Youve made a total of  edits throughout Wikipedia which to me suggests inexperience so it is hardly inaccurate to claim that you are new regardless of how long ago you signed up Wikipedia policy encourages patience and understanding towards those who are new Please explain how precisely this is being condescending  Ill admit that some of my early posts here were snarky but only in response to such comments as   This is blind POV  This is ridiculous  Well suit yourself Ill use a citation from the KC Star If you revert again it will be without valid reason so take care  You are trying to abuse Wikipedias policies by claiming that your biased or unreasonable actions have been in line with them That tactic shouldnt work Its your attempts to vandalize the article because of irrational bias that I find ridiculous  I think you are trying unsuccessfully to cover up your bias and POV by claiming to be on the side of Wikipedia guidelines That wont work with me and hopefully it wont work with other people  That means you are lying in the paragraph above when you suggest this is original research unsupported claims or laziness And you know you are Well great I hope youre happy Perhaps youve violated the reverts rule by now