Appletree or the JIDF   Please note that Arutz Sheva one of the sources is an article about David Appletree not the JIDF It describes actions he took not those of the JIDF It is appropriate then to attribute those actions to Appletree and not to the JIDF  Also please see WPRS and WPPRIMARY regarding the preference of secondary sources Arutz Sheva over primary sources the JIDF  Malik Shabazz talk  contribs   Tried to fix this here since I believe the article should be more about the JIDF itself than Appletree The original Arutz Sheva article does not even mention the JIDF    Eisendonut maybe we should see what other editors think before deleting the whole paragraph Some of us think that Appletree is the JIDF   Malik Shabazz talk  contribs   If thats the case then shouldnt there be a separate bio of him  I didnt delete the whole paragraphjust parts as i felt that this was supposed to be about the JIDF and the one Arutz Sheva piece didnt even mention the JIDF  It was just about Appletree  I dont see any RS directly expressing Appletrees involvement yet the fact that some of you think Appletree IS the JIDF for some reason is leaking into this article completely and its becoming more about him and less about the organization  So shouldnt it be separate  I was acting too quickly perhaps as I saw the fact that Shabazz made a good point      Having a newspaper interview doesnt make you notable enough to get a Wikipedia article See WPBIO and WPONEEVENT  Malik Shabazz talk  contribs   Understood thats part of the reason I deleted the references to Appletree since I dont think Ive seen any RS actually tying Appletree to the JIDF within the article itself  There was just the one link from within the one Arutz Sheva article to another article which does not mention anything about the JIDF and only talks about Appletree      Ive added a few quotes from Appletree to add context    Obolers blog says Andre Oboler discussed the matter with JIDFs David Appletree shortly after the take over   But Obolers blog is not a reliable source     We have some RS sources to satisfy that he is with the group in some way and has acted as a spokesperson in some regard but these dont define him as the spokesperson or negate that others are involved so Im unclear what needs to change until another source is presented to provide clarity     Not to be pedantic but Zionism On The Web is a website both technology wise and by clear references in the press not to mention in terms of content and not a blog It is also not my website I mean I am CEO of it but my person website is somewhere else and can be found by those wanting to look for it The notability and RS nature of the site is an open issue it keeps coming up for discussion and so far keeps ending up at the position well someone could make a page for it I guess it would be either a weak keep or a weak delete in an AfD I suspect At any rate I have spoken with David Appletree on the radio so at minimum I can say he definitly ex