I see your point about the weakness of the other parts of the article They will work themselves out in time especially since the section now tightening itself out can serve as a guideline for the rest of the piece  As for my removal of uncited info you neednt take it personally at all People usually dont know what needs citation until it is pointed out to them People usually dont get off their duffs until that info goes byebye Not to put too fine a point on it but you leapt into action after I repaired the material to the Discussion page right  LastlyId point out that after you told me you were working the piece I didnt get into an editwar with you about it I was happy you were knocking out citations and mostly excellent ones at that I gave you the time to put them together doing no more than adding cn tags to replace those references which werent that strong Im not that hard to work with I just hate having to cover the same ground repeatedly Once a citationsection is done it shouldnt need further examination like job done whats next Thats why I am a stickler for making sure the cites are the best they can be to start out with Good cites means good articles GA and FA articles