hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
18. Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists of the following:
Table:
 |  | Years Ended June 30, | 
($ in millions) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Unrealized gains on company owned life insurance contracts and investments held in rabbi trusts | $0.8 | $1.5 | $1.7
Interest income | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3
Foreign exchange | (0.4) | (0.7) | (0.4)
Pension earnings, interest and deferrals | (0.1) | (2.1) | (23.8)
Pension curtailment | — | — | (0.5)
Other | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2
Total other income (expense), net | $0.6 | $(0.8) | $(21.5)


Question: What was the percentage change in interest income in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: -66.67
Calculation: (0.1-0.3)/0.3
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
Business Metrics
We review a number of operating and financial metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends, formulate plans and make strategic decisions, including the following.
Transaction Volume. We define transaction volume as the dollar value of loans facilitated on our platform
during a given period. Transaction volume is an indicator of revenue and overall platform profitability and has
grown substantially in the past several years.
Loan Servicing Portfolio. We define our loan servicing portfolio as the aggregate outstanding consumer loan balance (principal plus accrued interest and fees) serviced by our platform at the date of measurement. Our loan servicing portfolio is an indicator of our servicing activities. The average loan servicing portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $8,213 million, $6,303 million and $4,501 million, respectively.
Active Merchants. We define active merchants as home improvement merchants and healthcare providers that have submitted at least one consumer application during the twelve months ended at the date of measurement. Because our transaction volume is a function of the size, engagement and growth of our merchant network, active merchants, in aggregate, are an indicator of future revenue and profitability, although they are not directly correlated. The comparative measures can also be impacted by disciplined corrective action taken by the Company to remove merchants from our program who do not meet our customer satisfaction standards.
Cumulative Consumer Accounts. We define cumulative consumer accounts as the aggregate number of consumer accounts approved on our platform since our inception, including accounts with both outstanding and zero balances. Although not directly correlated to revenue, cumulative consumer accounts is a measure of our brand awareness among consumers, as well as the value of the data we have been collecting from such consumers since our inception. We may use this data to support future growth by cross-marketing products and delivering potential additional customers to merchants that may not have been able to source those customers themselves.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Transaction Volume |  |  | 
Dollars (in millions) | $5,954 | $5,030 | $3,767
Percentage increase | 18% | 34% | 
Loan Servicing Portfolio |  |  | 
Dollars (in millions, at end of period) | $9,150 | $7,341 | $5,390
Percentage increase | 25% | 36% | 
Active Merchants |  |  | 
Number (at end of period) | 17,216 | 14,907 | 10,891
Percentage increase | 15% | 37% | 
Cumulative Consumer Accounts |  |  | 
Number (in millions, at end of period) | 3.03 | 2.24 | 1.57
Percentage increase | 35% | 43% | 


Question: What was the transaction volume in 2019?
Answer: 5,954
Net Loss per Share
The Company applies the two-class method to calculate its basic and diluted net loss per share as both classes of its voting shares are participating securities with equal participation rights and are entitled to receive dividends on a share for share basis.
The following table summarizes the reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding:
In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company was in a loss position and therefore diluted loss per share is equal to basic loss per share.
Table:
 | Years ended | 
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
Basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding | 113,026,424 | 105,671,839
The following items have been excluded from the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding because they are anti-dilutive: |  | 
Stock options | 3,812,242 | 5,476,790
Restricted share units | 1,939,918 | 2,473,665
Deferred share units | 673 | 347
 | 5,752,833 | 7,950,802


Question: What is the average anti-dilutive stock options for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 4644516
Calculation: (3,812,242+5,476,790)/2
A summary of the option activity as of May 26, 2019 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:
We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period, accounting for forfeitures as they occur. During fiscal 2017, we granted 1.1 million stock options with a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.12 per share. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $7.9 million, $15.8 million, and $29.8 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of fiscal 2019 was $28.83 per share.
Compensation expense for stock option awards totaled $2.2 million, $4.2 million, and $6.2 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, including discontinued operations of $0.2 million for fiscal 2017. Included in the compensation expense for stock option awards for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $0.2 million, $0.4 million, and $0.9 million, respectively, related to stock options granted by a subsidiary in the subsidiary's shares to the subsidiary's employees. The tax benefit related to the stock option expense for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $0.5 million, $1.4 million, and $2.4 million, respectively.
At May 26, 2019, we had $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.1 years.
Cash received from stock option exercises for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $12.4 million, $25.1 million, and $84.4 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled $2.3 million, $5.3 million, and $19.5 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Table:
Options | Number of Options (in Millions) | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in Millions)
Outstanding at May 27, 2018 | 5.1 | $28.11 |  | 
Exercised | (0.6) | $20.75 |  | $7.9
Expired | (0.1) | $29.84 |  | 
Outstanding at May 26, 2019 | 4.4 | $29.00 | 5.47 | $9.9
Exercisable at May 26, 2019 | 4.1 | $28.38 | 5.32 | $9.9


Question: What was the compensation expense for stock option awards during the fiscal year 2018?
Answer: $4.2 million
Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan
During Fiscal 2019, we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations (Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan), including in connection with our recent acquisitions of Catalyst and Liaison, to take further steps to improve our operational efficiency. The Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan charges relate to workforce reductions and facility consolidations. These charges require management to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the amount and timing of restructuring charges or recoveries. Our estimated liability could change subsequent to its recognition, requiring adjustments to the expense and the liability recorded. On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of the related liabilities and expenses and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate.
As of June 30, 2019, we expect total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan to be approximately $30.0 million, of which $28.3 million has already been recorded within "Special charges (recoveries)" to date. We do not expect to incur any further significant charges relating to this plan.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the year ended June 30, 2019 is shown below.
Table:
Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan | Workplace reduction | Facility costs | Total
Balance payable as at June 30, 2018 | $— | $— | $—
Accruals and adjustments | 12,460 | 15,858 | 28,318
Cash payments | (10,420) | (4,739) | (15,159)
Non-cash adjustments | — | (3,393) | (3,393)
Foreign exchange | (221) | (2,438) | (2,659)
Balance payable as at June 30, 2019 | $1,819 | $5,288 | $7,107


Question: What is the total Balance payable as at June 30, 2019 
Answer: 7,107
Results of Operations
We operate a cybersecurity business, focused on licensing and enforcement, providing advisory services, developing mobile security applications, and investing in emerging cybersecurity technologies and intellectual property. The following table summarizes our results of operations for the periods presented and as a percentage of our total revenue for those periods based on our consolidated statement of operations data. The year to year comparison of results of operations is not necessarily indicative of results of operations for future periods.
Table:
 |  |  | For the Years Ended December 31, |  |  | 
 | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | 2017 | 
 | Amount | % of Revenue | Amount | % of Revenue | Amount | % of Revenue
 |  |  | (In millions, except percentages) |  |  | 
Revenues | $13.2 | 100% | $82.3 | 100% | $50.5 | 100%
Cost of revenues | 1.9 | 14% | 15.3 | 19% | 6.0 | 12%
Gross profit | 11.3 | 86% | 67.0 | 81% | 44.5 | 88%
Operating expenses: |  |  |  |  |  | 
Selling, general and administrative (1) | 31.7 | 240% | 32.2 | 39% | 28.6 | 57%
Research and development | 2.0 | 15% | 2.1 | 2% | 1.5 | 3%
Total operating expenses | 33.7 | 225% | 34.3 | 41% | 30.1 | 60%
Other income (expense) | (0.3) | (2)% | (4.0) | (5)% | 2.2 | 4%
Income (loss) before income taxes | (22.7) | (172%) | 28.7 | 35% | 16.6 | 33%
Income tax provision (benefit) | (6.2) | (47%) | 8.0 | 10% | (6.2) | (12)%
Net income (loss) | $(16.5) | (125)% | $20.7 | 25% | $22.8 | 45%
(1) Includes stock based compensation | $1.0 | 8% | $1.6 | 2% | $0.8 | 2%


Question: What is the percentage change in cost of revenue between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 155
Calculation: (15.3-6)/6
Stock Options
Stock options granted pursuant to the 2016 Incentive Plan are granted at an exercise price not less than the market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Under the 2016 Incentive Plan, the term of the outstanding options may not exceed ten years nor be less than one year. Vesting of options is determined by the compensation committee of the board and the administrator of the 2016 Incentive Plan and can vary based upon the individual award agreements. In addition, outstanding options do not have dividend equivalent rights associated with them under the 2016 Incentive Plan.
A summary of stock option activity is as follows:
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, was $7.03 and $6.24, respectively. The Company did not grant stock options during the year ended December 31, 2019. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, was $16.0 million, $15.8 million, and $13.4 million, respectively.
Table:
 | Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value of In-the- Money Options ($)
Outstanding, December 31, 2018 | 4,864,836 | $17.76 |  | 
Exercised | -854,524 | 15.78 |  | 
Forfeited | -3,496 | 17.89 |  | 
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 | 4,006,816 | $18.18 | 3.71 | $78,949,941
Exercisable, December 31, 2019 | 3,462,664 | $17.86 | 3.70 | $69,349,255


Question: What was the weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018?
Answer: $7.03
NOTE 14 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND VENDORS (CONTINUED)
Our accounts receivable includes 3 customers that individually make up more than 10% of our accounts receivable at December 31, 2019 in the percentages of 17.8%, 15.4% and 13.3%.
The Company had four key partners through which 10% or greater of its revenue was generated in either 2019 or 2018 as set forth below. The amounts in the table below reflect the amount of revenue generated through those customers.
Table:
 | 2019 |  | 2018 | 
 | $ | %   | $ | % 
Partner A   | 1,315,706 | 5.3 | 6,841,386 | 32.3
Partner B   | 9,210,347 | 37.4 | 5,350,393 | 25.2
Partner C   | 4,051,217 | 16.5 | 2,584,103 | 12.2
Partner D   | 1,007,573 | 4.1 | 2,159,356 | 10.2


Question: What is the percentage change in revenue generated from Partner C from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 56.77
Calculation: (4,051,217-2,584,103)/2,584,103
Note 11: Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, consist of the following:
Depreciation expense, including amortization of capital leases, during fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, was $182.1 million, $165.2 million, and $152.3 million, respectively.
Table:
 | June 30, 2019 | June 24, 2018
 | (in thousands) | 
Manufacturing and engineering equipment | $1,039,454 | $911,140
Building sand improvements | 664,061 | 530,032
Computer and computer-related equipment | 190,974 | 182,451
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures | 82,115 | 66,378
Land | 46,155 | 46,155
 | 2,022,759 | 1,736,156
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (963,682) | (833,609)
 | $1,059,077 | $902,547


Question: What is the percentage change in the accumulated depreciation and amortization from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 15.6
Calculation: (963,682-833,609)/833,609
Income taxes. Income tax expense and effective annual income tax rates for fiscal 2019 and 2018, as well as information as to the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform in fiscal 2018, were as follows (dollars in millions):
(1) We believe the non-GAAP presentation of income tax expense and the effective annual tax rate excluding special tax items, the one-time employee bonus and restructuring charges provides additional insight over the change from the comparative reporting periods by isolating the impact of these significant, special items. In addition, the Company believes that its income tax expense, as adjusted, and effective tax rate, as adjusted, enhance the ability of investors to analyze the Company’s operating performance and supplement, but do not replace, its income tax expense and effective tax rate calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Income tax expense for fiscal 2019 was $17.3 million compared to $94.6 million for fiscal 2018. The decrease is primarily due to the $85.9 million impact of Tax
Reform that was recorded in fiscal 2018, which was partially offset by an increase in tax expense due to the global intangible low-taxed income provisions
("GILTI") of Tax Reform in fiscal 2019. Income tax expense also decreased by $10.5 million in fiscal 2019 as the Company reasserted that certain historical
undistributed earnings of two foreign subsidiaries will be permanently reinvested based on the expected working capital requirements of these two foreign
subsidiaries.
The $94.6 million of income tax expense recorded during fiscal 2018 included $85.9 million related to the enactment of Tax Reform. Included in the fiscal 2018 income tax expense was a $3.6 million benefit for the valuation allowance released against the net deferred tax assets in the U.S. as the Company is subject to GILTI.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Income tax expense, as reported (GAAP) | $17.3 | $94.6
Accumulated foreign earnings assertion  | 10.5 | —
U.S. Tax Reform | (7.0) | (85.9)
Impact of other special tax items | 0.2 | (1.1)
Impact of valuation allowance release  | — | 3.6
Impact of one-time employee bonus | — | 0.3
Income tax expense, as adjusted (non-GAAP) (1) | $21.0 | $11.5


Question: How many years did Income tax expense, as reported (GAAP) exceed $50 million?
Answer: 1
Calculation: 2018
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations, based on the department to which the related employee reports, as follows: The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations, based on the department to which the related employee reports, as follows:
The total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance-based restricted stock units as of December 31, 2019 was $3.6 million, and the weighted average period over which these equity awards are expected to vest is 1.6 years. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options as of December 31, 2019 was $2.0 million, and the weighted average period over which these equity awards are expected to vest is 2.30 years.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 |  | (in thousands) | 
Cost of net revenue | $577 | $489 | $332
Research and development | 16,545 | 17,953 | 16,190
Selling, general and administrative | 14,938 | 13,279 | 11,016
Restructuring expense | — | — | 5,130
 | $32,060 | $31,721 | $32,668


Question: What was the respective Selling, general and administrative expense in 2019, 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 14,938, 13,279, 11,016
11. Stockholders’ Equity
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense within selling, general and administrative expense as follows (in thousands):
(1) For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2018, represents a one-time cash-settled stock award that vested on November 30, 2017.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Year Ended August 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Restricted stock units | $53,766 | $84,082 | $42,122
Employee stock purchase plan (1) | 7,580 | 6,891 | 6,334
Other | — | 7,538 | 88
Total | $61,346 | $98,511 | $48,544


Question: What was the change in Other stock-based compensation expenses between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 7450
Calculation: 7,538-88
NOTE 19—RESTRUCTURING
In 2019, we initiated projects to restructure and modify our supply chain strategy, functional responsibilities, methods, capabilities, processes and rationalize suppliers with the goal of reducing ongoing costs and increasing the efficiencies of our worldwide procurement organization. The majority of the costs associated with these restructuring activities are related to consultants that we have engaged in connection with these efforts, and such costs have been recognized by our corporate entity. The total costs of this restructuring project are expected to exceed amounts incurred to date by $0.9 million and these efforts are expected to be completed early in fiscal 2020. Also, in fiscal 2019 our CTS and CGD segments incurred restructuring charges, consisting primarily of employee severance costs related to headcount reductions initiated to optimize our cost positions. The total costs of each of these restructuring plans initiated thus far are not expected to be significantly greater than the charges incurred to date.
Our fiscal 2018 restructuring activities related primarily to expenses incurred by our corporate entity to establish a North American shared services center. Our fiscal 2017 restructuring activities included corporate efforts to increase the centralization and efficiency of our manufacturing processes, as well as restructuring charges incurred by our CGD businesses related to the elimination of a level of management in the CGD simulator business.
Restructuring charges incurred by our business segments were as follows (in millions):
Table:
 |  | Years Ended September 30, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Restructuring costs: |  |  | 
Cubic Transportation Systems | $  3.2 | $  0.4 | $  0.4
Cubic Mission Solutions | — | 0.2 | —
Cubic Global Defense | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.9
Unallocated corporate expenses | 8.9 | 3.1 | 1.0
Total restructuring costs | $  15.4 | $  5.0 | $  2.3


Question: What are the years included in the table?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017
12. Derivative Instruments
(a) Summary of Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments primarily to manage exposures to foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate, and equity price risks. Our primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and equity prices. Our derivatives expose us to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreement. We do, however, seek to mitigate such risks by limiting our counterparties to major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored. Management does not expect material losses as a result of defaults by counterparties.
The notional amounts of our outstanding derivatives are summarized as follows (in millions):
Table:
 | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |  | 
Foreign currency derivatives—cash flow hedges | $663 | $147
Interest rate derivatives | 4,500 | 6,750
Net investment hedging instruments | 309 | 250
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |  | 
Foreign currency derivatives | 2,708 | 2,298
Total return swaps—deferred compensation | 574 | 566
Total | $8,754 | $10,011


Question: Which years does the table provide information for the company's outstanding derivatives?
Answer: 2019, 2018
20. Net Loss Per Share
The Company intends to settle the principal of the Convertible Notes in cash on conversion and calculates diluted earnings per share using the treasury-stock method. Stock-based awards and the conversion feature on the Convertible Notes that have an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation of diluted loss per common share, are excluded from this calculation.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the number of Common Stock from stock-based awards and the conversion feature on the Convertible Notes that had an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation of diluted earnings per common share were 3.5 million, 4.0 million and 3.6 million respectively.
In periods where a loss attributable to shareholders has been incurred all stock-based awards and the conversion feature on the Convertible Notes are anti-dilutive.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
 | $ | $ | $
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Teekay Corporation for basic loss per share | (310,577) | (79,237) | (163,276)
Reduction in net earnings due to dilutive impact of stock-based compensation in Teekay LNG, Altera and Teekay Tankers and stock purchase warrants in Altera | — | — | (90)
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Teekay Corporation for diluted loss per share | (310,577) | (79,237) | (163,366)
Weighted average number of common shares | 100,719,224 | 99,670,176 | 86,335,473
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation | — | — | —
Common stock and common stock equivalents | 100,719,224 | 99,670,176 | 86,335,473
Loss per common share - basic and diluted | (3.08) | (0.79) | (1.89)


Question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Weighted average number of common shares from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 1049048
Calculation: 100,719,224-99,670,176