I have a problem with the reception section My problem is that neither the linked citations or the section itself talk about the Raspberry Pi but rather use the RP as a coatrack for editorials about how best to educate children Yes we have a rough balance between editorial opinions favoring or opposing teaching children programming with a Raspberry Pi but no discussion about actual Raspberry Pis   Irony  sarcasm  ON Why its almost as if none of the editorials were written by someone who had actually held a Raspberry Pi in their hand And its almost as if the Raspberry Pi Wikipedia page was written be a bunch of editors who not only have never actually held a Raspberry Pi in their hand but cannot find any sources other than the RP foundation written by anyone who has Irony  sarcasm  OFF  As I have pointed out before you really cant write a reception section before anyone has received a Raspberry Pi and written about it  Speculation doesnt count Editorials about unrelated topics are right off  I propose that we delete the reception section and write a proper one once we know how the Raspberry Pi is received  This reminds me of an old joke The new wife of an IBM salesman goes to a judge wanting an annulment because he never consummated the marriage She explains instead he just sits at the foot of the bed every night telling me how great its going to be Thats pretty much the situation with the Raspberry Pi