RePSW facts Yes the facts were not then during the promotion obviously  Some IIRC were added by myself at some point  the article had been substantially edited by Irpen myself and several others after its promotion especially around the time it appeared on main page I do not think that the current facts would merit a WPFAR although of course anybody is free to request reviews I dont recall any sources which I could use for references now a good strategy to prompt some editors to react is to comment the unreferenced parts now andor copy them to talk asking for the citations On the bright side they dont seem to be too important to the article and concerned with rather minor details