The tank losses extremely biased  The Indian tank losses are exaggerated at atleast  tanks this means some Pakistani wants to believe that even more than  Indian tanks were destroyed And the Pakistani tanks losses are put at minimal  tanks The original source is US library which i dont consider as neutral at all considering the fact that US was a supporter of Pakistan The losses dont reflect the fact that Pakistan lost almost all major battles of Khem Karan PhilloraBurki and even at Chawinda according to pakistan general himself pakistan lost  tanksindia claim tanks on the other hand Pakistan exaggerate its claim to  tanksIndia accept only  tanks more importantly at Khem Karan and Phillora Indian army put on display some  tanks at khem karan and  tanks at phillora then how is it that pakistan losses are mere  and Indian losses Atleast  a complete lie   Spencer C Tucker one of the most renowned military historian puts pakistan losses at  tanksIndian claimed  tanks and Indian losses at  tanksPakistan claimed tanks   httpbooksgooglecoinbooksidNTmqiSiUCpgPAlpgPAdqpakistantanklossessourceblotsOUCZHbyUssigoILZncsKxRzDXKPkNFdGEPYhlensaXeirZsOUPWhENHirAfzuIDoBgvedCFUQAEwBzgKvonepageqpakistantanklossesffalse  All the Indian editors plz focus on this the neutral losses are represnted by US figures which i think are biased and further Spencer C Tucker is also one of the most renowned historian  even Stanley Wolpart and Jeremy Black made it clear that at the end of war Indian Army has Twice the number of tanksPakistan started with more tanks when war started  All the Indian editors must raise this issue as some pakistani editors think that by peddling lies they will win the  war