Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameMill Entertainment
This is a rather interesting case. Normally, I'd expect to keep a company article and use it to store reviews of its games if, say, one game is notable, but several are not. But in this case there is little about both the company and the games. Without prejudice to separate AfDs, none of its four games appear notable. All lack multiple, significant reviews. The Frozen and Cartoon Network games should be covered in their parent list/articles. Water Sports lacks coverage altogether. And that leaves Big Rigs, which has few reliable reviews and is known primarily for being the butt of jokes. With only reviews from GameSpot and G4, and little extra news commentary, I'd delete that one too (or perhaps try to redirect it to an article on games with exceptionally poor reception?) So that leaves the company itself, which has no independent coverage in reliable sources. (Here, have some press releases for shovelware:http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/12/15/gamemill-and-activision-announce-zhu-zhu-pets-for-nintendo-dshttp://www.ign.com/articles/2009/09/08/gamemill-announces-cruise-ship-vacation-games-for-wiihttp://www.ign.com/articles/2009/10/26/gamemill-announces-hidden-mysteries-titanic-for-wii-nintendo-ds-pc-and-mac. Nope, |no presumption of notability here
— [[User talk:Czar|czar]], 07:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:42 (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)