-- Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/PhragmenLindelof.lean
theorem quadrant_I (hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0))
    (hB : ∃ c < (2 : ℝ), ∃ B,
      f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c))
    (hre : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 ≤ x → ‖f x‖ ≤ C) (him : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 ≤ x → ‖f (x * I)‖ ≤ C) (hz_re : 0 ≤ z.re)
    (hz_im : 0 ≤ z.im) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Proof state:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hB : ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
⊢ ∃ c < π / (π / 2 - 0),
    ∃ B, (f ∘ cexp) =O[comap (abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))

Tactic:
rw [sub_zero, div_div_cancel₀ Real.pi_pos.ne']

Result:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hB : ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
⊢ ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, (f ∘ cexp) =O[comap (abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))

Proof state:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hB : ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
⊢ ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, (f ∘ cexp) =O[comap (abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))

Tactic:
rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩

Result:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1.intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
c : ℝ
hc : c < 2
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
⊢ ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, (f ∘ cexp) =O[comap (abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hB : ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
hz_re : 0 ≤ z.re
hz_im : 0 ≤ z.im
hzne : z ≠ 0
⊢ z.arg ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)

Tactic:
exact ⟨arg_nonneg_iff.2 hz_im, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff.2 (Or.inl hz_re)⟩

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1.intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
c : ℝ
hc : c < 2
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
⊢ (f ∘ cexp) =O[comap re atBot ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) ⊔ comap re atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z =>
    expR ((B ⊔ 0) * expR (c * |z.re|))

Tactic:
refine IsBigO.sup ?_ <| (hO.comp_tendsto <| tendsto_exp_comap_re_atTop.inf H.tendsto).trans <|
  .of_norm_eventuallyLE ?_

Result:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1.intro.intro.intro.refine_1
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
c : ℝ
hc : c < 2
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
⊢ (f ∘ cexp) =O[comap re atBot ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z => expR ((B ⊔ 0) * expR (c * |z.re|))

case inr.intro.intro.refine_1.intro.intro.intro.refine_2
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
c : ℝ
hc : c < 2
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
⊢ (fun x => ‖((fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)) ∘ cexp) x‖) ≤ᶠ[comap re atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z =>
    expR ((B ⊔ 0) * expR (c * |z.re|))

Proof state:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1.intro.intro.intro.refine_2
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
c : ℝ
hc : c < 2
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
⊢ (fun x => ‖((fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)) ∘ cexp) x‖) ≤ᶠ[comap re atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2))] fun z =>
    expR ((B ⊔ 0) * expR (c * |z.re|))

Tactic:
simp only [EventuallyLE, eventually_inf_principal, eventually_comap, comp_apply, one_mul,
  Real.norm_of_nonneg (Real.exp_pos _).le, norm_exp, ← Real.exp_mul, Real.exp_le_exp]

Result:
case inr.intro.intro.refine_1.intro.intro.intro.refine_2
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
ζ : ℂ
hζ : ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)
hz_re : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).re
hz_im : 0 ≤ (cexp ζ).im
hzne : cexp ζ ≠ 0
H : MapsTo cexp (im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2)) (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
c : ℝ
hc : c < 2
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
⊢ ∀ᶠ (b : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ (a : ℂ), a.re = b → a ∈ im ⁻¹' Ioo 0 (π / 2) → B * expR (a.re * c) ≤ (B ⊔ 0) * expR (c * |a.re|)

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hB : ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
hz_re : 0 ≤ z.re
hz_im : 0 ≤ z.im
hzne : z ≠ 0
⊢ ∃ ζ, ζ.im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2) ∧ cexp ζ = z

Tactic:
refine ⟨log z, ?_, exp_log hzne⟩

Result:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C : ℝ
f : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)
hB : ∃ c < 2, ∃ B, f =O[cobounded ℂ ⊓ 𝓟 (Ioi 0 ×ℂ Ioi 0)] fun z => expR (B * ‖z‖ ^ c)
hre : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f ↑x‖ ≤ C
him : ∀ (x : ℝ), 0 ≤ x → ‖f (↑x * I)‖ ≤ C
hz_re : 0 ≤ z.re
hz_im : 0 ≤ z.im
hzne : z ≠ 0
⊢ (log z).im ∈ Icc 0 (π / 2)