Coat of Arms of Vermont  Hi I presume your request is related to my assessment of the article for the heraldry and vexillology wikiproject My reasoning was basically that it was too long to be a stub and didnt have GA status which meant it had to be either Start or B class since it was on the short side I went for Start Having read it once again I cant immediately think of any content which could be added This is a problem I have with all coat of arms articles once youve said what it looks like when it was first used who designed it and any possible symbolism theres really not much else you can say unless the arms are old enough that you can trace the historical development Having said that it would possibly be interesting to know why the state has both a seal and a coat of arms  I would however take issue with your statement Vermont is the only US state to have authentic armorial bearings described in a blazon First what do you mean by an authentic coat of arms Are there states which use fake coats of arms Also given that the arms are an example of landscape heraldry you might find people arguing whether they are actually authentic arms Secondly a blazon is just a written description of a coat of arms given a picture of a coat of arms someone sufficiently experienced in heraldry can produce a blazon so theres nothing particularly unique about a coat of arms having a blazon In the European tradition it is in fact the blazon that defines the arms rather than the visual representation Thirdly if you want to get picky blazon usually refers to the anglofrench jargon used to describe coats of arms whereas the blazon of the CoA of Vermont is more like a laymans description although it does throw in a few heraldic terms I note that the external link you provide refers to the blazon as quasiheraldic terminology Finally Vermont is not the only state which has a blazon enshrined in statute see Coat of arms of North Dakota for example  Regarding possible improvements I would be inclined to add subheadings eg history blazonVermonters badge Also now that youve added a couple of other sources it would probably be good to add citations to indicate which facts come from which source The external link says that the arms were not defined by statute until  but the article says differently is the external site wrong Quoting the statute numbers could possibly be useful A couple more images could also be good eg of the arms being used today or historical versions showing the considerable liberties taken