As for controlled by a committee  it really depends on the maturity of the article and how controvertial it is  This article is both  By and large it is a delicate compromise between opposing POVs though some of the proID people still see it as biased against ID  As for the changes you made  my biggest issue with them is that they read like commentary not like an encylopaedia entry  If you can rephrase the sentances in a way that preserves the underlying shades of meaning and does so without sounding hostile to ID I would be happy with the changes though of course I cant speak for everyone involved here