In the section Reactions the line The Northeast Projects historical revisionism on historical Korean kingdoms is not neutral Term historical Korean kingdoms is Korean ethnocentrism Neutral dispassionate language must be used that respects the opinions of both Koreans and Chinese equally The line many other countries including China seems to make grand small points Using the word countries and including China implies national consensus or government statements which is not shown in the citations In particular citation  uses the words A Chinese historian not China Instead the wording could be similar to many nonKorean people including at least one Chinese historian  Reactions  It has been discussed extensively to an uneasy consensus at Goguryeo that Koreanness of Goguryeo is not equal to Chineseness There is a predominance of sources that refer to Goguryeo as a Korean kingdom and of Korean history with very little connections to China As for your concern for countries I will make the appropriate edit that you may address your issue  Key terminology  Later on Ill expand upon this part to explain how the Northeast Project has come to define various aspects of Chinas historical revisionism and political expansionism with specific cases     List of Research Topics  Actually there is an official website on the Northeast Project but it seems to be in relatively flux Ill try to get a fixed website linked ASAP