Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests
but '''merge''' any notably new material. Following John M Wolfson's comments above, the original title "Aggressive and abusive tactics used by the protesters in the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests" very much sounds like a  of Tactics and methods surrounding the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests and ; whether the actions are "aggressive" or "abusive" forms of civil disobedience techniques used against unresponsive governments and police, in HK or elsewhere around the world, or whether they are really "tactics" or not, or whether they are proportionate to the threat and urgency, are questions that go more into (at present) the "Reactions" article - PRC policy aims to discredit 30% of HK's population as "violent rioters". The tactics themselves (if they are tactics) make sense in the "Tactics" article. ''(As mentioned at Talk:Tactics and methods surrounding the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests#Government tactics and methods, it might be worth it to  off the PRC part of "Reactions" into a "PRC/HK governmental tactics ..." article, after choosing a reasonable name. The tactics of the PRC/HK governments in this context are a notable topic, no matter whether they are respectful of human rights and the international legal principle of self-determination or not
— User:Boud, 02:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE||WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Content forking)