Ttiotsw says Thus whereas the Jesus article has  images of Jesus the Muhammad article has only  images of which  are contentious and would have been editwarred over It would seem to be an unrepresentative view to simply remove the last few images from the article  My answer  Jusus article has  images of Jesus which are acceptedusedassociated about Jesus in  of Christianians  Muhammad article  images of Muhammad which are acceptedusedassociated about Muhammad in  of Muslims as well as nonmuslims in all the history   There is not even a single mosque having the image of Muhammad hanged and represented which proves that the image in wikipedia article is purely a POV for few people who argue about the image that it is related to some unknown painter and was used in a short span of history  Use of the image having no source and no creator is the violation of wikipedia images policy and not my personal opinion  If there is an image which represents and is associated to Muhammad in mainstream MuslimsnonMuslims then use it If there is no such image then it does NOT imply that you put some nonrepresenting image or you put some image which is not associated to Muhammad by Mainstream Muslimsnonmuslims but by very few people in a short span of history