Im still awaiting an explanation as to why my careful and accurate sourcing of statements in this article was vandalized while I was away during the past three weeks  When I added the archival sources many months ago they were approved by a Wikipedia editor  Moreover not only were the archival references recently vandalized but also the reference to my published article in Brief Chronicles a peerreviewed academic journal was deleted  These archival sources cannot be characterized as original research  As noted earlier on this page Alan Nelsons book is merely a series of quotations from these same archival sources stitched together with a bit of commentary  If my transcripts of these archival sources readily available to everyone on my webpage are original research and thus to be banned under Wikipedias policy then so is Alans book for the same reason namely that its largely a series of quotations from archival sources  And as stated earlier Alan misinterprets these sources thus generating factual errors  For example re the Brincknell incident Alan deliberately conflates William Waters one of the jurors in the coroners inquest into the death of Thomas Brincknell and Oxfords servant William Walter  On p  Alan writes of the coroners inquest that  The  jurymen were however as compliant as the jury was packed one juryman William Waters was Oxfords own servant