My dear colleaguesI cannot understand your umbrage I was reading your sources and I came to understand that the passage that I was reading was awfully familiarin fact the Wikipedia material was a word for word paraphrase of the source with the tenses of verbs changed I know you will agree with me that it is better to quote the source directly than to paraphrase Since so I replaced the paraphrase with a quote Do you object to the quote of your source I did not choose him I merely followed the footnotes In following the other footnote I noticed it had a contrasting view of the origin of the Eucharist and knowing that you would use it as a source I wanted to include it  If you have changes to make make them BRD if he says you cant revert as a piece called once merely because you dont like them