Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repellor vehicle
spaced ndash}}The article may have some forms of  in it, which would need to be corrected by editing, not deletion of the entire article. The initial rationale for deletion of the article as having or being comprised of "original synthesis" inherent in the article is not enough to qualify blanket deletion. A topic's merits are based upon |General notability guidelines regarding reliable sources, not the prose within the article. To start, refer to this simple Google search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=1590&bih=777&q=Repellor+vehicle&oq=Repellor+vehicle&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=0l0l0l728203l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0  here. Books exist about the topic, refer to: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/robotics-introduction-source-source-wikipedia/1103864852, http://www.amazon.co.uk/Unmanned-Ground-Vehicles-Autonomous-Driverless/dp/1155977025  and http://www.lybrary.com/driverless-technology-highimpact-emerging-technology-what-need-know-definitions-adoptions-impact-benefits-p-116996.html. Here's a link to an article about a repellor tank, which is a type of repellor vehicle: http://mocpages.com/moc.php/26063. These sources were found with ease after some simple searches, and there are very likely more sources available. It appears that the nominator didn't follow the guidelines listed in  for source searching prior to nominating this article for deletion, which nullifies the basis of nomination for deletion, as does using the article's content as qualification for deletion, rather than the availability of sources
— User:Northamerica1000, 09:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:No original research)