Kudos from me too Interestingly the response here states in the context of Wikipedia its the equivalent of counting to ten What status does this editor think he has which grants him the standing to publicly count to ten in judgment of other editors I do not think this either helps other editors or builds an encyclopedia Hes been meting out this public opprobrium for years ever since  when he first deleted an appropriate caution from an editor he disparaged in public and hundreds of times per year ever since  This year  times so far in December   times in November etc Given its sole use I cannot conclude its simply a made up word or simply counting to ten  He used it on me   as I worked and sought cooperation to bring a list of software products from unsourced spambait into RS guideline compliance in Plagiarism detection edit history  My edits were upheld by WPO and he used awai on that editor too  It should be noted that in this discussion the editor maintains and defends the belief that a single source must support all claims in a section or embedded list and that multiple independent overlapping sources dont count and never relinquishes it This is a sour editor who refuses to publicly agree cooperate admit a mistake or apparently read policies or guidelines When he was blocked for outing in November  he repeatedly requested to be unblocked without apparently reading the guideline for requesting unblocking and had to be pointedly spoon fed the words to copypaste in order for his unblock request to be finally accepted  This editor is in my opinion unacceptably tonedeaf to cooperative constructive editing or helpful discussion