BillPhone deletion   I am unsure why you thought this was blatant advertising g   The article was product neutral except for the title With respect to that all players in this payment space use the words bill to phone  There are multiple players providing this kind of payment which means there is an industry that is of value being discussed The article mentions the multiple players in this industry which means it isnt advertising but informative  BillPhone is like paypal and paypal is deemed acceptable  I would only presume it is because of usage or longevity of the product see point  and  to address this  The article focuses on an industry  payment option that has been in place for  years but is not addressed elsewhere in the wiki thereby making it valuable  The industry is in the billions of dollars cleared and settled which makes is significant  There were many industry references leading to the history  There was no blatant discussion as to benefits of this payment type over other payment types or in comparison to the competition Therefore there was no blatant advertising  As I said in the discussion on this piece I would gladly take suggestions and address When someone did post I did address their concerns  As I havent looked in the last month I cant tell if there were other concerns raised