Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Druyen
The small number of cites in Google scholar for his work fails to convince me that he passes  #1, and the small number of papers that even mention his supposed main research topic Vermögenskultur leads me to think that it is not a notable enough topic to make his expertise in it stand out as important. Of course, citation counts in Google scholar are a poor stand-in for academic impact, but we need evidence of impact to keep the article and we have none. So I don't think we can use  #1 as a basis for keeping the article. But he may pass #5; the language in the article is unclear and I'm not sufficiently familiar with the Austrian university system to tell whether his appointment is comparable to a personal chair. And, as Phil Bridger observes, the articles about him in Die Zeit, Die Welt, Südwestrundfunk|SWR Nachrichten, Wiener Zeitung etc make a persuasive case for 
— User:David, 05:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)