Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Layfield & Barrett
they are currently involved in an interesting legal dispute over anonymity of online commenters on :Glassdoor, which is getting some coverage online, mostly from law blogs but also from a few : http://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/the-worst-possible-response-to-a-bad-glassdoor-review.html, http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/upset_by_people_who_spit_their_venom_on_glassdoor_name_partner_seeks_identi/, https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160518/05383434471/law-firm-subpoenas-glassdoor-negative-anonymous-reviews-supercharges-streisand-effect-with-response.shtml, http://www.humanresourcesonline.net/can-employers-sue-online-commenters-negative-comments/, http://www.globallegalpost.com/global-view/law-firm-files-lawsuit-over-anonymous-online-trashing-30579733/, http://abovethelaw.com/2016/05/working-here-is-psychological-torture-law-firm-sues-over-anonymous-comments/, http://www.advocatie.nl/working-there-psychological-torture-kantoor-geweer-tegen-anonieme-aantijgingen. I also notice that this was already mentioned at Anonymous post#Effects on users. I'm leaning toward keep and improve at this point, but would be interested to hear other editors' opinions first
— User:OnionRing, 22:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)