Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obopay
and '''Salt'''. Completely agree with nominator's analysis of the sources in the article. On a search of Google News, I found one article of significant coverage at http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2009-12-07/obopay-turns-mobile-phones-into-banksbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice Business Week. Other items that look at first glance like significant coverage turned out to be press releases, such as http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/10/28/idUS94108+28-Oct-2009+PRN20091028 this one published by (and disavowed by) Reuters. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=obopay&oq=obopay&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.2627.3347.0.5322.6.2.0.0.0.0.837.837.6-1.1.0...0.0...1ac.1.y8NLZQe7OMo#q=obopay&hl=en&gl=us&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=m3BQUeuXEcnU2AWBz4CQCw&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44158598,d.b2I&fp=6cf242f5e722bf22&biw=1148&bih=670 Google News Archive turns up a few passing mentions in Reliable Sources like  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-18/orascom-s-burundi-unit-to-start-mobile-banking-to-add-customers.html Bloomberg. Bottom line, a single article in Business Week plus some passing mentions and press releases do not amount to significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, and this subject does not pass 
— User:MelanieN, 15:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)