Obviously people will read a book longer than kb Im not talking about book readership Im talking about encyclopaedia readership  You shouldnt be writing something here thats attempting to compete with book readership  We could argue the demographics inconclusively all day but I am still quite certain that there are really not many people out there who want to read kb of encyclopaedia article about a porn star   of the web being porn doesnt actually mean there are lots of people out there crying out for a lengthy pseudoencyclopaedic article on their favourite porn star  You seem to be saying that you have to write a long article for it to become an FA  This is not the case  The shortest are considerably under kb  Wouldnt you trade this massive article with star for five smaller ones with star  Each of which being more likely to actually be read and appreciated