Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One people under one God
or if appropriate '''merge and redirect'''. Apologies in advance for the length, there's a lot of sources here to analyze. Analysis of sources is as of this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=One_people_under_one_God&oldid=863735389. #1 is the Huffington Post, which is a relatively partisan source. Especially in the area of politics itself, partisan sources aren't generally reliable. #2 is a brief mention in passing. #3 is just a Bible passage, only very tangentially related. #4 covers it a bit, in context of analysis of Trump's speech in general, but I'm not sure of the reliability of the reference and it's regardless a pretty brief blurb. #5 only mentions in passing. #6 is the American Humanist Association, not particularly reliable and of course will have a clear position on the matter. #7 looks like an internal periodical for a specific organization, unknown reliability and certainly doing nothing for notability. #8 is NPR, certainly highly reliable, but is about the role of religion in his campaign in general and only mentions the specific phrase in passing. #9 is a blog, nothing more to be said there. #10 is RedState, another partisan source, and again those should be treated extremely carefully in terms of reliability on political topics. #11 is again about Trump's campaign and religion in general, with only a passing mention of the particular phrase. #12 is a partisan source ("liberal bias" right in their "About Us" page), so same caveat as before. #13 is the Inquisitr, which an RSN discussion found to be an unreliable source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_240#Inquisitr. #14 is again a brief mention in passing. #15 is a brief mention in passing and only of a passingly ''similar'' phrase, not even the one in question. #16 is just a quotation of the statement as part of a larger quote and isn't even about that portion of his speech. #17 is, again, just quoting it a part of a larger quote, and the article isn't at all addressing that portion of it. This is |reference bombing of every single thing that can be found that mentions the thing in passing, but no number of unreliable sources and passing mentions add up to |notability. This subject isn't notable for a standalone article, and at most should possibly be briefly mentioned in a parent or sibling article
— User:Seraphimblade, 18:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:REFBOMB||WP:N (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)