Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Lucie Tarpent
Largely per the comments of Agricola44. Looks like she fails  and she definitely looks to fail . While we have to be very careful not to just look at an academic's citation count and H-index before deciding whether they are notable, we also can't just say "it's a small field" and ignore their publication record. Are there any independent secondary sources that actually discuss Tarpent and her impact on her field in any depth? And we have to be careful here, if we define an academic's "field" narrowly enough then nearly all academic researchers would pass criteria 1 of . One sentence in one report doesn't meet a reasonable threshold in my opinion
— User:Shudde, 09:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)