Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan   Hi it doesnt matter if he fits in more categories For example Babur could be taken as an Indian king as well as a persian However there is a subtle difference between categories such as Tamil people Telugu people and People of Karnataka The first two talk more of their language rather than region where as the Karnataka category doesnt talk of language So I would fall under people of Karnataka though I cant manage even a smattering of Kannada btw there is nothing in the Radhakrishnan article to suggest that he spent time in Karnataka Of the people listed in CategoryTelugu people only Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya imo falls under both categories On an unrelated note regarding copyrights any photograph published in Indian media  years back or more i considered as Public Domain Also Tintins view about  years after death is not correct because of the following reason  Copyright is given to the photographer and not to the subject so the copyright expires only  years after the photographers death which is very difficult to determine