Repository: vercel/next.js
Pull request: fix: cli test failed when using rspack

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->

The PR has resolved the failures in `test/integration/cli/test/index.test.js`.

1. Prevent next Rspack experimental warning during test runs when `process.env.__NEXT_TEST_MODE` is set
2. Updated assertion to expect `next-rspack` version string when using Rspack


Changed files:
filename: packages/next/src/shared/lib/get-rspack.ts
patch: @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ export function getRspackReactRefresh() {
 }
 
 function warnRspack() {
+  if (process.env.__NEXT_TEST_MODE) {
+    return
+  }
   warnOnce(
     `\`next-rspack\` is currently experimental. It's not an official Next.js plugin, and is supported by the Rspack team in partnership with Next.js. Help improve Next.js and Rspack by providing feedback at https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/77800`
   )

filename: test/integration/cli/test/index.test.js
patch: @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ Relevant Packages:
   eslint-config-next: .*
   react: .*
   react-dom: .*
-  typescript: .*
+  typescript: .*${process.env.NEXT_RSPACK ? '\n  next-rspack: .*' : ''}
 Next.js Config:
   output: ${nextConfigOutput}
 `)