Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProElite 1 (event)
It is flat out not true to say the non-routine coverage only contains fight results.  Previews of the cards for example as what appeared in the print version of USA Today is by its nature as a preview not "results".  Something covered across multiple paragraphs that discuss the ramifications of the fights and the history of the fighters involved is not mere "stats" either.  The condition of the articles is a reason to improve them, not to delete them.  Looking over the first draft of many articles, including ones on famous historical subjects do not always look good, but we improve them instead of delete them.  As the commenter above me notes, quote, "the first and second event articles...contain...reference offering coverage of the event itself beyond fight results" and that is just in the articles, let alone the numerous sources that we can and should also add to the articles as well and also acknowledges that the third article's references added since the discussion started do indeed show signs of improvement.  The call for additional sources has been answered and is in the process of being addressed to improve the articles as well, which undeniably and objectively pass the , because these are not just televised events, but notable televised events and yes a first event of a mainstream televised promotion featuring UFC champion level fighters and that is written about in not just blogs, but newspaper articles by non-MMA specific publishers is inherently notable by any reasonable interpretation of the concept.  And if we are talking personal levels, I am far more disappointed by the number of delete votes we see in this and other discussions by accounts and IPs that never improve or add anything to these or other articles for that matter.  TreyGeek, you may help add articles, but seriously, how many deletes from this and other discussions do we see that ever do anything more than just lazily dismiss everything as non-notable without actually doing search sourcing.  And for the record, after I make this post, I will indeed add at least one source to an article under discussion here to show by example and not just words
— User:Temporary, 16:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)