Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joelle Behlock
normally I view beauty queen articles with suspicion, but here she has gone on to do a number of different things, and given the difficulty of finding third world sources that compare in quality to those in the first world, I think we DO have enough coverage to be adequate for GNG. Also, to say "That piece is an interview, so it's not |independent of the subject" misreads the guidelines ... who is the interviewer, what media published the interview, etc... that's what matters. This is also an article tht needs a lot of work, but I think it passes muster
— User:Montanabw, 20:52, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:42||WP:42 (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)