The information you added was actually quite against the NPOV both by the way it was worded and by the rejection of a balanced point of view  In order for NPOV to be properly addressed there must be the claim followed by the answer else it goes against fairness and becomes a tirade  The NPOV issues were all resolved  If you want to assist in the editing then do it kindly and with fairness  You may have issues with Russell but there are those who believe those issues can be addressed