Repository: vercel/next.js
Pull request: Removed link to maintain text consistency

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change

### What? Removed link 
### Why? To maintain text consistency. There are four includes of 'browser’s history stack' and two of them contain link with different style.
### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->


Changed files:
filename: docs/01-app/03-api-reference/04-functions/use-router.mdx
patch: @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ export default function Page() {
 
 ## `useRouter()`
 
-- `router.push(href: string, { scroll: boolean })`: Perform a client-side navigation to the provided route. Adds a new entry into the [browser’s history](https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/History_API) stack.
-- `router.replace(href: string, { scroll: boolean })`: Perform a client-side navigation to the provided route without adding a new entry into the [browser’s history stack](https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/History_API).
+- `router.push(href: string, { scroll: boolean })`: Perform a client-side navigation to the provided route. Adds a new entry into the [browser's history stack](https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/History_API).
+- `router.replace(href: string, { scroll: boolean })`: Perform a client-side navigation to the provided route without adding a new entry into the browser’s history stack.
 - `router.refresh()`: Refresh the current route. Making a new request to the server, re-fetching data requests, and re-rendering Server Components. The client will merge the updated React Server Component payload without losing unaffected client-side React (e.g. `useState`) or browser state (e.g. scroll position).
 - `router.prefetch(href: string, options?: { onInvalidate?: () => void })`: [Prefetch](/docs/app/getting-started/linking-and-navigating#prefetching) the provided route for faster client-side transitions. The optional `onInvalidate` callback is called when the [prefetched data becomes stale](/docs/app/guides/prefetching#extending-or-ejecting-link).
 - `router.back()`: Navigate back to the previous route in the browser’s history stack.