First I did not change the name of an AFD I changed the name of the article Articles are open for editing during AFD and people objected to the name I improved the article by changing the name which no one seemed to like Obviously one should then change the name of the AFD to correspond to the article For you to call that disruptive demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of the process  If I had changed it to something silly that would be different but I doubt theres an editor here who disputes that was an improvement Second I did not attack Aaron in it I described his actions I factually said he did not do a b  c I also described it as a preposterous attempt to circumvent standard procedure It was Honestly Ive been around for years and Ive never seen anything remotely like that nomination Now I dont think hes trying to make a point I think hes dead serious and thats the scary thing I also dont think the others are trying to make a point I think theyre abusing process Morton is handing out freaking barnstars to the little coterie that votes with him How is that less offensive than me making links to contributions The fact is that everyone here does look at contributions by certain people and Im just not so fake as to hide it Will be now obviously  Theyve got a little hit page that conservatives watchlist for which article to AFD next Then they swarm on it to make it look like a snowball Anyways I have no intention of conducting an RFC As you surely must know those are a complete waste of time I do have an intention of participating with wellreasoned commentary on the same AFDs based on the same sources they use Third I did not evade the block in any substantive way I simply left a message on your page Did I go mess with Scribner Did I go edit No I did not I simply asked you to explain your absurd comment that I had disrupted AFD   And btw Id like to thank Tbeatty for being nonridiculous Grown people running off to adminstrators to whine about a humourous though barbed response to a silly template is ridiculous Perhaps theyre not grown though in which case I guess its ok and I should stop picking on the children I dont dispute that I invited a block Im just frankly surprised that anyone cared enough to tattle