Can you make an effort to use standard text and formatting  I dont need the re I know you are referring to my comments  And I dont need the bold italics and bullets Im perfectly comfortable reading plain text in a small paragraph  Now looking at your reply squinting actually as it is mostly unreadable in its current form I see that you are quoting policy at me  Lets take a look shall we  First you quote the NPOV policy in regards to undue weight from viewpoints which doesnt apply to the material in question and if you think it does you need to describe how it does because you havent done that  Second you quote the part about giving undue weight any aspect of the subject  In both cases you ignore the subtle distinctions between viewpoints and aspects  So there we are  But now you argue that the storm itself is insignificant and the amount of material in the article given to it was out of proportion to other sections Im curious how you have reached these conclusions about significance and proportion without actually analyzing or discussing the human rights issues related to Katrina  Most sources list Katrina as one of the worst natural disasters in US history  If true would it also follow that it is also one of the worst human rights disasters as well and considering its coverage in the human rights literature would this not merit one large paragraph  out of  words