Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of David Douglas
ping|Autarch}}: Even with the addition of sources, there is still a problem, because you are now asserting notability for the individual via an an article on an event.  This a common conflation - notability for an event is not notability of a person.  If the event doesn't meet , then the event is not notable, and it largely doesn't matter ''who'' was involved in it, because  applies.  If instead. you want to indicate that the ''victim'' is notable, then we need to address  and , which is a different discussion entirely.  At this point, we are concerned with an article that says "a career criminal was possibly shot due to his criminal career," and I don't particularly think that's notable in ''any'' country.  Moreover, the coverage has to be greater than  - the people you cited as famous criminals are famous because they killed dozens of people and oversaw illegal empires that raked in millions.  Shooting a cop and drug possession and almost getting killed once are, honestly, parr for the course.  Being PIRA?  If there were six folks in it, sure, but there were a lot more than six folks in it, and they don't all get articles for that, again per .  So just be aware of all that
— User:MSJapan, 01:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:EVENT||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:CRIME||WP:BIO||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)