Picture caption again   This has been added yet again here footage of the activists beating Israeli soldiers    I have removed it twicetiresomeIn the picture there is no people identifiable at all I see no soldiers I see no activistsI see unidentifiable shadows     It is pretty obvious what it is    Really welcome to the wikipedia policies and guidelines     Ive removed it again Unfortunately this behavior is typical in IP conflict articles I blame the parents Prodego caption info needs to comply with WPV      Well it comes from a video and if you watch the video httpwwwyoutubecomwatchvgYjkLUcbJWo it is pretty clear Seanhoyland youve just violated the RR restriction on the article if its been reverted twice before     Its the person that readded it without any discussion that you should be talking to    Youtube is not a reliable source   I agree with Offriorob  This picture is very unclear by itself  It could easily be captioned the other way and noone would know the difference      Which is why it needs context of a proper descriptive caption that explains what is going on Bless sins youtube may host the video but it isnt the source However it the video isnt a secondary source which is why it isnt used for citations    You are not making any sense at allwithin policy or without policy    Im not talking about policy Im just saying that it is pretty obvious what the picture shows It doesnt mean the caption was the best but it certainly wasnt factually incorrect    That picture is a meaningless shadow puppet show People can say is it clear what it shows but the picture will always remain a shadow puppet show     If we are to have this image then we should have an image of a wounded or murdered peaceactivist to balance out NPOV Otherwise we should remove this image    Well it comes from a video and its pretty obvious isnt the same as WPV compliance which is what matters Thanks for RR restriction reminder but a talk page header needs to be added to that effect      At Profego it is all about which images we explicitly choose and which ones we explicitly dont Showing one certain image without showing a related image can be be POV as it is with this instance     CloseUp Footage of Mavi Marmara Passengers Attacking IDF Soldier look at frame  Does anyone still have any doubt about what the picture caption shows    Seanhoyland You can add one if you wish Its mentioned  sections up as well IJA yes but we dont have a perfect source of information If there is an image you think would improve the article we should certainly consider adding it UserProdegoProdego