Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/34 |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 9 February 2015 — United Video Properties Inc. v Telenet NV

(Case C-57/15)

(2015/C 138/46)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: United Video Properties Inc.

Respondent: Telenet NV

Questions referred

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Do the terms ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses’ in Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive[(1)](#ntr1-C_2015138EN.01003401-E0001) preclude the Belgian legislation which offers courts the possibility of taking into account certain well-defined features specific to the case and which provides for a system of varying flat rates in respect of costs for the assistance of a lawyer? |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Do the terms ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses’ in Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive preclude the case-law which states that the costs of a technical adviser are recoverable only in the event of fault (contractual or extra-contractual)? |

---

[Top](#document1)