Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/23 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Nurel v EUIPO — FKuR Property (Terylene)

(Case T-325/22) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023329EN.01002302-E0001)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Terylene - Earlier EU word mark TERRALENE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Proof of genuine use)

(2023/C 329/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nurel, SA (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: C. Anadón Giménez and J. Learte Álvarez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: FKuR Property GmbH (Willich, Germany) (represented by H. Timmann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2022 (Case R 1544/2021-4)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders Nurel, SA to pay the costs. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)