No it wouldnt look the same because I would personally revert anything that was unsourced fancruftspeculation before it got a chance to get in and weave itself into the article This is precisely what Ive done on Tekken  film and whenever someone tries to add something unsourced I try to verify it myself and if I cant revert it goes usually with a note asking for a source going to the editor It sounds badevil but its better than what I ended up seeing people were quoting the old Tekken  film as gospel saying its cast list or storyline was accurate etc People were citing Wikipedia as a source elsewhere This is why we cant afford to have articles like this with large masses of unsourced material it flushes Wikipedias credibility down the toilet   email