No no no  I posted no article no link  Not even the text I reverted was a link to the article  I made it quite clear that I was reverting vandalism according to policy  If you had been the one deleting it it wouldve been one thing since the policy makes an exception for deleting comments made on ones OWN talk page  But it was another user deleting comments  So it was against policy  If you had bothered to read edit summaries youd have seen that I was attempting to revert vandalism not harass  And now you question my entire purpose here  What is that purpose and why do you fail to WPAGF in stating that I have some purpose here other than contributing to the encyclopedia