Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

7.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 35/9

2. _Orders the Parliament to pay the applicant the installation_
_allowance provided for by Article 5 of Annex VII of the Staff_
_Regulations, amounting to two months’ basic salary, together_
_with default interest from 24 January 2002. The interest rate_
_to be applied shall be two points higher than the rate fixed by_
_the European Central Bank for principal refinancing operations_
_applicable during the period concerned._

3. _Orders the Parliament to bear all the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 97 of 20.4.2002.

**ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 5 November 2003**

**in Case T-130/02: Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG v Com-**
**mission of the European Communities** ( [1] )

_**(State aid — Multisectorial framework on regional aid for**_
_**large investment projects — Application for correction of a**_
_**decision declaring aid to be compatible with the common**_
_**market — Commission response — Not in the nature of a**_
_**decision — Application for annulment — Inadmissible)**_

(2004/C 35/13)

_(Language of the case: German)_

In Case T-130/02: Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG, whose registered
office is in Heiligengrabe, Germany, originally represented by
B. Luther and subsequently by R. Nierer, lawyers, against the
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Di
Bucci and T. Scharf) — application for annulment of the
alleged decision of the Commission of 5 February 2002 not to
correct its decision of 3 July 2001 relating to the authorisation
of State aid in the sum of DEM 69,3 million to the applicant
for an investment in Heiligengrabe, Germany — the Court
of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition),
composed, at the time of its deliberation, of V. Tiili, President,
and J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A.W.H. Meij and M. Vilaras,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 5 November
2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1. _The application is dismissed as inadmissible._

2. _The applicant shall pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 169, 13.7.2002.

**ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE**

**of 17 November 2003**

**in Case T-235/02: Strongline A/S v Office for Harmonis-**
**ation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)**
**(OHIM)** ( [1] )

_**(Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Failure**_
_**to produce evidence in the language of the opposition**_
_**procedure — Rule 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 —**_
_**Action manifestly inadmissible)**_

(2004/C 35/14)

_(Language of the case: English)_

In Case T-235/02: Strongline A/S, established in Glostrup
(Denmark), represented by J.S. Ørndrup, lawyer, against Office
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: O. Waelbroek), the intervener before
the Court of First Instance being Scala Inc., established in
Exton, Pennsylvania (United States of America), represented by
R.M. Hiddleston, solicitor — action brought against the
decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) of 27 May 2002 (Case R 830/2001-1) on the refusal
of an opposition for failure to substantiate rights based on
earlier trade marks — the Court of First Instance (Second
Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and
N.J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on
17 November 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1. _The action is dismissed._

2. _The applicant shall pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 233 of 28.9.02.