Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birkensnake
I've never posted my opinion on here, but what the heck. The whole crux of this debate comes down to the sources of this entry being blogs, thus making them unreliable sources, thus making this entry not notable. This not correct. According to , blogs ''can be'' considered reliable sources if they meet certain wickets. ''NOTE: I don't see any blogs currently being used as sources for this entry''. But since it seems to be such an issue of contention if you would like to use a blog as a source, it would be best to put the link on the talk page and discuss why it would or why it wouldn't be a reliable source. Some blogs are, some blogs aren't. I hope that helps
— User:HeartSWild, 07:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IRS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)