Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathi Bond
The book unambiguously passes  so if Bond herself is not considered notable, the existing material should be moved to a new article on the book as a “background” section. Since notability is not inherited, that might be the most strictly accurate way to do it. But especially with Bearcat’s finds, I think there’s enough out there for GNG. And I dislike the move option because there’s less scope for growth and improvement of the narrower book article, so I prefer to keep the bio
— User:LEvalyn, 19:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)