There are other definitions of false than not true  For example Deliberately untrue Arising from mistaken ideas and Intentionally deceptive   The false in false skeptic is more likely one of these describing people behaving as if skeptical even tho theyre not whether deliberately or not  Pointing out that some people behave like this backed up with reliable reports of such behavour seems to be a valid part of this article even if the label false skeptic is confusing     In your view and others yes But there are others who view false as the opposite of truth as it is meant to be Granted  Nothing can be so completly itself that it does not contain something of its opposite Lao Tzu For the sake of argument false is not true You are all opinion though ultimately we all are Either way the majority opinion of false is not true pseudo Therefore to claim someone is a false skeptic is impossible since you cant prove if your view let alone theres is  and knows what true skepticism is The logicians call this quite often the TRUE SCOTSMAN FALLACY  We could all form websites talk bs and then use it or our friends as sources The trouble is not in the getting of the source but in the quality therein Your view and sources lack quality and are not worthy of Wikiparticularly when applied to such a grand and ancient pylosophical view as Skepticism For example I know more than the average man in that I know that I know nothingSocrates  I believe he is saying that one cant know anything for certain and that this truth is the only real knowledge he has thus giving him an advantage that may not be there a lovely paradox Most view this statement to be that there is too much knowledge for one to know and that knowing this paradoxilly makes him wiser in his lack of wisdom HOWEVER you dont see me going to the page on Socrates finding bs sources that support my rare view and forcing hundreds of viewers in the future to be subject to my minority and severly lacking of analysis viewpoint do you I deleted it because it is unsalvageable If you all persist in bringing it back after I delete it again then to hell with it You can have this page Whine to whoever wiki is a democracy where the citizens are the whiners who work the system with the moderators who are unworthy and with no life and the wiki owners who are too poor to fund such a site properly And you wonder why donations are so tricky Wiggalama