Family controversy section Moved this recent  comment down from  Rape Allegations thread     This section regarding this allegation previously had its own mealymouthed not to say misleading heading Family controversy It has now been moved into the biography section which is perhaps a sensible place for it But why should it not have its own frank subheading Whether true or not the controversy not just a family one is clearly an important part of his biography and was splashed all over the national newspapers but it is also a discrete topic in itself     Taivo you deleted my assertion that this allegation gained widespread publicity together with the quote from The Washington Post about the shocked LDS reaction on the grounds that this was sensationalistic and not really necessary On the contrary it is the very notoriety of these allegations that makes it inevitable for them to be included in the article And the publicity and LDS reaction is an integral part of that story given that he was an LDS scholar Surely it therefore is really necessary The allegation made by his daughter may be sensationalist whether true or not but my edit doesnt make it any more so So I hope you will agree to rerevert Or do you have any other suggestion