Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foxit
Satisfies  with these articles that represent significant coverage from independent and seemingly reliable sources (if someone wants to call them not-reliable, they'll need to back that up): http://www.neowin.net/news/foxit-reader-6121224http://www.techcentral.ie/foxit-reader-portable-6-1-2/http://soft.zol.com.cn/409/4099993.htmlhttp://news.sina.com.tw/article/20131227/11454422.html.  "No indication of notability" isn't a reason for deletion at  which has been clearly explained at rguments to avoid in deletion discussions.  Simply doing a https://www.google.com/search?q=Foxit&safe=off&espv=210&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=FYvLUtiVDaKc2QXY7ID4Cw&ved=0CA0Q_AUoAA&biw=1920&bih=964 Google News search for Foxit produced all of these articles.  Maybe these references can be disputed when it comes to establishing notability but did any delete !votes even check before !voting?  These were as easy to find as it comes.  If you found no references, it helps the discussion to show what searches you did that resulted in no references.  Otherwise, your !vote is baseless and not very useful
— User:OlYeller21, 05:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AFD||WP:A (Wikipedia:Notability)