Contradiction in your addition and deletions of cited  content Since you are repeatedly deleting my contributions over various articles without discussion see my contributions page and talk page strewn with your messages  I find your selective actions  contradictory    We need to discuss the  serious contradictions in your appropriating the privilege  to add or remove content with citations by other editors There are instances galore but  I am going to discuss here only two such instances    Lets take instance  no  first regarding a dodgy book  KshatriyasandwouldbeKshatriyas  which is currently citation no  on article Khatri  An article which you ostensibly started editing on rd September and subsequently deleted various  valid content and citations and on which you have done considerable work deleting and adding citations  as well as conflicting with other editors trying to contribute content    Is this book a valid citation for a Wikipedia article or not  Because you have been instrumental in both creating  this citation as well as condemning it  Since you have have stated yourself that you are not happy with this citation  th September Matthew Vanitas creates an article Kshatriyas and wouldbe Kshatriyas  th September  same day Sitush contributes to the article   and then improve the citation and article over next three edits starting with  October  Sitush   October  Sun Quake  introduces Kshatriyas And WouldBe Kshatriyas citation on article Khatri User contributions Sunquake only posting on article Khatri Account created for SunQuake Singlepurpose account   th October  Sitush  states I have never added Kshatriyas and Wouldbe Kshatriyas as a source nor am I brilliantly happy with it as such  th October sensing something is odd here I ask Can a wikilink be a citaion  th October Page TalkKhatri  See the section at the bottom of the page titled Lets take the case of citation  and b  th October  On article TalkKshatriyas and wouldbe Kshatriyas I ask Is this book a valid secondary source for a wikipedai article  Whereas you state you are not happy with the citation  and yet it stays on the article inspite of your minute involvement with the article regarding edit contributions by others    Is this book a valid citation for a Wikipedia article or not   Next lets discuss the article Baid and the citations you have provided there that contradict your own statements to others regarding quality of sources and content