You bet I indeed am frustrated disappointed or should I disheartened and disgusted Not because of the block though Its because of the spiteful hateful and downright vindictive behaviour some people have in wikipedia and with profound connivance of some administrators even  is a sock of  just look at their contributions for past  hours Why should I be involved be anymore editing although I really want to when I know that some daft hater may simply revert ALL of them without caring much about silly things like justification or consequence and I will be blocked as a result I shouldnt be involved Wikipedia like any other bureaucracy is ruled by bullies including some administrators However the real bureaucracies do give you a chance to settle the dispute in court or police station And at least you can afford to not be so helpless about it Here my edits were labelled as propaganda implying that Im a propagandist after all my edits were rashly reverted although they had the chance to simply modify inaccuracies with good sources they chose to delete the whole section nothing was done and because nothing was done the reversion of my edits only accelerated now if not all most of my edits are entirely reverted  Then that genius John wrote on my talkpage  Im editwarring I usually specifically mention no editwar intended after my edit in description My friggin edits are getting reverted and Im the one he deemed to be the editwarrior Come on now will you You dont want to help me Frankly I dont know what you want Have a beautiful time here at the wikipedia Humanity is withering away much faster here at the wikipedia than in the real world The real world is sick in my view But in comparison to the demented arrangement here at wikipediaBecause here it every time sometimes  gratuitously comes down to majority of consensus no matter how ignorant andor prejudiced andor oblivious the involved editors are about the topic at hand their views still count Thats not a very efficient way that is rather a crazy medieval way of discerning whats reliable and whats not And thus implies that minority is always wrong and majority is always correct Thats fundamentally incorrect real world seems like a much better place to dwellAlthough I concede that some few of my sources too were questionable and faced justified skepticism I dont think that it necessitated a whole reversion Slight modifications would have worked just fine Thank God science doesnt progress like that in real world      Note