Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cariphalte (3rd nomination)
A cursory Google search establishes that lots of sources exist, and make it clear that this is a well-known product in the industry. These include at least two peer-reviewed studies (5 and 6 in the links that follow), contrary to one of the professed reasons for nominating this article ("the sourcing doesn't establish how well it performs or anything close to in depth"). Examples of sources: https://www.highwaysmagazine.co.uk/Shell-Cariphalte-50-years-and-counting/4092 1; https://hub-4.com/news/the-bugatti-circuit-of-le-mans-starts-afresh-thanks-to-shell-cariphalte-racetrack 2; http://www.haythink.com/news/detail.asp?ID=10158 3; https://web.archive.org/web/20200811135706/https://www.worldhighways.com/wh6/products/researchers-trial-3d-printing-both-concrete-and-asphalt-roads 4; https://clicsearch.csp.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_journals_1563382657&context=PC&vid=01CLIC_CONCORDIA:CSP&lang=en&search_scope=CSP_all_P_and_E&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=CSP_Library_physical_and_online&query=sub,exact,%20ROAD%20PROJECTS%20,AND&mode=advanced 5; https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/SHELL-CARIPHALTE-M-THE-A14-A-CASE-HISTORY-Preston/a970f354e3275d464712ab5d0f1e66554280377d 6; https://highways.today/2017/01/18/shells-innovations-bitumen-research-development/ 7; http://revistavial.com/shell-bitumen-lanza-al-mercado-shell-cariphalte-am3-fresh/ 8. Other sources were also raised in this article's previous nominations; they simply have not been incorporated into the article. {{u|Johnpacklambert}} and {{u|TenPoundHammer}} appear to be basing notability off of the state of the article, but that is otability#Article content does not determine notability|not how notability works. Incidentally, the nominator's claim that there were "Two No Consensus AfDs" is just flat-out false: The first was closed as a keep
— User:Usernameunique, 20:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)