Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gannon Award (2nd nomination)
Despite |notability not being temporary, I don't think the award was ever notable. The second (dead) source can be found http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/bostrom-gannon-award here now, but it's a primary source as it is published by the institution of a recipient. There are some trivial mentions of the award, but all in the Nick Bostrom context. Bottom line, there are no independent reliable sources about the award itself, and as such it is not notable per . The award does not need to be the primary topic, but the mentions are clearly not significant enough even for that standard. There is no detailed information at all in RS, and there would be insufficient material to write a useful article without the award's background, founders, their motivations, the full list of recipients, etc. I can't see any article to redirect this to either
— User:Gap9551, 23:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)