Immature edits by immature people   Your proposed cheerleader editnotice is a strong notveryfriendly solution to a problem that historically has been solved with honey  The historical way of dealing with editors who are immature is to watchlist articles likely to attract them revert them kindly explain why they were reverted using a welcome template or an individualized note and point them to the right way of doing this  Wikipedia is largely edited by adults for adults using social constructs familiar to adults  Its not MySpace or cartoonpedia or AllThingsDisneyWikicom and its not a teen hangout or kids playground  The social rules that junior high and elementary school students use dayindayout are quite different from those of Wikipedia and WPBITE says we have to be understanding of this and use a velvet glove approach  I dont run across very many editors who seem young by their edits but most of those I do dont last long  I can understand why  socially its just not a good fit  A myschoolpedia about their school and town edited by them for them would be a much better fit and much more enjoyable for them  email