Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Bank
due to the amount of  coverage which demonstrates notability. I am going through and adding some citations as I am able. That said, I understand the temptation to  this. Sky Harbor deserves a very large  for creating multiple articles with dozens of kilobytes of text and '''zero''' citations in them https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urban_Bank&oldid=53491295https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Banco_Filipino&oldid=53540102 (not to mention those "Comparisons" sections that may very well be unsourceable ) and then leaving them to gather dust for eight years. Even in 2006, that was not an acceptable practice, and it would be nice if this AfD motivated him to finally step up and add at least some sources to these giant uncited walls of text, notwithstanding that . Regards, Special:Contributions/61.10.165.33|61.10.165.33
— [[User talk:61.10.165.33|talk]]), 14:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:TNT||WP:TROUT||WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)