Good work on the JSTOR cite unfortunately its largely useless to those without access to JSTOR can you quote Hadar from the actual article Without the relevant passagesentence included in the article readers missing the necessary access rights wont be able to apraise the source As you say the accuracy of cited statements falls on the sources that first published it and as long as wikipedia cites the sources we are fine Either way it would be nice to read what Hadar wrote  In terms of phrasing im not particularly intested in the editwars that have arisen so far but for what its worth the word militant is Weaselworded Miltant hand out leaflet protest rally campaign Paramilitaries organize under arms follow hierarchy of rank engage in assassinationexplosivesarmed insurrectionreaction Misleading the reader for the sake of not embarassing the subject shouldnt be an aim of an encyclopedia article On the word MurderTerroristIf JSTOR states his involvement explicitly and the word murdererterrorist is applicable to his activities then the word murdererterrorist should be used The word murderer was already removed from the article once Calling MrEmanuel a murderer based on the counterpunch article isnt possible The claims of his involvement in the assasination of Folke Bernadotte originate with Bollyns telephone interview article and without access to Bollyns recording of the conversation its uncitable reliably  On the phrase militant Israeli group A combination of wording which was removed from the article previously the Irgun a radical Zionist paramilitary organization appears to be an entirely accurate description which strikes a balance between terroristfreedom fighter polemics The IZL article itself uses the rather clunky phrase a clandestine militant Zionist group which overall seems particularly generous to those who perpetrated the King David Hotel bombing amongst other atrocities