Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Michelle Darnell
Being a non-winning candidate for office is not a notability criterion — a person has to ''win'' the election and thereby ''hold'' office, not just run for it and lose, to clear , but this makes no claim that she has preexisting notability for any other reason. And the depth of |reliable source coverage shown here is ''not'' adequate to get her over  in lieu, as Joezasada claims above: of the six footnotes, one is a clarifying note rather than a reference; two are her own |primary source content about herself, which cannot support notability at all; two (''Reason'' and ''The Story Exchange'') just glancingly namecheck her existence in stories in which she is ''not'' the ''subject''; and the C-SPAN reference isn't coverage about her but merely a one-minute video clip of her speaking. These do not represent coverage ''about'' her — they represent the kind of purely |run of the mill sources that ''any'' candidate in ''any'' election could ''always'' show, not evidence that her candidacy was somehow a special case over and above everybody else's
— User:Bearcat, 18:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:MILL (Wikipedia:Notability)