Perplexing For this article it is helpful to explain what is meant by surrogate consent The AAP offers a reasonable definition and does so within the context of this article thus it seems appropriate to quote from it This quote was previously introduced with this text  Neonatal circumcision is performed with surrogate consent for reasons described by the American Academy of Pediatrics  With the edit summary Remove WPNPOV violation  we do not necessarily support the AAPs reasons Blackworm changed this to  Neonatal circumcision is performed with surrogate consent which is appropriate according to the American Academy of Pediatrics  This seems to miss the point were not saying that it is appropriate just that it occurs and what it means Do any reliable sources actually dispute the AAPs explanation     A second problem is the bunch of text inserted into the RACP quote This quote previously served as an introduction to the bioethical controversies involved With the edit summary Restore missing context and properly reflect source rather than cherrypicking conclusions WPNPOV Blackworm inserted material about the timing of circumcision as well as legal issues which are better suited to inclusion in circumcision and the law  As such it is not entirely clear what purpose the quote now serves Id suggest removing the legal material and moving the material about timing close to the Benatars comments on that subject