Actually my goal is to make a neutral POV present in these articles which involves removing the biased edits made by you two users You have both consistently  made very controversial and unfounded edits in this and similar articles based on your own agenda yet you accuse others of doin the same without acknowledging your own ridiculous POV edits I am not denying the link between Iberia and the British Isles but it is the same link shared across western and atlantic Europe and there is no special relationship with regards to those two respective regions The relationship is only based on the Ychromosome and Mtdna inheritance shared with all Western European regions It needs to be reminded that there are subgroups to the rb Ychromosome marker and the regions have differential values in both ychromosomes and mtdna There is very little to no evidence of autosomal and xchromosome analysis and when viewing the ychrommtdna percentages in these populations you need to look at them as a whole Rb is found across western Europe in high frequencies but it does not mean the populations are necessarily very related to each other There is no genetic evidence yet of a Neolithic link between the British Isles and Iberia since Rb traces back to a Paleolithic Iberian refuge The Neolithic and following periods were quite different between the Iberian and the British Isles and the Neolithic Ychrom and Mtdna percentage is much larger in Iberia than in Britain or Ireland You also must not rely so significantly on references by Sykes or Oppenheimer since they have not brought any new genetic evidence to the subject and only cite studies in their books that have already been out for quite some time and are already found cited in these articles Ive read through both books and they really do make hasty unfounded and biased conclusions that do not necessarily coincide with the results of the studies they refer so much to There are also books already out and also some to be released in the following months which  contradict and refute many of the findings or conclusions of Oppenheimer and Sykes Their views are also a minority among population geneticists and anthropologists because the majority acknoledge that many more studies on all sections of DNA need to be carried out to fully understand the origins of various peoples let alone declaring any solid conclusions or findings I do agree that I should discuss my edits when I make them and I will endeavour to do so from now on so it is easier to compromise on the fidings in this article