Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/36 |

---

Action brought on 11 April 2014 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24)

(Case T-225/14)

2014/C 184/58

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: iNET24 Holding AG (Feusisberg, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger and V. Dalichau, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 February 2014 in Case R 1867/2013-5; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Designation of the European Union for the international registration of the word mark ‘IDIRECT24’ for goods and services in classes 9, 36, 38 and 42 — International registration No 1 145 181

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |

---

[Top](#document1)