Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redfield & Wilton Strategies
the fact that |other stuff exists doesn't bear on notability: the question is whether there's significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. All I'm seeing is single-sentence |trivial mentions, which don't cut it. If in-depth coverage about the company itself is found, I'm glad to reëvaluate, but my searches aren't yielding anything
— User:Extraordinary, 05:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)