Actually he didnt say it should be entirely removed as an improvement to the article  He said here is my original edit which removed material that failed WPPEACOCK UserWildhartlivie restored the offending material  Another user then reremoved the peacock terms so as I say the matter is now resolved This did indeed resolve the issue of PEACOCK but was not a bar to reintroducing suitable content in as you put it some modified form which conformed to guidelines to make the appropriate points in the article