Not enough inline citations Perhaps you might like to comment on my stance over here     reImageAnotherVersionofthePastjpg   I saw your post to demon regarding this image I cannot undelete the image because of WPFUC b The image has not been reduced in size I also believe it fails  in that it directly competes with the commercial opportunities of the copyright holder  is also jumping out at me because the summarized text in the article serves the same purpose as the image There is not critical commentary about the design of the sight or visual representation of the image in the article Chronology of the Year Zero alternate reality game Therefore the exact image you uploaded isnt appropriate for use on wikipedia and a cropped or reduced size image may theoretically be appropriate but in the proposed article would just be decorative and against out nonfree content policy Sorry but I hope this explanation helps   Thanks very much for the reply  I understand your FairUse concerns and hopefully I can address all of them FUC b  Agreed  If the image is undeleted Id be happy to reduce its size and upload the smaller version but I cant really do that download the high resolution version until it is undeleted FUC   There are no commercial opportunities at stake here  Because of the odd nature of the website as part of an alternate reality game the only logical copyright holder would be either Nine Inch Nails  Entertainment or Interscope records  No one is making any money off of these websites in fact they officially have absolutely no connection to any company not even to the album Year Zero album that it is parallel to  Reznor himself has stated the ARG is NOT a promotional device  see Year Zero alternate reality game for more info on that FUC   Although the dates themselves are similar the text is not  The whole point of the originating website Another Version of the Past is that there are multiple perspectives of past events  The text in the WP article is a dry pointforpoint account neutral if you will  The two versions of the time line presented on the website represent both extremes of the fictional issues at hand proAmerican progovernment etc and on the other hand extremist rebellious reformatory etc  The image provides the user an opportunity to see the POVagendas at work and compare it to what actually happened  For example the New Orleans floods are described as a Faithbased disaster on one hand and Why Bother with New Orleans on the other   I still believe the image wouldnt be appropriate here The site the image came from is copyrighted and was used to promote the album for the record company executives regardless what Reznor said so FUC still concerns me and Im not convinced of FUC either We can simply quote snippets of text without showing it if we want to discuss how the timeline is presented Wed need to discuss visual aspects of how things look in order to show an image IMO I have asked another admin who is more versed in image policy to comment here so be patient for a nd opinion Thanks for your reply    Greetings I was asked to comment here This image is essentially text with decorative flourishes As such I dont see how  it could pass WPNFCC which requires that a nonfree image provide encyclopedic information beyond what text alone could convey I dont believe that the text alone quoted would be less informative than the image And I think that much text quoted verbatim would be a copyright violation which is another indicator that this image isnt allowed All the best    random  Ok fair enough  I know better than to argue with two admins   Thanks for taking the time to review the case     Lightning Bolt discog   Im not trying to kill you It just looks like an unneccessary article to me In my opinion their discog isnt so cumbersome that it cant fit in their main article If you disagree fine Im not that worried about   Totally fine I dont feel anywhere near strongly enough to care that much Good luck on it cheers UserMur