gkaradzhov/DeliData huggingface dataset:
SYSTEM: Llama,Lion,SYSTEM,Beaver,Cat&&E,2,C,3
Llama: 'What was everyone''s pick'
Lion: E
Cat: I picked 2
Llama: I picked E
Beaver: I picked 3 and 2.
Beaver: I think I will change that
Cat: What about E and 2?
Beaver: E and C
Beaver: Hmm, perhaps
Llama: 'C probably won''t help since that could be even or odd on other side and either is fine.'
Cat: yes, that is why I think 2 and E
Beaver: Okay, gotcha. 2 and E is my choice too
Llama: I would tend toward e and 2 also I think.
Llama: 'Why not 3 since we didn''t pick that'
Llama: E,2
Cat: 'as 3 is an odd number and whatever we get on the other side, it doesn''t tell us anyting'
Cat: E,2
Beaver: Agreed.
Llama: unless it is a vowel in which case it would prove the rule wrong
Cat: hmm. yes you are right
Llama: so you think we can pick 3 cards
Cat: Yes, we can pick three cards.
Cat: The rule is to pick the minimum cards required to verify the rule
Cat: E,2,3
Llama: oh ha! well three is likely not the minimum
Beaver: Yes, I think if we can do it in 2 we should aim for that
Llama: I guess we should just go for e and 2 then
Beaver: 'Let''s stick with that'
Beaver: Are we all agreed?
Cat: But now thinking about it, we need all three to prove the rule
Llama: 'me too.  I really don''t see a way to verify rule with only one card.'
Cat: so E,3,2
Llama: E,2,3
Llama: Three could be the minimum.
Cat: yes.
Cat: Lets go with three then
Cat: Agreed?
Llama: 'Let''s go with three.  Agreed'
Beaver: okay, agreed. Though, would we not technically need to check all of them?
Llama: 'C could be either odd or even and wouldn''t prove or disprove the rule.'
Beaver: That seems like the only way to fully test the rule. Or am I missing something?
Cat: yes. Thanks. I am now submitting my final decision  with three
Beaver: Oh, gotcha
Beaver: Ok, me too
Llama: me too
Beaver: E,2,3