Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet Simms
The nom's sole argument for deletion is moot as it's no longer an un-sourced BLP violation.  The coverage of this person in the sources provided by Northamerica1000 demonstrate easily passing  and .  Redirecting would be incorrect as the existing content about this person outside of Automatic Loveletter would be off-topic in that article
— User:Oakshade, 06:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)