Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlvana
per Morbid.  It's technically true that notability isn't inherited to a series, but I think we should treat it as doing so in this case. Call it  if you want, I'm thinking of it as a common-sense interpretation of what that phrase is supposed to mean.  Let me explain: Let's say we made articles for each film, two of them (#3, #4) there seems to be consensus would be notable. From that hypothetical point, it'd make a lot of sense (and make the encyclopedia more usable) to merge those two articles into a single article to avoid duplication and establish that this is part of a series. Certainly we haven't *lost* notability in the process, and including content that would not be notable on it's own (they, there's a #1 and #2) about the other films in the series seems entirely within process and policy as well. To turn my thinking around, the end result of a delete result here won't, I predict, be no articles on these films, it'll be two articles, one on #3, one on #4. I think the status quo is better
— User:Joe, 17:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)