s bizarre behavior Pot kettle What do you get off on acting like a cop around here or something If you dont have a problem with my edits dont concern yourself with matters that dont involve you    Funny  thats exactly what I would say to you  since this is my talk page were discussing    The tone of your responses which makes evident a presumption of bad faith is unwarranted and especially unbecoming of someone who is supposed to be a mediator FYI I dealt with UserSparky in the same fashion as other users working on the Reagan article It might have been misguided but I did have a reason for dealing with Sparky the way I did Before I got involved in this dispute I noticed that UserJiang had removed the rape section writing Wikipedia is not the National Enquirer He too left no comment on the talk page after removing it So combined with the nature of the material in question and what seemed to be unanimous opposition to his work from other editors chiming in on the subject this led me to conclude that this issue would be widely recognized as a vandalism matter and thus an appropriate situation for automatic reversion Perhaps I made the wrong calculation but I was acting to prevent what arguably appeared to be vandalism at the time    Your agression accusations and selfrighteousness are the issue that Im concerned about and my feeling is that your behavior  not the content you propose to add or delete  is a problem  And as far as my bad faith You said just above mudslingingpointing fingersdigging up dirt on each otherYou gave your opiniontabloid garbage and then Pot kettle What do you get off on acting like a cop around here or something If you dont have a problem with my edits dont concern yourself with matters that dont involve you I rest my case to quote Perry Mason  So thats all I have to say I have grown weary of this discussion and my attention will no longer be focused on it Cheers   I posted my last message hoping that youd be able to see where I was coming from so that we could start dealing with each other on a cooperative basis Instead you responded with your most vehement personal attack yet Still Im ready to start off with a clean slate with you if you are willing to do the same with me     What are the rules      What are the rules Where are the rules Who can post How many editors are there What is the mediation committee Why allow someone to edit a page if they are not logged in As I wasnt re Chiasmus etc  More specifically why not allow chiasmus examples on the chiasmus page  Thanks  Hi Vanatter  Ive left a number of useful links to info about policies and rules on  but you didnt do anything wrong and we welcome your edits whether logged in or not but we also do cleanup on articles If you have some something relatively brief that you have analyzed and that you want to add to Chiasmus as an example that would be great but we generally frown upon people adding links to their web sites to articles as it seems too close to advertising  I hope this helps clarify things and that you continue to contribute to Wikipedia And for more info on the WikipediaMediation Committee please see WikipediaDispute resolution  Thanks