Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank and Mary's Restaurant and Lounge
I have found sufficient sources that allow this restaurant to pass . http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=-gwSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=S-oDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4757,2337143&dq=frank-and-mary%27s+pittsboro Here is a restaurant review written by ''Chicago Sun-Times'' from Jane and Michael Stern. After perusing through the contents of this article, I have determined that it is a review, not a republishing of a press release. The article says, "Waitresses work fast and are friendly ..." Although this is not a critical review, it proves that the reviewers tried out the restaurant.The second source I discovered was http://www2.indystar.com/articles/8/066578-1028-P.html this article by Susan Guyett of ''The Indianapolis Star''. This is a fully-available article, and a cursory look at it proves that it is a |reliable review.Third, http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/columns/story?seriesId=2&columnist=newton_david&id=2952493 this article by David Newton of ESPN discusses Frank and Mary's in relation to Jeff Gordon, who always ate there "because there's really no other place to eat."Finally, I was able to obtain http://books.google.com/books?id=ha0f9HfmaoYC&pg=PA15&dq=%22Frank+and+Mary%27s%22&ei=hROWSoDDI5TkMLaGjdUH#v=onepage&q=%22Frank%20and%20Mary%27s%22&f=false this Google Books entry, which provides a 3-page review for this restaurant. Although this is a travel guide, notability is clearly established because the other restaurants in this book receive on average a half-page review.These four sources are all in-depth reliable sources about the subject. If this were a BLP or a novel, notability would be fully established. Why would it be any different for a restaurant? It shouldn't be because this restaurant easily passes 
— User:Cunard, 05:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)