Statistic removal   I am removing the statistics from the th paragraph for the following reasons   The source  qualifies as a WPPrimary by definition of a primary source  The source is not an original study in and of itself but is instead a metastudy based on the RCTs The underlying RCTs were not random or controlled as I indicated earlier by the Gregory Boyle and George Hill research my previous posts here linked to their research which is a reliable source  The sentence Im removing is a an opinion of the researchers themselves and is not directly supported by the results See  The actual reduction is not statistically significant See Statisticalsignificance The gold standard is   I cannot obtain the source article in question without paying for it but it really doesnt matter since were not supposed to be using primary sources directly anyway Both the monitorcoug and the aforementioned research goes to discredit the research  Prostitution when taken into account nullifies the benefits   Additional secondary source finding no benefit of MGM   Another secondary source discrediting the research based on nonsexual HIV acquisition See citations at the following link   See citations here malefemale transmission increased   Commentary that RCTs were not random at all this is a fact as participants were paid   No relationship between MGM  HIV in Kenya   Unlike the primary source in question Ive posted numerous links to reliable sources here It would be easy to justify removing additional statements based on the source in question but lets start with this one