The first question that is important for me is the accuracy of the first block about tendentious edits in Macedonian Muslims An administrator with particilar POV om Macedonian question without warning blocked an editor ie me with a contrary POV Nevertheless that until this moment the administrator didnt made some edits in the concrete articleThen this disputable blocking is an argument against me The second problem is why some of the other administrators denied to look profoundly The only caution by some other editor after my first blocking until I stop my edits in the article is this  with a very substantial argument Stop wasting everybodys time Then the other opponent made his reverts with call to find consensus Maybe hasting to defend your colleague Future Perfect at Sunrise you didnt notice that after it I didnt made some edits  nevertheless that some editors deleted important info with relevant sources Also maybe you didnt notice that there were editors who supported my efforts to find more neutral way    However my objections about abuse power of one administrator who is involved in these themes are actual