Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 December 2017 — Verus v EUIPO

(Case C‑101/17 P) (
[1](#t-ECR_62017CO0101_INF_EN_01-E0001)
)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark LUCEO — Declaration of invalidity)

| 1. | Appeal—Grounds—Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169)  (see paras 20-22) |

| 2. | Appeal—Grounds—Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court—Manifest inadmissibility  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169)  (see paras 25, 27) |

| 3. | Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted—Plea alleging distortion of the facts—Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion  (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d))  (see paras 28, 30, 33) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Verus Eood shall pay the costs. |

---

(
[1](#c-ECR_62017CO0101_INF_EN_01-E0001)
) [OJ C 195, 19.6.2017](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2017:195:TOC).

[Top](#document1)