So you think being rude in an edit summary is something you need to leave messages about but reverting productive work without explanation is something you can happily ignore  Seems to me thats a very warped perspective and implicitly condones what you claim not to condone  If you believe that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and if you want it to get better you should rethink your priorities  Sure criticise my rude edit summaries if you like but to simply ignore destructive edits like s is not helpful to anyone If Wikipedia is going to declare itself the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit then anonymous editors should not be discriminated against  In practice they are by you and many many others  The solution to that is not for me or anyone else to create accounts but for those who actively discriminate to stop doing so  At least youve taken the time to have a civil discussion  That courtesy is frequently not given  From another IP address a couple of months ago I wrote an entire article of I think very high quality lengthy well referenced comprehensive etc etc and then got blocked after someone reverted something I did with no explanation and I reverted back  Noone said a word about the article I wrote  all I got in return was a bunch of snotty templates and a block for trying to reinstate good work  Things like that make me pretty contemptuous of the culture here and I am very unlikely to start assuming good faith when bad faith is constantly assumed of me simply because I dont have a username