Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

9.11.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 274/7

5. _The first paragraph of Article 95 of the Treaty precludes the_
_levying of a tax such as that at issue in the main proceedings,_
_which is payable on car tax, in so far as the amount charged as_
_such a tax on a used car imported from another Member State_
_exceeds the amount of the residual tax incorporated in the value_
_of a similar used car already registered in the national territory._

( [1] ) OJ C 176 of 24.6.2000.

**JUDGMENT OF THE COURT**

**(Fifth Chamber)**

**of 19 September 2002**

**in Case C-104/00 P: DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung**
**AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market**
**(Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)** ( [1] )

_**(Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC)**_
_**No 40/94 — Word ‘Companyline’ — Absolute ground for**_
_**refusal — Distinctive character)**_

(2002/C 274/09)

_(Language of the case: German)_

_(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published_
_in the European Court Reports)_

In Case C-104/00 P, DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG
(represented by: S. von Petersdorff-Campen): Appeal against
the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European
Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 12 January 2000 in Case
T-19/99 DKV v OHIM (COMPANYLINE) [2000] ECR II-1,
seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the
proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von
Mühlendahl and D. Schennen), the Court (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber,
S. von Bahr, M. Wathelet, C.W.A. Timmermans and A. Rosas,
Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; H.A. Rühl,
Principal Administrator, for theRegistrar, has given a judgment
on 19 September 2002, in which it:

1. _Dismisses the appeal;_

2. _Orders DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG to pay the_
_costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 192 of 8.7.2000.

**JUDGMENT OF THE COURT**

**(Fifth Chamber)**

**of 19 September 2002**

**in Case C-113/00: Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the**
**European Communities** ( [1] )

_**(State aid — Agriculture — Aid for horticultural products**_
_**intended for industrial**_ _**processing in Extremadura —**_
_**Article 87(1) and (3)(a) and (c) EC — Small amount of aid**_
_**— No comments from parties concerned — Operating aid**_
_**— Aid relating to products subject to a common organisation**_
_**of the market — Restrictions on the free movement of goods**_
_**— Statement of reasons)**_

(2002/C 274/10)

_(Language of the case: Spanish)_

_(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published_
_in the European Court Reports)_

In Case C-113/00, Kingdom of Spain (Agent: S. Ortiz Vaamonde) v Commission of the European Communities (Agent:
D. Triantafyllou): Application for annulment of Commission
Decision 2000/237/EC of 22 December 1999 concerning an
aid scheme implemented by Spain in favour of horticultural
products intended for industrial processing in Extremadura in
the 1997/98 marketing year (OJ 2000 L 75, p. 54), the Court
(Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the
Chamber, D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola, M. Wathelet and
C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on
19 September 2002, in which it:

1. _Dismisses the application;_

2. _Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs._

( [1] ) OJ C 176 of 24.6.2000.