Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Tillman
I can see why this is such a hard one to determine consensus for. I'm sympathetic to the idea of  in this sort of scenario. There can be sufficient sources to justify a claim to notability but not a stand-alone article. Ultimately, however, though there is a salient fact of her age which serves as the basis for this coverage, the coverage in very high-profile sources extends past that. Her age and death may be driven the stories, but if many high-profile sources are going into some depth about other aspects of her life such that what is due weight to include goes beyond the fact of her age and basic biographical data, I have to lean keep. What is encyclopedic is what aspects of a subject receive coverage in reliable sources, and there looks to be just enough here to merit a stand-alone article. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 02:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOPAGE (Wikipedia:Notability)