March  UTC  It improves the article because it shows that Keith has FRAUDULENTLY presented himself as something OTHER than what he is  It goes right to his character Asking how it improves the article is like asking how including revelations that Clifford Irving made up the Hughes bio improves that article  The real takeway User Blaxthos will do ANYTHING to help cover for liberals And he is a prolific editor at Wikpiedia Ultimately this inclusion will stay because its both newsworthy and speaks to  Olbermanns dishonestly   But this attempt at liberal damage control is FAR more incriminating of Wikipedia in general and user Blaxthos in specific