Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insurrextion (2003)
Firstly, it sounds like the nominator should have taken this to articles to merge rather than delete, but that is beside the point. Consensus has always been that all WWE pay-per-view events due to their nature and coverage are independently notable. Every single WWE pay-per-view outside of this series, had their own pages prior to their creation. His rationale given here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slashme&diff=837428550&oldid=837379635&diffmode=source sounds to me like his biggest issue is that they are stubs, which is not reason for deletion, it just means I haven't finished expanding yet. Also there are several  that still mention these in more recent years http://www.skysports.com/wwe/news/14203/10929535/vote-worst-wwe-pay-per-view-names https://superluchas.com/los-ocho-peores-nombres-pay-per-view-ha-tenido-wwe-historia/ https://www.vavel.com/en-us/wrestling/2017/12/08/856514-wwe-reportedly-discussing-australian-ppv.html
— User:Galatz, 20:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)