Janbwade The statements you question are all verified in the body of the article from secondary and primary sources The primary source is the Watchtower organization itself If anything this source is biased towards itself which is understandable The other sources are diverse and unbiased and peer reviewed Since these secondary sources are reviews of data then bias is not only unlikely but virtually impossible So if anything we can say none of the sources are hostile toward the Watchtower organization or to the community of Jehovahs Witnesses Hence I fail to see veracity in your complaint   I recommend that you consider the subheading Acceptance within Jehovahs Witness community within the article about Jehovahs Witnesses and blood transfusion If you dispute its content and sources then please specify exactly why Also please keep in mind that due to  the Watchtower organizations policy to have JWs shun JWs who conscientiously accept transfusion of blood products it forbids and  your reputation as an ardent supporter of Watchtower policies then it is expected that JWs who disagree with the Watchtowers blood doctrine would not you access to their choices and HIPPA regulations are a powerful incentive for clinicians to keep patient preference highly confidential particularly when it is specifically requested Hence your personal experience is likely of little if any value in addressing the issue of your complaint