IP edits   In my RFA you said it was interesting that the IP I used was also used by Willy on Wheels well I was editing from a public terminal then I had no idea who Willy on Wheels was back then Hope this helps as an explanation   Oh I didnt mean anything by it I just found it interesting     Well now you know its a public terminal IP Oh well Ill try harder for my next RFA this onell probably fail as it is     Scott Johnson artist   Hi you voted in WikipediaArticles for deletionThe Instance I was wondering if you could also weigh in on WikipediaArticles for deletionScott Johnson artist and WikipediaArticlesfordeletionExtraLifendnomination as they are also up for deletion Thank you      UNPROTECT   Un protect my talk page so the new message ber will go away  Debito Arudou  I kind of liked the cool looking box quotes in the Criticism section Why did you take those out Theyre both accurate and verifiable actually  Add them back with sources then  None of them were sourced though a couple were credited but not sourced      Ill Mitch Images   Metros please tell me why you deleted the images from the talk page version of Ill Mitch I am working on I sourced them and tagged them Please tell me what I did wrong and I will correct it I have added immediate source description fair use rationale and tags Fair use images by copyright law can only be used for illustrative purposes in encyclopedic articles  Your article is a writeup on your user talk page  If it was in the article space everything would be fine but its the fact that its in the user space that led me to remove them from your user talk page     I am sorry I was told by BigDT that I should recreate the page in my user space so people on the deletion review page could see it Should I remove it from there Oh wait I see you already removed the pictures again sorry I thought I did the right thing Should I NOT have it on my talk page like I was told Did I misunderstand BigDT I really AM trying to do things the right way and this is actually beginning to seem like a hostile environment for a new contributor I just want to contribute my page and the right way and I have all these different ADMs telling me different things and deleting my contributions What should I do I am getting VERY discouraged    You know what Ive spent too much of my time on this I tried to contribute and it is obvious neither I nor my contributions are wanted here I am tired of being judged and wasting my time on an article that obviously nobody wants on their wikipedia  Im frustrated and Im done I truly hope you treat future new users with fair intentions better than Ive been treated If you make us all feel unwelcome and driven away wikipedia will not work as it was intended You lost an educated and wellintentioned contributor today and for what Is wikipedia better off now without this article How You may think so but I think not There was an entry here about a silly rapper guy who has a weird cult fan following odd but noteable Granted not on MTV or Time Magazine but among many people and among several independant reliable highly circulated sources I cant believe you dont consider Stuff Magazine a mainstream publication You better delete Stuffs wiki article too becasue it is not notable right Now it is deleted and anyone who ever wanted to seek information about it on wikipedia is SOL and I am discouraged and disappointed Congratulations you win but the wikipedia project loses     SPAM   Tell me how WikiSheboygan is SPAM     Never mind about it Its Beautiful Day   Because its your own personal wiki basically enough said     Yep I totaly agree with you     Images  Just go and delete the images I upload     Your Last Edit   Hey your last edit the redirection dos not work You want to tell me why it does not work It seems like you dont like to reply to my messages Huh    It works for me its going to Sheboygan like the redirect is set up to do     RFA   Sadly Metros Im not the same as any former user dont assume that just because I know people who have edited and introduced me to Wikipedia that I am the same as them I am not Hope this explains it all    From  You fellers ever heard of     Yes why      Boob Question Hello I noticed that you had made a comment about a page I contributed  Boob Productions on Lucky s talk page in regards to the speedy deletion criteria used to delete the page  I felt that the page was wrongly put up for speedy deletion and no debate was allowed to discuss the merits of the page in a normal deletion debate  I am still new to the process here so I come to you asking how I can ensure future pages I contribute are at the least given a fair opportunity for debate and discussion  You seem very knowledgable and involved so any info you offer would be greatly appreciated  Thanks in advance     Thanks   Thanks for the reverts to my userpage yesterday Always appreciated      Edits to WPANI   The thread you closed here you called it trolling  I think the descriptive may be a bit inappropiate and may be construed as slightly NPA  Please forgive me if I have misintrepeted  Regards     The user is ASKING to be blocked for  second with a ridiculous block summary  He also requests that his thread be added to BJAODN to glorify his post basically  I dont see it any other way      I may have misintrepeted  It all appeared in jest to me Regards      mind your business   yeah hey u put that i erased someones comments but i didnt so could you please mind youre business thank you The preceding unsigned comment was added by      ok jerk listen stay out of my business he is a triple crown champion so leave me alone   The role of a Wikipedia administrator is to mind other peoples business so to speak It is their core duty to make sure that Wikipedia is not damaged by malicious destructive or useless edits Even when editing in good faith a user may have their article deleted or their contributions reverted If you wish to contest the deletion of an article that you created please go to WPDRV and dissent the deletion there However even if you do contest the deletion at DRV it is possible that your request will be declined This is because articles must be verifiable notable neutral and wellformatted in order to be kept Keep in mind that an article that is wellformatted and otherwise desirable may be deleted if its subject is not notable This decision is only strengthened by a lack of sources andor content I hope this answers your query Thank you for inquiring