Parts of my own Talk Page deleted by editors who think they know better  Dear impartial but not disinteresed reader Coren and I have been having an entertaining and enjoyable discussion on the finer points of soapboxing  She is of the firm resolute belief that this version of my own talk page amounts to soapboxing and has deleted it  I recognize that there may be elements of soapboxing in the investment predictions for  section at the bottom of the page but have given her the opportunity to amend rather than delete the whole section  She has declined the opportunity to amend leaving me in the difficult position of having to type this with a knife pressed eversogently against my back with Coren carefully looking over my shoulder at the screen to check whether anything is in her Godlike view soaplike  Not the most pleasant position to be in I can assure you  To use another example picked completely at random Lets say theres been a nasty and vicious and ugly and persistent edit war over say fractional reserve banking and a number of editors want a messy but more informative version like this one kept in  Then lets say I post this earlier version on my talk page for readers to compare with the now inmyhumbleview slaughtered version  Is that soapboxing  To use another example closer to home  Lets say a guy like Zenwhat says to his coconspirators What can we do to have OUR version of debtbased monetary systemfractional reserve banking prevail like he clearly said here under the desperate heading Heeeeelp    And then he also bizarrely asks Gregalton help him delete references to Misesorg like he did here saying to Gregalton Also in case youre interested one of the easiest ways to find economics articles that have been vandalized is to do a search for links to Misesorg  As if a reference to the great Ludwig von Mises amounted to VANDALISM Can you BELIEVE IT  I have to hold a pencil between my teeth just to keep control of myself and keep typing this  The guy is clearly a vicious tiny weeny little troll    He also says to his coconspirator the following on the same page   I looked at the fractional reserve banking article recently and saw how it was so horribly vandalized It made me realize that were going around in circles We improve the articles to the point that they look great Then they get screwed up again So I had an idea Would you be interested in helping me write an essay on Monetary Crankery It could help people who ARENT educatedThe idea is for it to be straightforward with references but polemic and satirical of monetary crankery  Clearly this guy is obsessed with deleting or satirizing any positions on monetary theory that dont agree with his  The guy is mad  If the guy had napalm or nukes hed use them without hesitation     Then for good measure he goes back to debtbased monetary system to do more editing    Zenwhat is clearly a piece of work  Check out the dudes talk page  In addition to his obsessive interest in deleting anything associated with Misesorg his main interests appear to be something called cannabis culture and the Buddhist connection with marijuana  So I gather from this that his main interests are monetary theory and dope smoking  What a combo  Seeing this I ponder my options  I decide to post a note here ON MY OWN TALK PAGE asking readers to compare older better versions of some important articles on monetary theory with the current versions  For good measure I offer my predictions on the financial markets for  as a gift to the eight people persistent enough to read my humble little talk page    It immediately gets deleted by allseeing allknowing Coren as soapboxing  Is this strict compliance with WP guidelines or a WPstyle Fascist Dictatorship where people like Coren delete at will but dont bother to make CONSTRUCTIVE suggestions as to how what I have written CAN come within the guidelines      This is like watching evolution in reverse  I carefully construct a page with the help of others  It gets vandalized by those WITH A CLEAR AND OBVIOUS objective to delete or satirize all references to Ludwig von Mises or the Austrian School who knows what motivates these sickos  Instead of engaging in pointless edit wars with idiots I ask the impartial reader to compare the various versions on my talk page  I then get told off for soapboxing  I then ask what SPECIFIC words amount to soapboxing  I get no response  I feel vulnerable like someone has a knife in my back waiting to pounce  I feel like laughing and telling them to go buy CDOs backed by credit card debt or a billion in US Treasury notes the best insult I can muster given that both amount to a fate worse than death  They then go ahead and put the knife in  What am I to do dear reader