Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristi Yamaoka (6th nomination)
Firstly, I would like to re-iterate Indrian's point that "We are not here to debate the notability of the accident."  The fall's notability is, to be frank, irrelevant, as this is an article about Yamaoka, not her accident.  This article breaks , , and #NEWS, which state "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted", "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography may be unwarranted", and "Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event" respectively.  I have found not found multiple, reliable, independent, and secondary sources that offer non-trivial coverage of Yamaoka outside of the context of the fall.  As a result, I do not believe that this article should remain.  Frankly, I am surprised that this article was not deleted earlier.  To me, this article is a classic violation of the three guidelines I have used in my argument for deletion (Struck out due to my decision to support a re-direct (see below)).  Thank you for reading
— User:JEdgarFreeman, 21:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)