Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/46 |

---

Action brought on 19 April 2020 –Zoom v EUIPO — Facetec (ZOOM)

(Case T-204/20)

(2020/C 201/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Zoom KK (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. de Arpe Tejero, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Facetec Inc. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ZOOM — International registration designating the European Union No 1 323 959

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2020 in Case R 507/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs. |

Plea in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |

---

[Top](#document1)