Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

24.8.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 202/19

**COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**Official Journal of the European Communities** to the Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition:

Ms Tiili (President of Chamber), Mr Pirrung, Mr Mengozzi,
**Information**
Mr Meij and Mr Vilaras, Judges;

(2002/C 202/27) to the Fifth Chamber:

Mr Garcı´a-Valdecasas (President of Chamber), Ms Lindh
and Mr Cooke, Judges;
_Designation of Presidents of Chambers and assignment of Judges to_
_Chambers_ to the Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition:

Mr Garcı´a-Valdecasas (President of Chamber), Ms Lindh,
At its meeting on 4 July 2002 the Court of First Instance
Mr Moura Ramos, Mr Cooke and Mr Legal, Judges;
decided, pursuant to Article 2(4) of the Council Decision of
24 October 1988 and Articles 10 and 15 of the Rules of
Procedure of the Court of First Instance, for the period between Where the Judge Rapporteur is assigned to another Chamber
1 October 2002 and 30 September 2003: of three judges as a result of the amendment of the composition
of the Chambers, cases other than trade mark cases assigned
a. to designate as Presidents of Chamber: to the Second Chamber and a number of staff cases assigned
to the First Chamber on a pro rata basis shall be reassigned,

—
Judge Garcı´a-Valdecasas with effect from 1 October 2002, to the Chamber to which
the Judge Rapporteur belongs after that date.

—
Judge Lenaerts

— For cases in which the written procedure was completed and a
Judge Tiili
hearing in the oral procedure was held or fixed before
— 1 October 2002, the Chamber shall continue to sit with the
Judge Forwood
same composition as before for the oral procedure, the
b. to assign the Members of the Court of First Instance to deliberation and the judgment.
the Chambers as follows:

to the First Chamber: _Criteria for assigning cases to the Chambers_

Mr Vesterdorf (President), Mr Moura Ramos and Mr Legal, At its meeting on 4 July 2002, the Court of First Instance
Judges; established the following criteria for the assignment of cases
to the Chambers for the period between 1 October 2002 and
to the First Chamber, Extended Composition:
30 September 2003 pursuant to Article 12 of the Rules of
Mr Vesterdorf (President), Mr Azizi, Mr Moura Ramos, Procedure:
Mr Jaeger and Mr Legal, Judges;
1. (a) Actions which concern the implementation of the
to the Second Chamber: rules concerning State aid and the rules on trade
protection measures shall be assigned, with effect
Mr Forwood (President of Chamber), Mr Pirrung and from the lodging of the application and without
Mr Meij, Judges; prejudice to any subsequent application of
Articles 14 and 51 of the Rules of Procedure, to
to the Second Chamber, Extended Composition:
Chambers with an extended composition of five
Mr Forwood (President of Chamber), Mr Pirrung, Judges.
P. Mengozzi, Mr Meij and Mr Vilaras, Judges;
(b) All other cases shall be assigned, with effect from
to the Third Chamber: the lodging of the application and without prejudice
to any subsequent application of Articles 14 and 51
Mr Lenaerts (President of Chamber), Mr Azizi and Mr Jae- of the Rules of Procedure, to Chambers of three
ger, Judges; Judges.

to the Third Chamber, Extended Composition: 2. Cases referred to in paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b) shall be
assigned to Chambers as follows:
Mr Lenaerts (President of Chamber), Ms Lindh, Mr Azizi,
Mr Cooke and Mr Jaeger, Judges;
(a) The cases referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be
to the Fourth Chamber: assigned in turn, according to the order in which
they are registered at the Court Registry, to the First,
Ms Tiili (President of Chamber), Mr Mengozzi and Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Chambers, Extended
Mr Vilaras, Judges; Composition;

C 202/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24.8.2002

(b) Cases concerning intellectual property rights, as **JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**
referred to in Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure, shall be assigned, according to the order in
which they are registered at the Court Registry, to
the Second, and Fourth Chambers; **of 4 July 2002**

(c) The other cases referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall
be assigned to the First, Second, Third, Fourth and **in Case T-340/99: Arne Mathisen AS v Council of the**
Fifth Chambers. Such assignment is to be effected **European Union** ( [1] )
on the basis of three separate rotas, according to the
order in which they are registered at the Court
Registry:
_**(Definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties — Far-**_
_**med Atlantic salmon — Action for annulment — Undertak-**_
— For the cases referred to in Article 236 of the _**ing — Circumvention — Obligation to cooperate — Breach**_
EC Treaty and Article 152 of the EAEC Treaty; _**— Principle of proportionality — Claim for compensation)**_

—
For the cases concerning the implementation
of the rules on competition applicable to
(2002/C 202/28)
undertakings;

—
For the other cases covered by paragraph 1(b).
_(Language of the case: English)_
For the purposes of the rota mentioned in the first
indent above, the assignment of intellectual property
cases to the Second and Fourth Chambers on the
basis of the rota mentioned in paragraph 2(b) shall
be offset by the assignment of cases to the First,
Third and Fifth Chambers on a pro rata basis.
In Case T-340/99, Arne Mathisen AS, established in Værøy
(Norway), represented by S. Knudtzon, lawyer, with an address
For the purposes of the rotas referred to in parafor service in Luxembourg, v Council of the European Union
graphs 2(a) and 2(c), the First Chamber and the First
(Agents: S. Marquardt and G. Berrisch), supported by ComChamber, Extended Composition, presided by the
mission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz
President of the Court of First Instance, shall not be
and S. Meany): Application for annulment of Council Reguincluded in those lists every third time the end of a
lation (EC) No 1895/1999 of 27 August 1999 amending
rota is reached.
Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic
The President of the Court of First Instance may
salmon originating in Norway (OJ 1999 L 233, p. 1) and
derogate from that order on the ground that cases
compensation for damage suffered as a result of the adoption
are related or with a view to ensuring an even spread
of the workload. of the regulation, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber,
Extended Composition), composed of: M. Vilaras, President,
V. Tiili, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi and A.W.H. Meij, Judges;
J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
judgment on 4 July 2002, in which it:
_Plenary session_

At its meeting on 4 July 2002, the Court of First Instance 1. _Dismisses the application;_
decided pursuant to the second sub-paragraph of Article 32(1)
of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance that
where, following the designation of an Advocate General 2. _Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay the costs_
pursuant to Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure, there is an
_of the Council;_
even number of Judges in the Court of First Instance sitting in
plenary session, the rota established in advance in accordance
with which the President of the Court is to designate the Judge 3. _Orders the Commission to bear its own costs._
who will not take part in the judgment of the case shall be in
reverse order to that in which the Judges rank according to
their seniority in office under Article 6 of the Rules of
Procedure unless the Judge who would thus be designated is ( [1] ) OJ C 79 of 18.3.2000.
the Judge-Rapporteur. In that event, it shall be the judge
ranking immediately above him who shall be designated.