I reject calling people reliable sources for legal matters when they have no legal background I also reject the flagrant and widespread misquoting and misuse of WPRS by both yourself and many administrators For example primary sources arent always bad and can be used in many instances  and yet many make blanket statements on how they cant be used at least when they dont like the content For example why isnt Baracks dual citizenship as a child mentioned in the Barack Obama article It is definitely notable but the biased editors who patrol that article would never allow it in the main article  a million excuses would be thrown out and the editor attacked in order to keep it out As for why am I here  that question is above my paygrade However Im on wikipedia because I hate to see bias and imbalance  and I see a lot of it on wikipedia As for an incident report yes Im sure you could file it and Im sure one of the liberal admins would agree with you based on the evidence their own bias but we both know I havent really done anything wrong