Oppose per problems with bulk handling of disambiguation pages and differences from WPNCLANG as already noted     Is nobody listening to the point that that guideline was authored by one of the participants in this discussion and that it was written without consultation by affect wikiprojects Disambig Ethnic groups IPNA WP United States WPCanada and who was the same person who disregarded standing convention creating his own and then applying it across the board  Including anglicizations that since six RMs in BC overturned them  Is one guideline created by one author over a host of articles he has used to change and determinedly resist actions to revert his changes cf his behaviour in those RMs mean nothing in the face of those precedent RMs or all the other guidelines of the naming convention  And of the previous discussionsconsensus which created the model for the standalone names  Is one guideline created in isolation from all considerations it affects created by one author who is here in a somewhat COI capacity no less going to outweight dozens of other guideline passages  Cause thats just not right