Canvassing in regard to the Dan James Pantone article    Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively crossposting in order to influence the article on Dan James Pantone  Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that the occasional light use of crossposting to talk pages is part of Wikipedias common practice such crossposting should adhere to specific guidelines found in WikipediaSpam  In the past aggressively worded crossposting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking  It is best not to game the system and instead respect Wikipedias principle of consensusbuilding by ceasing to further crosspost and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand  Thank you    As I replied on my talk page I dont have any idea why you posted your message  I looked into it and you appear to have posted similar comments on eight other talk pages  Im not going to put time into exploring those users relationships to the article in question but if you did seek out support among other nonparticipants its probably advisable that you dont do that anymore  Please familiarize yourself with the policy on canvassing as soon as you can