Rursus Wikipedia is not paper and there is no natural limit to articles  Limits are just guidelines  I think it is easonable that articles on more complex and controversial topics will be longer than other articles the article on race will be longer than the article on igneous rocks for example  Our articles are organized with clear section headers so people can skip stuff they are not interested in  But given the wide range of misunderstandings about race I think there is a lot of value to one article that explores the different facets in detail  Obviously I am all for trimming fat or redundancies But most people simply cannot understand points most scientists take for granted unless they read aout the research by both population geneticists and sociologists  I see a lot of value in putting this material in the same article  To separate it is to confirm a widespread misbelief that sociologists and biologists do not agree with one another or have mutually reenforcing views  And I really hesitate to use summary style because people new to the topic just will not understand a summary of complex research It needs to be spelled out clearly however many words that takes