Given your username  and the content of your user page I do not consider you an unbiased person on this issue and I wish that you had left it to another neutral administrator to act on this matter especially so that other editors of that page whom I assume requested your intervention share your allegiance and were in persistent violation of wikipedia policies that content must be based on verifiable sources WikipediaNeutral point of view WikipediaNo original research Wikipedia Cite sources WikipediaVerifiability and WikipediaReliable sources and have failed to abide by those wikipedia policies despite my repeated requests in the talk pages hence justifying my description of their demonstrable deliberate false content as lies and my characterisation of their conduct as lying My socalled personal attacks on them simply characterised their conduct and does not meet wikipedias Blocking policys definition of Personal attacks which place users in danger provision that should be rarely used as a justification for blocking as for excessive reverts the blocking policy clearly states that In the cases where multiple parties violate the rule sysops should treat all sides equally have you done so I see that you havent as one of them has just now branded content that was painstakingly cited on a pointbypoint basis to verifiable and reliable sources a hoax httpenwikipediaorgwikiHistoryofIndianandArabicnumerals I will be reporting this to multiple neutral wikipedia administrators and WikiENl mailing list and asking for a review of the situation