I kind of agree with you on this one Bongo although I havent read what you said at the AfD so Ill have to go look  But its not like that article really brings down the encyclopedia  I think the clearer cut cases are promotional articles and insubstantial articles that dont make any sense  And there is a case to be made that the coverage in this case amounts to substantial coverage over a sustained years time period  I would prefer we lean towards inclusion rather than exclusion anyway As I said I dont think it meets the inclusion criteria but shit happens  Sometimes good articles get deleted You can always try again in a few months if youre determined enough   What else is shaking