Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

201805250501897042018/C 200/582312018TC20020180611EN01ENINFO\_JUDICIAL20180404464611

Case T-231/18: Action brought on 4 April 2018 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili)

[Top](#document1)

C2002018EN4610120180404EN0058461461

Action brought on 4 April 2018 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili)

(Case T-231/18)

2018/C 200/58Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam (Dulovo, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Romiţan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Victor Lupu (Bucharest, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark Djili — Application for registration No 15 497 662

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 January 2018 in Case R 1902/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |

| — | reject Lupu Victor’s appeal; |

| — | order the opponent and the appellant Lupu Victor to bear the costs of the proceedings. |

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in finding that there was an aural similarity between the signs; |

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in finding that the conceptual comparison had no relevance in the case. |

[Top](#document2)