I understand what youre saying No Im not advocating we neuter Wikipedia Im saying look at the article now compared to how you want it to be It is very neutral We dont tell readers how to think we dont tell readers what other people think We present the facts without commentary and allow readers to make up their own mind That is an amazing accomplishment considering the subject matter As human editors we certainly have a POV yet we have not allowed it into the article until the Reactions section Once I allowed mine into the talk page and was crucified for it It is similar to yours When the reader gets to the Reactions section they finally read POVs on both sides They read what other people think As they read them they decide I agree with this reaction I dont agree with this reaction You do this too But fortunately until they read those reactions they had none The article had only been presenting neutral facts up until that time and because that is all we had done we had not told readers what other people think about the situation We had not told them how to think Now we have a proposal to introduce reactions sooner in the article into the lede That is allowable under WPLEAD and therefore I must agree with it I agree that it is better to have the lede be a microcosm of the entire article In the article we tell readers what other people think at nearly the end of the article My suggestion is let the lede tell readers what other people think at nearly the end of the lede Like the body it gives readers a chance to read the neutral facts first Then they read what other people think and decide which ones they agree and disagree with after reading the neutral facts first It looks like I havent even convinced you that what you wish to add has a POV in only one direction and is not a neutral fact because you keep repeating how important it is probably because you came up with it yourself However I urge you to realize this reaction is POV it is not neutral and therefore were not making it the third sentence in the lede Were making it one of the last sentences in the lede and next to some other reactions after the reader has had a chance to read a neutral introduction to the subject  Its a good suggestion and it makes sense I hope we hear from some other editors