Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

*|*

# 52013JC0007

**JOINT REPORT TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on Serbia's progress in achieving the necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria and notably the key priority of taking steps towards a visible and sustainable improvement of relations with Kosovo( /\* JOIN/2013/07 final \*/**

  

JOINT REPORT TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

on Serbia's progress in achieving the
necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria and notably the key
priority of taking steps towards a visible and sustainable improvement of relations
with Kosovo\*

1.
Introduction

In its Opinion[1]
on Serbia's application for membership of October 2011, the European Commission
concluded that "Serbia is well on its way towards sufficiently fulfilling
the political criteria set by the Copenhagen European Council in 1993 and the
conditions of the Stabilisation and Association process, provided that progress
continues and that practical solutions are found to the problems with
Kosovo" and recommended that "negotiations for accession to the
European Union should be opened with Serbia as soon as it achieves further
significant progress in meeting the following key priority [of taking] further
steps to normalise relations with Kosovo in line with the conditions of the
Stabilisation and Association Process […]". Further to the Commission's
recommendation and on the basis of initial progress in improving relations with
Kosovo, the European Council granted Serbia candidate country status in March
2012.

In the light of the progress made in
the EU-facilitated dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo, under the auspices of
the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security
Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, and with the perspective of further
substantial progress being achieved in the first part of 2013, the Council
agreed in its conclusions of 11 December 2012 to review during the Irish
Presidency the progress made by Serbia on the basis of a report presented by
the Commission and the High Representative in the Spring 2013, with a view to a
possible decision of the European Council to open accession negotiations with
Serbia.

This
report herewith presents the additional progress made by Serbia between 11 December 2012 and 15 April 2013. It assesses steps taken to address the
key priority of improving relations with Kosovo, both in terms of latest
results achieved in the high level dialogue and in terms of actual
implementation of the agreements reached in 2011 and 2012.

The report also presents and assesses recent efforts to step up
the EU reform agenda and examines with particular attention the latest
developments in the areas of rule of law, particularly judicial reform,
anti-corruption policy and the fight against organised crime, independence of
key institutions, media freedom, anti-discrimination policy, protection of
minorities and improvement of the business environment. The report finally
takes stock of recent initiatives by Serbia to play a
constructive role in the region and improve relations with its neighbours.

The
assessment in this report takes into account information gathered and analysed
by the Commission and the High Representative, including inputs provided by the
Serbian authorities, findings of expert missions as well as information shared
by EU Member States and international organisations and civil society
organisations. The final part of the report draws conclusions and makes
recommendations.

2.
Improvement of relations with Kosovo

The dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina, following the Serbian elections, was upgraded to a high level
political process with the facilitation of the High Representative.

A series of high level
meetings between the two prime ministers started in October 2012. The HR was
very clear with the two sides from the start on the concept of the process: it would
be a step by step process, going from easier to more complicated issues and it
would not be open ended. The objective was the gradual normalisation of the two
sides' relations, without prejudice to the two parties' positions on status,
and achieving progress for both in their respective EU path.

Ten meetings have taken
place between October 2012 and the end of April 2013[2]. A meeting
also took place on 6 February between Presidents Nikolic and Jahjaga.

In the first part of
the high level dialogue until December 2012 the discussions dealt with the set
of what was considered easier issues such as completion of IBM implementation,
religious and cultural heritage, liaison arrangements. Some first significant
results were already achieved in those first months.

The most important was
IBM implementation. By the end of December 2012 four Gates, including the two
Gates in northern Kosovo, were operational and, since the end of February all
six Gates between Serbia and Kosovo are operational. In the context of the
implementation discussions, the two sides also agreed to start customs
collection and to establish a Fund for the development of northern Kosovo. Regarding
free movement, the ID card travel regime is operational and works well. The
agreement on customs stamps continues to be implemented by both sides. There
was good progress on civil registry and implementation should be completed by
January 2014. Regarding cadastre, both sides are still in the process of taking
the necessary preparatory steps. The agreement on acceptance of university
diplomas is proceeding smoothly. Serbia’s cooperation with EULEX has continued
to improve in a number of areas. This will need to intensify as the
normalisation between both parties intensifies. Direct high-level contacts and
regular contacts at operational level continue to facilitate cooperation,
including in the fight against organised crime. Serbia is committed to a full
implementation of the police protocol with EULEX.

Other significant
results achieved by the two Prime Ministers are the agreement on setting
liaison arrangements and the agreement on the improvement of protection of
religious and cultural heritage sites (creation of special/multi-ethnic police
unit in Kosovo).

In the second part of
the high level dialogue, since January 2013, the meetings of the two Prime
Ministers focused on northern Kosovo and delivering structures which meet the
security and justice needs of the local population in a way that ensures the
functionality of a single institutional and administrative set up in Kosovo, in
line with the December 2012 Council Conclusions.

During their talks, the
two sides agreed that the outcome of their discussions should be a set of
principles and arrangements that would give the Kosovo Serb community a new vision
of their future, by addressing their concerns and needs but in a way that
preserved the functionality of the Kosovo institutions and legal framework.

Throughout the high
level process the two sides showed commitment and engagement. The two Prime
Ministers in particular established a good working relationship and showed
political courage and maturity in discussing issues of great sensitivity and
complexity, often with a difficult political atmosphere in the background. They
should be commended. In the last phase of the dialogue Deputy Prime Ministers
from both sides joined the meetings and their presence brought an additional
element of local political legitimacy and expertise to the table.

The discussions on
northern Kosovo and the Kosovo Serb community concerns were concluded on 19
April with the initialling of a "First agreement of principles governing
the normalisation of relations".

The agreement provides
for the establishment of an Association/Community of Serb municipalities in
Kosovo which will function/operate within the existing legal framework of
Kosovo. The Association/Community will have a statute and its own bodies on the
basis of the other existing Association in Kosovo and will have a
representative role to the central government.

On police, the text of
the agreement affirms the principle of a single police force in Kosovo and the
integration of all police in northern Kosovo to the Kosovo Police. A regional
Police commander is appointed for the four northern municipalities. He is
nominated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Kosovo from a list provided by
the four mayors. This means that it was agreed that the four mayors of the
northern Serb majority municipalities would consult the Association/Community
and submit a list to the Ministry of Internal Affairs who will make the
nomination from this list.

On judiciary, the text
affirms the principle of integration and functioning of all judicial
authorities within the Kosovo legal framework.  An Appellate Court in Pristina
is established to deal with all Kosovo Serb majority municipalities and a
division of this Court will sit permanently in northern Mitrovica.

Municipal elections,
according to the agreement will be organised in the northern municipalities in
2013 with the facilitation of the OSCE.

The text of the
agreement also provides for concluding the discussions on energy and telecoms
by mid-June.

The two parties have
agreed that neither side will block, or encourage others to block the other
side's progress in their respective EU paths.

As to next steps, the
two parties agreed to adopt an implementation plan by 26 April and to establish
an implementation committee with the facilitation of the EU.

The EU also expects
that the two parties, in the spirit of the new understanding/relation between
them and without prejudice to the positions on the status of Kosovo, will
continue to work further for the normalisation of relations between them and in
this framework will address, among other issues, Kosovo's
integration/participation in international bodies.

3.
Recent progress in compliance with the
membership criteria 
3.1.
Introduction

In recent months, Serbia has taken steps to reinvigorate
the country's EU reform agenda. In line with its stated objective since it took
office in July 2012, the Serbian government has stepped up the coordination of the EU reform
agenda. It has started to implement the comprehensive Action Plan
it adopted in December 2012 to follow up on all findings of the Commission's
2012 Progress Report and intends to publish periodical reports on its execution
in April, June and September 2013. An important milestone was the adoption by
the government on 28 February 2013 of a National Plan for the Approximation
with the Acquis
(NPAA) for the period 2013-2016. The NPAA is a detailed planning
document of all legislation to be adopted by Serbia to implement obligations
from the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and prepare itself for
further aligning with the acquis. The NPAA includes a detailed plan for
legislative alignment in 2013 with corresponding budgetary resources. The
document also offers a basis to ensure effective scrutiny of related activities
and better involvement of relevant stakeholders.

The
Serbian government has been committed to improving the rule of law despite the
setbacks of 2012, in particular in the areas of judicial reform and the fight
against corruption. Draft
strategies are in preparation in several key areas and their adoption is
foreseen in the first half of 2013. While
it agreed to consult widely in
certain fields and requested corresponding EU expertise, the Serbian government
still needs to improve the consultation process with all stakeholders including
by leaving sufficient time in parliament for the necessary scrutiny of draft
legislation.

3.2.
Developments in
implementation of reforms

Regarding
the rule of law, a first set of legislative changes was adopted in
December 2012 upon proposals from the working groups set up in September 2012 with the participation of key
stakeholders. The laws on judges and prosecutors were amended to grant
permanent tenure to some 900 magistrates that were recruited in 2009 on a
probationary basis. Three important changes were introduced in the Criminal
Code: criminalisation of facilitators of abuses of the right to asylum in a
foreign country; decriminalisation of defamation, together with
decriminalisation of "unauthorised public comments on Court
proceedings"; and recognition as aggravating circumstance of certain
"hate" crimes motivated on grounds such as ethnic origin, religion or
sexual orientation. The offence of "abuse of office" was also amended
to redefine how it applies to private operators. Open cases under Art. 359 of
the Criminal Code need now to be re-qualified, on a case by case basis, under
new offences of the economic crime section of the Criminal Code. This part of
the Criminal Code is planned to undergo a comprehensive review for further
amendments in the future. Implementation of the new Criminal procedure Code
needs to be carefully prepared.

Regarding
the judicial reform, the new Serbian government has been confronted with
a formidable challenge following the decision of the Constitutional Court in
July 2012 to overturn the reappointment of judges and prosecutors, creating an
immediate practical difficulty with the need to reintegrate some 800
magistrates (representing one third of the total number). This situation also
meant that the initial focus from the Serbian authorities was to adopt urgent
measures in December 2012 before it could start to develop the medium to long
term vision including preparation of a comprehensive strategy that would ensure
structural and sustainable changes towards an impartial, independent and
efficient judiciary.

Following
the July 2012 rulings of the Constitutional Court, the High Judicial and State
Prosecutorial Councils re-appointed all the previously non-reappointed judges
and prosecutors, in line with the 60 days deadline required by the Constitutional Court. So far, magistrates were re-appointed into the Courts where they were
before or into the jurisdictions that replaced them. Adjustments to the Court
and Prosecutorial office networks are currently planned and are aimed at
ensuring an optimal allocation of the re-appointed magistrates, balancing their
individual wishes and constitutional rights not to be moved from one place to
another without their consent with the needs of the whole judiciary in terms of
access and proximity. There are still major imbalances in the workload of
judges and length of proceedings remains excessive in many cases. Further
reform of the court network necessitates a comprehensive analysis of the
functioning of the current network in terms of cost, efficiency and access to
justice. An important issue to ensure sustainability of reform is a medium to
long term strategy on the judiciary.

For
the period 2013-2018, the Ministry of Justice and Public Administration is
drafting a new strategy with the support of working groups meeting on a regular
basis and on the basis of a consultative process involving key stakeholders.
The government aims to finalise it in the course of the spring. It will take
stock of the problems encountered in the implementation of the previous
strategy of 2006 and be built around the key principles of independence, impartiality
and quality of justice, competence, accountability and efficiency of the
judiciary. It should aim to strengthen the High Judicial and State
Prosecutorial Councils, as the bodies mandated by the Constitution to guarantee
the independence of the judiciary. The strategy also needs to address the lack
of real judicial independence seen in many features of the current system. The
system of appointment and promotion of judges is not yet independent of either
the executive or the legislative. Moreover, the Councils need to become more
transparent in their functioning and their members should be accountable. A
comprehensive strategy which builds on a full analysis of the gaps in the
current framework is a key objective. It should rely on an inclusive process
with all stakeholders and make full use of the available assistance.

The
strategy should also aim at reinforcing the institutional capacity of the Judicial Academy for merit based recruitments as well as initial and continuous training of
judges and prosecutors. The strategy needs to be further developed and include
detailed plans for the strengthening of the framework for recruitment,
evaluation and discipline as well as for monitoring and measuring progress,
identifying responsible institutions, defining adequate financial and human
resources and a clear timeline for its implementation.

Another
priority goal is to establish a functioning accountability system in the
judiciary. In this respect, the State Prosecutorial Council is conducting a
consultation process on draft professional evaluation rules issued in February
2013. A consultation process was also launched by the High Judicial Council on
draft evaluation rules for judges and Court presidents. Implementation of the
draft ethical code for prosecutors issued in March 2012 should start soon. The
code of ethics for judges remains to be more systematically applied. Only a few
final decisions were taken under disciplinary rules adopted by the High
Judicial Council three years ago. Following the adoption of disciplinary rules
in July 2012 by the State Prosecutorial Council, first disciplinary proceedings
should be launched soon.

The
fight against corruption has been a central element of the government's
activities since its inception, underpinned by a "zero tolerance"
message.  A number of investigations have been launched, including into high
level corruption, in part on the basis of the problematic privatisations cases
identified in the past by the Anti-Corruption Council. Serbia has also made certain progress in combating organised crime. Operational
coordination and cooperation between law enforcement authorities remains
satisfactory. Serbia's track record in effectively investigating, prosecuting
and convicting perpetrators of corruption and organised crime needs to be
further improved, and additional human and financial resources made available,
including in the fields of witness protection, financial intelligence and the
special prosecution for organised crime.

A
draft strategy is being prepared on the fight against corruption for the period
2013-2018. Its preparation encompasses all involved institutions and relevant
stakeholders and is taking into consideration positive examples from the
region. It aims at both a structural approach dealing with issues such as good
governance, independent institutions, internal and external audit and control,
protection of whistle-blowers, and a sectorial one, addressing corruption in
sensitive sectors such as urbanism and spatial planning, judiciary, police,
education and health. The complementary roles of the Anti-Corruption Agency and
Anti-Corruption Council should be better defined for the implementation and
monitoring of the strategy and inter-institutional co-operation should be
facilitated. The government aims to finalise the strategy in the course of the
spring. Preparations of an action plan are to begin following the public
consultation on the draft strategy.

Regarding the respect for the role and independence of key
institutions, there is still room for improvement. Reports and
recommendations of independent institutions did not receive sufficient
political consideration and appropriate follow-up. Respect for their role and
independence also needs to be evidenced with the provision of sufficient and
stable ressources. The Ombudsman and the Commissioner
for free access to information of public importance and data
protection have started to cooperate with the recently established
parliamentary committee for civilian oversight of security services, and
following their recommendations, parliament adopted in February
2013 amendments to the Law on Military Security and Military Intelligence
Agencies regarding state security interceptions of communications. Serbia should ensure that its legal framework clearly distinguishes between interception
for criminal investigations and interception for state security, in line with
European best practices.

Regarding
freedom of the media, the decriminalisation of defamation (see above)
was             a significant development. In addition, an ad hoc
commission, composed of journalists, police and security-information agency
representatives was set up in January 2013 and tasked with shedding light on
the cases of unsolved murders of journalists. Regarding the implementation of
the media strategy, a working group was set up aiming at harmonising the
legislative framework in order to eliminate existing contradictions on
establishment and financing of the media. Two laws are under preparation: the
law on public information and media, which would cover the fields of public
information, media ownership and concentration as well as accreditation of
foreign correspondents – and the law on electronic media, which would cover
electronic media and public broadcasters. A first step has already been taken
with amendments to the law on public companies ending the possibility for
public authorities at all levels to establish public companies in the media
sector. The draft law on public information and media is currently under public
consultation; it should guarantee transparency of funding and regulate media
concentration, introduce thresholds and ceilings and give the Commission for
Protection of Competition a role in the process. In general, it needs to be
noted that media reports continue to be insufficiently analytical and balanced
and self-censorship remains widespread.

Some
progress can also be noted in the field of anti-discrimination policies
where the overall legal framework is broadly in place but its implementation as
well as enforcement remain to be improved on the basis of consistent efforts of
the authorities, including in generating          a more favourable climate in
the society. The recognition as aggravating circumstance of
certain "hate" crimes motivated on grounds such as ethnic origin,
religion or sexual orientation (see above) is a welcome development. A
comprehensive Strategy on fighting discrimination for the period 2013-2018 is
being prepared and actively consulted with stakeholders with a view to an
adoption in the second quarter of 2013, to be followed by Action Plans for its
implementation. The Commissioner for protection of Equality issued a
publication on "Court civil protection from discrimination" and a
"Manual for the fight against discrimination at work"  aimed to equip
legal professionals and other stakeholders with relevant reference materials. A
number of provisions of the 2009 Serbian Anti-Discrimination Law are not in
line with the EU 2001 Anti-Discrimination Directive and preparations for such
alignment have started. Regarding the protection of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual
and Transsexual (LGBT) population, activities have stepped up. There has been
overall a more active processing of discrimination cases against LGBT
population, thanks to police training, the development of Court practices and
improved cooperation with LGBT population as witnesses. A first ruling from the
Novi Sad Appellate Court has been delivered regarding discrimination in the
work place based on sexual orientation. The Commissioner for Equality remained
particulary active in the promotion of LGBT population rights. Overall, a
number of awareness raising activities were organised on anti-discrimination
issues and specifically on LGBT rights, targetting particularly law enforcement
officers and social workers. A first seminar in the framework of a 2012 Council
of Europe LGBT regional project was held in December 2012 in Belgrade.
Preparations for the 2013 Belgrade Pride Parade have started. Such efforts need
to be further developed and supported by visible political committment in order
to promote a better inclusion and protection of LGBT population and improve
tolerance and understanding across the Serbian society.

Regarding
the protection of minorities, Serbia has undertaken, in preparation of
the 2014 elections to the Minority Councils, a revision of the 2009 Law on the
National Minority Councils, in order to address some of the shortcomings. This
follows the recommendations made by the Ombudsman and the Commissioner for free
access to information of public importance in particular regarding the
electoral process and the rules governing the constitution of the Councils. Serbia also took steps to improve the implementation of the legal framework throughout its
territory. Measures have been implemented to broadcast TV programmes in
Romanian in Eastern Serbia and official instructions have introduced an
optional Romanian language class with elements of culture as from the next
school year, preceded by pilot classes starting in April 2013. The government
has called on the Serbian Orthodox Church to engage in a dialogue with the
Romanian Orthodox Church but there was still no progress on the issue of access
to religious services in Romanian. In the Sandzak area, primary level and high
schools have started teaching classes in the Bosniak language. In South Serbia, following the recent tensions surrounding the erection and removal of a
monument in Presevo, there have been renewed efforts to restore an effective
dialogue between the central governement and local authorities in order to
tackle all issues on the agenda, including the socio-economic development of
the region. Additional textbooks have been provided for classes in Albanian in South Serbia. Internship opportunities in the state administration have been made available
as of September 2012 for members of the Albanian, Bosniak and Roma minorities. Serbia needs to continue its efforts to implement more effectively the legal framework
across the country. The Commission will closely monitor progress in this area.

Regarding
the Roma, Serbia continues to actively follow up the operational
conclusions of the joint Serbia-Commission Roma seminar of June 2011. A
follow-up seminar is being planned to take place later in the spring. On civil
documentation, the two necessary laws to ensure the registration or subsequent
registration of "legally invisible" persons are now in place and new
procedures for their registration have started as of December 2012. Affirmative
action measures have increased in the education sector and further development
of the pedagogical assistants system - 175 persons so far - is being
considered. Measures on supporting employment opportunities for Roma have
continued. Regarding health care, 75 Roma women health mediators are working
under the Social affairs and Labour Ministry framework and Roma can now
register at the social care centre if they do not have a permanent address.
With regards to housing and forced evictions, Serbia has started preparations
to incorporate into the national legislation the relevant international
standards. Further sustained efforts, including financial, are needed to ensure
the full implementation of the Serbian Roma Strategy and address the difficult
situation of the Roma population who
are frequently victims of intolerance, hate speech and even physical attacks.

The
Serbian government has also carried on with reforms aimed at improving the
economic and business environment. A significant and positive
development was the adoption of the new Law on Public Procurement at the end of
2012. This law further aligns Serbian legislation with the acquis and
generally improves the efficiency of public procurement procedures, for example
by centralising public procurement. It strengthens the institutions in charge
of the enforcement and monitoring of the public procurement rules. New rules
for the prevention of corruption and conflict of interest were introduced.
Overall, this law should result in more transparent and efficient procurement
procedures, and increased competition. The government has adopted other
measures aimed at improving the business environment, including abolition of
more than 130 parafiscal charges and fees weighing on business activity,
amendment of the VAT law and adoption of a law limiting the deadline for
settlement of cash liabilities. A long overdue reform of socially-owned
companies was launched in December 2012, imposing an 18-month deadline for
completing their restructuring. The amendments to the Law on Internal Trade
adopted in January 2013 aim at reducing market entry barriers for retailers.

Serbia
started to implement the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters
on        1 January 2009. Serbia has built a satisfactory track record in
implementing its obligations under the Interim Agreement and is committed to
discuss and address any open issues. Serbia is also engaged in good faith in
the SAA adaptation exercise ahead of Croatia's accession to the EU. Issues
remain in the field of State aid and intellectual property rights. In particular,
the independence of the Commission for State aid control must be further
demonstrated, confirmation received that all State aid measures are notified to
this Commission and approved by it and adjustment of existing aid schemes must
be pursued.

3.3.
Regional cooperation and
bilateral relations

Following
some difficulties in the first months of its taking office, the Serbian government
stepped up high-level contacts with neighbouring countries in recent months in
an effort to restore a positive contribution to regional cooperation.

Regarding
relations with Croatia, a landmark visit of the Croatian Prime Minister
to Belgrade took place on 16 January 2013, on which occasion he agreed with the
Serbian Prime Minister to work towards further improvement of relations and to
enhance cooperation and joint work on a number of issues, including EU
integration, economy, refugees, border demarcation, missing persons, and war
crimes. A number of meetings also took place at ministerial level, in
particular the visit to Zagreb of the Serbian Foreign Affairs Minister in
March, and an agreement on cooperation on EU integration is in preparation. Relations
with Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) remained good. The Serbian Prime
Minister visited Sarajevo in January 2013 and the Chairman of the BiH Council
of Ministers was in Belgrade in February 2013. In December 2012, the Serbian
President received the Chair of BiH Presidency in Belgrade. A Memorandum of
Understanding for cooperation on EU integration was signed in December 2012 by the
two Foreign Affairs Ministers. A Protocol on Cooperation in the prosecution of
perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide was signed in
January 2013 between the Serbian war crimes prosecutor and the Office of the
prosecutor of BiH. Relations with Montenegro have improved. A visit of
the Serbian President took place in January 2013 in a positive atmosphere,
where he stressed the respect of Montenegrin sovereignty and territorial
integrity. Relations with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have
improved and the Serbian Prime minister visited Skopje in January  2013, with a
meeting of the Ministers of Justice taking place on the same occasion; it was
also agreed to hold a joint session of the two governments in May 2013 in Belgrade. The Serbian Foreign Affairs minister visited Skopje in February 2013 and signed
an agreement on cooperation in the EU integration process with his counterpart.
In addition, Serbia has made progress in restoring good relations
with Turkey. The importance of Serbia-Turkey relations for the region
was reaffirmed during President Nikolic’s visit to Ankara in early February
2013; this trip was preceded by a visit of the Turkish Foreign Affairs Minister
to Belgrade.

Serbia’s
relations with neighbouring EU Member States Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania remained good. On the occasion of the visit of the Bulgarian Foreign
Affairs minister to Serbia in December 2012, a social security agreement was
finalised and it was also agreed to prepare an agreement on good neighbourly
relations. A joint contact centre for police and customs cooperation at the
border check-point Kalotina was established. The Serbian and Bulgarian Prime
Ministers signed an agreement on the implementation of the gas interconnection
between Serbia and Bulgaria. The visit of the Serbian President to Hungary in November 2012 took place in a positive atmosphere. Serbia and Hungary have stepped up their cooperation in internal affairs as part of the measures
taken to curb the increase of unfounded asylum in the EU. Serbia and Romania continued cooperation on the protection of minorities in line with their
Joint Protocol of March 2012. Consultations continued under the auspices of the
OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities and conclusions were reached on a
number of steps taken or to be taken in the areas of media and education, while
the issue of religious services remained pending.

4.
Conclusions and recommendations

Serbia
has taken very significant steps towards visible and sustainable improvement in
relations with Kosovo, in line with the Council conclusions of December 2012. Serbia has actively and constructively engaged in the EU-facilitated dialogue with Pristina
and entered discussions on the whole range of issues necessary to achieve
visible and sustainable improvement in relations with Kosovo.

The
dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina, following the Serbian elections, was
upgraded to a high level political process with the facilitation of the High
Representative. Ten meetings have taken place between October 2012 and the end
of April 2013. A meeting also took place on 6 February between Presidents
Nikolic and Jahjaga. Implementation of agreements reached in the dialogue to
date has also continued. Implementation of the agreement on representation of
Kosovo in regional fora was generally ensured, with the admission of Kosovo as
fully-fledged member of the Regional Cooperation Council in February 2013 as a
landmark. On Integrated Border Management, joint interim crossing points were
opened on all six gates and they are up and running. The agreement on
protection of religious and cultural heritage sites of December 2012 is being
implemented. The agreement on customs stamps continues to be implemented by
both sides. There was good progress on civil registry and implementation should
be completed by January 2014. Regarding cadastre, both sides are still in the
process of taking the necessary preparatory steps. The agreement on acceptance
of university diplomas is proceeding smoothly. Serbia’s cooperation with EULEX
has continued to improve in certain areas.

The
two sides also agreed to start customs collection and to establish a Fund for
the development of northern Kosovo. In the second part of the high level
dialogue, since January 2013, the meetings of the two Prime Ministers focused
on northern Kosovo leading to the initialling of the agreement of 19 April 2013
on a "First agreement of principles governing the normalisation of
relations". This agreement foresees inter alia that discussions on Energy
and Telecoms will be intensified by the two sides and completed by June 15
2013.

On
this basis, the Commission considers that Serbia has met the key priority of
taking steps towards a visible and sustainable improvement of relations with
Kosovo.

Serbia
has also undertaken to reinvigorate the momentum of reforms in the key areas of
the rule of law, particularly judicial reform and anti-corruption policy,
independence of key institutions, media freedom, anti-discrimination policy,
protection of minorities and business environment. The Serbian authorities have
given renewed attention to all these areas for which they have started
developing a comprehensive and long term vision. Reforms in these areas are in
the making, focusing notably on the preparation of strategies, related action
plans and draft legislation. Progress in these areas will have to be sustained
over time. This is particularly the case in the judiciary which represents a
formidable challenge.

The
Serbian government has demonstrated in recent months its commitment to a
positive contribution to regional cooperation, which was underpinned by a
number of high-level contacts with neighbouring countries.

Recalling
its findings and conclusions set out in its Opinion on Serbia's membership application of October 2011, in the Strategy paper of October 2012 and in the
2012 Progress report on Serbia, the Commission concludes that:

Serbia
now sufficiently fulfils the political criteria and the conditions of the
Stabilisation and Association Process.

The
Commission also maintains its assessment regarding the economic criteria,
obligations under the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and the Interim
Agreement and Serbia's preparedness to take on obligations of membership.

The
Commission therefore recommends that negotiations for accession to the European
Union should be opened with Serbia.

The
Commission will continue to monitor Serbia's progress in complying with the
membership criteria and the conditions of the Stabilisation and Association
Process. The Commission recalls its recommendation of October 2012 that the
steps leading to the normalisation of relations between Belgrade and Pristina
should also be addressed in the context of the framework for the conduct of
future accession negotiations with Serbia.  The Commission will continue during
the accession negotiations to closely monitor reforms and their implementation
in the area of rule of law and fundamental rights, especially the judicial
reform, the fight against corruption and anti-discrimination policy. It will
make full use of the tools available at all stages of the accession process, in
particular the new approach endorsed by the December 2011 European Council as
regards the chapters on judiciary and fundamental rights and justice, freedom and
security.

\*               This designation is
without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999
and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

[1]               COM(2011) 668
final.

[2] 19 October, 7 November, 4
December and 17 January, 20 February, 4 March, 20 March, 2 April, 17 April and
19 April

[Top](#document1)