Question for AGK   Hi AGK You mention above that arbcom is anxious for Nina to submit her evidence so that others can rebut it Nina didnt open this case LHvU did He alleges that  there is a sustained and possibly coordinated campaign to have the Wikipedia article reflect the POV of the antiStratfordians providing potential authorship candidates and one in particular presently an enhanced preferably equal standing within the article to that of Shakespeare  Why is the committee not anxious for LHvU to provide his evidence so that whomever it is that hes accusing of engaging in this conspiracy can rebut his accusations  Bishonen has called for Nina to be banned for at least a year Why is the committee not anxious for her to provide her evidence so that Nina can rebut it  If I were you Nina Id sit tight and wait to see what evidence if any is brought against you or anyone else As things stand there is no evidence and no case to answer