Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/37 |

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 22 June 2004

in Case T-185/02: Claude Ruiz-Picasso and Others v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2004228EN.01003703-E0001)

(Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Opposition - Likelihood of confusion - Application for Community word trade mark PICARO - Earlier word trade mark PICASSO)

(2004/C 228/83)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-185/02: Claude Ruiz-Picasso, residing in Paris (France), Paloma Ruiz-Picasso, residing in London (United Kingdom), Maya Widmaier-Picasso, residing in Paris, Marina Ruiz-Picasso, residing in Geneva (Switzerland), Bernard Ruiz-Picasso, residing in Paris, represented by C. Gielen, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and U. Pfleghar), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court, being DaimlerChrysler AG, established in Stuttgart (Germany), represented by S. Völker, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg — Appeal against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 March 2002 (Case R 0247/2001-3) relating to opposition proceedings between the Picasso estate and DaimlerChrysler AG — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 22 June 2004, in which it:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1) | Dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2) | Orders the applicants to pay the costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)