Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics of Gatineau Park
and merge a few sentences in summary to Gatineau Park as discussed above. The article has been written by an editor with an admitted , and has resulted in a POV  attacking the NCC. Even though considerable effort has been made to keep this article NPOV, the article is still solely based on GPPC/NWPL arguments which are not notable. Perhaps one or two items should be mentionned at Gatineau Park, but the controversy of the park and NCC is not notable enough to warrant its own Wikipedia page. For comparison, Ottawa editors could consider the controversy over Lansdowne Live!, which has been a major source of debate in the city for over the past year, including many front-page news reports, yet does not have its own article (Lansdowne Live! redirects to Lansdowne Park). Even though a handful of news articles have mentionned "politics of Gatineau Park" issues (and mentionned GPPC/NWPL in passing), they are not notable enough to have their own article
— User:M, 23:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:SOAPBOX (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)