Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/48 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — Franmax v EUIPO — Ehrmann (Dino)

(Case T-21/15) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2016211EN.01004801-E0001)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative trade mark Dino - Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing a dinosaur - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 211/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Franmax UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: E. Saukalas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Uriarte Valiente, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu (Oberschönegg, Germany) (represented by: A. Gaul, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2014 (Case R 2012/2013-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu and Franmax UAB.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders Franmax UAB to pay the costs. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)