Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

16.3.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 68/3

**Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter &** established in Cincinnati, Ohio (United States of America),
**Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on** represented by C.J.J.C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers, lawyers.
**19 September 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court**
**of First Instance of the European Communities in case**
The Appellant claims that the Court should:
**T-119/00** ( [1] ) **between Procter & Gamble Company and**
**Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade** —
annul the judgment
**Marks and Designs) (OHIM)**

—
order the OHIM to pay the costs both at first instance
**(Case C-470/01 P)** and on appeal.

(2002/C 68/05)

_Pleas in law and main arguments_

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 19 September
See case C-468/01 P.
2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance
of the European Communities in case T-119/00 between
Procter & Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in ( [1] ) OJ C 192, 8.7.2000, p. 22.
the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company,
established in Cincinnati, Ohio (United States of America),
represented by C.J.J.C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers, lawyers.

**Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter &**
The Appellant claims that the Court should:
**Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on**
— **19 September 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court**
annul the judgment
**of First Instance of the European Communities in case**
— **T-121/00** ( [1] ) **between Procter & Gamble Company and**
order the OHIM to pay the costs both at first instance
**Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade**
and on appeal.
**Marks and Designs) (OHIM)**

**(Case C-472/01 P)**
_Pleas in law and main arguments_

(2002/C 68/07)
See case C-468/01 P.

( [1] ) OJ C 192, 8.7.2000, p. 21. An appeal against the judgment delivered on 19 September
2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of
the European Communities in case T-121/00 between Procter
& Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in the
Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi**Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter &** ties on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company,
**Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on** established in Cincinnati, Ohio (United States of America),
**19 september 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court** represented by C.J.J.C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers, lawyers.
**of First Instance of the European Communities in case**
**T-120/00** ( [1] ) **between Procter & Gamble Company and**
The Appellant claims that the Court should:
**Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade**
**Marks and Designs) (OHIM)** — annul the judgment

—
**(Case C-471/01 P)** order the OHIM to pay the costs both at first instance
and on appeal.
(2002/C 68/06)

_Pleas in law and main arguments_
An appeal against the judgment delivered on 19 September
2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of
See case C-468/01 P.
the European Communities in case T-120/00 between Procter
& Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in the
Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was ( [1] ) OJ C 192, 8.7.2000, p. 22.
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company,