This is becoming very tiresome  After the last reasonable attempt at compromise to keep one person Rothbard happy as well as everyone else by making the language neutral Rothbard returned to remove an important qualifying word some and to change parliament to government and to delete documenting links  That shows lack of good faith and also lack of understanding of parliamentary government  Regarding the first point to criticize a mullah or a priest is not to criticize Islam or Christianity and to criticize one activist in a movement is not to criticize the antiwar movement  That is simple dishonesty to claim otherwise  Regarding the second point in a parliamentary system the word government refers to prime minister and cabinet not to members of parliament  To advise government you are advising the prime minister  Nothing states that Palmer ever met the prime minister but he spoke to members of the parliament  Rothbard is perhaps no political scientist but there is a major difference between them  Even under the American system if someone speaks to members of the Congress it would be dishonest to write that she or he had come to Washington to advise the government  We had reached a compromise and Rothbard indicated that he could live with it but he has now gone in without any reason and changed the entry to be misleading  The agenda at work seems more to defame a person than to provide neutrally articulated information The issue is raised and its time for Rothbard to simply back off  Others here will have to revert his attempt to introduce errors into this entry