I sourced the testimonies I didnt violate a copyright I wasnt stealing If what I did by siting testimonies is wrong and sourcing them from the chickcom website then everyone that sources anything on wikipediaorg is stealing and infringing on copyrights This argument is so flawed that I dont even know what else to say There is an obvious bent against Jack Chick and his tracts The testimonies balance the page out considering the fact that half the page is on criticisms of him and the tracts The testimonies deserveshould be there just as much as the criticism and the popculture sections If those can be there the testimonies should be there too And unless someone can give me a REAL reason for criticism to be there but not testimonies then I will continue to repost it onto the page     Hjurgelis