April  UTC  Personally I think it is an important enough point to make in the first paragraph although if Tim and others prefer moving it to the fourth paragraph I wont object  However I have to say I do not read the first paragraph the same way Graft does I see no nonsequitor  The subject of the first sentence is not inherited traits that is in the predicate and the subject of the second sentence is not fact versus theory which again is in the predicate  The subject of the first sentence is evolution and the predicate provides a definition  The subject of the second sentence is evolutionary biology  the field of academe that makes the study of evolution its object and the source of just about all the contents of the article  The third sentence goes on to tell us about what we learn from evolutionary biology  This progression define a subject explain who studieshas expertise in it then elaborate on this field of study makes perfect sense to me I dont mean to prolong any argument with Graft but I just dont see this degrading the quality of the article or its educational value to a general readership