This article is currently not balanced It provides only a cursory summary of the official report and then an excessively long section on the disputed account This gives the incorrect impression that the official account is inadequate or wrong   Ultimately there is one fact that is not disputed  Captain Asseline flew the aircraft into a stall This is a very bad thing for a pilot to do at any time and a cardinal sin when done  ft above the ground The evidence is clear  the plane was at alphamax high angle of attack at very low airspeed and with engine set to idle Asseline has nobody else to blame for putting the plane into such a dangerous configuration he was in command All the other distracting issues eg precise altitude wearing a headset engine lag in responding to throttleup command etc etc are little more than red herrings because none of them excuse the fact that the plane stalled due to pilot error There is a lot of evidence in the official report I havent been able to find a version translated into  English its pretty clear what actually happened Oh and reference  is a bit dubious full of wacky conspiracy theories with no evidence to back them up I propose that the article needs a major overhaul trimming a lot out of the disputed account and providing more information from the official report