Wrong it is absolutely not undue when we are talking about the more concise  sentence broadest overview in a few sentences where UNDUE is very difficult to apply The rest of the article sure The controversy is not strictly over misogyny and harassment as no one proGG is talking and discussing those factors in any major sense irregardless of what the press says that side says it is about ethics and so to flat out ignore that in a broad overview while putting the opinions of the press that it is all about misogyny and harassment is a complete and utter violation of NPOV Yes the predominance of the opinion from the press condemning the movement is important thats why explaining that part out more in the lead provided the proper treatment of the sides per UNDUE But we will not be taking the opiniated stance that the press has to write the parts of this article in WPs voice  Well identify their opinion and thatll be predominate in this article as it will never have balanced but Wikipedia cannot condemn Gamergate in its own voice if we are to stay true to NPOV We have to treat the GG side as one side of a debate one that we cannot give balanced coverage to but without blaming them for anything Any other attempt to change that stance violates NPOV