ordu   Theres nothing wrong with using Armenian sources except when they are the only sources that are used to support a disputed and an inflammatory Armenian claim  Then it becomes POV and biased  even if it is true And it may very well be true but nobody has provided unbiased or NPOV sources in  months Just one passage from an Armenian hardly qualifies as a source and reverting over and over again isnt going to make it a fact either  If you have a logical explanation why this guy is not biased or not POV let me hear it   Also when talking about  years ago you cant put it in the Population section of Ordu today How is that irrelevant What next Apes and homoerectus who lived there  years ago Lets be serious