Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Wey
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can source it better than this. Under , the only notability claim that a radio station actually has to make to be keepable is that it exists as a properly licensed radio station that originates at least some of its own programming — it doesn't need to make any claim that would make it a special "more notable than other radio stations" case, as our goal for radio stations is to be as complete as feasibly possible a reference for ''all'' of them. But "as feasibly possible" is the operative part of that equation, because NMEDIA doesn't extend radio stations an ''exemption'' from having to be |reliably sourced — they still have to be the ''subject'' of at least ''some'' coverage in ''media'' other than their own |self-published content about themselves — but there's virtually no evidence of that being shown here, as the referencing is virtually entirely to |primary sources that can't support notability. So no, it doesn't need a stronger notability ''claim'' than is already present here, but it ''does'' need stronger ''referencing'' to ''support'' it than this
— User:Bearcat, 19:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)