No problem didnt want to move this conversation as I figured it would be wierd  Well first of all if we look at httpenwikipediaorgwikiImageTheScreamjpg and The Madonna etc we see that several of these old pictures are in socalled public domain in The USA And this being the American version of Wikipedia I would think that this link could be added as well I noticed that the linkpage which is on the Norwegian version of this Edvard Munch website isnt in the English version and this page cites books and websites as the sources of both images and text Now I can see that one may hesitate to link to a website like this but if one were to deny every similar website in other subjectsarticles to be linked to when the content is of such importance as it is here Wikipedia wouldnt be much to look at  You can find  probably thousands  of links of the same kind in all kinds of subjects and articles on Wikipedia But as I said I dont want to start an argument about this I just think its interesting to look into a case like this What can and what cant be linked to Its no big deal for me personally but Wikipedia should set a standard and stick to it  percent I just feel that the public should be able to see some other artworks of Edvard Munch than just The Scream and The Madonna Especially when the artist has been dead for over  years in regarding of copyright in several countries Oh well Time for a cup of coffee