to put the issue very simple there is clear evidence for a coregency at the end of akhenatens reign that is a fact there is evidence for at least one ruler inbetween akhenaten and tutankhamun that is a fact there are several sets of royal names associated with the two points above that is a fact these names share similarities between them and with names of other amarna royals but also have differences that is a fact one set of names is emphatically feminine the others are gender neutral that is a fact based on those facts some serious scholars maintain that there are two distinct individuals involved one female and one male that is a theory or more precisely a collection of theories that all subscribe to that basic premise based on those same facts some other serious scholars maintain that there is only one female individual involved that is another theory  saying that is neither an editorial decision nor original research it is simply stating the current state of affairs in this matter reasons one and two given at WPMERGE are good grounds to merge articles that deal with these theories likewise reasons three and four are good grounds for merging this article as well and WPNAME provides good ground for naming such an article smenkhkare