2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (2013)

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Principles The 2013 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines continue to adhere to some fundamental principles that inspired the 2003 and 2007 guidelines, namely to base recommendations on properly conducted studies identified from an extensive review of the literature; to consider, as the highest priority, data from randomized, controlled trials and their meta-analyses, but not to disregard the results of observational and other studies of appropriate scientific calibre; and to grade the level of scientific evidence and the strength of recommendations in order to more effectively alert physicians on recommendations that are based on the opinions of the experts rather than on evidence (Tables 1 and 2). When appropriately recognized, this can avoid guidelines being perceived as prescriptive and favour the performance of studies wherein opinion prevails and evidence is lacking.TABLE 1: Classes of recommendationsTABLE 2: Levels of evidenceThis shortened version of the ESH/ESC guidelines is for the practicing physician who often requires simplified information. However, whenever the physicians would like to know the source of the data upon which the recommendations are based, they are encouraged to consult the extensive version of the ESH/ESC guidelines wherein adequate references are given. These guidelines, however, do not override the individual responsibility of healthcare professionals to make appropriate decisions in the circumstances of the individual patient. 1.2 New aspects Because of new evidence on several diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of hypertension, the present guidelines differ from the 2007 ones in several points: Re-emphasis on integration of blood pressure (BP), cardiovascular risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage and clinical complications for total cardiovascular risk assessment. Update of the prognostic significance of out-of-office BP (both ambulatory and home BP), white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment only in patients with SBP or DBP values at least 140 or 90 mmHg, independent of level of total cardiovascular risk. Unified target SBP (<140 mmHg) in both higher and lower cardiovascular risk patients. Revised recommendations on treatment of hypertension in young people and in the elderly. Liberal approach to initial monotherapy, without any all-ranking purpose scheme. Revised therapeutic algorithm for achieving target BP. Revised attention to resistant hypertension. 2. DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS The continuous relationship between BP and cardiovascular and renal events make the distinction between normotension and hypertension difficult. In practice, however, cut-off BP values are universally used to facilitate the decision about treatment (Table 3).TABLE 3: Definitions and classification of office blood pressure levels (mmHg)In order to help prognosis, total cardiovascular risk should be stratified in different categories (low, moderate, high and very high risk referred to the 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality), based on BP category, cardiovascular risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage and presence of diabetes, and symptomatic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease (CKD), as summarized in Fig. 1.FIGURE 1: Stratification of total cardiovascular risk in categories of low, moderate, high and very high risk according to SBP and DBP and presence of risk factors (RFs), asymptomatic organ damage (OD), diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage or symptomatic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Individuals with a high normal office but a raised out-of-office BP (masked hypertension) have a cardiovascular risk in the hypertension range. Individuals with a high office BP but normal out-of-office BP (white-coat hypertension), particularly if there is no diabetes, OD, CVD or CKD, have lower risk than sustained hypertension for the same office BP. BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HT, hypertension; SBP, systolic blood pressure.3. DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION The initial evaluation of a patient with hypertension should confirm the diagnosis of hypertension; detect causes of secondary hypertension; and assess cardiovascular risk, organ damage and concomitant clinical conditions. This calls for BP measurement, medical history including family history, physical examination, laboratory investigation and further diagnostic tests. Some of the investigations are needed in all patients; others only in specific patient groups. 3.1 Blood pressure measurement 3.1.1 Office and out-of-office blood pressure Although conventional office BP measurement currently remains the ‘gold standard’ for screening, diagnosis and management of hypertension, it is generally accepted that out-of-office BP provides important adjunct information. At present, BP can no longer be estimated using a mercury manometer in many – although not all – European countries. Auscultatory or oscillometric semiautomatic sphygmomanometers are used instead, but these devices should be validated according to standardized protocols and their accuracy checked periodically. Table 4 gives instructions for correct office BP measurements, and Table 5 provides clinical indications for out-of-office BP measurement, namely measurements at home or over the 24 h.TABLE 4: Office blood pressure measurementTABLE 5: Clinical indications for out-of-office blood pressure measurement for diagnostic purposesOffice BP is usually higher than ambulatory and home BP and the difference increases as office BP increases. Cut-off values for the definition of hypertension by home and ambulatory BP are reported in Table 6.TABLE 6: Definitions of hypertension by office and out-of-office blood pressure levels3.1.2 White-coat and masked hypertension The term ‘white-coat’ or ‘isolated office’ hypertension refers to a condition in which BP is elevated in the office at repeated visits and normal out of the office either on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or on home blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, BP may be normal in the office and abnormally high out of the medical environment, which is termed ‘masked’ or ‘isolated ambulatory’ hypertension. Cut-off values to be used are those in Table 6. 3.1.3 Central blood pressure Owing to the variable superposition of incoming and reflected pressure waves along the arterial tree, aortic BP (central BP) may be different from brachial BP. Central BP can be estimated indirectly by various methods. The current guidelines consider that, despite the growing interest in these methods, more investigation is needed before recommending the routine measurement of central BP for clinical use. 3.2 Medical history The information to be obtained at the time of the first diagnosis of hypertension is indicated in Table 7.TABLE 7: Personal and family medical history3.3 Physical examination Physical examination aims to establish or verify the diagnosis of hypertension, establish current BP, screen for secondary causes of hypertension and refine global cardiovascular risk. Procedures for BP measurement are indicated in Tables 4 and 5. Other information to be obtained by physical examination is in Table 8.TABLE 8: Physical examination for secondary hypertension, organ damage and obesity3.4 Laboratory investigations Laboratory investigations are directed at providing evidence for additional risk factors, searching for secondary hypertension and looking for organ damage. Investigations should proceed from the most simple to the more complicated ones, as summarized in Table 9.TABLE 9: Laboratory investigations3.5 Searching for asymptomatic organ damage Owing to the importance of asymptomatic organ damage as an intermediate stage in the continuum of cardiovascular disease, and as a determinant of overall cardiovascular disease, signs of organ involvement should be sought carefully by appropriate techniques as indicated below.Figure3.6 Searching for secondary forms of hypertension A specific, potentially reversible cause of BP elevation can be identified in a relatively small number of adult patients with hypertension. However if basal work-up leads to the suspicion of a secondary form of hypertension, the patient should be referred to a specialized centre where specific diagnostic procedures may be performed. 4. TREATMENT APPROACH 4.1 Recommendations of previous guidelines revised The 2007 ESH/ESC Guidelines, like many other scientific guidelines, recommended the use of antihypertensive drugs in patients with Grade 1 hypertension even in the absence of other risk factors or organ damage after nonpharmacological treatment had proved unsuccessful. This recommendation also specifically included the elderly hypertensive patient. The 2007 Guidelines also suggested drug treatment of patients with diabetes, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) or CKD even when their BP was in the high normal range (130–139/85–89 mmHg). Furthermore, a lower BP target was recommended for these high or very high risk patients (<130/80 mmHg) than in patients at low–moderate risk (<140/90 mmHg). These recommendations were reappraised in a 2009 ESH Task Force document on the basis of an extensive critical review of the evidence. The following now summarizes the conclusions for the current guidelines: attention should be directed to the Class of recommendation and the Level of evidence, in order to distinguish what is considered compelling and what simply prudent. Figure 2 also summarizes recommendations and suggestions for treatment initiation and BP targets in the context of total risk stratification of hypertensive individuals.FIGURE 2: Initiation of lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drug treatment. Targets of treatment are also indicated. Colours are as in Fig. 1. See 4.3 and 6.5 for evidence that, in patients with diabetes, the optimal DBP target is between 80 and 85 mmHg. In the high normal blood pressure (BP) range, drug treatment should be considered in the presence of a raised out-of-office BP (masked hypertension). See 4.2 and 6.3 for lack of evidence in favour of drug treatment in young individuals with isolated systolic hypertension. CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HT, hypertension; OD, organ damage; RF, risk factor; SBP, systolic blood pressure.4.2 When to initiate antihypertensive drug treatmentFigure4.3 Blood pressure treatment targetsFigure5. TREATMENT STRATEGIES 5.1 Lifestyle changes Appropriate lifestyle changes are the cornerstone for the prevention of hypertension. They are also important for its treatment, although they should never delay the initiation of drug therapy in patients at high level of risk. In addition to the BP-lowering effect, lifestyle changes contribute to the control of other cardiovascular risk factors and clinical conditions. The lifestyle measures that have been shown to be capable of reducing BP and therefore recommended are as follows: salt restriction to 5–6 g/day; moderation of alcohol consumption to no more than 20–30 g of ethanol per day in men and 10–20 g/day in women; high consumption of vegetables and fruits and low-fat dairy products; reduction of weight to a BMI of 25 kg/m2 and waist circumference to less than 102 cm in men and less than 88 cm in women; at least 30 min of moderate dynamic exercise on 5 to 7 days per week. 5.2 Pharmacological therapy 5.2.1 Choice of antihypertensive drugs The current guidelines reconfirm that all major classes of antihypertensive agents are suitable for the initiation and maintenance of antihypertensive treatment either in monotherapy or in some combinations, and that no all-purpose ranking of drugs for general antihypertensive usage is evidence based. All classes have their advantages but also contraindications, and may be preferentially used or avoided in specific conditions. Contraindications and preferred indications are listed in Tables 10 and 11.TABLE 10: Compelling and possible contraindications to the use of antihypertensive drugsTABLE 11: Drugs to be preferred in specific conditions5.2.2 Monotherapy and combination therapy The current guidelines share the 2007 Guidelines’ opinion that monotherapy can reduce BP to target only in a limited number of patients and that most patients require the combination of at least two drugs, and they reconfirm that initiation with a drug combination can be considered in patients at high cardiovascular risk or with markedly high BP. The algorithm of Fig. 3, however, is a modification of the 2007 one, to emphasize that adding drugs to drugs should be done with attention to results and any compound overtly ineffective or minimally effective should be replaced, rather than retained in an automatic step-up multiple-drug approach. Combinations to be preferred or avoided are illustrated in Fig. 4.FIGURE 3: Monotherapy vs. drug combination strategies to achieve target blood pressure (BP). CV, cardiovascular.FIGURE 4: Possible combinations of classes of antihypertensive drugs. Green continuous lines: preferred combinations; green dashed line: useful combination (with some limitations); black dashed lines: possible but less well tested combinations; red continuous line: not recommended combination. Although verapamil and diltiazem are sometimes used with a β-blocker to improve ventricular rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation, only dihydropyridine calcium antagonists should normally be combined with β-blockers. ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker. *Thiazide diuretics also include thiazide-like compounds (chlorthalidone) and indapamide.Strengths of recommendations about choice of drugs and combinations of antihypertensive agents are given in the summary table below.Figure6. TREATMENT STRATEGIES IN SPECIAL CONDITIONS Summary recommendations for antihypertensive treatment strategies in various conditions are listed below. 6.1 White-coat and masked hypertensionFigure6.2 ElderlyFigure6.3 Young adultsFigure6.4 WomenFigure6.5 Diabetes mellitusFigure6.6 Metabolic syndromeFigure6.7 Diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathyFigure6.8 Cerebrovascular diseaseFigure6.9 Heart diseaseFigure6.10 Atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis and peripheral artery diseaseFigure6.11 Resistant hypertensionFigure7. TREATMENT OF ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORSFigure8. FOLLOW-UP 8.1 Follow-up visits After initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy, it is important to see the patient at 2-week to 4-week intervals to evaluate the effects on BP and to assess possible side-effects. Some medications will have an effect within days or weeks but a continued delayed response may occur during the first 2 months. Once the target is reached, a visit interval of a few months is reasonable. 8.2 Elevated blood pressure at control visits Patients and physicians have a tendency to interpret an uncontrolled BP at a given visit as due to occasional factors and thus to downplay its clinical significance. Due attention should be given to poor adherence or irregular consumption of drugs (sometimes because of adverse effects), to the white-coat effect and to substances or drugs opposing the antihypertensive effect of treatment. 8.3 Can antihypertensive medication be stopped? In some patients, in whom treatment is accompanied by an effective BP control for an extended period, it may be possible to reduce the number and dosage of drugs. This may be particularly the case if BP control is accompanied by healthy lifestyle changes. Reduction of medications should be made gradually and the patient should frequently be checked because of the risk of reappearance of hypertension. 9. IMPROVEMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL IN HYPERTENSION Despite overwhelming evidence that hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor and that BP-lowering substantially reduce the risk, there is evidence that all over the world a noticeable proportion of hypertensive individuals are unaware of this condition or, if aware, do not undergo treatment; target BP values are seldom achieved; failure to achieve BP control is associated with persistence of an elevated cardiovascular risk; and the rate of awareness of hypertension and BP control is improving slowly or not at all. As a consequence, high BP remains a leading cause of death and cardiovascular morbidity in Europe, as elsewhere in the world. Overall, three main causes of the low rate of BP control in real life have been identified: physician inertia; patient low adherence to treatment; and deficiencies of healthcare systems in their approach to chronic diseases. Methods to improve adherence to physicians’ recommendations are listed in Table 12.TABLE 12: Methods to improve adherence to physicians’ recommendations