Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 November 2016 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO

(Case C‑379/16 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62016CO0379_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public service contracts — Software development and maintenance services — Misinterpretation of the arguments and distortion of the evidence submitted by the other party to the proceedings before the General Court)

|  | Appeals—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Review by the Court of the findings of fact—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 5) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall bear their own costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62016CO0379_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) [OJ C 305, 22.8.2016](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:305:TOC).

[Top](#document1)