Has been dismissed as   I think such a specific description of how she was dismissed is nonNPOV I deleted it but the delete was reverted so I brought the issue to the discussion page Every accusations that exists has been used to describe her Id like to know the exact text of the paper source cited for that summary to see if it is an actual summary Besides even if the source is reliable and that an honest representation it seems like a nonNPOV summary itself being made by that source which cant be used or else The New York Times and Wall Street Journals editorial pages could each have their opinions held as fact I know that the printed article isnt describing her philosophy as sophmoric and preachy itself but even a summary of someone elses opinions can be nonNPOV if made so easily and is so strongly in one direction A printed opinion that everyone loveshates someone would still be considered NPOV even if from a reliable source that does not necessarily hold that opinion itself