Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/12 |

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2015 — Fetim v OHIM — Solid Floor (Solidfloor The professional’s choice)

(Case T-395/12)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2015096EN.01001201-E0001)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Solidfloor The professional’s choice - Earlier national figurative mark SOLID floor, earlier trade name and domain name Solid Floor Ltd - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 096/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fetim BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: L. Bakers, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Solid Floor Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2012 (Case R 884/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Solid Floor Ltd and Fetim BV.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | Dismisses the action; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Orders Fetim BV to pay the costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)