Ill read BLP for you Avoid repeating gossip Ask yourself whether the source is reliable whether the material is being presented as true and whether even if true it is relevant to an encyclopedia article about the subject When lessthanreliable publications print material they suspect is untrue they often include weasel phrases and attributions to anonymous sources Look out for these If the source doesnt believe its own story why should we  The original report of the allegation cites anonymous sources who were afraid to lose their scholarship Hell look at the title of the article itself  I wonder if ncaafootballfanhousecom passes the test for being a reliable source  I appreciate that Ive gotten under your skin enough for you to wikistalk me over to this article but know when to quit  Seriously