Vic arious Liability   An employer is vicariously liable for negligent acts or omissions by his employee in the course of employment whether or not such act or omission was specifically authorised by the employer To avoid vicarious liability an employer must demonstrate either that the employee was not negligent in that the employee was reasonably careful or that the employee was acting in his own right rather than on the employers business  It can also be understood this way When one person is liable for the negligent actions of another person even though the first person was not directly responsible for the injury For instance a parent can be vicariously liable for the harmful acts of a child and an employer can be vicariously liable for the acts of a worker  This I find very interesting thinking of whether a demarcation exist When can one say that the Employer is exonerated from the employees acts especially if the employee used the resources provided by the Employer Tools Vehicles Landed Property etc  I require additional research to give more detailsIf however anybody has anything to add please assist