Controversies section Id propose we move the content currently remaining in the controversies section instead into sections for each of his terms of office as DA that might then encourage expansion into more discussion of noteworthy cases and changes in policy that received comment in good sources So the Robert Blake trial occurred in his second term as DA and so was the removal of his office in the battered womens case Would make the structure of the article more chronological than taxonomic but I think that would be more neutral I agree the controversies section might have a bias in the mere name and the current battered women content is a little stilted away from the mere facts as it sits now