There are a few flood models Hydroplate Catastrophic plate tectonics CPT Asteroid impacts  note These flood models assume that the Genesis Flood is a fact  The Hydroplate model has popular general public interest but few adherents among creationary scientists  Rains come from water ejected from below crust  Flooding is also by sinking of continents  CPT is promoted by some PhD creationary scientists problems with it are noted by other equally degreed creationists  Flooding is by tsunami from oceans rains are a side product  Asteroid impacts are credited in two models  Asteroid impacts wCPT and Asteroid impacts wvertical tectonics  There are critics of both among creationary scientists  Flooding is by tsunami from oceans rains are a side product  Discussions of these models are found in creationary publications which are of course automatically rejected as FRINGE so So all you get are anticreationists misrepresenting creationists and claiming this is what creationists say  No one cares what creationists actually say nor why Its all automatically pseudoscience because everyone knows that creationism is pseudoscience  It doesnt matter if they are misrepresented or not  Theyre FRINGE freaks anyway