Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temi Olajide
I'm not convinced with arguments so far, for keep.I don't see much in the comprehensive secondary source that establish notability beyond all doubt. Really not a lot here, a simple small para that mentions her as a sleep consultant. I'm curious as to why so many editors are pushing to get the article kept when there is such tenuous notability. There is effectively no secondary sources that are in in-depth and that are independent of the subject. There is no other coverage, so it fails  and 
— User:scope_creep, 09:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)