Determining Petrophysical Properties of Low Resistivity Reservoirs Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logs (1999)

Determining Petrophysical Properties of Low Resistivity Reservoirs Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logs G.M. Hamada; G.M. Hamada King Saud University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar M.S. Al-Blehed; M.S. Al-Blehed King Saud University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar M.N.J. Al-Awad M.N.J. Al-Awad King Saud University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, October 1999. Paper Number: SPE-56789-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/56789-MS Published: October 03 1999 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Hamada, G.M., Al-Blehed, M.S., and M.N.J. Al-Awad. "Determining Petrophysical Properties of Low Resistivity Reservoirs Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logs." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, October 1999. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/56789-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractThe combination of conventional logs such as density, neutron and resistivity logs is proven to be very effective in the evaluation of normal reservoirs. An accurate determination of the petrophysical parameters with the conventional logs for low resistivity reservoirs is very difficult. This paper presents the two cases of low resistivity reservoirs and low contrast resistivity reservoirs. The problem of these reservoirs is that conventional logging interpretation shows water zones, but water free hydrocarbon would be produced. In the case of low resistivity contrast reservoirs it is very hard to determine water hydrocarbon contact with resistivity logs.Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has been only available as a supplement tool, to provide additional information on the producibility of the reservoir. The main limitation of NMR, however, has been the cost and time of acquiring data. This paper shows that in the case of low resistivity reservoirs NMR is very cost-effective tool and helps to accurately determine the reservoir rock petrophysical properties. In the analysis of NMR data, several aspects of NMR technique have been used;T1/T2 ratio for fluid identification,the difference between NMR derived porosity and total porosity to determine the types of clay minerals,NMR relaxation properties to identify fluids nature and rock propertiesThis paper presents four examples of low resistivity reservoirs. Analysis of NMR data of low resistivity reservoirs has helped to identify the producibility of these zones, to determine lithology independent porosity and to distinguish between bound and free water. For the case of low contrast resistivity reservoir where there was little resistivity contrast between water bearing formation and oil bearing formation, NMR has been able to identify the fluid nature of the two formations and then accurately the height of the oil column. This was based mainly on high contrast of NMR relaxation parameters. Keywords: well logging, high water saturation, contrast resistivity reservoir, surface area, upstream oil & gas, low resistivity reservoir, permeability, saturation, nmr, log analysis Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Open hole/cased hole log analysis This content is only available via PDF. 1999. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.