Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luon
As far as I can tell, the concept of a ''luon'', an alternative name for a kind of plasmon,  only appears in the one cited paper. The paper is a reliable source, per , but is a primary source. According to notability guidelines , a topic needs multiple, in-depth, secondary reliable sources that are independent of the creator. As a paper that was published just 2 weeks ago, this is a case of ; not been enough time has elapsed for independent reliable sources to develop, i.e., review papers, news stories from reputable publishers, etc. Without multiple RS, this article fails notability guidelines. An alternative to deletion would be to userfy the article
— User:Mark, 23:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)