March  UTC Hyperbole aside I didnt readd any of your removed links to the usergenerated forums nor did I remove your removed thinktank external links I also left most of your undue tags I only removed the overarching one  The article is in need of all viewpoints but if you want to categorically exclude the most cited advocates for one side of the argument Kleck and Lott theres never a chance of this article being balanced You need to articulate your objectsions to those sections more specifically or better yet because I find their language quite mild by many of our contentiousarticles add to the sections on other research