Surprised to see an admin say this  Ive been pretty busy the last few days and havent been able to keep up to date with the changes but maybe it is finally time to request arbitration I agree that there seems to be a basic misunderstanding of what NPOV actually means and perhaps arbitration is the way to go In the mean time try simply reverting the reverts Ive done that a few times and if enough people participate then none of us will be in danger of rr   wrp Bill Pringle Talk   This appears to be advice on how to conduct an edit war Suppose that editor gets  others to do the same thing you are proposing would that be okay too Arent there official routes to follow instead Duke  Talk   Yes there are official routes to follow and I and others have suggested several times that the dispute will probably end up in arbitration  The issue is an editor who reverts legitimate edits with little or no comment apparently because he doesnt like the change  He seems to have a problem understanding NPOV  My comment was meant to convey that just because somebody reverts your change if you feel it is without merit then you should feel free to rerevert it and include a note on why you are doing it  In this case the person tends to not participate in any discussion but then reverts back to some earlier version that he prefers  again with little or no substantive comment about why he reverted  I hope that clears up what I meant to say  Im running on very little sleep today so my original comment probably could have been phrased better    Nice hearing from you again BTW