Clarification Someone claimed that an editor here was making a libelous insinuation  Libelous is not a term to be thrown around loosely  First I didnt see anything that was factually untrue  That is the first requirement for libel  If something is true it is not libelous  Second opinion is never libelous  I just hope that people become more judicious about this Oh and finally libel against a public figure requires reckless indifference to the truth or knowledge that the statement was false  I dont see anything here that suggests there was any libel