Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video games notable for negative reception (2nd nomination)
and possible move to "Video games ''noted'' for negative reception".  But I understand the nominator's concerns.  The bar has to be very clear for this kind of article. There should not be just verifiable sources blasting the games, but verifiable sources noting that ''other'' sources have blasted the game (some Worst Ever lists), or that the game was a prominent commercial failure (E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (Atari 2600)|E.T.), or that the game sparked outrage (Super Columbine Massacre RPG!|Columbine).  Otherwise we just get "Video games somebody sometime somewhere didn't like" loaded with all kinds of |original research
— User:Matt, 12:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)