Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbophobia (third nomination)
this reeks of  ("if you want to delete Bosniakophobia, then you should also delete Serbophobia"). For what it's worth Bosniakophobia probably should be deleted, as it gets precisely '''ZERO''' hits in Google.http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bosniakophobia Also, just because the article has been nominated for deletion (unsuccessfully) twice before, that doesn't mean it should have been deleted ("Serbophobia was also nominated for deletion in the past etc, but nobody deleted it"). Furthermore, there are 1,250 Google hits when you search for "serbophobia -wikipedia -wiki" (i.e. when Wikipedia is eliminated).http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&hl=en&q=serbophobia+-wikipedia+-wiki&btnG=Search&meta= Granted, many are useless rubbish, but there are also many reputable sources in there. Finally, it's not clear why this being nominated for a third time (!) when no new arguments have been presented
— User:Estavisti, 22:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)