Bauder  httpcaselawlpfindlawcomscriptsgetcaseplcourtcovolscCscainvol  SUPREME COURT STATE OF COLORADO   No SA   ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE   January         IN THE MATTER OF FRED BAUDER       EN BANC ATTORNEY SUSPENDED       Linda Donnelly Attorney Regulation Counsel   James C Coyle Assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel   Denver Colorado   Fred Bauder Pro Se   Crestone Colorado   PER CURIAM   In this lawyer discipline case a hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of the hearing board The board and the panel recommended that the respondent Fred Bauder be suspended for thirty days be required to petition for reinstatement and pay certain costs before again being allowed to practice law We accept the recommendation   I   Fred Bauder was licensed to practice law in Colorado in  He failed to answer the formal complaint filed in this case and the hearing board entered a default against him The allegations of fact contained in the complaint were therefore deemed admitted See CRCP b People v Paulson   Pd   Colo  Based on the default and the evidence presented the hearing board found that the following had been established by clear and convincing evidence   On July   we publicly censured Bauder for soliciting for prostitution during a phone call with the wife of a dissolution of marriage client See People v Bauder   Pd   Colo  Bauder was ordered to pay the costs of that proceeding in the amount of  within thirty days of the date on the opinion See id at  He did not pay the costs as ordered however or file a motion for an extension of time to comply with our order Moreover Bauder failed to respond to a letter from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and has not explained or justified his noncompliance with the order As a result a request for investigation was filed against him Bauder did not respond to the request for investigation   The hearing board concluded that Bauder knowingly disobeyed an order of this court in violation of Colo RPC c and that his conduct also violated Colo RPC d engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and CRCP  failing to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation   II   The hearing panel approved the boards recommendation that Bauder be suspended for thirty days be required to petition for reinstatement and as a further condition of reinstatement demonstrate that he has paid the costs incurred in the  proceeding   Under the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions   Supp  ABA Standards  suspension is appropriate when a lawyer knowingly violates a court order or rule and there is injury or potential injury to a client or a party or interference or potential interference with a legal proceeding ABA Standards  However disbarment is warranted when a lawyer a intentionally or knowingly violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order and such violation causes injury or potential injury to a client the public the legal system or the profession Id at a   The  public censure is an aggravating factor for analyzing the proper level of discipline See id at a Other aggravating factors include Bauders refusal to acknowledge the wrongfulness of his conduct see id at g his substantial experience in the practice of law see id at i and his indifference to making restitution see id at j Because Bauder did not appear at the hearing or offer any evidence no mitigating factors were found   The lawyer respondent has defaulted and apparently ignored the disciplinary proceedings We elect to accept the boards recommendation See People v Rishel   Pd   Colo  We are satisfied that the requirement that the respondent undergo reinstatement proceedings and demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he is again fit to practice law will adequately protect the public Accordingly we accept the recommendations of the hearing board and panel One member of the court however would impose more severe discipline   III   It is hereby ordered that Fred Bauder is suspended from the practice of law for thirty days effective thirty days after the issuance of this opinion It is further ordered that prior to seeking reinstatement and as a condition thereof Bauder shall pay the costs of his  disciplinary proceeding in the amount of  plus statutory interest from August   to the Attorney Regulation Committee Bauder is further ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding in the amount of  within thirty days after this opinion is announced to the Attorney Regulation Committee  Seventeenth Street Suite  South Denver Colorado  Bauder shall not be reinstated until after he has complied with CRCP       These opinions are not final They may be modified changed or withdrawn in accordance with Rules  and  of the Colorado Appellate Rules Changes to or modifications of these opinions resulting from any action taken by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court are not incorporated here    Seems pretty clear to me