Generally speaking the births of descendants of QV are generally noted as such or trivially determinable as such  The birth announcements can not obviously rank any order of succession as it is constantly in a state of flux   But the descendants are determinable and generally noted as such by reliable sources births in The Times should be acceptable  Lastly  the idea is to keep this from becoming an endash v emdash v hyphen v proportional dash v whatever ArbCom nightmare as quickly as possible  Life is too short to waste on debates which end being of less than even academic significance IMO  Cheers  BTW  makes specific reference to all male lines descended from QV making this a notable category per se using a common name for the family   We do not even have to say more