The changelog mentions an improvement to the article as well  I really really think that some time needs to be spent reviewing the article that it is being redirected to I suspect there are many more policy that is in violation of and in particular of the policy that caused the initial reversion which was warlike and by nonwiki definitions stalking  Also perhaps a simple explanation here of what revert means how copyright applies only to one author and it not be stalking and also any other definitions of words and ideas which seem to not be the same here as they are in the real world  this would give me something productive to think about over the next  hours