Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erudition
per . It ''is'' a little more than a dictionary definition; unfortunately, what it adds to the definition is not encyclopedia material. We get an argument-from-etymology fallacy, a bit of personal opinion, and a paragraph of "I, too, majored in Western Lit". It's all unsourced (tagged as such since 2012!), and if sources for the claims of fact were dug up, it would be . Improving the article to the point where |it would be worth keeping would amount to rewriting it from scratch
— User:XOR, 15:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:SYNTH||WP:HEY (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)