Thank you for taking my suggestion by coming here to Talk instead of just reverting without explanation I have indeed reverted some changes by Jayjg  However these changes were not actually improvements  Briefly  actnoworg is brought up as an example of how circumcision advocacy is a term used by some advocates whereas Jays version makes it sound otherwise  Regardless of the subjective quality of the web site suppressing any mention of it would be POV hence unacceptable  WPNPOV is not negotiable  The definition of circumcision advocacy is accurate and not OR  If you have some sort of specific complaints I suggest altering the text instead of removing it  The article already mentions masturbation you would like to omit the relevant and cited fact that masturbation is harmless and NOT prevented by circumcision  Omiting this would be POV and WPNPOV is not negotiable  Actually whats reintroduced is the history with regard to advocacy which is entirely relevant In short these deletions all serve to harm the neutrality and comprehensiveness of the article  Therefore I will be forced to continue restoring the text if you attempt to remove it without an acceptable explanation  Your explanations thus far are not acceptable  Thank you for understanding