Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homosocratic
unsourced neologism. Note to article author: it's not that "Wikipedia has decided that it is not a word" - it's undoubtedly a word, but it's a ''new'' word and there is no evidence but your assertion that it is in widespread use. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=homosocratic&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en&lr= Google scholar does not find it. Wikipedia isn't a place for first publication of anything - see |No original research and #Articles on neologisms|Articles on neologisms and |Wikipedia is not for things made up one day
— User:JohnCD, 16:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NEO||WP:NFT (Wikipedia:No original research)