Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination)
and '''rename'''.  The company is not notable, but the case is.  It's had substantial coverage beyond the  threshold in http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-18/a-company-is-sued-over-its-no-bad-reviews-clause Business week, http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/18/kleargear-goes-into-social-media-lockdown-after-it-charges-customers-for-posting-bad-reviews/ Techdirt, and non-local news providers (for example, http://www.khou.com/news/KlearGear-fines-Texas-couple-35K-for-posting-negative-review-232421601.html Houston and http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/12/18/retailer-that-fined-couple-3500-for-negative-review-hit-with-lawsuit US News and World Report), as well as the source cited by SBaker43, above. Move to :Palmer v. Kleargear.com to make the article name conform to the topic and content
— User:TJRC, 00:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)