Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citation needed
to Wikipedia:Citation needed.  "Citation needed" is a bona fide meme, according to http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/citation-needed Know Your Meme. It's a nice history, but I wouldn't consider the site a reliable source. The meme has lead to the phenomenon of ''Wikiffiti''--citation needed stickers being placed on dubious public assertions--as reported in http://makezine.com/2008/01/02/wikiffiti-citation-needed/ Make, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-15037358.html The Boston Globe, http://reason.com/archives/2008/02/28/artifact-the-world-needs-citat reason.com, and http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2008/01/citation_needed.html boston.com. There is also a http://www.amazon.com/Citation-Needed-Wikipedias-Worst-Writing-ebook/dp/B005W55IVE book with this title. Together, these sources show that the Citation needed is verifiable in reliable sources, but not enough are both reliable and in-depth to pass notability per . But the topic warrants a merge into the main article on this topic, per  and -M. I agree with
— User:Ritchie333, 21:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)