Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut
Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut'' had its own international release, its own budget, its own theatrical release poster, its own screening at an international film festival. It has its own pages on https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/donnie_darko_the_directors_cut/ Rotten Tomatoes, http://www.metacritic.com/movie/donnie-darko-the-directors-cut Metacritic and http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=donniedarko04.htm Box Office Mojo, and two different home media releases (10 years apart). Its production and release were reported on by the likes of http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2005-02-14-dvd-donnie-darko_x.htm USA Today, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/jul/30/2 The Guardian, https://web.archive.org/web/20040806162303/http://www.indiewire.com/movies/movies_040722darko.html Indiewire, http://www.alternet.org/story/19627/the_resurrection_of_%27donnie_darko%27 AlterNet, and http://www.seattlepi.com/ae/movies/article/Donnie-Darko-gets-a-second-shot-in-theaters-1146161.php various http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/Teen-sinister-rabbit-get-second-chance-2696394.php other http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17348-2004Aug19.html sources. Reviews at the time came from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SbAEim_dVQkC Roger Ebert, http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2004/08/24/donnie_darko_directors_cut_2004_review.shtml the BBC, https://web.archive.org/web/20040807060457/http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0429/lim2.php The Village Voice, plus others. In all of these sources, it's the director's cut that's the primary subject, ''not'' the original film. This all suggests to me that the director's cut is notable (independent of the original film), meets , and that therefore this article should be kept
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)