Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the July 2016 Kabul bombing
WP:GNG says: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.   also prescribes that "notability not temporary".  Per First (perhaps the only) keep vote the page should be dealt with .  I think this is rule position, but I have seen the fate of page Reactions to the 2016 Nice attack + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2016_Nice_attack/ (1); more importantly the page view statistics and international reactions with huge difference itself speak for humanitarianism and dual standard for terrorism. So with this academic background I stand neutral at this PROD
— User:Nannadeem, 12:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP||WP:DUE (Wikipedia:Notability)