Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kübra Dadaşoğlu
I am not seeing '''significant coverage''' per GNG, specifically: ''"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.'' Anything that is just a passing mention or game coverage is typically considered . Number 1 is a team roster. Number 2 is coverage of the Championship team going into details on the backgrounds the players who participated. Her only mention there is "Kubra Dadaşoğlu, who is the best goalkeeper in the Turkish Ice Hockey Federation Women's League, and Betul Toygar, who is the best forward player, stated that women in the first place in the East are not warmly interested in sports but they are appreciated by the success stories that extend to the championship" (more or less based on translation) and really only confirms that she was named Best Goaltender. Number 3 is a interview with what appears to be her entire team, she is quoted three times (two of which are one sentence responses) and lacks the depth of coverage needed for a GNG-worthy source as she is not the subject. Number 4 is the same article as Number 2. Number 5 mentions her as the best goaltender from the previous season. Number 6 is a brief article stating the team won the championship and the subject won best goaltender. Number 7, she is listed among other athletes invited to a training camp. Number 8, she is listed as a member if the team. Number 9 is a stats page. For a Turkish player, this coverage is better than most get. However, I am just not seeing significant depth needed for GNG
— User:Yosemiter, 21:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)