TOC   Current events   Might we want either a temporary hatnote or a see also for the present humanitarian crisis I came here expecting to find a link to that article wherever it may be and couldnt find any            A lot of this coverage is over at Cyclone Nargis  Sadly there just isnt a lot of information out there since access to the country is so tightly controlled and even the assessment teams on the ground probably dont have the information wed expect to see     Name   in the article some parts say Burma and some say Myanmar  I think we should calll it Myanmar since it may not be recognized by many countries but that is the official international name  Preceding unsigned comment added by        Please read the tag at the top of the page  The name is under dispute     Moved the Page Move Protection tag to talk page   There isnt really a need for the tag to be on the article itself As was successfully argued regarding the dispute tag previously the tag itself doesnt help the article and it being on the talk page achieves the same end    Having a warning on the front page shows that the article is in a state of flux  Anyone who isnt particularly wikisavvy wouldnt realize that there is an ongoing dispute and that the current version may well change in the near future  The nonendorsement of the current name of the article is a reasonable point to make  I dont particularly care for either name but making it look stable when its unclear is kind of misleading to the reader    Youre not making a lot of sense The first sentence of the article notes the naming of the country I believe you were involved with the discussion regarding the Dispute tag and it came to the point where the only sensible solution was to have it on the talk page The same applies with this tag It has nothing to do with honesty and Id be insulted if I didnt assume good faith Please reconsider your reversion the last thing I want is an edit war of any sort    Look at the discussion on this page regarding the name dispute tag  I wouldnt say that there was a consensus that removing the tag was the only sensible solution The statement is true and not misleading  Neither staying nor moving are WPSNOWBALL Protection tags are usually on the front page of the article  See WPPROTECTOthernotes for talk page templates The tag deflects mastodons Having the tag on the article itself sends a clear message to people who might just assume that the name is wrong and move it The tag shows that the current name of the article is not a consensus statement Not having the tag implies to a casual reader that the current name is appropriate not the current consensus because there is no consensus It seems kind of redundant to you or me since weve been staring at it for the last couple of weeks but to someone who is not already involved it shows that the article is not stable  I mean I really dont care that much but why is it so critical to take it off      Because disputes regarding page moves arent what the user should be reading