Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019 — Vitromed v EUIPO

(Case C‑124/19 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word elements Vitromed Germany — Rejection of the application)

| 1. | Appeal — Grounds — Error of law relied on not identified — Manifest inadmissibility  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))  (see para. 5) |

| 2. | Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 5) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |

| 2. | Vitromed GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)