Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 May 2021 –  
Electrodomésticos Taurus v EUIPO – Shenzhen Aukey E-Business (AICOOK)

(Case T‑328/20)

(Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application of a declaratory nature – Application for directions to be issued – Inadmissibility)

| 1. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Declaratory judgments – Precluded  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(2) and (3))  (see para. 24) |

| 2. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Power of the General Court to alter the contested decision – Limits  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(3))  (see para. 28) |

| 3. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Direction issued to the Office – Precluded  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(6))  (see para. 32) |

| 4. | EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Alteration of a decision of the Office – Assessment in the light of the powers conferred on the Board of Appeal  (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(3))  (see para. 34) |

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2020 (Case R 2212/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Electrodomésticos Taurus and Shenzhen Aukey E-Business.

Operative part

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| 2. | Electrodomésticos Taurus, SL shall pay the costs. |

[Top](#document1)