Real talk   I not going to jump to assumptions I am going to ask you directly Why are you seemingly to me in my view of what you are doing and you can easily jump in and prove me wrong here invested heavily in reverting most of my sources without reading them from what i am seeing not telling me about certain wikipedia rules as the new guy and instead frequently threatening or calling my edits disruptive with no context to how that is  Now I could be completely wrong and I might be viewing you the wrong way and this whole thing maybe be just because I personally believe you have been slightly abusive especially with reverts of whole edits instead of areas that you personally had an issue with But then with the lack of you actually communicating with me you can see how one would think these views of you  Now I want to edit with accurate sources as much as anyone else and being a new guy and getting random claims of disruption in no context while then having very limited and vague communication in the describe your edit box followed by reverting the WHOLE PAGE everytime well that would annoy every new users you see