unblockTHANK YOU for a reasonable fucking comment The ONLY USER in ANY AREA who has actually made one  Ebyabe made comments which appear to be reasonable at first glance but are actually unreasonable because one is fraudulent and the other was untrue regarding a place where she could see that it was untrue  Well a sortof reasonable comment anyway because he claims that I am being confrontational when it is clearly visible at my talk page that other users are attacking me and not the other way around  I have not caused any confrontation   I have replied to other users who are putting a confrontation to me  I did ask how to report a user but I did not actually report him because nobody answered regardless of several posts made and the user himself did not comment there so that was not a confrontation like it would have been if Id been able to make the report  I would like to leave a message at this user s talk page but I cannot because for some reason those are blocked to so I have to do it this way instead  Hopefully he has the notifications turned on tags of username  I can be calm and work with other people  This is noted in my first reply where it gives several examples of how users should have had discussion instead of attacking and reverting me and arguing hostilely on my talk page  Users who wish to work with me should not make attacks write words like compliance revert edits when they could have further fixed the edit instead details of referredto edits in a separate paragraph below make false claims against me or delete my replies on discussion pages not talk pages and then ARCHIVE it after removing them  Users should not do these kinds of things to anyone  What this means is that if users act in a reasonable manner then a normal discussion can ensue including from myself  Merely because someone has used a template written a shorter reply or wrote their aggressive confrontational remarks in a businessstyle manner does not mean that they are being reasonable or writing nicely  When someone makes a falsified report about you or writes a falsified comment etc it is not reasonable to expect the victim to reply without mentioning this or to want to be friends with the attacker  If the other people are being reasonable then of COURSE I am going to reply to them in a different way  Editing an article bybelow is not reasonable nor is ganging up the discussion page nor is replying in several places at once etc  How can replying to other users stating bad andor false things about you be confrontational  I have mentioned several times about having an actual discussion but no one did this and instead just kept replying on my talk pages  The fact that I mentioned having a discussion indicates that I think reasonable discussion is the right or reasonable way to do it  Just no one wanted to do anything but attack me so I did not have another way  The headlines are not veiled they are in plain light  It was not any attempt to be hidden  For headline  I literally do or did not know of a different way to title this headline which is not an attack on myself  For headline  it is truthful and the falsification was blatant by Ebyabe and I actually expected her to edit it to something on her next message  I mean she directly mentions it edit summary says a reason but her message says differently directly not implied  For this headline it is not a personal attack because it is true and evident Administrator complains about my signature even though signature has been changed and messages by me since posted before the block happened as well as direct linking to comments which contain no personal attacks as a reason for personal attacks  If the titles were UNTRUE they would be attacks but since they are true unambiguously then they cant be attacks The last headline yes somewhat motivatedhostile because he is the one put an useless headline so that theres TWO AT ONCE AFTER my notice is up while also writing the things that show the actual tyranny a word used in this case solely because it is already being talked about and not meant as any attackinstigationhostileetc Although the link by Jamie appears to say something about political opinions if someone is making false claims then it is appropriate for them to be exposed   So as you can see my intents are to be reasonable and normal with the possible exception of this particular headline and repeatedly asking other people to do this but being annoyed by all their attacks and false remarks as well  Edits in a separate paragraph so that reading it is optional Users working with me should notrevert edits when they could have further fixed the edit instead  Instead of reverting multiple times attacking and then harassing the user could have simply improved my previous edit if the felt it necessary  It actually was in fact necessary because most of the paragraph was based on the incorrect idea that black people often check the white box on surveys because of   social characteristics or something and in order for it to both be accurate and make sense additional things would have to have been removed  These are the things that I left in in order to avoid conflict even though though it makes the article make much less sense in regards to flow when they are left in  I included in a comment several times that we should be fixing the problem with a reasonable discussion poll in order to get the correct version up but this was ignored except for one derogatory remark that mentioning reasonable solutions should not be done Editing an article by reverting back to the incomprehensible version is hardly reasonable  Editing it again if the first person got it wrong  because they couldnt properly figure out what it was talking about  is the reasonable way