hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
For the full year 2019, our ADG revenues increased 1.4% compared to the previous period. The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 9%, which was entirely due to a better product mix, and partially offset by a decrease in volumes by approximately 8%.
AMS revenues grew 4.6%, mainly due to the double-digits growth in Imaging. The increase was due to higher average selling prices of approximately 12%, as a result of a better product mix, and was partially offset by lower volumes of approximately 7%.
MDG revenues were down by 10.3%, mainly due to Microcontrollers. The decrease was due to lower volumes of approximately 10% while average selling prices remained substantially flat.
In 2018, all product groups registered double-digit revenue increase. Our ADG revenues increased 16.2% for the full year 2018 compared to the full year 2017 on growth in both Power Discrete and Automotive. The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 21% and volumes decreased by approximately 5%. The increase in average selling prices was entirely due to improved product mix, while selling prices remained substantially flat.
AMS revenues grew 19.9%, mainly on the strong increase in Imaging. The increase was due to higher volumes of approximately 12% and higher average selling prices of approximately 8%, which was entirely due to improved product mix of approximately 13%, while selling prices decreased by approximately 5%.
MDG revenues were up by 11.1%, with Digital and Microcontrollers & Memories equally contributing. The increase was primarily due to higher average selling prices of approximately 11%, while volumes remained substantially flat. The increase in average selling prices was due to a better product mix of approximately 13%, while the selling prices effect was negative of approximately 2%.
Table:
 | Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | % Variation | % Variation
2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 vs 2018 | 2018 vs 2017
 | (In millions) | (In millions) | (In millions) |  | 
Automotive and Discrete Group (ADG) | $3,606 | $3,556 | $3,059 | 1.4% | 16.2%
Analog MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS) | 3,299 | 3,154 | 2,630 | 4.6 | 19.9
Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG) | 2,638 | 2,940 | 2,646 | (10.3) | 11.1
Others | 13 | 14 | 12 | — | —
Total consolidated net revenues | $9,556 | $9,664 | $8,347 | (1.1)% | 15.8%


Question: In 2019, what was the reason for increase in ADG revenues?
Answer: The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 9%, which was entirely due to a better product mix, and partially offset by a decrease in volumes by approximately 8%.
Standard & Poor's Rating Services', a Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC business ("S&P"), corporate credit rating is "BBB." Moody’s Investor Service, Inc.'s ("Moody's") applicable rating is "Baa2." Fitch Ratings', a wholly owned subsidiary of Fimlac, S.A. ("Fitch"), applicable rating is "BBB." The below table outlines the fees paid on the unused portion of the facility ("Facility Fee Rate") and letter of credit fees and borrowings ("Undrawn Letter of Credit Fee and Borrowing Spread") that corresponds to the applicable rating levels from S&P, Moody's and Fitch.
In the event the rating levels are split, the applicable fees and spread will be based upon the rating level in effect for two of the rating agencies, or, if all three rating agencies have different rating levels, the applicable fees and spread will be based upon the rating level that is between the rating levels of the other two rating agencies.
Table:
Ratings Level (S&P/Moody's/Fitch) | Facility Fee Rate | All-in Borrowing Spread
A-/A3/A- or above | 0.090% | 1.000%
BBB+/Baa1/BBB+ | 0.100% | 1.125%
BBB/Baa2/BBB (current level) | 0.125% | 1.250%
BBB-/Baa3/BBB- | 0.175% | 1.375%
BB+/Ba1/BB+ or lower | 0.225% | 1.625%


Question: Suppose the approved loan amount for Tyson Foods is $12 million. What is the Facility Fee Rate payable?
Answer: 0.01
Calculation: 0.125% * 12
the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 5 . investments and derivative instruments ( continued ) collateral arrangements the company enters into various collateral arrangements in connection with its derivative instruments , which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , collateral pledged having a fair value of $ 1.1 billion and $ 790 , respectively , was included in fixed maturities , afs , in the consolidated balance sheets . from time to time , the company enters into secured borrowing arrangements as a means to increase net investment income . the company received cash collateral of $ 33 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . the following table presents the classification and carrying amount of loaned securities and derivative instruments collateral pledged. .

Table:
 | december 31 2011 | december 31 2010
fixed maturities afs | $ 1086 | $ 823
short-term investments | 199 | 2014
total collateral pledged | $ 1285 | $ 823
as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had accepted collateral with a fair value of $ 2.6 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of which $ 2.0 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , was cash collateral which was invested and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets in fixed maturities and short-term investments with corresponding amounts recorded in other assets and other liabilities .
the company is only permitted by contract to sell or repledge the noncash collateral in the event of a default by the counterparty .
as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , noncash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets .
securities on deposit with states the company is required by law to deposit securities with government agencies in states where it conducts business .
as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the fair value of securities on deposit was approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .

Question: what is the change in value of fixed maturities afs from 2010 to 2011 , ( in billions ) ?
Answer: 263
Calculation: subtract(1086, 823)
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2019, we have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
1) Includes interest up to maturity and principal payments. Please see note 10 "Long-Term Debt" for more details.
(2) Net of $30.7 million of sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to third parties.
Table:
 |  |  | Payments due between |  | 
 | Total | July 1, 2019— June 30, 2020 | July 1, 2020— June 30, 2022 | July 1, 2022— June 30, 2024 | July 1, 2024 and beyond
Long-term debt obligations (1) | $3,408,565 | $147,059 | $292,156 | $1,045,567 | $1,923,783
Operating lease obligations (2) | 318,851 | 72,853 | 106,394 | 59,441 | 80,163
Purchase obligations | 11,280 | 8,364 | 2,747 | 169 | —
 | $3,738,696 | $228,276 | $401,297 | $1,105,177 | $2,003,946


Question: What is the Total Commitments and Contractual Obligations?
Answer: 3,738,696
The following table sets forth activity during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 related to finite-lived intangible assets:
The Company regularly reviews the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets subject to depreciation and amortization, as well as the related useful lives, to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist which warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. An impairment loss is recognized when the sum of the expected future undiscounted net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset.
Should impairment exist, the impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over the asset’s fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, no impairment losses related to finite-lived intangible assets were recognized. Impairment loss related to finite-lived intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $2.2 million and related to acquired developed technology.
Table:
 | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | (in thousands) | 
Beginning balance | $240,500 | $310,645
Other additions | 86 | —
Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D | 4,400 | —
Amortization | (57,015) | (67,947)
Impairment losses | — | (2,198)
Ending balance | $187,971 | 240,500


Question: In which year was Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D greater than 4,000 thousands?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: locate and analyze Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D in row 6
Operating Segment Results
Currently, we have three reportable segments—Activision, Blizzard, and King. Our operating segments are consistent with the manner in which our operations are reviewed and managed by our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The CODM reviews segment performance exclusive of: the impact of the change in deferred revenues and related cost of revenues with respect to certain of our online-enabled games; share-based compensation expense; amortization of intangible assets as a result of purchase price accounting; fees and other expenses (including legal fees, expenses, and accruals) related to acquisitions, associated integration activities, and financings; certain restructuring and related costs; and certain other non-cash charges. The CODM does not review any information regarding total assets on an operating segment basis, and accordingly, no disclosure is made with respect thereto.
Our operating segments are also consistent with our internal organizational structure, the way we assess operating performance and allocate resources, and the availability of separate financial information. We do not aggregate operating segments.
Information on the reportable segment net revenues and segment operating income are presented below (amounts in millions):
(1) Intersegment revenues reflect licensing and service fees charged between segments.
Table:
 |  |  |  | For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
 | Activision | Blizzard | King | Total
Segment Revenues |  |  |  | 
Net revenues from external customers | $2,458 | $2,238 | $2,086 | $6,782
Intersegment net revenues (1) | — | 53 | — | 53
Segment net revenues | $2,458 | $2,291 | $2,086 | $6,835
Segment operating income | $1,011 | $685 | $750 | $2,446


Question: What is the total segment operating income of Activision and King?
Answer: 1761
Calculation: $1,011+$750
The Corporation’s segment profit (loss) is reported in two operating segments: Canadian broadband services and American broadband services. The reporting structure reflects how the Corporation manages its business activities to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance.
The Canadian and American broadband services segments provide a wide range of Internet, video and telephony services primarily to residential customers as well as business services across their coverage areas. The Canadian broadband services activities are carried out by Cogeco Connexion in the provinces of Québec and Ontario and the American broadband services activities are carried out by Atlantic Broadband in 11 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia.
The previously reported Business ICT services segment, comprised of the Cogeco Peer 1 operations, is now reported in discontinued operations following the sale on April 30, 2019 of the Cogeco Peer 1 subsidiary. Information about the discontinued segment is provided in Note 8.
The Corporation and its chief operating decision maker assess the performance of each operating segment based on its segment profit (loss), which is equal to revenue less operating expenses. The other expenses, except for management fees, financial expense and income taxes, are reported by segment solely for external reporting purposes.
(1) Revenue by geographic market includes $1,294,967 in Canada and $1,036,853 in the United States. (2) Comprised of restructuring costs within the Canadian broadband services segment and acquisition and integration costs related to the FiberLight network acquisition in the American broadband services segment.
Table:
Year ended August 31, 2019 | Canadian broadband services | American broadband services | Inter-segment eliminations and other | Consolidated
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | $ | $ | $ | $
Revenue (1) | 1,294,967 | 1,036,853 | — | 2,331,820
Operating expenses | 606,286 | 571,208 | 26,486 | 1,203,980
Management fees – Cogeco Inc. | — | — | 19,900 | 19,900
Segment profit (loss) | 688,681 | 465,645 | (46,386) | 1,107,940
Integration, restructuring and acquisition costs (2) | 9,299 | 1,851 | — | 11,150
Depreciation and amortization | 254,345 | 226,301 | 79 | 480,725
Financial expense |  |  |  | 175,502
Profit before income taxes |  |  |  | 440,563
Income taxes |  |  |  | 83,655
Profit for the year from continuing operations |  |  |  | 356,908
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | 241,940 | 192,605 | — | 434,545


Question: What is the average Revenue between Canadian and American broadband services for year ended August 31, 2019?
Answer: 1165910
Calculation: (1,294,967+1,036,853)/ 2
ADOPTION OF IFRS 16
Upon adoption of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, we recognized right-of-use assets of $2,257 million within property, plant and equipment, and lease liabilities of $2,304 million within debt, with an increase to our deficit of $19 million. These amounts were recognized in addition to assets under finance leases of $1,947 million and the corresponding finance lease liabilities of $2,097 million at December 31, 2018 under IAS 17. As a result, on January 1, 2019, our total right-of-use assets and lease liabilities amounted to $4,204 million and $4,401 million, respectively. The table below shows the impacts of adopting IFRS 16 on our January 1, 2019 consolidated statement of financial position.
BCE’s operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018 were $1,612 million. The difference between operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018 and lease liabilities of $2,304 million upon adoption of IFRS 16 at January 1, 2019, is due mainly to an increase of $1,122 million related to renewal options reasonably certain to be exercised, an increase of $112 million mainly related to non-monetary transactions and a decrease of ($542) million as a result of discounting applied to future lease payments, which was determined using a weighted average incremental borrowing rate of 3.49% at January 1, 2019.
Table:
 | DECEMBER 31, 2018 AS REPORTED | IFRS 16 IMPACTS | JANUARY 1, 2019 UPON ADOPTION OF IFRS 16
Prepaid expenses | 244 | (55) | 189
Other current assets | 329 | 9 | 338
Property, plant and equipment | 24,844 | 2,257 | 27,101
Other non-current assets | 847 | 17 | 864
Trade payables and other liabilities | 3,941 | (10) | 3,931
Debt due within one year | 4,645 | 293 | 4,938
Long-term debt | 19,760 | 2,011 | 21,771
Deferred tax liabilities | 3,163 | (7) | 3,156
Other non-current liabilities | 997 | (39) | 958
Deficit | (4,937) | (19) | (4,956)
Non-controlling interest | 326 | (1) | 325


Question: What is the total change between December 31, 2018 to January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of IFRS 16?
Answer: 4456
Calculation: -55+9+2,257+17-10+293+2,011-7-39-19-1
Results of Operations
The following table is a summary of our consolidated statements of operations for the specified periods and results of operations as a percentage of revenues for those periods. The period-to-period comparisons of results are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods. Percentage of revenues figures are rounded and therefore may not subtotal exactly.
A discussion regarding our consolidated statements of operations and results of operations as a percentage of revenue for 2019 compared to 2018 is presented below. A discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for 2018 compared to 2017 can be found under Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 14, 2019, which is available free of charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.go.
(1)  Stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows:
(2)  Amortization of intangible assets included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows:
(3) Restructuring-related expenses included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows:
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 |  | 2018 | 
 | Amount | % of Revenue | Amount | % of Revenue
 |  | (dollars in thousands) |  | 
Revenues, net | $49,036 | 100% | $58,631 | 100%
Cost of revenues (1) (2) (3) | 22,843 | 47 | 27,154 | 46
Gross profit | 26,193 | 53 | 31,477 | 54
Operating expenses: |  |  |  | 
Sales and marketing (1) (2) (3) | 15,836 | 32 | 23,425 | 40
Research and development (1) (2) (3) | 17,845 | 36 | 22,450 | 38
General and administrative (1) (2) (3) | 10,466 | 21 | 13,113 | 22
Impairment of goodwill | 1,910 | 4 | 14,740 | 26
Total operating expenses | 46,037 | 94 | 73,728 | 126
Loss from operations | (19,844) | (40) | (42,251) | (72)
Gain on divestiture | 5,064 | 10 | - | -
Other income, net | 2,252 | 5 | 1,593 | 3
Loss before (benefit from) provision for income taxes | (12,528) | (26) | (40,658) | (69)
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes | (120) | - | 586 | 1
Net loss | $(12,408) | (25)% | $(41,244) | (70)%


Question: What are the company's respective cost of revenue from operations in 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 27,154, 22,843
The following table summarizes restricted stock-based award activity, including service-based awards and performance-based awards, granted pursuant to Oracle-based stock plans and stock plans assumed from our acquisitions for our last three fiscal years ended May 31, 2019 :
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock-based awards that were vested and issued in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1.3 billion, $1.0 billion and $715 million, respectively. As of May 31, 2019, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock-based awards was $2.8 billion and is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.68 years.
No PSUs were granted in each of fiscal 2019 and 2018. In fiscal 2017, 1.7 million PSUs were granted which vest upon the attainment of certain performance metrics and service-based vesting. Based upon actual attainment relative to the “target” performance metric, certain participants have the ability to be issued up to 150% of the target number of PSUs originally granted, or to be issued no PSUs at all. In fiscal 2019, 2.4 million PSUs vested and 1.3 million PSUs remained outstanding as of May 31, 2019.
Table:
 |  | Restricted Stock-Based Awards Outstanding
(in millions, except fair value) | Number of Shares | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Balance, May 31, 2016 | 52 | $39.29
Granted | 42 | $39.40
Assumed | 14 | $37.83
Vested and Issued | (18) | $40.39
Canceled | (7) | $39.73
Balance, May 31, 2017 | 83 | $39.18
Granted | 44 | $47.42
Vested and Issued | (27) | $39.10
Canceled | (11) | $41.97
Balance, May 31, 2018 | 89 | $42.93
Granted | 53 | $42.47
Vested and Issued | (31) | $41.85
Canceled | (12) | $42.97
Balance, May 31, 2019 | 99 | $43.01


Question: When does the company's fiscal year end?
Answer: May 31
NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES
The components of loss before income taxes are as follows:
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Domestic | (1,698,689) | (2,468,805)
Foreign | (52,222) | (88,726)
Loss before income taxes | (1,750,911) | (2,557,531)


Question: What is the company's domestic loss before income tax in 2019?
Answer: 1,698,689
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
We recognize the benefits of tax return positions if we determine that the positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. Interest and penalties accrued on unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as tax expense in the period incurred. The following table reflects changes in the unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
Of the unrecognized tax benefits at December 28, 2019, $13.4 million would impact the effective tax rate if recognized.
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities which might result in proposed assessments. Our estimate for the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is judgmental in nature. However, we believe we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcome related to those matters.
Our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved or when statutes of limitation on potential assessments expire. As of December 28, 2019, changes to our uncertain tax positions in the next 12 months that are reasonably possible are not expected to have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.
At December 28, 2019, our tax years 2016 through 2019, 2015 through 2019 and 2014 through 2019, remain open for examination in the federal, state and foreign jurisdictions, respectively. However, to the extent allowed by law, the taxing authorities may have the right to examine prior periods where net operating losses and credits were generated and carried forward, and make adjustments up to the net operating loss and credit carryforward amounts.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Year Ended | 
 | December 28, 2019 | December 29, 2018 | December 30, 2017
Unrecognized tax benefit, beginning balance | $25,224 | $18,296 | $17,978
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 3,679 | 1,677 | 694
Additions based on tax positions from prior years | — | 5,332 | —
Reductions for tax positions of prior years | (5) | (7) | —
Reductions due to lapse of the applicable statute of limitations | (98) | (74) | (376)
Unrecognized tax benefit, ending balance | $28,800 | $25,224 | $18,296
Interest and penalties recognized as a component of Provision (benefit) for income taxes | $59 | $71 | $67
Interest and penalties accrued at period end | 212 | 230 | 218


Question: Which tax years are open for examination in the federal, state and foreign jurisdictions respectively?
Answer: 2016 through 2019, 2015 through 2019, 2014 through 2019