Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
| European flag | Official Journal  of the European Union | EN  C series |

---

|  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | C/2024/5848 | 7.10.2024 |

Action brought on 23 August 2024 – Montres Tudor v EUIPO (1926)

(Case T-444/24)

(C/2024/5848)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Montres Tudor SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mesa Sánchez and I. Pascual de Quinto Santos-Suárez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘1926’ – Application for registration No 1 745 423

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2024 in Case R 600/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Inconsistency as regards the goods in respect of which the contested international registration is regarded as distinctive. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | The trade mark applied for does not describe the characteristics of the goods claimed. Inapplicability of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | The contested international registration is inherently distinctive. Inapplicability of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |

---

[Top](#document1)