the issue of understanding the precedent set in  by a Lebanese judge    I do suggest you all check the Lebanese penal code and the ruling itself before vandalising this page The article in question makes sexual activity that goes against laws of nature illegal What the judge has done in his ruling is that he clarified that homosexuality despite being exceptional to the laws of nature does not actually goes against it like zoophilia In this case the precedent set is more than enough to render the article invalid when it comes to homosexuality If you may bring any evidence or counterarguments to prove your claims it would be greatly appreciatedBut any further unsuported edits will be flagged as vandalism in the future Thanks