Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

C 21/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.1.2004

1. _Dismisses the application;_

2. _Orders the applicant to pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

**JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 27 November 2003**

**in Case T-348/02: Quick restaurants SA v Office for**
**Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and**
**Designs) (OHIM)1** ( [1] )

_**(Community trade mark — Trade mark consisting of the**_
_**word Quick — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive**_
_**character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 —**_
_**Registration refused in part)**_

(2004/C 21/72)

_(Language of the case: French)_

In Case T-348/02, Quick restaurants SA, established in Brussels
(Belgium), represented by L. Van Bunnen, lawyer, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, v Office for Harmonisation
in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
(Agents: A. Rassat and S. Laitinen): Action for partial annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) of 17 September 2002 (Case R 1117/2000-2)
concerning registration of the word Quick as a Community
trade mark, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
composed of: V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras,
Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, has given a judgment on
27 November 2003, in which it:

1. _Dismisses the action;_

2. _Orders the applicant to pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.

**ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 15 October 2003**

**in Case T-372/02: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v Com-**
**mission of the European Communities** ( [1] )

_**—**_
_**(Development**_ _**cooperation**_ _**European**_ _**Community**_
_**Humanitarian Office — Framework partnership agreement**_
_**for the co-financing of operations carried out by NGOs —**_
_**Rejection of an application — Action for annulment —**_
_**Inadmissible)**_

(2004/C 21/73)

_(Language of the case: English)_

In Case T-372/02, Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV, established in
Rosbach (Germany), represented by H. Kaltenecker, lawyer, v
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Wilderspin and S. Fries): Application for (i) annulment of the
Commission’s decision of 22 October 2002 rejecting the
application by the applicant to sign a framework partnership
agreement with the European Community Humanitarian
Office (ECHO), (ii) an order requiring the Commission either
to reinstate the applicant in the position it had in 1996 when
it applied to sign a framework partnership agreement or,
alternatively, to invite it to sign the framework partnership
agreement now in force and (iii) an order requiring the
Commission to reimburse to the applicant the costs relating to
its complaint to the European Ombudsman, the Court of First
Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh, President,
R. García-Valdecasas and J. D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
has made an order on 15 October 2003, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1. _The application is dismissed as inadmissible in its entirety._

2. _The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the_
_Commission._

( [1] ) OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.