You should not have deleted the Area  page in my opinion  I modified the article from the rather nutty article posted by the original poster to reflect the ambiguities surrounding the sites existence and to remove the biased PoV of the original article  The article was backed up by a substantial array of links to third party sources that were not selfreferential in any way  It is my opinion that the popular culture interest of this subject matter warrants its inclusion in the same way that we have an article regarding Area  and other US government sites that are alleged to exist  If the text of the previously deleted user was unacceptable what text would be considered acceptable  How can this decision be appealed so that a proper consensus can be reached on how this important and encyclopedic subject matter can be referenced   Would you be open to another article containing a list and description of all alleged US government installations of reduced interest    Wgw