I see your article has been declined several times now I think theres some misunderstanding about what we mean by a reliable source on Wikipedia Reliable in our context means that somebody has a professional reputation to state things correctly and trustworthy For instance a newspaper cannot print whatever it likes  it needs to have tight editorial control as Rebekah Brooks found out the hard way for example So you can rely on what it says to be held to a known standard  You and your own websites on the other hand can say pretty much anything you like and thats why theyre unreliable because theres no code of practice or conduct stopping you writing Sean Coyne is the greatest filmmaker in all of history bar none and using it as a source for a Wikipedia article I think Steven Spielberg to pick a name completely at random might disagree with you on that  So thats why we dont allow stuff youve written yourself or appears on sites pretty much anyone can contribute to like Facebook Im afraid to say your article probably doesnt belong on Wikipedia  maybe in  years you might be as famous as Steven Spielberg and this film will gather historical interest but until then Im afraid its just not notable Sorry