The changes were already reverted They are being discussed now Only no one has yet come up with any actual problems with any of the edits I made other than the metaobjection that Wikipedias hardware did a poor job of representing the changes So I cant do anything to improve them or to come up with new solutions to issues Until an editor other than me decides that hes actually interested in working on the article rather than all this politicking Im  open to discussing the edits I layed out a few of my first edits above presented a sidebyside comparison of the changes explained my reasoning etc I fully accept that many of my changes were substandard though I consider them improvements over some of the terrible problems in the original version such as stubsections and opaque meaningless wording and that I may have been in error with some of my changes But if none of you have any interest in discussing or analyzing any of the proposed changes then the articles reached a dead end Additionally if mass edits to controversial articles were invariably disruptive then both me and Brian would have been banned from Wikipedia long ago Methinks youre overreacting a tiny bit My edits were only to a few sections and are really not that complicated Feel free to take the time to go over them and to comment on what changes you agree and disagree with