-- Mathlib/NumberTheory/DiophantineApproximation/Basic.lean
theorem aux₃ :
    |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - v / (u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v)| < (((u : ℝ) - ⌊ξ⌋ * v) * (2 * (u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v) - 1))⁻¹

Proof state:
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
H : 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
a b c : ℝ
a✝² : a ≠ 0
a✝¹ : b ≠ 0
a✝ : c ≠ 0
⊢ |b / c - a⁻¹| = |(a - c / b) * (b / c / a)|

Tactic:
congr 1

Result:
case e_a
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
H : 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
a b c : ℝ
a✝² : a ≠ 0
a✝¹ : b ≠ 0
a✝ : c ≠ 0
⊢ b / c - a⁻¹ = (a - c / b) * (b / c / a)

Proof state:
case intro.intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
h : ContfracLegendre.Ass ξ u v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / ↑u'| < (↑u' * (2 * ↑u' - 1))⁻¹

Tactic:
obtain ⟨Hv, Hv'⟩ := aux₀ (zero_lt_two.trans_le hv)

Result:
case intro.intro.intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
h : ContfracLegendre.Ass ξ u v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / ↑u'| < (↑u' * (2 * ↑u' - 1))⁻¹

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / ↑u'| < (↑u' * (2 * ↑u' - 1))⁻¹

Tactic:
have H : (2 * u' - 1 : ℝ) ≤ (2 * v - 1) * fract ξ := by
  replace h := (abs_lt.mp h).1
  have : (2 * (v : ℝ) - 1) * (-((v : ℝ) * (2 * v - 1))⁻¹ + u' / v) = 2 * u' - (1 + u') / v := by
    field_simp; ring
  rw [hu'ℝ, add_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ Hv.ne', ← sub_sub, sub_right_comm, self_sub_floor,
    lt_sub_iff_add_lt, ← mul_lt_mul_left Hv', this] at h
  refine LE.le.trans ?_ h.le
  rw [sub_le_sub_iff_left, div_le_one Hv, add_comm]
  exact mod_cast huv

Result:
case intro.intro.intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
H : 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / ↑u'| < (↑u' * (2 * ↑u' - 1))⁻¹

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
H : 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
help₁ : ∀ {a b c : ℝ}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → |a⁻¹ - b / c| = |(a - c / b) * (b / c / a)|
help₂ : ∀ {a b c d : ℝ}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → d ≠ 0 → (b * c)⁻¹ * (b / d / a) = (d * c * a)⁻¹
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / ↑u'| < (↑u' * (2 * ↑u' - 1))⁻¹

Tactic:
calc
  |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - v / u'| = |(fract ξ - u' / v) * (v / u' / fract ξ)| :=
    help₁ hξ₀.ne' Hv.ne' Hu.ne'
  _ = |fract ξ - u' / v| * (v / u' / fract ξ) := by rw [abs_mul, abs_of_pos H₁]
  _ < ((v : ℝ) * (2 * v - 1))⁻¹ * (v / u' / fract ξ) := (mul_lt_mul_right H₁).mpr h'
  _ = (u' * (2 * v - 1) * fract ξ)⁻¹ := help₂ hξ₀.ne' Hv.ne' Hv'.ne' Hu.ne'
  _ ≤ ((u' : ℝ) * (2 * u' - 1))⁻¹ := by
    rwa [inv_le_inv₀ (mul_pos (mul_pos Hu Hv') hξ₀) <| mul_pos Hu Hu', mul_assoc,
      mul_le_mul_left Hu]

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h : -(↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹ < ξ - ↑u / ↑v
this : (2 * ↑v - 1) * (-(↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹ + ↑u' / ↑v) = 2 * ↑u' - (1 + ↑u') / ↑v
⊢ 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ

Tactic:
rw [hu'ℝ, add_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ Hv.ne', ← sub_sub, sub_right_comm, self_sub_floor,
  lt_sub_iff_add_lt, ← mul_lt_mul_left Hv', this] at h

Result:
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h : 2 * ↑u' - (1 + ↑u') / ↑v < (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
this : (2 * ↑v - 1) * (-(↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹ + ↑u' / ↑v) = 2 * ↑u' - (1 + ↑u') / ↑v
⊢ 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ

Proof state:
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h : 2 * ↑u' - (1 + ↑u') / ↑v < (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
this : (2 * ↑v - 1) * (-(↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹ + ↑u' / ↑v) = 2 * ↑u' - (1 + ↑u') / ↑v
⊢ ↑u' + 1 ≤ ↑v

Tactic:
exact mod_cast huv

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h : -(↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹ < ξ - ↑u / ↑v
⊢ (2 * ↑v - 1) * (-↑v + ↑u' * (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))) * ↑v = (2 * ↑u' * ↑v - (1 + ↑u')) * (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1) * ↑v)

Tactic:
ring

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case e_a
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
H : 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
a b c : ℝ
a✝² : a ≠ 0
a✝¹ : b ≠ 0
a✝ : c ≠ 0
⊢ b / c - a⁻¹ = (a - c / b) * (b / c / a)

Tactic:
field_simp

Result:
case e_a
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu'ℝ : ↑u = ↑u' + ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v
Hu : 0 < ↑u'
Hu' : 0 < 2 * ↑u' - 1
Hv : 0 < ↑v
Hv' : 0 < 2 * ↑v - 1
H₁ : 0 < ↑v / ↑u' / fract ξ
h : |ξ - ↑u / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
h' : |fract ξ - ↑u' / ↑v| < (↑v * (2 * ↑v - 1))⁻¹
H : 2 * ↑u' - 1 ≤ (2 * ↑v - 1) * fract ξ
a b c : ℝ
a✝² : a ≠ 0
a✝¹ : b ≠ 0
a✝ : c ≠ 0
⊢ b * a = a * b

Proof state:
case intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
h : ContfracLegendre.Ass ξ u v
hu₀ : 0 < u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
huv : u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v < v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / (↑u - ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v)| < ((↑u - ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v) * (2 * (↑u - ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v) - 1))⁻¹

Tactic:
set u' := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v with hu'

Result:
case intro
ξ : ℝ
u v : ℤ
hv : 2 ≤ v
h : ContfracLegendre.Ass ξ u v
hξ₀ : 0 < fract ξ
u' : ℤ := u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
hu₀ : 0 < u'
huv : u' < v
hu' : u' = u - ⌊ξ⌋ * v
⊢ |(fract ξ)⁻¹ - ↑v / (↑u - ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v)| < ((↑u - ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v) * (2 * (↑u - ↑⌊ξ⌋ * ↑v) - 1))⁻¹