Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

201807200822012872018/C 276/795872017TC27620180806EN01ENINFO\_JUDICIAL20180620484811

Case T-587/17: Order of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — Unigroup v EUIPO — Pronova Laboratories (nailicin) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark nailicin — Earlier Benelux word mark NAILCLIN — Relative ground for refusal — Copy of the certificate of registration of the earlier mark — Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) — Taking into account of a document submitted in conjunction with the notice of opposition — Rule 19(4) Regulation No 2868/95 (now Article 7(5) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

[Top](#document1)

C2762018EN4810120180620EN0079481481

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — Unigroup v EUIPO — Pronova Laboratories (nailicin)

(Case T-587/17) (
[1](#t-C_2018276EN.01004801-E0001)
)

‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark nailicin — Earlier Benelux word mark NAILCLIN — Relative ground for refusal — Copy of the certificate of registration of the earlier mark — Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) — Taking into account of a document submitted in conjunction with the notice of opposition — Rule 19(4) Regulation No 2868/95 (now Article 7(5) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’

2018/C 276/79Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Unigroup ApS (Lyngby, Denmark) (represented by: M. Rijsdijk, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pronova Laboratories BV (Muiden, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Wertwijn, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2017 (Case R 2359/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Pronova Laboratories and Unigroup.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |

| 2. | Unigroup ApS is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Pronova Laboratories BV. |

---

(
[1](#c-C_2018276EN.01004801-E0001)
) [OJ C 347, 16.10.2017](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2017:347:TOC).

[Top](#document2)