Structural Analysis of DNA Interactions with Biogenic Polyamines and Cobalt(III)hexamine Studied by Fourier Transform Infrared and Capillary Electrophoresis (2004)

Biogenic polyamines, such as putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are small organic polycations involved in numerous diverse biological processes. These compounds play an important role in nucleic acid function due to their binding to DNA and RNA. It has been shown that biogenic polyamines cause DNA condensation and aggregation similar to that of inorganic cobalt(III)hexamine cation, which has the ability to induce DNA conformational changes. However, the nature of the polyamine·DNA binding at the molecular level is not clearly established and is the subject of much controversy. In the present study the effects of spermine, spermidine, putrescine, and cobalt(III)hexamine on the solution structure of calf-thymus DNA were investigated using affinity capillary electrophoresis, Fourier transform infrared, and circular dichroism spectroscopic methods. At low polycation concentrations, putrescine binds preferentially through the minor and major grooves of double strand DNA, whereas spermine, spermidine, and cobalt(III)hexamine bind to the major groove. At high polycation concentrations, putrescine interaction with the bases is weak, whereas strong base binding occurred for spermidine in the major and minor grooves of DNA duplex. However, major groove binding is preferred by spermine and cobalt(III)hexamine cations. Electrostatic attractions between polycation and the backbone phosphate group were also observed. No major alterations of B-DNA were observed for biogenic polyamines, whereas cobalt(III)hexamine induced a partial B → A transition. DNA condensation was also observed for cobalt(III)hexamine cation, whereas organic polyamines induced duplex stabilization. The binding constants calculated for biogenic polyamines are KSpm = 2.3 × 105m-1, KSpd = 1.4 × 105m-1, and KPut = 1.02 × 105m-1. Two binding constants have been found for cobalt(III)hexamine with K1 = 1.8 × 105m-1 and K2 = 9.2 × 104m-1. The Hill coefficients indicate a positive cooperativity binding for biogenic polyamines and a negative cooperativity for cobalt(III)hexamine. Biogenic polyamines, such as putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are small organic polycations involved in numerous diverse biological processes. These compounds play an important role in nucleic acid function due to their binding to DNA and RNA. It has been shown that biogenic polyamines cause DNA condensation and aggregation similar to that of inorganic cobalt(III)hexamine cation, which has the ability to induce DNA conformational changes. However, the nature of the polyamine·DNA binding at the molecular level is not clearly established and is the subject of much controversy. In the present study the effects of spermine, spermidine, putrescine, and cobalt(III)hexamine on the solution structure of calf-thymus DNA were investigated using affinity capillary electrophoresis, Fourier transform infrared, and circular dichroism spectroscopic methods. At low polycation concentrations, putrescine binds preferentially through the minor and major grooves of double strand DNA, whereas spermine, spermidine, and cobalt(III)hexamine bind to the major groove. At high polycation concentrations, putrescine interaction with the bases is weak, whereas strong base binding occurred for spermidine in the major and minor grooves of DNA duplex. However, major groove binding is preferred by spermine and cobalt(III)hexamine cations. Electrostatic attractions between polycation and the backbone phosphate group were also observed. No major alterations of B-DNA were observed for biogenic polyamines, whereas cobalt(III)hexamine induced a partial B → A transition. DNA condensation was also observed for cobalt(III)hexamine cation, whereas organic polyamines induced duplex stabilization. The binding constants calculated for biogenic polyamines are KSpm = 2.3 × 105m-1, KSpd = 1.4 × 105m-1, and KPut = 1.02 × 105m-1. Two binding constants have been found for cobalt(III)hexamine with K1 = 1.8 × 105m-1 and K2 = 9.2 × 104m-1. The Hill coefficients indicate a positive cooperativity binding for biogenic polyamines and a negative cooperativity for cobalt(III)hexamine. The biogenic polyamines putrescine [NH2(CH2)4NH2], spermidine [NH2(CH2)4NH(CH2)3NH2], and spermine [NH2(CH2)3NH(CH2)4NH(CH2)3NH2] (Structure 1) are the most prevalent polyamines in mammalian cells. They are small aliphatic polycations involved in numerous diverse biological processes, such as the ability to modulate gene expression and enzyme activities, activation of DNA synthesis, cell proliferation and differentiation, and others (1Tabor H. Tabor C.W. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1984; 53: 749-790Crossref PubMed Scopus (3214) Google Scholar, 2Pegg A.E. Cancer Res. 1988; 48: 759-774PubMed Google Scholar, 3Heby O. Differentiation. 1981; 19: 1-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (873) Google Scholar, 4Tkachenko A. Nesterova L. Pshenichnov M. Arch. Microbiol. 2001; 176: 155-157Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar, 5Marton L.J. Pegg A.E. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1995; 35: 55-91Crossref PubMed Scopus (705) Google Scholar, 6Cohen S.S. A Guide to the Polyamines. Oxford University Press, New York1998Google Scholar, 7Casero R.A. Woster P.M. J. Med. Chem. 2001; 44: 1-26Crossref PubMed Scopus (217) Google Scholar, 8Thomas T. Thomas T.J. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001; 58: 244-258Crossref PubMed Scopus (750) Google Scholar). Other functions of polyamines have been related to DNA protection from external agents (9Ha H.C. Sirisoma N.S. Kuppusamy P. Zweier J.L. Woster P.M. Casero Jr., R.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 11140-11145Crossref PubMed Scopus (505) Google Scholar, 10Ha H.C. Yager J.D. Woster P.A. Casero Jr., R.A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998; 244: 298-303Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar) and against radiation damage (11Oh T.J. Kim I.G. Biotech. Techniques. 1998; 12: 755-758Crossref Scopus (18) Google Scholar, 12Douki T. Bretonniere Y. J. Cadet. Radiat. Res. 2000; 153: 29-35Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). In general, spermidine and spermine are present in millimolar concentrations in vivo, whereas putrescine levels are slightly lower (13Morgan D.M.L. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1990; 18: 1080-1084Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar, 14Watanabe S. Kusama-Eguchi K. Kobayashi H. Igarashi K. J. Biol. Chem. 1991; 226: 20803-20809Abstract Full Text PDF Google Scholar, 15Igarashi K. Kashiwagi K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000; 271: 559-564Crossref PubMed Scopus (704) Google Scholar). However, the most important characteristic of polyamines within the cells is to bind nucleic acids and DNA in particular (1Tabor H. Tabor C.W. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1984; 53: 749-790Crossref PubMed Scopus (3214) Google Scholar, 6Cohen S.S. A Guide to the Polyamines. Oxford University Press, New York1998Google Scholar). Polyamines also have the ability to induce DNA conformational transitions. Their bindings have been reported to promote the conversion of the right-handed to a left-handed ZDNA (16Thomas T.J. Gunnia U.B. Thomas T. J. Biol. Chem. 1991; 266: 6137-6141Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 17Bancroft D. Williams L.D. Rich A. Egli M. Biochemistry. 1994; 33: 1073-1086Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar, 18Hasan R. Alam M.K. Ali R. FEBS Lett. 1995; 368: 27-30Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 19Ruiz-Chica J. Medina M.A. Sanchez-Jiménez F. Ramírez F.J. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001; 285: 437-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar) or to an alternative form of right-handed helix, A-DNA (20Minyat E.E. Ivanov V.I. Kritzyn A.M. Minchenkova L.E. Schyolkina A.K. J. Mol. Biol. 1978; 128: 379-409Google Scholar, 21Jain S. Zon G. Sundaralingam M. Biochemistry. 1989; 28: 2360-2364Crossref PubMed Scopus (165) Google Scholar, 22Real A.N. Greenall R.J. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2004; 21: 469-488Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). However, polyamines can also bind B-DNA, thus inducing no major biopolymer conformational changes (23Deng H. Bloomfield V.A. Benevides J.M. Thomas Jr., G.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: 3379-3385Crossref PubMed Scopus (174) Google Scholar, 24Ruiz-Chica J. Medina M.A. Sanchez-Jiménez F. Ramírez F.J. Biophys. J. 2001; 80: 443-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 25Ruiz-Chica J. Medina M.A. Sanchez-Jiménez F. Ramírez F.J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003; 1628: 11-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar). Another consequence of polyamine binding is the condensation of DNA occurring with both naked DNA (26Gosule L.C. Schellman J.A. Nature. 1976; 259: 333-335Crossref PubMed Scopus (503) Google Scholar, 27Pelta J. Livolant F. Sikorav J.-L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 5656-5662Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (301) Google Scholar, 28Bloomfield V.A. Biopolymers. 1997; 44: 269-282Crossref PubMed Scopus (990) Google Scholar, 29Lin Z. Wang C. Feng X. Liu M. Li J. Bai C. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 3228-3234Crossref PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, 30D'Agostino L. Di Luccia A. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002; 269: 4317-4325Crossref PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar) and chromatin (31Marquet R. Colson P. Houssier C. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1986; 4: 205-218Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 32Sen D. Crothers D.M. Biochemistry. 1986; 25: 1495-1503Crossref PubMed Scopus (88) Google Scholar). Immunocytochemical studies of spermidine and spermine have shown that these polyamines are associated with highly compacted mitotic chromosomes (33Hougaard D.M. Fujiwara K. Larsson L.I. Histochem. J. 1987; 19: 643-650Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 34Sauve D.M. Anderson H.J. Ray J.M. James W.M. Roberge M. J. Cell Biol. 1999; 145: 225-235Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar), inducing more stabilizing than regulating effects on the chromatin structure during the cell cycle (35Laitinen J. Stenius K. Eloranta T.O. Hölttä E. J. Cell. Biochem. 1998; 68: 200-212Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar). On the other hand, it has been shown that cobalt(III)hexamine cation is five times more efficient as a condensing agent than spermidine, having the same positive charges (36Widom J. Baldwin R.L. J. Mol. Biol. 1980; 144: 431-453Crossref PubMed Scopus (485) Google Scholar). These studies indicate that polyamine-induced DNA condensation is important to the cellular functions in vivo. However, the question of how they bind to DNA has not been clearly established. One of the early discoveries about polyamine·DNA interactions is the observation that polycation could stabilize double-stranded DNA (37Tabor H. Biochemistry. 1962; 1: 496-501Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar). Putrescine, spermidine, and spermine can increase the melting temperature (Tm) of DNA in a concentration-dependent manner by as much as 40 °C in low salt buffer solution, compared with that in the absence of polyamines (37Tabor H. Biochemistry. 1962; 1: 496-501Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar, 38Thomas T.J. Bloomfield V.A. Biopolymers. 1984; 23: 1295-1306Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar). Investigating on the mechanisms of this effect provides support for both electrostatic interaction between the polyamine amino-protonated groups and the negatively charged backbonePO2− group (38Thomas T.J. Bloomfield V.A. Biopolymers. 1984; 23: 1295-1306Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 39Tsuboi M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1964; 37: 1514-1522Crossref Google Scholar, 40Liquori A.M. Constantino L. Crescenzi V. Elia V. Giglio E. Puliti R. De Santis-Savino M. Vitagliano V. J. Mol. Biol. 1967; 24: 113-122Crossref Scopus (211) Google Scholar), as well as a direct interaction with DNA bases (21Jain S. Zon G. Sundaralingam M. Biochemistry. 1989; 28: 2360-2364Crossref PubMed Scopus (165) Google Scholar, 41Williams L.D. Frederick C.A. Ughetto G. Rich A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990; 18: 5533-5541Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar). Both experimental and theoretical methods have been used to determine the binding positions of polyamines on B-form DNA. These studies have concentrated mainly on spermine cation, whereas a few structural details about the binding of the other polyamines to DNA are known. Rather contradictory views concerning the binding sites of spermine and other polyamines have emerged. X-ray diffraction from crystals of B-form dodecamer revealed a spermine bound into the major groove of DNA duplex (42Drew H.R. Dickerson R.E. J. Mol. Biol. 1981; 151: 535-556Crossref PubMed Scopus (799) Google Scholar). In photoaffinity cleavage experiments (43Schmid N. Behr J.-P. Biochemistry. 1991; 30: 4357-4361Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar), the binding position of spermine in solution appeared to be in the minor groove of B-DNA. From the NMR study of polyamine with DNA dodecamer, it has been proposed that the spermine cation appeared to be mobile (44Wemmer D.E. Srivenugopol K.S. Reid B.R. Morris D.R. J. Mol. Biol. 1985; 185: 457-459Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar). This study suggested a rapid diffusion of the spermine along the DNA duplex with specific tight binding sites or delocalized binding with no discrete sites. Feuerstein et al. (45Feuerstein B.G. Pattabiraman N. Marton L.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990; 18: 1271-1282Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar) found that spermine prefers the major groove of B-DNA followed by minor groove interaction with phosphate binding being the least favorable. Different theoretical studies (46Pattabiraman N. Langridge R. Kollman P.A. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1984; 1: 1525-1533Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 47Feuerstein B.G. Pattabiraman N. Marton L.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986; 83: 5948-5992Crossref PubMed Scopus (165) Google Scholar) agreed with this hypothesis of spermine cation interacting with the dsDNA bases across the major groove. However, recent molecular mechanics simulation studies (48Bryson K. Greenall R.J. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2000; 18: 393-412Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar, 49Korolev N. Lyubartsev A.P. Nordenskiöld L. Laaksonen A. J. Mol. Biol. 2001; 308: 907-917Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar, 50Korolev N. Lyubartsev A.P. Laaksonen A. Nordenskiöld L. Biophys. J. 2002; 82: 2860-2875Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar) found that spermine occupies more varied sites, including binding along the backbone and bridging both the major and minor grooves. On the other hand, recent Raman study (24Ruiz-Chica J. Medina M.A. Sanchez-Jiménez F. Ramírez F.J. Biophys. J. 2001; 80: 443-454Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar) found that putrescine and spermidine prefer the minor groove of B-DNA, whereas spermine binds to the major groove. Thus, the binding positions of spermine and other polyamines on B-DNA have not been firmly resolved, and it is probable that both the base sequence and the environment have an important influence on polycation binding. In the present work, we have studied the interactions between calf-thymus DNA and biogenic polyamines as well as cobalt(III)hexamine cation using affinity capillary electrophoresis, Fourier transform infrared, and circular dichroism spectroscopic methods. Evidence for DNA condensation and helix stabilization is provided. Furthermore, the influence of polyamine charge and concentration on DNA structural changes has been discussed, and the presence of specific base-polyamine binding is reported. Materials—Polyamines spermine, spermidine, putrescine, and cobalt(III)hexamine were purchased from Sigma. Highly polymerized type I calf-thymus DNA sodium salt (7% sodium content) was purchased from Sigma, and deproteinated by the addition of CHCl3 and isoamyl alcohol in NaCl solution. To check the protein content of DNA solution, the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm was recorded. The A260/A280 ratio was 1.85, showing that the DNA was sufficiently free of protein (51Marmur J. J. Mol. Biol. 1961; 3: 208-218Crossref Scopus (8945) Google Scholar). Other chemicals were of reagent grade and used without further purification. Preparation of Stock Solutions—Sodium-DNA (8.3 mg/ml) was dissolved in 50 mm NaCl (pH 7.20) at 5 °C for 24 h with occasional stirring to ensure the formation of a homogeneous solution. The final concentration of the stock calf-thymus DNA solution was determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm using a molar extinction coefficient ϵ260 = 6600 cm-1m-1 (expressed as the molarity of phosphate groups) (52Reichmann M.E. Rice S.A. Thomas C.A. Doty P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954; 76: 3047-3053Crossref Scopus (2049) Google Scholar, 53Vijayalakshmi R. Kanthimathi M. Subramanian V. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000; 271: 731-734Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar). The UV absorbance at 260 nm of a diluted solution (1/250) of calf-thymus DNA used in our experiments was 0.661 (path length was 1 cm), and the final concentration of the stock DNA solution was 25 mm in DNA phosphate. The average length of the DNA molecules, estimated by gel electrophoresis, was 9000 bp (molecular mass ∼ 6 × 106 Da). The appropriate amount of polyamines (0.3-25 mm) was prepared in distilled water and added dropwise to the DNA solution, to attain the desired polyamine/DNA(P) molar ratios (r) of 1/80, 1/40, 1/20, 1/10, 1/4, 1/2, and 1 at a final DNA concentration of 12.5 mm (4.15 mg/ml) for infrared measurements. For capillary electrophoresis, the polyamine/DNA(P) ratios were 1/800, 1/400, 1/200, 1/100, 1/50, 1/25, 1/12.5, and 1/6.25 with a final DNA concentration of 1.25 mm. The pH of the solutions was adjusted at 7.0 ± 0.2 with a pH meter ORION model 210A, using NaOH solution. FTIR Spectra—Infrared spectra were recorded with a FTIR spectrometer (Impact 420 model) equipped with deuterated triglycine sulfate detector and KBr beam splitter, using AgBr windows. Spectra were recorded after 2-h incubation of polyamine with the polynucleotide solution and measured in triplicate (three individual samples of the same polynucleotide and polyamine concentrations). Interferograms were accumulated over the spectral range 400-4000 cm-1 with a nominal resolution of 2 cm-1 and a minimum of 100 scans. The water subtraction was carried out using 0.1 m NaCl solution at pH 7.0 ± 0.2 as a reference (54Alex S. Dupuis P. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1989; 157: 271-281Crossref Scopus (196) Google Scholar). A good water subtraction is considered to be achieved if there is a flat baseline around 2200 cm-1, where the water combination mode is located. This method yields a rough estimate of the subtraction scaling factor, but it removes the spectral features of water in a satisfactory way (54Alex S. Dupuis P. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1989; 157: 271-281Crossref Scopus (196) Google Scholar). The infrared spectra of polyamine·DNA complexes with molar ratios higher than 1/4 for spermine, spermidine, and cobalt-hexamine and higher than 1 for putrescine could not be recorded as a homogenous solution, due to DNA precipitation and solid gel formation. The difference spectra [(DNA solution + polyamine) - (DNA solution)] were obtained using a sharp DNA band at 968 cm-1 as an internal reference. This band, which is due to deoxyribose C-C and C-O stretching vibrations, exhibits no spectral changes (shifting or intensity variation) upon polyamine·DNA complexation and cancelled out upon spectral subtraction (55Ahmed Ouameur A. Nafisi S. Mohajerani N. Tajmir-Riahi H.A. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2003; 20: 561-565Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar). The spectra presented here were smoothed with a Savitzky-Golay procedure (54Alex S. Dupuis P. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1989; 157: 271-281Crossref Scopus (196) Google Scholar). The plots of the relative intensity (R) of several peaks of DNA in-plane vibrations related to A-T, G-C base pairs and thePO2− stretching vibrations such as 1717 (guanine), 1663 (thymine), 1609 (adenine), 1492 (cytosine), and 1222 cm-1 (PO2− groups), versus the polyamine concentrations were obtained after peak normalization using,Ri=IiI968eq.1 where Ii is the intensity of absorption peak for pure DNA and DNA in the complex with i concentration of polyamine, and I968 is the intensity of the 968 cm-1 peak (internal reference). Circular Dichroism Measurements—Spectra were recorded with a Jasco J-720 spectropolarimeter. For measurements in the near-UV region, a quartz cell with a path length of 0.1 cm was used. Five scans were accumulated at a scan speed of 50 nm/min, with data being collected at every nanometer from 200 to 320 nm. Sample temperature was maintained at 25 °C using a Neslab RTE-111 circulating water bath connected to the water-jacketed quartz cuvettes. The concentration of the calf-thymus DNA solutions was kept at 1.25 mm (0.4 mg/ml) in 25 mm phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. CD spectra of DNA·cobalt(III)hexamine complexes were recorded withCo(NH3)63+/DNA(P) molar ratios in the range of 0, 1/15, 1/10, 1/8, 1/6, and 1/4. Spectra were corrected for buffer signal, and conversion to the molar ellipticity [θ] was performed with Jasco Standard Analysis software. Capillary Electrophoresis—A P/ACE System MDQ (Beckman) with photodiode array detector was used to study polyamine·DNA interaction. An uncoated fused silica capillary of 75-μm inner length of and length of 50 cm the was used. The capillary was by with 1 sodium for followed by a with 0.1 sodium it was with buffer for at high followed by a baseline for at the used for the experiments the capillary was with NaOH 1 for 2 followed by with buffer for at high The capillary was with distilled water for at the for and with water were using a at for 5 was carried out at a of 25 for using were carried out at 25 and low in the capillary was the complex to during The capillary and were after every five The polyamine binding experiments were performed in a buffer pH 7.0 ± using concentration of calf-thymus DNA mm) and concentrations of The stock solutions of polyamines mm) and DNA mm) were prepared in the The solutions were to attain polyamine/DNA(P) molar ratios of to 1/6.25 in the presence of 1.25 mm DNA. was to for and with for the same stock solution. The were at 260 nm and were collected and with the P/ACE software. capillary was used to a in polyamine binds to DNA. The binding constants for the polyamine·DNA complexes can be determined by using of DNA complexes PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. Biochem. 1998; PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). The of of the DNA was determined from the changes in the of DNA in the presence of concentrations of polyamine using the where m is the of DNA measured for added polyamine whereas and to the of pure and DNA, The binding was determined by the experimental of and polyamine concentration to of this a form for the affinity capillary and complexes have been T. Biochem. 1998; PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar, G.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, G. Biochem. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R. Ouameur A. Nafisi S. Tajmir-Riahi H.A. DNA Cell Biol. 2004; 23: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the ratio of complex is from that of the DNA and the complex from the free G. Biochem. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). provides both and on molecular interaction. the of complex the of an for binding in a the of structural for the of the and for binding and concentration on K. Biochem. 1997; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The cooperativity of the binding can be using a Hill binding for polyamine the can be the of and is the The of - versus has a of and an on the of and Oxford University Press, New Scholar). The with the of cooperativity of a and provides a and of a and Oxford University Press, New Scholar). by FTIR FTIR spectral features of complexes between and cm-1 are presented in 1 and To polycation concentrations were for the biogenic polyamines and cobalt(III)hexamine (26Gosule L.C. Schellman J.A. Nature. 1976; 259: 333-335Crossref PubMed Scopus (503) Google Scholar). ratios of to 1/4 were studied for spermine spermidine and cobalt(III)hexamine due to their high positive However, molar ratios of to 1 were used for putrescine with no precipitation our experimental These are millimolar concentrations of polyamines have been found in the of cells (1Tabor H. Tabor C.W. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1984; 53: 749-790Crossref PubMed Scopus (3214) Google Scholar, 6Cohen S.S. A Guide to the Polyamines. Oxford University Press, New York1998Google Scholar). The and of the infrared of the DNA are in spectra in the of cm-1 for pure DNA, free polyamine, and and in solution at pH 7.0 ± 0.2 and difference spectra for polyamine·DNA obtained at polyamine/DNA(P) molar ratios relative and for the infrared of calf-thymus DNA in solution at pH ± = = = m = and = have been from the and are stretching of and of deoxyribose deoxyribose = = = m = and = have been from the and are in a At low polyamine concentrations = these polyamines bind to DNA Evidence for this from the changes in the intensity and of the absorption in the cm-1, due to the in-plane DNA (54Alex S. Dupuis P. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1989; 157: 271-281Crossref Scopus (196) Google Scholar, Ouameur A. Nafisi S. Mohajerani N. Tajmir-Riahi H.A. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2003; 20: 561-565Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar, E. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, E. J. J.A. Raman 1985; 12: Scholar, H. R. M. Tajmir-Riahi H.A. J. Biol.