Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique Party (2nd nomination)
To be fair, a political party's notability isn't a factor of its vote totals per se — even small fringe parties can be notable enough for inclusion here if they receive sufficient |reliable source coverage to clear . Rather, the core problem here is the article's complete and total lack of any reliable sources to support its notability at all. And even on the Swedish Wikipedia, the party actually just has a redirect to Linda Thelenius Rosing's BLP, rather than a standalone article about the political party itself — and if the Swedish Wikipedia, where the editor base literally by definition are going to have much better access to archived 15-year-old Swedish media coverage than the rest of us do, still can't find enough sources about a Swedish political party to get it over their notability standards, it can hardly be ''more'' notable in English than it is in its own native language
— User:Bearcat, 16:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)