Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuralink
I've been mulling this one over for a few days but I'm decided against a merge. I don't know whether Jytdog has me in mind when referring to "keeping out the typical Musk  hype" and "Musk's fanbase in Wikipedia" but it should be noted that despite a strong personal dislike of Musk, I stand by my position in Talk:Neuralink/Archive_1#Musk's_timeframes|a lengthy argument I had with Jytdog in April 2017, as the commentary about the timeframes Musk claims (which included criticism) fall under CRYSTALBALL's "It ''is'' appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced". This content would make the article a bit more substantial if included. SpinningSpark also notes the presence of sources around Neuralink which are sufficient for GNG (even discounting the examples of theirs which are unreliable
— User:Bilorv, 19:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTALBALL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)