Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple Pussy
fails pretty much all of our content policies and guidelines.  an internet guide and this is all original research with no reliable sources, let alone enough sources to write from NPOV. We can't keep an article that fails all of our official content policies by trying to stretch the  notability guideline. Notability is what we turn to to decide whether neutral, verifiable articles are on topics important enough to cover. It is not the backdoor to writing original research on "notable" topics. That said, I'll point out that consensus has been that sites like Keenspot do not automatically confer notability (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/God_Mode, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crazy_in_Love_%28comic%29, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alien_Dice, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/No_Pink_Ponies, various other AFDs, PRODs and A7 CSDs). Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards nominations are similarly non-notable as about 125 of them are handed out every year
— User:Dragonfiend, 09:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)