Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/35 |

---

Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)

(Case T-226/16)

(2016/C 232/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ipuri GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: K. Sandberg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: van Graaf GmbH & Co. KG (Vienna, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘IPURI’ — Application for registration No 8 971 021

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 March 2016 in Case R 886/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs before the Board of Appeal. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 15 in conjunction with Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009, Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation No 2868/95 and Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 8(2)(a) when applying Article 42(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |

---

[Top](#document1)