Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texts From Last Night
Are you serious? This clearly meets criterion #1 at  as the site has "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." See http://www.whas11.com/news/consumer/stories/WHAS11-090716-Top-Texting.4a0b263a.html here and http://www.herald.ie/lifestyle/the-best-way-to-land-a-book-deal--start-a-silly-blog-1845146.html here. And that's just from the ''references'', which not only means there might be more information about this site out there, but also suggests that you haven't even looked at the article. I wouldn't be surprised if you haven't; you've hardly bothered to give a decent nomination reason
— User:Pokerdance, 22:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)