Something these admins have clearly not read   Its clear from the reckless disregard shown towards Chooserr that the admins of wikipedia are failing to read the materials provided for their education  In this case the WikipediaControversialblocks page  The copy below has emphasis provided where the admins in this situation are failing   WikipediaControversial blocks From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia  While blocking IP addresses responsible for anonymous clearcut vandalism is routine many other uses of IP and username blocks are contentious Where consensus proves elusive such blocks are damaging to the community  The most controversial blocks are blocks of   suspected sock puppets or reincarnations of banned users  loggedin users with a substantial history of valid contributions regardless of the reasoning for the block  blocks made under the disruption provision of the blocking policy  blocks that while possibly wise lack policy basis  Once you are convinced that a block is warranted the recommended procedure for  controversial blocks is   Check the facts with care  Reread appropriate parts of WikipediaBlocking policy  If possible contact other administrators informally to be sure there are others who agree with your reasoning The administrators noticeboard IRC and email are effective tools for this  Place the block exercising due care in the wording of the reason  message and include a link to the user page of the user being blocked  Place a notice of the block on the talk page of the affected user with additional rationale outlining the facts and the part of the blocking policy you feel applies  Be willing to discuss the block with other Wikipedians Such discussion usually takes place either on the blocked users talk page or the administrators noticeboard the latter especially in those cases where it was already raised there  Block wars in which a user is repeatedly blocked and unblocked are extremely harmful They are a source of frustration and disappointment to many seasoned Wikipedians and tend to encourage further bad behavior on the part of the blocked user Avoid them Instead discuss the matter and try to reach a consensus  If no consensus has emerged after several respected Wikipedians have reviewed the matter the user should be left unblocked