Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/27 |

---

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2018 — W&O medical esthetics GmbH v EUIPO — Fidia farmaceutici (HYALSTYLE)

(Case T-178/17)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2018094EN.01002701-E0001)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark HYALSTYLE - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Request for the hearing of witnesses - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law))

(2018/C 094/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: W&O medical esthetics GmbH (Oberursel, Germany) (represented by: A. Finkentey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Fidia farmaceutici SpA (Abano Terme, Italy) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2017 (Case R 872/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between W&O medical esthetics and Fidia farmaceutici.

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The action is dismissed. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | W&O medical esthetics GmbH shall bear its own costs and those of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and of Fidia farmaceutici SpA. |

---

[Top](#document1)