Avusturya okulu içinde Ludwig Von Mises ve iktisadi düşünceye katkısı
Ludwig Von Mises in the framework of the Austrian school and his contributions to economic thought
Yazar: A. GÜLÇİN İMRE
Danışman: PROF.DR. KAYA ARDIÇ
İstanbul Üniversitesi / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü / İktisat Ana Bilim Dalı
Derece: Doktora, 2006
Konu: Ekonomi = Economics

Özet:
Yirminci yzy?l?n byk blmnde, iktisat teorisine egemen paradigma,Pozitivist yntem kullanan Neo-Klasik ve Keynesyen yaklaß?mlard?rM. aÒinstreamÓdßnce sisteminin ndeyilerinden giderek artan sapmalar grlmesi, Thomas S. Kuhnanlam?nda potansiyel devrime yol aacak krizin yaklaßt?Û?n? dßndrr.Bu durum gz nnde bulundurularak, tezimizde Ludwig von Mises ve iktisadidßncesi, -radikal ßekilde yeni ve arp?c? neriler iermesine raÛmen gemißte kalm?ßve k?smen unutulmuß bir paradigma P- raÒxeologyÓ (eylem mant?Û?) diye adland?r?lanAvusturya Üktisat Teorisi krizden ?k?ß yolu gsterebilecek alternatif bir paradigmaolarak tan?t?lmaya al?ß?ld?.MisesÕin Habsburg ViyanaÕs?nda baßlayan, Carl MengerÕin ve Eugen von Bhm-BawerkÕin entelektel varisi ve Friedrich A. HayekÕin hocas? olarak devam eden,NewÊYorkÕta gmen bir dßnr olarak noktalanan kariyeri, tarihi ve entelektelerevesine yerleßtirildi. MisesÕin, iktisat teorisine eylem mant?Û? bak?ß a?s? tart?ß?ld?.Teori blmnde, Avusturya OkuluÕnun ve zellikle MisesÕin deÛer ve rasyonellikteorisine zgn katk?lar? zerinde duruldu. Ard?ndan MisesÕin para ve fiyat teorileritan?t?ld?. Teorik yap?n?n kurulmas? ard?ndan sistemler ve sosyal kooperasyon konular?ele al?nd?. Kapitalizmde kr, zarar, rekabetin rol ve girißimci-tketici ilißkisi, sosyalizmve sosyalizmde iktisadi hesaplama sorunu ve mdahaleciliÛin ters etkileri zerindeduruldu. Mises-Hayek konjonktr dalgalanmalar? teorisi anlat?ld?. MisesÕin sosyalfelsefesini ieren Klasik Liberalizm ideali ve ilkeleri teorik baÛlant?lar? ile birlikte eleal?nd?. Joseph T. Salerno bak?ß a?s?yla, Avusturya OkuluÕnun tarihindeki ykselmelerve dßßler ayd?nlat?lmaya al?ß?ld?. Son olarak MisesÕin katk?lar? zetlenerek Misesdßncesine karß? son zamanlarda artan ilginin baz? nedenlerine eÛilindi. UygulamadanverdiÛimiz rneklerle Avusturya bak?ß a?s?n?n dikkate deÛer alternatif bir paradigmaolduÛu sonucuna ulaß?ld?.

Abstract:
For most of the twentieth century, economicsÕ reigning paradigm has been that ofÒNeo-ClassicismÓ and ÒKeynesianismÓ combined with the methodology of Òpositivism.ÓHowever, this paradigm has produced ever more anomalies and led to a potentiallyrevolutionary ÒcrisisÓ (in Thomas S. KuhnÕs sense).In this situation, I introduce Ludwig von Mises and his economic thought,because it is our thesis that Mises offers a way out of this crisis with a radically new, orrather old but forgotten paradigm ? of ÒAustrianÓ economics conceived as ÒpraxeologyÓ(the logic of action).First, Ludwig von Mises is placed in his historical and intellectual context:growing up in Habsburg Vienna as intellectual heir of Carl Menger and Eugen vonBoehm-Bawerk and teacher of Friedrich A. Hayek and concluding his career as anemigrant in New York City. I then turn to MisesÕ work and discuss his view ofeconomics as the Òlogic of action.Ó Next is a discussion of the Austrian and especiallyMisesian contribution to the theory of value and rationality. This is followed by apresentation of MisesÕ contribution to the theory of money and money prices. After this,I turn to MisesÕ theory of possible systems of social cooperation: of the consumerentrepreneurrelationship under capitalism and the function of profit, loss andcompetition; of socialism and the problem of economic calculation under socialism; andof the counterproductive nature of interventionism. Then the so-called Mises-Hayekbusiness cycle theory is discussed. It follows a discussion of MisesÕ social philosophy:of classical liberalism and its relation to ÒpositiveÓ economic theory. The next chapterexplains the reasons for the ups and downs in the history of the Austrian school and inparticular of Misesian economics according to the view of Joseph T. Salerno. Finally, Ioffer a summary of MisesÕ contributions and explain some of the reasons for the recentresurgence of interest in his thought. Based on these considerations, we come to theconclusion that the Austrian-Misesian approach to economics deserves careful attentionas an alternative paradigm.