This is not a vandalisation  I posted the following as a message to you I never made any vandalisation so I dont know where the bot entry came from  Oh and I also want to apologise for the note on my edit to the rodney king page as I have no idea whether you are actually biassed or not and I dont know how to change that edit annotation  sorry           I fail to see why you removed my edit clarifying the position as regards the missing section of tape  There is dispute whether a part of the tape that shows Mr King attempting to attack the officers actually exists although it is claimed that this unaired segment was the major reason why the jury returned the verdicts which they did  I do not think that a court of law has actually ruled as to the existence of a missing segment and I hardly think that quoting one website is sufficient evidence to assert its nonexistence If you have further authoritative sources for your assertion please give them as I would like to know for sure also In the meantime I dont think that it is unfair to say that there is a dispute as to whether a missing segment of tape exists Please dont think that I in any way condone the treatment of Mr King I am making my comments in the spirit of objectivity     So you see it is a message not a vandalisation