unblockreasonThe user that reported me made several false claims such as claims of personal attacks regardless of the fact that I have never made any and violating Wikipedias policies regardless that I have never done so  He himself has been reported several times for doing bad things like insulting people and posted directly fraudulent information both to me and apparently to administrators  I was not given any possibility of replying to the block request discussion because he also did not link this anywhere on my page and on his page I saw a template posted to him by a user of a different time he has done this stating that doing so is required  Basically the user who reported me shows clearly in bad faith The fact that I am being forced to defend on myself on Wikipedia for  hours is not a valid reason for a block  No personal attacks were made no refusal to do anything was done as no orders were given that could be refused due to the fact the orders did not even happen and being a victim of others who are repeatedly attacking me and even deleting my replies from discussion pages before archiving and defending myself from these continuous attacks is NOT a valid reason for a block  As for the articles which caused people to attack and harass me nothing regarding these articles was ever properly done  No messages asking to discuss it no polls done to find out which information is correct no editing done after my edits for the purpose of further improving the article nothing constructive or reasonable whatsoever just reverting the entire edit without discussion or reasonableness lying about the reason for reverting harassment and making fraudulent claims against me such as adding information without sources regardless of the fact that  I did not ADD any information to the article and  it is okay to add information that does not have  a source and most new articles consist mainly and some entirely of such information  Someone wrote something about friendly advice but not a SINGLE related comment was at all friendly and no advice was given whatsoever except for one which was both unhelpful and contained more untrue statements  Even this administrator is purposefully making blatantly fraudulent statements claiming that I ignored guidelines in regards to my signature regardless of the fact that the one who changed Wikipedias code to no longer link automatically is not me nor did they notify me nor could anyone think of a reasonable reason to do this regardless of the fact that it has been less then  hours since anyone requested that I learn programming code and then recode my signature to compensate for this flaw thats right less then  hours let alone a reasonable time of  months or so assuming the user has logged in for several hours every day during that time and regardless of the fact that even in that minuscule amount of time my signature had already been recoded before he ever did this block  This shows that the administrator himself is specifically in bad faith by citing an alleged problem that no longer even exists  There is also a log of the LITERAL AND DIRECT EXACT OPPOSITE of the claim of the person who reported me again WITHOUT NOTIFYING ME TO REPLY TO THE DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER at the Help Desk page  I advise that people looking at this do not read that conversation as evidence of replies and such because several of my replies were deleted before the conversation was archived and therefore it is an invalid archive BUT it does show the exact opposite of this claim in that I specifically complained about someone for doing that very thing because the conversation between MYSELF AND HIM should be done at only ONE place and should also be done at one of the appropriate pages rather then being harassive by using different places as this Administrator is claiming I have done when there is direct evidence that Ive done the opposite  So the main thing being that I am the victim of numerous people attacking me they should not have attacked me but instead should have done any of the things I mentioned or some other reasonable thing rather then reverting edits and then attacking and harassing me  I did not deserve any such harassment and attacks and do have the right to defend such things  If I am treated fairly instead then there could be a discussion on the matter instead of repeated reverting without any discussion then no such people would be reporting but since I did not do the things in the report other then correcting articles and since the decent reply to correcting articles which someone else thinks are incorrect is not to attack them as was done to me the block is wrong because things should be differently and because the people who were edit warring on purpose were other people rather then myself  In fact direct evidence of this is ALSO available as you can see that I stopped attempting to edit the article Black people to contain correct information once it was made obvious that three other editors did not want correct information to be available and would continuous revert it instead of simply editing to make it even better  The ones who want to do edit warring would not stop trying to stop the assaultive from reverting it but instead they would do something such as continuously revert edits from the one they disagree with  This was what the opposing party did not what I did  And yet still no discussion