Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol (video game)
Not enough independent |reliable sources to support a |verifiable and |neutral article. The IGN reference is only a landing page which doesn't count as independent coverage. Beckett.com has no indication of their editorial policies, they do however explicitely disclaim any editorial oversight: ''"Content is not necessarily reviewed by Beckett prior to posting and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of Beckett. Beckett makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the Content or as to the accuracy and reliability of the Content or any material or information that a Member transmits to other Members. If at any time Beckett chooses, in its sole discretion, to monitor the Services, Beckett assumes no responsibility for the Content, no obligation to modify or remove any inappropriate Content, and no responsibility for the conduct of the Member submitting any such Content."'' (from their http://beta.beckett.com/Content/Corporate/TOS.aspx Terms of Service). Other sources cited, including Ten Ton Hammer, are not considered as valid sources under the scope of G/S|Wikiproject VideoGames's source list. I'm also extremely shocked by the pattern of abusive behaviour and the multiple violations of  and  across several talk pages by some of the keep voters
— User:MLauba, 07:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:VG||WP:AGF||WP:NPA (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)