Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbin Harms
As far as I can see, he meets  #3 "Competed in a series or race of worldwide or national interest", and perhaps also #1 (though I don't know what counts as "a fully professional series"). This guy has raced in Grand Prix races in many countries (definitely of national interest in those countries, and some also definitely of international interest). Not having sources is not a reason to delete an article, per  , so why bring it to AfD? Why not just find and add "at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article"???? I have added one source, so it's no longer unsourced, but I am really not interested in motorsports. Did the nominator do , especially "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search"? and note "If you find that adequate sources ''do appear to exist'', the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources
— User:RebeccaGreen, 20:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NMOTORSPORT||WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)