Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Schnoebelen
To be honest, I thought that the {{fact}} tags made a fair enough point -- perhaps a little overzealous but |not in bad faith. Remember that we do have to adhere to  as a matter of legal responsibility. Having said that, my vote is to '''Keep''' the article, as the guy is clearly a notable figure (as a published author and controversial religious commentator) despite the difficulty we seem to be having in finding appropriate references. I think the references and links we have are enough to establish his notability, even if they are perhaps not formal enough to establish much else
— User:BreathingMeat, 03:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)