Crticism lacking in the article   This article lacks criticism He was criticised among other things regarding his attitude to nationalism and behaviour in WW where he lobbied to be recognised as king of Hungary by United States against the wishes of Central European people It would also be interesting to bring up what his PanEuropa Movement led by Nikolaus von CoudenhoveKalerg stood for in s and even today This wasnt a simple movement for unification of Europe but much more ideological organisation as Transparency in global change the vanguard of the open society by Burkart Holzner Leslie Holzner states PanEuropa Union became an exclusive conservative Catholic elite The article should describe his ideas in full and simplify his ideology to just unification of Europe Critical assessment of some of his statements and behaviours should also be included     He was very much opposed to the whole idea of nationalism Do you mean he was criticized for this by nationalists I remember reading some time that he lobbied to be recognized as King of Hungary during WWII this should definitely be added to the article He also lobbied for the recognition of an Austrian governmentinexile as opposed to the Nazi government Why do you think he a refugee from Nazism wanted Allied countries to recognize him as the legitimate ruler instead of the Nazis in Austria and their allies in Hungary at the time His activities  during these years when he opposed Nazism were in no way unique Charles de Gaulle was never elected by anyone when he proclaimed himself a leader either