and mine httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitleHistoryofvideogameconsoleseighthgenerationoldid    now the memory clock speeds of the main consoles xPSWiiu I put that there along time ago when no one lse has bothered to and other details in that article and thers i have done it and others built upon itnow look closely att he microconsole section in my version comapred to hisin his he has alot of things missing in mine i actually went to st n rd part websites n with a little thinking and figured all this stuff out myself and ofcourse looked up the facts in other websitesi mean the info matches even some articles here i mean i dont understand what the problem is when im actually doing the better job here how the hell can he  think doing a half assed job with errors be  better than one that is more detailed and accurate just because he didnt bothered looking it up or figuring it out on his or her own hmm like i said  this is more than just an error correcting it seems more like a personal thing to me from some envious  year old manif he was the one who went through all this trouble to look up the info fill in the blanks with a little thinking and problem solving he wouldnt say anything lol but since he dint  he uses and abuses his power by saying its disruptivethat is ridiculous on so many levels and totally untrueilike i said before im learning and yes ill try to cite and get  links or sources as much as i can but as you can see by the links i put here well i know how to find out facts about something as best as i canas you can see my contributions and work speeks for itselfso i made a few mistakes in the past  we all have its completely normal to make mistakes but theres adifferenc between making mistakes and being disruptive to purposely mess up an articlei would never do that because this is  of my favorite websites i come here pretty often to look up information and its wonderful that anyone can contribute but i also know that also anyone can purposely vandalize or mess up on purposeim not those people take my edits seriously and i did enough contributions here that i can tell the stuff i put has helped others because the ones who appreciate my efforts are the s who built upon it and dont erase it because its correctjust because some does edits in a mor lazy and half assed way doesnt mean they have to abuse their power as admins just because they couldnt do it themselvesthats childish and immature and unjustim sure theres many who would agree with me on this and i know the ones who dont aree are probably the ones who have the same prejudice and envious mindset as the  or s who suspended me just because i want to make a more accurate and specific version of an article as opposed to a halfassed mostly blank article just because they didnt feel like doing the extra work or researching or figuring out piecing things together or because they arent knowledgeable on the subjectim tech savy so i know enough i contribute and i come to wikipedia to get information and research so im a contributor as well as a readerdo the right thingpeople like me arent disruptive just because we have different ways to edit that are more dedicated than somewe all have our ways of doing things and as long as they do it with good intentions to make the site better than theyre not being disruptive its nto as if theyre purposely trying to mess up an articleit because we all have ways of doing thingsbut  thing i know is that being as accurate n thorough as possible isnt bad