I agree with Ragesoss  We already have a quote that says A lot of people have used Carson to push their own agendas and the entire section starts out by saying some conservatives  argue that restrictions placed on pesticides have caused needless deaths and hampered agriculture and more generally that environmental regulation unnecessarily restricts economic freedom  I think itd be okay to include a sentence that theres lobbying involving industrial firms as long as its from a neutral source  But do we need to include a lengthy paragraph from an obviously biased source about speculative claims of the connection between industry and the antienvironment lobby in an already long article  I think we can do this more neutrally and more concisely as I think Ragesoss is suggesting