weeks of interactions summarizes my  years of contributions Interesting I do not like thugs BMK and APK are just that in the style of editing that each chooses to use Both are keen on the rules as long as the rule at that moment applies to them IE Be Bold allows BMK to change any photo he wants and allows him to craft in moments a consensus with his posse behind him What I found amusing about that user is his ref to WPDIVA yet when you read DIVA it really should a lot like how he handles himself here His POV is the ONLY POV that matters and his passive aggressive POV pushing dominates the topics he edits and the user refuses to obtain unbiased comments from others as was noted in this edit httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitleTalkAJerseyCityCNewJerseydiffoldid Beyond My Ken pretends to want others to offer insight as long as he can posture his POV by dissuading from voting on anything I contribute and talking himself into thinking that other support his POV  minutes later then just executing the edit That is not a consensus that is a dictator and abusive way to control and dominate anything he decides to Dominate Epicgenius NeilN Castncoot are followers for the most part I think it is really funny that Epicgenius was the one that selected the Manhattan photo for the lead on that page then goes back and tells me do not replace lead photos anymore but I guess it is still ok for them to do so without any substantiation of the contributions I do not think that Epicgenius knows what he is doing here yet and his talk page somewhat supports that assertion Castncoot like a picture of a bridge for the lead photo of a city as that bridge is Iconic in spite of the fact that icons are not cities my contribution was to create a page that was about the topic city not leading with the bridge that gets you there The photo I changed out was actually the real city not the bridge going to it After over  years I have had only a few run ins with other editors I have hundreds of lead photos and a number of Featured ones too I have been bold in my editing as BMK claims that allows him to dominate topics and  of my photos are NEVER removed or replaced until someone decides to go off the deep end as BMK and APK did here lastly aerial photography is highly valued and extremely difficult as the collective combination of skills required is overwhelming at times No other editor on this site has contributed the type of content that I used to submit Now that BMK has made it clear that he will stalk my edits and revert any photographic contribution I make what is the point of continuing other then to just edit stories here as I have for years and perhaps Wikipedia can one day find another aerial photographer that is willing to donate to the site We will see