You can remove immediately anything thats clear POV but you have to take into consideration that other people might not agree with your assessment It is only civilized to give time for people to find and add references depends on the nature of the claim though As for partial democratic I would say that for example letting opposing parities to run for election as opposed to none but making it unfair by keeping the massmedia in your control could be considered partial democratic or calling miners to take care of the opposition political influnce in the act of justice and examples can continue I dont think even the FSN members would claim that the democracy in Romania was perfect at the moment when they finished their mandate Its like saying that somebody started to say halftruths after they lied continously its a partial truth but is not truth therefore we cant say they started to tell the truth  same in this case not everything they did was democratic I would have a bad feeling to leave it to they implemented democratic reforms because that would really be a halftruth The best thing would be to detail what kind of reforms they implemented and where they failed democracy but the space is too limitated for such detail thats why partial democratic has to do it for now before it was seemingly democratic which was more POVish in my opinion