Question: What was the average life expectancy in Elizabethan England?

Tudor period











Part of a series on theHistory of England
Timeline
Prehistoric Britain
Roman Britain
Sub-Roman Britain
Medieval period
Economy in the Middle Ages
Anglo-Saxon period
English unification
High Middle Ages
Norman conquest
Norman period
Late Middle Ages
Black Death in England
Tudor period
Tudor dynasty
Elizabethan period
English Renaissance
Stuart period
English Civil War
Commonwealth
Protectorate
Restoration
Glorious Revolution
Georgian period
Regency period
Victorian period
Edwardian period
First World War
Interwar period
Second World War
Social history of the United Kingdom (1945–present)
Political history of the United Kingdom (1945–present)

Topics
Social history of England
History of education in England
History of the economy of England
History of the politics of England
English overseas possessions
History of the English language

Polities
Kingdom of England
Kingdom of Great Britain
United Kingdom

By county
Bedfordshire
Berkshire
City of Bristol
Buckinghamshire
Cambridgeshire
Cheshire
Cornwall
Cumbria
Derbyshire
Devon
Dorset
Durham
East Riding of Yorkshire
East Sussex
Essex
Gloucestershire
Greater London
Greater Manchester
Hampshire
Herefordshire
Hertfordshire
Isle of Wight
Kent
Lancashire
Leicestershire
Lincolnshire
City of London
Merseyside
Norfolk
Northamptonshire
Northumberland
North Yorkshire
Nottinghamshire
Oxfordshire
Rutland
Shropshire
Somerset
South Yorkshire
Staffordshire
Suffolk
Surrey
Tyne and Wear
Warwickshire
West Midlands
West Sussex
West Yorkshire
Wiltshire
Worcestershire

By city or town
Birmingham
Bournemouth
Brighton
Bristol
Chester
Christchurch
Colchester
Coventry
Dover
Folkestone
Leeds
Liverpool
London
Maidstone
Manchester
Margate
Milton Keynes
Newcastle
Nottingham
Plymouth
Poole
Portsmouth
Reading
Rochester
Sheffield
Shrewsbury
Southampton
St Albans
Torquay
Wetherby
Worcester
Worthing
York

 Englandportalvt

Periods in English history



Prehistoric Britainuntil c. 43Roman Britainc. 43–410Anglo-Saxonc. 500–1066Norman1066–1154Plantagenet1154–1485Tudor1485–1603Elizabethan1558–1603Stuart1603–1714Jacobean1603–1625Caroline1625–1649(Interregnum)1649–1660Restoration1660–1714Georgian1714–1837Regency1811–1820Victorian1837–1901Edwardian1901–1914First World War1914–1918Interwar Britain1919–1939Second World War1939–1945
See also
Political history (1945–present)
Social history (1945–present)
Timelinevt









Part of a series on theHistory of the BritishIsles
Overview
United Kingdom
England
Isle of Wight
Isles of Scilly
Scotland
Shetland
Orkney
Inner Hebrides
Outer Hebrides
Wales
Anglesey
Northern Ireland
Ireland
Isle of Man (Mann)
Channel Islands
Jersey
Guernsey

Prehistoric period
Prehistoric Britain
Prehistoric England
Prehistoric Scotland
Prehistoric Shetland
Prehistoric Orkney
Prehistoric Wales
Prehistoric Ireland
Prehistoric Mann

Classical period
Roman Britain
Roman Scotland
Roman Wales
Protohistoric Ireland, Roman Ireland
End of Roman rule
Sub-Roman Britain

Medieval period
Medieval England
Early medieval England
High medieval England
Late medieval England
Medieval Scotland
Early medieval Scotland
High medieval Scotland
Late medieval Scotland
Medieval Wales
Early medieval Wales
High medieval Wales
Late medieval Wales
Medieval Ireland
Early medieval Ireland
High medieval Ireland
Late medieval Ireland
Medieval Mann

Early modern period
Early modern Britain
Early modern England
Early modern Scotland
Early modern Wales
Early modern Ireland
Early modern Mann

Late modern period
United Kingdom (since 1707)
Victorian period
Edwardian period
First World War
Interwar period
Second World War
Post-war period (political history)
Post-war period (social history)
Late modern Ireland
Late modern Mann
vt
The Tudor period is the period between 1485 and 1603 in England and Wales and includes the Elizabethan period during the reign of Elizabeth I until 1603. The Tudor period coincides with the dynasty of the House of Tudor in England whose first monarch was Henry VII (1457–1509). In terms of the entire span, the historian John Guy (1988) argues that "England was economically healthier, more expansive, and more optimistic under the Tudors" than at any time in a thousand years.[1]
Population and economy
Following the Black Death and the agricultural depression of the late 15th century, the population began to increase. It was less than 2 million in 1450, and about 4 million in 1600. The growing population stimulated economic growth, accelerated the commercialisation of agriculture, increased the production and export of wool, encouraged trade, and promoted the growth of London.[2]
The high wages and abundance of available land seen in the late 15th century and early 16th century were replaced with low wages and a land shortage. Various inflationary pressures, perhaps due to an influx of New World gold and a rising population, set the stage for social upheaval with the gap between the rich and poor widening. This was a period of significant change for the majority of the rural population, with manorial lords beginning the process of enclosure of village lands that previously had been open to everyone.[3]
English Reformation

The Reformation transformed English religion during the Tudor period. The four sovereigns, Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I had entirely different approaches, with Henry replacing the pope as the head of the Church of England but maintaining Catholic doctrines, Edward imposing a very strict Protestantism, Mary attempting to reinstate Catholicism, and Elizabeth arriving at a compromising position that defined the not-quite-Protestant Church of England. It began with the insistent demands of Henry VIII for an annulment of his marriage that Pope Clement VII refused to grant.[4]
Historians agreed that the great theme of Tudor history was the Reformation, the transformation of England from Catholicism to Protestantism. The main events, constitutional changes, and players at the national level have long been known, and the major controversies about them largely resolved. Historians until the late 20th century assumed that they knew what the causes were: on the one hand, a widespread dissatisfaction or even disgust with the evils, corruptions, failures, and contradictions of the established religion, setting up an undertone of anti-clericalism that indicated a rightness for reform. A second, less powerful influence was the intellectual impact of certain English reformers, such as the long-term impact of John Wycliffe (1328–1384) and his “Lollardy” reform movement, together with a stream of Reformation treatises and pamphlets from Martin Luther, John Calvin, and other reformers on the continent. The interpretation by Geoffrey Elton in 1960 is representative of the orthodox interpretation. He argues that:
The existing situation proved untenable because the laity feared, resented, and despised much about the Church, its officers, its courts and its wealth. ... A poverty-stricken and ignorant lower clergy, wealthy bishops and abbots, a wide ramification of jurisdiction, a mixture of high claims and low deeds did not make for respect or love among the laity.[5]
Social historians after 1960 began in-depth investigations of English religion at the local level, and discovered the orthodox interpretation was quite mistaken. The Lollardy movement had largely expired, and the pamphleteering of continental reformers hardly reached beyond a few scholars at the University of Cambridge—King Henry VIII had vigorously and publicly denounced Luther's heresies. More important, the Catholic Church was in a strong condition in 1500. England was devoutly Catholic, it was loyal to the pope, local parishes attracted strong local financial support, religious services were quite popular both at Sunday Mass and at family devotions. Complaints about the monasteries and the bishops were uncommon. The kings got along well with the popes and by the time Luther appeared on the scene, England was among the strongest supporters of orthodox Catholicism, and seemed a most unlikely place for a religious revolution.[6][7]
Tudor government
Henry VII:  1485–1509
Henry VII, founder of the House of Tudor, became King of England by defeating King Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field, the culmination of the Wars of the Roses. Henry engaged in a number of administrative, economic and diplomatic initiatives. He paid very close attention to detail and, instead of spending lavishly, concentrated on raising new revenues. His new taxes were unpopular, and when Henry VIII succeeded him, he executed Henry VII's two most hated tax collectors.[8][9]
Henry VIII: 1509–1547

Henry VIII, flamboyant, energetic, militaristic and headstrong, remains one of the most visible kings of England, primarily because of his six marriages, all designed to produce a male heir, and his heavy retribution in executing many top officials and aristocrats. In foreign-policy, he focused on fighting France—with minimal success—and had to deal with Scotland, Spain, and the Holy Roman Empire, often with military mobilisation or actual highly expensive warfare that led to high taxes. The chief military success came over Scotland.[10] The main policy development was Henry's taking full control of the Church of England. This followed from his break from Rome, which was caused by the refusal of the Pope to annul his original marriage. Henry thereby introduced a very mild variation of the Protestant Reformation. There were two main aspects. First Henry rejected the Pope as the head of the Church in England, insisting that national sovereignty required the Absolute supremacy of the king. Henry worked closely with Parliament in passing a series of laws that implemented the break. Englishmen could no longer appeal to Rome. All the decisions were to be made in England, ultimately by the King himself, and in practice by top aides such as Cardinal Wolsey and Thomas Cromwell. Parliament proved highly supportive, with little dissent. The decisive moves came with the Act of Supremacy in 1534 that made the king the protector and only supreme head of the church and clergy of England. After Henry imposed a heavy fine on the bishops, they nearly all complied. The laws of treason were greatly strengthened so that verbal dissent alone was treasonous. There were some short-lived popular rebellions that were quickly suppressed. The league level in terms of the aristocracy and the Church was supportive. The highly visible main refusals came from Bishop Fisher and Chancellor Thomas More; they were both executed. Among the senior aristocrats, trouble came from the Pole family, which supported Reginald Pole who was in exile in Europe. Henry destroyed the rest of the family, executing its leaders, and seizing all its property. The second stage involved the seizure of the monasteries. The monasteries operating religious and charitable institutions were closed, the monks and nuns were pensioned off, and the valuable lands were sold to friends of the King, thereby producing a large, wealthy, gentry class that supported Henry. In terms of theology and ritual there was little change, as Henry wanted to keep most elements of Catholicism and detested the "heresies" of Martin Luther and the other reformers.[11]
Father of the Royal Navy
Biographer J.J. Scarisbrick says that Henry deserved his traditional title of 'Father of the English navy.'[12] It became his personal weapon, his plaything, his passion. He inherited seven small warships from his father, and added two dozen more by 1514. In addition to those built in England, he bought up Italian and Hanseatic warships. By March 1513, he proudly watched his fleet sail down the Thames under command of Sir Edmund Howard. It was the most powerful naval force to date in English history: 24 ships led by the 1600 ton "Henry Imperial"; the fleet carried 5000 combat marines and 3000 sailors. It forced the outnumbered French fleet back to its ports, took control of the English Channel, and blockaded Brest. Henry was the first king to organise the navy as a permanent force, with a permanent administrative and logistical structure, funded by tax revenue. His personal attention was concentrated on land, where he founded the royal dockyards, planted trees for shipbuilding, enacted laws for in land navigation, guarded the coastline with fortifications, set up a school for navigation and designated the roles of officers and sailors. He closely supervised the construction of all his warships and their guns, knowing their designs, speed, tonnage, armaments and battle tactics. He encouraged his naval architects, who perfected the Italian technique of mounting guns in the waist of the ship, thus lowering the centre of gravity and making it a better platform. He supervised the smallest details and enjoyed nothing more than presiding over the launching of a new ship.[13] He drained his treasury on military and naval affairs, diverting the revenues from new taxes and the sales of monastery lands.[14][15][16]
Elton argues that Henry indeed build up the organisation and infrastructure of the Navy, but it was not a useful weapon for his style of warfare. It lacked a useful strategy. It did serve for defence against invasion, and for enhancing England's international prestige.[17]
Cardinal Wolsey
Professor Sara Nair James says that in 1515–1529 Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, "would be the most powerful man in England except, possibly, for the king."[18] Historian John Guy explains Wolsey's methods:
Only in the broadest respects was he [the king] taking independent decisions....It was Wolsey who almost invariably calculated the available options and ranked them for royal consideration; who established the parameters of each successive debate; who controlled the flow of official information; who selected the king's secretaries, middle-ranked officials, and JPs; and who promulgated decisions himself had largely shaped, if not strictly taken.[19]
Operating with the firm support of the king, and with special powers over the church given by the Pope, Wolsey dominated civic affairs, administration, the law, the church, and foreign-policy. He was amazingly energetic and far-reaching. In terms of achievements, he built a great fortune for himself, and was a major benefactor of arts, humanities and education. He projected numerous reforms, but in the end English government had not changed much. For all the promise, there was very little achievement of note. From the king's perspective, his greatest failure was an inability to get a divorce when Henry VIII needed a new wife to give him a son who would be the undisputed heir to the throne. Historians agree that Wolsey was a disappointment. In the end, he conspired with Henry's enemies, and died of natural causes before he could be beheaded.[20][21]
Thomas Cromwell
Historian Geoffrey Elton argued that Thomas Cromwell, who was Henry VIII's chief minister from 1532 to 1540, not only removed control of the Church of England from the hands of the Pope, but transformed England with an unprecedented modern, bureaucratic government.[22] Cromwell (1485–1540)[23] replaced medieval government-as-household-management. Cromwell introduced reforms into the administration that delineated the King's household from the state and created a modern administration. He injected Tudor power into the darker corners of the realm and radically altered the role of the Parliament of England. This transition happened in the 1530s, Elton argued, and must be regarded as part of a planned revolution. Elton's point was that before Cromwell the realm could be viewed as the King's private estate writ large, where most administration was done by the King's household servants rather than separate state offices. By masterminding these reforms, Cromwell laid the foundations of England's future stability and success. Cromwell's luck ran out when he picked the wrong bride for the King; he was beheaded for treason, More recently historians have emphasised that the king and others played powerful roles as well.[24][25]
Dissolution of the Monasteries: 1536–1540

The king had an annual income of about £100,000, but he needed much more in order to suppress rebellions and finance his foreign adventures. In 1533, for example, military expenditures on the northern border cost £25,000, while the 1534 rebellion in Ireland cost £38,000. Suppressing the Pilgrimage of Grace cost £50,000, and the king's new palaces were expensive. Meanwhile, customs revenue was slipping. The Church had an annual revenue of about £300,000; a new tax of 10% was imposed which brought in about £30,000. To get even larger sums it was proposed to seize the lands owned by monasteries, some of which the monks farmed and most of which was leased to local gentry. Taking ownership meant the rents went to the king. Selling the land to the gentry at a bargain price brought in £1 million in one-time revenue and gave the gentry a stake in the administration.[26] The clerical payments from First Fruits and Tenths, which previously went to the pope, now went to the king. Altogether, between 1536 and Henry's death, his government collected £1.3 million; this huge influx of money caused Cromwell to change the Crown's financial system to manage the money. He created a new department of state and a new official to collect the proceeds of the dissolution and the First Fruits and Tenths. The Court of Augmentations and number of departments meant a growing number of officials, which made the management of revenue a major activity.[27]
Cromwell's new system was highly efficient with far less corruption or secret payoffs or bribery than before. Its drawback was the multiplication of departments whose sole unifying agent was Cromwell; his fall caused confusion and uncertainty; the solution was even greater reliance on bureaucratic institutions and the new Privy Council.[28]
Role of Winchester
In dramatic contrast to his father, Henry VIII spent heavily, in terms of military operations in Britain and in France, and in building a great network of palaces. How to pay for it remained a serious issue. The growing number of departments meant many new salaried bureaucrats. There were further financial and administrative difficulties in 1540–58, aggravated by war, debasement, corruption and inefficiency, which were mainly caused by Somerset. After Cromwell's fall, William Paulet, 1st Marquess of Winchester, the Lord Treasurer, produced further reforms to simplify the arrangements, reforms which united most of the crown's finance under the exchequer. The courts of general surveyors and augmentations were fused into a new Court of Augmentations, and this was later absorbed into the exchequer along with the First Fruits and Tenths.[29]
Impact of war
At the end of his reign, Henry VII's peacetime income was about £113,000, Of which customs on imports amounted to about £40,000. There was little debt, and he left his son a large treasury. Henry VIII spent heavily on luxuries, such as tapestries and palaces, but his peacetime budget was generally satisfactory. The heavy strain came from warfare, including building defences, building a Navy, Suppressing insurrections, warring with Scotland, and engaging in very expensive continental warfare. Henry's Continental wars won him little glory or diplomatic influence, and no territory. Nevertheless, warfare 1511 to 1514 with three large expeditions and two smaller ones cost £912,000. The Boulogne campaign of 1544 cost £1,342,000 and the wars against Scotland £954,000; the naval wars cost £149,000 and large sums were spent to build and maintain inland and coastal fortifications. The total cost of war and defence between 1539–1547 was well over £2,000,000, although the accounting procedures were too primitive to give an accurate total. Adding it all up, approximately 35% came from taxes, 32% from selling land and monastery holdings, and 30% from debasing the coinage. The cost of war in the short reign of Edward VI was another £1,387,000.[30]
After 1540, the Privy Coffers were responsible for 'secret affairs', in particular for the financing of war. The Royal Mint was used to generate revenue by debasing the coinage; the government's profit in 1547–51 was £1.2 million. However, under the direction of regent Northumberland, Edward's wars were brought to an end. The mint no longer generated extra revenue after debasement was stopped in 1551.[31]
Edward VI: 1547–1553

Although Henry was only in his mid-50s, his health deteriorated rapidly in 1546. At the time the conservative faction, led by Bishop Stephen Gardiner and Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk that was opposed to religious reformation seemed to be in power, and was poised to take control of the regency of the nine-year-old boy who was heir to the throne. However, when the king died, the pro-reformation factions suddenly seized control of the new king, and of the Regency Council, under the leadership of Edward Seymour. Bishop Gardiner was discredited, and the Duke of Norfolk was imprisoned for all of the new king's reign.[32]
The short reign of Edward VI marked the triumph of Protestantism in England. Somerset, the elder brother of the late Queen Jane Seymour (married to Henry VIII) and uncle to King Edward VI had a successful military career. When the boy king was crowned, Somerset became Lord Protector of the realm and in effect ruled England from 1547 to 1549. Seymour led expensive, inconclusive wars with Scotland. His religious policies angered Catholics. Purgatory was rejected so there was no more need for prayers to saints, relics, and statues, nor for masses for the dead. Some 2400 permanent endowments called chantries had been established that supported thousands of priests who celebrated masses for the dead, or operated schools or hospitals in order to earn grace for the soul in purgatory. The endowments were seized by Cromwell in 1547.[33][34] Historians have contrasted the efficiency of Somerset's takeover of power in 1547 with the subsequent ineptitude of his rule. By autumn 1549, his costly wars had lost momentum, the crown faced financial ruin, and riots and rebellions had broken out around the country. He was overthrown by his former ally John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland.[35]
Until recent decades, Somerset's reputation with historians was high, in view of his many proclamations that appeared to back the common people against a rapacious landowning class. In the early 20th century this line was taken by the influential A. F. Pollard, to be echoed by Edward VI's leading biographer W. K. Jordan. A more critical approach was initiated by M. L. Bush and Dale Hoak in the mid-1970s. Since then, Somerset has often been portrayed as an arrogant ruler, devoid of the political and administrative skills necessary for governing the Tudor state.[36][37]
Dudley by contrast moved quickly after taking over an almost bankrupt administration in 1549.[38] Working with his top aide William Cecil, Dudley ended the costly wars with France and Scotland and tackled finances in ways that led to some economic recovery. To prevent further uprisings he introduced countrywide policing, appointed Lords Lieutenants who were in close contact with London, and set up what amounted to a standing national army. Working closely with Thomas Cramner, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dudley pursued an aggressively Protestant religious policy. They promoted radical reformers to high Church positions, with the Catholic bishops under attack. The use of the Book of Common Prayer became law in 1549; prayers were to be in English not Latin. The Mass was no longer to be celebrated, and preaching became the centerpiece of church services.
Purgatory, Protestantism declared, was a Catholic superstition that falsified the Scriptures. Prayers for the dead were useless because no one was actually in Purgatory. It followed that prayers to saints, veneration of relics, and adoration of statues were all useless superstitions that had to end. For centuries devout Englishman had created endowments called chantries designed as good works that generated grace to help them get out of purgatory after they died. Many chantries were altars or chapels inside churches, or endowments that supported thousands of priests who said Masses for the dead. In addition there were many schools and hospitals established as good works. In 1547 a new law closed down 2,374 chantries and seized their assets.[39] Although the Act required the money to go to "charitable" ends and the "public good," most of it appears to have gone to friends of the Court.[40] Historian A.G. Dickens has concluded:
To Catholic opinion, the problem set by these legal confiscations ... [was] the disappearance of a large clerical society from their midst, the silencing of masses, the rupture of both visible and spiritual ties, which over so many centuries have linked rude provincial man with a great world of the Faith. ... The Edwardian dissolution exerted its profounder effects in the field of religion. In large part it proved destructive, for while it helped to debar a revival of Catholic devotion it clearly contain elements which injured the reputation of Protestantism.[41]
The new Protestant orthodoxy for the Church of England was expressed in the Forty-Two Articles of Faith in 1553. But when the king suddenly died, Dudley's last-minute efforts to make his daughter-in-law Lady Jane Grey the new sovereign failed. Queen Mary took over and had him beheaded.[42][43]
Mary I: 1553–1558

Mary was the daughter of Henry VIII by Catherine of Aragon; she closely identified with her Catholic, Spanish heritage. She was next in line for the throne. However, in 1553 as Edward VI lay dying, he and the Duke of Northumberland plotted to make his niece Lady Jane Grey as the new Queen. Northumberland wanted to keep control of the government, and promote Protestantism. Edward signed a devise to alter the succession, but that was not legal, for only Parliament could amend its own acts. Edward's Privy Council kept his death secret for three days to install Lady Jane, but Northumberland had neglected to take control of Princess Mary. She fled and organised a band of supporters, who proclaimed her Queen across the country. The Privy Council abandoned Northumberland, and proclaimed Mary to be the sovereign after nine days of the pretended Jane Grey. Queen Mary imprisoned Lady Jane and executed Northumberland.[44][45]
Mary is remembered for her vigorous efforts to restore Roman Catholicism after Edward's short-lived crusade to minimise Catholicism in England. Protestant historians have long denigrated her reign, emphasising that in just five years she burned several hundred Protestants at the stake in the Marian persecutions. However, a historiographical revisionism since the 1980s has to some degree improved her reputation among scholars.[46][47] Christopher Haigh's bold reappraisal of the religious history of Mary's reign painted the revival of religious festivities and a general satisfaction, if not enthusiasm, at the return of the old Catholic practices.[48] Her re-establishment of Roman Catholicism was reversed by her younger half-sister and successor Elizabeth I.
Protestant writers at the time took a highly negative view, blasting her as "Bloody Mary". John Knox attacked her in his First Blast of the Trumpet against the Monstrous Regiment of Women (1558), and she was prominently vilified in Actes and Monuments (1563), by John Foxe. Foxe's book taught Protestants for centuries that Mary was a bloodthirsty tyrant. In the mid-20th century, H. F. M. Prescott attempted to redress the tradition that Mary was intolerant and authoritarian by writing more objectively, and scholarship since then has tended to view the older, simpler, partisan assessments of Mary with greater scepticism.[49]
Haigh concluded that the "last years of Mary's reign were not a gruesome preparation for Protestant victory, but a continuing consolidation of Catholic strength."[50] Catholic historians, such as John Lingard, argued Mary's policies failed not because they were wrong but because she had too short a reign to establish them. In other countries, the Catholic Counter-Reformation was spearheaded by Jesuit missionaries; Mary's chief religious advisor, Cardinal Pole, refused to allow the Jesuits in England.[51] Spain was widely seen as the enemy, and her marriage to King Phillip II of Spain was deeply unpopular, even though he had practically no role in English government and they had no children. The military loss of Calais to France was a bitter humiliation to English pride. Failed harvests increased public discontent.[52] Although Mary's rule was ultimately ineffectual and unpopular, her innovations regarding fiscal reform, naval expansion, and colonial exploration were later lauded as Elizabethan accomplishments.[53]
Elizabeth I: 1558–1603

Historians often depict Elizabeth's reign as the golden age in English history in terms of political, social and cultural development, and in comparison with Continental Europe.[54][55] Calling her "Gloriana" and using the symbol of Britannia starting in 1572, marked the Elizabethan age as a renaissance that inspired national pride through classical ideals, international expansion, and naval triumph over the hated and feared Spanish.[56]
Elizabeth's reign marks the decisive turning point in English religious history, as a predominantly Catholic nation at the beginning of her reign was predominantly Protestant by the end. Although Elizabeth executed 250 Catholic priests, she also executed some extreme Puritans, and on the whole she sought a moderately conservative position that mixed Royal control of the church (with no people role), combined with predominantly Catholic ritual, and a predominantly Calvinists theology.[57]
Scotland and Mary, Queen of Scots

Mary, Queen of Scots (lived 1542–87) was a devout Catholic and next in line for the throne of England after Elizabeth. Her status became a major domestic and international issue for England.[58] After the death of King James IV at the Battle of Flodden in 1513. The upshot was years of struggle for control of the throne, nominally held by the infant king James V (lived 1512–42, reigned 1513–42), until he came of age in 1528.
Mary of Guise (lived 1515–60) was a French woman close to the French throne. She ruled as the regent for her teenaged daughter Queen Mary, 1554–60. The regent and her daughter were both strong proponents of Catholicism and attempted to suppress the rapidly Growth of Protestantism in Scotland. Mary of Guise was a strong opponent of Protestantism, and worked to maintain a close alliance between Scotland and France, called the Auld Alliance. In 1559 the Regent became alarmed that widespread Scottish hostility against French rule was strengthening the partisan cause, so she banned unauthorised preaching. But the fiery preacher John Knox sent Scotland aflame with his preaching, leading the coalition of powerful Scottish nobles, calling themselves the Lords of the Congregation raised the rebellion to overthrow the Catholic Church and seize its lands. The Lords appealed to Elizabeth for English help, but she played a very cautious hand. The 1559 treaty with France called for peace and she was unwilling to violate it, especially since England had no allies at the time. Supporting rebels against the lawful ruler violated Elizabeth's deeply held claims to the legitimacy of all royalty. On the other hand, a French victory in Scotland would establish a Catholic state on the northern border supported by a powerful French enemy. Elizabeth first sent money, then sent artillery, then sent a fleet that destroyed the French fleet in Scotland. Finally she sent 8,000 troops north. The death of Mary of Guise allowed England, France and Scotland to come to terms in the Treaty of Edinburgh in 1560, which had a far-reaching impact. France permanently withdrew all its forces from Scotland. It ensured the success of the Reformation in Scotland; it began a century of peace with France; it ended any threat of a Scottish invasion; and it paved the way for a union of the two kingdoms in 1603 when the Scottish king James VI inherited the English throne as James I and launched the Stuart era.[59]
When the treaty was signed, Mary was in Paris as the wife of the French King Francis II. When he died in 1561, she returned to Scotland as Queen of Scotland. However, when Elizabeth refused to recognise her as the heir to the English throne, Mary rejected the Treaty of Edinburgh. She made an unfortunate marriage to Lord Darnley who mistreated her and murdered her Italian favourite David Rizzio. Darnley in turn was murdered by the Earl of Bothwell. He was acquitted of murder; she quickly married Bothwell. Most people at the time thought she was deeply involved in adultery or murder; historians have argued at length and are undecided. However rebellion broke out and the Protestant nobles defeated the Queen's forces in 1567.[60] She was forced to abdicate in favour of her infant son James VI; she fled to England, where Elizabeth confined her and house arrest for 19 years. Mary engaged in numerous complex plots to assassinate Elizabeth and become queen herself. Finally Elizabeth caught her plotting the Babington Plot and had her executed in 1587.[61][62]
Troubled later years: 1585–1603
Elizabeth's final two decades saw mounting problems that were left for the Stuarts to solve after 1603. John Cramsie, in reviewing the recent scholarship in 2003, argues:
the period 1585–1603 is now recognised by scholars as distinctly more troubled than the first half of Elizabeth's long reign. Costly wars against Spain and the Irish, involvement in the Netherlands, socio-economic distress, and an authoritarian turn by the regime all cast a pall over Gloriana's final years, underpinning a weariness with the queen's rule and open criticism of her government and its failures.[63]
Elizabeth remained a strong leader, but almost all of her earlier advisers had died or retired. Robert Cecil (1563–1612) took over the role of leading advisor long held by his father Lord Burghley. Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex (1567–1601) was her most prominent general, a role previously held by his stepfather Robert Dudley, who was the love of Elizabeth's life; and the adventurer/historian Sir Walter Raleigh (1552–1618) was a new face on the scene. The three new men formed a triangle of interlocking and opposing forces that was hard to break into. The first vacancy came in 1601, when Devereux was executed for attempting to take the Queen prisoner and seize power.[64] After Elizabeth died the new king kept on Cecil as his chief advisor, and beheaded Raleigh.
Popular uprisings

Numerous popular uprisings occurred; all suppressed by royal authorities. The largest were:
The largest and most serious was the Pilgrimage of Grace. It disrupted the North of England in 1536 protesting the religious reforms of Henry VIII, his Dissolution of the Monasteries and the policies of the King's chief minister, Thomas Cromwell, as well as other specific political, social and economic grievances.[65]
The Prayer Book Rebellion or "Western Rising" was a popular revolt in Devon and Cornwall in 1549. The Royal Court introduced the Book of Common Prayer, which was based on Protestant theology and the exclusive use of English. The change was widely unpopular – particularly in areas of still firmly Catholic religious loyalty, and in Cornwall where standard English was not popular.[66]
Kett's Rebellion began in 1549 in Norfolk; it started as a demonstration against enclosures of common land. The instigator, Robert Kett, was executed for treason.[67]
Wyatt's rebellion in 1554 against Queen Mary I's determination to marry Philip of Spain and named after Thomas Wyatt, one of its leaders.[68]
The Rising of the North or "Northern Rebellion" of 1569–70 was a failed attempt by Catholic nobles from Northern England to depose Queen Elizabeth I of England and replace her with Mary, Queen of Scots. It originated from bitter political factionalism in the royal Privy Concil. The extension of Tudor authority in northern England cause discontent among the aristocracy and gentry, as the new Protestant bishop tried to recover former church lands and alienated their new owners. Local Catholic elements were a large fraction of the population and resented the destruction of the rituals and practices. When the Royal army approached, the leadership disbanded their forces and fled to Scotland. A few leaders were executed, but many of the gentry saved their lives by handing over their lands to Queen Elizabeth.[69][70]
Local government
The main officials of the local government operated at the county level (also called "shire") were the sheriff and the Lord Lieutenant.[71]   the power of the sheriff had declined since medieval days, but he was still very prestigious.  He was appointed for a one-year term, with no renewals, by the King's Privy Council.  He was paid many small fees, but they probably did not meet the sheriff's expenses in terms of hospitality and hiring his under-sheriffs and bailiffs.  The sheriff held court every month to deal with civil and criminal cases.  He supervised elections, ran the jail and meted out punishments.  His subordinates provided staffing for the county's justices of the peace.
The Lord Lieutenant was a new office created by Henry VIII to represent the royal power in each county. He was a person with good enough connections at court to be selected by the king and served at the king's pleasure, often for decades.[72] He had  limited powers of direct control, so successful Lord Lieutenants  worked with his deputy lieutenants and  dealt with the  gentry through  compromise, consensus, and the inclusion of opposing factions.  He was in charge of mobilising the militia if necessary for defence, or to assist the king in military operations.  In Yorkshire in 1588, the Lord Lieutenant was the Earl of Huntington, who urgently needed to prepare defences in the face of the threatened invasion from the Spanish Armada.  The Queen's Privy Council urgently called upon him to mobilise the militia, and report on the availability of men and horses. Huntington's challenge was  to overcome the reluctance of many militia men, the  shortages of arms, training mishaps, and jealousy among the gentry as to who would command which unit. Despite Huntingdon's last-minute  efforts, the mobilisation of 1588 revealed a reluctant society that only grudgingly answered the call to arms.  The Armada never landed, and the militia were not actually used.[73]  During the civil wars of the mid-17th century, the Lord Lieutenant played an even more important role in mobilising his county either for king or for Parliament.[74]
The day-to-day business of government was in the hands of  several dozen justices of the peace (JP).  They handled all the real routine police administrative functions, and were paid through a modest level of fees.  Other local officials included constables, church-wardens, mayors, and city aldermen.  The JP duties involved a great deal of paperwork – primarily in Latin – and attracted a surprisingly strong cast of candidates.  For example, The 55 JPs in Devonshire holding office in 1592 included:
Sir Francis Drake, Sir Ferdinando Gorges, Gilberts, Carews, Seymours, Courtenays, and other names prominent among the men who laid the foundations of the maritime greatness of England and of the existence of America.  Of the fifty-five, twenty-eight were at one time or another high-sheriffs of the county, twenty more were then, or became afterwards, knights, six sat in the House of Commons, and three in the House of Lords.[75]
Social history and daily life
The cultural achievements of the Elizabethan era have long attracted scholars, and since the 1960s they have conducted intensive research on the social history of England.[76][77][78][79][80]
Monarchs
The House of Tudor produced five monarchs who ruled during this period (excluding Lady Jane Grey).

Henry VII
(1485–1509)
Henry VIII
(1509–1547)
Edward VI
(1547–1553)
Mary I
(1553–1558)
Elizabeth I
(1558–1603)

The Tudor myth

The Tudor myth is a particular tradition in English history, historiography and literature that presents the period of the 15th century, including the Wars of the Roses, as a dark age of anarchy and bloodshed, and sees the Tudor period of the 16th century as a golden age of peace, law, order, and prosperity.[81]
See also
Tudor architecture
Tudor Revival architecture
Tudor navy
Tudor rose
Early modern Britain
English Reformation

Harrington, Peter. The Castles of Henry VIII. Oxford, Osprey, 2007.

Further reading
Reference books
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2008) 
Bindoff, S.T. Tudor England (1950), short scholarly survey. 
Bucholz, Robert, and Newton Key. Early modern England 1485–1714: A narrative history (2009); University textbook
Collinson, Patrick, ed. The Sixteenth Century: 1485–1603 (Short Oxford History of the British Isles) (2002)
Elton, G. R. England Under the Tudors (1974) 
Fritze, Ronald H. ed. Historical Dictionary of Tudor England, 1485–1603 (1991), 818pp; 300 short essays by experts emphasis on politics, religion, and historiography. 
Gunn, Steven.  Henry VII's New Men and the Making of Tudor England (2016)/
Guy, J. A. The Tudors: A Very Short Introduction (2010) 
Guy, J. A. Tudor England (1990) a leading comprehensive survey 
Kinney, Arthur F. et al. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Tudor England (2000) 837pp; also published as Tudor England: An Encyclopedia 
Lockyer, Roger. Tudor and Stuart Britain: 1485-1714 (3rd ed. 2004), 576 pp 
Mackie, J. D. The Earlier Tudors, 1485–1558 (1952), comprehensive scholarly survey 
Morrill, John, ed. The Oxford illustrated history of Tudor & Stuart Britain (1996) ; survey essays by leading scholars; heavily illustrated
O'Day, Rosemary. The Routledge Companion to the Tudor Age (2010); also published as The Longman Companion to the Tudor Age (1995) 
Rogers, Caroline, and Roger Turvey. Henry VII (Access to History, 3rd. ed. 2005), textbook, 176pp.
Tittler, Robert and Norman Jones. A Companion to Tudor Britain. Blackwell Publishing, 2004. ISBN0-631-23618-X.
Wagner, John A. Historical Dictionary of the Elizabethan World: Britain, Ireland, Europe, and America (1999) 
Wagner, John A. and Susan Walters Schmid, eds. Encyclopedia of Tudor England (3 vol. 2011).
Williams, Penry.  The Later Tudors: England, 1547–1603 (1995) 
Political history
Black, J. B. The Reign of Elizabeth: 1558–1603 (2nd ed. 1958) survey by leading scholar ; 

MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Thomas Cranmer: A Life (1996).
Edwards, Philip. The Making of the Modern English State: 1460–1660 (2004)
Elton, G. R. ed. Studies in Tudor and Stuart politics and government: papers and reviews 1946–1972 (1974) 
Elton, G. R. The Parliament of England, 1559–1581 (1986) 
Levine, Mortimer. Tudor England 1485-1603 (Cambridge University Press: 1968)
Levine, Mortimer. Tudor Dynastic Problems 1460-1571 (Allen & Unwin: 1973)
MacCaffrey Wallace T. Elizabeth I (1993), scholarly biography
McLaren, Anne N. Political Culture in the Reign of Elizabeth I: queen and commonwealth 1558–1585 (Cambridge UP, 1999).
Neale, J. E. Queen Elizabeth I: A Biography (1934), scholarly biography 
Scarisbrick, J. J. Henry VIII (1968), scholarly biography; 
Starkey, David, and Susan Doran. Henry VIII: Man and Monarch (2009)
Starkey, David. The Reign of Henry VIII: Personalities and Politics (2002); 176pp
Turvey, Roger, and Keith Randell. Access to History: Henry VIII to Mary I: Government and Religion, 1509–1558 (Hodder, 2008), 240pp; textbook
Williams, Penry.  The Later Tudors: England, 1547–1603 (The New Oxford History of England) (1998) .
Wernham, Richard Bruce. Before the Armada: the growth of English foreign policy, 1485–1588 (1966), a standard history of foreign policy
Wernham, Richard Bruce. After the Armada: Elizabethan England and the struggle for Western Europe, 1588–1595 (1985)
Williams, Penry.  The Tudor Regime (1981)
Religious, social, economic and cultural history
Butler, Katherine.Music in Elizabethan Court Politics (2015)
Campbell, Mildred. English yeoman under Elizabeth and the early Stuarts (1942).
Clapham, John. A concise economic history of Britain: From the earliest times to 1750 (1916), pp 185 to 305 covers 1500 to 1750. 
Dickens, A.D. The English Reformation (1965) 
Doran, Susan, and Norman Jones, eds. The Elizabethan World (2010) essays by scholars
Duffy, Eamon. Reformation Divided: Catholics, Protestants and the Conversion of England (2017) 
Lipson, Ephraim. The economic history of England: vol 2: The Age of Mercantilism (7th ed. 1964).
Manley, Lawrence, ed. London in the Age of Shakespeare: an Anthology (1986).
Marshall, Peter. Heretics and Believers: A History of the English Reformation (2017) 
Notestein, Wallace. English people on the eve of colonization, 1603–1630 (1954). scholarly study of occupations and roles 
Norton, Elizabeth, The Hidden Lives of Tudor Women: A Social History (2017). 
Notestein, Wallace. A history of witchcraft in England from 1558 to 1718 (1911) 
Palliser, D. M. The Age of Elizabeth: England Under the Later Tudors, 1547–1603 (2nd ed 2014) wide-ranging survey of social and economic history
Ponko, Vincent. "The Privy Council and the spirit of Elizabethan economic management, 1558–1603." Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 58.4 (1968): 1–63. 
Rex, Richard. Henry VIII and the English Reformation (2nd ed. 2006) 
Rowse, A. L. The England of Elizabeth (2003).
Sim, Alison. The Tudor Housewife (McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP, 2001).
Tawney, R.H. The agrarian problem in the sixteenth century (1912) .
Traill, H.D. and J.S. Mann, eds. Social England: a record of the progress of the people in religion, laws, learning, arts, industry, commerce, science, literature and manners, from the earliest times to the present day: Volume iii: From the accession of Henry VIII to the death of Elizabeth" (1895) ; 876 pp; short essays by experts
Williams, Penry. Life in Tudor England (1969)
Williamson, James A. The Tudor Age (1961) 500 pp 
Willis, Deborah. Malevolent nurture: Witch-hunting and maternal power in early modern England (Cornell UP, 1995).
Youings, Joyce. Sixteenth Century England (The Penguin Social History of Britain) (1991)
Historiography
Anglo, Sydney. “Ill of the dead. The posthumous reputation of Henry VII,” Renaissance Studies 1 (1987): 27–47. 
Breen, Dan. "Early Modern Historiography." Literature Compass (2005) 2#1
Doran, Susan and Thomas Freeman, eds. Mary Tudor: Old and New Perspectives (Palgrave MacMillan, 2011).
Duffy, Eamon. "The English Reformation After Revisionism." Renaissance Quarterly 59.3 (2006): 720–731.
Elton, G.R. Modern Historians on British History 1485–1945: A Critical Bibliography 1945–1969 (1969), annotated guide to 1000 history books on every major topic, plus book reviews and major scholarly articles. 
Freeman, Thomas S. "'Restoration and Reaction: Reinterpreting the Marian Church'." Journal of Ecclesiastical History (2017). 
Furber, Elizabeth Chapin, ed. Changing Views on British History (1966) ch 3
Fussner, F. Smith. Tudor history and the historians (1970) 
Haigh, Christopher. "The recent historiography of the English Reformation." Historical Journal 25.4 (1982): 995–1007.
Lewycky, Nadine. "Politics and religion in the reign of Henry VIII: A historiographical review." (2009). 
Loades, David. "The Reign of Mary Tudor: Historiography and Research." Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies (1989): 547–558. 
McCaffrey, Wallace. "Recent Writings on Tutor History," in Richard Schlatter, ed., Recent Views on British History: Essays on Historical Writing since 1966 (Rutgers UP, 1984), pp 71–98
MacCulloch, Diarmaid. "The myth of the English Reformation" History Today (July 1991) 41#7
O'Day, Rosemary. The debate on the English Reformation (2nd ed. 2015). 
O'Day, Rosemary, ed. The Routledge Companion to the Tudor Age (2010)
Patterson, Annabel. "Rethinking Tudor Historiography." South Atlantic Quarterly (1993) 92#2 pp: 185–208.
Pugliatti, Paola. Shakespeare the historian (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996)
Trimble, William Raleigh. "Early Tudor Historiography, 1485–1548." Journal of the History of Ideas (1950): 30–41. online in JSTOR
Zagora, Perez. "English History, 1558–1640: A Bibliographical Survey," in Elizabeth Chapin Furber, ed. Changing views on British history: essays on historical writing since 1939 (Harvard University Press, 1966), pp 119–40
Primary sources
Archer, Ian W. and F. Douglas Price, eds. English Historical Documents, 1558–1603 (2011), a wide-ranging major collection
Bland, A.E., P.A. Brown and R.H. Tawney, eds. English economic history: select documents (1919).  733pp; covers 1086 to 1840s.
Elton, G.R. ed. The Tudor constitution: documents and commentary (1960) 
Felch, Susan M. ed. Elizabeth I and Her Age (Norton Critical Editions) (2009); 700pp; primary and secondary sources, with an emphasis on literature
Marcus, Leah S.; Rose, Mary Beth; and Mueller, Janel eds. Elizabeth I: The Collected Works (U of Chicago Press, 2002). ISBN0-226-50465-4.
Stater, Victor, ed. The Political History of Tudor and Stuart England: A Sourcebook (Routledge, 2002) 
Tawney, R. H., and Eileen Power, eds. Tudor Economic Documents (3 vols. 1924). 
Williams, C.H. ed. English Historical Documents, 1485–1558 (1957), a wide-ranging major collection
Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII (21 vol 1862–1932) 
Vol. 1. 1509–1514 and Index.- Vol. 2., pt. 1. 1515–1516.- Vol. 2., pt. 2. 1517–1518.- Vol. 3, pt. 1–2. 1519–1523.- Vol. 4. Introduction and Appendix, 1524–1530.- Vol. 4, pt. 1. 1524–1526.- Vol. 4, pt. 2. 1526–1528.- Vol. 4, pt. 3. 1529–1530, with a general index.- Vol. 5. 1531–1532.- Vol. 6. 1533.- Vol. 7. 1534.- Vol. 8. 1535, Jan.-July.- Vol. 9. 1535, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 10. 1536, Jan.-July.- Vol. 11. 1536, July–Dec.- Vol. 12, pt. 1. 1537, Jan.-May.- Vol. 12, pt. 2. 1537, June–Dec.- Vol. 13, pt. 1. 1538, Jan.-July.- Vol. 13, pt. 2. 1538, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 14, pt [i.e. pt.]. 1. 1539, Jan.-July.- Vol. 14, pt. 2. 1539, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 15. 1540, Jan.-Aug.- Vol. 16. 1540, Sept.- 1541, Dec.- Vol. 17. 1542.- Vol. 18, pt. 1 1543, Jan.-July.- Vol. 18, pt. 2. 1543, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 19, pt. 1. 1544, Jan.-July.- Vol. 19, pt. 2. 1544, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 20, pt. 1. 1545, Jan.-July.- Vol. 20, pt. 2. 1545, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 21, pt. 1. 1546, Jan.-Aug.- Vol. 21, pt. 2. 1546, Sept.-1547, Jan.- Addenda: Vol. 1, pt. 1. 1509–1537 and undated. Nos. 1–1293.- Addenda: Vol. 1, pt. 2. 1538–1547 and undated. Nos. 1294-end and index

, information page edited by historian John Guy
, learning resources from the British Library


, In Our Time, BBC Radio 4 discussion with John Guy, Christopher Haigh and Christine Carpenter (Oct, 26, 2000)