Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Society (Parts 1 and 2)
This nomination starts off with a false assertion. These books are '''not''' self-published. Furthermore, the fact that the material in them has been republished in the "PROUT in a Nutshell" series does not mean that the original books are somehow not notable by reverse inheritance (although I should mention here that I still consider the "PROUT in a Nutshell" series to be notable). As the nominator himself states, there are several citations in relation to these books. And the books are referenced on several Wikipedia pages, perhaps most notably at Law of Social Cycle. Hence, I believe that the notability of these books is adequately established, especially in light of the usual problems of |systemic bias. I have no doubt that many relevant documents can be found with a painstaking search of Indian sources in English, Hindi, Bengali, and so on. However, given the fact that Wikipedia is not a full-time job for me and I am coping with nine (9) concurrent AfD nominations from this same nominator, not to mention questionable edits on other articles not yet nominated for deletion by him, I would prefer to forgo such a time-consuming exercise
— User:Abhidevananda, 08:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)