Need Help Ive created the page but its clearly not exactly well presented  If someone could clean it up id be very grateful being completely new at this I dont want to screw it up completely Also if someone could insert citations for sources because again I have no idea how to atm O Thanks for the assistancePreceding unsigned comment added by        Bell    Bell never submitted the  for this program  They were attempting to expedite the  FAA certification in order to use it as their submission Instead they offered the Bell  due to its proven record and dual engine design to match the other aircraft being considered I do not believe this dual engine design was the sole reason but I remember that the FAA certification was a prime factor At no time did they offer the  for this contract bid There were only  submissions for the contract although MDHIs LUH website makes a case against both the Bell  and the Bell EP    This is some great backround on the selection processthe previous information had been based on Global Security httpwwwglobalsecurityorgmilitarysystemsaircraftluhhtm By all means update the article with this as the initital listing was preliminary    Merge  As the UHA is really a EC I would suggest this article is merged with the Eurocopter EC article before we end up with two identical articles  Actually both these aircraft are the BKC But since Eurocopter bought out Bolkow they get to call it whatever they want I guess Wikipediamerge shows you how to recommend merging articles   Merge  On second thought Im going to agree with you Other than radios and kits there will be very little modification to the standard production EC to create this helicopter   Dont Merge In time the UH will be loaded with info that have no need to be on EC article such US Army developments with it aircraft accidents etc I especially oppse this if LUH is also going to be merged into it as the LUH info is only tagentially relevant to the EC     Merge Part II   Merge  I recommend that the US Army Light Utility Helicopter Program article be merged into this article since the significance of the program is the aircraft that is selected     I have reinitiated this recommendation to merge US Army Light Utility Helicopter Program article into this article The reasons The articles contain duplicate information With the selection of the UH EC  as the program winner the US Army Light Utility Helicopter Program article will not grow since the program has now become the UH Lakota program   Dont Merge  Especially not if UH is merged into EC as all the information on a Army program is not highly relevant to the EC If the UH is not merged then it might be reasonable depending how it is done     Merge Part III   Merge  The LUH page should include the UHA data  The UHA is now the LUH  I would recommend keeping it distinct from the EC page as it is different in some ways from the base EC BK C in the areas of avionics and specific mission kits  Dont Merge  LUH was a military program not a aircraft its not in the same category The LUHs page point of focus  the other contenders and the competition itself dont hold the same relevancy to the helicopter article Putting everything together will restrict each subjects growth LUH program details will suffer as they wont be seen as relevant to the operational and technical traits of a aircraft    Merge  The LUH page should be merged into the UH page as both pages are rather short at this time The LUH program is over as it was won by the EC so there will be no new developments in the program which ar