Question: Can you cut a nerve fiber?

Wallerian degeneration


Wallerian degeneration is an active process of degeneration that results when a nerve fiber is cut or crushed and the part of the axon distal to the injury (i.e. farther from the neuron's cell body) degenerates.[1] A related process of  dying back or retrograde degeneration known as 'Wallerian-like degeneration' occurs in many neurodegenerative diseases, especially those where axonal transport is impaired.[2] Primary culture studies suggest that a failure to deliver sufficient quantities of the essential axonal protein NMNAT2 is a key initiating event.[3]
Wallerian degeneration occurs after axonal injury in both the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and central nervous system (CNS).  It occurs in the section of the axon distal to the site of injury and usually begins within 24–36hours of a lesion.  Prior to degeneration, the distal section of the axon tends to remain electrically excitable.  After injury, the axonal skeleton disintegrates, and the axonal membrane breaks apart. Axonal degeneration is followed by degradation of the  myelin sheath and infiltration by macrophages.  The macrophages, accompanied by Schwann cells, serve to clear the debris from the degeneration.[4][5]
Schwann cells respond to loss of axons by extrusion of their myelin sheaths, downregulation of myelin genes, dedifferentiation and proliferation. They finally align in tubes (Büngner bands) and express surface molecules that guide regenerating fibers.[6] Within 4 days of the injury, the distal end of the portion of the nerve fiber proximal to the lesion sends out sprouts towards those tubes and these sprouts are attracted by growth factors produced by Schwann cells in the tubes. If a sprout reaches the tube, it grows into it and advances about 1mm per day, eventually reaching and reinnervating the target tissue. If the sprouts cannot reach the tube, for instance because the gap is too wide or scar tissue has formed, surgery can help to guide the sprouts into the tubes. Regeneration is efficient in the PNS, with near complete recovery in case of lesions that occur close to the distal nerve terminal. However recovery is hardly observed at all in the spinal cord. One crucial difference is that in the CNS, including the spinal cord, myelin sheaths are produced by oligodendrocytes and not by Schwann cells.
History
Wallerian degeneration is named after Augustus Volney Waller. Waller experimented on frogs in 1850, by severing their glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves.  He then observed the distal nerves from the site of injury, 
which were separated from their cell bodies in the brain stem.[4]  
Waller described the disintegration of myelin, which he referred to as "medulla", into separate particles of various sizes.  The degenerating axons formed droplets that could be stained, thus allowing for studies of the course of individual nerve fibres.
Axonal degeneration
Although most injury responses include a calcium influx signaling to promote resealing of severed parts, axonal injuries initially lead to acute axonal degeneration (AAD), which is rapid separation of the proximal (the part nearer the cell body) and distal ends within 30 minutes of injury.[7] After separation, dystrophic bulb structures form at both terminals and the transected membranes are sealed.[8] A brief latency phase occurs in the distal segment during which it remains electrically excitable and structurally intact.[9] Degeneration follows with swelling of the axolemma, and eventually the formation of bead-like axonal spheroids. The process takes roughly 24hours in the PNS, and longer in the CNS.  The signaling pathways leading to axolemma degeneration are currently poorly understood.  However, research has shown that this AAD process is calcium–independent.[10]
Granular disintegration of the axonal cytoskeleton and inner organelles occurs after axolemma degradation.  Early changes include accumulation of mitochondria in the paranodal regions at the site of injury.  Endoplasmic reticulum degrades and mitochondria swell up and eventually disintegrate.  The depolymerization of microtubules occurs and is soon followed by degradation of the neurofilaments and other cytoskeleton components.  The disintegration is dependent on Ubiquitin and Calpain proteases (caused by influx of calcium ion), suggesting that axonal degeneration is an active process and not a passive one as previously misunderstood.[11] Thus the axon undergoes complete fragmentation.  The rate of degradation is dependent on the type of injury and is also slower in the CNS than in the PNS.  Another factor that affects degradation rate is the diameter of the axon: larger axons require a longer time for the cytoskeleton to degrade and thus take a longer time to degenerate.
Myelin clearance
Myelin is a phospholipid membrane that wraps around axons to provide them with insulation. It is produced by Schwann cells in the PNS, and by oligodendrocytes in the CNS.  Myelin clearance is the next step in Wallerian degeneration following axonal degeneration.  The cleaning up of myelin debris is different for PNS and CNS.  
PNS is much faster and efficient at clearing myelin debris in comparison to CNS, and Schwann cells are the primary cause of this difference. 
Another key aspect is the change in permeability of the blood-tissue barrier in the two systems.  
In PNS, the permeability increases throughout the distal stump, but the barrier disruption in CNS is limited to 
just the site of injury.[10]
Clearance in PNS
The response of Schwann cells to axonal injury is rapid.  The time period of response 
is estimated to be prior to the onset of axonal degeneration.  Neuregulins are believed 
to be responsible for the rapid activation.  They activate ErbB2 receptors in the Schwann 
cell microvilli, which results in the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase 
(MAPK).[12]  
Although MAPK activity is observed, the injury sensing mechanism of Schwann cells is 
yet to be fully understood.  The sensing is followed by decreased synthesis of myelin lipids 
and eventually stops within 48 hrs.  The myelin sheaths separate from the axons at 
the Schmidt-Lanterman incisures first and then rapidly deteriorate and shorten to form 
bead-like structures. Schwann cells continue to clear up the myelin debris by degrading their 
own myelin, phagocytose extracellular myelin and attract macrophages to myelin debris for further phagocytosis.[10] However, the macrophages are not attracted to the region for the first  few days; hence the Schwann cells take the major role in myelin cleaning until then.
Schwann cells have been observed to recruit macrophages by release of cytokines and 
chemokines after sensing of axonal injury.   The recruitment of macrophages helps 
improve the clearing rate of myelin debris.  The resident macrophages present in the 
nerves release further chemokines and cytokines to attract further macrophages.  
The degenerating nerve also produce macrophage chemotactic molecules.  
Another source of macrophage recruitment factors is serum.  Delayed macrophage recruitment 
was observed in B-cell deficient mice lacking serum antibodies.[10] These signaling molecules together cause an influx of macrophages, which peaks during the third week 
after injury.  While Schwann cells mediate the initial stage of myelin debris clean up, 
macrophages come in to finish the job.  Macrophages are facilitated by opsonins, which label debris for removal.  
The 3 major groups found in serum include complement, pentraxins, and antibodies.  However, only complement has shown to 
help in myelin debris phagocytosis.[13]
Murinson et al. (2005)[14] observed that non-myelinated or myelinated Schwann cells in contact with an injured 
axon enter cell cycle thus leading to proliferation.  Observed time duration for 
Schwann cell divisions were approximately 3 days after injury.[15]
Possible sources of proliferation signal are attributed to the ErbB2 receptors and the ErbB3 receptors.  
This proliferation could further enhance the myelin cleaning rates and plays an essential role in 
regeneration of axons observed in PNS.  Schwann cells emit growth factors that attract new axonal sprouts growing from the proximal stump after complete degeneration of the injured distal stump.  
This leads to possible reinnervation of the target cell or organ.  However, the reinnervation is 
not necessarily perfect, as possible misleading occurs during reinnervation of the proximal axons to target cells.
Clearance in CNS
In comparison to Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes require axon signals to survive.  
In their developmental stages, oligodendrocytes that fail to make contact to axon and 
receive axon signals undergo apoptosis.[16]
Experiments in Wallerian degeneration have shown that upon injury oligodendrocytes either undergo programmed cell death or enter a state of rest.  Therefore, unlike Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes fail to clean up the myelin sheaths and their debris.  In experiments conducted on rats
,[17] 
myelin sheaths were found for up to 22 months.  Therefore, CNS rates of myelin sheath clearance are very slow and 
could possibly be the cause for hindrance in the regeneration capabilities of the CNS axons as no growth factors 
are available to attract the proximal axons.  Another feature that results eventually is Glial scar formation.  
This further hinders chances for regeneration and reinnervation.
Oligodendrocytes fail to recruit macrophages for debris removal.  
Macrophage entry in general into CNS site of injury is very slow.  In contrast to PNS, 
Microglia play a vital role in CNS wallerian degeneration.  However, their recruitment is 
slower in comparison to macrophage recruitment in PNS by approximately 3 days. Further, microglia might be activated but hypertrophy, and fail to transform 
into fully phagocytic cells.  Those microglia that do transform, clear out the debris effectively.  Differentiating phagocytic microglia 
can be accomplished by testing for expression of Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II during wallerian degeneration.[18]
The rate of clearance is very slow among microglia in comparison to macrophages.  Possible source for variations in clearance rates could include lack of
opsonin activity around microglia, and the lack of increased permeability in the blood–brain barrier.  
The decreased permeability could further hinder macrophage infiltration to the site of injury.[10]
These findings have suggested that the delay in Wallerian degeneration in CNS in comparison to PNS is 
caused not due to a delay in axonal degeneration, but rather is due to the difference in clearance rates of myelin in CNS and PNS.[19]
Regeneration
Regeneration follows degeneration.  Regeneration is rapid in PNS, allowing for rates of up to 1 millimeter a day of regrowth.[20] Grafts may also be needed to allow for appropriate reinnervation.  
It is supported by Schwann cells through growth factors release.  CNS regeneration is much slower, and is almost absent in most vertebrate species.
The primary cause for this could be the delay in clearing up myelin debris.  Myelin debris, present in CNS or PNS, contains several 
inhibitory factors.  The prolonged presence of myelin debris in CNS could possibly hinder the regeneration.[21]
An experiment conducted on Newts, animals that have fast CNS axon regeneration capabilities, found that 
Wallerian degeneration of an optic nerve injury took up to 10 to 14 days on average, further suggesting that slow clearance 
inhibits regeneration.[22]
Schwann cells and endoneural fibroblasts in PNS
In healthy nerves, Nerve growth factor (NGF) is produced in very small amounts.  However, upon injury, NGF mRNA expression increases
by five to sevenfold within a period of 14 days. Nerve fibroblasts and Schwann cells play an important role in increased expression of 
NGF mRNA.[23]
Macrophages also stimulate Schwann cells and fibroblasts to produce NGF via macrophage-derived interleukin-1.[24]
Other neurotrophic molecules produced by Schwann cells and fibroblasts together include Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor,
Ciliary neurotrophic factor, Leukemia inhibitory factor, Insulin-like growth factor, and Fibroblast growth factor.  These factors 
together create a favorable environment for axonal growth and regeneration.[10]  Apart from growth factors, Schwann cells
also provide structural guidance to further enhance regeneration.  During their proliferation phase, Schwann cells begin to form a line of cells called 
Bands of Bungner within the basal laminar tube.  Axons have been observed to regenerate 
in close association to these cells.[25]
Schwann cells upregulate the production of cell surface adhesion molecule ninjurin further 
promoting growth.[26]
These lines of cell guide the axon regeneration in proper direction.  
The possible source of error that could result from this is possible mismatching of the 
target cells as discussed earlier.
Due to lack of such favorable promoting factors in CNS, regeneration is stunted in CNS.
Wallerian degeneration slow
Mice belonging to the strain C57BL/Wlds have delayed Wallerian degeneration,[27] 
and, thus, allow for the study of the roles of various cell types and the underlying cellular and molecular processes.  Current understanding of the 
process has been possible via experimentation on the Wlds strain of mice.  The mutation occurred first in mice in 
Harlan-Olac, a laboratory producing animals the United Kingdom.  The Wlds mutation 
is an autosomal-dominant mutation occurring in the mouse chromosome 4.[28][29] The gene mutation is an 85-kb tandem triplication, occurring naturally.  
The mutated region contains two associated genes: nicotinamide mononucleotide adenlyl transferase 1 (Nmnat-1) and ubiquitination factor e4b (Ube4b).  
A linker region encoding 18 amino acids is also part of the mutation.[5] The protective effect of the WldS protein has been shown to be due to the NMNAT1 region's NAD+ synthesizing active site.[30]
Although the protein created localizes within the nucleus and is barely detectable in axons, studies suggest that its protective effect is due to its presence in axonal and terminal compartments.[31][32] The protection provided by the WldS protein is intrinsic to the neurons and not surrounding support cells, and is only locally  protective of the axon, indicating an intracellular pathway is responsible for mediating Wallerian degeneration.[33] [34]
Effects of mutation
The mutation causes no harm to the mouse.  The only known effect is that the Wallerian degeneration 
is delayed by up to three weeks on average after injury of a nerve.  At first, it was suspected that the 
Wlds mutation slows down the macrophage infiltration, but recent studies suggest that the mutation protects axons rather than
slowing down the macrophages.[5]  The process by which the axonal protection is achieved is 
poorly understood.  However, studies suggest that the Wlds mutation leads to increased  NMNAT1 activity, which 
leads to increased NAD synthesis.[30] This in turn activates SIRT1-dependent process within the nucleus, causing changes in gene transcription.[30]NAD+ by itself may provide added axonal protection by increasing the axon's energy resources.[35] More recent work, however, raises doubt that either NMNAT1 or NAD+ can substitute for the full length Wlds gene.[36] These authors demonstrated by both in vitro and in vivo methods that the protective effect of overexpression of NMNAT1 or the addition of NAD+ did not protect axons from degeneration. However, later studies showed that NMNAT1 is protective when combined with an axonal targeting peptide, suggesting that the key to the protection provided by WldS was the combination of NMNAT1's activity and the axonal localization provided by the N Terminal domain of the chimeric protein.[37]
The provided axonal protection delays the onset of Wallerian degeneration.  Schwann cell activation should therefore be delayed, as they would not detect axonal degradation signals from ErbB2 receptors.  In experiments on Wlds mutated mice, macrophage infiltration was considerably delayed by up to six to eight days.[38] However, once the axonal degradation has begun, degeneration takes its normal course, and, respective of the nervous system, degradation follows at the above-described rates. Possible effects of this late onset are weaker regenerative abilities in the mice. Studies indicate that regeneration may be impaired in WldS mice, but this is likely a result of the environment being unfavorable for regeneration due to the continued existence of the undegenerated distal fiber, whereas normally debris is cleared, making way for new growth.[39]
SARM1
The Wallerian degeneration pathway has been further illuminated by the discovery that sterile alpha and TIR motif containing 1 (SARM1) protein plays a central role in the Wallerian degeneration pathway. The gene was first identified in drosophila genetic knockout screens, and subsequently knockouts of its homologue in mice showed robust protection of transected axons comparable to that of WldS.[40] SARM1 activation locally triggers a rapid collapse of NAD+ levels in the distal section of the injured axon, which then undergoes degeneration.[41] This collapse in NAD+ levels was later shown to be due to SARM1's TIR domain having intrinsic NAD+ cleavage activity.[42] The SARM1 protein has four domains, a  mitochondrial localization signal, an autoinhibitory N Terminus region consisting of armadillo/HEAT motifs, two sterile alpha motifs responsible for multimerization, and  a C Terminus Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor that, unlike all other known TIR domains, possesses enzymatic activity.[42] Activation of SARM1 is sufficient to collapse NAD+ levels and initiate the Wallerian degeneration pathway.[41] The activity of SARM1 helps to explain the protective nature of the survival factor NMNAT2, as NMNAT enzymes have been shown to prevent SARM1 mediated depletion of NAD+.[43] This relationship is further supported by the fact that mice lacking NMNAT2, which are normally not viable, are completely rescued by SARM1 deletion, placing NMNAT2 activity upstream of SARM1.[44] Other pro-degeneration signaling pathways, such as the MAP kinase pathway, have been linked to SARM1 activation. MAPK signaling has been shown to promote the loss of NMNAT2, thereby promoting SARM1 activation, although SARM1 activation also triggers the MAP kinase cascade, indicating some form of feedback loop exists.[45] One explanation for the protective effect of the WldS mutation is that the NMNAT1 region, which is normally localized to the soma, substitutes for the labile survival factor NMNAT2 to prevent SARM1 activation when the N Terminal Ube4 region of the WldS protein localizes it to the axon. The fact that the enhanced survival of WldS axons is due to the slower turnover of WldS compared to NMNAT2 also helps explain why SARM1 knockout confers longer protection, as SARM1 will be completely inactive regardless of inhibitor activity whereas WldS will eventually be degraded.
See also

Axonotmesis
Connective tissue in the peripheral nervous system
Diffuse axonal injury
Digestion chambers
Nerve injury
Neuroregeneration
Peripheral nerve injury
Primary and secondary brain injury
Seddon's classification
Spinal cord injury research





 at the US National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)