Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 July 2018 — QuaMa Quality Management v EUIPO

(Case C‑139/17 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62017CJ0139_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Opposition proceedings — Application for the word mark medialbo — Earlier mark MediaLB — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Notice of opposition filed by a person who is not the proprietor of the earlier mark — No formal application for registration of the transfer of the earlier mark within the opposition period — Inadmissibility)

| 1. | Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted—Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence—Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))  (see paras 33-35) |

| 2. | Appeal—Grounds—Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court—Error of law relied on not identified—Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 39) |

| 3. | Appeal—Grounds—Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal—Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 44) |

| 4. | Appeal—Grounds—Challenge to the contested decision before the General Court and not the judgment it delivered—Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 54) |

| 5. | Judicial proceedings—Statement of reasons for judgments—Scope  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 36)  (see para. 59) |

Operative part

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |

| 2. | Orders QuaMa Quality Management GmbH to pay the costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62017CJ0139_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) [OJ C 357, 23.10.2017](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2017:357:TOC).

[Top](#document1)