Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrington Plaza (2nd nomination)
A little bit on the history of this article that isn't readily apparent: I nominated this article at AfD yesterday on the grounds of notability (see first AfD link above). It was deleted not because of notability, but because {{user|HkFnsNGA}}&mdash;the article author and at that time its only contributor of content&mdash;blanked the page ''and'' made what I interpreted to be an explicit request for deletion on my talk page, thereby qualifying it for #G7|G7 speedy deletion. I tagged it as such and it was deleted. Personally, I would have preferred that AfD run its course, but I saw no point in keeping an article if its author and only contributor of content requested deletion. About the same time, {{user|Sancho Mandoval}} chimed in that he had found some sources to indicate the subject's notability, and requested the deleting admin to restore the article, which he did. '''No opinion''' on deletion this time around, but I ask the nominator to clarify the rationale for deletion, as the one cited is not valid
— User:Kuyabribri, 16:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)