Well thank you for at least stepping up and citing some kind of reasoning for what I consider unreasonable actions on the part of others Bob Rayner  No original research  Are you kidding me  Years of research was reported both failures and successes that was also physically verified experimentally by over  others worldwide and is cited on my original and now archived and now unalterable by me openorgdavidc website on both archivegoherecom and archiveorg in Europe  The past updates on that archive collection details those years of experimental research including the works of others on the subject around the world beginning with the first physical verifications by James Hurl of Australia and follows the story through to the last update before I gave up for a while out of exasperation due to unrelenting stupidity and prejudice dont confuse our religiously scientific dogma by citing facts  The theory of operation I believe is clearly stated and the flat earth prejudice against the subject is apparent in the overall tone and presentation of the balance of the definition of InertialPropulsion  A lone dissenting voice challenging the current dogma is how ALL of science progresses past the ignorance of yesteryears  To disallow original research is to attempt to hold ALL of science to a stable state and ignores the dynamic nature of the search for greater truths than we currently understand  Science is NOT a BIBLE and DOGMA is anathema to the entire process of research