Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milk Junkies
First, I want to say that Mania.com is definitely a reliable source.  Besides Anime News Network (which no longer reviews hentai), it is basically the gold standard for critical reviews of anime in English.  It has been accepted as a reliable source in featured articles (such as Madlax and Tokyo Mew Mew), and reviews from Mania.com are regularly cited in articles on anime and manga that have been released in English.  Furthermore, reviews from Mania.com are frequently given as reliable sources in AfD discussions for anime and manga articles, and have been used as a major reason for keeping many articles.  The article clearly now contains references to a reliable source with significant coverage of the topic, contrary to what MelainieN and Nuujinn claim.  All that being said, the coverage is only from a single source, and I feel that coverage from a single source is not sufficient to show that a topic is notable.  Though Mania.com chose to review two volumes of the series,  says that multiple sources are generally expected and multiple sources by the same author or organization are generally treated as a single source.  So unless significant coverage from at least one additional reliable source besides Mania.com is found, I still think the article should be deleted.  I would support redirecting the article as a valid search term if there was any appropriate target for a redirect, but I couldn't find one myself
— User:Calathan, 04:35, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)