Thank you for the apology  obviously I was offended and I lost my cool I apologize for calling you liar slamming your beliefs and to all whove read this  It wont happen again   I have legitimate policy related concerns about that entry as a whole While my concerns are legitimate Ive failed repeatedly at communicating my intent In the future I will use appropriate procedures to rectify them if they cant be worked out Thank you again for being the bigger person Hopefully we can work together to keep our exchanges constructive and find common ground    To be clear about my beliefs please realize that there is third side to this conspiracy coin  I am on the third side of the coin  It is the side of this argument who can look at the facts sources evidence and context and see that both the claims of chemtrail theorists and those of the countertheorist are dubious None of this can be done if the terminology is not precisely defined  My personal opinion is and I have a degree in this field is that we have the paranoiddelusional theorists arguing with the regulardelusional countertheorists    Let us step back and neutrally state the facts  If you are on one of the other sides of the coin we need to talk about POV The topic of my research CBW is difficult to approach without those one the other sides of this coin accusing my of being on the opposing side  I am afraid to state the known historical facts because but each side believes my idea is the POV of the other To keep the entry neutral the nuts point of view needs to be defined dissected and dismissed however I am concerned that both sides are nuts Please consider this when reading my posts reviewing my edits or reverting  I am no chemtrail theorist and am highly offended by such accusations I support neither claim    Let us differentiate the has happened from what is happening This topic cannot be approached with out it Thank you for letting me set the record strait