Richard  Feb Yeah so the problem as I see it is that we still dont have a good number for how many Germans died in Poland except that maybe according to httpwwwhnetorgreviewsshowrevcgipath the max is  million a number that is a little too round for my liking  Richard you reading very carelessly This is  in total not round million Or do you ridicule the estimations at start The a million is because more easy was to estimate the total and the  loses from obvious reasons Nobody can know exact number of deaths during flight there was complete chaos Who died was just buried on spot at road Some graves disappeared just because were provisionally marked only I remember some graves of even Polish soldiers on an edge of forest which disappeared in time The wooden crosses just disintegrated You do not believe because you are too young  In any event if you look at the numbers provided in Demographic estimates of the German exodus from Eastern Europe you see  deaths in the Eastern German territories and  in Poland for a total of  deaths which differs from Nitschkes estimates by about   The  is big number too big I would believe in accuracy if the difference would be  But Nitschke could not count the East lost Polish teritories Kresy  Any way my goal is to separate the Flight number from Expulsion number  If you take this downward revision of  and add it to the downward revision of  or so that the joint commission of Czech and German historians proposed you can see how the ZgVs numbers of  million could be revised downards to    million which is what I believe Overmans is proposing I dont understand the  figure yet   This counting I do not understand You want see the most exact total number of deaths I suppose What I attempt is to prevent such quacking like Polandmurdered millions of Germans We have to assume that same individuals can be handicapped and can not read and write correctly and the info should be VERY simple  What Im still looking for is some indication of whether Nitschke Haar and Overmans are widely accepted as right or if they are still the minority challenging the established majority opinion   In my opinion you contradict yourself You always propagated multipoint POV I always propagate logic and comparison We can come closer to truth only by deduction and investigation There will be always minority challenging the established majority opinion as you say Beside not always majority is right as you know Hitler was elected and supported by majority  It would help if we could get some quotes that evaluate the work of these historians and puts them in context of the overall consensus of academic opinion  If you have some idea how to do it I would try From my experience in my professional field it is really difficult to get clue who of the researches is good and who barely satisfactory You need to be professional yourself Regularly scientific authors do not attack openly the opponent in scientific journals They rather systematically attack opponent theories in extend period of time In historical journals can be the same Maybe you understand in this context that the academic opinion is not easy to grasp Beside quite often you need to know the scientists personal animosities Some Wiki editor can be smarter then me and get multi pro and contra from popular press article on internet Personally I do not trust popular newspapers there is too many errors and politic manipulations I would consider Google type search in this point as waist of time