Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 May 2017 — Keil v EUIPO

(Case C‑37/17 P)

(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark BasenCitrate — Declaration of invalidity)

| 1. | Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted  (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)  (see para. 4) |

| 2. | EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Overlapping of the scope of the grounds set out in Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3))  (see para. 4) |

| 3. | EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Word mark BasenCitrate  (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3))  (see para.4) |

| 4. | Procedure—Oral part of the procedure—Report for the Hearing drawn up by the Judge Rapporteur—Subject matter  (see para.4) |

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |

| 2. | Mr Rudolf Keil shall bear his own costs. |

[Top](#document1)