Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Tolson (2nd nomination)
You want to "salt" the article because he is "barely notable even locally"? I didn't even know |coatracking was a thing, I just thought this met the notability guidelines so i create the article to contribute to wikipedia. The whole point of this is either to see if there are sources enough to provide even more notability, because as established there is some, and when I checked there was more each time I contributed (which is why I did to help the article I created be better), and if not, then to delete the page. How does salting the article benefit to this situation? "I see every reason to salt the page so this situation doesn't recur." Please explain the reasons as you see every reason to delete the page filled with sources more reliable than not, so that it makes sense for anyone in the future that has sources that meet the notability guidelines better (as we seem to think they don't currently) they can contribute
— User:KickStartWrit, 09:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)