One editor keeps trying to remove references and accounts about the Arizona election  Indeed there are thousands of references to this election on google and most of the key facts are not in dispute    One editor keeps trying to wipe it out of Wikipedia making the excuse that since the Arizona Democratic Primary in March of  was financed by the Democratic Party as opposed to using tax payer funds and administered by a contractor as opposed to government employees that the election was thus a Priavte election and thus irrelevant  However these facts are not in dispute  The election was binding  The election was lawful and was upheld in the courts despite at least one lawsuit trying to stop it  The election was extremely scrutinzed as evidenced by the massive media coverage and professional analysis which is cited in the references and obvious from google  Voter turnout increased by a factor  There were no documented security breaches Certainly internet voting will be controversial for some time  It certainly offers the potential to materially increase voter participation and fundamentally alter the power structure of our country and to dislocate the economic interests of many  Nonetheless one cannot deny that internet voting does exist and that something happened in Arizona in March of  that attracted tens of thousands of television and newspaper accounts around the world at that time  Those who challenge facts about the election should feel free to point out that the election was financed by the democrats themselves and administered by a contractor but simply calling it a Private Election is fundamentally misleading to the public as office for which this binding election was for was President of the United States clearly a public office