Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 March 2019 — Sevenfriday v EUIPO

(Case C‑734/18 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the word mark SEVENFRIDAY — Opposition proceedings — Rejection of the application for registration — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

| 1. | Appeal — Grounds — Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal — Inadmissibility  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))  (see para. 5) |

| 2. | Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Inadmissibility — Challenge to the interpretation or application of EU law made by the General Court — Admissibility  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d))  (see para. 5) |

| 3. | Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility  (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1))  (see para. 5) |

| 4. | Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 5) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |

| 2. | Sevenfriday AG is ordered to bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)