Once again thank you for stubbing the Lotte Motz article and requesting protection  I am disturbed by the subsequent comment by Jack the GiantKiller which suggests that he intends to begin reinserting his knowingly false deceptive and unsupported edits into the article as soon as a mechanism for doing so is made available  Is it possible to get a rundown of how future revisions to the article are to be processed so I can forestall further malicious sabotage of the sort we have just gone through