Failed good article nomination This article has failed its Good article nomination This is how the article as of November   compares against the six good article criteria   Well written Sometimes good but sometimes gets confusing Organization makes it difficult to read  Verifiable Last reviewer found some nonreliable sources which are still there Examples include thefreedictionary Toronto Sun  Broad in coverage Gets unfocused Too much detail on some issues while not actually giving the reader the context to understand  Neutral point of view Some parts seem to give too much weight to Franciss own statements  Stable  Pass  Images  based on prior review    When these issues are addressed the article can be renominated If you feel that this review is in error feel free to have it reassessed Thank you for your work so far