Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House of Fine Art
u|James500}}, {{u|Sam Sailor}}, I wonder if you are aware that  leads to the same paragraph as ? The first sentence there is "{{teal|If a topic has received '''significant coverage''' in '''|reliable sources''' that are '''ndependent sources|independent of the subject''', it is '''presumed''' to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list}}". So perhaps, instead of merely stating "meets/satisfies GNG", you could provide evidence of where you found that significant coverage, why you think the detailed analysis of the sources provided here by {{u|NitinMlk}} is incorrect, and how you think that the sources you've found might satisfy ? Thanks
— User:Justlettersandnumbers, 17:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:I||WP:NCORP||WP:reliable sources (Wikipedia:Notability)