DEMOCRATS should never edit on Republican BIOS  One single edit  and to get banned is a real lesson in Wikipedias fammous assume good faith WPAGF Dont Bite the Newbie WPBITE   as well  including WPNPOV Neutral point of view and a neoclassic WPASF A simple formulation  less then forgot this pearls of wisdom  such as Undue weight Coatrack or WPCOAT which is gloriously stated as followsA coatrack article is a Wikipedia article that ostensibly discusses the nominal subject but in reality is a cover for a tangentially related bias subject The nominal subject is used as an empty coatrack which ends up being mostly obscured by the coats   and  this little gemfrom the man himself  I can NOT emphasize this enough There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative I heard it somewhere pseudo information is to be tagged with a needs a cite tag Wrong It should be removed aggressively unless it can be sourced This is true of all information but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons WPVERIFY   Finally the one Mr Gamaliel is most  familiar which considering hes a  selfdescribed democrat  which is a bold face contradiction to this  lovely and dear wikipolicy Conflict of interest or COI WPCOI Now Mr Gamaliel seems to be more concernif a sock puppet should dare to step his private domain as the official no bias keeper of the Peter Roskam biography consistent with a wikipolicy  WPOWN even though Mr Gamaliel is a hard core democrat than to good of Wikipeidas policies of Encyclopedic content  You think you right but you may be wrong I may be an infamous sock or I may be Peter him self or I may be his wife or kids You should consider the words of your own fearless leader the Grand Jimbo Walesas he states clearly unless you cant read this  I can NOT emphasize this enough There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative I heard it somewhere pseudo information is to be tagged with a needs a cite tag Wrong It should be removed aggressively unless it can be sourced This is true of all information but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons  Jimmy Wales  I removed a section is is in total violation of many and multiple wikipedia policy only to be Banned by an administrator who is pushing his point of view  You should remember Peter and his family lives in Wheaton and share the same IPs as the Infamous sockpuppet you accuse this account to be  You sure love to conform to published wikipolicy as it  been stated in wikipeida policy I quote  Anonymous edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person should be evaluated carefully When the subject is of ambiguous notability such edits should not be regarded as vandalism in the first instance and RC patrollers should bear in mind that they may be dealing with the subject The use of inflammatory edit summaries or vandalismrelated talkpage templates should be avoided  The Arbitration Committee has ruled in favor of showing leniency to the subjects of biographies who try to remove what they see as errors or unfair material  or in Jimmys words  reverting someone who is trying to remove libel about themselves is a horribly stupid thing to do Jimmy Wales  So Mr Admin dont be STUPID and have your ego write checks that wikipeida cant cover  Be smart not dumb