Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmood Khan (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform for |advertorial self-promotion, but an encyclopedia. Our content needs to be referenced to |reliable source coverage in media, not to the subject's own press releases — and apart from an unverified claim that he topped "the mainstream Australian music charts", which also fails to specify which chart provider is involved and thus could be iTunes for all we know, the only other notability claim here is "got X views on a piece of social media content", which is not a valid notability claim in its own right. (And for the record, my only past involvement here was moving the article from an inappropriate category to a more correct one in a batch of categorization cleanup.) There are no references here that constitute reliable sourcing for a Wikipedia article, and the article doesn't state anything about him that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have reliable sourcing — and even if a new version can be recreated in the future that makes a better claim of notability and cites better sources for it, he still doesn't get to create the article himself per  and 
— User:Bearcat, 15:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTADVERT||WP:RS||WP:AUTOBIO||WP:COI (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)