August  UTC  Edit I was under the impression that discussing the other user on a user talk page in the context of discussing a stillopen ANI discussion of whether the IBAN should be dissolved was acceptable My reason for believing this was that the other party had not been blocked  or even warned  for extensive commentary on me and my edits on his own talk page here and here Drmies claims below that I had received a final warning before being blocked but no such final warning  not even any initial warning  was received If I am blocked without warning for technically violating the terms of a poorlydefined IBAN because I am mimicking the supposedlyacceptable behaviour of the other party then blocking me without blocking them makes this a oneway IBAN something that no one agreed to Either I should be unblocked or the other party should be blocked