Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PNAC Members associated with the Administration of George W. Bush
or Keep No substantiated policy reason is given to throw away all this work entirely, per .  The OR and SYNTH objections are without merit even to the term "members" given the sourcing and the words the sources use (thus, no BLP issue).  The FORK issue, while having perhaps more purchase, is not sustained in the body of the list article where there is no Wikipedia POV shown, just a recitation of facts: these people did this and this. In short, these relatively few people notably articulated the governing principles of the group and/or as sourced signed on to a notable piece of lobbying of government by the group, and later were notably in government - in a way the sources draw a direct notable line between.  All that is well sourced, and yes both overlapping sets can be discussed and identified by name in the merge candidate or as a sub-list-article, which appears to have been the intent.  (Wikipedia:Article titles|Naming issues should be addressed elsewhere
— User:Alanscottwalker, 00:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:LISTPEOPLE (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)