I do not believe that I was edit warring given that I was reverting edits which appeared to be bad faith The other editor has already left a personal attack on my talk page and is continuing to make claims which are contrary to the source and refuses to cite or explain I would consider this either repeated insertion of unsourced material or deliberately introducing factual errors both considered vandalism or disruptive editing and are to be reverted on sight and constitute exceptions to RR when being reverted I have stopped reverting given that the editor above has expressed concern and I had asked for reconsideration of the warning I was issued but I do not believe that the other editor is behaving appropriately and I had issued an AIV report Thank you