Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of renewable energy manufacturers
This notable information was prodded and then thrown up for afd one day after work began on it – all in violation of efore.  Is the information  notable?  Yes.  Can the article be saved with editing?  Yes.  The rationale for deletion based irectory is not met.  The topic is clearly defined as manufacturers of the categories.  The rationale for  is also not met since it clearly defines its boundaries.  All that said, the article is definitely overly broad.  It would be much better and probably would not have triggered the deletion reaction if it had been broken up in smaller more focused articles on what areas where it was fully developed (e.g., wind, solar, wave).  I am willing to work with the original author to implement a more focused bite sized approach for a well researched article.  I appreciate the argument that it is a link farm however it should be noted that since this is a new industry these companies tend to be small start ups (I wandered in while backlinking an article I started on a one of the companies).  Therefore I am asking that the nominator withdraw the afd while this is implemented.  Thanks
— User:Americasroof, 18:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:B||WP:D||WP:SALAT (Wikipedia:Bots)