only explaining what NARTH claims no it provides a soft endorsement Wikipedia is for the benefit of readers not for the progaganda interests of orgs  The claim that all SSA treated by the org is unwanted is a WPREDFLAG claim   See MOSQUOTE  it is always wrong to use phrases like The site is considered sacred by the religions scriptures because it interpolates an opinion  also WPATTRIBUTEPOV    no reason the lead shouldnt explain what NARTHs claims are  WPFRINGE and WPREDFLAG applies  if they are wrong they need analysis in the body not presentation as soft endorsement in the lead