Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Oulds
Nothing stated in the article hands him an automatic "inherently notable" freebie just because he exists, but the sourcing isn't cutting it in terms of getting him over : it's far too dependent on |primary sources rather than |reliable ones — a person is not notable as a company director just because the fact can technically be referenced to the company's own |self-published website about itself, and neither is he notable as a writer just because the fact that he wrote a book can be metareferenced to itself — but the few sources which are actually reliable ones just make him a  rather than a |ten-year test passing topic of enduring permanent notability
— User:Bearcat, 15:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:BLP1E||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Notability)