That encyclopedia would be guilty of sourcing the same agendabased commentators if that is the case and in no way does it make this spurious radical claim verifiable This allegation of Jacksons neoconservatist legacy remains unverified and I have little faith in the mutual abilities of tweedledum and tweedledee to proffer anything substantial to give their fruitless quest to establish nonsense as a mainstay on WP articles even a modicum of integrity