Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Williams (2nd nomination)
Per , , , as well as . There is no doubt that notability was lacking and the recent event (death is an event) in  |news reports provides "imbalance" that does not advance notability. All this does is fuel |speculation as to what really happened to the young actor, that -N|didn't really have enough notability until a flurry of news events because of the death, is catapulted as becoming more important. Yes Wikipedia is dynamic, but these types of situations is why we have policies and guidelines directing us not to fall into the drama of being steered to becoming a newspaper, or falling for wanting to create a future "Death of" article as 8 out of 14 (57%) of the sources are about the "death of...". When considering the trading card and Joey awards (not notable) are added it is something like 86% of the sources do not advance notability but just providing |ref bombing
— User:Otr500, 10:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:RECENT||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BREAKING||WP:NOTSPECULATION||WP:SEMI||WP:REFBOMB (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)