Addendum documentation for ArbCom reverted from AN by Future Perfect at Sunrise twice    hours later the admin reverted their message Now we can consider the matter of what happened  Aftermath note  I created this topic when I was concerned there might be an serious emergency situation but did not have sufficient knowledge of the editors history especially recent onwiki conversations to judge how serious the matter was  but I had just observed behavior which was sufficiently out of the norm to not simply dismiss the replacementmessage on their user page       Aftermath note a I  may be incorrect but I do not believe Equazcion had sufficient knowledge of the history of the administrator to simply dismiss the matter Unfortunately there may be more to discuss about the interaction above but let us first clarify if I am correct or incorrect with regard to Equazcions knowledge of the administrator history especially recent communicationsinteractions      Aftermath note b In the interaction above Equazcion has characterized my interaction with the administrator on User talk Jimbo Wales prior to the administrators user page replacement message Before we discuss this further perhaps Equazcion may wish to reconsider the characterizations      I will immediately notify Equazcion of the notes a and b above so they may comment      Questions for administrators regarding the user talk message The big question of course do we need to follow up regarding this  Clearly an administrator replacing their user page and especially leaving it that way for  hours with that is an inappropriate reaction to any situation  Note that the administrators edits just prior to their user page replacement were  User talk Jimbo Wales Revision as of Rodhullandemu Bloqued WHY reply and fuck you  User talk Jimbo Wales Revision as of Rodhullandemu Bloqued WHY Im gone  User talk Jimbo Wales Revision as of Rodhullandemu Bloqued WHY goodbye Now what is all that the reaction to Hint A mock and a hear hear  Revision as of Proofreader Bloqued WHY edit conflict Retort to Rodhullandemu  who clearly has too many stars on their veteran editors medal  Note Python logic chip activated for Valentines day drama  Revision as of Proofreader Bloqued WHY edit conflict Hear hear to Rodhullandemus star reply to that onestarred nitwit Proofreader  although by a technicality only  are allowed  Executive summary light version That dastardly Proofreader mocked an administrator to virtual death with one silly message and a followup Hear Hear  should any administrator who can be mocked to virtual death so easily retain the bit       Executive summary heavy version  Inappropriate behavior for an administrator fuck you    A quick survey of the administrators editing history perhaps suggests insufficient interaction with editors to react well to unexpected responses Perhaps too much focus on RC  Note even in RC I see the following revert and user talk comment instead of template  Reversion Current revision as of Rodhullandemu m Reverted edits by Lucyrg talk to last version by Rodhullandemu  Comment on reverted user talk cur prev Rodhullandemu talk  contribs  bytes cmy Clearly we can all get frustrated with vandals but responding to a fans enthusiasm especially on Valentines day with  get a life is not something we should do when reverting it   more  Signing for all the above