I scanned the Fishbein book on Google Books and theres nothing about radionics in it If youre going to start using books that have nothing about the subject in question as sources taking it on faith that they appear to be a reliable source thenwell hang on to your hats boys because all bets are off Look radionics surely IS quackery as you and I or any other rational person might  refer to it in conversation But quackery is a loaded pejorative with fairly inflammatory connotations that many people find offensive myself included Its all well and good to have Helwig say most physicians dismiss radionics as quackery which is certainly not scientific or definitive just the mans impression of the situation and thats appropriate for the discussion The word quackery appears there and if you want it included in the page there it is But it really has no place in the main editorial thrust of the conversation is all Im saying