Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You didn't build that
to answer them in one place) I'd like to notice that the !votes above by M0rphzone, AgnosticAphid, KillerChihuahua and Holyfield1998 are not based in any real policy or guideline, despite their linking of  and the like. NOTNEWS makes sense in the context of very routine news coverage, but the fallout of this remark went well beyond that. http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/obamas_2012_tax_mandate/singleton/ It is still being cited. It Also, arguments like "not encyclopedic" are known to be |fallacious
— User:Cyclopia, 16:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:UNENCYC (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)