hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Stock Ownership Requirements
We believe that in order to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, our executive officers should have a financial stake in our Company. We have maintained stock ownership requirements for our executive officers since October 2005. For FY19, our executive officers were required to hold the following minimum number of shares:
• CEO: 6x base salary; • CFO, COO and President: 3x base salary; and • Executive Vice Presidents: 2x base salary.
Stock options and unvested RSUs and PRUs do not count toward stock ownership requirements.
The executive officer is required to acquire and thereafter maintain the stock ownership required within four years of becoming an executive officer of NortonLifeLock (or four years following the adoption date of these revised guidelines). During the four-year transitional period, each executive officer must retain at least 50% of all net (after-tax) equity grants until the required stock ownership level has been met.
As of October 25, 2019, Messrs. Kapuria, Pilette and Taylor reached the stated ownership requirements for FY19. Transitioning or former executive officers and non-executive officers are not included in the table below. See the table below for individual ownership levels relative to the executive’s ownership requirement.
(1) Based on the closing price for a share of our common stock of $22.69 on October 25, 2019.
Table:
Executive Officer | Ownership Requirement (1) (# of shares) | Holdings as of October 25, 2019(# of shares)
Samir Kapuria | 39,665 | 186,735
Vincent Pilette | 85,941 | 785,906
Scott C. Taylor | 52,887 | 408,724


Question: What is the value of Samir Kapuria's shares as of October 25, 2019?
Answer: 4237017.15
Calculation: 186,735*22.69
10. Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Trade creditors are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 to 60-day terms. Other creditors are non-interest bearing.
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade creditors approximates their fair value.
Table:
 |  | 2019 | 2018
 | Notes | £ million | £ million
Trade creditors |  | 2.3 | 1.4
Owed to subsidiaries |  | 90.4 | 84.8
Accruals |  | 5.1 | 4.5
Deferred income |  | 3.2 | 4.4
Lease liabilities | 14 | 0.1 | –
Other taxes and social security costs |  | 0.4 | 0.5
Government grants | 12 | 0.7 | 0.3
 |  | 102.2 | 95.9


Question: What was the percentage change in Accruals?
Answer: 13.33
Calculation: (5.1-4.5)/4.5
Stock-based Compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs, stock options, and ESPP shares for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017, which were allocated as follows (amounts shown in thousands):
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Cost of revenue | $207 | $78 | $52
Selling and marketing | 2,967 | 2,656 | 1,577
Research and development | 2,013 | 1,801 | 1,028
General and administrative | 4,450 | 4,415 | 2,821
Stock-based compensation expense included in expenses | $9,637 | $8,950 | $5,478


Question: What does the table provide for us?
Answer: stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs, stock options, and ESPP shares for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 .

Table:
 | september 18 2008 | september 30 2008 | december 31 2008
disca | $ 100.00 | $ 103.19 | $ 102.53
discb | $ 100.00 | $ 105.54 | $ 78.53
disck | $ 100.00 | $ 88.50 | $ 83.69
s&p 500 | $ 100.00 | $ 96.54 | $ 74.86
peer group | $ 100.00 | $ 92.67 | $ 68.79
s&p 500 peer group .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?
Answer: -21.47
Calculation: subtract(78.53, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
A summary of additions and deductions related to the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended March 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 follows (amounts in millions):
(1) Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
Table:
 | Balance at Beginning of Year | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | Deductions (1) | Balance at End of Year
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |  |  |  | 
Fiscal 2019 | $2.2 | $— | $(0.2) | $2.0
Fiscal 2018 | $2.1 | $0.2 | $(0.1) | $2.2
Fiscal 2017 | $2.5 | $0.2 | $(0.6) | $2.1


Question: What were the deductions in 2018?
Answer: (0.1)
Note 8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
The following table reflects changes in the net carrying amount of the components of intangible assets (in thousands):
Table:
 | Customer Relationships | Developed Technology | Trade Name | Total
Balance as of January 1, 2018 | $88,526 | $5,532 | $228 | $94,286
Amortization | (11,262) | (3,854) | (103) | (15,219)
Balance as of December 31, 2018 | 77,264 | 1,678 | 125 | 79,067
Intangible assets acquired | 19,805 | 16,583 | 2,219 | 38,607
Amortization | (12,673) | (1,441) | (122) | (14,236)
Balance as of December 31, 2019 | $84,396 | $16,820 | $2,222 | $103,438


Question: How many components of intangible assets had a total that exceeded $50,000 thousand as of December 31, 2019?
Answer: 1
Calculation: Customer Relationships
GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Key details of the term loan are as follows:
(1) The principal balance of the term loan is scheduled to be repaid on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter through December 31, 2024, with the balance due at maturity. For each of the next five years, principal repayments on the term loan are expected to be $4,000.
(2) For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, debt discount of $613 and $593, respectively, and debt issuance costs of $1,062
and $1,091, respectively, were amortized into interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Giving effect to the
amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs on the term loan, the effective interest rates were 5.95% and 5.99% during the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Term loan, face value(1) | $393,000 | $397,000
Unamortized debt discount (2) | (3,115) | (3,728)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(2) | (5,388) | (6,450)
Term loan | $384,497 | $386,822


Question: How is the principal balance of the term loan scheduled to be repaid?
Answer: on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter through December 31, 2024, with the balance due at maturity.
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist entirely of acquired in-process research and development technology, or IPR&D. The following table sets forth the Company’s activities related to the indefinite-lived intangible assets:
The Company performs its annual assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets on October 31 each year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired utilizing a qualitative test as a precursor to the quantitative test comparing the fair value of the assets with their carrying amount. Based on the qualitative test, if it is more likely than not that indicators of impairment exists, the Company proceeds to perform a quantitative analysis. Based on the Company’s assessment as of October 31, 2019, no indicators of impairment were identified.
In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, no IPR&D impairment losses were recorded. In the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized impairment losses of $2.0 million related to the Company's abandonment of a single IPR&D project.
Table:
Years Ended December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018
(in thousands) |  | 
Beginning balance | $4,400 | $4,400
Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D | (4,400) | —
Ending balance | $— | $4,400


Question: What was the change in the Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -4400
Calculation: -4,400 - 0
The assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2019.
(2) Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEO. Instead, the amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of stock options issued pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and certain inducement grants, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2019.
(3) All non-equity incentive plan compensation was paid pursuant to the Variable Pay Plan.
(4) The amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal 2019 include: $4,000 401(k) matching contribution by the Company for each NEOs other than Mr. McNab.
(5) The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Maletira a one-time discretionary bonus in the amount of $180,000 in connection with his work on the AvComm and Wireless acquisition. Please see “Discretionary Bonuses” under the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 36 of this proxy statement.
(6) Mr. Staley was awarded a $60,000 sign-on bonus when he joined the Company in February 2017.
The amounts in the salary, bonus, and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table reflect actual amounts paid for the relevant years, while the amounts in the stock awards column reflect accounting values. The tables entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table” provide further information on the named executive officers’ potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect to their equity awards. The Summary Compensation Table should be read in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative descriptions.
Table:
Name | Fiscal Year | Maximum Possible Value of MSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value | Maximum Possible Value of PSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Oleg Khaykin | 2019 | 4,067,526 | —
 | 2018 | 2,457,750 | 909,900
 | 2017 | 659,618 | —
Amar Maletira | 2019 | 1,379,350 | —
 | 2018 | 1,015,870 | 454,950
 | 2017 | 574,500 | —
Paul McNab | 2019 | 591,150 | —
 | 2018 | 442,395 | —
 | 2017 | 373,425 | —
Luke Scrivanich | 2019 | 591,150 | —
 | 2018 | 442,395 | —
 | 2017 | 393,600 | —
Gary Staley | 2019 | 591,150 | —
 | 2018 | 943,527 | —
 | 2017 | 303,948 | —


Question: What was the maximum possible value of MSU's using grant date fair value for Oleg Khaykin in 2018?
Answer: 2,457,750
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased by $15.3 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million increase in employee-related costs, which includes stock-based compensation, associated with our increased headcount from 128 employees as of December 31, 2017 to 173 employees as of December 31, 2018. The remaining increase was principally the result of a $7.0 million increase in hosting, software and messaging costs, a $0.6 million increase attributed to office related expenses to support revenue generating activities and a $0.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense attributable to our acquired intangible assets.
Gross margin percentage decreased due to our continued investment in personnel and infrastructure to support our growth in revenue.
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, |  | Change | 
 | 2018 | 2017 | $ | %
 |  | (dollars in thousands) |  | 
Cost of revenue | $ 46,810 | $ 31,503 | $ 15,307 | 48.6%
Gross margin % | 68% | 70% |  | 


Question: In which year was cost of revenue less than 40,000 thousands?
Answer: 2017
Calculation: locate and analyze cost of revenue in row 4
This section presents the Group’s contractual obligation to make a payment in the future in relation to purchases of property, plant and equipment, and lease commitments.
Capital expenditure and operating lease commitments of the Group at the reporting date are as follows:
The commitments set out above do not include contingent turnover rentals, which are charged on many retail premises leased by the Group. These rentals are calculated as a percentage of the turnover of the store occupying the premises, with the percentage and turnover threshold at which the additional rentals commence varying with each lease agreement.
The Group leases retail premises and warehousing facilities which are generally for periods up to 40 years. The operating lease commitments include leases for the Norwest office and distribution centres. Generally the lease agreements are for initial terms of between five and 25 years and most include multiple renewal options for additional five to 10-year terms. Under most leases, the Group is responsible for property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and expenses related to the leased properties. However, many of the more recent lease agreements have been negotiated on a gross or semi-gross basis, which eliminates or significantly reduces the Group’s exposure to operational charges associated with the properties.
From 1 July 2019, the Group adopted AASB 16 Leases and as a result the operating lease commitments set out above have been recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, with the exception of the service component of lease payments. Refer to Note 1.2.6 for a reconciliation between the operating lease commitments at 30 June 2019 and the lease liabilities recognised at 1 July 2019.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | $M | $M
Capital expenditure commitments |  | 
Estimated capital expenditure under firm contracts, payable: |  | 
Not later than one year | 398 | 416
Later than one year, not later than two years | – | –
Later than two years, not later than five years | – | –
Total capital expenditure commitments | 398 | 416
Operating lease commitments |  | 
Future minimum rentals under non-cancellable operating leases, payable: |  | 
Not later than one year | 1,998 | 2,089
Later than one year, not later than five years | 7,415 | 7,484
Later than five years | 12,378 | 13,331
Total operating lease commitments | 21,791 | 22,904
Total commitments for expenditure | 22,189 | 23,320


Question: What is the total commitments for expenditure in 2019?
Answer: 22,189
(c) Allowance for Credit Loss Rollforward
The allowances for credit loss and the related financing receivables are summarized as follows (in millions):
Table:
 |  |  | CREDIT LOSS ALLOWANCES | 
 | Lease Receivables | Loan Receivables | Financed Service Contracts | Total
Allowance for credit loss as of July 28, 2018 | $135 | $60 | $10 | $205
Provisions (benefits) | (54) | 11 | 27 | (16)
Recoveries (write-offs), net | (14) | — | (28) | (42)
Foreign exchange and other | (21) | — | — | (21)
Allowance for credit loss as of July 27, 2019 | $46 | $71 | $9 | $126


Question: What was the allowance for credit loss for lease receivables in 2018?
Answer: 135
Due To/From Related Parties, Net
Amounts due to and from related parties, net as of the periods presented consisted of the following (table in millions):
(1) Includes an immaterial amount related to our current operating lease liabilities due to related parties as of January 31, 2020.
We also recognized an immaterial amount related to non-current operating lease liabilities due to related parties. This amount has been included in operating lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2020.
Amounts included in due from related parties, net, excluding DFS and tax obligations, includes the current portion of amounts due to and due from related parties. Amounts included in due from related parties, net are generally settled in cash within 60 days of each quarter-end.
Table:
 | January 31, 2020 | February 1, 2019
Due from related parties, current | $1,618 | $1,248
Due to related parties, current(1) | 161 | 158
Due from related parties, net, current | $1,457 | $1,090


Question: How many years did current amounts due to related parties exceed $100 million?
Answer: 2
Calculation: 2020##2019
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2008 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2013 , we repurchased 14996957 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 152.14 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2013 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Table:
period | total number ofsharespurchased [a] | averageprice paidper share | total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b] | maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]
oct . 1 through oct . 31 | 1405535 | 153.18 | 1405535 | 4020650
nov . 1 through nov . 30 | 1027840 | 158.66 | 1025000 | 2995650
dec . 1 through dec . 31 | 2500944 | 163.14 | 2498520 | 497130
total | 4934319 | $ 159.37 | 4929055 | n/a
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 5264 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .
[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .
these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .
our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions .
on november 21 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase program , authorizing the repurchase of 60 million common shares by december 31 , 2017 .
the new authorization is effective january 1 , 2014 , and replaces the previous authorization , which expired on december 31 , 2013 , three months earlier than its original expiration date. .

Question: what was the percent of the total number of share repurchase in the fourth quarter of 2013 that was attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices
Answer: 0.11%
Calculation: divide(5264, 4934319)
16. INCOME TAXES
The components of (loss) income before (benefit from) income taxes are:
Table:
(in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Domestic | $(51,396) | (27,494) | 57,493
Foreign | (83,450) | 15,951 | 28,742
(Loss) income before (benefit from) income taxes | $(134,846) | $(11,543) | $86,235


Question: What is the average loss made by the company in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 73194.5
Calculation: (11,543 + 134,846)/2
Lease liabilities regarding right-of-use assets are included on the balance sheet under “Borrowings”.
Extension and termination options are included in several leases in order to optimize operational flexibility in terms of managing contracts. The lease term determined by TORM is the noncancellable period of a lease, together with any extension/termination options if these are/are not reasonably certain to be exercised.
Table:
USDm | 2019 | 2018
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flow |  | 
Less than one year | 7.5 | 5.2
One to five years | 27.6 | 25.6
More than five years | 0.1 | -
Total undiscounted lease liabilities as of 31 December | 35.2 | 30.8
Lease liabilities included under "Borrowings" as of 31 December | 30.6 | 25.3
Non-current | 10.2 | 3.2
Current | 20.4 | 22.1


Question: What was the percentage change in non-current lease liabilities?
Answer: 218.75
Calculation: (10.2-3.2)/3.2
9. Available-for-Sale Debt Investments and Equity Investments
The following table summarizes our available-for-sale debt investments and equity investments (in millions):
(1) We held equity interests in certain private equity funds of $0.6 billion as of July 27, 2019 which are accounted for under the NAV practical expedient following the adoption of ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments, starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
Table:
 | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018
Available-for-sale debt investments | $21,660 | $37,009
Marketable equity securities | 3 | 605
Total investments | 21,663 | 37,614
Non-marketable equity securities included in other assets (1) | 1,113 | 978
Equity method investments included in other assets | 87 | 118
Total | $22,863 | $38,710


Question: What was the Marketable equity securities in 2018?
Answer: 605
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, $21 million and $20 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits were classified as a reduction of deferred tax assets. The finalisation in the fourth quarter of 2018 of pending tax litigations triggered the reversal of uncertain tax positions in major tax jurisdictions for a total amount of $310 million.
It is reasonably possible that certain of the uncertain tax positions disclosed in the table above could increase within the next 12 months due to ongoing tax audits. The Company is not able to make an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible change.
Additionally, the Company elected to classify accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as components of income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income, they were less than $1 million in 2019, $1 million in 2018, less than $1 million in 2017, $1 million in 2016, $1 million in 2015, $27 million in 2014 and not material in the previous years. Accrued interest and penalties amounted to $6 million at December 31, 2019 and $5 million at December 31, 2018.
The tax years that remain open for review in the Company’s major tax jurisdictions, including France, Italy, United States and India, are from 1997 to 2019.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017
Balance at beginning of year | 38 | 333 | 258
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 7 | 43 | 43
Additions based on acquisitions related to the current year | 5 | — | —
Additions for tax positions of prior years | 1 | 8 | 12
Reduction for tax positions of prior years | (1) | (310) | (9)
Settlements | (2) | (18) | (2)
Prepayment / Refund | — | — | —
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations | — | — | —
Foreign currency translation | — | (18) | 31
Balance at end of year | 48 | 38 | 333


Question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Balance at end of year from December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 10
Calculation: 48-38