hellotayssir/FinQA_TAT-QA_financial_finetuning_dataset huggingface dataset:
The Company incurred approximately $106,000 in legal, professional, and other costs related to this acquisition accounted for as selling and administrative expenses when incurred. The remaining weighted-average useful life of intangible assets acquired was 12.5 years as of the acquisition date.
As the active cabinet business was not operated as a separate subsidiary, division or entity, Calix did not maintain separate financial statements for the active cabinet business. As a result, we are unable to accurately determine earnings/loss for the active cabinet business on a standalone basis since the date of acquisition.
The following table below reflects our unaudited pro forma combined results of operations as if the acquisition had taken place as of October 1, 2016 and shows the net sales and net income as if the active cabinet business were combined with the Clearfield business for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
The pro forma includes estimated expenses relating to the amortization of intangibles purchased, the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment, and estimated personnel costs:
The pro forma unaudited results do not purport to be indicative of the results which would have been obtained had the acquisition been completed as of the beginning of the earliest period presented or of results that may be obtained in the future. In addition, they do not include any benefits that may result from the acquisition due to synergies that may be derived from the elimination of any duplicative costs.
Table:
 | Pro Forma Year Ended September 30, 2018 (unaudited) | Pro Forma Year Ended September 30, 2017 (unaudited)
Net sales | $80,958,789 | $89,672,074
Income from operations | $5,554,766 | $8,174,841
Net income | 4,794,757 | $5,809,018
Net income per share: |  | 
Basic | 0.36 | $0.43
Diluted | 0.36 | $0.43


Question: What is the net income per basic share for pro forma year ended September 30, 2018?
Answer: 0.36
6. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following components at June 30, 2019 and 2018:
If the FIFO method of inventory had been used instead of the LIFO method, inventories would have been $178.4 million and $210.3 million higher as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Current cost of LIFO-valued inventories was $793.0 million at June 30, 2019 and $760.8 million at June 30, 2018. The reductions in LIFO-valued inventories decreased cost of sales by $0.0 million during fiscal year 2019 and $0.6 million during fiscal year 2018 and $0.0 million during fiscal year 2017.
Table:
 | June 30, | 
($ in millions) | 2019 | 2018
Raw materials and supplies | $169.8 | $157.5
Work in process | 425.7 | 372.5
Finished and purchased products | 192.2 | 159.2
Total inventory | $787.7 | $689.2


Question: What would the amount of inventories be if the FIFO method of inventory had been used instead of the LIFO method?
Answer: inventories would have been $178.4 million and $210.3 million higher as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Revenue
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased by $58.9 million, or 28%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. Subscription
and returns revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased by $54.1 million, or 27%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. Professional
services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased by $4.8 million, or 37%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. Growth in total
revenue was due primarily to increased demand for our products and services from both new and existing customers. Of the increase in total revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, approximately $29.6 million was attributable to existing customers, approximately $28.3 million was attributable to
new customers, and approximately $1.1 million was due to interest income on funds held for customers. Total subscription and returns revenue for 2018 included
$1.2 million related to our cross-border transactions technology acquired in May 2018.
Table:
 | For the Year Ended December 31, |  | Change | 
 | 2018 | 2017 | Amount | Percentage
 |  | (dollars in thousands) |  | 
Revenue: |  |  |  | 
Subscription and returns | $254,056 | $199,942 | $54,114 | 27%
Professional services | 18,042 | 13,217 | 4,825 | 37%
Total revenue | $272,098 | $213,159 | $58,939 | 28%


Question: What is the increase in total revenue attributed to?
Answer: increased demand for our products and services from both new and existing customers.
NOTE 17—SPECIAL CHARGES (RECOVERIES)
Special charges (recoveries) include costs and recoveries that relate to certain restructuring initiatives that we have undertaken from time to time under our various restructuring plans, as well as acquisition-related costs and other charges.
Table:
 |  | Year Ended June 30, | 
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Fiscal 2019 Restructuring Plan | $28,318 | $— | $—
Fiscal 2018 Restructuring Plan | 515 | 10,154 | —
Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan | 898 | 7,207 | 33,827
Restructuring Plans prior to Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan | (620) | 279 | (340)
Acquisition-related costs | 5,625 | 4,805 | 15,938
Other charges (recoveries) | 983 | 6,766 | 14,193
Total | $35,719 | $29,211 | $63,618


Question: What is the difference between the Acquisition-related costs for fiscal year 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 820
Calculation: 5,625-4,805
Geographic Revenue
In addition to the revenue presentation by reportable segment, we also measure revenue performance on a geographic basis.
Total revenue of $77,147 million in 2019 decreased 3.1 percent year to year as reported (1 percent adjusted for currency), but increased 0.2 percent excluding divested businesses and adjusted for currency.
Americas revenue decreased 1.9 percent as reported (1 percent adjusted for currency), but grew 1 percent excluding divested businesses and adjusted for currency. Within North America, the U.S. decreased 2.4 percent and Canada increased 4.0 percent as reported (6 percent adjusted for currency). Latin America declined as reported but grew adjusted for currency. Within Latin America, Brazil declined 4.8 percent as reported, but was flat adjusted for currency.
EMEA revenue decreased 4.1 percent as reported, but was essentially flat adjusted for currency and increased 1 percent excluding divested businesses and adjusted for currency. As reported, the U.K., France and Italy decreased 2.9 percent, 4.1 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively, but grew 1 percent, 1 percent and 4 percent, respectively, adjusted for currency. Germany decreased 7.9 percent as reported and 3 percent adjusted for currency. The Middle East and Africa region decreased 3.5 percent as reported and 2 percent adjusted for currency.
Asia Pacific revenue decreased 4.0 percent as reported (3 percent adjusted for currency) and 2 percent excluding divested businesses and adjusted for currency. Japan increased 2.3 percent as reported and 1 percent adjusted for currency.
Australia decreased 17.3 percent as reported and 11 percent adjusted for currency. China decreased 13.4 percent as reported and 11 percent adjusted for currency and India decreased 8.1 percent as reported and 5 percent adjusted for currency.
Table:
($ in millions) |  |  |  |  | 
For the year ended December 31: | 2019 | 2018 | Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change | Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency | Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Excluding Divested Businesses And Adjusted for Currency
Total revenue | $77,147 | $79,591 | (3.1)% | (1.0)% | 0.2%
Americas | $36,274 | $36,994 | (1.9)% | (1.1)% | 0.8%
Europe/Middle East/Africa | 24,443 | 25,491 | (4.1) | 0.4 | 1.3
Asia Pacific | 16,430 | 17,106 | (4.0) | (3.0) | (2.5)


Question: What percentage of total revenue was Americas Revenue in 2019?
Answer: 47.02
Calculation: (36,274 / 77,147) * 100
Cost of Net Revenue and Gross Profit
Cost of net revenue decreased $26.7 million to $149.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to $176.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by lower sales. The decrease in gross profit percentage for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, was due to lower revenue and product mix.
We currently expect that gross profit percentage will fluctuate in the future, from period-to-period, based on changes in product mix, average selling prices, and average manufacturing costs.
Table:
 | Year Ended December 31, |  | % Change
 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019
 |  | (dollars in thousands) | 
Cost of net revenue | $149,495 | $176,223 | (15)%
% of net revenue | 47% | 46% | 
Gross profit | 167,685 | 208,774 | (20)%
% of net revenue | 53% | 54% | 


Question: What led to decrease in gross profit percentage for the year ended December 31, 2019?
Answer: due to lower revenue and product mix.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest expense decreased $54.7 million during fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018, primarily due to elimination of the non-recourse residential financing obligations in connection with the sale of the Residential Lease Portfolio in November 2018, as well as the elimination of the sales-leaseback financing obligations in connection with the sale of the commercial sale-leaseback portfolio during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2019.
Interest expense increased $17.7 million in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 primarily due to new debt and new commercial sale-leaseback arrangements.
Other income increased by $119.4 million during fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018, primarily due to a $158.3 million gain on an equity investment with readily determinable fair value in fiscal 2019, as compared to a loss of $6.4 million in fiscal 2018. Additionally, gain on sale of equity investments during fiscal 2019 was $17.7 million, compared to $54.2 million in fiscal 2018.
Other income increased by $143.0 million in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. The change is primarily due to a $54.2 million gain on the sale of our equity method investments in fiscal 2018, a $73.0 million impairment charge in fiscal 2017 in our 8point3 Energy Partners LP equity investment balance due to the adoption of ASC 606 which materially increased the investment balance and consequently, led to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.
Table:
 |  | Fiscal Year | 
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
Interest income | $2,702 | $3,057 | $2,100
Interest expense | (53,353) | (108,011) | (90,288)
Other Income (expense): |  |  | 
Other, net | 174,734 | 55,314 | (87,645)
Other income (expense), net | $124,083 | $(49,640) | $(175,833)
As a percentage of revenue | 7% | (3)% | (10)%


Question: What was the change in other, net from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 119420
Calculation: 174,734 - 55,314
Significant components of Teradyne’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Teradyne evaluated the likelihood that it would realize deferred income taxes to offset future taxable income and concluded that it is more likely than not that a substantial majority of its deferred tax assets will be realized through consideration of both the positive and negative evidence. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, Teradyne maintained a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets of $77.2 million and $69.9 million, respectively, primarily related to state net operating losses and state tax credit carryforwards, due to the uncertainty regarding their realization. Adjustments could be required in the future if Teradyne estimates that the amount of deferred tax assets to be realized is more or less than the net amount recorded.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018
 | (in thousands) | 
Deferred tax assets |  | 
Tax credits | $79,480 | $69,091
Accruals | 25,424 | 23,449
Pension liabilities | 24,459 | 20,826
Inventory valuations | 18,572 | 18,514
Deferred revenue | 7,622 | 9,130
Equity compensation | 7,042 | 7,190
Vacation accrual | 4,768 | 4,772
Investment impairment | 3,292 | —
Net operating loss carryforwards | 2,705 | 3,658
Marketable securities | — | 962
Other | 1,472 | 685
Gross deferred tax assets | 174,836 | 158,277
Less: valuation allowance | (77,177) | (69,852)
Total deferred tax assets | $97,659 | $88,425
Deferred tax liabilities: |  | 
Depreciation | $(18,238) | $(14,028)
Intangible assets | (16,705) | (24,211)
Marketable securities | (1,601) | —
Total deferred tax liabilities | $(36,544) | $(38,239)
Net deferred assets | $61,115 | $50,186


Question: In which years were components of Teradyne’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) provided?
Answer: 2019, 2018
NOTE 2. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
For cash equivalents, amounts receivable or payable and short-term borrowings, fair values approximate carrying value, based on the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.
The Company’s estimates of the fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework is based on the inputs used in valuation, gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets, and requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows: Level 1: inputs to the valuation are quoted prices in an active market for identical assets Level 2: inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly Level 3: valuation is based on significant inputs that are unobservable in the market and the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that it believes market participants would use in pricing the asset
Fair value of financial assets, included in cash and cash equivalents, and financial liabilities is as follows:
(a) In accordance with ASC Subtopic 360-10, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying value of $4,575 were written down to their fair value of $1,300, resulting in an impairment totaling $3,275, which was included in earnings for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. The Company has entered into an agreement to sell these assets. That sale is expected to be completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2020.
Table:
 |  | Estimated Fair Value Measurements |  | 
Recurring Fair Value Measurements | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Fair Value
June 30, 2019 |  |  |  | 
Financial Assets: |  |  |  | 
Money market funds | $81,945 | $— | $— | $81,945
June 30, 2018 |  |  |  | 
Financial Assets: |  |  |  | 
Money market funds | $14,918 | $— | $— | $14,918
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements |  |  |  | 
June 30, 2019 |  |  |  | 
Long-lived assets held for sale | $— | $1,300 | $— | $1,300
June 30, 2018 |  |  |  | 
Long-lived assets held for sale (a) | $— | $1,300 | $— | $1,300


Question: What is the total fair value of money market funds as at June 30, 2018?
Answer: $14,918
B. Remuneration to other directors:
* Relinquished the position of Independent Director w.e.f. July 10, 2018.
** Relinquished the position of Independent Director w.e.f. September 28, 2018.
*** Appointed as Additional and Independent Director w.e.f. December 18, 2018.
**** Appointed as an Additional and Independent Director w.e.f. January 10, 2019.
@ As a policy, N Chandrasekaran, Chairman, has abstained from receiving commission from the Company.
@@ In line with the internal guidelines of the Company, no payment is made towards commission to the Non-Executive Directors of the Company, who are in full time employment with any other Tata company.
Table:
 |  |  |  | (` lakh)
Particulars of Remuneration | Sitting Fees for attending board/ committee meetings | Commission | Others, please specify | Total Amount
1. Independent Directors |  |  |  | 
Aman Mehta | 4.80 | 315.00 | - | 319.80
V Thyagarajan* | 3.00 | 100.00 | - | 103.00
Prof Clayton M Christensen** | 0.30 | 75.00 | - | 75.30
Dr Ron Sommer | 5.10 | 220.00 | - | 225.10
O P Bhatt | 7.50 | 215.00 | - | 222.50
Dr Pradeep Kumar Khosla | 2.10 | 150.00 | - | 152.10
Hanne Sorensen*** | 0.60 | 50.00 | - | 50.60
Keki Mistry*** | 0.60 | 50.00 | - | 50.60
Don Callahan**** | 0.30 | 35.00 | - | 35.30
Total (1) | 24.30 | 1,210.00 | - | 1,234.30
2. Other Non-Executive Directors |  |  |  | 
N Chandrasekaran@ | 3.60 | - | - | 3.60
Aarthi Subramanian@@ | 5.70 | - | - | 5.70
Total (2) | 9.30 | - | - | 9.30
Total (B)=(1+2) | 33.60 | 1,210.00 | - | 1,243.60
Total Managerial Remuneration |  |  |  | 
Ceiling as per the Act (@1% of profits calculated under Section 198 of the Companies Act, 2013) |  | 40,434.81 |  | 


Question: What is the Sitting Fees for attending board/ committee meetings for Aman Mehta?
Answer: 4.80
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 . the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Table:
2001 first quarter | high $ 60.15 | low $ 41.30 | 2000 first quarter | high $ 44.72 | low $ 34.25
second quarter | 52.25 | 39.95 | second quarter | 49.63 | 35.56
third quarter | 44.50 | 12.00 | third quarter | 70.25 | 45.13
fourth quarter | 17.80 | 11.60 | fourth quarter | 72.81 | 45.00
( b ) holders .
as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
( c ) dividends .
under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay .
in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .
the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty .
the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .
such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was the 2001 first quarter average of high and low stock prices?
Answer: 50.73
Calculation: add(60.15, 41.30), divide(#0, const_2)
compensation plan approved by security holders . the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans . the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5978 22.00 2014 .

Table:
plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 1211143 | $ 308.10 | 5156223
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | 5978 | 22.00 | 2014
total | 1217121 |  | 5156223
item 13 .
certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: what percentage of the outstanding options were from plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 99.5%
Calculation: divide(1211143, 1217121)
3. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
As of December 31, 2019, the Company did not hold any marketable securities.
Table:
 |  | December 31, 2018 |  | 
(in thousands) | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value
Municipal bonds | $44,802 | $13 | $(110) | $44,705
Corporate bonds | 48,499 | 23 | (226) | 48,296
 | $93,301 | $36 | $(336) | $93,001


Question: What is the value of the amortized costs of  the municipal bonds as a percentage of the total amortized cost?
Answer: 48.02
Calculation: (44,802/93,301 ) * 100
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased $124.2 million in 2019 compared to 2018. Our selling and administrative expenses by major expense type for 2019 and 2018 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Selling and administrative expenses increased approximately 70 basis points as a percentage of net sales in 2019 compared to 2018. The increase in expenses reflects the addition of PCM to our North America and EMEA segments, effective August 30, 2019.
The addition of PCM and increased variable compensation resulting from increased sales and gross profit in 2019 compared to 2018 were the primary drivers for the $90.9 million increase in personnel costs. PCM was also the primary driver for year over year increases in facilities, travel and entertainment, and marketing expenses.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately $8.8 million year over year, primarily due to additional amortization expense on newly acquired intangible assets.
Table:
 | 2019 | 2018 | Change
Personnel costs, including teammate benefits | $684,837 | $593,955 | $90,882
Depreciation and amortization | 46,209 | 37,458 | 8,751
Facility expenses | 30,945 | 26,396 | 4,549
Travel and entertainment | 28,402 | 25,656 | 2,746
Legal and professional fees | 16,839 | 16,103 | 736
Marketing | 11,597 | 10,345 | 1,252
Other | 61,908 | 46,616 | 15,292
Total | $880,737 | $756,529 | $124,208


Question: How much basis points as a percentage of net sale did Selling and administrative expenses increased in 2019 compared to 2018?
Answer: approximately 70 basis points