Redundant  trivial content  again   Efforts to reduce inappropriate style and content in this article may require request for external intervention To avoid this please lets stop adding and reinserting nonencyclopedic matter This has been complained of for years see the Redundant  trivial content section of this talk page but the editor responsible committing the same errors at numerous biographical articles on the Capetians and their spouses and inlaws as well as the Lorraines Savoys Estes Gonzagas Habsburgs Wittelsbachs and French ducal families seldom engages in talk page or edit discussions instead reinserting deletions and moving the page while dismissing fact tags and edit summary objections The problem persists in two forms inappropriate style and inappropriate content The content violates Wikipedias exclusionary policy against genealogical minutiae and exposition of insignificant details It consists of excess in Speculation assumptions about the feelings thoughts attractiveness or relationships of longdead persons presented as if factual or probable yet not cited from the persons diary correspondence or quoted statements Trivia information unimportant to the historical significance of the topic Redundancies information that is repeated more than twice in the article or duplicates info that isshould be in a different article Extranea superfluous information only tangentially related to the topic These edits reduce the professionalism of Wikipedia because they Include unsourced and often unsourceable assertions that may be inaccurate Use an editorial voice more appropriate to narrative in a novel than to an objective encylopedia  Divert the articles focus from facts which make the subject encyclopedically significant Pad the article making it harder to notice when sourced expansion is needed