Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Changxing railway station
per {{U|Mackensen}} et al.  exists to establish basic ground rules for large, high-speed train stations, as this is: "Existing heavy rail stations on a main system (i.e. not a heritage railway) are generally kept at AfD." This is about as |unchanging a consensus as I've seen; it's not a "soft consensus". Deleting this because "all Chinese media are |unreliable" is classic systematic bias and is thus untenable. If this were something controversial (say, prisoners in Tibet or a terrorist attack, Mandate of Heaven|heaven forbid), I'd understand, or if {{U|Jimbo}} declared trains stations to be |run of the mill, but |the coverage is substantial and uncontroversial as it gets
— User:Bearian, 15:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RAILOUTCOMES||WP:CCC||WP:RS||WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)