Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

10.5.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/29

**JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 26 February 2003**

**in Case T-59/01: Albert Nardone v Commission of the**
**European Communities** ( [1] )

_**(Action for annulment — Former official - Request for**_
_**invalidity pension)**_

(2003/C 112/54)

_(Language of the case: French)_

In Case T-59/01: Albert Nardone, a former official of the
Commission of the European Communities, residing inPiétrain
(Belgium), represented by J. R. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and
K. Delvolvé, lawyers, against the Commission of the European
Communities (Agent: J. Currall) — application, principally, for
the annulment of the Commission decision of 20 March 2000
refusing to grant the applicant an invalidity pension, —
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of:
B. Vesterdorf, President, N.J. Forwood and H. Legal, Judges;
D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
judgment on 26 February 2003, in which it:

1. _Dismisses the application;_

2. _Orders the parties to bear their own costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 173 of 16.6.01.

**JUDGMENT BY THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 27 February 2003**

**in Case T-61/01 Vendedurías de Armadores Reunidos, SA**
**v Commission of the European Communities** ( [1] )

_**(Fisheries — Community financial aid — Suspension of aid**_
_**— Action for damages)**_

(2003/C 112/55)

_(Language of the case: Spanish)_

In Case T-61/01, Vendedurías de Armadores Reunidos, SA,
established in Huelva (Spain), represented by represented by J.R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier and D. Domínguez Pérez,
lawyers, v the Commission of the European Communities
(agents: S. Pardo Quintillán and J. Guerra Fernández), an
application for compensation for the damages caused by the

unlawful suspension of the aid allocated to the joint enterprise
fisheries project SM/ESP/18/93, the Court of First Instance
(Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President, and
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; Registrar: J. Palacio González,
Principal Administrator, gave the following judgment on
27 February 2003:

1. _The application is dismissed;_

2. _The applicant is ordered to pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 150 of 19.5.01.

**JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 6 March 2003**

**in Case T-128/01: DaimlerChrysler Corporation v Office**
**for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks**
**and Designs) (OHIM)** ( [1] )

_**(Community trade mark — Figurative mark — Represen-**_
_**tation of a vehicle grille — Absolute ground for refusal —**_
_**Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Mark devoid**_
_**of any distinctive character)**_

(2003/C 112/56)

_(Language of the case: English)_

In Case T-128/01, DaimlerChrystler Corporation, established
in Auburn Hills, Michigan (United States), represented by
T. Cohen Jehoram, lawyer, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von
Mühlendahl and O. Waelbroeck): Action brought against the
decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) of 21 March 2001 (Case R 309/1999-2), the Court
of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: M. Vilaras,
President, V. Tiili and P. Mengozzi, Judges; J. Palacio González,
Principal Administrator, for theRegistrar, has given a judgment
on 6 March 2003, in which it:

1. _Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office_
_for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and_
_Designs) of 21 March 2001 (Case R 309/1999-2);_

2. _Orders the defendant to pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 245 of 1.9.2001.