Also what is of serious concern is your failure to understand my drawing on the Charles Manson example  I DID NOT utilize it as an example to convey the worthiness of the content you seek to remove but instead I utilized it to highlight the illogical reasoning of your colleagues intention to remove the subject content ie the middlefinger scandal merely because your colleague has concerns it can have the effect of impugning ones character  That is so erroneous  The subject of the article did the act in a public place so he should expect to have it publicly documented Hes a public figure in that respect just as well  If Manson did the criminal acts it will be documented irrespective of how bad it impugns him and so it follows if the subject of the article extended his middle finger as photographed by an AP photographer it will be documented as part of that scandalous conduct irrespective of whether the action of the subject causes a selfinflicted impugning of his character in the process