April  UTC No Bansk Bystrica was first recorded in  as Villa Nova Bystrice I think it is a good idea to use English Google hits excluding Wikipedia but I think we should also look at other more authoritative English sources listed at WikipediaNCGNWidelyacceptedname Would that be acceptable Also the modern name is clear while the historical name is very often contentious So I would suggest we do not replace official names accepted in modern English sources before discussing which historical name should be used along with the modern name I would also suggest such a discussion should always occur at the talk page of the article about the concerned place It will make sense to centralize discussion at one place and it is also in line with WPNCGN