Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 27 June 2023 –  
Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry v EUIPO and Devin

(Case C‑77/23 P)

(Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

| 1. | Appeal – Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Burden of proof – Scope  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)  (see paragraph 21) |

| 2. | Appeal – Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed – Formal requirements – Scope  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a(1) and 170b)  (see paragraphs 22, 23) |

| 3. | Appeal – Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Request failing to demonstrate that the issue is significant – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a(1) and 170b)  (see paragraphs 25-28) |

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is not allowed to proceed; |

| 2. | Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry is ordered to bear its costs. |

[Top](#document1)