A simple suggestion   Instead of contextualizing paragraph two by books of The Bible which implies a later Christian source the more relevant words Hebrew Bible or Tanakh or both ought to be the terms of definition  Otherwise one might start to think that Old Testament translations based upon the Greek Septaguint are the authorities when in fact the Masoretic text of the Tanakh is considered by Jews the obvious standard    The term Bible does not at all imply a later Christian source It is a widely used term for the books considered canonical by Christians that is not to say that they have a Christian origin It is also a misunderstanding that translations based on the Septuagint are authoritative for Christians Nearly all English Bible translations are in fact based on the Masoretic text Only in Eastern Orthodox streams of Christianity is the Septuagint the standard Bible In any case apart from a few fringe groups Christians realize that the authority of any translation ultimately goes back to the original Hebrew ie for the books of the Bible originally written in Hebrew of course      Failure to contextualize  The Construction sections th paragraph begins In  Israel captured Old Jerusalem and the Temple Mount from Jordan  No other information is given about this the impression is that Israel invaded Jordan without provocation when in fact Israels actions in the  war were in response to a mass attack upon her by Arab countries including Jordan after Egypts General Nasser and the other Arab States allied with Egypt had engaged in an act of war by closing down Israels ability to ship through the Straits of Tiran with the express and stated purpose of annihilating Israel  This false impression must be corrected if it is to avoid being unintentionally antiSemitic     Having a bias against Israel is not the same as being antiSemitic Also I think the current statement is simply concise not going deep into the political situation because this is not the topic of the article However if you feel contextualizing is necessary just go ahead Remember Wikipedias policy to be bold