Regarding the wikileaks allegations they were reported in other media including here here and here   Regarding the Gaddafi book printing affair it was mentioned here in an article written for the Middle East Forum by Daniel Nassif who is now the head of the Congressfunded AlHurra The context clearly shows the link between Nabih Berri and his sisterinlaw which is common knowledge in Lebanon and was intended to demonstrate that Berri works for his own interests and not for any specific ideals Another source mentioning Berris proximity to Samira Assi can be found here   Berris corruption is mentioned in scholarly books and these sources cannot by any standard be considered as either poor or unreliable Simply running Nabih Berri corruption through Google Books can show the extent to which his corruption is mentioned and recorded  Furthermore the article should include a criticism section as is the case in many other biographies of living persons   Lastly regarding the sockpuppet you have blocked him for a week and I believe that he should have been blocked for a longer period as one of his accounts had been blocked for edit warring and he immediately created another account to insert his edits and his demonstrated knowledge of Wikipedia rules prove that he was aware of his violations be it editwarring or sockpuppetry