regarding BrahmaKund   Dear Vejvanick   The advertisement notices on the top of article Brahma Kund are worth consideration as in our humble suggestion the notice is inappropriate Originally the Sihor page when originally created by someone was containing missing reference to Brahma Kund and authentic information on Brahma Kund was required  We other than myself  user Shivnag are a smallserious team working towards assessment exploration and verifyingvalidating the source material for various itemsreferences which falls under history faith beliefs archaeology and architecture for eg to talk about Sihor We ourselves are seriously concerned over authenticity of any content and the immediate article on Brahma Kund is a result of rigorous efforts invested during a reasonable span of time  This monument is somehow already under lookafter of official regional departmentauthorities and it carries a significance for the architecture and archaeology However creation of page was somehow an automated action while clicking on missing link of the same on Sihor page and we believed what we did was proper whereas we are simultaneously learning the wiki etiquette and guidelines and we in no manner or intention interested in violating the same We still realized if the Brahma Kund article could have been a stub under a relevant category but the advertisement notice is worth consideration  Please treat this request as a humble thoughtreply to latest outcome at wikipedia for the subjected page and kindly do the needful or may you please guide us if we are still missing something important to learn and follow  Thanking you in advance and kind regards