one topic at a time means the NPOV policy which you refuse to admit to even be on the table   your move of my post here to my talkpage saying I refuse to be brief or focus on one topic at a time belies the FACT that what I posted were verypertinent quote of policy your refusal to acknolwedge that policy and instead insisting that I instead satisfy WTMs false demands about WPVRS in the course of violating the passages of the NPOV policy is more than just highly questionable it is an NPA against me and condoning yet again the ongoing AGF towards me and my defense of POLICY    Your userpage talks about only with love and all that jazz I see only equivocation pandering to hatemongering racepolitics and soapboxing  all discussion will be moved here is fine but theres little point in raising this very important policy with you as you have shown a you are just not interested and b know so little about BC that your ability to even recognize blatant NPOV and SYNTH when you see it means that discussion with you is pointless you are aiding and abetting and encouraging a POV fork and you are yourself in clear violation of policy  I see no love from you only pandering to a hatedriven agenda on what sources are admissible and what are not per the demandsclaims of the POV artist in question