Fair use rationale for ImageBigmountainPNG  ImageBigmountainPNG is being used on this article I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use In addition to the boilerplate fair use template you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use  Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale Using one of the templates at WikipediaFair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy but remember that you must complete the template Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page  If there is other other fair use media consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page  Note that any fair use images uploaded after  May  and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded as described on criteria for speedy deletion If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page Thank you    Knock it off   I stumbled on this page while reviewing the recent changes page and the silly reverts chatting and unsubstantiated additions from both sides of the dispute evidently dont belong  Discuss stuff on this page or move on but stop cluttering up WP with crap And everyone again on both sides needs to read WPRS WPV and lots of other acronyms I cant think of right now       Please please please stop adding this material unless you can cite the sources  It is presented in a way that is extremely POV  If you continue you will leave me no option other than to invoke the RR rule  This will cause a block to your account which I am sure you do not want and I hate recommending  Bring your concerns to the discussion page  Thanks     I am about to make my one and only revert to this article for today  If an IP editor reverts this again without discussion I will ask that this page be protected from editing by editors without an account see WPRFPP this is doable and I think would be agreed to by the admins working at that page and I will then revert the POV material  Use this talk page and try to create an NPOV article or all IP editors may lose the ability to edit this article  I stumbled upon this page by accident and have no pro or con opinion on the management of this resort but it is on my watchlist now and I will do what I can to insist that statements by either camp are verifiable from reliable sources and not unverifiable opinions     Will the person who persists in vandalising this page please stop If you have genuine problems with the article then use the discussion forum that is what it is there for  If your problems are with the politics regarding the sale of the mountain then you are airing your views in the wrong way and in the wrong place  PLEASE STOP  Preceding unsigned comment added by      The anon IP vandal is back at it      Reasons   If you want to discuss reasons do so in here  You do not post open discussions in the article itself     Why do you insist on removing cited material  The IP of this company had been documented making changes for itself  Is there some reason to exclude bad news about this hostile takeover  Preceding unsigned comment added by SpecialContr