That was me I struck it late last night my time at the end of a big edit but didnt want to start this discussion and then sign off It shows up the synthesis nicely Eugene compared to you I know nothing about this stuff I came here because it was mentioned at Fringe Theories and it looked interesting I thought I might learn something I have a moderate level of interest in the early church Ive read  Crossans Essential Jesus  Historical Jesus  and Jesus A Revolutionary Biography   Robin Lane Foxs Pagans and Christians  and The Unauthorized Version   Robert Millers ed The Complete Gospels Annotated Scholars Version   Funk Hoover  Jesus Seminars The Five Gospels   Ian Wilsons Jesus The Evidence   ANWilsons Jesus   Michael Goulders A Tale of Two Missions   Robert Eisenmans James the Brother of Jesus  and  Elaine Pagels Gnostic Gospels cant lay my hands on it for the date  Not very closely and a long time ago So my knowledge is general I am relying on you and others for the specialist information that will make this a good article What I have brought here is a critical mind and an understanding of policy honed in editing a few medical articles where precision clarity and neutrality are crucial When I called this article crap the other day I was judging it on those criteria It is not clear and not neutral so I doubt its veracity  as will anyone with half a mind who reads it It is a bad article If you want it to be good or featured I recommend you welcome me SV and the many other good editors who come here It could be at GA in two weeks