GA Review  This review is transcluded from TalkStade Roland GarrosGA The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review  Reviewer     GA review see here for criteria  It is reasonably well written a prose  b MoS for lead layout word choice fiction and lists   Lead should be  paragraphs It is factually accurate and verifiable a references  b citations to reliable sources  c OR   Pretty sure that Gem is a fan site Location section completly unsourced Tenniseum and clay courts relies on one source could be a copyvio Too many unsourced things It is broad in its coverage a major aspects  b focused   Too much player info imo This is about the stadia not the players It follows the neutral point of view policy Fair representation without bias    It is stable No edit wars etc    It is illustrated by images where possible and appropriate a images are tagged and nonfree images have fair use rationales  b appropriate use with suitable captions   Is there not a shot showing the whole complex Also if not shouldnt PC be the court in the picture and not SL Overall  PassFail     Out of date in expansion v relocation as a result has been announced