STOP DELETING MY ADDITION  You MuboshguMephistophelian say  Please do not use talk pages  for general discussion of the topic They are for discussion related to improving the article They are not to be used as a forum or chat If you continue to use talk pages as you do you may be blocked from editing You are using the talk page to push a POV rather than addressing the article in a constructive manner Please stop  I AM NOT generally discussing a topic I AM NOT chatting I AM NOT    pushing a POV  If you do not understand basic English grammar you have no business telling me anything  FACT commas are used in this context to separate a list a series of related clauses  Grammar is not a matter of a general discussion or chatting or a point of view  It is a technically precise set of rules and in this case a set of rules that demonstrate that the foundation of the issue is a fraud  THIS IS NOT OPINION IT IS FACT IT IS RELEVANT TO THE ARTICLE IT IS FOUNDATIONAL TO THE ARTICLE  I AM TALKING ABOUT IMPROVING THE ARTICLE BY CLARIFYING THE FOUNDATION ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR AS ANY LITERATE PERSON CAN SEE  AND I AM TALKING ABOUT ADDING THE RELEVANT AND FOUNDATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAUSE  FROM TALK GUIDELINES why dont you review them   There is reasonable allowance for speculation suggestion and personal knowledge on talk pages with a view to prompting further investigation     make the extra effort so that other people understand you Being friendly is a great help It is always a good idea to explain your views it is less helpful for you to voice an opinion on something and not explain why   you hold it Explaining why you have a certain opinion helps to demonstrate its validity to others and reach consensus   Article talk pages should be used to discuss ways to improve an article  Deal with facts   The talk page can be used to park material removed from the article due to verification or other concerns while references are sought or concerns discussed   The talk page is particularly useful to talk about edits   New proposals for the article can be put forward for discussion by other editors if you wish   Do not threaten people For example threatening people with admins you   know or having them banned for disagreeing with you   Editing  or even removing  others comments is sometimes allowed But you  should exercise caution in doing so and normally stop if there is any objection  As I previously posted here THE ARTICLE SHOULD BE IMPROVED by making it clear in the opening statement that the entire issue is a fraud upon the public since there is no natural born citizen requirement that is applicable today That is fundamental to an informative relevant foundation to the article not a matter of opinion and a matter of grammatical fact  If I say No animal except a mouse or a rat at the time I give the signal shall be captured then I am saying only mice and rats shall be captured AT THE TIME I GIVE THE SIGNAL  My order has no validity at any other point in  time  Similarly the requirement for natural born citizen only applied AT   THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION  It does not apply today and the following clause should be part of the article since it is the clause at the foundation of the issue in the article  No person except a natural born Citizen or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States