Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Andrew Kantis
I believe Gibco has improperly summarized the gist of this discussion.  If the article were salvageable, then it would be salvaged.  I believe the problem is that there are not sufficient independent unbiased sources on which to build the article in the first place.  Mr Kantis is simply not a |notable person according to the standards of Wikipedia, and does not merit an article, no matter how well or poorly written
— User:WikiDan61, 16:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)