Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/12 |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt (Sweden) lodged on 15 December 2017 — Patent-och registreringsverket v Mats Hansson

(Case C-705/17)

(2018/C 083/19)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea hovrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Patent-och registreringsverket

Defendant: Mats Hansson

Questions referred

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Must Article 4(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Directive[(1)](#ntr1-C_2018083EN.01001202-E0001) be interpreted as meaning that the global assessment of all relevant factors which is to be made in an assessment of the likelihood of confusion may be affected by the fact that an element of the trade mark has expressly been excluded from protection on registration, that is to say, that a so-called disclaimer has been entered on registration? |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, can the disclaimer in such a case affect the global assessment in such a way that the competent authority has regard to the element in question but gives it a more limited importance so that it is not regarded as being distinctive, even if the element would de facto be distinctive and prominent in the earlier trade mark? |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative and the answer to the second question in the negative, can the disclaimer even so affect the global assessment in any other way? |

---

[Top](#document1)