Have you even looked at the citations I have updated the sources to include many primary and secondary citations How is it false information if it is repeated by over a dozen books and sites There is no consensus because several people in your claimed consensus have a conflict of interest in the group BAPS Please do not revert again or else your will be in violation of wikipedia policy of vandalism I am going to request for an administrator not affiliated with this discussion to look at it and the topic I will expand that part in the heading in a article and you are welcome to help me I have requested admin bbb to help me in the past and they have said no so I am  going try to contact other admins Please control yourself from reverting until then