I agree that this dispute shouldve been handled by discussion rather than reverting  And as I said several times now the other side refused to discuss it and answer my question  They were the ones breaking the rules not me  Regarding personal attacks the content wasnt the issue  The issue was the interpretation of the rules  In that case theres nothing wrong with attacking someones interpretation of the rules  It goes to the substance of the dispute  Let me be clear if I havent been already  I believe that I was quite correct and innocent in my actions  I dont lack for boldness  If some Wikipedia administrators want to block me despite the fact that Im right theyre free to do that  But it doesnt make me any less right  In this case the wrong side of the fence is the popular side  Its certainly not the first time