Please dont assume bad faith here by calling me prejudiced and my comment absurd A request was made for GA review and I am providing that I was very clear that I liked the article If I was prejudiced I would have done a lot more to this article than what I suggested First off I did not criticize Hjelmquist as a source He may be perfectly fine and I admitted that I did not know his work The Swedish title alone does not inform me of what is in the source It is however a secondary source and the point was that the secondary sources cited here are quite old They may be fine and good sources but some of them do require more critical attention like Grimms work