Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/30 |

---

Action brought on 17 April 2017 — Balti Gaas v Commission and INEA

(Case T-236/17)

(2017/C 221/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Balti Gaas OÜ (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: E. Tamm and L. Naaber-Kivisoo, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission and Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the defendants decision of 17 February 2017 Ref Ares(2017)890302[(1)](#ntr1-C_2017221EN.01003001-E0001); |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the defendants to bear their costs and pay those incurred by the applicant. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant submits that the defendants have not ensured that the procedures followed in awarding grants would have complied with the principles of legality, transparency and sound administration and relies on four pleas in law.

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | First plea in law, alleging lack of competence. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of an essential procedural requirement on the ground of failure to give a statement of reasons. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a lack of statement of reasons. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging lack of material accuracy of the statement of reasons. |

---

[Top](#document1)