GAC review   This article is off to a good start but I see some problems with the sourcing formatting and prose that concerns me  At this moment the article does not fulfill the GA criteria but Im willing to put the nomination on hold in order to allow contributors to work  Here are some suggestionscomments for improvement  The references are a mess  None of them are formatted properly and several of them IMDb scifipedia hunkymalecelebs are not from reliable sources  I suggest using citation templates in order to correctly format the links and look for replacement refs for those from disreputable sources   con  Two fansites are linked to in the external links  Per WPEL there should be none  Also remove the duplicate IMDb link to the awards and nominations page this is redundant ImageHanjpg does not have a fair use rationale The use of influential in the lead although sourced is open to debate  I would remove it entirely More information needs to be given in order for the lead to adhere to WPLEAD there is no mention of his early life music training family or cult following  Nil by Mouth shouldnt be mentioned by itself and more can be said about his film making as well and can be seen singing and playing piano in the  movie Track  and tracing over prerecorded versions of Beethovens music in Immortal Beloved Ref  Also remember to italicize the film name The Music section is only one sentence long and no date is given  The biography should follow a chronological timeline After graduating from drama school in  Oldman spent almost eight years in theater winning various awards such as  Ref successfully using an American accent what does successfully refer to  The accent itself In October  movie website TheShiznitcouk how is this a notable websiteaccolade Because of its length I suggest breaking the Filmography list into two columns Oldman also directed the music video for Red Rover a song from Jewish Rap Group Chutzpahs nd CD Hip Hop Fantasy the first comma placement outside of the quotation marks is correct the second isnt there are several of these that need to be fixed throughout the article I did not read the prose too closely but once these issues have been taken care of Im willing to give it a second review  Until then Im going to put the nomination on hold  Please do let me know if you have any questions or comments   con