Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 May 2017 —  
Neonart svetlobni in reklamni napisi Krevh v EUIPO

(Case C‑22/17 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the word mark neonart — Application lodged with General Court of the European Union signed by a ‘lawyer’ — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — No representation by a lawyer — Appeal manifestly unfounded)

| 1. | Judicial proceedings—Application initiating proceedings—Formal requirements—Signature by a lawyer—Application signed by a lawyer not authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of a State which is a party to the European Economic Area Agreement—Inadmissibility  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 19, fourth para.)  (see paras 6, 7) |

| 2. | Judicial proceedings—Application initiating proceedings—Formal requirements—Signature by a lawyer—Notion of ‘lawyer’—Independent interpretation  (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 19, fourth para.)  (see paras 6, 7) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Neonart svetlobni in reklamni napisi Krevh d.o.o. is to bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)