It instantly registered as vandalism incorrectly I hope in my mind and I reverted it I went back and put your revision back as a Good Faith edit I let you guys work it out on the talk page Sorry for the inconvenience       No worries  you are right to be vigilant The issue attracts passions on both sides      Big Four auditors external link deleted   Hey Ndenison you recently deleted external link added by me to Big Four auditors page Indeed I recently added such a link and it was deleted by OhNoitsJamie However in course of discussion Jamie recognized that this link could be added httpenwikipediaorgwikiUsertalkOhnoitsjamieThanksforthenotice So could you please reverse the deletion back Thanks BIGPAPA  Preceding unsigned comment added by      Done  As a side note since you have an account use that to edit  I assumed that this edit was from just another ip adding spam  Also sign your posts on talk pages with  tildas   Have a good day and sorry for the inconvenience        Thanks Ndenison I would also ask your advise I strongly believe that ilovebigcom should be also externally linked from  more pages  big four companies pages Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ernst  Young KPMG PricewaterhouseCoopers ilovebigcom even as of now has dozens of news and other stuff related to each of these companies I believe it will be useful for those people who try to find out more about these companies So here is the question Do you think it will be appropriate to add such links Thanks for the insight BIGPAPA  I dont know as I am not familiar with those articles  My only advice would be to go to the talk pages of those articles and ask that question        Thanks Ndenison      Rationale  My dear fellow  what is yours     Ill be completely honest with you  Some of the stuff I see is pretty funny and sometimes I chuckle  However I use Wikipedia quite often to research random subjects  With that being said I dont like to see stupid crap plastering an article  If you want to vandalize something besides an article ie user pages talk pages etc I really dont care as long as its not mine  Other people might care but not me  Just leave the articles alone unless of course youre adding useful information        Hair trigger revert   You reverted my changes to Game Artificial Intelligence in the cheating AI section These changes focused the section on the importance of cheating to AI itself the section as it stood got too distracted by the wider considerations of cheating and by specific examples  I understand that as an anon I get less consideration But please actually compare beforeafter in context Trimming can be constructive too   Hickson Compact Group   Perhaps you should read the article first This article is not about HCG and therefore it does not have a location or a picture The picture can be used illustratively but the INFOBOX cannot      Brass Knuckles   Why did you revert my edit    My edit is not vandalism Stop it Us