Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard T. Snodgrass
This is a slam dunk. The enormous citation base to his work is sufficient (GS h-index seems to be around 25): it is independent, verifiable, as well as being conclusive proof of impact. This indeed is the long-established standard test of  #1, which the subject conspicuously satisfies. ACM Fellow would also be a pass (as would "Fellow"-level election in any of the main scientific societies). Respectfully
— User:Agricola44, 14:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)