Support for unblock request See Shells response to this block made directly to Gnangarra via  Diffs Users like me are not permitted to edit archives of project pages like ANI  The request asked me to do something that it would have been a violation of Wikipedia editing policyguidelines for me to do Please follow the previous and next edits in the above link to Diffs just provided The block even the reason given for it just illustrates in my view additional piling on of alreadyunwarranted accusations Shell points out the unfair nature of this block see Diffs linked above move through to previous and next all of the material has been deleted from Gnangarras current talk page Why is the administrator not following the same requirements re archiving of current discussions that she thinks was required of me by  though JC says it was not  There was no condition or requirement in the closing administrator JCs closing summaryconclusion  I voluntarily added the archiving bot which is or was malfunctioning apparently as I have alerted both Shell and Gnangarra My reasonable and logical presentation of my own perspective on the ANI was posted before not after the request by Gnangarrait had  in it and was edited out in the past day but I put it back in so Shell and Gnangarra could refer to it more easily Labeling my comments as a rant or a screed is likewise still unwarranted and even in my view a violation of WikipediaEtiquette as I have said in the Sept  nowarchived ANI Shell has already indicated that this block should be removed unblocked and why she thinks so My list of comments above was posted prior to GnanGarras archive  post which is misplaced and which I myself restored in request above see the datetime stamps I did not make and do not make any personal attacks PA against anyone and I have not reiterated any such PA the word inhumane is not my word that is Gnangarras word paraphrase after quoting me from a nowarchived ANI also out of context Again please provide diffs  Paraphrasing and using words like inhumane which I myself did not use does not substantiate any claim of my engaging in any such PA personal attack  I did not engage in any such thing I did not accuse anyone of anything and certainly did not use uncivil or offensive language though others did so in that ANI see the editing summary which contains improper expletive language by another user I said that a user repeatedly seems to lack humane compassion and linked to earlier version of my current NB scroll up I observed that earlier in the July  ANI and still feel that way  I am being attacked while I have not attacked anyone the policy is WPNPA  There was no claim of personal attacks leveled at me in what Orderinchaos filed on September   all hisher claims have been proved to be incorrect and false I have engaged in no blockable behavior from July  until now and I still question the block initiated in July nevertheless I accepted the terms of that block and immediately accepted an offer of adoption I was not the one who canceled the adoption by Ecoleetage  The adopter Ecoleetage canceled it on his own after seeing what he says he considered no reason to continue it I thought he had or would have contacted  to inform him of that but apparently he did not  That was Ecoleetages action not mine There was no collusion with Ecoleetage on either my part or his part as Orderinchaos mistakenly claims there was in the Sept  ANI statements at top of itSee I wonder above Shells response and my reply to that I have not stated that Orderinchaos engaged in anything but possiblyinadvertent misstatements nonetheless they are misstatements and false accusations which led to further misstatements about my alleged behavior from July  to September    Any reply I made was later maligned as if it were a rant or a screed and not accorded the respect that it deserved and deserves as a goodfaith response I pointed out that other usersadministrators have not followed the diffs to previous and next in the link given by Orderinchaos and fail to see the errors in Orderinchaoss unwarranted suspicions leading to hisher false claims of canvassing of me by Ecoleetage which even if it had occurred was not my behavior but Ecoleetages  I did not perceive that I was being canvassed I perceived only courteous alerts from Ecoleetage to problems in some articles that needed work or that he had been nominated in a RfA Orderinchaoss suspicions are not backed up by facts in diffs that verify what he claims  They are false accusations made apparently inadvertently mistakes  I have not attacked Orderinchaos or anyone else for making them I have pointed out that they are mistakes however and that I should not be attacked on the basis of such false claims After posting the Sept th ANI apparently Orderinchaos took a Wikibreak I have had no contact with or from  since midJuly  the day he unblocked me and signed off on the adoption by Ecoleetage and explained that there was no condition or requirement re archiving in JCs closing of the July block see approx July  in archive page  The context for humane compassion is the full NB as it existed at the time of the link placed and as it exists now I did not use the word inhumane that is Gnangarras choice of words  It illustrates why statements in one place should not be quoted out of context and used as the basis for a block or sanctions against another editor of Wikipedia It is a punitive block for something that did not even occur