March  UTC Guy I think youre seriously mistaken about the concerns that have been raised both on Wikipedia and in the real world about BPs involvement in its article If you think those concerns are somehow wacky or agendadriven or otherwise worthy of being summarily dismissed you definitely have another think coming Personally Im horrified by the porosity of Wikipedias conflict of interest rules All the reassurances that BPs rep here has played by the rules simply underline my concern