Basically the differences from the page organization shown is that I moved the taxonomy section down and the distribution and range section up  This organization seemed to flow better as it seems that a lay reader would most likely be first interested in what it looks like and where it lives  And the taxonomy section is more specialized which is why I put it at the end  This organization also seemed to work for other Central American monkeys such as Central American Squirrel Monkey and Whiteheaded Capuchin  But its easy enough to change if it is a problem I removed the spider monkey comparison  The reason for making the comparison was that Geoffroys Spider Monkey is the largest sympatric monkey  But since that wasnt addressed in the body of the text and it isnt really necessary I removed it from the lead  Alternatively I can restore it to the lead and note it in the body if reviewers think it is valuable although I may not have a ref explicitly stating the comparison just the body size stats of the  species Im not sure about the image placement  I thought they were supposed to alternate positions to the extent possible and more importantly face the text  I am not finding either of these in the link but I remember it being an issue during the Primate FAC  And it probably would not look right facing away from the text   That source had a lot of good information readily available  Some of it overlaps other sources so I could swap references if necessary but I dont think it is