Maybe we have a languagecontext problem The article does not include a reference section only lots of links to places and an External Links section Nothing in the External Links section is a reliable rd party source which proves the persons notability in accordance with the policies and guidelines of the project Additionally the majority of the links embedded in the article seem to be to primary source or to sources which confirm existence which isnt the same as notability or popularity which again isnt the same as notability Maybe you can update the formatting in a way that helps the article to look less like you are trying to advocate the person andor her university it will help others to be more neutral Maybe even making it easier for people to see some notability in the article that we may be missing because of formatting By the way I looked at all those links before I placed my initial opinion at AfD and unfortunately looking again hasnt really changed my mind about the article