Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

201807270132025002018/C 285/613982018TC28520180813EN01ENINFO\_JUDICIAL20180625434421

Case T-398/18: Action brought on 25 June 2018 — Pielczyk v EUIPO — Thalgo TCH (DERMAEPIL SUGAR EPIL SYSTEM)

[Top](#document1)

C2852018EN4310120180625EN0061431442

Action brought on 25 June 2018 — Pielczyk v EUIPO — Thalgo TCH (DERMAEPIL SUGAR EPIL SYSTEM)

(Case T-398/18)

2018/C 285/61Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Radoslaw Pielczyk (Klijndijk, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Kielar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thalgo TCH (Roquebrune-sur-Argens, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union trade mark No 11 649 324

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 April 2018 in Joined Cases R 979/2017-4 and R 1070/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in part, namely in so far as the Board of Appeal   | a) | dismissed the Applicant’s appeal R 979/2017-4 |  | b) | partially allowed the cancellation Thalgo TCH’s appeal R 1070/2017-4 for the goods in Class 3 of the Nice Classification; |  | c) | declared the EUTM No 11 649 324 also invalid for the indicated goods in Class 3; |  | d) | upheld EUIPO’s decision of 21/03/2017 (Cancellation proceedings No 11 974 C) in part in which pursuant to the decision the Applicant’s trade mark has been declared invalid for goods in Class 3; | |

| — | order Thalgo TCH to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the cancellation Division of the EUIPO and the Board of Appeal; |

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

| — | Infringement of Rule 22(3)(4) in connection with Rule 40(6) of the Commission Regulation (Ec) No 2868/95; |

| — | Infringement of Article 64(2)(3) in connection with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |

[Top](#document2)