Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/36 |

---

Action brought on 24 April 2015 — Aguirre and Company v OHIM — Puma (Representation of a sports shoe)

(Case T-205/15)

(2015/C 205/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Aguirre and Company, SA. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Pomares Caballero and A. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark representing a sports shoe —Community trade mark No 1050520-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 January 2015 in Case R 696/2013-3

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | alter the contested decision so as to find that the ground of invalidity laid down in Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 found by the Board of Appeal is not met in this case; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | or, alternatively, annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | and, in any event, order OHIM to pay the costs and the costs of the applicant. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | infringement of an essential procedural requirement in that the contested decision contained inconsistent statements with the result that it is insufficiently reasoned. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | infringement of Article 25(1)(e) Regulation No 6/2002. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | infringement of Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002. |

---

[Top](#document1)