This is the BS I am talking about You have lied about me and other editors The Murray information was to support  fewer bombers If you look at Bzuks talk page you will see I provided him the Murray citation via google books so that is false as well And the same for Irving You didnt bother to trace his citation to the sources section did you Tut tut It reveals the figures for production came from Milchs notes If you had also bothered to read the next page p  I believe Irving demonstrates perfectly clearly what Milch felt about production levels This is part of the reason why you were blocked from editing on the Battle of Britain page and then again for socket puppeting  I am not refusing to give anything In fact I can give you the quote for the  Only I think Ill do it tomorrow night given I am tired and you having wasted most my time today You should have simply asked for it in the begining like a normal person instead of moving everything around and removing my citations As for the change in Romanian to Reich yes it is difficult to work out what Caldwell is referring to It seems this particular mission was a diversion to the synthetic oil plants in WGermany not Polesti RAF Bomber Command used an attack by the AF to attack this target In fact no I cant resist Two Gruppen of JG  were sent up after the RAF Lancasters but could not get past the swarms of RAF Spitfires and Mustangs For the day the RLV force lost  KIA  WIA and  fighters The RAF lost no bombers and one Spitfire  So there you have it  So now I would like you to recipricate