Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Belanger (2nd nomination)
This article was previously deleted by Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michelle_Belanger|AfD because it was considered promotional in a clear violation of the |NPOV policy and failing the |notability guidelines in Wikipedia standards. After its closure by a general consensus, it was again endorsed for deletion at a previous Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_April_29|DRV for the exact same reason, in a once again very clear attempt at relaunching the promotional activity for this individual by herself or her agent. That DRV was requested by an user who's single edit was to open that deletion review, using an account with the name of Belanger's ''vampire cult''. That same account {{user|Kheperu}} was blocked as a ole account|role account.  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia
— :Usernames_for_administrator_attention&diff=287047446&oldid=287045132] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AKheperu]. Now on this new trend of continuous attempts at bringing back this article in consecutive AfD/DRV requests, I want to mention that not all of the issues with NPOV were addressed, and that the articles' language does not fully comply with a scholarly accepted encyclopedic style. Stating that an individual is a ''psychic vampire'' is not appropriate in an encyclopedia, since it is subject to personal belief. It would be like stating that someone is an alien from Mars, if that was his belief or the belief of his personal cult. An encyclopedia must present well researched and established facts, not personal opinions or beliefs. This points to a conflict with NPOV on the proposed new version of the article. Adding to that, most of the new sources that were provided do not really comply with the [[Wikipedia:RS|RS]] policy, which clearly should not be user-uploaded images on imageshack or articles that just refer the subject or interview him, but do not review his work or discuss him in detail. There is not one single in depth reference addressing this individual from a single reliable source. This is not an indicator of notability, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:R (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)