The editors of the article which concerns a conservative spokesman who turned out to be a porn actor and a prostitute have altered the article to refer to the reports of his prostitution  which have be definitively PROVEN  as rumors even though the articles subject acknowledged his prostitution in a nationally broadcast radio program and in an article under his own name in Saloncom At the same time they insured that material from an unverified interview by an evangelical exgay blog was included  When I and others pointed out that none of this is true one of the editors a hack who goes by the name Elonka replied that Wikipedia is not in the business of telling the truth Thats for damn sure