Any reason you really want Desmond Tutu in the list twice   First and near the end In general it pays to read the edit summaries and the talk pages and actually LOOK at what was changed before you blindly revert not to mention it doesnt show the assumption of good faith You may which to take it out so the article doesnt look foolish imagesmilepng     If you look at your first edit you added Tutu back after I placed him first on the list Secondly asking you to discuss it instead of blind reverting as you did is much more of an assumption of good faith than your edit summary calling me a troll which is completely uncalled for Thirdly I posted on the talk page BEFORE I made the change unlike yourself  For the record with regard to edit summary Please see Wikipedias no personal attacks policy Comment on content not on the contributor personal attacks damage the community and deter users Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing Thank you