White House not a valid source for infobox   I dispute the White House being a source for its own war this seems to go against Wikipedia policy on verifiability and more importantly reliability because the WH is a partisan source and the viewpoint is seen by much of the world as extremist Furthermore including it as part of the war on terrorism simply because the American government views it as such is tantamount to saying Israel is an illegal state simply because the Iranian government doesnt say so After all he says it in a lot of his speeches He even said it at the official convention against the Holocaust It was a meeting of academic minds  As it stands the infobox is POV and it has only one clear proponent going agaisnt public opinion and editorial consensus in favor of a previous consensus reached only through one side leaving the table