Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"C" is For (Please Insert Sophomoric Genitalia Reference Here)
I came to this AfD expecting something much different, but after seeing the article I decided to take a look for myself.  A quick overview of the cited sources leads me to believe that the article meets "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" as in  and .  The IGN article in particular needs to be cited more than it is based on the depth of the coverage.  The Blabbermouth articles are also somewhat useful as source material.  However, source #3 seems to lack any instance of "Puscifer" and is an opinion article, which is generally not suitable as a source on WP.  Also, I'm afraid that source #7 is a poor source as well.  Not only is Twitter generally a poor source (with some exceptions), the link is prone to link rot as it doesn't link to the specific tweet's permalink.  I also wonder why source #9 is used.  As far as I can tell, it appears to be an ecommerce site selling the album, which I must recommend against using whenever possible.  Is there perhaps a better source for that?  Perhaps someone can clean up the page to meet album article guidelines
— User:Tathar, 08:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NALBUM||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)