Reversion    Why did you revert the page What didnt you like about my edits  In my view there was nothing wrong about my edits Those people are all alumni of the university I thought the section was too weak and short compared to entries of other universities like McGill  Wisdompower  Preceding unsigned comment added by         Thank you   I just wanted to thank you for your excellent antivandalism work and particularly for reverting the vandalism to my talk page yesterday It was much appreciated      The Best Halloween Ever   Hi I saw where you just tagged this for speedy deletion as patent nonsense and was curious as to why you chose that tag The page is wellwritten and doesnt appear to be gibberish     Talkback       A barnstar you deserve it  styleborder px solid gray backgroundcolor fdffe rowspan valignmiddle   rowspan  stylefontsize xlarge padding  verticalalign middle height em  The AntiVandalism Barnstar  styleverticalalign middle bordertop px solid gray  Youve beat me to reverting vandals several times tonight and when I took a look I couldnt help but notice the sheer volume of vandalism patrol youve been doing I think all your hard work deserves a barnstar       David Bielkheden   Why did you revert the last few changes to David Bielkheden article Seemed right to me    My mistake Ive rectified it and left a note on the IPs talk      Emile Durkheim    Why have you removed the edit to the suicide section in Emile Durkheims page which mentioned that egoistic suicide is also known as egotistical suicide  This is a productive edit as many editionstranslations refer to only one term and not the other  Readers should be aware of the relation between the terms  Preceding unsigned comment added by     Its redundant Egotistic and egotisticalsuicide are the same thing    That is the point to stating that it is also known as the other term  The words are not the same egoistic refers more to a general selfcentered nature while egotistical refers more to a selfcentered way of thinking and speaking  Look up the terms and you will see that they are not perfect synonyms  The implications of both terms on the semantics and the basic message of Durkheims theory is significant  This information  a matter of  words  should be included in Wikipedias article  Both are valid terms with different implications  It would not be the first time a Wikipedia article lists multiple terms for the same thing According Random House Websters Unabridged Dictionary theyre the same words He performed an egotistic suicide for egotistical reasons same thing    Unless that was a typo you just used exactly the same word twice  The difference is between EGOISTIC one T and EGOTISTICAL two Ts  Look up the two words in MerriamWebster  Preceding unsigned comment added by     Sorry that was a typo Forget the examples the word has the same meaning even according to our very own encyclopedia and so differntiation is not necessary     I support RaseaCs decision Saying that egoistic refers more to a general selfcentered nature while egotistical refers more to a selfcentered way of thinking and speaking is a very very vague differentiation even by your definitions I dont see what the difference is Even we just supposed that the two terms referred to two different things it would almost logically imply the terms egoistical suicide and egotistical suicide have different meanings  For my part however I am quite certain that Durkheim did not intend to use two distinct words with different meanings to refer to the same thing If the two words have been equally used by translators I believe we can fairly assume that they refer to the same thing Thus no need to distinguish between the two words they mean and refer to the exact same thing     They may indeed refer to the same thing  after all that is why both are used  People do interpret what they read based on the literal meanings of words however so it should be noted that translations of this book use the terms interchangeably regardless of etymology  Further the main point is this look at other Wikipedia articles  Take the Simpsons paradox as an example  The article mentions that this concept has gone by at least four different names each of which is listed  Those are all names for exactly the same thing  REAL ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLES MENTION ALL SYNONYMOUS AND RELATED TERMS  Your discrimination in this case is an unnecessary inhibition to Wikipedias potential  The addition of five extra words which acknowledge that this phenomenon has another name is not detrimental to the Wikipedia article  On the contrary it is a simple relation of facts  the very purpose of an encyclopedia to begin with  Preceding unsigned comment added by     Not only do they refer to the same thing the words are synonyms which is why it is redundant to list both The Simpsons Paradox example is irrelevant because those are four completely different terms which use completely different words If it makes it easier think of egoistic and egotistical being the same words as that is effectively what they are It is detrimental to the article as so far as it is redundant wording which should be avoided so as to improve the readibility of the sentence    please continue this discussion on the articles talk page   afd just some friendly advicewe dont use pictorial symbols therethe system supports them because they are used here in a few miscellaneous processes like sockpuppet investigations     Noted thanks     Help     What is the best way of deleting The Ida Funkhouser Roadside Memorialas it is in my opinion an implausible redirect I was unable to find a suitable speedy tag and WPPROD seems OTT   You just changed that to a redirect and now youre requesting deletion because its implausible  Please explain your intentions I dont follow your question Im afraid  User TalkFleetflameFleetf