Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carson Optical
Per HighKing. Fails Wikipedia:NCORP|NCORP big time. Neither of the WSJ articles offers more than Wikipedia:Trivial mentions|trivial mention on the subject. The NYT article (''For a Boat or the Ball Game, Flexible Binoculars'') does not even mention Carson Optical only Richard Cameron, president, "Copitar", the "Japanese optics manufacturer" and "Cameron International of Huntington, L.I.", that "imports electronic binoculars". This is the first three I randomly checked and the last one appears to only be |citation overkill. The  American Hunter source is a ''Review: Carson RD-826'' with only one paragraph about the company and owner. The company info consists: "that Carson Optical was started in 1990". That is zero for 4. The ''Indoor Outdoor source offers infor that ''Carson Optical Expands HQ''. This is far from in-depth sourcing on the company just about the expansion. The Bloomberg source offers one paragraph. The Long Island Business News is behind a paywall but is titled ''Carson Optical expanding in Ronkonkoma'' so both the last two are concerning the company expansion and are press-release type sources. I do not propose to offer that the company does not exist. I own a Carson PO-55 MiniBrite Pocket Magnifier. Notability means more than passing mentions and press releases (|routine coverage) showing that a company exists. "Keep" comments because "Wikipedia has a big shelf" or "the article has useful information about the company" are really just |"I like it
— User:Otr500, 06:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:REFBOMB||WP:ROUTINE||WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)