This is the chance youve been waiting for   to do a peer review of the problem of Apollonius   Wont you be so kind  Im sure youll set a good example for other mathematicians       It will be a pleasure Ive been watching with great interest the lively activity on the page With Barth Eppstein Ozob Melchoir and Reb involved not to mention your good self the article is blessed with expert editors and will surely go far I guess that means Id better be a really really tough reviewer      I dont mind you being tough but please be fast  I have to leave town this weekend to help with my sisters wedding Ill be gone for a few weeks so the FAC will have to wait until then  Thanks muchly for all your help you know how much I appreciate everything about you      Youre welcome Sorry I didnt manage to get it done before you left I tried to complete it yesterday morning but RL called before I had time to write up all my comments Hope you have had a nice break    Thank you  I havent left yet Im still packing and all that  I had to order a duplicate bridesmaid dress due to what I hope is a manufacturers defect P  No rest for the wicked  Your comments are very good and of course you caught my egregious editorializing about how difficult it is to solve the poA by eye having so many degrees of freedom compared to angle bisection  Your other comments also opened my eyes to the corners Id cut inadvertently in writing the article and how much work I have left to do  Oh well      Egregious editorializing is part of your charm   indeed I sometimes wish we could do more of that especially on articles like this More seriously if you can source the degrees of freedom issue three vs one I suppose then this is a point worth making Anyway hopefully it will not be you alone dashing round those corners Ill at least try to help the helpers Those that can do oh dear  I hope the dress turns out well  and that you have some cute shoes to go with it  Have fun    Another request for a more flexible transclusion tool Hello GG as I a while ago someone is requesting a tool to tranclude different sections on different pages Id like to read your comments     I replied there this is easy to do     PR problems   Hi G guy I am not sure how they did it but Rio Grande Glaze Ware has no talk page but has a peer review at WikipediaPeer reviewRio Grande Glaze Warearchive Also WikipediaPeer reviewThe ColbertOBrienStewart feudarchive is listed at  as just The Colbert assume this is a slash problem      Fixed The latter was a problem with the CF templates In the former case I guess they followed the link in the preview and forgot to save the talk page   Thanks so much  I am never quite sure when it is a simple fix like the first case or something more complex liek the CF templates       PR suggestion   Ruhrfisch suggested i ask you about getting this tool thrown onto the peer review pages automagically It sure helps me check linksetc at FAC       Updating the WikiProject Systems with fields    Thanks for your adjustments of the TemplateSys rating I created the  categories and it seems to work I guess it will take a view days before the template updates the categorisation of all articles       My implementation isnt particularly robust In particular it requires that the fields are capitalized correctly To make it more robust a separate template is needed to process variants on the field name See  for an example of such a template    I think it is a good start and a simple solution I guess I can remove most of the other categories and pages I created while I was copying the WikiProject Math structure   Now I am still very happy I started working with fields especially because the fields of systems and systems science is so different I has given me a better understanding of the separate fields I have some ideas to improve the situation But at the moment the variants on the field name doesnt seems to be a problem because I assessed all articles so far and I check all new assessments     Excellent news and good luck with your work    Hi I still have two questions  the categorisation of NA class articles doesnt seem to work see for example here  All nonbiographical articles  are listed under the T see for example CategorySystems articles in Control theory  Could you take a look at these thinks Thanks        TemplateGATable   Well it looks wonderful Which is why parents should never be permitted to pass judgement on the appearance of their children  Quick particulars  I think the SVG question rune is the better default icon than SVG neutral Truly the editor does not know if an article is good or bad regarding a particular criterion at T Neutral means that the editor is initially indifferent Not quite the right initial frame of mind If the editor remains ambivalent regarding a particular criterion then he or she can let the default SVG question rune remain  I surmise that you synchronize this template with the current state of WPWIAGA so that it expands to the current criteria whatever they may be that makes me an adopter I do think the use case remains problematical typing into a table can be prone to error I tend to type my comments up in a text editor my interaction with the edit box is a brief paste then preview If Ive          pasted into the wrong part of the table making a mess of the markup then theres no great pain over cancelling the session and then pasting into a newly summoned edit box Of course no one is being forced to use this box editors can take it or leave it and for those of us who really like the sidebyside presentation of criterion and critique the extra editing care is of no terrible concern I may have other comments But Ciao Bella  the corgi who runs my life wishes to have her walk now Ive been summoned      Ive switched to question runes for all but the overall assessment lack of knowledge about whether the article meets the criteria  open minded about the outcome I realised the point about editing tables which is why I provided a template for each row to hide most of the table code     Housekeeping Reminder   Hi G guy since the end  beginning of the month is on us I have made the new semiautomated PR archive for July and did the rest of the year while I was at it   I have mentioned this before but with the bot doing most archiving I would be fine if the translcuded PR pages no longer had links to edit the article or edit the article talk page I know this would save space and perhaps would allow the check links tool to be added per Ealdgyths request above   Take care       Re  VeblenBot   I use the page to keep track of new FACs Id just like for the page to be working as it was a few days ago again I dont think the page needs any improvements It was perfect as it was at least to me      I wish it would go away