IP   you have added text for the third time on neurofeedback after the notice above and an explanation of WPRR and Wikipedias medical sourcing requirements was posted to your talk page    Please review WPRR and do not reinstate text without gaining consensus  Again please note that RR is not a license to read contested text three times and that it pertains to an individual not an IP address or account  Please read WPMEDRS if you can locate a secondary review most likely listed at PubMed that mentions success with neurofeedback for TS we can discuss it  I have most of the recent reviews and am aware of no secondary review of TS that mentions success with neurofeedback   Please review WPNOTNEWS publishing unreviewed recent research is unencylcopedic  Please review WPOR one could argue isnt how Wikipedia articles are written  Perhaps it is time to request protection of the article