UNESCO Britannica Encarta Brisn Jospeph University of Ohio and every other source on the planet calls Arvanitic a DIALECT OF ALBANIAN Its status is disputed like that of Cantonese Some people say that it is a language in its own right some say that it is a dialect Therefore Wikipedia should not take sides by saying that it is a language and directly contradicting EVERY AVAILABLE SOURCE MATIA still has not provided any sources all he says is that we should check what he has written elsewhere Wikipedia should be neutral it should not be a hotbed for propaganda Clearly in all other disputed cases the form X linguistics is used Why should the POV with on verifiability be used