GA in zhwikipedia    Please add Link GAzh in interwiki section Thanks     I propose that Love should be viewed as an active verb and not as a Passive emotion I would propose that Love is in fact  when one provides for needs and desires of another and is unrelated to the emotions or experience of the one as in  Love should not be used for example in the phrase  I Love oranges because I do not fulfil any need in the orange  and I do not provide for any desire or requirement of the orange The orange on the other hand loves me  because it provides sustenance and pleasure and satisfies needs or desires in me The pleasure or satisfaction I feel at having my needs provided for should not be termed love If this entire subject is viewed in the light of the recent theories within Genetics on selfish attributes and Altruistic attributes and their Dominance  it makes perfect sense to begin viewing love  in all forms it may have  romantic familial  patriotic platonic in these terms Love is when you provide for another Love is when you give time to another Love is when you support another Love is when you put up with another If the other in turn loves you then it is a balanced and sucessful interpersonal relationship  I believe I should retract this section on Love as an active verb Due to the No original Research policy That and the four beers I drank before writing it  Apologies      Secrets of Love   What thhe hell is this section on about It sounds like the stuff you get in those quack selfhelp manuals that sell for like  a month for a year This is clearly not encyclopedic  it is nothing but POV unless someone can cite a reliable reference stating categorically that there are  secrets to love and that these are they Needs some serious improvement   Removed This section is subject to immediate removal If someone wishes to reinstate the content please forward the rationale here and be prepared with substantiation Thanks   Nice one Sorry if I sounded a little pushy with that  comment but Im glad you did something about it Thanks    what about adding information from that page its not refrenced but i think some information is worth mentioning in here  love  It looks like an interesting website but you pretty much captured the main problem with it not referenced As it stands it would be a stretch to even link to it let alone copy content from it into any Wikipedia article     fagtron   Im a wikipedia reader but I havent dabbled in editing at all  Could someone who has kindly remove the word fagtron from the Biology of love section  Im reasonably certain it isnt supposed to be there  Many thanks The preceding unsigned comment was added by     Heart Image Why there is a silly heartshaped image on top Lets stay to scholar sources and avoid pushing western propaganda   I would guess that its because this is a western language wikipedia and scholarly sources state that the heartshaped image is a well known western symbol for love It would only be silly to use it in an eastern language wikipedia  as silly as using an eastern symbol for love in a western language wikipedia no doubt It might be propagandistic to use a western symbol in an eastern wikipedia or an eastern symbol in a western wikipedia but it can hardly be so when the appropriate symbol appears in either type of wikipedia       Defining love How does one define love how do you know that you are in love if you have never felt it before Bumblebee   You read our article on Sternbergs Triangular theory of love of course That demonstrates that only people who have never had friends never had a crush on someone and who have always hated their family have never felt love before