Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhys Taylor (2nd nomination)
First of all, this is not a speedy candidate, since the article is far more than a recreation of the previously deleted content, and indeed provides refs to at least indicate the subject's importance, even if notability is in question.  From my perspective, there are at least 3 separate news articles cited which are specifically about this person.  So he seems to pass , even if somewhat marginally and even though he doesn't pass  (at least not yet).  But since GNG is sufficient to demonstrate notability, regardless of the subject's chosen profession, he seems worthy of keeping, at least for the time being.  If his notability remains marginal a few months hence and/or if the article becomes a vandalism magnet, it may be worth reconsidering
— User:Rlendog, 03:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE (Wikipedia:Notability)