Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaINFO
both.  MediaINFO says it is ''a web publishing software for digitized content''. In other words, a webpage design or "content management" utility.  Geneza is ''a privately held software vendor specialising in software solutions for Libraries and Publishers'', the maker of MediaINFO.  I'm afraid you get penalized -50 notability points for "software solutions".The question is whether this particular product has any particular claim to |significant effects on history, culture, and technology; and this article makes no claim for that kind of significance.  As such it is |just one of many such packages, with no particular claim to groundbreaking significance.Perceptions of bias are largely in the eyes of the beholder.  Now, moronic Facebook games have become cultural touchstones, symbols of the online culture of Facebook, and as such significance is easily shown.  When people 100 years from now ask what online life was like in the early 21st century, the topic of Farmville probably will come up.  I don't see a US-centric bias in software articles; what I see instead is an ocean of trivial tech-cruft, much of it obvious spam, where every bit player thinks that mention in a Top 100 list or a petty trade award confers historic significance.  There also is a large and obvious bias in favor of minor open-source and free software projects.  There are altogether too many articles on bit players in crowded software fields.  And this software looks very niche, and it does the same thing that many other software packages do
— User:Ihcoyc, 15:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:MILL (Wikipedia:Notability)