I havent seen any sources definitively define her as being a lobbyist currently  Nevertheless the entire section Lobbyist at the White House implies that she was there representing corporate or client interests and there is no evidence to support that  In stories about those visits she isnt identified as a lobbyist or conducting business on behalf of paying clients  Wouldnt a reporter want to define her as a lobbyist when covering her visits  In fact one visit described on this page is wholly inaccurate as it says she was present for a meeting that the source says she wasnt present for  If thats your basis for lobbying it doesnt seem to hold up