delusion zone   why is the article allowed to survive in this state it apparently gets a POV pass by badly impersonating sardonic writing most of the article is overt advocacy of a point of view case making beginning with an unsourced ethereal claim that there is no evidence for cow tipping as described aside from mostly unreliable eyewitness reports what is a mostly unreliable eyewitness report what about the part that is reliable weasel words  i dont think cows can be tipped either but this is hardly an article that meets wikipedia policyguidelinesstandards for clarity neutrality or good writing the second paragraph for example is badly written pretendintellectual humorobabble for the sole purpose of setting up the inclusion of the cutesy unnecessary phrase precarious ruminants the refrigerator example is strained nowhere mentioning center of gravity rather it encourages a lower center of gravity than an honest attempt to simulate a cow would have while making sure to reduce the lever thats just the start i would hackslash my way through the thing but i can tell from the history that its the pet of some watching worshipers  i hope nobody involved in creatingpreserving this article ever marks anything at wikipedia as POV original research or unencyclopedic wikipedia is not the farm team for the wannabe dave barry squad and yes that includes the useless pic caption the prime criterion of a wikipedia article element is not how funny you think it is