Why will Gwen Gale not read the sources   On I posted a section on Talk Death of Adolf Hitler titled Random Questions which started I am not a scholar I read Wiki but would not think of editing it But I was disappointed in this article and many points in the discussion so I am asking some questions Perhaps someone else will read and address them The section went on with several rethoritical questions and ended with As to sources the last books I have read are The Murder of Adolph Hitler by Hugh Thomas sort of shaky and The Last Days of Hitler by Anton Joachimsthaler English translation I buy much of this  Gwen Gale was apparently assigned me as an administrator because at  she replied with As the article lead saysThis said this talk page isnt a forum for talking about personal views or questions on a topic its meant for talking about sources and how to echo them in the text I say this because the article seems to already cover with thorough citations most if not all of what youve brought updodgy Gwen Gale talk  By this reply it appears that Gwen Gale is NOT FAMILIAR with the work of Joachimsthaler who I have just referenced and thinks that I am asking a personal question not a rhetorical one At that time I apologized tried to explain myself and restate my questions  At  I posted If I had read Kershaws Nemesis Chapter  note  and Epilogue note  I wouldnt have wasted your time You cant get much clearer than that Should be required reading Perhaps someone else should read them and possibly edit the article Thank you for your time talk  At  I posted I would like to direct people to the work of Ian Kershaw Hitler  Nemesis ISBN  Chapter  and the epilogue relate to this article Please pay attention to his notes and sources Be warned his book Hitler a Biography is a kind of digest which does not include these resourcesThe source Joachimsthaler is basically an English translation of a Germans analysis of s postSoviet interviews of bunker survivors The original transcripts must be available somewhere There are many other bunker interviews some with questionable intent and not all agree Wm talk  Since those posts I have posted a huge amount on the talk page virtually all of which Gwen Gale has disputed Much of the material I have posted I have later deleted often because I felt that the endless conflict between Gwen Gale and myself is counterproductive to the article  Anyone who is Wiki can probably bring back any of those posts Was I sometimes rude and argumentative Absolutely Was I making legitimate points which related to the article I thought so Did I receive effective support and encouragement by my administrator I think not but you judge  My main point was that Joachimsthaler had reviewed the information and had made a solid case for positions which Kershaw backed I repeatedly begged anyone especially Gwen Gale to read Joachimsthaler and Kershaw specifically two footnotes I even told the pages of the footnotes Gwen Gale clearly had not read either source   I posted under the heading Question for Gwen Gale  the following I lost you but Im confused myself It appears as though the person with the least information available is most influential on the article  The US is big on free press and it works My very low budget suburb is in a system which serves  people with  MILLION titles numbers approximate thanks Carol Thats on the next shuttle van Most of the rest of the assets of a state with  million people are a couple of days away by mail The specialty stuff on AE from Radcliffe took maybe a week And I am an amateur Dan you are over three million people higher in the food chain you must be world class Kierzek has clearly read and analyzed everything reviewed most of it and as far as I can tell every word he says is accurate and informed  Kershaw Joachimsthaler Thomas TrevorRoper Beevor Shirer Ryan Toland EberleUhl LehmannCarroll ODonnell Victor PetrovaWatson Vinogradov hit a snag reordered These are books which I have had in my possession and read parts of since Aug  I can understand if others do not have access to the same resources but I think that should be addressed If someone does not have access to two footnotes which are critical in a discussion that also should be addressedI know that this is POV and that I am personally involved But I can not help but believe that this article has problems with its processWm talk  On  Gwen Gale posted For starters