Resolving this once and for all   The dispute regarding the Roxas v Marcos case has gone on long enough It doesnt need to be this complicated This is a fascinating lawsuit with real life disputes over Yamashitas treasure right smack in the middle of it What is the real problem here A Hawaiian court sided with Roxas in  The Hawaii Supreme Court later sided with Marcos that insufficient evidence was presented to value restitution for the treasure seized It remanded to the trial court that it rework its valuation for the assets seized in its judgment The trial court returned a new judgment published  I believe and this judgment was upheld by the Hawaii Supreme Court So lets try this again fresh dont simply repeat whats already been said thats the reason why the dispute is still stuckrepeating the same thing again and again wont help I ask you to keep it simple and to the point  little tidy paragraph thats it what does this article need to say about Roxas v Marcos and what does it need not to say Can we do that