Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Joseph Watson (2nd nomination)
Whilst I did attempt to substantiate the page, I did so to give Wikipedia an accurate starting point in understanding his noxious nature as a "reporter"/controversy hound (who goes as far as to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksajP0hOggY openly mock minorities). On notability, both reddit and google report back a high number of hits, but that's a  argument and not something Wikipedia cares about. Ultimately there is no higher level sourcing for him, not from academia, the mainstream media or even  (other than his own). So I agree with the deletion vote on policy grounds
— User:Jobrot, 02:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GHITS||WP:NEWSBLOG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)