Erm Put of this section are almost always considered to be the ancient Libyans The reason is that there were two significant ancient Libyan tribes according to Egyptian records one was named the Libu from whom Libya takes its modern name and the other was named the Pitu from whom it took its ancient name  the Egyptians appear to have used Phut to refer to the area  If Codex considers Tubal v Jubal to be the tip then I would like to know why he is reverting which Codex once did as the sole purpose of one of Codex edits are to is when I was the originator of the phrase are is correct UK usage and we are meant to keep authors choice How Codex finds this is more significant than Tubal v Jubal I would like to know There are several other issues that I have to question how they are more significant To me it appears as if Codex has chosen the one which appears least supported and is intending to justify the whole reversion based on that mere issue which I find somewhat of a false premise   In particular I should like to know why Codex is apparantly unable to see that I am not misrepresenting the creationist view especially since he appears to be the one that added identical equalities eg Meschech  Massechusetts native tribe MagogMagyar GomerGermany to the Japheth article on two seperate occasions Massechusetts there being represented more generally by Algonquians and Magyar by the English name of their nation  Hungary  I would also like to know why Codex refers to my entries as shoddy when he is unable to see any connection between Cush and Nubia the connection is that Kush nation and Nubia are the same geographic location quite a large obvious connection And likewise why I use Sudan rather than East Africa essentially because Kush nation was situated in north Sudan not Eritrea or Somalia for example  Rather than cherry picking the easiest area to contest and attempting to imply the others are equally invalid without any argument each issue should be addressed In particular in order to avoid reverting the entire thing the simplest issues such as for example how UK usage authors choice for certain types of collective nouns works should be addressed first  User talkFDuffy