Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber)

4 May 2022 ([\*](#Footnote*))

(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ASI ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES – Earlier EU figurative and word marks ADI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

In Case T‑4/21,

**Advanced Superabrasives, Inc.,** established in Mars Hill, North Carolina (United States), represented by D. Piróg and A. Rytel, lawyers,

applicant,

v

**European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),** represented by V. Ruzek, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

**Adi Srl,** established in Thiene (Italy), represented by B. Saguatti, lawyer,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2020 (Case R 2713/2019-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Adi and Advanced Superabrasives,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira, President, M. Kancheva (Rapporteur) and P. Zilgalvis, Judges,

Registrar: J. Pichon, Administrator,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 5 January 2021,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 13 May 2021,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 7 May 2021,

further to the hearing on 20 January 2022,

gives the following

**Judgment**

**Background to the dispute**

1        On 31 August 2017, the applicant, Advanced Superabrasives, Inc., filed an application for registration of an EU trade mark with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1), as amended (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2017 L 154, p. 1)).

2        Registration as a mark was sought for the following figurative sign:

![Image not found](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)

3        The goods in respect of which registration was sought are in Class 7 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and correspond to the following description: ‘Diamond and cubic boron nitride grinding wheels in resin bond, metal bond, vitrified bond and plated formats for use with cutting, grinding and polishing machines; power-operated diamond dressers, hones, and abrasive sticks; power saw blades; thread and gear grinding wheels’.

4        The trade mark application was published in *European Union Trade Marks Bulletin*  No 182/2017 of 25 September 2017.

5        On 22 December 2017, the intervener, Adi Srl, filed a notice of opposition pursuant to Article 46 of Regulation 2017/1001 to registration of the mark applied for in respect of the goods referred to in paragraph 3 above.

6        The opposition was based on the following earlier marks:

–        the EU figurative mark reproduced below, which was filed on 18 June 2004, registered on 3 October 2005 under the number 3877991 and renewed on 28 April 2014 and covers goods in Class 7 corresponding to the following description: ‘Grindstones, milling machines, discs, calibrators, grinding machines, polishing machines, drilling machines, monitors, drilling bits and quadrants for the stone, ceramic, mechanical, optical and glass industries’:

![Image not found](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)

–        the EU word mark ADI, which was filed on 7 June 2004, registered on 29 July 2005 under the number 3859171 and renewed on 28 April 2014 and covers goods in Class 7 corresponding to the following description: ‘Grindstones, mills, discs, calibrators, grinders, polishers, drills, honing devices, rims and sectors for the stonemasonry, ceramics, mechanical, optical and glass sectors’.

7        The ground relied on in support of the opposition was that set out in Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001. In particular, the intervener claimed that its earlier marks enjoyed an enhanced degree of distinctiveness in the European Union.

8        On 19 July 2018, the applicant requested that the intervener furnish proof of use of the earlier marks in accordance with Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001. On 4 October 2018, the intervener submitted such evidence of use within the period specified.

9        On 12 November 2019, the Opposition Division rejected the opposition in its entirety. It took the view in particular that the intervener had not explicitly claimed that its marks were particularly distinctive by virtue of intensive use or reputation and found that the distinctiveness of the earlier marks, including the earlier figurative mark which included a diamond with ‘very limited’ distinctiveness, was ‘normal’.

10      On 29 November 2019, the intervener filed a notice of appeal with EUIPO, pursuant to Articles 66 to 71 of Regulation 2017/1001, against the decision of the Opposition Division.

11      By decision of 23 October 2020 (‘the contested decision’), the Board of Appeal upheld the intervener’s appeal and annulled the Opposition Division’s decision.

12      First, the Board of Appeal found that the Opposition Division had infringed essential procedural requirements in not examining, in the light of the evidence submitted by the intervener, the argument that the earlier marks enjoyed an enhanced degree of distinctiveness.

13      Secondly, the Board of Appeal found that the Opposition Division had been right in finding that the relevant territory for the purposes of the assessment of the likelihood of confusion was the whole of the European Union. It also, like the Opposition Division, found that the goods covered by the earlier marks were aimed exclusively at a professional public in different specialised sectors, whereas some of the goods covered by the mark applied for could target both the general public and professionals, the level of attention of which would be relatively high. However, the Board of Appeal took the view that a more specific evaluation of the relevant public had to be made following the assessment of the evidence of use of the earlier marks.

14      Thirdly, as regards the distinctiveness of the elements comprising the marks at issue, the Board of Appeal found, like the Opposition Division, that the element ‘advanced superabrasives’ in the mark applied for was not distinctive with regard to the goods at issue, at least as far as the English-speaking relevant public was concerned. Furthermore, according to the Board of Appeal, the word elements in upper-case letters ‘ADI’ in the earlier mark and ‘ASI’ in the mark applied for would be perceived as meaningless and were therefore distinctive. Lastly, the Board of Appeal found that the figurative elements representing a diamond in the earlier figurative mark and in the mark applied for had a limited degree of distinctiveness, since the diamonds referred to the material of which the goods at issue were made and were laudatory with regard to their hardness.

15      Fourthly, as regards the comparison of the signs, first, the Board of Appeal took the view that the Opposition Division had been right in finding that the earlier word mark and the mark applied for were visually and phonetically similar to a low degree, but that they were not conceptually similar. Secondly, it found that the Opposition Division had been right in finding that the earlier figurative mark was phonetically similar to a low degree to the mark applied for. However, according to the Board of Appeal, the Opposition Division had erred in finding that there was a ‘below-average’ or low degree of visual similarity and a low degree of conceptual similarity between the earlier figurative mark and the mark applied for. In that regard, the Board of Appeal took the view that there was an ‘at least average’ and not low degree of visual similarity between those marks and that they were conceptually identical to the limited extent that they both referred to the concept of a diamond, in spite of the weak distinctiveness of that concept.

16      On the basis of the foregoing, the Board of Appeal remitted the case to the Opposition Division, in accordance with Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001, to examine the evidence of use of the earlier mark and, if necessary, compare the goods at issue, assess the intervener’s claim of enhanced distinctiveness of its earlier marks and assess the likelihood of confusion taking into account all the relevant factors and the comparison of the signs carried out by the Board of Appeal, which was binding on the Opposition Division.

**Forms of order sought**

17      The applicant claims that the Court should:

–        annul the contested decision;

–        order EUIPO to pay the costs;

–        order the intervener to bear its own costs.

18      EUIPO contends that the Court should:

–        dismiss the action;

–        order the applicant to pay the costs.

19      The intervener contends that the Court should:

–        dismiss the action;

–        order the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the intervener at all stages of the proceedings.

**Law**

20      In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, alleging, first, infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001, secondly, infringement of Article 27(3)(b) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of 5 March 2018 supplementing Regulation 2017/1001, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (OJ 2018 L 104, p. 1), thirdly, infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625, and, fourthly, infringement of Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.

21      Given the date on which the application for registration at issue was filed, namely 31 August 2017, which is decisive for the purposes of identifying the applicable substantive law, the facts of the case are governed by the substantive provisions of Regulation No 207/2009 (see, to that effect, judgments of 8 May 2014, *Bimbo* v *OHIM*, C‑591/12 P, EU:C:2014:305, paragraph 12, and of 18 June 2020, *Primart* v *EUIPO*, C‑702/18 P, EU:C:2020:489, paragraph 2 and the case-law cited). Furthermore, since, according to settled case-law, procedural rules are generally held to apply on the date on which they enter into force (see judgment of 11 December 2012, *Commission* v *Spain*, C‑610/10, EU:C:2012:781, paragraph 45 and the case-law cited), the case is governed by the procedural provisions of Regulation 2017/1001 and of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.

22      Consequently, in the present case, so far as concerns the substantive rules, the references made by the Board of Appeal in the contested decision, by the applicant in the arguments put forward, by the intervener and by EUIPO to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 must be understood as referring to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, the wording of which is identical.

23      The Court takes the view that it is appropriate to examine, first of all, the first plea, then the second and fourth pleas taken together and, lastly, the third plea.

***The first plea, alleging infringement of** **Article 8****(1)(b) of Regulation** **No 2****07/2009***

24      By the first plea, the applicant disputes the Board of Appeal’s assessments regarding the visual and conceptual comparisons between the earlier figurative mark and the mark applied for (‘the marks at issue’).

25      In the first place, as regards the visual comparison, the applicant submits that the Board of Appeal erred in finding that there was an ‘at least average’ degree of visual similarity between the earlier figurative mark and the mark applied for. According to the applicant, the degree of visual similarity between those two marks should be held to be low or lower than average, since the differences between those marks outweigh the similarities between them.

26      In particular, the applicant claims that, since the figurative element representing a diamond is weakly distinctive in relation to the goods at issue, the perception of the marks at issue is dominated by their word elements. In that regard, the applicant agrees with the Board of Appeal’s finding that the element ‘advanced superabrasives’ in the mark applied for is non-distinctive. However, it takes the view that the word elements in upper-case letters ‘ADI’ and ‘ASI’ in the marks at issue are sufficient for it to be held that there is no similarity between those marks.

27      First of all, the applicant submits that a similarity between two letters in short trade marks is not sufficient to conclude that those marks are similar, because a difference in only one letter is sufficient to distinguish them from each other. It relies on a number of previous decisions of the Board of Appeal in that regard. Next, the applicant states that the word elements of the marks at issue are in different fonts and are arranged in a different way in relation to the element representing a diamond. It submits that the relevant public will thus notice that, in the element in upper-case letters ‘ADI’ in the earlier mark, the upper-case letters ‘A’, ‘D’ and ‘I’ are placed on the diamond itself, whereas, in the element in upper-case letters ‘ASI’ in the mark applied for, the upper-case letters ‘A’, ‘S’ and ‘I’ are not placed inside the figurative element, but in front of it. Furthermore, it contends that the element ‘ADI’ in the earlier mark is written in a normal-sized serif font and is not situated in the foreground. By contrast, it submits that the element ‘ASI’ in the mark applied for is written in a bold sans-serif font and is situated in the foreground. Lastly, the applicant contends that, even assuming that the public’s attention will focus on the figurative element in the form of a diamond in the marks at issue, as the Board of Appeal found, that element is different in each of those marks, inasmuch as, in the earlier mark, the diamond is two-dimensional and is situated in the foreground, whereas, in the mark applied for, the diamond is three-dimensional and is hidden by the word element.

28      In the second place, as regards the conceptual comparison, the applicant claims, in essence, that the Board of Appeal overestimated the concept arising from the figurative elements representing a diamond in the marks at issue. The applicant submits that that element has only a weak distinctive character, with the result that the Board of Appeal’s finding that those marks were conceptually identical to a limited extent is incorrect. As far as the applicant is concerned, the degree of conceptual similarity between those marks should be regarded as being, at most, low.

29      EUIPO and the intervener dispute those arguments.

30      Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) provides that, upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark, the trade mark applied for must not be registered if, because of its identity with, or similarity to, the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected. The likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.

31      The risk that the public may believe that the goods or services in question come from the same undertaking or from economically linked undertakings constitutes a likelihood of confusion. The likelihood of confusion must be assessed globally, according to the relevant public’s perception of the signs and goods or services in question and taking into account all factors relevant to the circumstances of the case, in particular the interdependence between the similarity of the signs and that of the goods or services covered (see judgment of 9 July 2003, *Laboratorios RTB* v *OHIM – Giorgio Beverly Hills (GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS)*, T‑162/01, EU:T:2003:199, paragraphs 30 to 33 and the case-law cited).

32      For the purposes of applying Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, a likelihood of confusion presupposes both that the marks at issue are identical or similar and that the goods or services which they cover are identical or similar. Those conditions are cumulative (see judgment of 22 January 2009, *Commercy* v *OHIM – easyGroup IP Licensing (easyHotel)*, T‑316/07, EU:T:2009:14, paragraph 42 and the case-law cited).

33      It must be pointed out at the outset that the applicant does not dispute the Board of Appeal’s assessments regarding the comparison between the earlier word mark and the mark applied for. Those assessments do not therefore form the subject matter of the present proceedings.

34      Furthermore, since the Board of Appeal did not rule on the comparison of the goods at issue (see paragraph 16 above), that comparison also does not form the subject matter of the present proceedings.

35      In the first place, as regards the relevant public, the Board of Appeal found, in paragraph 22 of the contested decision, that the Opposition Division had been right in finding that the relevant territory for the purposes of the assessment of the likelihood of confusion was the whole of the European Union, because the earlier marks were EU trade marks. It also, like the Opposition Division, found that the goods covered by the earlier marks were aimed exclusively at a professional public in different specialised sectors, whereas some of the goods covered by the mark applied for could target both the general public and professionals, the level of attention of which would be relatively high.

36      Those assessments on the part of the Board of Appeal, which are not, moreover, disputed by the applicant, must be upheld. Even if, as the Board of Appeal pointed out in paragraph 23 of the contested decision, the definition of the relevant public were to be more limited following the Opposition Division’s assessment of the evidence of use of the earlier marks, that assessment as regards the relevant public remains valid for the purposes of examining the two aspects which the applicant disputes in the context of the present plea, namely the visual and conceptual comparisons of the marks at issue.

37      In the second place, as regards the comparison of the marks at issue, it must be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion must, so far as concerns the visual, phonetic or conceptual similarity of the signs at issue, be based on the overall impression given by the signs, bearing in mind, in particular, their distinctive and dominant elements. The perception of the marks by the average consumer of the goods or services in question plays a decisive role in the global assessment of that likelihood of confusion. In this regard, the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not engage in an analysis of its various details (see judgment of 12 June 2007, *OHIM* v *Shaker*, C‑334/05 P, EU:C:2007:333, paragraph 35 and the case-law cited).

38      Assessment of the similarity between two marks means more than taking just one component of a composite trade mark and comparing it with another mark. On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole, which does not mean that the overall impression conveyed to the relevant public by a composite trade mark may not, in certain circumstances, be dominated by one or more of its components (see judgment of 12 June 2007, *OHIM* v *Shaker*, C‑334/05 P, EU:C:2007:333, paragraph 41 and the case-law cited). It is only if all the other components of the mark are negligible that the assessment of the similarity can be carried out solely on the basis of the dominant element (judgment of 12 June 2007, *OHIM* v *Shaker*, C‑334/05 P, EU:C:2007:333, paragraph 42). That could be the case, in particular, where that component is capable on its own of dominating the image of that mark which members of the relevant public retain, with the result that all the other components are negligible in the overall impression created by that mark (judgment of 20 September 2007, *Nestlé* v *OHIM*, C‑193/06 P, not published, EU:C:2007:539, paragraphs 42 and 43).

39      In the present case, the signs to be compared are the figurative mark applied for ASI ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES, which has been reproduced in paragraph 2 above, and the earlier figurative mark ADI, which has been reproduced in paragraph 6 above, respectively.

40      Accordingly, it must be stated that the earlier figurative mark consists of a three-letter word element and a large figurative element representing a two-dimensional diamond. In particular, it must be pointed out that the upper-case letters ‘A’, ‘D’ and ‘I’ in the word element are situated on the figurative element and that each of them is located within the three facets of the diamond. The mark applied for consists of a three-letter word element, namely the upper-case letters ‘A’, ‘S’ and ‘I’, which are situated in the foreground of a figurative element representing a three-dimensional diamond. The mark applied for also consists of a second word element, made up of the terms ‘ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES’, which are written in smaller upper-case letters.

41      As regards the distinctive and dominant elements of the marks at issue, the Board of Appeal found, in paragraph 26 of the contested decision, first, that the word element ‘advanced superabrasives’ in the mark applied for was not distinctive with regard to the goods at issue, at least for the English-speaking part of the relevant public, secondly, that the word elements in upper-case letters ‘ADI’ and ‘ASI’ were distinctive, because they would be perceived as meaningless, and, thirdly, that the figurative elements representing a diamond in the marks at issue had only limited or weak distinctiveness, since the diamonds referred to the material of which the goods at issue were made and were laudatory with regard to their hardness.

42      Those assessments on the part of the Board of Appeal, which are not, moreover, disputed by the applicant in the context of the present plea, must be upheld.

43      In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, the weak distinctive character of an element of a composite mark does not necessarily imply that that element cannot constitute a dominant element, since it may, on account, in particular, of its position in the sign or its size, make an impression on consumers and be remembered by them (see judgments of 28 April 2016, *Gervais Danone* v *EUIPO – Mahou (B’lue)*, T‑803/14, not published, EU:T:2016:251, paragraph 25 and the case-law cited, and of 8 November 2017, *Pempe* v *EUIPO – Marshall Amplification (THOMAS MARSHALL GARMENTS OF LEGENDS)*, T‑271/16, not published, EU:T:2017:787, paragraph 51 and the case-law cited; see also, to that effect, judgment of 11 April 2019, *Užstato sistemos administratorius* v *EUIPO – DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem (Representation of a bottle and an arrow)*, T‑477/18, not published, EU:T:2019:240, paragraph 39).

44      That is the case here with regard to the figurative element representing a diamond which the marks at issue have in common, an element which is not negligible in relation to the respective word elements ‘ADI’ and ‘ASI’ and is likely to be remembered by the relevant public on account of its size and position.

45      As regards the phonetic comparison, the Board of Appeal’s assessment, which is not, moreover, disputed by the applicant, that there is a low degree of phonetic similarity between the marks at issue must also be upheld.

46      By contrast, the applicant disputes the Board of Appeal’s assessments relating to the visual and conceptual comparisons of the marks at issue. In paragraph 32 of the contested decision, the Board of Appeal found, first, that there was an ‘at least average’ degree of visual similarity between the earlier figurative mark and the mark applied for and, secondly, that those marks were conceptually identical to the limited extent that they both referred to the same weakly distinctive concept of a diamond.

47      As regards the visual comparison, first of all, it must be stated that, as is apparent from paragraph 28 of the contested decision, the marks at issue have in common a three-letter word element, the distinctiveness of which is not disputed. That word element contains two identical letters in the same position, namely the upper-case letter ‘A’, as the first letter, and the upper-case letter ‘I’, as the last letter. The only difference between the word elements in the marks at issue is not therefore in the beginning or end of the words, as pointed out by the intervener, but in the letter in the middle of those words, namely the upper-case letter ‘D’ in the earlier mark and the upper-case letter ‘S’ in the mark applied for.

48      Accordingly, even though it is true that a similarity between two letters in short trade marks is not as such sufficient to conclude in all cases that those marks are similar (see, to that effect, judgment of 20 June 2019, *Nonnemacher* v *EUIPO – Ingram (WKU)*, T‑389/18, not published, EU:T:2019:438, paragraph 59), in the present case, the fact that the distinctive three-letter word elements in the marks at issue contain two identical letters at the beginning and at the end of the words confers on those word elements a degree of visual similarity which cannot be regarded as low and must be regarded as average. In that regard, it must be stated that the slight stylistic differences in the word element in each of the marks at issue, which are highlighted by the applicant, are not sufficient to call that finding into question.

49      It must also be pointed out that the respective word elements of the marks at issue, namely ‘ADI’ and ‘ASI’, are placed in a similar position on the figurative element of each mark, with the result that, even though there are some differences in the positions of those word elements, as is submitted by the applicant, it must be held, as the Board of Appeal found, that the similarities outweigh those differences. In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, as is apparent from paragraph 28 of the contested decision, noting the specific details which differentiate the marks at issue would, in the present case, require a detailed examination on the part of consumers. However, according to settled case-law, even with regard to a public displaying a high level of attention, it remains the case that the average consumer only rarely has a chance to compare the various marks directly and must therefore rely on his or her imperfect recollection of them (judgment of 22 June 1999, *Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer*, C‑342/97, EU:C:1999:323, paragraph 26; see, also, judgment of 15 October 2020, *Rothenberger* v *EUIPO – Paper Point (ROBOX)*, T‑49/20, not published, EU:T:2020:492, paragraph 99 and the case-law cited).

50      Furthermore, the marks at issue have in common a large figurative element representing a diamond. In spite of the weak distinctive character of that element in both marks (see paragraph 44 above), the high degree of similarity between those two figurative elements in common representing a diamond accentuates the fact that there is an average degree of visual similarity between the marks at issue which goes beyond a low degree of visual similarity, it being, however, understood that that similarity is mainly due to the distinctive word elements in those marks, namely ‘ADI’ and ‘ASI’.

51      Lastly, although the applicant submits that the word element ‘advanced superabrasives’ in the mark applied for contributes towards differentiating it from the earlier figurative mark, it must be held that, given its non-distinctive character, which is not, moreover, disputed by the applicant, and its very secondary, if not negligible, position in the mark applied for, that element is unlikely to hold the public’s attention.

52      Furthermore, as regards the previous decisions of the Board of Appeal on which the applicant has relied in support of its line of argument, it is sufficient to state that, according to settled case-law, the legality of decisions of the Boards of Appeal must be assessed solely on the basis of Regulation No 207/2009 and not on the basis of a previous decision-making practice (see, to that effect, judgment of 26 April 2007, *Alcon* v *OHIM*, C‑412/05 P, EU:C:2007:252, paragraph 65 and the case-law cited). In any event, it must be pointed out that the decisions relied on do not concern the analysis of trade marks which are characterised by three-letter terms combined with a highly similar figurative element, with the result that they cannot be directly compared with the present case.

53      The Board of Appeal was therefore right in finding that there was an ‘at least average’ degree of visual similarity between the marks at issue.

54      As regards the conceptual comparison, first, it must be stated that the distinctive word elements in the marks at issue, namely ‘ADI’ and ‘ASI’, do not, as acronyms of the respective names of the intervener and the applicant, have any clear meaning for the relevant public.

55      Secondly, in so far as the marks at issue have in common a figurative element representing a diamond, which, as has been established in paragraph 44 above, is not negligible in the overall visual impression on account of its size and position, it must be held, as the Board of Appeal found in paragraph 30 of the contested decision, that those marks are conceptually identical to the limited extent that they refer to the same concept of a diamond.

56      In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, where a conceptual similarity is based on a weakly distinctive, or even descriptive, element, it plays a limited role and has less impact on the assessment of the likelihood of confusion (see, to that effect, judgment of 15 October 2020, *ROBOX*, T‑49/20, not published, EU:T:2020:492, paragraph 92 and the case-law cited).

57      In the present case, in view of the weak distinctive character of the figurative element representing a diamond, the outcome of the conceptual comparison between the marks at issue can have only a limited impact on the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.

58      It follows that the Board of Appeal did not make any error of assessment in finding, in paragraph 32 of the contested decision, that the marks at issue were conceptually identical to the limited extent that they both referred to the same weakly distinctive concept of a diamond, in spite of the weakness of that concept. The Board of Appeal thus found, in essence, that, in view of the weak distinctive character of the figurative element representing a diamond, the outcome of the conceptual comparison between the marks at issue could have only a limited impact on the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.

59      In the light of the foregoing, it must be held that the Board of Appeal did not make any error of assessment in finding that, first, the degree of visual similarity between the marks at issue was ‘at least average’ and, secondly, that those marks were conceptually identical, but that that identity had only a limited impact on the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.

60      The first plea must therefore be rejected.

***The second and fourth pleas, alleging infringement of** **Article 71****(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 and of** **Article 27****(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625***

61      By its second and fourth pleas, which it is appropriate to examine together, the applicant criticises, in essence, the Board of Appeal for not having examined, in the contested decision, the intervener’s arguments as regards the enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks and for having decided, on the contrary, to remit the case to the Opposition Division in order for that issue to be re-examined.

62      The applicant submits, in particular, that the intervener based its opposition on the enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks and that that claim was reiterated in the context of its appeal against the Opposition Division’s decision. Accordingly, the Board of Appeal was, according to the applicant, obliged, in accordance with Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 and Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625, to examine not only the similarity between the marks at issue, but also the alleged enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks. The applicant argues that, in remitting the case to the Opposition Division, the Board of Appeal made a procedural error which resulted in the opposition proceedings being unduly prolonged. It also states that, according to the case-law, the review undertaken by the Boards of Appeal requires a reappraisal of the dispute as a whole, since the Boards of Appeal must re-examine in full the initial case and take into account evidence produced in due time. Lastly, the applicant concludes by submitting that, if the Board of Appeal had examined the enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks, it should have found that those marks did not have enhanced distinctiveness.

63      EUIPO and the intervener dispute those arguments.

64      Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 provides that:

‘Following the examination as to the allowability of the appeal, the Board of Appeal shall decide on the appeal. The Board of Appeal may either exercise any power within the competence of the department which was responsible for the decision appealed or remit the case to that department for further prosecution.’

65      Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 provides that:

‘The examination of the appeal shall include the following claims or requests provided that they have been raised in the statement of grounds of the appeal or, as the case may be, in the cross appeal and provided that they were raised in due time in the proceedings before the instance of [EUIPO] which adopted the decision subject to appeal:

…

(b)      recognition of the earlier trade mark on the market acquired through use for the purposes of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001;

…’

66      It must be observed at the outset that it is apparent from the use of the verb ‘may’ in Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 that the Board of Appeal of EUIPO has a broad discretion for the purposes of ‘either exercis[ing] any power within the competence of the department which was responsible for the decision appealed or remit[ting] the case to that department for further prosecution’.

67      In the present case, in the first place, it must be pointed out that, in the context of the appeal brought under Articles 66 to 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 by the intervener against the Opposition Division’s decision, the Board of Appeal found, in paragraphs 16 and 17 of the contested decision, that the Opposition Division had infringed essential procedural requirements in not examining, in the light of the evidence submitted by the intervener, the argument that the earlier marks had enhanced distinctiveness.

68      In the second place, it must be pointed out that, on the basis of the foregoing considerations, the Board of Appeal decided to annul the Opposition Division’s decision in its entirety and to remit the case to the Opposition Division, stating in paragraph 36 of the contested decision that:

‘Given the parties’ legitimate interest that the case be examined by both instances of [EUIPO], the case is remitted to the Opposition Division, in accordance with Article 71(1), second sentence, [of Regulation 2017/1001], to examine the evidence of use and if necessary compare the goods and services, assess the opponent’s claim of enhanced distinctiveness of its earlier marks … and assess globally the likelihood of confusion taking into account all the relevant factors in the present case and taking into account the comparison of the signs made [by the Board of Appeal in the contested decision,] which is binding upon the Opposition Division.’

69      It must be stated that the Board of Appeal therefore exercised the broad discretion which Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 confers on it (see paragraph 66 above) for the purposes of, inter alia, remitting the case to the first instance (see, to that effect, judgment of 28 April 2021, *Nosio* v *EUIPO – Tros del Beto (ACCUSÌ)*, T‑300/20, not published, EU:T:2021:223, paragraph 62). In so doing, the Board of Appeal decided to remit the case to the Opposition Division for further consideration and, in particular, for that division to examine the incomplete or incorrect aspects of its annulled decision in order globally to assess, in the light of all the relevant factors, the likelihood of confusion in the present case.

70      Consequently, in the absence of any arguments on the part of the applicant against the specific grounds which were relied on in order to remit the case to the Opposition Division in the present case, in particular the parties’ legitimate interest that the case be examined by both instances of EUIPO, it cannot be maintained that the Board of Appeal made any error on the basis of Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.

71      That finding is not capable of being called into question on the basis of Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625. As EUIPO correctly submits, the aim of that article, which is entitled ‘Examination of the appeal’, is to delimit the scope of appeals before the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO and not to circumscribe the discretion of the Boards of Appeal to remit the case to the Opposition Division. Moreover, in the light of the hierarchy of norms, a provision of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 cannot circumscribe a discretion which is conferred on the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO by a provision of the basic Regulation 2017/1001.

72      In the light of the foregoing, it must be held that the Board of Appeal did not infringe either Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 or Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.

73      The second and fourth pleas must therefore be rejected, without it being necessary to examine the merits of the applicant’s line of argument seeking a declaration that the earlier marks do not have enhanced distinctiveness.

***The third plea, alleging infringement of** **Article 95****(2) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with** **Article 27****(4) of** **Delegated** **Regulation 2018/625***

74      By its third plea, the applicant claims that the Board of Appeal misapplied Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625, in finding that the evidence which had been submitted in order to prove use of the earlier mark also had to be taken into consideration in assessing the intervener’s argument that the earlier marks had enhanced distinctiveness.

75      The applicant states that, even though the intervener claimed that the earlier marks had enhanced distinctiveness before the Opposition Division, it did not submit evidence other than that which was intended to prove use of its marks. According to the applicant, it was only at the stage of the appeal against the Opposition Division’s decision that the intervener claimed that that evidence showed that its marks had enhanced distinctiveness. It submits that consequently that evidence was belated for the purposes of showing that those marks have enhanced distinctiveness.

76      The applicant also claims that the evidence submitted by the intervener does not satisfy either of the conditions laid down in Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625. First, it argues that it is irrelevant with regard to the assessment of whether the earlier marks have enhanced distinctiveness since it does not consist of opinion polls, awards, industry press articles, and so forth. Secondly, it submits that the Board of Appeal did not give any valid reason to justify the belated taking into consideration of the evidence relating to use as evidence relating to the enhanced distinctiveness of those marks.

77      EUIPO and the intervener dispute those arguments.

78      Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 provides that ‘[EUIPO] may disregard facts or evidence which are not submitted in due time by the parties concerned’.

79      Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 provides the following:

‘In accordance with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Board of Appeal may accept facts or evidence submitted for the first time before it only where those facts or evidence meet the following requirements:

(a)      they are, on the face of it, likely to be relevant for the outcome of the case; and

(b)      they have not been produced in due time for valid reasons, in particular where they are merely supplementing relevant facts and evidence which had already been submitted in due time, or are filed to contest findings made or examined by the first instance of its own motion in the decision subject to appeal.’

80      As regards the intervener’s claim that its earlier marks have enhanced distinctiveness, the Board of Appeal found, in paragraphs 35 and 36 of the contested decision, that, pursuant to Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001, it was appropriate for the Opposition Division to take into consideration not only the evidence which the intervener had submitted on 8 May 2018 during the opposition proceedings before EUIPO, but also the evidence which had been submitted on 4 October 2018 and which was intended to prove use of the earlier marks in response to the applicant’s request to that effect.

81      In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, which the Board of Appeal referred to in paragraph 35 of the contested decision, proof of use and proof of enhanced distinctiveness or of reputation are indissociably linked, with the result that, in finding that only an excessive and illegitimate formalism would dictate that the evidence of use could not be adduced as proof of enhanced distinctiveness or of reputation, a Board of Appeal exercises its discretion under Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 in deciding that it is appropriate to take that evidence into consideration and in finding that that evidence is genuinely relevant for the purposes of assessing whether the earlier trade mark has enhanced distinctiveness or a reputation (see, to that effect, judgments of 2 December 2015, *Tsujimoto* v *OHIM – Kenzo (KENZO ESTATE)*, T‑414/13, not published, EU:T:2015:923, paragraph 23 and the case-law cited, and of 9 September 2020, *Kludi* v *EUIPO – Adlon Brand (ADLON)*, T‑144/19, not published, EU:T:2020:404, paragraph 65).

82      It follows that, contrary to what the applicant claims, both the evidence which the intervener submitted on 8 May 2018 in the context of its opposition and that submitted on 4 October 2018 in response to the applicant’s request for proof of use (see paragraph 8 above) are relevant and must be taken into consideration by the Opposition Division, in accordance with point 2 of the operative part of the contested decision, for the purposes of examining, in the context of the remittal to it, the intervener’s claim that its earlier marks have enhanced distinctiveness. That evidence cannot therefore necessarily be considered to be belated or irrelevant for that purpose, as the applicant claims.

83      Moreover, it must be stated that Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 is not applicable in the present case, as there are no ‘facts or evidence submitted for the first time before [the Board of Appeal]’, since the evidence of use (or of enhanced distinctiveness) in question was submitted before the Opposition Division.

84      It must therefore be held that the Board of Appeal did not infringe Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625, in finding that the evidence submitted in order to prove use of the earlier marks also had to be taken into consideration in assessing the intervener’s argument that those marks had enhanced distinctiveness.

85      The third plea must therefore be rejected.

86      In the light of all of the foregoing considerations, the action must be dismissed in its entirety.

**Costs**

87      Under Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.

88      Since the applicant has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs, in accordance with the forms of order sought by EUIPO and the intervener.

89      Furthermore, in so far as the intervener has claimed that the applicant should also be ordered to pay the costs incurred by the intervener at all stages of the proceedings, it is sufficient to state that, since the present judgment is dismissing the action brought against the contested decision, it is points 3 and 4 of the operative part of that decision which continue to determine the costs incurred in the opposition proceedings and in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO (see, to that effect, judgment of 19 October 2017, *Aldi* v *EUIPO – Sky (SKYLITe)*, T‑736/15, not published, EU:T:2017:729, paragraph 131).

On those grounds,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber)

hereby:

1.      **Dismisses the action;**

2.      **Orders Advanced Superabrasives, Inc. to pay the costs.**

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Costeira | Kancheva | Zilgalvis |

Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 4 May 2022.

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| E. Coulon |  | H. Kanninen |

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Registrar |  | President |

---

[\*](#Footref*)      Language of the case: English.

[Top](#document1)