Electrical Impedance Tomography (1999)

Previous article Next article Electrical Impedance TomographyMargaret Cheney, David Isaacson, and Jonathan C. NewellMargaret Cheney, David Isaacson, and Jonathan C. Newellhttps://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144598333613PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAboutAbstractThis paper surveys some of the work our group has done in electrical impedance tomography.[1] Google Scholar[2] Andrew Allers and , Fadil Santosa, Stability and resolution analysis of a linearized problem in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems, 7 (1991), 515–533 92f:92022 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[3] Google Scholar[4] Google Scholar[5] Carlos Berenstein and , Enrico Casadio Tarabusi, Inversion formulas for the k‐dimensional Radon transform in real hyperbolic spaces, Duke Math. J., 62 (1991), 613–631 93b:53056 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[6] Google Scholar[7] D. C. Barber and and B. H. Brown, Applied potential tomography, J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum., 17 (1984), pp. 723–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] B. H. Brown, , D. C. Barber and , and A. D. Seagar, Applied potential tomography: Possible clinical applications, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 6 (1985), pp. 109–121. 489 CPPMD5 0143-0815 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Alberto‐P. Calderón, On an inverse boundary value problem, Soc. Brasil. Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 1980, 65–73 81k:35160 Google Scholar[10] P. Colli Franzone, Il probleme inverso dell’elettrocardiografia, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. A, 15 (1978), pp. 30–51; and Google Scholar[11] M. Cheney and and D. Isaacson, Distinguishability in impedance imaging, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 39 (1992), pp. 852–860. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[12] Margaret Cheney and , David Isaacson, An overview of inversion algorithms for impedance imaging, Contemp. Math., Vol. 122, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1991, 29–39 1135853 Google Scholar[13] Margaret Cheney, , David Isaacson and , Eli Isaacson, Exact solutions to a linearized inverse boundary value problem, Inverse Problems, 6 (1990), 923–934 91j:35277 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[14] K.‐S. Cheng, , D. Isaacson, , J. C. Newell and , and D. G. Gisser, Electrode models for electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed Engr., 36 (1989), pp. 918–924. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[15] M. Cheney, , D. Isaacson, , J. Newell, , J. Goble and , and S. Simske, NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem, Internat. J. Imaging Systems and Technology, 2 (1990), pp. 66–75. iis IJITEG 0899-9457 Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] T. Connolly and , David Wall, On an inverse problem, with boundary measurements, for the steady state diffusion equation, Inverse Problems, 4 (1988), 995–1012 90b:35238 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[17] David Dobson, Convergence of a reconstruction method for the inverse conductivity problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52 (1992), 442–458 93c:35159 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[18] K. A. Dines and and R. J. Lytle, Analysis of electrical conductivity imaging, Geophysics, 46 (1981), pp. 1025–1036. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 Geophysics CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[19] W. Daily and and A. Ramirez, Electrical resistance tomography during in‐situ tricholoethylene remediation at the Savannah River Site, Applied Geophysics, 33 (1995), pp. 239–249. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[20] Google Scholar[21] Google Scholar[22] B. M. Eyüboglu and and T. C. Pilkington, Comments on distinguishability in electrical impedance tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 40 (1993), pp. 1328–1880. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[23] Google Scholar[24] L. F. Fuks, , M. Cheney, , D. Isaacson, , D. G. Gisser and , and J. C. Newell, Detection and imaging of electric conductivity and permittivity at low frequency, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 3 (1991), pp. 1106–1110. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[25] Google Scholar[26] Google Scholar[27] D. G. Gisser, , D. Isaacson and , and J. C. Newell, Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9, Suppl. A (1988), pp. 35–41. 489 CPPMD5 0143-0815 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[28] D. Gisser, , D. Isaacson and , J. Newell, Electric current computed tomography and eigenvalues, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 50 (1990), 1623–1634 91j:35280 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[29] D. G. Gisser, , D. Isaacson and , and J. C. Newell, Current topics in impedance imaging, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 8A (1987), pp. 39–46. 489 CPPMD5 0143-0815 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[30] Google Scholar[31] D. Isaacson, Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, MI‐5 (1986), pp. 91–95. itm ITMID4 0278-0062 IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[32] David Isaacson and , Margaret Cheney, Current problems in impedance imaging, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990, 141–149 1046434 Google Scholar[33] David Isaacson and , Margaret Cheney, Effects of measurement precision and finite numbers of electrodes on linear impedance imaging algorithms, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 51 (1991), 1705–1731 92h:35238 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[34] Google Scholar[35] David Isaacson and , Eli Isaacson, Comment on A.‐P. Calderón’s paper: “On an inverse boundary value problem” [in Seminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications to Continuum Physics (Rio de Janeiro, 1980), 65–73, Soc. Brasil. Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 1980; MR0590275 (81k:35160)], Math. Comp., 52 (1989), 553–559 90f:35201 Google Scholar[36] Guang‐Da Hu and , Taketomo Mitsui, Stability analysis of numerical methods for systems of neutral delay‐differential equations, BIT, 35 (1995), 504–515 97i:65130 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[37] Google Scholar[38] Google Scholar[39] H. Jain, , D. Isaacson, , P. M. Edic and , and J. C. Newell, Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 44 (1997), pp. 1051–1060. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[40] Google Scholar[41] A. Koskal and and B. M. Eyüboglu, Determination of optimum injected current patterns in electrical impedance tomography, Physiol. Meas., 16 (1995), pp. A99–A109. 3nk ZZZZZZ 0967-3334 Physiol. Meas CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[42] V. Kolehmainen, , M. Vauhkonen, , P. A. Karjalainen and , and J. P. Kaipio, Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns, Physiol. Meas., 18 (1997), pp. 289–303. 3nk ZZZZZZ 0967-3334 Physiol. Meas CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[43] Robert Kohn and , Michael Vogelius, Determining conductivity by boundary measurements, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 37 (1984), 289–298 85f:80008 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[44] Adrian Nachman, Reconstructions from boundary measurements, Ann. of Math. (2), 128 (1988), 531–576 90i:35283 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[45] Adrian Nachman, Global uniqueness for a two‐dimensional inverse boundary value problem, Ann. of Math. (2), 143 (1996), 71–96 96k:35189 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[46] J. C. Newell, , D. G. Gisser and , and D. Isaacson, An electric current tomograph, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 35 (1988), pp. 828–833. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[47] R. L. Parker, The inverse problem of resistivity sounding, Geophysics, 42 (1984), pp. 2143–2158. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 Geophysics CrossrefGoogle Scholar[48] A. Ramm, Multidimensional inverse scattering problems and completeness of the products of solutions to homogeneous PDE, Proceedings of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the GAMM (Vienna, 1988), Vol. 69, 1989, 0–0, T13–T22 90i:35286 Google Scholar[49] A. G. Ramm, Finding conductivity from boundary measurements, Comput. Math. Appl., 21 (1991), pp. 85–91. cap CMAPDK 0898-1221 Comput. Math. Appl. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[50] A. Ramirez, , W. Daily, , D. LaBrecque, , E. Owen and , and D. Chesnut, Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography, Water Resources Research, 29 (1993), pp. 73–87. wre WRERAQ 0043-1397 Water Resour. Res. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[51] A. Ramirez, , W. Daily, , A. Binley, , D. LaBrecque and , and D. Roelant, Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods, J. Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1 (1996), pp. 189–203. c8e ZZZZZZ 1083-1363 J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[52] Google Scholar[53] John Sylvester, A convergent layer stripping algorithm for the radially symmetric impedance tomography problem, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 17 (1992), 1955–1994 93m:65172 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[54] Erkki Somersalo, , Margaret Cheney and , David Isaacson, Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52 (1992), 1023–1040 93f:35052 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[55] Erkki Somersalo, , Margaret Cheney, , David Isaacson and , Eli Isaacson, Layer stripping: a direct numerical method for impedance imaging, Inverse Problems, 7 (1991), 899–926 92i:65193 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[56] S. Stphanesco, , C. Schlumberger and , and M. Schlumberger, Sur la distribution électrique autour d’une prise de terre ponctuelle dans un terrain a couchés horizontales, homogènes et isotropes, J. Physics & Radium Ser., 7 (1930), pp. 132–140. jrd JPRAAJ 0368-3842 J. Phys. Radium CrossrefGoogle Scholar[57] John Sylvester and , Gunther Uhlmann, A uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem in electrical prospection, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 39 (1986), 91–112 87j:35377 CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[58] Fadil Santosa and , Michael Vogelius, A backprojection algorithm for electrical impedance imaging, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 50 (1990), 216–243 91c:35159 LinkISIGoogle Scholar[59] Google Scholar[60] A. Wexler, , B. Fry and , and M. R. Neiman, Impedance‐computed tomography algorithm and system, Appl. Opt., 24 (1985), pp. 3985–3992. apo APOPAI 0003-6935 Appl. Opt. CrossrefISIGoogle Scholar[61] E. J. Woo, , J. Webster and , and W. J. Tompkins, The improved Newton‐Raphson method and its parallel implementation for static impedance imaging, Proc. IEEE‐EMBS Conf. Part 1, 5 (1990), pp. 102–103. Google Scholar[62] Google Scholar[63] T. J. Yorkey, , J. G. Webster and , and W. J. Tompkins, Comparing reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., BME‐34 (1987), pp. 843–852. ieb IEBEAX 0018-9294 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. CrossrefISIGoogle ScholarKeywordselectrical impedance tomographypulmonary embolusinverse boundary value problem Previous article Next article FiguresRelatedReferencesCited ByDetails The Born approximation in the three-dimensional Calderón problemJournal of Functional Analysis, Vol. 283, No. 12 | 1 Dec 2022 Cross Ref On reconstruction of binary images by efficient sample-based parameterization in applications for electrical impedance tomographyInternational Journal of Computer Mathematics, Vol. 99, No. 11 | 11 March 2022 Cross Ref Adaptively Regularized Bases-Expansion Subspace Optimization Methods for Electrical Impedance TomographyIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 69, No. 10 | 1 Oct 2022 Cross Ref Construction of Full-View Data from Limited-View Data Using Artificial Neural Network in the Inverse Scattering ProblemApplied Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 19 | 29 September 2022 Cross Ref Reconstruction of small and extended regions in EIT with a Robin transmission conditionInverse Problems | 19 August 2022 Cross Ref Machine learning enhanced electrical impedance tomography for 2D materialsInverse Problems, Vol. 38, No. 8 | 27 June 2022 Cross Ref A Dual-Modal Imaging Method Combining Ultrasound and Electromagnetism for Simultaneous Measurement of Tissue Elasticity and Electrical ConductivityIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 69, No. 8 | 1 Aug 2022 Cross Ref Investigation of a non-iterative technique based on topological derivatives for fast localization of small conductivity inclusionsComputers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 120 | 1 Aug 2022 Cross Ref Gastric Electrical Impedance Tomography (gEIT) Based on a 3D Jacobian Matrix and Dual-Step Fuzzy Clustering Post-ProcessingIEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 22, No. 14 | 15 Jul 2022 Cross Ref Distinguishing heat-treated dead cells from viable cells using frequency dependence of electrical impedanceBio-Medical Materials and Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 4 | 15 Jul 2022 Cross Ref Calderón's inverse problem with a finite number of measurements II: independent dataApplicable Analysis, Vol. 101, No. 10 | 26 March 2020 Cross Ref Series reversion in Calderón’s problemMathematics of Computation, Vol. 91, No. 336 | 31 May 2022 Cross Ref Bridging and Improving Theoretical and Computational Electrical Impedance Tomography via Data CompletionTan Bui-Thanh, Qin Li, and Leonardo Zepeda-Nún͂ezSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 44, No. 3 | 1 June 2022AbstractPDF (5695 KB)Majorization–Minimization Total Variation Solution Methods for Electrical Impedance TomographyMathematics, Vol. 10, No. 9 | 27 April 2022 Cross Ref Contact Adapting Electrode Model for Electrical Impedance TomographyJ. Dardé, N. Hyvönen, T. Kuutela, and T. ValkonenSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 82, No. 2 | 15 March 2022AbstractPDF (1929 KB)Soft wearable devices for deep-tissue sensingNature Reviews Materials, Vol. 119 | 14 March 2022 Cross Ref Scalp-Mounted Electrical Impedance Tomography of Cerebral HemodynamicsIEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 22, No. 5 | 1 Mar 2022 Cross Ref High-accuracy rebar position detection using deep learning–based frequency-difference electrical resistance tomographyAutomation in Construction, Vol. 135 | 1 Mar 2022 Cross Ref SNR-Enhanced, Rapid Electrical Conductivity Mapping Using Echo-Shifted MRITomography, Vol. 8, No. 1 | 5 February 2022 Cross Ref Influence of Electrode Positions on Performance of Hand Motion Capture Using EITIEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, Vol. 4, No. 1 | 1 Feb 2022 Cross Ref Electrical impedance tomography: a potential tool for intraoperative imaging of the tongue basePhysiological Measurement, Vol. 43, No. 1 | 22 February 2022 Cross Ref Neural networks for classification of strokes in electrical impedance tomography on a 3D head modelMathematics in Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4 | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shapeDiscrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, Vol. 15, No. 1 | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref High-Fidelity Shape Reconstruction for Electrical Impedance Tomography of Multi-Phase Conductivity via Deep Discrete RepresentationIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 71 | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref Nonlinear Difference Imaging to Image Local Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene Using Electrical Impedance TomographyIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 71 | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref Steady Systems of PDEs. Two Examples from ApplicationsMathematical and Computational Methods for Modelling, Approximation and Simulation | 23 January 2022 Cross Ref Electrical Capacitance TomographyIndustrial Tomography | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref Mathematical concepts for image reconstruction in tomographyIndustrial Tomography | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref Reconstruction of singular and degenerate inclusions in Calderón's problemInverse Problems and Imaging, Vol. 16, No. 5 | 1 Jan 2022 Cross Ref A two‐step accelerated Landweber‐type iteration regularization algorithm for sparse reconstruction of electrical impedance tomographyMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, Vol. 49 | 14 December 2021 Cross Ref Sound speed uncertainty in acousto-electric tomographyInverse Problems, Vol. 37, No. 12 | 26 November 2021 Cross Ref Stability for the Calderón’s problem for a class of anisotropic conductivities via an ad hoc misfit functionalInverse Problems, Vol. 37, No. 12 | 17 November 2021 Cross Ref Approximation error method for imaging the human head by electrical impedance tomography*Inverse Problems, Vol. 37, No. 12 | 23 November 2021 Cross Ref Detecting embedded rebar in cement mortar by frequency-difference electrical resistance tomographyAutomation in Construction, Vol. 132 | 1 Dec 2021 Cross Ref Electrical impedance tomography for non-invasive identification of fatty liver infiltrate in overweight individualsScientific Reports, Vol. 11, No. 1 | 6 October 2021 Cross Ref Infinite-Dimensional Inverse Problems with Finite MeasurementsArchive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Vol. 18 | 8 November 2021 Cross Ref A Krylov subspace type method for Electrical Impedance TomographyESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 6 | 25 November 2021 Cross Ref Coping with electrode polarization for development of DC-Driven electrical impedance tomographyFlow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 81 | 1 Oct 2021 Cross Ref Anatomical atlas of the upper part of the human head for electroencephalography and bioimpedance applicationsPhysiological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 10 | 26 November 2021 Cross Ref Model Selection Based Algorithm in Neonatal Chest EITIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 68, No. 9 | 1 Sep 2021 Cross Ref Electrical-tomographic imaging of physiological-induced conductive response in calf muscle compartments during voltage intensity change of electrical muscle stimulation (vic-EMS)Physiological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 9 | 27 September 2021 Cross Ref Boundary element fast multipole method for modeling electrical brain stimulation with voltage and current electrodesJournal of Neural Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 4 | 19 August 2021 Cross Ref Method of peripheral vein detection using Electrical Impedance TomographyJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 2008, No. 1 | 1 Aug 2021 Cross Ref Automatic quality assessment of capacitively-coupled bioimpedance signals for respiratory activity monitoringBiomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol. 68 | 1 Jul 2021 Cross Ref A Breath Monitoring Approach Based on Electrical Impedance MeasurementsIEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 5, No. 2 | 1 Jun 2021 Cross Ref Some non-linear systems of PDEs related to inverse problems in conductivityCalculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 60, No. 3 | 11 May 2021 Cross Ref Survey on Medical Imaging of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) by Variable Current Pattern MethodsJournal of ISMAC, Vol. 3, No. 2 | 12 May 2021 Cross Ref Rapid rotational magneto-acousto-electrical tomography with filtered back-projection algorithm based on plane wavesPhysics in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 66, No. 9 | 21 April 2021 Cross Ref Tomographic Proximity Imaging Using Conductive Sheet for Object TrackingSensors, Vol. 21, No. 8 | 13 April 2021 Cross Ref An Electrical Impedance Tomography System for Brain Stroke Imaging based on a Lebesgue-Space Inversion ProcedureIEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 5, No. 1 | 1 Mar 2021 Cross Ref Bioimpedance analysis as a tool for hemodynamic monitoring: overview, methods and challengesPhysiological Measurement, Vol. 42, No. 3 | 6 April 2021 Cross Ref A multiscale optimization framework for reconstructing binary images using multilevel PCA-based control space reductionBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express, Vol. 7, No. 2 | 29 January 2021 Cross Ref A spectral-in-time Newton–Krylov method for nonlinear PDE-constrained optimizationIMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Vol. 15 | 25 February 2021 Cross Ref Design of electrical impedance tomography for biomedicineJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1816, No. 1 | 1 Feb 2021 Cross Ref Preconditioning nonlocal multi-phase flowJournal of Computational Physics, Vol. 424 | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref Optimal Bayesian experimental design for electrical impedance tomography in medical imagingComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 373 | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref Stochastic Approximation for Optimization in Shape SpacesCaroline Geiersbach, Estefania Loayza-Romero, and Kathrin WelkerSIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 31, No. 1 | 26 January 2021AbstractPDF (10246 KB)Uniqueness, stability and global convergence for a discrete inverse elliptic Robin transmission problemNumerische Mathematik, Vol. 147, No. 1 | 18 November 2020 Cross Ref Effect of Water Flow on and in Engineering and Materials | 17 March 2021 Cross Ref Tomography in Biomedical Imaging and for Convergence | 9 April 2021 Cross Ref analysis of the electrode for electrical impedance Mathematics, Vol. No. 7 | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref electrical impedance tomography in A and | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref of a Impedance Tomography Based on the for Detection and | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref An Method for An Inverse Methods in Image Processing and Inverse Problems | 26 September 2021 Cross Ref Construction of Artificial for a in J. and Journal on and Optimization, Vol. No. 5 | 18 October 2021AbstractPDF of current impedance imaging on Pure & Applied Analysis, Vol. No. | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref Electrical Tomography Image Reconstruction Neural Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref An EIT System Signal Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref of 2D to of Materials | 1 Jan 2021 Cross Ref Boundary by Algorithm Using Electrical Impedance TomographyIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 69, No. 12 | 1 Dec 2020 Cross Ref image reconstruction for electrical impedance of Scientific Vol. 91, No. 12 | 1 Dec 2020 Cross Ref Imaging Conductivity in Graphene Using Electrical Impedance Vol. 11, No. 12 | 1 December 2020 Cross Ref A Design Method for and Sensors with Vol. No. 24 | 18 December 2020 Cross Ref and measurements of and using of Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1 | 9 2020 Cross Ref of measurement error on conductivity reconstruction in electrical impedance tomographyInverse Problems in and Engineering, Vol. No. 12 | 18 May 2020 Cross Ref Electrical impedance tomography image reconstruction based on backprojection and learning on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. No. 4 | 13 August 2020 Cross Ref A direct reconstruction algorithm for the anisotropic inverse conductivity problem based on Calderón’s method in the Problems, Vol. No. 12 | 3 December 2020 Cross Ref and inverse Born for the and Problems, Vol. No. 11 | 7 October 2020 Cross Ref of the electrical impedance tomography with a of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. No. 3 | 1 2020 Cross Ref Numerical of inverse problems by Problems, Vol. No. 11 | 23 October 2020 Cross Ref for a Tomographic with Conference on and Systems | 24 Oct 2020 Cross Ref Tomographic Approach for Proximity Imaging using Conductive 2020 The Annual Conference of the IEEE | 18 Oct 2020 Cross Ref An Boundary and Conductivity Simultaneous Method for Ultrasound Electrical Impedance TomographyIEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. No. 19 | 1 Oct 2020 Cross Ref Finite Method for Simulation of to Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. No. 10 | 1 Oct 2020 Cross Ref Reconstruction of conductivities in electrical impedance in Partial Differential Equations, Vol. No. 9 | 13 May 2020 Cross Ref A on Electrical Impedance Tomography Vol. No. 18 | 10 September 2020 Cross Ref Electrical Impedance for Variations in Vol. No. 18 | 17 September 2020 Cross Ref Electrical Impedance Method and Machine IEEE on Machine for Signal Processing | 1 Sep 2020 Cross Ref Determining in tomography with and Problems, Vol. No. 9 | 11 September 2020 Cross Ref EIT Using and Analysis Using Sensors Journal, Vol. No. 15 | 1 Aug 2020 Cross Ref Motion for A Ultrasound for Sensors Journal, Vol. No. 13 | 1 Jul 2020 Cross Ref Electrical Impedance Method Using Deep and Mathematical Methods in Vol. 2020 | 11 Jun 2020 Cross Ref Bayesian inversion for tomography in medical imaging using the nonlinear Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. | 1 Jun 2020 Cross Ref An EIT with IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Conference | 1 May 2020 Cross Ref Discrete of the as with applications in geometric inverse Problems, Vol. No. 5 | 5 May 2020 Cross Ref for Brain a for and Inverse in Vol. 18, No. 2 | 9 October Cross Ref Determination of from boundary Journal of Numerical Methods for & Vol. No. 11 | Feb 2020 Cross Ref Reconstruction of in Current Impedance TomographyJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vol. No. 2 | 19 November Cross Ref Tomographic Approach for Imaging Transactions on Vol. No. 1 | 1 Jan 2020 Cross Ref for Imaging of Transactions on Image Vol. 29 | 1 Jan 2020 Cross Ref Numerical and experimental analysis of the EIT and and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 1 | 18 October Cross Ref On of the of Electrical Impedance Hyvönen, and Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Vol. No. 1 | 9 January Problems PDEs with Applications to Modelling, Optimization, and Numerical | 5 February 2020 Cross Ref A Inversion Method for Transactions on Image Vol. 29 | 1 Jan 2020 Cross Ref for the Conductivity and Applications to Inverse and Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Vol. No. 1 | 12 February Electrical Impedance and Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. No. 1 | February of Current Impedance and Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Vol. No. 5 | 21 September for Inverse Qin Li, and J. Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Vol. No. 4 | 17 November and Detection of Local Impedance Using Electrical Vol. 8 | 1 Jan 2020 Cross Ref Bayesian for and Erkki Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 42, No. 6 | 14 December Imaging Method for Boundary in Electrical Impedance TomographyIEEE Sensors Journal | 1 Jan 2020 Cross Ref Mapping the conductivity of with Electrical Reports, Vol. 9, No.