Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 –  
EUIPO v Vincenti

(Case C‑653/20 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62020CJ0653_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal – Civil Service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 45(1) – Promotion – Decision not to promote an official – Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Duty to state reasons)

| 1. | Appeal – Grounds – Plea raised for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1), second subpara., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1))  (see paragraph 38) |

| 2. | Appeal – Grounds – Inadequate or contradictory grounds – Admissibility – Scope of the obligation to state reasons  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see paragraphs 46, 47) |

Operative part

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |

| 2. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62020CJ0653_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) [OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2021:148:TOC)

[Top](#document1)