Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (4th nomination)
How many times must we discuss this topic? Should I copy and paste my previous reply (or replies) each time? I mean, most of our feelings have not changed on this topic. This constant debate is doing nothing but draining the community, and is a clear ''' violation.''' Consensus is usually to '''merge this article to the Celibacy article, to the Sexual abstinence article, which already addresses involuntarily sexual abstinence in the lead, to the Sexual frustration article, or to delete.''' Given how small the Sexual frustration article currently is, and that there is enough to state about involuntary celibacy, I disagree that this should be merged to the Sexual frustration article or otherwise significantly covered there. Cover it in the Sexual abstinence article and call it a day. I wouldn't even mind if it was covered in the Celibacy article, or if it exists as its own article; '''I don't see a huge problem with this article existing as its own article.''' And again, this topic is not a medical topic. Just stop all this repeat debating. Sighs
— User:Flyer22, 20:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FORUMSHOP (Wikipedia:Consensus)