Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/40 |

---

Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)

(Case T-166/15)

(2015/C 198/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Claus Gramberg (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. Kettler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sorouch Mahdavi Sabet (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the design at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 1 968 496-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 460/2013-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision and declare Community design No 1 968 496-0002 invalid;  in the alternative, |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision and remit the case to the Board of Appeal for a new decision on the invalidity of Community design No 1 968 496-0002; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of 5(1)(b) Regulation No 6/2002; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002. |

---

[Top](#document1)