#  Executive Summary

INJECT is a new Innovation Action that supports technology transfer to the
creative industries; under the call for “action primarily consisting of
activities directly aiming at producing plans and arrangements or designs for
new, altered or improved products, processes or services” (H2020 Innovation
Action). To achieve its aim INJECT will test and establish an INJECT spin-off
business in the journalism market through its ecosystem developments. While
user testing and testing of the tool in operational environments will aid in
the development and technical improvements of the INJECT technology.

The INJECT tool is new to journalism and to European markets; the data
management plan covers this testing and validation of both technical and
economic performance in real life operating conditions provided by the
journalism market domain. This project therefore has limited scientific
research activities.

This document aims to present the data management plan for INJECT project, the
considerations, actions and activities planned with an aim to deliver on the
objectives of the project. The deliverable introduces the data management plan
as a living document, its purpose and intended use. The document discusses the
INJECT data types and applies the FAIR data management process to ensure that,
wherever possible, the research data is findable, accessible, interoperable
and reusable (FAIR), and to ensure it is soundly managed.

#  Purpose of the Data Management Plan

This deliverable of the INJECT project is prepared under WP5 and the Task 5.1
_INJECT Data Management Plan (1 st  version) _ . In this task we initiate
discussion of the data management life cycle, processes and/or generated by
the INJECT project and to make the data findable, accessible, interoperable
and reusable (FAIR). This data management plan is living document, a dynamic
document that will be edited and updated during the project, with a second
version to be delivered in month 18.

#  INJECT Data Types

The Data Management Plan asks the following questions and we address those
throughout the document, noting where actions are underway and further
considerations that will be made as the project develops. As previously noted,
the INJECT project is an H2020 Innovation Action, and hence is not intended to
generate scientific data per se, therefore the data management plan considers
the activities undertaken within the project.

**2.1 What is the purpose of the data collection/generation and its relation
to the objectives of the project?**

The three stated INJECT project objectives are:

Obj1: Extend and aggregate the new digital services and tools to increase the
productivity and creativity of journalists in different news environments

Obj2: Integrate and evaluate the new digital services and environments in CMS
environments

Obj3: Diffuse the new digital services and support offerings in news and
journalism markets

Data collection and generation related to each is to enable the co-creation
then effective evaluation of the INJECT tool, and scientific reporting of
research and innovation that will deliver each of these objectives.

**2.1.1 What types and formats of data will the project generate/collect?**

The project will generate and collect the following types and formats of data:

− Co-created user requirements on the INJECT tool and services: format is
structured text requirements;

− Parsed and semantic-tagged news stories from online digital news sources
(including partner news archives) as part of INJECT toolset: format is
PostgreSQL database, the processed/parsed results are stored into an external
Elastic Search Cluster for later searching;

− Semantic-tagged news stories used to inform design of INJECT creative search
strategies:

format is structured documents of news stories, associated word counts and
other observed patterns, by story type;

− Usability evaluation reports of INJECT tool by journalists: format is
structured written reports;

− Semi-structured interview data about INJECT tool use by journalists: format
is documented, content-tagged notes from semi-structured interviews;

− Focus group reports about INJECT tool use by journalists: format is
structured reports of focus group findings;

− INJECT tool activity log data, recording meaningful activities of tool users
over selected time periods: format is structured spreadsheet;

− Corpus of news stories generated by journalists using the INJECT tool:
format is structured database of news stories and related data attributes;

− Quantitative creativity assessments of news stories generated by journalists
with and without use of the INJECT tool: format will be structured
spreadsheets;

− Economic and contract data about each launched INJECT ecosystem: format is
structured spreadsheet.

**2.1.2 Will you re-use any existing data and how?**

The following data is reused from existing news sources:

− Parsed and semantic-tagged news stories from online digital news sources
(including partner news archives) as part of INJECT toolset: format is the raw
news article data is stored in a PostgreSQL database, the processed/parsed
results are stored into an external Elastic Search Cluster for later
searching;

− Semantic-tagged news stories used to inform design of INJECT creative search
strategies:

format is structured documents of news stories, associated word counts and
other observed patterns, by story type;

− Corpus of news stories generated by journalists using the INJECT tool:
format is structured database of news stories and related data attributes.

**2.1.3 What is the origin of the data?**

The reused data originates from selected news sources:

_Figure 1: News Sources_  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

**Source**

</th>  
<th>

**Country**

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

BBC

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Quartz

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Guardian

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Telegraph

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

FT

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr> </table>  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

The Times

</th>  
<th>

UK

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Sky News

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Independent

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Huffington Post

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Huffington Post

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Reuters News

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Economist

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The New York times

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Daily Mail

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Wall Street Journal

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Washington Post

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Metro

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Herald Scotland

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Bloomberg

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Scotsman

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Irish Times

</td>  
<td>

Ireland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Irish Independent

</td>  
<td>

Ireland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

New Statesman

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Newsweek

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Daily Beast

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Times Education Supplement

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

BBC Mundo

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

El Mundo

</td>  
<td>

Spain

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

El Pais

</td>  
<td>

Spain

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Cinco Dias

</td>  
<td>

Spain

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

CNN

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

CNN Money

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

London Evening Standard

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Birmingham Post

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Birmingham Mail

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Farming Life

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Belfast Telegraph

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Yorkshire Post

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Yorkshire Evening Post

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Manchester Evening News

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

South Wales Evening Post

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Irish Examiner

</td>  
<td>

Ireland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Herald Scotland

</td>  
<td>

Scotland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Mirror

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Irish Sun

</td>  
<td>

Ireland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Irish Daily Star

</td>  
<td>

Ireland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Sun

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr> </table>  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

Daily Star

</th>  
<th>

UK

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Daily Record

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Daily Express

</td>  
<td>

UK

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Los Angeles Times

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Chicago Tribune

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Onion

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Forbes

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Fox News

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Herald Tribune [International NY Times]

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

ABC News

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Buzzfeed

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Newsmax Media

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

U.S. News and World Report

</td>  
<td>

US

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Globe and Mail

</td>  
<td>

Canada

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Toronto Star

</td>  
<td>

Canada

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

New Zealand Herald

</td>  
<td>

NZ

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Dominion Post

</td>  
<td>

NZ

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Sydney Morning Herald

</td>  
<td>

Australia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Brisbane Times

</td>  
<td>

Australia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Herald Sun

</td>  
<td>

Australia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Daily Telegraph (Australia)

</td>  
<td>

Australia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Courier-Mail

</td>  
<td>

Australia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Bangkok Post

</td>  
<td>

Thailand

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Jakarta Globe

</td>  
<td>

Indonesia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

South China Morning Post

</td>  
<td>

Hong Kong

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Der Spiegel International

</td>  
<td>

Germany

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Ekathimerini

</td>  
<td>

Greece

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Dutch News

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Krakow Post

</td>  
<td>

Poland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Portugal Resident

</td>  
<td>

Portugal

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Local Newspaper

</td>  
<td>

Sweden

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Connexion Newspaper

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Le Monde

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Le Monde Diplomatique

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

EuroFora

</td>  
<td>

EU

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Friedl News

</td>  
<td>

Austria

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

New Europe

</td>  
<td>

Belgium

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Copenhagen Post

</td>  
<td>

Denmark

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

News of Iceland

</td>  
<td>

Iceland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Finnbay Newspaper

</td>  
<td>

Finland

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

North Cyprus News

</td>  
<td>

Cyprus

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Prague Daily Monitor

</td>  
<td>

Czech Republic

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Daily News Egypt

</td>  
<td>

Egypt

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Punch

</td>  
<td>

Nigeria

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Business Day Live

</td>  
<td>

South Africa

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Independent Newspaper

</td>  
<td>

South Africa

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Mail and Guardian

</td>  
<td>

South Africa

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Bhutan Observer

</td>  
<td>

Bhutan

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Financial Express

</td>  
<td>

India

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Business Standard

</td>  
<td>

India

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Economic Times

</td>  
<td>

India

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Indian Express

</td>  
<td>

India

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Live Mint [INDIA]

</td>  
<td>

India

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Stavanger Aftenblad

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Bergens Tidende

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Dagbladet

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Verdens Gang (VG)

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Dagens Næringsliv

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

NRK

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Aftenposten

</td>  
<td>

Norway

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Le Figaro

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

BFMTV

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Le Parisien

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Le Express

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

L'OBS

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Le Point

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Les Echos

</td>  
<td>

France

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

CBS

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

SCP

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

NU

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Al Jazeera

</td>  
<td>

Qatar

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

FD

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Adformatie

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Eerste Kamer

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Europees Parlement Nieuws

</td>  
<td>

Netherlands

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Daily Nation

</td>  
<td>

Kenya

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Vanguard

</td>  
<td>

Nigeria

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

The Namibian

</td>  
<td>

Namibia

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

News24

</td>  
<td>

South Africa

</td> </tr> </table>

As the first ecosystem for INJECT is established in Norway there will be more
sources that may be added, such as internal archives, statistical bureau
information, and public data (maps, weather, traffic). It is further noted
that this list will expand with further ecosystem developments as more
newspapers and others from the journalistic domain became customers in the
future.

**2.1.4 Data generated during the project arises from:**

− A user-centred co-design process with journalists and news organisations;

− Knowledge acquisition and validation exercises with experienced journalists
for each of the 6 INJECT creative search strategies;

− Data- and information-led design of each of the 6 INJECT creative search
strategies;

− Formative and summative evaluations of INJECT tool use by journalists and
news organisations.

− Original content created by journalists and news organisations who choose to
contribute to public Explaain card content.

**2.1.5 What is the expected size of the data?**

The expected sizes of the data varies by types:

− Documents and reporting describing the user requirements, user activity logs
and qualitative results from formative and summative evaluations of the INJECT
tool, including the corpus of generated news stories, will be small –
deliverable reports with short data appendices;

− Parsed and semantic-tagged news stories from online digital news sources
(including partner news archives) as part of INJECT toolset will be large. The
current data set at m6 of the project is just over one million articles.

**2.1.6 To whom might it be useful ('data utility')?**

The INJECT project data might be useful to:

− News organisations and IT providers who will target the news industry, to
inform their development of more creative and productive news stories, to
support the competitiveness of the sector;

− News organisations and IT providers who wish to develop new forms of
business model through which to deliver digital technologies to the news and
journalism sectors;

− Journalism practitioners who will extrapolate from project results in order
to improve journalism practices across Europe.

− Academics and University departments and Institutes that could use the
INJECT data for research and teaching purposes.

#  FAIR data

##  Making data findable, including provisions for metadata

As stated previously INJECT is an Innovation Action that supports technology
transfer to the creative industries; it will test and establish an INJECT
spin-off business in the journalism market through its ecosystem developments.
The INJECT tool is new to journalism and to European markets and the intention
is that it becomes a sought after commercially viable product. This viability
will require the product to be sold and to earn revenue, from both its
subscribed use and innovations made through paid for adaptations. It will be
necessary that some types of information are sold specifically to customers
and therefore cannot be in the public domain.

The FAIR framework asks:

− Are the data produced and/or used in the project discoverable with metadata,
identifiable and locatable by means of a standard identification mechanism
(e.g. persistent and unique identifiers such as Digital Object Identifiers)?

− What naming conventions do you follow?

− Will search keywords be provided that optimize possibilities for re-use?

− Do you provide clear version numbers?

− What metadata will be created? In case metadata standards do not exist in
your discipline, please outline what type of metadata will be created and how.

The following table provides INJECT’s current answers to these questions.

_Figure 2: Making data findable._  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

**Data type**

</th>  
<th>

**Discoverable?**

</th>  
<th>

**Reuse and metadata conventions**

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Co-created user

requirements on the INJECT tool and services

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The single user requirements document will be extracted from project
deliverables, and posted in an acceptable form on the INJECT project website

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Parsed and semantic-tagged news stories from online digital news sources as
part of INJECT toolset

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

All news stories will be searchable through the INJECT tool and advanced
search algorithms, which have APIs. News stories are tagged with semantic
metadata about article nouns and verbs, and person, place, organisation and
activity entities. The meta-data types are currently bespoke standards, to
allow tool development to take place

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Semantic-tagged news stories used to inform design of INJECT creative search
strategies

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The news stories will be collated in one or more online documents. Each news
article will be metatagged with data about the article’s length, presence and
number of keywords, and other observations

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Usability evaluation reports of INJECT tool by journalists

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The usability evaluation report content will not be made available for reuse.
Ethical approval does not allow for reuse and sharing

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Semi-structured interview data about INJECT tool use by journalists

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The semi-structured interview data will not be made available for reuse, as
ethical approval does not allow for its reuse and sharing

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Focus group reports about

INJECT tool use by journalists

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The focus group data will not be made available for reuse, as ethical approval
does not allow for its reuse and sharing

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

INJECT tool activity log data, recording meaningful activities of tool users
over selected time periods

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

Anonymous INJECT tool activity log data will be made available for sharing and
reuse, in line with ethical consent from journalist users. Clear log data
versions will be set up. Data will be structured and delivered in XLS sheets,
to allow analyst searching and management of the data

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Corpus of news stories generated by journalists using the INJECT tool

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The corpus of news stories will not be made available directly for reuse by
the project, although published articles will be available, at their
publication source

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Quantitative creativity assessments of selected news stories generated by
journalists with and without use of the INJECT tool

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

Anonymous quantitative creativity assessments of selected news stories
generated with and without the INJECT tool will be made available for sharing
and reuse, in line with ethical consent from the expert assessors. Clear log
data versions will be set up. Data will be structured and delivered in XLS
sheets, to allow analyst searching and management of the data

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Economic and contract data about each launched INJECT ecosystem

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The intention is that INJECT becomes a sought after commercially viable
product to be sold and to earn revenue, from both its subscribed use and
innovations made through paid for adaptations. It will be necessary that some
types of information are sold specifically to customers and therefore cannot
be in the public domain.

</td> </tr> </table>

##  Making data openly accessible

The FAIR framework asks:

− Which data produced and/or used in the project will be made openly available
as the default? If certain datasets cannot be shared (or need to be shared
under restrictions), explain why, clearly separating legal and contractual
reasons from voluntary restrictions.

− How will the data be made accessible (e.g. by deposition in a repository)?

− What methods or software tools are needed to access the data?

− Is documentation about the software needed to access the data included?

− Is it possible to include the relevant software (e.g. in open source code)?

− Where will the data and associated metadata, documentation and code be
deposited?

Preference should be given to certified repositories that support open access
where possible.

− Have you explored appropriate arrangements with the identified repository?

− If there are restrictions on use, how will access be provided?

− Is there a need for a data access committee?

− Are there well-described conditions for access (i.e. a machine readable
license)?

− How will the identity of the person accessing the data be ascertained?

The following table provides INJECT’s current answers to these questions for
data that will be made available for sharing in the project.

_Figure 3: Openly accessible data._  
  
<table>  
<tr>  
<th>

**Data type**

</th>  
<th>

**Open?**

</th>  
<th>

**How will data be accessed**

</th> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Co-created user requirements on the INJECT tool and services

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

The single user requirements document will be posted on the project website,
with clear signposting and instructions for use

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Parsed and semantictagged news stories from online digital news sources as
part of INJECT toolset

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The parsed and semantic-tagged news stories will not be made publicly
available. This data represents core commercial value of the INJECT tool, and
will be not shared, except through INJECT tools made available as part of the
commercial ecosystems

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Semantic-tagged news stories used to inform design of INJECT creative search
strategies

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

The news stories will be published in online documents that will be accessible
via the INJECT’s restricted project website and associated storage space. The
stories will be stored and edited using standard MS Office applications, which
users will need to edit them. A validated user log-in to the restricted area
of the INJECT project website will be needed to access and download the
stories

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

INJECT tool activity log data, recording meaningful activities of tool users
over selected time periods

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

The INJECT tool activity log data will be published in online documents that
will be accessible via the INJECT’s restricted project website and associated
storage space. The log data will be stored and edited using standard MS Office
applications, which users will need to edit them. A validated user log-in to
the restricted area of the INJECT project website will be needed to access and
download the log data

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Quantitative creativity assessments of selected news stories generated by
journalists with and

</td>  
<td>

Yes

</td>  
<td>

The collected quantitative assessments will be published in online documents
that also will be accessible via the INJECT’s restricted project website and
associated storage space. The assessments will be stored and edited using
standard MS

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

without use of the INJECT tool

</td>  
<td>

</td>  
<td>

Office applications, which users will need to edit them. A validated user log-
in to the restricted area of the INJECT project website will be needed to
access and download the quantitative assessments

</td> </tr>  
<tr>  
<td>

Economic and contract data about each launched

INJECT ecosystem

</td>  
<td>

No

</td>  
<td>

The intention is that INJECT becomes a sought after commercially viable
product with innovations made through paid for adaptations. It will be
necessary that some types of information are sold/contracted to specific
customers and therefore cannot be in the public domain.

</td> </tr> </table>

##  Making data interoperable

The FAIR assessment asks:

− Are the data produced in the project interoperable, that is allowing data
exchange and re-use between researchers, institutions, organisations,
countries, etc. (i.e. adhering to standards for formats, as much as possible
compliant with available (open) software applications, and in particular
facilitating re-combinations with different datasets from different origins)?

− What data and metadata vocabularies, standards or methodologies will you
follow to make your data interoperable?

− Will you be using standard vocabularies for all data types present in your
data set, to allow inter-disciplinary interoperability?

− In case it is unavoidable that you use uncommon or generate project specific
ontologies or vocabularies, will you provide mappings to more commonly used
ontologies?

In response, the INJECT project will not seek to make its data interoperable
with other research data sets, and to enable data exchange and re-use between
researchers, institutions, organisations and countries. There are several
reasons for this decision:

− There are no established standards for data about digital tool use in
journalism, to interoperate with;

− There are established standards for data about creativity support tool use
in computer science, to interoperate with, although a standardized survey
metric for digital creativity support has been developed by US researchers,
which the INJECT project will submit to.

To compensate, the INJECT project will make its data available in the most
open tools available, for example the MS Office suite, and to provide
sufficient documentation to enable understanding and use by other researchers.

##  Increase data re-use (through clarifying licences)

The FAIR framework asks:

− How will the data be licensed to permit the widest re-use possible?

− When will the data be made available for re-use? If an embargo is sought to
give time to publish or seek patents, specify why and how long this will
apply, bearing in mind that research data should be made available as soon as
possible.

− Are the data produced and/or used in the project useable by third parties,
in particular after the end of the project? If the re-use of some data is
restricted, explain why.

− How long is it intended that the data remains re-usable? − Are data quality
assurance processes described?

Data re-use is a live consideration for INJECT as the tool is technically
developed and ecosystems established. City and the Innovation Manager are
leading an exploration into the registrations of one or more trademarks for
the project. The current recommended action for public documents, such as the
website, have been marked with the copyright symbol (©), name and the year of
creation: Copyright © The INJECT Consortium, 2017. Data protection aspects of
the project will be coordinated across the relevant national data protection
authorities. The project is aware, and will work towards, upcoming European
data protection rules that will enter into force May 2018 and their impact
will be considered: _http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-
protection/reform/index_en.htm_

In addition, an ongoing investigation into Intellectual Property rights is
underway. Advice is has been sought through legal channels at City, University
of London. This includes consideration of how the INJECT tool operates in
framing and storing of article text and referencing plus the eco-systems’
payment and use of the tool. As the project develops this will be a key
consideration in work packages.

##  Allocation of resources

The FAIR framework asks:

− What are the costs for making data FAIR in your project?

− How will these be covered? Note that costs related to open access to
research data are eligible as part of the Horizon 2020 grant (if compliant
with the Grant Agreement conditions). − Who will be responsible for data
management in your project?

− Are the resources for long term preservation discussed (costs and potential
value, who decides and how what data will be kept and for how long)?

The FAIR framework has a minimum impact on INJECT. INJECT’s resources for
managing the FAIR framework are built into the project’s work plan. For
example:

− The development and management of the INJECT data types and sets is
incorporated into and budgeted for in the current work plan;

− Overall data management will be undertaken by the project manager role at
the project coordinator partner – Dr Amanda Brown.

However, the resources for long-term preservation discussed (costs and
potential value, who decides and how what data will be kept and for how long)
have yet to be finalised for the first version of the FAIR document.

##  Data security

The FAIR framework asks:

− What provisions are in place for data security (including data recovery as
well as secure storage and transfer of sensitive data)?

− Is the data safely stored in certified repositories for long-term
preservation and curation?

INJECT stores the processed/parsed results into an Amazon Elastic Search
Cluster. Amazon Elasticsearch Service routinely applies security patches and
keeps the Elasticsearch environment secure and up to date. INJECT controls
access to the Elasticsearch APIs using AWS Identity and Access Management
(IAM) policies, which ensure that INJECT components access the Amazon
Elasticsearch clusters securely. Moreover, the AWS API call history produced
by AWS CloudTrail enables security analysis, resource change tracking, and
compliance auditing.

##  Ethical aspects

The FAIR framework asks:

− Are there any ethical or legal issues that can have an impact on data
sharing? These can also be discussed in the context of the ethics review.

− Is informed consent for data sharing and long-term preservation included in
questionnaires dealing with personal data?

The INJECT consortium have not identified any specific ethics issues related
to the work plan, outcomes or dissemination. We do note that individual
partners will adhere to ethical rules.

At City, University of London the data management and compliance team are
undertaking a significant review of all policies and procedures on ethics and
data use. We continue to work to the current data protection policy with a
commitment to protecting and processing data with adherence to legislation and
other policy. “Sensitive data shall only be collected for certain specific
purposes, and shall be obtained with consent” will apply to all personal data
collected and any participants provided fair processing notices about the use
of that data. The project will adhere to the commitment to holding any data in
secure conditions, and will make every effort to safeguard against accidental
loss or corruption of data.

#  Summary and Outlook

The subsequent INJECT deliverable D5.2 will revisit the data management plan,
the considerations, actions and activities undertaken alongside the delivery
on the objectives of the project. “The FAIR Data Principles provide a set of
milestones for data producers” (Wilkinson et al, 2016) and as the project
develops and within the next deliverable we will revisit the data management
plan data types and consider the milestones to apply the FAIR data management
of research data that is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable
(FAIR).