Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspiracy journalism (2nd nomination)
I participated in the MfD and was invited to add my thoughts in this AfD#2. "Conspiracy Journalism" is Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary#Neologisms|neologisms and there is not enough reliable source material to satisfy .  The article violates wp:OR|No original research in that the article combines material from multiple web sources to reach the conclusion that Conspiracy Journalism represents a genre of journalism when the sources do not state that. The article lead states, "Conspiracy Journalism represents a genre of journalism that has elements of advocacy journalism, yellow journalism and investigative journalism." Books Ngram Viewer shows that, unlike advocacy journalism, yellow journalism, and investigative journalism mentioned in the conspiracy journalism article, http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=advocacy+journalism%2C+yellow+journalism%2C+investigative+journalism%2C+conspiracy+journalism&year_start=1960&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3 the phrase 'conspiracy journalism' has had no noticeable usage through 2008. Moreover, there is no sense from the sources in the article that they are each talking about the same idea when they mention the phrase "Conspiracy Journalism". Conspiracy journalism is fast becoming the Grigori_Rasputin#Murder|Rasputin of Wikipedia. Since its March 20, 2010 deletion, the material has been moved in the past nine months from article space-->AfD--> DRV-->Article Incubator-->MfD-->User space-->article space.  No significant new information has come to light since March 20, 2010 to overcome the reasons for deletion at AfD#1. As noted in the collapsed template above, the November 28, 2010 Article Incubation assessment established that the deleted article had not proven useful to write a new article at Article Incubator. Delete and remove from Wikipedia
— User:Uzma, 11:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)