Informal GA Review   Of course this doesnt actually constitute an actual GA review however I thought Id browse through and bring up the following suggestions to hopefully get the article up to a standard where I would pass it had I not been reviewing it for GA ie had I not been involved in the creation of the article  The main issue here is a lack of sources  if possible dont just use the actual episodes as sources Have a look on news websites etc for synopses and reviews of the episodes they give the reader something to actually refer to   Well written   Prose  Very choppy  would benefit well from a copyedit to increase the flow and readability of the Challenges sections   Manual of Style  Nothing too major  its easy to sort this out once the article is closer to being nominated There is information in the lead which isnt found elsewhere in the article  this also can be sorted out later down the line   Consistency  There are a few key issues here  Selective team reshuffles included  either include all of them or none Id question their inclusion  Task outlines need to give a clear indication of what consitutes a win  eg The team that makes the most profit wins  Minor point but is it Tim or Timothy    Factual accuracy  All claims need to be backed up with sources  especially those with dubious authenticity otherwise remove the claims  Sir Alan said that he chose Tim as the winner because of his likeness to his East End self  Sir Alan Sugar later admitted that Miriam probably didnt deserve to be fired at this point  In reality Paul Torrisi was fired before James Max  She is not allowed to apply for subsequent series of The Apprentice   Coverage   Lacking a Reception section outlining how the series was received in the press and any viewing ratings   Perhaps include a Production section  if there are any reliable sources to get the info from  References to the American version of The Apprentice  are they really relevant here   Neutrality  Quite a few highly biased terms in here just to pick a couple   Sairas aggressive behaviour   James because Sir Alan and the interviewers were not convinced of his dedication to work for Sir Alan although he had the best CV of the four    Stability  All fine here the series aired three years ago so this isnt an issue   Images  No problems the one image in the article has a valid Fair Use Rationale