Edits to Arbcomm  I find your edits to my arbcom case to be laughable Your gripes over content isnt worth anything in an arbcom case Now if you would suggest I broke some rule while editing that might be relevantThe pdf document I cited does in fact commend CAIR Whether that commendation is a wise one or not is not for me to support or deny  And yes editing to include original research without providing supporting reasons can reasonable be called vandalism