Your views of the editors position are distorted I dont mind using Beevor or any other of the saint trinity mentioned by you above as far as using them follows wikipedia guideline stay with the facts mostly relics isnt fact Its a personal assessment You seem to push on authority of the trinity and willing to put into article anything just coz they mere say so I appreciate your effort in trying to find the factual basis behind their statements But when you realized that there is none the next step became too hard to take  The source with criticism of the saint trinitys research obviously does not exist coz nobody knowscares about them outside of english world and inside they seem to be taken with religious zeal The systemic bias by its nature can not be countered by giving weights since this is exactly the way its introduced Blindly following guideline this is verifiable so shall be in while ignoring other stay with the facts will mere make wikipedia a collection of cliches and stereotypes popular among the prevailing editors This is reflected in details on the systemic bias page According to the guideline they should seek to improve articles by removing any examples of cultural bias that they encounter or making readers aware of them Ive put the warning tag