Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free World
The current state of the article is indeed "super flawed", but |deletion is not for clean-up. Potential sources exist, even if few are cited at present. DICDEF does not apply, as even in its current state the article goes far beyond just a definition, and there is potential for historical, political, and sociological discussion of the topic. Editors and the closing admin should also note the recent discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader of the Free World
— User:Cnilep, 00:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UGLY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)