Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Periannan Senapathy
fails both  & . No reliable third party sources cited in article, and the only one I could find elsewhere was a 25yo ''New Scientist'' article. The only argument presented to date, that of citations, is malformed as (i) ''mere citation'' is not "significant coverage" & (ii) Senapathy is merely the co-author of the exceptionally highly cited article listed in Silver seren's search. I would further point out that, unlike reliable sources substantiating that "the person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed", which is what (1) ''explicitly'' demands, and which is ''wholly'' lacking, WP:OR conjectures based upon ''mere citations'' do not provide any usable content for inclusion in the article
— User:Hrafn, 06:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)