Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Death Cookie
Looking back, I agree that too much of the article is devoted to plot summary, but there are at least two |reliable third-party sources. Catholic Answers is described on Wikipedia as "one of the largest Lay apostolates of Catholic apologetics and evangelization in the United States," so their opinion on this issue is probably notable enough to include. (See http://www.catholic.com/library/sr_chick_tracts_p5.asp). Another discussion of the comic is on About.com. According to Wikipedia, "The content is written by a network of over 600 journalists, called Guides, who are experts in their particular fields." Since http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/rr/blfaq_rr_chick_religion.htm this discussion was published on About.com, a former Top-10 website that is owned by ''The New York Times'', and written by an expert in the field of atheism/agnosticism, it also deserves inclusion. This article could be condensed into a paragraph-length summary in the main article on Chick tracts
— [[User talk:Crotalus horridus|***&nbsp;Crotalus&nbsp;***]], 21:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)