DELETION OR THEN MERGER   There must be verifiable objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability NRV  WPNOPAGE notability is a very serious question here and the weak and nonscholarly material does not amount to a stand alone article The article is a combination of some  criticred flagging of the  criticism of the Frankfurt School theories labelled here as Conspiracy Theory Yes it can entertained that some  claims  rumours are discussed on minor internet sites that amount to Conspiracy talk but it is no reason for a Wikipedia entry or let alone a stand alone Wikipedia article   REASONS FOR DELETION ARE NUMEROUS AND VERY CONCRETE WPNPOV neutral point of view   WPOR The term original research OR is used on Wikipedia to refer to materialsuch as facts allegations and ideasfor which no reliable published sources exist  WPV  means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source Where available academic and peerreviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources such as in history medicine and science  WPFRINGE A theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article  WPNOTOPINION Opinion pieces although some topics particularly those concerning current affairs and politics may stir passions and tempt people to climb soapboxes   WPYESPOV Avoid stating opinions as facts  WPWEIGHT Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published reliable sources For example discussion of isolated events criticisms or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news