Asides Sorry no you are not understanding the last point Your first version is essentially my POV controversial information should be removed from the article first  but your second does not make more sense And Im still confused about the block And the use of warnings and accusations and my involvement with Ron Paul articles will not be resolved right now But these are not the threshold question the fundamental difficulty in communicating itself I am willing to engage in civil good faith discussions towards the goal of working in a collegial and cooperative manner with other editors But to define our communicative relationship sufficiently mentorship or otherwise we must negotiate What do you need to hear in exchange for your committing to keep our conversation open and consensusseeking in accord with WPAGF That means we would not close it unless we reach consensus or one of use cites a specific policy quotation demonstrating the right to assume bad faith Thank you