Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropedia Foundation
All of the "keep votes" come from brand-new accounts and unregistered IP addresses, and since accounts are free on Wikipedia, this naturally will make some people wonder whether all of these comments might be |from the same person.  It also suggests that the "keep" supporters are probably unfamiliar with Wikipedia's process for deleting articles.  Since this is '''not a majority vote''', I'd like to clarify for our new editors (welcome!) that what we need for an article on an organization is a ''bona fide'' independent, third-party publication (e.g., a story in a major newspaper or magazine) that is ''about'' the specific organization.  Note that an article ''about'' the organization is different from an article that merely ''happens to mention'' the organization, or that is about a single person or member of the organization.  One detailed profile in a major media outlet trumps all "delete" comments
— User:WhatamIdoing, 19:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SOCK (Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry)