Firsfron youre right  I didnt and still dont think that Essjays  edits are likely to have resulted in any problems with this article and so I didnt think the task was that important hence my phrasing  However reading your last couple posts has convinced me that we are now saddled with the tedious task of verifying that my assumption rather than just waving our hands and saying Nah not likely to be a problem  As I said above I could forgive puffery on a user page and maybe even stupidly talking to the press while knowing that puffery was on his User Page  But tainting articles with false claims of expertise is just a royal pain in the butt  Lets get to work and stop worrying about the factual dispute tag  Its not the most important thing that we have to do