Re The Call of the Marching Bell   Im afraid that Ive had to revert your edit  Frst your change from Bangidara BangeDara wasnt properly explained  The sources use a variety of transliterations for example the online translation uses BNGEDAR on the title page and BngiDar in the text  Is there good reason to choose one over the other  Secondly you seriously overlinked the article  See WikipediaManual of Style linksOverlinking and underlinking whats the best ratio  An article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true  Low addedvalue items are linked without reason  such as  s and th century  Ive replaced some of the goods links that you added and Ive rewritten part of the article so that the problem of transliteration choice is dealt with      Hi while I appreciate your concern for maintianing the quality of the article I consider your reverts rather abrupt Except for the linking of years you do not clearly justify why you reverted other edits  Eg wikilinks to rationality pragmatism materialism spirituality and patriotism Although you later relinked England and Europe and repaired articles  The reason for putting transliterations in Italics is to keep the reader aware of foreign language texts which is a common practice  In your edit summary you blame me for unsourced changes It is evident that I did not add any new texts for which I had to provide any source but if you insist on keeping any part of text you should provide the relevant citation  In your edit you have linked the word Muslim with Islam which are two different articles The use of i and e is problematic of transliterating Persian and Urdu texts respectively But it is good practice to maintain the same standard in one article The sound of e is common pronunciation in Urdu And as the book predominantly contains Urdu poetry I followed the same pronunciation pattern Many thanks indeed for your messsage My friendly advice would be to carefully see before any blatant reverts in future cheers