Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill K. McNulty
vote' as nominator (the author has expended thousands of words explaining their 'keep' vote so I think I need to make my position quite clear). Article fails the current Wikipedia |notability guidelines for judges and the news coverage about McNulty is fleeting, only brief mentions therefore failing  criteria. Since http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jill_K._McNulty&diff=567033835&oldid=556098025 the AfD nomination, the article has been expanded greatly, unfortunately without any reliable proof of the increasingly exaggerated claims. Though McNulty worked as an acadmeic, I still fail to see any reliable secondary proof (other than
— [[User talk:Albiet|Albiet]]'s claims) that McNulty was an exceptionally important one (academics, by their job description, write academic books and papers and this doesn't make them notable per se)., NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)