May  UTC   Three comments about NPOV The second paragraph in this article links to  specific and very negative reviews  However no positive reviews are provided  Instead readers are provided to the wiki entries for religious right conservative and creationist  Since Rotten Tomatoes was used as a primary source for ratings could this sentence be updated to include at least one link to a positive film critic review  As mentioned in WikipediaNPOV even minority viewpoints cannot be completed ignored and in this case minority viewpoint should not be applied since the minority viewpoint is the thesis of the film   There seems to be a large discrepancy between film criticscientific community reception of this film and popular opinion user reviews of this film  Popular opinion votes on Internet websites are not considered a reliable source but in this case since Rotten Tomatoes was already used as a primary source for this portion of the article could this section be updated to include a reference to popular reception to this film with a link to the Rotten Tomatoes User Reviews  reviews  positive  rating at the time of this edit  Google user reviews for this film an aggregate largely from epinionscom show a similar  or  positive rating  Why is this film being treated so much differently than Fahrenheit   In this entry there is no reference to film critic opinion or popular opinion of the film even though the reception was nearly as extreme except positive not negative   at Rotten Tomatoes