Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMG! Ubuntu!
So no one is doubting that the site isn't very good at what it does, if not the best, but it doesn't pass : {{tq|"The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself."}} I've checked all of the sources, and the closest to a contender is ubuntu-user.com. The sources from Iketsi are either SPS interviews (don't help with notability) or casual mentions from other sites (which may prove a reliance, but OMG is never a subject of a non-trivial work). It looks like http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/11.10-dev-docs-survey.pdf it's worth mentioning its influence in some Ubuntu culture article, but it doesn't pass the criteria for its own article
— User:Czar, 16:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NWEB (Wikipedia:Notability)