Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Dearden
The article doesn't even really assert the subject's importance, and the given sources don't seem to indicate notability. I don't see any evidence that he is highly cited or has won any awards. Many of the sources in the article are associated with BBC and thus are not independent. One of the sources is a blog, and I don't think it's an expert blog that can be considered a |reliable source. I'm not sure what http://www.careers.cam.ac.uk/eReg/AccessDenied.asp?Requested=http://www.careers.cam.ac.uk/sectors/media/earlybioglist.asp this source is as I cannot access it. http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS311US311&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=Chris+Dearden+BBC A Google search turns up mostly the sources already in the article, but nothing that indicates notability per  or  in particular
— User:Pdcook, 22:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)