Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde Lewis (2nd nomination)
Having or not having a Wikipedia article is not a question of free speech vs. censorship, it's a question of notability vs. non-notability — but notability is not established by ''what'' an article says, it's established by how well the article |reliably sources what it says. However, the referencing here is ''far'' too dependent on his own |primary source content about himself, which does ''not'' help to establish notability: people get Wikipedia articles by being the ''subject'' of reliable source coverage, ''not'' by being the ''author'' of their own |self-published sources about ''themselves''. The only reference that actually counts as a reliable or notability-assisting source is a piece in his own hometown alt-weekly — so that reference would be fine ''if'' the rest of the sourcing around it were better, but it does not singlehandedly confer a  pass all by itself as an article's ''only'' valid source. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to hand him an automatic inclusion freebie just because he exists — but the sourcing is simply not cutting it
— User:Bearcat, 16:00, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)