Ive restored it  The image page had a perfectly good fair use justification which was hardly needed as you point out it is as clear a case of fair use as any  Steve did indicate that it seems to not be fair use without actually bothering to indicate why either here or in the edit summary  From his edit history it is hard to avoid the conclusion that he has an agenda  In any event as you point out this is a typical example of Chicks style  It certainly isnt causing Chick any financial damage to duplicate a single frame of a tract that is handed out by the thousands for free on the street  Including at least one excerpt of a Chick tract is absolutely necessary as we could write a hundred pages on what Chicks tracts are like and not convey what a simple quotation like this does