Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/47 |

---

Action brought on 23 March 2010 — Pieno žvaigždės v OHIM — Fattoria Scaldasole (Iogurt.)

(Case T-135/10)

2010/C 134/76

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: AB ‘Pieno žvaigždės’ (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: I. Lukauskienė and R. Žabolienė, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fattoria Scaldasole Srl (Monguzzo, Italy)

Form of order sought

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 January 2010 in case R 1070/2009-2; and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Iogurt.’, for goods in class 29

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: Lithuanian trade mark registration of the figurative mark ‘jogurtas’, for goods in class 29; Community trade mark registration of the figurative mark ‘jogurt’, for goods in class 29

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Deemed the appeal not to have been filed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 60 of Council Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 8 of Commission Regulation No 2869/95[(1)](#ntr1-C_2010134EN.01004701-E0001) as the Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that the fee for appeal was not paid within the prescribed time-limit of two months from the date of notification of the appealed decision.

---

[Top](#document1)