Enough is left in the article including three pics about this As even you say it may add significantly to our knowledge of dinosaurs or may not It is very greatly overplayed here and I will revert your reversions until someone wants to hammer out a compromise   What is your own position besides a claim about the recent splash it made  How is this discovery worth an entire section while other major discoveries about dinosaurs receive a passing mention at best You are not seeing the aim of my revisions which is to focus the article on dinosaur