My Reverting of The Edit In The History Section I didnt revert the edit because the material you removed isnt redundant in some ways which is fairly obvious if you read the  section as a whole The entire history section of this article is still in very bad shape in my opinion Id suggest that its got non NPOV issues in several spots the tone its written in and choice of words seem somewhat chatty and unencyclopedic to me and worst of all it continues to contain what Id argue are historical inaccuracies in some places Instead of editing out the paragraph that was removed today which contained a link to a map as well as an internal link to the ongoing Caledonia land dispute a subject quite relevant in the Grand Valley these days Id like to see the entire history section itself brought up to a higher standard In my opinion from a historical perspective the article itself would benefit more if some of the earlier comments in it regarding the acquisition of the land by the Six Nations were edited out and replaced by the material that was removed today As I said back in August Im willing to work on this article myself as time allows but in my opinion it doesnt make sense removing content thats not only relevant and contains references its actually of a higher quality than what remains