vague emptiness   The article is vague and does not say anything meaningful From an Abrahmis perspective it is possible to say how Judaism differes from Christianity and within Christianity Protestant from Catholic with specific doctrinal examples eg transubstantiantion and what thet means WHY can someone who is familiar with this subject not do the same for these schools At present all you can see are arguements about if Pali or Sanskrit is the correct etymology BUT nothing about what are the differences in a supposedyl heretical group or school or label The word some is used very vague how many of what degree and what kind of differences   How can anyone spend so much time writing this ENCYCLOPEDIC article without the slighetest idea of how buddhism may vary between adherants rather than arhants beggars belief