-- Mathlib/Analysis/Hofer.lean
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
hu :
  ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
key : ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
key₁ : ∀ (x : ℕ), d (u x) (u (x + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ x
key₂ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ϕ (u x) < ϕ (u (x + 1))
⊢ CauchySeq u

Tactic:
refine cauchySeq_of_le_geometric _ ε one_half_lt_one fun n => ?_

Result:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
hu :
  ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
key : ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
key₁ : ∀ (x : ℕ), d (u x) (u (x + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ x
key₂ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ϕ (u x) < ϕ (u (x + 1))
n : ℕ
⊢ d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε * (1 / 2) ^ n

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
⊢ False

Tactic:
have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
  intro x' k
  rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff₀, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
  positivity

Result:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
⊢ False

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
k : ℕ
x' : X
H : ∀ ε' > 0, ∀ (x' : X), ε' ≤ ε → d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε' ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
this : d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y

Tactic:
simpa [reformulation] using this

Result:
no goals

Proof state:
case hi
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
hu :
  ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
n : ℕ
IH : ∀ m ≤ n, d (u m) (u (m + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ m ∧ 2 * ϕ (u m) < ϕ (u (m + 1))
⊢ d (u (n + 1)) (u (n + 1 + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ (n + 1) ∧ 2 * ϕ (u (n + 1)) < ϕ (u (n + 1 + 1))

Tactic:
have A : d (u (n + 1)) x ≤ 2 * ε := by
  rw [dist_comm]
  let r := range (n + 1) calc
    d (u 0) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ r, d (u i) (u <| i + 1) := dist_le_range_sum_dist u (n + 1)
    _ ≤ ∑ i ∈ r, ε / 2 ^ i :=
      (sum_le_sum fun i i_in => (IH i <| Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp <| Finset.mem_range.mp i_in).1)
    _ = (∑ i ∈ r, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ i) * ε := by
      rw [Finset.sum_mul]
      field_simp
    _ ≤ 2 * ε := by gcongr; apply sum_geometric_two_le

Result:
case hi
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
hu :
  ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
n : ℕ
IH : ∀ m ≤ n, d (u m) (u (m + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ m ∧ 2 * ϕ (u m) < ϕ (u (m + 1))
A : d (u (n + 1)) x ≤ 2 * ε
⊢ d (u (n + 1)) (u (n + 1 + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ (n + 1) ∧ 2 * ϕ (u (n + 1)) < ϕ (u (n + 1 + 1))

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
hu :
  ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))

Tactic:
intro n

Result:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
hu :
  ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))
n : ℕ
⊢ d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
H : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ False

Tactic:
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩

Result:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
H : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
this : Nonempty X
⊢ False