Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slut-shaming
or '''Keep'''). Passes  as there are several books and journal articles that discuss the concept of slut-shaming (rather than just using the term).http://books.google.com/books?id=r0ODZH9h-mgC&pg=PA186&dq=%22slut+shaming%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TNO3UOHMEMjAiwK_4IGgCg&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22slut%20shaming%22&f=falsehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540253.2011.645023http://books.google.com/books?id=1jbsSXc9rUQC&pg=PA93&dq=%22slut+shaming%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TNO3UOHMEMjAiwK_4IGgCg&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22slut%20shaming%22&f=false As the article is quite short right now, I would favor merging into slut, but I believe a longer article could stand on its own
— User:Kaldari, 21:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)