Archive page     Table   Hi how are you On the table I created at Boeing  I intentionaly left the first  years before deliveries at zero to give a clear picture of when the fisrt plane was delivered to a customer Had I started with  it might make it seem like some deliveries might have been missed But I started with  and  at zero to show a marked begining of s in service If you dont mind I like to put it back to Zero    Im good  Sure change that back  That makes sense  It looked like maybe the deliveries started  years behind schedule    Went ahead and changed the  number back to      ER   thanks   People always make this range mistake Another guy asked me why a F has more fuel than ER yet has  km less range It took a while for him to get it  Sure  If you can improve the wording there more please do so        How is it going On Boeing  there are  different aircrafts in the specs I believe we should remove all of them Have a nice  table specification chart on the    and thats it We can even bring the way cross section of the  right next to this spec chart I believe articles need to be stand alone and comparing it to everything diminishes this Why not add Ilyushin il here too then Or many other aircaft The  article is very very poorly done Its not an encyclopedic entry Its simply a collection of newsbits It has become a forum to bash the A or even the A As soon as a story comes out somebody writes a paragraph there I have been doing some updates and I want to know if you agree about making the article more about the  and less about other planes    Hey going OK here  I can see both sides on the comparison chart   planes one smaller and one larger for comparson is enough  Itd be OK to remove non planes since other airliner articles dont have them  The fact this is a new plane helps causes lower quality in the article I think  People spend more time just adding info than cleaning it up and all  Ill keep an eye on it and do what I can  Take it easy Bangabalunga       Speed   You are correct It was  and  on Boeing last week I dont know when they changed it I know that wind tunnel testing has not gone well and the  will have more drag than  but I guess in order to have bragging rights against the A they must be faster I am sure airlines will still cruise at  though in the Intercontinental just to be efficient Take care    No problem  The  has had a cruise speed of Mach  for some time  Dont think theres not that much a difference there  Good catch on the upper deck  windows thing  I was confused before     Hughes Helicopters Some user slapped a notability tag on the Hughes Helicopters article I removed it to get his attention as some people dont read the talk pages and posted comments on the talk page also I dont know what his problem with the page is but it might be that its unsourced He just put the unreferenced tag up today so its not like noone wont know thats a problem Can you take a look and see what you think Thanks     Sure  Will do     Inlet geometry On FA Hornet you added the F as having variable inlet geometry I always understood that it was fixed on the F and I can have several printed sources on that Has that been changed on later Fs     I only reverted a change where the F replaced the F in this sentence The engine air intake of the Hornet is notable among its contemporaries for being fixed unlike the F F and F which have variable geometry or variable ramp engine air intakes  The F is from an earlier era  Please correct that if needed  Thanks    OK I didnt check the earlier history I just wanted to ask first to find out why it there in case you had a reason and now I know Ill take it out THanks  Use