Rubywine you are mixing thinks up and do conclusions out of the context You mention these things  I am perturbed at the strong tendency towards territorialism over this article displayed by  and  We do not want to own or be the alphaediting guys on these article As i already wrote a lot of people worked on the article and it provoced me a lot that the entire work of them was replaced by a copyright template without any serious demands inside the article I know you say there are serious demands i oppose it and call them original research and neutral point of view rejecting contributions from new editors  patronising new editors and intense personal hostility towards new editors this is absolut out of the context First you made major changes without writting them down on the talk page Second after your edits have been reverted you placed a copyright template At last i was not the one who started to be offensive On the contrary when you or henriettapussycat wanted to leave i asked to continue your work The answer was because i did not agree with the claim of a copyright violation i was called stupid and that i dont understand copyright violations After this i got offensive not before Italic textIn fact since starting work on this article I have engaged in far more discussion on this talk page than either of my accusers Yes but you did not edit the stuff you named as copyright violation for over a week Italic textSecondly I continue to be extremely dismayed at the material which appeared under the sections for sexual and psychological effects Could this not be fixed without a copyright template Italic textLastly for anyone who imagines that they WPOWN this article or who continues to regard it as a personal hobbyhorse take note after it emerges from copyvio scrutiny I will be making every effort to invite contributions from the Association of African Women Scholars RAINBO and other womens health activists This article is desperately in need of scholarly attention by people with relevant qualifications knowledge and experience You blame others that this article maybe their personal hobbyhorse With your actions you are the last one who should use such a sentence This article is desperately in need of scholarly attention by people with relevant qualifications knowledge and experience This article is mostly based on conclusions of official health organisations or human right groups like WHO UNICEF and UNFARP Do you really think their work is based on persons with lesser qualifications knowledge and experience  It seems to me that you and Henriettapussycat project your false and unlogic conclusions on others add some logical definitions out of the context to act a logical conclusion related to the original issue Furthermore i get more and more the feeling that you use the argumentation of a possible copyright violation to push your changes of the article