Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging (1974)

No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jan 1974Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging Donald F. Gleason, George T. Mellinger, and The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group Donald F. GleasonDonald F. Gleason , George T. MellingerGeorge T. Mellinger , and The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59889-4AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1974 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByIto Y, Udo K, Vertosick E, Sjoberg D, Vickers A, Al-Ahmadie H, Chen Y, Gopalan A, Sirintrapun S, Tickoo S, Scardino P, Eastham J, Reuter V and Fine S (2019) Clinical Usefulness of Prostate and Tumor Volume Related Parameters following Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 3, (535-540), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019.Rosenbaum C, Mandel P, Tennstedt P, Boehm K, Chun F, Graefen M, Heinzer H, Tilki D and Salomon G (2018) The Impact of Repeat Prostate Biopsies on Oncologic, Pathological and Perioperative Outcomes after Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 1, (103-108), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.Hansel D (2016) The Gleason Grading System: The Approach that Changed Prostate Cancer AssessmentJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 2S, (S140-S141), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017.Truong M, Hollenberg G, Weinberg E, Messing E, Miyamoto H and Frye T (2018) Impact of Gleason Subtype on Prostate Cancer Detection Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Final HistopathologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 2, (316-321), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.Stroup S, Moreira D, Chen Z, Howard L, Berger J, Terris M, Aronson W, Cooperberg M, Amling C, Kane C and Freedland S (2018) Biopsy Detected Gleason Pattern 5 is Associated with Recurrence, Metastasis and Mortality in a Cohort of Men with High Risk Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 6, (1309-1315), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.Newcomb L, Thompson I, Boyer H, Brooks J, Carroll P, Cooperberg M, Dash A, Ellis W, Fazli L, Feng Z, Gleave M, Kunju P, Lance R, McKenney J, Meng M, Nicolas M, Sanda M, Simko J, So A, Tretiakova M, Troyer D, True L, Vakar-Lopez F, Virgin J, Wagner A, Wei J, Zheng Y, Nelson P and Lin D (2018) Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS CohortJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 2, (313-320), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.Mandel P, Kriegmair M, Kamphake J, Chun F, Graefen M, Huland H and Tilki D (2018) Tumor Characteristics and Oncologic Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy in Men 75 Years Old or OlderJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 1, (89-94), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.Boehm K, Larcher A, Tian Z, Mandel P, Schiffmann J, Karakiewicz P, Graefen M, Huland H and Tilki D (2018) Low Other Cause Mortality Rates Reflect Good Patient Selection in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 1, (82-88), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Simonis K, Graefen M and Budaeus L (2018) Shear Wave Elastography for Localization of Prostate Cancer Lesions and Assessment of Elasticity Thresholds: Implications for Targeted Biopsies and Active Surveillance ProtocolsJournal of Urology, VOL. 193, NO. 3, (794-800), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015.Eggener S, Badani K, Barocas D, Barrisford G, Cheng J, Chin A, Corcoran A, Epstein J, George A, Gupta G, Hayn M, Kauffman E, Lane B, Liss M, Mirza M, Morgan T, Moses K, Nepple K, Preston M, Rais-Bahrami S, Resnick M, Siddiqui M, Silberstein J, Singer E, Sonn G, Sprenkle P, Stratton K, Taylor J, Tomaszewski J, Tollefson M, Vickers A, White W and Lowrance W (2018) Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population HealthJournal of Urology, VOL. 194, NO. 3, (626-634), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015.Adam M, Hannah A, Budäus L, Steuber T, Salomon G, Michl U, Haese A, Fisch M, Wittmer C, Steurer S, Minner S, Heinzer H, Huland H, Graefen M, Sauter G, Schlomm T and Isbarn H (2018) A Tertiary Gleason Pattern in the Prostatectomy Specimen and its Association with Adverse Outcome after Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 1, (97-102), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014.Maldonado L, Brait M, Loyo M, Sullenberger L, Wang K, Peskoe S, Rosenbaum E, Howard R, Toubaji A, Albadine R, Netto G, Hoque M, Platz E and Sidransky D (2018) GSTP1 Promoter Methylation is Associated with Recurrence in Early Stage Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 5, (1542-1548), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014.Masterson T, Cheng L, Mehan R and Koch M (2018) Tumor Focality Does Not Predict Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 2, (506-510), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.Amin A, Partin A and Epstein J (2018) Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 4, (1286-1290), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.Epstein J (2018) An Update of the Gleason Grading SystemJournal of Urology, VOL. 183, NO. 2, (433-440), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010.Budäus L, Isbarn H, Eichelberg C, Lughezzani G, Sun M, Perrotte P, Chun F, Salomon G, Steuber T, Köllermann J, Sauter G, Ahyai S, Zacharias M, Fisch M, Schlomm T, Haese A, Heinzer H, Huland H, Montorsi F, Graefen M and Karakiewicz P (2018) Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Multiplicative Interaction Between Surgical Margin Status and Pathological StageJournal of Urology, VOL. 184, NO. 4, (1341-1346), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010.Trock B, Guo C, Gonzalgo M, Magheli A, Loeb S and Epstein J (2018) Tertiary Gleason Patterns and Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: Proposal for a Modified Gleason Scoring SystemJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 4, (1364-1370), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.Kesarwani P, Mandhani A and Mittal R (2018) Polymorphisms in Tumor Necrosis Factor-A Gene and Prostate Cancer Risk in North Indian CohortJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 6, (2938-2943), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.Kordan Y, Salem S, Chang S, Clark P, Cookson M, Davis R, Herrell S, Baumgartner R, Phillips S, Smith J and Barocas D (2018) Impact of Positive Apical Surgical Margins on Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 6, (2695-2701), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.Whittemore D, Hick E, Carter M, Moul J, Miranda-Sousa A and Sexton W (2018) Significance of Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Gleason Score 7 Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 2, (516-522), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008.Sim H, Telesca D, Culp S, Ellis W, Lange P, True L and Lin D (2018) Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer Predicts Pathological Stage and Biochemical RecurrenceJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 5, (1775-1779), Online publication date: 1-May-2008.Billis A, Guimaraes M, Freitas L, Meirelles L, Magna L and Ferreira U (2018) The Impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Standard Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma in Needle BiopsiesJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 2, (548-553), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.Hattab E, Koch M, Eble J, Lin H and Cheng L (2018) Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 is a Powerful Predictor of Biochemical Relapse in Patients With Gleason Score 7 Prostatic AdenocarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. 175, NO. 5, (1695-1699), Online publication date: 1-May-2006.Porter C, Kodama K, Gibbons R, Correa R, Chun F, Perrotte P and Karakiewicz P (2018) 25-Year Prostate Cancer Control and Survival Outcomes: A 40-Year Radical Prostatectomy Single Institution SeriesJournal of Urology, VOL. 176, NO. 2, (569-574), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006.KRYGIEL J, SMITH D, HOMAN S, SUMNER W, NEASE R, BROWNSON R and CATALONA W (2018) INTERMEDIATE TERM BIOCHEMICAL PROGRESSION RATES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SCREEN DETECTED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 1, (126-130), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005.GRUBB R, ROEHL K, ANTENOR J and CATALONA W (2018) RESULTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINESJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 2, (668-672), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005.TROJAN L, MICHEL M, RENSCH F, JACKSON D, ALKEN P and GROBHOLZ R (2018) LYMPH AND BLOOD VESSEL ARCHITECTURE IN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT PROSTATIC TISSUE: LACK OF LYMPHANGIOGENESIS IN PROSTATE CARCINOMA ASSESSED WITH NOVEL LYMPHATIC MARKER LYMPHATIC VESSEL ENDOTHELIAL HYALURONAN RECEPTOR (LYVE-1)Journal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 1, (103-107), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004.ROEHL K, HAN M, RAMOS C, ANTENOR J and CATALONA W (2018) CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTSJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 3, (910-914), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2004.NG J, KOCH M, DAGGY J and CHENG L (2018) PERINEURAL INVASION IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS: LACK OF PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCEJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 6 Part 1, (2249-2251), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.HAN M, BRANNIGAN R, ANTENOR J, ROEHL K and CATALONA W (2018) ASSOCIATION OF HEMOSPERMIA WITH PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 6 Part 1, (2189-2192), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.MANOHARAN M, CIVANTOS F, KIM S, GOMEZ P and SOLOWAY M (2018) Visual Estimate of Percent of Carcinoma Predicts Recurrence After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 4 Part 1, (1194-1198), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003.KONDYLIS F, MORIARTY R, BOSTWICK D and SCHELLHAMMER P (2018) Prostate Cancer Grade Assignment: The Effect of Chronological, Interpretive and Translation BiasJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 4 Part 1, (1189-1193), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003.GROSSKLAUS D, COFFEY C, SHAPPELL S, JACK G, CHANG S and COOKSON M (2018) Percent Of Cancer in the Biopsy Set Predicts Pathological Findings After ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 5, (2032-2036), Online publication date: 1-May-2002.EPSTEIN J and POTTER S (2018) THE PATHOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY FINDINGS: IMPLICATIONS AND CURRENT CONTROVERSIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 2, (402-410), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2001.HAN M, PARTIN A, PIANTADOSI S, EPSTEIN J and WALSH P (2018) ERA SPECIFIC BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 2, (416-419), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2001.ISOLA J, AUVINEN A, POUTIAINEN M, KAKKOLA L, JÄRVINEN T, MÄÄTTÄNEN L, STENMAN U, TAMMELA T, HAKAMA M and VISAKORPI T (2018) PREDICTORS OF BIOLOGICAL AGGRESSIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN SCREENING DETECTED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 5, (1569-1574), Online publication date: 1-May-2001.GILLILAND F, GLEASON D, HUNT W, STONE N, HARLAN L and KEY C (2018) TRENDS IN GLEASON SCORE FOR PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSED BETWEEN 1983 AND 1993Journal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 3, (846-850), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001.GROSSKLAUS D, SHAPPELL S, GAUTAM S, SMITH J and COOKSON M (2018) RATIO OF FREE-TO-TOTAL PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CORRELATES WITH TUMOR VOLUME IN PATIENTS WITH INCREASED PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGENJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 2, (455-458), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2001.NAM R, ELHAJI Y, KRAHN M, HAKIMI J, HO M, CHU W, SWEET J, TRACHTENBERG J, JEWETT M and NAROD S (2018) SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CAG REPEAT POLYMORPHISM OF THE ANDROGEN RECEPTOR GENE IN PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 2, (567-572), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2000.ROACH M, LU J, PILEPICH M, ASBELL S, MOHIUDDIN M, TERRY R and GRIGNON D (2018) LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER RADIOTHERAPY ALONE: RADIATION THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP PROSTATE CANCER TRIALSJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 3, (864-868), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1999.OHORI M, ABBAS F, WHEELER T, KATTAN M, SCARDINO P and LERNER S (2018) PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE APICAL SECTION DETERMINED BY WHOLE MOUNT HISTOLOGYJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 2, (500-504), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1999.COLOMBEL M, DANTE R, BOUVIER R, RIBIERAS S, PANGAUD C, MARECHAL J and LASNE Y (2018) DIFFERENTIAL RNA EXPRESSION OF THE PS2 GENE IN THE HUMAN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT PROSTATIC TISSUEJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 3 Part 1, (927-930), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.Oefelein M, Smith N, Grayhack J, Schaeffer A and McVary K (2018) LONG-TERM RESULTS OF RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN MEN WITH HIGH GRADE CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATEJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 4, (1460-1465), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1997.Weldon V, Tavel F and Neuwirth H (2018) CONTINENCE, POTENCY AND MORBIDITY AFTER RADICAL PERINEAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 4, (1470-1475), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1997.O'Dowd G, Veltri R, Orozco R, Miller M and Oesterling J (2018) Update on the Appropriate Staging Evaluation for Newly Diagnosed Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 3, (687-698), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997.Cookson M, Fleshner N, Soloway S and Fair W (2018) Correlation between Gleason Score of Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen: Accuracy and Clinical ImplicationsJournal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 2, (559-562), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1997.Drew P, Murphy W, Kubilis P and Areford M (2018) Can Androgen Deprivation With Leuprolide be Predicted From Histology Alone? If Not, Why Not?Journal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 6, (2201-2205), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1997.Oyasu R (2018) Editorial: Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 2, (563-564), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1997.Coetzee L, Layfield L, Hars V and Paulson D (2018) Proliferative Index Determination in Prostatic Carcinoma Tissue: Is There Any Additional Prognostic Value Greater Than That of Gleason Score, Ploidy and Pathological Stage?Journal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 1, (214-218), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1997.Lerner S, Blute M, Bergstralh E, Bostwick D, Eickholt J and Zincke H (2018) Analysis of Risk Factors for Progression in Patients with Pathologically Confined Prostate Cancers After Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 156, NO. 1, (137-143), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1996.Parra R, Isorna S, Garcia Perez M, Cummings J and Boullier J (2018) Radical Perineal Prostatectomy without Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Selection Criteria and Early ResultsJournal of Urology, VOL. 155, NO. 2, (612-615), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1996.Weldon V, Tavel F, Neuwirth H and Cohen R (2018) Patterns of Positive Specimen Margins and Detectable Prostate Specific Antigen After Radical Perineal ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 153, NO. 5, (1565-1569), Online publication date: 1-May-1995.Fujikawa K, Sasaki M, Aoyama T, Itoh T and Yoshida O (2018) Prognostic Criteria in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Volume Weighted Mean Nuclear VolumeJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 6, (2123-2127), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1995.Hancock S, Cox R and Bagshaw M (2018) Prostate Specific Antigen After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Reevaluation of Long-Term Biochemical Control and Kinetics of Recurrence in Patients Treated at Stanford UniversityJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 4, (1412-1417), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1995.Weldon V, Tavel F, Neuwirth H and Cohen R (2018) Failure of Focal Prostate Cancer on Biopsy to Predict Focal Prostate Cancer: The Importance of PrevalenceJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 3, (1074-1077), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1995.Oefelein M, Colangelo L, Rademaker A and McVary K (2018) Intraoperative Blood Loss and Prognosis in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 2, (442-447), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1995.Oesterling J, Jacobsen S and Cooner W (2018) The Use of Age-Specific Reference Ranges for Serum Prostate Specific Anitgen in Men 60 years Old or OlderJournal of Urology, VOL. 153, NO. 4, (1160-1163), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1995.Mettlin C, Murphy G, Lee F, Littrup P, Chesley A, Babaian R, Badalament R, Kane R and Mostofi F (2018) Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Detected in the American Cancer Society-National Prostate Cancer Detection ProjectJournal of Urology, VOL. 152, NO. 5 Part 2, (1737-1740), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1994.Ohori M, Goad J, Wheeler T, Eastham J, Thompson T and Scardino P (2018) Can Radical Prostatectomy Alter the Progression of Poorly Differentiated Prostate Cancer?Journal of Urology, VOL. 152, NO. 5 Part 2, (1843-1849), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1994.Zietman A, Coen J, Shipley W, Willett C and Efird J (2018) Radical Radiation Therapy in the Management of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: The Initial Prostate Specific Antigen Value as a Predictor of Treatment OutcomeJournal of Urology, VOL. 151, NO. 3, (640-645), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1994.Bluestein D, Bostwick D, Bergstralh E and Oesterling J (2018) Eliminating the Need for Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Select Patients with Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 151, NO. 5, (1315-1320), Online publication date: 1-May-1994.Partin A, Lee B, Carmichael M, Walsh P and Epstein J (2018) Radical Prostatectomy for High Grade Disease: A Reevaluation 1994Journal of Urology, VOL. 151, NO. 6, (1583-1586), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1994.Persons D, Gibney D, Katzmann J, Lieber M, Farrow G and Jenkins R (2018) Use of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization for Deoxyribonucleic Acid Ploidy Analysis of Prostatic AdenocarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. 150, NO. 1, (120-125), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1993.Kuhn E, Kurnot R, Sesterhenn I, Chang E and Moul J (2018) Expression of the c-erbB-2 (Her-2/neu) Oncoprotein in Human Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. 150, NO. 5 Part 1, (1427-1433), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1993.Mcwhorter W, Hernandez A, Meikle A, Terreros D, Smith J, Skolnick M, L and H (2018) A of Prostate Cancer in High Risk of Urology, VOL. NO. 3 Part 1, Online publication date: G, Y and J (2018) of by Cancer in the Prostatic Adenocarcinoma of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: J, F, G, S and M (2018) The Clinical Usefulness of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen After Therapy of Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 3 Part 2, Online publication date: S, F, M, B, G and J (2018) of Pathological Tumor Volume and Stage in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: of and Magnetic Resonance of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: D, J, N, A and T (2018) Kinetics by and Deoxyribonucleic Acid Ploidy in Prostatic Carcinoma Needle BiopsiesJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: S, C, C and Scardino P (2018) The Risk of of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Clinically Localized of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: F, J, Bergstralh E and Oesterling J (2018) Findings in Patients with Newly Prostate Cancer: Prostate Specific Antigen is to All Other Clinical of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: E (2018) Margin Status in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy to of Tumor Tumor Grade and Tumor of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: Y, T and Yoshida O (2018) Prognostic Significance of Prostate Specific Antigen in Treatment for Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: S, C, D, J, Farrow G, W and D (2018) Situ Hybridization of Antigen in Human of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: A, Walsh A, R, J, Epstein J and D (2018) A of Nuclear and Gleason Grade as a Predictor of Prognosis in Stage Prostate Cancer: A of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: G, G, D and (2018) of Therapy in the Management of Pathological Stage C or Prostate Cancer Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: T, R, D and Farrow G (2018) Adenocarcinoma After Prostatic of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: A, Epstein J, K, A and Walsh P (2018) of Tumor Volume and of as of Pathological Stage in Clinical Stage Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: S, S, Paulson D and P (2018) Determination of Ploidy in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A with and Grading as a Predictor of Clinical RecurrenceJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: and M (2018) Carcinoma of the An Analysis of the of of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: K (2018) of Human Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Usefulness of as a Predictor for of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: J, Berger U, P, R and R (2018) Detection of Tumor in of Patients with Prostatic Carcinoma by of Urology, VOL. NO. 3, Online publication date: J, J, L, S and A (2018) and Prostatic An of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: J, Partin A, W and D (2018) Nuclear for Assessment of Prognosis of Patients With Prostatic Of A SystemJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: J, Partin A, Epstein J, W and D (2018) Nuclear for Assessment of Prognosis of Patients with Prostatic of for of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: J, Partin A and D (2018) of by a Grading of in the Prostatic Adenocarcinoma of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: L, E, L, Hannah J, B, and J (2018) Grading of Prostatic Biopsy: A with the Gleason Grading SystemJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 4 Part 1, Online publication date: J, S, E, Lee D and M (2018) Carcinoma of the Prostate in the The of of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: G, G, M, G, F, and H (2018) The of Biopsy in the of Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: K, M, K, A and H (2018) Adenocarcinoma of A and of the of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: C, B, G, W, M and J (2018) The Radiation of and Prostate of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: J, Z, R, R and L (2018) Prognostic Factors in Localized Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: J and Walsh P (2018) Radical Prostatectomy with of Pathological Findings in the of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: J and S (2018) Prostatic Clinical Pathological Gleason Histological Score and Early of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: F, D, J and J (2018) Correlation Between Stage and Grade in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A of Urology, VOL. NO. 3, Online publication date: C, P, R and A (2018) The of Treatment with and on and in Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: J, R and Grayhack J (2018) The Accuracy of Biopsy in Tumor by of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: C (2018) of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: A and J (2018) Metastasis Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: R, P, A, C and R (2018) of and Biochemical Parameters of the Prostate Adenocarcinoma of the of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: K and C (2018) the of Metastasis Histological Grading of Prostate A Analysis of with of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: C, W, S and A (2018) Stage A Prostatic Carcinoma and Repeat A 5 Years of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: R, D, A, J and R (2018) Accuracy of in Pelvic Staging Biopsies for Adenocarcinoma of the of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: W (2018) of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: H, Smith J, J and R (2018) Surgical Treatment of Stage Prostatic Significance of Tumor Grade and of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: D (2018) of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: H, Farrow G, R, R, W and D (2018) Between Grade and Stage of of the Prostate and Pelvic of Urology, VOL. NO. 3, Online publication date: R, R, D, G, M and J (2018) to Clinical Grading in Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: D, S, H, J and D (2018) A to of Human Prostate Cancer: Nuclear of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: A, H, L and F (2018) of by Gleason Grading in Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: G, N, J, R, C, J and C (2018) The of Prostate Cancer in the by the American of of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: J, N, C and J (2018) for Prostatic Acid Clinical of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: B, D, J, J and Walsh P (2018) Pathological Factors that Prognosis in Stage a Prostatic Cancer: the of of Urology, VOL. NO. 4, Online publication date: C (2018) Needle Biopsy of the of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: S, W, R, C, Cox E, W and Paulson D (2018) Prognosis of Patients With Stage Prostatic AdenocarcinomaJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: S, J, C, J and Paulson D (2018) with Grading in Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: C, R and E (2018) Carcinoma of the a of the and of of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: D, P and W (2018) of in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Research Group of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: R (2018) Early Stage Prostatic Cancer Biopsy Acid of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: A and J (2018) Blood A Prognostic in Adenocarcinoma of the of Urology, VOL. NO. 1, Online publication date: M, R, P and S (2018) in Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Clinical Prostatic Cancer and of Urology, VOL. NO. 5, Online publication date: E, J and J (2018) An Approach to Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. Part 2, Online publication date: W, M, and W (2018) Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: of Grade and to the Pattern of of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: A, F, A and S (2018) Carcinoma of the A at of Urology, VOL. NO. 3, Online publication date: T and G (2018) Primary Treatment of Prostatic Carcinoma with of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: D and O (2018) The Carcinoma of the of Urology, VOL. NO. 6, Online publication date: F and E (2018) Carcinoma of the A of Patients with Stage C Treated by Perineal ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. NO. 2, Online publication date: Volume 1974 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Donald F. Gleason by George T. Mellinger by The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group by All