UTC I suppose the entire section is slightly paradoxical because it deals with the nontechnical use of what the article largely treats as a technical term If someone can find a peerreviewed statement about who has actually been diagnosed with MDD which might be a bit of a challenge given confidentiality laws so even a peerreviewed source would probably have to quote the peoples own admission to diagnosis then thatd be great but for now Ive added a footnote in order to reiterate that the section isnt necessarily asserting clinical diagnosis but rather is listing people who have been at least socially diagnosed or selfdiagnosedwhich may be what a sociocultural aspects section needs to do anyway I dont know but hopefully the section should hold water for now given the minor word changes and the footnotes     August