Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 November 2019 — Luz Saúde v EUIPO

(Case C‑622/19 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62019CO0622_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

| 1. | Appeal — System whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Burden of proof  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)  (see para. 10) |

| 2. | Appeal — System whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed — Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed — Formal requirements — Scope  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)  (see paras 11-13) |

| 3. | Appeal — System whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate the significance of the issue — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)  (see paras 14-19) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is not allowed to proceed. |

| 2. | Luz Saúde, SA, shall bear its own costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62019CO0622_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) [OJ C 432, 23.12.2019](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2019:432:TOC).

[Top](#document1)