hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
Financing and cash flow
The Group delivered very strong cash generation in 2019, driven by higher operating profit and effective working capital management. Changes in working capital, reflected within cash flow from operations, benefited from:
• our continued focus on improving trade receivables collection; • a reduction in inventory levels due to a high level of shipments at the end of 2019; and • growth in payables, resulting from the increase in activity levels and emphasis on extending supplier payment terms.
Free cash flow for 2019 almost doubled year-on-year coming in at $100.1 million, compared to $50.9 million in 2018, resulting in a free cash flow conversion which represented 123 per cent of adjusted earnings (2018 77 per cent).
Free cash flow is set out below:
Note
1. Spirent adopted IFRS 16 on 1 January 2019; in prior periods operating lease payments were included within cash flow from operations.
Free cash flow includes a net cash outflow in respect of exceptional items in 2018 and 2019 of $5.5 million (2018 $3.6 million in respect of exceptional items charged in 2017 and 2018).
Tax payments of $5.6 million made in 2019 were consistent with the prior year (2018 $5.7 million). Net capital expenditure of $11.9 million was also broadly consistent with the prior year (2018 $10.6 million), with the incremental spend of $1.3 million primarily related to investment in 5G. We continue to exercise careful management of capital investment to ensure efficient use of capital and maximise return on investment.
Following the adoption of IFRS 16 on 1 January 2019, the payment of lease liabilities, both the principal and interest elements, are shown separately from net cash flow from operating activities. In previous periods they would have been reflected in that number. There is no overall impact in comparing free cash flow year-on-year.
In 2019, the final dividend for 2018 and an interim dividend for 2019 totalling $28.6 million were paid. This compared to total dividends of $54.8 million paid in 2018, including a special dividend of $29.9 million. In addition, 4.0 million shares were purchased and placed into the Employee Share Ownership Trust at a cost of $8.6 million (2018 1.5 million shares at a net cost of $2.5 million) and $1.9 million of cash consideration was paid to acquire the business of a navigation systems company based in the United Kingdom.
Following these payments, cash and cash equivalents closed at $183.2 million at 31 December 2019, compared with $121.6 million at 31 December 2018. There continues to be no bank debt.
Table:
$ million | 2019 | 2018
Cash flow from operations | 124.9 | 65.9
Tax paid | (5.6) | (5.7)
Net cash inflow from operating activities | 119.3 | 60.2
Interest received | 2.6 | 1.3
Net capital expenditure | (11.9) | (10.6)
Payment of lease liabilities, principal and interest1 | (10.3) | —
Lease payments received from finance leases | 0.4 | —
Free cash flow | 100.1 | 50.9


Question: What are the components factored in when calculating the net cash inflow from operating activities?
Answer: Cash flow from operations, Tax paid
Cash flow
Net cash flow from operating activities decreased by $4.8 million to $142.9 million from $147.7 million in the prior period. The small overall decrease was due to a $9.9 million reduction in the cashflow outflow on exceptional items, a $7.0 million improved use of working capital within the business, both being offset by an increase in overheads, primarily in relation to Sales and Marketing expenses.
Unlevered free cashflow decreased by $15.8 million to $123.8 million from $139.6 million in the prior-period representing the reduction in net cash flow from operating activities adjusted for the cashflow impact of exceptional items.
1 Restated for the adoption of IFRS 15 and change in accounting policy in respect of research and development expenditure tax credit scheme (“RDEC”) and provision for interest on uncertain tax positions, as explained in note 2 of the Financial Statements
2 Unlevered free cash flow is also represented by the sum of the marked rows and has been presented to enhance understanding of the Group’s cash generation capability
3 Excludes non-cash movements on exceptional items
Table:
 | FY19 | FY181
 | $M | $M
Cash EBITDA2 | 167.9 | 199.2
Net deferral of revenue | (49.7) | (129.6)
Net deferral of expenses | 0.9 | 8.4
Foreign exchange | 1.5 | (8.1)
Depreciation | (11.6) | (11.6)
Adjusted operating profit | 109.0 | 58.3
Net deferral of revenue | 49.7 | 129.6
Net deferral of expenses | (0.9) | (8.4)
Exceptional items 3 | (3.1) | (13.0)
Depreciation | 11.6 | 11.6
Foreign exchange | (1.5) | 8.1
Change in working capital 2 | (5.2) | (12.2)
Corporation tax paid 2 | (16.7) | (26.3)
Net cash flow from operating activities | 142.9 | 147.7
Exceptional items 3 | 3.1 | 13.0
Net capital expenditure 2 | (22.2) | (21.1)
Unlevered free cash flow | 123.8 | 139.6


Question: What components are factored in when calculating the unlevered free cash flow from the net cash flow from operating activities?
Answer: Exceptional items, Net capital expenditure
The accumulated benefit obligation for the United States defined benefit pension plans was $198.2 million and $172.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans was $39.9 million and $35.6 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of December 31:
Table:
 | 2019 |  | 2018 | 
 | United States | Foreign | United States | Foreign
 |  | (in millions) |  | 
Projected benefit obligation | $55.3 | $44.0 | $50.8 | $39.1
Accumulated benefit obligation | 53.2 | 39.9 | 48.6 | 35.6
Fair value of plan assets | — | 1.6 | — | 1.4


Question: What was the  accumulated benefit obligation for the United States defined benefit pension plans in 2019?
Answer: $198.2 million
Expenditure on R&D
TCS Innovation Labs are located in India and other parts of the world. These R&D centers, as certified by Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR) function from Pune, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi- NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai.
Expenditure incurred in the R&D centers and innovation centers during FY 2019 and FY 2018 are given below:
Table:
Expenditure on R&D and innovation | Unconsolidated |  | Consolidated | 
 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2018
a. Capital | 2 | - | 2 | -
b. Recurring | 303 | 295 | 306 | 298
c. Total R&D expenditure (a+b) | 305 | 295 | 308 | 298
d. Innovation center expenditure | 1,285 | 1,079 | 1,352 | 1,202
e. Total R&D and innovation expenditure (c+d) | 1,590 | 1,374 | 1,660 | 1,500
f. R&D and innovation expenditure as a percentage of total turnover | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.2%


Question: What body certifies the R&D centers?
Answer: Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR)
Note 8: Net Income per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the treasury stock method, for dilutive stock options, restricted stock units, and convertible notes.
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted computations for net income per share.
(1) Diluted shares outstanding do not include any effect resulting from note hedges associated with the Company’s 2018 Notes as their impact would have been anti-dilutive.
Table:
 |  | YearEnded | 
 | June 30, 2019 | June 24, 2018 | June 25, 2017
 |  | (in thousands, except per share data) | 
Numerator: |  |  | 
Net income | $2,191,430 | $2,380,681 | $1,697,763
Denominator: |  |  | 
Basic average shares outstanding | 152,478 | 161,643 | 162,222
Effect of potential dilutive securities: |  |  | 
Employee stock plans | 1,323 | 2,312 | 2,058
Convertible notes | 5,610 | 12,258 | 16,861
Warrants | 504 | 4,569 | 2,629
Diluted average shares outstanding | 159,915 | 180,782 | 183,770
Net income per share-basic | $14.37 | $14.73 | $10.47
Net income per share-diluted | $13.70 | $13.17 | $9.24


Question: What is the percentage change in the convertible notes from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -54.23
Calculation: ((5,610-12,258)/12,258) * 100
Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans. Under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee set the following non-equity incentive target amounts, non-equity incentive compensation cap percentages and relative percentages weights for each plan component for each of our NEOs in 2019 who are participating in our incentive compensation plans.
As noted above, Messrs Richard, Robert and Bruce Leeds no longer participate in incentive compensation. In addition, as
Mr. Reinhold left Systemax as the Chief Executive Officer in January 2019, he did not participate in the 2019 NEO Plan.
Table:
Name | Target ($) | Cap (%) | Net Sales (%) | Adjusted Operating Income (%) | Strategic Objectives (%) | Corporate Governance (%) | Business Unit/Individual Objectives (%)
Barry Litwin | 1,113,750 | 111 | 20 | 60 | 18 | 4 | 0
Thomas Clark | 225,000 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100
Robert Dooley | 615,000 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100
Eric Lerner | 300,900 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100
Manoj Shetty | 241,535 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100


Question: What is the total percentage net sales allocated under the 2019 Plan for Barry Litwin and Thomas Clark?
Answer: 20
Calculation: 20 + 0
(b) Credit Quality of Financing Receivables
Gross receivables, excluding residual value, less unearned income categorized by our internal credit risk rating as of July 27, 2019 and July 28, 2018 are summarized as follows (in millions):
We determine the adequacy of our allowance for credit loss by assessing the risks and losses inherent in our financing receivables by portfolio segment. The portfolio segment is based on the types of financing offered by us to our customers, which consist of the following: lease receivables, loan receivables, and financed service contracts.
Our internal credit risk ratings of 1 through 4 correspond to investment-grade ratings, while credit risk ratings of 5 and 6 correspond to non-investment grade ratings. Credit risk ratings of 7 and higher correspond to substandard ratings.
Table:
 |  |  | INTERNAL CREDIT RISK RATING | 
July 27, 2019 | 1 to 4 | 5 to 6 | 7 and Higher | Total
Lease receivables | $1,204 | $991 | $35 | $2,230
Loan receivables | 3,367 | 1,920 | 151 | 5,438
Financed service contracts | 1,413 | 939 | 17 | 2,369
Total | $5,984 | $3,850 | $203 | $10,037


Question: How did the company determine the adequacy for their allowance for credit loss?
Answer: assessing the risks and losses inherent in our financing receivables by portfolio segment.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
 | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 5051
mark-to-market tax settlement sharing | -196 ( 196 )
purchased power capacity | -21 ( 21 )
net wholesale revenue | -14 ( 14 )
volume/weather | 13
ano decommissioning trust | 24
retail electric price | 49
other | -2 ( 2 )
2011 net revenue | $ 4904
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .
see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases .
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors .
weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers .
industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 .
entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions .
increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments .
the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .
the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 .
these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the entergy corporation and subsidiaries net revenue in 2011
Answer: -2.9%
Calculation: subtract(4904, 5051), divide(#0, 5051)
Note 8 Property and Equipment, net
The following table details our property and equipment, net.
(1) Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, $28.3 million of assets that were included in property and equipment, net as of December 31, 2018 are now included in other non-current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019. These assets were related to capital leases, primarily for warehouse, office and small manufacturing facilities, IT equipment and automobiles, which are now ROU assets. Refer to Note 4, “Leases,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our ROU assets.
Table:
December 31, |  | 
(In millions) | 2019 | 2018(1)
Land and improvements | $ 50.7 | $ 41.2
Buildings | 747.0 | 728.6
Machinery and equipment | 2,453.2 | 2,325.7
Other property and equipment | 141.3 | 135.6
Construction-in-progress | 127.9 | 155.1
Property and equipment, gross | 3,520.1 | 3,386.2
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (2,378.2) | (2,350.0)
Property and equipment, net | $ 1,141.9 | $ 1,036.2


Question: What does the table represent?
Answer: details our property and equipment, net.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data presented for each of the five years ended December 31, 2019 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data presented should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, the notes to our consolidated financial statements and Item 7 “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
(1) On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, Leases, using the modified retrospective method at the beginning of the period of adoption, January 1, 2019, through the recognition of a lease obligation and corresponding right of use asset. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented under ASC 842, while prior periods amount were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 840, Leases.
(2) On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts that were not substantially complete as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.
(3) The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, reduces the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018. Due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, our income tax expense was reduced by $50.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from the re-measurement of our existing deferred tax assets and liabilities.
(4) Over the past five years, we completed 7 acquisitions. In aggregate, these acquisitions have added $343.6 million in goodwill. For additional information on our recent acquisitions, see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Table:
 |  |  | Year Ended December 31, |  | 
 | 2019 (1) | 2018 (2) | 2017 (3) | 2016 | 2015
 |  |  | (in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | 
Statement of Income Data: |  |  |  |  | 
Revenues | $2,222,559 | $1,958,557 | $1,717,018 | $1,601,596 | $1,550,117
Operating income | $138,325 | $112,742 | $98,194 | $90,963 | $84,886
Net income | $113,890 | $82,097 | $114,141 | $56,391 | $51,127
Basic earnings per share (Class A and B) | $2.85 | $2.08 | $2.94 | $1.48 | $1.36
Diluted earnings per share (Class A and B) | $2.83 | $2.06 | $2.91 | $1.47 | $1.36
Dividend per share | $1.08 | $1.00 | $0.84 | $0.84 | $0.84
Balance Sheet Data: |  |  |  |  | 
Working capital | $154,753 | $196,652 | $138,879 | $229,659 | $189,276
Goodwill (4) | $1,191,259 | $1,085,806 | $1,084,560 | $955,874 | $919,591
Total assets | $2,107,914 | $1,803,871 | $1,744,475 | $1,598,464 | $1,506,424
Long-term debt | $36,500 | $7,500 | $31,000 | $— | $—


Question: What is the percentage change in revenues from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 13.48
Calculation: (($ 2,222,559-$ 1,958,557)/$ 1,958,557) * 100
Liquidity risk
Our policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business.
Our liquidity needs are affected by many factors, some of which are based on the normal on-going operations of the business, and others that relate to the uncertainties of the global economy and the semiconductor industry. Although our cash requirements fluctuate based on the timing and extent of these factors, we believe that cash generated from operations, together with our principal sources of liquidity are sufficient to satisfy our current requirements, including our expected capital expenditures in 2020.
We intend to return cash to our shareholders on a regular basis in the form of dividend payments and, subject to our actual and anticipated liquidity requirements and other relevant factors, share buybacks.
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual and other obligations as at December 31, 2019.
Total short-term lines of credit amounted to €150 million at December 31, 2019. The amount outstanding at December 31, 2019 was nil and the undrawn portion totaled €150 million. The standby revolving credit facility of €150 million with a consortium of banks will be available through December 16, 2023.
For the majority of purchase commitments, the Company has flexible delivery schedules depending on the market conditions, which allows the Company, to a certain extent, to delay delivery beyond originally planned delivery schedules.
Table:
 | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-5 years | More than 5 years
Accounts payable | 119,712 | 119,712 | — | —
Income tax payable | 34,599 | 34,599 | — | —
Accrued expenses and other payables | 149,843 | 149,843 | — | —
Lease liabilities | 24,261 | 6,977 | 14,726 | 2,558
Pension liabilities | 7,734 | 333 | 2,544 | 4,857
Purchase obligations: |  |  |  | 
Purchase commitments to suppliers | 100,694 | 99,546 | 1,148 | —
Capital expenditure and other commitments | 43,692 | 40,745 | 2,947 | —
Total contractual obligations | 480,535 | 451,755 | 21,365 | 7,415


Question: What is the component that has the highest obligation for the company in 1-5 years?
Answer: Lease liabilities
Calculation: For COL 5 row 2-9 find the largest number and the corresponding component in COL2
Disaggregated Revenue
The table below includes the Company’s revenue for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2019 disaggregated by geographic reportable segment and market sector (in thousands):
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2019 |  | 
 |  | Reportable Segment: |  | 
 | AMER  | APAC  | EMEA  | Total
Market Sector: |  |  |  | 
Healthcare/Life Sciences  | $488,851 | $602,922 | $128,225 | $1,219,998
Industrial/Commercial  | 359,381 | 534,971 | 86,868 | 981,220
Aerospace/Defense  | 317,558 | 186,486 | 84,556 | 588,600
Communications  | 256,523 | 113,329 | 4,764 | 374,616
     External revenue  | 1,422,313 | 1,437,708 | 304,413 | 3,164,434
Inter-segment sales  | 6,995 | 119,497 | 5,520 | 132,012
    Segment revenue  | $1,429,308 | $1,557,205 | $309,933 | $3,296,446


Question: How many geographical segments did external revenue exceed $1,000,000 thousand?
Answer: 2
Calculation: AMER##APAC
The reconciliation from non-current segment assets to non-current group assets is shown in the following table: non-current assets according to segment reporting only include the values of continuing operations in the previous year. Therefore, the non-current assets of METRO China must be taken into account in the previous year and are therefore part of the reconciliation:
1 Adjustment of previous year according to explanation in notes.
Table:
€ million | 30/9/2018 | 30/9/2019
Non-current segment assets | 6,348 | 6,268
plus non-current segment assets METRO China | 560 | 0
Financial assets | 88 | 97
Investments accounted for using the equity method | 178 | 179
Deferred tax assets | 329 | 191
Other | 1 | 1
Non-current group assets | 7,503 | 6,736


Question: What was the adjustment for the values for 2018?
Answer: Adjustment of previous year according to explanation in notes
Segment operating results
Enterprise Security segment
Revenue increased $199 million primarily due to increases of $331 million in revenue from sales of our network and web security solutions and $36 million from sales of endpoint and information protection solutions, partially offset by a $184 million decrease in revenue as a result of the divestiture of our WSS and PKI solutions. Revenue during fiscal 2018 was also unfavorably affected by a shift in the mix of sales towards subscription and cloud-delivered solutions subject to ratable revenue recognition, which resulted in less in-period recognized revenue and more revenue deferred to the balance sheet as compared to fiscal 2017. Operating income increased $286 million primarily due to higher revenue discussed above, a $51 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses and a $38 million decrease in cost of revenues.
Table:
 | Fiscal Year |  | Variance in | 
(In millions, except for percentages) | 2018 | 2017 | Dollars | Percent
Net revenues | $2,554 | $2,355 | $199 | 8%
Percentage of total net revenues | 53% | 59% |  | 
Operating income | $473 | $187 | $286 | 153%
Operating margin | 19% | 8% |  | 


Question: What was the variance in percent for Operating income from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018?
Answer: 153%