hakansabunis/tr-academic-research-agent-index huggingface dataset:
KUR’AN’DA “ASHÂB-I UHDÛD” KISSASI-Dünden Bugüne Görsel Sadizm / Şiddetin Seyredilmesi-
THE PArABlE oF “DITCH DIGGErS (ASHAB-I UHDUD)” In QU’rAn
Yazar: Kasapoğlu, Abdurrahman
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 9, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: Tafsir ; Tefsir ; Looking on the violence,Qur’an,morals ; Şiddeti seyretme,“Ashab-ı Uhdûd”,Kur’an,ahlâk.

Kur’an tarihten sunduğu bir kesitte “Ashâb-ı Uhdûd” adı verilen bir topluluğun, şiddet uyguladıkları insanları, bu şiddet esnasında bilfiil seyretme tavrı içerisine girdiklerini anlatır. Günümüzde şiddeti seyretmek her zaman ve her yaştan insan için çok kolay elde edilen bir imkân haline gelmiştir. Bu imkanı fırsat bilen kitleler de yoğun bir şekilde kendilerine sunulan şiddeti seyretme tavrı içerisine girmişlerdir. İnsanları, özellikle de Müslümanların şiddeti seyretme karşısındaki bugünkü tavırlarını “Ashâb-ı Uhdûd” kıssasında verilmek istenen mesajlar açısından değerlendireceğiz.

The Qur’an, in a profile from history, describes a community called “ditch diggers (ashab-ı uhdud)” the members of which adopted the attitude of looking on the people when they threw into the ditches and persecuted. Today, looking on (or ignoring) the violence has been something with which everybody run across everywhere. These being the reality, a large number of people seem to be adapted to looking on violence they come upon around themselves. In this study, the attitude of looking on the violence, especially with regard to Muslim people, is considered in connection with the messages given in the parable of “ditch diggers (ashab-ı uhdud)” in Qur’an.
ZEYDİYYENİN KURAN TASAVVURU  VE TEFSİR DİNAMİKLERİNE DAİR
on THE ZEYDIYYE’S APProACHInG To THE Qor’An AnD ExEGESIS  DYnAMICS
Yazar: Ünal, Mehmet
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 9, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: Tafsir ; Tefsir ; Zeydiyye,Qur’an,Shiite,Mutazile,Ahl Sunnah,tafseer,exegesis,tev’il ; Zeydiyye,Kur’an,Şia,Mutezile,Ehl-i Sünnet,tefsir,te’vil.

Makale Şia ekolü içerisinde değerlendirilen Zeydiyye mezhebinin Kur’an tasavvurunu ve tefsir anlayışını ele almaktadır. Makalede önce Zeydiyye mezhebi ve ortaya çıkışı hakkında kısaca bilgi verilmiş, ardından da tefsir kaynakları ve bu kaynaklar hakkında yapılan çok az sayıdaki akademik çalışmaya değinilmiştir. Devamında Zeydiyye’nin kelamî ve fıkhî açıdan Kur’an anlayışı ve tefsirde izledikleri yöntemler üzerinde durulmuştur. Zeydiyyenin inanç açısından daha çok Mutezile ekolüne yakın durduğu, müteşabih ayetler konusunda te’vil yolunu tercih ettikleri muhtelif ayetlere dair yaptıkları te’vil örnekleriyle izah edilmiştir. Fıkıh ve amel bakımından Ehl-i Sünnet ekolüne en yakın Şii fırka olduğu ise yine Zeydiyye ekolüne ait muhtelif tefsirlerde yer alan ahkâm ayetlerine dair tefsir örnekler çerçevesinde örneklerle ortaya konmuştur.

The article is approaching the Koran concept and exegesis apprehension of Zeydiyye sect which has been accepted within the school of Shia. In the article, firstly brief information is given about the Zeydiyye sect and the emergence of it, then it’s been touched upon the exegesis sources and few academic studies carried out on these sources. Subsequently, it’s dwelled upon Zeydiyye’s “theological” and “juridical” concept of Our’an and his methods while dealing with exegesis. Zeydiyye’s being close to sect of Mutezile in religious faith, his preferring the allegorical interpretation (tev’il) about the anthropomorphic verses (müteshabih) has been explicated with the interpretation examples of him on diverse verses. In terms of “Islamic law” and “fulfillment” of practices its being the nearest Shiite group to the sect of “Ahl al-Suhhah” is again put forward in accordance with the exegesis samples about the “juridical” verses found in the diverse tafseers regarding the Zeydiyye sect.
MANA İLE HÜKÜM AYRIMINDA TEFSİR İLMİNİN YERİ
MANA İLE HÜKÜM AYRIMINDA TEFSİR İLMİNİN YERİ
Yazar: Demirci, Mehmet
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 9, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: Tafsir ; Tefsir ; Qur’an,exegesis,Islamic law,meaning,judgement,decision ; Tefsir,fıkıh,mana,hüküm,ayırım

Bu makale beyânî karakterdeki dini ilimlerden Tefsir ile Fıkıh ilminin kavşak noktası olan mana ile hüküm ayrımını ele almaktadır. Makalede her iki kavramın dil ve ıstılah anlamlarına ilişkin bilgiler verildikten sonra lafızların manaya delaleti ile hükme delaleti arasında ne gibi farklılıklar bulunduğu ve bunların hangi temellere dayandırıldığı açıklanmıştır. Böylece tefsir ve fıkıh ilimlerinin kendilerine has belli bir konuyu araştırmış olsalar bile genel anlamda birbirlerini nasıl tamamladıklarına da işaret edilmiştir.

In this article, the intersection point of Tafsir and Fiqh scientific distinction between the meaning and provisions have been come into contact with. Each of the two concepts were given information about the language and meaning of the term. What kind of differences between demonstrating the meaning of letter and constitute evidence of the provisions and their basis of which is described. Thus, the knowledge of their specific subject has been investigated, even if they overall mark each other how they were completed.
MANTIK ve MANTIK TARİHİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME
MANTIK ve MANTIK TARİHİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME
Yazar: Durusoy, Ali
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; Logic,Al-Farabi,Aristotle,conception,judgment

An overview on the history of logic is to be subject of this article. The circumstances and philosophical background that causes to emergence of Logic as a science are explained and afterward the developments in Logic are studied. After Socrates’ ‘concept’ and Plato’s ‘the metaphysics of concept’ Aristotle has built up the Logic, as an independent discipline from linguistics. The philosopher who has rebuilt up the logic in Arabic is Al-Farabi. Avicenna’s distinction of “tasavvur” (conception) and “tasdhik” (judgment) has provided to examine the logic with integrity in a way. However this integrity has not protected in modern eras. Hence the issues which deal with Logic, has been subject of methodology and philosophy of science, as became independent from logic. This also means the disintegrity of human mind. The central argument of this article is that we must overcome this disintegrity and integrate the logic with other sciences.

An overview on the history of logic is to be subject of this article. The circumstances and philosophical background that causes to emergence of Logic as a science are explained and afterward the developments in Logic are studied. After Socrates’ ‘concept’ and Plato’s ‘the metaphysics of concept’ Aristotle has built up the Logic, as an independent discipline from linguistics. The philosopher who has rebuilt up the logic in Arabic is Al-Farabi. Avicenna’s distinction of “tasavvur” (conception) and “tasdhik” (judgment) has provided to examine the logic with integrity in a way. However this integrity has not protected in modern eras. Hence the issues which deal with Logic, has been subject of methodology and philosophy of science, as became independent from logic. This also means the disintegrity of human mind. The central argument of this article is that we must overcome this disintegrity and integrate the logic with other sciences.
MANTIK TARİHİNDEN BİR SAYFA: YAHYA B. ADÎ (893/4-974)
MANTIK TARİHİNDEN BİR SAYFA: YAHYA B. ADÎ (893/4-974)
Yazar: Kayacık, Ahmet
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; mantık,Endülüs,Yahya b. adiy

Yahya Ibn Adi has an important role in translation movement from Greek to Arabic or Syriac in Tenth century. He also worked for contiuantion of this movement. This study contens, the short story of life him, his Works, especially in logic; and his activities in different fields of knowledge. The reader can find also some knowledges about his place or role in logical studies and his school and his being a chain in medico-logical tradition for next generations and finally for Andalus.

Yahya Ibn Adi has an important role in translation movement from Greek to Arabic or Syriac in Tenth century. He also worked for contiuantion of this movement. This study contens, the short story of life him, his Works, especially in logic; and his activities in different fields of knowledge. The reader can find also some knowledges about his place or role in logical studies and his school and his being a chain in medico-logical tradition for next generations and finally for Andalus.
EBU’L-BEREKAT EL-BAĞDADİ’NİN MANTIK İLMİNE BAKIŞI
EBU’L-BEREKAT EL-BAĞDADİ’NİN MANTIK İLMİNE BAKIŞI
Yazar: Cihan, Ahmet Kamil
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; Mantık,İlimler sınıflaması,Ebul Berekat el-Bağdadi

This research is about Abul Barakat al Baghdadi’s opinions on Logic. The aim of, functiol of, subject of logic, and its place in the classification of sciences is mentioned in this article. According to him, logic is important not for possibilaty of knowledge but also reasoning knowledge. The main and direct subject of logic is “meanings.” Also, words and writings are relevant to logic, indirectly. Logic is independent science in the classification of science. İt is also science of other sciences. The important of Baghdadi for logic is a giver a signal abandoning ontological logic to pure logic.

This research is about Abul Barakat al Baghdadi’s opinions on Logic. The aim of, functiol of, subject of logic, and its place in the classification of sciences is mentioned in this article. According to him, logic is important not for possibilaty of knowledge but also reasoning knowledge. The main and direct subject of logic is “meanings.” Also, words and writings are relevant to logic, indirectly. Logic is independent science in the classification of science. İt is also science of other sciences. The important of Baghdadi for logic is a giver a signal abandoning ontological logic to pure logic.
HARİZMİ’NİN MEFATİHU’L-ULUM’UNDA MANTIK
HARİZMİ’NİN MEFATİHU’L-ULUM’UNDA MANTIK
Yazar: Çapak, İbrahim
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; Al-Khawârizmî,Mafatih al-ulum,logic

Al-Khawârizmî lived in the tenth century as a bureaucrat. He only has a book called Mafatih al-ulum. He has written this book for managers in the his period. Analyzes several sciences in this book. One of the issues he addresses is the logic. Al-Kharizmi examines Isagoge, Categries, Perihermenias, Analititics, Apodiktics, Topics, Sophistics Rhetoric, Poetics. In this study we will study Al-Khawârizmî’s views about logic.

Al-Khawârizmî lived in the tenth century as a bureaucrat. He only has a book called Mafatih al-ulum. He has written this book for managers in the his period. Analyzes several sciences in this book. One of the issues he addresses is the logic. Al-Kharizmi examines Isagoge, Categries, Perihermenias, Analititics, Apodiktics, Topics, Sophistics Rhetoric, Poetics. In this study we will study Al-Khawârizmî’s views about logic.
MANTIKÎ KIYAS İLE FIKHÎ KIYASIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
MANTIKÎ KIYAS İLE FIKHÎ KIYASIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
Yazar: Hasırcı, Nazim
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; Logical Syllogism,Juridical Qıyas,Form,Content,Result,Middle Term

In this article in which logical syllogism and Juridical Qıyas are compared two reasoning types are first researched with the main lines, and then compared. It is seen that these two reasoning are resembled each other, but they are different from the stand point of form, content and the value of the result. At the same time, it is determined that Juridical Qıyas can be reduced to (transformed into) logical syllogism.

In this article in which logical syllogism and Juridical Qıyas are compared two reasoning types are first researched with the main lines, and then compared. It is seen that these two reasoning are resembled each other, but they are different from the stand point of form, content and the value of the result. At the same time, it is determined that Juridical Qıyas can be reduced to (transformed into) logical syllogism.
İSLAM MANTIK GELENEĞİNDE FENARİ’NİN YERİ  (Fenari Şerhi ve İçeriği Üzerine)
İSLAM MANTIK GELENEĞİNDE FENARİ’NİN YERİ  (Fenari Şerhi ve İçeriği Üzerine)
Yazar: Kayacık, Ahmet
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; mantık,fenari,şerh

Al-Fanari who lived in florishing time of Ottaman State was a scholar, professor and offical for goverment. Including logic he wrote many works in different fields. This article is about Farari’s commentary on Abhari’s Isagoge and about its content. By the way it was talked about the role or place of Fanari in this field, logic. This work that written on many glosses or super glosses, until now performed a good work in madrasas; and if we take this work for present readers or students we can say it is still preserving its value and importance.

Al-Fanari who lived in florishing time of Ottaman State was a scholar, professor and offical for goverment. Including logic he wrote many works in different fields. This article is about Farari’s commentary on Abhari’s Isagoge and about its content. By the way it was talked about the role or place of Fanari in this field, logic. This work that written on many glosses or super glosses, until now performed a good work in madrasas; and if we take this work for present readers or students we can say it is still preserving its value and importance.
MANTIKTA İÇERİĞİN ÖNEMİ
MANTIKTA İÇERİĞİN ÖNEMİ
Yazar: Derin, Necmi
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; Logıc,form,content,conception,ratification

In this study, we have examined the harmony form-content in the context of conception and ratification. The logic examines the valid syllogism ways and its acceptable rules from the point of form and relationship between thought and object from the point of content. Examining content of thought is studying about reality and indicates connection between logic and metaphysics. As a result of this connection it is possible to preserve thoughts from mistakes.

In this study, we have examined the harmony form-content in the context of conception and ratification. The logic examines the valid syllogism ways and its acceptable rules from the point of form and relationship between thought and object from the point of content. Examining content of thought is studying about reality and indicates connection between logic and metaphysics. As a result of this connection it is possible to preserve thoughts from mistakes.
ESÎRÜDDİN EL-EBHERÎ’NİN MUĞALATA’YA (SAFSATA) BAKIŞI
ESÎRÜDDİN EL-EBHERÎ’NİN MUĞALATA’YA (SAFSATA) BAKIŞI
Yazar: Kömürcü, Kamil
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; al-Abharî,sophisme,syllogism,fallacy,form,matter,utterance,meaning.

Sophisme, according to al-Abharî, is a syllogism consisting of incorrect propositions. These propositions are fallacy and deceptive. One approaches these syllogisms to deceive the other people consciously or unconsciously. One protects himself/herself from the erroneouses, learning these typical syllogisms. According to al-Abharî, the fallacy in a syllogism occurs either from the matter of this syllogism or its form. Sometimes, the fallacy occurs from both the matter and the form. The fallacy originating from its form arises from violating the conditions that generate valid conclusion. Al-Abharî evaluates these typical fallacy under six titles in the varied books. The fallacy originating from its matter results from the utterance of syllogism or its meaning. Al-Abharî investigating two fallacy regarding the utterance, expresses fifteen fallacies regarding the meaning, in addition to three fallacies resembling these. Al-Abharî presents twenty six fallacies regarding the utterance and the meaning.

Sophisme, according to al-Abharî, is a syllogism consisting of incorrect propositions. These propositions are fallacy and deceptive. One approaches these syllogisms to deceive the other people consciously or unconsciously. One protects himself/herself from the erroneouses, learning these typical syllogisms. According to al-Abharî, the fallacy in a syllogism occurs either from the matter of this syllogism or its form. Sometimes, the fallacy occurs from both the matter and the form. The fallacy originating from its form arises from violating the conditions that generate valid conclusion. Al-Abharî evaluates these typical fallacy under six titles in the varied books. The fallacy originating from its matter results from the utterance of syllogism or its meaning. Al-Abharî investigating two fallacy regarding the utterance, expresses fifteen fallacies regarding the meaning, in addition to three fallacies resembling these. Al-Abharî presents twenty six fallacies regarding the utterance and the meaning.
FÂRÂBÎ’DE YÜKLEMLİ KIYASLAR
FÂRÂBÎ’DE YÜKLEMLİ KIYASLAR
Yazar: İmamoğlugil, Halil
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 10, 2010
Anahtar kelimeler: History of Logic ; Mantık Tarihi ; Inference,syllogism,categorical syllogism,figures of syllogism,rules of figure,first figure,second figure,third figure,fourth figure,moods of figure

In this article, we examined how Alfarab approached to the subject of categorical syllogism within scope of his works entitled “Kitāb al-Kıyās al-Sağīr” and “Kitāb al-Kıyās”. Alfarab defined syllogism as Aristoteles did it, and after defining it, made analysing of that definition, and then explained each of the terms which composed the definition in that analysing. Categorical syllogisms were the main syllogisms that Alfarab emphasised. Before him, Aristoteles also took up those syllogisms. He examined it in the Organon and did not mention the syllogisms composed of conditional propositions. Alfarab noted that categorical syllogisms had to have same special conditions in terms of quality and quantity for giving conclusions of each figure of the categorical syllogisms, and exemplifid the moods giving conclusion in every figure.

In this article, we examined how Alfarab approached to the subject of categorical syllogism within scope of his works entitled “Kitāb al-Kıyās al-Sağīr” and “Kitāb al-Kıyās”. Alfarab defined syllogism as Aristoteles did it, and after defining it, made analysing of that definition, and then explained each of the terms which composed the definition in that analysing. Categorical syllogisms were the main syllogisms that Alfarab emphasised. Before him, Aristoteles also took up those syllogisms. He examined it in the Organon and did not mention the syllogisms composed of conditional propositions. Alfarab noted that categorical syllogisms had to have same special conditions in terms of quality and quantity for giving conclusions of each figure of the categorical syllogisms, and exemplifid the moods giving conclusion in every figure.
KÂSIM B. İBRAHİM ER-RESSÎ’NİN KELÂM YÖNTEMİ  VE TANRI ANLAYIŞI
Al-Qâsım ibn Ibrâhîm al-Rassi’s Methods of Theology and His Theological Views
Yazar: Öztürk, Resul
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 11, 2011
Anahtar kelimeler: Islamic Sects ; İslam Mezhepleri ; Al-Qâsım ibn Ibrâhîm al-Rassi,Zaydiyya,Kalam,Tawhid,justice,the five principles (usul-u hamse). ; Kâsım b. İbrahim er-Ressî,Zeydiyye,Kelâm,Tevhit,adalet,beş ilke (usul-u hamse).

Zeydiyye mezhebi İslam itikadına ilişkin görüşlerini ortaya koymuş ve İslam Kelâmına katkıda bulunmuştur. İslâmî ilimlerin her alanında düşünce üretmiş ve Müslümanların düşünce dünyalarına katkılar sunmuştur. Bu mezhebin önde gelen düşünürü Kâsım b. İbrahim er-Ressî’dir (246/860). Kâsım er-Ressî, Mutezile gibi aklı, inanç konularını anlamanın temeline yerleştirmiş ve Allah’ın varlığı, sıfatlarının bilinmesi, güzellik ve çirkinlik gibi değerlerin bilinmesinde aklı esas almıştır. Yine o, Allah’ın yaratılmışlardan uzak bir varlık olduğu inancını (tenzih) savunmuş ve teşbih, tecsim ve cebir ifade eden ayetleri ve hadisleri bu yaklaşımla yorumlamıştır. Akıl, Kur’an ve Sünneti birbiri ile uyumlu bilgi kaynakları olarak değerlendirmiş ve bu bilgi kaynakları arasında herhangi bir uyuşmazlık, çelişki ve tutarsızlığın olmayacağını savunmuştur.

Zaydiyya put forth their views about Islamic creeds and have contributed Islamic Kalam. Thinking in all fields of Islamic science has developed and presented contributions to the Muslim world have thought of. With the basic principles of the Zaydiyya similarities between the Mutazila are. Understand their beliefs about the mind as Mu’tazili. Al-Qâsım ibn Ibrâhîm al-Rassi (246/860) to basics and put God's existence, capacity to know, beauty and ugliness in the mind based on such values is known. Yet the belief in Allah as the one being created away (Glory) defended and the verses and hadiths which expression incarnate and forced expression of this approach has been interpreted. Mind, the Qur'an and Sunnah as sources of information with each other that Al-Qâsım ibn Ibrâhîm al-Rassi any conflict between these information sources, contradictions and inconsistencies in the advocate was not.
KLASİK DÖNEM ZEYDÎLERİNİN  ASHÂB-I HADİS HAKKINDAKİ NİTELEMELERİ: HAŞVİYYE
KLASİK DÖNEM ZEYDÎLERİNİN  ASHÂB-I HADİS HAKKINDAKİ NİTELEMELERİ: HAŞVİYYE
Yazar: Demirci, Kadir
Dergi: İslami İlimler Dergisi, Vol. 1 No. 11, 2011
Anahtar kelimeler: Islamic Sects ; İslam Mezhepleri ; Zeydiyye,Ashab-ı Hadis,Haşviyye

Bu makalede hicrî III. asırda yaşamış üç zeydî alimin ashâb-ı hadis hakkındaki nitelemeleri ele alınmıştır. Amaç hadisçilerle olan tartışmaların Mutezile ile sınırlı olmadığını ve bu tartışmaların sadece Allah’ın sıfatları gibi birkaç itikâdî konuları içermediğini göstermektir. Klasik dönem zeydî alimler ashâb-ı hadisi haşviyye, avam, ilim ve temyiz kabiliyeti olmayan ve aynı zamanda bidat, garip, tuhaf, faydasız şeyler rivayet eden kişiler olarak nitelendirmişlerdir. Zeydî alimler çoğunlukla bu nitelemeleri kendilerine sorulan hadislere verdikleri cevaplar esnasında yapmışlardır. Sıhhati sorulan söz konusu hadisler sünnî hadis eserlerinde rivayet edilen hadislerdir. Dolayısıyla bu hadisleri rivayet eden kütüb-ü tis’a müellifleri söz konusu nitelemelerin dolaylı da olsa muhatabı olmuşlardır. Bu nitelemelerin ana nedeni olarak ashâb-ı hadisin dînî metinleri anlama ve anlamlandırma problemi olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Kendi kültürümüzle yüzleşmemiz anlamı taşıyan bu çalışma daha sağlıklı bir hadis anlayışının yaygınlaşmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

Bu makalede hicrî III. asırda yaşamış üç zeydî alimin ashâb-ı hadis hakkındaki nitelemeleri ele alınmıştır. Amaç hadisçilerle olan tartışmaların Mutezile ile sınırlı olmadığını ve bu tartışmaların sadece Allah’ın sıfatları gibi birkaç itikâdî konuları içermediğini göstermektir. Klasik dönem zeydî alimler ashâb-ı hadisi haşviyye, avam, ilim ve temyiz kabiliyeti olmayan ve aynı zamanda bidat, garip, tuhaf, faydasız şeyler rivayet eden kişiler olarak nitelendirmişlerdir. Zeydî alimler çoğunlukla bu nitelemeleri kendilerine sorulan hadislere verdikleri cevaplar esnasında yapmışlardır. Sıhhati sorulan söz konusu hadisler sünnî hadis eserlerinde rivayet edilen hadislerdir. Dolayısıyla bu hadisleri rivayet eden kütüb-ü tis’a müellifleri söz konusu nitelemelerin dolaylı da olsa muhatabı olmuşlardır. Bu nitelemelerin ana nedeni olarak ashâb-ı hadisin dînî metinleri anlama ve anlamlandırma problemi olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Kendi kültürümüzle yüzleşmemiz anlamı taşıyan bu çalışma daha sağlıklı bir hadis anlayışının yaygınlaşmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.