NPOV dispute   Just so this isnt lost by the two suspiciously tangential talk page sections added just above this one here is a minor sample of the current NPOV dispute over this article In my interpretation the early October version of this article was rewritten with a load of weasle words which downplay criticm of the phrases usage and subtly play up the dubious narrative genre More mention of the possibility that the narrative genre is disinformation is needed The article should be explicitly clear that labeling an allegation a conspiracy theory is an attempt at dubiousness through association with the narrative genre Also generally and commonly considered in the intro are incomplete and need to be fixed for NPOV The new version of the article seems to be saying a lot less than the old version we should go through the diff line by line Did someone ever justify those massive changes Though some of them were good