Under Attack  User page has been under attack and will be protected until the vandals have stoppedSteve espinola   Wow Fucking double speak woman Lol If your page was vandalised what about the stuff you did to mine  No I think we got a little double think going on now which I find double plus plus bad but simultaneously double plus plus super double plus funny   Help support and spread newspeak today For you have already significantly adopted the other tenets of Big Brother govment   All I can say    War is peace  Slavery is freedom  Vandalism is fine editorial skill    HopeSeekr of xMule Talk    Mexican Estaban Steve Espinola I feel that your claims of wrongs perpetrated on you deserve documentation Given all your talk of vandalism to your page I think it makes sense that all the drama around your presence on Wikipedia be returned to your talk page where it belongs Signed the Brooklyn Steve Espinola user name Sojambi Pinola      new text  This was left on UserHopeSeekr of xMules discussion page at  Basicially he cut everything from his own page items  through  below and pasted it onto HopeSeekrs  Ive added my whole talk page to your talk page as youve been creatively editing yours I choose to creatively edit my own Steve espinola      LOL ROFLMFAO OK pay attention Steve Notice above how many people thank me for my edits Now look belowsee how many people gripe at you for yours HmmI still have trouble figuring out why a single person would become your advocate but I guess every one needs an attorney no matter what the crime Thanks for making this page even more vibrant  HopeSeekr of xMule Talk     Mmmmmmbo  good luck I think your version is great Mmmmmmbo  this was left unsigned by UserSteve espinola at  which pretty much solidifies that this user is also UserMmmmmmbo      Can you please explain your edits to Biff Rose They appear to express a negative POV towards the person Willmcw    For willmcw  I think its high time you stopped trying to rearrange my words The information contained on the biff rose site colelcts the pertinent info It is not a billboard for his achievements but an overview of his career I think records that were pressed and sold are of worth Ones that were not around in copies more than fifty or a hundred are not Ive interviewed Rose I know which ones sold and which ones didnt You can beef up a discog with murky details but it wont help the whole wiki crowd Stop being bullheaded and agressive because though youve been given power through edits you have also become that which you supposedly fight against You are not allowing the newer versions of this piece to come to life but instead are so closely guarding the information disseminated from within that you have become like a fascist Terrible  left unsigned by userSteve espinola at   Why do you delete the number of Carson appearances Why are you deleting the name of his biggest song What does it matter to you if the records sold  or  copies Do you have some personal animus towards Rose Please note that your personal feelings and your personallyobtained interviews should not be used to influence the article Its a biography and should present a comprehensive picture of his life Its not a place to gain revenge on someone you dont like Willmcw     Ive copied this discussion to the talkBiff Rose page Willmcw       Any info deleted was moved from prominence to more esoteric reading of it to make the article read better and have a decent flow That Rose was in Time magazine once in  is not of note That he wrote a song that was covered by both Tiny Tim and David Bowie is That that song was co written Oscar winning musician Paul Williams is important Also of note it should be mentioned that Rose has disavowed the Williams connection in several interviews until in late  on his own websites message board he admitted he was falsefying Williams own involvement in the song But a small  word blurb in time  years ago is not of worth As for Roses appearnaces on Carson there has been no reall connection with the amount of times Rose officially appeared on the show and how many times he taped performances He alleges himself that he appeared on the show  times Producerss from the Tonight show remember him being on with much less regularity Therefore a distinction to leave out embrassment would be something like Rose appeared with some level of regularity on the tonight show in the end of the decade Of note Rose was banned from any more performances on the Tonight Show because he refused to cut to a commercial break during his last performance reciting a poem he often claimed as his own which in fact was a poem by Paul Newmans uncle Joseph Newman This was chalked up to Roses irrascible nature I think it is important to notice to the anger that first rears its head here and then seems to pop up on the record he did in  and beyond to his later self released recordings where Rose is heard calling african americans niggers and making fun of the jewish religion citing Hitler as a genius who clearly had a vision Willmcw is trying to keep the previous words someone else wrote about Rose being a child molester which were clearly vandalism I did not write that and the anti semitic sentiments attributed to Rose are very easily found in his records and his websites Willmcw is a vandal and works against my own edits in a nasty and un wiki fashionSteve espinola       Greetings  Greetings and welcome to wikipedia Please excuse the rude treatment youve received from the administrator who has engaged most of your attention thus far He has a bad habit of disregarding WikipediaPlease do not bite the newcomers especially where a newcomer has made edits to an article or subject he deems to be his territory You should not let a hostile reception deter you from participating here and I hope you will stay While editing I encourage you to review Wikipedias policies and guidelines located here Please make a good faith attempt at abiding by each and if you believe that another user you have encountered is not doing so a proper recourse is to inform himher of it Thanks and welcome once again Rangerdude   I dont think that this is a new user Willmcw     A hunch that somebodys a returnee absent clear proof is no basis to harass him or her Unless you have proof and are prepared to make a case of it please assume good faith Rangerdude        Im not harassing anyone I came to his talk page to ask him to not delete material from an article The fact that he is using a different username today didnt seem like sufficient reason to call out the welcome wagon But you go right ahead if you like Cheers Willmcw           Revert warning  You are in danger of violating the three revert rule Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing Willmcw    REad this  Willmcw I understadn yo uare trying to avoid vandalism but by manipulating this site into your view you promote FASCISM  MY edits are good on the subject of Biff Rose  Look at his website research his recordings Time magazine has written numerous articles are these mentioned in other wiki posts NO So why here  As for Roses self released recordings I did a favor to you by listing them Are Other performers non accesible recordings listed NO  Do a better job editing and less of one POlicing because you stink at it  left unsigned by userSteve espinola on    Redirect  The article at Biff rose is improperlytitled because it is not capitalized correctly Please leave it as a redirect to the properlynamed article Thank you Willmcw    What the  Hey why are you reverting my edits and removing the photo of Biff Rose I found a separate article on the same topic where you seemed to be the main author incorporated the main points from it in an attempt to mege them Someone later redirected it Why are you deleting my additions Marcuse   However much I abhor racism antisemitism etc I think that whatever Biff Rose currently espouses seems more like it should be taken with a grain of salt Not quite the same as David Duke I have no problem with these things outlined in his bio but it should really not have the form as something showing a personal point of view It seems like the way the article was was fairly balanced showing both old and new aspects of the artist And let the quotes and links speak for themselves Why did