Email controversy   Ive removed some statements that were added which characterized the legal status of the emails attributed to Paladino  Those statements were improper synthesis and original research both prohibited on Wikipedia  I also flagged the source that is used for the purported contents of the emails  The source is a website that appears to have a strongly partisan bent and does not appear to have significant editorial oversight Furthermore the article doesnt clearly state the provenance of the emails it attributes to Paladino  I have no problem with including nature of the emails if that information is available from a reliable source but I question whether or not this source qualifies