The Accuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers (2017)

Letters18 April 2017The Accuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity TrackersLisa Cadmus-Bertram, PhD, Ronald Gangnon, PhD, Emily J. Wirkus, MPH, Keith M. Thraen-Borowski, PhD, and Jessica Gorzelitz-Liebhauser, MSLisa Cadmus-Bertram, PhDFrom University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin., Ronald Gangnon, PhDFrom University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin., Emily J. Wirkus, MPHFrom University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin., Keith M. Thraen-Borowski, PhDFrom University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin., and Jessica Gorzelitz-Liebhauser, MSFrom University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/L16-0353 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Background: Activity trackers may motivate persons to engage in healthy behaviors. They are also used in research and may help manage chronic conditions related to lifestyle (1). New devices have emerged as alternatives to traditional heart rate trackers, which require a separate chest strap. One type is a wrist-worn tracker with a light-emitting diode (LED). It measures the heart rate from tiny changes in skin blood volume by using light reflected from the skin. These new devices are unobtrusive and appropriate for continuous, long-term wear. Although previous studies have shown that they are generally accurate for measuring the number of ...References1. Bassett DR. Device-based monitoring in physical activity and public health research. Physiol Meas. 2012;33:1769-83. [PMID: 23110847] doi:10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1769 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:159. [PMID: 26684758] doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Wallen MP, Gomersall SR, Keating SE, Wisløff U, Coombes JS. Accuracy of heart rate watches: implications for weight management. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154420. [PMID: 27232714] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154420 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Wang R, Blackburn G, Desai M, Phelan D, Gillinov L, Houghtaling P, et al. Accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:104-6. [PMID: 27732703] doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3340 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC. Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. Int J Biostat. 2008;4:Article 16. [PMID: 22462118] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.Disclosures: Authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=L16-0353.This article was published at Annals.org on 11 April 2017. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoAccuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Lisa Cadmus-Bertram , Ronald Gangnon , Emily J. Wirkus , Keith M. Thraen-Borowski , and Jessica Gorzelitz-Liebhauser Accuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Jasmine Singh and Dean F. Sittig Metrics Cited byReview of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gaitRecommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE NetworkDemonstrating the Applicability of Smartwatches in PM2.5 Health Impact AssessmentWearable sensors enable personalized predictions of clinical laboratory measurementsESC working group on e-cardiology position paper: use of commercially available wearable technology for heart rate and activity tracking in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention—in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals, Patient Forum, and the Digital Health CommitteeSmart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring—Real-World Use beyond Atrial FibrillationDigital Health: Implications for Heart Failure ManagementSelf-powered cardiovascular electronic devices and systemsProof of Concept of a Novel Neck-Situated Wearable PPG System for Continuous Physiological MonitoringGuidelines for wrist-worn consumer wearable assessment of heart rate in biobehavioral researchBiosensors Show Promise as a Measure of Student Engagement in a Large Introductory Biology CourseValidity of Wrist-Worn photoplethysmography devices to measure heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysisThe Role of Wearables in Heart FailureReview of Validity and Reliability of Garmin Activity TrackersCommon wearable devices demonstrate variable accuracy in measuring heart rate during supraventricular tachycardiaWearable devices for remote vital signs monitoring in the outpatient setting: an overview of the fieldDepression and cardiovascular disease: Shared molecular mechanisms and clinical implicationsMeasuring Heart Rate Variability Using Commercially Available Devices in Healthy Children: A Validity and Reliability StudyWhy Would You? Looking into Applicable Motives to Use Life-LoggingUse of a Smart Watch for Early Detection of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Validation StudyReliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic ReviewAcoustic Sensing as a Novel Wearable Approach for Cardiac Monitoring at the WristSmartwatch for the Detection of Atrial FibrillationAntipsychotic drugs and sudden cardiac death: A literature review of the challenges in the prediction, management, and future stepsWearable Motion-Based Heart Rate at Rest: A Workplace EvaluationAccuracy of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure Estimations of Wrist-Worn and Arm-Worn Apple WatchesIn-Ear Pulse Rate Measurement: A Valid Alternative to Heart Rate Derived from Electrocardiography?Heart rate measures from the Apple Watch, Fitbit Charge HR 2, and electrocardiogram across different exercise intensitiesA Look at the Security and Privacy of Fitbit as a Health Activity TrackerModern Technologies for Personalized NutritionA Conceptual Framework for an Enhancing Running Motivation by Matching Music and Real-time Training LoadAutomatic Identification of Physical Activity Type and Duration by Wearable Activity Trackers: A Validation StudyHeart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation StudyWrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patientsSmart watches for heart rate assessment in atrial arrhythmiasComputerised decision support in physical activity interventions: A systematic literature reviewAssessment of the Fitbit Charge 2 for monitoring heart rateWearable technology for cardiology: An update and framework for the futureMethodological Shortcomings of Wrist-Worn Heart Rate Monitors ValidationsUsability Study of Mainstream Wearable Fitness Devices: Feature Analysis and System Usability Scale EvaluationAccuracy of Heart Rate Monitoring by Some Wrist-Worn Activity TrackersJasmine Singh and Dean F. Sittig, PhDWearable Heart Rate Monitor Technology Accuracy in Research: A Comparative Study Between PPG and ECG Technology 18 April 2017Volume 166, Issue 8Page: 610-612KeywordsBlood volumeBody mass indexClinical trialsConflicts of interestDisclosureElectrocardiographyExerciseHeart rateLongitudinal studiesThorax ePublished: 11 April 2017 Issue Published: 18 April 2017 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2017 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...