Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/64 |

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 February 2004

in Case T-120/03 Synopharm G,bH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2004106EN.01006403-E0001)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 106/131)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-120/03 between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG, represented by G. Hodapp, lawyer, and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and U. Pfleghar), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda, represented by J. Pereira da Cruz, lawyer – Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 January 2003 (Case R 44/2002-3) relating to the opposition proceedings between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG and Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda – the Court of first instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 February 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | There is no need to rule on the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the defendant. |

---

[Top](#document1)