Looking at s immensely helpful and insightful comment particularly the Godwins Law article I can see the downside of mentioning Nazi even to illustrate a point even when it is not intended as any kind of PA Looking into their and some other peoples comments I can also see the benefits of trying to avoid hyperbole and will strive to do so on my own But I see that you know Sitush personally and have a close involvement with himher It seems that you are here only to help Sitush turn these articles into hisher personal fiefdom As such I cannot rely on you to interpret further hurtful hyperbole in a neutral balanced fashion and cannot give that undertaking to you I see that this article sphere is being adminned by a small group of mostly involved admins That is not how articles spheres are supposed to be adminned I see this as a failure of Wikipedia adminning process This article sphere is infamous for various problems and I think rather that eds the problem is due to the failure of adminning process whereby articles are supposed to be adminned by uninvolved admins rather than a small group of involved admins If some admin is taking continuous interest in one particular area of articles they must be having some kind of involvementinterest in the content in that area That is not respectable adminning and will clearly lead to problems as indeed it is here It creates a situation where eds from only one particular orientation will have paramount power on article content and the eds on the other side will get butchered I do not think this article sphere has any problems that do not exist in other article spheres Other admins are being kept away by the continuous propaganda that this sphere is problematic and a small band of involved admins continues to occupy their turf Thanks and everything