Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CampusTours
my inclination is '''delete''', else I wouldn't have nominated it, but I agree with the above that this company might just barely reach the threshhold of notability. (Although it might not; again, the links that the author provided to establish notability are highly questionable.) The problem is that the article does ''not'' deserve to survive in its present form, and I think it's likely that the author (whose only contribs are to this article) is affiliated with the subject and may be unable to provide an appropriately |neutral point of view. And I don't know if there's anybody else who's informed enough to write a good, neutral article. Again, the company, if notable, is just barely so. If this whole virtual-tour thing catches on, the company will probably grow in importance and in notability, and at that time unbiased people will be familiar enough with it to write an appropriate article. Until then, however, I continue to believe that the appropriate action here is to '''delete
— User:VoiceOfReason, 05:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)