Inaccuracies in Modern day legacy France   Hello to whomever may be watching this page Although I have introduced myself elsewhere on Wikipedia primarily on the SNCF page this is my first message here My name is Jerry Ray and I am a consultant to SNCF the French railway company in Washington DC Last year I began reaching out to editors to help address inaccuracies related to the Holocaust in the SNCF article Now I would like to bring editors attention to similar issues within this article   As editors here will no doubt agree this is a difficult subject but one in which it is highly important to get the facts right My aim here is to provide a revised version of the current Modern day legacy section This new version with which I have had some assistance in researching and writing represents an improvement in several ways First it presents a clearer overview of what was at stake in the Liepitz case Second it describes the US controversy more accurately which was not limited to California Third it better describes how SNCF handled it and other viewpoints in the case some of which is retained from the current entry Lastly there is a short final paragraph describing actions taken by SNCF in the modern era relating to this episode   Here is what I suggest  Collapse France  In  a lawsuit was filed against French governmentowned rail company SNCF by Georges Lipietz a Holocaust survivor who was transported by SNCF to the Drancy internment camp in  Lipietz was held at the internment camp for several months before the camp was liberated After Lipietzs death the lawsuit was pursued by his family and in  an administrative court in Toulouse ruled in favor of the Lipietz family SNCF was ordered to pay  Euros in restitution SNCF appealed the ruling at an administrative appeals court in Bordeaux where in March  the original ruling was overturned According to historian Michael Marrus the court in Bordeaux declared the railway company had acted under the authority of the Vichy government and the German occupation and as such could not be held independently liable  Following the Lipietz trial SNCFs involvement in World War II became the subject of attention in the United States when SNCF explored bids on rail projects in Florida and California and SNCFs partlyowned subsidiary Keolis Rail Services America bid on projects in Virginia and Maryland While bidding on these rail contracts SNCF was criticized for not formally acknowledging and apologizing for its involvement in World War II In  SNCF chairman Guillaume Pepy released a formal statement of regrets for the companys actions during World War IIcite news titleSNCF French Railro