Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2024 –  
LD v EUIPO

(Case C‑659/23 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62023CO0659_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 42c – Placement on leave in the interests of the service – Withdrawal of rights and privileges – Article 90 of the Statute – Concept of ‘decision’ and ‘complaint’ – Period for lodging an appeal – Inadmissibility)

| 1. | Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion – Requirement that the distortion be obvious from the documents in the file  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see paragraphs 4 [6, 7, 20], 5, 6) |

| 2. | Appeal – Grounds – No specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary – Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))  (see paragraphs 4 [12-14], 5) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |

| 2. | LD shall bear her own costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62023CO0659_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) OJ C 4303, 15.7.2024.

[Top](#document1)