Hello   Hi Blu Aardvark glad to see you did not permanently leave Wikipedia  I was wondering why my TemplateCurrent event template redirect wasnt working couldnt see the obvious      Z   Thanks   Thanks for taking note of The Arcata Eye and Plazoid pages   Happy Birthday   Have a great day       Admin Fighter That was really funny gave me a good chuckle You should have just crossed it out and left it in      Removing religious and political categories Recent attempt at vote stacking leaves a bad taste in my mouth   Were you referring to this WikipediaAdministrators noticeboardIncidentsCatholic Alliance of Wikipedialike vote stacking       No I was referring to a Wikipedia email I recieved earlier today sent by  in an attempt to stack votes on AFDs related to Christianity Looks like hes got himself an RfC now     policy proposal   Hi you recently commented on bibleverse articles and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly  specific verses  WikipediaCentralized discussionVerses of  Kings  and       Ubuntu Logo   Blu  I noticed you changed the logo for the Ubuntu Linux User Box  Why  The usage policy on Ubuntus offical site clearly allows for such use Besides the logo is just that a lowresolution image of a logo which is allowed under fair use  I am aware that some discussion has been going around about fair use images in user boxes If you changed the logo to Tux because I labeled it as a fair use image and not with some other licensing information Im sure I can find an appropriate image copyright tag    At the time I had changed it several ongoing discussions had indicated that copyrighted images and logos available under fair use were not to be used in userspace per Wikipedia policy The Ubuntu trademark policy may allow it but Wikipedia policy per WPFU is to limit images that are not available for commercial use  which the Ubuntu trademark policy explicity disallows     contribs  The preceding text was copied from   WPNPA  Please review and adhere to WPNPA WPCIV and WPWQT Please refamilliarize yourself with Wikipedia policy Thanks in advance   I am fully aware of the above policies thank you I do not feel that it can be considered a personal attack or incivil to call a troll a troll Im sorry if you dont agree with me in that  but that does not mean that my statement is a violation of any of the above policies     contribs  It is a violation and you must refrain from it WPNPA is nonnegotiable   Funny Nobody considers it a violation of WPNPA to call  a vandal Nobody considers it a violation to all  a troll Why the double standard Particularly if all I stated was that I feel that this user is a troll WPNPA is nonnegotiable but apparently its open for interpretation depending on who it is eh     contribs  Eh again Anyway feel free to request another admin to review this instead   Anyway believe me when I say that to say I feel he is a troll is really one of the nicest things I can really say about him I apologize if it seems to be incivil but the fact of the matter is  I feel that strongly and can think of no other way to express that Without resorting to actual personal attacks that is     contribs  No need to apologize as I am not offended You must however attempt to be more thoughtful on how to express such an assessment trolling resembles the conduct of etc If you are unable to think of such alternatives I suggest you refrain from directing such comments until you are able to do so   To clarify lets say that I feel a certain members Nazi sympathiesapologist leanings impact their edits and interactions with other users I would rephrase it in terms of this being reflected in editing practices et cetera etc as opposed to the outright unqualified personal characterization as as a Nazi sympathizerapologist per se     Vandalism to my Userpage   Wikipedia Review is not a neoNazi Wikipedia hate site There are no neonazis on the forum  at least no open neonazis  and its not a hate site  its simply highly critical You were banned from the site for trolling no other reason If you want to hold that as a badge of honor its your perogative but I would request that you at least be honest about it Oh and before you call  a sockpuppet of Internodeuser you should do a whois on it Its a CenturyTel IP and geolocates to Canyon City OR Its not an Internode IP geolocating to Melbourne Australia Seriously  Its quite interesting that you know so much about this vandalism I really dont care if its Zordrac or not Its obviously one of the banned users at your little site I have enough evidence to have the whole IP range banned Thank you for your assistance    Allow me to politely point out that you have no evidence whatsoever You have an anon IP removing some trollish statements from your user page Also allow me to point out that I run Wikipedia Review By calling it a neonazi Wikipedia hate site you are essentially calling me and the rest of the members of that forum a neonazi Wikipedia hater  and that could be considered a personal attack I did not intend to pick a battle with you or anything of the sort but I would ask that you calm down I did see that you tagged this talk page with three templates that had no place whatsoever here  you will see that I removed your blatant trollery and I would ask that you do not do that again     contribs  WPRFCU is thataway  Tread lightly     Banned   Hey why did I get banned from the Wikipedia review Couldnt you stomach my criticism of your users nastiness about our admins And how pray tell does this give you the high moral ground to complain about blocking on Wikipedia    I didnt ban you  I havent even checked on the forum or Wikipedia for a couple of days now I assume this means that Qwerty banned you  Ill have to ask him why when I get a chance I dont really have the time to look things over at this particular moment because Im in the process of moving my stuff out but as soon as I get an oppurtunity Ill look into it for you     contribs  Having looked over your most recent posts I see nothing worthy of a ban Lifted and apologies     contribs   Febr