Troubling aspects of the artiicle as it exists right now    I believe if Eric Altermann is to be accorded the prestige of being associated with msnbccom it should be noted that he is a blogger for msnbccom I say that because I found conservative columnist and author Michelle Malkin referred to as a blogger in another article and I do believe thats meant to diminish the value of her statement So again yes We HAVE to see the forest for the trees No one article in Wikipedia exists in a vaccum There has to be a baseline standard and I reject any argumentation that suggests implies or directs that if I dont like that article go change it Instead one way or the other and I dont care which way liberals and conservatives have to be characterized by the same fair measuring stick   This is new Its from Conason Conason goes on to point out that Coulters critical nature is blunted by her preassumed opinions making many of the conclusions she draws irrelevant to the actual nature of her arguments Wow That seems a little unfair just hanging out there like that I propose either eliminating it orand I hate this approach as much as the next guyscotchtaping a quote after that which refutes this obvious cheapshot   This is old The McVeigh section as should be no surprise to anyone whos followed my work here is troubling Lets start with this quote  She was willing to characterize members of the Branch Davidians at the Waco compound as harmless American citizens  even after the survivors of the raid and subsequent immolation of the group by their leader were convicted Well some Waco compounders were convicted of something or another But the fact is that there WERE mostly innocent victims of David Koresh in that compound Its unbalanced to just add the tag line about conviced Davidians without acknowledging what I GUARANTEE you Ann was referring to which were the overwhelming number that were innocent   This quote is also troubling Timothy McVeigh made similar criticism as partial justification for his bombing Well McVeigh had LOTS of reasons for his bombing But who cares what a madman thinks And if you do then I understand he also had some uncomplimentary things to say about the Bible Therefore if we are to include this in Coulters section I say we include its compelement in Bill Mahers article It would go something like this Naher has frequently criticized the Bible calling it a bunch of fairy tales and claiming God doesnt write books  Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh made similar criticism as partial justification for his distrust of Christianity though the Bible has been widely criticized throughout history  Whadya say  Much more on this section later   Racism is not the same as being antiIslamic terrorists that want to kill Americans for supporting Israel etc To title Anns comments on Islamic Radicals as allegations of racism seems dishonest to me   Did Ann really say that ALL  women are not as bright as men Some editor in Wikipedia wants us to think so I say this quote be taken out until we get confirmation of her whole statement in context Now I know for a fact that Ann is only halfjoking when she argues women should not be allowed to vote so she is far from imune when it comes to suggesting she holds lessthanboilerplatefeminist views But this quote supposedly out of H  C seems like its probably another smear Again if proven wrong Ill gladly man up and stand corrected But unitl Im proven it wrong it should be excised in my view   More later