Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/45 |

---

Action brought on 22 June 2010 — El Coto De Rioja v OHIM — Álvarez Serrano (COTO DE GOMARIZ)

(Case T-276/10)

()

2010/C 234/80

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Coto De Rioja, S.A. (Oyón, Alava) (Spain) (represented by: J. Grimau Muñoz and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: María Álvarez Serrano (Gomariz Leiro, Orense) (Spain)

Form of order sought

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 28 April 2010 in Case R 1020/2008-4 and, consequently, declare invalid Community trade mark No 2 631 828, in Class 33, which contains the verbal element ‘COTO DE GOMARIZ’, and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Figurative trade mark containing the verbal element ‘COTO DE GOMARIZ’ (Application No 2 631 828) for goods in Class 33 ‘wines’.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: María Álvarez Serrano

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: EL COTO DE RIOJA S.A.

Trade mark right or sign of the applicant for the declaration: Community word mark ‘COTO DE IMAZ’ (No 339 333) for goods in Classes 29, 32 and 33; Community word mark ‘EL COTO’ (No 339 408) for goods in Classes 29, 32 and 33; and the well-known Spanish marks ‘EL COTO’ and ‘COTO DE IMAZ’ for ‘wines’.

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Annulment of the contested Community trade mark.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision and dismissal of the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 52(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark, in conjunction with Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of that regulation.

---

[Top](#document1)