Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/43 |

---

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2021 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND)

(Case T-616/19 REV) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2021462EN.01004301-E0001)

(Procedure - Application for revision - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark - Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action - Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court - Revision of the order - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 462/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz, S. Stolzenburg-Wiemer, M. Breuer and I. Dimitrov, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Tiemann and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Re:

APPLICATION for revision of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334).

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The application for revision of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334), is granted. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19). |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the annulment proceedings in Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19). |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs relating to the revision procedure. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | EUIPO shall pay half of the costs of Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG relating to the revision procedure. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Katjes Fassin shall bear half of its own costs relating to the revision procedure. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | The registrar shall annex the original of the present order to the original of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334). |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | The registrar shall make note of the present order in the margin of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334). |

---

---

[Top](#document1)