Comments on the block  It is a complaint and I have the rightly described the nature of edits being done by these two editorsBlocking me gives a wrong signal to them and probably will encourage such concerted POV pushing  I have already mentioned somewhere that the organisations supported by these editors have been mentioned as having fascist tendencies by world mediaThey cant deny that  Some examples against whites from User Bose There is no shortage of hinduhaters among white scholars or their pinko moonbat lackeys in India Surely some hinduhater like Wendy Doniger Deepa Mehta or Arundhati Roy has a copy of the film on their website Find it Then put it up   The world outside the US is irrelevant  Read the para Human Rights Watch has been criticized as a fraud in See how the edits endThe world outside the US is less relevant   My mention of them as US government lawyer and not Wikipedias was their attitude in the articleNo comment below is racist in characterThis is a false charge and the user who has made that should be blockedSecondly they insist on pushing some comments from Daniel Pipes who is widely known for his ProJewish POV leanings  The complete thread of that discussion is mentioned below   Refrain from inserting original research that is irrelevant to the Babri Mosque article Plus the section on Pipes you inserted is tantamount to a character assassination of wellrespected and US government appointed political scholar Daniel Pipes Further perpetration of such a deed is grounds for reportingNetaji   Reporting as legalTerryJHo  Is Wikipedia a US government property and you their lawyer I have taken cue from you In fact I have been everyone as AntiHinduTerryJHo    In this comment I have not named anyone as Hindu Taliban such inference is just an imaginationI have only given a general example