Look this is all very simple  Not once have the child molestation allegations been presented on wikipedia as anything other than an investigation that to everyones knowledge has not led to formal charges  If you or anyone else want to edit the page to elaborate on the matter saying Due to the fact that no evidence can be found that the investigations of Mr Fitch resulted in formal charges the veracity of the allegations is very much called into question then guess what  THATS FINE  Thats both factual and quite possibly the most accurate portrayal of the truth to everyones knowledge I would assume  But you know what else is factual  That SABC claimed that he was a child molester  If SABC lied about that dont you think people ought to know so the status of the case against him  That no formal charges have been brought against him  And not only to possibly vindicate Mr Fitch in the eyes of those who would have normally assumed that he was guilty but also to possibly diminish the reputation of SABC for accusing him of such a serious crime  I really dont see any way to justify the removal of the material however  To my knowledge it doesnt become libel until you claim or suggest that SABC was correct  I also cannot imagine why anyone would not agree to the middleground approach which is to add the no formal charges comment in order to balance the material