Getaway Thank you for your comments I most certainly did give my reasons  Read my previous comment What you didnt do is raise any points on the discussion page before making changes As for your charges   FAIR and Media Matters are certainly media watchdogs even though theyre political All media watchdogs are political Rush Limbaugh is political That doesnt make any of their views invalid but it does call for balance    Phrases like axe to grind serve no function in intelligent debate It would be equally pointless to argue that Limbaugh has an axe to grind He does and I dont have a problem with that He has every right to have an axe to grind here in the land of free speech and so do FAIR and Media Matters Having an axe to grind is just one way to say somebody takes a certain political position Limbaughs positions are one POV of a partisan debate and FAIRs are another Their axes excuse me their views need to be balanced By the way I dont know as much about Media Matters as about FAIR but FAIR makes no claim to be neutral and nonpartisan as you suggest What they claim is to be accurate Youre welcome to challenge that accuracy with sources Which leads to my next point   Its very easy to toss out weasel words like MM and FAIR both have long records of inaccuracy but youre not providing any evidence that their charges against Limbaugh are fallacious or inaccurate Judging from Limbaughs feeble response to FAIRs charges we might be tempted to conclude that Limbaugh cant answer FAIR because FAIR got it right If theres a problem with FAIRs accuracy youre welcome to include it with sources in the paragraph Ive issued this invitation three times already and nobody has taken me up on it But you do not get to blindly assert that FAIR isnt a credible source without any evidence to back you up and you dont get to water down what Ive written just because you dont like FAIRs work or because you cant find sources to back up your position   FAIR isnt merely expressing opinion Its documenting errors of fact Please dont confuse opinion with fact theyre not the same thing at all When Limbaugh claims that suspending rules on minority hiring will make earthquake repairs go quickly hes stating an opinion But when Limbaugh says the government suspended rules on minority hiring hes making a statement of fact FAIR is taking issue with Limbaughs facts    Im not asking for special treatment for FAIR Im asking that as per NPOV rules their view get equal treatment Are you asking for special treatment for Limbaughs views    Please focus on substance I am I feel its important to provide a historical perspective on this controversy and I feel the article needs to illustrate of the depth and scope of the controversy which is provided by the Media Matters quote I also feel this section needs a defining introductory sentence For these reasons Im restoring much of the previous text If you disagree please take issue with me on this page   BTW I feel that Allen made a useful clarifying edit in an earlier revision when he labeled FAIR a progressive organization and provided a link to an article I find that much more accurate than Liberal since FAIR keeps its distance from classic liberalism and sometimes takes issue with people who call themselves Liberal Can we keep the Progressive label