Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/26 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2014 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Weleda Trademark (MENOCHRON)

(Case T-473/11)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2014184EN.01002601-E0001)

((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark MENOCHRON - Earlier Community word mark MENODORON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 184/44

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Longevity Health Products (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Weleda Trademark AG (Arlesheim, Switzerland) (represented by: W. Haring, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2010 (Case R 2345/2010-4), relating to an opposition procedure between Weleda Trademark AG and Longevity Health Products, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)