Hello everyone interested in Richard Rohr and his bio on Wikipedia  I just came across this article from the point of knowing Richard quite well and having translated his talks and works into my language I do believe that the article has most of the facts right but fails to convey the core of his effortsteaching Especially the Richards Responses to Common Accusations by His Detractors seems rather counterproductive in putting accent on confrontational topics  which is the exact opposite of what Richard does  I would like to propose a change here and discuss this with everyone interested before attempting any edits here  Regards  Tomas Svoboda SvobodaT