By your argument since you do not know how to use Wikipedia you should not edit at all  Had you followed the guidelines your article might have been up  But no you edited pages for closed discussions leave messages on userpages accuse people of being vandals that do not qualify according to site standards and defend an obvious vandal only because he agrees with you  Wikipedia is not about elitist and snobbish entitlement it is about bringing forth sources that deal specifically enough with the subject sources that enough editors have access to to verify so that even someone not specialized in the subject can see the article is a reliable summery of those sources  But no you say that you are important and expect us to take you at your word with no evidence while you completely go against protocol If someone submits a paper to a journal and had it rejected that person would not help their chances by writing their objection on the filing cabinet in which the rejection notification was stored  That author would not do well to spray painting their objections on the editors house  That person would not help their chances by calling upon a former employee to argue his case who was fired the second day of work for showing up high and urinating on a secretary  Throwing a tantrum like a small child would not help that authors chances either especially if they did happen to be someone high up in a university because that is not how a professor is supposed to behave