RE To be clear I reacted seriously and extensively here to the remarks of  who at least read some of the material This second block by  does not react to anyones statements anyway Why talk then RE I have stated on several points ABCD added to argument my statement that I was blocked without serious delibration THAT is what I wrote and intended to write above E  brNow someone is blocking me for another time without reacting to any of my my content For example no reaction to the WPUPNOT thing So I am still accused of vandalism I want it out  RE Trusilver Please explain what do you mean by Your message was meant to do nothing more inflame and disrupt Do we mis a word somewhere like it means to say more to inflame dont worry could happen to any chief justice Now lets get serious again Maybe mrmrs Trusilver did not read it carefully but I want it to be read and reacted to more carefully MM Trusilver has not reacted to one single clearly written point Why then should or how could I react seriously then I could rephrase the same things but being clear WILL block me more time  I should not be reblocked for argumenting my case Above I wrote an explicit and clear reason why I wrote such and so and illustrating that the  editor or administrator had misread andor misinterpretated THAT is what I wrote above If you expect me to say nothing to favor my own case  well  please say so beforehand If not I am free to react here more so  If someone else reads it like it is you are infalaming without clearifying  well I am only making my case So the reader Wikipediaadministrator may be too sensitive to judge Then please leave it to someone else  To be sure if this reaction leads to anothor unqualified blocking I will withdraw anyting I said or wrote in my whole life I will even deny being born As I wrote before I do not seek unblocking nor extra blocking I want my contributions to be read and taken saeriously Even by contestants