Weve been through all this before  The fact that other articles treat their subject in a particular way is not a reason for changing this one which is in accordance with Wikipedia policies  Any alleged shortcomings of the Ayurveda article should be taken up at TalkAyurveda   The claim that the article almost just covers the scientific validity is something of an exaggeration  The sections on Medical and scientific analysis do not make up  rd of the sections they make up  subsections of text out of  and at a rough count and excluding the lead comprise around  words out of a total of over  and are preceded by the sections describing homoeopathy  The allegation that the article is a result of some sort of plot by Allopathy is not a valid criticism of the article and fails to assume good faith  And the answer to your question is that the article is about both  You may consider the issue of whether or not it actually works to be unimportant but I put it to you that most rational people would consider this to be the most important thing about any system of medicine