I agree to those terms and it is not this particular edit which is offensive to me it is Petes style of confrontation for the sake of it  He has a modus operandi of manipulating the policies of wikipedia and trying to constantly divert peoples attention from real issues of discussion such as this nonsense in order to create legalistic debates where they are not necessary I consider myself to get along famously with editors on the whole and I believe that my edits are fairly apolitical as much as they can be when writing on political topics  But I dont want to engage on these issues because that is just playing Petes games and frankly I couldnt be bothered because I know it gets no where Cheers