One again Jeffro you are making false statements As I above demonstrated Prof Tiplers Omega Point Theory has been publish in many peerreviewed science journals including a number of the leading physics journals The Wikipedia article on the Omega Point Theory lists seven different scientific journals in which said theory has been published That is quite a significant amount   There is no excuse for such a false statements on your part since even in the section pertaining to it in Existence of God article information is provided on Prof David Deutsch inventor of the quantum computer endorsing the physics of the Omega Point As well in the hyperlinked Omega Point Tipler article information is provided regarding the many peerreviewed science journals that Prof Tiplers Omega Point Theory has been published in including some of the worlds leading physics journals such as Reports on Progress in Physics and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society one of the worlds leading astrophysics journals   Out of  articles Prof Tiplers  Reports on Progress in Physics paper F J Tipler The structure of the world from pure numbers Vol  No  April  pp  was selected as one of  for the Highlights of  accolade as the very best articles published in Reports on Progress in Physics in  Vol  Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding reviews of the field They all received the highest praise from our international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal Website See Richard Palmer Publisher Highlights of  Reports on Progress in Physics   Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute of Physics Britains main professional body for physicists Further Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor according to Journal Citation Reports than Physical Review Letters which is the most prestigious American physics journal one incidently which Prof Tipler has been published in more than once A journals impact factor reflects the importance the science community places in that journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own papers   Regarding string theory it has no experimental support whatsoever and it violates the known laws of physics eg in general relativity singularities are unavoidable with realistic energy conditions for the HawkingPenrose singularity theorems see S W Hawking and R Penrose The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences Vol  No  January   pp  whereas singularities do not occur in string theory yet the known laws of physics have been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment to date Right now string theory isnt even science since it makes no predictions that can be tested ie its currently completely nonempirical To date string theory is nothing more than mathematical omphaloskepsis