Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dovico (company)
per the lack of significant coverage in |reliable sources. The coverage in the http://www.hoovers.com/company/Enterprise_Dovico_Enterprises_Inc_Les/thxxchfty-1-1njgbe.html Hoovers source is basically a directory listing. The coverage in the http://sbinfocanada.about.com/od/software/tp/timetracking.htm about.com source, while nontrivial, has dubious reliability and is not by itself sufficient to allow Dovico to pass . The http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/10464/1/gupea_2077_10464_1.pdf Sidenko paper is a passing mention and as a master's thesis, not a source that establishes notability. The other references in the article are either passing mentions or primary sources.A http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Dovico%22+software+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a Google News Archive search returns http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/news/article/494133 tangential coverage and press releases.I agree with the analyses of {{user|Thparkth}} and {{user|Pnm}} and concur that Dovico does not pass  Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (companies
— User:Cunard, 22:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)