See Also  Hi Gene I saw that you reverted my edits on a couple of pyramid related pages to include links to the pages on Ukrainian and Bosnian pyramids and for links to the pyramid category as well I just wanted to clarify why these links do not belong The Bosnian pyramid is considered a hoax If the digging on the Bosnian hill does eventually reveal a pyramid then the links are justified However until proof of a pyramid is found the site remains a hill with an archeologically significant medieval village on top In the case of the Ukrainian pyramid the press simply carried a wrong impression of the site into the popular culture This innacuracy was soon clarified by the archaeologist in charge    Please do not revert the external links sections of pyramid articles again I am well aware that the Bosnian and Ukrainian pramids are not really pyramids and that the scientific consensus supports this  however that is entirely beside the point the main reason they are known by most people is because some people claimed they were pyramids it is not for us to make value judgements concerning those claims our job is simply to provide links to all pyramidelated articles and let people read those articles and decide for themselves The see also list is a list of related subjects  it is not merely a list of legitimate pyramids Genepoole    I think when something is either falsely called or accidentally called something it is not no reasonable source of information would list it said entity under the misleading heading For example when a toddler calls a car a boat the rest of the world does not have to amuse the toddler by now considering cars as boats because some people claimed they were boats I realize youre taking an inclusionist stance on this and I respect that However I think the fact that the articles themselves are already improperly named is inclusionist enough Including the Ukrainian and Bosnian pyramids in a list of legitimate pyramids is very efficient way to undermine any intellectual weight this encyclopedia has I think making lists of things which are entirely opposed to the scientific consensus and in the case of the dig site in Ukraine against the stated clarification by the archaeologist leading the dig is irresponsible To that end I am once again making my reverts but in the interest of fairness I am also moving this conversation to the talk pages of the articles