Any chance of a return to Good Article status   TalkHarleyDavidsonGA  When this review was done the reasons for stripping this article of its Good Article status were as follows Prose quality Too many orphan sentences and single sentence paragraphs MoS compliance Introduction is too short see WPLEAD for more info Introduction should be a summary of the entire article and generally should not contain information which is not contained within the body One of the images contains a watermark for a website  Citation of reliable sources where necessary Large areas of uncited information Orphan sentences only complicate the issue of finding what comes from which source Article is littered with tags and rough edits  No original research Uncited information may contain original research  Since that time the introduction has been expanded the offending watermark has been cropped out of the image which had been donated under the appropriate licence by the site in question and citations have been added though maybe not enough  The peer reviewer tool came up with the following concerns Consider adding more links to the article per WikipediaManual of Style links and WikipediaBuild the web create links to relevant articles Per WikipediaWhat is a featured article Images should have concise captions Per WikipediaManual of Style numbers there should be a nonbreaking space    between a number and the unit of measurement For example instead of  cubic inch use  cubic inch which when you are editing the page should look like  cubic inch Per WikipediaManual of Style headings headings generally do not start with articles the an For example if there was a section called The Biography it should be changed to Biography Per WikipediaManual of Style headings headings generally should not repeat the title of the article For example if the article was Ferdinand Magellan instead of using the heading Magellans journey use Journey Per WikipediaManual of Style headings avoid using special characters ex  in headings Per WPWIAFA this articles table of contents ToC may be too long  consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WikipediaSummary style The script has spotted the following contractions Didnt if these are outside of quotations they should be expanded A search of the article found the use of didnt in a quote of a reference  We should also keep an eye on WPSIZERULE which indicates that we should probably split this article  Granted the  kB size is a gross figure and the readable prose would be somewhat less but splitting off and summarizing the History and Engines sections might be advisable    The Model Designations section could also use some work  OK folks are we up to it