Bovine emissions and suspected Scibaby accounts As far as I can see this edit violated no policies  I checked the source which is reliable and the edit appeared to be faithful to the sources information  I understand that Scibaby had a fixation on bovine emissions threatening humanity but you dont know for sure that it was a Scibaby account  You apparently blocked the account because it had an interest in a subject that was the same as a banned editor  Do you think that perhaps blocks in these types of situations should be handled by editors who arent regular contributors to the Global Warming articles