Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tavi Gevinson
I also don't think that a valid reason for deletion was given. Wikipedia is |not censored and the article seems to pass all key requirements of . It's relatively well-sourced, doesn't contain any defamatory information, and whatever basic personal facts it contains, they have already been published by several major news sources
— User:Rankiri, 22:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)