Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure play (2nd nomination)
Please |assume good faith. I did research the matter. There are an abundance of definitions that are more or less the same for "pure play". However, outside of a few debates/essays about whether a diverse or focused approach is better this subject doesn't have much meat. Subjects of this type, which are basically definitions, |do not belong in Wikipedia. It's just a jargon phrase with limited scope. I also do not find the "pure play method" notable as it is nothing differant than what is done with other businesses. (That is, analysis is based on the type and market of the business.) Of course, this is just my opinion based on my research. If you have contrary sources and information please use that knowledge to |improve the article
— User:Vassyana, 22:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:WINAD||WP:BB (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)