Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightweight rail
The entire lightweight rail article reads like an |essay, and is built up as a |non-neutral arguments for why this concept is so fantastic and bases itself on presenting |original research. We have an article about light railway, which covers the topic about railways which are lighter than normal, and we have an article about monorail. The article is constantly mixing terms; it tries to explain a science-fiction version of suspended monorails (real ones which are covered in the monorail article), but at the same time has selected incidents and examples from alleged short-comings from conventional railways which are used to support the authors point of view. Other claims are just not true: there are numerous elevated conventional railways; comparing the person-to-weight ratio of high-speed intercity trains (which for instance contains a dining car and needs more power output per tonne than, for instance a metro) to low-speed, high capacity people movers is mixing apples and bananas. No-where does it introduce any references from reliable sources, instead relying on the author's fanboy page on the issue. And don't get me going on the article being written in first person plural
— User:Arsenikk, 09:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FORUM||WP:POV||WP:OR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)