Well I could list here examples throughout history where problems of mutual understanding regarding the language even among natives of an same language has been used to selectively ignore fair doubts claims appeals complaints etc But to not make this answer too big  and mainly considering once more your answer as good faith and not as an attempt of tergiversation   and before ask you why do you discern a serious distinction between what Im pointing and what in general in  publications whether paper or electronic that claim to be neutral usually leads historians journalists editors and commentators to at least be warned by not follow certain guidelines of editorial standards involving accuracy andor impartiality  or ask you specific questions about double standard ie an editor makes me baseless accusations in a certain tone I respond to him in the same mode but specifically to those charges and only me is who become warned and blocked  I ask you what in this section are not clear to you