Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phone Call to Putin (2nd nomination)
or merge to wherever).  The article establishes notability of the term based on its being mentioned in passing in relation to one and only one case.  If the keep proponents are so convinced that this term is beyond being a "non-notable neologism", why in the world have such a hard time providing references which tie the term to something other than Mikheyev's case?  The term is "widely known" in Russia and is mentioned by numerous independent sources?  Give me two (2!) such sources, and as long as they are |reliable and don't reference back to Mikheyev's case like every single other source mentioned here, I'll change my vote to "keep" ("strong keep" if you give me three).  Thank you
— User:Ezhiki, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)