First NPOV is only violated by you Why do you say of course as EU brings nothing good and if you look eg to England or Poland most parties are AntiEU which does not mean they want immediately a withdrawal and thats of course It are simply facts Most parties in Europe are AntiEU but even if not why would that be a reason not to mention the parties who speculate about withdrawal And why would nonwinning in elections be a reason not to mention them They seek EU Withdrawal or a major reform or optouts for their nations But as you say you dont want they have weight because you simply do not tolerate other opinions about the EU and wanna have your LibDemProEUOpinion which is anyway evil in the article and undermine the parties who want real freedom and independence though in fact we AntiEUists do not have opinions but knowledge Second all that would give WP a very bad name which you dont wanna though it has anyway a bad name yet as WP is a nonneutral centerleft proEUSA propaganda platform But you may be right with the fact that the partylists are already better explained in the article Euroscepticism while Euroscepticism is also rather a proEU valuating name better would be Eurocriticism or AntiEUism which would but not be a reason to delete the lists but to delete this whole article and simply redirect to Euroscepticism and transfer the other information But I would say its better to have two seperate articles and this one with both lists