Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucie Chan
re|Bearcat}} and Special:Contributions/104.163.147.121|104.163.147.121 you have stated that an organization's website (even if that organization is the National Gallery of Canada) does not constitute a  but is considered . That really surprises me. Especially with regional and national museums. I have understood that a listing on a museum or other major institution's website constitutes a  to establish that an event did happen; it is  because it is authored by the curator and goes through ''extensive'' curatorial and editorial steps before arriving on the website. Is there anywhere that this has been noted or recorded? Pinging established AfD participants {{ping|Arthistorian1977|Megalibrarygirl|Mduvekot|DGG}} for objective/neutral clarification and discussion. And to be clear here: I want to understand established practice, and build consensus amongst key AfD participants about what does or does not count as  in this kind of situation
— User:Theredproject, 17:37, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)