Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

29.6.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 156/21

**JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE** **JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 20 March 2002**

**of 17 April 2002**
**in Case T-355/00: DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for**
**Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and**
**Designs) (OHIM)** ( [1] )
**in Case T-325/00: Elke Sada v Commission of the Euro-**
**pean Communities** ( [1] )
_**(Community trade mark — ‘TELE AID’ — Absolute grounds**_
_**for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC)**_
_**No 40/94)**_

_**(Officials — Temporary agent — Unemployment allowance**_
_**— Refused)**_ (2002/C 156/40)

_(Language of the case: German)_

(2002/C 156/39)

In Case T-355/00: DaimlerChrysler AG, established in Stuttgart
(Germany), represented by S. Völker, lawyer, v Office for
_(Language of the case: German)_ Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl and D. Schennen) — action brought against the decision of the Third Board
of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 September 2000
(Case R 142/2000-3) relating to registration of ‘TELE AID’ as
a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance
(Second Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of:
In Case T-325/00: Elke Sada, former temporary agent at
R.M. Moura Ramos, President, V. Tiili, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi
the Commission of the European Communities, residing in
and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a
Besozzo (Italy), represented by H.-J. Rüber, Rechtsanwalt, with
judgment on 20 March 2002, in which it:
an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and
B. Wägenbaur) — application for annulment of the decision 1. _Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office_
of the Commission of 20 December 1999 refusing to grant _for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and_
the applicant an unemployment allowance under Article 28a _Designs) of 12 September 2000 (Case R 142/2000-3) as_
of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the _regards the following categories of goods and services:_
European Communities — the Court of First Instance (Fourth
Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, V. Tiili and —
_‘electrical and electronic devices for transferring speech and_
P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on
_data; stationary and mobile transmission, relay and audio_
17 April 2002, in which it:
_receivers and devices; data processing equipment and parts_
_therefor; navigation devices’ within Class 9;_

—
_‘operation of a communications network’ within Class 38;_
1. _dismisses the application;_

—
_‘collection, storage, processing and output of information’_
_within Class 42._

2. _orders the parties to bear their own costs._
2. _As to the remainder, dismisses the action;_

3. _Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and one half of the_
_defendant’s costs; the defendant is to pay the other half of its_
_own costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 372 of 23.12.2000.

( [1] ) OJ C 28 of 27.1.2001.