I wrote most of the original rationale that is at the top of this Talk Page   The fact that someone doesnt know what theyre talking about doesnt change the fact that they said it and that they maybe even believe it  Wikipedia is not interested in truth it is interested in verifiability     I struggled to insert into the Criticism of the Catholic Church text documenting arguments that the Catholic Church is not a Christian church  It is not appropriate for Wikipedia to say definitively whether or not the Catholic Church is or is not a Christian church  What it can say is that the Catholic Church considers itself to be a Christian church but some Protestants do not   A similar principle applies here   If Christians have a misinformed opinion of Judaism that misinformed opinion should be documented somewhere in Wikipedia  I suggest that it be done here  Documenting it doesnt mean that the criticism based on a misinformed opinion is a valid criticism simply that a significant number of people hold this opinion  If maintaining an NPOV stance requires a rebuttal then lets put the rebuttal in   I imagine that this article could have both criticism of Judaism leveled by outsiders and criticism of Judaism leveled by Jews