Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Bhadana
Have been watching this article for sometime but fail to understand how it's encyclopedic. Lacks SIGCOV from reliable sources and fails GNG completely. Entirely promotional stuff built upon total unreliable sources such as https://socialblade.com/youtube/top/500/mostsubscribed this fan's blog and back reference to Youtube and his own self promotion blog. For those saying move to draft, it was once moved but immediately moved back to mainspace as is to be expected from generally non notable promotional stuffs. So moving it is worthless. If it's notable, just shows us multiple independent |RS discussing him directly and in detail. If no such sources exist then it's meaningless moving it to draft
— User:Ammarpad, 08:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)