History of Liverpool FC   Hi I have reverted your latest edit because it appears to be a verbatim quotation from someone elses work and therefore if not a breach of copyright plagiarism We cannot do this for legal reasons May I invite you to rewrite it in your own words adding a citation to your source That would fix the problem Thanks   Editors have moved further information to the History article to make sure that we present a coherent and concise description of LFC as a whole We should have only the most relevant and important info in the main article Eg That the City of Liverpool has made a World Cup bid is verging on off topic especially when LFCs involvement is only with the use of its stadium The rail station info has nothing to do with LFC in the slightest Liverpools split from Everton was already mentioned and described in detail in the article about Liverpool FCs history What facts exactly am I supposed to be getting over    Also I do not like being described as a vandal Especially when thats clearly not how Ive been acting Its quite insulting Please read here for a description of what a vandal is    Agreed Removal of unsourced information particularly if it may be a breach of WPCOPYRIGHT is not vandalism and saying that it is breaches our policy on personal attacks Please dont add it back without citing its source and certainly not without rewriting in your own words in a narrative style because Im afraid if you do you will be blocked from editing here Furthermore references to Hitler are equally likely to get you blocked Please take some time getting used to our policies before going much further Thanks   Abstract OK well we now have a citation thanks but merely quoting from an abstract isnt quite there yet What we need to say is something like In a study by Leeds University researchers X and Y it was stated that   although if different researchers have come to different conclusions or present different facts this should also be mentioned with sourcing for balance   Believe it or not we are trying to help you here but Ive had to remove this university study again the citation you gave just did not support the content you added and therefore your edit failed verifiability policy You need to take points from a full published version not just an abstract Even if it is your own work it is original research and not permitted here Any further disruption may lead to a block but at least that would give you some time to read other articles to see how they are written and sourced    OK Ive rewritten it to cite the research There is no need for there to be a section on the research the article is about the club not the research Hopefully that shuold get us somewhere     talkback       I really cant understand what world you are in You discredit uni research It is clear you have never been to one I have done uni research It is very intensive and no stone unturned   You appear to think it is about research The research article highlights the prime points of the split  no it wasnt rent at all  It is about the split and how it came about an dhow LFC were formed  I have the  page article and have read it there is verifiable link to it   I dragged out the prime points and put them in bold