Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malamanteau
Having looked through the sources provided, many of them are |unreliable or simply do not even mention "malamanteau" (no, someone writing it in the comments section doesn't count). The only ref that comes close to being usable is the ''Boston Globe'' article, but that alone is not enough to pass GNG. I will AGF that the author did not intentionally mislead us into assuming notability by using an unreliable blog from ''The Economist'' but not mentioning that fact that it is a blog in the reference. Also, this article is full of false attribution; not one of the sources provided in the Sarah Palin paragraph actually says that "refudiate" is a "malamanteau" (not that they would be reliable sources anyway) and there are other examples throughout
— User:BigDom, 07:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)