Dmcq I am having trouble comprehending your position  We have a source in which the FRC itself advocates the view that homosexuality and paedophilia are linked  We have impecable mainstream sources stating that empirical research does not show any such link  Given these facts would you agree that there is a POV issue with simply stating the FRC view without any caveat  If you do agree what do you think we need to support a caveat and what caveat would you propose  If you do not agree please explain why an uncontested statement of a view that is falsified by RS is appropriate for an encyclopedia