Ill look at this article more carefully tomorrow but Im a little concerned with the use of Kavan to kick off the whole background section She gives quite a shall we say unique interpretation to Falun Gongs reception in China in the early years Im not saying she should not be quoted but using a single source like that to orient the entire issue seems quite out of order Anyway historically on these pages weve had our fair share of undue proFalun Gong sentiments so I guess I understand Lets just try to keep it professional