It seems that you are right that the words of Rawats mother were added  not mixed with which leaves open the possibility of being obviously and thus deceptively interwoven but added to some quotes of Rawats in the quotes section of EPO  But even a cynic like yourself must concede that it was probably an honest mistake  First there isnt a single other case of false attribution mistaken or otherwise thats ever been made out against EPO that I can recall  John and JeanMichel whove done most if not all the work have been meticulous throughout  Plus they have openly invited corrections if and when any mistakes were noted  This is an opportunity for you then to make EPO even better  Congratulations for doing a small part in bringing the truth about Rawat to the general publice  Also the Mata Ji quote is in a set of sample quotes from the book Who Is Guru Maharaj Ji  It is just that  The only error is that the quotes are in the section of Rawats own quotes and not the more general category of all quotes of interest  In other words a simple mistake just like you said On the other hand you also make accusations of quotes out of context  You have offered no support at all for this accusation  Its time you did or gave up that scurrilous accusation On that score you also alleged that the editors of the above book themselves wrote some of the quotes in question  Wheres your evidence for that  I say theres none and if you know better nows the time to show your proof  Otherwise why say it  But whats really funny is how you yourself are so clearly guilty of doing just that taking quotes out of context  For some reason you felt compelled to drag in comments from an expremie forum here  Whatever the wisdom of that youd think you a serious academic with a keen eye for contextual abuse would know better than to say that I said you need to be slapped in the face when what I really said was  Her entire thesis is offensive and unsubstantiated by the evidence  She deserves the academic equivalent of a slap in the face My emphasis    If you cant tell the difference youre not fit to do the kind of careful analysis you purport to do  If you can tell the difference youre being purposely misleading and provocative  Your choice