Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/32 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2014 — Think Schuhwerk v OHIM — Müller (VOODOO)

(Case T-50/13)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2015007EN.01003201-E0001)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark VOODOO - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of descriptive character - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c)of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 007/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Think Schuhwerk GmbH (Kopfing, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Andreas Müller (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: J. Pick, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 November 2012 (Case R 474/2012 4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Think Schuhwerk GmbH and Mr Andreas Müller

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | orders Think Schuhwerk GmbH to pay the costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)