Apollo  and N is always refuted In a conventional calculation of the fuel balance assuming an effective exhaust velocity of  m  s a fuel shortcoming of over  t for the Apollo mission would Its commitment to an effective exhaust velocity calculations of  m  s ve never been reached in  and currently can not be achieved it would fuel a deficit of over  t come Because For the confluence with the lunar orbit the CSM would be decelerated with trailed LM of  km  s lunar escape velocity on the Moons orbital speed of  km  s These would be a fuel quantity of  high       t  t have been necessary for the moon landing a propellant mass of  would highly      t   t The start of the moon would have  high       t  t required and made the escape from the gravitational pull of the moon would have  high      t   t rocket fuel requires for the confluence with the Earths orbit would be  high      t   t of fuel have been necessary sum up thus resulting  t Now there stood only about  tons of rocket fuel to available  t CSM and LM  t Thus Apollo  and N were refuted forever