Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Grand Rapids FC season (2nd nomination)
I do not agree that every well sourced, well written article about an association football team merits inclusion on Wikipedia. For example, my cousin plays on a U-9 girls team. If her enthusiastic mother were to write a well sourced article that follows the MoS guidelines of WikiProject Football and has an absolutely beautiful flow to it, I would still expect to conclude that it meets neither  nor . Based on that, such an article does not belong here. Despite the fact that I contributed to this article—in an effort to get the subject evaluated more fairly—I don't think it is well sourced or well written. There are gaps in the sourcing of things written by the primary editor. There are sources that do not support what the article says. There are synthesis/original research issues, and there are neutrality issues. As I said above, it appears there is not enough independent coverage from reliable sources to conclude that there has been |significant coverage of the subject
— User:Taxman1913, 10:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NSEASONS||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)