Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Ozark
Noted, and agreed, thank you for your feedback. As I've done more research, I've become very aware of the truth of your point. That is why my ''core'' argument in favor of deletion is that Camp Ozark simply does not meet WP standards of notability (other problems with the article have been noted previously, see article). That said, my question then becomes whether it is best to just accept that there are many, many organizations (in this case, summer camps) that don't appear to meet WP standards of notability () yet still exist as entries in WP, and not worry about it, or should I, as a novice editor, try to improve content?  I guess I'm looking at this particular effort as a sort of "test case" as to whether or not WP standards, like , actually have "weight" or not, and if so, if I truly understand them.  So far, I have yet to hear anyone suggest Camp Ozark actually MEETS the standards of notability for an organization as defined by WP; in fact, what appear to be three very experienced editors (i.e
— User:Fæ, 16:25, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)