Nope I didnt read the guide to appealing didnt have time The user in question IS engaged in harassment Ive been doing this long enough to know and I can prove it Heshe immediately placed a threatening notice of blocking me permanently on my user page reverted the article while I was in the midst of editing it my second pass couldnt even preview changes then changed hisher mind as to my real wikisin since the onus for proving the Doris Day available as PD on archiveorg was on himher not me and the usual span for preBern had expired long ago  decided my REAL sin was Original Research oh noes and continued to revert based on that Does OR add clutter Sure it can but if the user in question was REALLY concerned about that about the quality of the article and about extraneous details WHY DIDNT HESHE EVEN NOTICE two paragraphs already there comprising about  of the entire article dealt with Norman Schwarzkopf an unrelated book and an unrelated ice cream store name Ill tell you why the user wasnt engaged in goodfaithgoodwill editing and the normal backandforth that leads to better articles Heshe was involved in blocking input to the article Why Was it personal against me or was it to preserve the existing content of the article including the false claims and extraneous material not even concerned with ther subject at hand I can only speculate but Id guess its some sort of power trip and wikibullying I dont really have time for this I have made a fair number of very good edits over the years and have usually refrained from saying anything that isnt directly related to content and improving articles I could pretend this user didnt do what heshe did but Im wasting my own time here and I dont really have a stake in any such pretense I dont have any stake in improving this article either no dog in the race I just see how it can be improved and made more informative As a longterm wikipedia user and editor I dont see any problem in jumping in and fixing something I almost expect some sort of pushback now but not over completely minor edits which are very good and ontarget in very minor stublike articles The problem isnt me here its that if people such as the user in question can get away with this sort of behavior and they are getting away with it wikipedia becomes a much poorer place a playground filled with bullies rather than a library where we can all learn and share Also I dont recal ever having called himher a bot I think you put those words in my mouth perhaps inadvertently Hisher behavior is malicious but probably not malware just the normal human collection of problems I think this user should be warned against trying to be a gatekeeper heshe isnt quite qualified for that at this point anyway and its having a very chilling effect across wikipedia I wont egnage in a battle of the wikipedia rule acronyms I will continue to write in English and to read articles on wikipedia in English and to think of ways to improve them in English I am fully aware of how the terms vandlism are used and misused here and most of the rest of the wikijargon Nothing new under the sun here If you read the edits I made carefully and note the times of the reverts and the history of actions by that other user you will see Im not off the mark here at all I know whats going on I dont know why but I dont have to and I expect the motivations arent interesting Respond if you have anything to say