To state that is not correct is contradicting sourced material  From the context it appears that youre trying to contradict me but I dont see how your comment advances that goal  That the Resolution did not explicitly assert either claim absolutely is sourced one need only look at the Resolution to see that  That critics have not found a claim which is clearly false is a negative claim do you seriously expect me to prove it  What else is there  That critics have claimed the war is based on lies  You arent seriously disputing that are you  So what exactly are you claiming is unsourced and incorrect  Nice how anything that doesnt fit with your radical leftism is a highly biased slant  As I have said the Resolution never claimed that there was a working relationship between SH and AQ  If you want to claim that the Resolution implied false statements fine  But anyone who claims that there is a single statement in the Resolution which is an outright lie is simply being dishonest  Now the Resolution cites Iraqs alleged weapons of mass destruction capability  It does not cite Iraqs alleged weapons of mass destruction  Therefore YOUR edit is inaccurate and unsourced  Since you have been informed of the error and yet you continue to make a claim that you know is false your editing is clearly vandalism and if you continue to remove the word capability I will seek administrative action  There is simply no room for disagreement on the Contents section  When discussing what a document says we should quote what it actually says rather than editing it for political convenience  In the Weapons of Mass Destruction and AlQaeda section you again are restoring unsourced statements  The cite for the claim that WMD and AQ were the main reasons is simply an article saying that there were  rationales  It doesnt actually say what any of those rationales are let alone make any determinations as to which arguments were principal  Its quite the pot calling the kettle black when you insist on including completely unsourced claims yet refuse to allow me to present any opposing views on the basis that its highly biased