Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtonomics (3rd nomination)
A bunch of mentions, but not enough to constitute |significant coverage. If it had four reviews, it'd be fine, but it doesn't even have two. And I have my doubts about the major review under discussion—the one by ''Computerra''. Our article on the mag has its print circ at 60k (very low...) and the site has no staff posted. Perhaps it's just in decline after its print mag folded, but there's very little to instill confidence as it is. In any event, send this to draft if someone else wants it there, but I don't see enough in-depth secondary source coverage to actually write something of substance on this topic. When this topic becomes sufficiently popular, the reliable source coverage will follow
— [[User talk:Czar|czar]], 19:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)