The links do work which is proof that youre not even attempting to look at them Can you consider actually looking at the evidence for once I see you are quick to make accusations that are baseless How surprising  The problem is that they are not proof of what they claim to be Damn how hard is that to understand Some of you are full of it and you know it  See WPV  The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material not on those seeking to remove it  So you want to include it provide an accurate citation You act as though all of this is obviously true but its not Your opinions are not facts and your arguments should have something other than namecalling to back them up   If you were truly interested in the accuracy of this article you would read the lengthy rebuttals above and respond to them Instead you make pathetic accusations and ignore the hard work of other Wikipedians and of course you never bother to deal with actual facts