Is the interest of building a better WIkipedia more important than Hansens views right or wrong  Of course not  However the interest of building a better Wikipedia must be considered more important while editing Wikipedia and your addition of your interpretation of Hansens views to unrelated articles is not in the interest of building a better Wikipedia  I receive money from  different entities none of whom care a fig about Hansen for what its worth but Im not allowed to consider their interests in editing Wikipedia or in the other collaborative projects I participate in  If you are unable to separate the importance of Hansens message from the importance of placing only what Hansen says or what is said about his message by reliable sources only in articles related to that message or to be precise only in articles to which that message is relevant then as a matter of conscience you shouldnt be editing Wikipedia   As for some of your specifics if the precise meaning isnt clear we Wikipedians are not allowed to interpret his words  He never said biosequestration and we dont seem to have an article on geosequestration proportional is false and hence shouldnt be in the articles unless he explicitly said it inversely proportional is less false but still not accurate and not the clear meaning of what he said and his comments on Kyoto are really about his interpretation of the consequences of Kyoto and should be treated as such  Kyoto would have set national goals but didnt specify the mechanisms of attainment Hansens interpretation that it encouraged cap and trade is an interpretation and should also have been treated as such even if his opinions were notable   Your points  and  above are correct but that doesnt explain why you didnt say it like that or add it to an article on sequestration or coal power plants rather than on biosequestration and Kyoto   My real identity is easy enough to determine from the article written about me as is WMCs from the article written about him  Im not sure about KDP  Its also easy enough to see that I dont have a conflict of interest and WMC should generally be agreeing with Hansens position if it had any economic reality