Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley G. Ellis
I agree with most of the rationale discussed above. One clarification: most/all of the sourcing is not independent of the subject, (and since no other sources exist, this fails ) but I disagree with the assertion that they are primary sources. The authors of, for example, the church news, would not be the subject of the article and therefore this would be a secondary source. However, since it is not an independent source, that is where it falls short
— User:Rollidan, 01:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)