Hmmm let me mark this as dubious for the moment Its possible that Noahs timeline is mixed up Lott may not have used the phrase himself until  but he inspired the term in  which does predate the Harvard study and you are right  they dont seem to quote anyone using the exact phraseology that Ive seen so far At the same time they dont address the matter with is an odd oversight but this may have been simple bias on their part Ill keep poking around and see if I can get through to Slates corrections department via email and will follow up soon