As far as Im concerned the ANI incident changes nothing as it was not verified to be him to a reasonable degree necessary to take any action  To consider anything that was said or done from that ANI and use that as a basis for any change from yesterday would be inconsistent with our ideals  Im willing to consider any evidence that there has been breach of the terms of the RFCU but I will not accept a standard of verification that is different than what I would want the community to use on me if I were accused of the same offense  As admins and editors we are duty bound to respect the outcome of the RFCU the consensus of the community until reasonable and reliable evidence is presented that a breach of the terms has occurred  This principle is larger than any issue with YRC as it speaks to and defines our character       Join WER