table of contents finance lease obligations the company has a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 164000 square feet located in alajuela , costa rica , to be used as a manufacturing and office facility . the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs , and in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 , the company was deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period . the building was completed in fiscal 2008 , and the company has recorded the fair market value of the building and land of $ 15.1 million within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets . at september 24 , 2011 , the company has recorded $ 1.6 million in accrued expenses and $ 16.9 million in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet . the term of the lease , which commenced in may 2008 , is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive 5-year terms . at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions . based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment . therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements are being depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years . future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 24 , 2011: .

Table:
fiscal 2012 | $ 1616
fiscal 2013 | 1672
fiscal 2014 | 1731
fiscal 2015 | 1791
fiscal 2016 | 1854
thereafter | 3643
total minimum payments | 12307
less-amount representing interest | -4017 ( 4017 )
total | $ 8290
the company also has to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility .
as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs .
the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 was deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period .
the $ 13.2 million fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet .
at september 24 , 2011 , the company has recorded $ 1.0 million in accrued expenses and $ 15.9 million in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .
the term of the lease is for a period of approximately 12 years commencing on november 14 , 2006 with the option to extend for two consecutive 5-year terms .
based on its asc 840-40 analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .
therefore , the improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the leasehold improvements are being depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of up to 35 years .
source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .
the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .
past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

Question: what percent of future minimum lease payments are projected to be paid off in 2016?
Answer: 22.4%
Calculation: divide(1854, 8290)