Fringe Views II How do you not understand that youre confirming that the Babylonian empire ended in  when its king was called to account   Strawman Try again     Read Jeremiah  It gives an order of events   years ends  Babylons king is called to account Babylons king was called to account in  Ergo  years ended in  Ergo  years of nations serving Babylon began in  Babylon replaced the Assyrian world power in    As I keep telling you your exegesis is fatuous for it obviates the context of  Chronicles  Jeremiah  Zechariah  Daniel  Zechariah  and Jeremiah  among others Try again         Fringe Views   Please desist from changing articles to match the fringe views of Jehovahs Witnesses You might like to start a section at articles Talk pages however it is unlikely that you will be able to indicate any widespread support for the alternative views taught by your religion Thanks    How is it fringe when theyre based on accurate and reliable sources Wikipedia is a place for truth not your noetical bigotry    Reliable sources indicate the widely accepted chronology of the period They do not support the JW chronology And you didnt even provide any sources You will need to discuss at the articles Talk pages to reach a concensus however there are no mainstream sources in support of your views    Agreed Ive reverted you again    You are both misinformed According to the Cyrus Cylinder Cyrus conquered Babylon in October  BCE Cyrus first regal year began in the spring of  BCE This means that the Jews would be back in their homeland by October  BCE or the seventh month Tishri as Ezra  says  It is a simple matter of counting back  years which brings us to  BCE for Jerusalems destruction Dates other than  BCE ignore the statements in Scripture that the land would be desolate for  years Daniel       Looking at your other edits Im concerned that you dont have any grasp yet of WPNPOV Ive raised them at Wikipedia talkWikiProject BibleEditor changes biblical dates etc where I hope you will explain your edits You are also failing to use WPEdit summaries which is sufficient reason for many people to revert you     Thank you for the reminder concerning the edit summaries field     You said This means that the Jews would be back in their homeland by October  BCE That is wrong The JW conclusion that the Jews must have returned the following year is entirely speculative Josephus explicitly states that the temple foundations were laid in Cyrus second year which means the Jews were back in his first year which means Cyrus decree was made at the beginning of hist first year and the Jews then had  months to make the month journey back to Jerusalem    Argumentum assertio does not a valid substitute for actual evidence make Try again