I think this is important is not a valid argument   Your response to multiple editors tagging your pages for deletion has been the work of Dr Adoni is now superior with elaboration  That doesnt work on Wikipedia  Its not enough for you to argue however strenuously that this work is really important  You instead must cite reliable independent sources what are those  see WPV to support the claims      You and everyone deleting the  Prime Spirals are all LIARS the original article was CITED it cited peer level speed tests of all the top prime algorithms  Yet you twits claim not verified BS I VERIFIED MY CLAIMS  This is why the world of Academia considers wiki to be run by clueless power hungry twit mods that know nothing about academia  READ THE CITES IN THE ARTICLE YOU TWITS DELETED  I shouldnt even be wasting my breath on such nazi censoring worms  PUT THE PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms  PUT IT BACK  httpsenwikipediaorgwikiprimespirals  GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software  httpsgithubcomevandrixSplattreemastercodedemopyprimesapyprimestests  httpsmailpythonorgpipermailtutorDecemberhtml  So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS    drprinceton