Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Reasons Why (2nd nomination)
Films are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist — they need to show markers of ''significance'', such as major film awards and/or enough attention from film critics to clear . But there's no such claim being made here, this is written more like an advertisement for the film than a neutral encyclopedia article (|conflict of interest likely, as the article was created by a user named "ImageEnt" and has subsequently been heavily edited by a user named "MattCampagna"), and even on a ProQuest search for decade-old coverage that might not have Googled, I still found only a bunch of smalltown community hyperlocals reprinting the exact same wire service article on the same day (thus combining into ''one'' data point, not several) and absolutely nothing from major media. That's not good enough.I should also note that both Matt and Jeff Campagna also had advertorialized autobiographical articles, with weak sourcing and no notability claim stronger than the existence of this film — see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Campagna (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Campagna
— User:Bearcat, 01:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)