Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoom face
The nomination fails to provide a reason to delete.  The prod was obviously disruptive as one should expect opposition from the creator when the article is newly-created and the |prod process is not to be used in such cases.   is irrelevant because the focus of the topic is not a particular word.  It's just the usual confusion as  explains:{{quote|One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written; another is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead users to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROD||WP:NAD||WP:NAD (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)