Didnt call it abuse of administrators rights at all ever  As I said there was no consensus in the AFD as of yet  In addition you clearly dont understand what the purpose of an AFD is  A person disagreeing with consensus and presenting alternative arguments is perfectly fine  In the case of the AFD youre referring to I presented an argument about his notability that is perfectly solid based on our established guidelines for biographies  Just because a person disagrees with you doesnt mean that its abuse of powers or disruptive