UNBLOCK  the question of integrity is not an issue for moderators  Regardless of the WPTRUTH that you seem to think you hold Wikipedia works on a WPCONSENSUS b reliable sources and c a collegial editing environment Your edits clearly show youre harassing an editor that you disagree with You will not be permitted to continue that way Please also note stop typing in ALL CAPS  its considered to be shouting and that doesnt go over well on the internet talk BWilkins track   Regardless of the WPTRUTH that you seem to think you hold   No those rules are from WIKIPEDIA not me What i dont see is you addressing the blatent biased opinion synthesis on an article which is viewed by others  Please tell me does wikipedia allow ADMINS to hold a biased one sided opinion When SIKH HISTORY admin have openly declared adherence to a strict orthodox viewpoint you as MOD should really be enforcing wikipedias own rules on your own admin You unblocking me is secondry to the blatent disregard for wikipedia rules on diet in sikhism So its NOT MY truth that i hold its wikikpedia rules that i hold which YOU disregard Now you have barred me because you deem me argument on integrity an attack on ADMIN when i have repeated over and over again its an ISSUE of an article which is purely one sided Now does wikipedia allow blatant disregard of rules from their own ADMIN    From the same scholar same book same ISBN NUMBER one rejected and one accepted the accepted statement fits in with the ADMINS own orthodox stance which he has openly declared on his Wikipedia page   QUOTE FROM ARTICLE  Gobind Singh Mansukhani states how vegetarianism and meateating has been left to the individual Sikh QUOTE FROM DELETED PASSAGE scholars hold a view that Sikhism has an ambivalent view on diet yet some accept that there are   passages against meat eating REF for both  and  Gobind Singh Mansukhani Introduction to Sikhism Delhi Hemkunt Press ISBN  There are passages against meat in the Adi Granth Both references from the SAME scholar yet one is accepted which is favor of an ambivalent view towards diet while another assessment from the same scholar admitting their are passages against meat eating is not accepted Why the Double standards    Why does the ADMIN on sikhhistory blatantly support their own ideological stance to the point of synthesis and selectively using texts and passages from authors who they cite and then reject the same authors when going against their position   How can you adressing harassment yet make no attempt on addressing the issue of BIAS in your articles Do you only protect the Orthodox Sunni islamic view and the unorthodox shia viewIF that is not the case then please can you tell me why sikhhistory ADMIN have taken the biased stance of only abiding by an orthodox POV  I dont think these questions im asking is harassment but if my objection is avoided time and again and the same allegations being made towards the same ADMIN for being one sided you again have AVOIDED the issue at hand which is a biased article protected by ADMIN to support their own beleifs i think that is a greater offense than my trying to get some sense from the ADMIN in question lol