It was a positive review I dont think you read it You cherry pick one line over a   Is this neutral Miltons book is the third by a science journalist to question neoDarwinism the other two being by Hitching and Taylor both mentioned in the article Spanner further says He does not by any means cover the same ground as Taylor  Milton also mentions this on his website about Taylor being a science journalist and questioning neoDarwinism before him of course you wouldnt know this becuase you dont read books by Milton I have seen your edits on Miltons page you seem to be under the impression he is a creationist if you bothered to read his books you would see is is actually a neolamarckist Milton has been misrepresented  Here is what Spanner says about Milton  He writes well forcefully and with conviction This book is well produced   Did you forget those bits On a side note  Who is David Spanner Hes a fundamentalist Christian who trained as mainly a physicist he was not an expert on biology he mainly wrote about thermodynamics and religion of course he would of disagreed with some of Miltons views becuase Milton is nonreligious Here is Douglas Spanner Douglas Spanner