DeLane Matthews  in re my  tagging of  article diff  see also   In regard to this article it looked like a normal biographical article about a television actress to me as opposed to being advertising And her four years in the cast of Daves World suggests to me that she is notable      OK  With IMDb the only source it looked like spam to me       IF Records and Little Nobody  in re IF Records hist Little Nobody hist  and COI spas      see also WikipediaArticles for deletionLittle Nobody nd nomination  nina phunsta is associated with IF Records so there is a clear conflict of interest   A Google search for nina phunsta adequately demonstrates the above claim when reading through various posts on forums  Various forum profiles of nina phunsta contain the IF Records website in their signature This is in contrast to previous claims that Andrez Bergen is a former writing colleague on nina phunstas talk page    DSK  is harder to pinpoint as it is a relatively newer handle but a Google search presents forum posts mostly related to IF records   As for the Little Nobody page   Wayward Seafarers Review Chris Downton D World June  This review does not exist on the D World website the link is to the homepage of that website There are no other external links under references that can be used to verify any of the text on the Wikipedia page Some of the articles cited are recent so a link to the article on the web version of the newspapers should be provided The ABC artist profile is the only reliable source and is dated from  and refers only to a local dance music scene Many of the links under External Links are broken   Much of the information appears to be fabricated as it does not appear anywhere else when performing a Google search  Colloquial language in background information Website  Little Nobodys dodgy MySpace site This indicates that the article is largely a puff piece   Thus articles related to Little Nobody and IF Records should be removed for  not meeting notability guidelines and  being written in an advertising format  large amounts of unverifiable information       No admin has denied the speedy yet but although it was tagged  or more hours ago neither has anyone deleted it  I agree that its spam and deserves deletion  The problem may be that promotional puffery that it is its been around for so long but that can cut both ways          has since declined dbg diff recommending  or AFD  I did a spam cleanup explaining why in my edit summary diff        Thank you The broken external links should also be dealt with according to Wikipedia policy and citations requested for the majority of the information posted That should allow administrators to conclude that the page does not meet notability criteria and is unverifiable I will attempt this soon UserWaltonS