Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 November 2016 —  
BSH Hausgeräte v EUIPO

(Case C‑389/16 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark AROMA — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded )

|  | Appeals—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 6) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | BSH Hausgeräte GmbH is to bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)