Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/25 |

---

Action brought on 7 September 2006 — Reitz and von Gadomski v OHIM (CMD-CLINIC)

(Case T-241/06)

(2006/C 261/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicants: J. Reitz (Aumühle, Germany) and B. von Gadomski (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Poser, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 6 July 2006 (R0372/2006-4); |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CMD-CLINIC’ in respect of goods and services in Classes 5, 10 and 44 (Application No 3 661 337).

Decision of the Examiner: Partial refusal to register.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: The contested decision is unlawful inasmuch as registration was wrongly refused pursuant to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94[(1)](#ntr1-C_2006261EN.01002501-E0001) on the basis that the mark applied for is descriptive and pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) thereof on the ground that it lacks distinctiveness.

---

[Top](#document1)