I am confused here  I posted something about both of the publically funded Waldorf schools in Sonoma County not an individual school and that information comes from official sources so it is properly sourced and the information provides information which contradicts the Official Waldorf position  I do not believe that the official statement of the Waldorf committee reflects their reality  Antiimmunization is so highly correlated with the Waldorf schools I have looked at as to be close to official policy  Waldorf schools in the US  education as practiced in the US includes a substantial antiimmunization       Concerns over immunizations   The current text refers to a consensus statement which is a dead link  This page httpwwwwaldorfanswersorgQuestionsMorehtm refers to a growing antiimmunization movement within and outside of Waldorf schools but again refers to the same dead link as the consensus statement on vaccinations  The article does not cite a verifiable source on the policy of Waldorf education towards vaccinations  The article does say Studies have found Waldorf pupils to have a lower incidence of allergies and allergiclike symptoms an effect which correlated with the extent to which they lived an anthroposophic lifestyle generally  in particular with reduced use of antibiotics antipyretics and measles mumps and rubella vaccination  Which is a deep violation of NPOV  to assert a correlation when there is a deep selection bias in the cited studies  I will replace the immunization section with something sourced unless it is properly sourced