RFC   I didnt say the sockpuppet issue wasnt relevant I said it couldnt be proven and if he insists hes not JB it should be dropped  The stuff with JB happened around the time I started on Wikipedia and I saw a little bit of it and have to agree that they have similar editing styles  However if we cant prove that Booyaka is JB then we have to judge Booyakas behavior on its own merits  If on the other hand we can prove that Booyaka is JB then Booyaka can be blocked    As for However when Booyaka replaced the tags and ignored the notes on the edit summary  thats when it became vandalism  No its still a content dispute  Its an inappropriate action but not vandalism  Read WPVandalism especially the part about what vandalism is not  I would call replacing the tags Bullying or Stubbornness  Not right not good but not vandalism either  Accusing someone of vandalism when they arent vandalising takes a bad situation and makes it worse    You said There are limited editors in Australia and New Zealand so the obtaining of third party sources is hindered severely in the time sense  I see that hence my advice to him to go easy on the AFDs and just use unreferenced  Not that I think hell take my advice  However there is a growing movement to speedy delete unsourced articles see WikipediaSpeedy deletion criterion for unsourced articles which you might want to comment on  As for your asking if I was an admin no I am not  If you specifically wanted comment from admins and not regular users then RFC wasnt where you wanted to be  Anyone is free to present an outside opinion on any open RFC  I saw Lethaniols comment  here and thought Id try to help out by providing my opinion  Thats all that ever comes out of an RFC by the way a few opinions  If youd like though I will ask  to take a look at that RFC  She is an admin and in my experience she is fair openminded and creative in solving problems