Tip and the CPS   I couldnt quickly find the full  text but I found this reference in the CPS most recent statement  In  and  the American Academy of Pediatrics AAP took a stand against the routine circumcision of newborns on the basis that there are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period In  the Fetus and Newborn Committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society CPS reviewed the literature available at that time and reached the same conclusion In  this position was reiterated by the AAP and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in their joint publication Guidelines for Perinatal Care The CPS Fetus and Newborn Committee reexamined the issue in  in response to an article on the benefits and risks of circumcision and saw no reason to modify its  statement     The current version does not accurately reflect their position   The conclusions section of the most recent study is all that is necessary and is  accurate If you do not like the way the CPS sums up their policy please take it up with the CPS This is wikipedia If you would like to publish your analyis in a peerreviewed journal then it too will be eligible for inclusion But including your original synthesis in wikipedia is a violation and must be reverted Thank you