Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Khawam
nbsp; Deletion nominations should take care to protect the material in our encyclopedia, as we are here to build an encyclopedia.&nbsp; One way they can do this is by analyzing the |WP:Alternatives to deletion.&nbsp; The current nomination argument shows no content deriving from WP:BEFORE.&nbsp; Nor does it expand on the basic theory of how Wikipedia deals with the combination of a non-notable topic and reliable material about that non-notable topic.&nbsp; This deficiency is so great in this case that because of the alternatives to deletion that are available, there is no deletion to discuss here, either of the redirect or the edit history.&nbsp; Any close here other then keep or speedy keep will encourage more defective nominations and more wasted time by AfD volunteers.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 23:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)