Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Abadilla
Even for ambassadors and senior civil servants, the notability test is still not just the ability to offer technical verification in the government's own self-published |primary sources that the person held the claimed roles — the notability test remains the depth and range and volume of |reliable source coverage the person did or didn't ''receive'' in ''media''. Regardless of the notability claim being made, the notability test for people always remains dependent on the quality of the ''referencing'' that can be used to ''support'' the notability claim, but nothing that's been shown either in the article or in this discussion adds up to notability-making sourcing. Yes, these would be notable roles if he could be properly sourced for them — but no, they aren't "inherent" notability freebies that ''exempt'' him from having to have any reliable source coverage just because he exists
— User:Bearcat, 12:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)