Please read our core policy WPNPOV It says The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting views The policy requires that where there are or have been conflicting views these should be presented fairly None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being the truth and all significant published points of view are to be presented not just the most popular one It should also not be asserted that the most popular view or some sort of intermediate view among the different views is the correct one Readers are left to form their own opinions WikipediaNeutralpointofviewFAQPseudoscience tells us The task before us is not to describe disputes as though for example pseudoscience were on a par with science rather the task is to represent the majority scientific view as the majority view and the minority sometimes pseudoscientific view as the minority view and moreover to explain how scientists have received pseudoscientific theories This is all in the purview of the task of describing a dispute fairly