Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Reed
Does not meet  for college athletes, and never played at highest level professionally.  Source from The Daily Californian is a school newspaper and not an |independent source as required by .   says "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability", but the sources are from MediaNews Group which syndicate each others articles (San Jose Mercury News, Oakland Tribune, Las Cruces Sun-News).  A lot of the sources listed were available subscription only, so cited results from  does not weed out articles that might be  coverage even though the limited headline and excerpt seems promising.  I personally can't verify it. This player generated some news because he decided to transfer schools within the Bay Area and happens to be a quarterback who played against Nebraska, so "keep" proponents can have a field day citing sources from the state of Nebraska.  But WP is .  I'm at a loss as to what would ever be "interesting or notable" in even the most polished |lead section for this article.  Perhaps someone can provide some talking points to change my mind on why  this person should not be considered un-of-the-mill and is deserving of an article
— User:Bagumba, 09:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NSPORT||WP:IS||WP:GNG||WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LEAD||WP:R (Wikipedia:Notability)