Dubious sentence   Consequently Ney now organised a combined arms infantry artillery and cavalry attack on La Haye Sainte which fell as the defending Kings German Legion troops ran out of ammunition Ney then moved artillery up to the allied centre and began to pulverise the infantry squares  This is the final sentence of the French Cavalry attack section  There seem to be several things wrong with it first attacking a building with cavalry is pointless be they with infantry or not second field artillery have little effect on reasonably stout like Belgian farmhouses buildings apart from shells setting them alight which is what happened to the Chateau de Goumont to little effect  I think two events are being conflated here    Having become obvious that the cavalry on their own were achieving little Ney organised a combined arms attack using Bachelus Division Reilles Corps and the remaining French cavalry in a fit enough state towards the centre of Wellingtons position this was halted by the Household Brigade cavalry led by Uxbridge who couldnt break the French infantry formations and consequently the British cavalry then fell back Uxbridge then tried to lead the DutchBelgian heavy cavalry into the attack but they refused to charge  Meanwhile Bachelus men and their cavalry supports were being hard hit by artillery fire and eventually fell back themselves    Simultaneously or thereabouts elements of DErlons Corps renewed the attack on La Haye Sainte and were ultimately successful     If you can reference all of that be bold and put it in     Done Im bloody bold and resolute  in Shakespeares words       Artillery   One omission and one challenge   We should say something about Wellingtons tactic of having his gun crews seek shelter in the infantry squares during the cavalry attacks There is also Mercers account of not doing so because he reckoned if his men ran for the Brunswick squares next to them the Brunswickers would run too He gives a great eyewitness account of what happened to cuirassiers when you fired canister at them at pointblank range too   Now the challenge Whats the source for there being only  guns in the Grand Battery French batteries field brigades or companies perhaps more correctly had eight guns There should have been either  or  ie  or  batteries as otherwise it would imply at least one incomplete unit or that some weapons were detached for some reason I dont recall any suggestion from elsewhere that that happened Were there perhaps  guns east of the Brussels road     Adkin p  has forty two lb eighteen lb cannon and six in and fourteen in howitzers  eighty pieces of ordnance in total from  artillery companies of  pieces each  This is for the period  to  pm  th Foot Artillery th th th th and th companies  th                th company  nd                th company  Marines of the Guard Foot Artillery  companies undifferentiated  Old Guard Foot Artillery th company     Thanks  and those figures are consistent with what I know of French artillery organisation ie each gun foot artillery company had  guns and two howitzers Your source shows  howitzers in total which says they had the howitzers of  companies hence  guns  so it ties in The eighteen pounders would be the guns of three companies and the six in howitzers would have been theirs  I wonder if someone miscounted by adding up just the guns and forgot to include the howitzers That would get you close to  guns Or perhaps  guns is what they had left after the Union Brigade got done with them    I vote we change it At present the article implies that there was a gun battery which covered the entire length of Wellingtons position and that this dilution of fire accounted for its relative ineffectiveness    By all means change it    Format In my internet explorer is the formating of the page rather strange The text begins very late almost beneath the infobox Can this be changed so that the article looks better   CEST  September   Preceding WikipediaSignaturesuns