Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Sian O'Callaghan (2nd nomination)
and futher '''objection''' to the way this is now handled. The locked and censored Death of Sian O'Callaghan|page now states ''This page has been indefinitely protect in order to conform to the requirements of Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Crime_perpetrators,'' giving at least a very strong impression that this is community decision or at least follows olicy|community guidelines. This is '''NOT''' the case. The policy cited does not mandate this drastic form of censorship nor does it make any mention of special treatment of British crime suspects. Do we start bowing to legal demands form every country? Should we delete Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 because it is a collection of criminal hate speech and misinformation? The hat note on the page should clearly state that the decision to censor the page lies with Wikimedia Foundation of the Wikipedia:Oversight|oversighters. It should also ''explicitly'' mention the request with a reference number or at least a date, so that the censorship could be challenged in a British court of law
— User:Petri, 21:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:P (Wikipedia:Portal)