Hello   Sometimes we agree  Sometimes we dont but its all good as far as I am concerned  I was not referring to you in any of my comments about shenanigans at NARM The troublesome editors are often single purpose and appear to be new  These editors do a grave disservice because their noise tends to shield an editor like Cirt from legitimate criticisms and scrutiny  You will notice that I did quite the opposite of what Cirt wanted at Santorum neologism  I am not any way in the habit of backing up Cirt  It just happens that often hes right though sometimes hes wrong And I dislike the sock campaigns that have been been related to the Landmark Education and Church of Scientology articles and turned personal against Cirt