Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levallois-Perret attack
Yet another guideline that outlines why this incident is not notable is . Since the bulk of the sourcing was published immediately after the attack, this is highly relevant. It says "news stories, without exception, are ''primary sources'', and must be treated with caution per ". For those who do not know, we rely on secondary coverage to gauge notability. That will only ''possibly'' (but no ) be addressed months from now. Until then, this incident fails our requirements
— User:TheGracefulSlick, 04:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RSBREAKING||WP:PSTS||WP:CRYSTALBALL (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)