Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear Pricey
I am deferring advocating to either Keep or Delete the article at this point in the discussion.) In general, of course, if an article has been speedily deleted and the creator (or another editor) believes the deletion to have been in error, the proper course is to request a |deletion review, not simply recreate the article, especially not without addressing any of the issues raised when the original article was tagged for deletion. And when an article was previously deleted due to a valid issue, and the same article is recreated without addressing the issue(s) raised, such an article will generally be deleted again after discussion reaches a onsensus|consensus to do so. But the article is now here on Wikipedia (again), and so there is an opportunity for {{U|AlexWit}} to provide |reliable sources to establish Dear Pricey's |notability. Indeed, I see that in fact AlexWit has already begun attempting to provide such sources — though I have not yet examined the sources to determine whether any of them are actually reliable sources by Wikipedia's definition. I will wait and see how the article develops
— User:GrammarFascist, 12:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DRV||WP:C||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)