Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pathfinder books
to Pathfinder Roleplaying Game. This list-based article graduated from AfC into mainspace. This is obviously not indiscriminate, as there are clear inclusion criteria. Excessive detail is not a policy-based reason for deletion. Unencyclopedic is a vague term that is often a synonym for . (DGG, I know you can craft a better AfD rationale than this.) Anyway, it's good that the lists have some references, albeit they are mostly primary refs. I wasn't able to find in-depth independent sources discussing these books as a set. It likely fails notability criteria like .  But given than the game is largely based on these books, it makes perfect sense to merge this content into the main Pathfinder article. Excessive information and catalogue-like info, such as the Code and Link columns, can be trimmed as a matter of routine editing. Per , a merge of content is preferred over deletion when there is verifiable material
— User:Mark, 20:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)