Did you try any calm discussion  No you left me no less than  templates accusing me of vandalism  Why are you only apologising for the first one  You need to explain why you even left that when anyone with half a brain could see that my edit was not vandalism  Did you even look at what you were reverting  You reverted twice within the same minute as the edits I made and when I asked you why  you reverted that within the same minute as well  When I tried to ask the previous editor who stupidly reverted my edit why he did that you reverted my edit to his page twice both times less than a minute after I left it  How exactly was I supposed to communicate with you   Now UserQwyrxian sure I know that civility is a policy  And Im always civil if I dont have to deal with idiots who accuse me of vandalism when they just lack the intellect to see what I was doing  I mean a  year old could tell that none of my edits were vandalism  It seems obvious to me that reverting constructive edits with offensive accusations of vandalism is much much more damaging to a project which is supposed to be about creating an encyclopaedia than one person calling another person a fucking idiot  So I followed the WPIAR policy