Sorry you are plain wrong  See comments on the talk page of the article at ANI and also on your talk page    OK that would be  editors in the previous dispute and  editor for the dispute now not a consensus from the previous dispute And if it was the consensus then why are we even having a DRN right now for the image But again for the nth time RR is not subject to whether or not youre right    Very true and you trapped Widescreen with that between the two of you last time  Im not that naive   You are also making misleading statements  Its not clear that we have a DRN for the image You have added a comment to the DRN but that is it  See the quotes on your talk page and I have also placed them at ANI the image idea was also rejected  Now DRN cannot resolve the issue but the clear consensus three to zero was that text was enough  THat is the default position until you can change it  As I say I am dubious about the text as well its not balanced but I will address that next week    I never trapped anyone nor forced Widescreen to edit war nor did I say theres a consensus for the image what I said was there was no consensus not to include the image which you mistakenly think there was even though one of your citations is from the current dispute in the last one If there was we wouldnt be having the DRN righy now That aside you already violated RR and by not reverting the violation    If you check the comments I summarised on your talk page you will find your wikilawyering over images and tables was covered