Page protection Keilana can you please explain why you have semi protected the page Huma Abedin  You have stated vandalism which is clearly not the case Please see Biographies of living personsNoticeboard where the matter is being dealt with  Can you explain your actions  I understand I am new here but it was one of the first pieces of information i have cont to wikipedia there has been no decision made I can not understand your actions   Having now had the rules for vandalism explained to me I believe you have abused your power as my contib clearly dosent fit any of the terms  I ask you to reaccess your actions  The decision was made at WikipediaRequestsforpageprotectionHumaAbedineditCtalkChistoryClinksCwatchClogs Its common practice during an edit dispute such as this for an uninvolved admin such as Keilana to semiprotect the page to reduce the intensity of the dispute In any case from the tone of WikipediaBiographiesoflivingpersonsNoticeboardGossipmagazinesasreliablesources it seems that semiprotection was the right call to stablize the article while discussion continued there and on the talk page of the reliability of sources MBisanz talk   I would question how uninolved you actally are give these messges left on my talk page And dont worry Youll be able to edit that page in  days Enjoy BoL   And by waiting for five days is by just waiting and youll be able to edit the semid pages Dont worry give Keilana some time Shes offline right now and so am I BoL  Retrieved from httpenwikipediaorgwikiUsertalkfreehuman  I intend on asking someone to examine your actions You clearly statd vandalism as your reason for the protection i would not you made no contibution to the talk page and sort no concensus from you action I will also ask you to explain you relastionship to those who have sort to remove the information  I would also like to know why you have changed you id  thanks I will be adding this information to the talk page and any were else i find help  I also note you did not add the fact the matter was being listed to protection page to the talk page of the article   I did not create the name of the page in regards to gossip mag tittle had you read the info you would understand Hillary Clinton was interviewed for the article  To request unprotection please go here WikipediaRequestsforpageprotectionCurrentrequestsforunprotection To ask for Keilana to be examined Id wait for her to respond here and if your not satisfied there is the WikipediaAdministrators noticeboard I leave the personal inquiries for Keilana to answer is she desires to MBisanz talk   Responded on the editors talk thanks MB KeilanaParlez ici   I would like to know how the article was brought to your attention I would also advise you that i have posted this information on the talk page of the article  Thank you Dear MBisanz thank you so much for responding to those concerns on my talk page Ive posted on the persons talk if she wants my admin actions looked at she can always seek input at AN or God forbid through recall Youve been a great help recently and when youre ready for RfA Id really like to nominate you if youve got some space for me  Best KeilanaParlez ici   Retrieved from httpenwikipediaorgwikiUsertalkMBisanz  and your atual post  Hello Sorry I couldnt attend to your concerns earlier I semiprotected the page here because of the reasons stated there As it is election season in the United States articles about prominent political figures such as Mrs Clinton are particularly vulnerable hence the protection There was a dispute over the reliability of sources and I protected the article to cool the dispute Protection isnt an endorsement of the current version I have no ulterior motive see here for protection policyinformation In general an admin doesnt need consensus to protect a page when a dispute is ongoing Is there a problem with my administrative actions Thanks for expressing your concerns feel free to ask on my talk page if you have other questions or need something Best KeilanaParlez ici   Retrieved from httpenwikipediaorgwikiUsertalkfreehuman  The information was added to keep record for a complaint add so people reading the page understand why it is copy protected  Who bought the information to the protect board  Should not the fact it was brought to the board have been added to the talk page so people could provide information as to why it shouldnt be protected  I was again note you claimed your reason for protecting the page was vandelism which it clearly is not How do I request a recall  Thanks