If this is of any assistance  Here is a copy of the list I last posted over at the Juggernaut Talk page of the small part of Asgardians past offenses that I had the energy to look up when I originally wrote it I have also asked  to contribute Feel free to add anything that you may not have known previously  Asgardian being a proven sockpuppet user which turns suspicious whenever various anonymous ips have reverted to his edits   Asgardians block page for consistent editwarring before starting to simply do one revert a day or so to get away with it regardless if this is in direct violation of consensus like in the Dormammu case    Newer conflicts     noticing that Asgardian has continually written editsummaries that have little or nothing to do with what hes actually doing or even flatout contradict it and Asgardian stating that hell continue to do so as long as he can get away with it  Ive grown very very tired of edits like this where the editor does multiple things and then puts in a partially truthful edit summary Response As for J Grebs concern Ive made a request to be directed to the relevant rule on Wikipedia    noticing Asgardians tendency for dishonesty to then accuse anyone who points if out for incivility which given that he does what he always does makes it impossible to even respond   Asgardian recently apparently systematically vandalising pagestructures just to make a point and various other users making a plea to finally shut him down      Only the most recent situation of distorting profile content and deleting multiple references regardless that the information was entirely correct and that the entire Talk population disagrees with him and going by my experience on other pages such as Thanos he will eventually revert everything at a time when everyone else has mostly lost interest even if he has to wait half a year to do so    This proved prophetic as most recently  warned him of a ban if he continued to remove valid references and he left the pages Dormammu alone for a few weeks after this but then returned and did exactly the same thing all over again despite that nobody agreed with him with my main problem being that he essentially replaced referenced exact quotes with personal opinions  In addition there was this old hint that he finds this behavior funny  insidious misrepresentationheh How old are you  That said I have been reluctant to view him as a troll since he does seem to try doing much more useful things than simply being a neverending nuisance for everyone in this community myself in particular despite  asking me if I considered him as one given that some of his tactics correspond to those of a sophisticated troll and have given him chance after chance to find compromises and he has occasionally made minor attempts in this regard but generally just completely reverts to the same version over and over Recently we tried again with the deal being that Id keep my temper in checkstay as polite as I can and give benefit of doubt and him supposed to prove that hes willing to change and turn more trustworthy and compromising  Id be fine with if he simply changed for the better and stopped deleting references or reinsert factual errors and for a little while he seemed to make some effort in other cases such as The Stranger but reasoning and compromises ie rewrite the sentences for better structure if you wish but keep valid references and accuracy cor