NPOV   I notice a strong tendency among commentators on this site to want to remove any hint of controversy connected to Caterpillars activities  The result is to align the article with Caterpillars own corporate interest and effectively to present the facts from Caterpillars own POV  For example the Labour controversy section is not as it stands at the moment the history of Caterpillars relations with organised labour but the story of how the company successfully outflanked those pesky unions  This violates NPOV  It is a fact that people have protested Caterpillar selling bulldozers to Israel  Whether those people are right or wrong to do so is not for us to decide its true that the company has been criticised for who it does business with so it deserves to stay in the article  Period