The missed shot  I have omitted most of the text for the section on the missed shot for the very simple reasons there are a no explanation as to why there is a problem with the SBT requiring a missed shot given that the WC identifies witnesses which could place any of the three shots as the missed shot  including the third and b because the witnesses who it was claimed say ALL bullets struck the occupents most certainly do not support the contention that all three bullets indeed did so with the sole exception of Nellie Connally who said JFK was hit then her husband John Connally btw claims he was hit with the second bullet but from his description that first bullet could have been fired at  as he didnt see JFK and his selfdescribed movements match his reaction from that point NONE of the other witnesses noted who heard or saw JFK struck with the first bullet say that they then saw Connally or JFK hit with a second bullet besides the fatal head wound The closest is Newman who describes a second shot then Connally grabbing his chest which appears to be more consistent with Nellie pulling him towards her Indeed some such as Hill and the Chisms only heard TWO shots so cant be used as a witness to claim all three shots hit their mark when obviously they only heard and saw two hit their mark  The section IOW needs to be rewritten to clarify why if Kennedy was struck with the first bullet that this somehow negates the SBT when the WC itself doesnt seem to have a problem as they suggest scenarios whereby a second bullet missed fired around  or a third bullet missed just before the limo went into the underpass