Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

201807060561993542018/C 259/438822016TC25920180723EN01ENINFO\_JUDICIAL20180607313222

Case T-882/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2018 — Sipral World v EUIPO — La Dolfina (DOLFINA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DOLFINA — No genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

[Top](#document1)

C2592018EN3120120180607EN0043312322

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2018 — Sipral World v EUIPO — La Dolfina (DOLFINA)

(Case T-882/16) (
[1](#t-C_2018259EN.01003102-E0001)
)

‛(EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DOLFINA — No genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))’

2018/C 259/43Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sipral World, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero and A. Ruo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: La Dolfina, SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: J.Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 1897/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between La Dolfina and Sipral World.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |

| 2. | Orders Sipral World, SL, to pay the costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-C_2018259EN.01003102-E0001)
) [OJ C 46, 13.2.2017](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2017:046:TOC).

[Top](#document2)