635 KEYNOTE-495/KeyImPaCT: updated analysis of a biomarker-directed, randomized, phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab-based combination therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (2022)

<h3>Background</h3> The group sequential, adaptively randomized, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-495/KeyImPaCT trial (NCT03516981) demonstrated the feasibility of using prospective T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile (Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) dual biomarker status to assess the clinical activity of first-line pembrolizumab-based combination therapies in advanced non−small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present updated efficacy data relative to prespecified biomarker-defined subgroups for each treatment arm. <h3>Methods</h3> Patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC were categorized by Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP and TMB dual biomarker status (Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>low</sup>TMB<sup>non-high</sup>, Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup>, Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>non-high</sup>, Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup>) then randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pembrolizumab (200 mg IV Q3W) plus the multikinase inhibitor (targeting VEGFRs 1-3, FGFRs 1-4, PDGFRα, RET, and KIT) lenvatinib (20 mg oral QD), CTLA-4 inhibitor quavonlimab (75 mg IV Q6W), or LAG-3 inhibitor favezelimab (initially 200 mg and then 800 mg IV Q3W). Adaptive randomization based on objective response rate (ORR) was employed, and frequent interim analyses were performed to quantify efficacy and assess for futility. The primary end point of investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST v1.1 was assessed using prespecified efficacy thresholds for each biomarker-defined subgroup: an ORR of &gt;5% within the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>low</sup>TMB<sup>non-high</sup> subgroup, &gt;20% within the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup> subgroup and Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>non-high</sup> subgroup, and &gt;45% within the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup> subgroup evaluated using a Bayesian posterior probability. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1, overall survival (OS), and safety. <h3>Results</h3> At data cutoff (March 21, 2022), 243 patients had been treated (pembrolizumab+lenvatinib, n=80; pembrolizumab+quavonlimab, n=82; pembrolizumab+favezelimab 200 mg, n=30; pembrolizumab+favezelimab 800 mg, n=51). Efficacy data are presented in<b> table 1</b>. ORR with pembrolizumab+lenvatinib in the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>non-high</sup> subgroup met the prespecified efficacy threshold. The safety profile of each treatment arm was consistent with the known safety profile of each combination. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Pembrolizumab-based combination therapy continued to show promising antitumor activity and durable response in the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup> subgroup across all combinations. Response in the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>non-high</sup> subgroup treated with pembrolizumab+lenvatinib met the prespecified efficacy threshold. Although response in the pembrolizumab+favezelimab arm did not reach the efficacy bar, there was a trend toward improved ORR in the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup> subgroup versus the other 3 biomarker-defined subgroups; median PFS and OS were also numerically longer in the Tcell<sub>inf</sub>GEP<sup>non-low</sup>TMB<sup>high</sup> subgroup compared with the other 3 biomarker-defined subgroups. Prospective assessment of dual biomarkers, as performed in this study, may help identify patients with NSCLC most likely to respond to pembrolizumab-based combination therapies. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Mehak Aggarwal, PharmD, and Holly C. Cappelli, PhD, CMPP, of ApotheCom (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck &amp; Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT03516981 <h3>Consent</h3> The study protocol and all amendments were approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each institution. All patients provided written informed consent