I think its a really bad idea to start listing nicknames it adds little of value to the article and encourages flyby editing with tendentious additions of nicknames Pretty much the same reason why none of the regular editors think a separate criticism section is a good idea As I see it we should either have one nickname or none My vote is for Darwins rottweiler  it focuses on Dawkins main intellectual contribution to evolutionary theory and alludes to the fact that he can be a fiercecontroversial figure What do the rest of you think