Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan Pantziarka
The reason for the delete vote is because the rules for Notability can be found at . It says sources must be ''secondary'' ie. newspapers, magazines, books, etc.. ''about'' the topic, not ''by'' the topic (summarized at ). Of course material by the subject of the article is available, but anyone can show their accomplishments. That is why we need independent evidence from sources unassociated with the subject that this is a person of "note" ie. discussed in a significant manner by other people. There is a single source that does this, ''The Independent'', from 1999. I'm actually impressed with the wide ranging career of Pantziarka and couldn't imagine this was all the same person, yet couldn't imagine two people with the same name either. So I searched many sources both online and off and had no luck, other than the ''Independent''. If there are other sources like it, they should be added since it establishes notability, but I could not find them
— User:Green, 16:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:42 (Wikipedia:Notability)