Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/74 |

---

Action brought on 24 November 2006 — Boston Scientific v OHIM — Terumo (CAPIO)

(Case T-325/06)

(2006/C 326/152)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Boston Scientific Ltd (Christ Church, Barbados) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan)

Form of order sought

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 September 2006, served to the representatives of the plaintiff on 18 September 2006, in Case R 61/2006-2; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and Board of Appeal. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CAPIO’ for goods in class 10 — application No 2 554 434

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha

Mark or sign cited: The national and Community word marks ‘CAPIOX’ and ‘CAPIOX PULSE’ for goods in class 10

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 43 of Council Regulation No 40/94 and Rule 22 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 as Terumo failed to prove sufficient use of its trade mark, and of Article 8(1)(b) of the Council regulation as the conflicting trade marks are not likely to be confused.

---

[Top](#document1)