Several inappropriate Coldplay article reverts   I just saw  rollback all of the Manual of Style and WPAlbum style fixes I did for Coldplays singles EPs and albums thanks to the Song infobox template not being updated both properly and in conjuction with the edits to the Album infobox It seems obvious to me that you selectively endorse the revisions to the Manual of Style or the WPAlbums style guide eg bolding article titles in artists chronologies as your reverts  to various article edits go against the current WikiProject Albums style and the MoS guidelines in terms of undoing En dashes mmss album lengths and proper track listing style as well as propogating piping years to XXXX in music low addedvalue links to years and dates as well as duplicate Wikilinks in articles and templates for years dates bandnames release titles etc Im being BOLD and editing the Song infobox template soon to be more like the Album infobox as it should be You should be reasonable enough to understand that the WPAlbum standard is meant to be consistantly applied to WPSongs regardless of whether anyone has actually updated the Songs infobox template in due course Its improper that you feel it necessary to revert completely legitimate edits generally without properly stating the reasons for revert no less because you feel territorial about various Coldplay articles which is against guidelines when people are making edits that are both in good faith and legitimate alongside the style guides While I dont take it personally dont intend on getting into an edit war and Im sure you can rebutt for yourself I will be stating these issues in the Songs  Albums projects Talk pages in order to clarify that your reverts are misguided and impeding these projects Please adapt to currentlyinuse style guidelines for WPAlbums like most other users have in order for these projects to continue moving forward