condo to prevent unecessary redirects   tz   Not sure the recent edit changing Tyler from Anarchist to Nihilist is accurate Tyler certainly does have a ethos and creed where as a nihilist does not His creed can certainly be said to be destruction of the current culture and certainly retrograde in many respects seeking to return to a simpler subsistence level of existence ie huntergatherer but he definitely has an established ethos and worldview It is simply contrary to much of modern society I posit that the edit should be reverted back to anarchist     Readers Digest JackJoe Hey a few years ago I was reading a really old Readers Digest and I swear I actually read an article written first person from an organs point of view  I dont remember which  and the guys name was Joe  This was before I read the book so I just thought it was a really odd coincidence at the timeI cant seem to find the article anymore though  Does anyone else have any info on this  Was Joe changed to Jack to avoid legal troubles with the original Joes XXXXXX author   The author of the book was talking about real stories from Readers Digest so you probably did read the same ones he refered to Joe is changed to Jack in the movie because Readers Digest wasnt willing to allow them to mention it in the film    I have a copy of John Pekkanens article I am Johns Brain Tumour from Readers Digest South Africa  volume  number  Chapter  of my copy of Palahniuks Fight club has I am Janes Uterus I am Joes Prostate  I am totally Joes Gallbladder ISBN  Vintage  UK Random House The English RD sites I searched came up empty The earliet Joes I found were two  videos  from Pyramid Films I found that Pyramid Media credits it to RD  Does anyone have a source of an actual Readers Digest article with Joe   tz   It is mentioned on the commentary for the DVD that Readers Digest told them not to use Joe Apperantely they own the copyright somehow Either way the narrator in the book does use Joe rather than Jack And given that the book is the original story I believe that Joe should be used more often in the article than Jack though the narrator fits the characters name more accurately The article seems to lean too much towards being about the movie which makes it seem as if it was the original source material instead of the book It would be best that we keep the article based mainly on the book with details on the movie where applicable Otherwise what we would be doing would be the equivelent of someone making the Lord of the Rings article more about the Peter Jackson movie than JRR Tolkiens work     Tyler section We should merge the Tyler Durden section into the characters section There isnt a need for  separate sections on him As it is it looks redundant and a bit sloppy Any details that dont fit that section can go into a different one     Backstory of the novel I just recently updated the article on Chuck Palahniuk with info on how Fight Club came to be This is in the first paragraph of the Biography section I was wondering if anyone thought we should include that info in this article since it gives the backstory of how it was written       Musical This this for real Ive never heard such a thing can anyone offer proof     Aug  UTC  See httpwwwplaybillcomnewsarticlehtml for more details Also a recent Guardian interview      Movie  Book Balance As I mentioned above at the end of the Readers Digest JackJoe section the article is biased towards the movie that is the info for the film is treated as being the primary source instead of the book and needs to be balanced equally for the book I have fixed a recent rewrite of the plot section which made it even more biased in favor of the film but more work could be done to balance the article I think that fixing this is the most important o