Edit summary   When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled Edit summary under the main editbox It looks like this    The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page in the page revision history on the diff page and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article See mHelpEdit summary for full information on this feature  When you leave the edit summary blank some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted so please always briefly summarize your edits especially when you are making subtle but important changes like changing dates or numbers Thank you    I do when Im doing anything more than grammar The only exception to this would be on Clan Fraser of Lovat of which Im the only editor at present and I didnt think to add edit summaries Otherwise I believe that I have done so If you have any particular situations in which I have failed to do so Id be happy to explain myself Id much appreciate it   See it for yourself Green bars are for edit summaries red bars are for edits with no summaries   Thats quite a nifty tool there Im fully aware of edit summaries I dont provide edit summaries on my own talk page or my User Page I also dont usually provide them on other users talk pages In earlier editing I didnt take the summary seriously if youre referring to anything from several months ago or more I do apologize Like I said if you have any particular situations where you believe I missed one please bring them up to me I would sincerely like to know Otherwise I dont see what youre trying to accomplish here   I think the link speaks for itself  As for what Im trying to accomplish I think my original comment explained just that   If you were trying to just helpfully remind me I thank you though I dont think it was needed I saw the page it didnt say anything to me except that I finally know my edit count If you really want to get a point across to me I suggest you do so blatantly If your original comment explained your motives then we are done here     Your nonsense page   If you are interested in archiving your old talk you may want to review WikipediaHow to archive a talk page  Accusing other editors of defacing your talk page for politely reminding you of Wikipedia policies against personal attacks does not demonstrate good faith on your part and will only make you look bad  I suggest you move the archive to a more appropriate name like   Furthermore making negative comments about discussion by other editors and claiming that their edits are not worth reading shows that you arent interested in abiding by  WPNPA WPCIV nor WPEQ  If you want to improve your working relationship with other editors it might help to avoid incivility   Im not interested in archiving my old talk as of yet but thank you for the suggestion I use nonsense in a lot of ways other people do not because I find a lot of other words to be boring at present Likewise  instead of cool or awesome or thats interesting Im currently in the habit of referring to things as nifty Its something I do I know how to archive a talk page Ive done it before I still do not consider suggesting ignorance to be a personal attack because Ive grown up in a rather intellectual atmosphere Im not going to change just because a few people are offended at my words I thought that this was resolved by now I have quite decent relationships with other working editors it seems that a particular user and myself simply do not get along It is regretful but something which seems to be If someone takes offence to my creation of a Nonsense page they can bring it up to me personally as you have done and I will explain Thats another thing that I do My other option would be to straightout delete your reminders of policy just like another particular user has done with mine in the past I think you know why I dont do that When all is said and done its my talk page and Ill do what I like with it   I think you have avoided my point  Other editors including myself may perceive your comments as petty attacks Your response seems to show that you just dont care about civility or treating other editors with a modicum of respect  The edits in question most certainly did not deface your talk page nor could they be considered nonsense in the true definition of the word  Describing the discussion as worthless comes close to violating the spirit of WPNPA  While I dont think you are directly making a serious personal attack in this instance you cannot use your talk page to attack other editors  Again please read WPCIV    I have not avoided your point Other editors may percieve all they wish but if theyre not willing to bring it up to me then it isnt serious enough to be dealt with Generally I dont retain high levels of respect for people who simply percieve without making sure of things I believe I explained the labelling of nonsense  its akin to miscellaneous in its current usage on this page Language is a living fluid thing especially where I come from you cant tie things down to set defenitions  its all about context I didnt say that the content of the page was worthless  simply that it was probably not worth reading since it is irrelevant by now and probably doesnt have anything to do with the reader I still do not view anything on that page as a reminder of policy I view this as a better solution than Strike offensive words or replace them with milder ones on talk pages as suggested by WPCIV I have left all words undifferenced and simply moved them to a place where I do not have to see them when Im looking for a new message They simply arent serving any purpose for me   My talk page essentially serves as a tool for others to leave me messages whatever they may be Its much easier for me to not only get the messages faster but to respond to them civilly and cooly if I do not have to review certain discussions that do naught but aggrivate me