Repeated attempts to force a change against consensus  I have changed the text in the summary from passive exposure to tobacco smoke increases risk of disease and disability to passive exposure to tobacco smoke causes death disease and disability I have done this after looking carefully at the four references the text I used comes from reference  and also after reading the interesting discussion of this point on the talk page see Passive smoking  Cause and association I have also noted that my edit actually restored the consensus version which was in place since midNovember  until one editor   started changing it on  January without any explanation and has kept changing it since then ignoring the fact that his changes were reverted by many editors Here is a brief history of the edits done by   On January   deletes in its entirety the sentence Current scientific evidence shows that passive exposure to tobacco smoke causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability No explnation is provided for the deletion It is reverted by  a few moments later    On January    changes causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability to increases risk of disease and chronic illness leading to disability and death without explanation This is reverted by  changes twice causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability to increases risk of disease and chronic illness leading to disability This is reverted first by  and then by   On February   changes four times causes death disease and chronic illness leading to disability to increases risk of disease and chronic illness leading to disability and in another attempt changes the whole phrase with may be a health hazard His changes are reverted by three editors  who takes it as vandalism DessourcesDessources and   who asks  to stop making this change Next time causes becomes increases risk this goes to dispute   On February   repeats the same change twice and is reverted by  and   Between February  and February   has repeated the same change three times one on each day which have been reverted by   and by   Although I am a newcomer to wikipedia it would surprise me if this were acceptable practice I think that  should accept the verdict of the other editors and stop making the same change Please discuss