Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/33 |

---

Action brought on 26 August 2022 — GKP v EUIPO — Cristalfarma (TIARA RUBIS)

(Case T-518/22)

(2022/C 398/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: GKP GmbH (Ehrenhausen an der Weinstraße, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cristalfarma Srl (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark TIARA RUBIS — Application for registration No 18 205 571

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2022 in Case R 1878/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul paragraph 2 of the operative part of the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | uphold in its entirety paragraph 1 of the operative part of the contested decision; and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs of the earlier stages of the proceedings. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of certain services in class 35; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of goods in class 5 and certain services. |

---

[Top](#document1)