Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/22 |

---

Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)

(Case T-479/16)

(2016/C 383/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, A. Stolz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘AROMASENSATIONS’ — Application for registration No 14 198 824

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 2482/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismisses the appeal insofar as it is based on Article 7(1)(b); |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of principles of equal treatment and sound administration. |

---

[Top](#document1)