Insertion of Disputed tag  This article has more than seriously bad writing It is an article on a subject which has no business being in an encyclopedia at all Much of what is passed as information here is actually speculation by myriad newspaper editors   An encyclopedic article should not just contain facts let alone unproven allegations It should also have a context for those facts and the facts should be checked and balanced  For instance it is also a fact that the Ohio th Congressional district is steel coal union country and considered a tradeunion Democrat seat by the DNC they rank it very very high on their target list of seats to win back at any cost That the current occupant of that seat also holds a house leadership position makes the target all the more compelling Where are these concepts in the article series  Adding to the confusion is the extreme reliance on very recent press reports  many of those reports originally generated from speculation on sealed court documents  Further statements like Bob Ney ROH lied when he said he was duped by Abramoff and lied again on financial disclosure forms when he said that a nonprofit had paid for the trip show the extraordinary bias and excitment of the article authors Even the opening sentence shows not even a faint pass at fairness The monetary influence of Jack Abramoff ran deep in Washington as Jack Abramoff spent millions of dollars to influence and entertain Republican politicians   I cant clean this up because I have neither the time nor the detailed info More importantly I dont believe anyone but the prosecutor and the defense teams have the detailed info and none of that will be revealed for quite some time  As to the press articles as sources History is already showing how badly the press handled many of the controveries of the past year The facts of the Katrina response now show that CNN et al were wrong wrong wrong wrong on way to many of their charges and reports   I use Wikipedia a lot and want to see it thive Articles like this add nothing mislead the impressionable and can only harm the reputation of Wikis in general and Wikipedia specifically