False inormation in the article  As you would expect the propagandists would say and do everything to mislead us They once again proved themselfs to be the proven LIARS we alreayd knew they were since the article wrongly states that the darker picture with the falloff effects is the edited one which is pure BS  The original photo is the one with the falloff effect which was printed in The West Australian already back in august    min in this clip httpwwwyoutubecomwatchvlMuTiziCszU while the lighten up picture is the EDITED version who came out much later So unless the propaganda trolls cant find a version of THEIR claimed original version dated EARLIER than august second  i suggest them to SHUTUP  Proven fake httpuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthumbAldrinApollooriginaljpgpxAldrinApollooriginaljpg  Original httpuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthumbcAldrinApollojpgpxAldrinApollojpg   Preceding unsigned comment added by     Youtube is not a reliable source for information about a conspiracy theory Is there a reliable source available that supports your claim      The Buzz Alrdin photo is explained at ExaminationofApolloMoonphotographsIssues with crosshairs in photos      The video shows a guy holding up the actual newspaper from  aug  to prove that the falloff picture is how the original one looked like but then its youtube who isnt a reliable source  your desperate try for making a point is laughable but i wouldnt expect more from a propaganda TROLL   Preceding unsigned comment added by       No that newspaper doesnt show what the original one looks like  The original is a transparency that is in NASAs vaults  They made prints that were widely reprinted See this for more information     Bullshit excuses from NASA wont make it true you have the history of that picture in the video i linked to and even the NASA site you linked to shows the fact that the darker picture is the first one the original from  while the more lighten edited version came out  So why you arguing you dont have a chance here As i said BRING UP a picture dated earlier than  aug  or SHUTUP  its that simple   please stop insulting other editors and please sign your posts just put four tildes at the end       I dont tolerating having my talk session closed this is what the propagandists do censoring their opponents Unless the propagandists cant bring up the picture THEY claim to be the original together with a date which needs to be earlier than second of august  i will change the article False misleading information should never be tolerated Its already proven that the falloff darker version IS the original If anyone wants to argue then bring up      The propaganda liars  This article is beyond laughable Since the propagandists trash talking and like to debunk ppl like Bart Sibrel Ralph Rene and Bill Kaysing with no evidence to debunk them however we should debunk the LIARS the propagandists listen to  youtube is not a reliable source the propagandists says still they link to youtube videos themselfs to suit their false propaganda in a desperate act to try prove THEIR laughable points So if they can link to youtube videos i will do the same just to prove that THEIR sources are nothing else than FALSE PROPAGANDA Using proven liars like Jay Windley Phil Plait and Svectors youtube series as some kinda evidence is laughable  I think that these trolls needs their own section lets see what kinda ppl who is behind the sites that the propagandists always links to Its time to face their cl