Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fergie second studio album
As I see it, this project ''already'' exists. That is, there has been a body of activity creating something. Even if the project was abandoned today, it would still warrant some sort of mention (probably in Fergie (singer)). So, that's why I think the "almost certain to take place" bit of  is not relevant here. As a body of work, something has already taken place. Thus, looking at all of ,  and , it seems to me the most important criterion is verifiability. I accept your case elsewhere that there's only one reliable citation given. Unless more turn up, that's insufficient for a standalone article and the material should be merged with Fergie (singer). If more become available, it seems to me that an article is warranted (and allowed under ). So, basically, I agree with your last bit above, if I might quote selectively: "Information ... can be merged into Fergie (singer) ... Unless ... there is considerable non-trivial coverage
— User:Bondegezou, 12:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:MUSIC||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)