You just dont give up do you Why dont you try doing something positive stats section is unencyclopedic Its getting really stale  a couple of comments here and there from the peanut gallery doesnt dictate policy How statisistics on eating disorders on an article on eating disorders  is uncyclopedic is beyond me This is being positive  contributing images and information that might actually be interesting or useful at least I make the effort As I understand personal attacks are a no no but criticising the content is not criticising the content is a bit hard to do in some cases because there is little to no content to criticise It also seems that does who criticise the most contribute the least Like this oops there is nothing there Just to reiterate a fact there was no interest displayed by you in this article at all despite the fact that you have been on Wikipedia for years now it seems to be a pressing concern