That is an interesting spin on your earlier comment my views have zero validity on my talk page but  validity at an RFC I am not sure I can make a cogent response to these conflicting statements In answer to your question I think it important to maintain clear personal boundaries when it comes to disputes between editors Not accepting personal attacks is one such boundry another is courtesy and another is mutual respect If these personal boundries break down subsequent discussion can degenerate into generalised mudslinging which I think is what happened with the RFCs I have been the subject of These RFCs have brought accusations that are too generalised to either prove or refute As a generalisation it is generally a good idea to avoid accusations based on generalisations because I would end up being painted in a bad light whether I particiated or not   With regard to the RFC the lack of courtesy shown by not being notified of a draft being started is indicative of a lack of respect for myself or at least that is my personal view valid or not Evidence support this view is indicated by the fact that if the proposers of the RFC were really interested in resolving their personal disagreements with me they would have brought their pet peeves to this talk page first and we could resolve them in an amicable way Unfortunetly that did not happen I can only speculate why but I think it has something to do with the inabilty of a group of editors myself included not being able to come to shared understanding of how notability applies to certain topics I am a reasonable editor and I am confident when it comes to disputes personal or editorial a that shared understanding of the issues involved can be reached But it can only come about in an atmosphere of mutual respect and courtesy