The version that you are attempting to revert to is unstable Your Talmudic source might be correct but it does not have any relevance to the article You are attempting to edit against consensus If you continue to revert then I will report you for WPRR and editwarring Thank you    Youve made three mistakes   Is the version Id reverted to  unstable On the contrary the version that you were attempting to revert to  is unstable because the chapter youd removed was added three years ago on  May  and lasted until  March  ie until the day before yestreday whereas the version you were attempting to revert to  lasted for less than  hours only  that were uncontinuous and broken so which version is more stable Returning the chapter youd removed  is not against the consensus at all The chapter is supported by UserMOBDeadMeat and is also supported by UserChrishatch and is also supported by UserEliko whereas the removal of the chapter is supported by UserBasket of Puppies only Really it was also supported in the past by UserDragonflySixtyseven however their reason for the removal  was refuted on  and on the article talk page as well and they didnt respond to the refutation According to the law Silence gives consent the very fact that UserDragonflySixtyseven didnt respond to the refutation  shows that UserDragonflySixtyseven does not reject the explanation given on  and on the article talk page as well for returning the chapter To sum up three editors UserMOBDeadMeat UserChrishatch and UserEliko support the chapter and one single user UserBasket of Puppies rejects it so which option is more consensual Returning the chapter or removing it The chapter you removed is relevant as Id explained on the article talk page  before you removed the chapter If you think the chapter is irrelevant  despite my explanation on the article talk page why its relevant then please discuss that on the article talk page  Note that when you responded to me on my talk page  each one of us had made one revert only  during  so considering that the single revert Ive made during   was sufficient for you to warn me of your reporting me for WPRR and editwarring  if I continue to revert also your single revert youve made during   should be sufficient for me to warn you of my reporting you for WPRR and editwarring  if you continue to revert If you continue to both  remove a consensual chapter  and replace it by an unstable version which is against the consensus then I will report you for violating Wikipedia policy that requires  to discuss everything on the article talk page  before removing a consensual chapter and before replacing it by an unstable version which is against the consensus Anyways due to your claim about irrelevance I will add to the stable consensual chapter  some clarifications to make sure that every reader including UserBasket of Puppies understands its relevance