Here Toby asked me to take a look at this Here is what I saw in a notso quick look at recent edits This  April version of the article had an initial paragraph in the Colonia Era section which was largely unsupported In this  April edit Toby replaced this paragraph with new content still largely unsupported The new content changed the focus of the paragraph removing a heavy weight previously given to rape in a masterslave relationship in favor of heavier emphasis on mulatto offspring In this series of three April  edits DDK reintroduced the emphasis on rape citing supporting sources In this  April edit Tobby reverted the DDK edits saying WP is not a blog In this  April edit Tobby added and rearranged some material In this  April edit anon  reverted the article back to its state as of the last edit by DDK without explanation In this edit apparently not noticing that the article had been anonymously reverted to one of his prevvious edit versions DDK made some further edits to the article saying Undid revision  by Tobby talkNot weighted properly Vast majority of scholarsand obvious common sense state slavemaster relationsips were rape by the very nature In this May  edit Toby added and removed some material in this and other sections of the article saying readd quotes per WPNPOV plus add pics In this May  edit DDk reverted the prior edit by Tobby saying   rv stop If you want to make these kinds of controversial changes use the Talk page In this May  edit Toby added a  tag to the section  I think Ive got that straignt Some of the edits mentioned above were separated from one another by unrelated edits made by other users  Guys please reread WPBRD I know that it is an essay and not a policy but it does describe a workable method for reaching consensus by identifying objections to edits and keeping discussion moving forward and help towards breaking deadlocks That BoldRevertDiscuss method is much superior to the BoldRevertUnrevertEdit war method which has been tried here Regardless of how the section at issue got to be in its current state can we please have some discussion aimed at establishing a consensus about what it ought to contain  It looks to me as if the main area of disagreement is how much weight should be given to information about masterslave rapes in colonial America in an article on the topic of Mulatto which the lead sentence describes as a term commonly used in the United States to refer to a person who is born from one white parent and one black parent or more broadly a person of any mixed ancestry Input from editors not involved in the editwarish exchanges above would probably be useful Ill mention that this source might be useful It speaks somewhat to the subtopic at issue here though not from an American Colonial Era viewpoint    earlier Boracay Bill