Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

2.8.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/43

_Pleas in law and main arguments_

Community trade mark Word mark ‘DigiFilm’, applicasought: tion no 2 467 348

Goods or services: Goods and services in Classes 9
(storage media etc.) and 42
(creating photographs etc.)

Decision contested before Refusal by the examiner of rethe Board of Appeal: gistration

Decision of the Board of Dismissal of the applicant's apAppeal: peal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b)
and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 40/94 ( [1] )

( [1] ) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the
Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

**Action brought on 19 May 2003 by CeWe Color AG &**
**Co. OHG against the Office for Harmonisation in the**
**Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)**

**(Case T-179/03)**

(2003/C 184/95)

_(Language of the case: German)_

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on
19 May 2003 by CeWe Color AG & Co. OHG, Oldenburg
(Germany), represented by Chr. Spintig, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—
annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the
defendant of 12 March 2003 in Case R 638/2002-3;

—
order the defendant to pay the costs.

_Pleas in law and main arguments_

Community trade mark Word mark ‘DigiFilmMaker’, apsought: plication no 2 467 017

Goods or services: Goods and services in Classes 9
(storage media etc.) and 42
(creating photographs etc.)

Decision contested before Refusal by the examiner of rethe Board of Appeal: gistration

Decision of the Board of Dismissal of the applicant's apAppeal: peal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b)
and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 40/94 ( [1] )

( [1] ) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the
Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

**Action brought on 20 May 2003 by Gianmarco Addi-**
**mando and Others against the European Parliament**

**(Case T-182/03)**

(2003/C 184/96)

_(Language of the case: French)_

An action against the European Parliament was brought before
the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on
20 May 2003 by Gianmarco Addimando, residing in Luxembourg, and 32 other officials, represented by G. Bounéou,
lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

—
annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority
changing, with effect from a year not further specified
(1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period
during which the applicants were officials of the
European Parliament), the procedure for calculating the
annual expense of travelling to Greece in respect of the
journey via Brindisi, as taken into consideration for the
destination of Athens;

or, in the alternative,

—
annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority
to reimburse, with effect from a year not further specified
(1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period
during which the applicants were officials of the
European Parliament), the cost of the sea passage from
Brindisi to various Greek frontier points (Corfu, Igoumenitsa, Patras) on the basis of an ‘aircraft type seat’ ticket;

—
annul all the applicants' pay slips implementing the
decisions annulment of which is sought;

—
reimburse to the applicants all the amounts not paid
following implementation of the decisions annulment of
which is sought, together with legal interest;