None of you is addressing my reason for trying to balance the text Furthermore I did not start the process of undoing edits I am merely trying to create a BALANCED article The fact that it is wellsourced is irrelevant if the material is just cherrypicked to discredit Stevenson The material I deleted is there because of your socalled debunking agenda You clearly have an axe to grind on Stevenson and  are unwilling to listen Instead of admitting your bias you hide behind Wikipedia norms of consensus and condescending lecturing Instead of actually engaging in a discussion about the content we are disagreeing over you want to simply keep ignoring my arguments Admit that you have an ideological agenda and please go grind your axe somewhere else