Don  This is classic  You wrote  pounds of stuff took off in a tangent and didnt even answer my question under discussion requiring no more than a simple yesno objective response Then you went ahead and reversed my deletion in the article without discussing it here Please get consensus before making any article changes  I took a closer look at your source for the under  thing and found a few issues   It is a paid report costing  to access How can any editor verify that you arent making bogus claims    This article seems to be referring to meditation in general and not Sahaj Marg so its not relevant to this discussion  You may want to place it in the meditation article   It is speaking of the inappropriateness of meditation from a pediatric standpoint supposedly  I havent read it The wiki article on pediatrics says that this science is relevant to children up to  to  of age So how is this specifically relevant to the  years of age point under discussion here If you want to put in a criticism of Sahaj Marg making younger children meditate dont hide it in an irrelevant footnote    Finally the sentence Sahaj Marg guru recommends a minimum age of  before beginning the practice of meditation implying this technique is not suitable for younger people is your extrapolation of the motivations for the SRCM rules ie original research Not admissible I will be removing the implying this technique is not suitable for younger people part   Please try to be brief objective and to the point in your response