Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Ault
This guy (narrowly) fails the requirements for . Although he clearly knows a lot about Oracle, I don't think this fulfills the requirements. He definitely isn't highly cited (RQ 1): a search of Jstor for "Mike Ault" and "Mike Ault Oracle" reveals little (the one paper that his name appears on is clearly not him, being a journal of political science). GScholar has more results, but they're all guides written by him rather than academic papers, and he isn't cited by anyone. There's no suggestion that he came up with any new concepts or theories (RQ 2) or gained fame from his work (RQ 4). A very shaky case could be made for the Oracle series being a significant collection of works (RQ 3), but I question its real significance. Delete, but reluctantly so
— User:FirefoxLSD, 11:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)