Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/36 |

---

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS)

(Case T-136/20) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022024EN.01003602-E0001)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 24/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ardex GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lian Chen (Seseña Nuevo, Spain) (represented by: A. González López-Menchero and V. Valero Piña, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2019 (Case R 2503/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ardex and Mr Chen.

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ardex GmbH and Mr Lian Chen. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)