Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 May 2018 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO

(Case C‑656/17 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the word mark berlinGas — Rejection of the application for registration)

| 1. | Appeal—Grounds—Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded—Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181)  (see para. 2) |

| 2. | Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 3) |

| 3. | Appeal—Grounds—Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal—Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c))  (see para. 3) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |

| 2. | Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH is to bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)