Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 July 2018 — Tetra Pharm (1997) v EUIPO

(Case C‑726/17 P)

(Appeal — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark SeboCalm — Rejection of the application for registration)

| 1. | Appeal—Grounds—Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded—Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181)  (see paras 3, 5, 6) |

| 2. | Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see paras 5, 6) |

| 3. | Appeal—Grounds—Inadequate statement of reasons—Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning—Lawfulness—Conditions  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see paras 5, 6) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |

| 2. | Tetra Pharm (1997) Ltd shall bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)