Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush in popular culture 2
mdash; list of trivia trying to show that Rush is common in popular culture. It's plauged by  and reliance on ''one fan site'' for reference. The mention that Rush has been influenced in popular culture on the main page is fine, becuase virtually ''all this information comes from that one site, which is already linked to and mentioned in the main article''. Redirect is unnecessary, because nothing is merged and most of the edit history we'd be preserving is edit warring and info thrown out. Besides, to quote the usuals:  indiscriminate collection of information, violates the various offshoots of the Manual of Style, which state (on  based on a larger consensus than a group of editors on the Rush talkpage), that articles that are lists of trivia or isolated facts are to be avoided. And like I said, they're all from one source, which fails  to begin with. Once again, '''Delete'''.&mdash
— User:Deckiller, 23:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:AVTRIV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)