Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 April 2018 — Cryo-Save v EUIPO

(Case C‑327/17 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62017CO0327_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal — European Union trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

| 1. | Appeal—Interest in bringing proceedings—Condition—Appeal capable of procuring an advantage for the party bringing it  (see para. 12) |

| 2. | EU trade mark—Appeals procedure—No need to adjudicate—Appeal lodged by the proprietor of an EU trade mark against a judgment of the General Court upholding the decision of a Board of Appeal which granted the application for revocation of the mark—Withdrawal of the application for revocation of the mark—End of the dispute  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 149 and 190(1); European Parliament and Council Regulation No 2017/1001, Arts 66(1) and 71(3))  (see paras 14, 16) |

| 3. | Judicial proceedings—Costs—No need to adjudicate  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 142, 149, 184(1) and 190)  (see paras 17, 18) |

Operative part

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present appeal. |

| 2. | Cryo-Save AG shall pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the present proceedings. |

| 3. | Cryo-Save AG and MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG shall bear their own costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62017CO0327_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) [OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2017:330:TOC)

[Top](#document1)