Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaner (2nd nomination)
Yes, that's right, call me stupid.  Excellent way to hammer your point home.  Now, ignorance of  aside, let's address the issue of "adding more dictionary article content": the article contains a brief, expandable summary of the term's history and subjective impact.  All these bits of information are outside the scope of a dictionary definition; a dicdef would be limited to the meaning and useage of the word. -- |Y'''&#124
— User:Yukichigai, 23:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL||WP:IKNOWBEST (Wikipedia:Civility)