Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 1273
Ultimately, we should look for reliable sources (non-catalogs) that mention the object to ascertain whether it merits a Wikipedia page or not. Seeing none, it should be deleted. {{u|ExoEditor}} and {{u|PopePompus}}, see note 1 of : {{tq|These criteria do not supersede WP:NOTABILITY, they merely supplement and clarify it within the context of astronomical objects. If an astronomical object does not meet the general notability guideline, especially if it lacks evidence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, then it risks being merged or redirected to an existing article, or deleted altogether.}} We are missing the "significant" part here, hence the article should be deleted
— User:Sam, 21:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NASTCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)