Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PearC
Insider201283 produced some of these "reliable and independent sources" one of which I provided above.  All of these had the problem of if it wasn't for the development in the Psystar case nobody would know PearC existed.  Bizon computers which had more references than this article was deleted because it didn't meet  and if what it had wasn't enough than the one lone reference this article has certainly isn't.  Simply claiming there are sources is not enough.  We need to SEE them
— User:BruceGrubb, 13:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)