Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

9.9.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 259/15

(c) The other cases referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall **JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**
be assigned to the First, Second, Third, Fourth and
Fifth Chambers. Such assignment is to be effected
on the basis of three separate rotas, reflecting the **of 21 June 2000**
order in which the cases are registered at the Court
Registry:
**in Case T-537/93: Hervé Tromeur v Council of the**
— for the cases referred to in Article 236 of the **European Union and Commission of the European Com-**
**munities** ( [1] )
EC Treaty and Article 152 of the EAEC Treaty,

—
for the cases concerning the implementation _**(Action for damages — Non-contractual liability — Milk —**_
of the rules on competition applicable to _**Additional levy — Reference quantity — Producer having**_
undertakings, _**entered into an undertaking to convert — Production not**_
_**resumed on expiry of the undertaking)**_

—
for the other cases covered by paragraph 1(b).
(2000/C 259/24)

For the purposes of the rota referred to in the first indent of
paragraph 2(c), the assignment of cases concerning intellectual
property to the Second and Fourth Chambers on the basis of _(Language of the case: French)_
the rota referred to in paragraph 2(b) shall be compensated for
by the assignment of cases to the First, Third and Fifth
Chambers on a pro rata basis. In Case T-537/93: Hervé Tromeur, residing in Fuzunec, France,
represented by C. Larzul and F. Buffet, and subsequently by
A. Delanoé, of the Rennes Bar, with an address for service in
For the purposes of the rotas referred to in paragraphs 2(a) Luxembourg at the Chambers of A. May, 398 Route d’Esch, v
and 2(c), the First Chamber and the First Chamber, Extended Council of the European Union (Agents: M. Colaert and
Composition, presided over by the President of the Court of M. Nu´n˜ez Müller) and Commission of the European CommuniFirst Instance, shall not be included in those lists every third ties (Agents: G. Berscheid and M. Nu´n˜ez Müller) — application
thime the end of a rota is reached. for compensation under Article 178 and the second paragraph
of Article 215 of the EC Treaty (now Article 235 EC and the
second paragraph of Article 288 EC) for damage suffered by
the applicant as a result of his having been prevented
The President of the Court of First Instance may derogate from
from marketing milk by virtue of Council Regulation (EEC)
that order on the ground that cases related or with a view to
No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the
ensuring an even spread of the workload.
application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation
(EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector
(OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13), as supplemented by Commission
_**Plenary session**_ Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 laying down
detailed rules for the application of the additional levy referred
to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 (OJ 1984
L 132, p. 11) — the Court of First Instance of the European
At ist plenary meeting on 4 July 2000, the Court of First
Communities (Single Judge: R.M. Moura Ramos); J. Palacio
Instance decided pursuant to the second subparagraph of
Gonza´lez, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgArticle 32(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First
ment on 21 June 2000, in which it:
Instance that where, following the designation of an Advocate
General pusruant to Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure, there
is an even number of Judges in the Court of First Instance 1. _Dismisses the application;_
sitting in plenary session, the rota established in advance in
accordance with which the President of the Court is to
designate the Judge who will not take part in the judgment of
2. _Orders the applicant to pay the costs._
the case shall be in reverse order to that in which the Judges
rank according to their seniority in office under Article 6 of
the Rules of Procedure, unless the Judge who would thus be
designated is the Judge-Rapporteur. In that event, it shall be
the Judge ranking immediately above him who shall be
( [1] ) OJ C 314 of 20.11.93.
designated.