theories about how life on Earth may regulate the planets biosphere to make it more hospitable to life This discusses all scientific views on the subject in general including the views of Drs James Lovelock Lynn Margulis Richard Dawkins Carl Sagan etc   Gaia hypothesis A subset of the above article this is a discussion of Dr James Lovelocks ideas on Gaia theory   Gaia theory analogs  A discussion of protoscientific mystical and religious views that some people believe are related to Gaia theory   Gaians  A discussion of the small leftwing radical political and environmentalist group   Of course other articles could be made as well if needed  We must not push mystical political or religious ideology into our science articles on Gaia theory Biological evolution or Quantum Mechanics etc All I am asking is that we continue to follow the same disambiguation and NPOV policy that we also have followed  Is this clear    Jul  UTC    quick points  I think everybody here is missing a common scientific manner of using Gaia theory I believe many use it like game theory As in they dont always talk about a game theory or the game theory  Separate articles is not the only precedent on Wikipedia See neutral theory of molecular evolution I believe practically one of the first things to say about this scientific theory is that a whole lot of nonscientists took it as a direct challenge to Darwin even though it appears that its authors did not mean it to be I put it in the first paragraph    Jul  UTC