Federalism

qas: question: What is federalism? 
answers: text: Federalism refers to the mixed or compound mode of government

question: In Federalism, are the division of powers equal? 
answers: text: division of powers between two levels of government of equal status

question: What type of governments are included in federalism? 
answers: text: general government (the central or 'federal' government) with regional governments

question: How many governments are apart of federalism?
answers: text: relationship of parity between the two levels of government

question: What isn't federalism?

question: What features are indistinctive of federalism? 

question: What document rejected modern federalist government?

question: What distinguishes Federalism from no other types of government?

question: Federalism combines what three types of government?
context: Federalism refers to the mixed or compound mode of government, combining a general government (the central or 'federal' government) with regional governments (provincial, state, Land, cantonal, territorial or other sub-unit governments) in a single political system. Its distinctive feature, exemplified in the founding example of modern federalism of the United States of America under the Constitution of 1789, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of government established. It can thus be defined as a form of government in which there is a division of powers between two levels of government of equal status.

qas: question: Before new research, what was the definition of federalism? 
answers: text: a division of sovereignty between two levels of government

question: After new research, what was the final definition of federalism? 
answers: text: final and absolute source of political authority in a political community - is not possible.

question: When was federalism put into place? 
answers: text: The descent of the United States into Civil War in the mid-nineteenth century

question: What is the difference between multi-level political forms and federalism? 
answers: text: the characteristic of equality of standing between the two levels of government established

question: What is an example of a federal union? 
answers: text: the European Union

question: What historical event illustrated that dividing sovereignty was possible?

question: Old research has clarified that Federalism has how many distinct forms?

question: What organization is a leading example of a local union?

question: What distinguishes Federalism from other single-level governments?

question: What form of Federalism is characterized by where sovereignty resides in the partial?
context: Until recently, in the absence of prior agreement on a clear and precise definition, the concept was thought to mean (as a shorthand) 'a division of sovereignty between two levels of government'. New research, however, argues that this cannot be correct, as dividing sovereignty - when this concept is properly understood in its core meaning of the final and absolute source of political authority in a political community - is not possible. The descent of the United States into Civil War in the mid-nineteenth century, over disputes about unallocated competences concerning slavery and ultimately the right of secession, showed this. One or other level of government could be sovereign to decide such matters, but not both simultaneously. Therefore, it is now suggested that federalism is more appropriately conceived as 'a division of the powers flowing from sovereignty between two levels of government'. What differentiates the concept from other multi-level political forms is the characteristic of equality of standing between the two levels of government established. This clarified definition opens the way to identifying two distinct federal forms, where before only one was known, based upon whether sovereignty resides in the whole (in one people) or in the parts (in many peoples): the federal state (or federation) and the federal union of states (or federal union), respectively. Leading examples of the federal state include the United States, Germany, Canada, Switzerland, Australia and India. The leading example of the federal union of states is the European Union.

qas: question: What is the Latin word for federalism? 
answers: text: foedus

question: What was federalism and confederalism common meaning in the 18th century? 
answers: text: a simple league or inter-governmental relationship among sovereign states based upon a treaty.

question: What did James Madison referred to the new United States as? 
answers: text: 'neither a national nor a federal Constitution, but a composition of both

question: What isn't the Latin word for federalism? 

question: What was federalism and confederalism common meaning in the 17th century? 

question: What did James Madison referred to the old United States as? 

question: What did John Madison referred to the new United States as? 

question: What did James Madison referred to the new United Nations as? 
context: The terms 'federalism' and 'confederalism' both have a root in the Latin word foedus, meaning treaty, pact or covenant. Their common meaning until the late eighteenth century was a simple league or inter-governmental relationship among sovereign states based upon a treaty. They were therefore initially synonyms. It was in this sense that James Madison in Federalist 39 had referred to the new United States as 'neither a national nor a federal Constitution, but a composition of both' (ie. neither a single large unitary state nor a league/confederation among several small states, but a hybrid of the two). In the course of the nineteenth century the meaning of federalism would come to shift, strengthening to refer uniquely to the novel compound political form, while the meaning of confederalism would remain at a league of states. Thus, this article relates to the modern usage of the word 'federalism'.

qas: question: Where does the federalist model work best in? 
answers: text: homogeneous states

question: What are homogeneous states? 
answers: text: United States, Germany or Australia

question: Where can tensions be found in the federalist countries?
answers: text: Canada

question: What countries did the federalist model fail in? 
answers: text: Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia

question: What countries dismissed the federalist model? 
answers: text: Ukraine or Syria

question: Where does the federalist model work worst in? 

question: What aren't homogeneous states? 

question: Where can't tensions be found in the federalist countries?

question: What countries did the federalist model succeed in? 

question: What countries embraced the federalist model? 
context: Whilst it is often perceived as an optimal solution for states comprising different cultural or ethnic communities, the federalist model seems to work best in largely homogeneous states such as the United States, Germany or Australia, but there is also evidence to the contrary such as in Switzerland. Tensions between territories can still be found in federalist countries such as Canada and federation as a way to appease and quell military conflict has failed recently in places like Lybia or Iraq, while the formula is simultaneously proposed and dismissed in countries such as Ukraine or Syria. Federations such as Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia collapsed as soon as it was possible to put the model to the test.

qas: question: In the United States, what was federalism referred to? 
answers: text: belief in a stronger central government.

question: When the U.S Constitution was being drafted, what did the federalist party support? 
answers: text: stronger central government

question: What did anti-federalist support? 
answers: text: weaker central government

question: On the political spectrum, where does federalism stand? 
answers: text: federalism" is situated in the middle of the political spectrum between a confederacy and a unitary state

question: In the United States, what wasn't federalism referred to? 

question: When the U.S Constitution was being erased, what did the federalist party support? 

question: When the U.S Constitution was being drafted, what did the federalist party oppose? 

question: What did anti-federalist oppose?

question: On the political spectrum, where doesn't federalism stand? 
context: In the United States, federalism originally referred to belief in a stronger central government. When the U.S. Constitution was being drafted, the Federalist Party supported a stronger central government, while "Anti-Federalists" wanted a weaker central government. This is very different from the modern usage of "federalism" in Europe and the United States. The distinction stems from the fact that "federalism" is situated in the middle of the political spectrum between a confederacy and a unitary state. The U.S. Constitution was written as a reaction to the Articles of Confederation, under which the United States was a loose confederation with a weak central government.

qas: question: Who has a greater history of unitary states? 
answers: text: Europe

question: What does federalism mean in Europe? 
answers: text: weaker central government, relative to a unitary state

question: What branch does the United States want to limit under the federalist model? 
answers: text: judiciary

question: Who has a lesser history of unitary states? 

question: Who has a greater history of solitary states? 

question: What doesn't federalism mean in Europe? 

question: What branch doesn't the United States want to limit under the federalist model?

question: What branch does the United Nations want to limit under the federalist model?
context: In contrast, Europe has a greater history of unitary states than North America, thus European "federalism" argues for a weaker central government, relative to a unitary state. The modern American usage of the word is much closer to the European sense. As the power of the Federal government has increased, some people have perceived a much more unitary state than they believe the Founding Fathers intended. Most people politically advocating "federalism" in the United States argue in favor of limiting the powers of the federal government, especially the judiciary (see Federalist Society, New Federalism).

qas: question: What happened on January 1st 1901?
answers: text: nation-state of Australia officially came into existence as a federation

question: When did the United Kingdom colonized the Australian continent?
answers: text: 1788

question: Which model is of federalism is similar to the federalism model in Australia? 
answers: text: United States of America

question: What was established when Australia was colonized? 
answers: text: six, eventually self-governing, colonies

question: What happened on January 21st 1901?

question: When did the United Kingdom leave the Australian continent?

question: When didn't the United Kingdom colonize the Australian continent?

question: Which model is of federalism is opposite to the federalism model in Australia? 

question: What was abolished when Australia was colonized? 
context: On the 1st of January 1901 the nation-state of Australia officially came into existence as a federation. The Australian continent was colonised by the United Kingdom in 1788, which subsequently established six, eventually self-governing, colonies there. In the 1890s the governments of these colonies all held referendums on becoming a unified, self-governing "Commonwealth" within the British Empire. When all the colonies voted in favour of federation, the Federation of Australia commenced, resulting in the establishment of the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901. The model of Australian federalism adheres closely to the original model of the United States of America, although it does so through a parliamentary Westminster system rather than a presidential system.

qas: question: When was Brazil's fall of the monarchy?
answers: text: 1889

question: Who caused the fall of the monarchy happened in Brazil?
answers: text: military coup d'état led to the rise of the presidential system, headed by Deodoro da Fonseca.

question: When did Brazil adopt federalism? 
answers: text: 1891

question: What other system does Brazil use? 
answers: text: Fonseca system

question: What is the fonseca system? 
answers: text: regulate interstate trade

question: When was Brazil's rise of the monarchy?

question: Who didn't cause the fall of the monarchy that happened in Brazil?

question: When did Brazil reject federalism? 

question: What other system does Brazil reject? 

question: What isn't the fonseca system?
context: In Brazil, the fall of the monarchy in 1889 by a military coup d'état led to the rise of the presidential system, headed by Deodoro da Fonseca. Aided by well-known jurist Ruy Barbosa, Fonseca established federalism in Brazil by decree, but this system of government would be confirmed by every Brazilian constitution since 1891, although some of them would distort some of the federalist principles. The 1937 Constitution, for example, granted the federal government the authority to appoint State Governors (called interventors) at will, thus centralizing power in the hands of President Getúlio Vargas. Brazil also uses the Fonseca system to regulate interstate trade. Brazil is one of the biggest federal governments.

qas: question: What is the government of India based on? 
answers: text: tiered system

question: What is a tiered system? 
answers: text: the Constitution of India delineates the subjects on which each tier of government has executive powers

question: What was the constitution originally provided for? 
answers: text: two-tier system of government

question: When the third tiere was added on, what is it in form of? 
answers: text: Panchayats and Municipalities

question: What isn't the government of India based on?

question: What isn't a tiered system? 

question: What was the constitution originally not provided for? 

question: What was the constitution never provided for? 

question: When the third tiere was taken off, what is it in form of? 
context: The government of India is based on a tiered system, in which the Constitution of India delineates the subjects on which each tier of government has executive powers. The Constitution originally provided for a two-tier system of government, the Union Government (also known as the Central Government), representing the Union of India, and the State governments. Later, a third tier was added in the form of Panchayats and Municipalities. In the current arrangement, The Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution delimits the subjects of each level of governmental jurisdiction, dividing them into three lists:

qas: question: What is a distinguishing aspect of Indian federalism?
answers: text: asymmetric

question: What does Article 370 say?
answers: text: special provisions for the state of Jammu and Kashmir as per its Instrument of Accession

question: What does Article 371 say?
answers: text: special provisions for the states of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Goa, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Sikkim

question: What happens with President's Rule?
answers: text: the central government (through its appointed Governor) takes control of state's administration for certain months

question: What isn't a distinguishing aspect of Indian federalism?

question: What does Article 307 say?

question: What does Article 317 say?

question: What never happens with President's Rule?

question: What happens with Prime Minister's Rule?
context: A distinguishing aspect of Indian federalism is that unlike many other forms of federalism, it is asymmetric. Article 370 makes special provisions for the state of Jammu and Kashmir as per its Instrument of Accession. Article 371 makes special provisions for the states of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Goa, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Sikkim as per their accession or state-hood deals. Also one more aspect of Indian federalism is system of President's Rule in which the central government (through its appointed Governor) takes control of state's administration for certain months when no party can form a government in the state or there is violent disturbance in the state.

qas: question: Who is the strongest advocate of the European Federalism?
answers: text: Germany, Italy, Belgium and Luxembourg

question: Who opposed the European Federalism? 
answers: text: United Kingdom, Denmark and France

question: When did the French authorities adopted the pro-European Unification position? 
answers: text: Since the presidency of François Mitterrand (1981-1995

question: Who is the strongest opponent of the European Federalism?

question: Who supported the European Federalism?

question: When did the English authorities adopt the pro-European Unification position? 

question: When did the French authorities reject the pro-European Unification position? 

question: When didn't the French authorities adopted the pro-European Unification position? 
context: Although the drafts of both the Maastricht treaty and the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe mentioned federalism, the representatives of the member countries (all of whom would have had to agree to use of the term) never formally adopted it. The strongest advocates of European federalism have been Germany, Italy, Belgium and Luxembourg while those historically most strongly opposed have been the United Kingdom, Denmark and France (with conservative presidents and governments). Since the presidency of François Mitterrand (1981-1995), the French authorities have adopted a much more pro-European Unification position, as they consider that a strong EU is presenting the best "insurance" against a unified Germany which might become too strong and thus a threat for its neighbours.

qas: question: When did the federal war end?
answers: text: 1863

question: How did the federal war end? 
answers: text: with the signing of the Treaty of Coche by both the centralist government of the time and the Federal Forces

question: What did the United States of Venezuela incorporate? 
answers: text: "Federation of Sovereign States" upon principles borrowed from the Articles of Confederation of the United States of America

question: In this type of federation each country had its own what? 
answers: text: President

question: When did the federal war start?

question: How did the federal war start? 

question: What did the United States of Venezuela reject?

question: What did the United States of America incorporate?

question: In this type of federation each country had shared what? 
context: The Federal War ended in 1863 with the signing of the Treaty of Coche by both the centralist government of the time and the Federal Forces. The United States of Venezuela were subsequently incorporated under a "Federation of Sovereign States" upon principles borrowed from the Articles of Confederation of the United States of America. In this Federation, each State had a "President" of its own that controlled almost every issue, even the creation of "State Armies," while the Federal Army was required to obtain presidential permission to enter any given state.

qas: question: How many components does the Belgian federalism have? 
answers: text: three components

question: What passed on July 18, 2007?
answers: text: Brussels' parliament

question: What are the Flemish representatives in favor for?
answers: text: Brussels resolution, with the exception of one party

question: What is Belgian Federalism? 
answers: text: the federal system passed in the parliaments of Wallonia and Brussels.

question: How many components does the Belgian federalism not have? 

question: What passed on July 18, 2007?

question: What didn't pass on July 18, 2008?

question: What are the Flemish representatives not in favor of?

question: What isn't Belgian Federalism? 
context: On the other hand, Belgian federalism is federated with three components. An affirmative resolution concerning Brussels' place in the federal system passed in the parliaments of Wallonia and Brussels. These resolutions passed against the desires of Dutch-speaking parties, who are generally in favour of a federal system with two components (i.e. the Dutch and French Communities of Belgium). However, the Flemish representatives in the Parliament of the Brussels Capital-Region voted in favour of the Brussels resolution, with the exception of one party. The chairman of the Walloon Parliament stated on July 17, 2008 that, "Brussels would take an attitude". Brussels' parliament passed the resolution on July 18, 2008:

qas: question: How did they manage the tensions in the present of Spanish Transition to democracy?
answers: text: the drafters of the current Spanish constitution avoided giving labels such as 'federal' to the territorial arrangements.

question: Which cities are recognized in the Spanish Democratic Constitution? 
answers: text: Basque Country and Navarre

question: Where are the main taxes taken?
answers: text: Madrid

question: How did they ignore the tensions in the present of Spanish Transition to democracy?

question: How did they manage the tensions in the present of Spanish Transition to communism?

question: Which cities aren't recognized in the Spanish Democratic Constitution? 

question: Which cities are recognized in the Spanish Socialist Constitution? 

question: Where are the main taxes ignored?
context: However, in order to manage the tensions present in the Spanish transition to democracy, the drafters of the current Spanish constitution avoided giving labels such as 'federal' to the territorial arrangements. Besides, unlike in the federal system, the main taxes are taken centrally from Madrid (except for the Basque Country and Navarre, which were recognized in the Spanish democratic constitution as charter territories drawing from historical reasons) and then distributed to the Autonomous Communities.

qas: question: What are anarchists against? 
answers: text: State

question: What are anarchists not against? 
answers: text: not against political organization or "governance"—so long as it is self-governance utilizing direct democracy.

question: What mode of government does the anarchists prefer? 
answers: text: federalism or confederalism

question: What are anarchists for?

question: What aren't anarchists against?

question: What are anarchists against?

question: What mode of government does the anarchists hate? 

question: What mode of sports does the anarchists prefer? 
context: Anarchists are against the State but are not against political organization or "governance"—so long as it is self-governance utilizing direct democracy. The mode of political organization preferred by anarchists, in general, is federalism or confederalism.[citation needed] However, the anarchist definition of federalism tends to differ from the definition of federalism assumed by pro-state political scientists. The following is a brief description of federalism from section I.5 of An Anarchist FAQ:

qas: question: Who can elect the members of the upper house? 
answers: text: government or legislature

question: Can the members of the upper house be elected directly or indirectly? 
answers: text: indirectly

question: Can the members of the lower house be elected directly or indirectly? 
answers: text: directly

question: Who can't elect the members of the upper house? 

question: Who can elect the leaders of the upper house? 

question: Can the members of the upper house be impeached directly or indirectly? 

question: Can the members of the lower house be impeached directly or indirectly? 

question: Can the citizens of the lower house be elected directly or indirectly? 
context: Alternatively, or in addition to this practice, the members of an upper house may be indirectly elected by the government or legislature of the component states, as occurred in the United States prior to 1913, or be actual members or delegates of the state governments, as, for example, is the case in the German Bundesrat and in the Council of the European Union. The lower house of a federal legislature is usually directly elected, with apportionment in proportion to population, although states may sometimes still be guaranteed a certain minimum number of seats.

qas: question: What is federalism seen as? 
answers: text: a useful way to structure political systems in order prevent violence among different groups with countries

question: What does federalism allow?
answers: text: it allows certain groups to legislate at the subnational level

question: What do scholars think of federalism?
answers: text: Some scholars have suggested, however, that federalism can divide countries

question: What isn't federalism seen as? 

question: What is communism seen as? 

question: What doesn't federalism allow?

question: What does federalism not allow?

question: What don't scholars think of federalism?
context: Federalism, and other forms of territorially autonomy, is generally seen as a useful way to structure political systems in order prevent violence among different groups with countries because it allows certain groups to legislate at the subnational level. Some scholars have suggested, however, that federalism can divide countries and result in state collapse because it creates proto-states. Still others have shown that federalism is only divisive when it lacks mechanisms tthat encourage political parties to compete across regional boundaries.

qas: question: What happened to Russia's subdivision of government? 
answers: text: changed towards a generally autonomous model

question: When was Russia's subdivision liberalized?
answers: text: in the aftermath of the Soviet Union

question: Who was in charge when the reforms was going on? 
answers: text: Boris Yeltsin

question: Who scaled back some reforms from Yeltsin? 
answers: text: Vladimir Putin

question: What happened to Prussia's subdivision of government?

question: When wasn't Russia's subdivision liberalized?

question: Who wasn't in charge when the reform was going on? 

question: Who was in charge when the reforms was scrapped? 

question: Who escalted some reforms from Yeltsin? 
context: The post-Imperial nature of Russian subdivision of government changed towards a generally autonomous model which began with the establishment of the USSR (of which Russia was governed as part). It was liberalized in the aftermath of the Soviet Union, with the reforms under Boris Yeltsin preserving much of the Soviet structure while applying increasingly liberal reforms to the governance of the constituent republics and subjects (while also coming into conflict with Chechen secessionist rebels during the Chechen War). Some of the reforms under Yeltsin were scaled back by Vladimir Putin.

qas: question: What is federalism in the United States?
answers: text: ederalism in the United States is the evolving relationship between state governments and the federal government of the United States

question: How has the American government evolved?
answers: text: American government has evolved from a system of dual federalism to one of associative federalism.

question: What happened in Federalist No.46?
answers: text: James Madison asserted that the states and national government

question: What happened in Federalist No. 28
answers: text: "Federalist No. 28," suggested that both levels of government would exercise authority to the citizens' benefit

question: What is federalism out the United States?

question: How has the American government devolved?

question: What happened in Federalist No.64?

question: What never happened in Federalist No.46?

question: What happened in Federalist No. 82
context: Federalism in the United States is the evolving relationship between state governments and the federal government of the United States. American government has evolved from a system of dual federalism to one of associative federalism. In "Federalist No. 46," James Madison asserted that the states and national government "are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers." Alexander Hamilton, writing in "Federalist No. 28," suggested that both levels of government would exercise authority to the citizens' benefit: "If their [the peoples'] rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress." (1)

qas: question: Why did the constitution didn't have to explain federalism? 
answers: text: Because the states were preexisting political entities

question: What is another word for express powers? 
answers: text: enumerated powers

question: Where can we find express powers?
answers: text: in the Constitution

question: What are the expressed powers? 
answers: text: the right to levy taxes, declare war, and regulate interstate and foreign commerce.

question: What does the Necessary and Proper Clause do? 
answers: text: gives the federal government the implied power to pass any law "necessary and proper" for the execution of its express powers

question: Why did the constitution have to explain federalism? 

question: What is another word for suppress powers? 

question: Where can we find suppress powers?

question: What are the suppressed powers? 

question: What does the Unnecessary and Proper Clause do? 
context: Because the states were preexisting political entities, the U.S. Constitution did not need to define or explain federalism in any one section but it often mentions the rights and responsibilities of state governments and state officials in relation to the federal government. The federal government has certain express powers (also called enumerated powers) which are powers spelled out in the Constitution, including the right to levy taxes, declare war, and regulate interstate and foreign commerce. In addition, the Necessary and Proper Clause gives the federal government the implied power to pass any law "necessary and proper" for the execution of its express powers. Other powers—the reserved powers—are reserved to the people or the states. The power delegated to the federal government was significantly expanded by the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), amendments to the Constitution following the Civil War, and by some later amendments—as well as the overall claim of the Civil War, that the states were legally subject to the final dictates of the federal government.

qas: question: What was the federalist party of the United States opposed to?
answers: text: Democratic-Republicans

question: What did the democratic-republican party believe in?
answers: text: the Legislature had too much power (mainly because of the Necessary and Proper Clause) and that they were unchecked

question: Who decided the rights in specific cases?
answers: text: the judicial system of courts

question: What was the federalist party of the United States in support of?

question: What was the federalist party of the United Nations opposed to?

question: What did the democratic-republican party not believe in?

question: What did the democratic-republican party oppose?

question: Who decided the rights in all cases?
context: The Federalist Party of the United States was opposed by the Democratic-Republicans, including powerful figures such as Thomas Jefferson. The Democratic-Republicans mainly believed that: the Legislature had too much power (mainly because of the Necessary and Proper Clause) and that they were unchecked; the Executive had too much power, and that there was no check on the executive; a dictator would arise; and that a bill of rights should be coupled with the constitution to prevent a dictator (then believed to eventually be the president) from exploiting or tyrannizing citizens. The federalists, on the other hand, argued that it was impossible to list all the rights, and those that were not listed could be easily overlooked because they were not in the official bill of rights. Rather, rights in specific cases were to be decided by the judicial system of courts.

qas: question: What is the meaning of federalism?
answers: text: as a political movement, and of what constitutes a 'federalist', varies with country and historical context

question: What types of movements are associated with federalism?
answers: text: Movements associated with the establishment or development of federations can exhibit either centralising or decentralising trends.

question: What countries advocate for a strong central government?
answers: text: United States and Australia

question: What isn't the meaning of federalism?

question: What is the meaning of anti-federalism?

question: What types of movements aren't associated with federalism?

question: What types of non-movements are associated with federalism?

question: What countries are against a strong central government?
context: The meaning of federalism, as a political movement, and of what constitutes a 'federalist', varies with country and historical context.[citation needed] Movements associated with the establishment or development of federations can exhibit either centralising or decentralising trends.[citation needed] For example, at the time those nations were being established, factions known as "federalists" in the United States and Australia advocated the formation of strong central government. Similarly, in European Union politics, federalists mostly seek greater EU integration. In contrast, in Spain and in post-war Germany, federal movements have sought decentralisation: the transfer of power from central authorities to local units. In Canada, where Quebec separatism has been a political force for several decades, the "federalist" impulse aims to keep Quebec inside Canada.

qas: question: What happened between 1938 to 1995?
answers: text: the U.S. Supreme Court did not invalidate any federal statute as exceeding Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.

question: What are most actions in the federal government known as?
answers: text: Commerce Clause

question: What did the court reject in 1995?
answers: text: the Supreme Court rejected the Gun-Free School Zones Act in the Lopez decision

question: What did the court reject in 1994?
answers: text: rejected the civil remedy portion of the Violence Against Women Act

question: What does the commerce clause include?
answers: text: include marijuana laws in the Gonzales v. Raich decision

question: What happened between 1983 to 1995?

question: What happened between 1938 to 1959?

question: What are no actions in the federal government known as?

question: What did the court accept in 1995?

question: What did the court reject in 1949?
context: From 1938 until 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court did not invalidate any federal statute as exceeding Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. Most actions by the federal government can find some legal support among the express powers, such as the Commerce Clause, whose applicability has been narrowed by the Supreme Court in recent years. In 1995 the Supreme Court rejected the Gun-Free School Zones Act in the Lopez decision, and also rejected the civil remedy portion of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 in the United States v. Morrison decision. Recently, the Commerce Clause was interpreted to include marijuana laws in the Gonzales v. Raich decision.

qas: question: How many components does the Belgian political landscape include?
answers: text: two components

question: What are the two components in the Belgian political landscape?
answers: text: the Dutch-speaking population represented by Dutch-language political parties, and the majority populations of Wallonia and Brussels

question: What component is the Brussel Region?
answers: text: third component

question: What happens with the Brussels special position?
answers: text: consequently has a number of political issues

question: How many components does the Belgian political landscape exclude?

question: How many components doesn't the Belgian political landscape include?

question: What are the three components in the Belgian political landscape?

question: What component isn't the Brussel Region?

question: What happens without the Brussels special position?
context: On one hand, this means that the Belgian political landscape, generally speaking, consists of only two components: the Dutch-speaking population represented by Dutch-language political parties, and the majority populations of Wallonia and Brussels, represented by their French-speaking parties. The Brussels region emerges as a third component. This specific dual form of federalism, with the special position of Brussels, consequently has a number of political issues—even minor ones—that are being fought out over the Dutch/French-language political division. With such issues, a final decision is possible only in the form of a compromise. This tendency gives this dual federalism model a number of traits that generally are ascribed to confederalism, and makes the future of Belgian federalism contentious.

qas: question: The US Constitution says what to amendments? 
answers: text: provides that no state may be deprived of equal representation in the senate without its consent

question: What happens when certain constitutional amendments cannot occur?
answers: text: cannot occur without the unanimous consent of all states or of a particular state

question: Any amendment in the Canadian constitution that needs to be modified, needs to do what first?
answers: text: would require unanimous consent of the provinces.

question: What is the German basic law?
answers: text: provides that no amendment is admissible at all that would abolish the federal system.

question: The UN Constitution says what to amendments? 

question: The US Constitution doesn't say what to amendments? 

question: Any amendment in the Canadian constitution that needs to be modified, needs to do what last?

question: What happens when certain constitutional amendments can occur?

question: What is the German advanced law?
context: Some federal constitutions also provide that certain constitutional amendments cannot occur without the unanimous consent of all states or of a particular state. The US constitution provides that no state may be deprived of equal representation in the senate without its consent. In Australia, if a proposed amendment will specifically impact one or more states, then it must be endorsed in the referendum held in each of those states. Any amendment to the Canadian constitution that would modify the role of the monarchy would require unanimous consent of the provinces. The German Basic Law provides that no amendment is admissible at all that would abolish the federal system.

qas: question: What does every component state of federation possess?
answers: text: the same powers

question: Asymmetric federalism exist when?
answers: text: where states are granted different powers, or some possess greater autonomy than others do

question: What cities in Spain are in the historic movement?
answers: text: Basques and Catalans, as well as the Galicians

question: Is Spain apart of federalism?
answers: text: Spain is not a federalism, but a decentralized administrative organization of the state.

question: What does no components state of federation possess?

question: What does every component state of federation not possess?

question: Symmetric federalism exist when?

question: Why is Spain a part of federalism?
context: Where every component state of a federation possesses the same powers, we are said to find 'symmetric federalism'. Asymmetric federalism exists where states are granted different powers, or some possess greater autonomy than others do. This is often done in recognition of the existence of a distinct culture in a particular region or regions. In Spain, the Basques and Catalans, as well as the Galicians, spearheaded a historic movement to have their national specificity recognized, crystallizing in the "historical communities" such as Navarre, Galicia, Catalonia, and the Basque Country. They have more powers than the later expanded arrangement for other Spanish regions, or the Spain of the autonomous communities (called also the "coffee for everyone" arrangement), partly to deal with their separate identity and to appease peripheral nationalist leanings, partly out of respect to specific rights they had held earlier in history. However, strictly speaking Spain is not a federalism, but a decentralized administrative organization of the state.

qas: question: What does federations have for amendments of the constitution? 
answers: text: special procedures

question: What may guarantee the self-governing status of the competent states?
answers: text: federal structure

question: What needs to be done in order to amend the Australia and Switzerland Constitution?
answers: text: required that a proposal be endorsed not just by an overall majority of the electorate in the nation as a whole

question: What doesn't federations have for amendments of the constitution?

question: What does federations have for amendments of the conservation?

question: What may guarantee the self-governing status of the incompetent states?

question: What will not guarantee the self-governing status of the competent states?

question: What doesn't need to be done in order to amend the Australia and Switzerland Constitution?
context: Federations often have special procedures for amendment of the federal constitution. As well as reflecting the federal structure of the state this may guarantee that the self-governing status of the component states cannot be abolished without their consent. An amendment to the constitution of the United States must be ratified by three-quarters of either the state legislatures, or of constitutional conventions specially elected in each of the states, before it can come into effect. In referendums to amend the constitutions of Australia and Switzerland it is required that a proposal be endorsed not just by an overall majority of the electorate in the nation as a whole, but also by separate majorities in each of a majority of the states or cantons. In Australia, this latter requirement is known as a double majority.

qas: question: What does the structures of the federal government incorporate?
answers: text: mechanisms to protect the rights of component states

question: What is one method to protect the rights of the component states?
answers: text: intrastate federalism

question: What is intrastate federalism?
answers: text: is to directly represent the governments of component states in federal political institutions

question: What is a bicameral legislature?
answers: text: the upper house is often used to represent the component states while the lower house represents the people of the nation as a whole

question: What does the structures of the federal government ignore?

question: What does the structures of the local government incorporate?

question: What is one method to strike the rights of the component states?

question: What isn't intrastate federalism?

question: What is a tricameral legislature?
context: The structures of most federal governments incorporate mechanisms to protect the rights of component states. One method, known as 'intrastate federalism', is to directly represent the governments of component states in federal political institutions. Where a federation has a bicameral legislature the upper house is often used to represent the component states while the lower house represents the people of the nation as a whole. A federal upper house may be based on a special scheme of apportionment, as is the case in the senates of the United States and Australia, where each state is represented by an equal number of senators irrespective of the size of its population.

qas: question: What does federations often employ?
answers: text: union of states

question: What is federalist paper no. 39?
answers: text: that the US Constitution "is in strictness neither a national nor a federal constitution; but a composition of both

question: What is the foundation for federalist paper no. 39?
answers: text: it is federal, not national; in the sources from which the ordinary powers of the Government are drawn, it is partly federal, and partly national..

question: What is the 10th Amendment in the United States?
answers: text: which reserves all powers and rights that are not delegated to the Federal Government as left to the States and to the people.

question: What does federations never employ?

question: What does federalist paper no. 93 contain?

question: What doesn't federalist paper no. 93 contain?

question: What is the foundation for federalist paper no. 93?

question: What is the 10th Amendment in the United Nations?
context: Federations often employ the paradox of being a union of states, while still being states (or having aspects of statehood) in themselves. For example, James Madison (author of the US Constitution) wrote in Federalist Paper No. 39 that the US Constitution "is in strictness neither a national nor a federal constitution; but a composition of both. In its foundation, it is federal, not national; in the sources from which the ordinary powers of the Government are drawn, it is partly federal, and partly national..." This stems from the fact that states in the US maintain all sovereignty that they do not yield to the federation by their own consent. This was reaffirmed by the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reserves all powers and rights that are not delegated to the Federal Government as left to the States and to the people.

qas: question: When is a federation formed?
answers: text: two levels

question: What two levels equal a federation?
answers: text: the central government and the regions

question: Why is Brazil an exception?
answers: text: because the 1988 Constitution included the municipalities as autonomous political entities making the federation tripartite

question: What is each state divided into?
answers: text: municipalities

question: What does each state have their own of?
answers: text: with their own legislative council (câmara de vereadores) and a mayor (prefeito

question: When is a federation dissolved?

question: What two levels don't equal a federation?

question: Why is Brazil not an exception?

question: What is each city divided into?

question: What doesn't each state have their own of?
context: Usually, a federation is formed at two levels: the central government and the regions (states, provinces, territories), and little to nothing is said about second or third level administrative political entities. Brazil is an exception, because the 1988 Constitution included the municipalities as autonomous political entities making the federation tripartite, encompassing the Union, the States, and the municipalities. Each state is divided into municipalities (municípios) with their own legislative council (câmara de vereadores) and a mayor (prefeito), which are partly autonomous from both Federal and State Government. Each municipality has a "little constitution", called "organic law" (lei orgânica). Mexico is an intermediate case, in that municipalities are granted full-autonomy by the federal constitution and their existence as autonomous entities (municipio libre, "free municipality") is established by the federal government and cannot be revoked by the states' constitutions. Moreover, the federal constitution determines which powers and competencies belong exclusively to the municipalities and not to the constituent states. However, municipalities do not have an elected legislative assembly.

qas: question: China is the largest what?
answers: text: China is the largest unitary state in the world by both population and land area

question: What are Chinese nationalist suspicious of?
answers: text: decentralization

question: Why is China's government similar to unity structure?
answers: text: Chinese government is far too unwieldy to effectively and equitably manage the country's affairs

question: How long has China been with centralized power?
answers: text: centuries

question: China is the smallest what?

question: What are Chinese nationalist in favor of?

question: What are Chinese socialists suspicious of?

question: Why is China's government not similar to unity structure?

question: How long has China been without centralized power?
context: China is the largest unitary state in the world by both population and land area. Although China has had long periods of central rule for centuries, it is often argued that the unitary structure of the Chinese government is far too unwieldy to effectively and equitably manage the country's affairs. On the other hand, Chinese nationalists are suspicious of decentralization as a form of secessionism and a backdoor for national disunity; still others argue that the degree of autonomy given to provincial-level officials in the People's Republic of China amounts to a de facto federalism.

qas: question: What type of state is the Philippines?
answers: text: unitary state

question: What types of powers does the Philippines have?
answers: text: some powers devolved to Local Government Units (LGUs) under the terms of the Local Government Code

question: What type of modifications been added to the Philippines Constitution? 
answers: text: possible transition to a federal system as part of a shift to a parliamentary system.

question: What did President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo establish?
answers: text: the Consultative Commission

question: What type of state isn't the Philippines?

question: What types of powers does the Philippines give up?

question: What type of modifications have been removed from the Philippines Constitution? 

question: What type of songs have been added to the Philippines Constitution? 

question: What did President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo desolve?
context: The Philippines is a unitary state with some powers devolved to Local Government Units (LGUs) under the terms of the Local Government Code. There is also one autonomous region, the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao. Over the years various modifications have been proposed to the Constitution of the Philippines, including possible transition to a federal system as part of a shift to a parliamentary system. In 2004, Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo established the Consultative Commission which suggested such a Charter Change but no action was taken by the Philippine Congress to amend the 1987 Constitution.

qas: question: What type of state is Spain?
answers: text: unitary state

question: What type of federalism system does Spain have?
answers: text: unitary state with a high level of decentralisation, often regarded as a federal system in all but name or a "federation without federalism"

question: What type of government does Spain have?
answers: text: central government

question: What does Spain's government accounts for?
answers: text: 8% of public spending, 38% for the regional governments, 13% for the local councils, and the remaining 31% for the social security system

question: What type of state isn't Spain?

question: What type of federalism system does Spain reject?

question: What type of communism system does Spain have?

question: What type of government doesn't Spain have?

question: What does Spain's government not account for?
context: Spain is a unitary state with a high level of decentralisation, often regarded as a federal system in all but name or a "federation without federalism". The country has been quoted as being "an extraordinarily decentralized country", with the central government accounting for just 18% of public spending, 38% for the regional governments, 13% for the local councils, and the remaining 31% for the social security system. The current Spanish constitution has been implemented in such a way that, in many respects, Spain can be compared to countries which are undeniably federal.

qas: question: How has United Kingdom been governed?
answers: text: unitary state

question: Instead of the UK adopting the federalist model, what did they do?
answers: text: UK has relied on gradual devolution to decentralise political power

question: When did devolution in the UK begin?
answers: text: 1914

question: What is Ireland Act 1914?
answers: text: which granted home rule to Ireland as a constituent country of the former United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

question: What is Irish Free State?
answers: text: eventually evolved into the modern day Republic of Ireland

question: How has United Kingdom not been governed?

question: Instead of the UK adopting the federalist model, what didn't they do?

question: When did revolution in the UK begin?

question: What isn't Ireland Act 1914?

question: What is Irish Cost State?
context: The United Kingdom has traditionally been governed as a unitary state by the Westminster Parliament in London. Instead of adopting a federal model, the UK has relied on gradual devolution to decentralise political power. Devolution in the UK began with the Government of Ireland Act 1914 which granted home rule to Ireland as a constituent country of the former United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Following the partition of Ireland in 1921 which saw the creation of the sovereign Irish Free State (which eventually evolved into the modern day Republic of Ireland), Northern Ireland retained its devolved government through the Parliament of Northern Ireland, the only part of the UK to have such a body at this time. This body was suspended in 1972 and Northern Ireland was governed by direct rule during the period of conflict known as The Troubles.

qas: question: What has the process of devolution in the UK did?
answers: text: decentralised power once again

question: What happened since 1997?
answers: text: referendums in Scotland and Wales and the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland

question: Does England have its own Parliament?
answers: text: England does not have its own parliament and English affairs continue to be decided by the Westminster Parliament

question: What does the region of England continue to use?
answers: text: certain governmental administrative functions

question: What has the process of revolution in the UK did?

question: What has the process of devolution in the US did?

question: What happened since 1979?

question: Why does England have its own Parliament?

question: What doesn't the region of England continue to use?
context: In modern times, a process of devolution in the United Kingdom has decentralised power once again. Since the 1997 referendums in Scotland and Wales and the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland, three of the four constituent countries of the UK now have some level of autonomy. Government has been devolved to the Scottish Parliament, the National Assembly for Wales and the Northern Ireland Assembly. England does not have its own parliament and English affairs continue to be decided by the Westminster Parliament. In 1998 a set of eight unelected Regional assemblies, or chambers, was created to support the English Regional Development Agencies, but these were abolished between 2008 and 2010. The Regions of England continue to be used in certain governmental administrative functions.

qas: question: What is ecclesiology?
answers: text: the doctrine of the church

question: What happens in Presbyterian denominations?
answers: text: the local church is ruled by elected elders, some of which are ministerial.

question: In political federalism what does Presbyterian ecclesiology do?
answers: text: shared sovereignty

question: What does each greater level of assembly have?
answers: text: authority over its constituent members

question: What isn't ecclesiology?

question: What doesn't happen in Presbyterian denominations?

question: In political federalism what does Presbyterian ecclesiology not do?

question: In political communism what does Presbyterian ecclesiology do?

question: What does each lesser level of assembly have?
context: Federalism also finds expression in ecclesiology (the doctrine of the church). For example, presbyterian church governance resembles parliamentary republicanism (a form of political federalism) to a large extent. In Presbyterian denominations, the local church is ruled by elected elders, some of which are ministerial. Each church then sends representatives or commissioners to presbyteries and further to a general assembly. Each greater level of assembly has ruling authority over its constituent members. In this governmental structure, each component has some level of sovereignty over itself. As in political federalism, in presbyterian ecclesiology there is shared sovereignty.

qas: question: When was the earliest source of political federalism according to Christians?
answers: text: is the ecclesiastical federalism found in the Bible.

question: What was the structure that the early Christian church described?
answers: text: in the New Testament

question: What happens in the council of Jerusalem?
answers: text: the Apostles and elders gathered together to govern the Church

question: Where can the elements of federalism can be found?
answers: text: can be found in almost every Christian denomination, some more than others.

question: When was the latest source of political federalism according to Christians?

question: When was the earliest source of political federalism according to Muslims?

question: Where was the structure that the late Christian church described?

question: What never happens in the council of Jerusalem?

question: Where can't the elements of federalism can be found?
context: Some Christians argue that the earliest source of political federalism (or federalism in human institutions; in contrast to theological federalism) is the ecclesiastical federalism found in the Bible. They point to the structure of the early Christian Church as described (and prescribed, as believed by many) in the New Testament. In their arguments, this is particularly demonstrated in the Council of Jerusalem, described in Acts chapter 15, where the Apostles and elders gathered together to govern the Church; the Apostles being representatives of the universal Church, and elders being such for the local church. To this day, elements of federalism can be found in almost every Christian denomination, some more than others.

qas: question: In nearly all federalism countries, central powers enjoy what?
answers: text: the powers of foreign policy and national defense as exclusive federal powers

question: Per the UN definition, what is federalism?
answers: text: federation would not be a single sovereign state

question: What is the German Empire?
answers: text: Germany retain the right to act on their own behalf at an international level,

question: What is the libson treaty?
answers: text: powers which are not either exclusively of European competence or shared between EU and state as concurrent powers are retained by the constituent states.

question: In nearly all federalism countries, decentralized powers enjoy what?

question: In nearly no federalism countries, central powers enjoy what?

question: Per the US definition, what is federalism?

question: What isn't the German Empire?

question: What isn't the Libson treaty?
context: In almost all federations the central government enjoys the powers of foreign policy and national defense as exclusive federal powers. Were this not the case a federation would not be a single sovereign state, per the UN definition. Notably, the states of Germany retain the right to act on their own behalf at an international level, a condition originally granted in exchange for the Kingdom of Bavaria's agreement to join the German Empire in 1871. Beyond this the precise division of power varies from one nation to another. The constitutions of Germany and the United States provide that all powers not specifically granted to the federal government are retained by the states. The Constitution of some countries like Canada and India, on the other hand, state that powers not explicitly granted to the provincial governments are retained by the federal government. Much like the US system, the Australian Constitution allocates to the Federal government (the Commonwealth of Australia) the power to make laws about certain specified matters which were considered too difficult for the States to manage, so that the States retain all other areas of responsibility. Under the division of powers of the European Union in the Lisbon Treaty, powers which are not either exclusively of European competence or shared between EU and state as concurrent powers are retained by the constituent states.