Mondegreen   Let me refresh your memory because I clearly see that regulations have somewhat obscured it Quoting WPRevert if you feel the edit is unsatisfactory then try to improve it if possible  reword rather than revert I have not yet seen a single example of a chaste veteran Wikipedia editor who actually made the effort to find references for unsourced claims although I strongly feel that in this case it was fitting the description of the main article subject so why source the obvious rather than ruthlessly reverting thus making other editors run errands Isnt that what Wikipedia should be about  mutual help by equally respected members of the community regardless of the time theyve been here What I see instead is something like Im just enforcing a policy by assigning a parking ticket I know I might be wrong but if you want to avoid paying the fine better start running around schnell Hell Im not doing it for you I got more heads to chop