Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2016 —

Roland v EUIPO

(Case C‑515/15 P)

‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Mark in the category ‘other’, consisting of a nuance of the colour red applied to the sole of a shoe — Opposition from the proprietor of the figurative mark registered internationally, containing the word elements ‘my SHOES’ — Rejection of the opposition’

| 1. | Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 26, 27) |

| 2. | Appeals — Grounds — Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support the operative part — Invalid plea in law (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 28) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Roland SE is ordered to pay the costs. |

[Top](#document1)