Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profile Defenders (2nd nomination)
I'm striking my keep vote and voting delete.  I just spent some more time reading the material thinking I could fix this, but on second glance the sourcing is poor.  For example, the WaPost piece is an opinion column, and the Inc piece is a guest writer.  If you take out the court filings there's not much left.  I think it would just be faster and easier to blow it up, and only rewrite it if enough decent sources can be found.  So I'm going for 
— User:Timtempleton, 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)