Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional wrestling attacks
The nominator is blissfully ignoring the section of  on primary sources, specifically for works of |fiction.  (Or works of kayfabe if you prefer)  All of these articles meet  at levels anywhere from "just barely" to "with flying colors", as each can be cited to various primary sources, e.g. the specific wrestling event(s) in which the move appeared.  Some could use more overt citations, but remember that "inline" citations (e.g. "used by wrestler X in WrestlingEvent Y on wrestler Z") qualify.  Also take a look at Y:V%26A#Verifiability: Citing the Primary Source|my repeatedly used arguments on citing fiction from the primary source.  As to , I agree that ''some'' articles contain ''some'' OR content, but this is neither a majority of the articles nor a majority of their content.  This at most warrants a cleanup.  Finally, we come to : every one of these moves is or has been a "signature" move by more than one major, mainstream wrestler.  Notability is therefore asserted by the repeated use of the move by prominent figures in wrestling media. -- |Y'''&#124
— User:Yukichigai, 22:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:FICT||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:IKNOWBEST (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)