Kievan_Rus%27

qas: question: What year was Kievan Rus became a territory?
answers: text: 882

question: Who was the ruler at the begining of Kievan?
answers: text: Prince Oleg

question: Who achieve the first major expansion of Kievan?
answers: text: Kiev. Sviatoslav I

question: Which ruler introduced Christianity in Kievan Rus?
answers: text: Vladimir the Great

question: What did Yaroslav sons achieve  during his time in Keivan Rus?
answers: text: issued its first written legal code

question: What years did Prince Oleg reign?

question: Which way did Prince Oleg extend his rule?

question: Who achieved the first minor expansion of Kievan?

question: Which ruler introduced Islam in Kievan Rus?

question: What did Yaroslav daughters achieve during his time Keivan Rus?
context: Kievan Rus' begins with the rule (882–912) of Prince Oleg, who extended his control from Novgorod south along the Dnieper river valley in order to protect trade from Khazar incursions from the east and moved his capital to the more strategic Kiev. Sviatoslav I (died 972) achieved the first major expansion of Kievan Rus' territorial control, fighting a war of conquest against the Khazar Empire. Vladimir the Great (980–1015) introduced Christianity with his own baptism and, by decree, that of all the inhabitants of Kiev and beyond. Kievan Rus' reached its greatest extent under Yaroslav I (1019–1054); his sons assembled and issued its first written legal code, the Rus' Justice, shortly after his death.

qas: question: When was the term Kievan Rus first coined?
answers: text: 19th century

question: When did the term Kievan Rus first appear in English?
answers: text: 1913

question: Who first translated the term Kievan Rus into english from russian?
answers: text: Vasily Klyuchevsky

question: What was invented in the 19th century?

question: When did the term Kievan Rus first appear in Russia?

question: Who first wrote the term Kievan Rus into english from russian?

question: What type of cities were also known as Rus?
context: The term "Kievan Rus'" (Ки́евская Русь Kievskaya Rus’) was coined in the 19th century in Russian historiography to refer to the period when the centre was in Kiev. In English, the term was introduced in the early 20th century, when it was found in the 1913 English translation of Vasily Klyuchevsky's A History of Russia, to distinguish the early polity from successor states, which were also named Rus. Later, the Russian term was rendered into Belarusian and Ukrainian as Кіеўская Русь Kijeŭskaja Rus’ and Ки́ївська Русь Kyivs'ka Rus’, respectively.

qas: question: Who populated the area between the Baltic Sea and the Black sea before Kievan Rus?
answers: text: Slavic tribes

question: Where were the Limen Slavs located before Kievan Rus?
answers: text: Novgorod

question: Where was the Finnic Chud Tripe located curing this time period?
answers: text: Ladoga and Karelia regions

question: Which tribe resided in the south?
answers: text: Poliane

question: Which lands were primarily populated by western Slavic tribes?

question: Where were the Limen Slavs located after Kievan Rus?

question: Who occupied the headwaters of the East Dvina?

question: Which tribe resided in the northwest?

question: Which tribe resided in the southeast?
context: Prior to the emergence of Kievan Rus' in the 9th century AD, the lands between the Baltic Sea and Black Sea were primarily populated by eastern Slavic tribes. In the northern region around Novgorod were the Ilmen Slavs and neighboring Krivichi, who occupied territories surrounding the headwaters of the West Dvina, Dnieper, and Volga Rivers. To their north, in the Ladoga and Karelia regions, were the Finnic Chud tribe. In the south, in the area around Kiev, were the Poliane, a group of Slavicized tribes with Iranian origins, the Drevliane to the west of the Dnieper, and the Severiane to the east. To their north and east were the Vyatichi, and to their south was forested land settled by Slav farmers, giving way to steppelands populated by nomadic herdsmen.

qas: question: What controversy currently surrounds the Rus?
answers: text: whether the Rus’ were Varangians (Vikings) or Slavs

question: What were the "Rus" accourding to the "Normanist"?
answers: text: Scandinavians

question: What did the Russians beleive the Rus were?
answers: text: Slavs

question: Which controversy surrounded the Rus in the past?

question: What certainty was largely to contemporary sources/

question: What did the Russian believe the Rus were not?

question: What account was written in the 1200's?

question: Who formed a majority of the elite ruling class?
context: Controversy persists over whether the Rus’ were Varangians (Vikings) or Slavs. This uncertainty is due largely to a paucity of contemporary sources. Attempts to address this question instead rely on archaeological evidence, the accounts of foreign observers, legends and literature from centuries later. To some extent the controversy is related to the foundation myths of modern states in the region. According to the "Normanist" view, the Rus' were Scandinavians, while Russian and Ukrainian nationalist historians generally argue that the Rus' were themselves Slavs. Normanist theories focus on the earliest written source for the East Slavs, the Russian Primary Chronicle, although even this account was not produced until the 12th century. Nationalist accounts have suggested that the Rus' were present before the arrival of the Varangians, noting that only a handful of Scandinavian words can be found in modern Russian and that Scandinavian names in the early chronicles were soon replaced by Slavic names. Nevertheless, archaeological evidence from the area suggests that a Scandinavian population was present during the 10th century at the latest. On balance, it seems likely that the Rus' proper were a small minority of Scandinavians who formed an elite ruling class, while the great majority of their subjects were Slavs. Considering the linguistic arguments mounted by nationalist scholars, if the proto-Rus' were Scandinavians, they must have quickly become nativized, adopting Slavic languages and other cultural practices.

qas: question: Which early traveler provided an early description of the Rus?
answers: text: Ahmad ibn Fadlan

question: What did Ahmad say about the Rus when he described clothing?
answers: text: garments that only cover half of his body

question: Which historian refered to the Rus as "Scythians"?
answers: text: Leo the Deacon

question: Which late traveler provided a description of the Rus?

question: What covered the majority of the Rus's body?

question: Which scientist is refered to the Rus as "Scythians'?

question: What Arab historian refered to the Rus as "Scythians'?

question: What did the Rus adopt that was Roman?
context: Ahmad ibn Fadlan, an Arab traveler during the 10th century, provided one of the earliest written descriptions of the Rus': "They are as tall as a date palm, blond and ruddy, so that they do not need to wear a tunic nor a cloak; rather the men among them wear garments that only cover half of his body and leaves one of his hands free." Liutprand of Cremona, who was twice an envoy to the Byzantine court (949 and 968), identifies the "Russi" with the Norse ("the Russi, whom we call Norsemen by another name") but explains the name as a Greek term referring to their physical traits ("A certain people made up of a part of the Norse, whom the Greeks call [...] the Russi on account of their physical features, we designate as Norsemen because of the location of their origin."). Leo the Deacon, a 10th-century Byzantine historian and chronicler, refers to the Rus' as "Scythians" and notes that they tended to adopt Greek rituals and customs.

qas: question: Which two groups were divided inn the territories of the East Slavs?
answers: text: Varangians and the Khazars

question: In what year did the Varangians impose tribute from the Slavic and Finnic?
answers: text: 859

question: In what year did the Slavic and Finnic tribes rebel againts the Varangians?
answers: text: 862

question: Which two groups were divided between the territories of the West Slavs?

question: What was written in the 9th century?

question: What year did the Slavic and Finnic tribes join the Varagians?

question: Who did the Finnic and Slavic tribes offer tribute to in 862?

question: What year did the Varangians begin to rule the innic and Slavic tribes?
context: According to the Primary Chronicle, the territories of the East Slavs in the 9th century were divided between the Varangians and the Khazars. The Varangians are first mentioned imposing tribute from Slavic and Finnic tribes in 859. In 862, the Finnic and Slavic tribes in the area of Novgorod rebelled against the Varangians, driving them "back beyond the sea and, refusing them further tribute, set out to govern themselves." The tribes had no laws, however, and soon began to make war with one another, prompting them to invite the Varangians back to rule them and bring peace to the region:

qas: question: What were the names of the three brothers that rulled Novgotod, Beloozero, and Izborsk?
answers: text: Rurik, Sineus, and Truvor

question: Whoch of the three brothers become the sole ruller over all three of the teritories?
answers: text: Rurik

question: What was the name of the small city on the hill that was discovered by Rurik's men?
answers: text: Kiev

question: What were the names of the three sisters that ruled Novgorod, Beloozero, and Izborsk?

question: Which of the three sisters became the sole ruler over all three of the territories?

question: Which two sisters died?

question: What was the name of the large city on the hill that was discovered by Rurik's men?

question: What two women asked for permission to go to Tsargrad?
context: The three brothers—Rurik, Sineus, and Truvor—established themselves in Novgorod, Beloozero, and Izborsk, respectively. Two of the brothers died, and Rurik became the sole ruler of the territory and progenitor of the Rurik Dynasty. A short time later, two of Rurik’s men, Askold and Dir, asked him for permission to go to Tsargrad (Constantinople). On their way south, they discovered "a small city on a hill," Kiev, captured it and the surrounding country from the Khazars, populated the region with more Varangians, and "established their dominion over the country of the Polyanians."

qas: question: Between what years did Askold and Dir continued to attack Kiev?
answers: text: 863–66

question: What did the attack between Rus and Byzantines lead to?
answers: text: Patriarch to send missionaries north to engage

question: Wat was the purpose of the Patriarch when they were sent north?
answers: text: to convert the Rus' and the Slavs.

question: What was written in 863?

question: What years did Askold and Dir make peace with Kiev?

question: What was was the purpose of the Patriarch when they were sent south?

question: What did type of devastation did Patriarch Photius write about the suburbs?

question: Who immediately attacked the city?
context: The Chronicle reports that Askold and Dir continued to Constantinople with a navy to attack the city in 863–66, catching the Byzantines by surprise and ravaging the surrounding area, though other accounts date the attack in 860. Patriarch Photius vividly describes the "universal" devastation of the suburbs and nearby islands, and another account further details the destruction and slaughter of the invasion. The Rus' turned back before attacking the city itself, due either to a storm dispersing their boats, the return of the Emperor, or in a later account, due to a miracle after a ceremonial appeal by the Patriarch and the Emperor to the Virgin. The attack was the first encounter between the Rus' and Byzantines and led the Patriarch to send missionaries north to engage and attempt to convert the Rus' and the Slavs.

qas: question: When did Ruik past away?
answers: text: 879

question: When Rurik past away, who took over?
answers: text: Prince Oleg

question: Who declared Kiev "The mother of Rus citis'?
answers: text: Prince Oleg

question: What year did Oleg conquer the Drevlians?
answers: text: 883

question: Who died in the 800's?

question: Who killed Rrik and claimed his kingdom?

question: Who wrote that Kiev was "The mother of Rus cities"?

question: Who did Oleg conquer in the 800's?

question: Who peaceably asked the Drevlians for a fur tribute?
context: Rurik led the Rus' until his death in about 879, bequeathing his kingdom to his kinsman, Prince Oleg, as regent for his young son, Igor. In 880-82, Oleg led a military force south along the Dnieper river, capturing Smolensk and Lyubech before reaching Kiev, where he deposed and killed Askold and Dir, proclaimed himself prince, and declared Kiev the "mother of Rus' cities." Oleg set about consolidating his power over the surrounding region and the riverways north to Novgorod, imposing tribute on the East Slav tribes. In 883, he conquered the Drevlians, imposing a fur tribute on them. By 885 he had subjugated the Poliane, Severiane, Vyatichi, and Radimichs, forbidding them to pay further tribute to the Khazars. Oleg continued to develop and expand a network of Rus' forts in Slav lands, begun by Rurik in the north.

qas: question: Why did the Kievan state prosper?
answers: text: abundant supply of furs, beeswax, honey, and slaves for export

question: How many trade routes did the Kievan state control?
answers: text: three

question: Which route was a central post in Kiev?
answers: text: Dnieper route

question: What other means of pay when purchasing items may have been in place?
answers: text: money-lending system

question: What made the Kievan state deteriorate?

question: How many minor trade routes did the Kievan state control?

question: What was moved north on a network of rivers and short portages along the Dnieper?

question: What was the hub in the north-south overland trade route?
context: The new Kievan state prospered due to its abundant supply of furs, beeswax, honey, and slaves for export, and because it controlled three main trade routes of Eastern Europe. In the north, Novgorod served as a commercial link between the Baltic Sea and the Volga trade route to the lands of the Volga Bulgars, the Khazars, and across the Caspian Sea as far as Baghdad, providing access to markets and products from Central Asia and the Middle East. Trade from the Baltic also moved south on a network of rivers and short portages along the Dnieper known as the "route from the Varangians to the Greeks," continuing to the Black Sea and on to Constantinople. Kiev was a central outpost along the Dnieper route and a hub with the east-west overland trade route between the Khazars and the Germanic lands of Central Europe. These commercial connections enriched Rus' merchants and princes, funding military forces and the construction of churches, palaces, fortifications, and further towns. Demand for luxury goods fostered production of expensive jewelry and religious wares, allowing their export, and an advanced credit and money-lending system may have also been in place.

qas: question: What led to constant problems with the Khazars?
answers: text: rapid expansion of the Rus' to the south

question: Which area did the Khazars rule over?
answers: text: Black Sea steppe

question: Who were allies with the Khazars?
answers: text: Byzantine Empire

question: Who were common enimies to both the Khazars and Byzantine Empire?
answers: text: Persians and Arabs

question: What led to intermittent problems for the Khazars?

question: Who had rapid expand to the north?

question: Which area did the Khazars relinquish?

question: Who ruled the Black Sea steppe during the 800's?

question: Who were the common allies to both the Khazarsand the Byzantine Empire?
context: The rapid expansion of the Rus' to the south led to conflict and volatile relationships with the Khazars and other neighbors on the Pontic steppe. The Khazars dominated the Black Sea steppe during the 8th century, trading and frequently allying with the Byzantine Empire against Persians and Arabs. In the late 8th century, the collapse of the Göktürk Khaganate led the Magyars and the Pechenegs, Ugric and Turkic peoples from Central Asia, to migrate west into the steppe region, leading to military conflict, disruption of trade, and instability within the Khazar Khaganate. The Rus' and Slavs had earlier allied with the Khazars against Arab raids on the Caucasus, but they increasingly worked against them to secure control of the trade routes.

qas: question: What did the Byzantine empire use to expand its political influence?
answers: text: turmoil

question: What teritory did the Byzantine empire hit first with their political beliefs? 
answers: text: Khazars

question: What did the Byzantines help the Khazars with?
answers: text: build a fortress at Sarkel

question: What was established in the 800's?

question: What was written in 830?

question: What was being protected in the 800's?

question: What did the Byzantines refuse to help the Khazars with?

question: What served as a minor diplomatic link with the Khazars and others?
context: The Byzantine Empire was able to take advantage of the turmoil to expand its political influence and commercial relationships, first with the Khazars and later with the Rus' and other steppe groups. The Byzantines established the Theme of Cherson, formally known as Klimata, in the Crimea in the 830s to defend against raids by the Rus' and to protect vital grain shipments supplying Constantinople. Cherson also served as a key diplomatic link with the Khazars and others on the steppe, and it became the centre of Black Sea commerce. The Byzantines also helped the Khazars build a fortress at Sarkel on the Don river to protect their northwest frontier against incursions by the Turkic migrants and the Rus', and to control caravan trade routes and the portage between the Don and Volga rivers.

qas: question: What led to Khazar having to put more strain on its military?
answers: text: expansion of the Rus

question: Who led the war on Dniester and Dnieper?
answers: text: Oleg

question: What year were the Magyars and Pechenges drug into the war?
answers: text: 894

question: What year did the Rus raid Baku, Gilan,Mazandaran, and Caucasus?
answers: text: 913

question: What led to Khazar having to put less strain on its military?

question: Who waged a decisive war in 890?

question: Who had a peaceful alliance with the Byzantines and Bulgarian Empires?

question: Who arranged for Magyars to attack Bulgarian territory to the south?

question: Who was forced to migrate further east?
context: The expansion of the Rus' put further military and economic pressure on the Khazars, depriving them of territory, tributaries, and trade. In around 890, Oleg waged an indecisive war in the lands of the lower Dniester and Dnieper rivers with the Tivertsi and the Ulichs, who were likely acting as vassals of the Magyars, blocking Rus' access to the Black Sea. In 894, the Magyars and Pechenegs were drawn into the wars between the Byzantines and the Bulgarian Empire. The Byzantines arranged for the Magyars to attack Bulgarian territory from the north, and Bulgaria in turn persuaded the Pechenegs to attack the Magyars from their rear. Boxed in, the Magyars were forced to migrate further west across the Carpathian Mountains into the Hungarian plain, depriving the Khazars of an important ally and a buffer from the Rus'. The migration of the Magyars allowed Rus' access to the Black Sea, and they soon launched excursions into Khazar territory along the sea coast, up the Don river, and into the lower Volga region. The Rus' were raiding and plundering into the Caspian Sea region from 864, with the first large-scale expedition in 913, when they extensively raided Baku, Gilan, Mazandaran and penetrated into the Caucasus.

qas: question: Around what time did the Khazars unable to no longer command tribute from Volga?
answers: text: 10th century

question: Who did the Byzantium ally with against the Khazar's?
answers: text: Pechenegs

question: What did the Pechenges trade with the Rus?
answers: text: livestock

question: Who was able to command tribute in the 10th century?

question: Whose relationship with Khazars improved?

question: What was written in 915?

question: What did the Pechenges refuse to trade with the Rus?

question: Who was making peace with the Rus in 920?
context: As the 10th century progressed, the Khazars were no longer able to command tribute from the Volga Bulgars, and their relationship with the Byzantines deteriorated, as Byzantium increasingly allied with the Pechenegs against them. The Pechenegs were thus secure to raid the lands of the Khazars from their base between the Volga and Don rivers, allowing them to expand to the west. Rus' relations with the Pechenegs were complex, as the groups alternately formed alliances with and against one another. The Pechenegs were nomads roaming the steppe raising livestock which they traded with the Rus' for agricultural goods and other products. The lucrative Rus' trade with the Byzantine Empire had to pass through Pecheneg-controlled territory, so the need for generally peaceful relations was essential. Nevertheless, while the Primary Chronicle reports the Pechenegs entering Rus' territory in 915 and then making peace, they were waging war with one another again in 920. Pechenegs are reported assisting the Rus' in later campaigns against the Byzantines, yet allied with the Byzantines against the Rus' at other times.

qas: question: In what year did the Rus attack Constantinople?
answers: text: 860

question: What had Prince Rastislav requested?
answers: text: provide teachers

question: What did Cyril and Mehodius come up with to help with the issue of the Slaves not having a written language?
answers: text: devised the Glagolitic alphabet

question: In what year did the Rus accept a bishop?
answers: text: 867

question: Who sent missionaries south?

question: Who had a written language?

question: Who wrote the Glagolitic alphabet in 863?

question: What year was the Byzantine cultural influence spread?

question: What year did Rus accept a pope?
context: After the Rus' attack on Constantinople in 860, the Byzantine Patriarch Photius sent missionaries north to convert the Rus' and the Slavs. Prince Rastislav of Moravia had requested the Emperor to provide teachers to interpret the holy scriptures, so in 863 the brothers Cyril and Methodius were sent as missionaries, due to their knowledge of the Slavonic language. The Slavs had no written language, so the brothers devised the Glagolitic alphabet, later developed into Cyrillic, and standardized the language of the Slavs, later known as Old Church Slavonic. They translated portions of the Bible and drafted the first Slavic civil code and other documents, and the language and texts spread throughout Slavic territories, including Kievan Rus’. The mission of Cyril and Methodius served both evangelical and diplomatic purposes, spreading Byzantine cultural influence in support of imperial foreign policy. In 867 the Patriarch announced that the Rus' had accepted a bishop, and in 874 he speaks of an "Archbishop of the Rus'."

qas: question: When did the relations between the Rus and Byzantines start to become more complicated?
answers: text: after Oleg took control over Kiev

question: What were the primary concerns the Rus and Byzantines had with oleg?
answers: text: commercial, cultural, and military concerns

question: When did the Rus attack the Constantinole once again?
answers: text: 907

question: What was not depended upon for the wealth and income of Rus?

question: What did Constantine Porphyrogentus write about concerning the princes of Kiev?

question: What was written about Rus in 907?

question: What years was the military prowess and shrewdness of Oleg glorified?
context: Relations between the Rus' and Byzantines became more complex after Oleg took control over Kiev, reflecting commercial, cultural, and military concerns. The wealth and income of the Rus' depended heavily upon trade with Byzantium. Constantine Porphyrogenitus described the annual course of the princes of Kiev, collecting tribute from client tribes, assembling the product into a flotilla of hundreds of boats, conducting them down the Dnieper to the Black Sea, and sailing to the estuary of the Dniester, the Danube delta, and on to Constantinople. On their return trip they would carry silk fabrics, spices, wine, and fruit. The importance of this trade relationship led to military action when disputes arose. The Primary Chronicle reports that the Rus' attacked Constantinople again in 907, probably to secure trade access. The Chronicle glorifies the military prowess and shrewdness of Oleg, an account imbued with legendary detail. Byzantine sources do not mention the attack, but a pair of treaties in 907 and 911 set forth a trade agreement with the Rus', the terms suggesting pressure on the Byzantines, who granted the Rus' quarters and supplies for their merchants and tax-free trading privileges in Constantinople.

qas: question: What known document tells of the death of Oleg?
answers: text: The Chronicle

question: What was prophesised by a sorcerer involving Oleg's death?
answers: text: certain horse

question: What does Oleg do to his horse?
answers: text: has the horse sequestered

question: WHo succeeded Oleg in 913?
answers: text: Prince Igor

question: What known document tells the birth of Oleg?

question: What year did Oleg die?

question: Who conquered and killed Oleg?

question: Who dies in the 913?
context: The Chronicle provides a mythic tale of Oleg's death. A sorcerer prophesies that the death of the Grand Prince would be associated with a certain horse. Oleg has the horse sequestered, and it later dies. Oleg goes to visit the horse and stands over the carcass, gloating that he had outlived the threat, when a snake strikes him from among the bones, and he soon becomes ill and dies. The Chronicle reports that Prince Igor succeeded Oleg in 913, and after some brief conflicts with the Drevlians and the Pechenegs, a period of peace ensued for over twenty years.

qas: question: What year did Igot led a Rus attack on Constantinople?
answers: text: 941

question: How large was the fleet that attacked the Bithynian coast along with the Pecheneg allies?
answers: text: 10,000 vessels

question: Why did the attack by the Rus go so well on the coast at the start?
answers: text: Byzantine fleet was occupied with the Arabs

question: What did the emperor of Byzatine do to some of the old retired ships to help fight the Rus?
answers: text: outfitted with Greek fire throwers

question: What year did Oleg make peace with Constantinople?

question: How many sailing ships attacked the Bithyian coast?

question: Why id the attack by the Rus go so poorly on the coast at the start?

question: How was the large group of retired ships outfitted?

question: What year was the Rus fleet defeated?
context: In 941, Igor led another major Rus' attack on Constantinople, probably over trading rights again. A navy of 10,000 vessels, including Pecheneg allies, landed on the Bithynian coast and devastated the Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus. The attack was well-timed, perhaps due to intelligence, as the Byzantine fleet was occupied with the Arabs in the Mediterranean, and the bulk of its army was stationed in the east. The Rus’ burned towns, churches, and monasteries, butchering the people and amassing booty. The emperor arranged for a small group of retired ships to be outfitted with Greek fire throwers and sent them out to meet the Rus’, luring them into surrounding the contingent before unleashing the Greek fire. Liutprand of Cremona wrote that "the Rus', seeing the flames, jumped overboard, preferring water to fire. Some sank, weighed down by the weight of their breastplates and helmets; others caught fire." Those captured were beheaded. The ploy dispelled the Rus’ fleet, but their attacks continued into the hinterland as far as Nicomedia, with many atrocities reported as victims were crucified and set up for use as targets. At last a Byzantine army arrived from the Balkans to drive the Rus' back, and a naval contingent reportedly destroyed much of the Rus' fleet on its return voyage (possibly an exaggeration since the Rus' soon mounted another attack). The outcome indicates increased military might by Byzantium since 911, suggesting a shift in the balance of power.

qas: question: Where did Igor get warriors from after returning to Kiev after being drivin out by the Byzatines?
answers: text: Slavs and Pecheneg allies

question: When did the Rus return to Byzatine seeking revenge?
answers: text: 944

question: IN what year was the peace treaty signed between the Rus,  Byzantine and the Bulgarians.
answers: text: 945

question: What was Igor not keen on?

question: Who dismantled a large force of warriors among the Slav and Pecheneg?

question: What year did the Rus force retreat again?

question: What did the Rus reject from the Emperor?

question: What year did the Rus defeat the Byzantines the the Bulgarians?
context: Igor returned to Kiev keen for revenge. He assembled a large force of warriors from among neighboring Slavs and Pecheneg allies, and sent for reinforcements of Varangians from “beyond the sea.” In 944 the Rus' force advanced again on the Greeks, by land and sea, and a Byzantine force from Cherson responded. The Emperor sent gifts and offered tribute in lieu of war, and the Rus' accepted. Envoys were sent between the Rus’, the Byzantines, and the Bulgarians in 945, and a peace treaty was completed. The agreement again focused on trade, but this time with terms less favorable to the Rus’, including stringent regulations on the conduct of Rus’ merchants in Cherson and Constantinople and specific punishments for violations of the law. The Byzantines may have been motivated to enter the treaty out of concern of a prolonged alliance of the Rus', Pechenegs, and Bulgarians against them, though the more favorable terms further suggest a shift in power.

qas: question: When did Prince Igor past away?
answers: text: 945

question: Who ruled in Prince Oleg's place following his death?
answers: text: his wife Olga

question: In what year did Sviatoslav take over as leader?
answers: text: 963

question: Where did Sviatoslav move the capital to?
answers: text: Pereyaslavets

question: When was Rus marked by rapid expansion?

question: What year did Sviatoslav's mother convert?

question: What was consolidated in functioning empire?

question: What year was Sviatoslav's empire consolidated?
context: Following the death of Grand Prince Igor in 945, his wife Olga ruled as regent in Kiev until their son Sviatoslav reached maturity (ca. 963). His decade-long reign over Rus' was marked by rapid expansion through the conquest of the Khazars of the Pontic steppe and the invasion of the Balkans. By the end of his short life, Sviatoslav carved out for himself the largest state in Europe, eventually moving his capital from Kiev to Pereyaslavets on the Danube in 969. In contrast with his mother's conversion to Christianity, Sviatoslav, like his druzhina, remained a staunch pagan. Due to his abrupt death in an ambush in 972, Sviatoslav's conquests, for the most part, were not consolidated into a functioning empire, while his failure to establish a stable succession led to a fratricidal feud among his sons, which resulted in two of his three sons being killed.

qas: question: What year did Sviatoslav pass away?
answers: text: 972

question: How long did the region of Kiev dominate the State of the Rus?
answers: text: two centuries

question: What years did Vladimir the Great reign as leader?
answers: text: 980–1015

question: When was the title of Grand Duke introduced?

question: What was not recognized after the death of Sviatoslav?

question: What year was the struggle between Vladimir the Great and Yaropolk I?

question: What region was not dominated by the state of Kievan Rus?

question: Where did the Grand King if Kiev control?
context: It is not clearly documented when the title of the Grand Duke was first introduced, but the importance of the Kiev principality was recognized after the death of Sviatoslav I in 972 and the ensuing struggle between Vladimir the Great and Yaropolk I. The region of Kiev dominated the state of Kievan Rus' for the next two centuries. The Grand Prince ("velikiy kniaz'") of Kiev controlled the lands around the city, and his formally subordinate relatives ruled the other cities and paid him tribute. The zenith of the state's power came during the reigns of Vladimir the Great (980–1015) and Prince Yaroslav I the Wise (1019–1054). Both rulers continued the steady expansion of Kievan Rus' that had begun under Oleg.

qas: question: What territory was Vladimar Prince of before his father died?
answers: text: Novgorod

question: In 976, where did Vladimir have to flee to?
answers: text: Scandinavia

question: When did the Christianization of Kievan begin?
answers: text: 988

question: Who did Vladimir marry that was the sister of the Byzantine emperor?
answers: text: Princess Anna

question: Where did Vladimir live in the 900s?

question: What year did Yaropolk take control of Scandinavia?

question: What year did Vladimir reconquer Novgorod?

question: Who accepted Islam because it prohibited consumption of alcohol?

question: What year did Vladimir marry Princess Anna?
context: Vladimir had been prince of Novgorod when his father Sviatoslav I died in 972. He was forced to flee to Scandinavia in 976 after his half-brother Yaropolk had murdered his other brother Oleg and taken control of Rus. In Scandinavia, with the help of his relative Earl Håkon Sigurdsson, ruler of Norway, Vladimir assembled a Viking army and reconquered Novgorod and Kiev from Yaropolk. As Prince of Kiev, Vladimir's most notable achievement was the Christianization of Kievan Rus', a process that began in 988. The Primary Chronicle states that when Vladimir had decided to accept a new faith instead of the traditional idol-worship (paganism) of the Slavs, he sent out some of his most valued advisors and warriors as emissaries to different parts of Europe. They visited the Christians of the Latin Rite, the Jews, and the Muslims before finally arriving in Constantinople. They rejected Islam because, among other things, it prohibited the consumption of alcohol, and Judaism because the god of the Jews had permitted his chosen people to be deprived of their country. They found the ceremonies in the Roman church to be dull. But at Constantinople, they were so astounded by the beauty of the cathedral of Hagia Sophia and the liturgical service held there that they made up their minds there and then about the faith they would like to follow. Upon their arrival home, they convinced Vladimir that the faith of the Byzantine Rite was the best choice of all, upon which Vladimir made a journey to Constantinople and arranged to marry Princess Anna, the sister of Byzantine emperor Basil II.

qas: question: What was considered too be Kiev's most important route for trade?
answers: text: Dnieper River

question: What language did the church write  the liturgy in?
answers: text: Cyrillic

question: What did this literature help with that was written in Cyrillic?
answers: text: facilitated the conversion to Christianity

question: Why did Vladimir chose Western Christianity?

question: What was considered the least important route for trade?

question: What language were the corpus of translations translated into?

question: What did the literature that was written in Cyrillic not help with?

question: What did the West Slavs develop?
context: Vladimir's choice of Eastern Christianity may also have reflected his close personal ties with Constantinople, which dominated the Black Sea and hence trade on Kiev's most vital commercial route, the Dnieper River. Adherence to the Eastern Church had long-range political, cultural, and religious consequences. The church had a liturgy written in Cyrillic and a corpus of translations from Greek that had been produced for the Slavic peoples. This literature facilitated the conversion to Christianity of the Eastern Slavs and introduced them to rudimentary Greek philosophy, science, and historiography without the necessity of learning Greek (there were some merchants who did business with Greeks and likely had an understanding of contemporary business Greek). In contrast, educated people in medieval Western and Central Europe learned Latin. Enjoying independence from the Roman authority and free from tenets of Latin learning, the East Slavs developed their own literature and fine arts, quite distinct from those of other Eastern Orthodox countries.[citation needed] (See Old East Slavic language and Architecture of Kievan Rus for details ). Following the Great Schism of 1054, the Rus' church maintained communion with both Rome and Constantinople for some time, but along with most of the Eastern churches it eventually split to follow the Eastern Orthodox. That being said, unlike other parts of the Greek world, Kievan Rus' did not have a strong hostility to the Western world.

qas: question: What was Yaroslav also known as?
answers: text: the Wise

question: Who was Yaroslav's father?
answers: text: Vladimir the Great

question: In what year did Yaroslav become the prince of Kiev?
answers: text: 1019

question: What was Yaroslav nor known as?

question: Who did not struggle for power with his brothers?

question: Who was the daughter of Vladimir the Great?

question: What was Yaroslav not eager to improve?

question: What year did Yaroslav's sons develop the Kiev Pechersk Lavra?
context: Yaroslav, known as "the Wise", struggled for power with his brothers. A son of Vladimir the Great, he was vice-regent of Novgorod at the time of his father's death in 1015. Subsequently, his eldest surviving brother, Svyatopolk the Accursed, killed three of his other brothers and seized power in Kiev. Yaroslav, with the active support of the Novgorodians and the help of Viking mercenaries, defeated Svyatopolk and became the grand prince of Kiev in 1019. Although he first established his rule over Kiev in 1019, he did not have uncontested rule of all of Kievan Rus' until 1036. Like Vladimir, Yaroslav was eager to improve relations with the rest of Europe, especially the Byzantine Empire. Yaroslav's granddaughter, Eupraxia the daughter of his son Vsevolod I, Prince of Kiev, was married to Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor. Yaroslav also arranged marriages for his sister and three daughters to the kings of Poland, France, Hungary and Norway. Yaroslav promulgated the first East Slavic law code, Russkaya Pravda; built Saint Sophia Cathedral in Kiev and Saint Sophia Cathedral in Novgorod; patronized local clergy and monasticism; and is said to have founded a school system. Yaroslav's sons developed the great Kiev Pechersk Lavra (monastery), which functioned in Kievan Rus' as an ecclesiastical academy.

qas: question: What was the name of the UN-conventional system that was implemented?
answers: text: rota system

question: What did the rota system do?
answers: text: power was transferred to the eldest member

question: What was often deployed when trying to gain power?
answers: text: Familicide

question: What was the name of the conventional system that was implemented?

question: What did the rota system not do?

question: What was not deployed when trying to gain power?

question: Who developed familicide?

question: Who improved relations between the Olegovichi and Monomakhs?
context: An unconventional power succession system was established (rota system) whereby power was transferred to the eldest member of the ruling dynasty rather than from father to son, i.e. in most cases to the eldest brother of the ruler, fomenting constant hatred and rivalry within the royal family.[citation needed] Familicide was frequently deployed in obtaining power and can be traced particularly during the time of the Yaroslavichi rule (sons of Yaroslav) when the established system was skipped in the establishment of Vladimir II Monomakh as the Grand Prince of Kiev,[clarification needed] in turn creating major squabbles between Olegovichi from Chernihiv, Monomakhs from Pereyaslav, Izyaslavichi from Turov/Volhynia, and Polotsk Princes.[citation needed]

qas: question: What immediately occurred after Yarsolav the Wise past away?
answers: text: conflict

question: Who was fighting for Tmutarakan following Yarsolav's death?
answers: text: Rostislav Vladimirovich

question: What country did the fleeing Grand Prince run off to?
answers: text: Poland

question: Where did the first federal council of Rus take place in 1097?
answers: text: city of Liubech

question: What did not cause a conflict of power?

question: Who did not contest the power of the Grand Prince?

question: What country did the Grand Prince avoid?

question: What year did the Grand Prince return to establish order?
context: The most prominent struggle for power was the conflict that erupted after the death of Yaroslav the Wise. The rivaling Principality of Polotsk was contesting the power of the Grand Prince by occupying Novgorod, while Rostislav Vladimirovich was fighting for the Black Sea port of Tmutarakan belonging to Chernihiv.[citation needed] Three of Yaroslav's sons that first allied together found themselves fighting each other especially after their defeat to the Cuman forces in 1068 at the Battle of the Alta River. At the same time an uprising took place in Kiev, bringing to power Vseslav of Polotsk who supported the traditional Slavic paganism.[citation needed] The ruling Grand Prince Iziaslav fled to Poland asking for support and in couple of years returned to establish the order.[citation needed] The affairs became even more complicated by the end of the 11th century driving the state into chaos and constant warfare. On the initiative of Vladimir II Monomakh in 1097 the first federal council of Kievan Rus took place near Chernihiv]in the city of Liubech with the main intention to find an understanding among the fighting sides. However even though that did not really stop the fighting, it certainly cooled things off.[citation needed]

qas: question: What played a major role in the decline of the Rus?
answers: text: decline of Constantinople

question: What terriroty did the trade from the Varangians to the Greeks route mainly go through?
answers: text: Byzantine

question: Which terrirory was the main power in this trade relatinship?
answers: text: Kiev

question: What played a minor rule in the decline of the Rus?

question: Who was not a major trading partner of Kievan Rus?

question: What territory did the trade fro Varagians to the Greeks mainly avoid?

question: What was not a major cornerstone of Kiev wealth and prosperity?

question: Who was a minor power and minor initiator?
context: The decline of Constantinople – a main trading partner of Kievan Rus' – played a significant role in the decline of the Kievan Rus'. The trade route from the Varangians to the Greeks, along which the goods were moving from the Black Sea (mainly Byzantine) through eastern Europe to the Baltic, was a cornerstone of Kiev wealth and prosperity. Kiev was the main power and initiator in this relationship, once the Byzantine Empire fell into turmoil and the supplies became erratic, profits dried out, and Kiev lost its appeal.[citation needed]

qas: question: Who was the last ruller to keep the region united?
answers: text: Mstislav the Great

question: When did Mstislav die?
answers: text: 1169

question: When did the Kievan state break up into twelve seperate principalities?
answers: text: 12th century,

question: Who was the first ruler to keep the region united?

question: What year did Mstislav the Great unit the region?

question: When did the Kievan state unit?

question: What became less fragmented?
context: The last ruler to maintain united state was Mstislav the Great. After his death in 1132 the Kievan Rus' fell into recession and a rapid decline, and Mstislav's successor Yaropolk II of Kiev instead of focussing on the external threat of the Cumans was embroiled in conflicts with the growing power of the Novgorod Republic. In 1169, as the Kievan Rus' state was full of internal conflict, Andrei Bogolyubsky of Vladimir sacked the city of Kiev. The sack of the city fundamentally changed the perception of Kiev and was evidence of the fragmentation of the Kievan Rus'. By the end of the 12th century, the Kievan state became even further fragmented and had been divided into roughly twelve different principalities.

qas: question: What helped speed up the decline of the Kievan Rus?
answers: text: The Crusades

question: In what year did the Crusade sack Constantinople?
answers: text: 1204

question: What group was attacking the the Baltic Region in 1204?
answers: text: Teutonic Knights

question: What helped restore the Kievam Rus?

question: What year did the Kievan Rus go into decline?

question: What group united the Baltic region in 1204?

question: What helped the keep the local Orthodox Christianity of Kievan Rus?
context: The Crusades brought a shift in European trade routes that accelerated the decline of Kievan Rus'. In 1204 the forces of the Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople, making the Dnieper trade route marginal. At the same time the Teutonic Knights (of the Northern Crusades) were conquering the Baltic region and threatening the Lands of Novgorod. Concurrently with it the Ruthenian Federation of Kievan Rus' started to disintegrate into smaller principalities as the Rurik dynasty grew. The local Orthodox Christianity of Kievan Rus', while struggling to establish itself in the predominantly pagan state and losing its main base in Constantinople was on the brink of extinction. Some of the main regional centres that developed later were Novgorod, Chernigov, Galich, Kiev, Ryazan, Vladimir-upon-Klyazma, Vladimir of Volyn and Polotsk.

qas: question: Why was the Republic of Novgorod doing so well while the Kievan Rus declined?
answers: text: it controlled trade routes

question: What happened to Novgorod when Kievan Rus began to decline?
answers: text: became more independent

question: In what year did Novgorod aquire its own archbishop?
answers: text: 1169

question: What prospered in the south?

question: Why was the Republic of Novogorod doing so poorly?

question: What year did Novgorod assign its own archbishop?

question: What was a sign of decreased important and political independence?

question: When was Novgorad established as a democrat form of government? 
context: In the north, the Republic of Novgorod prospered because it controlled trade routes from the River Volga to the Baltic Sea. As Kievan Rus' declined, Novgorod became more independent. A local oligarchy ruled Novgorod; major government decisions were made by a town assembly, which also elected a prince as the city's military leader. In the 12th century, Novgorod acquired its own archbishop Ilya in 1169, a sign of increased importance and political independence, while about 30 years prior to that in 1136 in Novgorod was established a republican form of government - elective monarchy. Since then Novgorod enjoyed a wide degree of autonomy although being closely associated with the Kievan Rus.

qas: question: The Slavs from Kievan would eventually settle in the North East of the region, What would this region later become?
answers: text: Grand Duchy of Moscow

question: What was the name of the oldest city in the north east?
answers: text: Rostov

question: In what year did the mongol invasion begin?
answers: text: In 1299

question: How did the Slavs form the Grand Duchy of Moscow in the southeast?

question: What is the youngest centre in the southeast?

question: What city did Prince Andrey Bogolyuskiy sack in the 12th century?

question: Who did not take the title of Grand Prince?

question: When did Vladimir-Suzdal assert itself as a minor power?
context: In the northeast, Slavs from the Kievan region colonized the territory that later would become the Grand Duchy of Moscow by subjugating and merging with the Finnic tribes already occupying the area. The city of Rostov, the oldest centre of the northeast, was supplanted first by Suzdal and then by the city of Vladimir, which become the capital of Vladimir-Suzdal'. The combined principality of Vladimir-Suzdal asserted itself as a major power in Kievan Rus' in the late 12th century. In 1169 Prince Andrey Bogolyubskiy of Vladimir-Suzdal sacked the city of Kiev and took over the title of the (Великий Князь/Velikiy Knyaz/Grand Prince or Grand Duke) to Vladimir, this way claiming the primacy in Rus'. Prince Andrey then installed his younger brother, who ruled briefly in Kiev while Andrey continued to rule his realm from Suzdal. In 1299, in the wake of the Mongol invasion, the metropolitan moved from Kiev to the city of Vladimir and Vladimir-Suzdal.

qas: question: Which neighbors did Halych develop trade relations with?
answers: text: Polish, Hungarian and Lithuanian

question: Who united the two previously separated principalities?
answers: text: Prince Roman Mstislavich

question: In what year did Mstislavich defeat the Kiev?
answers: text: 1202

question: Who became metropolitan in 1370?
answers: text: Cyprian

question: Which neighbors did Halych not develop trade relations with?

question: Who did not unit the two principalities?

question: Who did not conquer Kiev in 1202?

question: When did Prince Daniil rule?

question: What did the patriarch of the Western Orthodox Church grant?
context: To the southwest, the principality of Halych had developed trade relations with its Polish, Hungarian and Lithuanian neighbours and emerged as the local successor to Kievan Rus'. In 1199, Prince Roman Mstislavich united the two previously separate principalities. In 1202 he conquered Kiev, and assumed the title of Grand Duke of Kievan Rus', which was held by the rulers of Vladimir-Suzdal since 1169. His son, Prince Daniil (r. 1238–1264) looked for support from the West. He accepted a crown as a "Rex Rusiae" ("King of Russia") from the Roman papacy, apparently doing so without breaking with Constantinople. In 1370, the patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church in Constantinople granted the King of Poland a metropolitan for his Russian subjects. Lithuanian rulers also requested and received a metropolitan for Novagrudok shortly afterwards. Cyprian, a candidate pushed by the Lithuanian rulers, became Metropolitan of Kiev in 1375 and metropolitan of Moscow in 1382; this way the church in the Russian countries was reunited for some time. In 1439, Kiev became the seat of a separate "Metropolitan of Kiev, Galich and all Rus'" for all Greek Orthodox Christians under Polish-Lithuanian rule.

qas: question: How did the leader of Kiev gain political control?
answers: text: Due to the expansion of trade

question: From what did this new princedom emerge from?
answers: text: from a coalition of traditional patriarchic family communes

question: What type of government came from the coalition of traditional patriachic family?
answers: text: first notable form of self-government

question: What caused the decline of Kiev political power?

question: What emerged from a traditional matriarchal family communes?

question: Why did the patriarchic family communes not band together?

question: What became smaller with am emphasis on family holdings?
context: Due to the expansion of trade and its geographical proximity, Kiev became the most important trade centre and chief among the communes; therefore the leader of Kiev gained political "control" over the surrounding areas. This princedom emerged from a coalition of traditional patriarchic family communes banded together in an effort to increase the applicable workforce and expand the productivity of the land. This union developed the first major cities in the Rus' and was the first notable form of self-government. As these communes became larger, the emphasis was taken off the family holdings and placed on the territory that surrounded. This shift in ideology became known as the verv'.

qas: question: Which two groups dominated the society of Kievan Rus?
answers: text: mixture of Slavic and Scandinavian elites

question: What was severely lacking in Kievan in the 12th century?
answers: text: class institutions and autonomous towns

question: What was the group called that owed labour duty to the princes?
answers: text: tribute-paying peasants

question: Which two groups did not dominate societyof Kievan Rus?

question: Who did not receive income and land from the princes?

question: What was not lacking in Kievan in the 12th century?

question: What was the group called that did not owe labour duty to the princes?

question: What was widespread in Eastern Europe?
context: In the 11th century and the 12th century, the princes and their retinues, which were a mixture of Slavic and Scandinavian elites, dominated the society of Kievan Rus'. Leading soldiers and officials received income and land from the princes in return for their political and military services. Kievan society lacked the class institutions and autonomous towns that were typical of Western European feudalism. Nevertheless, urban merchants, artisans and labourers sometimes exercised political influence through a city assembly, the veche (council), which included all the adult males in the population. In some cases, the veche either made agreements with their rulers or expelled them and invited others to take their place. At the bottom of society was a stratum of slaves. More important was a class of tribute-paying peasants, who owed labour duty to the princes. The widespread personal serfdom characteristic of Western Europe did not exist in Kievan Rus'.

qas: question: What eventually led to the creation of the peasant/smerdy class?
answers: text: change in political structure

question: When did wages on the manors develop?
answers: text: 1031

question: What were the smerdy initially given in the Kievian law code?
answers: text: given equality

question: What lead to the eventual destruction of the peasant/smerdy class?

question: Who were the free landed people that worked by labouring for wages?

question: Who was not given equality in the Kievian law code?

question: Who was theoretically not equal to the prince?

question: Who began to slowly gain their rights and become more equal in the eyes of the law?
context: The change in political structure led to the inevitable development of the peasant class or smerdy. The smerdy were free un-landed people that found work by labouring for wages on the manors which began to develop around 1031 as the verv' began to dominate socio-political structure. The smerdy were initially given equality in the Kievian law code, they were theoretically equal to the prince, so they enjoyed as much freedom as can be expected of manual labourers. However, in the 13th century they began to slowly lose their rights and became less equal in the eyes of the law.

qas: question: Despite being much smaller than wester europe, what they known for being?
answers: text: the largest contemporary European state

question: What could you find in Novgorod that you couldn't in most other cities?
answers: text: sewage system and wood paving

question: What were some of the rights women had during this time period?
answers: text: property and inheritance rights

question: What area was sparsely populated compared to Northern Europe?

question: Despite being larger than Western Europe, what was Kievan Rus known for being?

question: What couldn't you find in Novgoroad that was available in most other cities?

question: Who did not confine punishment to fines and used capital punishment?

question: What rights were denied to women?
context: Kievan Rus', although sparsely populated compared to Western Europe, was not only the largest contemporary European state in terms of area but also culturally advanced. Literacy in Kiev, Novgorod and other large cities was high. As birch bark documents attest, they exchanged love letters and prepared cheat sheets for schools. Novgorod had a sewage system and wood paving not often found in other cities at the time. The Russkaya Pravda confined punishments to fines and generally did not use capital punishment. Certain rights were accorded to women, such as property and inheritance rights.

qas: question: To which dynasty did Yarolav's step mother belong to?
answers: text: Macedonian dynasty

question: Which three countried did Yaroslav's daughters become queens of?
answers: text: Hungary, France and Norway

question: Who did Yaroslav's sons marry?
answers: text: daughters of a Polish king and a Byzantine emperor

question: What did not play an important role in European politics?

question: Whose stepmother did not belong to a Macedonian dynasty?

question: Who was not the greatest ruler of Byzantium?

question: Which countries did Yaroslav's sons become kings of?

question: Who did Yaroslav's sons not marry?
context: Kievan Rus' also played an important genealogical role in European politics. Yaroslav the Wise, whose stepmother belonged to the Macedonian dynasty, the greatest one to rule Byzantium, married the only legitimate daughter of the king who Christianized Sweden. His daughters became queens of Hungary, France and Norway, his sons married the daughters of a Polish king and a Byzantine emperor (not to mention a niece of the Pope), while his granddaughters were a German Empress and (according to one theory) the queen of Scotland. A grandson married the only daughter of the last Anglo-Saxon king of England. Thus the Rurikids were a well-connected royal family of the time.

qas: question: How early did the relationship begin between the Pecheneg and the Rus?
answers: text: 9th century

question: What did the Pecheneg frequesntly do over the span of two centuries?
answers: text: sporadic raids into the lands of Rus

question: What year did the Pechenges attack the city of Kiev?
answers: text: 968

question: Whichgroup was known to support the Pecheneges in their military efforts?
answers: text: Byzantine Empire

question: How late did the relationship between the Pecheneg and the Rus begin?

question: What did the Pecheneg frequently not do over the span of two centuries?

question: What did not escalate in full scale wars?

question: What year did the Pecheneg war begin?

question: What year did Pechenegs make peace with the city of Kiev?
context: From the 9th century, the Pecheneg nomads began an uneasy relationship with Kievan Rus′. For over two centuries they launched sporadic raids into the lands of Rus′, which sometimes escalated into full-scale wars (such as the 920 war on the Pechenegs by Igor of Kiev reported in the Primary Chronicle), but there were also temporary military alliances (e.g. the 943 Byzantine campaign by Igor). In 968, the Pechenegs attacked and besieged the city of Kiev. Some speculation exists that the Pechenegs drove off the Tivertsi and the Ulichs to the regions of the upper Dniester river in Bukovina. The Byzantine Empire was known to support the Pechenegs in their military campaigns against the Eastern Slavic states.[citation needed]

qas: question: Although uncertian, who is considered to be the first head of Kiev?
answers: text: Michael I

question: Who was considered to be the first bishop of the Church of the Titches?
answers: text: Leontiy

question: What year was the creation of the Kiev Metropolis?

question: Who was the last bishop of the Churchof Tiches?

question: Who was the leader of the church of the Kiev Metropolis?

question: Who was confirmed to be the first metropolitan to be confirmed in the 10th century?

question: How many dioceses were there in the 10th century?
context: The exact date of creation of the Kiev Metropolis is uncertain, as well as who was the first leader of the church. Predominantly it is considered that the first head was Michael I of Kiev, however some sources also claim Leontiy who is often placed after Michael or Anastas Chersonesos, became the first bishop of the Church of the Tithes. The first metropolitan to be confirmed by historical sources is Theopemp, who was appointed by Patriarch Alexius of Constantinople in 1038. Before 1015 there were five dioceses: Kiev, Chernihiv, Bilhorod, Volodymyr, Novgorod, and soon thereafter Yuriy-upon-Ros. The Kiev Metropolitan sent his own delegation to the Council of Bari in 1098.