Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

C 19/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25.1.2003

_former employee, at his request, the documents relating to his_
_qualifications and professional experience gained during his_
_employment._

( [1] ) OJ C 303, 27.10.2001.

**Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundespat-**
**entgericht by order of that Court of 26 June 2002 in the**
**complaint proceedings of Deutsche Telekom AG against**
**DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG**

**(Case C-367/02)**

(2003/C 19/18)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by order of the (Federal Patent Court)
of 26 June 2002, received at the Court Registry on 14 October
2002, for a preliminary ruling in the complaint proceedings
of Deutsche Telekom AG against DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG on the following question:

Do the words ‘association with the earlier trade mark’ in the
second part of Article 4(1)(b) of the Trademarks Directive ( [1] )
apply to the case where the earlier trade mark is attributed to
the later trade mark, the later trade mark having been formed
by adding a well known company logo, or an element in a
trade mark series belonging to the owner of the later trade
mark, to the earlier trade mark, which is a one-word logo
which is neither the undertaking’s logo nor an element in a
trade mark series and is of average distinctiveness?

( [1] ) First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to
approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade
marks (OJ L 40 of 11.02.1989, p. 1).

**Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di**
**Milano, Prima Sezione penale by order of that court of**
**26 October 2002 in criminal proceedings against Silvio**
**Berlusconi**

**(Case C-387/02)**

(2003/C 19/19)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Milano,
Prima Sezione penale (Milan District Court, First Criminal

Chamber) of 26 October 2002 received at the Court Registry
on 31 October 2002, for a preliminary ruling in the criminal
proceedings against Silvio Berlusconi on the following questions:

1. Does Article 6 of Directive 68/151/EEC( [1] ) on co-ordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the
interests of members and others, are required by Member
States of companies within the meaning of the second
paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, with a view
to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the
Community concern not only cases of failure to publish
the balance sheet and profit and loss account, but also
cases where those documents are published but their
contents are false, given that the harm to the interests of
members and third parties is clearly greater in the latter
case? Is the directive intended in that respect to lay down
a minimum level of protection at Community level
leaving it to the Member States to put in place means of
protection against the submitting of false balance sheets
or the publishing of false company accounts?

2. Do the criteria of effectiveness, proportionality and
dissuasiveness, which the penalties to be adopted by the
Member States under Council Directive 68/151 must
satisfy in order to be regarded as ‘appropriate’, refer to
the nature or type of penalty considered in the abstract,
or rather to its application in practice having regard to
the structural characteristics of the legal system within
which it takes effect?

3. Are the principles set out in Council Directive 78/660/
EEC ( [2] ) of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the
Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of
companies, Council Directive 83/349/EEC ( [3] ) of 13 June
1983 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on consolidated accounts and Council Directive 90/605/EEC ( [4] ) of
8 November 1990 amending Directive 78/660/EEC on
annual accounts and Directive 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts as regards the scope of those directives,
upon which national measures relating to the drafting
and contents of annual accounts and annual reports, in
particular, of capital companies, must be based, to be
interpreted as precluding a Member State from setting
minimum thresholds below which inaccurate statements
in annual accounts and annual reports relating to companies limited by shares, partnerships limited by shares
and limited liability companies are not punishable?

( [1] ) OJ, English Special Edition 1968 (I), p. 41.
( [2] ) OJ 1978 L 222, p. 11.
( [3] ) OJ 1983 L 193, p. 1.
( [4] ) OJ 1990 L 317, p. 60.