hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2008 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 ) | snap-onincorporated | peer group ( 3 ) | s&p 500
december 31 2008 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2009 | 111.40 | 127.17 | 126.46
december 31 2010 | 153.24 | 169.36 | 145.51
december 31 2011 | 140.40 | 165.85 | 148.59
december 31 2012 | 223.82 | 195.02 | 172.37
december 31 2013 | 315.72 | 265.68 | 228.19
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .
( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .
( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .
grainger , inc .
24 snap-on incorporated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 .

Question: what is the return on investment if $ 100 are invested in s&p500 at the end of 2008 and sold at the end of 2010?
Answer: 45.51
Calculation: subtract(145.51, 100), divide(#0, 100)
Geographic information
The Group is domiciled in the UK and the following tables detail external revenue by location of customers, trade receivables and non-current assets (excluding deferred tax) by geographic area:
Due to the large number of customers the Group serves, there are no individual customers whose revenue is greater than 10% of the Group’s total revenue in all periods presented in these financial statements.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
Revenue | £m | £m
UK | 349.9 | 324.9
Ireland | 5.2 | 5.2
Total revenue | 355.1 | 330.1


Question: What was the percentage change in revenue in Ireland in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 0
Calculation: (5.2-5.2)/5.2
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
19. Financial Income and Costs
An analysis of financial income and costs is as follows:
Table:
 |  | For the year ended December 31, | 
 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Financial Income |  |  | 
Interest income | 2,650 | 4,784 | 5,318
Total financial income | 2,650 | 4,784 | 5,318
Financial Costs |  |  | 
Amortization and write-off of deferred loan/bond issuance costs/premium | 12,398 | 12,593 | 14,154
Interest expense on loans and realized loss on cash flow hedges | 85,813 | 111,600 | 122,819
Interest expense on bonds and realized loss on CCSs | 27,085 | 30,029 | 34,607
Lease charge | 10,875 | 10,520 | 10,506
Loss arising on bond repurchases at a premium (Note 13)13) | 1,459 | — | 2,119
Other financial costs, including unrealized foreign exchange losses on cash and bonds | 1,551 | 1,885 | 6,276
Total financial costs | 139,181 | 166,627 | 190,481


Question: What was the loss arising on bond repurchases at a premium in 2019?
Answer: 2,119
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

Table:
date | altria group inc . | altria group inc . peer group | s&p 500
december 2011 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 2012 | $ 111.77 | $ 108.78 | $ 115.99
december 2013 | $ 143.69 | $ 135.61 | $ 153.55
december 2014 | $ 193.28 | $ 151.74 | $ 174.55
december 2015 | $ 237.92 | $ 177.04 | $ 176.94
december 2016 | $ 286.61 | $ 192.56 | $ 198.09
altria altria group , inc .
group , inc .
peer group s&p 500 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from december 2011 to december 2013?
Answer: 53.55%
Calculation: subtract(153.55, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
NOTE 7 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
Depreciation expense was $8.6 million, $8.0 million, and $8.4 million in fiscal years ended February 28, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Fixed assets not yet in service consist primarily of capitalized internal-use software and certain tooling and other equipment that have not been placed into service.
Table:
 | February 28, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Leasehold improvements | $3,522 | $3,157
LoJack system components and law enforcement |  | 
tracking units | 20,326 | 20,558
Plant equipment and tooling | 13,078 | 16,842
Office equipment, computers and furniture | 11,553 | 14,206
Software | 31,349 | 31,427
 | 79,828 | 86,190
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (58,641) | (69,585)
 | 21,187 | 16,605
Fixed assets not yet in service | 5,836 | 4,657
 | $27,023 | $21,262


Question: What was the change in fixed assets not yet in service from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 1179
Calculation: (5,836-4,657)
Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets
The following table presents the amortization of purchased intangible assets (in millions):
The decrease in amortization of purchased intangible assets was due largely to the purchased intangible assets related to the divestiture of SPVSS business on October 28, 2018, partially offset by amortization from our recent acquisitions.
Table:
Years Ended | July 27, 2019 | July 28, 2018 | July 29, 2017
Amortization of purchased intangible assets: |  |  | 
Cost of sales | $624 | $640 | $556
Operating expenses |  |  | 
Amortization of purchased intangible assets | 150 | 221 | 259
Restructuring and other charges | — | — | 38
Total | $774 | $861 | $853


Question: Why did amortization of purchased intangible assets decrease?
Answer: due largely to the purchased intangible assets related to the divestiture of SPVSS business on October 28, 2018
8. Directors and Key Management remuneration
The remuneration of Directors is disclosed in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 64 to 74:
Key Management compensation
During the year to 31 March 2019, Key Management comprised the members of the OLT and the Non-Executive Directors (2018: OLT and the Non-Executive Directors). The remuneration of all Key Management (including Directors) was as follows:
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | £m | £m
Short-term employee benefits | 5.3 | 4.9
Share-based payments | 3.5 | 2.6
Termination benefits | – | 0.1
Pension contributions | 0.2 | 0.2
Total | 9.0 | 7.8


Question: What was the total amount of key management compensation in 2019?
Answer: 9.0
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 15 — Shareholders' Equity
A roll forward of common shares outstanding is as follows:
Table:
 | As of December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018
Balance at beginning of the year | 32,750,727 | 32,938,466
Repurchases | (420,770) | (342,100)
Restricted stock unit issuances | 142,449 | 154,361
Balance at end of period | 32,472,406 | 32,750,727


Question: What was the amount of Repurchases in 2018?
Answer: (342,100)
Noncurrent Assets and Liabilities
The increase in noncurrent assets of $39,531 million ($39,470 million adjusted for currency) was driven by: • A net increase in goodwill and net intangible assets of $34,104 million ($34,058 million adjusted for currency) due to the acquisition of Red Hat; and • An increase in operating right-of-use assets of $4,996 million ($5,010 million adjusted for currency) as a result of the adoption of the new leasing standard on January 1, 2019; and• An increase in prepaid pension assets of $2,199 million ($2,152 million adjusted for currency) driven by higher returns on plan assets and plan remeasurements; partially offset by • A decrease in net property, plant and equipment of $782 million ($785 million adjusted for currency).
Long-term debt increased $18,497 million ($18,550 million adjusted for currency) primarily driven by: • Issuances of $26,081 million; partially offset by • Reclassifications to short-term debt of $7,592 million to reflect upcoming maturities.
Noncurrent liabilities (excluding debt) increased $6,778 million ($6,911 million adjusted for currency) primarily driven by: • An increase in long-term operating lease liabilities of $3,879 million ($3,893 million adjusted for currency) as a result of the adoption of the new leasing standard on January 1, 2019; and • An increase in other liabilities of $2,352 million ($2,320 million adjusted for currency), primarily driven by increases in deferred tax liabilities of $1,534 million and income tax reserves of $923 million.
Table:
($ in millions) |  | 
At December 31: | 2019 | 2018
Noncurrent assets | $113,767 | $74,236
Long-term debt | $ 54,102 | $35,605
Noncurrent liabilities (excluding debt) | $ 39,398 | $32,621


Question: What caused the increase in the prepaid expenses?
Answer: driven by higher returns on plan assets and plan remeasurements; partially offset by • A decrease in net property, plant and equipment of $782 million ($785 million adjusted for currency).
Gross Profit
Gross profit in fiscal year 2019 increased to $444.8 million, or 18.7 percent of net sales from $382.3 million, or 17.7 percent of net sales for fiscal year 2018. Excluding the impact of the surcharge revenue, our gross margin in fiscal year 2019 was 22.9 percent compared to 21.3 percent in fiscal year 2018. The results reflect the impact of improved product mix coupled with capacity gains and operating cost reductions compared to the same period a year ago. Fiscal year 2019 also reflects an $11.4 million benefit related to an insurance recovery in our third fiscal quarter.
Our surcharge mechanism is structured to recover increases in raw material costs, although in certain cases with a lag effect as discussed above. While the surcharge generally protects the absolute gross profit dollars, it does have a dilutive effect on gross margin as a percent of sales. The following represents a summary of the dilutive impact of the surcharge on gross margin. We present and discuss these financial measures because management believes removing the impact of surcharge provides a more consistent and meaningful basis for comparing results of operations from period to period. See the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for further discussion of these financial measures.
Table:
 | Fiscal Year | 
($ in millions) | 2019 | 2018
Net sales | $2,380.2 | $2,157.7
Less: surcharge revenue | 438.1 | 365.4
Net sales excluding surcharge revenue | $1,942.1 | $1,792.3
Gross profit | $444.8 | $382.3
Gross margin | 18.7% | 17.7%
Gross margin excluding surcharge revenue | 22.9% | 21.3%


Question: In which year was the gross margin larger?
Answer: 2019
Calculation: 18.7%>17.7%
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Eligible employees are offered shares through a 24-month offering period, which consists of four consecutive 6-month purchase periods. Employees may purchase a limited number of shares of the Company’s stock at a discount of up to 15% of the lesser of the market value at the beginning of the offering period or the end of each 6-month purchase period. On September 13, 2018, the ESPP was amended to increase the shares reserved for issuance by 2 million shares of common stock. As of April 26, 2019, 7 million shares were available for issuance. The following table summarizes activity related to the purchase rights issued under the ESPP (in millions):
Table:
 |  | Year Ended | 
 | April 26, 2019 | April 27, 2018 | April 28, 2017
Shares issued under the ESPP | 3 | 4 | 4
Proceeds from issuance of shares | $ 96 | $ 85 | $ 80


Question: What were the shares issued under the ESPP in 2019?
Answer: 3
Segment operating results
Enterprise Security segment
Revenue increased $199 million primarily due to increases of $331 million in revenue from sales of our network and web security solutions and $36 million from sales of endpoint and information protection solutions, partially offset by a $184 million decrease in revenue as a result of the divestiture of our WSS and PKI solutions. Revenue during fiscal 2018 was also unfavorably affected by a shift in the mix of sales towards subscription and cloud-delivered solutions subject to ratable revenue recognition, which resulted in less in-period recognized revenue and more revenue deferred to the balance sheet as compared to fiscal 2017. Operating income increased $286 million primarily due to higher revenue discussed above, a $51 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses and a $38 million decrease in cost of revenues.
Table:
 | Fiscal Year |  | Variance in | 
(In millions, except for percentages) | 2018 | 2017 | Dollars | Percent
Net revenues | $2,554 | $2,355 | $199 | 8%
Percentage of total net revenues | 53% | 59% |  | 
Operating income | $473 | $187 | $286 | 153%
Operating margin | 19% | 8% |  | 


Question: What was the variance in percent for Net revenues from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018?
Answer: 8%
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following tables present the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) for the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
Table:
 | Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Available-for-sale Securities | Minimum Pension Liability | Foreign Currency | Total
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $0.3 | $(5.3) | $(9.4) | $(14.4)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | (13.6) | (5.6) | — | (19.2)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 15.2 | 0.8 | — | 16.0
Net other comprehensive loss | 1.6 | (4.8) | — | (3.2)
Balance at March 31, 2018 | $1.9 | $(10.1) | $(9.4) | $(17.6)


Question: Which years does the table provide information for the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI)?
Answer: 2019, 2018
4 Expenses
The Group has identified a number of significant expense items below that impacted financial performance for the year:
(a) Finance costs
Included in finance costs are costs related to unsecured notes on issue and interest expense on lease liabilities.
Refer to note 16 for details on unsecured notes on issue and note 12 for details on interest expense on lease liabilities for the year.
(b) Data centre rent paid to APDC
NEXTDC Limited acquired Asia Pacific Data Centre ("APDC") on 18 October 2018 (refer to note 26). Prior to acquisition, APDC was the landlord of three of NEXTDC’s data centre facilities: M1 Melbourne, S1 Sydney and P1 Perth. For the year ended 30 June 2018, NEXTDC paid rent and ancillary amounts to APDC totalling $13.8 million that was included in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income in Data centre facility costs. On early adoption of AASB 16 from 1 July 2018, this rent ceased to be a Data centre facility cost, and became a depreciation expense and finance cost, until 18 October 2018, when the three leases were derecognised on acquisition.
(c) APDC acquisition costs
A number of acquisition related costs were incurred as a result of the acquisition of APDC. Refer note 26 for further details.
Table:
 |  | 30 June 2019 | 30 June 2018
 | Note | $'000 | $'000
EXPENSE |  |  | 
Finance costs | 4(a) | (54,897) | (25,803)
Data centre rent paid to APDC (included in Data centre facility costs) | 4(b) | - | (13,785)
APDC transaction costs (included in Professional fees) | 4(c) | (5,459) | -
Landholder duty on acquisition of APDC properties (included in Office and administrative expenses) | 4(c) | (3,498) | -


Question: What was the sum of all expenses in FY19?
Answer: 63854
Calculation: 54,897 + 5,459 + 3,498
Medical Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the fiscal years ended:
Net Sales. The Medical segment had minimal net sales in both periods from newly launched products.
Gross Profit. Medical segment gross profit was a loss of $3.5 million in fiscal 2018 compared to a loss of $3.1 million in fiscal 2017. The increased loss primarily relates to the vertical manufacturing integration of some key components and research efforts to expand the product offerings.
Loss from Operations. Medical segment loss from operations increased $2.9 million to $11.4 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $8.5 million in fiscal 2017. The increased loss relates to higher outside professional fees, research and development and marketing expenses in fiscal 2018. Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Table:
(Dollars in Millions) | April 28, 2018 | April 29, 2017 | Net Change ($) | Net Change (%)
Net Sales | $ 0.3 | $ 0.2 | $ 0.1 | 50.0 %
Gross Profit | $ (3.5) | $ (3.1) | $ (0.4) | (12.9)%
Loss from Operations | $ (11.4) | $ (8.5) | $ (2.9) | (34.1)%


Question: What is the average Loss from Operations for Fiscal Year Ended April 28, 2018 to April 29, 2017?
Answer: -9.95
Calculation: -(11.4+8.5) / 2
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Warranties
The Company’s standard warranty obligation to its customers provides for repair or replacement of a defective product at the Company’s discretion for a period of time following purchase, generally between 12 and 24 months. Factors that affect the warranty obligation include product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise. The estimated cost associated with fulfilling the Company’s warranty obligation to customers is recorded in cost of revenue.
Changes in the Company’s warranty liability, which is included as a component of accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, are set forth in the table below (in thousands):
Table:
 |  | Year Ended December 31, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Warranty reserve, beginning of period | $8,220 | $8,306 | $2,158
Provisions made to warranty reserve during the period | 13,708 | 11,775 | 16,597
Charges against warranty reserve during the period | (11,574) | (11,861) | (10,449)
Warranty reserve end of period | $10,354 | 8,220 | 8,306


Question: What is the difference in warranty reserve from beginning to end of period 2019?
Answer: 2134
Calculation: 10,354 - 8,220
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
 | december 31 2008 | december 31 2009 | december 31 2010 | december 31 2011
disca | $ 102.53 | $ 222.09 | $ 301.96 | $ 296.67
discb | $ 78.53 | $ 162.82 | $ 225.95 | $ 217.56
disck | $ 83.69 | $ 165.75 | $ 229.31 | $ 235.63
s&p 500 | $ 74.86 | $ 92.42 | $ 104.24 | $ 104.23
peer group | $ 68.79 | $ 100.70 | $ 121.35 | $ 138.19
.

Question: the k series stock outperformed the s&p 500 by what percent over 5 years?
Answer: 126%
Calculation: subtract(235.63, 104.23), divide(#0, 104.23)
NOTE 24. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic net earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for that period. The dilutive effect is calculated using the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted net income per share assumes the exercise of options issued under our stock option plans (and the issuance of shares under our share plans) for periods in which exercises (or issuances) would have a dilutive effect.
The calculation of basic and diluted net income per share attributable to common shareholders is based on the following data:
Table:
 | December 31, | 
 | 2018 | 2019
Net earnings used for purposes of calculating net income per common share |  | 
Net earnings from operations | 157,133 | 329,013
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year (thousands) | 52,432 | 49,418
Effect of dilutive potential common shares from stock options and restricted shares | 678 | 580
Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding | 53,110 | 49,999
Basic net earnings per share: from operations | 3.00 | 6.66
Diluted net earnings per share: | 2.96 | 6.58


Question: For what years is information on earnings per share available?
Answer: 2018, 2019