I understand your taking a rain check Wikipedia is largely not fun for me anymore either I continue to edit here because I have become addicted Plain and simple I have become addicted to making sure certain articles okayand to wanting to know they are okay Im not too addicted to improving articles anymore though I still do that too but my main concerns at Wikipedia these days are vandalism deceptive edits which falls under vandalism messiness and inaccuracy which may or may not fall under vandalism Your take on the the Heterosexualization article an article I dont remember being involved in until now would be beneficial and relevant I believe This is not a long draggedout dogfight and I have made it clear to the editor that I am not going to sit there and debate his Westernerobjections for hours on end My complaint is not a matter of debate I feel My complaint is his habit of not playing by Wikipedias guidelinesrules I advised him to do that I am not interested in getting into a debate with him because he believes what he believes and it affects everything he does in regards to editing LGBT topics at Wikipedia You say WP is an encyclopedia the task here is to present not our personal feelings and views but what reliable expert sources have said Im saying this editor most often doesnt go by that   I asked others to weigh in because otherwisenothing is going to get resolved As I stated on your talk page I posted a message about it at Wikipedia talkWikiProject LGBT studies which you may have seen already but I hardly get any help from there or from other WikiProjects these days So part of my approach these days is to go to relevant editors individually and hope they weigh in Im not sure what is going on with people not helping out at Wikipedia anymore and ignoring requests for opinions to resolve disputesand or how to make improvements but it is extremely annoying and is making me want to quit Wikipedia even more I dont understand this Leave them to it attitude that has been going around lately I mean I understand it in cases such as yours but it seems almost everyone here is doing it now being lazy or otherwise disinterested when editors genuinely need help to resolve issues at an article It often takes more than two editors to resolve disputes and sometimes content issues Whats the point of WikiProjects or WPDispute resolution if people generally arent willing to help weigh in I understand your objections to weighing in but part of me also wonders how a quick comment from you will hurt anything Unless you are not the type of editor who can comment and then leave it at that Im that typr of editor most times if someone replies in a challenging response I usually have to reply back