Notice that her own widelyread book is not mentioned in References And look at the reference that is there Whos behind all this elaborate smear Antisemitism  Accused by whom why I wouldnt edit this entry on a dare Wetman  I agree  I also think this runon should be deleted but fear editing it  The state and nature of their marriage has been the subject of much speculation with some claiming it is a purely political arrangement and widespread stories about their regular arguments but the fact remains that they have remained together and whilst spending extended periods apart still vacation together apparently long after the political necessity for the marriage to stay together passed  I think its repetitive of the sentence before and somewhat inappropriate     US Senator Senate Election    Question has Hillary done anything noteworthy as a senator yet   Oct   UTC I did try to include a header on this but it was removed by Salazar This does need research  inclusion    It says in the article that she campaigned heavily in Upstate New York  She campaigned in heavily Democratic areas of New York like Albany but the traditionally Republican areas in Upstate New York really didnt have a candidate Lazio is a RINO he likes governmentrun social programs he supports abortion hes antigun etc  I remember reading in the Press  SunBulletin a Binghamtonarea newspaper that her campaign aides had determined that downstate was such an easy sell for her that she only needed around  of the vote in Upstate  I think she got  or so in my county  Wolfman obviously I dont object to the editing in principle and you and I have made some opposite kinds of edits to other political articles with an appropriate degree of attention to NPOV but I think with respect to your changes to my Senate section Edit you kept the facts I inserted that were favorable to Sen Clinton ie Twothirds of the voters dismissed the carpetbagging issue but removed much of the factual information that portrayed her in a negative light specifically the objective fact that she returned a  campaign donation from the Muslim group accused of terrorist connections and the kissing of Arafats wife  These events actually figured into the campaign and they are actual facts not POV  And I was careful I thought to avoid implying that these events were evidence of anything which is a POV I just stated the fact that they were part of the Republican attacks on her which is objective  Id appreciate some reply but Ill give it some time before attempting to revise my section      Page moved   See     Neutrality This page doesnt mention Whitewater or her role in the health care plan two of the things shes most famous for  Also some of the prose is fairly fawning eg the two were soon inseperablepartners in moot court political campaigns and matters of the heart  Needs a neutral party to go over this and add facts NPOV  I dont know enough to do it     Again if you feel it is NPOV add the White Water and healtcare section  It is not that hard it is on the Bill Clinton page  ChrisDJackson  Well as I said I dont really know enough about this topic I was just drawing attention to this for others who might be able to help the article     I dispute the neutrality of this page  Do I know enough to fix it Not really  But even so you have no right to remove the header  Thank you     Please do not remove the Neutrality Dispute header  Im in the process of finding people to correct this but you have no right to remove it    Signature I removed Hillarys signature from the page  If its going to be readded at least put it off to the side with a caption  As it was it looked like an attempt at making it look like she signed the page  But since Im not sure her signature is relevant in the first place I removed it rather than fixing it     Naming the husbandN