Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words having different meanings in British and American English
fundamentally, the nominator doesn't like the current state of the article and intends to write another to replace it. Such a deletion is against policy. There seems to be no dispute as to whether the subject is encyclopedic (|reliable sources are available for the subject -- whether those sources bear out every detail of the current content is no reason to delete -- one editor's view is to the contrary, notwithstanding the cited books, which I will |assume that editor has read to be sure).  If the pages are in such a need of a re-write the proper procedure is to propose the alternate on the talk page or create it in userspace and reference it on the talk page, rather than make the community take it on faith that this article will indeed be written, will be better than the current one, and will properly attribute any prior versions as per the GFDL.  We all have come across an article in our humble opinions we'd prefer to delete and start from scratch. Fortunately, you can propose your own version for community review and consensus. Unfortunately, we cannot just delete something because we would rather re-start from scratch
— User:Carlossuarez46, 00:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)