Look the thing is and Im not being arrogent here I have been dabbling in GAs lately and have looked at a bunch of others which I havent touched It doesnt have to be perfect cause I know its not just good And I know the  things needed the other bunch of stuff with the lead is redundent as a bunch of GA and Ive seen one on FAC not having links in lead However if you look at the review Im not familiar with whitewash or Madienin a sporting context for both as I know the historical context to whitewash sorry but we may differ here on views but this is not Wikipedia for the specials Also I am an accedmic undergrade so I know all about dumbing down to a point but linking basic terms for a non english speaker thats a bit too far especially since this is and encyclopeia for English speakers If your reading it and review it then a comprensable level of English would be presumed by even the most unassuming English native Personally I do not want to stick with what he has said and rather have a clean break and have a restarted review by someone with a capable level of English