Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seapunk
This is a very, very recently coined term and as such, doesn't have anything that would be considered a reliable source. In response to '''Dinospartan117''', a term, person, place, or item might be considered notable within a group of people, but that doesn't automatically mean it's notable enough to go onto Wikipedia. What's needed to prove notability are reliable sources. (See  for what's considered a reliable source.) Unfortunately I didn't find that when I did a search on this term. I found some blogs, youtube videos, and sources that would be considered trivial at best, but I didn't find anything reliable. A reliable source would be if Rolling Stone did an article on seapunk or if it was covered in a news article. That said, I think that it might be worth userfying () until Dinospartan117 can find enough reliable sources to flesh the term out
— User:Tokyogirl79, 07:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:USERFY (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)