-- Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/FloorPow.lean
theorem tendsto_div_of_monotone_of_exists_subseq_tendsto_div (u : ℕ → ℝ) (l : ℝ)
    (hmono : Monotone u)
    (hlim : ∀ a : ℝ, 1 < a → ∃ c : ℕ → ℕ, (∀ᶠ n in atTop, (c (n + 1) : ℝ) ≤ a * c n) ∧
      Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / c n) atTop (𝓝 l)) :
    Tendsto (fun n => u n / n) atTop (𝓝 l)

Proof state:
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
ε : ℝ
εpos : 0 < ε
c : ℕ → ℕ
cgrowth : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
L : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u (c n) - ↑(c n) * l ≤ ε * ↑(c n)
a : ℕ
ha : ∀ (b : ℕ), a ≤ b → ↑(c (b + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c b) ∧ u (c b) - ↑(c b) * l ≤ ε * ↑(c b)
M : ℕ := (image (fun i => c i) (range (a + 1))).max' ⋯
n : ℕ
hn : n ∈ Set.Ici M
exN : ∃ N, n < c N
N : ℕ := Nat.find exN
ncN : n < c N
⊢ a + 1 ≤ N

Tactic:
by_contra! h

Result:
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
ε : ℝ
εpos : 0 < ε
c : ℕ → ℕ
cgrowth : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
L : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u (c n) - ↑(c n) * l ≤ ε * ↑(c n)
a : ℕ
ha : ∀ (b : ℕ), a ≤ b → ↑(c (b + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c b) ∧ u (c b) - ↑(c b) * l ≤ ε * ↑(c b)
M : ℕ := (image (fun i => c i) (range (a + 1))).max' ⋯
n : ℕ
hn : n ∈ Set.Ici M
exN : ∃ N, n < c N
N : ℕ := Nat.find exN
ncN : n < c N
h : N < a + 1
⊢ False

Proof state:
case h
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
ε : ℝ
εpos : 0 < ε
c : ℕ → ℕ
cgrowth : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
L : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c n) * l - u (c n) ≤ ε * ↑(c n)
a : ℕ
ha : ∀ (b : ℕ), a ≤ b → ↑(c (b + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c b) ∧ ↑(c b) * l - u (c b) ≤ ε * ↑(c b)
M : ℕ := (image (fun i => c i) (range (a + 1))).max' ⋯
n : ℕ
hn : n ∈ Set.Ici M
⊢ ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n

Tactic:
have exN : ∃ N, n < c N := by
  rcases (tendsto_atTop.1 ctop (n + 1)).exists with ⟨N, hN⟩
  exact ⟨N, by omega⟩

Result:
case h
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
ε : ℝ
εpos : 0 < ε
c : ℕ → ℕ
cgrowth : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
L : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c n) * l - u (c n) ≤ ε * ↑(c n)
a : ℕ
ha : ∀ (b : ℕ), a ≤ b → ↑(c (b + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c b) ∧ ↑(c b) * l - u (c b) ≤ ε * ↑(c b)
M : ℕ := (image (fun i => c i) (range (a + 1))).max' ⋯
n : ℕ
hn : n ∈ Set.Ici M
exN : ∃ N, n < c N
⊢ ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
c : ℕ → ℕ
left✝ : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ 2 * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
⊢ 0 ≤ l

Tactic:
have : Tendsto (fun n => u 0 / c n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
  tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop (tendsto_natCast_atTop_iff.2 ctop)

Result:
case intro.intro.intro
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
c : ℕ → ℕ
left✝ : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ 2 * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
this : Tendsto (fun n => u 0 / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 0)
⊢ 0 ≤ l

Proof state:
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
ε : ℝ
εpos : 0 < ε
⊢ ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n

Tactic:
rcases hlim (1 + ε) ((lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 εpos) with ⟨c, cgrowth, ctop, clim⟩

Result:
case intro.intro.intro
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
ε : ℝ
εpos : 0 < ε
c : ℕ → ℕ
cgrowth : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ (1 + ε) * ↑(c n)
ctop : Tendsto c atTop atTop
clim : Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
⊢ ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n

Proof state:
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
B : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n
d : ℝ
hd : d > l
L : Tendsto (fun ε => l + ε * (1 + ε + l)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 l)
⊢ ∃ ε, l + ε * (1 + ε + l) < d ∧ 0 < ε

Tactic:
exact (((tendsto_order.1 L).2 d hd).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case h
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
B : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n
d : ℝ
hd : d < l
ε : ℝ
hε : d + ε * (1 + l) < l
εpos : 0 < ε
n : ℕ
hn : ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n
npos : n ∈ Set.Ioi 0
⊢ d < u n / ↑n

Tactic:
simp_rw [div_eq_inv_mul]

Result:
case h
u : ℕ → ℝ
l : ℝ
hmono : Monotone u
hlim :
  ∀ (a : ℝ),
    1 < a →
      ∃ c,
        (∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑(c (n + 1)) ≤ a * ↑(c n)) ∧
          Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / ↑(c n)) atTop (𝓝 l)
lnonneg : 0 ≤ l
A : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, u n - ↑n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * ↑n
B : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n
d : ℝ
hd : d < l
ε : ℝ
hε : d + ε * (1 + l) < l
εpos : 0 < ε
n : ℕ
hn : ↑n * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * ↑n
npos : n ∈ Set.Ioi 0
⊢ d < (↑n)⁻¹ * u n