First of all let me answer your tag that is removed by me  WPPolicy  Fairness of tone If were going to characterize disputes neutrally we should present competing views with a consistently fair and sensitive tone Many articles end up as partisan commentary even while presenting both points of view Even when a topic is presented in terms of facts rather than opinion an article can still radiate an implied stance through either selection of which facts to present or more subtly their organization  for instance refuting opposing views as one goes along makes them look a lot worse than collecting them in an opinionsofopponents section  We should instead write articles with the tone that all positions presented are at least plausible bearing in mind the important qualification about extreme minority views Lets present all significant competing views sympathetically We can write with the attitude that suchandsuch is a good idea except that in the view of some detractors the supporters of said view overlooked suchandsuch a detail    Now let me mention one thing to you  If a name Khan was mentioned twice and you were having preservations against them  You would have discussed it before otherwsie you would have deleted Khan a single time But you didnt done this instead you deleted edited and vandalised whole of the article as usuall This was against WPs policy  At last let me share one thing Obscure people should never be allowed having a space in Noteable Marwats If they are allowed then they must have true face I recently read Khan Habibullah Khan at  national dailys Were they also advertising or are you against him only pulling tribal enimity