Section b of the GACR states it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections layout words to watch fiction and list incorporation Refering to MOSLAYOUT we are drawn to section  Notes and references It begins For how to generate and format these sections see HelpFootnotes and WikipediaCiting sources WikipediaCiting sources aka WPREF includes section  Variation in citation methods aka WPCITEVAR Extracted guidlelines of note from sections  and   To be avoided  Switching between major citation styles eg switching between parenthetical and  tags or between the style preferred by one academic discipline vs another  Generally considered helpful  Imposing one style on an article with incompatible citation styles eg some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references an improvement because it makes the formatting consistent  By following GAcriteria I am led with no uncertainty to a sound conclusion and made the reasonable request that all references be made consistent They are currently a mixed bag of s and  Per WPCITEVAR this is avoidable and unhelpful and therefore unacceptable in my opinion it fails the GAN requirement to follow MOSLAYOUT closely enough I will be failing this part of the GA nomination should the article remain a mixed bag per WPGACR which is built upon consensus that affects ALL of wikipedia and ALL GA nominations A local consensus cannot seek to make an exception for oneoff nominations WPIAR does not apply here  Lets bear in mind one final point  I dont answer to the likes of you because your flamboyant attitude damages Wiki it doesnt help it