is there any reason to think the article is ACTUALLY biased Yes there are actually  reasons sir First The refs have absolutely nothing to back up their statements Furthermore article uses their opinions and estimations rather than facts Hence the wording Eg instead of X peaces of equipment was of model Y from year Z it says most of the equipment were relics Second and most important The Spanish and Russian articles about the subject  the actual involving parties  have no such negative flavour about soviet involvement Only the English has it And as we figured out without any facts behind it Only opinions of the British myth writers acclaimed academics