Further on Amdo   Hi I appreciate your additions to the History section in Amdo However regarding the latest addition According to Tibetan Government in Exile Chogyal Phagpa the head of the Sakyapa school of Tibetan Buddhism became the religious instructor of Kublai Khan In exchange Chogyal Phagpa received the support of Kublai Khan and assumed political power over the three provinces or cholkas of Tibethttpwwwtibetcomstatuskingshtml The Three Dharma Kings of Tibet This intereaction called priestpatron in tibetan chyn relation was the first in history of Tibet and was also developped under afterward circonstancesTibetan sovereignty debate I wanted to query two things  First the Amdo article is about the Amdo region not Tibet and not the sovereignty debate While I can see how the relations with the Mongols can be relevant since the Mongols first incorporated Amdo into other commandariesprovinces I dont think we need too much detail on the relations between the Mongols and Tibet  that is dealt with in other articles Furthermore it is bad form to use internal reference ie another Wikipedia article cannot be used as a reference Finally this statement presents only one point of view when clearly there are several I dont want the History section of Amdo to turn into a rehash of either History of Tibet or Tibet sovereignty debate  I propose to cut the added paragraph to  a relationship which the Tibetan GovernmentinExile now terms a patronpriest relationship whereby Tibet exchanged political control for the power of religious instruction of the Khansref Please let me know if there are any problems with this proposal