Dear Yiyu  Dont work too much on the Mao article here  whatever you agree on will have no real strength behind it because you are not working with other editors and when you polish something together it will ultimately be destroyed by those that had no part in it  You also need to watch out for what wikipedia calls weasel terms that are used in the draft above   weasel terms are ways of saying thing that really avoid the issue  If an editor says some analysts believe it really means I dont know who believes it but I want it in this article  Unfortunately the current wiki has no way to decide truth and lies   The best you can do is present all sides not just one or two and cite evidence     For everything that is a lie you can add sentences describing why it is untrue  There have been some movements to give weight to editors that are educated in one area more than those that are just shooting their mouths off but they have failed  As we all know many times history has been distorted and many people have been fooled so dont be too sure that you know what really happened when all most of us really have are handmedown stories  Lastly be sure not to get too wrapped up in articles  Find other articles to edit and your experience will be much more fulfilling   Come to visit Mao often and put it on your watchlist but dont let it consume you or sour you on wikipedia   I can guarantee you that  years from now there will STILL be edit wars on the Mao page  Working through the night to make a perfect article wont stop someone from getting up in the morning and ruining your delicate balancing act  You probably have great insight into many things that are completely uncovered in Wiki  give those a try sometime  Hope this helps Gummy