Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Davis (county clerk)
I understand the nominator's concerns about , but I think it's pretty obvious that Kim Davis herself is now getting coverage that's beyond the scope of rule 3, which says "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented." It's pretty obvious that her role is significant and well documented. The Guardian has written an article about her history leading up to becoming a clerk (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/02/kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-divorced-three-times) and there's been coverage comparing this to the schoolhouse stand. I think that's well beyond the requirements to keep
— User:Nomader, 00:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)