Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acton Fall Fair
There's only one non-|primary source here to even ''begin'' establishing notability, and it just links to a general content directory for the defunct local community weekly while providing ''no'' title or date information to help us figure out ''where'' in its 100+-year haystack the content actually being cited might be found. This is ''exactly'' why I keep getting on people's necks about the need to provide ''complete'' citation details and not just blank URLs or links to generic content directories. Something like this would have to clear  on the basis of coverage that expanded ''beyond'' just the local weekly newspaper, but there's no evidence of that being shown at all. It can absolutely be briefly mentioned in the town's article, but the sourcing here doesn't earn it a standalone article of its own independently of that
— User:Bearcat, 19:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:No original research)