OKyou all call my behavior aggressive but I consider it WPBOLD You all call my editing behavior uncivil but I just call it being vocal about the removal of valid material from Wikipedia I will refrain from using strong language in edit summaries in the future including capital letters You say that This is persistent and entrenched behavior on your part that you dont seem to understand or want to change after many warnings and two blocks  Ive never had any substantial warnings only the two expedited blocks You say that I should accept the rules when other editors are totally disregarding andor misquoting them or trying to pass off essays and guidelines as policy when they are not The fact is that if someone is removing goodvalidsourced material from Wikipedia Im going to call them out on it Any way that you put it strong wording in edit summaries is not a valid reason to permablock people as short sentences like that can easily be taken out of context  Regarding my claims of censorship and vandalism in the abovementioned edit summaries Im not sure what else to call it if not censorship and vandalismI suppose I could always call it the constant removal of valid categoriesinformation from articles but that would be whitewashing the issue For whatever reason entirely valid relevant and sourced material is consistently removed from many articles Paul Wolfowitz Ben Bernanke Lewis Libby others by the same editors again and again and after a while it just gets very old ridiculous and frustrating to have to keep inserting this valid information over and over By the way I consider the removal of valid materialcategories from articles over and over again to be censorship and vandalismdont you Some kindof phantom clause in WPBLP is constantly cited to try to justify the removal of this information even though this information is currently found in thousands of other articles with no problem at all  When I wrote Revery sic Jayjgs idiotic edit in an edit summary for removing CategoryEthnic nationalism from the White nationalism article I only made that statement because the very first sentence of the article said White nationalism WN is a form of ethnic nationalism  thus the removal of said category seemed rather idiotic in my opinion since the first sentence of the article obviously confirmed that particular category Jayjg then changed that first sentence he provided no source for this edit and removed the category I never called Jayjg idiotic only that particular edit  Since everything I write on here seems to be misconstrued taken the wrong way and wrongfully considered uncivil andor aggressive what is and what is not civil and aggressive is highly POV and a matter of opinion by the way I plan to edit  and remove any and all information that could be considered offensive or uncivil  I am going to bring the page down to the basics  Truthfully I try my best to avoid getting caught up in all of these Wikipolitics personal vendettas petty edit wars childish games etc I am part of no groupcabal here I stick to myself and mind my own business and improve and expand Wikipedia as best I can However when I see factual edits constantly being reverted for no apparent reason what I term censorship and vandalism it tends to make me a bit angry so I have no choice except to be vocal about it and hope that other good editors see what is happening and will begin to take action and discuss these issues Thats another thingthe complete and utter lack of discussion by these people whether in edit summaries or on talk pages I would like to discuss these issues and I always try to leave a good edit summary but whenever I try to discuss these issues the response I so often get is one or two bogus sentences and the mindless repetition of a bunch of Wikipedia essaysguidelines NOTE NOT POLICIES in an attempt to justify the censorious deletionvandalism the constant removal of valid categoriesinformation from articles I havent even been able to respond to this block since I am barred from editing the admin messageboard I was given no warnings and I was blocked before I even had a chance to defend myself regarding these spurious and overblown allegations