Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbella Ewing
There's nothing encyclopedic here.The lede has more information about other people than it does about the subject. It's all about where the subject stood in relation to other especially long-lived people in a mythical competition to breathe longer.The body is similarly bereft of anything that belongs in an encyclopedia. Her family considered her a gem and attributed her longevity to positive thinking. Her parents were from Mississippi. She broke her hip at one of her last birthday parties and wound up in a nursing home. She lived, worked, married, had a child and died. Far from "an exceptionally strong claim of notability", there's barely any at all.|Notability requires |significant coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources.  What we have here is profoundly insignificant coverage, and all for the non-inherently notable attribute of deferring the visit of the Grim Reaper a bit longer than most. Birthday greetings and an obit, plus a mention on a GRG table of old people who died in 2008 just doesn't cut it.Arguing in the alternative, if others think this null set of a subject does scrape by our |general notability guideline, (although how, I cannot imagine) then OPAGE counsels that a list and not a stand-alone article is the proper resolution here
— User:David, 15:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE (Wikipedia:Notability)