Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So Happy I Could Die
The logic of  seems rather strange to me.  says that a person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians. If the same logic applies to , we will say that person who has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books is '''not notable at all''', since '''the only coverage of this person occurs in the context of history of that field'''. Clearly this is not what  suggests.  states significant coverage '''need not''' be the main topic of the source material. In my own view, whether the '''main topic is the album''' is not important, while the '''volume''' of sourcing is.--Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231
— [[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]), 14:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NSONG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)