is a matter of people editing your contributions Otherwise why would you editwar in order to include content that violates the rules more particularly about OR and that happens to be written by you  A lot of OR has already been removed many times from many articles by many editors including me However you created conflicts only when your contributions were concerned because you just cannot accept the idea that your holy edits wouldnt stay on WP  Im not reverting any change made by anyone I am removing content that has nothing to do on Wikipedia such as unsourced opinions and original research Each time Im removing something it is always perfectly justified according to the WP policies and guidelines However each time you start an edit war youre just unable to find anything to substanciate it other than personal attacks By the way contributing to an article in any way either by actually writing quality content ie content that meet the requirements from various policies or by removing the content that doesnt correspond to the WP standards is work So yes I have worked on Eva articles  So you are the hothead who throws childish trantrums each time someone dares to touch your Holy Writings and who yell at me instead of trying to discuss with civility and to actually try to justify your edits  Concerning your nonesense about authority as Dandy Sephy reminded you consensus isnt require to write things and things being changed is what wikipedia is about  Moreover there is no need of consensus to remove obvious policy violations either such as original research unsourced opinions etc That is everything I have removed from your contribs  On the contrary as it is stated in WPV Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed I know very well what the next part of the sentence recommands but it only highlights the fact that there is no need of discussion only that the editor wanting to reinclude the content has the duty to find a source and not endlessly argue that editors should be allowed to write unsourced OR There is also the Jimmy Wales quote I can NOT emphasize this enough There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative I heard it somewhere pseudo information is to be tagged with a needs a cite tag Wrong It should be removed aggressively unless it can be sourced So if youre not ready to accept that anyone can remove your edits you should not contribute What youre saying is indeed utter nonesense Nowhere in WP is it stated that I would need your approval before removing your contribs whether Id just be wanting to replace them with something entirely different or theyd be blatant policy violations and indeed Wikipedia is not going to tolerate policy violations just so that some contributors could maintain their grasps on articles and their pride When I remove content it is always according to the most basic rules of WP so theres no discussing it It is not authority it is applying the rules of WP and I cant see why they wouldnt apply to you By the way youre reproaching me a socalled authority but it doesnt seem to bother you to reinsert your content back into the article without any discussion of without any justification concerning the various policies and guidelines You should not give lessons about authority in these circumstances In conclusion your multiple and failed attempts at article ownership have only slowed down improvements as your silly argument is doing now Youd better either start showing you can write the actual quality content that youre boasting about or stop whining    So everything youre saying is utter nonesense  It