Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimson Viper
I disagree with the nominator's subjective assertion that there are no substantive mentions of the character in reliable sources. The issue to consider is whether the subject has garnered enough significant coverage to warrant a standalone article. In this instance, given the article's state of sourcing, a merge proposal would be more appropriate then a proposal for outright deletion if there is concern about whether the topic warrants a standalone article. It's a borderline for me, but per , a few sources I have found which is not used in the article. Coverage range from substantial to incidental
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Notability)