Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/29 |

---

Action brought on 22 September 2016 — Wirecard v EUIPO (mycard2go)

(Case T-676/16)

(2016/C 410/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘mycard2go’ — Application No 14 303 457

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2016 in Case R 280/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the defendant for continuation of the registration procedure concerning EU trade mark No 014303457; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |

Plea in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |

---

[Top](#document1)