Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Kentucky (BB-66)
Both of these ships had their keels laid and were partially completed before cancellation. In cases such as the {{sclass|Montana|battleship}}s, where none of the ships which had names assigned to them were ever laid down, merging and redirecting the individual ships to the class article makes sense. In cases where construction was actually done, however, the ships should retain individual articles. Also, the "shifting notability standards" argument here is a bit of a red herring; while the standards considered for the notability of ships that don't otherwise meet the GNG might be stricter,  still applies otherwise, and the subjects of both of these articles clearly meet the GNG
— User:The, 23:57, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)