I have explained in my edit summaries why Gregor Maehle and Manohar Laxman Varadpande a clearly reliable source for theater but not for prehistory fail our criteria at WPRS They really should not be used we should be using qualified academics Do I really have to raise this at WPRSN  As for ithyphallic although a number of sources state this as fact others are not quite sure eg Shaivism in Ancient India From the Earliest Times to CAD  Ishwar Chandra Tyagi    Snippet view  More editions The bull was a sacred animal which is clear from the shorthorned bull and the humped bull on the various seals from  Marshalls identification of the deity of the figure with Shiva Pashupati or a prototype of Shiva raises a problem when  He himself admits whether the god is intended to be ithyphallic or not is doubtful This says appears to be This has a list of questions that have been raised including gender whether heshe is in a yoga stance whether there are  heads and whether ithyphallic or not Then there is Flood who I am guessing is the original source for probably The Saiva TraditionsG Flood  The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism  The famous Pasupati seal shows a seated perhaps ithyphallic Note also about the horns  some suggest this is a headdress NPOV means we dont state something as fact that is questions and that we show all significant views Ive raised the whole issue of this seal at the Wikiproject India talk page