Is that anything like saying The hypothesis on Global Warming doesnt have any significant scientific support  Im not saying it doesnt but its wrong for you to suggest that theres no scientific support against anthropogenic GW the same as saying there was no scientific support for global cooling then  Perhaps the reason there is so much more support for GW than global cooling in the s is that information and studies are so much more available these days  Maybe the reason GW is such a big deal now is because places like MySpace and MTV make it so much more marketable  Personally I see a lot of hype and not a lot of proof