How do you call this I call it an admin that doesnt know policy  WikipediaThreerevert rule states Wikipedians who revert a page in whole or in part more than three times in  hours except in certain special circumstances are likely to be blocked from editing Saying  people edited the page after you before the issue rose up is not a valid excuse Its not an excuse at all just a fact  People dont edit pages to let others know they approve of existing content  that would require an alteration of the same content and make little sense  usersvoiced their opposition Nope  One brand new user  opposed it but admitted he was mistaken then came up with another inaccurate claim then went completely irrelevant  Two anonymous users posted in this section yes but not on anything relevant   didnt comment here until after your protection though he did nominate the image for deletion on Commons and his message on your talk page is almost undoubtedly why you involved yourself here  I was aware of these actions but not obliged to respond in any particular way here  That leaves only  whose claim it isnt the italian flag was completely and hopelessly irrelevant there are after all twentytwo other flags on the page in question and only one is presented albeit vaguely as the official one  Thats practically just one user with an irrelevant nonjustification