S News article states that the prosecution case was so strong that it set a high bar for the defense so high that Weintein saw the defense as facing an extremely large burden In another article law professor Susan Abraham says in an interview that she too was impressed httpwwwnjtvonlineorgnjtodayvideoformerpublicdefenderthinksprosecutionhasgoodcaseagainstravi Granted one can find different articles that give different points of view that is why it is unwise to characterize the consensus of others views especially when one uses tendentious phrasing Cuomos phrasing smacks of punditry he says that legal analysts wondered why the state insisted on pursuing bias intimidation chargesthe insisted suggesting that the prosecution was being stubborn or irrational I dont understand the relevance of your point about a change in media coverage this section is not about media coverage If anything the change in media emphases should make one dubious about any article that purports to say what everyone else is thinking or should think This section should explore specific reactions after the verdict not try to tell us what the experts in general are thinking at any one time       The U