Why LaVey anyway   Well so far Reason Rules The Neutrality sticker is still up though LGagnon threatened I believe that it would only be temporary Intellectually I am actually rather satisfied to leave it at that  But  Not For one thing I enjoy intellectual duelling much too much All Hail Wikipedia Ah for the days of learning for the sake of learning  I raised the question as part of my pursuit here why LaVey Why not Timothy McVeigh Again theres not enough room for everyone so how were the selected selected We know who is included Who was excluded or perhaps simply nonincluded ie unintentionally in contradistinction to intentional exclusion  What is more in view of the evolution of terrorism  to all intents and purposes   virtually morphing  into a veritable weltanschauung Timothy McVeigh takes on a new urgency relevance and intellectualphilosophical challenge  My fear is that the whole effort is loaded biased in violation of Wikipedia rules The whole thing seems to be a charade to ride satanism in on the ratiocinative coattails of Objectivist Ayn Rand Otherwise again why not Timothy McVeigh Again he explicitly mentioned and is often discussed in terms of Randian libertarianism She would disown him like a Bolshevik of course but then she would disown LaVey in utter disgust So if theres room only for one of the two why LaVey  If I dont receive reasoned responses I will edit LaVey out again Again boys and girls my emphasis is on a truly Wikipedian neutral POV AOluwatoyin  Oh by the way regarding my being blocked  on grounds of incivility no less  LGagnon who started all the trouble on the other hand does not get blocked He who refers to admins as vandalcoddling Thats not incivility Such revolting doublestandards will not stand Im just getting warmed up here AOluwatoyin