I think theres a chance but we should avoid the appearance of arguing with reviewers perhaps we should refer specifically to the FAQ when submitting the article  We should also first do an unofficial review and make some changes here first to take account of likely issues      Unofficial review kickoff  Here are a few potential issues that I noticed change ensuring to intended to ensure since the former implies success which would probably be construed as POV There are a number of faulty links deadlinks access denied redirects etc  area of freedom security and justice should probably be in inverted commas or italics otherwise it sounds like meaningless PR Do the images in the Geography section particularly the coast of Crete really illustrate the text There are flags such as citationneeded and who Words like micromanage are POV Im not sure if most people would understand the Legal section For instance would a reader understand the specialist meaning of regulation in an EU context eg that a socalled Council regulation is equivalent to a law  The even in may even invalidate EU legislation sounds a little surprised  of course fundamental rights take precedence over normal legislation   Improve references to include more books to supplement or replace many of the europaeu sources europaeu is OK for many things like legislation official statements policy and statistics but should be checked  Im not sure if the text In negotiations on the Treaty of Lisbon French President Nicolas Sarkozy succeeded in removing the words free and undistorted competition from the treaties However the requirement is maintained in an annex and it is unclear whether this will have any practical effect on EU policy  is OK ie supported by the reference and the treaties