Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Huizhou
the fact you cite  is my single biggest frustration on Wikipedia. NOTTRAVEL means WP is not written like a travel guide, meaning articles shouldn't tell you which restaurants are the "best" or how to get to which tourist attractions. NOTTRAVEL then gets applied in a flagrant and erroneous way to encyclopedic transportation articles, because, god forbid, transport is kind of like travel, is it not?  Wikivoyage doesn't want this kind of information, but readers wanting information on the history of bus transport or bus routes in a city would. Furthermore, there's a coordinated effort to get these lists removed from Wikipedia only on  grounds, even though there's even a :Category:List of Bus Routes. If this violates , so does List of Bus Routes in London, which has been kept twice. I know I'm slipping into a  argument here, but the analogy in this case is actually an accurate one. Cite something like , the fact it's poorly sourced, or the fact there's some timetable info in there that shouldn't be there, but the entire nomination is just one giant , and it's going to get through because there'll be a majority, as always happens
— User:SportingFlyer, 02:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:OSE||WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)