said it a year ago and Ill repeat it this article is embarrassing  This is Wikipedia not Everything readers shouldnt be bombarded with a debate they most likely have no interest in  Check out the Sodium page  its nasty stuff and we eat it every day yet theres no sodium controversy  A bad example  Of course just like this page is a bad example of a Wikipedia page  Since the controversy aspect now takes up the majority of the page yet is peripheral to the subject I am forced to disagree with s strategy of merging the Water fluoridation controversy page back in to this one  A section consisting of a paragraph or two summarizing the debate and linking to the other article is by far the more professional way of structuring this page   years down the line when the requisite research has finally been done and the controversy is settled one side or other is going to look somewhat foolish  Being more of a centrist I dont really mind so much but we can all work towards decreasing the embarrassment by following sound Wiki practice and not throwing cream pies around where innocent bystanders might be hit  Comments on this position are welcome