Read very closely  Per WPVERIFY and WPBURDEN the burden of proof that the image shows Godane has already been proven through the many upon many reliable and reputable sources You seem to have an issue with this therefore the onus has now been transferred to you in order to prove to the contrary something which you have so far failed to do  None of the sources you have cited have explicitly denied the authenticity of the image They have merely used a different image of Godane This does not support your contention that the image which is being discussed here which is used by sources more reliable and reputable eg United States State Department  BBC and Reuters among others against the sources which you have cited of which I have not heard of any one of them  Suna times and Waamo news  No there are not multiple images on Godane there are only two The one being discussed here and the one you consistently regurgitate Yes it wont make the other various portraits vanish This still doset help you becuase through the above sources it is seen which image is clearly favored by the more reliable sources This source here  is the only thing that you have showed me which highlights that the image may not be Godane I bet youre smiling and clapping your hands right now that through this magical source you have proven the image is not Godane right WRONG This source is meager It is unreliable as it is questionable The article is a blog unworthy of proper accreditation and its riddled with spelling errors and grammatical errors eg Hammami is still advocating for Robows troopss Are you kidding me The author cant even spell and youre taking this blog over acclaimed sources such as Reuters or the US State Department Wow is all I can say Furthermore the blog doesnt identity which picture is incorrect If indeed any image is incorrect the author never cites his source and the article was published over a year before those media sources cited above circulated the image being discussed here Moreover even if the images were used prior it still doesnt help as the author hasnt established where he got his information from concerning this supposed incorrect image of Godane Again youre going to have to do more digging than that in order to prove your point The basis that foreign media agencies have no credibility on reporting in areas where local media is present is just well stupid By that logic any materialinformation coming from any part of the world which is not from the United States the United Kingdom or Europe already excludes many of those sources This geographical argument is meaningless Ok then how about I remove all references to BBCReuters Council on Foreign Relations Brookings Institution Associated Press Agence FrancePresse the National Counterterrorism Center Oh look they use the image as well  and many many more sources just becuase they are reporting from places where they are not based Hmm Seems reasonable logical to me if we were to follow your logic What you are forgetting is that each news agency no matter if its western gets its information from local sources from the places where they are covering a story or reporting from whether thats Somalia or Timbuktu This source for example from BBC  is from the BBC African branch BBC Africa They will have reporters correspondents sources all across Africa And this is only one media source The Somalian media are going to be no more accurate than BBC Africa  as they will not have the extensive resources that the BBC have even in Somalia but also elsewhere And finally this the various portraits can perhaps go in the body as StantheMan suggested   So now youre willing to compromise Ahh I see So when you find yourself in between an undeniable rock and a hard place when it comes to your POV you finally are willing to take a compromise that was offered to you by  which you rejected We cant do that   was way to conciliatory towards you by even offering you a choice What you believe should happen to the image is now up to you   Im afraid that Im not as conciliatory