You seem to be totally blind to Chomskys characterisation of the situation That Chomsky is lending support to Faurissons credibility ie passing off academic dishonesty and fraud as free speech issues calling Faurisson an apolitical liberal and selectively citing his work to make it appear that hes not antisemetic defending fraudulent research as findings and then claiming that findings is a totally neutral term which can include fraud etc is exactly the criticism leveled by his opponents and it seems to be a valid one Ive showed evidence of this repeatedly in this thread and you refuse to address it