Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/26 |

---

Action brought on 26 March 2012 — Pro-Duo v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (GO!)

(Case T-141/12)

2012/C 165/46

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Pro-Duo (Ghent, Belgium) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Form of order sought

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Suspend the action pending the outcome of the Cancellation proceedings No 5011 C; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 January 2012 in case R 1373/2011-4, insofar as it declined to suspend proceedings pending outcome of the Cancellation proceedings, or to annul the decision entirely; and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Order the Opponent to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in black, white and grey ‘GO!’, for goods in class 3 — Community trade mark application No 8859712

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 6070981 of the figurative mark ‘GO GLORIA ORTIZ’, for goods in class 3

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: The Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market erred in law in failing to suspend the proceedings; and infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was a likelihood of confusion between the two trademarks.

---

[Top](#document1)