Just so you know I added in almost all of the info to this article including all of the info about the questions being raised about Nashs accuracy Initially I had a complete rundown on Carpinellis allegations against Nash all referenced and sourced to show exactly what was being said Then Carpinelli stated on this talk page that her allegations had been in error As a result I corrected the article to state this again using detailed references to support what was said in the article The thought that Im supporting Nash is a laughif that were true why would I add all the the info on the questions raised about his accuracy That said I also do not have an axe to grind against him My goal is to keep this article NPOV and well referenced As stated  and  appear to be sockpuppets of the same user and this editor is unable to produce a credible source to support hisher POV allegations As a result this editors edits are not allowed Best