Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/48 |

---

Action brought on 31 August 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-535/21)

(2021/C 431/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 1 431 829-0009

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 June 2021 in Case R 1004/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | alter the contested decision to:   |  |  | | --- | --- | | — | allow the applicant’s appeal, |  |  |  | | --- | --- | | — | dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicant’s application ICD 10 297 to declare the contested design invalid, |  |  |  | | --- | --- | | — | order the invalidity applicant to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division; | |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the invalidity applicant to pay the applicant’s fees and costs. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155); |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172); |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010. |

---

[Top](#document1)