-- Mathlib/Control/Traversable/Equiv.lean
theorem isLawfulTraversable' [Traversable t']
    (h₀ : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f)
    (h₁ : ∀ {α β} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f)
    (h₂ : ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [Applicative F],
      ∀ [LawfulApplicative F] {α β} (f : α → F β), traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f) :
    LawfulTraversable t' where
  -- we can't use the same approach as for `lawful_functor'` because
  -- h₂ needs a `LawfulApplicative` assumption
  toLawfulFunctor := Equiv.lawfulFunctor' eqv @h₀ @h₁
  id_traverse _

Proof state:
case e_x.e_a
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝⁶ : Traversable t
inst✝⁵ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝⁴ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
F✝ G✝ : Type u → Type u
inst✝³ : Applicative F✝
inst✝² : Applicative G✝
inst✝¹ : LawfulApplicative F✝
inst✝ : LawfulApplicative G✝
α✝ β✝ γ✝ : Type u
x✝² : β✝ → F✝ γ✝
x✝¹ : α✝ → G✝ β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ Equiv.traverse eqv x✝¹ x✝ = traverse x✝¹ x✝

Tactic:
rw [h₂]

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝² : Traversable t
inst✝¹ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
α✝ β✝ : Type u
x✝¹ : α✝ → β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ pure (Equiv.map eqv x✝¹ x✝) = id.mk (Equiv.map eqv x✝¹ x✝)

Tactic:
rfl

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝⁶ : Traversable t
inst✝⁵ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝⁴ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
F✝ G✝ : Type u → Type u
inst✝³ : Applicative F✝
inst✝² : Applicative G✝
inst✝¹ : LawfulApplicative F✝
inst✝ : LawfulApplicative G✝
α✝ β✝ γ✝ : Type u
x✝² : β✝ → F✝ γ✝
x✝¹ : α✝ → G✝ β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ traverse (Comp.mk ∘ map x✝² ∘ x✝¹) x✝ = Comp.mk (traverse x✝² <$> traverse x✝¹ x✝)

Tactic:
rw [h₂, Equiv.comp_traverse, h₂]

Result:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝⁶ : Traversable t
inst✝⁵ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝⁴ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
F✝ G✝ : Type u → Type u
inst✝³ : Applicative F✝
inst✝² : Applicative G✝
inst✝¹ : LawfulApplicative F✝
inst✝ : LawfulApplicative G✝
α✝ β✝ γ✝ : Type u
x✝² : β✝ → F✝ γ✝
x✝¹ : α✝ → G✝ β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ Comp.mk (Equiv.traverse eqv x✝² <$> Equiv.traverse eqv x✝¹ x✝) = Comp.mk (Equiv.traverse eqv x✝² <$> traverse x✝¹ x✝)

Proof state:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝⁶ : Traversable t
inst✝⁵ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝⁴ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
F✝ G✝ : Type u → Type u
inst✝³ : Applicative F✝
inst✝² : Applicative G✝
inst✝¹ : LawfulApplicative F✝
inst✝ : LawfulApplicative G✝
x✝⁴ : ApplicativeTransformation F✝ G✝
x✝³ x✝² : Type u
x✝¹ : x✝³ → F✝ x✝²
x✝ : t' x✝³
⊢ (fun {α} => x✝⁴.app α) (traverse x✝¹ x✝) = traverse ((fun {α} => x✝⁴.app α) ∘ x✝¹) x✝

Tactic:
rw [h₂, Equiv.naturality, h₂]

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝² : Traversable t
inst✝¹ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
α✝ : Type u
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ traverse pure x✝ = x✝

Tactic:
rw [h₂, Equiv.id_traverse]

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝⁶ : Traversable t
inst✝⁵ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝⁴ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
F✝ G✝ : Type u → Type u
inst✝³ : Applicative F✝
inst✝² : Applicative G✝
inst✝¹ : LawfulApplicative F✝
inst✝ : LawfulApplicative G✝
α✝ β✝ γ✝ : Type u
x✝² : β✝ → F✝ γ✝
x✝¹ : α✝ → G✝ β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ Comp.mk (Equiv.traverse eqv x✝² <$> Equiv.traverse eqv x✝¹ x✝) = Comp.mk (Equiv.traverse eqv x✝² <$> traverse x✝¹ x✝)

Tactic:
congr

Result:
case e_x.e_a
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝⁶ : Traversable t
inst✝⁵ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝⁴ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
F✝ G✝ : Type u → Type u
inst✝³ : Applicative F✝
inst✝² : Applicative G✝
inst✝¹ : LawfulApplicative F✝
inst✝ : LawfulApplicative G✝
α✝ β✝ γ✝ : Type u
x✝² : β✝ → F✝ γ✝
x✝¹ : α✝ → G✝ β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ Equiv.traverse eqv x✝¹ x✝ = traverse x✝¹ x✝

Proof state:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝² : Traversable t
inst✝¹ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
α✝ β✝ : Type u
x✝¹ : α✝ → β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ traverse (pure ∘ x✝¹) x✝ = id.mk (x✝¹ <$> x✝)

Tactic:
rw [h₂, Equiv.traverse_eq_map_id, h₀]

Result:
t t' : Type u → Type u
eqv : (α : Type u) → t α ≃ t' α
inst✝² : Traversable t
inst✝¹ : LawfulTraversable t
inst✝ : Traversable t'
h₀ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β), map f = Equiv.map eqv f
h₁ : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : β), mapConst f = (Equiv.map eqv ∘ Function.const α) f
h₂ :
  ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [inst : Applicative F] [inst_1 : LawfulApplicative F] {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β),
    traverse f = Equiv.traverse eqv f
α✝ β✝ : Type u
x✝¹ : α✝ → β✝
x✝ : t' α✝
⊢ pure (Equiv.map eqv x✝¹ x✝) = id.mk (Equiv.map eqv x✝¹ x✝)