While I am not the one to question your protecting a page or article whether or not it is an FA category I want to point out at least one inaccuracy in the Western Chalukya page I pointed out to user Dinesh Kannambadi about one portion of text mentioned in the article on the Western Chalukyas The said portion is copied in here for your information and consideration as an admin  The overall effort by Somesvara IV to rebuild the Chalukya empire failed and the dynasty was ended by the Seuna rulers who drove Somesvara IV into exile in Banavasi  After the fall of the Chalukyas the Seunas and Hoysalas continued warring over the Krishna River region in  each inflicting a defeat on the other at various points in time This period saw the fall of two great empires the Chalukyas of the western deccan and the Cholas of Tamilakam On the ruins of these two empires were built the Kingdoms of their feudatories whose mutual antagonisms filled the annals of Deccan history for over a hundred years the Pandyas taking control over some regions of the erstwhile Chola empire  In the above passage while it may be ok for giving info on kingdoms in western deccan or deccan whose mutual antagonisms filled history annals I feel that mentioning the demise of the Cholas who did so in  AD in the Chalukya page who got eclipsed in  WHICH IS ALMOST  YEARS PRIOR TO THAT OF THE CHALUKYAS is quite inappropriate  MrKannambadi also mentions that the Chalukyas convincingly eclipsed the Cholas after the Cholas lost Vengi is quite untrue This is because Vengi was lost by the Chalukyas to the Cholas themselves under Vikrama Chola for after winning Vengi in  or  Vikramaditya expired in  or so and was followed by very weak successors and the Chalukya capital itself was lost for around  years from  courtesy Ancient India by KANSastri  edition So what does he mean there by winning Vengi and keeping it for  years the Cholas were convincingly eclipsed by the Chalukyas Does it mean that we are to believe that sustaining a victory for  years enables an empire to claim glory or feeling that their opponents were convincingly eclipsed  I know Kannambadi will also speak about jingoism and that Hoysalas too won Gangavadi from Cholas but pls remind him that the same was prior to the Chalukyas conquering Vengi  I am sure you will be very well acquainted with these facts in case you have indepth knoweldge of Indian History especially that of South India  I will await for your hopefully impartial decision so that these pages are reopened and their quality further improved through placing of proper facts supported by evidences