Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/25 |

---

Action brought on 2 July 2021 — ZR v EUIPO

(Case T-400/21)

(2021/C 368/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZR (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the decision of the EUIPO rejecting the applicant’s application for transfer from the European Commission to the EUIPO; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul, insofar as necessary, the decision to reject the applicant’s complaint filed under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the defendant to bear the costs. |

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 4, 8, 27, 29 and 110 of Staff Regulations and of the principles of continuity of EU officials, of the comparison of merits and of transparency; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to state reasons and the duty of care, resulting in a manifest error of appreciation. |

---

[Top](#document1)