Cell Non-Autonomous Modulation Of Tumor Cell Responses To Pharmacological Inhibition Of The Proteasome (2013)

Extensive preclinical studies of several groups using tumor cells co-cultured with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) has documented that the potent anti-MM activity of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is not suppressed by BMSCs (e.g. primary and immortalized BMSCs). Using our compartment-specific bioluminescence imaging (CS-BLI) assays, we extended these observations to larger panels of MM cell lines. We observed, however, a recurrent pattern that primary CD138+ MM tumor cells from bortezomib-refractory patients recurrently exhibited substantial in vitro response to clinically-achievable concentrations and durations of bortezomib treatment. To simulate this clinicopathological observation, MM.1R-Luc+ cells were injected i.v. in SCID-beige mice and treated with bortezomib (0.5 mg/kg s.c. twice weekly for 5 weeks): diffuse MM tumors initially responded to bortezomib, but eventually became refractory. These in vivo-resistant MM cells were isolated from the mice and were treated in vitro with bortezomib, exhibiteing similar responsinveness to this agent as their isogenic bortezomib-naive MM cells, To further address the possibility that this represents a previously underexplored form of a microenvironment-induced alteration in bortezomib responsiveness, we studied how MM cells respond to pharmacological proteasome inhibition after variable times of co-culture with BMSCs prior to bortezomib exposure. We observed that prolonged tumor-stromal co-culture (48-96hrs) prior to initiation of bortezomib treatment did not affect drug sensitivity for many of the MM cell lines (OPM2, H929, UM9, KMS11, KMS18 and RPMI-8226) tested. Notably, prolonged co-cultures with BMSCs prior to bortezomib treatment enhanced the activity of this agent for other MM cell lines (e.g. OPM1, Dox40, OCI-My5, KMS12BM or KMS18). However, MM.1S and MM.1R cells, when exposed to extended co-cultures with BMSCs prior to initiation of drug exposure, exhibited significant attenuation (2-3 fold increase of IC50 values) of their response to bortezomib in several independent replicate experiments. In support of these in vitro results, heterotypic s.c. xenografts of Luc+ MM.1S cells co-implanted with Luc-negative BMSCs did not show significant reduction in MM tumor growth with bortezomib treatment (0.5 mg/kg s.c. twice weekly for 5 weeks) compared to vehicle-treated controls (p=0.13), as quantified by bioluminescence imaging. In co-cultures with BMSCs, MM.1S and MM.1R cells also exhibited suppression of their response to carfilzomib (the degree of this stroma-induced resistance was more pronounced that in the case of bortezomib for these 2 cell lines). Consistent with these observations, in vivo administration of carfilzomib in the orthotopic model of diffuse bone lesions of MM.1R-Luc+ cells was associated with less pronounced reduction in tumor growth, compared to bortezomib treatment (p&lt;0.03). These results suggest that the stroma-induced attenuation of activity against a subset of MM cells represents a class-effect for this group of therapeutics, despite quantitative differences between different proteasome inhibitors. Mechanistically, we determined a distinct transcriptional signature of stroma-induced transcripts which are overexpressed in refractory myeloma patients with significantly shorter overall survival (p&lt;0.03, log-rank tests) after bortezomib treatment. Our results in vitro and in vivo support the notion that the responses of MM cells to proteasome inhibition can exhibit substantial plasticity depending on the specific microenvironmental context with which these MM cells interact. We also identify prognostically-relevant candidate molecular mediators of stroma-induced resistance to proteasome-inhibitor based therapy in MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.