Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Jose
Seems at present the claim to notability rests on awards. Which aren't really that. Since one is a single "honourable mention" among many and one is a scholarship. The only remaining thing, therefore, is one award from the Asia Society of New york. In any case, and most importantly, a random award is explicitly not part of . There are dozens of journalism prizes out there, and that's why it isn't considered notable if you win one unless the prize itself is notable, like the Pulitzer. The "secondary" sources mentioned discuss individual stories and consist mainly of blog roundups of notable stories of that period. So that isn't useful either. Essentially, it is difficult to find any journalist of any experience who has written one or two stories about which an analogous article could not be written. Which is why this needs to be deleted. Special:Contributions/210.7.71.114|210.7.71.114
— [[User talk:210.7.71.114|talk]]), 09:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)