The early part of the article including much of the lead has to first discuss what the legislation is and what it does  Proponent or opponent viewpoints dont get introduced until the second paragraph of the lead and appear to be well balanced  We have certain restrictions on introduction size and it tries to summarize the articles content  Many of the sections first introduce the topic which is discussion of the legislation or the argumentdispute and then go into procon  The graph in Distribution of Tax burden is discussed in this section second sentence and the second to last sentence and further discussed in the subarticle  Yes  it does suggest that all tax levels in the graph would decrease due to the larger tax base and taxation of wealth  The source is also provided for those that want more details  This is a summary so we had to condense the information and try to present the major viewpoints  Reorganization is welcome so long as both views are presented  I dont disagree that the predicted effects section has much pro content  It is a summary of the subarticle which is primarily positive information  I think it shows neutrality that we split off much of the positive information into a subarticle  Advocates could charge that we created a POV fork  If there is something that is not represented there for criticism from a reputable source and sufficient weight please add it  Dont blame the article for POV if there is no significant criticism to present on these areas  Many of these points are accepted benefits by both proponents and critics  Seems some people want to see tons of criticism on every point because they dont like the plan  well it doesnt work that way  There are just some things that are positive for any particular tax reform  I responded to Brianyouman that regressive points were addressed in the article and was describing the points of argument  I did go outside the discussion of the article to point out some things that he was using for examples  Much of the debate is contrast from the current system to the FairTax  There are basic definitions of progressive and regressive but many frame them as regressive compared to what the current system or progressive compared to Anyway Perhaps were hitting on