On a separate note the following  statements made by  in this discussion  As Ive said before if you think that statement in the Mercan Dede article is inaccurate you should address the issue over there not here  Criticizing the content of that article here is kind of pointless       Its inaccurate according to you its not inaccurate according to the Mercan Dede article It seems it is necessary for me to point out that I am being guided by what the Mercan Dede article says whereas you are saying that you know better that your personal opinion trumps what the Mercan Dede article says  In effect you seem to be violating the WP principle of no OR WPOR     Appear to contradict the following statement made in a previously archived discussion here   Im afraid the statement that his main interests were Aqeedah Fiqh Tasawwuf appears only in the infobox There is absolutely nothing in the article to support it Which means it should really be removed from the infobox     Seems  is only interesting in using Wikipedia policies that suit him as he accuses of voilating WPOR in this discussion when he himself is guilty of violating it in the previous discussion