hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018
The following tables in this section set forth our selected consolidated statements of operations (in thousands), data for the percentage change and data as a percentage of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net.
Revenue
The $81.9 million increase in total revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018 was the result of a $46.3 million, or 16%, increase in our SaaS and license revenue and a $35.6 million, or 27%, increase in our hardware and other revenue. Our software license revenue included within SaaS and license revenue increased $2.1 million to $43.4 million in 2019 as compared to $41.3 million during 2018. The increase in our Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue in 2019 was primarily due to growth in our subscriber base, including the revenue impact from subscribers we added in 2018. To a lesser extent, SaaS and license revenue increased in the period due to an increase in license fees. The increase in hardware and other revenue in 2019 compared to 2018 was due to an increase in the volume of video cameras sold. Our Other segment contributed 15% of the increase in SaaS and license revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018. The increase in SaaS and license revenue for our Other segment in 2019 as compared to 2018 was due to an increase in sales of our energy management and demand response solutions and our property management and HVAC solutions. Hardware and other revenue in our Other segment decreased 13% in 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to the timing of sales related to our remote access management solution.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
Revenue: |  |  | % Change
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 vs. 2018
SaaS and license revenue | $337,375 | $291,072 | 16%
Hardware and other revenue | 164,988 | 129,422 | 27%
Total revenue | $502,363 | $420,494 | 19%


Question: How many years did SaaS and license revenue exceed $300,000 thousand?
Answer: 1
Calculation: 2019
Autodesk applies fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist of cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other financial instruments, on a recurring basis. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require Autodesk to develop its own assumptions. When determining fair value, Autodesk uses observable market data and relies on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available. Autodesk reviews for any potential changes on a quarterly basis, in conjunction with our fiscal quarter-end close.
Autodesk's cash equivalents, marketable securities, and financial instruments are primarily classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Autodesk values its securities on pricing from pricing vendors, who may use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly in determining fair value (Level 2). Autodesk's Level 2 securities are valued primarily using observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Autodesk's Level 3 securities consist of investments held in convertible debt securities, and derivative contracts.
A reconciliation of the change in Autodesk’s Level 3 items for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019 was as follows:
(1) Included in “Interest and other expense, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Table:
 |  | Fair Value Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | 
 | Derivative Contracts | Convertible Debt Securities | Total
Balances, January 31, 2018 | $1.0 | $7.8 | $8.8
Settlements | — | (3.5) | (3.5)
(Losses) Gains included in earnings (1) | (0.2) | 0.5 | 0.3
Losses included in OCI | — | (0.4) | (0.4)
Balances, January 31, 2019 | $0.8 | $4.4 | $5.2


Question: What is the difference in the balances for derivative contracts for 31 January 2018 and 31 January 2019?
Answer: 0.2
Calculation: 1-0.8
A summary of additions and deductions related to the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended March 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 follows (amounts in millions):
(1) Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
Table:
 | Balance at Beginning of Year | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | Deductions (1) | Balance at End of Year
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |  |  |  | 
Fiscal 2019 | $2.2 | $— | $(0.2) | $2.0
Fiscal 2018 | $2.1 | $0.2 | $(0.1) | $2.2
Fiscal 2017 | $2.5 | $0.2 | $(0.6) | $2.1


Question: What was the change in the Balance at Beginning of Year between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: -0.4
Calculation: 2.1-2.5
Lockheed Martin Transaction
On August 16, 2016, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Leidos Holdings, Inc. merged with the IS&GS Business in a Reverse Morris Trust transaction (the "IS&GS Transactions").
During fiscal 2017, the Company recorded adjustments to finalize the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed which resulted in a $337 million increase in goodwill. Significant changes included intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, deferred tax assets, other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and deferred tax liabilities.
On January 10, 2018, the final amount of the net working capital of the IS&GS Business was determined through a binding arbitration proceeding in accordance with the Separation Agreement with Lockheed Martin. As a result, $24 million was recorded as acquisition costs in the consolidated statements of income for fiscal 2017. On January 18, 2018, the final working capital amount of $105 million was paid to Lockheed Martin, of which $24 million and $81 million was presented as cash flows from operating and investing activities, respectively, on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
During fiscal 2018, a tax indemnification liability of $23 million was paid to Lockheed Martin in accordance with the Tax Matters Agreement, which was presented as cash flows from financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The Company incurred the following expenses related to the acquisition and integration of the IS&GS Business:
These acquisition and integration costs have been recorded within Corporate and presented in "Acquisition, integration and restructuring costs" on the consolidated statements of income.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended | 
 | January 3, 2020 | December 28, 2018 | December 29, 2017
 |  | (in millions) | 
Acquisition costs | $— | $— | $25
Integration costs | 3 | 29 | 77
Total acquisition and integration costs | $3 | $29 | $102


Question: What was the average Acquisition costs for 2017, 2018 and 2020?
Answer: 8.33
Calculation: (0 + 0 + 25) / 3
Selected Financial Data
• Significant events affecting our historical earnings trends in 2018 through 2019 are described in “Special Items” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section.
• 2017 data includes severance, pension and benefit charges, gain on spectrum license transactions, acquisition and integration related charges, product realignment charges, net gain on sale of divested businesses and early debt redemption costs. 2016 data includes severance, pension and benefit charges, gain on spectrum license transactions, net gain on sale of divested businesses and early debt redemption costs. 2015 data includes severance, pension and benefit credits and gain on spectrum license transactions.
• On January 1, 2019, we adopted several Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) that were issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) using the modified retrospective basis. On January 1, 2018, we adopted several ASUs that were issued by the FASB. These standards were adopted on different bases, including: (1) prospective; (2) full retrospective; and (3) modified retrospective.
Based on the method of adoption, certain figures are not comparable, with full retrospective reflected in all periods. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Table:
 |  |  |  | (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
Results of Operations |  |  |  |  | 
Operating revenues | $131,868 | $130,863 | $ 126,034 | $ 125,980 | $ 131,620
Operating income | 30,378 | 22,278 | 27,425 | 29,249 | 30,615
Net income attributable to Verizon | 19,265 | 15,528 | 30,101 | 13,127 | 17,879
Per common share – basic | 4.66 | 3.76 | 7.37 | 3.22 | 4.38
Per common share – diluted | 4.65 | 3.76 | 7.36 | 3.21 | 4.37
Cash dividends declared per common share | 2.435 | 2.385 | 2.335 | 2.285 | 2.230
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 523 | 511 | 449 | 481 | 496
Financial Position |  |  |  |  | 
Total assets | $ 291,727 | $ 264,829 | $ 257,143 | $ 244,180 | $ 244,175
Debt maturing within one year | 10,777 | 7,190 | 3,453 | 2,645 | 6,489
Long-term debt | 100,712 | 105,873 | 113,642 | 105,433 | 103,240
Employee benefit obligations | 17,952 | 18,599 | 22,112 | 26,166 | 29,957
Noncontrolling interests | 1,440 | 1,565 | 1,591 | 1,508 | 1,414
Equity attributable to Verizon | 61,395 | 53,145 | 43,096 | 22,524 | 16,428


Question: What was the change in the Per common share – basic from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 0.9
Calculation: 4.66 - 3.76
in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk terminal facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2016 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .

Table:
 | number | capacity ( mmbbl )
liquids terminals | 51 | 85.2
bulk terminals | 37 | 2014
jones act tankers | 12 | 4.0
competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity .
our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies .
our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services .
in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures .
our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets. .

Question: what is the average capacity in mmbbl of liquids terminals?
Answer: 1.67
Calculation: divide(85.2, 51)
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

Table:
 | total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 | average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 | total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 | maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3
october 1 - 31 | 1231868 | $ 20.74 | 1230394 | $ 214001430
november 1 - 30 | 1723139 | $ 18.89 | 1722246 | $ 181474975
december 1 - 31 | 1295639 | $ 20.25 | 1285000 | $ 155459545
total | 4250646 | $ 19.84 | 4237640 | 
1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .
we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period .
2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program .
3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) .
on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock .
the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program .
there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what is the percentage decrease in average price per share from october to november?
Answer: 8.92%
Calculation: subtract(20.74, 18.89), divide(#0, 20.74), multiply(#1, const_100)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The table below details where reclassifications of realized transactions out of AOCI are recorded on the consolidated statements of income (amounts in millions).
Table:
 |  | Year ended March 31, |  | 
Description of AOCI Component | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | Related Statement of Income Line
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities | $(5.6) | $(15.2) | $(1.5) | Other income, net
Amortization of actuarial loss | (1.0) | (0.8) | — | Other income, net
Reclassification of realized transactions, net of taxes | $(6.6) | $(16.0) | $(1.5) | Net Income


Question: What was the change in the Amortization of actuarial loss between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -0.2
Calculation: -1.0-(-0.8)
Note: 1 See “Alternative performance measures” on page 231 for further details and reconciliations to the respective closest equivalent GAAP measure.
The Group’s adjusted effective tax rate for its controlled businesses for the year ended 31 March 2019 was 24.4% compared to 20.6% for the last financial year. The higher rate in the current year is primarily due to a change in the mix of the Group’s profit, driven by the financing for the Liberty Global transaction. The tax rate in the prior year also reflected the consequences of closing tax audits in Germany and Romania. We expect the Group’s adjusted effective tax rate to remain in the low-mid twenties range for the medium term.
The Group’s adjusted effective tax rate for both years does not include the following items: the derecognition of a deferred tax asset in Spain of €1,166 million (2018: €nil); deferred tax on the use of Luxembourg losses of €320 million (2018: €304 million); an increase in the deferred tax asset of €488 million (2018: €330 million) arising from a revaluation of investments based upon the local GAAP financial statements and tax returns.
The Group’s adjusted effective tax rate for the year ended 31 March 2018 does not include the recognition of a deferred tax asset of €1,603 million due to higher interest rates; and a tax charge in respect of capital gains on the transfer of share in Vodafone Kenya Limited to the Vodacom Group of €110 million.
Table:
Taxation |  | 
 | 2019 €m | 2018 €m
Income tax (expense)/credit: | (1,496) | 879
Tax on adjustments to derive adjusted profit before tax | (206) | (188)
Deferred tax following revaluation of investments in Luxembourg | (488) | (330)
Luxembourg deferred tax asset recognised | – | (1,603)
Deferred tax on use of Luxembourg losses in the year | 320 | 304
Tax on the Safaricom transaction | – | 110
Derecognition of a deferred tax asset in Spain | 1,166 | –
Adjusted income tax expense for calculating adjusted tax rate1 | (704) | (828)
Loss)/profit before tax | (2,613) | 3,878
Adjustments to derive adjusted profit before tax (see earnings per share) | 5,149 | 530
Adjusted profit before tax1 | 2,536 | 4,408
Share of adjusted results in associates and joint ventures | 348 | (389)
Adjusted profit before tax for calculating adjusted effective tax rate | 2,884 | 4,019
Adjusted effective tax rate1 | 24.4% | 20.6%


Question: Which year has a higher Adjusted effective tax rate?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: 24.4% > 20.6%
28. Contingent liabilities and legal proceedings
Contingent liabilities are potential future cash outflows, where the likelihood of payment is considered more than remote, but is not considered probable or cannot be measured reliably.
Notes: 1 Performance bonds require the Group to make payments to third parties in the event that the Group does not perform what is expected of it under the terms of any related contracts or commercial arrangements
2 Other guarantees principally comprise Vodafone Group Plc’s guarantee of the Group’s 50% share of an AUD1.7 billion loan facility and a US$3.5 billion loan facility of its joint venture, Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Limited. The Group’s share of these loan balances is included in the net investment in joint venture (see note 12 “Investments in associates and joint arrangements”).
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | €m | €m
Performance bonds1 | 337 | 993
Other guarantees and contingent liabilities2 | 2,943 | 4,036


Question: What are contingent liabilities?
Answer: potential future cash outflows, where the likelihood of payment is considered more than remote, but is not considered probable or cannot be measured reliably
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic net income per share is based on the weighted average common and Class A shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share includes any dilutive effects of stock options outstanding and unvested restricted shares.
Basic net income per share was calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common and Class A shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share was calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effects of stock options and unvested restricted shares. Due to the net loss in the year ended June 3, 2017 restricted shares in the amount of 131,292 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been
antidilutive. The computations of basic net income per share and diluted net income per share are as follows (in thousands):
Table:
 | June 1, 2019 | June 2, 2018 | June 3, 2017
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | $54,229 | $125,932 | $(74,278)
Basic weighted-average common shares (including Class A) | 48,467 | 48,353 | 48,362
Effect of dilutive securities: |  |  | 
Common stock options and restricted stock | 122 | 115 | —
Dilutive potential common shares | 48,589 | 48,468 | 48,362
Net income (loss) per common share: |  |  | 
Basic | $1.12 | $2.60 | $(1.54)
Diluted | $1.12 | $2.60 | $(1.54)


Question: What is the average of the last 3 years basic net income per common share?
Answer: 0.73
Calculation: (1.12 + 2.60 - 1.54) / 3
16. Earnings Per Share
The weighted-average number of shares outstanding used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
Table:
 |  | Fiscal | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (in millions) | 
Basic | 338 | 350 | 355
Dilutive impact of share-based compensation arrangements | 2 | 3 | 3
Diluted | 340 | 353 | 358


Question: What was used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share?
Answer: The weighted-average number of shares outstanding
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Table:
 | 12/28/02 | 1/3/04 | 1/1/05 | 12/31/05 | 12/30/06 | 12/29/07
cadence design systems inc . | 100.00 | 149.92 | 113.38 | 138.92 | 147.04 | 139.82
s & p 500 | 100.00 | 128.68 | 142.69 | 149.70 | 173.34 | 182.87
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 149.75 | 164.64 | 168.60 | 187.83 | 205.22
s & p information technology | 100.00 | 147.23 | 150.99 | 152.49 | 165.32 | 192.28
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock versus the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/29/07?
Answer: -43.05%
Calculation: subtract(139.82, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(182.87, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)