Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/43 |

---

Action brought on 21 October 2021 — Mostostal v EUIPO — Polimex — Mostostal (MOSTOSTAL)

(Case T-684/21)

(2022/C 2/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: C. Saettel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Polimex — Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark MOSTOSTAL — European Union trade mark No 9 329 848

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2021 in Case R 2508/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | declare the European Union trade mark registered on 20 May 2011 under No 9 329 848 valid; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs in accordance with Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 59(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |

---

[Top](#document1)