Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

C 4/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 6.1.2001

**Action brought on 6 September 2000 by Cooperative** **Action brought on 16 October 2000 by SAT.1 Satel-**
**Codess Sociale Cooperative Sociale a r.l. and Others** **litenFernsehen GmbH against the Office for Harmonis-**
**against Commission of the European Communities** **ation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)**

**(Case T-323/00)**
**(Case T-235/00)**

(2001/C 4/09)

(2001/C 4/08)

_(Language of the case: German)_

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
_(Language of the case: Italian)_ Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on
16 October 2000 by SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH, Mainz
and Berlin, Germany, represented by Rheinhard Schneider, of
An action against the Commission of the European Communi- Büsing, Müffelmann & Theye, Bremen (Germany).
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 6 September 2000 by Cooperative
Codess Sociale Cooperative Sociale a r.l. and Others, represent- The applicant claims that the Court should:
ed by Franca Gajulli and Isabella Gianniotti, of the Venice Bar.

— annul and declare invalid the decision of the Second
Board of Appeal of the defendant of 2 August 2000 in
The applicant claims that the Court should: Case R 312/99-2;

—
— order the defendant to pay the costs.
annul Articles 1, 2, 5 and 6 of Commission Decision
2000/394/EEC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in
Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security
contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995,
_Pleas in law and main arguments_
or annul Articles 1, 2, 5 and 6 thereof, and declare
applicable the exemption provided for by Article 86(2) of
the Treaty (services of general economic interest) to the
applicant; Mark: Wordmark ‘SAT. 2’ — Application No 513135

— order the Commission to pay the costs. Goods or services: Goods and services in Classes 35,
38, 41, 42 (including distribution
of radio and television programmes, production of films and
television programmes, distribution of film rights, development
_Pleas in law and main arguments_ of software)

Decision contested Refusal by the examiner to register
before the Board of
The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied upon in
Appeal:
Cases T-234/00 Fondazione Opera S. Maria della Carità v
Commission.( [1] )
Pleas in law: — misapplication of Article
7(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC)
No 40/94

— misapplication of Article
( [1] ) See p. 5 of this Official Journal.
7(1)(c) of Regulation (EEC)
No 40/94