Totalitarian and dictatorship are two words with meaning and indeed are defined at length on Wikipedia with their own articles Perhaps we should delete the articles because no regime could ever qualify That is not what neutrality means The USSR qualifies under those definitions under the vast majority of nonMarxist scholarship we have already dealt with the sources issue at length as reflected in Britannica and Encarta which both deal with the former USSR at length and very adequately synthesize that scholarship into long articles Also earlier versions of this article included the terms and were edited out I encourage those interested to go back and see what went on previously   The issue is whether totalitarian dictatorships are nonneutral language I dont think they are nonneutral at all  The words have meaning I think Fred has written at length on how the USSR qualified and I defer to his effort Perhaps someone should post it up here Now is the time to resolve it