GA   GA Reassessment still ongoing   I wish to inform anyone interested that this GA Reassessment is still active and that there has been virtually no participation from those who might want to keep the articles GA status    Please advise where and how a GA assessment that was closed on December   and is listed above as kept can still be active Where is there an open GA reassessment that has not been noted on this page anywhere I was active in the discussion of the GA reassessment opened and closed in December Nothing has been published on this page that indicates there is anything currently active     Sorry for not providing a link earlier the reassessment can be seen at WikipediaGood article reassessment specifically WikipediaGood article reassessmentHilary Duff     Thanks for the link  I often wonder about the genesis of usernames and yours would be one of those So the same editor who opened and closed the first reassessment in December which was challenged for cause and demands of a deadline can come back in improperly open yet another GA reassessment fail to properly notify editors on this talk page and fail to post the GA reassessment content on this page and it still be valid What a questionable practice Id say    Wildhartlivie the instructions to individual reassessments per WPGAR are to give editors enough time to respond Thus deadlines can be set for that Also this reassessment is a community reassessment so the decision to keep this at GA status lies with the community not me I closed the individual GAR after much criticism on the grounds that a community reassessment would be opened No such thing occurred so I decided to begin one myself Furthermore I dont feel a notification here is necessary as there is a message making note of a reassessment at the top of the page As far as I know I am not in breach of any policy    Perhaps perhaps not In my experience here notification of a GAR is posted both as a message and not just a template at both the articles talk page and at the main project or projects which oversee the article WPACTOR WPBIOG etc Thats how a reviewer ensures that the GAR is publicized since the goal is to preserve the GA not lose it    Chase it may not be policy but it is good practice as like WHL pointed out the goal is to improve the article Besides you never updated the date How would we know that youve started a new one  contr    re foodfight   can we removed the movie its been confiremed its not going to be released and many other people whos movies arent released arent put here so we should remove the movie    Nevertheless it is work in which she appeared Its been confirm where