hansen7/spatialagent_human huggingface dataset:
Gene: IDS (ENSG00000010404), rank 105
Marker for: Excit_L3/4/5 (vs Excit_L4)
Expression ratio: Excit_L3/4/5/Excit_L4: 1.199; std logFC = 1.417
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: RFX4 (ENSG00000111783), rank 106
Marker for: Astro (vs OPC)
Expression ratio: Astro/OPC: 4.136; std logFC = 3.027
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: CARMN (ENSG00000249669), rank 107
Marker for: EndoMural (vs Oligo)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/Oligo: 62.359; std logFC = 4.253
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: LINC01374 (ENSG00000280560), rank 108
Marker for: Micro (vs Excit_L2/3)
Expression ratio: Micro/Excit_L2/3: 22.04; std logFC = 6.044
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: KIAA1217 (ENSG00000120549), rank 109
Marker for: Excit_L6 (vs Inhib)
Expression ratio: Excit_L6/Inhib: 1.829; std logFC = 1.94
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SYNPR (ENSG00000163630), rank 110
Marker for: Inhib (vs Excit)
Expression ratio: Inhib/Excit: 3.576; std logFC = 1.999
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SMOC1 (ENSG00000198732), rank 111
Marker for: OPC (vs Oligo)
Expression ratio: OPC/Oligo: 6.427; std logFC = 4.207
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: MECOM (ENSG00000085276), rank 112
Marker for: EndoMural (vs OPC)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/OPC: 22.14; std logFC = 4.259
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SMOC1 (ENSG00000198732), rank 114
Marker for: OPC (vs Oligo)
Expression ratio: OPC/Oligo: 6.427; std logFC = 4.205
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: CALM2 (ENSG00000143933), rank 115
Marker for: Excit_L3/4/5 (vs Excit_L4)
Expression ratio: Excit_L3/4/5/Excit_L4: 1.154; std logFC = 1.415
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: MECOM (ENSG00000085276), rank 116
Marker for: EndoMural (vs OPC)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/OPC: 22.14; std logFC = 4.222
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: AC073091.4 (ENSG00000287749), rank 118
Marker for: Excit_L5 (vs Excit_L5/6)
Expression ratio: Excit_L5/Excit_L5/6: 1.909; std logFC = 2.062
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: MYT1 (ENSG00000196132), rank 119
Marker for: OPC (vs Inhib)
Expression ratio: OPC/Inhib: 5.509; std logFC = 4.128
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: PAMR1 (ENSG00000149090), rank 120
Marker for: Astro (vs Excit)
Expression ratio: Astro/Excit: 10.602; std logFC = 2.929
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SYNE2 (ENSG00000054654), rank 121
Marker for: EndoMural (vs OPC)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/OPC: 7.53; std logFC = 4.095
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: IKZF1 (ENSG00000185811), rank 122
Marker for: Micro (vs EndoMural)
Expression ratio: Micro/EndoMural: 15.284; std logFC = 5.715
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: MYT1 (ENSG00000196132), rank 123
Marker for: OPC (vs Inhib)
Expression ratio: OPC/Inhib: 5.509; std logFC = 4.133
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: LINC01378 (ENSG00000236922), rank 124
Marker for: Excit_L3 (vs Excit_L5)
Expression ratio: Excit_L3/Excit_L5: 1.524; std logFC = 1.631
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: COL5A3 (ENSG00000080573), rank 125
Marker for: Astro (vs EndoMural)
Expression ratio: Astro/EndoMural: 3.505; std logFC = 2.971
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SYNE2 (ENSG00000054654), rank 126
Marker for: EndoMural (vs OPC)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/OPC: 7.53; std logFC = 4.113
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: IKZF1 (ENSG00000185811), rank 127
Marker for: Micro (vs EndoMural)
Expression ratio: Micro/EndoMural: 15.284; std logFC = 5.664
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: TRABD2A (ENSG00000186854), rank 128
Marker for: Excit_L5 (vs Excit_L5/6)
Expression ratio: Excit_L5/Excit_L5/6: 2.259; std logFC = 2.005
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SLC12A8 (ENSG00000221955), rank 129
Marker for: Excit_L2/3 (vs Excit_L3)
Expression ratio: Excit_L2/3/Excit_L3: 1.417; std logFC = 1.075
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: GRIN3A (ENSG00000198785), rank 130
Marker for: Inhib (vs Excit)
Expression ratio: Inhib/Excit: 5.769; std logFC = 1.947
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: NTN1 (ENSG00000065320), rank 131
Marker for: OPC (vs EndoMural)
Expression ratio: OPC/EndoMural: 4.253; std logFC = 3.899
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: GRIN3A (ENSG00000198785), rank 133
Marker for: Inhib (vs Excit_L5)
Expression ratio: Inhib/Excit_L5: 2.257; std logFC = 1.959
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: CACNG4 (ENSG00000075461), rank 134
Marker for: OPC (vs Inhib)
Expression ratio: OPC/Inhib: 5.975; std logFC = 3.869
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: LINC02296 (ENSG00000258859), rank 135
Marker for: Excit_L3 (vs Excit_L2/3)
Expression ratio: Excit_L3/Excit_L2/3: 2.408; std logFC = 1.61
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: PAMR1 (ENSG00000149090), rank 136
Marker for: Astro (vs Excit_L3)
Expression ratio: Astro/Excit_L3: 6.45; std logFC = 2.932
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: NOTCH3 (ENSG00000074181), rank 137
Marker for: EndoMural (vs Excit_L2/3)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/Excit_L2/3: 14.073; std logFC = 3.957
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: AC007368.1 (ENSG00000255595), rank 139
Marker for: Excit_L5/6 (vs Excit_L3)
Expression ratio: Excit_L5/6/Excit_L3: 1.439; std logFC = 1.547
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: COL12A1 (ENSG00000111799), rank 140
Marker for: Excit_L5 (vs Excit_L5/6)
Expression ratio: Excit_L5/Excit_L5/6: 2.645; std logFC = 1.793
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: CACNG4 (ENSG00000075461), rank 142
Marker for: OPC (vs Inhib)
Expression ratio: OPC/Inhib: 5.975; std logFC = 3.805
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SLC25A18 (ENSG00000182902), rank 143
Marker for: Astro (vs Oligo)
Expression ratio: Astro/Oligo: 8.053; std logFC = 2.754
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: ITGA1 (ENSG00000213949), rank 144
Marker for: EndoMural (vs Inhib)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/Inhib: 18.646; std logFC = 3.926
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: NTN1 (ENSG00000065320), rank 145
Marker for: OPC (vs EndoMural)
Expression ratio: OPC/EndoMural: 4.253; std logFC = 3.855
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: ENC1 (ENSG00000171617), rank 146
Marker for: Excit_L3/4/5 (vs Excit_L3)
Expression ratio: Excit_L3/4/5/Excit_L3: 1.226; std logFC = 1.363
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SLC25A18 (ENSG00000182902), rank 147
Marker for: Astro (vs Oligo)
Expression ratio: Astro/Oligo: 8.053; std logFC = 2.891
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: CLDN5 (ENSG00000184113), rank 148
Marker for: EndoMural (vs Oligo)
Expression ratio: EndoMural/Oligo: 29.155; std logFC = 3.929
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: DPP4 (ENSG00000197635), rank 149
Marker for: Excit_L6 (vs Excit_L4)
Expression ratio: Excit_L6/Excit_L4: 3.529; std logFC = 1.829
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy
Gene: SAMD5 (ENSG00000203727), rank 150
Marker for: Inhib (vs Excit)
Expression ratio: Inhib/Excit: 5.279; std logFC = 1.81
Reasoning: From literature https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh1938 , I didn't use the scdata because I think it can be very noisy