Quite a few of my edit were prior to Lancaster becoming involved in editing the page Also the first block of my edits were when I was tasked with merging it with Actus et potentia But its Lancasters rapid and escalating talk page demands that are much more of an issue than rapid edits to the article Ive had to spend an enormous amount of time responding to that talk page and to TalkEnergeia one of the articles to be merged Would it make any difference if I could prove hes made false and misleading statements in his charges But if thats not the sort of thing you usually look into I dont want to impose  Should I open a WPAN like he did Ive collected this list from Aug  where Lancaster has reversed actions of mine in whole or in part Thats not all and thats just the th  Lancasters deletion of most of what Ive worked on in the article   August  My changes to the definitions in the lead from   August    August  My addition of modal logic to the lead from   August    August  My changes to Actuality from   August    August  My addition of an OR tag from   August    August   Please let me know if more instances or additional information on each would be helpful Or anything that would help shed some light Thank you