Umm  Im not exactly promoting him  Im a Democrat and I voted for Gore  But the consensus of several users  in fact EVERY user except you  was very clearly in favor of the quote being removed from the introduction  The quote provides no context is blatantly POV not to mention terribly inaccurate and silly considering what actually happened with the election fraud see httpwwwcommondreamsorgviewshtm and the fact that Gore actually won anyway  So how did he make Dubyah the president  Yes Im aware thats the first thing many people think of when they see him just as the first thing many people think of when they see Mama Cass is that she died choking on a ham sandwich  This like the quote is not true at all but merely an illresearched fallacy  Does this mean we should write in Cass introduction that she is best known for having choked on a ham sandwich  No because it simply isnt factually based or accurate at all Even if it was accurate it still wouldnt be appropriate for the introduction as it provides no context Pretend you are someone who didnt know anything about him and you saw this quote that he made George W Bush the presidentwhat would that mean Is he the magical fairy who goes around granting wishes and making people president with his magical fairy wand from Lollypopland You need to provide context and a detailed account of what actually happened before you provide such a glib not to mention factually inaccurate summary As I said before Ive reviewed Toesumbrellas chachas edits and none of them appear to be vandalism but a pretty good faith attempt at removing something which not only constitutes a huge violation of NPOV policy but also violates the consensus as reached on this talk page months ago  So again I dont know what your point is about that user being banned when the offense seems to be only the fact that they removed vandalism well over  times  To me your offenses of violation of NPOV violating consensus when no one agrees with you and editing other users sigs seem a twinkle more extreme than theirs  I invite everyone to look at the comments that Griot left on Astrucs talk page wherein he revealed his very clear bias on this issuehe accused Nader of being a Maoistand he is clearly just using Wikipedia as his own personal coloring book to slander him in violation of NPOV policy and in violation of an irrefutable consensus on this issue