I do  Its a diversionary tactic   Since the writer cannot answer the issues you and I have raised he is diverting the debate to a new red herring topic   All Wikipeida editors write about topics that they fancy  This is not a problem  In fact it is an asset since when we care about a topic we are more likely to have the facts at our fingertips   The problems come with poor editing and poor logic such as voting to keep articles that appear to favor ones personal political convictions and to delete those that dont  and devil take the rules  Some editors will try everything in an AFD shifting their arguments false arguments strawman arguments personal attacks outright untruths I have pointed out  outright assertions of untruth in ADDs this week alone and good red herring to get an article deleted when the only real argument they have is WikipediaI just dont like it