Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auburn Avenue (publication)
I believe the articles referenced do suggest notability (to whatever subjective degree) and the stub should not be deleted. Stubs have room to grow and expand. Furthermore, I've come across dozens of stubs that don't have any references cited and they have not been recommended for deletion. To keep citing  when only selected articles are being held to that standard is unfair. There's no required quantifiable amount of sources or coverage that constitutes "significant coverage." To nit pit whether two cited independent sources actually mention the publication, when the sources are clearly recognizing and featuring its exclusive content, is also unfair. I still contend that there are no concrete identifiable grounds on which this stub should be deleted
— User:juliarulia, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)