Well one could be conservative and say that it is misleading but if it is misleading it is inherently false my logic being that if it is only halftrue it is essentially not true ie false  We cannot make such general statements about anarchocapitalism in this case we must clarify what Rothbard means when he says he has the right to own the product that he has made    Socialists believe unconditionally in the individuals right to possess what he or she produced   Anarchocapitalists on the other hand believe in the individuals right to possess what he or she produced not merely obtained such as through trade if the product was made using previously unowned natural resources  And to address your point Vision Thing trade does not necessarily imply a contractual division of labour for trade is possible in economic systems such as mutualism which do not recognize a division of labour  Even if your statement were true Vision Thing we shouldnt be confusing or misleading readers with vague implications and paradoxes