Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/59 |

---

Action brought on 17 October 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst (Shoes)

(Case T-647/22)

(2022/C 463/87)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst (Waalwijck, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 3 320 555-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2022 in Case R 726/2021-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Failure to take into account the breach of contractual obligations and bad faith. |

---

[Top](#document1)