Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinitism (religion)
An obvious vote, since I'm the author; no, I am not David Haley.  I like to peruse the philosophy portal and happened upon the article that I spun off into Infinitism (philosophy), which contained a brief sentence about Infinitism also being the name of a religion; subsequent Googling turned up Haley's site.  It seemed sufficiently different from the infinitist epistomological concept to warrant a separate entry, but only a stub (which I tagged it as from the beginning).  The reference to Universism was an admittedly hasty response to the first {{importance}} tag, and could be reasonably removed; the article was NOT "set up as competition for the already barely-if-that notable Universism."  Application of the  policy, since this is in reference to religion, seems odd since most people would consider any religion other than their own "things made up ... one day."  I apologize if I inappropriately removed the {{importance}} tag; this is my first time creating an article (for future reference, who decides when an {{importance}} tag can be reasonably removed?).  I can't respond to the "nn" comment as I am not familiar with that abbreviation
— User:Sketch051, 02:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)