Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Gujral
Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but the referencing is almost entirely to |primary sources and listicles, not real media coverage that is substantively about him. For example, a person is not notable as a contributor to publications just because you reference the fact to his own writing ''for'' those publications — the notability test is not the ability to verify that he's been the ''author'' of media coverage of other ''things'', it's the ability to verify that he's been the ''subject'' of media coverage authored by other ''people''. Similarly, video clips of him speaking are not support for notability either — again, the notability test is not the ability to show sources in which he's ''doing'' the speaking, but the ability to show sources in which he's the ''subject'' that ''other'' people are speaking ''about
— User:Bearcat, 18:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)