Well the point I was trying to make is that the WAP is uncontroversial because it is a tautology or virtually a tautology  Football might be a ball instead of a game  But observing requires at least one observer as a consequence of the premise  A fantasy that I would think would be controversial in scientific circles is an observer observing physical conditions that preclude the observers physical existence  I dont agree even loosely that an uncontroversial statement is tautological say Killing innocent children is bad  A sorta nontrivial value judgment about what makes for bad and what does not has to be first made  But Dead people are not alive should not be controversial and should not need external proof