Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Environmental
I agree that the Inc. "profile" is, in fact, a bare-bones mention in a rolling list, and not remotely the feature article AkankshaG and Sandfernandocourt imply that it is.  The other two cites Akanksha raises are likewise passing mentions; this particular company is neither the subject of, nor discussed in the "significant detail" the GNG requires, in either.  The other cites in the article, which look superficially good, are either likewise passing mentions or fail to be |reliable sources.  That being said, would Sanfernandocourt care to explain what makes this a bad faith nomination?  Anything beyond that he disagrees with it, or the implication that someone who describes himself as a "deletionist" must by definition have malicious intent?  I am sure, for example, that he would not care himself to be characterized as having made a "bad faith keep" simply because he erroneously conflates a mention on Inc.'s website into a feature article in the magazine
— User:Ravenswing, 06:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)