This thread started with your accusation that somehow information was being hidden That was never the case and any viewer can see that the original text was retained and moved into a separate paragraph to clearly illustrate that it represents an opposing point of view The previous entry was a thirdparty opinion not fact about NOM prevent the legal recognition and acceptance of marriage and civil unions for samesex couples NOMs reasoning as to their views on civil unions does not necessarily translate into prevent recognition and acceptance which is an opinionor spin to use your wordfor which there is no reference and is anyway far too hefty a conversation for the intro Best to keep that in the section about civil unions where in fact there is far better info As I mention below the best approach for the intro is to include the entire quote unedited which I have now done This should satisfy your suggestion that the opening clearly indicate a summary of NOMs views while meeting the requirement of presenting all significant views