i see youve redirected  the clairsentience article let me askwhat was the point of the weeks of discussions and rewrites if you guys were going to redirect it anywayyou should have told me t get lost out of here what was the point of it all  why did i listen to you  at all  why did i remove all personal references  why did i reference and source all of my matereal diligently and in great detail   why did i edit and re edit for style and content   why did i make additional references to religios  anthropological socialogical  philosophical medical  physics  chemistry  botany  mental health etc  so that all views were included and respected  why did i fulfill all of the above hurdles and hoops to fulfill wikpedia formatting and guidlines for you too to delete months of hard work and effort  your actions are without integrity or honour  clairsentience article redirect   Hi  whoever removed the clairsentience article and made it redirect  can you please try and respect that the article that was there had evolved over a couple of months of discussion and many rewrites and multiple edits which involved much discussion over a long period i could delete this clairvoyance article but i wont because revert and delete wars then stupidly take place   which is a real shame when a library becomes a bar room brawl   i hope you can respect the clairsentience article   ive been clairsentient for most of my adult life and it wasnt easy to come this far and to struggle for  decades to articulate my experience in a way which makes rational sense to the world at large of which the clairsentience article is a manifest example so please try and respect the vast amount of struggle and work which has gone into it