Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latarsha Rose
Subject is covered in enough sourceshttps://www.google.com/search?q=%22Latarsha+Rose%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#q=%22Latarsha+Rose%22&hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&psj=1&ei=0RvRT_iOLqbM2AX1w-CLDw&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=119d693c4ec9a097&biw=855&bih=495 so that this is not a failed BLP, and an encyclopedic article can be maintained for our readers.  As with any actor, we do not judge notability by the least of their roles, but by the best... and we can then factor in length of career, and yes... even those minor roles.  She first received media attention in 2002 for her appearances in the Bravo TV series ''The It Factor'',https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Latarsha+Rose%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Latarsha+Rose%22%2C+It+Factor&oq=%22Latarsha+Rose%22%2C+It+Factor&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3...7135969.7138422.1.7138672.11.11.0.0.0.0.344.2314.0j6j4j1.11.0...0.0.aIBbKsAtJE8&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=d3a82f0016748be5&biw=855&bih=495 and while since then not starring in as many ''major'' productions as many Hollywood notables, nor getting massive amounts of coverage, she has done enough per  and has ''just'' enough coverage per  so that she as a topic is worthy of being retained and expanded and improved over time and through regular editing.  Wikipedia does not restrict its coverage to ''only'' Academy Award winners... and even if seen by some as only ''minor'', |notability is still notability
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 23:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)