carbon copy participation in AFDs   Seems like practically every AFD I close has the following Delete as lacking indepth coverage in reliable independent thirdparty sources Should such sources be integrated into the article feel free to leave a note on my talk page and Ill take another look Stuartyeates talk  Its up to you if you want to keep doing this but it suggests you are not being very thorough in forming your opinion when you post the exact same remark every single time you participate which reduces the weight given to your position when making a close In the case of WikipediaArticles for deletionThe Adventure of Exham Priory in particular you seem to have entirely missed the same point as the nominator that this is a short story published in an anthology and not a standalone book The nominator seemed genuinely unaware of this but it had already been mentioned at AFD before you copied in your standard remark suggesting you did not read the other comments at all These discussions are supposed to be just that discussions not voting Further if you choose to participate in a discussion normally you watch that discussion to see if anything changes instead of trying to assign that duty to someone else Again you are not breaking any policies per se just thought you should be aware of the impression created by such driveby style participation in discussions