The following was written as a reply to your message on my talk page and it refers to the text of that message Normally I reply to a message on the talk page where it is posted to avoid fragmenting discussion but since you have also posted a message to me here and since it concerns you more than me I am posting my reply here  First of all you say sorry for this but no apologies are necessary I am sure that everything you did was done in good faith and all of us when we first start to edit Wikipedia dont know all the policies guidelines etc so there is no blame to be attached to anyone who perfectly innocently does things which they then find are not considered acceptable I should think very few of us manage to do any significant editing of Wikipedia without making some sort of mistakes  There are several issues here I will try to deal with the ones that I think are most important  You say that permission has been given for use of the content However we cant take the unsubstantiated word of just anyone who chooses to create a Wikipedia account that they have copyright permission This is not just some kind of pedantry unfortunately people do come here and lie about such issues Just yesterday I was looking at the case of someone who has over several years repeatedly lied about copyright permission forged evidence of such permission and used multiple Wikipedia accounts to do so I am giving you below information about how to give copyright permission to Wikipedia However I still suggest that that may not be a useful way forward for several reasons Granting permission under the relevant licensing terms will mean that permission is give for anyone at all anywhere in the world to reuse the text as it is or modified however they like for any purpose including their own commercial use subject to minimal requirements essentially no more than providing a link to show where they got the content from In practice there are very few organisations or businesses that are willing to license their website content so freely and it is very unlikely that an organisation which puts  Tinkatolli ApS without further qualification at the bottom of its web pages will be willing to do so There is no such thing as licensing text for use only on Wikipedia because anything posted to any Wikipedia page is automatically released under free licensing terms Also even if Tinkatolli ApS is willing to change its copyright licensing terms in that way it is doubtful whether there will be any point in doing so The result would be that reuse by anyone anywhere in the world would be allowed for ever just so that the content would be posted temporarily to a userspace page to be edited to make it less promotional Contrary to what many people think it is not possible for me even to restore the information to a userspace page to be edited without copyright permission Knowingly posting copyrightinfringing content to a page on a publicly viewable website is illegal and having the word user in the title at the top of the page doesnt change that A much better way forward is for me to email the content to you so that you can edit it off Wikipedia However please note that if you choose to take this option it must not be posted to any page at all on Wikipedia while copyrightinfringing content is still there Let me know if you want me to email it to you  You wrote The first reason you had mentioned it looks like for promotion only it isnt its well known and has a big audience I am not at all sure what you think promotion means but it has nothing whatever to do with how well known the subject is I should think that at the last United States presidential election campaign Barack Obama was one of the best known people in the world and certainly better known than Tinkatolli but taht does not detract from teh fact that he and his supporters mounted a massive campaign to promote him Such language as for exampleTinkatolli inspires kids to create move think and give in the game and away from the computer is unambiguously promotional and the whole article was permeated by such promotional writing  Finally as I said I would do I will give you information on how to give Wikipedia copyright permission As I have already explained I dont recommend taking that option but it is up to you if you wish to  If the external website belongs to you and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the textwhich means allowing other people to modify itthen you may include on the external site the statement I name am the author of this article article name and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License Version  and later and the Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike  Unported License You may also email or mail the Foundation to release the content See WikipediaDonating copyrighted materials for more