hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Note 18 – Restructuring
During the second half of 2019, the Company implemented a restructuring plan to realign its expense structure with the reduction in revenue experienced in recent years and overall Company objectives. Management assessed the efficiency of our operations and consolidated locations and personnel, among other things, where possible. As part of this restructuring plan, the Company announced plans to reduce its overall operating expenses, both in the U.S and internationally.
In February 2019, the Company announced the restructuring of certain of our workforce predominantly in Germany, which included the closure of our office location in Munich, Germany accompanied by relocation or severance benefits for the affected employees. We also offered voluntary early retirement to certain other employees, which was announced in March 2019.
In January 2018, the Company announced an early retirement incentive program for employees that met certain defined requirements. The cumulative amount incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018 related to this restructuring program was $7.3 million. We did not incur any additional expenses related to this restructuring program during the year ended December 31, 2019.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending restructuring liability, which is included in accrued wages and benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, is as follows:
Table:
(In thousands) | 2019 | 2018
Balance at beginning of period | $185 | $205
Plus: Amounts charged to cost and expense | 6,014 | 7,261
Less: Amounts paid | (4,631) | (7,281)
Balance at end of period | $1,568 | $185


Question: What was the change in Amounts charged to cost and expense between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: -1247
Calculation: 6,014-7,261
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

Table:
( in thousands ) | year ended december 31 , 2013 | year ended december 31 , 2012
foreign currency losses net | $ -1115 ( 1115 ) | $ -1401 ( 1401 )
other income ( expense ) net | 69 | -4 ( 4 )
total other expense net | $ -1046 ( 1046 ) | $ -1405 ( 1405 )
income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) .
during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) .
in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 .
an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns .
in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year .
in january 2013 , the u.s .
congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 .
the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity .
the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s .
research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities .
when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 .
net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage decrease in net come for the year ended 2013 to the year ended 2012?
Answer: 17.04%
Calculation: subtract(245.3, 203.5), divide(#0, 245.3)
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
16. Voyage Expenses and Commissions
An analysis of voyage expenses and commissions is as follows:
Bunkers’ consumption and other voyage expenses represents mainly bunkers consumed during vessels’ unemployment and off-hire.
Table:
 |  | For the year ended December 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Brokers’ commissions on revenue | 6,456 | 7,555 | 7,527
Bunkers’ consumption and other voyage expenses | 8,948 | 12,819 | 16,245
Total | 15,404 | 20,374 | 23,772


Question: In which year was the brokers' commissions on revenue the highest?
Answer: 2018
Calculation: 7,555 > 7,527 > 6,456
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the five years ended may 31 , 2016 . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index on may 31 , 2011 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/11 5/145/135/12 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology 5/15 5/16 * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2011 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . global payments information technology .

Table:
 | globalpayments | s&p500 | s&pinformationtechnology
may 31 2011 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2012 | 81.90 | 99.59 | 107.57
may 31 2013 | 92.63 | 126.75 | 123.83
may 31 2014 | 132.59 | 152.67 | 153.42
may 31 2015 | 202.06 | 170.69 | 182.29
may 31 2016 | 300.97 | 173.62 | 187.97
issuer purchases of equity securities as announced on july 28 , 2015 , our board of directors authorized the additional repurchase of up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock .
under these and other existing authorizations , we repurchased and retired 2.2 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 135.9 million including commissions , or an average price of $ 63.17 per share , during the year ended may 31 , 2016 .
global payments inc .
| 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 29 .

Question: if $ 100000 are invested in s&p500 in may 2011 , what will be the total value of the investment in may 2012?
Answer: 99590
Calculation: subtract(99.59, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(const_100, #1), multiply(100000, #2)
Disaggregation of Revenue
We generate revenue from the sale of services and sale of software for end-user software products provided through direct customer downloads and through the sale of these end-user software products via partners. The following table depicts the disaggregation of revenue (in thousands) according to revenue type and is consistent with how we evaluate our financial performance:
Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
Table:
 | Twelve months ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Services  | $59,545 | $64,476
Software and other   | 3,788 | 5,073
             Total revenue  | $63,333 | $69,549


Question: How does the company create revenue?
Answer: from the sale of services and sale of software for end-user software products provided through direct customer downloads and through the sale of these end-user software products via partners.
Assets are not allocated to segments for internal reporting presentations. A portion of amortization and depreciation is included with various other costs in an overhead allocation to each segment; it is impracticable for us to separately identify the amount of amortization and depreciation by segment that is included in the measure of segment profit or loss.
Long-lived assets, excluding financial instruments and tax assets, classified by the location of the controlling statutory company and with countries over 10% of the total shown separately, were as follows:
Table:
(In millions) |  |  | 
June 30, | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
United States | $ 55,252 | $ 44,501 | $ 42,730
Ireland | 12,958 | 12,843 | 12,889
Other countries | 25,422 | 22,538 | 19,898
Total | $  93,632 | $  79,882 | $  75,517


Question: What was the percentage change in the total long-lived assets from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 5.78
Calculation: (79,882-75,517)/75,517
Billings
Group reported billings decreased by $8.3 million or 1.1 per cent to $760.3 million in the year-ended 31 March 2019. This represented a 0.1 per cent decrease on a constant currency (“CC”) basis.
Billings by region
Americas Billings attributable to the Americas decreased by $2.2 million to $267.8 million in the period, representing a 0.8 per cent reduction on a reported basis and 0.7 per cent on a constant currency basis; this decrease largely driven by a decline in Enduser products due to the stronger performance in the prior-year compare as a consequence of the impact of the WannaCry ransomware outbreak and the launch of Intercept X, the Group’s next-gen endpoint product, partially offset by an improved performance in UTM sales.
EMEA Billings attributable to EMEA increased by $0.2 million to $395.3 million in the period, representing 0.1 per cent growth on a reported basis and 0.9 per cent growth on a constant currency basis. An increase in sales of Server products being partially offset by a reduction in endpoint and email products.
APJ Billings attributable to APJ decreased by $6.3 million to $97.2 million in the period, representing 6.1 per cent on a reported basis and 2.8 per cent on a constant currency basis. As in the Americas, growth was negatively impacted by the stronger performance in the prior-year compare compounded by a legacy Network product transition in the first-half of the year partially offset by an improvement in sales of Server products.
Table:
 | FY19 | FY18 | Growth % | Growth %
 | $m (Reported) | $m (Reported) | (Reported) | (CC)
Billings by Region: |  |  |  | 
- Americas | 267.8 | 270.0 | (0.8) | (0.7)
- EMEA | 395.3 | 395.1 | 0.1 | 0.9
- APJ | 97.2 | 103.5 | (6.1) | (2.8)
 | 760.3 | 768.6 | (1.1) | (0.1)
Billings by Product: |  |  |  | 
– Network | 345.9 | 353.4 | (2.1) | (1.1)
– Enduser | 377.1 | 383.2 | (1.6) | (0.7)
– Other | 37.3 | 32.0 | 16.6 | 17.1
 | 760.3 | 768.6 | (1.1) | (0.1)
Billings by Type: |  |  |  | 
– Subscription | 644.6 | 644.2 | 0.1 | 1.0
– Hardware | 105.7 | 113.7 | (7.0) | (6.1)
– Other | 10.0 | 10.7 | (6.5) | (4.6)
 | 760.3 | 768.6 | (1.1) | (0.1)


Question: What was the percentage change in Group reported billings in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 1.1 per cent
Billings
Billings represent the value of products and services invoiced to customers after receiving a purchase order from the customer and delivering products and services to them, or for which there is no right to a refund. Billings do not equate to statutory revenue.
Table:
 | Year-ended 31 March 2019 | Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2
 | $M | $M
Revenue | 710.6 | 639.0
Net deferral of revenue (see note 23) | 49.7 | 129.6
Billings | 760.3 | 768.6
Currency revaluation | 25.9 | 18.7
Constant currency billings | 786.2 | 787.3


Question: What was the percentage change in Revenue in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 11.21
Calculation: (710.6-639.0)/639.0
Director Compensation
In 2019, we compensated each non-management director of our Company by granting to each such outside director 15,000 RSUs. The RSUs vested in equal amounts of 3,750 RSUs on each of March 15, 2019, June 15, 2019, September 15, 2019 and December 15, 2019. In addition, we pay our non-management directors cash director fees of $40,000 per annum ($10,000 per quarter). Non-management directors also receive additional cash compensation on an annual basis for serving on the following Board committees: The Audit Committee Chairperson receives $7,500 and members receive $5,000; the Chairperson and members of each of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive annual fees of $3,750 and $2,500, respectively.
In consideration for serving as the sole member of our Strategic Development Committee, in June 2013 we issued to Niv Harizman a five-year stock option to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $1.88 per share, which option vested 100,000 shares on the date of grant, 100,000 shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vested 100,000 shares on the second anniversary from the grant date. On June 17, 2018, Mr. Harizman exercised the aforementioned stock option on a net (cashless) exercise basis by delivering to us 181,936 shares of our common stock and he received 118,064 shares of our common stock.
The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to all persons who served as members of our board of directors (other than our Named Executive Officers) during the year ended December 31, 2019. No director who is also a Named Executive Officer received any compensation for services as a director in 2019.
(1) Represents directors’ fees payable in cash to each non-management director of $10,000 per quarter ($40,000 per annum) for 2019 plus additional cash fees for serving on Board committees as disclosed in the text above.
(2) The amounts included in this column represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards (RSUs) granted to directors, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions see Note B[11] to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The 15,000 RSUs granted to each non-management director vested on a quarterly basis beginning March 15, 2019. Each restricted stock unit represents the contingent right to receive one share of common stock.
(3) As of December 31, 2019, each of the above listed directors held outstanding stock options to purchase 35,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.34 per share.
(4) Includes payment of dividends (dividend equivalent rights) on RSUs for 2019.
Table:
Name | Fees earned or paid in cash ($) (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) (3) | All other compensation ($) (4) | Total ($)
Emanuel Pearlman | $ 50,000 | $ 39,000 | $ 750 | $  89,750
Niv Harizman | $ 46,250 | $ 39,000 | $ 750 | $  86,000
Alison Hoffman | $ 48,890 | $ 39,000 | $ 750 | $ 88,640


Question: How many directors received compensation of more than $88,000?
Answer: 2
Calculation: Emanuel Pearlman##Alison Hoffman
Stock Option Award Amendment
The Board of Directors has in 2019 amended and restated the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 1,000,000 stock options for issuance. The stock options have been allocated amongst management and employees of the Company.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has granted 755,000 and 234,000 options with vesting over a period of two and three years, respectively, and an exercise price of $4.70 per share.
The Company has used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the grant date fair value of the options with the following assumptions applied to the model;
The expected volatility was based on historical volatility observed from historical company-specific data during the two years prior to the grant date.
The compensation expense related to the stock option awards was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the remaining unrecognized cost related to non-vested stock options was $0.5 million with a remaining average remaining vesting period of 2.1 years.
Table:
 | Options with two year vesting | Options with three year vesting
Volatility | 57.5% | 52.5%
Dividend yield | 10.0 % | 10.0%
Risk-free interest rate | 1.64% | 1.65%
Weighted-average grant date fair value | $0.59 | $0.58


Question: What is the average dividend yield between options with vesting over a period of two and three years?
Answer: 10
Calculation: (10% + 10%)/2
Market Information
Our common stock is traded under the symbol “OPRX” on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Only a limited market exists for our securities. There is no assurance that a regular trading market will develop, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder may be unable to resell his securities in our company.
The following tables set forth the range of high and low bid information for our common stock for the each of the periods indicated. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
On March 24, 2020, the last sales price per share of our common stock was $7.93
Table:
 | Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2018 | 
Quarter Ended | High $ | Low $
March 31, 2018   | 4.98 | 3.36
June 30, 2018   | 11.00 | 4.29
September 30, 2018   | 18.39 | 9.32
December 31, 2018   | 18.00 | 8.92


Question: What does the table show us?
Answer: the range of high and low bid information for our common stock for the each of the periods indicated
Commitments and Significant Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments at December 27, 2019:
(1) Interest on our various outstanding debt instruments is included in the above table, except for our Term Loan and ABL, which have floating interest rates. At December 27, 2019, we had borrowings of $238.1 million under our Term Loan and zero under our ABL. During the fiscal year ended December 27, 2019, the weighted average interest rate on our Term Loan was approximately 5.8% and we incurred interest expense of approximately $13.9 million. During the fiscal year ended December 27, 2019, the weighted average interest rate on our ABL borrowings was approximately 3.7% and we incurred interest expense of approximately $1.6 million. See Note 9 “Debt Obligations” to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our debt instruments.
(2) The table above excludes cash to be paid for income taxes, $14.7 million of total contingent earn-out liabilities related to certain acquisitions as of December 27, 2019 and approximately $5.3 million of lease payments related to long-term leases for several vehicles and a distribution and processing facility that do not commence until fiscal 2020.
We had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $16.6 million and $15.8 million at December 27, 2019 and December 28, 2018, respectively. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral to secure our borrowings under our credit facilities.
Table:
 |  |  | Payments Due by Period (1, 2) |  | 
 | Total  | Less than One Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Thereafter
 |  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
Inventory purchase commitments | $53,413 | $53,413 | $— | $— | $—
Indebtedness | $406,644 | $2,993 | $244,151 | $159,500 | $—
Finance lease obligations  | $4,597 | $880 | $1,715 | $1,392 | $610
Pension exit liabilities  | $2,169 | $149 | $329 | $375 | $1,316
Long-term operating leases  | $197,359 | $25,662 | $43,130 | $30,080 | $98,487
Total  | $664,182 | $83,097 | $289,325 | $191,347 | $100,413


Question: Which component of contractual obligation has the highest total value?
Answer: Indebtedness
Calculation: 406,644> 197,359> 53,413> 4,597> 2,169
Our property business includes the operation of communications sites and managed networks, the leasing of property interests, and, in select markets, the operation of fiber and the provision of backup power through shared generators. Our presence in a number of markets at different relative stages of wireless development provides us with significant diversification and long-term growth potential. Our property segments accounted for the following percentage of consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31,:
Communications Sites. Approximately 95%, 96% and 97% of revenue in our property segments was attributable to our communications sites, excluding DAS networks, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
We lease space on our communications sites to tenants providing a diverse range of communications services, including cellular voice and data, broadcasting, mobile video and a number of other applications. In addition, in many of our international markets, we receive pass-through revenue from our tenants to cover certain costs, including power and fuel costs and ground rent. Our top tenants by revenue for each region are as follows for the year ended December 31, 2019: • U.S.: AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”); Verizon Wireless; T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”); and Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) accounted for an aggregate of 89% of U.S. property segment revenue. T-Mobile and Sprint have announced plans to merge in 2020. • Asia: Vodafone Idea Limited; Bharti Airtel Limited (“Airtel”); and Reliance Jio accounted for an aggregate of 83% of Asia property segment revenue. • Africa: MTN Group Limited (“MTN”); and Airtel accounted for an aggregate of 74% of Africa property segment revenue. • Europe: Telefónica S.A (“Telefónica”); Bouygues; and Free accounted for an aggregate of 70% of Europe property segment revenue. • Latin America: Telefónica; AT&T; and América Móvil accounted for an aggregate of 58% of Latin America property segment revenue.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
U.S. | 55% | 51% | 55%
Asia | 16% | 21% | 17%
Africa | 8% | 7% | 7%
Europe | 2% | 2% | 2%
Latin America | 18% | 17% | 18%


Question: How many percent of total revenue in 2019 was accounted for by property segments in the U.S.?
Answer: 55%
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at March 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of the following (amounts in thousands):
Although not reflected in the table above, the tax effect on the pension balances was $2.4 million and $2.3 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Table:
 | Pension |  | Other Benefits | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018
Net actuarial loss (gain) | $16,864 | $15,691 | $(793) | $(879)
Prior service cost | 1,325 | 1,413 | — | —
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss | $18,189 | $17,104 | $(793) | $(879)


Question: What was the prior service cost for Pension in 2019?
Answer: 1,325