IN DEFENSE OF THE JENNIFER ONEILL ARTICLE AND A NOTE TO ALL READERS   IN DEFENSE OF THE JENNIFER ONEILL ARTICLE AND A NOTE TO ALL READERS       This article has been tagged at its beginning since one single Wikipedia editorMikeWazowski believes it to be objectionable and defective in three particular respects            First he finds the article to be defective in HIS opinion and reasons that it relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject rather than references from independent authors and thirdparty publications It should be noted that this article does contain some references to Jennifer ONeills  autobiography Surviving Myself which was published by William Morrow and Sons Publishing New York Apparently MikeWazowski  does not consider one of the biggest publishing houses in America to be a reliable thirdparty publication source The total absurdity of this position speaks for itself      Additionally under Wikipedia policy guidelines personal and official websites CAN be used as a source and as a citation  See httpenwikipediaorgwikiWikipediaBiographiesoflivingpersonsUsingthesubjectasaselfpublishedsource      Secondly MikeWazowski finds this article defective in that in HIS opinion this article contains  wording that merely promotes the subject without imparting verifiable information  The factual material in this article is accurate and true and correct WITH citations  MikeWazowski offers his conclusory general opinion that this article is simply Jennifer ONeill selfpromoting  without citation to a single example of it in the entire article      Third MikeWazowski find this article defective in that in HIS opinion the article contains improper references to selfpublished sources  Once again he apparently consider her autobiography which was disseminated by a third party publishing house William Morrow and Sons New York to be an unreliable selfpublished source      Finally the validity of these negative criticisms must be viewed in light of the source of the accusations in the case  The reader only needs to go to the user talkpage for MikeWazowski to find it is filled with questions from numerous other editors to explain his edits strikeouts and deletion of entire pages and articles which he simply totally ignores  It is also significant that MikeWazowski has been invited to make corrections to any material he finds objectionable but has refused to do so        This fact can and should speak volumes more than any words