Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2018 –  
Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS)

(Case T‑456/17)

(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

| 1. | Judicial proceedings—Application initiating proceedings—Formal requirements—Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute—Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d))  (see para. 24) |

| 2. | EU trade mark—Appeals procedure—Action before the EU judicature—Jurisdiction of the General Court—Direction issued to the Office @ Direction addressed to the Office—Not included  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(6))  (see para. 28) |

| 3. | EU trade mark—Appeals procedure—Action before the EU judicature—Power of the General Court to alter the contested decision—Limits  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(2) and (3))  (see para. 46) |

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2017 (Case R 516/2011-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Lupu and Mr Dzhihangir.

Operative part

| 1. | The plea of inadmissibility is joined to the main proceedings. |

| 2. | The action is dismissed. |

| 3. | Mr Victor Lupu shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |

| 4. | Mr Ibryam Dzhihangir shall bear his own costs. |

[Top](#document1)