What was done on these two pages is a bit different from the pages Im used to seeing  Most of the pages Ive looked at place a  tag in a section named References and populate that section with inline REFITEM instances where REFITEM is often formatted by one of the citation templates from WPCITET  Individual REFITEMs in the text hook to their References section appearances via numbered links and backlinks supplied by the mechanism behind the   and  tags the Citephp extension to MediaWiki   The ref  note template family can also be used to supply connective links and backlinks but dont do autonumbering of links  WPGTL describes the References section as containing  items that you used in constructing the article and have referenced cited in the article An example is then given using  which puts the example item into a  collection under an example section named confusingly to me Notes instead of References  What appears to have been done on the two pages being discussed here is that the items which would go in the References section have been broken up into  some harvardreferenced books and  other stuff  mostly web pages but some books as well on the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry page  with the harvardreferenced books being put in a bulleted list in a section titled References and the other stuff in a list autonumbered with  etc in a section named Notes  Thats what threw me  Im not used to seeing that done   WPGTL does say it is more important to have clarity and consistency in an article than to adhere to any particular system  I have plenty of other things on my plate at present so I think Ill drop the matter here