Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional brands in South Park (2nd nomination)
per EALacey, sgeureka, Erik, and Bignole.  Fictional brands have no relevance on Wikipedia under they are independantly notable.  |Notability is not inherited - being a part of a larger notable topic does not make something notable.  By that logic, we would have a separate articles for every member of a famous person's family, because that person is notable and their family are associated with them.  Everything must establish notability of it's own accord... think about it; planet Earth is notable, does that mean we need a separate article for everyone who lives on Earth?  I mean, they live on a notable planet, so why not?  (Please note sarcasm)  Listing every fictional brand on a popular TV show is |indiscriminate information.  If something is notable for being on ''South Park'', what's to stop me from making a List of characters in South Park with brown hair?  Notability guidelines exist for a reason.  This article fails to establish why it deserves a place on Wikipedia.  It's fancruft - perfect for South Park wiki but certainly not here
— User:Paul730, 02:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)