Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 June 2016 —

Mocek, Wenta, KAJMAN Firma Handlowo-Usługowo-Produkcyjna v EUIPO

(Case C‑619/15 P)

‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU Trade Mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark in green, white and grey representing the design of a crocodile containing the word element ‘KAJMAN’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the EU figurative mark in black and white representing the design of a crocodile — Partial refusal to register by a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)’

Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 4)

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Eugenia Mocek, Jadwiga Wenta, KAJMAN Firma Handlowo-Usługowo-Produkcyjna shall bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)