More and more mysterious although I am very grateful for the irenic tone of s comments  I am not in breach of any wikipolicies  My extensive comments exclusively address by reference to textual evidence I might add the validity of an edit by  namely the inappropriate and unjustifiable addition perhaps lovers which I now delete  On the contrary I consider  is in breach of WPPOV since heshe is clearly pressing hisher own esoteric reading of the text   Spence does not support the view that Baoyu and Qin Zhong were perhaps lovers thus the edit is unsupported by anything except what I must call s whimsy