Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxologist (2nd nomination)
It's no more than a term invented by a tax and accounting firm for publicity purposes. Until the wider world has taken notice of the word that can be substantiated with sources outside of the tax industry, it should not have its own article per . Taxology is actually another word for Taxonomy (biology)|taxonomy - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/taxologyhttps://www.thefreedictionary.com/taxology used since the 19th century (a taxologist is therefore a taxonomist), it is therefore  quite wrong to usurp the definition an older word still in use https://books.google.com/books?id=PtxBAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Taxologist%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Taxologisthttps://books.google.com/books?id=D_N1AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Taxologist%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Taxologist  without showing that the new definition has gain wider currency outside of these companies. Redirect to taxonomy is therefore another possibility
— User:Hzh, 22:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)