Dear Sir   Wikipedias rules for protecting a page do not make a provision for using the tool on an editors talk page especially when the protect is used as an added punishment  One must wonder at the complete lack of moral fiber displayed when an administrator improperly utilizes a protect on an editors talk page after repeat after said editor had been blocked from further editing  This violation of wikipedias rules was further compounded by the administrators failure to withdraw the protection for nearly  hours after the block itself was removed  In an attempt to cover up this error the same administrator added the comments that he was removing the block when in fact he was actually removing the protection  This gives rise to the notion that administrators who violate wikipedia rules are immune to sanction by their peers  This safe harbor must give the vengeful administrator the feeling of  great power  Sad true and very funny  PS  Would you please ask administrators and editors who seek to enforce the laws of capitalization to at least spell the word correctly when they chastise  the violator