Uh what   This article is far fetched yes but can be supported It mentions that there is no proof of an underground base while I have seen video footage of it Being new to wikipedia what constitues as fair proof Theres masses of media examples out there to support at least parts of these claims It seems to me that when people say something looks like it fits into what one would call a Conspiracy Theory we have carte blanche to pretend it doesnt exist and laugh about it There are hours and hours of lectures from prominant reserchers yet where are the cititions from there I dont want to cause trouble but I feel I must say something about this