This is Mark Turner again  OK the links to the university press sites for the books are gone  I am sorry to have caught myself in a whirlpool of confusion Last night I made some changes that kept disappearing and so I remade them as I went but that seems to have precipitated a cascade I dont follow Although I was a UNIX sysadmin in early life I do not know anything about Wikipedia Someone made a page for me long ago and from time to time I have edited it to remove factual ambiguity or add links to things like university press sites for the books in the bibliographyThe editors seem now to be asking for more external sources There are a ton of these on my own webpage but thought it inappropriate to put them on Wikipedia I just added using an IP address login an external source David Brooks reviewed my work in an article in The Atlantic Monthly and uses it in his TED talk I placed both of these on my Wikipedia page under external links Is this the right thing to do or the wrong thing to do There are people in countries all over the world eager to make such edits Would it be better if they did them