Re Please be less bitey   Ive read your comments on my talk page  You are entitled your opinion of course but I stand by my actions  This seems to be a clear case of spamming which needs to be dealt with firmly  What is incontrovertible is that a few days ago  added links to several Fox Chapel Publishing websites to a range of articles  When they were removed they were readded by another IP editor and subsequently by Gloden a new user  It is also easy to verify that  is an IP address assigned to Fox Chapel Publishing  If Gloden is to be believed then somebody at Fox Chapel added those links and identical links were readded by a new user acting independently less than  hours lately and that users apparently created an account for the express purpose of adding those links I believe that that is stretching credibility  Sure youd need a CU to confirm it for certain but it appears clear that there is a prima facie case there  Both user Gloden and the IP editors were told that the links added were in contravention of policy on external links but chose to ignore that fact  The edit summaries suggest that the reverting edit summaries were being read and that they were aware of the nature of their addition but they were willing to persist in readding the links anyway  There comes a point where AGF is no longer tenable when it is clear that the true motives of an editor are not in the best interest of the project AGF should be dropped  I believe that was reached a long time ago and when that point is reached the conclusion is simple he is a spammer and should be dealt with accordingly  My post at ANI did not solicit any concerns about my own behaviour  the response seemed to confirm my reading of the issue  Having said this I dont believe myself to be infallible so Ill open this up to editor review to see if the general consensus is if I have acted appropriately