Verifiability   WikipediaVerifiability states that  The obligation to provide a reputable source is on editors wishing to include information not on those seeking to remove it  Until such time that this policy is met the section currently entitled Scientist should be removed for lack of verifiability coupled with reliance on weasel phrasing as the support for the entire section  This is further born out by the cite your sources section that states If the article has many unsourced statements that have been there a long time you may request sources on the talk page before removing them unless the article or information is about a living person in which case remove the unsourced information emphasis mine  This is mandatory policy  Please adhere to it until such time as editors can provide sources andor rewrite the section with appropriate sourcing  Thanks    The information that you are complaining about isnt about a person  Its about criticssupporters  You are wilfully misinterpreting policy  Please stop      That is an incorrect assessment  The unsourced information is about Sarfati  That it is attributed to anon criticssupporters and is unsourced is the reason that it is unverifiable  Can you provide sources for the assertions  If not it should be deleted according to the verifiability policy  Also I respectfully request that this discussion be about content rather than personal commentary directed at meie willfullyThank you    No you are wrong  What there could be libel       The anonymous assertions are unsourced and  the anonymous assertions are well anonymous  This alone puts it in the range between gossip and libel  Furthermore as there are no sources WikipediaVerifiability is violated Please tell me how you believe I am wrong  With all the text on this talk page no one has supplied even one source that verifies the anonymous assertion cite your sources If you doubt the accuracy or origin of an unsourced statement that has been in an article for a long time delete it or move it to the talk page    Can you improve the section including sources and lack of anonymous weasel phrases rather than reverting it back to this original disputed form     Verifiability   WikipediaVerifiability states that  The obligation to provide a reputable source is on editors wishing to include information not on those seeking to remove it  Until such time that this policy is met the section currently entitled Scientist should be removed for lack of verifiability coupled with reliance on weasel phrasing as the support for the entire section  This is further born out by the cite your sources section that states If the article has many unsourced statements that have been there a long time you may request sources on the talk page before removing them unless the article or information is about a living person in which case remove the unsourced information emphasis mine  This is mandatory policy  Please adhere to it until such time as editors can provide sources andor rewrite the section with appropriate sourcing  Thanks    The information that you are complaining about isnt about a person  Its about criticssupporters  You are wilfully misinterpreting policy  Please stop      That is an incorrect assessment  The unsourced information is about Sarfati  That it is attributed to anon criticssupporters and is unsourced is the reason that it is unverifiable  Can you provide sources for the assertions  If not it should be deleted according to the verifiability policy  Also I respectfully request that this discussion be about content rather than personal commentary directed at meie willfullyThank you    No you are wrong  What there could be libel       The anonymous assertions are unsourced and  the anonymous assertions are well anonymous  This alone puts it in