I am a bit confused you seemed to have taken things rather personally and resorted to ad hominem attacks  You accuse me of trying to start and edit war when in fact I started this section in the discussion page to avoid an edit war  I have made sure to avoid any violation of the RR policy so how exactly was this an edit war  Certainly the article has been edited numerous times since the discussion started but that is the point of the discussion  Discussion is not supposed to prevent editing entirely but to facilitate healthy editing which ultimately improves the articles rather than pointless reverts back and forth I am also confused about why you think I attacked you because I never did  I did follow WPAGF but assume good faith does not mean I have to assume you are correct  I assumed you were doing your best to contribute to the article but I also believed you were mistaken and did my best to clarify these mistakes  I even mentioned that your argument was true to some degree which hardly sounds like an argument containing personal attacks Also I assume you wrote your last paragraph before checking the most recent update to the article because I had already done exactly what you suggested  It seems like we have come to an agreement so I dont see why any further accusations that I am some sort of troll are necessary  Hopefully you wont take criticism and constructive contributions to a discussion so personally I know sometimes with text the tone can come of as sarcastic andor patronizing when that was not the authors original intent but that is exactly why we have the Assume Good Faith policy so that tempers dont get out of hand when the tone of a discussion becomes ambiguous like that