Regarding the Million Dollar Baby article I also have some questions about an edit you made to the Million Dollar Baby article  On WTSPOILER you said In covering fiction the opinion of a single critic even a fairly prominent one is usually not significant I then found multiple reliable sources who used spoiler warnings and created a Spoiler alerts section in the Million Dollar Baby article that contained citations to Roger Ebert of the Chicago SunTimes Susan Wloszczyna of USA Today who mentioned David Thomson of The Independent and Michael Medved Jeffrey Overstreet of Christianity Today Mark Moring of Christianity Today film critic Debbie Schlussel Michael Atkinson of the The Village Voice and Ian Grey of Baltimore City Paper You removed the Spoiler debate section with the edit summary Removing per WPWEIGHT This is giving a ridiculous amount of attention to a minor aspect of the films reception and said on the talk page that the section was blown up due to internal Wikipedia discussions and that the external statements seem to have been dredged up and plonked down on the article When someone finds a reliable source for material do you consider that dredging up You seemed to think that one citation was not enough and you seemed to think that citations involving nine people was too much Was there a certain number of citations you had in mind when you made that comment on WTSPOILER