Indeed numerous Iranian media pointed that out right away  That is why I support the idea of including Jewish at the beginning of that subsection of the article  It is not to single out Pilz because he is jewish per se it is because both Iranian media as well as officials from Foreign Ministry have called it a part of the ongoing Zionst smear campaign against Iran   Pilz early anouncements  had claimed that both final candidates of the Iranian presidency were mentioned in his extraordinarily reliable Agent D report  So no matter which candidate won he would have smeared the winner   He had anticipiated that Rajsanjani wins like most people expected so he had initially put the focus more on Rafsanjani  As an Iranian I also feel this is coordinated It is indeed hard to explain how the major Western media would be so quick to report all those allegatoins which so far have turned out to be false without even a cursory investigation How could for example AP Reuters and AFP all three make the same mistake at the same time And it wasnt even on just one allegation it was on multiple  So multiple News Agencies making multiple mistakes that a pro would hardly ever do all at the same time  And I have seen a pattern like this for years on numerous other antiIran smear reports  Also you might notice how so many people involved in this very article are Jews or at least their edit history clearly shows their proZionist stance  I dont think that is accidental either they are voluntary contributors to the same  smear campaign because they view Islamic Iran as a threat to Zionism  The same people also have an interest on the Rafsanjani article and probably many other Iranrelated articles