September  UTC   You write   Im not going to run around repeating the same arguments endlessly  We can broaden the subject      But lets compartmentalise this by dealing with the JTB question first  No You cannot broaden a subject and deal with the JTB question when a very specific clarification on a passage that appears as shown above to violate Wiki rules in that it appears to several here that you have made a synthesis based on personal inferences of two distinct scholars ideas To broaden the subject means to avoid answering the query about your violation of these rules wriggling out of the doubt by changing the subject Persist in refusing to cut and paste the evidence if it is in the form we ask for available in the talk records is evidence of uncooperative editing and bad faith Either by cutting and pasting or several minutes of retyping you can provide us with that simple set of texts surely a timesaving way for both you and others for the clarification asked of you I take it that if you refuse to do this the contested passage can be eliminated since your silence would suggest you can not justify it in terms of the rules of composition some see as having been compromised there