Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 77
but '''weak on 66'''. Essentially per BrownHairedGirl. I'm gobsmacked at the sources put forward by Eastmain. How anyone on earth could consider them reliable is beyond me. |GNG is an important guideline and shouldn't discarded lightly.  It is important for good reason.  Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it is usually impossible to have an encyclopaedic article about a subject that is properly verified.  These bus route articles are a case in point: they are littered with original research and for all we know could be totally inaccurate.  The reason they are littered with original research is because the reliable sources aren't there.  For that reason, the original research is fatal and unsalvageable
— User:Mkativerata, 03:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)