Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Surendran (politician) (3rd nomination)
What's going on here I don't understand... How can the notability of a person who sees more than a hundred different  types of reliable sources be repeatedly questioned? You should clarify why he failed the  WP:GNG.. According to GNG {{tq|A topic is presumed'' to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when'' it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject}}. So Not satisfying  criteria does not per se indicate a lack of notability.The "" standard is the only component needed to pass the  WP:GNG. Are you saying that  and  can't be used because he didn't pass  ?  Btw ,I can't proceed without mentioning your double standard ,why it isn't applicable here the same criteria you defined in the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/T._Geenakumari This discussion.? Please elaborate and It amazes me that you could not find more sources about him that are not already used in the article
— User:Padavalamkuttanpilla, 09:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:NPOL||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BASIC||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Notability)