Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond A. Watson (2nd nomination)
Coverage is not exclusively local, nor is it exclusively routine and/or trivial, so I don't think either of those arguments holds water. With the depth and range of news reporting that he seems to have accumulated, I can't see how Watson fails /. Maybe this means that the guideline is too broad and accepts articles that it shouldn't, but that would be much better discussed elsewhere and certainly isn't a reason for deleting in this specific case. Nor would retaining this article create a precedent of any kind, since the decision should (and hopefully will) be based on the article in question rather than any general principle
— User:Alzarian16, 19:10, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)