Wikipedia is all about citing material from reliable published thirdparty sources and thats the state of the article today  You are welcome to cite reliable sources supporting what you say above but not to remove cited material  Where you say Cannot interject evidence favoring France you are correct I wrote An extradition hearing in which France would present evidence favoring extradition of Diab to France to face trial had been approved and scheduled to begin in January  to try to explain the process but the bolded portion of the sentence is not according to the cited source and I have removed it   I have again undone some of your unexplained changes such as delinking  Paris synagogue bombing  Again we dont use honorifics such as Dr in Wikipedia please see WPCREDENTIAL