Ill show you the relevance of them WPANUserGeoeg reported by Userdicklyon Result Both blocked for  hours dicklyon and Geoeg have been disagreeing about an article where WPCOI is a concern Since dicklyon reported Geoeg for RR heshe is focusing negative attention on Geoeg Why is this not harassment WPANISPA Milto LOL pia pointed out a concern about a WPSPA editor also focusing negative attention on them Why is this not harassment WPCOINSPAs and socks pushing POV PR and advertising on the ChapmanUniversitySchoolofLaw Page This also focuses negative attention not totally unlike what I said Justanother has done Why is this not harassment  You seem to buy into Bishonens belief that I am out to get Justanother and thereby assume anything I bring up must be part of that campaign You are wrong in this case he was being disruptive while other editors were genuinely trying to resolve a dispute If this isnt being disruptive all that needs to be done is give a brief explanation why answers like this are acceptable QUsing reliable sources should this article have a section discussing Hubbards personality   ARephrase Should a onesided POV analysis of Hubbards personality based on a small number of critical sources and bordering on WPOR synthesis be posted in the article as a work in progress or should a balanced NPOV and nonOR piece be developed in a sandbox by interested parties from all sides of the issue Which one benefits the project There that is a more accurate statement of the issue    Please put your assumptions about what you think Im doing and ask yourself if the arbcom meant to give Justanother a free pass from having to abide by any rules that I happen to point out For crying out loud by your logic I couldnt report ANY violation of policy by him whether its valid or not Does that really make sense to you