edit conflict but yes to the last comment Fine but to be valid for the article it must of course be a cited opinion from a reliable third party and not our own assessementcritique of any individual paper another articles misquote is justification of course for using the the primary source So sadly if a paper is obviously flawed but no textbookjournal subsequently rips it to shreds then the reliable source of the paper must stand as per WPCite  WPVerify however wrong that is  Wikipedia as an encyclopedia must lag behind developing knowledge so as a quick single step are there any good recent review papers we can look at rather than having to try and find commentary on each research paper remember WP generally prefers secondary sources to primary  although WPMEDMOS does allow for primary research studies