Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect rhyme
Yes, this is long, but I have been doing some homework on the applicable policies, and would rather just spell it out one time.  I think you may be reading the guidelines too narrowly, and misinterpreting the intent.  Lets look at the actual policies at hand.  At least two of us are confident that it can be expanded (even if we aren't the experts to do so).  My reading of wp:AFD (ie: ''If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD.'') says this isn't a good candidate for AFD, as we have explained how to fix it. I don't question the |faith of the nom in the least, it is just that others here may have more imagination when it comes to the potential for the article here.  That it hasn't been expanded really isn't a strong argument to delete, via .  If the consensus thinks there is no hope to ever expand, that still doesn't mean it fails WP:DICDEF automatically.  DICDEF says a couple of important things that apply, including ''All stubs should have the potential to develop into full articles. A stub that has no possibility whatsoever for expansion beyond stub status is presenting the verifiable information in the wrong way. Wikipedia should not have single-fact articles.'' which I take to mean that if the article COULDN'T be expanded, then it should be merged into something else, and yes, single fact articles shouldn't be kept if they '''can't''' be expanded.  I am arguing it can.  Even so, DICDEF almost contradicts itself later when it says ''This does not mean that stubs that have no possibility for expansion should be copied to Wiktionary. They are still encyclopedia articles, not dictionary articles.'' so even if it WAS a single use, that doesn't automatically qualify it as a WP:DICDEF to be deleted or transwiki'ed (already there), and there may be circumstances where a short article with a single use is valid.  It seems to boil down to two basic issue, and a YES to either one says we have to keep
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:NOEFFORT (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)