Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/19 |

---

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Frank v Commission

(Case T-603/15)[(1)](#ntr1-C_2017178EN.01001901-E0001)

((Action for annulment - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2015 - Decision of the ERCEA declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible - Implied decision of the Commission rejecting the administrative appeal relating to the decision of the ERCEA - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 178/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Regine Frank (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially W. Trautner, subsequently by E. Niitväli and M. Reysen, then by E. Niitväli, M. Reysen and S. Wachs, and finally S. Conrad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, acting as agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) of 5 June 2015 relating, in the context of the ‘ERC starting grant’ programme, to proposal No 680151 of the applicant — which was not given a positive evaluation during step 1 and was not admitted to step 2 of the evaluation — and the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s administrative appeal pursuant to Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes ([OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1](./../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:L:2003:011:TOC)).

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Ms Regine Frank and the European Commission shall bear their own costs. |

---

[Top](#document1)