You are right that I havent read the judgement  That is because I have a fulltime job which does not involve the law and Wikipedia is a hobby for me ie I dont care to make the time for it   But thats the point articles like this would be helpful for a layman if they summarize the most important issues of the case up front which is what I suggested in the first place  As it is the length and bearing of the article are discouraging for someone who is not a lawyer or law student I think Wikipedia policy is pretty clear in discouraging this approach  Unfortunately for me I dont presently have the time to read the case text and write a decent summary of it which is something that would be better done by a scholar of the work anyway  I can only urge you to do so and hope that you or another legalminded Wikipedian will come to agree  Best of luck and keep up the good work