protocolSection identificationModule nctId: NCT06299150, orgStudyIdInfo id: 2023-1, briefTitle: Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Techniques Restoring Ellis Class II Traumatized Central Incisors In Children, statusModule overallStatus: NOT_YET_RECRUITING, startDateStruct date: 2024-03-01, primaryCompletionDateStruct date: 2024-05-01, completionDateStruct date: 2025-02-01, studyFirstPostDateStruct date: 2024-03-07, lastUpdatePostDateStruct date: 2024-03-07, sponsorCollaboratorsModule leadSponsor name: October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, class: OTHER, descriptionModule briefSummary: Dental trauma (DT) of the incisors and their supporting tissues, which is one of the most challenging dental emergency situations, requires immediate assessment and management due to psychological and physical reasons. (8) This is especially important for young permanent teeth because of continuing development in order to minimize undesired complications. The treatment of dental trauma is sometimes neglected. (9,10) although it might lead to pain, difficulty in articulation and mastication as well as having considerable negative effects on patient's self-esteem. (11) However, aesthetics of the anterior teeth are very important aspects of human appearance and could be affected by many factors including the presence of fillings, tooth color, position, alignment, shape and number. (12)Rasmussen ST et al. discovered in 1981 that most children suffer from tooth trauma. (13) According to their research, 25% of all schoolchildren and 33% of adults have undergone trauma, with the majority of cases occurring before the age of 19. (14)As the maxillary incisors are the most commonly injured teeth due to their exposed position, a functional, aesthetic and time-efficient restoration is frequently demanded.(15) According to the current International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines, crown fractures confined to enamel and dentine may be treated either with a direct composite restoration or with an adhesive reattachment of the fractured fragment.(16) As long as the fragment is intact, reattachment is often preferred in dental practice. This technique facilitates the restoration of the tooth with its original anatomy, color and function in a minimum amount of time. (17,18) Unfortunately, clinical studies regarding the survival of reattached fragments are scarce, and results from laboratory investigations cannot be transferred to clinical settings without limitations. (19) Furthermore, longevity data of direct composite restorations in fractured anterior teeth are restricted to a few clinical studies. (20, 21)In addition to the aforementioned restorative alternatives, the use of small partial glassy restorations-partial laminate veneers (PLVs), sectional veneers, or ceramic fragments-has become increasingly popular over the last few years. (22,23) PLVs are thin pieces of glass-matrix ceramic fragments without a defined shape that are used to restore small defects in the anterior teeth. As tooth preparation is not required for this type of restoration, as for conventional laminate veneers, and minimal to no prep is accepted, the maximum amount of enamel surface structure is conserved. (24) Thus, retention relies completely on adhesion, which is primarily achieved by bonding to the conditioned glassy surface. (25,26) Despite their growing popularity, available data in the literature on PLVs are limited to a few in vitro studies (27,28) and case reports (29, 30, 31), without any clinical information available at present.Patients in all groups will receive a minimally invasive restoration with high esthetic advantages and long-term success of their fractured incisors (either conventional composite restoration, fragment reattachment or partial laminate veneers) that require minimal to no preparation depends on the type of restoration will receive and doesn't require local anesthesia., conditionsModule conditions: Composites Resins, designModule studyType: INTERVENTIONAL, phases: NA, designInfo allocation: RANDOMIZED, interventionModel: PARALLEL, interventionModelDescription: The study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) where 2 arm parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio were compared. The child participants and the legal guardian of each participating child and the statistician were blinded., primaryPurpose: TREATMENT, maskingInfo masking: SINGLE, whoMasked: PARTICIPANT, enrollmentInfo count: 40, type: ESTIMATED, armsInterventionsModule interventions name: IPS e.max CAD, outcomesModule primaryOutcomes measure: Clinical success/ survival, eligibilityModule sex: ALL, minimumAge: 8 Years, maximumAge: 18 Years, stdAges: CHILD, stdAges: ADULT, contactsLocationsModule, hasResults: False