Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadèmia Siciliana
I fail to see how the referenced interviews are Wikipedia:Interviews#Independent_or_not|not independent, given it's not proven that the interviewees and the interviewers are linked. I consider all the references given as third-party. I do agree it's a small and relatively new organization, but it passes . We should also consider that its field of action is superspecialized: we can't expect massive international coverage, given that Sicilian language|Sicilian is a minority language. This should also lower the quantity of citations needed for being considered having |significant coverage. I also just found one more reference to the organization, related to CLDR, which I'm going to add to the article
— User:Dapal, 23:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RECENT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Recentism)