Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unverified longevity claims
See my reasoning from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incomplete longevity claims. As a stand-alone topic, what this split is based upon (when it was called "incomplete" claims) is either parroting the GRG's verified/unverified claims (while allowing their unverified claims to persist), or pure  with about what constitutes verified/not verified/complete/incomplete claims. This is purely |crystal balling that these claims could or will have reliable sources. This was merged before and split under the basis that these are the claims based on non-reliable sources (that certain people still want to list here under as their cruft-de-jur). For example, http://newsrescue.com/nigeria-claims-world-oldest-man-170-year-old-oluwaro-iloro-ekiti/#axzz3NM0eEteO this for James Olofintuyi is not a reliable source and rather than actually deleting and removing it, it's been moved to this page if/until the GRG has verified it. At best, the place for these speculative nonsense claims is the project's (Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians|complete or the Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians/Incomplete cases|incomplete cases list) rather than as an separate article from the actual "verified" claims but frankly we shouldn't be webhosting a storehouse of all nonsense claims so that people who are interested in this cruft can keep track of it using our resources
— User:Ricky81682, 23:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:No original research)