The current status of what we have posted to each other cant really call it a conversation IMO at my talk  TalkQuackwatch I really appreciate what youre trying to do with comments such as this   Youre trying to calm the situation thats clear However I hope you arent offended by my reminding you to please comment on the contributions and not the contributors Quackwatch is a controversial article with often heated discussions  Its best to closely follow talk page guidelines and keep a cool head even when you think others are not     I hope youll consider refactoring per above     Should we seek a thirdparty to help  Im disappointed by the edits you made to UserPeterStJohnScratchPad after I made the comment above  It appears youre no longer discussing the issues with me per WPDR      again if you cite specifics I can address them Overbroad generalizations are too easy to brush off as insinuations which of course is not what you intend However the edits that disappoint you are in my userspace not in an article Please feel free to point out a specific thing that violates a specific policy Also feel free to bring in more people although I wonder at the term third party as there seem to be more than three already And no I dont mean to ignore you but ScienceApologist is posting much faster and more conspicuously eg at the ANI he brought which you may wish to follow So lacking specifics to address Im busier elsewhere And yeah Ill copy this to your talk