Given that Heinstein prefers to ignore the discussions Ive engaged in above and to fling insults and shabby dimestore innuendo Im not going to review his comments in detail However  Heinstein isnt telling the truth when he says Ive removed the information about Jenrettes Harvard degree if you check the edit history youll see Ive repeatedly added back the specific degree information which Jenrette herself has for some odd reason deleted on several occasions  The key reference in the Jenrette family history section and who really cares which medieval warlords are lurking in her family tree the number of Wikipedia biographies which include such nonencyclopedic information is all but nil is a selfpublished vanity press book  It cant be used as a source in a BLP  Wikipedia isnt bound by the dictates of the Congress Of Vienna Nobody else is so far as I know  But even according to the sources provided regarding that conclave of oppressors of the common folk whatever titles were involved went only to the descendants of the thencurrent royalty not their descendants spouses so there still wouldnt be any reliable source for identify Jenrette as a princess  The only sources linking Jenrettes current husband and the titles he claims come from his own website that genealogy site just republishes usersubmitted content and matches up to his website The language to which Jenrette and Heinstein object in particular the use of style with respect to titles is standard Wikipedia usage even extending to reigning royal families see eg Prince Philippe Duke of Brabant Iaki Urdangarn Duke of Palma de Mallorca Charles FitzGerald th Duke of Leinster Sophie Hereditary Princess of Liechtenstein  The Princess Sophie article also distinguishes carefully between claimed titles like Ludovisis and legally recognized titles note also Jaime Duke of Madrid where the article text is quite scrupulous on this point  If Ludovisi doesnt like being accurately as a perfume entrepreneur he shouldnt set up a personal website describing his perfume business at length or issue press releases promoting that business and hawking its products  or give interviews to websites covering the perfume business in general  or announce plans to issue an entire series of fragrances  It would have been inappropriate even genuinely derisive to identify him as the unemployed pretender to a longdefunct European throne there being no apparent evidence that he was otherwise engages in gainful employment His involvement in the perfume business is the only solidly sourced information about him in any version of the Jenrette article   Finally The Big Bad Wolfowitz notes with malice aforethought Wikipedia coverage must be balanced and neutral If the article is going to include Jenrettes glorious colonial ancestors it must also cover their involvement with slavery and the slave trade if were going to cover her husbands claimed noble family and heritage we must also cover its surprisingly welldocumented involvement with Mussolini and the Fascisti