Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Jones views
I think that it might have been a better idea to have kept the "views" section in the main article, and then deleted those things that you consider to be unsourced. I can understand that Wikipedia can't have an article saying "these are the views of Alex Jones" without full attribution, since we need to abide by . However, forking off and AfDing seems like the wrong way to deal with it - and 1 week was a bit short for a notification period, as the complaints in the talk page suggest. I suspect that the "best option" would probably end in a revert war, but at least then the problems would stay with the main article. So I'd say '''withdraw AfD, revert back into the main article,''' and then delete unattributed/dangerous stuff from there. Unfortunately, that might mean keeping the article on a watchlist to ensure that troublesome unattributed statements don't come back: what can you do, though, eh
— User:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad, 17:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LIVING (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)