Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oralno doba
Since even Babelfish and GoogleTranslate show that the Serbian media sources deal entirely with the show and/or its host, and since they are not simply pocket reviews or trivial mentons in a list or database, their coverage meets "significant" per guideline.  As for determiniing the reliability of a Serbian national media source to cite articles on Serbian media topics, that question is now at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias#Serbian_sources_for_articles_on_Serbian_topics|WikiProject Countering systemic bias, the Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Serbian_sources|eliable sources noticeboard, and Serbian-related pages Talk:Serbia#Serbian_sources_for_articles_on_Serbian_topics|Talk:Serbia and Talk:Cinema of Serbia#Serbian sources for articles on Serbian media topics|Talk:Cinema of Serbia.  As I had noticed the question had not been asked where it might best '''BE''' asked, I went and asked.  While you are free to go over and call them "tabloids", many European eliable sources|reliable sources make use of Tabloid#Europe|that accepted smaller format and it does not hold the same onus in Europe as it might in the US... so it might be best to await input from editors able to make a neutral determination
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 19:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:R (Wikipedia:Redirect)