opeds are worthless sources when they dont work for chrisOs narrative mustreads which establish the fact of the matter when they do work for chrisOs narrative courtappointed forensic ballistics experts are fringe kooks also     side note i actually added text which stated discretly that the libel conviction had been overturned by a higher court but that was rvd such a statement of fact is a little too stark for the article campers tastes such things have to be insulated and obscured by intricatelyparsed verbosity which in the end gives the impression that nothing was decided in the court case at all the operative definition here for npov violation after all is not chrisOs pov