Attitude   what appears to be a rather noncontroversial statement is in the eye of the beholder  I have no idea how old you are but as someone who watched the original series as it aired it seemed to me to be an extremely unlikely statement as it apparently did to the person who wrote the source you added thank you by the way because they indicate that they inquired more deeply about it and their inquiries were rebuffed  Id bet my next paycheck that  of the people who watched the series would find the suggestion that those two would ever reside together again to be ludicrous and as such it was highly questionable and not unreasonable to tag  Furthermore your hypocrisy is so thick it smothers  You chide me for not leaving an edit summary here and yet you leave this edit here with no explanation whatsoever  My intent was crystal clear there is no other interpretation for what I did other than the fact that I question the veracity of the statement  On the other hand what was the reason for your edit  Did you revert me because you think that the sourcing is already located in the article  Do you disapprove of tags midarticle   Or is it something else altogether  You claim to give IP editors their due but at least one interpretation of your actions is that you simply revert IP editors at your whim  It was you not I who committed the greater error in failing to explain via edit summary  Its not fair to judge someone based upon one interaction but Ive seen folks around here who criticize others for faults they possess themselves dump on IP editors and then delete critical comments like this from their talk page because their skin is so thin they confuse legitimate criticism with personal attack  I guess well not need long to see if you fit in that category