I never proposed whitewash ie Peluchons draft I proposed cutback or stub as per WPATTACK which is close to a perfect fit BLP applies on a sliding scale to small corps and in this case it was decided that the CEO is a nonnotable redirect so anything that reflects badly on the principals should be treated similarly to BLP to some degree Only good sourced balanced data should appear I think the rest of your question should probably be referred to my talk also As near as I can tell all talk onwiki about five figures is rumormongering and fails V insofar as it applies to project space It just occurred to me maybe Mr Laurent doesnt have the money but he can certainly string out a cheap publicity stunt without it Anyway there are many explanations and no hard facts Deferring to a longer answer later I think WPDUCK applies Tell me am I editing constructively or not by asking that the articles subject be rightly legally identified according to authoritative sources I will be happy to add more other constructive edits to my edit history but I dont know how that would help much Sure we can talk court cases after we know what corporations the court case is about Will anyone agree with me that the clause that CFTC corrected last month can now be corrected by us this month Cmon thats easy