httpwwwpublicationsparliamentukpacmcmhansrdcmdebtexthtm   Hansard not a reliable secondary source   Over on the David Kelly talk page it says Hansard isnt a reliable Wikipedian source I am quite frankly puzzled by the reasons given eg An editor removed the Hansard quotes as the MP was confused and his the MPs opinions dont count even if he the MP is Father of the House  A clear case of opinionating if there ever were one  httpenwikipediaorgwikiTalkDavidKellyweaponsexpert