lol  much needed cite  Thats hilarious  Since calling it a false proof wasnt enough  what more could I possibly say about that selfpublished blog piece where Shostak rambles off a bunch of bare assertions about banking  Clearly Shostak hits a logical home run when he pulls this gem of wisdom out of the blue that with free bankingthe potential for the creation of money out of thin air is minimal Certainly theres no room for disputing the convincing case that Shostak presents  Maybe someone else will play the fun game of counting how many WP policies would be violated by trying to use the Shostak piece as a citation  Maybe the Wikipedia Fun Club will be interested  Oh and if youre truly concerned about the quality of talk page discussion  see my above fallacy count and go from there