Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Gebru
To clarify, '''Speedy Keep''' if the deletion rationale is taken at face value, as there are many claims to significance in the article. '''Keep''' if we assume the deletion rationale concerns notability. I'm actually on the edge of weak keep and regular keep, but regardless, I think the sourcing as it is, without even looking for more, gets by . The article needs some serious editing, though, as while there are enough good sources for notability purposes, many of these sources are primary/poor. I went through and combined repeated refs into named refs to better assess the article, but didn't make any real revisions to the article. I will also be !voting for a selective merge to this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethiopian Global Initiative. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 17:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)