Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takuro Ueno
unless more reliable sources can be found.  Unfortunately, the Marquis WW's aren't considered reliable (see, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_53#Is_Who.27s_Who_a_reliable_source.3F), and I'm unable to find significant |secondary coverage of this consultant under this name or 上野拓朗, you'd think there'd be a news article or book that gives some in-depth coverage of him somewhere.  AEA membership is not a criteria for notability, nor is being a teacher (see WP:PROF for guidance on that), but more important than questions of notability are the questions of verifiability. At present, we have no verifiable reliable sources that I can see, and WP:BLP and WP:V leave little room for any result but delete in such a case
— User:Joe, 20:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)