Semiprotection is not a valid way to deal with the anonymous edits that have been happening lately as they are not vandalism  I can see the argument for keeping the International Churches of Christ content in a separate article  Its degree of significance to the main topic has not been clearly spelled out does it deserve a whole paragraph in the Churches of Christ article just a sentence or a see also at the bottom and there are no sources besides the restorationmovementorg website so strictly speaking the onus is on those who want to keep it to provide some justification from reliable sources  It is also any editors prerogative to edit as an IP rather than creating an account if disruption becomes unreasonable the IP can be blocked but it seems like more of an editorial dispute  Some aspects of it for example the census count versus the unsourced anti numbers are clearcut but in general the problem points are in desperate need of secondary sources