Bingo its an encyclopedia Chemerinskys argument for example was considered by the Court and rejected This is not an opinion piece its an encyclopedia entry on a specific court case In this case the Courts decision is the Courts decision vis a vis this particular consideration Apparently not only are you not an attorney youre having some problems sorting out why an entry on one court case shouldnt be balanced in terms of argument The reason why is that a decision was rendered Reargue it somewhere else This Court is the final arbiter of this Courts decision on this case If it is reheard by the full Court or the Supreme Court youll get another bite at the apple You and SaltyBoatr among others apparently wish it were otherwise Not only am I not some chickensht anonymous pundit you can reach me at martyebleyahoocom Get a law degree or quite mucking the entry up You can make a new entry on Second Amendment Controversy if youre that excited