Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/58 |

---

Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — e-bility (Scooter)

(Case T-646/22)

(2022/C 463/86)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Piaggio & C. (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci and B. La Tella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: e-bility GmbH (Remagen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design (Scooter) — Community design No 4363588-0001

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2022 in Case R 1663/2020-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | declare the proprietor’s Community design registered under No 4363588-0001 invalid; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order the defendant and the proprietor to pay the procedural costs relating to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO and the potential other party to the present proceedings to pay all of the costs of the proceedings. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Incorrect assessment and unfounded exclusion of decisive evidence provided by the applicant; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |

---

[Top](#document1)