Headley  you are assuming there is a problem related to disagreement within NLP  you are calling groups within NLP tribes or sects and people representing them shamen please dont hype your view how about a little rationality Im glad to see that you do consider a web search valid for inferring some general trends which contradicts what you said earlier when it showed no support for Engrams and there are certainly lots of different trainings  Im VERY interested in what you consider key differences in what they teach and Im sure it would help the article  because from what Ive read they share a great amount of core teachings principles presuppositions approaches processes though they often apply it in different ways  yes there are also disagreements its a weakness of the field that I agree wholeheartedly with  some groups probably make wild claims though noone has found a link to show it yet  except via secondary sources others are quite academic and training quality varies  there are no nonpromotional editors at present except perhaps VoiceOfAll  you are promoting against NLP probably more strongly that were promoting for NLP and the research often focuses on a wild claim it would be a shame not to represent what NLP groups claim in common plus noting differences  instead just working with the pieces that have been researched so far people wouldnt realise that PRS is a small component nor that it is not taught as researched