hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
At March 31, 2019, the Company had $7.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits. A reconciliation of gross unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) is as follows (amounts in thousands):
At March 31, 2019, $1.9 million of the $7.7 million of unrecognized income tax benefits would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate, if recognized. It is reasonably possible that the total unrecognized tax benefit could decrease by $1.0 million in fiscal year 2020 if the advanced pricing arrangement for one of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is agreed to by the foreign tax authority and an ongoing audit in one of the Company’s foreign jurisdictions is settled.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and multiple foreign jurisdictions, including various state and local jurisdictions. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service concluded its examinations of the Company’s U.S. federal tax returns for all tax years through 2003. Because of net operating losses, the Company’s U.S. federal returns for 2003 and later years will remain subject to examination until the losses are utilized. The Company is subject to income tax examinations in various foreign and U.S. state jurisdictions for the years 2014 and forward. The Company records potential interest and penalty expenses related to unrecognized income tax benefits within its global operations in income tax expense. The Company had $0.5 million and $0.9 million of accrued interest and penalties respectively at March 31, 2019 and 2018, which are included as a component of income tax expense. To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Years Ended March 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Beginning of fiscal year | $8,680 | $7,390 | $7,103
Additions from business combinations | — | 1,270 | —
Additions for tax positions of the current year | 2,027 | 1,078 | 762
Additions for tax positions of prior years | 519 | — | —
Reductions for tax positions of prior years | (633) | (1,058) | (64)
Lapse in statute of limitations | (9) | — | (411)
Settlements | (2,923) | — | —
End of fiscal year | $7,661 | $8,680 | $7,390


Question: What was the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of fiscal year in 2019?
Answer: 8,680
Autodesk applies fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist of cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other financial instruments, on a recurring basis. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require Autodesk to develop its own assumptions. When determining fair value, Autodesk uses observable market data and relies on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available. Autodesk reviews for any potential changes on a quarterly basis, in conjunction with our fiscal quarter-end close.
Autodesk's cash equivalents, marketable securities, and financial instruments are primarily classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Autodesk values its securities on pricing from pricing vendors, who may use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly in determining fair value (Level 2). Autodesk's Level 2 securities are valued primarily using observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Autodesk's Level 3 securities consist of investments held in convertible debt securities, and derivative contracts.
A reconciliation of the change in Autodesk’s Level 3 items for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019 was as follows:
(1) Included in “Interest and other expense, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Table:
 |  | Fair Value Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | 
 | Derivative Contracts | Convertible Debt Securities | Total
Balances, January 31, 2018 | $1.0 | $7.8 | $8.8
Settlements | — | (3.5) | (3.5)
(Losses) Gains included in earnings (1) | (0.2) | 0.5 | 0.3
Losses included in OCI | — | (0.4) | (0.4)
Balances, January 31, 2019 | $0.8 | $4.4 | $5.2


Question: What level(s) are Autodesk's cash equivalents, marketable securities, and financial instruments classified as?
Answer: Autodesk's cash equivalents, marketable securities, and financial instruments are primarily classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
acquired is represented by allied 2019s infrastructure of market-based collection routes and its related integrated waste transfer and disposal channels , whose value has been included in goodwill . all of the goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from the allied acquisition are not deductible for income tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from december 5 , 2008 , the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the acquisition had been completed as of january 1 , 2008 . the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . furthermore , the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the acquisition ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) .

Table:
 | year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )
revenue | $ 9362.2
net income | 285.7
basic earnings per share | 0.76
diluted earnings per share | 0.75
the unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes .
restructuring charges as a result of the 2008 allied acquisition , we committed to a restructuring plan related to our corporate overhead and other administrative and operating functions .
the plan included closing our corporate office in florida , consolidating administrative functions to arizona , the former headquarters of allied , and reducing staffing levels .
the plan also included closing and consolidating certain operating locations and terminating certain leases .
during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we incurred $ 11.4 million , net of adjustments , and $ 63.2 million , respectively , of restructuring and integration charges related to our integration of allied .
these charges and adjustments primarily related to severance and other employee termination and relocation benefits and consulting and professional fees .
substantially all the charges are recorded in our corporate segment .
we do not expect to incur additional charges to complete our plan .
we expect that the remaining charges will be paid during 2011 .
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Question: for the year ended december 31 2008 what was the net profit margin
Answer: 3.1%
Calculation: divide(285.7, 9362.2)
The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of our net revenues in one or more of the following periods:
Nokia was our largest customer in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017. Nokia purchases products directly from us and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Based on information provided to us by its contract manufacturers and our distributors, purchases by Nokia represented approximately 45%, 36% and 41% of our net revenues in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. To our knowledge, none of our other OEM customers accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues in any of these periods.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Year Ended | 
 |  | March 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses:        |  |  | 
Flextronics Technology | 21.8% | 14.0% | 10.4%
Sanmina | 17.7 | 16.0 | 20.4
Distributors:        |  |  | 
Avnet Logistics | 31.3 | 35.3 | 25.5
Nexcomm  | 14.8 | 16.1 | 19.7


Question: What was the change in net revenue from Sanmina from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 1.7
Calculation: 17.7 - 16.0
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Expressed in US $000's except share and per share amounts
Table:
 | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 
 | Years ended | 
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
 | $ | $
Balance, beginning of the year | (12,216) | 3,435
 |  | 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 12,865 | (19,821)
Loss on cash flow hedges reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings were as follows: |  | 
Cost of revenues | 279 | 255
Sales and marketing | 1,538 | 1,224
Research and development | 2,620 | 2,063
General and administrative | 744 | 628
Tax effect on unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges | (4,784) | —
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 13,262 | (15,651)
Balance, end of the year | 1,046 | (12,216)


Question: What information does the table show?
Answer: the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Restricted Stock Units
RSU activity is summarized as follows (shares in thousands):
The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $55.69, $46.17, and $37.99, respectively. The total fair value of RSUs vested as of the vesting dates during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $58.4 million, $49.9 million, and $37.2 million, respectively.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs was $127.2 million at December 31, 2019, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
Table:
 | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested shares at December 31, 2018 | 4,117 | $41.94
Granted | 1,589 | 55.69
Forfeited | (510) | 45.72
Vested | (1,440) | 40.61
Unvested shares at December 31, 2019 | 3,756 | $47.76


Question: What was the number of granted shares?
Answer: 1,589
P. Income Taxes
The domestic and foreign components of income before income tax for the periods presented were as follows (table in millions):
Table:
 |  | For the Year Ended | 
 | January 31, 2020 | February 1, 2019 | February 2, 2018
Domestic | $895 | $680 | $462
Foreign | 543 | 1,149 | 1,115
Total income before income tax | $1,438 | $1,829 | $1,577


Question: What was the change in Foreign income between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 34
Calculation: 1,149-1,115
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
The components of the net deferred tax asset and liability and related valuation allowance were as follows:
The Company provides valuation allowances if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management assesses the available evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
Assets: |  | 
Operating lease liability | $878.5 | $—
Net operating loss carryforwards | 356.6 | 264.9
Accrued asset retirement obligations | 174.9 | 165.7
Stock-based compensation | 5.6 | 6.3
Unearned revenue | 31.7 | 28.3
Unrealized loss on foreign currency | 3.8 | 12.9
Other accruals and allowances | 65.6 | 78.6
Items not currently deductible and other | 26.1 | 26.2
Liabilities: |  | 
Depreciation and amortization | (1,040.3) | (757.0)
Right-of-use asset | (865.1) | —
Deferred rent | (79.7) | (36.9)
Other | — | (15.3)
Subtotal | (442.3) | (226.3)
Valuation allowance | (194.2) | (151.9)
Net deferred tax liabilities | $(636.5) | $(378.2)


Question: What was the Stock-based compensation in 2018?
Answer: 6.3
NOTE E – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The Company’s property and equipment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consists of the following:
Depreciation and amortization expense included as a charge to income was $66,082 and $67,107 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Development test equipment | $16,461 | $19,110
Computer software | 76,134 | 76,134
Office equipment | 66,685 | 61,367
Office fixtures and furniture | 330,568 | 330,568
Leasehold improvements | 18,016 | 18,016
Total | 507,864 | 505,195
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (321,339) | (257,906)
Total property and equipment | 186,525 | $247,289


Question: Which year has a higher total value of property and equipment?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: Find and compare the total property and equipment across the two years
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)
The Company estimates the fair value of its ESPP share options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of highly subjective estimates and assumptions. The Company estimates the expected term of ESPP share options based on the length of each offering period, which is six months.
The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the ESPP share option. Expected volatility is based on the Company’s historical volatility. The Company uses an expected dividend rate of zero as it currently has no history or expectation of paying dividends on its ordinary shares.
The grant date fair value per ordinary share is based on the closing market value of its ordinary shares on the first day of each ESPP offering period. The first authorized offering period under the ESPP commenced on July 1, 2017.
The fair value of each ESPP option grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model that used the following weighted-average assumptions:
The weighted-average per share fair value of ESPP share options granted to employees during the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, was $9.58 and $6.41, respectively.
Table:
 | Year ended March 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Expected term (in years) | 0.5 | 0.5
Risk-free interest rate | 2.3% | 1.4%
Expected volatility | 39.1% | 29.9%
Expected dividend yield   | —% | —%
Grant date fair value per ordinary share | $36.69 | $27.15


Question: What is the risk free interest rate based on?
Answer: a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the ESPP share option.
34. Share-based payment continued
3.8 million share incentives were granted during 2019 (2018 2.7 million). The fair value of share incentives has been estimated as at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes binomial model. The following table gives the assumptions made in arriving at the share-based payment charge and the fair value:
The expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical volatility of the Company’s share price over the previous two years which management considers to be the period which is likely to be most representative of future volatility. The risk free rate is calculated by reference to UK government bonds.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Weighted average share price (pence) | 163.1 | 112.9
Weighted average exercise price (pence) | 0.0 | 0.0
Weighted average fair value (pence) | 141.1 | 95.1
Expected volatility (%) | 31.6–32.8 | 30.6
Option life (years): |  | 
– Performance Shares | 3.0 | 3.0
– Options and SARs | 10.0 | 10.0
Risk free rate (%) | 0.48-0.72 | 0.88
Dividend yield (%) | 2.5–3.0 | 3.0


Question: What was the change in the Weighted average share price (pence)?
Answer: 50.2
Calculation: 163.1-112.9
6. Financial Instruments
The composition of financial instruments is as follows:
The fair values of the Company’s financial instrument is the amount that would be received in an asset sale or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between unaffiliated market participants and is recorded using a hierarchical disclosure framework based upon the level of subjectivity of the inputs used in measuring assets and liabilities. The levels are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available.
The Company classifies its financial instrument within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy on the basis of models utilizing market observable inputs. The interest rate swap has been valued on the basis of valuations provided by third-party pricing services, as derived from standard valuation or pricing models. Market-based observable inputs for the interest rate swap include one month LIBOR-based yield curves over the term of the swap. The Company reviews third-party pricing provider models, key inputs and assumptions and understands the pricing processes at its third-party providers in determining the overall reasonableness of the fair value of its Level 2 financial instruments. The Company also considers the risk of nonperformance by assessing the swap counterparty's credit risk in the estimate of fair value of the interest rate swap. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has not made any adjustments to the valuations obtained from its third party pricing providers.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
(in thousands) |  | 
Assets |  | 
Interest rate swap | $— | $1,623
Liabilities |  | 
Interest rate swap | $37 | $—


Question: In which year was interest rate swap less than 1,000 thousands?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: locate and analyze interest rate swap in row 4
be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as discussed in note 4 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2004 , and we are in different stages of the irs appeals process for these years . the irs is examining our tax returns for tax years 2005 and 2006 . in the third quarter of 2007 , we believe that we reached an agreement in principle with the irs to resolve all of the issues , except interest , related to tax years 1995 through 1998 , including the previously reported dispute over certain donations of property . we anticipate signing a closing agreement in 2008 . at december 31 , 2007 , we have recorded a current liability of $ 140 million for tax payments in 2008 related to federal and state income tax examinations . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2007 2006 2005 .

Table:
millions of dollars | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
rental income | $ 68 | $ 83 | $ 59
net gain on non-operating asset dispositions | 52 | 72 | 135
interest income | 50 | 29 | 17
sale of receivables fees | -35 ( 35 ) | -33 ( 33 ) | -23 ( 23 )
non-operating environmental costs and other | -19 ( 19 ) | -33 ( 33 ) | -43 ( 43 )
total | $ 116 | $ 118 | $ 145
12 .
share repurchase program on january 30 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 20 million shares of union pacific corporation common stock through the end of 2009 .
management 2019s assessments of market conditions and other pertinent facts guide the timing and volume of all repurchases .
we expect to fund our common stock repurchases through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non- operating properties , debt issuances , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2007 .
during 2007 , we repurchased approximately 13 million shares under this program at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 1.5 billion .
these shares were recorded in treasury stock at cost , which includes any applicable commissions and fees. .

Question: what was the percentage of the total other income in 2007 that was rental income
Answer: 58.6%
Calculation: divide(68, 116)
The following table summarizes net revenues by significant product and services categories:
Endpoint and information protection products include endpoint security, advanced threat protection, and information protection solutions and their related support services. Network and web security products include network security, web security, and cloud security solutions and their related support services. WSS and PKI products consist of the solutions we divested on October 31, 2017. Other products and services primarily consist of email security products, managed security services, consulting, and other professional services.
Consumer security products include Norton security, Norton Secure VPN, and other consumer security solutions. Identity and information protection products include LifeLock identity theft protection and other information protection solutions.
Products and service revenue information
Table:
 |  | Year Ended | 
(in millions) | March 29, 2019 | March 30, 2018 | March 31, 2017
Enterprise Security: |  |  | 
Endpoint and information protection | $1,027 | $983 | $947
Network and web security | 748 | 782 | 451
WSS and PKI | - | 238 | 422
Other products and services | 548 | 551 | 535
Total Enterprise Security | $2,323 | $2,554 | $2,355
Consumer Cyber Safety: |  |  | 
Consumer security | $1,471 | $1,504 | $1,527
Identity and information protection | 937 | 776 | 137
Total Consumer Cyber Safety | 2,408 | 2,280 | 1,664
Total net revenues | $4,731 | $4,834 | $4,019


Question: What do Endpoint and information protection products include?
Answer: endpoint security, advanced threat protection, and information protection solutions and their related support services