Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepperfry
The sources are pretty bad. All the stuff in Economic Times is blatant redressed PR. Every single other source that I managed to look was using quotes by the company employees as story sources (which doesn't satisfy ). More importantly this is  and should be deleted. Saying that promotional content can be fixed and putting the burden on volunteer editors is counterproductive. It is essentially encouraging the  on Wikipedia. We don't want a  situation. Once Wikipedia becomes a medium for promotion it loses its relevance as an encyclopaedia
— User:Lemongirl942, 02:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:PROMO||WP:SYSTEMICBIAS||WP:BOGOF (Wikipedia:Notability)