Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/19 |

---

Action brought on 26 October 2011 — Kokomarina v OHIM — Euro Shoe Unie (interdit de me gronder I D M G)

(Case T-568/11)

2012/C 13/39

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Kokomarina (Concarneau, France) (represented by: C. Charrière-Bournazel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Euro Shoe Unie NV (Beringen, Belgium)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | declare Kokomarina’s action to be admissible; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 July 2011 in Case R 1814/2010-1; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | dismiss the opposition brought by EURO SHOE UNIE NV against the application for registration as a Community trade mark of Kokomarina’s mark ‘I D M G — interdit de me gronder’. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘interdit de me gronder I D M G’ for goods in class 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Euro Shoe Unie NV.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Benelux word mark ‘DMG’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 35.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Lack of use of the opposed mark and no likelihood of confusion.

---

[Top](#document1)