Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

*|*

# 52012SC0027

**COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social committee and the Committee of the Regions Making Raw Materials available for Europe's future well-being - proposal for a European Innovation Partnership on Raw materials /\* SWD/2012/0027 \*/**

  

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER

Accompanying the document

Communication from the Commission
to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
committee and the Committee of the Regions

Making Raw Materials available for
Europe's future well-being - proposal for a European Innovation Partnership on
Raw materials

1.
Coherence with conditions for success[1]
and EU value added
1.1.
Focus on a specific societal challenge:

The European
Union needs to make a significant step by 2020 if it is to improve the security
of supply and achieve efficient and sustainable management of non-energy,
non-agricultural raw materials in the EU. These include many and diversified
materials such as aggregates, industrial minerals and wood, but also metals
used in high technology industries such as cobalt, platinum, rare earths, and
titanium.

The objectives
of this Partnership are clear: the European Union has to extract more
efficiently and safely, to re-use and recycle more, to find
alternatives/substitutes for critical raw materials and to be more resource
efficient by decoupling resource use from economic growth.

There are clear
positive impacts on competitiveness, with about 30 million EU jobs depending on
the availability of raw materials. The development of EU's high tech
manufacturing industry including eco-technologies is at stake. The proposal
aims at reducing the risk of undermining the EU capacity to produce strategic
products for its society. From this perspective, it is also a necessary basis
for the success of other relevant Innovation Partnerships.

1.2.
Major policy instruments

The policy
measures used are both on the supply and on the demand-side. On
the supply-side, companies should be the main drivers of efficiency
improvements, but national and EU level research and innovation funding can be
mobilised to fund development of the new technologies and processes. In this
context, research and innovation are crucial because new and more sustainable
extraction, more resource efficient use and recycling technologies, as
well as new substitutes for currently used materials cannot be developed
without significant efforts involving new research activities as well as new
Development and Innovation projects.

On the demand
side, standardisation and certification schemes are needed in
many instances, in order to complement the market. Examples of such needs
include:

·
interoperable software and data management
packages, allowing faster integration of data for cross-country exploration and
survey including 3D geological mapping;

·
common terminology related to mineral and metals
classification and production statistics, harmonised geological resources
classification e.g. according to the UNFC[2] guidelines;

·
new eco-design standards
and requirements to promote the use of recycled materials, to increase the
durability and recyclability of products and to ensure an efficient use of
materials (e.g. metals scrap, paper for recycling)

Special
attention will be given to promote a full implementation of existing
legislation and increased exchange of best practices related to the
implementation of Environmental and Minerals Policies in Member States,
particularly in the field of land use and in mining waste, as well as in the
sustainable management of resources, including harvesting and mobilisation of
wood.

Public
procurement plays also an important role in
steering innovation in general and sustainable trends in particular. Indeed, in
being first or early, smart and responsible purchasers, public procurers can be
powerful actors to create incentives for recycled materials and related
services to steer the materials flow efficiently by all means. Public
procurement policies on a national, regional or local level that support the
uptake and diffusion of new substitutes, and recycling technologies and
sufficient collecting schemes for raw materials will be developed with all
stakeholders from demand and supply side. Public procurement can stimulate best
practice examples, promote the use of recycled, durable and recyclable products
and can help to set benchmarks for economical feasible and environmental sound
solutions.

1.3.
EU added value of this Partnership

The Partnership will create critical
mass towards the single objective of ensuring sustainable access to raw
materials by creating synergies between different policy instruments
(technological, regulatory and standardisation), reinforcing co-ordination with
Member States where their contribution is crucial and ensuring the development
of integrated value chains.

The lack, in the past, of clear EU
instruments aiming at promoting innovation has contributed to a gradual loss of
skills and knowledge in the EU (e.g. of mining and related engineering). At the
same time, the insufficient implementation of the EU waste legislation has
hampered the full exploitation of EU's potential (e.g. recycling). The
Partnership aims at changing this situation.

There is an insufficient co-operation
between Member States in different domains. National geological surveys use
different nomenclature and different definitions which limits pan-EU
assessments and references. Some countries apply strict conditions in public
procurement, notably to promote the recycling markets, but there is scope for
an extension of this practice.

The mining, harvesting, substitution,
resource efficiency and recycling research efforts inside the EU do not
presently have the necessary critical mass. Developing integrated 'value
chains' from extraction and process of raw material, product design and use
to end of life can only be achieved by ensuring a dialogue between mining,
harvesting, manufacturing, waste management and recycling industries. No
national research programme in the EU can cover all aspects.

In addition, co-operation between
national research organisations is very limited and contributes to a high
fragmentation the European Research Area[3]. The research
investments and risks are too large for many private companies. Efforts should
be made to strengthen research initiatives both at EU and at international
level with a view to address issues of common benefit at global level e.g.
finding viable alternatives for primary and secondary raw materials.

Also, the EU should play a geopolitical
role in ensuring access for EU companies to raw materials in the world
while respecting as far as possible EU environmental standards. These
standards, set at EU level and adopted world-wide, can ensure a level playing
field and the competitiveness of EU players.

Similar to Large Scale Facility
(LSF)-Programmes in natural science, the establishment of structured joint
venture programmes in the addressed areas would strengthen national excellence
and increase visibility, both within the EU and on the international stage.
Whilst EU companies can participate in commercial deep-sea exploration and
exploitation activities, they are excluded from the state-sponsored efforts
that some non-EU countries, with the same concerns as the EU about raw
materials, are now beginning to undertake.

1.4.
Support from Member states and stakeholders

The Council has, on different occasions,
asked for swift action. The Council Conclusions of 10th of March 2011
"INVITES the Commission to further promote innovation and research and
development efforts in the raw materials value chain, to assess the case for
launching a European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on raw materials and to come
forward with proposals for this as appropriate". The Environmental Council
of December 2010 calls on the Commission to develop integrated and sustainable
material-based strategies.

Several EU Member States such as Finland,
France, the Netherlands and Germany have already developed their national raw
material strategies and also have been very supportive of EU initiatives in
this field. Many indications show that Member States see a real added value for
stronger EU-level co-operation.

A public consultation[4],
which ran from 15 April until 22 June 2011, yielded about 160 contributions
from citizens, organisations (federations, companies active in mining,
recycling and down-stream users), and public authorities, which supported the
overall idea and objective of an Innovation Partnership, the suggested targets
and possible work packages.

2.
Work packages
2.1.
WP 1 - Developing innovative technologies and
solutions for sustainable and
safe raw materials supply

Addressing innovative technologies along
the entire value chain for cost-effective, safe and environmentally and
socially sound raw materials production including:

·
advanced exploration technologies, such as for
sensing and 3D/4D mapping;

·
innovative alternatives for extraction,
including frontier technologies such as for the extraction of deep continental
crust and marine raw materials resources that will build a new benchmark in
mining of primary resources;

·
technologies to reduce the use of hazardous
substances, such as cyanide in mining processes, and creosote in wood
treatment;, and technologies to improve the recovery from waste, including for
example red mud and abandoned or closed mining waste facilities;

·
advanced technologies for the pre-processing
steps of minerals and secondary raw materials such as metals, glass, plastics,
paper, wood, waste aggregates etc. via automated sorting systems, and clean and
resource efficient processing of raw materials, such as (bio-) hydrometallurgy,
closed loop processes for most polluting and most value-adding industrial
production, including innovative technological solutions for water management,
combined with energy consumption minimisation and recovery of by-products;

·
turning wastes into valuable secondary raw
materials by developing more efficient recycling/recovering processes (e.g.
metals recycling from municipal waste, thermo-chemical phosphorous recovery
from incinerated sludge, rare metals recovery from waste electric and
electronic equipment, advanced recycling methods for the construction and
demolition waste, multi-material cartons and paper waste etc.);

·
the development of standardisation roadmaps for
the above fields to ensure practical application of the research results and
binding together the developed technologies to enable the most effective
innovation impact, while avoiding unnecessary costs for business.

2.2.
WP 2 – Developing innovative and sustainable solutions
for the appropriate substitution
of critical and scarce raw materials

Achieving solutions to reduce the use
including finding of substitutes of critical, scarce or hazardous materials
including:

·
First set of priority actions may be derived
from identified critical raw materials for our economy and from the most
economically vital and ecological sensitive applications where critical raw
materials are used in large proportions or are the crucial components;

·
Finding sustainable alternatives, for example,
for rare earths in permanent or heat resistant magnets, LEDs and displays, or
electrical drives and regenerative braking; precious metals in catalysers,
indium and gallium compounds in semi-conductors, telecommunication or lighting;

·
Addressing technical solutions to increase
resource efficient production technology (production processes and
manufacturing equipments) in order to be competitive on the global market;

·
Building upon the work of relevant European
Technology Platforms, identify opportunities and develop new ideas for
innovative materials and products with potential to be put in the market.

2.3.
WP 3 - Improving EU's
raw materials regulatory framework, knowledge and infrastructure base

Finding sustainable alternative solutions
such as those related to:

·
building an innovative knowledge base of EU
resources, including exploration of primary and secondary raw materials (on
land and in the marine environment) and estimations of the resource
availability including urban mines (land fills and mining waste);

·
make use of satellite based information systems
such the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security;

·
identification and exchange of best practices in
defining a minerals policy in the Member States based on principles of
sustainable development and on a strict enforcement of the existing legislation
notably for what concerns the safety of mining waste facilities, the prevention
of mining waste generation and the reduction of their impact on the
environment;

·
identification of best practices in terms of
land-use planning for minerals in the Member States and to incorporate the
consideration of minerals in marine spatial plans;

·
identifying different instruments (such as
one-stop-shop or parallel assessment) in order to facilitate the process for
authorisation of minerals exploration and extraction in the Member States;

·
improving environmental impact assessment
methodologies and identifying good practices in their use to facilitate the
access to and the smooth supply of primary and secondary raw materials;

·
standardisation of geological data including
by-products and coherence on the relevant terminology, such as common
terminology related to mineral and metals classification and production
statistics[5];

·
promote the application of the existing Best
Available Technique (BAT) documents for the extractive industry and pulp and
paper industry inside and outside the EU;

·
implementation of standardisation and/or
certification schemes for mining operations;

·
skills to promote technical excellence in line
with the requirements of a high-tech mining industry and to maximise the added
value of innovation;

2.4.
WP 4 - Improving the regulatory framework
conditions, notably by promoting excellence and prevention,
preparation for re-use and recycling through public (e.g. procurement) and
private initiatives

Pursue the following non-technological
actions:

·
finding appropriate tools for a timely
assessment of the officially adopted targets in particular by taking advantage
of the experience of the most advanced Member States;

·
improve the profitability and reduce the cost of
recycling by enhancing efficiency in the collection, sorting and recycling of
waste, including by:

·
examining innovative economic models for
incentivising consumers to return waste to collection points;

·
identifying and examining existing collection
systems which combine competition, high recovery rates, environmental protection
and low costs;

·
developing new economic instruments promoting
the use of recycled materials and the further development of EU based recycling
industry;

·
identifying ways of tracking major flows of
waste inside and outside the EU to eliminate illegal or substandard treatment
of waste by a strict application of existing legislation;

·
develop new product policies focused on primary
and secondary raw materials efficiency (recyclability, durability, etc) through
various type of EU instruments: green public procurement, ecodesign Directive,
Ecolabels;

·
propose and implement standardisation and/or
certification schemes for example, for recycling facilities inside and outside
the EU to avoid environmental leakage to assist and complement recycling
companies activities, through interoperable authority-company systems for
tracking waste to prevent illegal dumping/ trade for collecting processing
hazardous waste electronic equipment.

·
Develop incentives and innovative support
schemes to optimise the added value that can be extracted from primary and
secondary raw materials.

2.5.
WP 5 – International framework – horizontal
approach

Promoting appropriate international
co-operation, including with exporting or recycling developing countries. This
co-operation may deal with different policy issues such as

·
geology and improving the geological knowledge
base;

·
research and innovation;

·
trade and investment conditions;

·
policy dialogue/co-operation with international
organisations and fora such as the World Bank, African Union, Extractive
Industries Transparency Initiative, OECD, G20 and International Resources
Panel, as well as bilateral cooperation (e.g. Japan, the US, Australia.

3.
Governance structure

The EIP will follow the usual EU
institutional decision making processes to implement actions, such as in
funding, regulation and standardisation. The Council will provide EU-level
political guidance (launch and endorse the implementation plan, and adjust
political targets). The Parliament will be kept informed.

The
governance structure covers 4 different levels of action:

3.1.
High level steering Group (HLSG)

The Steering Group will be the orientation
level, because it will develop the strategic direction of this EIP.

Mandate:

Its mandate will have two parts. During the
preparation phase (mid-2012-early 2013) the HLSG will compile the strategic
implementation plan (facilitated by ‘EC-secretariat’). During the
implementation phase (mid-2013 – 2020), its tasks will be broadened to:

·
Preparation: From mid-2012 to early 2013:
Compile strategic implementation plan (facilitated by ‘EC-secretariat’);

·
Implementation: mid-2013 – 2020:

·
Organise monitoring of progress made;

·
Updating strategic implementation plan (SIP);
foreseen annually, but can be more frequent if necessary;

·
Ensure feedback-inputs from broader stakeholder
communities;

·
Engage as EIP ‘champions/ambassadors’ with EU
Institutions, Member States and stakeholder communities;

·
Designate leaders of each work package as
appropriate;

·
Meeting once a year, or more often if needed.

Composition:

·
6 Ministers in total (2 for each of the domains
Industry/Economy, Environment and Research);

·
10 to 12 CEOs of major EU Industries (mining and
materials producers including chemical, pulp and paper, wood-based industries,
mechanical engineering and waste management industries);

·
EIB and EIF high-level representative; NGO
high-level representative (e.g. EEB, EITI);

·
6 high-level representatives of research
organisations (e.g. ERA-NET, European geological surveys, European space
agencies, and European Technology Platforms);

·
Vice President and Commissioner for Industry and
Entrepreneurship and Commissioner for the Environment and Commissioner for
Research, Innovation and Science will be associated.

The above-mentioned figures are merely
indicative of the type and proportionality of representation which will be
taken into account.

Appointment procedure:

·
EC appoints, from mid-2012 (to be confirmed) for
3-4 years.

·
EC may re-appoint some members to ensure
continuity, and will appoint replacements by person with similar expertise.

3.2.
Sherpa Group

The objective of the Sherpa Group is to
ensure a smooth running of the partnership including planning of major
actions/events and preparing the meetings and follow-up of the High Level
Steering Group.

Mandate:

Meeting once or twice between the meetings
of the HLSG, and content-wise, it will provide the link between the
orientation-level of the HLSG with the planning-implementation levels.

Composition:

The Sherpa Group should largely mirror the
types of actors from the Members of the HLSG but may include some extra
members, on a case by case basis, if considered appropriate. The Sherpas should
be the 'personal confidente' of their respective Steering Group member and have
the expertise of the subject.

3.3.
Operational groups – implementation level and
broad stakeholder involvement

Their main task is to provide advice to the
HLSG, to convert the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) into tasks and
actions, to organise and carry out the detailed planning of the actions of the
SIP. Different operational groups may be convened in order to provide the
necessary expertise according to the different subjects covered by the working
packages.

Mandate:

They could be set up for specific actions,
and dissolved upon successful delivery of action. These groups may work for
various work packages and will be the operational glue on the shop floor level.
They will also contribute to monitor the implementation of actions defined in
the strategic implementation plan.

Composition:

Operational groups are made up of experts
in the different areas covered by the work packages. They may include, where
appropriate, representatives of local authorities and relevant bodies and
initiatives, such as Public-Private Partnerships, Joint Programming
Initiatives, Joint Technology Initiatives, and other funding initiatives
Participants should come from all relevant sources of expertise, including
actors not directly represented in the HLSG.

3.4.
Role of the European Commission

The Commissioner responsible for Industry
and Entrepreneurship and the Commissioner responsible for Research, Innovation
and Science will lead the EIP in association with the Commissioner responsible
for Environment. Other Commissioners will be associated and invited on an ad
hoc basis depending on the specific subject of discussion (e.g. Commissioner
responsible for Trade).

The European Commission appoints the HLSG
and the operational advisory groups. It will also facilitate/ assist the HLSG,
stakeholder engagement, and provide logistical support (e.g. organisation of
conferences, website, etc).

The European Commission offers the
secretariat services in the start-up phase. Existing structures in the relevant
areas, such as European Technology Platforms, will be used as appropriate. At
the moment of the official creation of the Partnership, a secretariat will be
ready to start operating to organise work under the five different work
packages including the meetings of the expert groups and the annual meeting of
the Steering Group.

In late 2014, and in view of the experience
gathered in the initial two/three years, the European Commission will propose
any appropriate adaptations to the basic governance structure presented above.

4.
Link with existing initiatives and actions
4.1.
General overview

Instrument/Initiatives || Names || Potential role in EIP

European Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives || Sustainable Mineral Resources (SMR), ENIAC (JTI on nanoelectronics), Artemis (JTI on embedded systems), Photonics21, Manufuture, SusChem, Forest-Based Industries, ECTP (Construction Platform), EUROP (Robotics) and EuMaT (Advanced Materials), Forest-based Sector Technology Platform || Existing networks of relevant industries with strong innovation needs and research organisation should contribute in the definition of the targets and the implementation of the defined roadmaps.

ERA-NET || Industrial handling of raw materials || Implementation of Member State R&D contributions

Joint Programming Initiative || Healthy and productive seas and oceans || Implementation of Member State R&D contributions

European Co-operation in Science and Technology (COST) networks || Not yet identified || Implementation of Member State R&D contributions

Space programmes || GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security), GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System), EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service) and GALILEO || Collection of information about mineral resources

4.2.
Link with EU funding programmes

FP7 themes and initiatives || Implementation of EU R&D contributions || Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials and new Production Technologies and Environment Factories of the Future PPP, Environmental Technologies

CIP || Implementation of EU level innovation contributions || Innovation support for SMEs and ICT

LIFE+ || Contribution to sustainable management and environmental issues || Sustainable Management of Natural Resources

The new HORIZON 2020, among other
instruments, is expected to support actions for this Partnership.

5.
Reaching out and reporting to the civil society and
involvement of all Member States

In order to ensure a regular consultation
of other parties not directly present in the basic structure of the
Partnership, two mechanisms are foreseen:

The Council of Ministers will be regularly
informed about major developments in the area of Raw Materials in line with the
recent Competitiveness Council Conclusions adopted on 9th March 2011
and those adopted by the ENV Council in December 2010. The Innovation
Partnership could be a major topic of this regular exchange of views with the
Council.

A broader Stakeholders' Forum will be held
annually. This would be an occasion to take stock of the work done by the
Partnership and to provide inputs for the continuation of the activities.

With ERA-NET in materials and ETP-SMR, the
Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) and waste consultations groups the
EU has already set up other fora to provide continuity among stakeholders.

Moreover, visibility actions and
dissemination of information via an internet portal are envisaged.

6.
Roadmap with expected outcomes and clear milestones

The following milestones are envisaged:

·
From mid-2012: nomination of HLSG by EC and start
work on EIP, based on discussions with Member States, EP, and stakeholders;

·
Early 2013: Strategic Implementation Plan
finalised by HLSG, and which will be presented by the EC to the EP and Council
(first semester of 2013);

·
From mid-2013: implementation started and first
annual conference held;

A number of preparatory actions and studies
have been initiated in 2011 to underpin the work of this EIP, and will bring
their first deliverables late 2011, and in the period 2012-2013, so that the
EIP can show concrete progress from the very start.

Short term: (2012-2013)

·
The key actors and infrastructure for feeding
the raw materials knowledge base of Europe identified.

·
First elements of the raw materials knowledge
base are in place notably through the GMES initial operations and the GMES and
Africa initiative.

·
Study on Innovative Technologies and Possible
Pilot Plants to be finalised

·
Development of a reliable tool assessing
environmental impacts of materials

·
Launching dedicated FP7 research actions
targeting basic concepts and technological elements for new production plants
in extraction and processing and for collection, recycling of raw materials and
actions for finding substitutes and viable alternatives for at least three to
critical raw materials. Launching networking and co-ordination initiatives (FP7
CSAs and ERA-NETs) to create a suitable critical mass involving as appropriate
public authorities, industry and the research community.

2014:

·
Progress assessment (including the governance
structure): to take into account new Multiannual Financial Framework and new
Commission in place.

Medium - long term: (2014-2020)

·
Complete raw materials knowledge base of Europe
created and permanently updated including a deliverable of a European 3-D
map of the distribution of raw materials resources, projection of future
demand of raw materials according various scenarios, economic and environmental
impacts of the scenarios.

·
Up to ten innovative pilot plants for raw
materials extraction, processing, product design and recycling.

·
a Network of European Research, Education and
Training Centres on Mineral resources and Mining and Materials Management
(M³) is created.

·
Industrially viable alternatives for at least
three substitutes to critical raw materials (or groups thereof) addressed
also via research projects.

·
Initiatives including legislation and
standardisation promoting the uptake of innovative solutions in place.

·
Enhanced efficiency in recycling of waste
streams

[1]               As outlined in the Innovation Union Flagship
Communication COM(2010) 546

[2]               United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC) for
Fossil Energy and Mineral Resources provided by the UNECE Ad Hoc Group of
Experts on the Harmonization of Fossil Energy and Mineral Resources Terminology

[3]               A project under ERA-NET on industrial handling will
make an evaluation on the current shortages.

[4]               http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/raw-materials/public-consultation-ip/index\_en.htm

[5]               E.g. Talc production in
France can today not be differentiated between low and high grade Talc, while
imported Talc will be a high quality grade commodity typically with a high
whiteness and limited countries of supply (Pakistan, China, North Korea)

[Top](#document1)