Johnpedia two quick thngs  First Justanother didnt ask me to comment hereIve had no communication with him in weeks maybe Ill send him a note now  I just happened to eavesdrop on your discussion and it struck me that you might be under the mistaken impression that the problem here had to do with your intraScientology standards of civilized conduct   Yes if somebodys behavior is objectionable or wrongheaded you have every right to say something about it  But this is where you seem not to grasp the concept of civility  You can and often should comment on their behaviorwhy you disagree with it how it can be remedied in the interest of the good of the article or the Wikipedia community  You should however confine yourself to talking about the behavior not the person  In other words it is appropriate to say I think your edit made things worse because you removed x and shifted the order of y and this creates confusion because of z so Ive restored x and propose that we move y to the top of the section  It is inappropriate  and counterproductive to say you must be an insecure bozo with a shrivelled penis to make such a stupid edit  Do you understand the difference  Your comments are alltoooften closer to example   And while wikinazi may be just a name it completely unacceptable