Sorry the three revert thing was my mistake For the record the issue it NOT whether the hat section should be included on the Frank Rossitano but whether there should be a discussion about it first or at the very least whether Jeffrey O Gustafson should provide an explanation that is actually an explanation and not a sarcastic putdown On the talk page he wrote We are an encyclopedia Ive linked the word for people who seem to forget what that is which surpasses any of my comments in everything but cleverness The indiscriminate collection of information section of WPNOT does not explicitly cover the issue as Jeffrey O Gustafson seems to believe and I believe there is definitely room for some POV Again this could have been settled in a debate but Jeffrey O Gustafson was just too good for that He went on repeatedly deleting the section even after I added a big honkin notice that said not to for the time being YOU tell me what I was supposed to do