Lead image   A poorquality blackandwhtie photo of a thcentury miniature doe what for this article exactly If we had no other options and the article were long I could abide it since a long article without an image is intimidating and looks boring to most readers This however is a short article barely improved upon since the last major addition of text to the body in  almost ten years ago The only major addition since then is the infobox The current lead image is here for the first time since the one I replaced back in May is no longer in the article at all although it was much better artistically and was colourful The image I changed it to which has now been relegated to halfsize at the bottom of the infobox was of his own signature showing clearly how the count presented himself in his own official acts It is contemporary and interesting The current image is boring and centuries too late to be a likeness of RBIII no relation to RGIII that we know of So what is it illustrating Nothing Its purpose was mainly to spruce up a family tree Its decorative but thats not the main usual purpose of images at Wikipedia We have no image that can claim to show what he looked like or what nearcontemporaries thought he looked like or should have looked like But weve got a signature from an era when folks like RBIII were generally illiterate Ive changed the image back but being in the spirit of the season Ive left the infobox