Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Case C‑801/21 P

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

v

Indo European Foods Ltd

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 April 2022

(Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed)

1. Appeal – Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Burden of proof

   (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 170a(1) and 170b)

   (see paragraph 24)
2. Appeal – Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed – Formal requirements – Scope

   (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 170a(1) and 170b)

   (see paragraphs 25, 26)
3. Appeal – Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed demonstrating that the issue is significant – Appeal allowed to proceed

   (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 170a(1) and 170b)

   (see paragraphs 30-43)

[See the text of the decision.](https://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?num=C-801/21)

[Top](#document1)