Efficient Delivery of Gold Nanoparticles by Dual Receptor Targeting (2011)

The fabrication and characterization of a dual receptor targeted system (DRTS) are described. It is demonstrated that DRTS is more efficient at delivering gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to ovarian cancer cells expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and folate receptor (FR) than their corresponding single-receptor-targeting systems (SRTS). Targeted delivery of inorganic nanoparticles, particularly of gold, may find wide utility in a number of biomedical applications due to their unique physicochemical and optoelectronic properties.1-6 However, efficient delivery of a threshold amount of such particles is required for successful biomedical applications including imaging, detection and diagnosis, and therapy.7, 8 Efficient delivery of gold nanoparticles may be achieved by simultaneous targeting of multiple receptors on the cancer cells.9 Hence, selection of appropriate targets is crucial for successful application of multiple or dual receptor targeted drug delivery system. Herein, we demonstrate the fabrication and characterization of gold nanoconjugates containing epidermal receptor growth factor (EGFR) and folate receptor (FR) antibodies on a single gold core, as a proof of principle study, to enhance the loading of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to EGFR and FR expressing cancer cells. We further demonstrate that the dual receptor targeted system (DRTS) is more efficient in delivering AuNPs to EGFR and FR expressing cancer cells than their corresponding single receptor targeting systems (SRTS). Such selective delivery of AuNPs could be utilized in numerous biomedical applications such as detection, diagnosis, and therapy. The folate receptor α (FRα) and EGFR are known to be overexpressed in a number of malignancies including ovarian cancer.10 Farletuzumab, a monoclonal antibody to FRα, is in Phase III clinical trials both alone or in combination with platinum/taxane chemotherapy for the patients experiencing recurrence.11 Several monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR (trastuzumab, cetuximab, pertuzumab, and panitumumab) and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib) have been investigated and are currently in different phases of clinical trials in ovarian cancer.12 Thus, FR and EGFR represent important targets for tumor-specific delivery of anticancer drugs. Here, we demonstrate, as a proof of principle study, the fabrication and characterization of a DRTS and demonstrate that it is much more efficient in delivering AuNPs to EGFR and FR expressing ovarian cancer cells, Skov3-ip and OVCAR-5, than their corresponding SRTS. Such selective delivery of AuNPs has the potential to be used in numerous biomedical applications including detection, diagnosis and therapeutics. The EGFR and FR expression pattern in various ovarian cancer cells lines were first determined by western blot analysis (Figure 1A). The EGFR and FR expressions follow the pattern Skov3-ip is greater than OVCAR-5 with little to no expression in A2780 and ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) cells (normal cells). This is further substantiated by confocal microscopy after treating Skov3-ip and OVCAR-5 cells with Cy-5 labeled anti-EGFR antibody (Ab-EGFR, green) and Cy3 labeled anti-FR antibody (Ab-FR, red) at 4 °C (Figure 1B,C, respectively). The predominant green fluorescence demonstrates higher binding of EGFR antibody supporting a higher expression of EGFR in OVCAR-5 cells. Similarly, weaker red fluorescence indicates lower reduced binding of anti-FR antibody supporting lower expression of FR. Likewise, strong green and red fluorescence are observed in case of Skov3-ip cells indicating higher expression of both EGFR and FR, supporting the western blot data. EGFR and FR expression in ovarian cancer cells. A) Western blot analysis of various ovarian cancer cells Skov3-ip, OVCAR-5, A2780 (sen = sensitive; cis = cisplatin resistant). Confocal images of B) OVCAR5 cells and C) Skov3-ip cells used to demonstrate the EGFR and FR expression in green and red fluorescence, after binding of Cy5 and Cy3 labeled anti-EGFR (green) and anti-FR (red) to OVCAR5 and Skov-ip3 cells, respectively. The blue color represents the DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining of the nucleus. The scale bar is 10 μm. To demonstrate the ability of DRTS to effectively deliver AuNPs to ovarian cancer cells that moderately express both EGFR and FR, we selected OVCAR-5 and Skov3-ip cells. First we synthesized and characterized the gold nanoconjugates containing anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C225) and anti-FR antibody (Ab-FR) (methods are explained in the Experimental Section).13 Figure 2A demonstrates the binding and stability of the nanoconjugates. It is evident from the Figure 2A that ≈90% of the radiolabelled 125I-C225 (C*) was bound to AuNP when incubated in the presence of equal amount of non-radiolabelled Ab-FR (F). When 125I-Ab-FR (F*) was incubated with AuNPs in the presence of non-radioiodinated C225, ≈70% of Ab-FR was bound to gold. When both of the radioiodinated C225 and Ab-FR were incubated with AuNP, ≈80% of the Ab were bound to AuNPs. Stability of the nanoconjugate studied in terms of the release of Ab-EGFR and Ab-FR in mouse plasma demonstrates that only 5% of C225 was released after 24 h of incubation whereas ≈15% of Ab-FR was released in the same time period, demonstrating significant stability of the gold nanoconjugates under biologically relevant condition. This is further confirmed by UV-vis spectroscopy (Figures 2B,C) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 2D). It is evident from Figure 2B that the addition of antibodies and IgGs (immunoglobulins) to AuNPs increases the absorbance of the surface plasmon resonance band from 0.18 to 0.22 suggesting the perturbation of the electrical double layer and binding of antibodies to AuNP.14-16 Addition of 150 mM NaCl to unprotected AuNPs leads to complete aggregation of AuNPs with a significant decrease in absorbance and a larger shift in the absorption maxima (28 nm shift, Figure 2C). However, all the SRTS and DRTS conjugates are stable against salt-induced aggregation in terms of minimum reduction in absorbance and shift in the absorption maxima (maximum 3 nm shift). This is further confirmed by TEM where no significant aggregation was observed (Figure 2D). Characterization of DRTS and SRTS nanoconjugates using radioiodination, UV-vis spectroscopy and TEM. A) Binding of anti-EGFR (C or C*) and FR (F or F*) to AuNPs and release from the nanoconjugate after incubation with mouse plasma for 24 h. * indicates 125I labeled antibody. Stability of different nanoconjugates in the presence and absence of NaCl. B) Change in absorbance of different nanoconjugates in the presence and absence of NaCl. C) Shift in absorption maxima recorded after 15 min incubation of the nanoconjugates in 150 mM NaCl. D) TEM image of Au-C225-FR. Next we investigated the ability of the DRTS to target EGFR and FR expressing cancer cells to efficiently deliver AuNPs and compared the results with their corresponding SRTS. To maintain equal surface coverage by the antibody, IgG along with either Ab-FR or Ab-EGFR was used to generate the SRTS (Au-FR-IgG and Au-C225-IgG). Figure 3A demonstrates the uptake of the nanoconjugates, in terms of gold content, when Skov3-ip cells were treated with an equal amount of the nanoconjugates. Gold content was measured by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA).17 It is clear from the figure that the DRTS is much more effective at delivering AuNPs to Skov3-ip cells, which is evident from the increase in gold content in dual receptor targeted Au-C225-AbFR (DRTS) versus either single receptor targeted Au-AbFR-IgG or Au-C225-IgG (SRTS) treated cells. The figure also demonstrates some non-specific uptake of the gold when the cells are treated with non-targeted nanoconjugate, Au-IgG. Similar results were observed with OVCAR5 cells (Figure 3B). However, the difference in uptake of the nanoconjugates in OVCAR5 and Skov3-ip cells might be due to the difference in their inherent endocytic processes.13 The endocytic pathways through which Skov3-ip or OVCAR-5 cells internalize the antibody–eceptor complex are not clearly defined. Intracellular localization of AuNPs in OVCAR-5 and Skov3-ip cells by DRTS and SRTS delivery was further demonstrated by TEM (Supporting Information, Figure S1,S2). In OVCAR-5 and Skov3-ip cells, AuNPs in the form of DRTS and SRTS are found in double membrane bound multivesicular bodies (Supporting Information, Figure S1,S2, respectively). However, the uptake of non-specific Au-IgG was very minimal (data not shown). Targeted delivery of gold nanoconjugates via dual receptor targeting: a) Skov3-ip cells and b) OVCAR5 cells. Targeting efficacy of DRTS (Au-FR-C225) versus SRTS (Au-C225-IgG and Au-FR-IgG) and non-targeted counterpart (Au-IgG) to Skov3-ip and OVCAR5 cells, respectively. Cells were treated with different nanoconjugates for 2 h. Gold content was estimated by INAA, * indicates p < 0.05. Ovarian cancer is recognized as most deadly among the gynecologic malignancies.10 Even though patients respond to initial chemotherapy after surgical debulking, unfortunately, most patients experience a more aggressive and drug-resistant relapse.18 Targeted delivery of inorganic nanoparticles may be utilized for early detection, diagnosis, and better therapeutic intervention by delivering chemotherapeutics in tumor specific manner. As a proof-of-principle study, we have demonstrated the fabrication and characterization of a dual receptor targeted system exploiting EGFR and FR as target receptors to deliver AuNPs to ovarian cancer cells that exhibit overexpression of either EGFR or FR or both. Furthermore, if the cancer cells overexpress both receptors, the ability of this DRTS to target those cancer cells will be further enhanced. As a result of this, AuNPs fabricated in a DRTS form may be delivered in a much more effective way to the cells in the heterogeneous population.19 This form of delivery coupled with the technological advantages associated with gold nanoparticles, such as hyperthermia using non- invasive radio frequency (RF), X-contrast behavior, and as a delivery vehicle, may be utilized for the therapeutics detection, and diagnosis of cancer.20 Reagents: Antibody was principally purchased from Cell Signaling and Santa Cruz, Cetuximab (Bristol Mayer Squib). Folate receptor antibody was purchased from Enzo life science, cat no ALX-804-439-R100, para formaldehyde was purchased from Electron Microscopy Science, 15710, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Fischer Scientific, S-5058. Cell Culture: Ovarian cancer cell lines (OVCAR-5 and Skov3-ip) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection and A2780 sensitive and resistant were kindly provided by Dr. Barbara Vanderhyden, University of Ottawa, Canada and cultured using DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium) and RPMI 1640 (Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium 1640) with L-glutamine (Cellgro Mediatech, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotics (penicillin–streptomycin). Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Dual Nanoconjugates: AuNPs were synthesized from tetrachloroauric acid by wet chemical methods using sodium borohydride as a reducing agent as previously described.13 AuNPs thus formed were characterized using UV-vis and TEM, confirming that ≈5 nm size, spherical nanoparticles were formed by this method (data not shown). For the synthesis of dual nanoconjugates, cetuximab (2 μg mL−1) and anti-folate receptor antibody (2 μg mL−1) were added to the 1.0 mL of the AuNP solution and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The solution was centrifuged at 20 000 rpm at 10 °C for 1 h and the pellet was collected, measured by UV-vis, and used for the treatment. Synthesis of Conjugates Containing anti-EGFR Antibody Labeled with Cy5 Dye and anti-Folate Antibody Labeled with Cy3 Dye: The monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C225) and FR-α antibody were conjugated with monoclonal antibody labeling dyes Cy5 and Cy3, respectively, according to the manufacturers protocol (GE healthcare, PA33001).13 In brief, the antibody (2 mg mL−1) was diluted (1:1) with PBS buffer and then incubated with Cy3 dye for 30 min in the presence of coupling buffer. Free dye was separated through a gel filtration column provided in the kit. The dye labeled antibody (C225-Cy3 and FR-α) thus obtained was used to treat the cells to demonstrate the binding to the corresponding receptors and to establish the receptor expression pattern. Immunofluorescence Microscopy: Cells (2 × 104 per well) were seeded in 4 well chamber slides. After 24 h, each well was treated either with C225-Cy5 and anti-FR-Cy3 at a concentration of 2 μg mL−1 for 30 min at 4 °C. At the end of the experiments each well in the chamber slide was washed three times with cold PBS. Cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 15 min followed by washing with PBS. They were then mounted in a mounting media containing the nuclear stain DAPI (Vectashield). Slides were then observed using laser confocal microscopy at 63 W lenses.13 Characterization of the Nanoconjugates by Radioiodine Labeling: Aliquots of the antibody were labeled to a high specific activity using the chloramine-T. Briefly, 500 μg of the protein was labeled with 1.0 mCi (10 μL) of carrier free iodine-25 radionuclide in the presence of 100 μg chloramine-T (100 μL of 10 μg μL−1 diluted in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4). The reaction was stopped by adding 500 μg sodium metabisulfite (100 μL of 50 μg μL−1 diluted in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4). This final product was dialyzed against PBS in a 1000 molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) dialysis membrane (Spectra/Por 7) overnight at 4 °C to obtain the purified labeled antibody. The specific activity of the protein labeling procedure was determined by trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation of a small fraction of the labeled antibody and it was found to be <99% labeled. The protein concentration in the labeled antibody stock was determined by the bicinchonic acid (BCA) method. Different amount of labeled C225 (hot) was added to GNP solution in the presence of cold anti-FR and incubated for 2 h. Then the conjugates were centrifuged down at 45 000 g for 1 h. The radioactive emission from the 10 μL of the C225-GNP conjugates before centrifugation and supernatant was measured in the gamma counter. The difference between the emission from total protein before centrifugation and free protein present in the supernatant was used to calculate the bound concentration of C225 at the AuNP surface. Similar experiments were performed using hot anti-FR antibody to quantify the amount of binding to AuNP. Colloidal Stability of the Nanoconjugates Monitored by UV-vis Spectroscopy: Different amounts of the antibodies (anti-EGFR, anti-FR, or a mixture of both) or IgG was added to AuNP solution and incubated for 2 h. UV-vis spectra of the final solution were recorded in a Shimadzu Spectrophotometer (UV-PC12). Once all the spectra were recorded, all the samples were subjected to aggregation test by adding 150 mM of NaCl solution.21 After 15 min of incubation, UV-vis spectra of the same conjugates were recorded again. Visualization of Intracellular Localization of Gold Nanoparticles by TEM: TEM images were acquired using a FEI TECNAI 12 instruments operated at 100 KV after drop coating different nanoconjugates on carbon-coated copper grids. Figure 2D clearly demonstrates non-aggregated, well-dispersed AuNPs in the form of Au-C225-FR throughout the grid. For intracellular localization of AuNPs, confluent cancer cells were treated with the purified nanoconjugates (2 μg mL−1) for 2 h. At the end of the treatment cells were thoroughly washed with PBS, trypsinized, and washed three times again in PBS then fixed in Trumps fixative and processed for TEM microscopy. In Vitro Targeting of Au-C225-FR to Cancer Cells Expressing EGFR and FR: Confluent OVCAR-5 and Skov3-ip cells in 100-mm tissue culture dishes (in triplicate) were treated with the purified nanoconjugates (2 μg mL−1) for 2 h. At the end of the treatment, cells were thoroughly washed with PBS, trypsinized, and washed three times again in PBS. Finally, cells were pooled down at 1300 rpm to obtain the pellet for the INAA, as previously reported.17 Humanized IgG was used as an isotype control, and the cells were treated with Au-IgG as described above. Western Blot Analysis: The expression of EGFR and FR was determined in untreated OSE, OVCAR-5, Skov3-ip, A2780-sensetive, and A2780-resistant cells. Cells were grown in a 100-mm tissue culture dish in RPMI and DMEM medium containing serum, L-glutamine, and antibiotics. Confluent cells were harvested and cell lysates were collected using NP-40 lysis buffer. Protein concentration in the cell lysates was measured using Bradford assay kit (Bio-rad). The proteins were loaded on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel for separation and transferred to a PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride)membrane. The membrane was incubated with EGFR antibody (Santa cruz, sc-03) and FR antibody (Enzo life science, cat no ALX-804-439-R100). Blot was washed thrice with TBS-Tween 20 (0.1%) and incubated with secondary antibody conjugated with peroxidase. The membrane was stripped with stripping buffer to see the beta-actin for protein loading. Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA): Samples were analyzed by INAA as previously described.17 In brief, nanoconjugates and cell pellets were transferred and weighed into precleaned, high-density polyethylene irradiation vials and lyophilized to constant dry weight. Samples were then reconstituted with sample solution (100 μL), loaded in polyethylene transfer “rabbits”, and irradiated for 90 s in a thermal flux density of ≈5 × 1013 ncm−2 s−1. Samples were allowed to decay for 24–48 h and counted in real-time on a high-purity germanium detector for 3600 s at a sample-to-detector distance of ≈5 cm. Gold mass was quantified by measuring the 411.8 keV gamma ray from β-decay of 198Au (half-life t1/2 = 2.7 d) and calibrated using certified gold standard solutions as described previously. Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author. This work was supported by the NIH CA135011, CA136494 grants (PM). Detailed facts of importance to specialist readers are published as ”Supporting Information”. Such documents are peer-reviewed, but not copy-edited or typeset. They are made available as submitted by the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.