Disputed fair use rationale for ImageNRSV Catholicjpg Thanks for uploading ImageNRSV Catholicjpg However there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under fair use may be invalid Please read the instructions at WikipediaNonfree content carefully then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use Using one of the templates at WikipediaFair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy but remember that you must complete the template Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page  If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page Thank you    Quitting  Please dont contact me Im quitting Too much effort not enough worth it   Whatwhat happened  Dont worry about it its all good Thanks     Well miss you   I think you were a great editor and sysop  You are always welcome to come back     Orphaned nonfree media ImageBoo  Mariojpg  Thanks for uploading ImageBoo  Mariojpg The media description page currently specifies that it is nonfree and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use However it is currently orphaned meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia If the media was previously in an article please go to the article and see why it was removed You may add it back if you think that that will be useful However please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia see our policy for nonfree media  If you have uploaded other unlicensed media please check whether theyre used in any articles or not You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the  link it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in and then selecting Image from the dropdown box Note that all nonfree media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days as described on criteria for speedy deletion Thank you     Disputed fair use rationale for ImageFlea Chrono Triggerjpg Thanks for uploading ImageFlea Chrono Triggerjpg However there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under fair use may be invalid Please read the instructions at WikipediaNonfree content carefully then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use Using one of the templates at WikipediaFair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy but remember that you must complete the template Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page  If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page Thank you    Zeitgeist video   A draft userspace article has been created  Please see WikipediaDeletion reviewLog November     HELP Many thanks for the tips Does Presse papier mean cookies my system is in French     Sterling History username block  I blocked because of this report to UAA Its in how its used as well as how its named I see a change of username is in progress         I blocked the above IP recently as being part of a weird POV vandal spree originating from Australia apparently but when I saw in the edit history that there were many good edits from the IP as well I shortened the block considerably      Palestinian People   Sorry for the late notice but I should let you know I undid your removal of sourced info regarding Arab leaders who have made statements similar to Golda Meirs statement on the nonexistence of the socalled Palestinian people   My reasoning is that only posting Meirs comment without the historical context showing that it is a common statement by leaders in the region is an attempt to paint Meir as a racist and therefore violates the NPOV standards  If you have suggestions on reformatting it please be my guest Im somewhat new and dont know quite how to do all the formatting especially since some of the documents are things like UN records and decadesold newspapers that are publicly available but not available as web links  Preceding unsigned comment added by         Please   do not revert nonvandalism without a proper edit summary as you did on   I have readded my comments  they are legitimate and wellintentioned     Sure thing Hows this      Saad Attiya  Thanks My error and I apologize for misunderstanding missed the remark as I was working on antivandalism and it just looked like a page blank But your point is quite accurate  I have attempted and think I have succeeded to resolve the copyright issue  Please have a look at let me know if you feel I need to do more   In fact it still appears to be an almost word for word copy if not direct word for word copy from that website Ive marked it under the copyright problems page for now It will need a total rewrite If you think you can do this without worrying about plagiarism feel free to remove the tag       I saw your note on Ryulongs talk page and I know that you opened the last RfC on Ryulongs blocks I opened a request for arbitration last week but it doesnt look hopeful right now so far as acceptance goes  the consensus seems to be that another RfC may be required since its been so long since the last one If I opened another RfC would you be willing to cocertify    I certainly think this will have to be discussed on RFC   people have already rejected the proposal    If I am around I will sign it If you look at the original list of people who signed the position I believe you will find at least one other person who will sign I also suggest you keep it real simple Doubtless people will come flying in with accusations of a witchhunt even if you have legitimate concerns you will wish to do all you can to make sure those concerns are not legitimate I would stick to keeping the blocks of people who edited Power RangersAnime articles there are unfortunately a lot failing to assume good faith blocks of improper length without any warnings for users who likely are just making newbie mistakes failing to use proper block summaries I have been aghast at some of his blocks in the past only to find out they were socks and never coming before the community with controversial blocks Im thinking you could add to that many deletions out of process look at the astounding number of times hes deleted an image for failing fair use guidelines without waiting the required one week always Power Rangers related and being