GA review  see WPWIAGA for criteria  Is it reasonably well written A Prose quality   B MoS compliance  Is it factually accurate and verifiable A References to sources   B Citation of reliable sources where necessary   C No original research  Is it broad in its coverage A Major aspects   B Focused  Is it neutral Fair representation without bias  Is it stable  No edit wars etc  Does it contain images to illustrate the topic A Images are copyright tagged and nonfree images have fair use rationales   B Images are provided where possible and appropriate with suitable captions  Overall  Pass or Fail   Yup looks fine for GA now