Look at the rd paragraph beginning with The general media response  According to the cited source  of reviews are negative yet a significant minority  are positive  However no credence is given to this significant minority  Instead of quotes or a hyperlink to a positive review wiki readers are presented with patronizing links to the wiki articles for religious right conservative and creationist  This appears to violate WikipediaNeutralpointofview by giving no weight instead of due weight to the leading minority viewpoint  I previously brought this up in the NPOV discussion about this article but no other editors had any comments  Due to the controversial nature of this article I did not make the change to the article  I believe the NPOV discussion for this article was archived