Follow up on deletion discussion   We are pretty far off topic on the AfD so I thought I would bring it here Do please review our policies on assuming good faith and civility as it is difficult to spin accusations of FUD and trolling into a positive light I find it a little galling that you are repeatedly juxtaposing insults and requests for assistance Do not expect any help in response to such posts  Short summary of how we got here I followed WPBEFORE prior to nominating the article for deletion so I already had a decent idea of what sources or lack thereof are available I have of course been wrong before to be precise  of the time over my  nominations which is why we solicit feedback during a discussion Explaining why a source is borderline or inadequate in the context of notability is not negativity it is part of the discussion A deletion discussion is in itself I suppose an inherently negative process but I am not really aware of any way to sugarcoat that If I were able to produce examples of sources that exhibit notability of the subject I would have added them to the article rather than nominate it for deletion in the first place  You also expressed concern about my recent edits to the article which were an effort to cut through the noise that I mentioned in the deletion discussion I tried to explain the reason for each removal in my edit summaries but if you have any specific concerns or questions please let me know