Dear Modernist   I dont routinely insert material into any page without some attempt to correctly cite it references can be disputed not this What we have here amounts to this is my POV on some matter now kindly locate some references for it if you please This wont do   If you have some proprietary feeling about the paragraph or know the contributor request the citation if you would But dumping material like this on the page does not warrant my research support on the basis of collaboration   This also applies to the following uncited edit under Later Works  Devoting his full energies to his work Picasso became more daring his works more colorful and expressive and from  through  he produced a torrent of paintings and hundreds of copperplate etchings At the time these works were dismissed by most as pornographic fantasies of an impotent old man or the slapdash works of an artist who was past his prime   One editor commented on this correctly and called it   undignified writing and  highly speculative  January  UTCLarry Siegel  Another editor defended it saying Its clearly from a decent source though it would be better if that source was cited But there is no reason to remove it Tao talk    How would Tao possibly know if it was a decent source This is all nonsense Modernist and you know it Mysweetoldetc