That is very interesting  What is it about the research conducted by BLT that strikes you as pseudoscience  Is it their methodology  Because Id hate to think you are excluding extremely relevant material from this article simply because you dont agree with their findings  Im sure youre a very intelligent person but I think a deeper explanation of what you consider pseudoscience to be and what the criteria are is definitely in order here especially considering the content you are leaving out based on this judgment  Later  Calgarr