In the paragraph  However in his subsequent work The Path of the Pole Hapgood conceded Einsteins point that the weight of the polar ice would be insufficient to bring about a polar shift Instead Hapgood argued that the forces that caused the shifts in the crust must be located below the surface He had no satisfactory explanation for how this could occur The last sentence should be removed as it is POV The term satisfactory in this context without giving any empirical criteria that needs to be met implies a reaction by the reader to Hapgoods explanation he or she was not satisfied by his explanation Instead the editor should present Hapgoods explanations and let the Wikipedia reader decide whether or not it constitutes a satisfactory explanation