naming  vandal for the good faith doing harm to Wikipedia    Wikipedia is not a soapbox Articles and particularly their titles must conform to policy regarding verifiability  Wikipedias role as an encyclopedia of existing recognized knowledge  The existing recognized knowledge about Basho that he was a writer of Haiku Hokku is not the existing recognized knowledge about Haiku and Basho It is for circle of academicians Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable published sources making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered see WikipediaNeutral point of view The books of Shirine are not published worldwide and might content minority views that were not proved  To write about Basho as a writer of Hokku when he is known in Japan as writer of Haiku to create article about Hokku when Shika perfectly explained that it was Haiku what is this Karate