The Revised French-American-British Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is New Better? (1985)

Editorials1 October 1985The Revised French-American-British Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is New Better?CLARA D. BLOOMFIELD, M.D., RICHARD D. BRUNNING, M.D.CLARA D. BLOOMFIELD, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, RICHARD D. BRUNNING, M.D.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-614 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptSince its introduction in 1976, the classification of the acute myeloid leukemias by the French-American-British (FAB) Cooperative Group (1) has deservedly gained wide acceptance. This acceptance has occurred primarily because the classification provides a common language for persons treating and studying acute leukemia. Before widespread adoption of this classification the terminology applied to different forms of acute myeloid leukemia varied and comparison of treatment results among institutions was difficult. The classification has also been shown to have independent prognostic significance for survival (2). An additional factor contributing to its adoption has been its relative ease of use, because diagnosis depends...References1. BENNETTCATOVSKYDANIEL JDM. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias: French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haematol. 1976;33:451-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Fourth International Workshop on Chromosomes in Leukemia 1982: clinical significance of chromosomal abnormalities in acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1984;11:332-50. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. BENNETTCATOVSKYDANIEL JDM. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982;51:189-99. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. HEADSAVAGECEREZO DRL. Reproducibility of the French-American-British classification of acute leukemia: the Southwest Oncology Group experience. Am J Hematol. 1985;18:47-57. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. STANLEYMCKENNAELLINGERBRUNNING MRGR. Classification of 358 cases of acute myeloid leukemia by FAB criteria: analysis of clinical and morphologic features. In: BLOOMFIELD CD, ed. Adult Leukemias 2. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1985:147-74. Google Scholar6. AMAKIHATTORIBENNETT IKJ. FAB classification of acute leukemias correlating with response to chemotherapy. Nippon Ketsueki Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;47:206-38. MedlineGoogle Scholar7. BENNETTCATOVSKYDANIEL JDM. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:620-5. LinkGoogle Scholar8. ARTHURBLOOMFIELD DC. Partial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 16 and bone marrow eosinophilia in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: a new association. Blood. 1983;61:994-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. HOLMESKEATINGCORK RMA. A unique pattern of central nervous system leukemia in acute myelomonocytic leukemia associated with inv(16)(p13q22). Blood. 1985;65:1071-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. BENNETT J. The French-American-British classification of the acute adult myeloid leukemias: its clinical relevance. In: BLOOMFIELD CD, ed. Adult Leukemias 1. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1982:109-25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar11. SCOAZECIMBERTCROFTS JMM. Myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia? A study of 28 cases presenting with borderline features. Cancer. 1985;55:2390-4. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. GRALNICKGALTONCATOVSKY HDD. Classification of acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med. 1977;87:740-53. LinkGoogle Scholar13. APPELBAUMSTORBRAMBERG FRR. Allogeneic marrow transplantation in the treatment of preleukemia. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:689-93. LinkGoogle Scholar14. Acute Leukemia Group B Criteria for Evaluating Acute Leukemia: June 1974 Modification of the 1969 Criteria. Scarsdale, New York: Cancer and Leukemia Group B: 1974. Google Scholar15. BENNETTCATOVSKYDANIEL JDM. Criteria for the diagnosis of acute leukemia of megakaryocyte lineage (M7): a report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:460-2. LinkGoogle Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Minnesota Health Sciences Center Minneapolis, Minnesota PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited ByPrevalence of Leukemia and Associated Factors among Patients with Abnormal Hematological Parameters in Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional StudyThe novel three‑way variant t(6;17;15)(p21;q21;q22) in acute promyelocytic leukemia with an FLT3‑ITD mutation: A case reportAcute Myeloid LeukaemiaSignal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) gene polymorphisms are associated with treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemiaAssociation of Janus kinase 2 ( JAK2 ) polymorphisms with acute leukemia susceptibilityExpression of human liver HSPGs on acute myeloid leukemiaEffects of sodium stibogluconate on differentiation and proliferation of human myeloid leukemia cell lines in vitroAcute Myeloid LeukemiaSimultaneous Detection of Leukemia Blast Cells on PB/BM — Smears Combining May-Gruenwald Giemsa- and APAAP StainingThe Myeloproliferative Disorders an Historical Appraisal and Personal ExperiencesMorphologic characteristics of erythroleukemia (Acute Myeloid Leukemia; FAB-M6): A CALGB studyErythroleukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: An Historical Appraisal and a Personal ViewProposed Criteria for Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Dogs and CatsBone marrow trephine interpretation: diagnostic utility and potential pitfallsTerminal transferase expression in acute myeloid leukaemia: biology and prognosisChromosome analysis as an aid in differential diagnosis of erythroleukemia (M6) and myelodysplasiaMorphologic, immunologic and cytogenetic studies in erythroleukaemia: evidence for multilineage involvement and identification of two distinct cytogenetic-clihicopathological typesMyeloid leukemia differentiation by phorbol ester and retinoic acid: A practical approachClassification of acute leukaemiasAn increase in basophils in a case of acute myelomonocytic leukaemia associated with marrow eosinophilia and inversion of chromosome 16SERUM LYSOZYME IS RELATED TO LEUKAEMIC SUBTYPE IN AMLTherapiekonzepteTreatment of Acute Megakaryocytic LeukemiaWILLIAM R. FRIEDENBERG, M.D., JOSEPH J. MAZZA, M.D., JOHN D. HINES, M.D.Acute Myeloid Leukemia and ErythroleukemiaE. DEL POTRO, M.D., I. KRSNIK, M.D., J. DIAZ MEDIA VILLA, M.D., A. VILLEGAS, M.D., D. ESPINOS, M.D., M.T. FERRO, M.D. 1 October 1985Volume 103, Issue 4Page: 614-616KeywordsAcute myeloid leukemiaResearch funding Issue Published: 1 October 1985 PDF DownloadLoading ...