IP editor you are mistaken in your interpretation of the above posting and thus posted wrong information in your edit summary when you reverted the article without further comment here Once discussion starts its bad form to go ahead and revert and not respond once you made a bad faith insinuation of ownership Even more so when you obviously dont understand where to look on this very talk page for article milestones to see when things occurred The comments section you referenced was from  when this article was nominated for featured article review The article was reassessed and relisted on April   You are working from  year old no longer valid or relevant notes I agree with the above editor regarding your text changes  you have removed the language flow from the text of the article when you went through and stuck the years of films into parenthesis after each film name It rendered the language of the article choppy I also see no valid reason why you would go through and put line breaks in the middle of citations it is a waste of effort If you want to work on filling out some citations that you would like to see fine but please do not make edits that make the language of the article less polished It would be a great benefit if you would post here and let the discussion complete before you charge ahead Also please explain the need to change from numerical entries to spelled out numbers