Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (9th nomination)
Per the nominators statement of ''consider the fact that notability and factuality have been established beyond usual doubt.''  He then goes onto say: ''However, whether the topic is notable or not, it has remained without any serious content for far too long to believe anyone will improve it''.  '''|So what? - There is no deadline'''.  Notability has already been established, referenced and cleaned up since nomination #1 and nomination #9.  I would even push for the irony of it being notable ONLY via the fact it's been up for deletion so many times and survived.  Same time, next year
— User:Lugnuts, 17:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)