August  UTC   Daily there is not a single article on wikipedia that utilizes the same MoS as editors have designed on their own accord here The currentlist style would be okay maybe in a List article but here it is not only unnecessary but might qualify as original research My original argument is sound We cannot enumerate every single person who says Israel is an evil country nor can we make dedicated sanctions for individuals that editors like Jimmy Carter Adams and Mooley while not others Ill start on the section later today but the crux of the issue is really about content It will be best for the article to cut out the junk and redundancy remove fringe characters or regulate them to minimal status and dont quote entire pages of a book IMO it would be a lot better to list Israels relationship with the Palestinians in a bulletstyled format and the follow it with a bulletstyled format response Ie Critics Arab citizens of Israel are marginalized because they dont have the same rights as Jews Opponents While inequalities exist Arabs have the same rights as Jews blah blah blah Then provide rd party characters to support Jimmy Carter The main issue is the fact that the criticism section is about  of the article and the responses are left at the bottom of the page This is totally unacceptable