From WPCOMPETENCE Where we very often see big controversies though is with editors who are disruptive while trying to help This is where we sometimes see a harmful side effect of our generally quite useful notion of assuming good faith Many editors have focused so much on this that they have come to believe that good faith is all that is required to be a useful contributor Sadly this is not the case at all Competence is required as well  Competence is required  Yet what can we do when we suspect that competence is lacking  That entry does not provide any step by step process for allowing us to express our concerns regarding editors who are editing outside their areas of expertise  So Wikipedia policy clearly states that competence is requiredbut it doesnt give us anything to do about it    When we suspect that an entry has a problemwhat do we do about it  Welleither we fix it or we tag the page so that other people can hopefully fix the problem  Clearly I believe these two editors have a problembut what could I do to fix it  Obviously I spent a lot of time trying to encourage them to look at the reliable sources  That didnt workso all I could think to do was tag them with an accurate label so that other editors might be alerted to the problem    Are there better ways of dealing with problems of incompetence  There are always better ways to deal with problems  But so far no other editors have brought any other ways to my attention  Just because Ive tagged these two editors as having a problemin no way shape or form means that any other editors will do anything about it  But thats on them