Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crocker Park
Notwithstanding the sources added, I still think that it doesnt qualify for its own article. Sources are not reliable (in the sense that they are not '''independent''' WP:RS authored by 1) the company that owns Crocker Park and 2) the Crocker Park official site. In my opinion it does not satsify  and is at odds with . I think that ''part'' of the article may be '''merged''' as a point of interest (as argued above), but on the whole it should '''not be redirected''' and be '''deleted
— User:Johnson8776, 06:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:NOTADVERTISING (Wikipedia:Notability)