hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

Table:
 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010
masco | $ 101.79 | $ 76.74 | $ 42.81 | $ 54.89 | $ 51.51
s&p 500 index | $ 115.61 | $ 121.95 | $ 77.38 | $ 97.44 | $ 111.89
s&p industrials index | $ 113.16 | $ 126.72 | $ 76.79 | $ 92.30 | $ 116.64
s&p consumer durables & apparel index | $ 106.16 | $ 84.50 | $ 56.13 | $ 76.51 | $ 99.87
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares .
during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards .
we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the s&p industrial index from 2006 to 2007
Answer: 11.9%
Calculation: subtract(126.72, 113.16), divide(#0, 113.16)
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margins
Cost of revenues consists primarily of manufacturing materials, payroll, shipping and handling costs, manufacturing-related overhead and amortization of certain intangible assets. Our manufacturing operations rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide key components and materials for our products, some of which are a sole source. We order materials and supplies based on backlog and forecasted customer orders.
Tooling and setup costs related to changing manufacturing lots at our suppliers are also included in the cost of revenues. We expense all warranty costs, inventory provisions and amortization of certain intangible assets as cost of revenues. Gross profit and gross margin by segment were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Probe Cards Gross profit in the Probe Cards segment increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 primarily due to increased sales, offset by higher variable costs and by less favorable product mix.
Systems Gross profit and gross margin in the Systems segment increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 due to increased sales.
Corporate and Other Corporate and Other includes unallocated expenses relating to amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation, restructuring charges, net, and acquisition-related costs, including charges related to inventory stepped up to fair value and other costs, which are not used in evaluating the results of, or in allocating resources to, our reportable segments.
Overall Gross profit and gross margin fluctuate with revenue levels, product mix, selling prices, factory loading and material costs. For fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, gross profit increased due to increased sales while gross margins remained relatively consistent with fluctuations in product mix.
Stock-based compensation expense included in gross profit for fiscal 2019 and 2018 was $4.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal 2019 |  | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Gross profit | $211,382 | $50,927 | $(24,813) | $237,496
Gross margin | 43.0 % | 51.9 % | — % | 40.3 %
Fiscal 2018 |  |  |  | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Gross profit | $187,320 | $47,074 | $(24,055) | $210,339
Gross margin | 43.1 % | 49.3 % | — % | 39.7 %
Fiscal 2017 |  |  |  | 
 | Probe Cards | Systems | Corporate and Other | Total
Gross profit | $195,903 | $46,647 | $(26,953) | $215,597
Gross margin | 43.1 % | 49.8 % | — % | 39.3 %


Question: What does cost of revenues include?
Answer: onsists primarily of manufacturing materials, payroll, shipping and handling costs, manufacturing-related overhead and amortization of certain intangible assets
8. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by operating segment are as follows (amounts in millions):
At December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, there were no accumulated impairment losses.
Table:
 | Activision | Blizzard | King | Total
Balance at December 31, 2017 | $6,898 | $190 | $2,675 | $9,763
Other | (1) | — | — | (1)
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $6,897 | $190 | $2,675 | $9,762
Other | 1 | — | 1 | 2
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $6,898 | $190 | $2,676 | $9,764


Question: What was the balance in the carrying amount of goodwill by Blizzard in 2017?
Answer: $190
Financial information of associates and joint ventures:
There is no individually significant associate or joint venture for the Company. For individually immaterial associates and joint ventures, the following tables summarize the amount recognized by the Company at its share of those associates and joint ventures separately.
When an associate or a joint venture is a foreign operation, and the functional currency of the foreign entity is different from the Company, an exchange difference arising from translation of the foreign entity will be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
Such exchange differences recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) in the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 were NT$45 million, NT$(16) million and NT$(9) million, respectively, which were not included in the following table.
The aggregate amount of the Company’s share of all its individually immaterial associates that are accounted for using the equity method was as follows:
Table:
 |  | For the years ended December 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
 | $NT(In Thousands) | $NT (In Thousands) | $NT (In Thousands)
Profit (loss) from continuing operations | $77,589 | $(616,665) | $115,329
Post-tax profit from discontinued operations | 80,248 | — | —
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 526,773 | (82,871) | 873,308
Total comprehensive income (loss) | $684,610 | $(699,536) | $988,637


Question: What is recognized as comprehensive income (loss)?
Answer: an exchange difference arising from translation of the foreign entity will be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
The following table provides a reconciliation of Adjusted Gross Profit to Gross Profit, the most directly comparable financial measure presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
(a) Represents depreciation and amortization expense included in cost of goods sold
(b) Represents additional operating costs incurred in connection with the start-up of our new manufacturing lines as part of the Freshpet Kitchens expansion project in 2016 that included adding two additional product lines.
(c) Represents non-cash share-based compensation expense included in cost of goods sold.
Table:
 | Twelve Months Ended December 31, |  |  |  | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
 | (Dollars in thousands) |  |  |  | 
Gross Profit | $114,197 | $89,990 | $72,416 | $60,371 | $54,649
Depreciation expense (a) | 6,370 | 6,089 | 5,791 | 4,028 | 2,566
Plant start-up expense (b) | — | — | — | 1,628 | —
Non-cash share-based compensation (c) | 922 | 859 | 243 | 221 | 201
Adjusted Gross Profit | $121,489 | $96,938 | $78,450 | $66,248 | $57,416
Adjusted Gross Profit as a % of Net Sales | 49.4% | 50.2% | 51.5% | 51.1% | 50.6%


Question: What is the gross profit for each financial year end shown in the table (in chronological order)?
Answer: $54,649, $60,371, $72,416, $89,990, $114,197
21. Subsidiaries
The advances given to subsidiaries were interest-free and unsecured with settlement neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future.
The deemed investment in a subsidiary, Singtel Group Treasury Pte. Ltd. (“SGT”), arose from financial guarantees provided by the Company for loans drawn down by SGT prior to 1 April 2010.
The significant subsidiaries of the Group are set out in Note 44.1 to Note 44.3.
Table:
 |  | Company | 
 | 31 March 2019 | 31 March 2018 | 1 April 2017
 | S$ Mil | S$ Mil | S$ Mil
Unquoted equity shares, at cost | 14,259.7 | 13,676.4 | 11,001.2
Shareholders' advances | 5,733.0 | 5,733.0 | 6,423.3
Deemed investment in a subsidiary | 32.5 | 32.5 | 32.5
 | 20,025.2 | 19,441.9 | 17,457.0
Less: Allowance for impairment losses | (16.0) | (16.0) | (16.0)
 | 20,009.2 | 19,425.9 | 17,441.0


Question: Which subsidiary is there a deemed investment in?
Answer: Singtel Group Treasury Pte. Ltd. (“SGT”)
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities consisted of the following (in thousands):
We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale. All marketable securities represent the investment of funds available for current operations, notwithstanding their contractual maturities. Such marketable securities are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.
We typically invest in highly-rated securities with low probabilities of default. Our investment policy requires investments to be rated single A or better, limits the types of acceptable investments, concentration as to security holder and duration of the investment. The gross unrealized gains and losses in fiscal 2019 and 2018 were caused primarily by changes in interest rates.
The longer the duration of marketable securities, the more susceptible they are to changes in market interest rates and bond yields. As yields increase, those securities with a lower yield-at-cost show a mark-to-market unrealized loss. We anticipate recovering the full cost of the securities either as market conditions improve, or as the securities mature. Accordingly, we believe that the unrealized losses are not other-than-temporary.
When evaluating the investments for otherthan- temporary impairment, we review factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below the amortized cost basis, current market liquidity, interest rate risk, the financial condition of the issuer, and credit rating downgrades. As of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, gross unrealized losses related to our marketable securities portfolio were not material.
Table:
December 28, 2019 | Amortized Cost   | Gains   | Losses   | Fair Value  
U.S. Treasuries | $10,458 | $11 | $— | $10,469
Commercial paper | 3,914 | 1 | (4) | 3,911
Corporate bond | 33,867 | 68 | (7) | 33,928
Certificate of deposit | 3,584 | 5 | — | 3,589
Agency securities | 24,408 | 38 | (16) | 24,430
 | $76,231 | $123 | $(27) | $76,327
December 29, 2018 | Amortized Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value
U.S. Treasuries | $7,997 | $1 | $(1) | $7,997
Commercial paper | 2,296 | — | (1) | 2,295
Corporate bond | 30,833 | 1 | (160) | 30,674
Certificate of deposit | 960 | — | (3) | 957
Agency securities | 8,667 | — | (59) | 8,608
 | $50,753 | $2 | $(224) | $50,531


Question: What was the fair value of corporate bond?
Answer: 33,928
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 8 — Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities
2016 Plan
In June 2016, we announced plans to restructure operations by phasing out production at our Elkhart, IN facility and transitioning it into a research and development center supporting our global operations ("June 2016 Plan"). Additional organizational changes were also implemented in various other locations. In 2017, we revised this plan to include an additional $1,100 in planned costs related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters in Lisle, IL and our plant in Bolingbrook, IL, both of which have now been consolidated into a single facility. Restructuring charges under this plan, which is substantially complete, were $4,284, $4,559, and $4,139 during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The total restructuring liability related to the June 2016 Plan was $233 and $668 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Any additional costs related to line movements, equipment charges, and other costs will be expensed as incurred.
The following table displays the restructuring charges associated with the June 2016 Plan as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through December 31, 2019:
(1) Other charges include the effects of currency translation, travel, legal and other charges.
Table:
June 2016 Plan | Planned Costs | Actual costs incurred through December 31, 2019
Workforce reduction | $3,075 | $3,340
Building and equipment relocation | 9,025 | 10,534
Asset impairment charge | — | 1,168
Other charges (1) | 1,300 | 988
Restructuring charges | $13,400 | $16,030


Question: What was the difference between the planned costs and actual costs incurred for Workforce Reduction?
Answer: 265
Calculation: 3,340-3,075
A.2.6 Calculation of return on capital employed
For purposes of calculating ROCE in interim periods, income before interest after tax is annualized. Average capital employed is determined using the average of the respective balances as of the quarterly reporting dates for the periods under review.
[1] Item Other interest expenses / income, net primarily consists of interest relating to corporate debt, and related hedging activities, as well as interest income on corporate assets.
Table:
(in millions of €) | 2019 | 2018
Net income | 5,648 | 6,120
Less: Other interest expenses / income, net 1 | (529) | (482)
Plus: SFS Other interest expenses / income | 763 | 721
Plus: Net interest expenses related to provisions for pensions and similar |  | 
obligations | 148 | 164
Less: Interest adjustments |  | 
(discontinued operations) | – | –
Less: Taxes on interest adjustments |  | 
(tax rate (flat) 30%) | (115) | (121)
(I) Income before interest after tax | 5,916 | 6,401
(II) Average capital employed | 53,459 | 50,715
(I) / (II) ROCE | 11.1 % | 12.6 %


Question: What is the increase / (decrease) in income tax from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -4.96
Calculation: -115 / -121 - 1
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
The following table sets forth consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated (amounts in millions) and as a percentage of total net revenues, except for cost of revenues, which are presented as a percentage of associated revenues:
(1) During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we identified an amount which should have been recorded in the three months and year ended December 31, 2018 to reduce income tax expense by $35 million. Our statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, as presented above, has been revised to reflect the correction. See further discussion in Note 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Represents the loss on extinguishment of debt we recognized in connection with our debt financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018. The loss on extinguishment is comprised of a $25 million premium payment and a $15 million write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs.
Table:
 | For the Years |  | Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 |  | 2018(1) | 
Net revenues |  |  |  | 
Product sales | $1,975 | 30% | $2,255 | 30%
Subscription, licensing, and other revenues | 4,514 | 70 | 5,245 | 70
Total net revenues | 6,489 | 100 | 7,500 | 100
Costs and expenses |  |  |  | 
Cost of revenues—product sales: |  |  |  | 
Product costs | 656 | 33 | 719 | 32
Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses | 240 | 12 | 371 | 16
Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other |  |  |  | 
Game operations and distribution costs | 965 | 21 | 1,028 | 20
Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses | 233 | 5 | 399 | 8
Product development | 998 | 15 | 1,101 | 15
Sales and marketing | 926 | 14 | 1,062 | 14
General and administrative | 732 | 11 | 822 | 11
Restructuring and related costs | 132 | 2 | 10 | —
Total costs and expenses | 4,882 | 75 | 5,512 | 73
Operating income | 1,607 | 25 | 1,988 | 27
Interest and other expense (income), net | (26) | — | 71 | 1
Loss on extinguishment of debt (2) | — | — | 40 | 1
Income before income tax expense | 1,633 | 25 | 1,877 | 25
Income tax expense | 130 | 2 | 29 | —
Net income | $1,503 | 23% | $1,848 | 25%


Question: What is the difference in game operations and distribution costs between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 63
Calculation: (1,028-965)
Note 13 Contract costs
The table below provides a reconciliation of the contract costs balance.
Contract costs are amortized over a period ranging from 12 to 84 months.
Table:
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | 2019 | 2018
Opening balance, January 1 | 707 | 636
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs | 602 | 567
Amortization included in operating costs | (523) | (477)
Impairment charges included in operating costs | (3) | (19)
Ending balance, December 31 | 783 | 707


Question: What is the difference in the opening and ending balances in 2019?
Answer: 76
Calculation: 783-707
IMPAIRMENT TESTING
As described in Note 2, Significant accounting policies, goodwill is tested annually for impairment by comparing the carrying value of a CGU or group of CGUs to the recoverable amount, where the recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal or value in use.
VALUE IN USE
The value in use for a CGU or group of CGUs is determined by discounting five-year cash flow projections derived from business plans reviewed by senior management. The projections reflect management’s expectations of revenue, segment profit, capital expenditures, working capital and operating cash flows, based on past experience and future expectations of operating performance.
Cash flows beyond the five-year period are extrapolated using perpetuity growth rates. None of the perpetuity growth rates exceed the long-term historical growth rates for the markets in which we operate.
The discount rates are applied to the cash flow projections and are derived from the weighted average cost of capital for each CGU or group of CGUs.
The following table shows the key assumptions used to estimate the recoverable amounts of the groups of CGUs.
The recoverable amounts determined in a prior year for the Bell Wireless and Bell Wireline groups of CGUs exceed their corresponding current carrying values by a substantial margin and have been carried forward and used in the impairment test for the current year. We believe that any reasonable possible change in the key assumptions on which the estimate of recoverable amounts of the Bell Wireless or Bell Wireline groups of CGUs is based would not cause their carrying amounts to exceed their recoverable amounts.
For the Bell Media group of CGUs, a decrease of (1.1%) in the perpetuity growth rate or an increase of 0.8% in the discount rate would have resulted in its recoverable amount being equal to its carrying value.
Table:
 | ASSUMPTIONS USED | 
GROUPS OF CGUs | PERPETUITY GROWTH RATE | DISCOUNT RATE
Bell Wireless | 0.8% | 9.1%
Bell Wireline | 1.0% | 6.0%
Bell Media | 1.0% | 8.0%


Question: How is goodwill tested annually for impairment?
Answer: by comparing the carrying value of a CGU or group of CGUs to the recoverable amount, where the recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal or value in use
2 Alternative performance measures continued
Cash generation
Cash generation is one of the Group’s key performance indicators used by the Board to monitor the performance of the Group and measure the successful implementation of our strategy. It is one of three financial measures on which Executive Directors’ variable remuneration is based.
Cash generation is adjusted operating profit after adding back depreciation and amortisation (excluding IFRS 16 depreciation), less cash payments to pension schemes in excess of the charge to operating profit, equity settled share plans and working capital changes.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | £m | £m
Adjusted operating profit | 282.7 | 264.9
Depreciation and amortisation (excluding IFRS16 depreciation) | 34.3 | 32.9
Cash payments to pension schemes in excess of charge to P&L | (5.2) | (4.6)
Equity settled share plans | 6.2 | 5.7
Working capital changes | (21.4) | (22.5)
Cash generation | 296.6 | 276.4


Question: In which year was the amount of adjusted operating profit larger?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: 282.7>264.9
TERM DEPOSITS
An analysis of the Group’s term deposits by currencies are as follows:
The effective interest rate for the term deposits of the Group with initial terms of over three months to three years during the year ended 31 December 2019 was 3.57% (2018: 4.08%).
Term deposits with initial terms of over three months were neither past due nor impaired. As at 31 December 2019, the carrying amounts of the term deposits with initial terms of over three months approximated their fair values.
Table:
 | As at 31 December | 
 | 2019 | 2018
 | RMB’Million | RMB’Million
Included in non-current assets: |  | 
RMB term deposits | 19,000 | –
Included in current assets: |  | 
RMB term deposits | 28,598 | 55,180
USD term deposits | 16,325 | 6,349
Other currencies | 1,988 | 1,389
 | 46,911 | 62,918
 | 65,911 | 62,918


Question: How much was the RMB term deposits included in non-current assets as at 31 December 2019?
Answer: 19,000
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts of borrowings under credit facilities and under loans approximates fair value as interest rates on these instruments approximates current market rates.
Notes payable and long-term debt is carried at amortized cost; however, the Company estimates the fair value of notes payable and long-term debt for disclosure purposes. The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s notes payable and long-term debt, by hierarchy level as of the periods indicated:
(1) The fair value estimates are based upon observable market data.
(2) This fair value estimate is based on the Company’s indicative borrowing cost derived from discounted cash flows.
Refer to Note 9 – “Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits” for disclosure surrounding the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets.
Table:
 |  | August 31, 2019 |  | August 31, 2018 | 
(in thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value
Notes payable and long-term debt: (Note 8) |  |  |  |  | 
5.625% Senior Notes | Level 2(1) | $398,886 | $416,000 | $397,995 | $415,704
4.700% Senior Notes | Level 2(1) | 498,004 | 525,890 | 497,350 | 503,545
4.900% Senior Notes | Level 3(2) | 299,057 | 318,704 | 298,814 | 306,535
3.950% Senior Notes | Level 2(1) | 494,825 | 509,845 | 494,208 | 476,010


Question: What were the Level 3 fair value estimates based on?
Answer: the Company’s indicative borrowing cost derived from discounted cash flows.