Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/38 |

---

Action brought on 23 February 2016 — International Gaming Projects v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (TRIPLE EVOLUTION)

(Case T-82/16)

(2016/C 136/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: M. Garayalde Niño, A. Alpera Plazas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘TRIPLE EVOLUTION’ — Application for registration No 11 968 138

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2015 in Case R 725/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | admit the application; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the registration of the EU mark TRIPLE EVOLUTION in all the goods and services it seeks protection; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO and/or the opponent to bear the fees and costs. |

Plea in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the confronted signs. |

---

[Top](#document1)