Vandalism by Muslim editors  Given a perception by Indian media that Amicus Curiae has accused Modi many muslims and some pseudo liberals are trying to deviate the actual  Page report of Mr Raju Ramchandran which actually praises and absolve Modi of all the conspiracy and other charges Mr Raju as a lawyer express a Probability that If Sanjiv Bhatt is true lets assume then a case can be lodge and if Modi is found innocent in court then the case can be closed This is the whole report of amicus curiae which has been distorted by Indian Media as Evidence against Modi Here are the releveant sources hope  all of you will go through the whole reportits only  pages  httpibnliveincomnewsgujaratriotsteestaspleaforreportrejectedhtml   httpwwwfirstpostcomindiasitvsamicuscuriaereportatriumphofdemocracyhtmlwonderful article the exaggeration of amicus report by indian media completely exposed  httpwebcachegoogleusercontentcomsearchqcacheIwFYBbPGTvJwwwthehinducomnewsnationalarticleeceamicusrelyonsanjivbhattcdhlenctclnkglin   httpwebcachegoogleusercontentcomsearchqcachevQnmYKpiJtarabenmojagarincitynewsFpDsanjivbhattstrategiserhlenglinprmdimvnsstripSanjiv Bhatt a strategiser as pointed by Amicus himself his point that who is SIT to reject sanjiv bhatt evidence and that Modi should prove himself innocent are both useless  In short Mr Raju wants Modi to prove his innocence in Court As far as i know the constitution  One has to be proven guilty in Court and not that one has to prove his innocence in court Similarly who is SIT to reject Sanjiv Bhatt evidence SCIENCE and MODERN TECH are the one to reject Sanjiv bhattcongress agent evidence  the time at which he claimed he was with Modi  however his Mobile record shows that he was  KM away from Modi Office that whole Day