Irredentist edits in Wikipedia pages   I found several innovations and new WIKI rules applied by some users that violates the normal comportament of editors  These estonishing edits were made by some editors who managed to block all oponents using gang tactics and misinformation of administrators  See next page httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitleOriginoftheRomaniansactionhistory  cur  prev   November  Borsoka talk  contribs    bytes    Further reading books written before WWII cur  prev   November  Borsoka talk  contribs    bytes    unreferred nonEnglish source the deleted source English version cur  prev   November  Borsoka talk  contribs    bytes    Secondary sources unreferred source which was written before WWII cur  prev   November  Borsoka talk  contribs    bytes    Theory of DacoRomanian continuity WPNPOV this section presents the scholars views not their argumentation  cur  prev   November  Borsoka talk  contribs    bytes    Theories on the Romanians ethnogenesis there is no need to add scholars POV of their opponents POV X does not accept Ys view and says that Ys view is exclusivelly based on Ys biased stupid  approach  cur  prev   November  Borsoka talk  contribs    bytes    Theories on the Romanians ethnogenesis unrelevant information and the two specialist mentioned in connection with the immigrationist theory are not Hungarians  and more nonHungarian scholar could be added   All these edits show the real character of the editor named Borsoka He is considered as an irredentist editor by Romanians Ukrainian and Serb editors  Amazing reasons to erase Romanian references and Romanian historians text  Book before WW      Non English reference      Scholars view  and not scholars argumentation here original research of Borsoka  There is no need to add scholars POV of their opponents but in his Hungarian history pages there are a lot of such opinions  Stupid approach   new original research of Borsoka about Romanian references  Specialists are not Hungarians     Also the user Fakirbakir erased several Romanian references because he considered  that he personally disagree the opinions of the Romanian author and if he disagrees an author here about Georgescu a historian he erases it from WIKI pages  httpsenwikipediaorgwikiTalkOriginoftheRomanians  section Georgescus statement I have to disagree with Georgescus statement  There is a simple explanation of these amazing innovations and new Wikipedia rules The two editors Borsoka and Fakirbakir act as a gang against editors from neighboring countries and act alternatively to avoid the RR rule and to eliminate single editors Their scope to emphasize the priority in history of Hungarians this is a part of the definition of IRREDENTISM to show the priority in history against neigbouring countries   All these reasons made the mentioned history article to be of very bad quality due to irredentist edits Some Romanian journals wrote about these activities in the Wikipedia pages and so Wikipedia is considered as an unreliable source for history due to these amazing edits Unfortunately no administrator acted against these tactics I mentioned you the vandalism in the mentioned pages but no result