Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/33 |

---

Action brought on 9 April 2008 — BCS v OHIM — Deere (Combination of colours green and yellow)

(Case T-137/08)

(2008/C 142/60)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: BCS SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Franzosi, V. Jandoli, F. Santonocito, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deere & Company (Moline, United States)

Form of order sought

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 16 January 2008 in case R 0222/2007-2; and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: A figurative mark consisting of the colour combination of green and yellow for goods in classes 7 and 12 — Community trade mark No 63 289

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Deere & Company

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(3), 52(1)(c) in connection with Article 8(4) and Article 73(1) of Council Regulation No 40/94, as:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | the Board of Appeal ought to have interpreted Article 7(3) very strictly and, accordingly, should have imposed a rigorous burden of proof on the other party to the proceedings; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | the Board of Appeal failed to recognize the prior de facto trade mark of the applicant; and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | the Board of Appeal used contradictory reasoning in its decision. |

---

[Top](#document1)