Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia in culture (2nd nomination)
per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wikipedia_in_culture|overwhelming prior consensus that is unlikely to have changed.  I find this nomination, and the nominator's other actions regarding this article disruptive.  Despite an overwhelming keep in the last nomination, Sceptre wiped it out shortly thereafter with a redirect, and earlier today, attempted to wipe it out in the same manner, then initiated this AfD.  I find such forceful attempts to delete articles despite clear evidence of the community's support for them an abuse of the deletion process and of the community's time.  This kind of behavior is and antithetical to Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building.  AfD's purpose is to get rid of articles that are widely agreed upon to be bad for the encyclopedia, not to take |repeated potshots at articles you don't like.  Maybe this isn't the right place to be leveling such personal criticism, but I still feel it's warranted.  I don't like it when people try to get their way through just shoving, shoving, shoving
— User:Father, 09:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)