That sounds exactly right  good job My current position is that there were enough reasonably independent editors participating and wellreasoned arguments put forth that a claim of overwhelming consensus is untenable If only the usual suspects had participated then possibly mediation would be the best course Then again I happen to think that I am correct always  that the decentquality sources are more in keeping with one article than with two Whether this is truly so will only become more clear as the articles get dragged towards quality