Androgyny, sex-role stereotypes, and clinical judgment (1983)

Advertisement Journals Books Search Menu Menu Navbar Search Filter Social Work Research and AbstractsThis issueNASW Family Social WorkBooksJournalsOxford Academic Mobile Enter search term Search Issues About About Social Work Research and Abstracts About the National Association of Social Workers About the National Association of Social Workers Press Journals Career Network Journals on Oxford Academic Books on Oxford Academic NASW Family Issues About About Social Work Research and Abstracts About the National Association of Social Workers About the National Association of Social Workers Press Journals Career Network Close Navbar Search Filter Social Work Research and AbstractsThis issueNASW Family Social WorkBooksJournalsOxford Academic Enter search term Search Advanced Search Search Menu Article Navigation Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation Volume 19 Issue 1 Spring 1983 < Previous Next > Article Navigation Article Navigation Journal Article Androgyny, sex-role stereotypes, and clinical judgment Get access Dennis M. Dailey, DSW Dennis M. Dailey, DSW Professor School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Work Research and Abstracts, Volume 19, Issue 1, Spring 1983, Pages 20–24, https://doi.org/10.1093/swra/19.1.20 Published: 01 March 1983 Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Cite Cite Dennis M. Dailey, Androgyny, sex-role stereotypes, and clinical judgment, Social Work Research and Abstracts, Volume 19, Issue 1, Spring 1983, Pages 20–24, https://doi.org/10.1093/swra/19.1.20 Select Format Select format .ris (Mendeley, Papers, Zotero) .enw (EndNote) .bibtex (BibTex) .txt (Medlars, RefWorks) Download citation Close Permissions Icon Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Navbar Search Filter Social Work Research and AbstractsThis issueNASW Family Social WorkBooksJournalsOxford Academic Mobile Enter search term Search Close Navbar Search Filter Social Work Research and AbstractsThis issueNASW Family Social WorkBooksJournalsOxford Academic Enter search term Search Advanced Search Search Menu Abstract Because recent studies of sex bias in clinical judgment have resulted In contradictory findings when biological sex was used as the control variable, this study focused on the impact of workers' and clients' sex roles—masculine, feminine, or androgynous. Although the sex role of the worker produced no systematic differences, workers showed a strong positive response to the androgynous client, suggesting the emergence of a new sex bias. This content is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 1983 by the National Association of Social Workers Issue Section: Research You do not currently have access to this article. Download all slides Sign in Get help with access National Association of Social Workers members Sign in through society site Personal account Sign in with email/username & password Get email alerts Save searches Purchase content Activate your purchase / trial code Sign in Register Institutional access Sign in through your institution Sign in with a library card Sign in with username / password Recommend to your librarian Institutional account management Sign in as administrator Get help with access Institutional access Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways: IP based access Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account. Sign in through your institution Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth / Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic. Click Sign in through your institution. Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in. When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic. If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator. Sign in with a library card Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian. Society Members Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways: Sign in through society site Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal: Click Sign in through society site. When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic. If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society. Sign in using a personal account Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below. Personal account A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions. Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. Viewing your signed in accounts Click the account icon in the top right to: View your signed in personal account and access account management features. View the institutional accounts that are providing access. Signed in but can't access content Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian. Institutional account management For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more. Close access help modal Purchase Subscription prices and ordering for this journal Purchasing options for books and journals across Oxford Academic Short-term Access To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above. Don't already have a personal account? Register Androgyny, sex-role stereotypes, and clinical judgment - 24 Hours access EUR €36.00 GBP £32.00 USD $39.00 Rental This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve. Advertisement Citations Views 18 Altmetric More metrics information × Email alerts Article activity alert Advance article alerts New issue alert Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic Citing articles via Web of Science (11) Google Scholar Latest Most Read Most Cited Social worker burnout: A longitudinal study Improving Research Writing Measuring Attitudes toward Poverty: A New Scale Counting the rural homeless population: Methodological dilemmas Coping strategies and the maintenance of change after inpatient alcoholism treatment More from Oxford Academic Social Sciences Social Work Books Journals Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement close advertisement About Social Work Research and Abstracts Facebook Twitter Journals Career Network Print ISSN 0148-0847 Copyright © 2023 National Association of Social Workers About Oxford Academic Publish journals with us University press partners What we publish New features Authoring Open access Purchasing Institutional account management Rights and permissions Get help with access Accessibility Contact us Advertising Media enquiries Oxford University Press News Oxford Languages University of Oxford Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide Copyright © 2023 Oxford University Press Cookie settings Cookie policy Privacy policy Legal notice