I dont buy those arguments  First there has also been a recent trend of creating a season article for every Division I program for each of the last  or so seasons I see no reason that that trend wont start to backtrack into earlier teams Pages getting deleted have less to do with the notion of a singleseason article being inherently nonnotable than it has to do with those specific articles not being up to standards Just look at all the singleseason Nebraska football articles that are being created and kept You say There will never be a separate article for any of these pre Gators football teams Thats a rather bold proclamation to issue on behalf of all editors present and future Never say never  I dont buy that you need to bypass the redirect to take the reader to the applicable section Thats why the season redirects typically redirect to the correct section in the target article Even better in case the sections get renamed only the redirect will need to have its link tweaked rather than the set of all articles that bypassed the redirect  Just because there is only one single season article between  and  right now it does not preclude the distinct possibility of there being more Especially when many of those s squads finished in the top  and the  team actually played in the national championship game  how is that not notable  Merging the decade articles is a fine consensus Im in no way countering that However consensus can change over time and there is no need to prevent other articles from linking to new Florida season articles should that situation ever arise  I dont know why you bring in broken links unless youre suggesting that the decade articles would be deleted and that somehow the bot could figure out to point the link at the season article at that point Why not keep it simple and leave the link to the redirect That way there is no need for this magic bot Thats one of the main features of redirects to serve as a placeholder for a possible future article distinct from the redirect target You call my arguments specious yet Im not the one trying to justify departure from accepted Wikipedia guidelines  True the answer is obvious Have the redirect point at the correct section of the decade article Simple as that Ill even help update the redirect targets