Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2016 —

Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v EUIPO

(Case C‑479/15 P)

‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word mark NANU — Opposition by the proprietor of the word mark NAMMU — Partial refusal to register — Likelihood of confusion — Distortion of the facts — Inadequate statement of reasons’

| 1. | Appeals — Grounds — Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts put before the General Court — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — Assessments relating to the similarity of the marks at issue — Assessments relating to the similarity of the goods or services (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 14-16, 28, 31) |

| 2. | Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the evidence duly produced — Inadmissible save when the clear sense of the evidence is distorted — Duty of the General Court to state the reasons for its assessment of the evidence — Scope (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 26, 27) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs. |

[Top](#document1)