Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/21 |

---

Action brought on 15 November 2013 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)

(Case T-596/13)

2014/C 39/37

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Emsibeth SpA (Verona, Italy) (represented by: A. Arpaia, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Peek & Cloppenburg KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the General Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | set aside the contested decision; and |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community mark sought: the figurative mark ‘Nael’, for goods in class 3 — application for registration No 9726894

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Peek & Cloppenburg KG

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘Mc Neal’, for goods in class 3

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division’s decision and rejection of the application for registration of the mark

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/09.

---

[Top](#document1)