Great sentiment but the rules and policies are in many cases inherently explicitly bad If they were fundamentally sound they wouldnt yield such preposterous results they so often do particularly on politicaleconomics articles Believe it or not but Ive actually try to edit within those flaws and it doesnt work   OR is one of my favorites You can add completely relevant wellsourced text with great informative value but are explicitly prohibited from doing so and are thus unable to correct a distorted rendition on a given topic When editing so called fringe articles this becomes almost comical Since fringe by its very definition means that it is outside what is considered mainstream it is easy to find mainstream articles that criticizes the fringe position but nigh on impossible to find a mainstream source that counters that position since the mainstream by and large is critical of that position So you need to find an article that explicitly counters the arbitrary chosen article used by the mainstream editor Obviously that will be very difficult since fringe articles are again by its very definition scarce And if you do find one the mainstream editor calls on the RS rule thus ruling out the use of that source because and heres the kicker its fringe And there is nothing you can do about it because that is what the rules say Talk about catch   Thus you can add whatever demonstrably false bullshit you want in order to inflate the criticism of the fringe position This easy to do since theres an endless amount of mainstream articles to choose from These criticisms become virtually impossible to counter because of the OR RS or some other bullshit rule According to the rules it is better to have false and distortive information on the article provided it is critical than correct and informative material This is not the consequence of some manipulation of otherwise good rules and policies this is the explicit goal and purpose of WP Truth is not an issue the High Lord Jimmy Wales tells us only whatever delusional bullshit claims that can be verified by delusional bullshit mainstream sources  Ive got blocked many times that is true But why I have got blocked Well in most cases its the result of me trying to defend an article against what any sensible person would have to call vandalism But of course vandalism is just keeping with rules and policies in the WP world Also if you happen to be alone in defending a certain edit and you have two opponents they can just take turns reverting your edit until you hit the rr rule Another charming aspect of the WP rules and policies  So no the rules and policies are not mostly okay Very far from it They are the very reason why WP cannot be used as source on information about economics not even in a youtube commentary debate It works fine when it comes to physics or other natural sciences But not when it comes to economics That is a shame but it is the inevitable consequence of fundamentally flawed rules and policies and the implementation thereof I may not have been around as long as you have but Ive been around long enough to know how fucked up WPs rules and policies are And they are holding WP back