Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/61 |

---

Order of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)

(Case T-356/17) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019044EN.01006101-E0001)

((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Word mark RoB - Declaration of invalidity - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 58(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 44/79)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Daico International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Kassner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: American Franchise Marketing Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 (Case R 1407/2016-2), relating to cancellation proceedings between American Franchise Marketing and Daico International.

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The action is dismissed. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Daico International BV shall pay the costs. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)