Regarding HeartBreaker The Original Tribute to Pat Benatar please forgive me for not fully understanding what makes this listed for deletion Perhaps its just a guiedlines issue But what speciffically makes any of the other tribute bands listed on the tribute act page any more notable than HeartBreaker to allow those pages inclusion Is it the formatting Unfortunately I am new to the Wikipedia environment regarding editing and possibly need some direction on this I came across the tribute acts pages and noticed The Iron Maidens which is a local group with not as long a tenure in the tribute community as HeartBreaker although definately notable and they are incuded But beyond The Iron Maidens are bands whos accomplishments pale in comparison to HeartBreaker HeartBreaker IS a notable respected and an acknowledged band of the tribute community as well as being one of the first of local tribute acts to appear in the LA area when the tribute phenomenon began during the late s particularily with a female lead singer That in itself makes HeartBreaker a pioneer to the community What other information or details do you suggest including other that what is listed in the biography which is certainly not insignificant in order to make this page more or as notable than or as any of the other other listed tribute bands by Wikipedia standards and to gain inclusion Please advise I have perused some of the other acts pages linked to the tribute acts page and see only a few with significant notability most have even fewer accomplishments and notariety than HeartBreaker some Ive never even heard of and certainly arent known to our local tribute community which definately expands beyond just the LA area HeartBreaker has been written about and featured in reliable sources and is known for its tenure quality and respected within our tribute community particularily since we are one of the longest running tributes AND are acknowledged BY the artist to whom we pay tribute Pat Benatar and members of her bands We are the only band of any kind listed in her official web pages and have been joined by significant original members of her band This in itself lends support to the tribute act pages The histoy of the tribute act pages specifically points to acts who are joined to play with the artists to whom they tribute and further goes on the list bands on the page Why is it not acceptable to list HeartBreaker and a biography of information to support the tribute act pages We may not have as much notariety as The Iron Maidens but we certainly are not insignificant and definately are more notable that some of the listed bands HeartBreaker was featured in a televised documentary about tribute bands on a major network and has been written about and listed is major publications How can any of this not be notable when this is in regard to tribute bands Please explain Thank you