Ugly Personal Attacks  You Approve  Good Morning Philippe  The post above yours by LoverofArt is typical of his posts in my direction  An ugly personal attack by a person who has in essence defamed a widely respected organization  the National Civilian Community Corps  by posting false and misleading information at the Wikipedia website  If your  Wikipedias best idea is that what should happen next is that I enter into a prolonged dialogue with that person hoping to reason with himher while heshe continues to exert control over content and issue ugly diatribes then your processes leave a great deal to be desired  A responsible adult  a real Editor  should have interceded long ago  Heshe and the others working over the NCCC text at this time seem to feel that any statement introduced by the phrase According to  does not belong at Wikipedia  As I read it there was objection at one of your pages to placing references at the end of that phrase rather than at the end of the quotation  Why an encyclopedia would have as a policy including bald claims as if fact without reference to the source in its text eludes me  It would give the impression that the encyclopedia had evaluated the statement which is obviously not the case   I appreciate Wikipedias effort to provide freely accessible information to the public  I am not impressed however by the response to gross errors made at the Wikipedia site  Your crew is attacking the messenger at least in part because it is the message that it does not like  A pretty sorry performance which you seem to be joining by failing to address the issues I raise or the attacks on me  Pull LoverofArt out of this situation and I will join in a dispute resolution process regarding editing the NCCC site  I refuse to have further dealings with himher