Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterdeep
or '''merge''': In a first search I did not see large-scale discussion, but a number of shorter bits about Waterdeep in secondary sources, both present in and as yet absent from the article. I would like to search more, but that takes time, especially given the number of deletion discussions going on at the moment. Taking these sources together, especially when considering that Undermountain redirects here, and therefore any discussion of Untermountain in secondary sources directly pertains to the notability of this article, I think the article can be kept. If all that together is not seen as enough, the present information should still be |preserved, both by merging (I guess to Faerûn), and by keeping the history available for future use and improvement
— User:Daranios, 15:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Editing policy)