Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaglier
in general.  is the relevent policy requiring ''significant'' sustained useage, and I agree with what appears to be the current consensus that List of dog crossbreeds handles these generally non-notable cross-breeds fine. Cunard's listings above don't really convince me otherwise on those areas. As Fish+Karate said though, I do think  Cockapoo, Goldendoodle, and Goldador could warrant having their own individual AfD instead (with no prejudice against the filer for filing these as all one). Those might be more likely to be redirects instead (e.g., golden lab already redirects to Labrador Retriever, and using goldador tries to bypass that, but individual AfD is the best place for that kind of focused cleanup. Overall though, encyclopedic articles would be sticking to mostly https://www.akc.org/press-center/facts-and-stats/breeds-year-recognized recognized breeds as one standard. Simply doing a cross and making up a name and having a few sources that are fairly indiscriminate , does not meet notability
— User:Kingofaces43, 17:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:NOTCATALOGUE (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)