I am very surprised that Jack is still eliminating verified sources and inserting his own editorializing into the sexuality section while it is under active discussion here  As the material I have restored to the section makes clear this is not just a matter of three critics examining Rydbergs poems nor is it sensationalizing  While it would be inappropriate to examine the specific details of Rydbergs private life his basic sexual orientation is a matter of absolute unanimity among all scholars and reference works that have considered the subject and is an important aspect of Rydbergs life that should not be whitewashed or swept into the closet  I would welcome a goodfaith attempt by anyone to cast this material in a more acceptable light as was suggested regarding the Thomas Mann article  However wholesale deletion of sources insertion of misleading and deceptive quotes and personal editorializing such as permeated the last edits to this section should not be acceptable in any reference work