Thanks but I did contact the admin who stuck my name on there I didnt get a response I removed my own declaration and name Didnt consider that a revert at the time just an edit The only thing I considered a revert was actually reverting when someone cheekily readded it I reverted under WPLibel and left the following details on ANI I have never in my entire wiki history or life intently read or edited any articles or biog relating to The Troubles it does not interest me one iota My name on that list was defamatory and I exercised WPLibel to remove it and to save time getting it suppressed Its common sense and normal reasoning that we dont identifyban someone as a sex offender without proof and you just as equally dont list them on a public website where I am not anonymous as being involved in highly contentious and potentially incriminating topics which people might take literally and use against them even life threatening The admin was wrong in his suppositions the underlying comparison was wrong the warning does not apply to me Might as well try to warn me not to waredit in theory holocaustdenial or farright political party discussions the fact that I never have or do prevails over such notices as does upholding AGF in acknowledging that I dont The admin was advised of my removing the entry and has not taken the matter any further and neither should anyone else  let sleeping dogs lie and no one will have excuses to cast spurious remarks If libellous remarks can be removed from BLPs under WPRRNO I assume too they can be removed under a similar RRNO situation Despite not having a mainspace article on me I am a living person and have rights to privacy too as much as any BLP This listing is a threat to my privacy and safety under Wikis own policy I dont need to threaten legal riffraff Wikipedians should know this is not a safe way to expose people I feel even more exposed by it being raised again These talk pages are open scanned by bots and all sorts which compromises anonymity This is not a good compromise The physical safety and wellbeing of people is more important than the protection of a few bytes data on some articles    RFF