hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
The following table summarizes information regarding common stock share awards granted and vested (in thousands, except per share award amounts):
As of December 31, 2019, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of actual forfeitures, related to nonvested common stock share awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.8 years.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Number of share awards granted | 34 | 34 | 24
Weighted average grant-date fair value per share award | $25.41 | $27.68 | $32.93
Fair value of share awards vested | $840 | $880 | $850


Question: What was the change in Fair value of share awards vested in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: -40
Calculation: 840-880
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 15. WARRANTIES
Provisions of our sales agreements include customary product warranties, ranging from 12 months to 24 months following installation. The estimated cost of our warranty obligation is recorded when revenue is recognized and is based upon our historical experience by product, configuration and geographic region.
Our estimated warranty obligation is included in Other accrued expenses in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in our product warranty obligation are as follows:
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Balances at beginning of period | $2,084 | $2,312 | $2,329
Warranty acquired in business combinations | 4,818 | 305 | 118
Increases to accruals | 1,752 | 1,606 | 2,029
Warranty expenditures | (2,249) | (2,127) | (2,184)
Effect of changes in exchange rates | 8 | (12) | 20
Balances at end of period | $6,413 | $2,084 | $2,312


Question: What was the balance at the beginning of period in 2017?
Answer: $2,329
4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
We grow and maintain flocks of layers (mature female chickens), pullets (female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), and breeders (male and female chickens used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks). Our total flock at June 1, 2019, consisted of approximately 9.4 million pullets and breeders and 36.2 million layers.
Table:
 | June 1, 2019 | June 2, 2018
Flocks, net of accumulated amortization | $105,536 | $96,594
Eggs | 14,318 | 17,313
Feed and supplies | 52,383 | 54,737
 | $172,237 | $168,644


Question: What is the age for the pullets?
Answer: under 18 weeks
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table summarizes the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company’s voting securities and the securities of the Company beneficially owned by the Company’s directors and officers as of April 27, 2020.
Table:
Name and address of Beneficial Owner | Amount of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Beneficial Ownership
Garo H. Armen (1) | 4,741,323 (2) | 36%
Robert B. Stein (1) | 502,500 (3) | 4%
Khalil Barrage (1) | 380,000 (4) | 3%
Alexander K. Arrow (1) | 671,799 (5) | 6%
Larry N. Feinberg 808 North St., Greenwich, CT 06831 | 800,000 (6) | 7%
Brian J. Corvese (1) | 145,000 (7) | 1%
David A. Lovejoy | 668,037 (8) | 6%
Josh Silverman (1) | 140,000 (9) | 1%
Strategic Bio Partners LLC (10) 777 Third Avenue 30th Floor New York, NY 10017 | 1,895,945 (11) | 17%
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons) | 6,580,622 (12) | 44%


Question: What is the amount and percent of beneficial ownership owned by Robert B. Stein?
Answer: 502,500, 4%
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2019.
(1) These amounts include interest and principal payment obligations on our €135.0 million of 2024 Notes through the maturity date of June 30, 2024, interest and principal payments on our $445.0 million of 2022 Notes through the maturity date of March 1, 2022, interest and principal payments on our $189.2 million of 2021 Notes through the maturity date of April 15, 2021 and $12.5 million due under an installment payment agreement with a vendor.
(2) The amounts include principal and interest payments under our finance lease obligations. Our finance lease obligations were incurred in connection with IRUs for inter-city and intra-city dark fiber underlying substantial portions of our network. These finance leases are presented on our balance sheet at the net present value of the future minimum lease payments, or $169.8 million at December 31, 2019. These leases generally have initial terms of 15 to 20 years.
(3) These amounts include amounts due under our facilities, operating leases, colocation obligations and carrier neutral data center obligations. Certain of these operating lease liabilities are presented on our balance sheet at the net present value of the future minimum lease payments, or $96.8 million at December 31, 2019.
(4) These amounts include amounts due under unconditional purchase obligations including dark fiber IRU operating and finance lease agreements entered into but not delivered and accepted prior to December 31, 2019.
Table:
 |  |  | Payments due by period |  | 
 | Total | Less than 1 year | 1 - 3 years | 3 - 5 years | After 5 years
 |  |  | (in thousands) |  | 
Debt(1) | 903,696 | 50,601 | 691,748 | 161,347 | —
Finance lease obligations(2) | 340,188 | 25,459 | 48,693 | 45,311 | 220,725
Operating leases, colocation and data center obligations(3) | 205,087 | 36,119 | 42,344 | 26,138 | 100,486
Unconditional purchase obligations(4) | 27,885 | 12,154 | 1,346 | 1,307 | 13,078
Total contractual cash obligations | $1,476,856 | $124,333 | $784,131 | $234,103 | $334,289


Question: What is the value of the interest and principal payment obligations included in the debt under 2022 Notes?
Answer: 445.0 million
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

Table:
 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 | 12/31/2018
hum | $ 100 | $ 140 | $ 176 | $ 202 | $ 247 | $ 287
s&p 500 | $ 100 | $ 114 | $ 115 | $ 129 | $ 157 | $ 150
peer group | $ 100 | $ 128 | $ 135 | $ 137 | $ 173 | $ 191
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the percent of the of the growth for stock total return performance for hum from 2016 to 2017
Answer: 22.3%
Calculation: subtract(247, 202), divide(#0, 202)
Summary Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Our material capital commitments consist of obligations under facilities and operating leases. Some of these leases have free or escalating rent payment provisions. We recognize rent expense under leases on a straight-line basis. We anticipate that we will experience an increase in our capital expenditures and lease commitments as a result of our anticipated growth in operations, infrastructure, personnel and resources devoted to building our brand name.
The following table summarizes our obligations as of March 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):
We generally do not enter into binding purchase obligations. The purchase obligations above relate primarily to marketing and IT services. The contractual obligations table above excludes unrecognized tax benefits, plus related interest and penalties totaling $1.1 million because we cannot reasonably estimate in which future periods these amounts will ultimately be settled.
We have certain software royalty commitments associated with the shipment and licensing of certain products. Royalty expense is generally based on a fixed cost per unit shipped or a fixed fee for unlimited units shipped over a designated period. Royalty expense, included in cost of software and products revenues was $12.3 million in fiscal 2019 and $4.5 million million in fiscal 2018.
We offer a 90-day limited product warranty for our software. To date, costs relating to this product warranty have not been material.
Table:
 |  |  | Payments Due by Period |  | 
 | Total | Less Than 1 Year | 2-3 Years | 4-5 Years | More Than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations | $23,673 | $9,008 | $10,907 | $2,827 | $931
Purchase obligations | 20,520 | 16,748 | 3,669 | 103 | —
Total | $44,193 | $25,756 | $14,576 | $2,930 | $931


Question: What kinds of purchase obligations does the data refer to?
Answer: primarily to marketing and IT services
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific net revenues decreased $1.4 million in 2019 compared to 2018 (see “Revenues” above). Asia Pacific expenses decreased $203,000 from 2018 to 2019. This decrease was primarily due to a $503,000 decrease of salary expense, offset partially by a $303,000 increase in member acquisition costs.
Foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted our local currency loss from our operations in Asia Pacific by approximately $136,000 for 2019. Foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar positively impacted our local currency loss from our operations in Asia Pacific by approximately $127,000 for 2018.
Table:
Year Ended December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018
(In thousands) |  | 
Revenues | $6,490 | $7,859
(Loss) from operations | $(7,488) | $(6,322)
(Loss) from operations as a % of revenues | (115)% | (80)%


Question: How much did Asia Pacific expenses decrease by from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: $203,000
Contract Assets and Liabilities
Contract assets represent the Company’s rights to consideration in exchange for services transferred to a customer that have not been billed as of the reporting date. While the Company’s rights to consideration are generally unconditional at the time its performance obligations are satisfied, under certain circumstances the related billing occurs in arrears, generally within one month of the services being rendered.
At the inception of a contract, the Company generally expects the period between when it transfers its services to its customers and when the customer pays for such services will be one year or less.
Contract liabilities relate to advance consideration received or the right to consideration that is unconditional from customers for which revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied and control transferred to the customer.
The table below sets forth the Company’s contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers.
The increase in the contract assets balance during the period was primarily due to $203 million of revenue recognized that was not billed, in accordance with the terms of the contracts, as of December 31, 2019, offset by $193 million of contract assets included in the December 31, 2018 balance that were invoiced to Nielsen’s clients and therefore transferred to trade receivables.
The decrease in the contract liability balance during the period was primarily due to $326 million of advance consideration received or the right to consideration that is unconditional from customers for which revenue was not recognized during the period, offset by $337 million of revenue recognized during the period that had been included in the December 31, 2018 contract liability balance.
Table:
(IN MILLIONS) | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Contract assets | $218 | $210
Contract liabilities | $346 | $359


Question: What is the percentage change in the contract assets from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 3.81
Calculation: (218-210)/210
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): RSUs represent the right to receive one share of NortonLifeLock common stock for each vested RSU upon the settlement date, subject to continued employment through each vesting date.
(1) Mr. Clark did not receive an RSU award for FY19.
(2) In FY19, Messrs. Taylor and Noviello, as FY18 NEOs, were granted a mix of PRUs and RSUs at 70% and 30%, respectively. All other executives, other than Mr. Clark, received a mix of PRUs and RSUs at 50% and 50%, respectively.
Table:
NEO | FY19 RSU Award Amount (#)(2) | Grant Date Value ($)
Gregory S. Clark(1) | 0 | 0
Nicholas R. Noviello | 95,416 | 2,106,785
Amy L. Cappellanti-Wolf | 78,620 | 1,683,254
Samir Kapuria | 238,243 | 5,100,783
Scott C. Taylor | 61,339 | 1,354,365


Question: What is the total grant date value for all NEOs?
Answer: 10245187
Calculation: 0+2,106,785+1,683,254+5,100,783+1,354,365
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018
The following tables in this section set forth our selected consolidated statements of operations (in thousands), data for the percentage change and data as a percentage of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net.
Revenue
The $81.9 million increase in total revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018 was the result of a $46.3 million, or 16%, increase in our SaaS and license revenue and a $35.6 million, or 27%, increase in our hardware and other revenue. Our software license revenue included within SaaS and license revenue increased $2.1 million to $43.4 million in 2019 as compared to $41.3 million during 2018. The increase in our Alarm.com segment SaaS and license revenue in 2019 was primarily due to growth in our subscriber base, including the revenue impact from subscribers we added in 2018. To a lesser extent, SaaS and license revenue increased in the period due to an increase in license fees. The increase in hardware and other revenue in 2019 compared to 2018 was due to an increase in the volume of video cameras sold. Our Other segment contributed 15% of the increase in SaaS and license revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018. The increase in SaaS and license revenue for our Other segment in 2019 as compared to 2018 was due to an increase in sales of our energy management and demand response solutions and our property management and HVAC solutions. Hardware and other revenue in our Other segment decreased 13% in 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to the timing of sales related to our remote access management solution.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
Revenue: |  |  | % Change
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 vs. 2018
SaaS and license revenue | $337,375 | $291,072 | 16%
Hardware and other revenue | 164,988 | 129,422 | 27%
Total revenue | $502,363 | $420,494 | 19%


Question: What was the SaaS and license revenue in 2019?
Answer: $337,375
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding stock options and stock awards.
* Includes a charge of $2.0 billion or $2.23 of basic and diluted earnings per share in 2018 associated with U.S. tax reform.
Actual shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 887.1 million and 892.5 million, respectively. The year-to- year decrease was primarily the result of the common stock repurchase program. The average number of common shares
outstanding assuming dilution was 23.5 million shares lower in 2019 versus 2018
Table:
For the year ended December 31: | 2019 | 2018 | Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |  |  | 
Assuming dilution | $10.57 | $9.51* | 11.1%
Basic | $10.63 | $9.56* | 11.2%
Diluted operating (non-GAAP) | $12.81 | $13.81 | (7.2)%
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions) |  |  | 
Assuming dilution | 892.8 | 916.3 | (2.6)%
Basic | 887.2 | 912.0 | (2.7)%


Question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the average number of common shares in 2019?
Answer: 23.5 million shares lower in 2019 versus 2018
Stock-based Compensation Expense
The income tax benefit related to share-based compensation was $66 million, $158 million and $97 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The income tax benefits related to share-based compensation for the periods presented prior to the second quarter of 2018 were offset by an increase in the U.S. valuation allowance. Stock-based compensation expense of $30 million and $19 million was capitalized and remained in inventory as of August 29, 2019 and August 30, 2018, respectively. As of August 29, 2019, $439 million of total unrecognized compensation costs for unvested awards, before the effect of any future forfeitures, was expected to be recognized through the fourth quarter of 2023, resulting in a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.
Table:
For the year ended | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Stock-based compensation expense by caption |  |  | 
Cost of goods sold | $102 | $83 | $88
Selling, general, and administrative | 73 | 61 | 75
Research and development | 68 | 54 | 52
 | $243 | $198 | $215
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award |  |  | 
Restricted stock awards | $178 | $140 | $144
Stock options | 33 | 55 | 71
ESPP | 32 | 3 | —
 | $243 | $198 | $215


Question: What is the difference between stock-based compensation expenses between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 45
Calculation: $243-$198
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
As of December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Computers, software, furniture and fixtures | $1,406 | $1,407
Equipment under capital lease  3,348 | 3,348 | 3,525
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (3,171) | (2,448)
Property and equipment, net | $1,583 | $2,484


Question: What is the ratio of depreciation and amortization expense for the year 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 1.11
Calculation: 1/0.9
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

Table:
 | december 31 2006 | january 18 2007 refinancing
2007 | $ 61661 | $ 96161
2008 | 257541 | 282041
2009 | 68129 | 145129
2010 | 33586 | 215586
2011 | 941875 | 165455
thereafter | 1646709 | 2105129
total | $ 3009501 | $ 3009501
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the percentage change in estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: -5.8%
Calculation: subtract(4.9, 5.2), divide(#0, 5.2)
The following table reconciles total segment adjusted EBITDA to net (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
We do not have any single customer that provides more than 10% of our consolidated total operating revenue.
The assets we hold outside of the U.S. represent less than 10% of our total assets. Revenue from sources outside of the U.S. is responsible for less than 10% of our total operating revenue.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (Dollars in millions) | 
Total segment adjusted EBITDA | $15,987 | 16,647 | 12,560
Depreciation and amortization | (4,829) | (5,120) | (3,936)
Goodwill impairment | (6,506) | (2,726) | —
Other operating expenses | (7,216) | (8,045) | (6,504)
Share-based compensation | (162) | (186) | (111)
Operating (loss) income | (2,726) | 570 | 2,009
Total other expense, net | (2,040) | (2,133) | (1,469)
(Loss) income before income taxes | (4,766) | (1,563) | 540
Income tax expense (benefit) | 503 | 170 | (849)
Net (loss) income | $(5,269) | (1,733) | 1,389


Question: What is the percentage change in income tax expense (benefit) in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 195.88
Calculation: (503-170)/170