Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Directive (retrospectives)
not speedy.  The context is pretty simple to figure out - project management and evaluations following a project.  I assume that it's "Prime," because in software projects (and any other kind of group retrospective analysis) assigning blame is a discussion killer.  Yet it happens a lot.  So setting a guideline like this makes sense.  (I mention the previous just to indicate that figuring out context on this isn't all that hard.)  I suppose you could speedy it under G11 for apparently advertising the book, but I'd recommend against that.  Since it was nommed twelve minutes after creation by a first time contributor, it could well be a stub that the creator intends to build on. (Or not...)  I don't know how notable this particular concept is, and would agree that if it reaches normal end of AfD that it be deleted on  and EO
— User:LaughingVulcan, 01:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Notability)