mfd I do not agree with  your close of WikipediaMiscellany for deletionWikipediaArticle IncubatorMarie Charlotte de la Trmoille which I think a classic supervote There were  opinions the noms opinion to delete as a stale draft another editors opinion to delete because of questionable notability and a stale draft  my opinion to redirect to the apparent subject of the article and a keep opinion that the subject was notable and that the user thought it could be worked on further and had a source available  You decided to delete admitting that this may not look like the right result based on your view that   it was extremely unlikely that a redirect would help find the associated article  perhaps but it would help the user find at least some information on the named person the incubator was a bad idea there was a user willing to work on it you would undelete  but there wasa user willing to work on it   As you didnt delete it someone placed a speedy on it which is reasonable of them but I boldly reversed it while I ask you to reconsider If you   hold by your decision  want to revert me I will not consider it wheelwarring in this circumstance  Your reasons  is misconceivedthe pt of the redirect is to find some info on the named subject which is present in the article redirected toit at least identifies the person your personal opinion that an accepted feature of WP should be closed down and  the distinction you drew between someone who might work on it and someone who could   Since you said if there is a user willing to work on it you would be happy to move it please  either relist for further discussion  move it to my user space or that of FactSpace or redirect as I suggested   And there would be some merit in an argument that a person opposed in principle to the article incubator should not close mfds involving it If I opposed articles on unpopulated extinct villages in general should I close such AfDs in conformity to my opinion