Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

C 47/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.2.2004

**COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 15 October 2003**

**in Case T-288/02: Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) v**
**Commission of the European Communities** ( [1] )

_**(Action for annulment — Decision to conclude a research**_
_**contract — Inadmissibility)**_

(2004/C 47/55)

_(Language of the case: French)_

In Case T-288/02 Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), established in Pathumthani (Thailand), represented by H Teissier du
Cros, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
against the Commission of the European Communities
(Agents: P. Kuijper and B Schöfer) — application for the
annulment of the decision of the European Commission of
22 February 2002 to conclude a research contract within the
framework of the ‘Asia-Invest’ programme with the Centre for
Energy-Environment Research and Development — the Court
of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh,
President, R García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 15 October 2003, the operative
part of which is as follows:

(1) _The action is dismissed as clearly inadmissible._

(2) _The parties are ordered to bear their own costs in the main_
_proceedings and in the proceedings for interim relief._

( [1] ) OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.

**Action brought on 8 December 2003 by Flavia Angeletti**
**against the Commission of the European Communities**

**(Case T-394/03)**

(2004/C 47/56)

_(Language of the case: French)_

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the

European Communities on 8 December 2003 by Flavia
Angeletti, residing in Nice (France), represented by Juan Ramón
Iturriagagoitia and Karine Delvolvé, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—
annul the medical findings of 22 February 2003, notified
on 7 October 2003 and received on 14 October 2003 by
Flavia Angeletti;

— annul the decision of the Commission of 7 October
2003, received on 14 October 2003, refusing to recognise
the occupational origin of the applicant’s medical complaint;

— annul the decision of the Commission of 17 October
2003, corrected by letter of 27 October 2003, charging
to the applicant part of the fees and expenses charged by
members of the medical committee;

—
annul the mandate of the medical committee, communicated to the applicant on 18 April 2003, as a preparatory
act;

—
annul the letter of 5 May 2003 containing a refusal to
allow the forwarding to the medical committee of a scan
carried out on 21 February 2003, as a preparatory act;

—
annul the decision of 30 January 2001, and uphold the
request of the applicant made by way of her complaint of
4 September 2000, and the opinion of the medical
committee of 5 November 1999;

—
order the Commission to pay the fees and expenses of
the medical committee in full;

—
order the Commission to pay, in their entirety, the fees
and expenses incurred by the applicant in the context of
the irregular opinion of the medical committee and of
the decision of the institution taken on the basis thereof,
together with interest thereon;

—
order the Commission to pay all the costs.