The section deals with accusations  not with any admission   Hari has carefully never admitted plagiarism   WPBLP states that we must reflect accurately what the reliable sources state  and the sources in that secton deal specifically with the accusations not with any admission     When using reliable sources the content of the source as opposed to headlines govern what the claims can state    In his return of the Orwell Prize Hari does not make any admissions of plagiarism  Nor was the Orwell Prize controversy founded in that  but n the claim that he made up an atrocity which did not occur  So since the section with the title accusations contains claims about accusations then the section title should reflect what the section contains  since the Orwell Prize article was not accused of containing plagiarism then that sectin can not be called plagiarism and since his actual apology does not contain plagiarism at all we can not state on our own that he admtted plagiarism  there is no reason for us to make the charge on our own  The principle on Wikipedia is that we do not make conslusions at all but can only recite what is in the body of reliable sources especially and specificaly when a living person is involved  Cheers