Although this list is a scant  items none of its items are older than December I happen to believe all sorts of edits are happening on Wikipedia but they are just going undetected  The article on Zarqawi led me to believe this as references to a yearsold CIA report claiming he was deadmissing a leg kept disappearing from the article I wasnt paying close enough attention then to find out who This crusade is good for Wikipedia because it will defuse future endeavors by propagandists by making their actions public and documented Apologizing for Jack or anyone else by saying hes just your average biased editor is   Your field of interest expression of misunderstandingclassic extreme worst case argument is addressed repeatedly in the article See such phrases as surrepticious editing investment direct involvement or financial or political involvement etc Sure by some wacky logic you can connect everyone in these ways