Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elicia Hughes
I am somewhat, but not totally, swayed by the argument for deletion of this Biography per  and #NEWS.  As I see it, the argument for notability is that the court cases are notable.  I'd be open to "keep" (and move to an article on '''the case''', rather than a Bio) if someone can argue that case is notable, e.g. by setting a notable precedent, for the ruling that he first trial was won by improper jury stacking.  (I see no guideline like /CA for determining the notability of court cases, but think there ought to be one).  Failing such demonstration of notabiloty for the court cases, I recommend '''delete''' per nominator's reasoning
— User:Pete, 18:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO1E||WP:NOT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)