Question: How did King Arthur die?

Battle of Camlann


The Battle of Camlann (Welsh: Gwaith Camlan or Brwydr Camlan) is reputed to have been the final battle of King Arthur, in which he either died or was fatally wounded, fighting either with or against Mordred, who is also said to have died.
Etymology
The name may derive from a Brittonic *Cambo-landa ("crooked/twisting-enclosure" or "crooked/twisting open land"),[1] or (less likely) *Cambo-glanna ("crooked/twisting bank (of a river)"), as found in the name of the Roman fort of Camboglanna in Cumbria.[2][3][4]
Historicity

The earliest known reference to the battle of Camlann is an entry in the 10th-century Annales Cambriae, recording the battle in the year 537[5] (or 539, but 537 in most editions[6]). It mentions Mordred (Medraut), but it does not specify that he and Arthur fought on opposite sides.
Gueith camlann in qua Arthur et Medraut corruerunt. 
 The strife of Camlann in which Arthur and Medraut [Mordred] perished.[n 1]

The location described as Camlann is unknown. Andrew Breeze writes:
"Last of all, what can we conclude about Camlan itself? Can we say anything at all on its location, significance, and even whether it happened or not? Here we may recall the views expressed by [O. J.] Padel, [K.] Dark, Dumville, and [N.] Higham. All are skeptics, variously declaring that the Annales Cambriae entry for Camlan can be taken seriously only by the 'no smoke without fire' school of thinking (OJP), that it provides 'no evidence whatsoever for a prototypical Arthur' (KD), and that as a record it is 'unverifiable' if not 'entirely unhistorical' (NH). The status of the entry for 537 is therefore now clear. On the one hand it is presented as sober fact and appears in the context of persons known to history (Irish saints, Maelgwn Gwynedd, Gildas). On the other, we cannot be certain that it is old; and the circumstance that, by the tenth century, Arthur had long been the creature of fable must subvert its authority. The historical Arthur thus becomes little more than a wisp of air. Unless unexpected evidence turns up, the only honest answer we can give here is that of Kenneth Jackson, that 'We do not know, but he may well have existed.'"[5]
Legendary versions
Medieval Welsh tradition
Camlann is mentioned in the circa 9th/10th-century Englynion y Beddau ("Stanzas of the Graves", Stanza 12) from the Black Book of Carmarthen as the site of the grave of Osfran's (unnamed) son.[8][9] The Welsh prose text Culhwch and Olwen, dated to the 11th or 12th century, mentions the battle twice in connection to heroes who fought there. The text includes a triad naming Morfran ail Tegid, Sandde Bryd Angel, and Cynwyl Sant as the three men who survived Camlann: Morfran because of his fearsome ugliness, Sandde because of his angelic beauty, and Cynwyl because he left Arthur last.[8][10] This triad shows that Camlann was famous as a battle that few survived.[11] Caitlin Green suggests that "Osfran's son" from the Englynion y Beddau is connected to Morfran from Culhwch and Olwen.[12] The text also mentions Gwyn Hywar, overseer of Cornwall and Devon, one of the nine men who plotted the Battle of Camlann, suggesting a now-lost tradition of complex intrigue underpinning Arthur's last battle.[8][11]
The Welsh Triads offer clues to the alleged cause of the Battle of Camlann. Triad 51 largely reflects (and is derived from[13]) Geoffrey (see below): Medrawd (Mordred) rebels against Arthur while the latter is campaigning on the continent and usurps the throne, instigating the battle. Triad 53 lists a slap Gwenhwyvach gave to her sister Gwenhwyfar (Guinevere), wife of Arthur, as one of the "Three Harmful Blows of the Island of Britain", causing the Strife of Camlann.[14] Calling Camlann one of Britain's "Three Futile Battles", Triad 84 also mentions this dispute between sisters.[15] Triad 54 describes Medrawd raiding Arthur's court, throwing Gwenhwyfar to the ground and beating her. Other Triads in which Camlann is mentioned include Triad 30 ("Three Faithless War Bands"), Triad 59 ("Three Unfortunate Counsels"), and Triad 84 ("Three Futile Battles").[11]
Camlann is mentioned in Peniarth MS.37, a 14th-century copy of the Gwentian Code of the Welsh Laws, which (according to Peter Bartrum) shows that it was a topic familiar to Welsh writers. The law states "when the queen shall will a song in the chamber, let the bard sing a song respecting Camlan, and that not loud, lest the hall be disturbed." The 15th/16th-century poet Tudur Aled says that the battle came about through the treachery of Medrod and happened "about two nuts".[16] In the 13th/14th-century Welsh tale The Dream of Rhonabwy,[17] the immediate cause of the battle is a deliberate provocation by Arthur's rogue peace envoy named Iddawg (Iddawc Cordd Prydain) who intentionally insulted Medrawd.[18]
Chronicle tradition
Geoffrey of Monmouth included the Battle of Camlann in his pseudo-historical Historia Regum Britanniae, written circa 1136. Geoffrey's version drew on existing Welsh tradition, but embellished the account with invented details. His focus was not on individuals but the 'character of the British nation'.[19] In Books X and IX, Arthur goes to war against the Roman procurator Lucius Tiberius, leaving his nephew Modredus (Mordred) in charge of Britain. In Arthur's absence, Modredus secretly marries Arthur's wife Ganhumara (Guinevere) and takes the throne for himself. Arthur returns and his army faces Modredus' at Camblana (the River Camel in Cornwall). Many are killed, including Modredus; Arthur is mortally wounded and taken to the Isle of Avalon to recover, passing the crown to his kinsman Constantine.[11][20]
Geoffrey's work was highly influential, and was adapted into various other languages, including Wace's Anglo-Norman Roman de Brut (c. 1155), Layamon's Middle English Brut (early 13th century), and the Welsh Brut y Brenhinedd (mid-13th century). Various later works are based fairly closely on Geoffrey, including the Middle English Alliterative Morte Arthure, written around 1400.[21] The chronicle tradition typically follows Geoffrey in placing Camlann on the Camel in Cornwall: Wace places it at "Camel, over against the entrance to Cornwall,"[22] and Layamon specifies the location as Camelford.[23]
Romance tradition

Further traditions about Arthur's final battle are developed in the Arthurian romances. These often follow Geoffrey's blueprint, but alter many of the details. The legend shifts to the 'character of individuals' and the proposed adultery between Guinevere and Lancelot is first mentioned.[19]
In the Vulgate Mort Artu,[24] part of the French Lancelot-Grail (Vulgate) cycle, Arthur goes to France not to fight the Romans, but to fight his former knight Lancelot, who had engaged in an affair with Guinevere. He leaves Mordred in charge of Britain when he departs, only for Mordred to betray him and seize the throne. Arthur brings his army back to Britain where they meet Mordred at Salisbury Plain in south central England (Camlann is not mentioned). The fighting begins by an accident of fate, when a startled knight draws his sword to kill an adder during the standoff negotiations between Mordred and Arthur (represented by Lucan and Bedivere in Le Morte d' Arthur). Many die and Arthur kills Mordred in a final duel, but is himself mortally wounded. Arthur tasks his knight Griflet (or Bedivere) with returning his sword Excalibur to the Lady of the Lake, and the king is taken to Avalon.
The Mort Artu account of Arthur's last battle was adapted into many subsequent works, including the Old French Post-Vulgate Cycle, the Middle English Stanzaic Morte Arthur,[25] and Thomas Malory's influential Middle English work Le Mort d'Arthur.[26] These works all locate the battle at Salisbury.[27]
Avalon stories


In a popular motif, introduced by Geoffrey in Historia and elaborated in his later Vita Merlini,[28] Arthur was then taken to the isle of Avalon in hope that he could be saved. Geoffrey has Arthur delivered to Avalon and Morgen (Morgan le Fay) by Taliesin, while later authors including those of the Vulgate cycles and Le Morte d'Arthur would have Morgan and others arrive in a boat to take him away.
Some accounts, such as Morte Arthur and Morte Arthure, as well as the commentary by Gerald of Wales,[29] declare that Arthur died in Avalon (identifying it as Glastonbury) and has been buried there. Geoffrey gives a possibility (but not assurance) for Arthur's wounds to be healed, while Wace and Layamon even outright state that this did happen and Arthur is about to return. Other versions like Mort Artu and Le Morte d'Arthur do not give a definitive answer to Arthur's ultimate fate.

See also
Battle of Badon
Notes





 at The Camelot Project