New reviewer Unfortunately Philcha has been taken ill and has asked for another reviewer to take over this I am willing to do so although other reviewers may also be willing Ive made some minor fixes and copyedits please fix or revert these if I have made any mistakes or you disagree with them  On my read through the main outstanding issue I noticed is the section on threats and conservation especially the first paragraph I am wholly supportive of the good intent to draw attention to a conservation issue but please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should not express opinions or make predictions without attribution to reliable sources We should inform the reader about the facts and present a balance of opinions in reliable sources then trust the reader to come to their own conclusions The language in the entirely uncited first paragraph is loose and opinionated Since these days it is hard to enforce rules If this continues unabated will very likely be unable to recover  These are grounds to fail on criteria a  and