UTC  Rebuttal I was the first person to revert the edits so let me state my case  First I do not think this is vandalism  I do think though that it was poor editing the kind I would normally ascribe to newbies except that   More importantly though I do not think that the section on the May issue is notable enough to warrant inclusion    The user is correct that he has references  The CBS  article that the user mentions doesnt talk about any controversy scandal or even minor kerfuffle over the portrait  Yes the magazine received some letters about it but any magazine with a readership of at least  will receive at least  angry letter  If letters to the editor are the standard than we might have Controversy over criticism of the Inquirer due to letters in the May issue Controversy over global warming denialism letters from the March and April issues and Controversy over the portrayal of Michael Nutter a letter in the February issue  In short the edits smelled like the work of someone with an axe to grind and a fairly unrefined axe at that  Thats why I reverted the edits  I cant speak to other users thoughts but I deliberately refrained from reremoving the content not wanting to risk an edit war  It seems that other users agree with my evaluation but that one party refuses to hear us out  not no way not no how      June