Discussion of Censorship in this section If editors wish to rely upon policy to censor  do not choose only the bits that you need to manipulate the discussion to form a directed conclusion  First the policy that was misquoted here on this page applied to Harrassment    It required an uninvolved administrator to invoke You are clearly not  Second the community explicitly rejected censorship of records in the public domain There was no consensus found to censor such knowledge from our encyclopedia readers No consensus found  rejected idea  Third The correspondence is unequivocally irrevocably and famously in the public domain and is clearly allowed by the arbcom editing principle referred to above  In short the policy quoted does not apply  as one can clearly see from the distinctions made regarding onwiki harassment and the rejected proposal and secondly as an involved editor in the subject  it is not your place