I dont find your sketch I agree that this article has huge problems The biggest is deciding what its trying to be Im inclined at the moment to think it should be about the philosophical side of the question of abiogenesis  Aristotle said it was a selfevident truth then Pasteur showed it wasnt but he simultaneously showed that Darwin must be be wrong on theoretical grounds Kelvin drew attention to a second theoretical obstacle to Darwin the nd law Miller and Urey drawing on Oparin and Haldane then demonstrated that the nd law is not an obstacle to the spontaneous emergence of complex from less complex systems But Im not sure where to go from there Some mention should be made of information theory which is simply a restatement of the nd law I agree that the critics section should go  its peurile Not go to any other article just go Panspermia in this article Im not sure about  its an argument about the details of where life mayn have originated not whether it could originate spontaneously from nonliving matter which is what I currently see this article as being about Interesting that Kelvin believed in panspermia as a possibility Funny man Kelvin  no great scientist has ever been so wrong so often About Pasteur I think we need to keep this article simple the nuances of Pouchet et al should be kept for some other article Or am I oversimplifying this article Im leaving Wiki now wont be back so up to you to do as you wish