Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MKR (programming language) (2nd nomination)
Userfy.  There are ''no'' sources other than the developers' mailing list.  All other sources appear to refer to the field, rather than the specific "language".  Suggest that the developer restore than article ''if'' it gets some discussion in .  As for the previous AfD, it found that COI is not a reason to delete.  Absence of sources ''is'', and the matter was not brought up then.  In favor of deletion, rather than waiting for sourcing, as a number of redirects have been created by the developer, which would probably be worthy of deletion even if the article were kept.  , although not a reason to delete, ''is'' a reason to delete something more quickly than if a neutral party though it relevent in the absence of sourcing.  &mdash
— User:Arthur, 15:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)