Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtesy flush
again.  You could try a transwiki but I don't think this would meet even their standards for sourcing of usage.  The current version is nothing more than a dictionary definition of a neologism (both inappropriate for the encyclopedia).  One of the alleged sources cited in this article isn't even about this subject - it's about a |not-particularly notable product
— User:Rossami, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)