Lack of FollowUp by UserKtrKevin Rutherford on deletion made  November   is confirmed VANDALISM by lack of response after  days   Mr Rutherford has made no attempt to answer here about his deletion of sourced content whose veracity is as strong or stronger than what UserMikenorton above assesses as reliable sources ie Orey Cal  book as source material gleefully he wrote above Thats much better  I can actually see the wood for the trees now  In addition by implication UserMikenorton is implying that wikipedia articles themselves are unreliable as sources  This is evidence for censorship by UserMikenorton as well  If you want to be taken seriously UserMikenorton I suggest you read and comprehend the deleted material before spouting misrepresenatations of fact about the deleted material