Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/101 West Ohio
The sourcing that can be found is thin, although I'm open to changing my vote if convincingly significant coverage can be uncovered. The page on the EPA website does not amount to significant independent coverage, in my view, because it was largely provided by the owners of the building in question. The EPA may be a reliable source, but it must also be independent of the subject, which is not wholly the case here. The award the building won is not significant coverage; it's merely a listing of an award it won. It fails  on these bases. The spirit of notability is that reliable sources have independently decided to take note of something because they think it's worth noting. The award may indicate this to a degree, but the EPA coverage certainly does not, in my view. It is on a website that catalogs all buildings meeting its certifications, and thus the EPA was effectively required to "take note" of it instead of deciding on its own that it was notable
— User:Batard0, 15:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)