Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodhall Spa Cottage Museum
would be a vote, but there is no point here to vote further) {{u|onel5969}}, While in any other case this should have been closed as a clear keep consensus, the discussion of it is really, really, REALLY poor, consisting of , saying but not showing which books does it have significant coverage in (per ), per XYZ person....jeez. In any case, this will surely not be deleted and  would at best be closed as no consensus for another discussion, but I wanted to discuss the sources by an analysis
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)