Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioquake3
While most here would not deny that your average PC gamer sees the value and notability in IoQuake3, we have to remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and like any good encyclopedia its sources have to be |reliable and published and provide |siginificant coverage to ensure factual information.  Nobody is questioning whether its popular, or even whether its a good program.  The issue comes down to those two things, no matter how popular the engine may be.  Should those things ever be satisfied, or if sources are found now that fit that criteria then it's always welcome as an article
— User:Teancum, 12:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)