Okay while I agree with the first point that the previous header title is more appropriate I must say that Im kinda alarmed by your second contention Your POV on Timothy Leary is of course valid in your own right but to generalize and dismiss him and his ideas from this article doesnt seem to be fair It is not our duty to figure out what material is subjectively valid or not I have taken both a literature class and a criminal justice class on the undergraduate level that included a subtantial section about Leary his reasearch and ideaology Hes defintely notable Even though I might not susbscribe to all of what he believes I still think that it would be incomplete to write him off as a crazy just because thats how his image is perpetuated today To make wikipedia the best resource we may want to include Learys conclusions but ensure that readers can get the complete picture about him and his work so they can make up their mind on their own Cest vrai non