Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planes of Fame
While the ''subject'' of the article may be noteworthy, the article itself is a loser, even with the worst of the grandstanding language removed.  It has only two sources; one of them is used once, and is the only source for its section (which is even written in the first person!), so it's essentially a one-source article.  More disturbing, the one source is the website of the subject of the article (and the other source is from its section's subject's website), a violation of the self-published source rule ().  An article based on its subject's own (self-published) website falls far short of the |verifiability standards.  Until and unless a collection of proper outside sources is developed, I'd drop this article.  It can be re-instituted when good sources turn up.  Google-citing guys: here's your chance to go get those "significant hits" and use them to establish facts, while dropping the remaining rah-rah language
— User:JingleJim, 22:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPS||WP:verify (Wikipedia:Verifiability)