Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScrewAttack (2nd nomination)
the keep !vote above is based on the fact that ScrewAttack is |part of something notable which doesn't confer notability because notability isn't inherited.  A quick https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22ScrewAttack%22&rlz=1C1CHBD_en-GBGB755GB755&oq=%22ScrewAttack%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.1028j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 source search reveals nothing other than fancruft, self-published sources and affiliated media outlets.  There are no independent, reliable reviews which give any indication of the article passing |web notability standards.  I am opposed to a merge because after looking at the article of the parent company, there is little sourced, encyclopedic content that can be merged.  Perhaps a redirect may be the way to go but it's definitely not up to notability or verifiability standards
— User:DrStrauss, 13:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NWEB (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)