Thats a personal attack You indulge it because you know you can get away with it You get it away with it because indeed you edit Wikipedia  I suggest its only because I put you on the spot that you respond now Youre entitled to your view that Im infantile and attention seeking but not to propagate it in this way If you want infantile I suggest you look at  from an editor here who runs his his Talk page as some sort of an art club compare that with the  scholarly notes the uploader took the time to provide at Commons As for attentionseeking it is precisely because I seek to avoid attention that I do not operate a Wikipedia account I contribute regularly to Wikipedia on a UK BT internet IP  that is a shared dynamic address which is regularly changed by them and every time I repower my system so my edit history which would identify me immediately is concealed And in truth there are no shortage of infantile and attentionseeking editors at Wikipedia in any case   Of course that sentence should be removed from the lead As for conspiracy theories this is StraussKahns BLP and the plausible theory that he was set up for the event that now defines him in the eyes of the world for a while anyway believed by a majority of French citizens should be mentioned in it   Its clear to me that the management of this page is not fit for purpose I shall apply for its protection to be removed As is is so often the case the cure is plainly worse than the disease You might care to atone for you gratuitous attack by telling me who the administrator is who protected the page in the first place I need to apply to them as a first step