JackARoe thank you for responding  That article says Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation  That raises a question  In writing the article I paraphrased the Material well some of it  It seems to me that paraphrasing is necessary when conveying information  I mean SethRoberts published  books and when they discussed a topic it was discussed in depth  So my question is  Is paraphrasing considered to be interpretation  To me it is not interpretation but others might say it is  It would seem that Verbal thinks I am interpreting instead of paraphrasing  But since he isnt a knowledgeable editor  meaning an editor with knowledge of the subject matter  I dont see how he can know that  Verbal acting on the assumption that I have been interpreting instead of paraphrasing has been trying to block any new primary sources that I might add  Now the article also says that primary sources must be used with care but it doesnt say that they cant be used in abundance  In a case like this I dont see why the sections that describe the Material cant be abundantly sourced to the Seth books  I really do have a handicap when it comes to finding secondary sources what Ive been calling thirdparty sources up to now  I have always been interested in the Seth material not metaphysics in general  Thus I have almost all the Seth books but few other books on metaphysical subjects where references to SethRoberts might occur  I do have many Cayce and Casteneda books but they dont say a thing about Seth  Finding more secondary sources is difficult for me because my town has a small library and youll be amazed by this I dont have a car to drive to the nearest city  However it seems to me that given the sale of  million books and the secondary references that are already in the article notability has already been established  Because I was the only person here who was able to keep reverting Verbals cuts to the article I am now being accused of editwarring  Theres the possibility that I wont be around to prevent Verbal from chopchopchopping at the article  That being the case I hope youll stick around