Image copyright problem with ImageAntgif Thanks for uploading ImageAntgif The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image which is required by Wikipedias policy on images  If you dont indicate the copyright status of the image on the images description page using an appropriate copyright tag it may be deleted some time in the next seven days  If you have uploaded other images please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well  For more information on using images see the following pages WikipediaImage use policy WikipediaImage copyright tags  This is an automated notice by   For assistance on the image use policy see WikipediaMedia copyright questions   Hi Further to this I see youve added a fair use tag which seems to be appropriate to for the subject You do however need to state the source of the image and who owns the copyright Its a very cool image by the way Thanks     Sockpuppet   I think the sockpuppet notice should be moved as a notice to the talk page There was just one sockpuppet and he is no longer using them and he the main account was not indefblocked     Page move vandalism  Wikipedia has clear procedures on moving pages Other than in exceptional circumstances all pages should be moved by following the instructions on the Requested Moves page Unilateral moves can trigger edit wars break links and cause a lot of problems Please stop unilaterally moving pages as you did with Kim Jongil and follow the correct procedure     I gather English may not be your native language article names should match common usage in English and not for instance a transliteration of the Russian version   I see you have already been warned about this in regard to Sanhedrin and you agreed to stop doing it to avoid getting blocked  Well please do stop      Amenia  Since you were one of the few regular users supporting me in the RfC just wanted to say thanks You have any advice on the best way to go about a next step It seems so unfair that this little click can distort the borders of Europe   Block  I have reverted nationalist antiSoviet propaganda mass deletion and removing the mention of Nazi collaborationist war crimes in Participants in World War II about once a day I have been blocked in circumvent of the rules by a POV admin The article should be restored to the preedit war status  Nixer you reverted that article four times I have blocked you for only  hours although your repeated RR violations would usually warrant more as would your POV admin remark above     Taking no position whether Nixer  deserves a block for revert warring I must note that  reverts accumulated in  not  hours as per this Staying under RR is no entitlement in any way and general revert warring is subject to admins discretion blocks However in such case the admin should be uninvolved unlike  who was one of the editors who reverted Nixer Again I take no position on whether Nixer should be blocked for RV warring in general just noting that technically RR is not there and blocking by admin who participates in article disagreement is highly inappropriate in such case  All this aside Nixer you should cool down finally    Three of Nixers reverts were within  hours and the fourth was the following morning which I reverted but subsequently restored Furthermore I am not a recent editor of this article and am not thrilled by the attitude presented by either Nixer or the editors reverted if there had been any genuine discussion they might have been able to reach a compromise as they were both presenting opposing nationalistic views Nevertheless he reverted the article four times in a row without discussion while  and the others did not Sadly he has a long track record of such behavior    Please look the talk page more precisely The discussion is going and all sides present their arguments I do not revert without pointing my arguments in the talk page The first edit of my opponents seemed to me as vandalism because they performed mass deletion of valid info The version I do protect stayed in its status for many months and users who perform mass deletion to a stable version should better explain their moteves in the talk page first   ProhibitOnions Holocaust Denial is not acceptable in Wikipedia Im appaled at the suppression of data about the crimes perpetrated by the Nazis and their collaborators It is even less acceptable to abuse RR in order to block ones opponents I advise all interested parties to move their dispute to WPANI with a stern warning that Holocaust Denial will not be tolerated     There is no holocaust denial dispute is about the fact that was the participation in holocaust enough importnant to put it in article that is meant to be short overview or not If Holocaust there actualy quite small amount of Estonian collaborators participated is mentioned then a lot more  things that were at similar or bigger scale need to be mentioned and that would make article too long Also Nixers version has factual mistakes in it   Ive already corrected the mistakes you pointed If you know some things of bigger scale connected to participation of the Baltic states please point them  The murders and deportations of Estonians between June  and August  were much more numerous than Holocaust victims of Estonia but in your opinion it shouldnt be included    The Estonian SS units participated not only in Estonia you see And Estonians murdered all  Estonian Jews Do you think it is not worth enough to be mentioned Holocaust victims were murdered not just deported   Since I was first to have commented here I will add extra two cents If ProhibitOnions per his judgement concludes the Nixer was running a sterile revert war the block may be justified Lack of technical RR is not a foolproof defence Even though RR is a policy for a reason and should be applied in most cases some revert warriors permanently stay  step under RR and do nothing but reverting This should not be allowed If PO thinks that this is the case here sterile revert warring technically under RR he should NOT have said that the block is for RR but he should make it clear that this is a judgement block imposed by his own decision based on the evidence that Nixer was involved in a sterile revert war despite staying under RR At the same time Nixer claims that he was not running a revert war but attempted a discussion at talk which was ingored by his opponents Whoever studies this or PO himself needs to take a good look on all details  However Nixer is indeed known as generally a hotheaded guy even though I commend his committment to add content to Wikipedia He may be right or wrong but in any case he gets excited too much Nixer an advise Do not revert any article more than twice in any  hours even if your opponents are wrong and otherwise bad I almost guarantee that by adopting this you will not be blocked for revert warring Now please seize attempts getting yourself unblocked It is only  hours Take a break and come back tomorrow chilled out   Regards   Irpen thank you very much for commenting In fact the users in this case do not ignore my comments although it happens rather frequently in other articles but their nationalistic POV seems to be very strong Anyway I did not revert this article more than twice a day by my