Plautus satires irresponsible comments are those of a crackpot  Plautus satires comments are idiotic nonsense I have refereed papers for five mathematics journals and my published papers have been refereed and some unpublished ones that I submitted Obviously history is consulted obviously proofchecking is not the main point of refereeing obviously novel ideas are examined in the context of accepted notions To say that mathematics is not a science but a language ignores the fact that hundreds of journals are devoted to publishing new discoveries in mathematics Obviously in judging publicationworthiness one considers how new discoveries may be relevant to potential future research one considers esthetics which for most mathematicians is the main motive for doing mathematics or for learning mathematics Whence this loony idea that there is no need to consult history Do you not see sections on how a new discovery fits into the historical development of the subject in many research papers in mathematics  Plautus satires comments are those of a crackpot