Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 November 2018 –  
Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)

(Case T‑82/18)

(EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark HUSKY — Earlier EU word and figurative marks HUSKY — Relative ground for refusal — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

EU trade mark — Registration procedure — Withdrawal, restriction and amendment of the trade mark application — Power vested solely in the applicant — No action on the part of the applicant in the course of the opposition and appeal proceedings before EUIPO — Removal, by the Board of Appeal, of the implicit withdrawal of the trade mark application — Not permissible

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 43(1), replaced by European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 49(1))

(see para. 37)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2018 (Case R 812/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Husky of Tostock and Husky CZ.

Operative part

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |

| 2. | Husky CZ s.r.o. shall pay the costs. |

[Top](#document1)