Introduction of scholar at risk in webpage (M6-7) D4.3 public in webpage (1

Month after approval)

</th> </tr> </table>

T4.3 To implement four

Transdisciplinary and

Transnational Science Shop projects to respond “glocally” to societal grand
challenges and facilitate the exchange of students internationally.

Define four None - IrsiCaixa and ISGlobal, Description of the TT RRI OS
Transdisciplinary with inputs from all Projects in website (M32-33) and
Transnational partners D4.2 public in webpage (1

RRI and Open Month after approval)

Science projects

D4.2  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T4.4

</th>  
<th>

To organize an open call to spread out InSPIRES good practices and implement 5
TT SS projects

</th>  
<th>

Define open call evaluation criteria Selection of winners

D4.1

</th>  
<th>

None

</th>  
<th>

\-

</th>  
<th>

ISGlobal with inputs from all the partners

</th>  
<th>

Publication of open call and evaluation indicators in website (M22-23)
Publication of winners in website (M28)

D4.1 public in website public in webpage (1 Month after approval)

</th> </tr> </table>

##  3.5 WP5

The overall aim of this work package is to facilitate the training of new
science shops structures and their steady connection by developing training
sessions, information sessions and pedagogical material tailored for the
relevant stakeholders: actual or future coordinators and mediators, local
communities’ representatives, academic staff/researchers, students and local
authorities. The ambition is to strengthen the growth of science shop models
up to the standards identified by the European Commission, in particular in
terms of RRI, OSc and impact evaluation requirements, and contributing to
tackle current grand challenges.  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

Task Name of task Outputs Data generated

</th>  
<th>

Kind of data

</th>  
<th>

Responsible partners

</th>  
<th>

MGMT strategy

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

WP5 - Training activities to strengthen the growth of science shops

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td> </tr> </table>

T5.1 To create common basic Training workshop None - UdL, VU, ESSRG and Brief
report on common knowledge among all the during Kick-off UNIFI definitions in
website. (M3-4) project partners meeting  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T5.2

</th>  
<th>

To organize two “on the field” international schools in Tunisia and Bolivia,
to strengthen the participatory research and innovation practices beyond
Europe’s borders

</th>  
<th>

School in Tunis

School in Bolivia

Training materials

</th>  
<th>

None

</th>  
<th>

\-

</th>  
<th>

UdL, VU, ESSRG and ISGlobal

</th>  
<th>

Report on schools in website: Tunisia (M22-23) and Bolivia (M24-25).

Training materials available in website and other repositories (RRI-tools,
scientix, etc) (M26-27)

</th> </tr> </table>

T5.3 To launch two European summer  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T5.4

</th>  
<th>

Co-development of an accessible an interactive eLearning platform to develop
and strengthen a “global civil society”

</th>  
<th>

Videos in 4 languages

First release in M28

Second release in

M39

D5.2

</th>  
<th>

None

</th>  
<th>

\-

</th>  
<th>

UdL, VU, ESSRG and UNIFI, with inputs from all partners

</th>  
<th>

Announcement on releases in website (M28 and 29) Hosting of videos in website
(M29-30).

MOOC in platforms

(Coursera…) (M36)

</th> </tr> </table>

International schools to school in Budapest strengthen the International
winter participatory research school and innovation practices Training
materials beyond Europe’s borders

None - UdL Report on schools in website:

Budapest (M18-19) and final school (M46-47) Calls to schools in website and
other related webs (M40).  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

</th>  
<th>

</th>  
<th>

</th>  
<th>

</th>  
<th>

</th>  
<th>

D5.2 public in website (1 month after approval)

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

T5.5

</td>  
<td>

Joint production of videos and case studies based on the SS2.0, including the
transnational ones

</td>  
<td>

Videos in 4 languages

Code for voice over

(deaf)

Language sign addition D5.1

</td>  
<td>

None -

</td>  
<td>

UdL, with inputs from all partners

</td>  
<td>

Hosting of videos in website (M29-30).

Code for voice over available

(M31-32)

D5.1 public in website (1 month after approval)

</td> </tr> </table>

##  3.6 WP6

This WP led by ISGlobal proposes to review, improve and provide an impact
evaluation approach to deliver the evidence and increase the effectiveness and
impact of SS in the society. This WP aims to improve the impact evaluation
approach of previous SS, harmonize and integrated the impact evaluation
methodology in SS projects. This new impact evaluation approach will also
offer a clear guidance to evaluate SS in different geographical and sectorial
contexts, helping to identify and co-create with end-users relevant indicators
of process and result to monitoring and evaluate the impacts before and after
the implementation of the SS.  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

Task Name of task

</th>  
<th>

Outputs

</th>  
<th>

Data generated

</th>  
<th>

Kind of data

</th>  
<th>

Responsible partners

</th>  
<th>

MGMT strategy

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

WP6 – Impact Evaluation

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

T6.1

</td>  
<td>

Review the impact evaluation methodologies used in previous Science Shop
models and compare the impact that SS projects have had on communities,
teaching, training, research, and innovation in collaboration with WP2

</td>  
<td>

Review of previous impact evaluation methods for SS. D6.2 (with T6.2 and

T6.3)

</td>  
<td>

None

</td>  
<td>

\-

</td>  
<td>

ESSRG, with input from ISGlobal, VU and UdL

</td>  
<td>

Summary of review in website (M6-7)

D6.2 public in website (1 month after approval)

</td> </tr> </table>  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T6.2

</th>  
<th>

Develop, validate and integrate, in

collaboration with WP3,

a new impact evaluation methodology for RRI and Open Science Shops.

</th>  
<th>

New impact evaluation methodology – D6.1

D6.2 (with T6.1 and

T6.3)

</th>  
<th>

None

</th>  
<th>

\-

</th>  
<th>

ISGlobal, with input from all the partners

</th>  
<th>

Brief summary of new methods in website (M12-13). D6.1 and D6.2 public in
website (1 month after approval)

</th> </tr> </table>

T6.3 Compare impact D6.2 (with T6.1 and T6.3d1 –

evaluation T6.2) questionnaires methodologies and T6.3d2 – results between new
Interviews and traditional models transcripts

of SS’s and T6.3d3 – Focus geographical areas in groups collaboration with WP4
transcripts T6.3d1 – QT ISGlobal with input D6.2 public in website (1

T6.3d2 and d3 from all the partners month after approval)

\- QL Summary of D6.2 results in

website (M27-28) T6.3d1 – annonymised + consent signed (in questionnaire) +
stored in Zenodo, public after approval of D6.2 T6.3d2 and d3 - consent signed
+ annonymised + stored in Zenodo, public after  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T6.4

</th>  
<th>

Assess learning and training process in WP5

</th>  
<th>

Evaluation of training activities

</th>  
<th>

T6.4d1 – questionnaires

T6.4d2 – Interviews transcripts T6.4d3 – Focus groups transcripts

</th>  
<th>

T6.4d1 – QT

T6.4d2 and d3

\- QL

</th>  
<th>

VU, with input from ISGlobal

</th>  
<th>

Summary of results in website (M46-47). T6.4d1 – annonymised + consent signed
(in

questionnaire) + stored in

Zenodo, public

T6.4d2 and d3 - consent signed + annonymised + stored in Zenodo, public

</th> </tr> </table>  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T6.5

</th>  
<th>

Assess the communication

activities in

collaboration with WP7

</th>  
<th>

Evaluation of communication

activities

</th>  
<th>

T6.5d1 – questionnaires

T6.5d2 – Interviews transcripts

</th>  
<th>

T6.5d1 – QT

T6.5d2 and d3

\- QL

</th>  
<th>

UNIFI, with input from ISGlobal

</th>  
<th>

Summary of results in website (M40).

T6.5d1 – annonymised + consent signed (in questionnaire) + stored in

</th> </tr> </table>

D6.2 approval  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

T6.5d3 – Focus groups transcripts

</th>  
<th>

Zenodo, public

T6.5d2 and d3 - annonymised

\+ consent signed (in questionnaire) + stored in

Zenodo, public

</th> </tr> </table>

##  3.7 WP7

This horizontal WP led by ISGlobal will cover the communication, dissemination
and exploitation activities for the project, including the development of a
plan for internal and external project communication; the development of
communication tools; the dissemination of the project results, and very
important the development of an exploitation plan in order to ensure long term
running of the SS activities. This horizontal WP will be fundamental to raise
awareness of these research practices within the civil society, as well as
other RRI stakeholders.

InSPIRES will be mainly operating in territories where such practices have not
yet been developed.  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

Task Name of task Outputs

</th>  
<th>

Data generated

</th>  
<th>

Kind of data

</th>  
<th>

Responsible partners

</th>  
<th>

MGMT strategy

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

WP7 – Communications, dissemination and exploitation

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

T7.1

</td>  
<td>

Internal and External Communication plan and tools

</td>  
<td>

Communication Plan Website (accessible and with a section of

“Submit your question”)

D7.1

</td>  
<td>

None

</td>  
<td>

\-

</td>  
<td>

ISGlobal, with inputs of all partners

</td>  
<td>

Communication strategy summary in website (M8) D7.1 public in website (M48)

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

T7.2

</td>  
<td>

Dissemination

</td>  
<td>

Communication actions

</td>  
<td>

None

</td>  
<td>

\-

</td>  
<td>

ISGlobal, with inputs of all partners

</td>  
<td>

\-

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

T7.3

</td>  
<td>

Exploitation and Sustainability

</td>  
<td>

IPR strategy D7.1

</td>  
<td>

None

</td>  
<td>

\-

</td>  
<td>

ISGlobal, with inputs of all partners

</td>  
<td>

D7.1 public in website (M48)

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

T7.4

</td>  
<td>

Intermediate and Final Conferences

</td>  
<td>

Intermediate conference – M15 Final conference – M46

</td>  
<td>

None

</td>  
<td>

\-

</td>  
<td>

ISGlobal, with inputs of all partners

</td>  
<td>

Conference calls in website

(M13 and M 44)

Conference reports in website

(M16 and M 47)

</td> </tr> </table>

#  4\. Authorship policy

The following policy of authorship aims at anticipating and mitigating
misunderstandings around the publication of dissemination and exploitation
materials. It emerges from leading journals recommendations and evidence from
systematic review of authorship across research disciplines (Dickersin, 2002;
Marušić, 2011).

If possible, InSPIRES publications should be published in Open Access journals
to make the results available to as many as possible. With regard to
dissemination the consortium should aspire to find “inclusive” solutions in
authorship rather than to be “exclusive”.

This policy is divided in three main topics: recognition of InSPIRES,
collective authorship and individual authorship:

  * Recognition of InSPIRES: Every publication emerging from InSPIRES or its satellite Science Shops projects must acknowledge the InSPIRES projects and EC funding according to the dissemination plan rules and must quote the following sentence “This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 74167”. In some journals it is possible to use collective authorship in form of “The InSPIRES Consortium” or “N.N. _and_ the InSPIRES Consortium” where all members of the consortium are included. Whenever possible, this formula might be explored. Note that this kind of authorship might require signatures or an authorship declaration from the entire group and all group members should approve the final version before publication. 

  

  * Collective authorship: collective authorship might be appropriate for dissemination materials such as posters or presentations describing the overall project. In such cases, the formula “The InSPIRES Consortium” must be used. Collective authorship is appropriate when the intellectual work underpinning a publication has been carried out by a group, and no one person can be identified as having substantially greater responsibility for its contents than others. When one or several members of the project are presenting the project (in a conference, e.g.), the by-line would read “N.N _on behalf of_ the InSPIRES Consortium”. 

  

  * Individual authorship: according to the International Committee of Medial Journal Editors suggestions, those identified as authors on a scientific manuscript to be submitted to publication must meet the following three conditions: 

    * Substantial contributions to conception and design, OR acquisition of data, OR analysis and interpretation of data. 

  

    * Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. o Final approval of the version to be published. 

  

  

Participation solely in the collection of data is insufficient by itself and
those persons who have contributed in the article but whose contributors do
not justify authorship may be acknowledge and their contribution described.

The order of authors in the manuscript will be proposed by the lead
publication responsible, and evaluated by a Publication Executive Board (PEB).
The lead author will propose, in consultation with the leader of the relevant
work package (if that is a different person), an ordered list of authors to be
named on the manuscript. In general, the order of authors should be
established based on the relevance of each author contribution, according to
the journal discipline. In the event of disagreement about authorship, the PEB
will adjudicate.

The first author will normally be the person who has made the largest
substantial intellectual contribution to the work. The first author will also
normally be expected to coordinate the circulation, editing, submission and
revision of the manuscript. The first author will circulate the final version
of the manuscript to the PEB at least a week before submitting it for
publication so that the board is aware of the manuscript, its contents and
authorship and has the opportunity to comment. Non-response from the members
of the PEB may be taken to indicate assent to proceed. If possible, InSPIRES
investigators who do not qualify for authorship will be listed separately
under a heading such as Contributors or Acknowledgements, as will other
members of the InSPIRES team who have made non-authorial contributions to the
manuscript.

Ensuring quality is essential to the good name of InSPIRES. Authors are
encouraged to share drafts and articles with their InSPIRES colleagues for
comment and feedback, or simply as a way of sharing their work. Published
articles and abstracts should be sent to the Coordination Team and
Dissemination WP leader.