Source: EURLEX
Language: en
Format: md

|  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/38 |

---

Action brought on 6 December 2019 – CrossFit v EUIPO – Hochwarter (CROSSBOX)

(Case T-835/19)

(2020/C 36/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CrossFit Inc. (Scotts Valley, California, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marlis Hochwarter (Vienna, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark CROSSBOX – European Union trade mark No 12 503 471

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 in Case R 1832/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | annul the contested decision; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the General Court. |

Pleas in law

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 8(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council; |

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council. |

---

[Top](#document1)