The proposed content language is generally acceptable   I would suggest that the jury be identified as a grand jury and that the word special possibly be omitted     The content as currently suggested does not provide link references which I do believe are important and suspect would be forthcoming   There are a goodly number of NYTs articles to choose from regarding the lynching and specifying a grand jury some of which can be found here  httpquerynytimescomsearchsitesearchqueryportjervislynchingmoredateall  While I do feel the visual impact and related narrative supporting the previously cited external link reference to the s KKK outfit from Port Jervis now on display in a Liverpool England slavery museum is valid powerful and worthy of inclusion httpwwwliverpoolmuseumsorgukismcollectionslegaciesklukluxklanaspx additional confirming documentation can be found here httpwwwnytimescomtravelihtmuseumhtmlrscpsqportjerviskustcse    As user has accepted the proposed content and I have already added an external link to the Minisink Valley Historical Society presumably further qualifying language regarding the contents topics will not be included in the entrys narrative with a link to the the MVHSs web page that had previously figured largely in users concerns and proposed narrative content  Other than these observations I feel user Jonathanwallaces content will adequately serve the purpose   Thank you