Judicial aspects of felony conviction   The article does not make it clear that the termination of Sloans custody rights did not just toss Shamema into some arbitrarilychosen foster home as if Sloan was some sort of unfit parent Sloan was never found to be an unfit parent or a danger to his daughter  The essential ingredient in the termination of Sloans parental righs was US dollars  Shemema was returned to the USA because the couple who were private US citizens had the money to pay and agent to get Shemema back That US couple wanted to raise Shamema as a Christian which Sloan did not want  No govt agencies of any sort were involved in that action Sloans wife as the time had been coerced by the paid agents The coersion by their agent included implied threats against the health and safety of that womans own children but those threats occurred outside of US territory  During Sloans time as a fugitive the govt of the USA had custody of him multiple times and chose not to extradict him back to Virginia simply because of the expense involved  Sloan was a fugitive in name only and only because one Viriginia judge was annoyed at him and he the authority to make him a fugitive rather than just let Shemamas natural parent raise her as he saw fit  I am asking for balance in the presentation of this story It is not as simple as the text currently suggests and the implications as the the text currently stands that Sloan was simply just another irresponsible unfit parent  Please review the facts and ensure that the text reflects the real ambiguities of the situation We are not here to redetermine the best interests of Shamema we are here to report the Truth wo any implied defamation of Sloans character  He is a convicted felon and we make that clear enough but was fail to present the proper context of the termination of his parental rights