I agree with Matt Crypto This split seems very unnecessary excessively hasty and poorlyreasoned It adds complication confusion and redirection where none is necessary and there was none before creates hundreds of links to a redirect page just because of the off chance both hypothetical and unlikely that at some point in the future there might be a distinct Lives of the Twelve Caesars article which you should have established consensus for or at least discussed first and is incredibly poor wikipediainternallinking style in that it buries the actual title of Suetonius work like so Lives of the Twelve CaesarsSuetonius rather than something more reasonable that would allow links to both like Suetonius Lives of the Twelve Caesars Piped links that go to unexpected pages someone clicking Suetonius expects a link to the person not to a random one of the books he wrote I realize that its the only extant one but its still random and arbitrary from an objective perspective are strongly discouraged because of the circuitous and confusing path they give to our readers and the information they coyly hide ie that the book of Suetonius being referenced is Lives of the Twelve Caesars from anyone who doesnt take the time to click the link and read the whole page provided So even if these edits of Neddyseagoons are necessary theyre being done so poorly that all of them will need to be reverted and fixed anyway Hence my dissatisfaction with how much haste and needless rushing around and how little discussion and forethought went into this Lots of wasted effort for everyone involved