Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

*|*

# 52013DC0298

**COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A EUROPEAN STRATEGY FOR MICRO- AND NANOELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS /\* COM/2013/0298 final \*/**

  

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

A EUROPEAN STRATEGY FOR MICRO- AND
NANOELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS

1.           Introduction

Micro- and nanoelectronic components and
systems[1]
are not only essential to digital products and services; they also underpin
innovation and competitiveness of all major economic sectors. Today's cars,
planes, and trains are safer, more energy-efficient and comfortable thanks to their
electronic parts. The same holds for large sectors like medical and health
equipment, home appliances, energy networks and security systems. This is why
micro- and nanoelectronics is a Key Enabling Technology (KET)[2] and is essential for growth and
jobs in the European Union (EU).

This Communication sets out a strategy to
strengthen the competitiveness and growth capacity of the micro- and
nanoelectronics industry in Europe. In line with the updated industrial policy[3], the aim is for Europe to stay at the forefront in the design and manufacturing of these technologies and
to provide benefits across the economy.

The strategy spans policy instruments at
regional, national and EU level including financial support for research,
development and innovation (R&D&I), access to capital investment (CAPEX)
as well as the improvement and better use of relevant legislation. The strategy
builds on Europe's strengths[4]
and on regional clusters of excellence. It covers the whole value chain from
material and equipment manufacturing to design and volume production of micro-
and nanoelectronics components and systems.

The importance of the area and the
challenges faced by the stakeholders in the EU require urgent and bold actions in
order to leave no weak link in Europe's innovation and value chains. The focus
is on:

·
Attracting and channelling investments in
support of a European roadmap for industrial leadership in micro- and
nanoelectronics.

·
Setting up an EU-level mechanism to combine and
focus support to micro- and nanoelectronics R&D&I by Member States, the
EU and the private sector.

·
Taking measures to strengthen Europe's
competitiveness towards a global level playing field regarding state aid, to support
business development and SMEs, and to address the skills gap.

2.           Why are Micro- and
nanoelectronics essential for Europe?

2.1.        An
important industry with a significant potential for growth and a massive
economic footprint

Micro- and nanoelectronics underpin a significant part of the worldwide economy. Their role
will continue to grow as future products and services will become more digital,
as illustrated below.

·
The global turnover of the sector alone was
around €230 billion in 2012[5]. The
value of products comprising micro- and nanoelectronic components represents
around €1.600 billion of value worldwide.

·
Despite the recent financial and economic
setbacks, the worldwide market for micro- and
nanoelectronics has grown by 5% per year since 2000.
Further growth of at least the same magnitude is predicted for the remaining
part of the current decade.

·
The pace of innovation in the field is one of the
main drivers behind the high growth rates of the whole digital sector which
today has a total value of around €3.000 billion worldwide[6].

·
In Europe, micro- and nanoelectronics is
responsible for 200.000 direct and more than 1.000.000 indirect jobs[7] and the demand for skills is
unceasing.

·
The impact of micro- and nanoelectronics on the
whole economy is estimated at 10% of the worldwide GDP[8].

2.2.        A key technology for addressing
the societal challenges

Micro- and nanoelectronics are not only the
computing power in PCs and mobile devices. They fulfil also the sensing and
actuating functions[9]
found for example in smart meters and smart grids for lower energy consumption,
or in implants and sophisticated medical equipment for better healthcare and
for helping the elderly population. They are also the building blocks for
better security, for the safety and efficiency of the whole transport systems
and for environmental monitoring.

Today no societal challenge can be
successfully met without electronics.

3.           A changing industrial
landscape for micro- and nanoelectronics

3.1.        Technology progress opens
new opportunities

Two main tracks characterise technology
development and drive business transformation. A first track progresses the
miniaturisation of components at the nano scale along an international roadmap for
technology development established by industry[10].
This is the "more Moore" track aiming at higher performance,
lower costs and less energy consumption[11].

A second track aims at diversifying the functions
of a chip by integrating micro-scale elements such as power transistors and
electro-mechanical switches. This is referred to as the "more than Moore" track. This track is at the basis of innovations in many important fields
such as energy-efficient buildings, smart cities and intelligent transport
systems.

In addition, totally new, disruptive
technologies and architectures are being researched. This is often referred to
as the "beyond CMOS"[12]
track. It requires multi-disciplinary research, deep understanding of physics
and chemistry and excellence in engineering.

Furthermore, in order to lower production
costs, industry increases also step by step the size of the material support[13] for producing micro- and
nanoelectronics. Massive investments in R&D&I and CAPEX are required
for such transitions in manufacturing standards.

3.2.        Escalating R&D&I
costs and a more competitive R&D&I environment

Further miniaturisation implies escalating
costs for R&D&I and CAPEX. The R&D&I intensity of the micro-
and nanoelectronics industry increased from 11% in 2000 to 17% in 2009[14]. This trend appears to
continue. Such high investments can only be sustained by volume production.

Consolidation in the industry is on-going.
This could lead to a situation where only a few actors are left worldwide and
perhaps none in Europe. It is estimated that a 10% share of the worldwide
market is needed for a semiconductor company to sustain the investment to keep
up with technology development.

As a result, global alliances between
companies are formed, e.g. the New York based IBM alliance on 300 mm wafer technology
and the Global 450 Consortium focusing on the transition to 450 mm wafers. In Europe, the next generation technology development is centred on leading research centres
such as LETI[15],
Fraunhofer[16],
and imec[17]
working in close cooperation with industrial players. Research itself is
increasingly becoming global with the emergence of Asia as the home of patent
holders and a skilled workforce.

3.3.        New business and
production models

The micro- and nanoelectronics industrial landscape
is changing drastically with a significant shift of volume production to Asia in the last 15 years[18].
Overall, production in Europe has dropped to just less than 10% of world
production in 2011. Despite the strengths of US companies in the field only 16%
of production is made in the US.

With the increased cost of setting up
production facilities ("fabs"), the granting by territorial
authorities of financial incentives has become an important element in the
decision where to build new capacity. Tax breaks, land, cheap energy and other
incentives play a major role as does the availability of skilled labour force[19].

Another important trend is the rise of the "foundry"
model[20].
Foundries developed strongly in Asia and represent already around 10% of the
worldwide electronic components production. In conjunction, there are an
increasing number of "fabless" companies[21] that generate income from
selling chip designs. Without production, these fabless companies have not the
high financial overheads of the manufacturing companies.

Secure access to production capacity may
however become problematic in the future as foundries extend their offer to
include design and prototyping which would give them an insight into the end
products. To minimize the risk, some companies doing own designs keep limited
production lines in-house (the so-called "fab-lite model").

3.4.        Equipment manufacturers
own key elements of the value chain

Without progress in production equipment,
advances in further miniaturisation and increased functionality of chips are
not possible. Equipment manufacturers have become a key part of the value chain
which is reflected in their prominent role in the international technology alliances.

4.           Europe's strengths
and weaknesses

4.1.        Industry
structured around centres of excellence and wider supply chains covering all Europe

Similar to the rest of the world, Europe's micro- and nanoelectronics industry is concentrated around major regional
production and design sites. The regions around Dresden (DE), Grenoble (FR) and
Eindhoven-Leuven (NL-BE) host three main research and production centres with
increased specialisation in one of the three areas of "more Moore", "more than Moore" and equipment and materials. In
addition, the region of Dublin (IE) hosts a large European manufacturing site
of microprocessors, and Cambridge (UK) e.g. is home to the leading company in
the design of low power consumption microprocessors that equip most of today's
mobile devices and tablets.

This clustering and regional specialisation
is essential for the future development of the sector. However, it relies on a
wide supply chain spread across Europe. This includes relatively smaller but
highly innovative and specialised clusters such as the regions of Graz and Vienna (AT), Milan and Catania (IT) or Helsinki (FI).

Europe counts three
large indigenous micro- and nanoelectronics companies ranking 8th
(STMicroelectronics), 10th (Infineon) and 12th (NXP) in
worldwide sales in 2012. Europe also attracted some major overseas companies
that invest in Europe (e.g. GlobalFoundries and Intel). Micro- and
nanoelectronics manufacturing in Europe is further served by a very competitive
and extended value chain and ecosystem of companies, including many SMEs. The
main manufacturing sites are embedded in the regional clusters as mentioned
above.

4.2.        Leading in essential
vertical markets, almost absent in some large segments

Europe is
relatively absent in the production of computer and consumer related components
that represent a large part of the total market. It is leading though in
electronics for automotive (~50% of global production), for energy applications
(~40%) and industrial automation (~35%). Europe is also still strong in
designing electronics for mobile telecommunications.

European companies, including a large
number of SMEs, are world leaders in smart micro-systems like health implants
and sensing technologies. Although these are currently niche markets, they are
areas of high growth (typically more than 10% per year). Another key asset is the
European leadership in the high growth market of low power consumption
components.

4.3.        Undisputed European
leadership in materials and equipment

Europe has some of
the most important equipment and materials suppliers including e.g. ASML and
SOITEC that hold significant shares of the relevant world market. These
companies rely on many suppliers established throughout Europe many of them SMEs.
These European equipment and materials suppliers uniquely master highly
sophisticated technologies ranging from optics and lasers to precision
mechanics and chemistry. Their role in progressing the micro- and
nanoelectronics area is significant and well acknowledged as e.g. illustrated
by the recent strategic investment of major semiconductor companies in ASML[22].

4.4.        Investments of EU
companies remain relatively modest

Although in absolute terms investments by European
companies are high (in the order of billions of euros), they remain relatively
modest compared to investments made elsewhere. Europe's business attractiveness
nevertheless remains high given the size of its consumption which is above
20% of the world market. But future investments in electronics manufacturing in
Europe are not guaranteed. Competition with other regions in the world is
stiff.

Public investment in R&D&I and
policies to attract private investment remains highly fragmented across the EU
despite the progress made in the last five years. This sharply contrasts with
the fact that European R&D&I in micro- and nanoelectronics is world-class
and very attractive to international players.

5.           European efforts
so far

5.1.        Regional and national
efforts reinforcing the clusters of excellence

Important efforts, notably over the last 15
years, have been devoted at regional level to build industrial and technology
clusters in the area. The most successful clusters are the result of long-term
sustained strategies that combine policies such as tax incentives, investment
in R&D&I in public labs, intensive industry-academia cooperation,
world-class infrastructures, critical coverage of the value chain and a dynamic
business environment. The availability of skills and knowledge is equally of major
importance for the field.

With the challenges ahead including the
increasing costs of R&D&I, the fierce worldwide competition and the
erosion of some key parts of the value chain in Europe (e.g. the stage of packaging
components into systems), much closer collaboration along value chains and in
innovation ecosystems at EU level is a must.

5.2.        A growing and more
coordinated investment in R&D&I at EU level

Investment in R&D&I in micro- and
nanoelectronics is part of the EU programmes for research and development since
their inception. The EUREKA programme also has a large research cluster on micro-
and nanoelectronics[23].

After 10 years of stagnation of EU support
to R&D&I in the field[24],
a gradual increase of around 20% per year started in 2011 leading to a budget
of more than €200 million in 2013. In order to focus the R&D&I efforts
and build critical mass, the Commission, Member States and private stakeholders
together launched, in 2008, a public-private partnership in the form of a Joint
Undertaking[25]
(ENIAC JU). By the end of 2013, the ENIAC JU will have invested both from the
public and private sides more than €2 billion on R&D&I in addition to
around €1 billion invested in micro- and nanoelectronics in the Seventh
Framework Programme.

5.3.        Technology breakthroughs
but gaps in the innovation chain

The focus in the EU R&D&I support
is on preparing for the next two generations of technologies[26]. Through these programmes,
industry kept pace with the state-of-the-art developments in further miniaturisation.
Also through these programmes, sophisticated smart systems were developed that
today are deployed for example in cars or health systems.

However the EU R&D&I programmes so
far supported the early phases of the innovation process, i.e. validating the
technologies up to a laboratory level[27].
The logic was to leave the next steps getting closer to the final product up to
industry, given the high level of investment these require. This led to clear
gaps in the innovation chain. To be effective and cross the so-called 'valley
of death', support to research and innovation in the field needs increasingly
to address the whole innovation chain spreading beyond any one company, region
or Member State.

The ENIAC JU called recently for
manufacturing pilot lines addressing particularly these higher scales of
technological maturity. The strong interest demonstrated by the private
stakeholders and the public authorities to support these pilot lines show their
strategic importance.

6.           The way forward - a
European industrial strategy

The proposed strategy builds on the
European initiative on Key Enabling Technologies and on the HORIZON 2020[28] proposal for research,
development and innovation. It focuses though on the actions that are specific
for the challenges faced in micro- and nanoelectronics.

6.1.        Objective: Reverse the
decline of EU's share of world's supply

Europe cannot
afford to lose the capacity to design and manufacture micro- and
nanoelectronics. This would put large parts of the value chains of major
industrial sectors at risk and deprive Europe of essential technologies needed
to address its societal challenges.

Given the wide range of opportunities ahead
and the challenges industry is facing, it is now urgent to step up and
coordinate all relevant public efforts across Europe. An industrial strategy should
ensure return to growth and reach, in a decade, a level of production in the EU
that is closer to its share of world GDP. In detail, the aims are to:

·
Ensure the availability of micro- and
nanoelectronics that are needed for the competitiveness of key industries in Europe.

·
Attract higher investment in advanced
manufacturing in Europe and reinforce industrial competitiveness across the
value chain from design to manufacturing.

·
Maintain leadership in equipment and material
supply and in areas such as "more than Moore" and energy-efficient
components.

·
Build leadership in the design of chips in high
growth markets, notably in the design of complex components.

6.2.        Focus on Europe's
strengths, build on and reinforce Europe's leading clusters

As indicated above, Europe's assets in
micro- and nanoelectronics include an excellent academic research community and
industrial leadership in vertical markets. Moreover, when considering Europe as a whole, there is an industrial and technology presence across the full value
chain including equipment, material, manufacturing, design as well as strong
end-user industry.

Building on these strengths and mobilising
the resources needed should make Europe a major player in micro- and
nanoelectronics. Mobilising resources will need alignment of actions at
regional, national and European level. This will build confidence and stimulate
the renewal and growth of manufacturing capability in Europe.

Emphasis is on reinforcing and building on
the excellence of research and technology organisations (RTOs) in terms of
facilities and staff. They should be the "places to be" for talented
engineers and researchers in the field, at the centre of ecosystems to attract
private investments in manufacturing and design. In order to maximise return on
investment and ensure excellence, further progress towards complementary
specialisation and stronger cooperation between the main RTOs will be a key for
success in line with the Smart Specialisation strategy[29] of the EU.

To ensure the further uptake of electronics
in all industrial sectors and seize the opportunities arising from cross-disciplinary
work, closer cross-border and cross-sector collaborations including with end-user
industries should be reinforced.

6.3.        Seize opportunities arising
in non-conventional fields and support SMEs growth

SMEs play a key role in emerging areas like
plastic and organic electronics, smart integrated systems and in general in the
field of design. An important goal therefore is to better integrate SMEs in
value chains, and provide them with access to state-of-the-art technologies and
R&D&I facilities. Support to centres of excellence that help embed
micro- and nanoelectronics in all types of products and services will be
essential to spur innovation across the economy and mainly in non-technology
SMEs.

EU–wide partnerships between end-user
industries, public authorities and suppliers (large and small) of micro- and
nanoelectronics will help open up new high growth areas like electric vehicles,
energy-efficient buildings and smart cities and all types of mobile web
services.

7.           The Actions

7.1.        Towards a European Strategic
Roadmap for investment in the field

The aim is to attract higher public and
private investments and channel these to implement a roadmap for leadership to
be established by industry.

The level of public and private
investment will match the size of the challenge. The intention is to bring the
total public and private investment in R&D&I at EU, national and
regional level to more than €1.5 billion per year, i.e. a total budget of more
than €10 billion over seven years.

To this end the Commission will pursue the
dialogue with stakeholders and set up an Electronics Leaders Group to elaborate
and help implement a European Industrial Strategic Roadmap that will build on Europe's strengths and cover three complementary lines:

·
The development of the "More than Moore" technology track on wafer sizes of 200 mm and 300 mm. This will enable Europe to maintain and expand its leadership[30]
in a market that represents roughly €60 billion per year and has a 13 % yearly
growth. It will have a direct impact on high-value jobs creation including
notably in SMEs.

·
The further progression of "More Moore"
technologies for ultimate miniaturisation on wafer sizes of 300 mm. The
investment should enable Europe to gradually increase production in this market
that represents more than €200 billion[31].

·
The development of new manufacturing technology on
450 mm wafers. The investment will initially benefit equipment and material
manufacturers in Europe who are today world leaders on a market of around €40 billion
per year and will provide a clear competitive edge to the whole industry, in a five
to ten years range.

The roadmap will be established at the latest
by the end of 2013 as a set of concrete actions reinforcing notably Europe's clusters of excellence in manufacturing and design (see Section 4.1) and ensuring
openness to partnerships and alliances across the value chain. The actions of the public sector, European Commission, Member States and regional authorities will consist of:

·
Supporting R&D&I through institutional
funding or grants to actions driven by the roadmap. Focused and coordinated
interventions[32]
generating critical mass and maximising return on investment will be mobilised.

·
Developing, in partnership with industry and in support
to innovation, an advanced manufacturing and piloting infrastructure to bridge
the gap in the innovation chain and connect design with actual deployment.

·
Facilitating access to financing CAPEX through loans
and equities, notably regional funds and the innovation schemes of the European
Investment Bank (EIB). In this context, the European
Commission signed in February 2013 a Memorandum of Understanding with the EIB
signalling KETs as a priority for investments.

The Commission will prepare the ground for
industry to team up along the value chain and to develop and regularly update
the roadmap. Member States, regional authorities and the European Commission
will support the roadmap individually and/or collectively including through a
Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) and the EUREKA initiative. It will ensure the
best use of regional Structural Funds including through Smart Specialisation between
the target clusters and the use of financial instruments foreseen under European
Structural Investment Funds (ESI Funds)[33].

Industry will engage in maintaining and
expanding design and manufacturing activities in Europe and will regularly update
the roadmap with the help of RTOs and the academic community in order to keep
it up to date with the dynamics of market and technology developments.

7.2.        The
Joint Technology Initiative: A tri-partite model for large scale projects

The European Commission will propose a
Joint Technology Initiative[34]
based on Article 187 TFEU that combines resources at project level in support
of cross-border industry-academia collaborative R&D&I. The proposal for
a Council Regulation to establish a Joint Undertaking will replace the two
existing Joint Undertakings on embedded computing systems (ARTEMIS) and nano-electronics
(ENIAC) that were set up under the Seventh Framework Programme. Within HORIZON
2020 under the 'Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies' challenge, the
new JTI will cover three main interrelated areas:

·
Design technologies, manufacturing processes and
integration, equipment and materials for micro- and nanoelectronics.

·
Processes, methods, tools and platforms,
reference designs and architectures for embedded/Cyber-Physical Systems.

·
Multi-disciplinary approaches for smart systems.

The new JTI will build on lessons learned
from the current JTIs[35] and provide a simplified funding structure. It will mainly support
capital-intensive actions[36] such as pilot lines or large scale demonstrators at higher
Technology Readiness Level up to level 8 as shown above. These will require a
tri-partite funding model involving the European Commission, Member States and industry and will help align relevant investment strategies across Europe. The implementation will follow the principles of HORIZON 2020 and will be
consistent with the cross-cutting KETs work programme to strengthen
cross-fertilisation between the different KETs.

Support to the JTI will be complemented
with EU funding for technological R &D and for innovation actions targeting
notably SMEs. This will cover R&D&I in new areas of micro- and
nanoelectronics (see Section 6.3), including those requiring the combination of
several key enabling technologies such as advanced materials, industrial
biotechnology, photonics, nanotechnology and advanced manufacturing systems[37].

Within the new JTI the Commission will furthermore
explore how to simplify and accelerate state aid approvals including through a
Project of Common European Interest according to Article 107.3(b) of TFEU.

7.3.        Building
on, and supporting horizontal competitiveness measures

The access to a highly skilled workforce of
engineers and technicians and to high quality graduates is essential for
attracting private investments in electronics. Similar to the whole ICT sector,
micro- and nanoelectronics is suffering from an increasing skills gap and a
mismatch between supply and demand of skills. The Commission will continue to
promote digital competences for industry through the e-Skills initiative and
has recently launched the "Grand Coalition for ICT skills and jobs".
. For micro- and nanoelectronics the engagement of industry to attract the
young generation early in its education is critical. In addition to industrial efforts
and relevant initiatives at regional and national level the Commission will
continue to co-finance in HORIZON 2020 projects to develop and disseminate training
and teaching materials on the latest technology in micro- and nanoelectronics as
well as support awareness campaigns targeting young entrepreneurs.

In addition, the European Commission is
putting in place an EU Skills Panorama with updated forecasts of skills supply
and labour market needs up to 2020, to improve transparency for Skills,
Competences and Occupations classification (ESCO), as a shared interface
between the worlds of employment, education and training and to support
mobility.

Together with RTOs, Universities and
national and regional authorities, the Commission will seek to make shared
facilities and services for testing and early experimentation of micro- and
nano-electronics technologies available to start-ups, SME's and users across
Europe.

Furthermore through public procurement of
innovations that are driven by micro- and nanoelectronics such as health or
security equipment better conditions for market developments in these fields
will be created.

7.4.        International
dimension

The European Commission will promote international
cooperation in micro- and nanoelectronics especially in areas of mutual benefit
such as international technology road-mapping, bench marking, standardisation,
health and safety issues linked to nano-materials[38], and preparing the transition
to 450 mm wafer size or advanced research in "beyond CMOS".

The European Commission will continue its
efforts to move towards a more transparent and global level playing field in
international multi- and bilateral fora by limiting trade/market distortions and
to support industry in sectorial trade negotiations and in relevant issues
demanding an international debate such as the problem of non-practicing
entities (NPEs).

8.           Conclusions

As it has done in strategic fields such as
aeronautics or space, Europe has no other choice but to engage in an ambitious
industrial strategy for micro- and nanoelectronics. This Communication proposes
such a strategy that is based on a European roadmap for the field. It supports
smart regional specialisation and promotes close cooperation along the value
and innovation chains.

The EU, national and regional financial
resources in this field have to be aligned in order to reach the critical mass
needed to attract investments and the world best talents. Financial resources
will be concentrated on Europe's leading clusters. The further development of
these will enable the whole European businesses, wherever located, to exploit
the latest developments in micro- and nanoelectronics. The action plan in annex
summarises what should be done.

ANNEX

|| Main actions: || By: || When:

1 || Pursue the dialogue with stakeholders, set up an Electronics Leaders Group to elaborate and help implement a European Electronics Industrial Strategic Roadmap || European Commission, Industry || The latest by end 2013

|| Promote smart specialization, use of financial instruments foreseen under European Structural Investment Funds (ESI Funds) and HORIZON 2020 || European Commission, Member States || On-going - to be reinforced

|| Promote, under the Memorandum of Understanding signed with the EIB on KETs, the means to ensure capital investment in production in Europe || European Investment Bank, Industry || 1Q2014

2 || Adopt Council Regulation and launch of the new tri-partite JTI || European Commission, Member States, I ndustry || Early 2014

|| Within the JTI, explore how to simplify and accelerate state aid approvals including through a Project of Common European Interest according to Article 107.3(b) TFEU || European Commission, Member States, Industry || 3Q13

3 || Continuous dialogue with key RTOs, regions and Member States to strengthen the micro- and nanoelectronics eco-system at a European level || European Commission, Member States, Regions, RTOs || On-going – to be reinforced

|| Within HORIZON 2020 make shared facilities for testing and early experimentation available to start-ups, SME's, universities and users || RTOs, European Commission || 1Q2014

|| Invest in building bricks (education, training); foster a favourable engineering environment in Europe || Member States, Academics || 1Q14 - 4Q20

4 || Elaborate and implement a market-pull strategy focussed on electronics-intensive products using diverse instruments such as public procurement || Industry, Member States, Regions, European Commission || By 2Q2014

|| Elaborate policy actions aimed at establishing a world level-playing field by limiting trade/market distortions including within the Government and Authorities Meeting on Semiconductor (GAMS) || European Commission, Industry || On-going - to be reinforced

[1]               Referred to as "micro-
and nanoelectronics" in this Communication, spans from nano-scale
transistors to micro-scale systems integrating multiple functions on a chip

[2]               COM(2012) 341 final

[3]               COM(2012) 582 final 'A stronger European Industry for
Growth and Economic Recovery'

[4]               e.g. electronics for cars, energy and manufacturing
sectors

[5]               World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS), 2012 (http://www.wsts.org/)

[6]               Digiworld report, IDATE 2012 (http://www.idate.org)

[7]               http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/ict/files/kets/hlg\_report\_final\_en.pdf

[8]               See European Semiconductor Industry Association
(ESIA) Competitiveness Report, 2008 "Mastering Innovation Shaping the
Future" (https://www.eeca.eu/data/File/ESIA\_Broch\_CompReport\_Total.pdf)

[9]               A sensor is any device, such as a thermometer, that
detects a physical condition in the world. Actuators are devices, such as
switches, that perform actions such as turning things on or off or making
adjustments in an operational system

[10]             International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS)
(http://www.itrs.net)

[11]             Moore's Law: doubling performance to cost ratio every
18-24 months

[12]             Complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) is the
standard technology for integrated circuits in the "more Moore" track

[13]             Micro- and nanoelectronics chips are produced on round
material supports called 'wafers'. Successive technology generations are
identified by the diameter size of the wafers on which they are produced. Today
production is mainly done on 200 mm and 300 mm wafers. The next wafer size will
be 450 mm

[14]             OECD Information Technology Outlook        
(http://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/oecdinformationtechnologyoutlook2010.htm)

[15]             LETI is an institute of CEA, a French research-and-technology
organization. It specialises in nanotechnologies and their applications, from
wireless devices, to biology, healthcare and photonics (http://www-leti.cea.fr)

[16]             The German Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft undertakes applied
research of direct utility to private and public enterprise and of wide benefit
to society. Several institutes are focusing on integrated circuits and systems
(http://www.fraunhofer.de)

[17]             Belgian imec performs world-leading research in
nanoelectronics, leveraging scientific knowledge with global partnerships in
ICT, healthcare and energy (http://www.imec.be)

[18]             e.g. Capital expenditure of Korean companies increased
from 13% in 2005 to 27% in 2012

[19]             See Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA),
Maintaining America's Competitive Edge: Government Policies Affecting
Semiconductor Industry R&D and Manufacturing Activity, March 2009 (http://www.semiconductors.org/clientuploads/directory/DocumentSIA/Research%20and%20Technology/Competitiveness\_White\_Paper.pdf)

[20]             A foundry is a company owning factories and offering
manufacturing services to "fabless" customers

[21]             A fabless company designs its own components but
outsources their manufacturing to a service provider (the "foundry")

[22]             See http://www.asml.com/asml/show.do?ctx=5869&rid=46974
- "As part of the program, Intel, TSMC and Samsung will each acquire ASML
shares, equal to an aggregate 23 percent minority equity stake in ASML for EUR
3.85 billion in cash"

[23]             http://www.catrene.org/

[24]             At ~€130 million per year

[25]             Based on Article 187 TFEU

[26]             Along the International Technology Roadmap for
Semiconductors (ITRS) http://www.itrs.net/

[27]             Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) are used to assess
the maturity of evolving technologies. Levels 1 to 4 typically refer to early
R&D while levels 5-8 indicate prototyping and actual system validation in
an operational environment

[28]             COM(2011) 809 final

[29]             http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home

[30]             Currently, production in Europe in this track is more
than 30% of the world value.

[31]             Europe's share of production is around 9%, but Europe is still at the leading edge of technology in the miniaturisation race.

[32]             From regional, national and EU level programmes.

[33]             http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home

[34]             The impact of the proposal will be presented in the
impact assessment. The budgetary impact will be included in the legislative and
financial statement.

[35]             First interim evaluation of the ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint
Technology Initiatives, 2010     
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/information\_society/evaluation/rtd/jti/artemis\_and\_eniac\_evaluation\_report\_final.pdf

[36]             Currently, public support to pilot lines in ENIAC JU is
between €50 and €120 million per action.

[37]             See COM(2012) 582 final Section III.A.1.ii)

[38]             COM(2012) 572 final: Second
Regulatory Review on Nanomaterials

[Top](#document1)