Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subconscious
whether it exists or not doesn't matter at enWP; only that it can be |verified.  The article states, "In everyday speech and popular writing, however, the term is very commonly encountered as a layman's replacement for the unconscious mind. The ... term is prominent in the New Age and self-help literature, in which investigating or controlling its supposed knowledge or power is seen as advantageous."  If you ask 10 Wikipedians, probably 7 would agree it's a notable term.  It's defined by http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=subconscious+definition&aq=4sx&aqi=g-s2g-sx1g-s1g-sx6&aql=&oq=subconsious hundreds of dictionaries.  There are http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&source=hp&q=subconscious&aql=&oq=subconsious&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws over 100,000 Ghits at Google scholar. It's a word used in the news http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&source=hp&q=subconscious&aql=&oq=subconsious&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sn hundreds of times each week.  This is an easy rescue
— User:Bearian, 23:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)