Best     I agree with you Apcbg and will change the article back to the wording of the version that includes Ecuador and Uruguay though I will add  tags and put the whole lot into alphabetical order  The added wording to the Peruvian one tries to justify the claim where other nations do not and this is a problem  Regarding the fact tags Ive seen the Chilean document and IMO this does still require further verification beyond that     Yes I also believe that those reservations of rights need better sourcing      I think I should be clear on this because of this edit  which I have reverted  We do not make any attempt to explain the justification behind the claims of the US Russia Brazil Ecuador or Uruguay to rights in the Antarctic  Nor indeed the claims of those that actually claim territory  New Zealand Australia France Norway the UK Chile and Argentina  Per NPOV we should not treat Peru any differently to those twelve other countries     Ok I put the references in the Peruvian case as shown in the s template but wanted to emphasize that the references  and  are given to the cases of Peru Ecuador and Uruguay but even so put a single source in peru greetings     Im afraid we cant accept that reference because on principle blogs arent reliable sources  Nonetheless I have moved those two sources so that it is clearer to what they apply  I still think there ought to be reliable sources for this that arent related to the Chilean government or military since as Apcbg says such a claim is a Big Deal but I am prepared to accept my current revision for now