-- Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/AkraBazzi.lean
lemma isBigO_apply_r_sub_b (q : ℝ → ℝ) (hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1))
    (hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) (i : α) :
    (fun n => q (r i n) - q (b i * n)) =O[atTop] fun n => (deriv q n) * (r i n - b i * n)

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
⊢ (fun n => q ↑(r i n) - q (b i * ↑n)) =O[atTop] fun n => deriv q ↑n * (↑(r i n) - b i * ↑n)

Tactic:
have hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1 := ⟨hb_pos, hb_lt_one⟩

Result:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
⊢ (fun n => q ↑(r i n) - q (b i * ↑n)) =O[atTop] fun n => deriv q ↑n * (↑(r i n) - b i * ↑n)

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly✝ : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb' : ∀ (i : α), b' ≤ b i
c₁ : ℝ
left✝¹ : c₁ > 0
c₂ : ℝ
left✝ : c₂ > 0
hq_poly :
  ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * x) x,
      (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x) (c₂ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x)
h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop
n : ℕ
hn : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * ↑n) ↑n, ‖deriv q u‖ ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖) (c₂ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖)
h_bi_le_r : ∀ (i : α), b (min_bi b) / 2 * ↑n ≤ ↑(r i n)
h_ge_n₀ : R.n₀ ≤ n
h_n_pos : 0 < n
h_bn : 1 < b' * ↑n
z : ℝ
hz : z ∈ Set.Icc (b' * ↑n) ↑n
⊢ 1 < b' * ↑n

Tactic:
exact h_bn

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case hab
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i✝ : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
i : α
⊢ b (min_bi b) ≤ b i

Tactic:
aesop

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
this : 0 < b (min_bi b)
⊢ 0 < b'

Tactic:
positivity

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i✝ : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
i : α
⊢ b i / 2 ≤ b i

Tactic:
exact le_of_lt <| div_two_lt_of_pos (R.b_pos i)

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly✝ : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb' : ∀ (i : α), b' ≤ b i
c₁ : ℝ
left✝¹ : c₁ > 0
c₂ : ℝ
left✝ : c₂ > 0
hq_poly :
  ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * x) x,
      (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x) (c₂ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x)
h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop
n : ℕ
hn : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * ↑n) ↑n, ‖deriv q u‖ ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖) (c₂ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖)
h_bi_le_r : ∀ (i : α), b (min_bi b) / 2 * ↑n ≤ ↑(r i n)
h_ge_n₀ : R.n₀ ≤ n
h_n_pos : 0 < n
h_bn : 1 < b' * ↑n
⊢ b i * ↑n ∈ Set.Icc (b' * ↑n) ↑n

Tactic:
refine ⟨by gcongr; exact hb' i, ?_⟩

Result:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly✝ : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb' : ∀ (i : α), b' ≤ b i
c₁ : ℝ
left✝¹ : c₁ > 0
c₂ : ℝ
left✝ : c₂ > 0
hq_poly :
  ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * x) x,
      (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x) (c₂ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x)
h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop
n : ℕ
hn : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * ↑n) ↑n, ‖deriv q u‖ ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖) (c₂ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖)
h_bi_le_r : ∀ (i : α), b (min_bi b) / 2 * ↑n ≤ ↑(r i n)
h_ge_n₀ : R.n₀ ≤ n
h_n_pos : 0 < n
h_bn : 1 < b' * ↑n
⊢ b i * ↑n ≤ ↑n

Proof state:
case h
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly✝ : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb' : ∀ (i : α), b' ≤ b i
c₁ : ℝ
left✝¹ : c₁ > 0
c₂ : ℝ
left✝ : c₂ > 0
hq_poly :
  ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * x) x,
      (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x) (c₂ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x)
h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop
n : ℕ
hn : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * ↑n) ↑n, ‖deriv q u‖ ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖) (c₂ * ‖deriv q ↑n‖)
h_bi_le_r : ∀ (i : α), b (min_bi b) / 2 * ↑n ≤ ↑(r i n)
h_ge_n₀ : R.n₀ ≤ n
h_n_pos : 0 < n
h_bn : 1 < b' * ↑n
⊢ b i ≤ 1

Tactic:
exact le_of_lt <| R.b_lt_one i

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly✝ : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb' : ∀ (i : α), b' ≤ b i
c₁ : ℝ
left✝¹ : c₁ > 0
c₂ : ℝ
left✝ : c₂ > 0
hq_poly :
  ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * x) x,
      (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x) (c₂ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x)
⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℕ) in atTop, ‖q ↑(r i x) - q (b i * ↑x)‖ ≤ c₂ * ‖deriv q ↑x * (↑(r i x) - b i * ↑x)‖

Tactic:
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop :=
  Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb_pos tendsto_id

Result:
case intro.intro.intro.intro
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : Fintype α
T : ℕ → ℝ
g : ℝ → ℝ
a b : α → ℝ
r : α → ℕ → ℕ
inst✝ : Nonempty α
R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r
q : ℝ → ℝ
hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1)
hq_poly✝ : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖
i : α
b' : ℝ := b (min_bi b) / 2
hb_pos : 0 < b'
hb_lt_one : b' < 1
hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb' : ∀ (i : α), b' ≤ b i
c₁ : ℝ
left✝¹ : c₁ > 0
c₂ : ℝ
left✝ : c₂ > 0
hq_poly :
  ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
    ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b' * x) x,
      (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x) (c₂ * (fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) x)
h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop
⊢ ∀ᶠ (x : ℕ) in atTop, ‖q ↑(r i x) - q (b i * ↑x)‖ ≤ c₂ * ‖deriv q ↑x * (↑(r i x) - b i * ↑x)‖