Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 19.68 0.56 Welcome
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 20.24 0.16 back
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 20.40 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 20.56 0.08 another
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 20.80 0.48 exciting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 21.28 0.40 edition
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 21.68 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 21.84 0.32 Inside
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 22.40 0.24 Media
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 22.64 0.40 Weekly.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 23.04 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 23.28 0.32 Ryan
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 23.60 0.24 Boni,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 24.08 0.24 joined
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 24.40 0.08 again
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 24.96 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 25.12 0.32 Kevin
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 25.44 0.64 Bastos
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 26.24 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 26.40 0.16 here
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 26.72 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 26.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 26.96 0.40 left.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 27.36 0.32 Thank
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 27.76 0.16 you,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 27.92 0.32 Ryan
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 28.24 0.32 Boni.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 28.88 0.32 Welcome
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 29.28 0.40 back.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 30.24 0.24 Over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 30.56 0.08 here
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 30.88 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 30.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 31.04 0.40 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 31.60 0.32 Derek
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 32.00 0.56 Bonner,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 32.88 0.08 back
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 33.20 0.56 again.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 34.40 0.56 Quickly,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 34.96 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 35.04 0.16 wanted
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 35.20 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 35.28 0.08 start
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 35.36 0.16 the-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 35.52 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 35.68 0.40 Didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 36.08 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 36.16 0.32 switch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 36.48 0.24 chairs
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 36.72 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 36.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 36.96 0.40 past?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 37.36 0.32 Oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 37.84 0.08 should
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 38.24 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 38.40 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 38.56 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 38.64 0.16 again?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 38.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 38.88 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 39.20 0.72 know.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.16 0.32 Let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.48 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.56 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.64 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.72 0.16 now!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 40.96 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.20 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.28 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.44 0.16 worlds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.60 0.16 ready
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.76 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.84 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 41.92 0.08 left
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 42.00 0.32 side.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 42.40 1.36 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 44.32 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 44.40 0.32 bright.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 44.72 0.32 Nobody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 45.04 0.08 else
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 45.20 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 45.44 0.16 seen
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 45.60 0.24 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 45.84 0.08 other
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 45.92 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 46.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 46.08 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 46.48 0.08 who
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 46.80 0.08 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 47.12 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 47.44 0.56 you.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 48.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 48.48 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 48.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 48.88 0.08 start
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 49.04 0.16 off
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 49.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 49.36 0.08 show
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 49.60 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 49.68 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 49.84 0.08 quick
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 50.08 0.56 apology
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 50.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 51.04 1.04 Mr.-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 52.32 0.24 No,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 52.56 0.24 no,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 52.80 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 52.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 53.12 0.48 Bastos.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 53.60 0.16 Of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 53.76 0.08 course
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 53.92 0.16 not.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 55.36 0.08 To
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 55.60 0.32 Brad
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 56.08 0.88 Bird,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 57.12 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 57.36 0.40 director
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 57.84 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 58.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 58.40 0.72 Incredibles,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 59.12 1.36 Ratatouille,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 60.48 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 60.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 61.04 0.32 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 61.36 0.40 Giant.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 61.76 0.32 Yeah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 62.08 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 62.24 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 62.40 0.16 fan
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 62.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 63.04 0.40 Inside
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 63.52 0.32 Media
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 63.92 0.56 Weekly.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 64.48 0.32 Last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 64.80 0.16 week,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 64.96 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 65.12 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 65.20 0.16 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 65.36 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 65.44 0.32 JJ
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 65.84 0.56 Abrams
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 66.40 0.40 directing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 67.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 67.52 0.08 new
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 67.68 0.24 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 67.92 0.32 Wars
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 68.32 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 68.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 68.64 0.40 kept
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 69.04 0.56 saying,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 69.76 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 69.92 0.40 JJ
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 70.32 0.48 Abrams
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 70.80 0.24 directed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 71.04 0.40 Mission
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 71.44 0.56 Impossible
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 72.00 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 72.08 0.32 Ghost
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 72.40 0.56 Protocol.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 73.20 0.08 When
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 73.84 0.48 Ghost
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 74.32 0.48 Protocol
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 74.80 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 74.88 0.32 directed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 75.20 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 75.28 0.32 Brad
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 75.68 0.48 Bird
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 76.40 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 76.88 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 76.96 0.64 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 77.60 0.40 JJ
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 78.00 0.40 Abrams
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 78.48 0.16 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 78.64 0.32 directed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 78.96 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 79.20 0.08 far
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 79.44 0.40 superior,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 79.84 0.40 Mission
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 80.24 0.56 Impossible
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 80.80 0.24 Three
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 81.20 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 81.36 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 81.60 0.40 producer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 82.24 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 82.40 0.40 Mission
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 82.80 0.80 Impossible
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 83.60 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 83.68 0.32 Ghost
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 84.00 0.64 Protocol.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 84.64 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 84.96 0.56 apologies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 85.52 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 86.08 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 86.32 0.40 Brad,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 86.80 0.40 sorry.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 87.60 0.32 Stop
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 88.00 0.32 sending
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 88.32 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 88.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 88.56 0.40 emails
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 89.04 1.60 already.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 90.72 0.24 Phone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 91.04 0.32 calls
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 91.36 0.40 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 92.00 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 93.12 0.08 another
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 93.92 0.56 leftover
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 94.48 0.16 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 94.64 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 94.80 0.16 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 95.04 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 95.20 0.32 week,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 95.68 0.48 Bastos
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 96.32 0.08 asked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 96.56 0.24 did,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 96.96 0.08 asked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 97.28 0.72 did,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 98.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 98.16 0.64 asked-d-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 99.12 0.40 Asked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 100.08 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 101.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 101.68 0.08 market
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 102.08 0.24 share
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 102.56 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 102.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 102.88 0.56 iPhone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 103.52 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 103.68 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 103.76 0.08 United
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 104.00 0.08 States
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 104.40 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 104.48 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 104.72 0.40 phones?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 105.12 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 105.28 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 105.44 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 105.60 0.16 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 105.84 0.16 about-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 106.00 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 106.24 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 106.40 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 106.56 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 106.64 0.40 idea.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 107.12 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 107.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 107.52 0.08 might
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 107.68 0.24 be.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 108.48 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 108.56 0.32 crack
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 108.96 0.40 staff,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 109.44 0.24 crack
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 109.76 0.40 research
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 110.16 0.32 staff,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 110.64 0.32 jumped
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 110.96 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 111.04 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 111.28 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 111.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 111.52 0.40 Insider
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 112.08 0.64 Weekly.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 112.88 1.28 Ryan!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 114.80 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 115.12 0.32 looked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 115.44 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 115.60 0.32 up,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 116.16 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 116.32 0.72 ComScore
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 117.12 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 117.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 117.28 0.16 company
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 117.60 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 117.76 0.08 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 118.00 0.40 provides
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 118.48 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 118.64 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 118.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 119.12 0.56 industry.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 119.68 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 120.80 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 121.60 0.24 is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 122.00 0.24 ends
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 122.48 0.64 October,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 123.36 0.40 2012
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 123.92 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 124.32 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 124.40 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 124.56 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 124.64 0.24 goes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 124.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 124.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 125.04 0.24 paying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 125.28 0.40 customers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 125.76 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 126.00 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 126.08 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 126.40 0.08 us
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 126.96 0.56 cheapies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 127.60 0.08 who
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 127.68 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 127.92 0.16 pay
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 128.08 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 128.16 0.16 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 128.64 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 128.72 0.24 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 128.96 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 129.04 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 129.28 0.08 three
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 129.44 0.16 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 129.60 0.24 months
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 129.92 0.08 after
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 130.08 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 130.24 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 130.32 0.40 whatever.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 130.88 0.72 Anyway,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 132.96 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 133.12 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 133.28 0.24 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 133.52 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 133.76 0.08 whether
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 134.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 134.24 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 134.56 0.40 10,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 134.96 0.56 12,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 135.52 0.24 whatever
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 135.84 0.40 percent,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 136.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 136.32 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 136.48 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 136.64 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 136.80 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 136.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 137.04 0.32 guesses
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 137.36 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 137.44 0.16 how-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 137.60 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 137.76 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 137.84 0.08 said
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 138.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 138.16 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 138.40 0.16 higher
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 138.56 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 138.64 0.72 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 139.36 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 139.68 0.24 you'd
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 140.00 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 140.08 0.32 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 140.56 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 140.64 0.16 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 140.80 0.24 bit
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 141.04 0.48 higher.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 142.64 0.24 Of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 143.04 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 143.84 0.56 phones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 144.96 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 145.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 145.36 0.08 United
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 145.60 0.40 States,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 146.08 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 146.24 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 146.40 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 146.64 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 146.88 0.40 feature
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 147.28 0.40 phones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 147.68 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 147.84 0.88 smartphones.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 148.88 0.32 Apple
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 149.28 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 149.52 1.20 17.8%
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 150.72 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 150.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 150.96 0.08 market
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 151.28 0.32 share.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 151.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 151.92 0.24 would've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 152.16 0.24 expected
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 152.40 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 152.48 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 152.56 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 152.64 0.24 higher.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 152.88 0.64 Samsung
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 153.52 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 153.60 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 153.76 0.88 26.3
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 154.64 0.08 This
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 154.72 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 154.80 0.56 manufacturer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 155.44 0.48 Samsung
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 156.08 0.80 26.3,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 156.88 0.32 Apple
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 157.68 0.48 17.8,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 158.16 0.16 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 158.40 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 158.72 0.08 pretty
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 158.88 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 159.04 0.24 tied
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 159.36 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 159.44 0.32 LG
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 160.00 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 160.16 1.04 17.6.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 161.36 0.56 Motorola
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 162.08 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 162.16 0.40 11,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 162.56 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 162.72 0.80 HTC,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 163.52 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 163.68 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 163.76 0.32 starting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 164.08 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 164.16 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 164.32 0.08 some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 165.12 0.32 problems
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 165.52 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 165.60 0.56 6.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 166.24 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 167.84 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 168.00 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 168.08 0.24 bad
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 168.40 0.48 quarter.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 169.76 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 170.00 0.80 surprising.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 170.88 0.24 Now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 171.20 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 171.28 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 171.44 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 171.60 0.16 to,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 171.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 172.08 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 172.24 0.08 should
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 172.40 0.08 say
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 172.56 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 172.80 0.80 smartphones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 174.32 0.08 found
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 174.56 0.16 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 174.72 0.24 kinds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 174.96 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 175.04 0.08 stuff
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 175.20 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 175.36 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 175.52 0.80 ComScore.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 176.48 0.72 Smartphones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 177.28 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 177.52 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 177.68 0.96 51.9%
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 179.20 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 179.44 0.48 mobile
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 179.92 0.56 phones,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 181.20 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 181.44 0.16 past
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 181.84 0.08 quarter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 182.64 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 182.88 0.08 two
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 183.04 0.24 quarters
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 183.28 0.32 ago.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 183.60 0.24 Third
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 183.84 0.16 quarter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 184.16 0.16 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 184.40 0.24 expected
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 184.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 184.72 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 184.88 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 185.36 0.56 60%.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 185.92 0.24 Now,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 186.16 0.16 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 186.32 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 186.40 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 186.56 0.16 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 186.80 0.72 smartphones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 187.68 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 187.84 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 188.00 0.24 rid
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 188.24 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 188.32 0.16 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 188.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 188.56 0.32 feature
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 188.96 1.28 phones,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 190.88 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 191.12 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 191.28 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 191.44 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 191.68 0.64 platforms,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 192.40 0.48 Google
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 192.88 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 192.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 193.12 1.20 53.6%,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 194.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 194.40 0.56 Android
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 195.12 0.64 platform.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 196.00 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 196.16 0.32 Apple
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 196.48 0.48 iOS
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 197.04 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 197.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 197.28 2.00 34.3%.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 199.60 0.40 Rim
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 200.16 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 200.32 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 200.48 0.88 7.8,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 201.36 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 201.60 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 201.68 0.08 course
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 201.84 0.16 is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 202.08 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 202.32 0.96 Blackberry.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 203.68 0.32 Pretty
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 204.00 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 204.16 0.48 Blackberry
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 204.64 0.40 phones.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 205.12 0.64 Microsoft
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 205.84 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 206.00 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 206.08 1.20 3.2,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 207.36 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 207.68 0.72 surprisingly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 208.56 0.32 pulling
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 208.96 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 209.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 209.44 0.32 rear
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 209.84 0.08 here
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 210.00 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 210.16 0.64 Symbion
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 211.20 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 211.36 1.84 0.6%.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 213.36 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 213.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 213.76 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 214.08 0.08 believe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 214.32 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 214.48 0.48 Symbian
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 215.04 0.24 phone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 215.36 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 215.52 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 215.68 0.08 made
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 215.92 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 216.08 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 216.16 0.16 couple
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 216.40 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 216.48 0.40 years.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 218.00 0.08 It
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 218.08 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 218.24 0.64 Symbian,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 218.88 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 218.96 0.16 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 219.12 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 219.20 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 219.60 0.40 remember,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 220.00 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 220.08 0.24 was,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 220.32 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 220.56 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 223.36 0.72 Nokia,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 224.08 0.40 Sony,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 224.48 0.56 Ericsson
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 225.04 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 225.28 0.08 together
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 225.60 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 225.84 0.40 supported
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 226.96 0.56 Symbian
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 227.60 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 227.68 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 227.84 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 227.92 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 228.00 0.56 abandoned
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 228.56 0.56 Symbion.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 229.36 0.40 Nokia
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 229.92 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 230.00 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 230.16 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 230.32 0.56 holdout,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 230.96 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 231.12 0.08 went
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 231.36 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 231.68 0.08 making
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 231.92 0.48 Windows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 232.40 0.48 phones.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 232.88 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 233.36 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 233.60 0.16 probably
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 233.84 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 234.00 0.40 relevant
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 234.48 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 234.64 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 234.72 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 234.80 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 234.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 235.12 0.40 Internet
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 235.52 0.24 memes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 235.76 0.16 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 235.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 236.00 0.48 Nokia
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 236.48 0.32 brick.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 236.80 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 237.44 0.48 so,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 238.00 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 238.08 0.24 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 238.32 1.04 0.6%
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 240.24 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 240.48 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 240.72 0.72 smartphones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 241.52 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 241.60 0.16 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 241.84 1.28 Symbian,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 243.28 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 243.68 0.24 leads
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 243.92 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 244.08 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 244.24 0.08 believe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 244.72 0.24 too,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 245.04 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 245.52 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 245.84 0.48 aren't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 246.32 0.96 necessarily,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 247.28 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 247.44 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 248.00 0.48 everybody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 248.48 0.32 thinks-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 248.80 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 249.04 0.32 There's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 249.36 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 249.44 0.16 problem
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 249.68 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 249.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 249.92 0.32 reportings
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 250.24 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 250.32 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 250.56 0.24 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 250.80 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 250.96 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 251.04 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 251.20 0.24 that!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 252.24 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 252.80 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 253.28 0.08 might
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 253.52 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 253.68 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 253.76 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 253.92 0.24 quick-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 254.24 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 254.32 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 254.56 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 254.72 0.08 always
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 254.80 0.48 assume,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 255.28 0.32 oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 255.60 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 255.68 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 256.72 0.48 wealthier
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 257.28 0.16 area
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 257.60 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 258.00 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 258.08 0.16 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 258.24 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 258.32 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 258.64 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 258.80 0.32 newest,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 259.12 0.32 greatest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 259.52 0.24 thing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 259.76 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 259.84 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 260.16 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 260.24 0.32 holding
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 260.56 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 260.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 260.88 0.08 things
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 261.20 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 261.36 0.32 work.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 262.16 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 262.40 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 262.56 0.08 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 262.64 0.40 buying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 263.04 0.32 them.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 263.36 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 263.60 0.16 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 263.76 0.16 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 264.00 0.08 them
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 264.24 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 264.40 0.48 free.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 264.88 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 265.04 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 265.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 265.52 0.24 go.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 265.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 265.92 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 266.16 0.48 hello,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 266.64 0.24 what's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 266.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 267.04 0.08 free
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 267.28 0.32 one?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 268.24 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 268.40 0.40 hence
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 268.88 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 269.04 0.32 piece
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 269.36 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 269.44 0.96 garbage.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 270.64 0.48 Although
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 271.60 0.32 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 272.00 0.08 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 272.24 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 272.40 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 272.48 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 272.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 272.72 0.24 stuff,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 273.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 273.12 0.56 subsidized
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 273.68 0.32 phones
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 274.00 0.08 may
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 274.16 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 274.32 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 274.56 0.08 away
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 274.72 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 274.88 0.08 everything
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 275.20 0.08 may
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 275.28 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 275.68 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 275.92 0.08 into
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 276.08 0.56 okay.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 276.64 0.32 Don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 276.96 0.08 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 277.04 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 277.12 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 277.60 0.40 Which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 278.08 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 278.24 0.48 worse.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 278.80 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 278.96 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 279.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 279.12 0.40 "which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 279.52 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 279.60 0.48 worse"
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 280.08 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 280.16 0.08 week
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 280.48 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 280.80 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 280.88 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 281.12 0.08 two
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 281.84 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 282.32 0.48 oriented
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 282.96 0.40 items
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 283.44 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 283.68 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 283.84 0.16 paper
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 284.00 0.64 yesterday,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 284.64 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 284.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 284.88 0.08 thought
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 285.12 0.32 let's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 285.44 0.32 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 285.84 0.08 discuss
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 286.16 0.32 these.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 286.48 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 286.64 0.16 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 286.96 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 287.12 0.72 worse?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 288.24 0.56 Jainy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 288.88 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 289.04 0.16 pull
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 289.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 289.52 0.32 plug
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 290.08 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 290.48 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 290.88 0.48 perks,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 291.36 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 291.52 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 291.76 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 291.84 0.24 excited
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 292.08 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 292.24 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 292.48 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 292.56 0.24 fuel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 292.80 0.40 perks.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 293.20 0.08 This
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 293.36 0.16 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 293.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 293.68 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 293.92 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 294.24 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 294.40 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 294.48 0.32 buy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 294.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 294.88 0.24 gas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 295.20 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 295.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 295.52 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 295.68 0.08 back
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 295.84 0.08 into
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 296.08 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 296.24 0.24 store
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 296.80 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 297.04 0.32 you,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 297.84 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 298.00 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 298.24 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 298.32 0.48 percentage
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 298.88 0.08 off
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 299.44 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 299.76 0.08 your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 300.24 1.28 food,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 301.60 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 301.92 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 302.00 0.32 whatever
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 302.32 0.24 reason,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 302.56 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 302.72 0.16 matter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 302.96 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 303.04 0.16 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 303.20 0.16 gas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 303.52 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 303.60 0.32 bought
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 304.08 0.08 came
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 304.24 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 304.32 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 304.64 0.40 1%,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 305.04 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 305.12 0.24 seemed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 305.36 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 305.44 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 305.76 0.16 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 305.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 306.08 0.24 time.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 306.64 0.48 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 307.12 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 307.20 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 307.28 0.16 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 307.44 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 307.60 0.16 10
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 307.84 0.32 gallon
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 308.24 0.48 tank,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 308.80 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 309.12 0.40 getting,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 309.60 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 309.92 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 310.24 0.08 your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 310.40 0.56 percentage
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 311.36 0.40 based
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 311.76 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 311.84 0.40 buying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 312.32 0.16 10
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 312.56 0.48 gallons.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 313.04 0.32 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 313.36 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 313.52 0.16 it-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 314.00 0.56 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 314.96 0.24 Or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 317.36 1.12 McDonald's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 318.80 0.72 introducing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 320.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 320.32 0.32 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 320.80 0.72 McBites
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 321.60 0.08 happy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 321.84 0.40 meal.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 322.32 0.24 See,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 322.56 0.40 everybody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 322.96 0.48 laughs,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 323.44 0.16 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 323.68 0.64 saying.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 324.56 0.32 Which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 324.88 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 325.04 0.40 worse?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 325.44 0.32 Smaller
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 325.76 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 325.92 0.32 chicken
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 326.24 0.64 nuggets,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 326.88 0.16 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 327.04 0.72 Mcbites
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 327.76 0.16 happy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 328.08 0.64 meal.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 329.44 0.32 Which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 329.84 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 330.00 0.48 worse?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 330.96 0.24 From
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 331.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 331.36 0.08 real
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 331.60 0.56 perspective?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 332.24 0.32 Which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 332.56 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 332.80 0.40 worse?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 333.20 0.24 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 333.44 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 333.60 0.32 course.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 333.92 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.16 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.24 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.32 0.08 show
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.40 0.16 is!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.56 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.64 0.24 labor
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 334.88 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 335.20 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 335.44 0.56 reported-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 336.00 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 336.16 0.24 Either
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 336.40 0.32 way.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 336.96 0.08 What
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 337.20 0.16 am
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 337.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 337.60 0.48 angrier
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 338.16 0.32 about?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 338.56 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 338.88 0.48 angrier
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 339.44 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 339.60 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 339.92 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 340.16 0.16 rid
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 340.40 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 340.48 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 340.64 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 340.96 0.56 perks.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 341.52 0.16 I-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 341.68 0.48 truly,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 342.16 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 342.32 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 342.64 0.64 dumb,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 343.60 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 343.92 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 344.00 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 344.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 344.32 0.16 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 344.72 0.08 care
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 344.88 0.24 less
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 345.12 0.16 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 345.28 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 345.44 0.64 McDonald's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.08 0.16 is.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.32 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.48 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.72 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.80 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 346.96 0.16 say,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 347.20 0.16 oh
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 347.44 0.32 gosh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 347.84 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 348.08 0.80 McDonald's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 348.88 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 349.04 0.56 unhealthy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 349.76 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 350.00 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 350.40 0.32 selling
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 350.96 0.24 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 351.28 0.56 sticks.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 351.92 0.24 I'd
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 352.88 0.32 perceive
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 353.28 0.08 them
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 353.36 0.16 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 353.60 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 353.84 0.72 panacea
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 354.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 354.80 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 355.12 0.08 good
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 355.28 0.56 nutrition
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 356.00 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 356.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 356.24 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 356.40 0.40 point.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 356.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 356.96 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 357.52 0.32 yeah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 357.84 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 358.24 0.40 silly,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 358.64 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 358.72 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 358.88 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 358.96 0.08 say
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 359.12 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 359.44 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 359.52 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 359.60 0.32 ticked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 359.92 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 360.00 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 360.32 0.16 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 360.48 0.16 rid
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 360.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 360.72 0.24 those.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 360.96 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 361.04 0.16 went
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 361.20 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 361.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 361.52 0.80 store,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 362.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 362.56 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 362.88 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 363.12 0.08 two
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 363.36 0.16 weeks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 363.52 0.32 ago,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 363.92 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 364.08 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 364.40 0.96 10%
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 365.52 0.08 off
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 365.76 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 365.92 0.08 our
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 366.08 0.08 entire
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 366.40 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 366.88 0.48 bill.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 367.76 0.48 Nice!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 368.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 368.48 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 368.80 0.08 mean
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 368.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 369.12 0.32 brag
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 369.44 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 369.60 0.24 anything,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 369.84 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 369.92 0.32 we're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 370.24 1.76 hoarders.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 372.64 0.08 Do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 372.88 0.16 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 373.04 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 373.12 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 373.36 0.32 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 373.68 0.32 worse
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 374.08 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 374.16 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 374.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 374.40 0.40 two?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 375.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 375.60 0.64 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 376.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 376.96 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 377.20 0.08 play
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 377.36 0.48 devil's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 377.84 0.56 advocate-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 378.40 1.04 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 379.52 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 379.60 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 379.76 0.24 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 380.08 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 380.32 1.68 bite,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 383.60 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 384.16 0.16 just,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 384.48 0.08 really
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 384.72 0.32 gets
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 385.04 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 385.20 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 385.36 0.32 nerves
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 385.68 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 385.76 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 386.00 0.16 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 386.16 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 386.32 0.24 pretend
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 386.64 0.16 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 386.88 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 387.04 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 387.20 0.08 such
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 387.44 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 387.60 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 387.76 0.08 health
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 388.08 0.48 kick.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 388.72 0.24 Like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 389.04 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 389.28 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 389.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 389.60 0.48 healthier
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 390.24 0.64 alternative
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 391.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 391.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 391.36 0.08 happy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 391.76 0.40 meal.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 392.32 0.08 This
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 392.56 0.16 is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 392.80 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 392.96 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 393.12 0.32 yours
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 393.52 0.32 eating
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 394.08 0.40 balls
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 394.48 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 394.64 0.48 bread.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 395.20 0.32 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 395.52 0.32 basically
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 395.92 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.00 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.08 0.16 is.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.24 0.32 There's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.56 0.08 gonna
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.64 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.80 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.88 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 396.96 0.24 bit
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 397.20 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 397.36 0.08 some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 397.52 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 397.84 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 398.08 0.16 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 399.28 0.40 parts
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 399.84 0.24 inside
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 400.24 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 400.40 0.32 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 400.72 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 401.04 0.24 Lent
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 401.36 0.24 coming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 401.60 0.16 up.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 401.76 0.48 Everyone's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 402.24 0.24 doing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 402.48 0.16 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 402.64 0.24 stuff.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 402.88 0.24 You've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 403.12 0.16 seen
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 403.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 403.36 0.56 Arby's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 403.92 0.16 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 404.08 0.56 commercial,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 404.64 0.32 right?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 405.44 0.08 This
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 405.52 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 405.68 0.16 their,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 405.84 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 405.92 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 406.08 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 406.16 1.04 latest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 407.28 0.56 episode,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 407.84 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 407.92 0.08 family
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 408.16 0.48 dinner.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 408.64 0.32 Lent.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 408.96 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 409.04 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 409.12 0.24 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 409.36 0.40 kids,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 409.76 0.32 right?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 410.08 0.40 From,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 410.48 0.32 uh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 410.88 0.72 advertising
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 411.60 0.48 unit?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 412.24 0.08 There
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 412.40 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 412.48 0.16 go.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 412.64 0.48 Targeting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 413.20 0.32 based
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 413.52 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 413.68 0.40 religious
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 414.24 0.72 needs.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 415.36 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 415.52 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 415.84 0.40 introduce
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 416.32 0.16 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 416.56 0.72 Mcbites
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 417.28 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 417.44 0.48 October
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 418.00 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 418.16 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 418.32 0.96 reason.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 419.84 0.08 This
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 420.16 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 420.40 0.48 true.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 421.04 0.40 Now,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 421.84 0.24 yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 422.08 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 422.24 0.72 I-I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 422.96 0.32 hoping
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 423.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 423.52 0.48 the,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 424.00 0.08 well
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 424.16 0.40 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 424.56 0.40 assuming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 424.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 425.04 0.72 McBites
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 425.76 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 425.92 0.16 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 426.16 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 426.40 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 426.72 0.40 jumping
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 427.12 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 427.28 0.64 the,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 427.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 428.00 0.48 Lenten
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 430.24 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 430.48 0.16 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 431.04 0.72 necessarily
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 431.76 0.16 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 431.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 432.00 0.32 pretend
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 432.32 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 432.48 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 432.64 0.32 healthy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 434.00 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 435.44 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 435.68 0.24 goes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 435.92 0.08 back
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 436.08 0.16 to-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 436.32 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 436.40 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 436.64 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 436.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 436.88 0.64 McDonald's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 437.52 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 437.60 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 437.68 0.32 regular
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 438.00 0.32 basis,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 438.32 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 438.64 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 438.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 438.80 0.16 any
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 438.96 0.24 fast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 439.20 0.32 food.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 439.68 0.32 Let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.00 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.08 0.16 say,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.24 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.32 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.64 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.80 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 440.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 441.04 0.16 eat
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 441.28 0.16 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 441.44 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 441.52 0.40 regular
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 442.00 0.80 basis,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 443.20 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 443.52 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 443.68 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 443.76 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 443.84 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 443.92 0.16 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 444.08 0.40 healthy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 444.56 0.80 as,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 445.52 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 445.68 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 445.84 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 446.08 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 446.32 0.32 eating
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 446.64 0.16 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 446.80 0.16 home,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 446.96 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 447.04 0.24 guess.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 447.28 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 447.36 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 447.60 0.16 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 447.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 447.92 0.08 say
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 448.00 0.16 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 448.16 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 448.24 0.72 necessarily
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 448.96 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 449.20 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 449.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 449.44 0.16 may
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 449.60 0.16 make
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 449.76 0.32 junk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 450.16 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 450.24 0.08 home
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 450.48 0.40 too.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 451.68 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 451.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 452.00 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 452.40 0.40 perks,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 452.80 0.32 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 453.12 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 453.20 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 453.28 0.16 say,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 453.44 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 453.76 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 454.00 0.40 perks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 454.40 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 454.72 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 454.96 0.16 taking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 455.20 0.16 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 455.44 0.08 away
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 455.60 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 455.68 0.24 me.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 455.92 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 456.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 456.24 0.08 guess
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 456.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 456.88 0.16 makes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 457.04 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 457.12 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 457.20 0.16 bit
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 457.36 0.32 worse
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 457.68 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 457.84 0.32 me.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 458.24 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 458.40 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 458.56 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 458.72 0.24 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 459.04 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 459.28 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 459.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 459.52 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 459.68 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 460.00 0.40 perks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 460.40 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 460.72 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 461.60 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 461.92 0.24 saying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 462.16 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 462.56 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 462.72 0.48 confusing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 463.36 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 463.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 463.68 0.56 system.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 464.40 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 464.88 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 465.04 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 465.28 0.40 remember,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 465.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 465.76 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.00 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.08 0.16 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.24 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.32 0.32 guys
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.64 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.80 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 466.96 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 467.28 0.48 perks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 467.76 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 468.00 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 468.16 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 468.32 0.08 came
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 468.56 0.08 into
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 468.96 0.80 being,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 470.48 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 470.72 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 471.12 0.08 concern
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 471.76 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 472.08 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 472.24 0.08 fact
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 472.64 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 473.44 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 473.60 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 473.84 0.56 counteract
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 474.56 0.32 the,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 474.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 475.12 0.08 price
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 475.52 0.32 floor
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 475.92 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 476.08 0.40 milk.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 476.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 476.64 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 476.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 477.20 0.08 United
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 477.44 0.32 Dairy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 477.76 0.32 Farmers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 478.16 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 478.32 0.40 upset,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 478.72 0.32 saying,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 479.04 0.48 "Oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 479.52 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 479.76 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 479.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 479.92 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 480.00 0.16 able
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 480.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 480.24 0.16 just-"
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 480.56 0.24 'cause
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 480.80 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 480.88 0.32 can't,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 481.20 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 481.28 0.24 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 481.52 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 481.60 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 481.68 0.24 sale
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 481.92 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 482.08 0.32 milk.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 482.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 482.48 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 482.72 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 482.80 0.16 now.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 483.20 0.48 Somebody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 483.68 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 483.76 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 483.84 0.32 explain
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 484.16 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 484.24 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 484.40 0.48 Capitalism
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 484.96 0.32 exists
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 485.28 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 485.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 485.44 0.08 United
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 485.60 0.32 States,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 486.00 0.24 except-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 486.24 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 486.56 0.32 Except
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 487.04 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 487.20 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 487.36 0.32 comes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 487.76 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 488.00 0.48 dairy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 488.80 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 489.28 0.96 Pennsylvania.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 490.32 0.08 What
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 490.48 0.08 else
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 490.56 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 490.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 490.88 0.48 minimum
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 491.44 0.48 standard?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 492.00 0.56 Liquor,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 492.56 0.24 right?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 492.88 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 492.96 0.24 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 493.20 0.16 sell
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 493.44 0.32 liquor
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 493.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 493.92 1.36 cigarettes.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 495.28 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 495.60 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 495.68 0.32 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 496.00 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 496.08 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 496.24 0.24 sale
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 496.48 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 496.64 0.64 cigarettes.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 497.52 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 497.84 0.32 sorry,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 498.16 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 498.24 0.24 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 498.48 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 498.56 0.24 below
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 498.80 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 498.88 0.40 floor.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 499.28 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 499.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 499.52 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 499.76 0.32 understand,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.16 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.32 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.40 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.48 0.16 different
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.72 0.16 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.88 0.08 having
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 500.96 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 501.28 0.16 $50
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 501.68 0.24 gift
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 501.92 0.40 certificate
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 502.32 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 502.40 0.48 Walmart
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 502.88 0.16 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 503.04 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 503.12 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 503.20 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 503.44 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 503.60 0.40 milk?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 504.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 504.08 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 504.40 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 504.80 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 505.92 0.08 price
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 506.32 0.32 off.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 506.72 0.32 Gift
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 507.12 0.32 cards
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 507.52 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 507.68 0.32 different.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 508.08 0.32 You're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 508.56 0.16 putting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 508.80 0.40 actual
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 509.20 0.40 physical
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 509.60 0.32 dollars
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 510.00 0.08 into
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 510.16 0.08 account
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 510.32 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 510.40 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 510.72 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 510.96 0.40 dollars
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 511.44 0.32 back,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 512.16 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 512.32 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 512.48 0.24 also,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 512.80 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 512.88 0.48 wouldn't,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 513.36 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 513.44 0.16 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 513.68 0.32 accept
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 514.16 0.32 milk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 514.56 0.32 anyway.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 514.88 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 514.96 0.32 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 515.28 0.08 give
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 515.36 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 515.44 0.48 discount
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 515.92 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 516.08 0.48 milk.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 516.72 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 517.44 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 517.68 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 517.92 0.08 done
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 518.16 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 518.32 0.16 way.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 518.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 518.64 0.40 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 519.12 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 519.20 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 519.52 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 519.76 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 520.16 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 520.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 520.64 0.32 fuel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 521.04 0.40 perks,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 521.52 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 521.76 0.24 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 522.00 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 522.08 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 522.16 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 522.24 0.56 correct,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 522.88 0.16 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 523.28 0.08 came
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 523.52 0.40 out.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 524.08 0.48 They,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 524.64 0.64 um,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 525.68 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 525.92 0.24 could,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 526.24 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 526.32 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 526.56 0.24 spend
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 526.88 0.08 money
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 527.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 527.28 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 527.52 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 527.60 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 527.76 0.40 discount
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 528.16 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 528.32 0.08 your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 528.40 0.24 gas.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 528.64 0.40 'Cause
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 529.04 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 529.12 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 529.36 0.24 when,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 529.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 529.84 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 530.24 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 530.40 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 530.72 0.32 fuel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 531.04 0.32 stations
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 531.52 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 531.84 0.24 opened
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 532.32 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 532.56 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 532.72 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 532.96 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 533.04 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 533.20 0.32 them,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 533.76 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 534.00 0.32 one.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 534.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 534.56 0.32 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 534.88 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 535.04 0.16 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 535.28 0.08 does
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 535.52 0.32 anything,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 535.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 536.00 0.24 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 536.56 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 536.80 0.24 started
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 537.12 0.24 giving
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 537.44 0.48 discounts
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 538.00 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 538.08 0.24 gas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 538.56 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 538.80 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 539.04 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 539.44 0.24 started
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 539.76 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 539.92 0.08 use
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 540.24 0.48 them,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 540.96 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 541.28 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 541.44 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 541.76 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 542.40 0.56 hoarding
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 543.12 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 543.36 0.24 gas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 544.08 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 544.32 0.24 looking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 544.64 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 544.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 544.96 0.32 lowest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 545.36 0.08 possible
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 545.92 0.56 price.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 546.64 0.40 So,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 547.12 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 547.20 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 547.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 547.52 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 547.68 0.32 waiting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 548.08 0.08 until
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 548.32 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 548.40 0.48 discount
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 548.88 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 549.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 549.20 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 549.28 0.16 $2
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 549.52 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 549.92 0.40 $3
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 550.48 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 550.56 0.24 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 550.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 550.88 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 551.04 0.08 take
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 551.20 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 551.36 0.08 two
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 551.52 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 551.68 0.32 cans
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 552.08 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 552.24 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 552.32 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 552.56 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 552.64 0.16 fill
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 552.88 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 553.04 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 553.12 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 553.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 553.36 0.40 discount
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 553.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 554.00 0.32 everything.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 554.48 0.72 Introducing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 555.36 0.08 both
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 556.24 0.08 made
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 556.48 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 556.72 0.56 beneficial
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 557.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 557.68 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 558.00 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 558.16 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 558.40 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 558.56 0.24 gas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 558.96 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 559.12 0.40 Giant
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 559.52 0.48 Eagle,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 560.08 0.08 whether
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 560.32 0.16 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 560.48 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 560.72 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 560.88 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 561.12 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 561.76 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 562.00 0.64 discount.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 562.64 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 562.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 563.04 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 563.44 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 563.68 0.08 became
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 564.08 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 564.40 0.32 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 564.80 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 565.12 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 565.28 0.48 regular
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 565.84 0.16 thing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 566.08 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 566.32 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 566.64 0.24 I'll
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 566.88 0.24 buy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 567.20 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 567.28 0.40 gas,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 567.76 0.16 too,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 567.92 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 568.08 0.32 Giant
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 568.40 0.32 Eagle
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 568.72 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 568.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 569.04 0.56 encouragement
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 570.56 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 570.72 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 570.88 0.24 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 571.28 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 571.44 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 571.60 0.56 replacing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 572.16 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 572.24 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 572.40 0.40 something,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 572.80 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 572.96 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 573.12 0.32 sounds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 573.44 0.16 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 573.60 0.64 confusing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 574.88 0.32 They're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 575.28 0.40 basically
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 575.84 0.56 adopting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 576.48 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 576.72 0.40 sheets
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 577.20 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 577.36 0.48 method,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 577.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 577.92 0.16 guess,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 578.08 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 578.24 0.40 gas.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 578.64 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 579.04 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 579.12 0.16 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 579.28 0.16 rid
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 579.44 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 579.60 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 579.76 0.08 food
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 580.08 0.48 perks,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 580.56 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 580.64 0.16 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 580.80 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 581.04 0.24 giving
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 581.28 0.16 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 581.44 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 581.60 0.40 additional
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 582.00 0.24 3
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 582.40 0.32 cents
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 582.80 0.08 off
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 583.20 0.56 instantly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 583.84 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 584.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 584.08 0.64 pump.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 584.96 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 585.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 585.44 0.08 idea
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 585.76 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 585.84 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 586.08 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 586.24 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 586.48 0.56 complex,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 587.04 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 587.20 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 587.36 0.08 believe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 587.52 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 587.68 0.24 statement
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.00 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.08 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.24 0.08 read
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.48 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.56 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.80 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 588.96 0.40 complex
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 589.52 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 589.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 589.92 0.80 consumer.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 590.88 0.64 Mhmm.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 591.76 0.16 All
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 591.92 0.16 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 592.08 0.24 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 592.32 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 592.40 0.16 in,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 592.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 592.64 0.40 swipe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 593.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 593.12 0.32 card.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 593.44 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 593.60 0.08 tell
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 593.92 0.08 me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 594.08 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 594.32 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 594.40 0.40 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 594.80 0.64 earning.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 595.68 0.08 When
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 595.76 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 596.08 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 596.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 596.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 596.32 0.32 store,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 596.64 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 596.72 0.32 swipe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.12 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.20 0.24 card.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.44 0.08 Do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.52 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.60 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.68 0.16 any,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 597.84 0.24 oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 598.08 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 598.16 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 598.40 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 598.48 0.64 any.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 599.12 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 599.44 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 599.60 0.32 buying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 599.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 600.00 0.40 groceries.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 600.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 600.56 0.08 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 600.64 0.64 checked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 601.28 0.16 out.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 601.84 0.24 That,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 602.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 602.32 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 602.56 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 602.72 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 602.96 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 603.20 0.48 utterly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 603.76 0.88 ridiculous.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 604.64 0.56 Mhmm,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 605.28 0.48 yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 606.56 0.40 Inside
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 607.20 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 608.16 0.40 weekly.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 608.56 0.08 If
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 608.64 0.32 Johnny
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 609.04 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 609.20 0.16 looking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 609.36 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 609.60 0.32 sheets
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 610.08 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 610.24 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 610.64 0.48 inspirational
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 611.12 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 611.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 611.52 0.64 MTO,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 612.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 612.32 0.08 next
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 612.40 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 612.48 0.16 after.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 612.64 1.20 Exactly.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 614.08 0.16 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 614.24 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 614.32 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 614.40 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 614.56 0.72 mates.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 615.36 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 615.68 0.32 true.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 616.24 0.48 Caffeine-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 616.72 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 616.88 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 616.96 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 617.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 617.20 0.40 sandwich
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 617.60 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 617.68 0.32 Giant
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 618.00 0.40 Eagle?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 618.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 618.72 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 618.80 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 618.88 0.40 sandwich
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 619.28 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 619.36 0.88 Johnny
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 620.24 0.16 ,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 620.40 0.16 oh
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 620.64 0.24 yeah!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 620.96 0.32 Pretty
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 621.28 0.24 good?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 621.68 0.24 Very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 621.92 0.24 good.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 622.24 0.32 Aw,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 622.56 0.64 dude!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 623.28 0.08 He
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 623.52 0.48 needs-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 624.00 0.08 Oh
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 624.24 0.32 yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 624.72 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 624.80 0.24 am
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 625.04 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 625.12 0.16 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 625.28 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 625.44 0.80 Johnny
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 626.32 0.40 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 626.80 0.32 Not,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 627.12 0.32 not,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 627.52 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 627.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 627.92 0.40 get-go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 628.48 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 628.64 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 628.72 0.40 sale.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 629.52 0.24 Gas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 629.84 0.24 station
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 630.16 0.32 food's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 630.56 0.24 great.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 630.88 1.68 Ever
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 632.56 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 632.72 0.32 food,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 633.04 0.24 whenever
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 633.28 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 634.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 634.64 0.16 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 634.80 0.24 fish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 635.12 0.08 man
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 635.20 0.32 bites
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 635.60 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 635.68 0.16 morning!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 635.92 0.16 Of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 636.08 0.16 course!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 638.24 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 638.48 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 638.64 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 638.80 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 638.96 0.48 football
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 639.44 0.24 game
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 639.68 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 639.84 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 640.00 0.64 weekend.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 641.44 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 641.76 0.56 amongst
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 643.12 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 643.36 0.56 blackout
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 644.08 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 644.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 644.40 0.48 football
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 644.88 0.40 game,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 645.36 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 645.68 0.56 was,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 646.96 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 647.04 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 647.52 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 647.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 648.48 0.64 talk,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 649.36 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 649.60 0.16 was,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 649.76 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 649.92 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 650.00 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 650.08 0.16 few
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 650.24 0.56 commercial,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 650.80 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 650.96 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 651.12 0.16 game
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 651.36 0.32 itself,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 651.68 0.24 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 651.92 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 652.00 0.08 few
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 652.08 0.64 commercials,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 652.72 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 652.96 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 653.04 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 653.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 653.76 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.08 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.32 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.48 0.16 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.64 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.72 0.16 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.88 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 654.96 0.72 commercials,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 655.68 0.16 'cause
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 657.68 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 657.84 0.24 seems
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 658.08 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 658.24 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 658.56 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 658.64 0.08 most
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 658.80 0.24 talked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 659.12 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 659.28 0.32 thing,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 659.60 0.24 but-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 659.84 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 660.00 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 660.16 0.08 also
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 660.40 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 660.56 0.56 parallel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 661.12 0.32 opinion
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 661.44 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 661.60 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 661.68 0.48 commercial
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 662.64 0.40 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 663.84 0.64 Marketing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 664.48 0.40 Land,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 664.88 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 665.04 0.24 guy,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 665.28 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 665.36 0.16 guy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 665.52 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 665.68 0.40 Marketing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 666.08 0.16 Land
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 666.32 0.32 tracked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 666.64 0.48 mentions
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 667.20 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 667.28 0.56 Superbowl
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 667.84 0.48 ads,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 668.32 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 668.64 0.08 he
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 668.80 0.24 looked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 669.04 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 669.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 669.28 0.40 52
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 669.76 0.08 national
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 670.00 0.64 commercials
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 670.64 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 670.72 0.32 aired
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 671.04 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 671.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 671.28 0.48 kickoff
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 671.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 672.08 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 672.32 0.32 clock
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 672.64 0.16 hit
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 672.88 0.80 zero.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 673.76 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 674.00 0.64 was-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 674.64 0.08 He
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 674.72 0.08 did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 674.88 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 675.04 0.08 again
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 675.28 0.16 last-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 675.60 0.08 He
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 675.76 0.08 did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 675.92 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 676.16 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 676.40 0.56 year,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 677.12 0.48 um,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 678.08 0.32 seeing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 678.80 0.08 social
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 679.04 0.72 networks,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 679.76 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 679.92 0.16 often
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 680.16 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 680.24 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 680.40 0.48 mentioned,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 680.96 0.08 whether
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 681.20 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 681.36 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 681.68 0.08 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 682.32 0.48 said,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 682.88 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 683.12 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 683.36 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 683.52 0.48 tagline
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 684.08 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 684.16 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 684.32 0.40 bottom
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 684.80 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 685.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 685.12 0.32 graphic
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 685.52 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 685.68 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 685.84 0.64 end.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 686.72 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 688.16 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 688.48 0.56 year,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 689.44 0.64 Twitter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 690.32 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 690.56 0.64 26
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 691.60 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 691.76 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 692.08 0.32 52
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 693.60 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 693.84 0.48 mentioned.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 694.40 0.16 Now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 694.72 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 695.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 695.12 0.56 Twitter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 695.76 0.40 logo.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 696.16 0.08 That
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 696.32 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 696.48 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 696.56 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 696.72 1.60 hashtag,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 698.56 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 699.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 700.08 0.48 me,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 701.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 701.60 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 701.76 0.40 everybody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 702.16 0.56 associates
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 702.80 0.32 Twitter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 703.20 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 703.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 703.36 0.64 hashtag,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 704.00 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 704.56 0.32 it's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 705.12 0.24 can,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 705.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 705.52 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 705.92 0.32 search
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 706.32 0.08 other
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 707.52 0.24 ways
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 707.84 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 708.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 708.08 0.56 hashtag.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 708.64 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 708.72 0.16 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 708.88 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 708.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 709.04 0.40 Google
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 709.44 0.32 Plus
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 709.76 0.16 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 709.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 710.00 0.48 Facebook
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 710.48 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 710.56 0.24 search
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 710.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 710.96 0.48 hashtag
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 711.60 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 711.84 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.00 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.08 0.16 using
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.24 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.40 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.56 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.64 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 712.88 0.32 funny
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 713.20 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 713.28 0.16 that-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 713.44 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 713.60 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 713.68 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 713.76 0.56 yesterday,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 714.32 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 714.40 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 714.48 0.16 putting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 714.64 0.56 hashtags
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 715.20 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 715.36 0.08 your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 715.44 0.32 Google
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 715.76 0.32 Plus.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 716.08 0.40 I-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 718.00 0.48 But,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 718.56 0.56 uh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 719.44 0.32 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 719.76 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 719.92 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 720.00 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 720.24 0.32 funny
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 720.56 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 720.64 0.40 Twitter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 721.04 0.32 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 721.36 0.32 invent
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 721.76 0.72 hashtags
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 722.48 0.40 themselves,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 722.88 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 723.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 723.20 0.24 user
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 723.44 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 723.60 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 723.68 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 723.76 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 724.00 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 724.16 0.40 anyway,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 724.56 0.48 Twitter,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 725.04 0.56 26,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 725.60 0.64 Facebook,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 726.24 0.48 4,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 726.96 0.48 Google
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 727.52 0.80 plus,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 728.88 0.72 0,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 729.76 0.72 YouTube,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 730.48 0.24 1,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 730.72 0.80 Instagram,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 731.52 0.32 1.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 731.92 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 732.00 0.32 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 732.32 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 732.40 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 732.48 0.32 commercial
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 732.80 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 732.88 0.16 ?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 733.52 0.48 Last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 734.16 0.08 year
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 735.36 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 735.68 0.32 59
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 736.32 0.08 national
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 736.64 0.48 ads,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 737.12 0.48 Facebook
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 737.68 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 737.76 0.16 8
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 738.00 0.40 mentions,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 738.40 0.48 Twitter,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 738.88 0.16 8
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 739.04 0.40 mentions,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 739.44 0.32 Google
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 739.76 0.40 Plus,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 740.16 0.48 0.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 740.64 0.16 Is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 740.80 0.16 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 741.12 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 741.28 0.40 trend?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 741.76 0.16 Is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 742.00 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 742.72 0.32 showing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 743.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 743.36 0.16 power
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 743.68 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 743.84 0.48 Twitter?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 744.40 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 744.64 0.24 fall
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 744.96 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 745.04 0.56 Facebook?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 745.60 0.16 Is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 745.76 0.16 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 745.92 0.32 both?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 746.32 0.08 What
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 746.48 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 746.56 0.16 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 746.72 0.32 think?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 747.28 0.32 Yes.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 747.68 0.72 Absolutely.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 748.40 0.40 Okay.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 748.88 0.48 Next-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 749.36 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 749.60 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 749.76 0.08 mean
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 750.08 0.72 Facebook,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 750.88 0.48 Facebook
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 751.52 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 752.32 0.72 over.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 753.04 0.32 It,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 753.68 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 753.92 1.52 is.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 755.44 0.24 Right.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 755.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 755.84 0.24 forgot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 756.16 0.08 your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 756.24 0.48 soapbox
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 756.72 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 756.80 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 756.88 0.32 one.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 757.20 0.48 Sorry.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 759.20 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 759.60 0.08 went
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 759.76 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 759.92 0.48 Facebook
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 760.48 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 760.72 0.24 night.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 761.04 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 761.20 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 761.36 0.64 Facebook.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 762.00 0.08 It
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 762.16 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 762.32 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 762.88 0.56 terrifically
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 763.52 0.64 uncool.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 764.16 0.08 It
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 764.32 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 764.48 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 764.64 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 764.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 764.88 0.08 front
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 765.12 0.24 end.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 765.68 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 765.76 0.32 guys
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 766.08 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 766.32 0.32 movies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 766.64 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 766.96 0.24 two,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 767.20 0.08 three
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 767.44 0.08 years
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 767.60 0.40 ago,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 768.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 768.40 0.16 number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 768.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 768.80 0.64 Myspace
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 769.60 0.48 mentions
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 770.16 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 770.32 0.16 them.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 770.48 0.32 Sure.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 770.80 0.16 Of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 770.96 0.24 course.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 771.28 0.40 Movies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 771.68 0.08 take
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 771.92 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 772.00 0.08 year
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 772.24 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 772.32 0.08 produce
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 772.80 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 772.96 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 773.20 0.72 antiquated
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 774.00 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 774.16 0.24 seemed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 774.48 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 774.56 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 774.80 0.32 theater
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 775.20 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 775.36 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 776.00 0.56 Myspace
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 776.64 0.48 mentioned
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 777.20 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 777.36 0.08 many
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 777.52 0.32 times
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 778.00 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 778.40 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 778.56 0.80 essentially
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 779.36 0.24 dead
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 779.76 0.08 social
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 780.16 0.48 network
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 780.64 0.16 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 780.80 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 780.96 0.48 point.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 782.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 782.48 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 782.64 0.16 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 782.88 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 783.12 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 783.28 0.24 seemed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 784.00 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 784.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 784.48 0.72 hashtag
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 785.36 0.32 alone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 785.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 786.16 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 786.40 0.56 associating
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 787.04 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 787.12 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 787.28 0.64 Twitter,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 788.16 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 788.48 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 788.64 0.32 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 788.96 0.08 free
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 789.28 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 789.44 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 789.60 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 789.68 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 789.84 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 790.08 0.32 event,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 790.40 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 790.64 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 790.80 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 790.88 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 791.04 0.24 exact
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 791.44 0.08 use
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 791.60 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 791.76 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 792.00 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 792.24 0.48 trending.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 792.72 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 792.96 0.08 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 793.12 0.24 spent
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 793.44 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 793.60 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 793.84 0.08 money
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 794.00 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 794.16 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 794.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 794.56 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 794.72 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 795.04 0.40 foolish
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 795.52 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 796.16 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 796.40 0.08 every
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 796.48 0.32 single
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 796.80 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 796.88 0.16 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 797.04 0.48 commercials
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 797.52 0.32 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 797.84 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 797.92 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 798.00 0.56 hashtag.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 798.56 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 798.80 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 798.96 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.04 0.16 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.20 0.16 throw
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.44 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.60 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.76 0.16 end.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 799.92 0.40 Somebody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 800.32 0.16 liked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 800.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 800.56 0.56 commercial.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 801.28 0.16 How
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 801.52 0.16 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 801.68 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 801.76 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 801.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 801.92 0.08 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 802.00 0.24 about?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 802.24 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 802.40 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 802.56 0.32 creates
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 802.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 802.96 0.56 buzz.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 803.52 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 803.68 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 803.84 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 804.00 0.08 your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 804.24 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 804.48 0.08 time
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 804.72 0.40 slot,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 805.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 805.28 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 805.44 0.16 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 805.68 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 806.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 806.16 0.64 footprint
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 806.96 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 807.36 0.08 social
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 807.68 0.48 media.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 808.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 808.32 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 808.48 0.48 it's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 808.96 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 809.20 0.16 such
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 809.36 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 809.44 0.40 easy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 809.92 0.08 way
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 810.08 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 810.48 0.40 branch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 810.96 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 811.12 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 811.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 811.36 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 811.44 0.16 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 811.60 0.32 aren't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 811.92 0.16 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 812.08 0.32 watching.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 812.48 0.16 All
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 812.64 0.24 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 812.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 812.96 0.24 saw
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 813.20 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 813.28 0.32 friend's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 813.60 0.56 feed.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 814.32 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 814.64 0.16 talked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 814.80 0.16 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 815.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 815.12 0.88 Mercedes-Benz
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 816.00 0.56 commercial.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 816.56 0.16 All
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 816.72 0.16 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 816.88 0.24 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 817.12 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 817.36 0.24 check
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 817.60 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 817.68 0.16 out!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 819.04 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 819.36 1.12 free.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 820.48 1.52 Yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 822.08 0.56 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 822.80 0.40 uh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 824.80 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 824.96 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 825.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 825.60 0.56 consensus
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 826.16 0.24 seems
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 826.40 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 826.56 0.40 typically
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 826.96 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 827.04 0.16 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 827.20 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 827.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 827.36 0.48 Superbowl
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 827.84 0.48 ads
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 828.40 0.08 themselves
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 828.72 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 829.04 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 829.12 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 829.28 0.64 underwhelming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 829.92 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 830.00 0.08 year
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 830.24 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 830.32 0.40 have,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 830.72 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 831.04 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 831.12 0.16 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 831.28 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 831.36 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 831.68 0.32 ongoing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 832.00 0.24 trend
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 832.24 0.16 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 832.40 0.48 Superbowl
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 832.88 0.16 years.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 833.04 0.16 Are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 833.20 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 833.28 0.16 allowed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 833.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 833.52 0.08 say
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 833.60 0.64 Superbowl?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 834.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 834.32 0.16 guess
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 834.56 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 834.64 0.32 are.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 835.76 0.48 Critical
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 836.32 0.40 commentary
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 836.80 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 837.04 0.40 reporting?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 837.52 0.24 Big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 837.92 0.32 gain.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 838.40 0.24 We're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 838.64 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 838.80 0.48 advertising
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 839.28 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 839.44 0.24 We're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 839.68 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 839.76 0.32 selling
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 840.08 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 840.32 0.32 Let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 840.64 0.16 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 840.80 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 841.04 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 841.12 0.16 work.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 841.28 0.24 There's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 841.52 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 841.68 0.16 ton
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 842.08 0.24 of-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 842.32 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 842.56 0.16 Did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 842.80 0.16 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 842.96 0.08 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 843.20 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 843.36 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 843.52 0.16 tried
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 843.68 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 843.76 0.48 trademark
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 844.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 844.40 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 844.64 0.48 game?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 845.12 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 845.28 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 845.44 0.32 game?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 846.08 0.48 NFL
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 846.64 0.24 tried.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 846.88 0.08 He
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 846.96 0.16 talked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 847.12 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 847.20 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 847.28 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 847.36 0.08 he
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 847.44 0.40 Samsung
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 847.92 1.60 commercial.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 850.96 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 851.20 0.32 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 851.52 0.08 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 851.68 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 851.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 851.92 0.08 best
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 852.32 0.64 Superbowl
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 853.28 0.40 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 854.08 0.48 trailer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 855.04 1.04 spots.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 856.08 0.32 Um,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 856.56 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 856.88 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 857.04 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 857.20 0.08 quite
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 857.44 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 857.52 0.08 few
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 858.24 0.08 during
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 858.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 858.88 0.56 Superbowl.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 859.44 0.24 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 859.76 0.16 Man
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 859.92 0.32 3,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 860.40 0.24 Fast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 860.72 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 860.80 0.40 Furious
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 861.28 0.40 6,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 861.76 0.32 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 862.08 0.40 Trek:
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 862.48 0.24 Into
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 862.72 0.48 Darkness,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 863.36 0.32 World
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 863.68 0.24 War
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 863.92 0.48 Z,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 864.56 0.32 Brad
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 864.96 0.32 Pitt
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 865.28 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 865.36 0.64 zombies.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 866.08 0.08 What
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 866.24 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 866.40 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 866.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 866.80 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 867.04 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 867.28 0.48 combining
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 867.84 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 868.00 0.32 two?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 868.32 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 868.48 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 868.72 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 868.88 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 869.12 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 869.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 869.44 0.40 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 869.92 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 870.00 0.40 all.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 870.56 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 870.80 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 870.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 871.12 0.08 book
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 871.28 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 871.44 0.32 all.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 871.92 0.08 No
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 872.16 0.08 part
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 872.40 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 872.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 872.64 0.08 book
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 872.88 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 872.96 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 873.20 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 873.36 0.08 any
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 873.84 0.48 segment
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 874.32 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 874.40 0.16 all.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 874.56 0.24 Brad
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 874.80 0.40 Pitt's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 875.20 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 875.28 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 875.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 875.52 0.48 book?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 876.16 0.56 Sorry.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 877.04 1.28 Oz,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 878.40 0.24 no.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 878.64 0.40 Pretty
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 879.04 0.16 good.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 879.28 0.40 Oz.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 879.76 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 879.84 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 880.00 0.24 great-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 880.40 0.24 Oz:
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 880.72 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 880.80 0.24 Great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 881.04 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 881.12 0.48 Powerful,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 881.60 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 881.76 0.24 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 882.08 0.72 Ranger,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 882.88 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 883.44 1.28 Snitch.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 885.04 0.48 Now,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 886.32 0.08 best
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 886.72 0.32 trailer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 887.20 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 887.76 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 888.16 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 888.32 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 888.40 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 888.64 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 888.96 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 889.12 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 889.28 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 889.68 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 889.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 889.92 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 890.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 890.08 0.32 biggest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 890.40 0.08 here
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 890.64 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 890.72 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 891.20 0.08 most
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 891.44 0.24 interested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 891.68 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 891.92 0.24 seeing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 892.40 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 892.48 0.16 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 892.64 0.32 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 892.96 0.16 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 893.12 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 893.20 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 893.36 0.48 spots?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 894.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 894.24 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 894.40 0.16 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 894.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 894.64 0.32 definitely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 894.96 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 895.04 0.32 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 895.36 0.16 Man
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 895.52 0.32 3
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 895.84 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 895.92 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 896.00 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 896.08 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 896.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 896.32 0.24 biggest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 896.56 0.40 movie.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 896.96 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 897.12 0.08 thought
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 897.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 897.36 0.08 best
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 897.52 0.32 trailer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 897.84 0.16 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 898.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 898.08 0.40 Wizard
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 898.48 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 898.64 0.32 Oz,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 898.96 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 899.04 0.24 Oz:
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 899.28 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 899.36 0.32 Great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 899.68 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 899.76 0.56 Powerful.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 900.48 0.32 Just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 900.80 0.16 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 901.76 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 901.92 0.24 saw
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 902.16 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 902.32 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 902.40 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 902.56 0.40 footage
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 903.04 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 903.20 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 903.52 0.40 hadn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 904.00 0.24 seen
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 904.24 0.32 before,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 904.56 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 904.80 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 904.88 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 905.12 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 905.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 905.76 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 905.92 0.32 was,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 906.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 906.32 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 906.48 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 906.56 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 906.72 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 906.80 0.24 watching
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.12 0.24 game,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.36 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.44 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.52 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.60 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.68 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.76 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 907.84 0.16 around,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 908.00 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 908.08 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 908.16 0.40 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 908.56 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 908.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 908.72 0.64 necessarily
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 909.36 0.24 listen
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 909.60 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 909.68 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 909.76 0.24 trailer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.00 0.16 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.16 0.24 well.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.40 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.64 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.80 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 910.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.04 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.12 0.16 of,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.28 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.36 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.44 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.60 0.24 noise
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 911.92 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.00 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.16 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.24 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.32 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.48 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.64 0.24 watching
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 912.88 0.16 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 913.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 913.20 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 913.36 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 913.44 0.32 based
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 913.76 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 913.84 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 914.00 0.48 visual,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 914.56 0.24 showing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 914.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 914.96 0.32 actual
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 915.28 0.08 world
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 916.08 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 916.24 0.80 Oz.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 917.84 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 918.08 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 918.32 0.24 just,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 918.56 0.32 yeah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 918.88 0.24 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 919.12 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 919.28 0.32 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 919.60 0.08 really
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 919.68 0.16 care
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 919.92 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 920.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 920.08 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 920.48 0.08 before
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 920.56 0.24 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 920.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 921.04 0.24 said,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 921.28 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 921.52 0.24 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 921.76 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 921.92 0.32 doesn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 922.24 0.16 look
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 922.40 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 922.48 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 922.80 0.08 gonna
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 922.96 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 923.12 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 923.28 0.32 great.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 923.60 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 923.76 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 924.00 0.16 happen
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 924.16 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 924.32 0.40 particularly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 924.72 0.16 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 924.88 0.32 James
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 925.20 1.44 Franco.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 926.96 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 927.20 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 927.60 0.08 made
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 927.76 0.08 me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 927.84 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 928.08 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 928.24 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 928.40 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 929.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 929.76 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 929.92 0.16 probably
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 930.24 0.32 agree.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 930.56 0.16 Out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 930.72 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 930.88 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 931.04 0.48 trailers,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 931.52 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 931.60 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 931.68 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 931.92 0.16 remember
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 932.16 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 932.32 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 932.40 0.32 you,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 932.88 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 933.04 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 933.12 0.08 them
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 933.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 933.52 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 933.68 0.32 said,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 934.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 934.64 0.16 only
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 934.80 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 934.96 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 935.36 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 935.52 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 935.60 0.24 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 935.92 0.16 Man
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 936.08 0.32 3.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 936.40 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 936.64 0.32 traveled
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 936.96 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 937.04 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 937.20 0.40 middle
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 937.60 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 937.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 937.84 0.24 game
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 938.32 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 938.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 939.12 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 939.36 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 939.52 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 939.76 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 939.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 940.00 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 940.16 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 940.24 0.24 biggest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 940.56 0.40 movie.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 940.96 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 941.04 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 941.12 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 941.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 941.52 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 941.84 0.16 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 942.08 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 942.24 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 942.32 0.32 looking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 942.72 0.08 forward
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 942.88 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 943.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 943.20 0.64 most.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 944.24 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 944.40 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 944.56 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 944.80 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 945.92 0.08 great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 946.40 0.48 attention
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 947.12 0.08 through
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 948.08 0.08 both
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 948.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 948.40 0.08 fact
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 948.64 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 948.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 948.96 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 949.20 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 949.36 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 949.52 0.72 outstanding.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 950.32 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 950.40 0.08 second
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 950.64 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 950.88 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 951.04 0.32 good,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 951.76 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 952.00 0.64 Avengers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 952.72 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 953.44 0.08 pretty
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 953.76 0.56 darned
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 954.40 0.08 good
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 954.72 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 954.88 0.40 well.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 955.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.00 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.16 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.32 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.48 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.56 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.64 0.32 biggest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 956.96 0.40 film,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 957.36 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 957.44 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 957.60 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 957.68 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 957.92 0.24 right.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 958.24 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 958.32 0.32 biggest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 958.64 0.32 legs
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 959.04 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 959.20 0.08 probably
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 959.60 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 960.00 0.64 Oz.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 960.72 0.24 Did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 960.96 0.24 anyone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 961.28 0.08 else
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 961.44 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 961.60 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 961.68 0.16 feeling
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 961.84 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 962.00 0.16 Fast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 962.24 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 962.32 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 962.48 0.40 Furious
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 963.04 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 963.84 0.72 old?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 964.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 964.96 0.24 mean-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 965.36 0.24 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 965.60 0.40 Number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.00 0.16 6
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.24 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.40 0.08 end
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.48 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.56 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.64 0.24 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 966.96 1.44 struggling.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 968.48 0.32 Yeah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 969.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 969.52 0.32 mean-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 970.64 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 970.72 0.40 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 971.12 0.40 think,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 971.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 972.32 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 972.56 0.08 may
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 972.72 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 972.88 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 972.96 0.32 wrong
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 973.36 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 973.60 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 974.08 0.08 thought
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 974.32 0.32 similar
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 974.64 0.16 things
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 974.88 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 975.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 975.12 0.40 5th
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 975.52 1.04 one,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 976.88 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 977.12 0.08 many
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 977.44 0.32 cars
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 977.84 0.24 flip
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 978.16 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 978.40 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 978.48 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 978.64 0.32 movie?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 979.04 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 979.12 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 979.36 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 979.44 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 979.60 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 979.76 0.24 1
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 980.16 0.08 car
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 980.48 0.40 flips
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 980.88 0.24 over,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 981.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 981.20 0.24 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 981.44 0.16 2
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 981.76 0.64 cars,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 982.40 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 982.48 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 982.72 0.08 another
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 982.96 0.08 car
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 983.20 0.40 flips
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 983.60 0.16 over.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 983.76 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 984.00 0.16 thought,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 984.16 0.40 oh
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 984.56 0.16 man.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 984.88 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 985.12 0.40 crazy,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 985.52 0.08 these
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 985.60 0.32 guys
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 985.92 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 986.00 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 986.08 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 986.16 0.16 car
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 986.40 0.48 drivers,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 986.88 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 986.96 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 987.20 0.32 secret
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 987.52 0.48 agents.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.00 0.24 They're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.24 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.32 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.40 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.48 0.16 place.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.64 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.72 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 988.80 0.32 blowing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 989.12 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 989.20 0.96 helicopters.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 990.40 0.32 He's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 991.20 0.24 driving
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 991.44 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 991.52 0.24 car.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 991.76 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 991.92 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 992.08 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 992.24 2.00 license.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 994.80 0.32 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 995.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 995.20 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 995.36 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 995.52 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 995.76 0.16 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 995.92 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 996.08 0.48 Oz.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 996.72 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 996.88 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 997.04 0.24 too,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 997.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 997.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 997.60 0.48 struggle
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 998.16 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 998.64 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 998.80 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 999.20 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 999.60 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1000.08 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1000.56 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.04 0.32 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.36 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.44 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.60 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.68 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.76 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.84 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1001.92 0.72 skepticism.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1002.72 0.32 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1003.04 0.16 Man
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1003.20 0.56 3,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1003.76 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1003.84 0.16 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1004.00 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1004.16 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1004.48 0.40 getting.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1005.28 0.24 Fast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1005.60 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1005.76 0.48 Furious,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1006.40 0.32 despite
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1006.72 0.16 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1006.88 0.16 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1007.04 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1007.12 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1007.20 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1007.28 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1007.52 0.24 getting.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1007.76 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1008.00 0.40 popcorn
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1008.40 0.32 candy,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1008.72 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1008.80 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1008.88 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1009.04 0.24 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1009.28 0.32 Trek,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1009.60 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1009.84 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1009.92 0.16 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1010.08 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1010.16 0.40 assuming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1010.56 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1010.88 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1010.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.04 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.12 0.16 uh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.28 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.36 0.08 good
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.44 0.16 as-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.60 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.76 0.16 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1011.92 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1012.08 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1012.32 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1012.56 0.40 trailer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1013.04 0.24 looked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1013.28 0.56 excellent.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1014.08 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1014.24 0.24 again,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1014.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1014.56 0.32 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1014.88 0.16 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1015.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1015.12 0.32 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1015.44 0.16 Man
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1015.68 0.32 one,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1016.00 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1016.16 0.24 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1016.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1016.56 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1018.64 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1018.88 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1019.04 0.08 positive
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1019.44 0.48 buzz
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1019.92 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1020.08 0.40 generated
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1020.48 0.08 around
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1020.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1020.88 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1021.12 0.40 one,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1021.60 0.08 especially
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1022.24 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1022.48 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1022.72 0.08 who
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1022.96 0.48 weren't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1023.44 0.80 necessarily
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1024.24 0.24 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1024.56 0.32 Trek
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1025.20 0.56 fans.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1025.84 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1026.16 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1026.32 0.16 talked
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1026.56 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1026.72 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1026.88 0.32 before,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1027.28 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1027.36 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1027.68 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1027.84 0.24 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1028.08 0.40 Trek.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1028.48 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1028.64 0.08 thought
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1028.80 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1028.88 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1029.20 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1029.28 0.80 fantastic.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1030.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1030.32 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1030.48 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1030.80 0.08 sort
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1030.96 0.24 of,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1031.28 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1031.36 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1031.92 0.48 thumbs
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1032.48 0.24 its
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1032.72 0.24 nose
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1033.12 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1033.84 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1033.92 0.16 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1034.16 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1034.32 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1034.56 0.48 history
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1035.12 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1035.28 0.16 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1035.52 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1035.68 0.24 there,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1035.92 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1036.08 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1036.24 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1036.40 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1036.64 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1036.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1036.88 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1037.04 0.72 humongous.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1037.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1038.00 0.16 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1038.16 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1038.32 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1038.48 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1038.56 0.40 smart
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1039.04 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1039.20 0.24 showed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1039.44 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1039.60 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1039.84 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1040.08 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1040.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1040.56 0.48 supposed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1041.12 0.24 bill
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1041.36 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1041.52 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1041.60 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1041.68 0.24 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1041.92 0.16 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1042.08 1.36 .
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1043.44 0.24 Oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1043.76 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1043.84 0.08 he
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1044.00 0.16 is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1044.16 0.32 he's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1044.56 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1044.80 0.24 hot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1045.36 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1045.44 0.16 now.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1045.60 0.08 He
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1045.68 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1045.84 0.16 huge
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1046.08 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1046.40 0.24 now.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1046.64 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1046.72 0.32 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.04 0.16 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.28 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.36 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.52 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.68 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.76 0.08 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1047.92 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1048.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1048.16 0.72 all,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1048.96 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1049.20 0.48 Sherlock
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1049.84 0.16 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1050.00 0.08 anything
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1050.24 0.16 else
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1050.48 0.24 they've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1050.72 0.16 seen
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1050.88 0.08 him
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1050.96 0.24 do.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1051.20 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1051.36 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1051.60 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1051.76 0.40 connected
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1052.16 0.48 audience
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1052.80 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1052.96 0.32 well.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1053.52 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1053.68 0.32 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1054.00 0.24 Trek
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1054.32 0.32 fans
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1054.72 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1054.96 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1055.12 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1055.36 0.32 likely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1055.92 0.08 general
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1056.40 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1056.56 0.32 fans
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1056.96 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1057.04 0.32 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1057.36 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1057.44 0.32 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1058.40 0.32 unless
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1058.72 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1059.04 0.32 throwing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1059.36 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1059.44 0.08 some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1059.52 0.48 Downton
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1060.08 0.56 Abbey
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1060.72 0.40 stars
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1061.20 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1061.36 0.32 well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1061.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1061.76 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.08 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.32 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.40 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.72 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.80 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1062.96 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1063.20 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1063.68 0.40 attention
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1064.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1064.32 0.32 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1064.64 0.32 so.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1065.04 0.08 What
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1065.20 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1065.44 0.80 Snitch?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1066.56 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1066.80 0.48 Rock;
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1067.36 0.64 Snitch,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1068.00 1.04 huh?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1069.04 0.64 Ah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1070.64 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1070.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1070.88 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1070.96 0.40 wanna
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1071.36 0.16 ask
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1071.52 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1071.60 0.16 though,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1071.76 0.08 did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1071.84 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1071.92 0.08 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1072.08 0.32 Journey
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1072.40 0.16 2
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1072.88 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1073.36 1.60 year?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1075.36 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1075.52 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1075.76 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1076.00 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1076.16 0.16 ask
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1076.64 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1076.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1076.88 0.24 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1077.20 0.56 Ranger.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1077.76 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1077.92 0.16 feel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1078.40 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1078.64 0.16 this-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1079.68 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1079.84 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1080.08 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1080.32 0.08 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1080.48 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1080.56 0.24 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1080.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1080.88 0.24 less
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1081.12 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1081.44 0.24 interested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1081.68 0.16 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1081.84 0.24 seeing,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1082.08 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1082.24 0.16 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1082.48 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1082.64 0.08 probably
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1082.80 0.32 wasn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1083.12 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1083.20 0.16 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1083.36 0.32 interested.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1083.76 0.40 Is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.24 0.16 Is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.40 0.16 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.56 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.80 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.88 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1084.96 0.56 humongous
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1085.60 0.32 flop
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1086.08 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1086.24 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1086.64 0.40 Johnny
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1087.04 0.24 Depp
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1087.52 0.08 enough
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1087.68 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1087.84 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1088.08 0.08 draw
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1088.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1088.72 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1088.96 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1089.20 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1089.76 0.64 to?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1090.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1090.48 0.32 mean.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1091.28 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1091.44 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1091.76 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1092.00 0.64 surprised
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1092.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1092.96 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1094.24 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1094.56 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1094.72 0.32 game
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1095.12 0.08 time
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1096.32 0.32 TV
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1096.80 0.24 spot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1097.28 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1097.52 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1097.68 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1097.84 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1098.00 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1098.24 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1098.40 0.48 budget
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1098.96 0.24 they've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1099.20 0.08 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1099.36 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1099.52 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1099.68 0.08 his
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1099.84 0.32 movie,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1100.16 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1100.32 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1100.56 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1101.04 0.24 looks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1101.44 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1101.68 0.64 garbage.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1102.48 0.08 In
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1102.64 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1102.72 0.40 opinion,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1103.12 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1103.28 0.24 least.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1103.52 0.32 Special
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1103.84 0.24 effects
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1104.08 0.16 did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1104.24 0.16 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1104.48 0.08 look
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1104.56 0.40 amazing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1105.20 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1106.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1107.04 0.40 didn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1107.44 0.08 understand
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1107.84 0.08 why
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.00 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.08 0.16 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.24 0.08 making
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.56 0.24 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1108.88 0.32 begin
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1109.20 0.24 with.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1109.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1109.52 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1109.84 0.16 understand
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1110.16 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1110.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1110.48 0.40 appeal
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1110.96 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1111.20 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1111.36 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1111.60 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1111.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1111.92 0.24 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1112.24 0.80 Ranger.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1113.28 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1113.52 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1113.92 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1114.16 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1114.40 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1114.48 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1114.96 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1115.12 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1115.28 0.80 is-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1116.96 0.08 If
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1117.12 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1117.44 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1117.60 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1117.68 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1117.84 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1118.00 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1118.24 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1118.40 0.64 blockbuster
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1119.04 0.24 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1119.28 0.08 during
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1119.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1119.44 0.48 summer,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1119.92 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1120.00 0.32 isn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1120.32 0.08 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1120.48 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1120.56 0.56 summary.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1121.12 0.08 It
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1121.20 0.16 should
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1121.36 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1121.52 0.16 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1121.68 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1121.92 0.56 primarily,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1122.48 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1122.64 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1122.80 0.40 enjoyed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1123.20 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1123.28 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1123.44 0.08 family
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1123.92 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1125.12 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1125.36 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1125.44 0.40 appeal
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1125.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1126.00 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1126.16 0.32 broader
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1126.48 0.40 spectrum
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1126.96 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1127.12 0.24 just,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1127.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1127.44 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1127.68 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1128.00 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1128.16 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1128.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1128.32 0.80 nostalgia.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1129.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1129.92 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1130.16 0.32 no,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1130.72 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1130.88 0.40 desire
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1131.28 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1131.36 0.16 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1131.52 0.16 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1131.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1131.76 0.32 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1132.08 0.40 imagine
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1132.48 0.24 anyone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1133.20 0.08 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1133.44 0.32 younger
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1133.84 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1133.92 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1134.00 0.24 am
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1134.40 0.32 wanting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1134.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1134.80 0.40 see.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1135.28 0.32 No,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1135.84 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1136.00 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1136.16 0.24 you've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1136.48 0.24 got,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1136.72 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1137.04 0.40 targeting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1137.44 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1137.60 0.08 really
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1137.68 0.32 strange
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1138.00 0.56 audience.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1138.56 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1138.72 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1138.96 0.32 noticed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1139.28 0.24 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1139.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1139.60 0.56 preview,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1140.16 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1140.32 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1140.40 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1140.56 0.32 rated
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1141.36 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1141.60 0.40 now.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1142.72 0.16 My
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1142.96 0.08 guess
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1143.28 0.40 is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1144.00 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1144.24 0.32 shooting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1144.56 0.16 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1144.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1144.80 0.40 PG
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1145.28 0.40 rating.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.08 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.40 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.48 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.64 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.80 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1146.96 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1147.12 0.40 it,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1147.68 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1147.92 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1148.08 0.80 Disney's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1148.88 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1149.04 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1149.20 0.24 say,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1149.52 0.16 strong
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1149.84 1.28 backing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1151.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1151.84 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1152.00 0.24 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1152.24 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1152.40 0.08 strong
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1152.64 0.24 push
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1152.88 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1153.04 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1153.12 0.16 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1153.28 0.32 PG
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1153.76 0.32 rating,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1154.08 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1154.24 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1154.40 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1154.56 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1154.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1154.88 0.32 case,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1155.52 0.32 someone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1156.08 0.40 like,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1156.64 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1156.80 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1157.44 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1157.60 0.48 dad's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1158.08 0.32 age,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1158.48 0.64 60s,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1159.20 0.32 grew
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1159.52 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1159.68 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1159.84 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1159.92 0.32 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1160.24 0.56 Ranger.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1160.96 0.08 That
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1161.20 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1161.36 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1161.60 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1161.92 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1162.40 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1162.64 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1162.88 0.08 take
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1163.12 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1163.28 0.08 back
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1163.52 0.08 interest
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1163.76 0.24 in.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1164.00 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1164.24 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1164.32 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1164.48 0.08 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1164.64 0.16 time,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1164.88 0.72 Disney's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1165.60 0.16 always
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1165.84 0.24 trying,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1166.08 0.08 well
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1166.56 0.24 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1166.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1166.88 0.24 push
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1167.20 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1167.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1167.52 0.08 next
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1167.76 0.08 new
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1168.00 0.40 thing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1169.12 0.32 Taking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1169.60 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1169.84 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1170.08 0.32 Star
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1170.96 0.56 Wars
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1171.60 0.08 market
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1172.08 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1172.32 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1172.48 0.40 smart,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1172.96 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1173.28 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1173.44 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1173.60 0.40 likely,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.00 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.16 0.24 was,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.40 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.48 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.72 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1174.88 0.56 workflow
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1175.60 0.08 before
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1175.84 0.48 then,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1176.48 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1177.84 0.32 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1178.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1178.32 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1178.48 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1178.80 0.32 boy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1179.28 0.40 market.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1179.68 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1179.84 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1180.00 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1180.16 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1180.24 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1180.32 0.56 vehicle
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1180.88 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1180.96 0.16 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1181.20 0.16 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1181.36 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1181.44 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1181.68 0.40 foresee
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1182.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1182.16 0.40 happening.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1182.56 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1182.88 0.16 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1183.12 0.48 you.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1184.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1184.40 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1184.64 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1184.80 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1185.04 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1185.68 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1186.16 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1186.32 0.08 great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1186.64 0.72 success,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1187.44 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1187.68 0.40 depending
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1188.16 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1188.24 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1188.40 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1188.72 0.40 released,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1189.12 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1189.28 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1190.00 0.08 make
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1190.24 0.08 some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1190.48 0.32 money.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1190.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1191.04 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1191.28 0.24 we're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1191.60 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1191.76 0.24 waiting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1192.00 0.16 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1192.16 0.32 GI
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1192.64 0.32 Joe,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1193.04 0.40 right?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1194.72 0.64 So.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1195.68 0.40 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1196.24 0.16 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1196.40 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1196.64 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1196.80 0.24 seems
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.12 0.16 me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.36 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.52 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.68 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.84 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1197.92 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1198.08 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1198.16 0.08 better
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1198.40 0.64 vessel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1199.12 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1199.60 0.64 restarting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1200.24 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1200.40 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1200.48 0.48 television
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1201.04 0.40 series,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1201.44 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1201.52 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1201.68 0.24 wanted
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1201.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.00 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.08 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.24 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.40 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.48 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.64 0.24 thing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1202.88 0.48 Like,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1203.44 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1203.68 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1203.92 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1204.56 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1204.72 0.64 WBS
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1205.44 0.64 arrow.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1206.16 0.40 Yes.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1206.64 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1207.04 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1207.36 0.08 along
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1207.60 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1207.84 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1207.92 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1208.08 0.48 like-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1208.72 0.32 Yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1209.52 0.08 That
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1209.76 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1209.92 0.24 of,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1210.16 0.32 um,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1210.56 0.32 tone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1210.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1211.12 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1211.28 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1211.44 0.24 something.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1211.76 0.08 A
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1211.84 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1212.08 0.24 bit,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1212.32 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1212.40 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1212.56 0.24 bit
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1212.80 0.48 darker,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1213.28 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1213.52 0.32 still.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1214.16 0.08 That
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1214.40 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1214.56 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1214.64 0.24 low
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1214.88 0.40 budget
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1215.28 0.08 feel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1215.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1215.52 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1215.60 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1215.68 0.16 well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1215.84 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.00 0.24 Right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.24 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.32 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.48 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.64 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.72 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1216.88 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1217.04 0.16 But-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1217.20 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1217.36 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1217.44 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1217.68 0.16 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1217.84 0.08 why
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.00 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.08 0.16 need
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.24 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.40 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.48 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.56 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1218.64 0.40 budget
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1219.04 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1219.12 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1219.20 0.16 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1219.36 0.32 Ranger.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1219.68 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1219.92 0.08 why
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.08 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.24 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.32 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.40 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.48 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1220.72 0.48 missing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1221.20 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1221.28 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1221.36 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1221.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1221.68 0.40 trailer,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1222.32 0.08 side
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1222.56 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1222.72 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1222.88 0.88 train-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1224.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1224.24 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1224.48 0.08 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1224.88 0.24 what's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1225.12 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1225.20 0.16 on.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1225.36 0.16 How
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1225.52 0.08 many
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1225.60 0.64 perspectives
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1226.32 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1226.40 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1226.56 0.16 train
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1226.80 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1227.04 0.48 wrecked?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1227.60 0.24 Yeah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1227.84 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1228.08 0.32 must've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1228.40 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1228.64 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1229.04 0.72 legit,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1229.76 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1230.48 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1230.64 0.32 must've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1230.96 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1231.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1231.12 0.32 steam
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1231.44 0.32 engine
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1231.84 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1232.00 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1232.48 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1232.64 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1232.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1232.96 0.72 reassemble.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1233.76 0.32 Took
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1234.08 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1234.16 0.16 half
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1234.32 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1234.48 0.56 budget.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1235.12 0.24 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1235.36 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1235.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1235.52 0.16 wonder
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1235.68 0.16 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1235.84 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.08 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.16 0.16 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.32 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.40 0.24 cast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.64 0.08 too
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.80 0.16 wide
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1236.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1237.12 0.32 net
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1237.52 0.08 here
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1237.76 0.24 too,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1238.00 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1238.32 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1238.40 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1238.56 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1238.88 0.24 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1239.12 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1239.68 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1239.92 0.24 older
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1240.24 0.40 generation
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1240.80 0.08 might
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1240.96 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1241.12 0.32 interested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1241.52 0.24 in,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1241.76 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1241.84 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1241.92 0.24 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1242.24 0.40 Ranger,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1242.64 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1242.80 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1242.96 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1243.20 0.16 cast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1243.44 0.32 Armie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1243.76 0.40 Hammer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1244.24 0.16 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1244.40 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1244.48 0.24 Lone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1244.72 0.32 Ranger
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.04 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.12 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.36 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.44 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.52 0.16 like,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.68 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1245.92 0.16 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.08 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.16 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.32 0.08 young
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.40 0.48 audience,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.88 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1246.96 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1247.04 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1247.12 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1247.20 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1247.44 0.16 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1247.60 0.24 to,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1247.92 0.16 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1248.08 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1248.16 0.40 appeal
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1248.56 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1248.64 0.16 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1248.80 0.08 many
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1249.20 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1249.60 0.24 wide
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1249.92 0.56 audiences
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1250.48 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1250.56 0.40 possible,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1250.96 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1251.12 0.40 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1251.60 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1251.84 0.16 feeling
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.08 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.24 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.32 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.48 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.56 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1252.80 0.56 miss.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1253.36 0.32 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1253.76 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1253.84 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1253.92 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1254.08 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1254.16 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1254.24 0.40 movies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1254.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1254.88 0.16 cast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1255.20 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1255.44 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1255.68 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1256.08 0.48 flops
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1256.64 0.40 anyway.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1257.12 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1257.20 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1257.36 0.32 you've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1257.68 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1257.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1258.00 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1258.24 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1258.48 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1258.72 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1259.04 0.40 specific
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1259.60 0.40 target
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1260.08 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1260.24 0.16 hit
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1260.48 0.08 hard
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1260.72 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1260.96 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1261.92 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1262.32 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1262.48 0.08 keep
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1262.80 0.32 saying,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1263.20 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1263.28 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1263.52 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1263.68 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1263.84 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1264.00 0.08 good
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1264.16 0.08 job
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1264.40 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1264.56 0.40 anything,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1265.04 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1265.20 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1265.44 0.08 make
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1265.68 0.32 money.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1266.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1266.08 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1266.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1266.40 0.56 Avengers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1267.12 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1267.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1267.28 0.40 perfect
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1267.76 0.08 example
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1268.16 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1268.24 0.24 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1268.56 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1268.88 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1269.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1269.12 0.08 great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1269.36 0.48 film.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1270.00 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1270.32 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1270.48 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1270.72 0.32 narrow
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1271.20 0.64 market,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1271.92 0.32 but,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1272.24 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1272.40 0.24 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1272.72 0.08 really
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1273.04 0.32 beating
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1273.44 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1273.60 0.32 drum
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1274.00 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1274.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1274.32 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1274.48 0.08 making
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1274.72 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1274.80 0.08 pretty
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1275.04 0.32 darn
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1275.52 0.08 good
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1275.68 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1276.32 1.44 versus,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1278.00 0.32 well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1278.48 0.16 X
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1278.64 0.32 -Men
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1279.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1279.12 0.08 few
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1279.28 0.08 years
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1279.44 0.24 ago
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1279.92 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1280.08 0.08 made
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1280.24 0.32 money,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1280.56 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1280.72 0.56 Wolverine
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1281.36 0.16 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1281.52 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1281.60 0.24 tank
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1282.00 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1282.24 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1282.40 0.24 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1282.64 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1282.80 0.80 garbage.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1283.76 0.32 So,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1284.24 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1284.40 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1284.64 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1284.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1284.96 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1285.20 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1285.44 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1285.52 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1285.68 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1285.84 0.24 way,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1286.08 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1286.40 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1286.56 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1286.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1286.72 0.16 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1286.88 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1287.12 0.24 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1287.36 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1287.44 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1287.76 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.08 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.24 0.16 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.40 0.16 saying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.56 0.16 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.72 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.80 0.16 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1288.96 0.24 thinking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1289.28 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1289.52 0.32 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1289.84 0.32 Man,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1290.16 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1290.24 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1290.48 0.40 Robert
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1290.88 0.40 Downey
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1291.28 0.32 Jr.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1291.68 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1291.84 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1291.92 0.40 perfect
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1292.64 0.16 cast
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1292.96 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1293.04 0.32 he's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1293.36 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1293.52 0.16 of,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1294.00 0.08 he
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1294.16 0.48 appeals
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1294.64 0.40 exactly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1295.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1295.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1295.28 0.56 demographic
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1295.92 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1296.00 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1296.24 0.32 interested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1296.56 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1296.72 0.24 Iron
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1296.96 0.24 Man,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1297.20 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1297.28 0.32 opposed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1297.60 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1297.68 0.24 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1297.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1298.00 0.16 bring
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1298.24 0.08 some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1298.48 0.08 young
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1298.88 0.24 actor
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1299.28 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1299.36 0.24 trying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1299.60 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1299.68 0.08 bring
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1299.84 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1299.92 0.24 younger
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1300.16 0.48 audience
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1300.72 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1300.88 0.08 were
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1301.12 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1301.36 0.32 for.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1301.84 0.32 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1302.24 0.32 reflective
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1302.56 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1302.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1302.88 0.08 real
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1303.04 0.08 character
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1303.36 0.48 portrayed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1303.84 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1303.92 0.32 comic
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1304.24 0.40 books.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1304.64 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1304.80 0.16 told
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1304.96 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1305.12 0.24 before,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1305.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1305.44 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1305.68 0.24 guy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1305.92 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1306.08 0.48 problems,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1306.56 1.04 alcoholism,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1307.76 0.40 facing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1308.32 0.32 things.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1308.64 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1308.80 0.32 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1309.36 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1309.52 0.08 real
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1309.92 0.08 person
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1310.32 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1310.40 0.24 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1310.72 0.24 doing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1310.96 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1311.12 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1311.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1311.36 0.08 best
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1311.52 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1311.60 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1311.76 0.48 ability,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1312.24 0.48 versus
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1313.36 0.08 no
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1313.44 0.40 offense,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1313.84 0.24 poor
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1314.08 0.24 Lou
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1314.32 0.72 Ferrigno.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1315.44 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1315.52 0.32 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1315.84 0.24 relate
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1316.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1316.24 0.40 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1317.12 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1317.36 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1317.52 0.40 can't.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1318.08 0.48 Speaking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1318.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1318.88 1.20 problems.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1320.96 0.40 He's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1321.36 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1321.52 0.32 working.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1321.84 0.24 He's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1322.08 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1322.24 0.56 working.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1323.12 0.64 Microsoft
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1323.84 0.40 Surface
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1324.32 0.48 Pro!
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1324.80 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1325.12 0.32 coming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1325.44 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1325.92 0.08 next
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1326.32 0.64 week.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1327.20 0.48 $899
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1328.88 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1328.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1329.04 0.48 64
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1329.60 0.64 gigabyte
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1330.40 0.56 version.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1331.28 0.40 Plus,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1331.68 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1331.84 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1331.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1332.00 0.24 pay
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1332.48 0.64 $119
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1333.12 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1333.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1333.36 0.24 touch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1333.60 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1333.84 0.08 type
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1334.08 0.56 cover,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1334.80 0.40 Intel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1335.28 0.24 core
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1335.60 0.64 I-5,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1336.32 0.08 five
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1336.88 0.40 hours
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1337.36 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1337.52 0.40 battery
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1338.00 0.72 life.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1338.80 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1339.04 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1339.28 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1339.36 0.48 smarter
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1339.92 0.48 move,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1340.56 0.40 demo
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1341.04 0.40 units
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1341.44 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1341.52 0.08 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1341.68 0.40 popping
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1342.08 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1342.16 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1342.32 0.48 retailers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1342.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1343.04 0.08 week
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1343.20 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1343.36 0.48 advance
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1344.00 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1344.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1344.88 0.08 release
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1345.36 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1345.52 0.56 this.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1346.32 0.32 Is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1346.72 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1347.04 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1347.60 0.08 life
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1348.88 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1349.36 0.56 Windows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1349.92 0.24 8
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1350.40 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1350.56 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1350.64 0.48 Surface
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1351.12 0.48 Pro?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1351.68 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1351.84 0.56 mean-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1352.40 0.24 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1353.60 0.56 Surface
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1354.16 0.24 Pro
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1354.80 1.84 thinks-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1356.80 0.56 borderline
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1357.52 0.48 missing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1358.08 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1358.24 0.48 window,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1358.80 1.20 completely.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1360.88 0.16 All
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1361.04 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1361.12 0.40 buzz
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1361.52 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1361.76 0.24 reading
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.00 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.16 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.24 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.40 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.48 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.56 0.16 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.72 0.16 about:
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1362.88 0.40 "Oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1363.28 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1363.52 0.32 buying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1363.84 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1364.00 0.16 64
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1364.16 0.56 gigabyte
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1364.72 0.32 model,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.04 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.12 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.20 0.16 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.36 0.24 am
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.60 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.68 0.08 really
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1365.84 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1366.16 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1366.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1366.40 0.08 hard
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1366.64 0.48 drive"?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1367.12 0.32 There's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1367.44 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1367.68 0.64 substantial
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1368.32 0.40 amount
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1368.72 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1368.80 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1369.04 0.16 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1369.20 0.48 taken.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1369.76 0.32 41
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1370.16 0.32 gigs
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1370.48 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1370.56 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1370.64 0.16 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1370.80 0.16 taken
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1370.96 0.16 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1371.12 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1371.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1371.28 0.32 operating-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1371.60 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1371.76 0.40 Strictly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1372.16 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1372.24 0.24 operating
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1372.48 0.32 system.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1372.80 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1372.88 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1373.12 0.40 buying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1373.52 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1373.60 0.16 64
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1373.92 0.56 gigabyte
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1374.56 0.64 tablet.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1375.28 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1375.52 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1375.84 0.32 23
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1376.32 0.88 gigs.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1378.72 0.24 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1378.96 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1379.12 0.08 mean
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1379.28 0.40 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1379.68 0.32 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.00 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.16 0.08 concern
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.48 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.64 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.72 0.16 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.88 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1380.96 0.32 people,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1381.28 0.08 especially
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1381.68 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1381.84 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1382.08 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1382.16 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1382.24 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1382.32 0.40 imagined
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1382.80 0.08 might
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1382.96 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1383.12 0.32 interested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1383.44 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1383.52 0.40 buying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1383.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1384.00 0.48 Surface
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1384.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1384.88 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1385.20 0.08 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1385.44 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1385.60 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1385.76 0.56 tablets
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1386.48 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1387.52 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1387.76 0.08 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1387.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.08 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.24 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.40 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.48 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.56 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.72 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1388.80 0.56 upgrading.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1389.44 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1389.76 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1389.84 0.16 number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1390.16 0.16 that,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1390.32 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1390.56 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1390.64 0.56 buzz
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1391.20 0.08 number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1391.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1391.44 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1391.60 0.08 stand
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1391.84 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.00 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.08 0.16 them.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.24 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.40 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.48 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.56 0.16 find
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.72 0.16 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.88 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1392.96 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1393.04 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1393.12 0.56 buzzing,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1393.68 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1393.92 0.16 like,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1394.08 0.48 "Wait,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1394.56 0.08 why
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1394.64 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1394.72 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1394.80 0.08 only
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1394.88 0.16 21
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1395.04 0.88 gigabytes"?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1396.64 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1396.88 0.08 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1397.20 0.48 time,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1398.08 0.56 Windows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1398.72 0.16 8
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1398.96 0.16 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1399.12 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1399.28 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1399.36 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1399.44 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1399.60 0.56 exclusive
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1400.16 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1400.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1400.32 0.48 Surface
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1400.80 0.16 Pro
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1401.36 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1401.44 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1401.52 0.16 full
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1401.76 0.48 version,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1402.24 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1402.40 0.24 is,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1402.64 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1402.72 0.24 think,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1402.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1403.12 0.24 huge
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1403.52 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1403.84 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1404.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1404.16 0.08 product
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1404.88 0.40 maybe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1405.36 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1405.52 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1405.68 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1406.00 0.56 successful
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1406.56 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1406.72 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1406.80 0.08 should
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1407.04 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1407.36 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1407.60 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1407.76 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1408.08 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1408.16 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1408.32 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1408.56 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1408.80 0.08 these
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1408.96 0.08 other
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1409.12 0.40 companies.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1409.52 0.40 Windows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1409.92 0.16 8
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1410.24 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1410.40 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1410.48 0.64 successful,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1411.28 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1411.60 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1411.76 0.08 far
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1411.84 0.16 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1412.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1412.08 0.56 standalone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1412.64 0.32 product,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1412.96 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.20 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.28 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.36 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.44 0.16 look
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.60 0.16 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1413.84 0.40 cheaper
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1414.24 0.40 knockoff
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1414.64 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1414.88 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1414.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1415.04 0.08 come
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1415.12 0.24 out,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1415.36 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1415.44 0.32 maybe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1415.76 0.16 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1415.92 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1416.16 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1416.32 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1416.56 0.40 gen.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1416.96 0.32 We'll
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1417.28 0.24 wait
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1417.52 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1417.68 0.08 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1417.84 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1417.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1418.00 0.24 problems
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1418.24 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1418.48 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1418.64 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1418.72 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1418.88 0.24 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1419.20 0.24 Wait
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1419.52 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1419.76 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1420.08 0.56 applications
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1420.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1420.96 0.32 catch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1421.28 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1421.44 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1421.60 0.64 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1423.36 0.24 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1423.60 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1423.68 0.40 don't,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1424.08 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1424.16 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1424.48 0.32 know.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1426.56 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1426.88 0.08 still
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1427.12 0.32 holding
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1427.52 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1427.68 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1427.84 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1428.00 0.32 computer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1428.40 0.32 thing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1429.04 0.24 Nate
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1429.28 0.64 Doty's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1429.92 0.24 running
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1430.24 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1430.40 0.24 little,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1430.72 1.12 uh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1432.08 0.48 separation
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1432.64 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1432.80 0.24 him,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1433.04 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1433.28 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1433.52 0.40 I'm-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1434.48 0.08 That
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1434.72 0.24 makes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1434.96 0.08 me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1435.12 0.56 nervous.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1435.68 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1435.84 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1436.08 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1436.24 0.40 amount
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1436.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1437.36 0.08 stuff
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1437.60 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1437.84 0.16 there,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1438.08 0.24 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1438.32 0.24 I,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1438.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1438.72 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1438.96 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1439.12 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1439.28 0.32 likely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1439.60 0.08 not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1439.76 0.32 buy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1440.08 0.24 one.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1440.64 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1440.80 0.08 will
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1440.96 0.16 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1441.12 0.16 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1441.28 0.32 likely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1441.60 0.24 buy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1441.84 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1441.92 0.48 computer,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1442.48 0.08 also
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1442.72 0.32 running
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1443.44 0.56 Windows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1444.00 0.40 8.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1444.48 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1444.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1444.88 0.32 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1445.20 0.08 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1445.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1445.52 0.08 reason
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1445.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1446.16 0.08 go
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1446.48 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1447.52 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1447.92 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1448.08 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1448.24 0.48 investment
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1448.88 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1449.12 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1449.44 0.08 else
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1450.00 0.40 nearly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1450.48 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1450.72 0.08 good
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1451.04 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1451.36 0.08 better
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1451.76 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1452.00 0.32 proven
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1452.48 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1452.72 0.16 already
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1453.12 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1453.28 0.24 there.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1453.52 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1453.60 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1453.92 1.60 cheaper.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1458.16 0.88 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1459.36 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1459.60 0.08 been
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1459.84 0.08 having
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1460.16 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1460.32 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1460.56 0.56 busy,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1461.20 0.80 busy,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1462.16 0.48 busy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1462.80 0.08 year
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1463.44 0.80 already.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1465.52 0.16 Of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1465.68 0.24 course,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1465.92 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1466.08 0.32 recently
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1466.40 0.40 signed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1466.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1466.88 0.16 deal
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1467.04 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1467.12 0.32 Turner
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1467.44 0.64 Broadcasting,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1468.08 0.32 Warner
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1468.40 0.32 Brothers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1468.80 0.48 Television
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1469.28 0.48 Group,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1469.84 0.32 meaning
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1470.32 0.48 Cartoon
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1470.80 0.56 Network,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1471.36 0.48 Warner
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1471.84 0.32 Brothers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1472.16 0.40 Animation,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1472.56 0.32 Adult
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1472.88 0.32 Swim
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1473.20 0.32 shows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1473.52 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1473.60 0.16 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1473.76 0.24 coming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1474.00 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1474.08 0.96 Netflix.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1475.44 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1475.68 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1475.76 0.40 signed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1476.16 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1476.32 0.08 big
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1476.48 0.16 deal
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1476.72 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1476.80 0.56 Disney
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1477.44 0.08 before
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1477.76 0.40 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1478.32 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1479.28 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1479.52 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1479.76 0.40 released
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1480.40 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1480.72 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1480.88 0.32 House
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1481.28 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1481.36 0.56 Cards,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1481.92 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1482.08 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1482.24 0.96 Netflix.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1483.36 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1483.68 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1483.76 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1484.16 0.24 series
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1484.56 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1484.64 0.32 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1484.96 0.16 doing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1485.20 0.32 completely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1485.60 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1485.76 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1485.84 0.24 own.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1486.16 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1486.32 0.08 did
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1486.48 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1486.64 0.80 Lillehammer,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1487.44 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1487.52 0.16 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1487.68 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1487.76 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1487.92 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1488.00 0.32 combo
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1488.56 0.64 thing.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1490.56 0.24 All
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1490.88 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1491.12 0.40 shows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1492.56 0.32 coming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1492.96 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1493.12 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1493.20 0.32 once,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1493.60 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1493.68 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1493.92 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1494.08 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1494.72 0.48 completely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1495.44 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1495.76 0.08 day
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1496.00 0.32 one,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1496.48 0.32 David
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1496.80 0.48 Fincher
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1497.68 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1497.84 0.32 producing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1498.24 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1498.40 0.32 directing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1498.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1498.96 0.08 believe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1499.12 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1499.28 0.08 first
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1499.36 0.16 2
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1499.52 0.56 episodes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1500.08 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1500.16 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1500.32 0.32 Kevin
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1500.64 0.32 Spacey
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1500.96 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1501.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1501.28 0.64 star.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1502.48 0.16 Is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1502.80 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1503.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1503.52 0.08 new
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1503.76 0.72 trend?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1505.04 0.24 There's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1505.44 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1505.52 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1505.76 0.08 two
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1505.92 0.24 sides
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1506.16 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1506.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1506.32 0.64 coin.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1507.20 0.24 Some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1507.44 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1507.76 0.16 talk
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1507.92 0.16 about,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1508.08 0.40 "Oh,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1508.48 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1508.64 0.08 need
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1508.80 0.08 word
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1509.04 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1509.12 0.32 mouth.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1509.44 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1509.52 0.32 builds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1509.92 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1510.24 0.16 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1510.48 0.08 week
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1510.64 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1510.80 0.08 week
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1510.96 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1511.20 0.32 waiting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1511.52 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1511.68 0.40 waiting".
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1512.08 0.40 Whereas
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1512.56 0.16 others
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1512.72 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1512.88 0.40 saying,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1513.28 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1513.36 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1513.68 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1513.92 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1514.08 0.08 great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1514.48 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1515.28 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1515.52 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1515.76 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1515.92 0.40 instant-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1516.40 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1516.48 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1516.64 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1516.72 0.32 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1517.04 0.32 interested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1517.36 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1517.52 0.16 seeing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1517.68 0.16 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1517.84 0.32 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1518.24 0.24 going,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1518.64 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1518.80 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1518.96 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1519.28 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1520.00 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1520.16 0.24 its
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1520.40 0.48 entirety
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1521.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1521.60 0.08 next
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1521.84 0.56 episode,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1522.40 0.08 without
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1522.56 0.08 having
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1522.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1522.96 0.40 wait.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1523.36 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1523.60 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1523.76 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1523.92 0.08 may
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1524.08 0.32 stick
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1524.48 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1524.64 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1524.88 0.24 longer
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1525.28 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1525.52 1.20 you,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1526.80 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1527.04 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1527.20 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1527.28 0.08 better
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1527.52 0.08 feel
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1527.76 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1527.84 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1528.08 0.48 Your
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1529.12 0.32 thoughts
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1529.92 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1530.08 1.20 Netflix?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1532.00 0.24 On
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1532.40 0.08 both
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1532.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1532.80 0.72 those,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1534.40 0.56 signing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1535.04 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1535.36 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1535.68 0.40 ticket,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1536.08 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1536.16 0.48 Cartoon
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1536.64 0.48 Network
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.20 0.16 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.36 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.44 0.16 kinds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.60 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.68 0.16 stuff,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.84 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1537.92 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.00 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.08 0.48 Disney.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.56 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.72 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.80 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.88 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1538.96 0.64 absolutely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1539.60 0.48 brilliant.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1540.08 0.32 They're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1540.40 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1540.48 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1540.56 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1540.64 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1540.80 0.64 stranglehold
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1541.52 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1541.68 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1541.84 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1542.00 0.40 kid's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1542.48 0.48 entertainment
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1543.12 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1543.28 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1543.44 0.40 animated
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1544.00 0.40 stuff.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1544.48 0.24 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1544.80 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1544.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1544.96 0.16 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1545.12 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1545.28 0.24 huge
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1545.68 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1546.08 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1546.32 0.08 could
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1546.48 0.24 be,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1546.72 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1546.80 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1547.12 0.08 potential
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1547.52 0.56 distractor
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1548.08 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1548.16 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1548.24 0.16 kid
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1548.40 0.16 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1548.56 0.16 home.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1548.72 0.32 Maybe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1549.04 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1549.12 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1549.28 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1549.44 0.08 couple
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1549.60 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1549.92 0.24 minutes
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1550.24 0.08 by
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1550.32 0.32 myself,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1550.64 0.24 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1550.88 0.08 put
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1550.96 0.16 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1551.12 0.56 Netflix.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1551.68 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1551.76 0.16 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.00 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.16 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.24 0.16 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.40 0.16 kinds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.56 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.64 0.24 things.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1552.88 0.32 That's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1553.20 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1553.28 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1553.44 0.24 create
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1553.68 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1553.76 0.16 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1553.92 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1554.00 0.64 subscriptions
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1554.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1554.88 0.40 way.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1555.44 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1555.76 0.16 then
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1556.08 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1556.16 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1556.32 0.16 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1556.56 0.24 time,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1556.96 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1557.04 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1557.20 0.08 look
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1557.28 0.16 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1557.44 0.32 House
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1557.76 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1557.84 0.32 Cards
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1558.24 0.08 being
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1558.40 0.40 released
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1558.88 0.48 completely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1559.44 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1559.60 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1559.76 0.08 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1560.00 0.64 day,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1561.04 0.24 I've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1561.36 0.32 mixed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1561.76 0.32 feelings
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1562.16 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1562.24 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1562.48 0.24 Because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1562.88 0.08 from
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1563.04 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1563.20 0.08 business
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1563.60 0.96 standpoint,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1564.80 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1564.96 0.24 don't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1565.20 0.16 know
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1565.44 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1565.52 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1565.68 0.08 really
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1565.92 0.08 understand
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1566.40 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1566.80 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1567.76 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1567.92 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1568.08 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1568.40 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1568.48 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1568.64 0.24 House
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1568.88 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1568.96 0.40 Cards,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1569.36 0.32 maybe
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1569.68 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1570.00 0.08 only
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1570.08 0.16 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1570.24 0.48 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1570.80 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1570.88 0.08 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1570.96 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1571.20 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1571.36 0.16 only
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1571.52 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1571.60 0.16 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1571.76 0.16 pay
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1571.92 0.16 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1572.08 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1572.24 0.08 month
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1572.40 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1572.48 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1572.64 0.24 now.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1572.88 0.48 Whereas,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1573.36 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1573.44 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1573.60 0.32 spread
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.00 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.08 0.16 out,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.24 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.40 0.16 Right.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.56 0.08 now
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.64 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1574.88 0.24 getting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1575.12 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1575.28 0.08 business
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1575.52 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1575.60 0.48 multiple
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1576.08 0.64 months,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1577.04 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1577.60 0.32 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1578.08 0.08 also
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1579.28 0.56 adhering
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1579.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1580.00 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1580.16 0.08 business
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1580.40 0.40 model.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1580.80 0.56 Anybody
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1581.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1581.44 0.24 watches
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1581.76 0.40 television
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1582.16 0.24 shows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1582.40 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1582.48 0.56 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1583.12 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1583.28 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1583.36 0.40 binge
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1583.76 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1583.92 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1584.08 0.24 watching
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1584.48 0.08 where
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1584.64 0.32 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1584.96 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1585.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1585.12 0.24 crank
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1585.44 0.16 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1585.60 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1585.68 0.56 seasons.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1586.24 0.16 Some
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1586.40 0.16 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1586.64 0.16 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1586.80 0.24 wait
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1587.04 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1587.20 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1587.36 0.40 television
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1587.76 0.08 show
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1587.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1588.00 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1588.08 0.08 done
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1588.24 0.32 running
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1588.56 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1588.64 0.40 television
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1589.52 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1589.68 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1589.84 0.08 can
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1589.92 0.16 watch
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1590.16 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1590.24 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1590.40 0.08 right
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1590.56 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1590.64 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1590.80 0.16 row
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1591.12 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1591.28 0.80 Netflix.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1592.16 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1592.40 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1593.36 0.48 doesn't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1593.92 0.08 seem
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1594.24 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1594.32 0.08 make
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1594.56 0.08 sense
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1594.96 0.56 financially,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1595.60 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1595.76 0.16 least
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1596.00 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1596.08 0.08 way
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1596.24 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1596.48 0.24 thinking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1596.72 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1596.88 0.32 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1597.28 0.08 But
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1597.68 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1597.84 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1597.92 0.08 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1598.08 0.24 time,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1598.32 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1598.40 0.16 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1598.56 0.24 that's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1598.88 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1598.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1599.04 0.08 make
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1599.12 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1599.28 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1599.36 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1599.52 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1599.68 0.40 customers
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1600.16 0.16 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1600.32 0.08 happy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1600.72 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1600.88 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1601.04 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1601.20 0.32 saying,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1601.60 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1601.68 0.24 right,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1601.92 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1602.08 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1602.16 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1602.32 0.40 works.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1602.72 0.08 We
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1602.88 0.08 understand
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1603.28 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1603.44 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1603.60 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1603.68 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1603.84 0.24 want.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.08 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.24 0.24 we're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.48 0.08 actually
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.64 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.72 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.80 0.16 give
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1604.96 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.12 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.28 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.36 0.24 time.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.60 0.24 Right.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1605.92 0.16 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1606.08 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1606.32 0.16 the,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1606.48 0.08 what
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1606.64 0.32 cable
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1607.04 0.08 should
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1607.28 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1607.36 0.24 doing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1607.76 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1607.92 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1608.00 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1608.16 0.72 perspective.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1608.96 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1609.12 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1609.44 0.24 cable
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1609.84 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1610.00 0.24 the,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1610.24 0.40 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1610.64 0.32 buy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1611.04 0.08 everything
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1611.68 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1612.32 0.40 $200
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1612.72 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1612.88 0.24 month,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1613.12 0.08 where
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1613.28 0.48 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1613.84 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1613.92 0.64 piecemealing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1614.56 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1614.72 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1614.88 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1615.12 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1615.20 0.08 little
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1615.28 0.32 bit?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1615.60 0.24 Here,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1615.84 0.24 we'll
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1616.08 0.08 take
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1616.16 0.24 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1616.40 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1616.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1616.64 0.16 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1616.80 0.24 they're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1617.12 0.32 smart
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1617.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1617.60 0.32 segment
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1618.08 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1618.32 0.08 business
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1618.72 0.64 model,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1619.76 0.08 as
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1620.08 0.40 well.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1620.72 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1620.96 0.32 can't
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1621.36 0.40 compete
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1621.84 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1622.00 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1622.32 0.08 like
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1622.56 0.80 Amazon,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1623.36 0.08 which
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1623.68 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1624.00 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1624.32 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1624.80 0.32 huge
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1625.44 0.48 mega
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1626.00 0.64 corporation.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1626.64 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1626.80 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1626.88 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1627.04 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1627.28 0.40 becoming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1627.92 0.08 far
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1628.16 0.32 bigger
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1628.56 0.08 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1628.80 0.08 just
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1628.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1629.04 0.40 shipment
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1629.52 0.56 organization
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1630.16 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1630.32 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1630.48 0.48 instant
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1630.96 0.48 run.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1631.60 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1632.08 0.16 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1632.24 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1632.48 0.24 you're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1632.80 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1632.96 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1633.12 0.40 have,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1633.76 0.08 more
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1633.92 0.16 than
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1634.16 0.40 likely,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1634.56 0.16 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1634.72 0.08 lot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1634.80 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1634.88 0.08 people
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1635.04 0.08 who
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1635.12 0.16 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1635.28 0.40 dropping
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1635.76 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1635.84 0.32 cable
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1636.32 0.40 line,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1636.80 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1637.04 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1637.12 0.48 comfortable
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1637.68 0.32 picking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1638.00 0.08 up
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1638.16 0.48 Amazon
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1638.72 0.32 prime
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1639.12 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1639.20 0.64 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1639.92 0.16 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1640.08 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1640.16 0.16 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1640.40 0.32 time.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1640.80 0.08 You
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1640.96 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1641.20 0.24 I've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1641.52 0.08 got
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1641.68 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1641.76 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1641.92 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1642.08 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1642.32 0.16 this.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1642.48 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1642.56 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1642.72 0.24 it's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1642.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1643.04 0.16 same
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1643.20 0.08 thing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1643.36 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1643.44 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1643.52 0.24 20
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1643.92 0.16 years
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1644.16 0.24 ago
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1644.80 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1646.08 0.40 premium
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1646.56 0.24 cable
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1646.88 0.56 networks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1647.44 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1647.52 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1647.60 0.24 time,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1647.84 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1647.92 0.16 know?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1648.08 0.32 I'll
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1648.40 0.08 get
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1648.48 0.48 HBO
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1649.04 0.16 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1649.20 0.24 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1649.52 0.08 these
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1649.60 0.24 kinds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1649.84 0.16 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1650.00 0.24 things,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1650.24 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1650.32 0.32 I'll
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1650.64 0.16 get,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1650.80 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1650.88 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1651.04 0.56 Showtime,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1651.68 0.08 because
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1651.84 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1652.00 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1652.16 0.08 these
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1652.40 0.24 kinds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1652.64 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1652.88 0.56 things.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1653.92 0.08 If
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1654.16 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1654.48 0.08 both
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1655.20 0.08 have
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1655.36 0.08 an
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1655.52 0.64 Allegiant
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1656.24 0.56 audience
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1657.28 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1657.60 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1657.68 0.16 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1657.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1658.00 0.08 keep
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1658.24 0.40 remembering
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1658.64 0.72 Amazons,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1659.44 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1659.68 0.32 sorry,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1660.00 0.48 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1660.56 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1660.64 0.24 talking
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1660.88 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1660.96 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1661.12 0.48 Arrested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1661.68 0.40 Development
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1662.48 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1662.64 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1662.80 0.40 future.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1663.28 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1663.60 0.08 if
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1663.84 0.24 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1664.16 0.08 something
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1664.56 0.08 always
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1664.88 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1665.04 0.40 carrot
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1665.52 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1665.68 0.08 there
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1665.84 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1666.00 0.08 keep
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1666.24 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1666.40 0.48 watching,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1666.96 0.32 yeah,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1667.28 0.24 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1667.60 0.08 probably
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1667.84 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1667.92 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1668.00 0.24 jump
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1668.24 0.16 in.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1668.48 0.32 Sure,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1668.80 0.32 I'm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.12 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.20 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.28 0.16 stay
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.44 0.08 with
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.52 0.24 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.76 0.08 And
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1669.92 0.08 my
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1670.00 0.24 wife
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1670.32 0.08 has
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1670.40 0.24 told
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1670.64 0.08 me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1670.80 0.40 already,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1671.20 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1671.36 0.08 are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1671.52 0.08 back
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1671.76 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1671.84 0.64 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1672.56 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1672.72 0.48 Arrested
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1673.20 0.56 Development
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1673.76 0.48 comes.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1674.32 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1674.48 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1674.72 0.48 it's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1675.36 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1675.76 0.08 love
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1676.16 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1676.32 0.08 program
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1676.88 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1677.04 0.08 we
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1677.28 0.08 never
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1677.44 0.32 watched
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1677.92 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1678.16 0.08 show
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1678.48 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1678.64 0.08 it
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1678.72 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1678.88 0.40 on.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1679.44 0.24 Not
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1679.68 0.32 wanting
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1680.00 0.24 to.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1680.24 1.04 Me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1681.36 0.56 either.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1681.92 0.48 Wow.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1682.56 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1682.72 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1682.88 0.32 it's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1683.20 0.72 it's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1683.92 0.40 it's,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1684.40 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1684.48 0.08 would
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1684.64 0.08 say
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1684.88 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1685.04 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1685.12 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1685.20 0.08 best
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1685.36 0.24 shows
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1685.60 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1685.76 0.24 It's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1686.00 0.16 great.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1686.24 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1686.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1686.40 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1686.48 0.16 20
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1686.80 0.24 years,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1687.04 0.08 without
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1687.68 0.56 questions-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1688.72 0.24 oh
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1689.04 0.24 yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1689.36 0.08 Oh
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1689.68 0.32 yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1690.16 0.32 Yeah.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1690.56 0.24 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1690.88 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1690.96 0.16 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1691.12 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1691.28 0.56 Netflix
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1691.92 0.40 definitely
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1692.32 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1692.40 0.32 ahead
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1692.72 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1692.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1692.88 0.32 curve
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1693.20 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1693.36 0.16 this.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1693.52 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1693.68 0.08 think
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1693.84 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1694.08 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1694.64 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1695.04 0.08 very
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1695.44 0.40 smart
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1695.92 0.24 move,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1696.16 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1696.32 0.32 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1696.64 0.32 know-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1696.96 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1697.20 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1697.36 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1697.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1697.52 0.24 be.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1697.84 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1697.92 0.16 mean,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1698.08 0.08 their
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1698.32 0.48 survival
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1698.88 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1699.04 0.08 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1699.28 0.48 question,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1699.92 0.08 even
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1700.40 0.32 let's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1700.72 0.08 say
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1700.96 0.08 a
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1701.04 0.08 year
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1701.28 0.24 ago
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1701.84 0.08 when
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1702.24 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1702.48 0.08 business
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1702.80 0.40 model
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1703.28 0.24 changed
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1703.60 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1703.76 0.08 they
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1703.92 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1704.24 0.08 so
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1704.40 0.08 much
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1704.56 0.56 criticism
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1705.28 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1706.24 0.48 doubling
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1706.80 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1706.96 0.40 cost,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1707.36 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1707.44 0.24 know,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1707.68 0.40 paying
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1708.16 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1709.12 0.08 both
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1709.52 0.24 parts
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1709.76 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1709.92 0.32 that.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1710.56 0.08 They
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1710.80 0.08 had
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1711.04 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1711.28 0.08 be
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1711.44 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1711.60 0.96 survive.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1713.36 0.64 Okay.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1714.24 0.40 Well,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1715.28 0.32 there's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1715.68 0.24 lots
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1715.92 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1716.00 0.08 other
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1716.16 0.24 stuff,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1716.40 0.08 but
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1716.48 0.32 we're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1716.80 0.08 kind
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1716.88 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1717.44 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1717.60 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1717.76 0.08 time
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1719.20 0.08 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1719.52 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1719.68 0.32 week.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1720.00 0.08 I
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1720.16 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1720.32 0.08 want
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1720.56 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1720.80 0.32 mention
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1721.52 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1721.92 0.32 Warm
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1722.32 0.40 Bodies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1722.88 0.08 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1722.96 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1723.04 0.08 number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1723.36 0.08 one
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1723.52 0.32 movie
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1723.84 0.08 of
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1723.92 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1724.08 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1724.24 0.96 weekend.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1725.76 0.48 Sorry.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1726.72 0.64 18.8
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1727.44 0.24 million.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1727.68 0.80 Armageddon.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1728.88 0.32 Bonds
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1729.20 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1729.36 0.40 Gretta
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1729.76 0.16 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1729.92 0.08 number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1730.00 0.32 2
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1730.48 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1730.72 0.56 9.4-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1731.44 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1731.60 0.24 I've
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1731.84 0.16 heard
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1732.00 0.08 such
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1732.24 0.08 great
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1732.40 0.08 things
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1732.48 0.08 about
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1732.56 0.16 it.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1732.72 0.32 Silver
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1733.04 0.40 Linings
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1733.44 0.48 Playbook,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1733.92 0.32 Mama,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1734.24 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1734.32 0.40 Zero
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1734.72 0.24 Dark
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1734.96 0.32 30,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1735.28 0.48 Roundup.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1735.84 0.40 Bullet
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1736.32 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1736.48 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1736.56 0.24 Head
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1737.04 0.56 debuted
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1737.60 0.08 at
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1737.68 0.08 number
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1737.84 0.40 6.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1738.24 0.08 It
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1738.32 0.16 was
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1738.64 0.40 sliced
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1739.12 0.40 alone,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1739.52 0.96 4.5
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1740.88 0.64 million.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1742.16 0.32 Slies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1742.72 0.40 worst
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1743.12 0.40 opening
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1743.52 0.40 weekend
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1744.72 0.40 since-
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1745.28 0.16 -
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1745.60 0.40 Black
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1746.00 0.40 Hawks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1746.40 0.16 in
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1746.56 0.96 1981.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1748.08 0.24 Are
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1748.32 0.08 you
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1748.48 0.32 meaning
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1748.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1749.04 0.08 tell
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1749.28 0.08 me
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1749.52 0.08 that
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1749.92 0.56 Sylvester
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1750.48 0.56 Stallone
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1751.12 0.08 is
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1751.28 0.08 over
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1751.44 0.16 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1751.60 0.40 hill?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1752.00 0.32 What's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1752.32 0.08 the
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1752.40 0.08 next
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1752.56 0.40 Arnold
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1752.96 1.12 Schwarzenegger?
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1754.16 1.92 Awake.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1756.64 0.24 2
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1756.88 0.32 movies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1757.20 0.24 coming
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1757.44 0.08 out
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1757.52 0.16 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1757.68 0.32 weekend,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1758.00 0.48 Identity
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1758.56 0.24 Theft
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1758.88 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1759.04 0.08 The
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1759.12 0.48 Identity
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1759.68 0.32 Thief.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1760.08 0.40 Jason
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1760.48 0.48 Batman,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1760.96 0.48 Melissa
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1761.44 0.56 McCarthy
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1762.32 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1762.48 0.08 side
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1762.72 0.40 effects.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1763.36 0.64 Possibly
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1764.00 0.24 Steven
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1764.24 0.88 Lederberg's
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1765.12 0.08 last
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1765.44 0.40 movie,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1766.32 0.16 Jude
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1766.56 0.16 law,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1766.72 0.40 Rooney
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1767.12 0.40 Mara,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1767.76 0.40 Channing
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1768.16 0.48 Tatum,
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1768.64 0.08 and
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1768.72 0.40 Catherine
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1769.12 0.40 Zeta
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1769.52 0.56 Jones.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1770.16 0.08 So
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1770.48 0.32 we're
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1770.80 0.08 going
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1770.88 0.08 to
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1770.96 0.16 see
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1771.12 0.08 how
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1771.20 0.08 all
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1771.36 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1771.44 0.32 movies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1771.84 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1772.08 0.08 or
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1772.24 0.16 both
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1772.48 0.08 those
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1772.56 0.32 movies
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1772.96 0.08 do
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1773.20 0.08 this
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1773.36 0.32 weekend
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1774.08 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1774.40 0.08 next
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1774.64 0.08 week
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1774.96 0.08 on
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1775.12 0.24 Inside
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1775.44 0.24 Media
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1775.68 0.40 Weekly.
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1776.08 0.32 Thanks
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1776.40 0.16 for
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1776.56 0.32 joining
Inside_Media_Weekly_13_-_Feb._5_2013 1 1776.88 22.96 us.