I conclude hes a vandal for what I consider very sound reasons leading to inevitable deductionsbut lets not talk about him and stick to the specifics of the issue at hand  It is backwards to approach any controversal subject by first listing the defense of the perpetrators  can you imagine how jarring it would be for you to read an account of say the Antebellum South which began by listing choice quotes regarding lenient recommendations plantation owners gave to their overseers concerning the treatment of their subjects Its utterly bizarre  It is grossly POV as well as inaccurate to portrary the perpetrators as giving rights and protection when they are doing precisely the contrary The whole turgid mess is an appalling whitewash despite a few throwabone references in the links and everyone involved in whatever horrific consensus if any Hellspawned it ought to be very ashamed of themselves