Weak Oppose While the rape claim certainly seems extremely dubious at this point Im not sure weve reached the point yet where its been positively shown to be false That said I would agree that  if she has been named in RS  it would be acceptable to include her name in the article if its relevant which I believe it is as opposed to just to out her However it seems the only outlet that has given her surname as redacted is GotNews which is not a RS Even the outlets that have reported on GotNews story have been careful not to use the name redacted I am of the suspicion this will change in the coming day or two and my opinion is we should wait until it does at which time Id change my vote to support     Endorse above BlueSalix has taken the words out of my mouth At this time I dont believe it would be right to name her unless the sources do such first Alternatively her deliberately coming out of her nickname to embrace and reassert such allegations would also be a sign that disclosing the name would be appropriate    Thanks Yeah while Im sure many people feel indignant andor scandalized about the evolution of this story its not WPs job to exact punishment I feel like we should go slow and steady on using names unless and until it becomes absolutely necessary to maintain the integrity of the article    Strong oppose  firstly the accusers rape claim has not turned out to be false there are questions over details she alleged Secondly the name thats being bandied around is from a single source posted by some blogger That utterly fails WPRS I notice that the Daily Mail a newspaper not averse to naming and shaming has decided not to reveal the name of the accuser nor that of members of her family And neither should we here Given the gravity of the situation it would require some seriously reliable sources Furthermore I have suppressed her name at least for now for the above reasons Its nonpublic personal information along with accusations of potentially criminal activity YMMV but thats the call Im making here     Just to underline this it appears the name has been repeated by Inquisitr in addition to GotNews however it bears noting now before the point is raised that Inquisitr is not RS As per s point we really need Reuters or the New York Times to use a specific name before we even consider it      Categories   I feel like including the following categories  Feminism and sexuality Feminist theory Misandry Misogyny  is a little WPPOINTY Does anyone object to their removal      do you have sources to support such cats