Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/45 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — TeamBank v EUIPO — Fio Systems (FYYO)

(Case T-826/17) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019044EN.01004501-E0001)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark FYYO - Earlier EU word mark FIO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 44/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: TeamBank AG Nürnberg (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and H. Lindner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fio Systems AG (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: S. Hänsel, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 (Case R 2337/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Fio Systems and TeamBank Nürnberg.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1) | Dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2) | Orders TeamBank AG Nürnberg to pay the costs. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)