Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlene Griggs-Knope
The nominator cites  without explaining why he believes this article doesn't pass that guideline. The benchmark for GNG is that the subject of an article has significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, and this article checks all those boxes. It is well-sourced by reliable secondary sources, with coverage that goes beyond plot summary into a Development section as well. I imagine this article could be expanded further, but that's not a reason for deletion. The nominator doesn't seem to be making a policy-based argument for deletions but rather stating his own opinion that she's a "minor character" who he, in his subjective opinion, feels isn't notable
— User:Hunter, 13:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)