The whole Research section of this article is highly problematic  As I have pointed out before not only does WPMEDRS apply but WPWEIGHT is a problem as well As presently constituted over half this article and a third of the footnotes are about medical researchnearly all of it primary sources and nearly all of it uncritically positive  Out of the hundreds of TM studies that the TM org claims show various benefit why are the ones being cited here the ones being chosen  Does that not give undue weight to study X over studies Y and Z   A balanced article with proper weight would have about a single paragraph maybe two that summarizes the range of proTM studies their conclusions the  problems if any with those studies the adverse TM studies and the problems with those studies if any  Basically say something like this with citations to secondary sources about the medical research   Since  various studies of TMs effects on a broad range of physiological and phychological functions have been undertaken FN The TM Org claims over  such studies have been undertaken and that they show benefits unique to TM ranging from soup to nuts and everything inbetweenFN  The methodology of these studies have been criticized for a variety of reasons such as none of them are doubleblind etc FN Metastudies conducted at the University of Alberta and the University of Kentucky in  and  concluded that the vast majority of these studies were insufficently documented ot be subject to metaanalysis In each metastudy only  of the TMrelated studies were classified as good and these had little or no statistical significance versus alternative treatments FN  Other studies have concluded that while there are apparent benefits to practicing TM the same or similar benefits are achieved with alternative regimes such as   Further while the TM Org claims that there are no adverse effects to practice of TM several studies have shown that some subjects have problems with meditation resulting in adverse effects ranging from A to Z FN These conclusions however have been criticized by  because  FN  I dont mean to suggest that as the actual language but I do mean to suggest that the wholesale rewrite of this section is needed to comply with WPMEDRS and WPWEIGHT