BTW where a particular critic is published or quoted is technically only relevant for verifiability as far as the reputation of the publication Time and Womens Wear Daily are equally reputable sources in the very sense I mean as in that if either one publishes an interview with a major personality you can be pretty damn sure the person actually said the quotes Writing Bob said I love it is a statement of a fact directly known to the author The interviewer saw and heard the interviewee say it unless they are lying the publisher let them get away with it and the interviewee didnt scream bloody murder Doubtful for either of those magazines The same critics interview published on the fansite wwwilovebookscom fails that test His published quotes are notable but not verifiable In the little known Collection of My Interviews of Book Critics written by Joe English Professor PhD and published by Oxford University Press it definitely passes due to scholarly review OTOH the interview quotes of an unnamed Palestinean as part of an article in Time about the West Bank pass the verifiability test though notability of the quotes would depend on context The same article in Womens Wear Daily does not as they are much less likely to have fact checked it as thoroughly which is needed for something such as that Its much more plausible that the WWD author spent his entire in country time sitting in the hotel bar writing a fake article and got away with it Get it Its also unlikely TBH that Bloom would have said anything different if he was asked the exact same questions in the same order by the same person in the exact same context except that the interview was for Time Also a formal review by him would have said the same thingjust in better language As far as a book review by a professional which is a direct statement of opinion by an expert where the critic is published is a function of his reputation not vice versa Peeps write reviews for Time instead of The Podunk Daily because of their reputation and the fact they are published in Time is just an indication of that Say that famous reviewer retires and only writes occasional reviews for his hometown paper The Podunk Daily to keep his hand in They are just as usable though it might be harder to verify that you can assume a reviewer published in Time is a good one you have to check the other one out