I take personal offense to the term antiscience religious propaganda fluff piece  That sir is borderline hate speech in the context you have attempted to use it in  Cadedral is a personal friend residing in an entirely different country than I  He happens to also believe that all facets of Paleontology should be represented in the Paleontology article as properly cited pieces of evidence  And censoring the documented instances of fraud and scientific viewpoints of MILLIONS of Christians and YEC is irresponsible and only perpetuates the widely revered opinion that Wikipedia is a liberally biased engine  What you are doing is injecting your personal preference into science  Which is again irresponsible