Army I started the subject here because  the Kilogram article was seriously deficient when I first started on it heres what it looked like  there has long been the common misperception that the kilogram is uniquely a unit of mass and the pound is a unit of weight so people would logically first begin their research into the issue at Kilogram and  the nuances of the effect of buoyancy on mass standards and precision metrology seem to be appropriately addressed in a Kilogram article too It has previously been suggested that a new article be created called Mass versus weight Indeed we can create such an article but its not the sort of article title that one would think of typing directly to look up So you end up just briefly touching upon the subject in Kilogram and providing a link to the Mass versus weight article I like Wikipedias ability to link to other articles for further reading When done judiciously you really exploit the strength of hyperlinks when done to excess like linking dates to see what the hell other totally unreleated events occurred on July   it burdens the article IMO When linked properly we write for instance While the weight of objects are often expressed in kilograms and the Weight article is one that one would type all by itself and linking to it provides a logical handy easytoremember article for further reading But an article titled Mass versus weight strikes me as simply fragmenting a subject for the sake of fragmenting a subject Few would remember two weeks later that the topic is titled Mass versus weight but would remember that you first go to Kilogram to find the link Thats the clue that an article shouldnt be fragmented into a separate topic how obvious is the title of the article Wikipedia is getting out of hand in this regard IMO Thats my  anyway