Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manon von Gerkan
Sources are nowhere near sufficient to meet the dual test of ''reliability'' and ''significant coverage''. What has been presented so far?http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/models/Manon_von+Gerkan/ This is a PR profile - who knows who puts the information on there; http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/swimsuit/collection/models/manon_von_gerkan.html this has no meaning; http://www.perfectpeople.net/biography/119/manon-von-gerkan.htm this has no content; and it is well established that IMDB is not reliable. We cannot have a reliable article about this subject because there is no coverage in reliable sources. An encyclopaedia is only as good as its sources. That's why ''reliability'' must be given its proper weight in . Still awaiting any genuine coverage of the subject in reliable secondary sources
— User:Mkativerata, 02:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)