Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2019 –  
Dickmanns v EUIPO

(Case T‑538/18)

(Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory measure — Period within which an action must be brought — Inadmissibility)

| 1. | Action for annulment — Action brought against a decision confirming an earlier decision that has become final — Inadmissibility — Concept of confirmatory decision — No new element in relation to the earlier decision and no re-examination of the situation of the addressee of the decision  (Art. 263 TFEU)  (see paras 28-31, 37, 40, 41) |

| 2. | Actions brought by officials — Application for damages linked to an application for annulment — Dismissal of claim for annulment leading to dismissal of the claim for compensation  (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 91)  (see para. 45) |

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 14 December 2017, and ‘if need be’ the decisions of 28 November 2013 and 4 June 2014 of EUIPO terminating the applicant’s employment contract as of 30 June 2018, and, second, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| 2. | Ms Sigrid Dickmanns shall bear her own costs and pay the costs incurred by EUIPO. |

[Top](#document1)