September  UTC Ill try to take the points in turn Hope I get this format right   WPBLPGOSSIP states that Be wary of sources that use weasel words and that attribute material to anonymous sources I am not aware of any weasel words or attribution to anonymous sources I am not sure how the section applies if you could be more clear it would be helpful   The phrase involve claims about third parties is so vague as to not be any assistance By this metric so little can be used that its almost meaningless Someone stating their birthdate or the grade school they attended But for a person saying I have a conflict with Jenny Smith over Issue X  where do we draw the line It could easily be said that an actor and actress divorcing with one placing on their personal publicist website a statement about separating for reasons of X is a claim about third parties but I wouldnt argue it is unreliable nor unencyclopedic to include in the biography of either individual One can take things too far and I think in this case the avoidance of even mentioning the existence of dispute is getting to the point where people are being literalist and not using their common sense