Moved from Montanabw talk  Moved here by Montanabw so all active editors may participate in the discussion Hi Montanabw  I followed your recommendation and read all the page WikipediaExternallinks and didnt find the case of regarding the edition I did to the value Melbourne Cup  Please tell me which point is the one that you think that aplies here   Besides that as I already stated the text and the picture are high quality and very relevant to the value I dont understand whats going on  Waiting for your reply  Regards   Sebastiansta  As other editors have been trying to explain to you we have no need for an enormous diagram of disproportionate size particularly when it appears to be copyrighted and it is not properly sourced by using a spamlink to a commercial site  Please read WPNOADS and take further discussion to the article talk page     I removed the diagram againit was taking up way too much space and looked copypasted from somewhere else   White Arabian mare  Lets take this to the article talk page or that of the user     Hi  I will address what you said   You are using a copyrighted image I Have permission to use it Also there is no copyright over the image in fact I will citate you it appears to be copyrighted You are using a forprofit betting site as a source There is a lot of forprofit betting sites as resources In fact many of the big bookmakers have their own article in Wikipedia William Hill bookmaker As you may know they are legal companies you might like them or not but that is your personal issue  and the material is not necessary for the article The material is just for the article Is the race course of the race  If the issue is the image size we can talk about that but the issue seems different here  The other editor didnt explain to me anything Just remove the material   Please just objective facts not a lot of appears to seems to intention to  Is there any big editors authority I think that this exceeds already the common sense    Sebastiansta  You uploaded the image as your own work that alone qualifies as a copyright violation only the owner of the image has the authority to release copyright via the WPOTRS system  It is irrelevant that William Hill has a WP article it does not make their web page a reliable source for info about the track and furthermore that information is more appropriate for the article about the track not this race  The big editor authority are the policies and guidelines of wikipedia that I have already posted to you at your talk page  The image is out and the text you tried to add which is also close to a copyvio because youve pretty much just rephrased what is said at the link you cited is also out  Furthermore as your primary edits seem to be to the William Hill page and this one I suspect you also work for that company and may therefore fall under the conflict of interest rules here or are engaging in paid advocacy which is also subject to restrictions noted here  WPCOIPAYDISCLOSE  Now please drop the issue two experienced editors have told you this is not permissible and why  repeatedly