Very good I still think some spinoff articles would be justified because many believe that the MK article should be reduced to an overview but readers have requested even more extensive details such as what has Knox said about the first call to her mother I was thinking of emphasizing all the crime experts who have gone to Perugia talked with police and interviewed the students or friends over there Hence create Investigations of the Kercher murder as a broader article noting the prosecutionpolice viewpoint is just one investigation then add Paul Ciolino Joe Tacopina ABC News  SeattleT Steve Moore etc In that article we would jump into the forensic details and highlight the controversial evidence or lack of motives as noted in each investigation That would allow for answering those reader questions about the details Also we need a separate article Amanda Knox because unless that bio can be presented in a wellrounded way she is inherently branded for all of  with the murder of MK She is also notable for mostwatched person on Italian TV and the other lawsuits not just the MK case This is like the reverse of Separate but equal Knox cannot be described in neutral terms unless separated from the title  intro of the Murder article where she is listed as one of the convicted In this situation not separate is inherently tainted by the crime article as equal to murderer and cannot present an NPOV view of a person Since separate is unequal then not separate is equal By extension everyone still on trial in a notable case should be granted their own NPOVneutral bio article with their trial as only  section in their bios So if I formed a WikiProject Legal Cases then I would recommend separate articles for all presumed innocent who later could be merged back into the crime article when the typical appeals had ended Things to ponder Wikid