Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Teo
While I can see a lot of work has been done to fully reference the article for which its editors should be commended, I really don't think the subject is notable enough for a stand alone biography article. Would such an individual be covered in a biographical encyclopedia (for instance, does Singapore have an equivalent of ''Who's Who'', such as the ''New Zealand Dictionary of Biography'' or the ''Australian Dictionary of Biography''? If so, would they qualify for appearance in that? If not, then I suggest perhaps we are reaching in our inclusion.) The subject appears to have received quite a bit of coverage in the context of that one incident, but otherwise they will likely remain a low profile individual. As such, it seems to me like BLP1E applies here, although as Anotherclown suggests perhaps the topic could be covered as a small part in a wider article (if a suitable one is agreed upon, and obviously being careful not to breach ). Beyond this, surely the other consideration is the subject's privacy and not impacting upon their ability to rehabilitate on release. Regards
— User:AustralianRupert, 08:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)