Multiple problems   There are virtually no citations in this midlength article to verifiable sources I am not saying anything in its inaccurate but specific related facts need to be cited to a verifiable source and the text certainly shouldnt be expanded without citing any added text  In this regard the opinions of the Supreme Court should constitute excellent sources to the extent they reflect specific facts  Without wanting to step on the ongoing editing of others I have added an example in the article adding a note to source the date of the incident and placed the citation in Blue Book form   The tone of the article at places is not encyclopedic  Wikipedia should not take an editorial stance even on a matter condemned by  of the world  See WPMORALIZE   I have removed the full text of the two US Supreme Court opinions from the notes see WPNOTREPOSITORY  I replaced the full text about  characters with links to the texts of the opinions at wwwfindlawcom and conformed the legal citations to Blue Book form  The article seems to be getting some editorial attention so with these obersevations I am going to let the willing keep at it for now