I got my first block ie not this one for keeping an article in line with a consensus that was established one month beforehand but now youre using an unresolved discussion from  months ago as the entire basis for your changes to Aesop That makes no sense The reason Aesop used BCAD for the last  months straight is not because nobody noticed my revert against consensus it was because Mzilikazi agreed on his talk page to stop changing the articles All five of us had agreed some of us implicitly rather than explicitlyto leave both articles alone and that is indeed what occurred for many months By ignoring this commitment youre the one breaching consensus Dougweller