Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 May 2018 — Merck v EUIPO

(Case C‑62/18 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark FEMIBION — Partial rejection of the application for revocation)

| 1. | Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 5) |

| 2. | Appeal—Grounds—Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal—Inadmissibility  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d) and 169(2))  (see para. 5) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |

| 2. | Merck KGaA shall bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)