Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

C 202/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 24.8.2002

(b) Cases concerning intellectual property rights, as **JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**
referred to in Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure, shall be assigned, according to the order in
which they are registered at the Court Registry, to
the Second, and Fourth Chambers; **of 4 July 2002**

(c) The other cases referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall
be assigned to the First, Second, Third, Fourth and **in Case T-340/99: Arne Mathisen AS v Council of the**
Fifth Chambers. Such assignment is to be effected **European Union** ( [1] )
on the basis of three separate rotas, according to the
order in which they are registered at the Court
Registry:
_**(Definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties — Far-**_
_**med Atlantic salmon — Action for annulment — Undertak-**_
— For the cases referred to in Article 236 of the _**ing — Circumvention — Obligation to cooperate — Breach**_
EC Treaty and Article 152 of the EAEC Treaty; _**— Principle of proportionality — Claim for compensation)**_

—
For the cases concerning the implementation
of the rules on competition applicable to
(2002/C 202/28)
undertakings;

—
For the other cases covered by paragraph 1(b).
_(Language of the case: English)_
For the purposes of the rota mentioned in the first
indent above, the assignment of intellectual property
cases to the Second and Fourth Chambers on the
basis of the rota mentioned in paragraph 2(b) shall
be offset by the assignment of cases to the First,
Third and Fifth Chambers on a pro rata basis.
In Case T-340/99, Arne Mathisen AS, established in Værøy
(Norway), represented by S. Knudtzon, lawyer, with an address
For the purposes of the rotas referred to in parafor service in Luxembourg, v Council of the European Union
graphs 2(a) and 2(c), the First Chamber and the First
(Agents: S. Marquardt and G. Berrisch), supported by ComChamber, Extended Composition, presided by the
mission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz
President of the Court of First Instance, shall not be
and S. Meany): Application for annulment of Council Reguincluded in those lists every third time the end of a
lation (EC) No 1895/1999 of 27 August 1999 amending
rota is reached.
Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic
The President of the Court of First Instance may
salmon originating in Norway (OJ 1999 L 233, p. 1) and
derogate from that order on the ground that cases
compensation for damage suffered as a result of the adoption
are related or with a view to ensuring an even spread
of the workload. of the regulation, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber,
Extended Composition), composed of: M. Vilaras, President,
V. Tiili, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi and A.W.H. Meij, Judges;
J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
judgment on 4 July 2002, in which it:
_Plenary session_

At its meeting on 4 July 2002, the Court of First Instance 1. _Dismisses the application;_
decided pursuant to the second sub-paragraph of Article 32(1)
of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance that
where, following the designation of an Advocate General 2. _Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay the costs_
pursuant to Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure, there is an
_of the Council;_
even number of Judges in the Court of First Instance sitting in
plenary session, the rota established in advance in accordance
with which the President of the Court is to designate the Judge 3. _Orders the Commission to bear its own costs._
who will not take part in the judgment of the case shall be in
reverse order to that in which the Judges rank according to
their seniority in office under Article 6 of the Rules of
Procedure unless the Judge who would thus be designated is ( [1] ) OJ C 79 of 18.3.2000.
the Judge-Rapporteur. In that event, it shall be the judge
ranking immediately above him who shall be designated.