Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pritzker Military Presents
That quote starts with the word '''"Generally"''' which you have omitted from your rendition, {{noping|Pigsonthewing}}, meaning that isn't an open and shut case. The policy also includes {{tq|"the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone"}}, to which I point out (again) the glaring omission from the article of ANY citation except for those from its own website and IMDb content (mindful that IMDb content can be user-generated). In other words, your argument on the face does NOT solve the notability issue. Nor does it address the  nature of the article, especially since it is supported by the museum's own WikiProject. What other organization in the world has its own WikiProject
— User:Normal, 23:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROMOTIONAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)