Dear Wikipedia Neutrality guardian  Re Saddam Hussein entry no one has yet to answer my question why do the live palestinians deserve mention in the  primary intro for a non palestinian leader but the Slaughtered Kurds of Saddams own countrymen do not   You could have Written Some parts of the Arab world admired Saddam for standing up to the west Without mentioning the Palestinians just like you refuse to mention the slaughtered  Kurds But you insist on mentioning the Palestinians and further conceal any remnant of opposing POV with the fascists friend the term  humanrights situation which you hope anyone can interpret as anything  Are you claiming that the horrors both existed and didnt exist depending on who you ask where are all those dead kurds then  revive them Im sure they will be glad to read in wikipedia that what was done to them was only a situation A situation is good Elain in Seinfeld has situations comes and goes They can dig up their graves and go home to watch the reruns  Never mind the bodies they will soon rot and everyone would have forgotten all about it Shhhhhhh But Only one thing as sure as the Sun existed didnt it The palestinians and their glee thats as solid as Iron who needs proof its the Palestinians Amen Do you have a paraplegic handy by any chance   I want to know a rational arumgent of why it is so important and humanitarian to  disguise Saddams undisputed DNA proven horrors It must be VERY important there must be some divine logic here beyond my rationality Oh It will upset the palestinians sure dont you think Saddams other little hobbies other than encouraging palestinians have upset at least the same number of people or largeer why do you stifle their emphasis then Either you stifle ALL non Iraqi effects of Saddam or you mention them NEUTRALLY that means not ONLY the palestinians   Are you perhaps saying that  gassed kurds and their millions of grieving relativessupporters are less important than  million live palestinians with no direct contact to Iraqi affairs other than a blushing glee at Saddams deeds if so how many how many nonpalestinians does it take to die till that issue becomes  important enough to mention if it contrasts the palestinian POV  a million  million by any chance does this number mean anything to you or do you just file it in you head as Human rights situation   and how many palestinians angry that  would it take for you to remove all the henceforth controversial entries on mathematics  palestinians  perhaps remember how to count women They wont like it unless you count women as  for men they might cause something to your Human rights situation otherwise   And this pargraph   an increase in humanrights abuses notably acts of genocide against Iraqi Kurds The United States continued to view Saddam with deep suspicion however primarly due to his pursuit of weapons of mass destruction  do you have any factual references that dispute any of this supported FACTS not liberal wishful illusions   all of it is corroborated in the links   And this  Thanks for pointing this out I suspect that it was removed because an anon is getting a kick out replacing noncontroversial matteroffact statements like the above with overtly emotive deliberately provocative ones  Are you hinting that this sentence While he remained a popular hero among many disaffected Arabs for standing up to the West and for his unflinching support for the Palestinians  is a NPOV what proof do you have of his support of the palestinians are ther any references of this or just hearsay  Just call wikipedia the Western Edition of Pravda and be done with it never mind that the Palestinian POV is merely matter of morale and the opposing POV rests on actual crimes of war how in your humane conscience can you condone this state of affairs And I dont want to skewer anyone either If I wante to Skewer Saddam I would have called him a Hitler wannabe Little Stalin  the prince of evil and so forth This is skewering Mentioning FACTS is never skewering even if the palestinians dont like them