As previously written in discussion per wikipedias own written polices but immediately deleted by Blackpearl and then sanctioned by  Lessheard vanU Blackpearll  calls herself evidently Mrs Johnny Depp and Pirate lordess and such  She celebrates on her official wikipedia bio pages that she did many pages and articles on the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean for wikipedia   Why would someone devote so much time to  check the site and on these pages and then recklessly calls anyone who doesnt follow her bias views vandals attackers and such   Has her judgement become impaired   Her goal to fuse her love and fantasies with the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean is very clear  That is a conflict of interest and that is not being neutral and is against wikipedias own written polices  Sorry but if one purchases products such as Pirates of the Caribbean posters toys and Walt Disney merchandise and also using emotional love and fantasies for wikipedia  wikinews articles doesnt make the articles neutral and it causes a conflict of interest   As recorded Blackpearls pages regarding this issue are one sided not neutral are bias in conflict of interest and are all promotional tools promoting the causes and products of the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean   Yes Pirates of the Caribbean and similar wikipedia articles are not neutral they are a series of one sided promotional pages including links to products and causes of the Walt Disney Company   Following wikipedias own written neutral policy entire articles would have to be deleted    Yet Blackpearl continues to violate Wikipedia polices and purpose     Then with IPs being deliberately blocked and contributing writers having been wrongly accused and falsely called various things if anyone then attempts to generate a new article related to Pirates of the Caribbean following wikipedias own written polices editors and administrators gang up and generate false reason upon reason to delete those articles and ban the IP user   They use a countless list of double standards and twisted logic to justify their reckless acts   Its a total lock out by the editors and administrators abusing their trust tools acting like a private monarchy   To date Blackpearls has proven she has ultimate control has repeatedly stated that is her purpose and had even sought to have the articles locked    Then you Lessheard vanU wrote that you dont want to lock these articles stating it goes against company policy but yet you added that you are preparing to possibly lock the articles in some capacity and do other acts against those who have been falsely branded and wrongly labeled as vandals and harassing the editors etc   Other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include SVTCobra and Whoville and Chris Mann   We have documented that they say one thing yet practice another   We have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers   We contributing writers also wonder just how many editors and administrators have a conflict of interest to various articles   So since you  Lessheard vanU have personally chosen to block IP addresses and made false allegations against me and other contributing people we are requesting clarification   When did Blackpearl become owner controller and self judge of certain wikipedia articles  If you believe that Blackpearl owns and has absolute control over Pirates of the Caribbean articles then please state that is the policy  Why is Blackpearl allowed to violate wikipedias own written polices and purpose  Why are other editors and administrators upholding double standards  For you cant have double standards as the wikipedia written policies detail a cooperative community effort for articles and its suppose to be neutral    Furthermore there is no way to discuss nor talk about the reckless actions of Blackpearl without saying and describing what they are  Yet immediately Blackpearl has wrongly and irresponsibly calls anyone placing anything critical or changes to certain pages she had appointed herself as self controller of as vandals and outright claims that she is being attacked and then goes to her peers with which to delete the talk and discussion  leaving only the editors and administrators comments and self bias online while blocking IPs   What is shocking that you dont know who I nor other contributing writers are    Why are Blackpearl actions being upheld    Why is her emotional state calling herself various names in fantasy as she selfishly promotes her personal cause to glorify and promote a cause for her love for Pirates of the Caribbean and its people all to go unquestioned   Blackpearl has proven she is not able to be neutral is completely bias while preventing other contributing writers to adding facts and information to the wikipedia articles she claims she owns and controls   Whoville and SVTCobra have also proven their bias and double standards practices   If Blackpearl owns and controls those articles then why does editors and administrators prevent and block other contributing writers from creating their own articles of the same subject and why are we held to different standards than Blackpearl   Why are double standards being used against contributing writers who follow wikipedias own written policies and purposes    Then following wikipedias own written rules as recorded discussion talk was created to confront these issues and serious charges and threats against contributing people  Yet Blackpearl simply gets you to immediately block IP addresses and threaten more   Then she gives you an award saying that she is thanking you for protecting her from being attacked   Are you aware of wikipedias own written polices about communications    Us contributing writers are well aware of them  Have you read this one when in doubt dont delete   Proper and detailed wikipedia communications procedures were followed yet you Lessheard vanU have followed her reckless actions giving her more unchecked power control and validation   This is both reckless and dangerous  There are written policies that you broke when you outright deleted the talk and discussion  But evidently you dont care   Either there are the written policies of Wikipedia to be followed or by the actions of wikipedias editors and administrators have proven it is overrun by double standards corruption and recklessness  Wikipedias purpose isnt to create kings queens and monarchies upholding double standards and playing power trip games unless that is the editors and administrators purpose   Wikipedia solicits itself as a free public forum and details its own written polices yet some editors and administrators have shown that they have seized control of wikipedia deliberately using it solely for their own personal agenda and causes while wrongly blocking the public other contributing writers from using it and continue to falsely solicit that its a free public forum   Thus if you yet again plan to delete this talk and discussion continue to uphold double standards and generate more false claims with which to wrongly block and threaten against us contributing writers of whom follow wikipedias written community policies then first notify wikipedias owners and lawyers of your actions   For this is still a free public community cooperative forum for everyone that is until wikipedia formally changes its published written polices and solicitations   It cant have it both ways   We await  your respected reply