Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/33 |

---

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2014 — Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v OHIM — Gap (ITM) (GAPPol)

(Case T-125/14)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2015026EN.01003302-E0001)

((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 026/42)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Gap (ITM), Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2014 (Case R 686/2013-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Gap (ITM), Inc. and PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska.

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska and Gap (ITM), Inc. |

---

[Top](#document1)