Use of Locked Nucleic Acid Oligonucleotides as Hybridization/FRET Probes for Quantification of 16S rDNA by Real-Time PCR (2005)

BioTechniquesVol. 38, No. 1 BenchmarksOpen AccessUse of locked nucleic acid oligonucleotides as hybridization/FRET probes for quantification of 16S rDNA by real-time PCROliver Goldenberg, Olfert Landt, Ralf R. Schumann, Ulf B. Göbel & Lutz HamannOliver GoldenbergCharité University Medical Center, Olfert LandtTIB MOLBIOL, Berlin, Germany, Ralf R. SchumannCharité University Medical Center, Ulf B. GöbelCharité University Medical Center & Lutz Hamann*Address correspondence to: Lutz Hamann, Institute for Microbiology and Hygiene, Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, Dorotheenstrasse 96, 10117 Berlin, Germany. e-mail: E-mail Address: lutz.hamann@charite.deCharité University Medical CenterPublished Online:30 May 2018https://doi.org/10.2144/05381BM01AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Quantification of bacterial species from the highly diverse human gastrointestinal microflora (1,2) is a great technical challenge (3). Since several diseases are associated with an altered composition of the gastrointestinal microflora (2,4,5), methods for quantification of specific bacterial species or genera are of great importance to monitor the population dynamics within this microbial ecosystem. Various methods for analyzing the composition of complex microbiota have been developed (reviewed in Reference 6). As most intestinal bacterial species are yet uncultured, quantification by real-time PCR seems to be the method of choice. Real-time PCR allows quantification using SYBR® Green or probe-based systems, [e.g., TaqMan® or hybridization/fluorescent resonance emission transfer (FRET) probes] (7). The major advantage of probes is the sequence-specific detection, whereas SYBR Green detection often results in a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity due to detection of unspecific amplification products.Unfortunately, species- or genus-specific sequences of the 16S rRNA genes required for specific detection of bacteria are very short, thus preventing the use of DNA-based probes. Conventional DNA probes of approximately 20 bp in length are necessary to reach a suitable melting temperature (Tm). Thus, the quantification of species-specific bacterial DNA with probes requires species-specific amplification using two primer pairs for comparing two different bacterial species. Quantitative comparison of two PCR amplifications demands tremendous "fine-tuning" due to different PCR efficiencies resulting from varying binding kinetics of the two different primer pairs. Therefore, our aim was to establish an assay to quantify different bacterial species with probes from one 16S rDNA product, generated by one pair of eubacterial-conserved primers. This product spans different species-specific regions, allowing the quantification by individual specific probes. Such an approach using minor groove binding (MGB) TaqMan probes has recently been published (8). The addition of the minor groove binding peptide to the TaqMan probes resulted in an increased Tm, thereby allowing for the design of very short species-specific probes. Alternatively, the incorporation of locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides within the probes also results in an increased Tm due to their rigid conformational structure (9). Several applications for LNA technology have been described within the last 2 years, including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, 5′-nuclease assay, expression profiling, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (10–15).We demonstrate here that LNA-containing oligonucleotides can also be used as hybridization/FRET probes for detection and quantification of short species-specific 16S rDNA sequences by real-time PCR. Based on this novel application, we established a sensitive assay for rapid quantification of bacterial 16S rDNA using hybridization/FRET probes containing LNA nucleotides.The assay is based on the amplification of a 354-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA target gene from eubacterial DNA. DNA was isolated by a conventional phenol/chloroform extraction from human stool samples representating the complex gastrointestinal microbial community. Eubacterial-conserved primers for amplification used were as follows: sense, 5′-CATGGRTGTCGTCAGCTCGTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGACGGGCGGTGTGTACA-3′ (R = A or G, due to variations at this position). The product was detected with eubacterial-conserved hybridization/FRET probes (EuBdonor and EuBacceptor) containing LNA nucleotides: EuBdonor, 5′-ACGTCATCCCC-3′ labeled with fluorescein at the 3′ end and EuBacceptor, 5′-CCTTCCTC-3′ labeled with LC-705 at the 5′ end. The LNA nucleotides are shown in bold. The eubacterial-conserved regions within the 16S rRNA genes for designing primers and probes were chosen according to the analysis of domain-specific 16S primers by Baker and Cowan (sense, pos. 1054–1074; reverse, pos. 1391-1408; EuBdonor, pos. 1184-1194; EuBacceptor, pos. 1174-1182) (16). The insertion of the respective LNA nucleotides resulted in a Tm shift from 33° to 63°C (EuBdonor) and below 26° to 65°C (EuBacceptor) compared to DNA oligonucleotides without LNAs. PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 µL containing 4 µL FastStart DNA MasterPLUS hybridization/FRET (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), 5 µL DNA, 0.25 µM primers, and 0.2 µM probes. Amplification in the LightCycler® instrument (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) was according to the following parameters: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 0 s, annealing at 60°C for 10 s, and extension at 72°C for 15 s. Fluorescence intensity was determined during each cycle at the end of the annealing step. By performing 10-fold dilution steps of 100 ng target DNA, it could be seen that LNA-containing hybridization/FRET probes are well suited for specific product detection (Figure 1A).Figure 1. Comparative detection of fluorescent signal development between SYBR Green and locked nucleic acid (LNA) hybridization/fluorescent resonance emission transfer (FRET) probes using DNA from human feces.(A) Hybridization/FRET probes. (B) SYBR Green.To compare this new detection method with a conventional detection method, we performed a similar PCR run with the same primers and template DNA using SYBR Green for detection (Figure 1B). A comparison of both assays showed similar results regarding fluorescence generation, demonstrating that LNA-containing oligonucleotides can be applied as hybridization/FRET probes for real-time PCR (Figure 1). However, cycle threshold (Ct) values were found to be approximately 3.2 cycles lower with the SYBR Green assay, indicating a higher sensitivity of SYBR Green compared to hybridization/FRET probes, most likely due to the fact that a greater number of SYBR Green molecules are incorporated by the product.To show species-specific detection, we designed LNA/FRET probes specific for the Bacteroides genus as follows: 5′-LC-640-AGCCGACACCT-3′ and 5′-CGTTATGGCACTT-FL-3′. Amplification with the same conditions as described above, and Bacteroides-specific detection is shown in Figure 2. Using 10-fold dilutions of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron DNA yields strong signal generation (Figure 2A, lanes 1–5). In contrast, 100 ng of five control DNAs from Klebsiella planticola, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium sporogenes, and Bifidobacterium longum, each containing three mismatches per probe, gave no fluorescence signal even after 40 cycles of amplification, indicating high specificity of the probes (Figure 2A, lanes 6–10). Successful amplification of all DNAs was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 2B).Figure 2. Sensitivity and specificity of locked nucleic acid (LNA) hybridization/fluorescent resonance emission transfer (FRET) probes specific for the Bacteroides genus.(A) Fluorescent signal generation using 100 ng (lane1), 10 ng (lane 2), 1 ng (lane 3), 0.1 ng (lane 4), and 0.01 ng (lane 5) of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron DNA. To control specificity 100 ng DNA of Klebsiella planticola (lane 6), Enterococcus faecalis (lane 7), Bacillus cereus (lane 8), Clostridium sporogenes (lane 9), and Bifidobacterium longum (lane 10) were used. (B) Successful amplification was shown by agarose gel electrophoresis.Taken together, the results demonstrate that LNA-based hybridization/FRET probes are suitable alternatives to the recently published MGB probes in quantitative real-time PCR of 16S rDNA and extend the potential of using short detection probes with respect to dye chemistry and PCR instruments. Employing LNA oligonucleotides may permit the use of significant shorter probes, as LNA-containing hybridization/FRET probes of 8–11 bp are working as well as MGB probes of 13–18 bp (8). Furthermore, both assays should be able to discriminate between species that differ in only 1 or 2 bp due to the significant decrease in the Tm by either mismatched LNA-containing probes or MGB probes.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, CAPNetz, Project C5) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, project GO 363/10-1).Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.References1. Boriello, S.P. 1986. Microbial flora of the gastrointestinal tract, p. 2–16. In M.J. Hill (Ed.), Microbial Metabolism in the Digestive Tract. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar2. Kalliomaki, M. and E. Isolauri. 2003. Role of intestinal flora in the development of allergy. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 3:15–20.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3. von Wintzingerode, F., U.B. Gobel, and E. Stackebrandt. 1997. Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 21:213–229.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4. Guarner, F. and J.R. Malagelada. 2003. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 361:512–519.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Seksik, P., L. Rigottier-Gois, G. Gramet, M. Sutren, P. Pochart, P. Marteau, R. Jian, and J. Dore. 2003. Alterations of the dominant faecal bacterial groups in patients with Crohn's disease of the colon. Gut 52:237–242.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6. Zoetendal, E.G., C.T. Collier, S. Koike, R.I. Mackie, and H.R. Gaskins. 2004. Molecular ecological analysis of the gastrointestinal microbiota: a review. J. Nutr. 134:465–472.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7. Wittwer, C.T., K.M. Ririe, R.V. Andrew, D.A. David, R.A. Gundry, and U.J. Balis. 1997. The LightCycler: a microvolume multisample fluorimeter with rapid temperature control. BioTechniques 22:176–181.Link, CAS, Google Scholar8. Ott, S.J., M. Musfeldt, U. Ullmann, J. Hampe, and S. Schreiber. 2004. Quantification of intestinal bacterial populations by real-time PCR with a universal primer set and minor groove binder probes: a global approach to the enteric flora. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2566–2572.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar9. Koshkin, A.A., K.S. Sanajay, P. Nieslen, K.V. Rajwanshi, R. Kumar, M. Meldgaard, C.E. Olsen, and J. Wengel. 1998. LNA (locked nucleic acid): synthesis of the adenin, cytosin, guanine, 5-methylcytosin, thymidin and uracil bicyclonucleosid monomers,oligomerisationand unprecedented nucleic acid recognition. Tetrahedron 54:3607–3630.Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar10. Johnson, M.P., L.M. Haupt, and L.R. Griffiths. 2004. Locked nucleic acid (LNA) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype analysis and validation using real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:e55.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11. Letertre, C., S. Perelle, F. Dilasser, K. Arar, and P. Fach. 2003. Evaluation of the performance of LNA and MGB probes in 5′-nuclease PCR assays. Mol. Cell Probes 17:307–311.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar12. Silahtaroglu, A.N., N. Tommerup, and H. Vissing. 2003. FISHing with locked nucleic acids (LNA): evaluation of different LNA/DNA mixmers. Mol. Cell Probes 17:165–169.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13. Simeonov, A. and T.T. Nikiforov. 2002. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using short fluorescently labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes and fluorescence polarization detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:e91.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14. Tolstrup, N., P.S. Nielsen, J.G. Kolberg, A.M. Frankel, H. Vissing, and S. Kauppinen. 2003. OligoDesign: optimal design of LNA (locked nucleic acid) oligonucleotide capture probes for gene expression profiling. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3758–3762.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar15. Ugozzoli, L.A., D. Latorra, R. Pucket, K. Arar, and K. Hamby. 2004. Real-time genotyping with oligonucleotide probes containing locked nucleic acids. Anal. Biochem. 324:143–152.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar16. Baker, G.C., J.J. Smith, and D.A. Cowan. 2003. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J. Microbiol. Methods 55:541–555.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByRecent advances in fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probes in nucleic acid diagnosis1 January 2020 | Analytical Methods, Vol. 12, No. 7Scanning for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations by DNA melting analysis with TaqMan probes23 February 2017 | Molecular Biology, Vol. 51, No. 1LNA™13 May 2013LNA for Optimization of Fluorescent Oligonucleotide Probes: Improved Spectral Properties and Target Binding14 March 2011 | Bioconjugate Chemistry, Vol. 22, No. 4Use of Base Modifications in Primers and Amplicons to Improve Nucleic Acids Detection in the Real-Time Snake Polymerase Chain ReactionASSAY and Drug Development Technologies, Vol. 9, No. 1LNA probe-based real-time RT-PCR for the detection of infectious bronchitis virus from the oviduct of unvaccinated and vaccinated laying hensJournal of Virological Methods, Vol. 155, No. 1Use of Base-Modified Duplex-Stabilizing Deoxynucleoside 5′-Triphosphates To Enhance the Hybridization Properties of Primers and Probes in Detection Polymerase Chain Reaction1 December 2008 | Biochemistry, Vol. 47, No. 51Quantification of low-expressed mRNA using 5′ LNA-containing real-time PCR primersBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Vol. 354, No. 1Molecular monitoring of the intestinal flora by denaturing high performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Microbiological Methods, Vol. 68, No. 1Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Quantitative Detection of Brassica napus Using a Locked Nucleic Acid TaqMan Probe21 January 2006 | Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 54, No. 4Locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes in high-throughput genetic analysis: Application to an assay for type 1 diabetes-related HLA-DQB1 allelesClinical Biochemistry, Vol. 38, No. 11 Vol. 38, No. 1 STAY CONNECTED Metrics History Received 21 June 2004 Accepted 20 August 2004 Published online 30 May 2018 Published in print January 2005 Information© 2005 Author(s)AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, CAPNetz, Project C5) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, project GO 363/10-1).Competing Interests StatementThe authors declare no competing interests.PDF download