Your comment and judgements were obviously made BEFORE I had a chance to complete my response  The evidence your provide above shows that you left your length outside view not even half way through my response which means that you could only have actually seen only a tiny fraction of my side of the story before you began typing your socalled outside view  And may I ask you again Were you or were you not previously acquainted with Aeon or any of the UC Riverside article editors prior to leaving your supposedly outside view  or perhaps after egregiously violating WPNPA and WPAGF above along with being proven that you left a partisan outside view in an RFC you dont believe that dialoguecan be productive anymore how convenient