Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Chunk
This cat greatly exceeds the |General notability guidelines with worldwide, reliable and third-party media reports (ie. not just in the US, but New Zealand and Australia as well). The fallacy that seems to be being repeated here is that this cat is only notable for the news coverage; this cat is notable because it is the second largest known cat, the heaviest known cat alive, the extensive media coverage ''and'' because of its "TV stardom". Notability is not temporary and if this cat is notable enough for inclusion in multiple national newspaper and television news reports, for being a large cat, there is no reason why it is not notable enough for inclusion into Wikipedia. We may not be news, but when news reports reveal a notable subject, we should revel in the reliable sources that offers, not dismiss the subject by citing acronyms. '''~ AmeIiorate
— User:AmeIiorate, 09:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)