Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female Egyptologists
u|David Eppstein}} has made a strong case that this topic is notable per . Contrary to {{u|Fram}}'s assertion, some people do care about whether archaeologists (including Egyptologists) ''today'' are women, e.g. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=csshE845UsQC&dq=women+in+archaeology&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_shttp://trowelblazers.com/https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DKAj27myGQUC&dq=women+in+archaeology&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_shttps://books.google.co.uk/books?id=brj2o4EF_EMC&dq=women+in+archaeology&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_shttps://www.australianarchaeologicalassociation.com.au/journal/review-of-women-in-archaeology-a-feminist-critique-edited-by-hilary-du-cros-and-laurajane-smith/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/div-classtitlewomenandaposs-archaeology-political-feminism-gender-theory-and-historical-revisiondiv/2314183E0C9404DEA3FD4205180C774Fhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED402263http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00438240050131162?journalCode=rwar20http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00293652.1992.9965541http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/345322?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. The Wikidata argument is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned; the list is referenced, albeit in a roundabout way, through the Wikidata entries (perhaps this could be made more explicit). If the nominator is seeking to ban bot-maintained lists from Wikidata, that should be a much wider community discussion. Personally I think it's an extremely promising solution to the problem of lists get created and then never properly maintained. &ndash;&#8239
— User:Joe, 16:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Notability)