Well since were making a list individual bootlegs dont need to be notable themselves but I know what you mean we need some standards for inclusion As with the sketchy nature of bootlegs themselves we need to make sure we included only actual bootlegs I mean bootleg in the traditional sense of the word Generally I would say if we can find enough information to write a short paragraph or so on it then lets include it Most of the sources for this information is going to be found on personal sites of collectors and not really verifiable so I would say for every inclusion we should have at least two independent sources Unless you got a book on Who bootlegs I tried to track down my friends but he couldnt find it   Im sure youve found these sites already but these are what Ive been using  httpthewhonetbootlegshtmllplisthtml  A little overwhelming at first I know but has the most bootlegs including obscure variations  httpwwwxmissioncomlegalizewhobootsindexhtml  Hasnt been updated in forever Mentions The Who The Illustrated Discography as his source which I believe is what my friends book is called  I still need to do some research before I starting putting together an article so feel free to start it Im gonna try to get a hold of that book I might just go an buy myself a copy Another thing we should include is this