ec with Moni Or that using say Dictionary of National Biography articles is better than using Oxford Dictionary of National Biography articles because the first is free to everyone and the second is only free to UK library subscribers Never mind the  year difference in scholarship and the turgid prose and EdwardianVictorian POV Ive seen it argued that we should use the DNB before the ODNB Its like competence isnt required to edit merely civility which is so wrong on so many counts its not even funny I took the latest Wikipedia Foundation survey today and found it unsettling More questions seemed aimed at how close is editing WP to FB and what would make it coolermore social mediaetc to you Does no one remember were supposed to be writing an encyclopedia