Okay theres a decision but Im not seeing a lot of discussion that gives the reasoning against merger   I resent that you didnt bother to give a reason Im going to decide against the merge but Im also going to record why yes chromosomal crossover is one of several types of recombination  that alone isnt justification because all could be covered on one page I missed this before but all of these others types of recombination also have their own subpages linked from this main page  sitespecific recombination transposons and nonhomologous end joining  just as for chromosomal crossover Now that I realize this my mind is changed Heres my ideas on how to edit this article Add to each of sections for other types of recombination the same Main article Foo note at the top Homologous recombination should point here rather than to chromosomal crossover and there should be information on homologous vs nonhomologous recombination here I have to think about how to actually summarize the topic on this page but the redirect to chromosomal crossover contributed to my initial suggestion to merge The category levels of crossing over vs other types of recombination needs to be reconsidered Perhaps all types of recombination should be categories on the same level Alternatively it could be homologous vs nonhomologous recombination with the different types of recombination within each but since sitespecific recombination uses partial homology this is might just be confusing to the reader As  suggested information specific to chromosomal crossover should be moved to the crossover page such that chromosomal crossover does not dominate the information content of this article