Then the ban will probably have to be made permanent  Your decision admins   I had a sick feeling it would come to this  It always seems to in this day and age  This will probably be declared my last wikiedit by the administrators and thats even if Im allowed to put this on my Talk page for I am compelled to believe that the administrators of Wikipedia will have to extend my ban permanently not as a function of a Wikibreak but as a function that I cannot exercise good faith in a consensus which does not care whether the information is accurate verifiable or even true  In fact given the current state of Wikipedia it is no longer sufficient nor even necessary to act in good faith and provide verifiable information  What is sufficient and the only thing necessary is to provide information the collective will accept as verified  note that I did not say verifiable  If the garbage I have to put up with like on almost every meaningful edit Ive made in the last eight weeks is true the collective has already spoken and I have no place on Wikipedia whatsoever especially because I believe that the consensus is not only wrong but either flagrantly misinformed or downright stupid  This stands in violation of basically all five pillars of Wikipedia  First Wikipedia is NOT an encyclopedia as long as the general public is allowed to edit it but only in the form in which a collective will accept  I will give a good example of this in the first real problem I ran in to about  weeks ago  BCS National Championship Game  I tried a number of edits to properly represent the BCS nullification of the participation of USC in two illegal Championship Games and removing their designation since the games no longer are believed to have taken place  httpwwwbcsfootballorgnewsstoryid   An edit war began on that subject and the subject of Wikipedias rules regarding no damnatio memoriae came up  I proposed and repeatedly that the concept of damnatio memoriae applied since that was the exact penalty imposed by the BCS when they nullified the entire participation of USC in the  Orange Bowl and  Rose Bowl pages along with USCs entire  season nullified by the NCAA beforehand I wouldve deleted eight weeks ago under encyclopedic verification but we now have a conflict between damnatio memoriae and encyclopedic verification  AND since Wikipedia does not respect the BCS as a sanctioning body trying to remain neutral  Ill get to that in a moment in part two Wikipedia accepts as valid USCs  vacated victories including in a BCS National Championship Game which no longer logistically should exist  Hence Wikipedia  recognizes in the form that they won the  Orange Bowl USC as the BCS National Champion  if Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and their participation in the  Rose Bowl which was also nullified by the BCS  Ergo we now have a nonencyclopedic nonverifiable situation which is in fact false  Only the sanctioning body can give sanction to the event and only the sanctioning body can take it away  Remember this one for later as well  I had respected the decision of no damnatio memoriae but can do so no longer because of the fact that it creates an encyclopedic falsehood  And because the collective accepts no damnatio memoriae even in cases where it applies we now have to change one of the hardest and fastest rules on Wikipedia on every editing page  Encyclopedic content must only be considered verified by the collective  That is all and also that is the only acceptable basis for content on Wikipedia  actual encyclopedic verification is no longer sufficient nor necessary  Anything short of that will be removed by the collective  If I am reinstated I am considering removal of all mentions of vacated participation in games  That means the  Orange and  Rose Bowls go as does their mentions in BCS National Championship Game as well as USCs entire  season page replaced with notations of the nullifications  Any other games where the participation of one or both schools are removed also go as well  As one example the  Sugar Bowl may also be deleted if the NCAA or BCS nullifies specifically Ohio States participation in the event  That dovetails nicely into debunking pillar number two  If the collective is the sole basis for acceptability on Wikipedia then Wikipedia cannot be neutral  In fact when the collective is misinformed and prejudicial on top of being inaccurate this redoubles that since the collective enforces the rules Wikipedia is not at all neutral but written with the biases of the collective in mind  An example on this is the last incident which finally led to what drew the ban  Wrestlemania XXVIII  I dont think I need to go in to great detail because some of the admins saw it but the dispute was basically that the collective enforces that one match is already signed to the event while openly denying another match being signed for the event though both matches were for the time being finalized in wrestling promos since Mania XXVII  I believe that the collective of wrestling editors on Wikipedia are a bunch of snotnosed marks worthy of little good faith and little else  I believe their biases have entered into the discussion making it impossible to be accepted by the collective meaning only really two options  Leave the editing or leave Wikipedia  In both options the material amount and composition on the page is now false  Either both matches are scheduled for Mania XXVIII or neither is  I have no respect admins for what I call truth by consensus because of events such as exactly this  Wikipedias collective can then enforce an encyclopedic reality in their own eyes see pillar  on anyone using the site either to edit or to gain information even if that information is illinformed misleading or frankly prejudicial  And again this basically brings us in an extreme case to a statement made on my talk page by a snotnosed little punk named ChristianandJericho  You know you should just STOP editing your edits are false you havent made one good edit the whole community is against you you are being uncivil you have been reported TWICE and you are not familiar with WPCRYSTAL Christianandjericho talk    He is then correct even if he is a nongrammatical leetspeak punk  The collective has completely rejected any contribution I make on a wrestling page because of their false interpretation of WPCrystal  Especially when I demonstrate that they are lying which I will not be civil with open liars  especially on a forum considered an encyclopedia again see pillar  and prejudicial as I believe the only way that the characterization of the match I wished added being WPCrystal and the match considered not WPCrystal is a WPCrystal in itself  that the wrestler involved is not considered an acceptable candidate by the community nor it is believed the WWE itself for this match and will be removed from the conditions in which he gains this match by the time the card takes place  It is the open bias against Daniel Bryan that is the basis for their action  no more and no less  Otherwise either both matches at this point are WPCrystal or neither match is  To say that John CenaThe Rock is not WPCrystal and to say Daniel Bryans cashin is is blatantly false arrogant prejudicial and worthy of contempt  If you wish to have this stand you will have to permanently ban me from posting to any wrestling page whatsoever  the decisions have already been made visavis the collective truth and verifiability be freaking damned  No edit I make in any wrestling page will ever be accepted by the collective because the collective is wrong and frankly does not even deserve good faith nor any respect  This dovetails nicely into Pillar   Wikipedia cannot then be free content in which anyone can edit  Basically only those accepted by the collective should be allowed to edit  In fact more and more I am seeing it basically come down to as not only a function of the content itself but of an ambiguous demand to do it the right way that certain parties should be the only ones to edit pages  Edits themselves can be discussed but the general public attempting to edit will almost certainly be reversed by those within the hierarchy who claim such authority even if no real authority exists  An example of this Ive ran into  The Final Fantasy preferred pages or whatever you wish to have called their designation  One night being bored and thinking about it I realized something interesting in the different concepts of the combat in different Final Fantasy games  In VII and VIII Game Over only occurs when the active party is eliminated through knockout  In IX an additional condition either way of being Stopped can create victory or defeat  In X the same condition exists as VII and VIII  In XII the entire party must be eliminated  In XIII only the party leader is defeated  Having played these games extensively I decide it might be interesting to put the differences on the pages  All are reverted and since I used playing of the games to be the source Im called for WPOR  Now wait a minute  In that case I have no place editing those pages at all be it by their status within Wi