I dont know about logic but policy will hopefully As F says having multiple wellsourced viewpoints in the article is fine  Removing references that you dont like because you only hold to one perspective is of course unacceptable  Ive blocked Alan for  hours for repeatedly violating this policy  Now maybe theres something wrong with those references I dont know  Maybe theyre not WPRS or WPDUE or something else and I have no problem with Alan or anyone else discussing that issue here or at a relevant noticeboard and maybe eventually consensus will agree to remove them  But edit warring to push a POVnot so good   So you know play nice everyone