RfC Incompatibility between the standard scientific notation for paragroups and links     Standard scientific notation for paragroups is to use an asterisk after the name for the haplotype The very conciseness which makes this a very useful standard reduces its usefulness as a link Therefore currently there is no standard for both noting a paragroup and usefully linking to the paragroup article which explains this distinction without saying Haplotype paragroup which in my limited understanding seems to be either a tautology or an oxymoron I told you it was limited I fear my option may be marginally acceptable and I was hoping someone with a better knowledge of the subject might either endorse them or have a better idea Current status  The current status If you missed that I cant say I am surprised it is a link shown as  after the colon and before the word The on this line Paragroups are marked with an asterisk which is pipelinked to the redirect page  haplogroup creating about  or so double redirects Option  paragroup My favorite Might be better to use the abbreviation para instead to save space Option your idea here Including haplotype paragroup if that works