Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universe reality
but as "Cosmology (The Urantia Book)", and use it as the main article for that topic according to  (there already is a decent but cumbersome subsection "Cosmology" in The Urantia Book article, which could actually stand to have content shifted to a side article like this one). The book doesn't use the phrase "universe reality" as a specially defined term and "cosmology" could be taken as a synonym as far as I can tell. There is independent third-party assessment that this aspect of the book is notable.  The harshest published criticism to date was Martin Gardner's ''Urantia: The Great Cult Mystery'', but his summary conclusion on this aspect of the book was that "The UB's cosmology outrivals in fantasy the cosmology of any science fiction work known to me".  Brad Gooch in his book echoed this view and added in the context of discussing the cosmology that "No one can read through the UB, or even just parts of it, without wondering how such an incredibly detailed mix of science, ethics, politics, and polytheology ever got set down in one monstrous blue-covered volume."  That being said it's clear the article is in rough shape and needs a lot of work.  I've been on the fence about whether it's a suitable topic for a wikipedia article and haven't contributed to it before, but in the sense of it becoming a  explanation of the TUB's cosmology (eg, like Mormon cosmology, Hindu cosmology, etc... heck, there's even a Raëlian cosmology article on WP), I think that it is a defensible sub-topic to keep and improve. If there is agreement by the end of the Afd that it is worth keeping, I'll assist with clean up
— User:Wazronk, 21:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SS||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Summary style)