Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional landship (2nd nomination)
By reading the past discussions I can see why the content was originally split from the Landship article. However, most (all? I could not find anything that is related with the topic from the two given references) of the content here is unsourced original research. Perhaps  is the solution here... Deletion is not cleanup, but any cleanup would make the article pointless as stated above
— User:Ceosad, 18:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)