sudosh   Youre incorrect it was not decided in the EAS AfD that Sudosh and EAS will be merged until EAS has its own article I can read just fine and misrepresenting an AfD discussion will not win you any support here What actually transpired is that one editor  suggested that until various distros adopt EAS it should be best that it stay in the sudosh article Nobody else supported that motion and the result of the AfD was not merge but rather delete Since a DeletenotMerge vote is actually support for keeping it out of the article  I realise you are the main developer and should know if the project has changed name However if the fact of the name change is so insignificant that the only source available so far is your own sayso on various web sites and announcement lists that fails the verifiabiliy test Wikipedia isnt about including everything its only about including information that is independently verifiable If or when EAS gets picked up by your userbase and gets recognition as the replacement of sudosh then there will be enough evidence out there to include it anywhere in Wikipedia Until then there is just not enough information out there from an neutral source ie someone other than you to conclude that EAS really is the replacement of sudosh After all it might turn out that nobody likes EAS or that your entire userbase rejects EAS and continues to develop sudosh on their own Then the article would be wrong if we kept your edits  However that doesnt mean no mention of EAS can be in the article Ill edit it to reflect what is currently knowable by external sources