On second thought Max I just took a look at the history and saw that you posted not only the link that you say youre not defending but also the link to the material from the white supremacist antisemite William Pierce Theres no need to keep the link on the page while discussing its merits although that link has no merits to discuss Wikipedias editors know how to look at edit histories When a link is that egregious and beyond the pale any responsible editor will remove it until its existence can be justified Also I didnt remove an external link without cause I explained my cause both here and in the edit summary That cause was not a claim that its offensive in some way but a clear obvious violation of WPEL and WPRS with regard to fringe websites  However Ive just taken a look at your edit history and can honestly say that outside of your edits to this article I cant see any evidence of an antisemitic agenda on your part so Im going to continue to WPAGF However it will be to your advantage to recognize that editors who are accustomed to working on Judaismrelated articles have long experience with users who just innocently raise the question of whether there might be racist material in the Talmud or whether there just might be a Jewish conspiracy for world domination or whether weve fairly portrayed the views of folks who think that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a genuine document and shouldnt we leave the material up while we discuss it The answer to that question is no and if my assumption of good faith is justified youll have no trouble seeing why  Again Max follow those links and youll see why neither you nor I nor any responsible editor would want them to stay on this article or any other that we had a hand in Im honestly not trying to start a feud or a flame war or anything else and I do wish you the best experience possible on Wikipedia