Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 May 2016 —

Gat Microencapsulation v EUIPO

(Case C‑639/15 P)

‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure — European Union word mark KARIS — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Refusal in part of the application for registration — Appeal manifestly inadmissible’

| 1. | Appeal — Grounds — Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169) (see para. 4) |

| 2. | Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 4) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Gat Microencapsulation GmbH (formerly Gat Microencapsulation AG) shall bear its own costs. |

[Top](#document1)