Three different editors reverted RHBs attempts to restore the old revision  I believe this is the consensus that Ozob referred to  If RHB doesnt like this small consensus then the correct course of action is of course to start an RfC  But as far as my own obligations to discuss I have discussed every action that I have made to the article  I have made attempts to incorporate every reasonable criticism of the content  And I have done this amid a torrent of insults  Forgive me if I say that I find your post most frustrating and unhelpful  Have you actually read this discussion page