In response to your note on my Talk page GD the source is the Philadelphia Inquirer an eminently reliable source Describes this whistleblowers testimony as scathing though at times vague No apparent verdict one way or the other on her credibility other than scathing though at times vague Its worth putting into the article since others are angling for a way to get ACORNs self serving spin doctoring into the article one way or another and they werent under oath