No not from me and it seems to this observer like youre still feeling bitter at the suggestion that the great length of the article is a problem which you appeared to take as a personal criticism of your work as an editor The way youve presented exactly two comments above gives me the feeling that you are trying to present a onesided case namely that the tag was clearly inappropriate before and obviously should be removed now I try to AGF and Ive been watching you work hard on the page but it seems this attempt to gain consensus is really something of a badfaith attempt to sweep the size issue under the rug so you dont have to tear apart your article any more The article is still enormous and the removal of maps certain castles etc hasnt made the article better IMHO and its still hard to edit resize etc as discussed in some of the other comments you chose not to include here It takes me  seconds just to preview the page with no edits for example I think it still needs more work of some kind