I appreciate your reasoned explanation of the edits Lucericr but it is still troubling that Chzz chose to enforce Wikipedias policies for personal rather than objective reasons and please no more inane references to WPAGF or the like it is perfectly obvious why Chzz felt motivated to decimate my contributions to the SoftD page It is becoming abundantly clear that this web sites objectivity is compromised by a small group of privileged admins some of whom manipulate policy and selectively enforce standards to their own personal tastes So much for the encyclopedia that anyone can edit If you really want to claim that your policies are enforced fairly then I challenge one of you to edit the Softimage XSI page in the same way Chzz edited the SoftD page The XSI page not written by me contains similar unreferenced descriptive passages and laundrylists of features yet Chzz remarkably felt no need to correct its flaws Either way I dont have time to get involved in protracted arguments with teenagers every time I contribute to this site As a thirdyear law student I have better things to do than convince Wikipedia to bestow upon me dubious the honor of retaining the information that I provide to it free of charge