Youre not assuming good faith  I read the article the day the movie came out so I was unaware of the correction  I read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie  Furthermore my statements about Michael Chrichton were very accurate  I also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view  But something being a minority view doesnt make it an incorrect view or vandalism  If you disagree with me you can reword my blurb to your liking but to call it vandalism is petty