Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalen Berns (2nd nomination)
The article seems a classic case of , is much longer than reliable sources allow, and generally comes close to the edge of GNG. Cites #6 and #7 might have persuaded me but both are written by single contributors to their respective publications (one was by Posie Parker who actually seems more notable than Berns from my source scan, but who doesn't have a page as far as I can see). If kept and properly improved, it seems to me like the article itself would be very lean given the limited set of  - with nearly all the RS dealing with an event better mentioned on JK Rowling's page. That makes me think it fails  too. It feels very well described by  IMO
— User:Hypnotist, 23:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OVERCITE||WP:RS||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:PSEUDO (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)