Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/33 |

---

Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v EUIPO (MASTIHACARE)

(Case T-60/20)

(2020/C 103/47)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou (Chios, Greece) (represented by: A-E. Malami, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for international registration designating the European Union of the word mark MASTIHACARE — Application for registration No 1388895;

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2019 in Case R 692/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | admit the present action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | permit the registration under No 1388895 of the international trade mark ‘MASTIHACARE’ designating the EU, for all goods in Class 3; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs under Article 190(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020103EN.01003301-E0001) of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)