Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizona Wildcats football series records
In addition to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Longhorns football series records, these types of lists have discussed at some length Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#UB Bulls Football Records|here in Nov. 2015 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 16#Category:College football all-time series records|here in Sept. 2015.  The consensus, which I support, is that we should not have such "series results" lists.  The real issues here are whether the lists satisfy  and whether, even if the subject is notable, we ought to exercise editorial judgment under  to opt against a stand-alone list/article.  In this case, I favor our exercise of editorial judgment to avoid such articles for two reasons. First, I have concerns about our ability to maintain such sprawling lists, as the data at issue is massive (particularly if there are such lists for dozens and dozens of college football programs) and changes with great frequency.  Second, the same data sets are published off Wikipedia by organizations (e.g., http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/texas/head-to-head.html here) that are better equipped to perform regular updates of the data. As for , it remains my view that a number of editors have incorrectly interpreted NOTSTATS and that deletionists will seek to exploit that misinterpretation.  The purpose of NOTSTATS is to require context for stats and to avoid pure data dumps.  If there is a statistical list that is notable and not indiscriminate, NOTSTATS suggests that any such listing should have contextual narrative text and citations. The introductory sentence of  emphasizes precisely this: "To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources."   As
— User:Ejgreen77, 06:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:NOTSTATS (Wikipedia:Notability)