Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munay-ki
I could understand if this was some legitimate work of ethnology, but I don't even know how we document a belief that somehow involves Indus Valley civilization ideals transmitted by Siberians to the Andes, supposedly 30,000 years ago...I mean there are just so many different things wrong with this that it would need several paragraphs to explain.  Again, if this was legitimate ethnology, we would have no problem saying "The Inka believe that the deity they call..." etc.  This is just .  If the guy who invented this stuff is notable, we could merge a small paragraph of this into his article.  We do have articles on BS artists where we accurately describe RS explanations for why they are BS artists (like that miracle water guy whose commercials are still running), but that would require good sourcing and it would probably require that this guy has gotten into some sort of trouble.  If he's just an obscure loon, then we don't really need anything
— User:Hyperion35, 14:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MADEUP (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)