So far nobodys reverted me so that gives me hope Meantime let me pick your brain on a broader related issue In recent years Wikipedia has likely gained in importance as a vetting tool for employers clients and others considering doing business with someone Naturally the one doing the vetting has the lions share of responsibility in judging an entrys reliability and supplementing it with other research That said do we bear some degree of ethical obligation to researchers to ensure an entry presents as far as possible an accurate wellrounded picture of the subject In the case of Ms Caesar I was concerned that universities or other organizations looking to employ her andor give her some sort of public platform would come away with the impression that nothing about her merits further scrutiny What are your thoughts