Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephants Are Not Birds
The appropriate subject-specific guideline is , which requires that the "book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself." Superficially, there are some sources, but they're mostly about the manufactured controversy around its publication, so we might disqualify them as . Ideally, we want to see substantial reviews of the contents of the book itself, not just tabloid stories about its release. If it is in fact notable, no matter how offensive its contents, we should have a neutral article about it, including criticism: there are many similar examples in :Category:Propaganda books and pamphlets. However the current contents are mostly unsourced fluff about the non-notable publisher
— User:Pburka, 20:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)