fringe   Alun wrote    far too much and far too pov  if POV means not NPOV i challenge you to identify text which isnt presented neutrally ie not favoring a side but neutrally stating other peoples opinions then lets improve that text   fringe theories shoud not have so much space  per NPOV All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view representing significant views fairly proportionately and without bias  a view that is mentioned in almost every discussion of the topic should be described fairly and in proportion to the attention it receives   the addition was entirely promoting a singe point of view  a view that was not previously missing from the article   provide arguments against as well or its povpushing  the  Environmental impacts section does just that but if there are specific points that should be added or changed i encourage further targeted development demanding perfection in every edit seems inappropriate