I disagree I think that fairness is an important aspiration  No I accept that there is some valid work there and I respect your attempts to be fair But I dont believe youve succeeded in fairness and despite all your Wikicorrectness  you or some others have somehow almost surgically removed much valid criticism that was mentioned and referenced and also managed to leave out a whole raft of important fact as exemplified by the glaring omission of any mention of Rawats teaching the ashram way of life That information was there I pop in after an absence of a few months and lo its all gone along with everything else I edited  Furthermore this talk page still has diehards Momento you and this Rainer fellow still trying to turn black into white even arguing that Rawat did not teach the ashram way of life Can you expect me to take this stuff seriously  Please dont be surprised that I dont have so much faith that your particular brand of WikiCorrectness is yielding an accurate and valuable resource