False accusations     I have been accused of sock puppeting yet they still havnt brought one single piece of tangible proof even though the other person claimed he was from mexico which I am from the states The main reason why I was initially blocked was because of Bigcat as his false accusations bias moderating lies misinformation and more lies different people have noted he was bias and still he is allowed to control the lion vs tiger section with only repeating its not reliable or not a peer journal none of this is true for instance his account where he put on lion vs tiger has been sitting there for going on  years and still no one has even peered into it it is a straight up lie that he said the lion was killed here is the full article of the  fight  urlhttpbpblogspotcomNuqIbtehBTDEkmIAAAAAAAAyuIuNemgrJvfIsAnotherfightatbostocksjpgurl  Miss informs people and twists facts he uses this tactics on the roman accounts leaving out who won in popmeii and following it in with a non credible source William bridges is not a historian but he uses it to capitalize on the archaeology book in fact that book roots to the fact the lion defeated the tiger as romanitalian sites says the tiger is being attacked by a lion urlhttpwwwromanoimperocompompeihtmlurl  He routes it to the usual that it was a leopard but the leopard mosaic is in the house of doves the lion standing over a prostrated tiger is in the house of faun Several members point out his major flaws such as Bbbeto as he states its not that the sources arnt reliable he just doesnt want anything that favors the lion and will show the lion as the usual winner its not that they arent peer jorunals its that the support the lion he has erased over  things not seeable now on the talk page and edit page it doesnt matter if its from a trainer if they support the lion he will call it unreliable and the rules dont applywhat rules Its only his rules there hasnt been a consensus done by  people at once going on over  years Is this what wiki is for for who ever is the more persistent and the better liar to be able to control wiki Its just his  and he should be banned from editing that topic since he is already a part of over  forums specifically on topic where he has been caught lying for instance he just said he has graduated from  universitys urlhttpsenwikipediaorgwikiUserBigCaturl  Really he graduated from  of the top university around the world Show us just one of them name the university show us who you studied under show us a copy of your diploma he is a pathological liar look under the bear contributions countless of people call him specifically a tiger fan look at the talk page there the lion vs tiger contribution only he is ever erasing things of favoring the lion Wikipedia mods should be ashamed for having a person use its search engine for a person pumping out his own propaganda and bias POV for this amount of time unchecked He now says that no experts favor a lion really Define expert if we look at what wiki has as expert urlhttpsenwikipediaorgwikiExperturl  We can see that an expert is someone who has prolonged experience or observation the topic is about them fighting so they have to have excerpts and citations of them seeing a fightno excerpts of them exist for the tiger so far yet he disputes people who does and is considered experts  Clyde beatty Terrel jaccobs Bert nelson Peter taylor Dave hoover Damoo dhotre Marco Peters Isablela thomas William blackburne George conklin Dave salmoni Samatha stephens Dr antle from big cat rescue Dr Frank mendel  There are alot of experts who favor the lion yet he will just lie and lie and lie that they dont just like the accounts there are  tigers killed by lions just from Clyde beatty alone  urlhttptrovenlagovaundpdelarticlesearchTermclydebeattytigerskilledsearchLimitsurl  Lions have killed tigers hundreds of times theres even photo evidence of the combatants urlhttptrovenlagovaundpdelarticlesearchTermtigerpriesanddieslionsearchLimitsurl urlhttptrovenlagovaundpdelarticlesearchTermliontigerfightturinsearchLimitsurl Yet the only one he accepts is the one to make like the lion is incapable of killing a tiger by highlighting they were small female ambushed ectgiving the appeal that lions dont stand a chance when in fact they are taller at the shoulder heavier as a species has more genuine experts who favor the lion over the tiger upon experience has killed more times then vice versa The article doesnt have to show a one sided one but a fair assessment should be brought in by atleast  peer reviewers of people who actually read the actual dam article instead of leaving lies and misinformation by the biggest bias liar on the web In fact i just left crumbs there I am not gona participate in aiding this topic on this search engine again you guys can manipulate the system and misinform people all you like I will take this info to a proper site where people like Bigcat and flatout aka false accusers and liars cant do anything about changing the truth