You mention POV pushing from my source However on the contrary you cherry pick Euwes  year old comment where the actual Krabbe article STATES THE CONTRARY You are misquoting the source you cite Furthermore the blunder you feature you say that black has a better pawn structure If you insisit on being accurate you should actually say BLACK IS UP A CLEAR PAWN  Also you state some weird line where I QUOTEAfter Ne White chases again with f Then after Ng the game usually continues e Ng d completing the most commonly seen sequence in the Gambit see diagram In this position White is on the attack and his attack will generally persevere with tactics such as Nb after a pawn trade at d However Black can return the piece with a slightly better endgame after making White overextend his pawns by Neg e Bc exf Nxf and now Whites best followup is to head for an uninspiring endgame with Qe Qe Qxe Kxe THERE IS NO SOURCE FOR THIS CLAIM SOURCE IT THEN HOLD YOUR OWN ARTICLE TO THE SAME STANDARD YOU ARE HOLDING ME TO FOR NOT REASON JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE THE WAY I TALK Wikipedia as you have so eloquently stated is not for anyone An analogy which so strikingly represents the world