Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/35 |

---

Action brought on 20 February 2015 — Navitar v OHIM — Elukuva (NaviTar)

(Case T-93/15)

(2015/C 127/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Navitar, Inc. (Rochester, United States) (represented by: J. Mattes, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: MTÜ Elukuva (Tallinn, Estonia)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘NaviTar’ — Application for registration No 11 147 246

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 December 2014 in Case R 401/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order MTÜ Elukuva to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal, in case MTÜ Elukuva should become an intervening party in this case. |

Plea(s) in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |

---

[Top](#document1)