Anybody with a web blog can post anything even if it may be false So help me find sufficient third party proof of what the direct web site diehardsportcom claims When I do a Google search for SIcom diehardsportcom I have trouble finding anything that has SIcom publishing something from diehardsportcom I likewise have problems doing a Google search of foxsportscom diehardsportcom  Furthermore your edit should be written in a neutral point of view especially with a controversial call like that In this particular case the author of the Diehard Sport article should be attributed directly in the text because he was one giving us that interpretation of the video which could be disputed by for example LA writers and fans