Reliable Source Isnt this a reliable source Victims  Emily Hilscher   What the Heck  I edited something on the  may page and you keep deleting it why It is constructive and I dont see how it is vandalism So I plan to reedit the page Thank you for causing others more work and frustration   Sorry i havent remover anthing of the footballers wives episodes page And i created the page an just wasnt signed in at the time i accidently lost the series  episode summarys when i was writing them I put them back up straight away   deleting things   thanks for clearing the stuff about deletion up Im new to deletion  The preceding unsigned comment was added by             ok and where am i supposed to reply to things you say to me here               Thanks for the insight I agree with you Its much easier to do it back and forth     how do I change the title of an article I want to change St Peter High School Ottawa to St Peter Catholic High School  never mind  sorry i got it now      Dr Qwert   I was not aware that the consensus had changed I was also under the impression that removing recent warnings from ones talk page was also considered vandalism Im sorry if I had erred    Re  I tagged Byron Long for speedy deletion since it appeared to be entirely unreferenced which given the controversial nature of the subject matter would constitute a serious WPBLP violation  WPBLP states that Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and controversial in tone where there is no NPOV version to revert to should delete the article without discussion see WikipediaCriteria for speedy deletion criterion G for more details  Looking through the page history however it appears that there actually was a reference for the article which I have restored   CSD G does use the term negative in tone which is a somewhat unfortunate choice of words  The more fundamental policy here appears to be WikipediaBiographies of living persons which states that biographies that are unsourced and controversial in tone should be speedily deleted  The underlying issue is not whether we believe that a description of a living person as a porn actor is actually negative  Rather for WPBLP purposes the issue is whether if an article incorrectly described someone as a porn actor such a description would be regarded as defamatory for the purpose of WikipediaLibel  that is whether such an incorrect description if widely believed might be likely to have a significantly adverse effect on the employment prospects or general reputation of the subject of the article  I would contend that describing someone as a porn actor is sufficiently controversial in tone to invoke WPBLP concerns for the speedy removal andor deletion of any unreferenced claims of this nature     Deletion of rain check   Why has this valid article disappeared  Please undelete it and if you feel it is not up to Wikipedia standards instead nominate it under WPAfD to give others a chance to comment on it andor improve it Thanks     I understand that it has been transwikied however it was enough to be its own Wikipedia article and can be expanded from a stub to a better article by adding information about how rainchecks are handled and processed by stores  For example some simply hand the user a piece of paper or carbon copy others take the customers information enter it into a computer and print a raincheck with a barcode later notifying the customer automatically by phoneemailmail Also other offers like rebates may no longer be valid when the raincheck is redeemed       Thkxs for the welcome   Im finally making an effort to participate around here Thanks for the welcome     Jen Banbury   Thanks for spotting that this was not a proper speedy delete about the same time i first noticed it I have rewritten and expanded the article significantly although it could doubtless use further work     All of my info and sources came out of the first two pages of a google search on her name  not really tricky research I agree lots of people over use A and G and dbcontext Thats why I undeleted this and expanded it a bit The original was not well written but the key facts were there    Yes but in this case note that it wasnt just mistagged An admin actually deleted the page while I was working on my first edit I undeleted The admin says that he still stands by his decision to delete the version as it was when tagged      I need a bit of help   Could you go ahead and delete Skykcom I think an IP sock of the author is removing the CSD tag Its obvious spam so I have no qualms about replacing that tag    Thank you      Joss Fritz   Fair comment  it asserts notability Ill ensure I check this in future before doing a dbnn  Ive tagged it for cleanupwikify for now as its rather lacking the way it stands Regards    Speedy deletion comment I unfortunately do not know any other tags beside the dbbio to mark a page for possible deletion  I understand that there is an articles for deletion list as I have discussed pages there myself however I do not know the tag to mark a page as such nor do I know the tag for proposed deletion   I just wanted to say thanks for the information that I can now use to better help keep Wikipedia free of frivolous articles  I just stick to my personal motto I got everyones back Sorry about that  Im pretty new around here and am currently reading all the many rules on the Administrators Reading List  Once I learn all these little housekeeping rules I hope to apply to be an admin myself      hello and wondering how to    I wanted to put an entry in like spectrum strategy consultants but when i do i get a deletion thingee suggestions  btw Dublin Ireland is a lot different from Minneapolis Minnesota Galway Ireland would be a better fit  looking for help in advance The preceding unsigned comment was added by      comment on location for vacation  cultural fit  just trying to help worked in MSP for many years in the Hi Tech business in the s and Ireland in s  Down to brass tacks There is an item for Spectrum Strategy which I based an entry on So why is my entry deleted and the one for Spectrum Strategy not The preceding unsigned comment was added by       I am using the same as spectrum strategy consultants along the lines of what you have suggested ie no daylight Both entries should be handled the same either accepted or spam deleted right The preceding unsigned comment was added by       mmm if you do a search on intercai mondiale you well see a number of proven reputable sources OFCOM a l