Impact of MR-guided PET Reconstruction on Seizure Foci Localization with FDG PET (2019)

392 Aim: Determine if MR-guided FDG-PET reconstruction improves diagnostic accuracy and epileptogenic lesion localization for patients with focal epilepsy.
 Introduction: Abnormalities detected on MRI or FDG PET alter clinical management and prognosis in patients with focal epilepsy considering surgery (1). Concordant MRI findings are not always present, whereas ∼80% of adult patients with chronic seizures have FDG PET abnormalities. State-of-art FDG PET, however, remains limited by partial volume effects (PVEs) that reduce sensitivity particularly for extra-temporal epilepsy (2). MR-guided (MRG) PET reconstruction reduces PVEs (3). We tested the hypothesis that MRG PET reconstruction increases correct localization of epileptogenic lesions across readers with different levels of clinical experience.
 Methods: After IRB approval, a neuroradiologist with 1000+ brain PET interpretations identified 26 epilepsy subjects that underwent simultaneous FDG PET-MRI (Siemens Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with final adjudicated diagnosis either as normal (N=10) or cortical dysplasia (N=16). PET emission images were reconstructed using conventional OSEM and MRG PET reconstructions (asymmetric Bowsher prior with 3D MPRAGE as anatomical prior image). Then, 3 blinded readers (with 12, 6 & 18 years of experience; respectively) evaluated cases containing either OSEM or MRG PET in the sagittal, axial and coronal planes for each case (MRI data was not provided). Readers determined if there were focal FDG abnormalities consistent with an epileptogenic zone, then assigned ordinal values to image quality (0-3; where 3 was “excellent”) and diagnostic confidence (1-3; where 3 = “definite” abnormality or normal study).
 Results: The figure below shows coronal OSEM and MRG PET reconstructions (A & B respectively) with co-registered MRI (C) - MRG PET better demonstrated the focal FDG abnormality associated with right frontal cortical dysplasia. All 3 readers rated MRG PET images higher in overall quality (2.6 +/- 0.7 vs 2.0 +/- 0.5, Mann-Whitney test, P<0.00001). Reconstruction method did not affect diagnostic confidence (2.6 +/- 0.7 vs 2.9 +/- 0.4, Mann-Whitney test, P=0.555). Readers 2 & 3 (with less experience reading brain FDG PET), improved their localization of the seizure focus using MRG PET images from 42.9 to 75%, and 50 to 75% correct respectively. Reader 1, with the most experience, demonstrated no change in correct localization (85.7 vs 83.3%), but reported more confidence in the diagnosis (P=0.033). Global percentage correct for all 3 raters increased from 59.5% to 77.8% (chi-squared test, P=0.086). MRG PET images increased interpretation sensitivity from 69% to 75%, specificity from 70% to 83% and accuracy from 70% to 78%, but these changes did not reach statistical significance.
 Conclusions: These initial results demonstrate that MRG PET reconstruction of FDG data can increase correct seizure localization for PET readers with less experience. Study limitations include that clinical history, anatomical correlation and non-attenuation corrected FDG PET images were not available to blinded readers. Future work will increase the number of subjects evaluated by the 3 readers to increase statistical power.