Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/33 |

---

Action brought on 11 November 2015 — Frame v OHIM — Bianca-Moden (BiancalunA)

(Case T-628/15)

(2016/C 007/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Frame Srl (San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy) (represented by: M. Borghese, R. Giordano, E. Montelione, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bianca-Moden GmbH & Co. KG (Ochtrup, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘BiancalunA’ — Application for registration No 11 246 204

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2015 in Case R 2720/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; and/or |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | remit the case to OHIM so that the likelihood of confusion is properly analyzed taking into account the results of the proof of use filed by Bianca-Moden GmbH & Co. KG; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs both at the first instance and on the present proceedings; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | in the alternative, reform the contested decision so that the following goods in class 25 would be registered: underwear, pyjama’s, t-shirts, panties, undues. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Erroneous interpretation of Regulation No 207/2009 in selecting just one earlier right; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Erroneous interpretation of Regulation No 207/2009 in evaluating the likelihood of confusion amongst the signs in comparison. |

---

[Top](#document1)