Its a no hokum bias The article should be based on archaeological and liguistic evidence not neopagan attempts to reconstruct ancient Canaanite religion and hokey attempts to connect a sea god with the god of the Bible You cant simply equate Yaw with YHWH the latter coming from the root HWH with the Y a grammatical prefix while in the case of Yaw the root is YW Nor can you pretend that Yaw was the main name used just to push this hokey equation