Point one The anomalous status of Palestinian refugees and of UNRWA is a result of historical contingency not some imagined antisemitic double standard The original intention of UNRWA was to abate the immediate humanitarian situation then help Palestinians integrate into their new host countries Palestinian refugees generally refused integration as did host countries and donors which is why UNRWA eventually gave up on integrating them It is correct to call this a political decision rather than a strictly humanitarian one but the alternative  pressing for integration  would also be a political decision rather than a strictly humanitarian one so cries of UNRWAs politicization are fairly silly What this means for the article The anomalous situation of Palestinian refugees should be mentioned but not at every turn not in the second paragraph of the lede and not in a fashion which boosts the Israeli governments view of UNRWA over other views