination office and manufacturing space. The Company has signed a second amendment to the lease, which extends the lease an additional 88 months, beginning October 1, 2017 and expiring January 31, 2025. The average annual rent over the period of the amendment is approximately $312,000. The Company believes the leased space is adequate to meet FEI-Zyfer’s operational needs.
The Tianjin, China facility is the location of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, FEI-Asia. The subsidiary’s office and manufacturing facility is located in the Tianjin Free-Trade Zone. The lease was renewable annually with monthly rent of $8,500 through August 2019. As mentioned in Footnote 3, below, FEI-Asia was sold on May 21, 2019 and as a result the lease commitment transferred with the sale.
FEI-Elcom entered into a new lease agreement on February 1, 2018 regarding its Northvale, New Jersey facility. The facility consists of a combination office and manufacturing space. The lease, which expires in January 31, 2021, requires monthly payments of $9,673. The Company believes the leased space is adequate to meet FEI-Elcom’s operational needs.
Table:
Location | Size (sq. ft.) | Own or Lease
Long Island, NY | 93,000 | Lease
Garden Grove, CA | 27,850 | Lease
Tianjin, China | 28,000 | Lease
Northvale, NJ | 9,000 | Lease


Question: What is the difference in size between the Long Island, NY and Northvale, NJ facility in sq ft?
Answer: 84000
Calculation: 93,000-9,000
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars ) | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
jpmorgan chase | $ 100.00 | $ 80.03 | $ 108.98 | $ 148.98 | $ 163.71 | $ 177.40
kbw bank index | 100.00 | 76.82 | 102.19 | 140.77 | 153.96 | 154.71
s&p financial index | 100.00 | 82.94 | 106.78 | 144.79 | 166.76 | 164.15
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 102.11 | 118.44 | 156.78 | 178.22 | 180.67
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(177.40, 154.71)
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 14 . leases ( continued ) to the sale transaction on april 12 , 1999 . therefore , the remaining outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Table:
remainder of 1999 | $ 7606
2000 | 7583
2001 | 4891
2002 | 3054
2003 | 1415
thereafter | 1178
total | $ 25727
15 .
sale of assets in the second quarter of 1996 , packaging entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with caraustar industries whereby packaging sold its two recycled paperboard mills and a fiber recycling operation and brokerage business to the joint venture in return for cash and a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture .
proceeds from the sale were approximately $ 115 million and the group recognized a $ 50 million pretax gain ( $ 30 million after taxes ) in the second quarter of 1996 .
in june , 1998 , packaging sold its remaining 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture to caraustar industries for cash and a note of $ 26000000 .
the group recognized a $ 15 million pretax gain on this transaction .
at april 11 , 1999 , the balance of the note with accrued interest is $ 27122000 .
the note was paid in june , 1999 .
16 .
subsequent events on august 25 , 1999 , pca and packaging agreed that the acquisition consideration should be reduced as a result of a postclosing price adjustment by an amount equal to $ 20 million plus interest through the date of payment by packaging .
the group recorded $ 11.9 million of this amount as part of the impairment charge on the accompanying financial statements , representing the amount that was previously estimated by packaging .
pca intends to record the remaining amount in september , 1999 .
in august , 1999 , pca signed purchase and sales agreements with various buyers to sell approximately 405000 acres of timberland .
pca has completed the sale of approximately 260000 of these acres and expects to complete the sale of the remaining acres by mid-november , 1999. .

Question: what was the total in thousands in minimum rental payments in 2000 and 2001?
Answer: 12474
Calculation: add(7583, 4891)
Market Information
Our common stock is traded under the symbol “OPRX” on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Only a limited market exists for our securities. There is no assurance that a regular trading market will develop, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder may be unable to resell his securities in our company.
The following tables set forth the range of high and low bid information for our common stock for the each of the periods indicated. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
On March 24, 2020, the last sales price per share of our common stock was $7.93
Table:
 | Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2018 | 
Quarter Ended | High $ | Low $
March 31, 2018   | 4.98 | 3.36
June 30, 2018   | 11.00 | 4.29
September 30, 2018   | 18.39 | 9.32
December 31, 2018   | 18.00 | 8.92


Question: What is the average of high bids throughout 2018? 
Answer: 13.09
Calculation: (4.98+11.00+18.39+18.00)/4
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | metropolitan ( in millions )
cash and cash equivalents | $ 49
receivables net | 28
other current assets | 40
property and equipment | 22
goodwill | 569
other intangible assets | 263
other long-term assets | 1
total assets acquired | 972
current liabilities | -22 ( 22 )
other long-term liabilities | -99 ( 99 )
total liabilities assumed | -121 ( 121 )
net assets acquired | $ 851
the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .
the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years .
on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas .
the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets .
a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans .
in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans .
under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .

Question: what is the working capital of metropolitan?
Answer: 95
Calculation: add(49, 28), add(#0, 40), subtract(#1, 22)
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2012 , we repurchased 13804709 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.33 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2012 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Table:
period | total number ofsharespurchased [a] | averageprice paidper share | total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b] | maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]
oct . 1 through oct . 31 | 1068414 | 121.70 | 1028300 | 16041399
nov . 1 through nov . 30 | 659631 | 120.84 | 655000 | 15386399
dec . 1 through dec . 31 | 411683 | 124.58 | 350450 | 15035949
total | 2139728 | $ 121.99 | 2033750 | n/a
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 105978 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .
[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .
these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .
our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what was the cost of total share repurchases during 2012?
Answer: 1592097089
Calculation: multiply(13804709, 115.33)
Restricted Cash
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, and current and non-current portion of restricted cash reported on the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of January 31, 2020 and February 1, 2019 (table in millions):
Amounts included in restricted cash primarily relate to certain employee-related benefits, as well as amounts related to installment payments to certain employees as part of acquisitions, subject to the achievement of specified future employment conditions.
Table:
 | January 31, 2020 | February 1, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents | $2,915 | $3,532
Restricted cash within other current assets | 83 | 35
Restricted cash within other assets | 33 | 29
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $3,031 | $3,596


Question: What were the Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in 2020?
Answer: 3,031
Free Cash Flow. We define free cash flow ("FCF"), a non-GAAP financial measure, as cash flow provided by operations less capital expenditures. FCF was$ 24.7 million for fiscal 2019 compared to $4.0 million for fiscal 2018, an increase of $20.7 million.
Non-GAAP financial measures, including FCF, are used for internal management assessments because such measures provide additional insight to investors into ongoing financial performance. In particular, we provide FCF because we believe it offers insight into the metrics that are driving management decisions. We view FCF as an important financial metric as it demonstrates our ability to generate cash and can allow us to pursue opportunities that enhance shareholder value. FCF is a non-GAAP financial measure that should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, measures of our financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
A reconciliation of FCF to our financial statements that were prepared using GAAP follows (in millions):
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Cash flows provided by operating activities | $115.3 | $66.8
Payments for property, plant and equipment | (90.6) | (62.8)
Free cash flow | 24.7 | 4.0


Question: What was the change in Payments for property, plant and equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -27.8
Calculation: -90.6-(-62.8)
6. Operating profit
The Group has identified a number of items which are material due to the significance of their nature and/or amount. These are listed separately here to provide a better understanding of the financial performance of the Group:
Following the application of IFRS 16, depreciation of property, plant and equipment has been restated for the year ended 31 March 2018 (note 2).
Table:
 |  | 2019 | (Restated) 2018
 | Note | £m | £m
Staff costs | 7 | (56.0) | (54.5)
Contractor costs |  | (0.4) | (0.4)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 14 | (4.9) | (4.9)
Amortisation of intangible assets | 13 | (4.0) | (4.1)
Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment |  | 0.1 | –


Question: Why are some of the items identified by the group considered material?
Answer: due to the significance of their nature and/or amount. These are listed separately here to provide a better understanding of the financial performance of the Group
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the analysis of other GAAP financial measures, such as net income. Some of the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA include:
• It does not reflect our current contractual commitments that will have an impact on future cash flows; • It does not reflect the impact of working capital requirements or capital expenditures; and • It is not a universally consistent calculation, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with using the measure of Adjusted EBITDA through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income, as presented below.
(1) Includes equity-based compensation to employees and directors, as well as equity-based payments to non-employees.
(2) Includes losses recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 associated with the financial guarantee arrangement for a Bank Partner that did not renew its loan origination agreement when it expired in November 2019. See Note 14 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 for additional discussion of our financial guarantee arrangements.
(3) For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes loss on remeasurement of our tax receivable agreement liability of $9.8 million and professional fees associated with our strategic alternatives review process of $1.5 million. For the year ended December 31, 2018, includes certain costs associated with our IPO, which were not deferrable against the proceeds of the IPO. Further, includes certain costs, such as legal and debt arrangement costs, related to our March 2018 term loan upsizing. For the year ended December 31, 2017, includes one-time fees paid to an affiliate of one of the members of the board of managers in conjunction with the August 2017 term loan transaction.
(4) For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes (i) legal fees associated with IPO related litigation of $2.0 million, (ii) one-time tax compliance fees related to filing the final tax return for the Former Corporate Investors associated with the Reorganization Transactions of $0.2 million, and (iii) lien filing expenses related to certain Bank Partner solar loans of $0.6 million.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Net income | $95,973 | $127,980 | $138,668
Interest expense | 23,860 | 23,584 | 7,536
Tax expense (benefit) | (7,125) | 5,534 | —
Depreciation and amortization | 7,304 | 4,478 | 3,983
Equity-based compensation expense(1) | 13,769 | 6,054 | 4,253
Change in financial guarantee liability(2) | 16,215 | — | —
Transaction expenses(3) | 11,345 | 2,393 | 2,612
Non-recurring expenses(4) | 2,804 | — | —
Adjusted EBITDA | $164,145 | $170,023 | $157,052


Question: What was the net income in 2019?
Answer: 95,973
Note 18 Other Post-Employment Benefits and Other Employee Benefit Plans
In addition to providing pension benefits, we maintain two Other Post-Employment Benefit Plans which provide a portion of healthcare, dental, vision and life insurance benefits for certain retired legacy employees. These plans are in the U.S. and Canada. Covered employees who retired on or after attaining age 55 and who had rendered at least 10 years of service were entitled to post-retirement healthcare, dental and life insurance benefits. These benefits are subject to deductibles, co-payment provisions and other limitations. The information below relates to these two plans.
Contributions made by us, net of Medicare Part D subsidies received in the U.S., are reported below as benefits paid. We may change the benefits at any time. The status of these plans, including a reconciliation of benefit obligations, a reconciliation of plan assets and the funded status of the plans, follows:
Table:
 | December 31, | 
(In millions) | 2019 | 2018
Change in benefit obligations: |  | 
Benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ 46.4 | $ 51.3
Service cost | — | 0.1
Interest cost | 1.6 | 1.4
Actuarial (gain) loss | (1.2) | (1.7)
Benefits paid, net | (3.3) | (4.5)
Plan amendments | — | (0.2)
Benefit obligation at end of period | $ 43.5 | $ 46.4
Change in plan assets: |  | 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | $ — | $ —
Employer contribution | 3.3 | 4.5
Benefits paid, net | (3.3) | (4.5)
Fair value of plan assets at end of period | $ — | $ —
Net amount recognized: |  | 
Underfunded status | $ (43.5) | $ (46.4)
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year | $ 43.5 | $ 46.4
Net amount recognized in consolidated balance sheets consists of: |  | 
Current liability | $ (5.3) | $ (5.3)
Non-current liability | (38.2) | (41.1)
Net amount recognized | $ (43.5) | $ (46.4)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of: |  | 
Net actuarial (gain) loss | $ (0.6) | $ 0.4
Prior service credit | (2.6) | (3.0)
Total | $ (3.2) | $ (2.6)


Question: What employees are eligible for two Other Post-Employment Benefit Plans?
Answer: Covered employees who retired on or after attaining age 55 and who had rendered at least 10 years of service
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

Table:
 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
masco | $ 128.21 | $ 120.32 | $ 102.45 | $ 165.80 | $ 229.59
s&p 500 index | $ 125.92 | $ 144.58 | $ 147.60 | $ 171.04 | $ 225.85
s&p industrials index | $ 120.19 | $ 151.89 | $ 150.97 | $ 173.87 | $ 243.73
s&p consumer durables & apparel index | $ 136.29 | $ 177.91 | $ 191.64 | $ 232.84 | $ 316.28
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares .
during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards .
we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the performance of s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 14.82%
Calculation: divide(144.58, 125.92), divide(#0, 125.92)