Those comments were not present on the discussion page I now see they are present on the requested move page however this is not the proper place to put them      Body Snatchers   I would like you to take a quick look at the article comparing the Body Snatchers novel to filmed versions before you edit it out as vandalism again  Preceding unsigned comment added by     It wasnt vandalism it was spam     If critique is spam lets get rid of cinefantastique as well then  Preceding unsigned comment added by     Responding on your talk page     Yes I am affiliated with the site and I have put a great deal of research into the piece you are editing out which compares the books structure and themes to all film versions with an examination of how the prevalent culture influenced or failed to influence those versions It is not a tossedoff article written so I could get Google ranking by linking in Wikipedia not a valid method anyway since Google changed their algorithm late last year nor was it written with the intent to lead Wikipedians by proxy to the sites front page   There is no similar article available at the moment on the net Thats not to say I am special just that noone else has bothered to write the piece and as it has something to contribute to the subject I dont see why it should be excised  Preceding unsigned comment added by      Disputed fair use rationale for ImageMileyworldjpg Thanks for uploading ImageMileyworldjpg However there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under fair use may be invalid Please read the instructions at WikipediaNonfree content carefully then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use Using one of the templates at WikipediaFair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy but remember that you must complete the template Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page  If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page Thank you You have not addressed the major issue here This is a copyrighted image that does not meet the requirements for fair use The issues is not about the windows decoration but the use of this image as decoration and not critical commentary about the website It is only valid in an article about the website   Not true If there is critical commentary about the page then it is legit      Gun laws in the United States by state  Possible copyright infringement   You recently tagged Gun laws in the United States by state as a possible copyright infringement from various sources as spelled out below but I dont see any specifics  Where should I look for that  And where should this possible copyright infringement be discussed  at WikipediaCopyright problems or somewhere else  I am aware of problems with this article and in fact I participated in a discussion about them  see TalkGun laws in the United States by stateMaterial copied from CarryConcealednet  Im thinking that the copied material should be removed but Im concerned that the copied material be carefully identified and the original material left in the article so Id like to participate in the discussion  If you reply here I will see what you say  Thanks    Upon further review Ive started a discussion about this at WikipediaCopyright problems February Articles  Feel free to join in        Replied over there BTW  when did I call  a banned editor     You didnt thats why I rolled back I thought you did though because you removed a section which has his signature and the last contribution on the page before your removal was by him Turns out someone else forged the sig      RE February    Which article    diff