The surface issue at hand is the statement that it is not enough to summarize the book but that it MUST have a judgment from science attached to it The surface reasons given quote WPX for a wide range of X Yet the actual discussion is based on what I said above the feeling among some that science is King and must trump religion within Wikipedia articles You opened the door to the science discussion yourself above Mr King when you brought up terrible science referring to Genesis when I asked why Shiva is not classified as a myth but Genesis is singled out for that purpose you started revealing your feelings about it yourself Now before I start analyzing your thoughts