Suggestions to impove the article   There suggestions to improve the article This is the comments from   Lead   Your writing has a lot of adverbs like originally primarily mainly these arent necessary  Sometimes they have a place but they also clutter up the prose and many of them can be removed  Third cable channel behind disney and nick  Third in what  Kids programming  Its not clear  Overall in the lead the writing is choppy and needs to be streamlined  Heres an example Since  it began airing a small amount of liveaction programming specifically movies from Warner Bros and New Line Cinema both of which are also owned by Time Warner  Rewrite like this In  it started airing liveaction programming including movies from Warner Bros and New Line Cinema  No one cares that theyre owned by Time Warner  See WPLEAD for instructions on what should be in a good lead  The lead should be a summary of the entire article and this lead should be enhanced to include every subject within the article written in a summary style  History   The clean up banner is legitimate and should be addressed  Usually clean up banners should be handled before the article is listed at WPPR  I can see a number of  templates in the following sections  These should be addressed and the sourcing improved  As a general rule every paragraph should have at least one source and more if there are multiple assertions  See WPINCITE for reference anchor placement  They dont go in the middle of the sentence but rather at the end unless the assertion is very controversial  The parenthetical reference in the first sentence is too detailed  Give a few examples of what was acquired and leave it at that  Watch out for one sentence paragraphs  These stubs are not acceptable at GAC  Consider combining or expanding  Make sure titles are always italicized even when not linked  What is meant by the Powerhouse era  What is powerhouse music    Programming   This is a section with no prose  Not good  Sections with just a tophat are unnecessary  Either add some prose or remove the section  I think you fold in most of the programming info in the previous section  Related projects   Here is a section Cartoon Network Universe FusionFall see above  References   The key to references is consistency  Make sure every website ref has at least the title url publisher and accessdate  You probably want to use templates like  to help with consistency  Deviantart appears to be a blog or discussion forum  This is not a credible reference  See WPCITE and WPVERIFY for instructions on credible references  Avoid blogs forums chat rooms social networking sites etc  Overall   As stated above the article needs a lot more referencing  This will be a major sticking point if you want it to pass GAC   I would also seek out someone who can do a thorough copy edit  There isnt much about the financing of the channel advertising revenue demographics that sort of thing  It would be nice to see some more information on these topics  This concludes my review  Please contact me on my talk page if you have specific questions  Best of luck to you  Ive fix the issue Some movies were carried from th Century Fox Paramount Pictures and Walt Disney Pictures which are not owned by Time Warner Ive improved some  it a little bit but the article needs to be rewrite and remove any blog user and fan sites which are not reliable Any reliable sources can be added per WPV and WPRS Remember  is recommended Good luck improving the article