Sorry  This discussion isnt about improving some sentence  It is about reporting what the document Homosexualitatis problema says  As you stated at the beginning The document clearly says In fact circumstances may exist or may have existed in the past which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance or other circumstances may increase it What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable Quote the document directly Add reliable and notable opinions The document mentions deliberate choice only in relation to the origin of homosexual orientation  It says nothing of deliberate choice in relation to homosexual behaviour  It says nothing about any particular when  circumstances that make behaviour a deliberate choice  It just says that the sexual behaviour of homosexuals is not always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable We all make many choices that are not deliberate choices we make many choices without reflection without even adverting to the fact of making a choice  The culpability or merit of our choices varies not only according to the gravity of the matter but also according to the deliberateness of our choices  According as a choice is more or less or not at all deliberate the culpability or merit is greater or less or null  You say When it isnt compulsive it is a result of choice  To the extent that behaviour is not compulsive to that extent behaviour is a result of choice a choice that may be to a greater or less extent or not at all deliberate and thus culpable or meritorious  The extent of compulsion can vary  If it is total then there is no choice deliberate or not and there is no culpability or merit  If it is not total the freedom of choice is to that extent limited but the culpability or merit can still be greater less or null  What the document says is that the sexual behaviour of homosexuals is not always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable  The document does not exclude the view that their sexual behaviour is sometimes totally compulsive and therefore inculpable  The document also does not exclude the view that their sexual behaviour is always partially compulsive and therefore less than totally culpable The document does not say When homosexual activity is the result of deliberate choice it is not made inculpable by natural sexual orientation  At best that is an originalresearch conclusion from what it says The document says It has been argued that the homosexual orientation in certain cases is not the result of deliberate choice  The secondary source that illustrates what the document says of the homosexual tendency by using the analogy of kleptomania says no one makes himself a kleptomaniac and no one really wants to be one  The document says circumstances may exist or may have existed in the past which would reduce or remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance or other circumstances may increase it What is at all costs to be avoided is the unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable  The secondary source illustrates what the document says the more compulsive the disorder the more reduced is the moral culpability for ones actions Yet we would never say that kleptomaniacs should be allowed to steal at will What is wrong with the following summaries of what Homosexualitatis problema says on the question all of which Roscelese has rejected The letter said that circumstances can reduce or remove an individuals culpability and can also increase it but that homosexual sexual activity is not always and completely compulsive for homosexual persons Circumstances the letter said can diminish or eliminate an individuals culpability and can also augment it but it rejected the idea that homosexual activity is always totally compulsive and therefore inculpable for a homosexual person The letter rejects the idea that homosexual activity is always totally compulsive and therefore inculpable for a homosexual person while also stating that circumstances can diminish or eliminate or also augment an individuals culpability Are these not far more faithful to what the document actually says than the meandering originalresearch The letter said that when homosexual activity is the result of deliberate choice it is not made inculpable by natural sexual orientation contradicting the idea that natural orientation rendered it totally inculpable