Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

20150731063617142015/C 270/473122015TC27020150817EN01ENINFO\_JUDICIAL20150609373822

Case T-312/15: Action brought on 9 June 2015 — Market Watch v OHIM — Glaxo Group (MITOCHRON)

[Top](#document1)

C2702015EN3720120150609EN0047372382

Action brought on 9 June 2015 — Market Watch v OHIM — Glaxo Group (MITOCHRON)

(Case T-312/15)

2015/C 270/47Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. (Freeport, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Glaxo Group Ltd (Brentford, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘MITOCHRON’ — Application for registration No 11 200 078

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2015 in Case R 507/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | admit the complaint; |

| — | annul the contested decision and dismiss in its entirety the application filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |

Plea in law

| — | The trade marks involved in the dispute are not so similar as to be capable of being confused. |

[Top](#document2)