March  UTC  I just now removed the other two unbalanced tags for the Kleck and Lott sections I dont see any articulation of how theyre biased other than you saying sections on flawed studies Thats simply not sufficient If your argument is that no mention needs to be made of those studies because at all I strongly doubt others will agree that would result in a balanced article  Perhaps I misunderstand your objections though I do not like the rearrangement of the article into specific sections for each researcher I think that may be some of your objection I would recommend reverting back to the earlier organization where it was organized by issue and not researcher Organizing by researcher allows for the problems youre concerned about That said I do not see any bias in those sections for those researchers Hemenways research is cited as a rebuttal in the opening paragraph of the first paragraph and not long after in the next