You dont have to be condescending I know what references are and I clicked through them they were however NOT about Sara Flounders You personally have drawn a conclusion that she is a fringe leftist journalist but this is obviously your own opinion as is your view of the IAC Its obvious that you have a personal bias about the subject All Im trying to contribute to the article is that the cited numbers should not be taken as cold hard fact and that there were dissenting opinions about the methods used to arrive at those numbers So right now as I see it you havent shown anything to substantiate your claim that Sara Flounders is not a worthy source for Wikipedia Before I edit and repost to the article have a look at this paper as well and offer your thoughts on whether its worthy of this page httpunconqueredbosniatripodcomBalkhtml Thanks