Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/15 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2016 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v EUIPO — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)

(Case T-400/15)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2016410EN.01001502-E0001)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark CITRUS SATURDAY - Earlier national word mark CITRUS - Late submission of documents - Discretion conferred by Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rule 19 and Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

(2016/C 410/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ana Isabel Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto (Algés, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pita Negrão, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: University College London (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2015 (Case R 2109/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ms Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto and University College London.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders Ana Isabel Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto to pay the costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)