-- Mathlib/.lake/packages/lean4/src/lean/Init/Data/List/Lex.lean
theorem lex_eq_false_iff_exists [BEq α] [PartialEquivBEq α] (lt : α → α → Bool)
    (lt_irrefl : ∀ x y, x == y → lt x y = false)
    (lt_asymm : ∀ x y, lt x y = true → lt y x = false)
    (lt_antisymm : ∀ x y, lt x y = false → lt y x = false → x == y) :
    lex l₁ l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (l₁.take l₂.length) (· == ·)) ∨
        (∃ (i : Nat) (h₁ : i < l₁.length) (h₂ : i < l₂.length),
          (∀ j, (hj : j < i) →
            l₁[j]'(Nat.lt_trans hj h₁) == l₂[j]'(Nat.lt_trans hj h₂)) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i])

Proof state:
case nil
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
l₂ : List α
⊢ [].lex l₂ lt = false ↔
    (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length []) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
      ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), ([][j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] [][i] = true

Tactic:
cases l₂ with
| nil => simp [lex]
| cons b bs => simp [lex]

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
hab : lt a b = false
eq : (b == a) = true
i : Nat
h₁ : i < l₁.length
h₂ : i < l₂.length
w₁ : ∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true
w₂ : lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
⊢ i + 1 < l₂.length + 1

Tactic:
simpa using h₂

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case cons.cons.mpr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.succ.refine_1
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
i : Nat
h₁ : i + 1 < l₁.length + 1
h₂ : i + 1 < l₂.length + 1
w₁ : ∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i + 1), ((a :: l₁)[j] == (b :: l₂)[j]) = true
w₂ : lt (b :: l₂)[i + 1] (a :: l₁)[i + 1] = true
x✝ : (a == b) = true
j : Nat
hj : j < i
⊢ (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true

Tactic:
simpa using w₁ (j + 1) (by simpa)

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
hab : lt a b = false
h :
  (a == b) = true →
    (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
      ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
eq : ¬(b == a) = true
hba : lt b a = true
⊢ (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < 0), ((a :: l₁)[j] == (b :: l₂)[j]) = true) ∧ lt (b :: l₂)[0] (a :: l₁)[0] = true

Tactic:
simpa

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
hab : lt a b = false
h :
  (a == b) = true →
    (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
      ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
eq : ¬(b == a) = true
hba : lt b a = true
⊢ 0 < l₂.length + 1

Tactic:
simp

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
hab : lt a b = false
eq : (b == a) = true
i : Nat
h₁ : i < l₁.length
h₂ : i < l₂.length
w₁ : ∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true
w₂ : lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
⊢ i + 1 < l₁.length + 1

Tactic:
simpa using h₁

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case cons.cons.mpr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.zero
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
h₁ : 0 < l₁.length + 1
h₂ : 0 < l₂.length + 1
w₁ : ∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < 0), ((a :: l₁)[j] == (b :: l₂)[j]) = true
w₂ : lt (b :: l₂)[0] (a :: l₁)[0] = true
⊢ lt a b = false ∧
    ((a == b) = true →
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true)

Tactic:
simp at w₂

Result:
case cons.cons.mpr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.zero
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
h₁ : 0 < l₁.length + 1
h₂ : 0 < l₂.length + 1
w₁ : ∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < 0), ((a :: l₁)[j] == (b :: l₂)[j]) = true
w₂ : lt b a = true
⊢ lt a b = false ∧
    ((a == b) = true →
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true)

Proof state:
case cons.cons.mpr.inr.intro.intro.intro.intro.zero
α : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : BEq α
inst✝ : PartialEquivBEq α
lt : α → α → Bool
lt_irrefl : ∀ (x y : α), (x == y) = true → lt x y = false
lt_asymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = true → lt y x = false
lt_antisymm : ∀ (x y : α), lt x y = false → lt y x = false → (x == y) = true
a : α
l₁ : List α
ih :
  ∀ {l₂ : List α},
    l₁.lex l₂ lt = false ↔
      (l₂.isEqv (take l₂.length l₁) fun x1 x2 => x1 == x2) = true ∨
        ∃ i h₁ h₂, (∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < i), (l₁[j] == l₂[j]) = true) ∧ lt l₂[i] l₁[i] = true
b : α
l₂ : List α
h₁ : 0 < l₁.length + 1
h₂ : 0 < l₂.length + 1
w₁ : ∀ (j : Nat) (hj : j < 0), ((a :: l₁)[j] == (b :: l₂)[j]) = true
w₂ : lt b a = true
eq : (a == b) = true
⊢ False

Tactic:
simp [lt_irrefl _ _ (BEq.symm eq)] at w₂

Result:
no goals