protocolSection identificationModule nctId: NCT06344221, orgStudyIdInfo id: 2023-A00954-41, briefTitle: Post-stroke Haptic Feedback Use Deficit: A Comparative and Reliability Study, acronym: HapticS, statusModule overallStatus: NOT_YET_RECRUITING, startDateStruct date: 2024-04-15, primaryCompletionDateStruct date: 2024-07-15, completionDateStruct date: 2024-07-15, studyFirstPostDateStruct date: 2024-04-03, lastUpdatePostDateStruct date: 2024-04-03, sponsorCollaboratorsModule leadSponsor name: Centre Hospitalier St Anne, class: OTHER, collaborators name: Brain & Spine Institute (ICM), collaborators name: Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, descriptionModule briefSummary: The aim of this comparative and reliability study is to highlight a deficit in the use of vibrotactile sensory feedback (haptic effect) in the planning and execution of fine manual dexterity movements after stroke. The investigators will include 3 groups of subjects, 1 group of young healthy subjects, 1 of older subjects matched in age and sex to the group of chronic stroke patients. Participants will take part in clinical tests of fine motor skills and sensitivity and will use a device to assess the key components of manual dexterity, to which vibrotactile sensors will be added. If they so wish, participants will be able to take part in a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study to assess the facilitation of cortical excitability due to the haptic effect., conditionsModule conditions: Stroke, conditions: Upper Extremity Paresis, conditions: Manual Dexterity, conditions: Sensory Integration Dysfunction, conditions: Vibration; Disorder, designModule studyType: INTERVENTIONAL, phases: NA, designInfo allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED, interventionModel: PARALLEL, primaryPurpose: DIAGNOSTIC, maskingInfo masking: NONE, enrollmentInfo count: 90, type: ESTIMATED, armsInterventionsModule interventions name: Dextrain Manipulandum and haptic feedback device, outcomesModule primaryOutcomes measure: Assessing haptic effect during a dexterity exercise with and without sensory feedback: finger independence, secondaryOutcomes measure: Assessing haptic effect during another dexterity exercise with and without sensory feedback: the force control of the index, secondaryOutcomes measure: Assessing haptic effect during another dexterity exercise with and without sensory feedback: the rhythm capacity, secondaryOutcomes measure: Correlation between clinical assessment and haptic measure, secondaryOutcomes measure: Assessment of the feasibility of the haptic measures, secondaryOutcomes measure: Assessment of the benefits of the haptic measures, secondaryOutcomes measure: Study the test re-test reliability of the haptic device by comparing the haptic effect on dexterity assessed at the beginning and end of the session by the same evaluator, secondaryOutcomes measure: Assessment of the impact of age on the dexterity performances (Finger independence, force control of the index and rhythm capacity), secondaryOutcomes measure: Measurement of the manual dexterity facilitation between tactile (haptic device with vibrations on the fingers) and auditory feedback (sounds during the dexterity tasks), secondaryOutcomes measure: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), eligibilityModule sex: ALL, minimumAge: 18 Years, stdAges: ADULT, stdAges: OLDER_ADULT, contactsLocationsModule, hasResults: False