I guess there are two issues  However just because you fail to see the value of the content IMO does not justify the reversions when the content added by myself and others made which accurately toned down the bold statement being made that most textbooks failed to address the criticism of the SPE  Your suggested wording is akin to what we already made  Is the content helpful  Id be happier if we addressed the fact that the SPE is often used as a notable subject in psychology education  Perhaps a better source can be found which mentions this and can be moved to a different section of the article as it probably doesnt belong in criticism