Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Radevski (2nd nomination)
Possibly a WP:AUTOBIO''" does '''not''' mean it is one... and while COI is always a concern, it is not a strong deletion rationale for notable topics (see Jimmy Wales), and even if it ''were'' a COI (not established)... the author has not touched the article for nearly two years. The 2009 nominator returning it again to AFD is fine so that we can revisit the issues of November 2009 and see how this person's career may have progressed in the interim.  However, being "''just a director''" can be notable enough if works or director are covered reliable soucres.  We do not expect nor demand that a person notable to Australia be notable world-wide, nor do we demand that their career grows, nor that they stay in the news |if they had enough coverage in the past.  Conversely, having ''enough'' coverage in reliable sources '''''IS''''' a valid reason to "weak keep"... but yes, the article needs work. Okay. Being improvable, even if |not done, does not automaticaly equate to deletion.  So... what do we have that could assist in improvements |some time in the future? http://www.smh.com.au/news/tv-reviews/inside-australia-the-prodigal-son/2006/05/02/1146335720355.html ''Sidney Morning Herald'' speaks toward the filmmaker or his works in a more-than-trivial fashion. So does http://www.theage.com.au/news/tv--radio/seeing-both-sides/2006/04/25/1145861347223.html ''The Age'' and http://www.nysun.com/arts/returning-home-somewhat-changed/63996/ ''The New York Sun'' The filmmaker being an editor at ''National Library of Australia#Trove|Trove'' means little, as we do not delete Roger Ebert simply because he authors works in places other than Wikipedia.   The University of Notre Dame Australia offers some background.http://www.nd.edu.au/sydney/schools/arts/staff/tradevski.shtml  ''Culture Unplugged'' offers more.http://www.cultureunplugged.com/storyteller/Tony_Radevski His films have screened internationally. Anyone check for coverage of them
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 00:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP||WP:NEGLECT||WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:Notability)