Grny  Rosikno Witnesses to Mystery Investigations Into Christs Relics   Several editors tried to prevent including material from that book voicing an opinion of the authors that the results of numerous timeconsuming and comprehensive analyses conducted using the most technologically advanced equipment available seemed to coincide with assertions prevalent in Christian tradition under the pretext of RS For discussion of the matter see httpenwikipediaorgwikiWikipediaReliablesourcesNoticeboardIsabookbyajournalistandaphotographerareliablesourceforananalysisofreligiousrelicsF   Ignatius is a serious Catholic publisher I dont know why books published by them should be excluded from Wikipedia except someones hostility to Catholicism If we exclude Grny then we should also exclude CarrolCruz catholic writer as well and Nickell sceptical writer who is much more biased against any relics than any Catholic source so his book is not the sort of book that should be used to write a neutral article The statement is an opinion cited not a fact Besides there is no such academic discipline as study of the relics yet anyone can publish whatever wants In the lead we have two negative opinions by Erasmus from s and by Thurston from  So the lead is not neutral To balance it we have posititve GrnyRosiko opinion from  much more recent after several researches on some relics described in their book have been published