Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump orb (2nd nomination)
LM2000 is right that at the depth of media coverage that Trump generates, we could eventually end up having to keep an article about every single object he so much as touches if the only standard we applied is "did it get a blip of press coverage at the time". To actually warrant an article, however, this would need to pass the |ten-year test for enduring ''significance'', which I'm not seeing any evidence that it does. LM2000 is also correct that a small amount of content about this at the article on the Riyadh ''summit'' would be acceptable, but it doesn't need its own standalone article
— User:Bearcat, 15:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Recentism)