Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/29 |

---

Order of the General Court of 30 May 2018 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)

(Case T-664/16) [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018392EN.01002901-E0001)

((EU trade mark - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Replacement of a party to the proceedings - Transfer of the rights of the EU trade mark applicant - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant for replacement - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 392/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PJ (represented by: S., lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, and subsequently by A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2016 (Case R 1670/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Erdmann & Rossi and PJ.

Operative part of the order

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The action shall be dismissed as inadmissible. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for replacement. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | PJ is to pay the costs. |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | [Y]-GmbH, and each party, is to bear its own costs relating to the application for replacement. |

---

---

[Top](#document1)