hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
(10) Goodwill
Goodwill consists of the following (in millions):
The increase in Goodwill related to our Compass Analytics acquisition is deductible for tax purposes. For the 2018 increase in Goodwill, $19.7 million is deductible for tax purposes and $3.2 million is not deductible for tax purposes.
Table:
 | Software Solutions | Data and Analytics | Corporate and Other | Total
Balance, December 31, 2017 | $2,134.7 | $172.1 | $— | $2,306.8
HeavyWater and Ernst acquisitions (Note 3) | 22.9 | — | — | 22.9
Balance, December 31, 2018 | 2,157.6 | 172.1 | — | 2,329.7
Compass Analytics acquisition (Note 3) | 31.7 | — | — | 31.7
Balance, December 31, 2019 | $2,189.3 | $172.1 | $— | $2,361.4


Question: What was the change in the balance of software solutions between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 22.9
Calculation: 2,157.6-2,134.7
Deferred revenue primarily consists of amounts that have been invoiced but not yet been recognized as revenue and consists of performance obligations pertaining to support and subscription services. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized revenue of $63.2 million and $60.2 million, related to deferred revenue at the beginning of the period.
Deferred revenue consisted of the following (in thousands):
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
Deferred revenue: |  | 
Products | $6,593 | $5,216
Services | 94,571 | 92,750
Total deferred revenue | 101,164 | 97,966
Less: current portion | (62,233) | (63,874)
Non-current portion | $38,931 | $34,092


Question: What is the percentage change in total deferred revenue 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 3.26
Calculation: (101,164 - 97,966)/97,966
GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes non-interest and interest-bearing demand deposit accounts with various financial institutions. Cash equivalents include money market mutual fund accounts, which are invested in government securities. We consider all highly liquid investments that mature three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of our cash equivalents approximate their fair values due to their short maturities and highly liquid nature. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.
At times, our cash balances may exceed federally insured amounts and potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these balances based on its assessment of the creditworthiness and financial viability of these financial institutions. Further, our cash equivalents may expose us to credit risk; however, we believe this risk is limited, as the investments are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily consists of interest-bearing escrow accounts that are required under the terms of the contracts with our Bank Partners. Restricted cash is typically comprised of three components: (i) amounts we have escrowed with Bank Partners as limited protection to the Bank Partners in the event of excess Bank Partner portfolio credit losses; (ii) additional amounts we maintain for certain Bank Partners based on a contractual percentage of the total interest billed on outstanding deferred interest loans that are within the promotional period less previous finance charge reversal ("FCR") settlements on such outstanding loans; and (iii) certain custodial intransit loan funding and consumer borrower payments that we are restricted from using for our operations. These custodial balances are not considered in our evaluation of restricted cash usage. As it relates to our restricted cash escrowed with Bank Partners, we record a liability for the amount of restricted cash we expect to be payable to our Bank Partners, which is accounted for as a financial guarantee. Refer to Note 14 for additional information.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total included within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of the dates indicated.
Table:
 |  | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Cash and cash equivalents | $195,760 | $303,390 | $224,614
Restricted cash | 250,081 | 155,109 | 129,224
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | $445,841 | $458,499 | $353,838


Question: What was the percentage change in restricted cash between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 20.03
Calculation: (155,109-129,224)/129,224
VMware Stock Repurchases
VMware purchases stock from time to time in open market transactions, subject to market conditions. The timing of any repurchases and the actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including VMware’s stock price, cash requirements for operations and business combinations, corporate, legal and regulatory requirements and other market and economic conditions. VMware is not obligated to purchase any shares under its stock repurchase programs. Purchases can be discontinued at any time VMware believes additional purchases are not warranted. From time to time, VMware also purchases stock in private transactions, such as those with Dell. All shares repurchased under VMware’s stock repurchase programs are retired.
The following table summarizes stock repurchase activity, including shares purchased from Dell, during the periods presented (aggregate purchase price in millions, shares in thousands):
(1) The aggregate purchase price of repurchased shares is classified as a reduction to additional paid-in capital until the balance is reduced to zero and the excess is recorded as a reduction to retained earnings.
Table:
 |  | For the Year Ended | 
 | January 31, 2020 | February 1, 2019 | February 2, 2018
Aggregate purchase price (1) | $1,334 | $42 | $1,449
Class A common stock repurchased | 7,664 | 286 | 13,977
Weighted-average price per share | $174.02 | $148.07 | $103.66


Question: What was the percentage change in weighted-average price per share between 2019 and 2020?
Answer: 17.53
Calculation: (174.02-148.07)/148.07
8. Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue consisted of the following:
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Current: |  | 
Domains | $752.7 | $686.3
Hosting and presence | 526.7 | 483.3
Business applications | 265.0 | 224.1
 | $1,544.4 | $1,393.7
Noncurrent: |  | 
Domains | $382.2 | $365.8
Hosting and presence | 187.2 | 180.6
Business applications | 85.0 | 77.4
 | $ 654.4 | $623.8


Question: What is the 2019 year end total non-current deferred revenue?
Answer: 654.4
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
The components of the net deferred tax asset and liability and related valuation allowance were as follows:
The Company provides valuation allowances if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management assesses the available evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
Assets: |  | 
Operating lease liability | $878.5 | $—
Net operating loss carryforwards | 356.6 | 264.9
Accrued asset retirement obligations | 174.9 | 165.7
Stock-based compensation | 5.6 | 6.3
Unearned revenue | 31.7 | 28.3
Unrealized loss on foreign currency | 3.8 | 12.9
Other accruals and allowances | 65.6 | 78.6
Items not currently deductible and other | 26.1 | 26.2
Liabilities: |  | 
Depreciation and amortization | (1,040.3) | (757.0)
Right-of-use asset | (865.1) | —
Deferred rent | (79.7) | (36.9)
Other | — | (15.3)
Subtotal | (442.3) | (226.3)
Valuation allowance | (194.2) | (151.9)
Net deferred tax liabilities | $(636.5) | $(378.2)


Question: What was the percentage change in Net deferred tax liabilities between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 68.3
Calculation: (-636.5-(-378.2))/-378.2
2020 Incentive Plan Enhancements.
For 2020, we have transitioned into the operation phase of our long-term strategy. As discussed further in this
CD&A, following an internal review process, extensive discussions with our shareholders and consultation with our executive compensation consultants, we revised the design for our 2020 incentive programs to support our strategic priorities as described below:
• added Revenue as metric to our STI plan to encourage and reward top-line performance • changed the metric and performance period for our LTI plan to three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA target • added three-year Relative TSR Modifier, as a positive or negative adjustment +/- 20%, for our LTI plan.
Table:
 | Short-Term Incentive Plan | 
Strategy | Integrate and Transform | Operate
Metrics | 2018 & 2019 Weighting | 2020 Weighting
Adjusted EBITDA | 65% | 50%
Free Cash Flow | 25% | 25%
Revenue | — | 15%
Customer Experience | 10% | 10%
 | Long-Term Incentive Plan | 
Strategy | Integrate and Transform | Operate
Metrics | 2018 & 2019 Weighting | 2020 Weighting
Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate (2 year) | 100% | —
Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA (3 year) | — | 100%
Relative TSR Modifier (3 year) | — | +/-20%


Question: What is the  change in the Adjusted EBITDA target under Short-Term Incentive Plan in 2020?
Answer: 15
Calculation: 65%-50%
6. Financial Instruments
The composition of financial instruments is as follows:
The fair values of the Company’s financial instrument is the amount that would be received in an asset sale or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between unaffiliated market participants and is recorded using a hierarchical disclosure framework based upon the level of subjectivity of the inputs used in measuring assets and liabilities. The levels are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available.
The Company classifies its financial instrument within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy on the basis of models utilizing market observable inputs. The interest rate swap has been valued on the basis of valuations provided by third-party pricing services, as derived from standard valuation or pricing models. Market-based observable inputs for the interest rate swap include one month LIBOR-based yield curves over the term of the swap. The Company reviews third-party pricing provider models, key inputs and assumptions and understands the pricing processes at its third-party providers in determining the overall reasonableness of the fair value of its Level 2 financial instruments. The Company also considers the risk of nonperformance by assessing the swap counterparty's credit risk in the estimate of fair value of the interest rate swap. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has not made any adjustments to the valuations obtained from its third party pricing providers.
Table:
 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
(in thousands) |  | 
Assets |  | 
Interest rate swap | $— | $1,623
Liabilities |  | 
Interest rate swap | $37 | $—


Question: What was the average interest rate swap liabilities for 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 18.5
Calculation: (37 + 0) / 2
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased $13.0 million to $88.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $101.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in intangible asset amortization of $8.9 million as certain assets reached the end of their useful lives, as well as decreases in payroll-related expense of $1.7 million due to lower headcount, professional fees of $1.3 million, outside services of $0.5 million, and travel-related expenses of $0.3 million.
We expect selling, general and administrative expenses to remain relatively flat in the near-term; however, our expenses may increase in the future as we expand our sales and marketing organization to enable market expansion.
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, |  | % Change
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019
 |  | (dollars in thousands) | 
Selling, general and administrative | $88,762 | $101,789 | (13)%
% of net revenue | 28% | 26% | 


Question: In which year was Selling, general and administrative less than 100,000 thousands?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: locate and analyze Selling, general and administrative in row 4
The following table summarizes information regarding common stock share awards granted and vested (in thousands, except per share award amounts):
As of December 31, 2019, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of actual forfeitures, related to nonvested common stock share awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.8 years.
Table:
 |  | Years Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Number of share awards granted | 34 | 34 | 24
Weighted average grant-date fair value per share award | $25.41 | $27.68 | $32.93
Fair value of share awards vested | $840 | $880 | $850


Question: In which years was the Number of share awards granted calculated?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017
Billings
Billings represent the value of products and services invoiced to customers after receiving a purchase order from the customer and delivering products and services to them, or for which there is no right to a refund. Billings do not equate to statutory revenue.
Table:
 | Year-ended 31 March 2019 | Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2
 | $M | $M
Revenue | 710.6 | 639.0
Net deferral of revenue (see note 23) | 49.7 | 129.6
Billings | 760.3 | 768.6
Currency revaluation | 25.9 | 18.7
Constant currency billings | 786.2 | 787.3


Question: What was the amount of Billings in 2019?
Answer: 760.3
Restricted Stock Units
During the fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company issued both service-based RSUs and market-based performance RSUs (“PRSUs”). Market-based PRSUs generally vest three years from the grant date if certain performance criteria are achieved and require continued employment. Based upon the terms of such awards, the number of shares that can be earned over the performance periods is based on the Company’s Common Stock price performance compared to the market price performance of the Philadelphia Semiconductor Sector Index (“SOX”), ranging from 0% to 150% of target. The stock price performance or market price performance is measured using the closing price for the 50-trading days prior to the dates the performance period begins and ends. The target number of shares represented by the market-based PRSUs is increased by 2% of target for each 1% that Common Stock price performance exceeds the market price performance of the SOX index. The result of the vesting formula is rounded down to the nearest whole number. Total stockholder return is a measure of stock price appreciation in this performance period.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity:
The fair value of the Company’s service-based RSUs was calculated based on fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant, discounted for dividends.
Table:
 | Service-based RSUs Outstanding |  | Market-based RSUs Outstanding | 
 | Number of Shares | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | Number of Shares | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
June 26, 2016 | 3,256,513 | $71.34 | 1,078,591 | $63.12
Granted | 1,224,877 | $114.13 | 435,694 | $111.75
Vested | (1,677,318) | $69.10 | (592,321) | $46.67
Forfeited or canceled | (116,466) | $76.76 | (59,509) | $66.81
June 25, 2017 | 2,687,606 | $92.01 | 862,455 | $83.83
Granted | 964,391 | $183.97 | 285,866 | $170.15
Vested | (1,362,369) | $87.80 | (407,024) | $76.88
Forfeited or canceled | (96,540) | $108.67 | (47,571) | $91.36
June 24, 2018 | 2,193,088 | $134.34 | 693,726 | $104.59
Granted | 893,622 | $161.64 | 163,529 | $165.78
Vested | (1,135,284) | $115.23 | (301,622) | $70.58
Forfeited or canceled | (154,541) | $141.38 | (120,859) | $104.73
June 30, 2019 | 1,796,885 | $159.36 | 434,774 | $144.57


Question: Which type of RSUs outstanding is higher as of June 26, 2016?
Answer: Service-based RSUs Outstanding
Calculation: Find the type of RSUs outstanding that is higher as of June 26, 2016
Non‐executive Director fees are paid from an aggregate annual fee pool of $4,000,000, as approved by shareholders at the AGM on 18 November 2010. Total board and committee fees paid during F19 were $2,859,903 (refer to section 5.1).
Non‐executive Directors do not receive variable pay and no Directors’ fees are paid to Executive Directors.
In recognition of the equal importance and workload of all of the Board’s Committees, the Board reviewed Non‐executive Director fees and determined to increase Chair and Member fees for the People Performance Committee and Sustainability Committee as detailed in the table below, effective 1 July 2019. The table below provides a summary of F19 and F20 Board and Committee fees:
Table:
 | CHAIR |  | MEMBER | 
 | F19 FEE | F20 FEE | F19 FEE | F20 FEE
BOARD AND COMMITTEE FEES ($) | INCL. SUPER | INCL. SUPER | INCL. SUPER | INCL. SUPER
Board | $790,531 | $790,531 | $254,990 | $254,990
Audit, Risk Management and Compliance Committee | $65,000 | $65,000 | $32,500 | $32,500
People Performance Committee | $54,525 | $65,000 | $27,265 | $32,500
Sustainability Committee | $45,000 | $65,000 | $22,500 | $32,500
Nomination Committee | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil


Question: What is the percentage increase for the fees paid to the Chair of Sustainability Committee between F19 and F20?
Answer: 44.44
Calculation: (65,000 - 45,000)/ 45,000
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008 | $ 980
2009 | 1185
2010 | 978
2011 | 1022
2012 | 1425
2013 - 2017 | $ 8147
( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables .
the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution .
concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk .
the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures .
( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results .
effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps .
this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed .
the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses .
the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 20.9%
Calculation: subtract(1185, 980), divide(#0, 980)
9. DEFERRED REVENUES
Deferred revenues consisted of the following:
Deferred cloud services and license support revenues and deferred hardware revenues substantially represent customer payments made in advance for cloud or support contracts that are typically billed in advance with corresponding revenues generally being recognized ratably over the contractual periods. Deferred services revenues include prepayments for our services business and revenues for these services are generally recognized as the services are performed. Deferred cloud license and on-premise license revenues typically resulted from customer payments that related to undelivered products and services or specified enhancements.
In connection with our acquisitions, we have estimated the fair values of the cloud services and license support performance obligations assumed from our acquired companies. We generally have estimated the fair values of these obligations assumed using a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related to fulfilling the obligations plus a normal profit margin. The sum of the costs and operating profit approximates, in theory, the amount that we would be required to pay a third party to assume these acquired obligations. These aforementioned fair value adjustments recorded for obligations assumed from our acquisitions reduced the cloud services and license support deferred revenues balances that we recorded as liabilities from these acquisitions and also reduced the resulting revenues that we recognized or will recognize over the terms of the acquired obligations during the post-combination periods.
Table:
 |  | May 31,
(in millions) | 2019 | 2018
Cloud services and license support | $7,340 | $7,265
Hardware | 635 | 645
Services | 360 | 404
Cloud license and on-premise license | 39 | 27
Deferred revenues, current | 8,374 | 8,341
Deferred revenues, non-current (in other non-current liabilities) | 669 | 625
Total deferred revenues | $9,043 | $8,966


Question: What is the difference in the total deferred revenues from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 77
Calculation: 9,043-8,966
Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations represents contract revenues that have not yet been recognized for contracts with a duration greater than one year. As of December 31, 2019, we did not have any significant performance obligations related to customer contracts that had an original expected duration of one year or more, other than maintenance services, which are satisfied over time. As a practical expedient, for certain contracts recognize revenue equal to the amounts we are entitled to invoice which correspond to the value of completed performance obligations to date. The amount related to these performance obligations was $13.3 million as of December 31, 2018. The amount related to these performance obligations was $13.6 million as of December 31, 2019, and the Company expects to recognize 64% of such revenue over the next 12 months with the remainder thereafter.
The following table provides information about accounts receivables, contract assets and unearned revenue from contracts with customers:
(1) Included in other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Of the outstanding unearned revenue balance as of December 31, 2018, $12.7 million was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Table:
(In thousands) | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018
Accounts receivable | $90,531 | $99,385
Contract assets (1) | $2,812 | $3,766
Unearned revenue | $11,963 | $17,940
Non-current unearned revenue | $6,012 | $5,296


Question: What was the amount of Accounts Receivable in 2019?
Answer: $90,531