An Introduction to Neural Networks for Hearing Aid Noise Recognition (1995)

No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyClinical Focus: Innovation1 Nov 1995An Introduction to Neural Networks for Hearing Aid Noise Recognition Jun W. Kim, and Richard S. TylerPhD Jun W. Kim Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, E230 GH, Iowa City, IA 52242 Google Scholar More articles by this author and Richard S. Tyler Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, E230 GH, Iowa City, IA 52242 Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0403.20 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Bentler, R. A., Niebuhr, D., Getta, J., & Anderson, C. V. (1993a). Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I: Objective measures.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(4), 808–819. MedlineGoogle Scholar Bentler, R. A., Niebuhr, D., Getta, J., & Anderson, C. V. (1993b). Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(4), 820–831. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Chen, S., Cowan, C. F. N., & Grant, P. M. (1991). Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2(2), 302–309. Google Scholar De Mori, R., & Flammia, G. (1993). Speaker-independent consonant classification continuous speech with distinctive features and neural networks.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(6), 3091–3103. Google Scholar Dillon, H., & Lovegrove, R. (1993). Single-microphone noise reduction systems for hearing aids: A review and evaluation.In G. A. Studebaker & I. Hochberg (Eds.), Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance (vol. 20, pp. 353–370). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar Funahashi, K. (1989). On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks.Neural Networks, 2(3), 183–192. Google Scholar Graf, H., & de Vegvar, P. (1987). A C-MOS implementation of a neural network model.Proceedings of the 1987 Stanford Conference (pp. 351–362). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar Graf, H., Jackel, L., Howard, R., Straughn, B., Denker, J., Hubbard, W., Tennant, D., & Schwartz, D. (1986). VLSI implementation of a neural network memory with several hundreds of neurons.AIP Conference Proceedings, 151, 182–187. Google Scholar Graupe, D., Grosspietsch, J. K., & Taylor, R. J. (1986). A self-adaptive noise filtering system.Hearing Instruments, 37(9), 29–34. Google Scholar Hinton, G. E., Sejnowski, T. J., & Ackley, D. H. (1984). Boltzmann machines: Constraint satisfaction networks that learn (Technical Report CMU-CS-84-119). Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Computer Science. Google Scholar Holler, M., Tam, S., Castro, H., & Benson, R. (1989). An electronically trainable artificial neural network (ETANN) with 10240 ‘Float Gate’ synapses.International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2, 191–196. Google Scholar Hopfield, J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 2554–2558. Google Scholar Howard, R., Schwartz, D., Denker, J., Epworth, R., Graf, H., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L., Straughn, B., & Tennant, D. (1987). An associative memory based on an electronic neural network architecture.IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED-34(7), 1553–1556. Google Scholar Knapp, M., & Wang, H-P. (1992). Machine fault classification: A neural network approach.International Journal of Production Research, 30, 811–823. Google Scholar Kohonen, T. (1984). Self-organization and associative memory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar Levy, W. B. (1985). Associative changes at the synapse: LTP in the hippocampus.Synaptic modification, neuron selectivity, and nervous system organization (pp. 5–34). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA. Google Scholar Lim, J. S., & Oppenheim, A. V. (1979). Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech.Proceedings of the IEEE, 61, 1337–1351. Google Scholar Lippmann, R. (1987, April). An introduction to computing with neural nets.IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4–22. Google Scholar Lippmann, R. (1989). Review of neural networks for speech recognition.Neural Computing, 1, 1–38. Google Scholar Mirchandani, G. (1989). On hidden nodes for neural nets.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 36, 661–664. Google Scholar Plomp, R. (1978). Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, S114 (A). Google Scholar Reed, R. (1993). Pruning algorithms—A survey.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 4(5), 740–747. Google Scholar Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Google Scholar Sage, J., Thompson, K., & Whithers, R. (1986) An artificial neural network integrated circuit based on MNOS/CCD principles.In J. S. Denker (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Networks for Computing, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 151, 381–385. Google Scholar Sejnowski, T., & Rosenberg, C. (1986). NETtalk: A parallel network that learns to read aloud (Technical Report JHU/EECS-86/01). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Google Scholar Stein, L. K., & Dempesy-Hart, D. (1984). Listener-assessed intelligibility of a hearing aid self-adaptive noise filter.Ear and Hearing, 5, 199–204. Google Scholar Tamura, S. (1989). An analysis of a noise reduction neural network.ICASSP, 89, 553–556. Google Scholar Tamura, S., & Waibel, A. (1988, April). Noise reduction using connectionist models. Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 553–556. Google Scholar Tyler, R. S. (1988). Signal processing techniques to reduce the effects of impaired frequency resolution.The Hearing Journal, 41(9), 34–47. Google Scholar Tyler, R. S., Baker, L. J., & Armstrong-Bednall, G. (1983). Difficulties experienced by hearing-aid candidates and hearing-aid users.British Journal of Audiology, 17, 191–201. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Tyler, R. S., & Kuk, F. K. (1987). Consonant recognition evaluation of “noise suppression” hearing aids in speech-babble and low-frequency noise.Ear and Hearing, 10, 243–249. Google Scholar Van Tasell, D. J., Larsen, S. Y., & Fabry, D. A. (1988). Effects of adaptive hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects.Ear and Hearing, 9, 15–21. Google Scholar Wasserman, P. D. (1989). Neural computing: Theory and practice. New York: Van Nostrand Reinord. Google Scholar Wasserman, P. D. (1993). Advanced methods in neural computing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinord. Google Scholar Weiss, M., & Neuman, A. C. (1993). Noise reduction in hearing aids.In G. A. Studebaker & I. Hochberg (Eds.), Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance (Vol. 19, pp. 337–350). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar Widrow, B., Rumelhart, D. & Lehr, M. A. (1994). Communications of the ACM, 37(3), 87–105. Google Scholar White, M., Holiday, M., Guo, Y., & Paulos, J. (1990). New strategies for improving speech enhancement.International Journal of Biomedical Computing, 25, 101–124. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 4Issue 3November 1995Pages: 20-31 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Aug 19, 1993Accepted: Jan 9, 1995 Published in issue: Nov 1, 1995 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesKeywordsback propagationspeechhearing aidnoiseneural networkCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1995 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...