Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/17 |

---

Action brought on 19 February 2020 — Alvargonzález Ramos v EUIPO — Ursus-3 Capital, A.V. (URSUS Kapital)

(Case T-114/20)

(2020/C 129/22)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Pablo Erik Alvargonzález Ramos (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ursus-3 Capital, A.V., SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark URSUS Kapital — European Union trade mark No 5 641 303

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2019 in Case R 711/202019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | deliver a judgment amending the contested decision and dismissing the application for a declaration of invalidity for non-use brought against the registered European Union trade mark No 5 641 303 URSUS Kapital (figurative) in relation to ‘financial affairs’ in Class 36 and declare that trade mark No 5 641 303 has been genuinely used for ‘financial affairs’; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | in the alternative, deliver a judgment which, in addition to amending the contested decision, dismissing the application for a declaration of invalidity for non-use brought against the registered European Union trade mark No 5 641 303 URSUS Kapital (figurative) in relation to ‘financial affairs’ in Class 36, declares that trade mark No 5 641 303 has been genuinely used at least for ‘financial affairs, namely investment services, investment of funds, investment analysis, investment management and administration, investment advice and real estate investment services’. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | in the alternative, annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings. |

Pleas in law

Infringement of Articles 18 and 58 Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 10 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---

[Top](#document1)