Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Tillman (2nd nomination)
I have added more sources, so there is now significant coverage from 1990, 1993, 1997, 2006 and 2007. Much of it is in her local paper, the ''Hartford Courant'', with an article in another Connecticut paper, the ''Journal Inquirer''. However, in 2006 there is also a long article in the Salvation Army journal ''Priority!'', and there are long obituaries in the ''New York Times'' (republished internationally) and ''Boston Globe'', with shorter ones in other media. That is certainly enough to meet . While the nominator may think that "Breathing for a long time is not notable", clearly newspapers like the ''New York Times'' and ''Boston Globe'' think that it is notable enough for them to give it significant coverage, and that is what  is based on, not how long a subject breathes for
— User:RebeccaGreen, 10:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)