New Section entitled Origins and Development of the Term  I see that yesterday someone with username Strongarm added a section to this article entitled Origins and Development of the Term  I agree that there is a bit of a deficiency in the article as to the origins of the term one which I had previously attempted to rectify by writing an article on the FundamentalistModernist Controversy within the Presbyterian Church USA  I welcome Strongarms comments as extending my article both temporally and to other denominations    That said a couple concerns    there are obvious NPOV problems with this new section   It somewhat seems to me that this material would be much more aptly placed in the article Fundamentalist Christianity and referenced in the Fundamentalism article by link   I would argue that the relationship of the Five Fundamentals and the series of articles entitled The Fundamentals is more accurately presented in my article since the Five Fundamentals after all were published in  whereas The Fundamentals were published serially between  and   I therefore would object to characterizing the Five Fundamentals as a narrowing of fundamentalism as expounded in The Fundamentals since chronologically the Five Fundamentals came first     As for Strongarms comment on the Five Fundamentals Another version put the Deity of Christ in place of the Virgin Birth  I would note that the Five Fundamentals as a position within the PCUSA were always constant  Other denominations Baptist I think ultimately expounded other versions of the Five Fundamentals  Im a historian of Presbyterianism so Im not as familiar with these other versions of the Five Fundamentals and Id appreciate someone who knows about this topic writing about it but I think that should be done in a way that doesnt conflate the Presbyterian Five Fundamentals with other versions of the Five Fundamentals