-- Mathlib/Topology/Category/Compactum.lean
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x

Proof state:
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
⊢ S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q

Tactic:
apply finiteInterClosure_insert

Result:
case cond
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
⊢ FiniteInter T0

case H
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
⊢ S ∈ finiteInterClosure (insert AA T0)

Proof state:
case h.h
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
x✝ : Ultrafilter X.A
⊢ x✝ ∈ Set.univ ↔ x✝ ∈ Compactum.basic Set.univ

Tactic:
refine ⟨?_, by tauto⟩

Result:
case h.h
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
x✝ : Ultrafilter X.A
⊢ x✝ ∈ Set.univ → x✝ ∈ Compactum.basic Set.univ

Proof state:
case inr
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
this : ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
h : ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q
⊢ S.Nonempty

Tactic:
rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩

Result:
case inr.intro.intro
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
this : ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q
Q : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hQ : Q ∈ T0
hS : AA ∩ Q ∈ T2
⊢ (AA ∩ Q).Nonempty

Proof state:
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, S.Nonempty
this : ∀ (F : fsu), ↑F ⊆ T1 → (⋂₀ ι F).Nonempty
G : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter X.A)
h1 : T1 ⊆ (↑G).sets
c1 : X.join G = F
P : Set X.A
hP : P ∈ ↑(X.incl x)
⊢ AA ⊆ X.str ⁻¹' P

Tactic:
rintro x ⟨rfl⟩

Result:
case refl
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, S.Nonempty
G : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter X.A)
c1 : X.join G = F
P : Set X.A
x : Ultrafilter X.A
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {X.str x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 (X.str x)
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → X.str x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, X.str x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty
claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, S.Nonempty
this : ∀ (F : fsu), ↑F ⊆ T1 → (⋂₀ ι F).Nonempty
h1 : T1 ⊆ (↑G).sets
hP : P ∈ ↑(X.incl (X.str x))
⊢ x ∈ X.str ⁻¹' P

Proof state:
case intro.intro
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
S : Set X.A
hS : S ∈ F
⊢ (AA ∩ Compactum.basic S).Nonempty

Tactic:
rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩

Result:
case intro.intro.intro.intro
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
S : Set X.A
hS : S ∈ F
G : Ultrafilter X.A
hG : G ∈ Compactum.basic S
hG2 : X.str G = x
⊢ (AA ∩ Compactum.basic S).Nonempty