Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menzoberranzan
Per my arguments at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rod_of_Seven_Parts, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemis Entreri, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mielikki_%28Forgotten_Realms%29, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruenor Battlehammer and the arguments of others at the similarly ill-advised Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furyondy and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faerûn (this last is particularly relevant as it is a similar setting, and was almost - and should probably have been since there were many "keeps" and only one "merge" - snowball kept). Tedious, almost pointy  nomination that ignores editor consensus; unfortunately becoming quite common in Articles for Discussion discussions.  Amazing
— User:Zahakiel, 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)