CBDunkerson I hope this comment on my own talk page is not considered intervention I see Ive been unblocked  I did not mean to suggest that MONGO was purposely inserting information as part of his job The only reason I said I would not be surprised is because this has been going on for a while now and Wikipedia has not stopped it What else am I to think Although I admit to not being familiar with Wikipedias procedures Still that comment by me is nothing compared to what MONGOs been getting away with  Also just noticed this btw  Wikipedia is supposed to be NPOV which is why MONGO should steer clear of the  pages    An examination of the exchanges between MONGO and myself here is a good example  MONGO seems content with personal attacks who cares how many misguided folks there are  His comments are clearly ad hominem personal attacks towards me and many others   The following from this page shows hes content with namecalling as well I removed an external link to a namecalling site MONGO reverts me leaving the following statement I like this weblinkit summaries things quite well   I apologize for any insinuations on my part but also must stress my own attempts at a NPOV  Im sure we all agree from MONGOs own statements here that he is neither apologetic nor neutral  The POV pushers that try to add nonsense to the articles related to the  events have been told repeatedly that the vast majority of their contributions to those article violated numerous policies This doesnt seem to stop them This editor I blocked routinely reverts those that support the concensus verison and yes conspiracy theorists is what they arethey are not researchers Simply put and I wont apologize for this not being more civil I will continue to block POV pushers that disrupt the discussion pages and the articles with nonsense Two other admins responded to the unblock request and did not unblock this editor I then moved the early parts of this conversation from an article talk page to here for all to see It is ludicrus to assume that I was doing anything other than to ensure that the POV pushers of nonsense know that there is a limit to the level of disruption that needs to be tolerated   If MONGO calls this paper which has been peer reviewed by two physicists before being accepted for publication in a book nonsense obviously he is not NPOV