Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Sword (2nd nomination)
Re: ''In addition, the deletion has been turned down or reversed however many times it is, and that in itself is an argument for notability ~ if it weren't notable, the previous deletions would have succeeded or stuck.'' WHere has it been reversed or overturned? I don't see any evidence for anything other than its been re-created a number of times? Being deleted three times says a lot. And while it's an essay, I suggest you have a look at , including ''A commonly seen argument at AfD is "Subject has X number of Y, that's notable/non-notable". Notability isn't determined by something's quantity of members, but rather by the quality of the subject's verifiable, reliable sources.'' It's something to keep in mind, the latter are still lacking in terms of non-trivial coverage. Also while it's software and not wholly a website, this portion of  is worth keeping in mind, ''Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance
— [[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]][[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]], 13:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIG||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)