Strong oppose   and  show that the father has consistently been conflicted on whether the victim should actually be named or not Meanwhile we have no evidence that the other family members actually support the victim being named indeed in the latter link evidence to the contrary existed    Support name is used by international Anglophone media including BBC and The Telegraph Wikipedia takes the POV of credible international Anglophone media not what individual editors from their own original research consider appropriate The Wikimedia guidelines on contoversial content lay out a principle that restrictions to intellectual openness will not as a rule be made when demanded by institutions  They will be made when they are in response to clear and documentable responses by large numbers of individual users unmoved by ulterior motives when deemed legitimate under terms and conditions determined by members of the Wikimedia community The documentary Indias Daughter mentions that families of rape victims face a culture of shame and many feel that its better for rape victims to be killed than have to face social stigma In my opinion the goal of Wikipedia is not to pander to that kind of mindset even if that upsets people in the short term    A combination of IAR BLP and common decency goes against your viewpoint A Meta study from five years ago has no relevance on this Wiki It is common for in sensitive cases such as this one where the family object to having the victim named for that name not to be included This goes for both Wikipedia and most respectable news media as well although the latter has been caught out by the contradictory statements by the father    Comment  Im going to wait a few more days before I decide  In the past it has been my belief that the family had decided that they did not object but I preferred to wait for better evidence  As for now I wouldnt make a decision on anything that was said in the past as it is understandable that the parents may have wavered in their decision and furthermore it can be hard to trust press reports when it comes to any sensational news reporting  after the more recent death of the two girls who supposedly hung themselves there were a least a half a dozen different versions of the incident flying around in the press  After I watched the documentary before YouTube deleted it where I heardsaw the parents clearly say that they wanted her name published I was ready to support WPs use of her name  But reading the  link above Ive decided to wait to see if anything more is published re her name before I decide     BTW just to throw it out there the use of a victims name remains problematic for the presssee