Please feel free to collaborate a wording that works for you Mantis My main point is that we can discuss the pseudonym in the article my thoughts of where were to do so were simply a suggestion As Blueboars comment I appreciate that moving ahead despite your thoughts that we could include it It would be akin to someone noting the similarities between Mickey Blue Eyes with Analyze This we usually leave it up to the reader to make the connection though we can do so if a reviewer or someone citable notes it For me its a chewingthefood argument against inclusion  The anon wont be contributing to the discussion for a week so I think if we want we can try to anticipate what she might object to and act accordingly