Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamad Barakat (2nd nomination)
obviously, and a trout to the nominator for restoring a blatantly policy-violating article—regardless of whether it's courtesy-blanked or not—purely for the sake of a pointless piece of process-for-the-sake-of-process. Per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIridescent&type=revision&diff=913803907&oldid=913803259 my previous comment {{tq|every single version is either blatant advertising, a laundry-list of insults and  violations, or a meaningless microstub&nbsp;… Nobody has a problem with someone writing a {{em|compliant}} biography of this guy, but none of the people arguing over this appear to have the slightest interest in doing so.}}; if someone {{em|does}} want to write a BLP-compliant biography I have no issue with that being kept, but it's abundantly clear that neither of the two people who say they think the initial deletion was inappropriate have any intention of doing so.&nbsp;&#8209;&nbsp
— User:Iridescent, 14:55, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLPCRIME (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)