Closing comment This nomination is being put back into the GAN reviewing pool The review is now over  days old the oldest by nearly two months and the current reviewer has not posted any new review material to the review page since May  despite several reminders on Dirtlawyers talk page and here and assertions that he would be back on the case that day July  was on it July  and was working on comments now July  In fact  edits have been made on Wikipedia by the reviewer since that July  talkpage statement but none of them have continued this review or another incomplete one for TalkVratislav LokvencGA now  days old  It is extremely unfair for a nominator to have to wait four and a half months once the review has been opened and its made worse when you consider that the nomination was submitted over ten months old the oldest extant nomination by over three months With the GA Cup about to start its second round it is likely to be picked up by a new reviewer in a matter of days and finished with reasonable dispatch As I pointed out on Dirtlawyers talk page earlier this week the Good Article instructions page says  This commitment has not been met here and its time to find a new reviewer who will meet it