Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/9 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2013 — Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Lepiarz v OHIM — Henkel (SUPER GLUE)

(Case T-591/11)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2014031EN.01000901-E0001)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark SUPER GLUE - Earlier Benelux word mark SUPERGLUE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2014/C 31/14

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Jarosław Lepiarz Alicja sp. j. (Jaworzno, Poland) (represented by: M. Konieczyński and I. Kubiec, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Henkel Corp. (Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 September 2011 (Case R 1147/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Henkel Corp. and Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Jarosław Lepiarz Alicja sp.j.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe Medox Lepiarz Jarosław Lepiarz Alicja sp.j. to pay the costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)