I posted to the PD talk page and just now realized the case was closed when I looked at the history of the PD talk page Anyway at least one ArbCom clerk has without precedent come up with a new rule that people cant post to talk pages of an ArbCom case when the case is closed So my post there is likely to be deleted Given that Im reposting it here as follows Borncycle please understand youve been found guilty by ArbCom of making excessive responses whatever that is it sure isnt codified anywhere and violating the spirit of WPBRD which isnt policy or even a guideline just an essay With this case ArbCom has come up with an arbitrary uncodified standard that must be followed dont make excessive responses In this thread alone youve already posted three times Youve been warned about this I strongly suggest you not violate excessive responses again You are walking on thin ice Nobody has any idea how thin that ice is because nobody anywhere has any basis for evaluating what constitutes excessive responses Perhaps we should follow WPRR as a guide and avoid posting more than three times in a thread within  hours Call it WPR  three responses Maybe we need a warning tag too like  to help keep people inline who are excessively responding No doubt some of ArbCom will believe Im violating WPPEDANTIC excessively pedantic and being absurd Of course a mirror is useful which is the point of my post here excessive responses is an absurd metric and ArbCom is way out of line in finding someone in violation of this nonexistent standard Then to further on sanction you for violating it and violating an essay is illustrative of the ArbCom we currently have My serious advice to you is to drop it and walk away No amount of effort on your part will result in this injustice being rectified