Thank you But administrators must also follow the policies Now Gwen changed or deleted too many of my editspure and simple I mean where does she get off saying the police surmised Peg died on Sept  Whats her source She have the police report I do The police surmised no such thing The death certificatenot my original researchsays Date of Suicide September  as does the police report Coroners Report and Inquest The date of death given as September   is because that was when she was DECLARED DEAD by the coroner If the coroner had not examined the body for another hour and eleven minutes Pegs death date would have been recorded as September  for he would have declared her dead at  AM yet the date of suicide would remain September  for the coroner knew the rate of decay That was the way it was done in s Los AngelesThe coroner knew what he was doingGwen didnt I have official documents provided to me by the City of Los Angeles yet Gwen would rather what Use a newspaper as a more verifiable source than these or just pick one section of the death certificate without reading the entire document Has she even read it All of it Why am I even having this discussion  As it stands now the article contains a good deal of ambiguity whereas before it had very little And once again I raise the concern that the article was argued over discussed and a concensus agreed to by numerous longtime editors such as Rossrs and Wildhartlivie and if I remember Pinkadelic At any rate the article stood on its legs for many months before Gwen brought the hatchet I care about Wikipedia too and I am concerned about unverifiable entries making their way into any article I fully remember when Wiki was the laughing stock of the Internet and scholarship in general Did you see how many pages Gwen used up in the View History and then had the nerve the gall to tell me she tweaked it She didnt tweak it she rewrote the damn thing And would it not have been a polite courtesy to first talk over all the edits This more than anything is why there are so many ill feelings between contributors on Wiki Too many are simply too head strong to think Wait a sec so and so has obviously done a lot of work here maybe I should talk some things over with him  to reach a concensus and make a better article Thats what a professional editor would dothats what my book editor does with meand isnt that what Britannica and all other encyclopedia editors do