Fast and rigorous inversion of triaxial induction logging data to determine formation resistivity anisotropy, bed boundary position, relative dip and azimuth angles (2003)

PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2003Fast and rigorous inversion of triaxial induction logging data to determine formation resistivity anisotropy, bed boundary position, relative dip and azimuth anglesAuthors: Hanming WangTom BarberRichard RosthalJacques TabanouBarbara AndersonTarek HabashyHanming WangSchlumberger, Tom BarberSchlumberger, Richard RosthalSchlumberger, Jacques TabanouSchlumberger, Barbara AndersonSchlumberger, and Tarek HabashySchlumbergerhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817974 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817974FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by2-D Pixel-Based Inversion for Simultaneous Reconstruction of Resistivity and Dielectric Constant From Electromagnetic Logging-While-Drilling MeasurementsIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 60Anisotropy from Deep Directional Resistivity LWD Measurements19 October 2020Fast inversion of triaxial induction data in dipping crossbedded formationsGong Li Wang, Tom Barber, Peter Wu, David Allen, and Aria Abubakar24 January 2017 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 82, No. 2Direct determination of dip and anisotropy using triaxial electric dipole loggingTeruhiko Hagiwara1 September 2016Borehole Geophysics Complete Session1 September 2016Advanced methods for the evaluation of a hybrid-type unconventional play: The Bakken petroleum systemIain Pirie, Jack Horkowitz, Gary Simpson, and John Hohman18 April 2016 | Interpretation, Vol. 4, No. 2Anisotropy and D2B Estimate from Directional Resistivity ToolT. Hagiwara and Pedro Anguiano-Rojas*19 August 2015A new method to determine the VTI anisotropic resistivity and formation dipT. Hagiwara5 August 2014Determination of dip and anisotropy from transient triaxial induction measurementsTeruhiko Hagiwara18 June 2012 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 77, No. 4Magnetic Point Dipole versus Finite-size Circular Loop Models in Coaxial and Coplanar Two Coil Arrays in Induction ToolsPaulo Roberto de Carvalho, Cícero Roberto Teixeira Régis, and Allen Quentin Howard Jr.13 March 2014Apparent dip and apparent anisotropy from multifrequency triaxial induction measurementsTeruhiko Hagiwara4 January 2011 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 76, No. 1Apparent dip determination from tri‐axial induction dip‐meter measurementsTerry Hagiwara14 October 2009A 3D parametric inversion algorithm for triaxial induction dataAria Abubakar, Tarek M. Habashy, Vladimir Druskin, Leonid Knizhnerman, and Sofia Davydycheva12 January 2006 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 71, No. 1Triaxial induction tool with electrode sleeve: A study of its response to borehole eccentricitySofia Davydycheva, Dean Homan, and Gerald Minerbo6 October 2006A data‐adaptive spatial resolution method for three‐dimensional inversion of triaxial borehole electromagnetic measurementsFaruk O. Alpak, Robert K. Mallan, Junsheng Hou, and Carlos Torres‐Verdín7 December 2005A three‐dimensional parametric inversion of multi‐component multi‐spacing induction logging dataAria Abubakar, Tarek M. Habashy, Vladimir Druskin, Sofia Davydycheva, Hanming Wang, Tom Barber, and Leonid Knizhnerman3 January 2005 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2003ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2003 Pages: 2452 publication data© 2003 Copyright © 2003 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Hanming Wang, Tom Barber, Richard Rosthal, Jacques Tabanou, Barbara Anderson, and Tarek Habashy, (2003), "Fast and rigorous inversion of triaxial induction logging data to determine formation resistivity anisotropy, bed boundary position, relative dip and azimuth angles," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 514-517. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817974 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...