Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mountain Astrologer
This magazine fails . Literally nothing of the references (which are: a references without a link, second one is the closest to attribute to something but seems like a passing mention, primary stuff and the reference that has nothing to do with the subject) in the article is significant coverage of the subject to account to  which counts towards . I was not able to find anything in secondary sources. Regarding as to what Atlantic306 has said, to pass  you need to have ''significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.'' Not notable
— User:Jovanmilic97, 10:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)