Well two counterpoints and an attempt to help you see the main point again  First you authoritatively state yellowcake would barely qualify as a dirty bomb but it is not clear what standard you are using since the AP article states the following  Exposure carries welldocumented health concerns associated with heavy metals such as damage to internal organs experts say The big problem comes with any inhalation of any of the yellowcake dust said Doug Brugge a professor of public health issues at the Tufts University School of Medicine  Second the AP article notes there is remaining radioactive debris at Tuwaitha  Im not sure if youve been on the ground I leave that possibility open but unless you have a source to back up your point the AP article reads like there is other material there that are radiological  But if we are actually reasoning together you will see that is not my main point about why we should post the AP article  The AP source reaffirms that Iraq did have WMD material known or unknown it not the point  You claim yellowcake is not WMD material but the Canadians bought it to make nuclear energy so your definition of WMD material seems personal  The reader of this entry on WMD should know that Iraq had this material and if not this section of the site is imbalanced  That is my point