Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

*|*

# 52014DC0211

**REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the implementation of Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on science and technology statistics /\* COM/2014/0211 final \*/**

  

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

on the implementation of Decision No
1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council on science and technology statistics

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Official statistics on science, technology and innovation
in the European Union are largely based on Decision No 1608/2003/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council of
22 July 2003 concerning the production and development of Community
statistics on science and technology[1].
The Commission has implemented this Decision in close
cooperation with Member States through regulatory measures, voluntary
data collections and through the Union's statistical authority (Eurostat)'s own
data production.

This report
evaluates the implementation of the individual statistical actions listed in
Article 2 of the Decision. These are aimed at establishing
a statistical information system on science, technology and innovation to
support and monitor EU policies. The report mainly covers developments
since the previous report in 2011.

Commission
Regulations (EC) No 753/2004 and No 1450/2004 implementing Decision 1608/2003/EC
relate to two data collections that are regularly performed within the European
Statistical System (ESS) by Member States’ statistical authorities. Research
and development (R&D) and innovation statistics
collected under the Regulations, together with statistics on human
resources in science and technology, high-technology industries and
knowledge-based services, and patents, have become
recognised and widely-quoted reference data for monitoring EU science,
technology and innovation policy.

From the
reference year 2012 onwards, science, technology and
innovation data collections will gradually come under the new Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012, with effect from the October
2013 data transmissions. Commission Regulations (EC) No 753/2004 and No 1450/2004
have thereby been repealed.

The quality of
the statistical data has become more important, due to policy setting and
monitoring requirements and, in particular, the fact that policy targets are
set on the basis of statistical information. The Europe 2020 strategy has set a
precise target of raising combined public and private R&D investment levels
to 3 % of GDP. It is therefore of the utmost importance that the quality
of the measurements is (and remains) of a high standard.

The adoption of
the above Commission Regulations implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC improved
science, technology and innovation data
quality. This has been followed by gradual on-going improvements and close
monitoring of quality. Agreeing and implementing international standards and
methodology, and constant discussion of their relevance in a dynamic
measurement framework, should help to keep the statistics up-to-date and of
first-class quality.

Further
development work on science, technology and
innovation statistics will take account of policy priorities and the
development of the ESS as a whole. Given the priorities set in the Europe 2020
strategy and its supporting actions, a balance will be sought between novel
solutions and measures to further improve existing science,
technology and innovation statistics. The link
with other business statistics will be strengthened by including R&D and
innovation statistics in a future ‘Framework Regulation integrating business statistics’
currently under discussion within the ESS.

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL

on the implementation of Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European
Parliament and of
the Council on science and technology statistics

1.
INTRODUCTION

This is the third implementation report submitted by the Commission to the European
Parliament and the Council under Article 5 of Decision No 1608/2003/EC (hereinafter
‘the Decision’). The first report was adopted on 14 December
2007[2]
and the second on 11 April 2011[3].

In this
context, it is worth to recall several recent policy initiatives. In June 2010,
the European Council adopted the Europe 2020 strategy for jobs and smart,
sustainable and inclusive growth[4].
It also confirmed the five EU headline targets, one of which is to improve the
conditions for innovation and research and development, in particular with the
aim of raising combined public and private R&D investment levels to 3 %
of GDP.

In its
Communication of 6 October 2010[5]
on the Innovation Union Flagship Initiative, the Commission proposed an
additional indicator reflecting R&D and innovation intensity as well as an
annual Innovation Union Scoreboard for monitoring overall progress in
innovation performance.

On 17 July 2012,
the Commission adopted a Communication on A Reinforced European Research
Area partnership for Excellence and Growth[6].
It called for urgent structural changes across Europe in a partnership with Member States and stakeholder organisations for the timely delivery of concrete measures to raise
the level of excellence of Europe’s public research system. As part of this
initiative, a robust European Research Area (ERA) monitoring mechanism (EMM) has
been developed based on indicators for actions to monitor ERA policy reforms
and their implementation, providing transparency to the Council, the European
Parliament and the scientific community, and a basis for the Commission’s own
future decisions.

More recently,
in its Communication of 13 September 2013[7],
the Commission presented an indicator to measure performance in innovation
output. The indicator intends to support policy-makers to establish new or stronger
measures to remove bottlenecks that prevent innovators from translating ideas
into products and services that can be successful on the market.

The present report
takes stock of the implementation of the statistical information system on
science, technology and innovation (STI) required by the Decision and
extensively used to support and monitor related EU policies. The report mainly covers
developments since the previous report in 2011. The first part focuses on
implementation of measures under Article 2 of the Decision. It is followed
by chapters on data quality, costs and statistical burden. The final chapter
looks ahead to future actions.

2.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION

2.1
Regulatory measures

The Commission has
implemented the Decision through regulatory measures and voluntary data collections
in the Member States and through Eurostat's own statistical production.

Most
importantly, in 2004, two implementing Regulations came into force:

•   Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2004[8], which focuses
particularly on R&D statistics and also covers statistics on human
resources in science and technology (HRST), high‑technology industries
and knowledge-based services, patents and other science and technology
statistics (without assigning tasks directly to Member States or the ESS in
general); and

•   Commission Regulation (EC) No 1450/2004[9] on Community
statistics on innovation.

The R&D and innovation statistics collected under these
Regulations have become recognised and widely-quoted reference data in EU
policy monitoring.

In 2012, the 2004 Regulations were replaced
by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012[10], which also amended the
detailed requirements for R&D, other science and technology, and innovation
statistics.

The need for a new Implementing Regulation arose mainly
from the adoption of the Europe 2020 strategy and its various flagship
initiatives, together with monitoring of the ERA, which called for agreement on
the statistical monitoring framework for the corresponding EU policies. In
order to keep the STI data set as relevant as possible for users, it is
essential that the indicators used are based on statistics and variables which
are regularly produced in the Member States and, as far as possible, covered by
statistical legislation.

By specifying the statistical unit required and the uniform
quality reporting, the Regulation also took a further step towards harmonising
R&D and innovation statistics and strengthening the link with general
business statistics.

2.2 Main achievements

The main achievements in the period covered by this report
were as follows:

•   There was continued growth in the data production
volume of R&D expenditure and personnel data, compiled in various
dimensions and breakdowns based on the Frascati Manual (OECD 2002);

•   Agreement was reached on a further breakdown of data
on ‘R&D funded from abroad’;

•   A methodology was developed for measuring
trans-nationally coordinated research in Europe (as part of Government budget appropriations or outlays for R&D - GBAORD);

•   A more complete collection of information on public
funding to ICT R&D from the business enterprise sector was initiated;

•   The 2012 Community innovation survey was prepared on
the basis of the Oslo Manual (OECD, Eurostat 2005) to measure the innovation
performance of enterprises using a harmonised survey methodology and
questionnaire including an ad hoc module on strategies and obstacles for
reaching enterprises’ goals (increasing turnover, market share or profit
margin; decreasing costs);

•   Community innovation survey data at individual enterprise
level (‘microdata’) could be accessed more quickly via Eurostat’s SAFE Centre
and CD-ROM releases for external researchers; access now also includes the 2010
data set;

•   Improvement of the quality and harmonisation of STI
data through established quality reporting and the introduction of new quality measures;

•   Work has begun on streamlining national data and
metadata transmissions by working towards the use of the common ESS tools to
support a more efficient and standardised production process;

•   The timeliness of preliminary and final data
releases has increased, due to improved data production processes in the ESS
and more robust follow-up routines;

•   Regular data production on employment in
knowledge-intensive activities was set up, using an agreed methodology for classification
of such activities;

•   Regular data processing of statistics on Community
trade marks and Community designs began in 2013;

•   The publication of She Figures, the
Commission’s 2012 report on women’s role in science, was facilitated by gender
breakdowns of R&D and HRST data, where appropriate; and

•   Classifications used for STI statistics were updated
to comply with their revised versions (according to economic activity – NACE, trade
products – SITC, education – ISCED, occupation – ISCO and territories - NUTS).

The main
dissemination channel for the detailed STI data and related documentation is
Eurostat’s online database (Eurobase). The Commission also disseminates STI
data in several policy reports (e.g. related to the Europe 2020 strategy
and the ERA).

2.3
Implementation of STI statistics in Member States

National data collections have been and will further be re-adjusted
to meet the revised data requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) No
995/2012. New data have been requested for the first time in December 2013 for
GBAORD, June 2014 for innovation and June 2015 for R&D. Some of this work was
already launched during the piloting phase of the new or revised data
collections.

Member States’ compliance with the mandatory data provision
requirements has been very satisfactory and followed up annually in two formal
reporting rounds. The number of Member States with missing provisional R&D
data for example was reduced to one in 2013 (and two and three in 2011-2012). This
improved situation enabled the release of the EU R&D target indicator in 16
and 14 days after the end of the mandatory delivery date (31 October) in 2012
and 2013. Delays were previously 30 to 40 days. Coverage problems and delays in
data deliveries have been mainly limited to isolated occurrences affecting national
data production systems (e.g. temporary lack of resources, major redesign
of production system).

3. DATA QUALITY

The framework for the data quality of STI statistics is the
European Statistics Code of Practice[11].
This covers 15 main principles, of which several relate to the general
institutional conditions (professional independence or adequacy of resources) of
Member State authorities and organisations contributing to the overall
quality of European statistics. Other principles such as sound methodology
through manuals are for the STI statistics internationally established and
frequently evaluated in joint efforts with the Member States. Several quality
principles relating directly to the STI surveys (inter alia accuracy,
coherence and comparability) are covered and monitored through regular quality
reporting.

Eurostat has been collecting national quality reports on
R&D and GBAORD statistics since 2007 and for each two-yearly round of the
Community innovation survey since 2004. Serious shortcomings have not been
identified. However for the R&D statistics some follow-up work has been identified
in the form of national quality improvement action plans on R&D statistics (in
2011) in particular in the areas of improving the identification and updating
regularly the frame population of R&D performers (enterprises known or
assumed to perform R&D). Innovation survey challenges are mainly linked to
measurement issues. Constant efforts are required to convey concisely but precisely
to enterprise respondents what they are being asked for (new or significantly
improved products and processes) and encourage them to process the desired
information. Similarly quantification of the turnover from innovative products
and the innovation expenditures remain challenging to
be measured.

Synthesis of the innovation survey quality reports is
released in online database together with the data. Regulation (EU) No 995/2012
has made quality reporting part of the mandatory data provision as from 2013.

4. COST AND
BURDEN

4.1 STI
statistics within the ESS

Eurostat’s most
recent overall analysis of response burden and production costs in the Member
States, launched for 2010, assessed the costs of producing STI (R&D and innovation)
statistics as ‘medium’ and the response burden as ‘medium/high’. In this
evaluation STI statistics performed in line with most statistical domains which
were part of the overall assessment exercise, with somewhat lower production
costs and a higher response burden than business statistics in general.

4.2 Detailed
information collection on cost and burden

Regular
attempts have been made to collect data on the cost and burden of STI data
collections. Exact figures have been requested in the quality reporting, but consistent
data allowing comparison or evaluation of the overall costs have proved
difficult to obtain. Many Member States have pointed out that it will not be
possible to separate the cost of the R&D and innovation surveys and data
compilations, either from other business and related statistics or from similar
activities based only on national needs. Where data are available, reporting methodologies
that vary between Member States, and between institutions within Member States,
preclude meaningful comparison or publication of the individual cost estimates.

Subject to the
above reservations, the average burden measured by time spent filling in the
enterprise sector R&D questionnaire for the reference period 2009 varied
from 0.3 to six hours among the 13 of 15 Member States for which data are available.
An exceptional value of 11 hours was reported by two Member States. Much fewer data
are available from other economic sectors, although the periods of time spent
filling in the R&D questionnaire in the government sector and higher
education, while relatively close to each other, seem to be longer than in the
enterprise sector.

As regards the
Community innovation survey, the information in the quality reporting from the
2008 and 2010 survey waves reveals that the time spent by innovative
enterprises on filling in the questionnaire varied between 0.48 and over three
hours. Just two countries reported that more time was needed to fill in the
questionnaire in 2010 than in 2008. Non-innovative enterprises spent between 0.24
and 1.85 hours filling in the questionnaire in 2010. Four out of ten countries
reported higher costs in 2010 than in 2008, five had lower costs and one
reported the same costs for both years.

4.3 Eurostat
co-financing of STI data collections in Member States

The calls for grant proposals in 2006 and
2009 were followed by several similar calls under the 2011 Commission budget for co-financing the non-mandatory parts of the R&D or
innovation data collections or for studying the feasibility of developing new
indicators or financing the surveys on Career Development of Doctorate holders
(CDH). In 2011, total financial commitments for STI statistics were € 1 019 974
for 13 Member States and Norway.

Phare
Multi-Beneficiary Programmes for statistical cooperation, the Transition
Facility Multi-Beneficiary Programme for statistical integration and the Instrument
for Pre-accession Assistance (programmes from 2004 to 2011) have involved co-financing
for a total of € 1 518 105 to conduct R&D, innovation and CDH
surveys in associated third countries and Member States that joined the Union in
2004 or later.

5. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF STI STATISTICS

5.1 Changes in the environment

The Commission Communication on a vision for European
statistics[12]
calls for more integrated, more intelligent approaches to the production of
statistics. This includes integrating statistical tools, making increased use
of administrative sources and simplifying and improving the statistical
regulatory environment to obtain richer forward-looking statistical data, improve
productivity and reduce the response burden.

Now that the implementing rules for STI statistics have
been presented more consistently in Regulation (EU) No 995/2012, the next step
will be to strengthen the link with other business statistics by including
R&D and innovation statistics in a future ‘Framework Regulation integrating
business statistics’, currently under discussion within the ESS. This will also
provide the next opportunity to re-evaluate the mandatory content of R&D
and innovation data.

On various occasions in recent years, national statistical
authorities have reported a lack of resources, raising serious concerns as to
their ability to meet existing or new ESS requirements. Priority setting is therefore
more crucial than ever, for existing and planned statistical operations alike.

5.2 Improving and evaluating existing STI statistics

Statistics need to be sound and fit for purpose. Existing data
collections, on R&D and innovation in particular, will be kept under
constant relevance and quality review through the full use of regular
compliance monitoring and systematic collection of quality reports. This is now
even more important as the Europe 2020 strategy will be monitored partly
through sets of STI indicators.

For R&D statistics, efforts are continuing to ensure
that underlying data are reported for all R&D performers (or at least
estimated when needed, whether or not they are known beforehand) and that these
cover all economic sectors and sub-sectors and operating units of all sizes,
i.e. the totality of R&D expenditure and personnel in the economy at a
given time.

For European innovation statistics, an assessment will be
made as to whether extending the coverage (to all business activities, the
entire economy) would add sufficient new information to justify the additional
resources needed and if this would be methodologically feasible.

As with the new work, improvements in existing STI
statistics will be made, where mutually beneficial, in cooperation with the
OECD and other international organisations with which coordination has already
been stepped up. This includes continuing work to revise methodological reference
manuals.

5.3 New
indicators, new uses

Responding to
the new user needs is particularly challenging in the present ESS environment,
in particular in light of tighter budgets. New indicators and new data sources
will nevertheless be frequently requested by the user community. Development
work which goes beyond using the existing data sources, including new
indicators, new data sources and even further breakdowns of the existing data
(as they may involve larger sample sizes or methodological work), will take
place only after thorough screening and, to the extent possible, cost/benefit
analysis. Feasibility studies and pilot surveys will also be used in this
context.

Further
internationalisation of R&D, innovation and other enterprise activities pose,
in overall terms, even additional challenges for compiling STI statistics now
and in the future. This covers both obtaining new statistical data on
internationalisation and also mastering business surveys in more globalised
world and therefore more complex context.

The European
System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010)[13] is the newest
internationally compatible EU accounting framework for a systematic and
detailed description of an economy. This will be implemented as from September
2014. A major difference from the previous version (ESA
95) is the recognition of R&D as capital formation rather than considering
it intermediary consumption. In other words, instead of R&D activities
providing intermediate input to the main production of an enterprise, it will
be now recognised as output in its own right and result in an increase in
countries' GDP. This modification introduces new requirements for more detailed
and broader measurement of R&D. Related to the OECD led revision of the
Frascati Manual it is currently under consideration to what extent the R&D
surveys, can contribute to R&D capitalisation work and what amendments
could possibly be introduced.

[1]               Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 22 July 2003 concerning the production and development of
Community statistics on science and technology, OJ L 230, 16.9.2003, p. 1.

[2]           Report
from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the
implementation of Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council. COM(2007) 801.

[3]               Report from the Commission to the European Parliament
and the Council on the implementation of Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council on science and technology statistics.
COM(2011) 184.

[4]               European Council conclusions of 17 June 2010. CO EUR
9, CONCL 2.

[5]               Communication from the Commission to the European
Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the
Committee of the Regions on Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. COM(2010) 546.

[6]               Communication from the Commission to the European
Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the
Committee of the Regions on A Reinforced European Research Area Partnership
for Excellence and Growth. COM(2012) 392 final.

[7]               Communication from the Commission to the European
Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the
Committee of the Regions on Measuring innovation output in Europe: towards a
new indicator. COM(2013) 624 final.

[8]               Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2004 of 22 April
2004 implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council as regards statistics on science and technology, OJ L 118,
23.4.2004, p. 23.

[9]               Commission Regulation (EC) No 1450/2004 of 13 August
2004 implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council concerning the production and development of Community
statistics on innovation, OJ L 267, 14.8.2004, p. 32.

[10]             Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 of
26 October 2012 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Decision
No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the
production and development of Community statistics on science and technology, OJ
L 299, 27.10.2012, p. 18.

[11]         Recommendation
of the Commission on the independence, integrity and accountability of the
national and Community statistical authorities. COM(2005) 217.

[12]             Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament
and the Council on the production method of EU statistics: a vision for the
next decade. COM(2009) 404.

[13]             Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional
accounts in the European Union, OJ L 174, 26.6.2013, p. 1.

[Top](#document1)