Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 —

Inditex v EUIPO

(Case C‑575/15 P) (
[\*1](#t-ECR_62015CO0575_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

‛Appeal — EU trade mark — Marque verbale ZARA — Services de transport — Genuine use — Revocation proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 51(1)(a) — Distortion of the evidence — Rights of defence’

| 1. | Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 22, 56) |

| 2. | Appeal — Grounds — Error of law relied on not identified — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 31) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Industria de Diseño Textil SA (Inditex) shall pay the costs. |

---

(
[\*1](#c-ECR_62015CO0575_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) OJC 38, 1.2.2016.

[Top](#document1)