Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Roxxx (2nd nomination)
im not going to go in the validity of having a biography on a glorifeid prostitute on wikiepdia. while there asre some porners like Jenna Jameson that have legitimate mainstream coverage in the mainstream media, there are also hunrdedds of porn stars whose names arent really known or covered outside of porn industry blogs and random little dinky ratholes on the Net. one criteria that we need to remember is  and . especially the later, its difficult to find verifiable sources on these porn people because half the time the article writers dont even bother to find their real names or to figure out what fake name theyre using to whore. this isnt necessarily a disaster except that they rarely bother to find sources that cover this that would meet ANY standard of notability currently upeld by Wikipedia. articles like pople on Rahcel Roxx are only marginally more notable than your average garage band and posting articles on every hooker in California isnt going to fly unless you can find sources to verify some of these comments, which also dangerously push up on  without |reliable sources. to reiterate, this article should be ''deleted'' and ONLY rercreated once verifiable,  s are detected
— User:Smith, 19:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)