Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/62 |

---

Action brought on 6 March 2019 — Flovax v EUIPO — Dagniaux and Gervais Danone (GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923)

(Case T-147/19)

(2019/C 148/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Flovax Sàrl (Doncols, Luxembourg) (represented by: C.-S. Marchiani, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dagniaux (Roubaix, France), Compagnie Gervais Danone (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, Compagnie Gervais Danone

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative colour mark GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923 ‘Text and paint: Pantone blue no 302; background Pantone no 1205c (cream)’ — EU trade mark No 896 480

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 May 2018 in Case R 2210/2016-1 and R 2211/2016-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 18 May 2018 in Cases R 2210/2016-1 and R 2211/2016-1; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | declare admissible appeal R 2211/2016-1 lodged by FLOVAX before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul Cancellation Division Decision No 10417 C taken on the basis of Article 55(1) of the EU trade mark regulation, following the application for revocation registered on 22 October 2015 by Compagnie Gervais Danone, rejecting in its entirety that application for revocation; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order Compagnie Gervais Danone to pay to the proprietor of the mark the cancellation fee and representation costs, set out on the basis of the maximum rate indicated in Article 94 of the EU trade mark regulation. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 70 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Breach of the principle of audi alteram partem; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Error of law in the Board of Appeal’s assessment of the conditions for establishing inadmissibility in the action before it. |

---

[Top](#document1)