-- Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/GrowsPolynomially.lean
lemma GrowsPolynomially.add_isLittleO {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : GrowsPolynomially f)
    (hfg : g =o[atTop] f) : GrowsPolynomially fun x => f x + g x

Proof state:
case e_a
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, f x ≤ 0
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → f y ≤ 0
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 3 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonpos : f u ≤ 0
⊢ ‖f u‖ = -f u

Tactic:
exact norm_of_nonpos hfu_nonpos

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case lb
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, f x ≤ 0
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → f y ≤ 0
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 3 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonpos : f u ≤ 0
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f u
⊢ 3 * c₁ * (f x + g x) ≤ f u + g u

case ub
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, f x ≤ 0
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → f y ≤ 0
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 3 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonpos : f u ≤ 0
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f u
⊢ f u + g u ≤ c₂ / 3 * (f x + g x)

Tactic:
case lb =>
  calc f u + g u ≥ f u - ‖g u‖ := by
              rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_eq_abs]; gcongr; exact neg_abs_le _
       _ ≥ f u + 1/2 * f u := by
              rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
              gcongr
              refine le_of_neg_le_neg ?_
              rwa [neg_neg, ← neg_mul, ← neg_div]
       _ = 3/2 * f u := by ring
       _ ≥ 3/2 * (c₁ * f x) := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).1
       _ = 3*c₁ * (1/2 * f x) := by ring
       _ ≥ 3*c₁ * (f x + g x) := by gcongr

Result:
case ub
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, f x ≤ 0
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → f y ≤ 0
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 3 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonpos : f u ≤ 0
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ -1 / 2 * f u
⊢ f u + g u ≤ c₂ / 3 * (f x + g x)

Proof state:
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, 0 ≤ f x
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → 0 ≤ f y
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 3 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 1 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonneg : 0 ≤ f u
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f u
⊢ 3 / 2 * f u ≤ 3 / 2 * (c₂ * f x)

Tactic:
gcongr

Result:
case h
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, 0 ≤ f x
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → 0 ≤ f y
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 3 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 1 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonneg : 0 ≤ f u
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f u
⊢ f u ≤ c₂ * f x

Proof state:
case h
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, 0 ≤ f x
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → 0 ≤ f y
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 3 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 1 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonneg : 0 ≤ f u
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f u
⊢ c₁ * f x ≤ f u

Tactic:
exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).1

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf✝ : GrowsPolynomially f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
hf' : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, 0 ≤ f x
c₁ : ℝ
hc₁_mem : 0 < c₁
c₂ : ℝ
hc₂_mem : 0 < c₂
hf : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f x‖
x : ℝ
hf₁ : ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * f x) (c₂ * f x)
hfg' : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → ‖g y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖f y‖
hf₂ : ∀ (y : ℝ), b * id x ≤ y → 0 ≤ f y
hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x
hbx : b * x ≤ x
hfg₂ : ‖g x‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f x
hx_ub : f x + g x ≤ 3 / 2 * f x
hx_lb : 1 / 2 * f x ≤ f x + g x
u : ℝ
hu_lb : b * x ≤ u
hu_ub : u ≤ x
hfu_nonneg : 0 ≤ f u
hfg₃ : ‖g u‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * f u
⊢ c₁ / 3 * (f x + g x) ≤ f u + g u

Tactic:
calc f u + g u ≥ f u - ‖g u‖ := by
            rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_eq_abs]; gcongr; exact neg_abs_le _
     _ ≥ f u - 1/2 * f u := by gcongr
     _ = 1/2 * f u := by ring
     _ ≥ 1/2 * (c₁ * f x) := by gcongr; exact (hf₁ u ⟨hu_lb, hu_ub⟩).1
     _ = c₁/3 * (3/2 * f x) := by ring
     _ ≥ c₁/3 * (f x + g x) := by gcongr

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf : GrowsPolynomially f
hfg : g =o[atTop] f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
⊢ ∃ c₁ > 0,
    ∃ c₂ > 0,
      ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
        ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x,
          (fun x => f x + g x) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => f x + g x) x) (c₂ * (fun x => f x + g x) x)

Tactic:
have hb_ub := hb.2

Result:
f g : ℝ → ℝ
hf : GrowsPolynomially f
hfg : g =o[atTop] f
b : ℝ
hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1
hb_ub : b < 1
⊢ ∃ c₁ > 0,
    ∃ c₂ > 0,
      ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop,
        ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x,
          (fun x => f x + g x) u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (fun x => f x + g x) x) (c₂ * (fun x => f x + g x) x)