El Nino  The limited and perhaps maladroit changes Ive made in the first bit of the article ignoring please my snide comment you may give a sense of where jargon might impede readability of the article  However could be a case in which if you have to ask then maybe you cant help or maybe you can  Ive added article to watch list for the moment and may try to marginally contribute I dont pretend to understand subject with slightest depth and would be cautious  The larger problem is in its organization   A general reader wants to know immediately what are the potential consequences of El Nino Instead the articles lead grafs launch  into a longwinded and seemingly vague description of its history and theory that are more appropriate for deep into its body