Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Knox
The relevant portion of the  guidelines which I think makes a separate article on Knox more than appropriate is: '''"If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial, a separate biography may be appropriate. Individuals notable for well-documented events, such as John Hinckley, Jr., fit into this category. The significance of an event or individual should be indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources."''' Hell in a Bucket's above GNews link http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Amanda+Knox%22 strongly suggests, to me, that Amanda Knox has indeed been the subject of persistent, ongoing coverage. If you review the sources in that link -- all of which are extremely reliable -- their subject is ''not'' the murder and/or trial but is instead ''Amanda Knox.'' The Hinckley example listed in the BLP1E guidelines is a somewhat interesting corollary but I think it is best-suited to merely illustrate the point -- there are a multitude of individuals notable for, loosely construed, "one event" that are still very clearly notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I argue that the persistent nature of the coverage ''focused on Amanda Knox'' passes this hurdle (and, in my opinion, does so by quite a wide margin, but that is more subjective
— User:Ginsengbomb, 19:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)