The administration of aspirin is in no way equivalent to the removal of copious amounts of primary erogenious tissue from the genitalia for not significant medical benefit and for no medical benefit not more effieciently attainable through use of devices such as proper washing and condom usage  Circumcision removes around  nerve cells rds  of the mobile skin of the penis the protection of the glans afforded by the foreskin  causing the glans to undergo keratinization  Whether or not certain editors on here would like to admit the veracity of this source it is none the less citing peerreviewed papers    A simple study of the history of the proceedure in the united states should tell you a significant amount  It was introduced in the late s by Dr Kellogg as in corn flakes as a method to prevent masturbation meaning they knew it reduced sexual pleasure because masturbation was demonized as the root of all illnesses at the time  Dr Kellogg also advocated the administration of acid to the clitoris of female subjects for similiar reasons and if you think White america doesnt have a female genital mutilation history read The Rape of Innocence by Patricia Robinett