Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Wood
Ph.D.s having wacky theories is not in and of itself notable, and self-published theories on web sites are not reliable secondary sources of notability. The academic paper and letter in a journal by two others debunking her theories are such a source, but not enough of a source to convince me that anyone takes her theories seriously or that she's an important part of the 9/11 conspiracy theory world. Put it this way: if we were evaluating a non-crackpot Ph.D. for notability using , one self-published paper with only two citations would be very far from satisfying that guideline
— User:David, 23:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)