Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exposed: The Climate of Fear
I'm going to leave to others the argument about this show being notable (imho its not). And instead give some good reasons for it to be deleted as a strict  issue: The entire article is based upon a specific editors selective quoting from the transcript of the show. Stringing these together is a series of  statements, such as ''Beck proposed explanations for global warming, and while stating that the Earth is warming,'' ...continuing... ''his one-hour documentary presented the views of Scientists_who_oppose_the_global_warming_consensus|scientists who don't believe that global warming is caused by humans.''. For the first sentence: Where is that explanation? and what does it consist of? Answer: Ask the editor - since the show doesn't give such an explanation. For the second sentence: Say's who? Answer: The editor. John Christy for instance does  believe that humans have a finger in global warming. (he contests the amount - or rather if its catastrophic). We do not have a |reliable source summarizing this show - or to give hints to the editors on which parts to focus or expand. Its a freebie ride to quote whatever random part of the show to match your own POV (or in this case the editors). For other examples, lets take headlines: "Experts on Kyoto" ... says who? John Christy certainly isn't. Nice touch with the quote from Al Gore (very much taken out of context - but used in the same way in the show). "Global Warming Crowd" who are these? The show doesn't say (transcript doesn't even have the word: Crowd). "Intimidation Tactics" - the word Intimidation doesn't appear in the transcript - why is it in quotation marks? etc. etc. etc
— User:KimDabelsteinPetersen, 20:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)