st Please dont forget to sign before leave yr comment  nd No you saw pretty wrong  the nd quote of the version I propose is not present in the current version   rd Again One more time the present version has a serious flaw as I put above in the section Spurious Quotations by using a book citation in a spurious way doubly not only by stating a different thing from the original citation but mainly acting so leaving a implicit meaning totally different from the original quote To refresh your memory  The original book citation states that in certain historical moment a military revolt sparked a cycle of instability while the present version using the st one in a partial way as reference to give a veneer of respectability states that the rise to power of the civilians a year later would have been responsible for the beginning of the overall instability Thus spurious quotation aside also a spurious correlation  So if to one a eliminate such spuriousness and b put the appropriate initial causes of the instability of this period with proper references is not an improvement Well it would become not just hard but impossible to believe in this ones good faith as well as it would be the confirmation of this ones selective double standard behavior   th Concerning to the civilians rising to power in the end of  it was implied in some of my previous versions  which also after more than a year were not improved neither discussed but disruptively reverted Anyway for now how about  The early Brazilian republican period was nothing more than a military dictatorship Following the bubble of encilhamento and the st naval revolt the country entered into a prolonged cycle of general instability marked by rebellions both civilian as military that even with the ascension to power of civilians at the end of  did not stop Little by little these rebellions undermined the regime in a such extent that by  in the wake of the murder of his running mate it was possible for the defeated opposition presidential candidate Getlio Vargas supported by most of the military to lead a revolt  Oooor The early Brazilian republican period was nothing more than a military dictatorship and pretty before the civilians rise to power in  following  severe crisis an economic and a military the country has entered into a prolonged cycle of general instability marked by rebellions both civilian as military Little by little these rebellions undermined the regime in a such extent that by  in the wake of the murder of his running mate it was possible for the defeated opposition presidential candidate Getlio Vargas supported by most of the military to lead a revolt   And Last but not Least concerning to changes of Brazils boundaries in the early th century it is already there in the version I propose in the foreign affairs rd paragraph that same one which yourself considered pretty solid  So any more doubts about this paragraph