Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2021 –  
Qx World v EUIPO – Mandelay (EDUCTOR)

(Case T‑84/20)

(EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 16(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention)

| 1. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Appeal brought against a decision of a unit of the Office ruling at first instance and referred to the Board of Appeal – Functional continuity between those two bodies – Examination of the appeal by the Board of Appeal – Scope  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 71(1))  (see para. 26) |

| 2. | EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Statement of reasons for decisions – Scope  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 94)  (see para. 30) |

| 3. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Condition of admissibility – Grounds of appeal directed only against decisions of the Boards of Appeal  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(1))  (see para. 31) |

| 4. | EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Use of the mark capable of being prohibited by virtue of another earlier right – Review by the competent bodies of the Office and by the Court as to the national law applicable – Scope  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 53(1); Commission Regulation 2018/625, Art. 16(1)(b))  (see paras 40-44) |

| 5. | EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion – Invalidity proceedings concerning relative grounds for refusal – Examination restricted to the facts, evidence and arguments provided – Examination of a legal question of the Office’s own motion – Condition  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 95(1))  (see paras 46, 47) |

| 6. | EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Absence of consent on the part of the proprietor of a mark to the registration applied for by an agent or a representative under its own name – Agent or representative – Aim  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(3) and 53(1)(a))  (see paras 60, 61) |

| 7. | EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Non-registered mark or another sign used in the course of trade – Word mark EDUCTOR and non-registered mark EDUCTOR  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(3) and 53(1)(b))  (see paras 63, 64, 69, 72, 73, 77, 78) |

| 8. | Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Correction of an error of reasoning during the proceedings before the Court – Not permissible  (Art. 296 TFEU)  (see para. 74) |

| 9. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Power of the General Court to alter the contested decision – Limits  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(3))  (see para. 79) |

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2019 (Case R 1310/2019-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Qx World and Mandelay.

Operative part

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 November 2019; |

| 2. | Orders Qx World Kft., EUIPO and Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) each to bear their own costs. |

[Top](#document1)