Just because B and  are similar does not mean that they are same Similarly Love Jihad and Forced conversion may look similar to some but they are not same In love jihad one has a jihadist impulse which is far more fanatical and unscrupulous than the normal Islamist impulse to convert resulting in Forced conversion So they are at a totally different level and are distinct concepts There may be other differences too I myself am doing OR here but my OR gets no place in the article This source is being used on the strength of the OR that Love Jihad is samesimilar to Forced conversion and this is how it becomes a violation of WPOR policy and that is why it should have no place in the article I am afraid using this source does involve synthesis Heres how The source is being used to convey the sense that Love Jihad is an imaginary baseless concept This is being done on the strength of the OR that Love Jihad and Forced conversion are same similar  combining it with the source is being used to convey that the source is saying that Love jihad is a baseless concept This is how it is synthesis Actually we have no source except the opinion of WP eds which are inadmissible in article space that the two concepts are same similar  this source does not say that the issue of Love jihad is baseless It is only saying things about Forced conversion etc So you see the synthesis part now The source is being made to say things it does NOT say I hope I have been able to convey myself clearly Thanks    Arbitrary break