person is  is not status where status is an abstract concept with a nontrivial definition is fundamentally a statement of an idea even though a person is the subject of the sentence Or if you like the proposition could be phrased as a proof Wikipedians follow all five pillars Malleus does not follow pillar  therefore Malleus is not a Wikipedian Contrast that to calling another editor a Dishonest fuck even if we granted for the sake of argument that the first statement could be deduced accuracy or inaccuracy can dishonesty implies motive to deceive and I have yet to see that proven the latter is gratuitous insult