From my perspective my edit is  compatible with what is the Wiki policy for Reliable Sources  WPNo Original Research states A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward descriptive statements of facts that any educated person with access to the source but without specialist knowledge will be able to verify are supported by the source  My comments were entirely descriptive statements of fact that even a young school child would be able to verify as being true  There was no presence of analysis or interpretation in my statement  I merely said the website was shut down and a new message replaced its text regarding side effects  Do you have any additional feedback