The key policy here is WPUNDUE It requires articles to not treat positions that are held by a distinct minority of experts in a field as being of equal weight with the opinions held by a majority of such experts For scientific topics the state of expert opinion is determined by publications in peer reviewed scientific journlals That prohibts treating the scientific claims of creationists as having equal weight as the responses made to them since those responses reflect the vast majority of scientific opinion Now it is required that minority views be summerized correctly and fairly and if their are language issues that can be addressed but the basic structure of the article which shows creationist claims being refuted by arguments upholding the reality of biological evolution is appropriate because it reflects the current scientific consensus That consensus comes from peer reviewed scientific jounals not talk page discussions