What is going on here   From WikipediaArticlesfordeletionMajorGarrett  Delete Not sure why an article that short needed to be posted its obvious that only minimal effort went into its creation Theres reams of data available about Garrett and his career an hour or so with Google at the very least would have created the basis for a pretty good article so this one doesnt have any justification for existence Duncan talk   In other words there are reams of information about this person It has the potential to be a pretty good article with about an hours work Therefore it doesnt have any justification for existence Is this type of thought process the norm on Wikipedia these days