argument by argument tm  If you have to invent a fallacy then even you have to know that youre grasping for straws  Collect we do not have to say the world is regarded as being round by some members of the scientific community any more than we have to say water has never definitively been proven to be wet  While I would personally prefer that we said something like Hams claims have been disproven by modern science because I think it sounds more authoritative if its between incorrect or nothing then incorrect is clearly the superior choice because it is factually true  And please dont try that all the intelligent readers already know hes wrong so theres no need to point out that hes wrong argument  Every fringepusher and their uncle has already tried that tactic and its bullshit  We cant just allow Wikipedia to be full of rubbish and assume that the smart readers will filter the fact from the fiction