The lead section is a summary of the main points but it mentions her involment in  the Puerto Rican Defend Fund using the political code word active I object to this description because I know many extremely involved and active lawyers and she doesnt fit the profile According to the Washington Post The organizations board had a limited role  at bimonthly meetings it generally left the legal tactics to the dozen or so staff lawyersI wouldnt describe the board as a bunch of firebrandsHer social activism does not shed light on whether she has as a trial judge or later on the appellate bench been a judicial activist  the derogatory label conservatives sometimes apply to liberal jurists  But I dont have time to edit or discuss so I supposed is your call after all your are the active and extremely involved editor in this article