I just worked with the webaccessible version of the citation available If you can verify the full quote in context as part of an actual review then of course go ahead and restore it Sandwiched between the unsourced Daily Mail quote and the review in the National Alliance probably the worlds largest outright neoNazi organization I might have been a little biased in how far I trusted the citation I dont know exactly what a medical doctor expert in urology would have to do with reviewing a book about neurology or why we should necessarily take his opinion seriously but whatever thats really not my concern If its a verifiable review and you can personally verify it then just go ahead and revert my edit you dont need permission